The Non-Disclosed and Hyper-Allergenic Vaccine Adjuvant

Catherine J. Frompovich
vactruth.com
07/15/2010

What do peanuts and vaccines have in common? Well, you’re probably thinking that some people have allergic reactions to both, and you are correct. Peanuts cause the most common severe food allergy reactions. Vaccines, on the other hand, that are grown on chicken eggs (MMR and influenza vaccines in particular) cause allergic reactions for which pharmaceutical and vaccine makers willingly provide cautionary notices on vaccine package inserts. It’s important to note that technically there can be two responses: a reaction, e.g., immediate allergic response (anaphylaxis), and a side effect, e.g., fever, rash, or localized swelling later on.

As an aside, vaccine makers would like to get away from growing vaccines on eggs for several reasons. In the April 11, 2007 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) the article Safety and Immunogenicity of a Baculovirus-Expressed Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccine” by John J. Treanor, MD, et al, stated:

In this study, we evaluated an experimental influenza vaccine consisting of recombinant HA expressed in insect cells by a recombinant baculovirus (rHA0). This alternative avoids dependence on eggs and is very efficient because of the high levels of protein expression under the control of the baculovirus polyhedrin promoter. http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/297/14/1577

In essence, researchers produced vaccines grown on insect cells. If that vaccine production technology will be used or substituted for fertile egg mediums in the future, what cautionary information will appear on vaccine package inserts about bugs?

Allergic reactions to vaccines used to be of prime concern to pharmaceutical and vaccine makers. That changed after the passage of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2006 [PREP Act 42USC 247(d)-6d)] that, basically, exonerates vaccine makers of any damages from vaccines and/or vaccinations. A special vaccine court has been established from which harmed individuals must seek permission to bring legal charges. Common tort law no longer applies to vaccine/vaccination injury/damage.

What peanuts have in common with vaccines is something that very few healthcare consumers and medical doctors may be aware of: Peanut oil is a hidden and non-stated ingredient in the manufacture of children’s vaccines. This was brought to light in a 2010 court case wherein parents were accused of Shaken Baby Syndrome; had their child taken from them and placed in foster care for almost eight months; and Harold E. Buttram, MD, presented corroborating medical information to the court regarding the anaphylactic reaction the six-month old baby boy experienced resulting in tremendous swelling and pressure of the brain.

In Doctor Buttram’s paper presented for publication, “Subdural Hemorrhages Occurring in an Infant Immediately Following Vaccination,” he methodically charts the infant’s anamnestic allergic response to vaccines at four months of age. An anamnestic allergic response is a secondary immune response resulting from exposure to a previously encountered antigen. Such responses should preclude further administration of all vaccines.

Immediately following routine 6-month vaccines Pentacel [DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccine], Prevnar7 [Pneumococcal 7-valent Conjugate Vaccine], and Rotateq [Rotavirus Vaccine], the infant suffered an explosive rupturing of a facial hemangioma [abnormal buildup of blood vessels] and traumatic brain injury confirmed by a brain MRI [Magnetic Resonance Imaging].

Let’s consider the components that make up the Pentacel vaccine: Aluminum phosphate, bovine serum albumin, formaldehyde, glutaraldhyde, MRC-5, DNA and cellular protein, neomycin, polymyxin b sulfate, polysorbate 80, 2-phenoxyethanol. [1]

The two other vaccines administered simultaneously to the infant had equally remarkable ingredients. In the hopes of keeping this article as brief as possible, I’ve elected not to include their makeup.

Two days after the above-administered vaccines, a brain MRI showed extensive bilateral subdural hematomas [collection of blood outside blood vessels in both sides of the brain], something often thought to be due to trauma associated with Shaken Baby Syndrome.

Buttram noted that the scheduled and administered 4-month vaccines contained aluminum and unlabeled peanut oil. Furthermore, the infant’s mother observed noticeable enlargement and puffiness of the right strawberry-shaped facial hemangioma. Additionally, during 52 days of hospitalization, the infant was vaccinated further with the Hepatitis B vaccine. Medical records indicate tremendous head enlargement in a 30-day period, which could indicate hydrocephalus and/or brain hemorrhage.

Since Doctor Buttram was the expert witness for the defense (the child’s parents, who had the child taken away from them by civil authorities contending Shaken Baby Syndrome), he investigated and prepared a time line and inventory of the various vaccines administered along with the infant’s reactions and attending medical personnel witness statements as to the explosive rupturing of the facial hemangioma immediately after the injection while the infant was screaming dramatically.

Buttram found that yeast protein—a potent allergen—and peanut oil were used as adjuvants but not listed on the vaccine inserts. It was Doctor Buttram’s contention that both these adjuvants caused the hemangioma’s explosive reaction.

As part of his researched testimony, Doctor Buttram chronicled the use of peanut oil in vaccines, which proves rather interesting. After penicillin was invented (1945) researchers found that the kidneys excreted it within 3 hours thereby rendering it ineffective. In order to prolong penicillin’s action it was mixed with 4 to 4.8 percent beeswax and peanut oil. As a result, penicillin was slowly released as the body metabolized the oil. To further extend penicillin’s effects, penicillin with aluminum monostearate was added to make a solution suspended in peanut oil that kept blood levels of penicillin up to 24 to 26 hours. In 1964 Merck produced the adjuvant 65-4 that contained up to 65 percent peanut oil plus Arlasel A, aluminum stearate, and other ingredients with 13-fold higher levels of antibodies than previous vaccines. During the 1970s and 1980s peanut oil became a common practice and ingredient in vaccines. Coincidentally, peanut allergies began rising exponentially in children as more vaccines were administered. Heather Fraser in her 2010 book, The History of the Peanut Allergy Epidemic, documents this.

Concomitantly, hospital records indicate anaphylaxis reactions to vaccines. In the USA there were rising incidences of food anaphylaxis in children under five years of age. Hospital records in the USA further indicate that Emergency Room records indicated an increase of anaphylaxis from 671 per 100,000 during 1992-94 to 876 per 100,000 in 1995. More than 90 percent of all food allergy fatalities were documented as due to ingestion of peanuts and tree nuts, a 1991 study revealed. Nevertheless, in 2009 the prevalence of peanut allergy in children under 18 years of age amounted to more than 2 percent in both the United States and Britain. Additionally, in the U.S. during 2009, about 4.5 million people were allergic to peanuts, or about 1.5 percent of the population.

Interestingly, Romy Fischer, et al, in the American Journal of Pathology [2005; 167:1621-1630] say,

We compared the oral and nasal routes of peanut sensitization for the development of a mouse model of allergy. Mice were sensitized by administration of peanut proteins in the presence of cholera toxin as adjuvant. Antibody and cytokine responses were characterized, as well as airway reactivity to nasal challenge with peanut or unrelated antigens. Oral sensitization promoted higher levels of IgE, but lower IgG responses, than nasal sensitization. Both orally and nasally sensitized mice experienced airway hyperreactivity on nasal peanut challenge.” http://ajp.amjpathol.org/cgi/content/full/167/6/1621

Their research basically demonstrates that inhalation of peanut protein/antigens is cause for concern.

Aside from the above information, aflatoxin, a toxic fungus produced by Aspergillus flavus, often is found on peanuts and causes anaphylaxis.

Surely one important aspect about allergic response that needs to be highlighted is this: According to the doctor who “found” alimentary anaphylaxis, Dr. Charles Richter (1913), food anaphylaxis resulted from proteins that had not been properly broken down or avoided modification by the digestive system. In today’s medical practice many physicians recognize what is termed “Leaky Gut Syndrome,” which acts similarly insofar as some undigested proteins cross the intestinal lumen and contribute to much health-related problems.

Perhaps now is an excellent opportunity to point out that many proteins used in the manufacture of vaccines—or that “result” from the manufacturing process, e.g., not filtered out completely—are injected directly into the blood stream and thereby avoid modification by the digestive system, another apparent factor in the etiology of vaccine adverse reactions in addition to the numerous toxic adjuvants included in each vaccine for boosted immune response, which most often are too strong for an infant’s immature immune system to cope with thereby precipitating “blown circuits” such as neurological damage.

Maybe because the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers refined peanut oil as GRAS (generally recognized as safe), vaccine manufacturers think it safe to use as a vaccine adjuvant while not recognizing the differences in physiology and function between food protein sources that are gut-digested from those syringed directly into the bloodstream. That issue could wind up becoming a critical learning for much of medicine, pharmaceutical and vaccine makers.

Further validation of peanut oil in a vaccine appeared in The New York Times, Business Financial Section page 31, September 19, 1964, under the headline:

Peanut Oil Use In A New Vaccine.” It labeled peanut oil the key ingredient in Adjuvant 65 that was patented by Merck & Co., Inc. in September 1964. Ironically that article by Stacy V. Jones began with “A pharmaceutical manufacturer has developed a vaccine that it predicts will considerably lengthen immunity from influenza and other virus infections, thereby requiring fewer ‘shots’.” So much for their crystal ball gazing about fewer shots. If anything, they have manufactured and been influential in mandating more vaccinations than ever. Incidentally, Adjuvant 65, as a stand-alone product, supposedly is no longer used in the manufacture of vaccines in the United States.

Let’s review vaccinations that are mandated for infants and children:

Hepatitis B Vaccine: First dose at birth to 2 months; Second dose at 1 to 4 months; Third dose at 6 to 18 months

Hib vaccine: First dose at 2 months; Second dose at 4 months; Third dose at 6 months; Fourth dose at 12 to 15 months

Polio vaccine: First dose at 2 months; Second dose at 4 months; Third dose at 6 to 18 months; Fourth dose at 4 to 6 years

DTaP vaccine: First dose at 2 months; Second dose at 4 months; Third dose at 6 months; Fourth dose at 15 to 18 months; Fifth dose at 4 to 6 years; DTaP is recommended at 11 years

Pneumococcal vaccine: First dose at 2 months; Second dose at 4 months; Third dose at 6 months; Fourth dose at 12 to 18 months

Rotavirus vaccine: First dose at 2 months; Second dose at 4 months; Third dose at 6 months

Hepatitis A vaccine: First dose at 12 months; Second dose at 18 months

Influenza vaccine:First dose at 6 months (requires a booster one month after initial vaccine); Annually until 5 years (then yearly if indicated or desired, according to risks)

MMR vaccine: First dose at 12 to 15 months; Second dose at 4 to 6 years

Varicella vaccine: First dose at 12 to 15 months; Second dose at 4 to 6 years

Meningococcal vaccine: Single dose at 11 years

Human papillomavirus vaccine (adolescent girls only): First dose at 11 years; Second dose two months after first dose; Third dose six months after first dose

http://www.medicinenet.com/childhood_vaccination_schedule/article.htm

So, by the above schedule one easily can ascertain that infants, in particular, are being subjected to numerous adjuvants, the least of which is non-disclosed emulsified peanut oil. There are several articles about peanut use in vaccines in the literature. Furthermore, President George W. Bush’s government set in place in 1991 the goal of raising national vaccination levels among preschool children to 90 percent by the year 2000. [2]

Other oils used in the manufacture of vaccines can include mineral oil (paraffin), squalene (shark liver oil, which probably is the most dangerous of any oil), and at one time in the 1930s and 1940s, cottonseed oil. For more information on adverse effects of adjuvants in vaccines, visit this web site http://www.whale.to/vaccine/adjuvants.html#Oil_Emulsions_

Interestingly, Ms. Fraser points out in her book that Charles Janeway, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator and Yale University School of Medicine professor in 1989, revealed that adjuvants were the “immunologists’ dirty little secret”. The secret was really a poorly understood puzzle regarding the body’s response to them. Janeway suggested that there are cross-reactive combinations of which researchers are unaware but which the body recognizes. [3]

Before I leave adjuvants, Doctor Buttram’s article mentioned Arlacel A, something I’d not heard of before. So I checked on it and found that it is a mono-oleate of manitol with the following information, which seems intriguing:

Dianhydro mannitol mono-oleate, a surfactant used in the preparation of water-in-oil injectable pharmaceutical preparations was found to autoxidize on storing, with the formation of free acidity and labile peroxides. The autoxidized substance was found to cause peritoneal adhesions when injected intraperitoneally in mice. The autoxidized material could be reclaimed by chromatography through alumina. The eluate was comparable to normal saline in toxicity and the adsorbate was found to be more toxic. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/113435337/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0

An issue that, perhaps, has exacerbated infants’ adverse reactions to vaccines is the practice of their being injected with multiple immune-challenging vaccines at one time for convenience sake although no longitudinal studies have been undertaken for that type of protocol. Consider that, that is what happened to the six month old baby boy in this article.

As pointed out so succinctly in Fraser’s book, and with which I totally agree, “One of the side effects engendered by vaccine ingredients is the production of IgE antibodies.” [4] Doctor Buttram, who is a medical expert in environmental medicine, certainly is in his element when discussing such responses.

Fraser points out what Doctor Buttram has observed in his practice: “Doctors knew that as the number and potency of vaccines increased, so too would the risk of side effects that included soaring IgE and atopy [genetic tendency to develop classic allergy diseases, e.g., asthma, rhinitis, dermatitis, food sensitivities, especially in autistic children]. Anaphylaxis immediately following vaccination had finally become an ‘obstacle’ to the routine jab, doctors observed.” [5]

What all this seems to come down to is the fact that since the advent of the practice to administer numerous vaccines at one visit, there has been a rise in anaphylaxis—something not seen as dramatically or in such prolific numbers, as is attested to in the literature, plus the Autism Spectrum Disorder that effects male children predominately because of the supposed interaction with testosterone.

Shortly before Christmas 2009, Dr. Catherine Rice, PhD, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that the rate of autism for U.S. children is one in every 110 children as of 2006! http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/12/17/autism.new.numbers/index.html

One glaring, if not gnawing, question all health consumers ought to be asking is: Why is the human infant brain affected by vaccines? According to Doctor Buttram’s paper, the brain has the highest fat content of any organ in the human body and, therefore, is susceptible to lipid peroxidation, The process whereby free radicals “steal” electrons from the lipids in our cell membranes, resulting in cell damage and increased production of free radicals. http://www.biochem.northwestern.edu/holmgren/Glossary/Definitions/Def-L/lipid_peroxidation.html

Furthermore, the Pourcyrous et al study out of the University of Tennessee with results published in the Journal Pediatrics, 2007; 151:167-172, indicates more answers to that question:

  • Brain inflammation, as indicated by elevations of C-Reactive proteins.
  • Brain edema, which can be assumed as one of the cardinal manifestations of inflammation.
  • Potentially lethal cardiorespiratory events.
  • Intraventricular brain hemorrhages—just what happened to the little fellow in this article.

Renowned brain surgeon Russell Blaylock’s research indicates over-stimulation for prolonged periods of time by vaccine adjuvants precipitates chronic inflammation, which, of course, is very destructive to the brain.

How convenient it would be to place the blame on Shaken Baby Syndrome and innocent parents whose lives are traumatized in numerous ways because of what their darling innocent infants and children are suffering through. Any parent knows the heartbreak and heartache of having a sick child. But when a child is permanently damaged because of medical procedures, as was indicated by the court in this case as probable vaccine damage and not Shaken Baby Syndrome, it’s time to demand answers from everyone: oversight health agencies at federal level, e.g., FDA, CDC, HHS; the medical profession, e.g., American Medical Association (AMA); pharmaceutical and vaccine makers both U.S. based and international; and from the U.S. Congress and its oversight powers.

Representative Carolyn B. Malloney (D-NY-14) introduced the Comparative Study of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Populations Act of 2007 that went nowhere in 110th Congress. Any bills that are not voted upon and passed as each two year congress ends, automatically become sine die or “dead.” They must be reintroduced into the next congress, as they don’t carry over. However, Congresswoman Malloney introduced a similar bill in the 109th Congress and was supposed to do so in the 111th, but apparently has not as of this late date in the waning half of the 111th Congress.

As a consumer healthcare researcher, I cannot believe that members of the U.S. Congress would not want to investigate what’s going on with our children’s health and the relationship to vaccines. I can only conjecture that because of the heavy duty lobbying by vaccine makers with their deep pockets and gifting, that it is easier to believe in Shaken Baby Syndrome. Shame on anyone who believes vaccines cannot cause inflammation/swelling and damage the brain.

Note: The legal citation for the adjudication is Case No. JVJV002265 (Iowa Dist. Ct. June 1, 2010), for which I thank the defendants and their attorney.

References

1 Heather Fraser, The History of the Peanut Allergy Epidemic, (Hamilton, Canada: Expresso Book Machine, 2010) 141

2 Heather Fraser, The History of the Peanut Allergy Epidemic, (Hamilton, Canada: Expresso Book Machine, 2010) 131

3 Ibid, 127

4 Heather Fraser, The History of the Peanut Allergy Epidemic, (Hamilton, Canada: Expresso Book Machine, 2010) 142

5 Ibid, 156

*Correction – Dr. Harold Buttram’s paper presented for publication, “Subdural Hemorrhages Occurring in an Infant Immediately Following Vaccination,” methodically charted the infant’s anamnestic allergic response to vaccines at six months of age, not four as mentioned in the above article.

  • Christina England

    Thank you for this Catherine, it is extremely important that this information is spread to as many parents as possible.

    An excellent article

    Christina

  • Catherine

    “Vaccines, on the other hand, that are grown on chicken eggs.”

    Thank you Catherine. This is what an allergy specialist Dr Webb told me when my son reacted to the vaccine and ended up like an AIDS victim in AIDS.

    I court social services tried to label me negligent for not vaccinating the next child even though the allergy expert advised against it.

  • http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WETHEPEOPLE_UNITED/ Marsha

    My Goodness, Tina, what would we do without you helping shed light on truth? Thank you sooooo much. Hugs

  • Shawn Siegel

    Ms Frompovich, vaccination is IM, rather than IV, which is what you suggest. My understanding thus far is that the IM introduction of the antigen and accompanying unmentionables is far more problematic than inhalation or ingestion because is quickly involves the lymph system.

    Thoughts? … thanks!

  • http://www.catherinejfrompoivch.com Catherine J Frompovich

    Shawn,
    I did NOT say that vaccinations were IV. Please read the article again, as I think you may not understand what I have written. Both Doctor Buttram and the attorney who represented this case in court have vetted this article, and neither came to your conclusion.

  • Christina Waldman

    Thank you for this great article. I’d like to mention as well the May 2010 article on how peanut allergies have tripled in the last ten years in very young children. A local health newsletter found in my doctor’s office reported on this study:

    S. Sicherer et a., “U.S. Prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year followup,” J Allergy Clin Immunol v.125(6), pp. 1322-1326.

    http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/0091-6749/PIIS0091674910005750.pdf

    According to the article, the researchers don’t know why peanut allergies have tripled. They think it might be because our immune systems are “too clean.” They have nothing to do, so attack harmless food proteins. Maybe the researchers should read this book!

  • http://www.facebook.com/ann.giltner Ann

    It’s late and maybe I missed it, but I didn’t see which vaccines have peanut oil in them. I’m curious because my son was injured by the only vaccine he ever got: the hep B at birth. When he was 22 months old he had his first taste of a peanut product and we landed in the ER. He was vomiting, his entire body turned blood red (like he’d been severely sunburned), his breathing became raspy, he was lethargic, etc. It was really scary. Since there was absolutely no family history of any severe food allergies, we were baffled. If peanut oil is in the hep B vaccine he got, that would make a lot of sense.

  • Belinda Moran

    Thanks for a great article! We are one of those families falsely-accused of SBS after my son suffered an intracentricular hemorrhage and not one shred of medical evidence supporting SBS!

  • http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/ Barbara F. Gregory

    Vaccines are not the only pharmaceuticals with undisclosed ingredients. ALL pharmaceuticals can contain GRAS ingredients. So that routine vitamin K shot given to newborns could be contaminated with food protein from GRAS oils.

  • John Fryer Chemist

    to Shawn

    One problem is that with millions of vaccines given IV it is certain that some will by accident enter the veins and that will give problems over and above those mentioned here.

  • http://www.vactruth.com Kat

    My child has a peanut allergy and she just got the vitamin K shot at birth. I believe there was peanut oil in the Vit. K shot. Under US patents for vegetable oil it includes peanut oi. Vegetable oil is in the vit. K shot.

  • http://www.peanutallergyepidemic.com Heather Fraser

    I list several vaccine and adjuvant patents that include peanut oil. It’s all hidden in plain sight. Here’s the blog: http://heatherfraserwrites.blogspot.com/

  • http://www.healthforyou.org/ Roger Langford

    The following link goes to a page missing message.

    # A Lesson Not Learned in Vaccinology: The Man-Made Peanut Allergy Epidemic

  • http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=7277598&id=69667273997&saved#!/pages/Vaccination-Information-Network-VINE/69667273997 Erwin Alber

    “The prevalence of peanut allergies has doubled in the 5 years from 1997 to 2002 according to research reported in the December 2003 JACI, and researchers don’t really know why. There hasn’t been more recent research on peanut allergies, many because the US federal government funds research very minimally.”

    http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=7277574&id=69667273997&saved

    I bet. Not much point looking for an answer one already has the answer to!

  • Ursula

    I had never heard that vaccines can contain peanut oil! I did allow my four older kids to be vaccinated (they didn’t get nearly as many shots here in Canada, but bad enough), but smartened up with the fifth, after her first shot. None of my 13 grandchildren is vaccinated, though.

    I am going to spread this information to every mother with little kids!

  • Amy Caryn

    This is information that needs to be shared with EVERYONE.

    One suggestion, however – don’t stop getting the vaccines unless your physician advises you not to – it would be far worse to have many of these diseases return! However, have the child tested for allergies before giving vaccines – to be safe – and always ask if there is a way to come in several visits to get the vaccines individually rather than all in one visit to watch for particular reactions.

    I will definitely be sharing this with a great many of my fellow researchers.

  • Ted

    I just read through the section of the act referenced here. Misinformation at best. The act in question is concerning pandemics and biological warfare attacks and responses to such public emergencies. Immunity is given during these limited times (90 days at the longest) except if one willfully misuses a product or uses it after expiration and a couple other things. This is NOT blanket immunity as your article suggests.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Ted,

    Thanks for your comment. Can you please elaborate what you mean? I didn’t get what I think what you are suggesting from the article at all.

    Thanks.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Pat-Schwarz/100001505165550 Pat Schwarz

    They are killing our children with all of the required vaccines.  Many of them contain cells from aborted male babies.  What does that do to a little body when it is injected into to them.  All kinds of horrible medical problems, including cancer of all kinds.  These cells are a dangerous foreign invasion into the baby of another human being’s cells. They don’t belong and they don’t know where they belong or what to do.  They end up as cancers and other medical emergencies throughout the whole body.  Children of God is just one website with important information.  This will not be able to be hidden or denied for much longer by the medical profession.  Thank God there are some brave and honorable men and women who are telling the truth about this serious danger to our children.  Of course, those who stand to benefit the most from the whole vaccine onslaught will do everything they can to discredit them.  Again, the truth always prevails.   

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Pat-Schwarz/100001505165550 Pat Schwarz

    Peanuts are not the problem.  These altered vaccines, using aborted male baby cells, are also causing very weakened immune system disorders.  Therefore, allergies are increasing.  I would bet that the flu, pneumonia, shingles, meningitis, and other new vaccines are doing the same thing, weakening our immune systems. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Pat-Schwarz/100001505165550 Pat Schwarz

    The website is Children of God For Life, and there are links to other information sites and research done by reputable medical professionals.

  • Tiffany

    Unfortunately, it’s really not that simple. Allergy tests are inconclusive and can NOT be trusted as an official answer as to whether we will react or not, particularly with infants, UNLESS you are dealing with only IgE reactions. With mast cell dysfunctions, we don’t need an antigen to connect with an antibody to cause a violent allergic reaction, it can happen because our cells are reacting to a chemical, additive, preservative that is a non-IgE mast cell degranulator…this means it makes histamine along with tons of other inflammatory chemicals flood your blood stream creating flushing, hives, welts, breathing trouble all the way to full-blown anaphylaxis…while an allergist stands shaking his/her head telling you that you aren’t allergic, so you aren’t responding to it. There is no way to tell if these children are going to react from simple allergy testing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    You might be interested to know that not only has peanut oil been accepted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as to what it considers GRAS (generally recognized as safe), but as well since its use in vaccines dating back to day one, the FDA has as well also given the same rating of GRAS, to aluminum adjuvants. That is actually pretty darn irresponsible and actually a claims of vaccine safety blowing, fact; that considering all the multiple vaccines that contain an aluminum adjuvant.

    Control of Colloid Stability through Zeta Potential

    With a closing chapter on its relationship to cardiovascular disease

    by Thomas M. Riddick

    Consulting Engineer and Chemist, Thomas M. Riddick and Associates, 
    New York, New York — and Technical Director
     
    1968, by Thomas M. Riddick

    Library of Congress Catalogue Number 67–18001

    Excerpts: 

    Despite the number of references to aluminum toxicity, the FDA has always exempted it from testing, by putting it on their “Generally Regarded as Safe” ( GRAS ) list. Aluminum can be added to foods, medicines or water without restriction from the FDA.

    Source: http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/riddick/index.html 

    Aluminum or Aluminium contamination, safety, danger, risks, toxicity by Ray Sahelian, M.D. 

    Author: Samara Soghoian, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center.

    Excerpted:  

    From: History of crime against the Food Laws (1929) by Dr. Riley, the prime mover behind the original Pure Food Law and Director of the FDA. He resigned in disgust in 1912 over exceptions granted to the law and lack of enforcement. 

    Aluminum has been exempted from testing for safety by the FDA under a convoluted logic wherein it is classified as GRAS. (Generally Regarded As Safe.) It has never been tested by the FDA on its safety and there are NO restrictions whatever on the amount or use of aluminum. Diseases Associated with Aluminium Intoxication. H. Tomlinson, M.B., Ch.B., MRCS., LRCP. 

    Read the full article: 

    http://www.raysahelian.com/aluminum.html

    SOME EFFECTS OF REDUCED CARRYING CAPACITY 

    Aluminum toxicity is a widespread problem in all forms of life, including humans, animals, fish, plants and trees, and causes widespread degradation of the environment and health. Over 7000 reference articles on aluminum toxicity exist in various data bases; ( as of 1996 ) all recognizing the toxicity but concluding the mechanism of action is unknown. — [ Search results - scirus.com ] 

    http://www.scirus.com/srsapp/search?q=%22aluminum+toxicity%22&ds=mem=jnl&ds=web#results

    Aluminum Toxicity
    http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/hydro/al.htm

    Lack Of Aluminum Adjuvant Safety Data, (my review of the CDC documents, with excerpts)
    http://www.vacfacts.info/aluminum-vaccine-adjuvant-fa/ 

    Facts About Vaccine Aluminum Adjuvants, (with some of the latest studies) 
    http://www.vacfacts.info/facts-about-vaccine-aluminum-a/

    As it states in the article, vaccine manufacturers think it safe to use as a vaccine adjuvant while not recognizing the differences in physiology and function between food protein sources that are gut-digested from those syringed directly into the bloodstream. That issue could wind up becoming a critical learning for much of medicine, pharmaceutical and vaccine makers.

    As a fact this issue should have been critical learning in 1929, and it is now long before the year 2012. What is wrong with this picture? They do not actually care about your health, quite obviously; nor the truth. To much to lose, the truth be known. But what do the children have to lose in being harmed, and the parents; everything.

    Scientists learn how adjuvant makes vaccines effective

    Excerpt:
    The discovery of alum as a vaccine booster actually began with tapioca, a starchy substance used in pudding and as a thickener in cooking. In the early 1920s a scientist named Ramone reported that, for unknown reasons, he had mixed tapioca with inactivated tetanus toxin and found that it served as a more effective vaccine than did the toxin itself. Several years later, a researcher named A.T. Glenny read Ramone’s account and decided to mix aluminum salts, or alum, with inactivated tetanus toxin in a test vaccine he tried on rabbits. Again, the vaccine with the adjuvant was more effective than a vaccine containing the toxin alone.

    The adjuvant alum was first widely used in humans in the 1950s as part of the Salk poliomyelitis vaccine. Since then, adjuvants have been widely used in many vaccines, including the Diptheria vaccine

    http://news.bio-medicine.org/biology-news-2/Scientists-learn-how-adjuvant-makes-vaccines-effective-1143-1/

    Pharma clearly does not actually, nor fully understand the immune system, nor the CDC and FDA. And I doubt that they actually care, either. Can not ever be wrong.

    Lets look at squalene oil, same thing, and with the same kind of irresponsibility going on. 

    Gulf War Syndrome
    ANTI-SQUALENE ANTIBODIES LINK 
    GULF WAR SYNDROME TO ANTHRAX VACCINE

    Squalene was found by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in five lots of the AVIP anthrax vaccine. The discovery of serum anti-squalene antibodies and the development of a test to detect these antibodies has made it possible to see that links appear to exist between the contaminated AVIP vaccine lots, the illness experienced by post-1997 vaccine recipients, the illness experienced by non-deployed 1990-1991-era patients, and the illness in deployed 1990-1991-era patients that has been referred to as GWS.

    The data establishing these links is presented in the peer-reviewed February 2000 and August 2002 articles. The published findings (1) strongly suggest that the GWS-like illness being reported by all of the various patient groups is the same illness, (2) strongly suggest that the contaminated vaccine caused the illness in the AVIP group, and (3) further suggest that squalene contamination of one or more 1990-1991-era vaccines accounts for the GWS cases from that era.

    Read more:
    http://www.autoimmune.com/GWSGen.html

    But yet when you actually go to the FDA site, it seems that they now deny that they ever found any squalene oil in the Gulf War vaccines.

    Yes, squalene is a naturally occurring substance in the human body, and it as well exists in some foods.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squalene

    The problem is that there is a huge difference between consuming squalene, and that of injecting it. This is what pharma and the FDA can not get through their head, seemingly intentionally. You can not simply inject any substance you want into the body, because it naturally exists in the body, or because it is already ingested in dietary form. Depending on what it is, it can cause severe immune reactivity; thus as it is injected, the immune system is and/or can become confused and can react against it as non self. Studies have shown for years that squalene should never be used in a vaccine, as it can cause severe autoimmune reactions; and the CDC is clearly aware of that.

    The same thing happened when they put L Histidine (a never before used ingredient) in Gardasil; thinking well, its already produced in the body, we won’t need to study it for safety; and they were wrong.

    August 30, 2008
    Polysorbate 80 and Histidine, a marriage of disaster
    http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak/080830

  • Airgid47

    I used to work at a medical equipment company in central NY.  Most boring job I ever had (FDA paranoia etc.).  I remember overhearing an engineer talking at lunchtime about his 2 kids that had autism.  I thought to myself, that must suck.  He went on to say that the autism wasn’t near as bad as the other two kids who had severe allergies to peanuts.  I never heard of anyone allergic to peanuts or any other nuts when I was a kid (I’m 56).  Later I read about the peanut oil adjuvant.  The autism in the other two was likely caused by vaccines as well.
    I felt so bad for the family!

  • Anmensah

    my child had ugly rash, and welted, dry skin of both legs, a week post vaccination with Pentacel and Prevnar 13. the second series of vaccines resulted in same itchy, ugly rash all over body, which became worse and is still present months after, to this day.
    I am a nurse. I too was brainwashed into beliveing that vaccines are 100% safe, until I became a mother and was forced to do my own research after my child’s reaction. My child was healthy without skin ailments prior to being vaccinated. Now that he’s vaccinated, he is very hypersensitive, had 3 ear infections by 11 months old, had Bronchiloits weeks after Prevnar 13 vacine, and is still suffering from atopic dermatitis to this day. What do you call this, my own silly observations or a possible result of a vaccine adverse reactions? The vaccines were to protect him, and boosts his immune system resulted in him becoming ill with an autoimmune disorder. I now feel guilty. I took him perfectly healthy to a doctor of medicine(pediatrician) who used medicine(vaccines) to make him ill in the name of prophylactive(preventive) medicine.
    I know some will say that vaccines have saved many lives. There is some true to that. However, not every child will benefit from every vaccine. Some vaccines pose more risks than benefits. That’s why a one sized vaccine approach should not apply to every body. And yes, some people do become mentally damaged, and physically damaged by vaccines. And yes, some people haved died. Infants and Children are people too.
    I never looked good in a one size fits all type of style any. So, I don’t want my medicine to be offered to me in the same way. Vaccine should be offered holistically, first know the child’s immune balance, risks, family history, predisposing factors to certain ailments, sensitivity to certain chemicals, and metals, etc before giving a vaccine. Look at me, as a child I caught measles, mumps and chicken pox. Of course I felt sick for few weeks, but I still played. I am still alive in my 30s. I am still immune to this date, as evidence by recent blood tests. I am more immune than someone who had the synthetic virus(vaccine). The good thing about me, is that I don’t ever need a booster shot for MMR. I just have some beauty marks left over from chicken pox and long life immunity to measles, mumps and chicken, and for some reason, my rubeolla titer is always positive. So no MMR boosters for me.
    I hate medicine that values money over people.
    I hate short cuts in medicine and vaccine(using adjuvants to cut back on the amount of virus and bacteria used in the vaccine, but still expect to recieve the same, if not greater immune response.)
    I hate fetal parts being used in vaccines. That in itself is unethical and unhealthy.
    I hate stray virus such as the RSV, Porcine Poravirus, SIV being in vaccines. I recently found out that the SIV is the Seimien(monkey) immune defiency virus. The SIV virus is similar to HIV in humans. That is scary. We all know what HIV can caus Aids. We all know what Aids can do the human body.
    Of course, the polio vaccine is manufactured using monkey kidney cells. How can the pharmaceuticals assure me 100% that there are no stray viruses, human or animal are into the vaccines. They did cover their ass-ets by stating on the vaccine package inserts that there were no carginogenic, or fertality testing done on the vaccine. So in truth we were warned. If you develop cancer, etc from the vaccine, YOU WERE WARNED. So there are no liability for them. HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!

     

  • Mema

    Testing for allergies won’t help when the vaccines are CAUSING the problem in the first place. That’s the problem here. So vaccinating at ALL is the issue. And hardly a doctor in this country that is already vaccinating a child, would even DARE suggest to STOP vaccinating. That’s Bollocks! You haven’t seen how ignorant and ill informed and ruthless these doctors are when it comes to vaccinating. And you are clueless about the “illnesses” these diseases are not sitting there in a cloud, just WAITING to pounce onto all the “unvaccinated”. We are not born vaccine deficient, we are born WITH AN IMMUNE SYSTEM and with our mother’s antibodies passed through her breastmilk and placenta.

    Let’s really get to the heart of the matter here, vaccines are changing your body and doing things that were NEVER meant to happen. We have an immune system for a purpose. Let’s use it and let it do it’s job. Let’s also stop eating all the damaging crap and toxic chemicals we pour on our babies from day one. Johnson and Johson make cute little commercials, but they are advertising TOXIC WASTE. Our kids have traded acute illness that were benign and easy to recover from like chicken pox, measles, mumps etc with good nutrition, herbs, vitamins and rest and fresh air and sunshine (vit D), for chronically sick and debilitating life long illnesses and disorders, allergies, autism, ADD, cancer etc.