Vaccinations: Much To Do About Nothing?
Daily, more and more information surfaces about problems with vaccines and what some regard as ‘forced’ vaccinations, particularly in the USA. However, both the medical profession and the pharmaceutical industry seem to regard the ever-increasing, publicized downside of vaccines as “much to do about nothing.” “Nothing” can be further from the facts, according to emerging statistical information and parents-turned-advocates, those whose children have been damaged or killed by vaccines, e.g., Association for Vaccine Damaged Children (AVDC), Canada; Global Vaccine Awareness League (GVAL), California (USA); Immunization Awareness Society (IAS), New Zealand; Medical Misdiagnosis Research (Canada); the National Vaccine Information Center in the Greater Washington, DC area (USA); Truth About Gardasil® (USA); Vaccine Awareness Network (VAN, Australia), just to name a few.
Why are parents advocating on behalf of vaccine awareness? One reason possibly can be found in UNICEF’s Fourth Progress Report CUC/CIDA Development of Basic Services for Children in Thailand, covering the period January–December 1988.
According to UNICEF, in 1987 with 63 percent of Thai children vaccinated for measles, there were 42,051 cases of measles or 78.1 measles cases per 100,000/population. [Tables B & C of UNICEF’s report] Interestingly, Dr. Raymond Obomsawin, PhD, says
…with respect to the expansion of the measles vaccination program, “. . . the immunization coverage for measles has increased from 6 percent in 1984 to 63 percent in 1988, leading to a reduction in measles prevalence from 93.7/100,000 in 1984 to 37.1/100,000 in 1986.
What the report fails to indicate though is that although the 1986 inununization [sic] coverage of 44% had increased by 1987 to 60%, the measles infection rate in the same period actually more than doubled, with an increase from 37.1 to 87.1 per 100,000. [In just one year!] It is also noteworthy that the culminating maximum immunization coverage of 63% achieved in 1988, correlates with a 1988 infection report rate of 59.1 /100,000–which in fact poses higher level of measles infection than the 1982 reported infection rate of 57.1 /100,000, which was a time when measles immunization was not being provided in Thailand. [Compelling observation that seems to be overlooked by vaccine ‘pushers’.] (The higher per capita infection rate–after five years of expanding coverage–obviously reflects very negatively on the assumed efficacy of the vaccine, and may have been deliberately obfuscated in the reporting. No evidence was seen to suggest that the post-immunization increases in disease rates were attributable to case reporting improvements.) (http://www.alternative-doctor.com/vaccination…)
Based upon the above observation by Dr. Obomsawin, who is president of an R&D institution, and his doctoral work was in Health Science and Human Ecology, there’s an apparent reason to question ‘fudged’ information about vaccine efficacy. Furthermore, Think Twice Global Vaccine Institute has this to say about the measles vaccine:
The manufacturer also warns that the measles vaccine “has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential” and “it is…not known whether [it] can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproductive capacity.” Thus, “it would be prudent to assume that the vaccine strain of virus is…capable of inducing adverse fetal effects.” Also, “caution should be exercised when…administered to a nursing woman.”(42) (http://www.thinktwice.com/measles.htm)
As a child, this writer contracted both ‘regular’ measles and German measles with no apparent health side effects or antibiotics to treat either episode. During the measles confinement, a homeopathic physician treated me at home; doctors made house calls back then. Childhood diseases seem to have strengthened my immune system, as I’ve had the flu only once and that was after receiving the 1957 flu vaccine, plus I never contract the common cold. Childhood diseases enhance natural immunity; that, perhaps, is why nature targets them to that particular segment of the population. Statistics seem to support more and more diseases that are being vaccinated for/against are experiencing rebounds. Go figure!
Additionally, children now experience terrible adverse reactions to vaccinations that NEVER appeared before the 1980s when the massive push to vaccinate was instituted by pharmaceutical companies and a snow job was pulled over on public health care agencies.
To corroborate the above statement, the USA Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in 2008 contracted with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review the epidemiological, clinical, and biological evidence regarding adverse health events associated with specific vaccines covered by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The vaccines to be reviewed are
- varicella vaccines,
- influenza vaccines,
- hepatitis B vaccine,
- human papillomavirus virus vaccines,
- hepatitis A vaccines,
- meningococcal vaccines,
- measles-mumps rubella vaccines, and
- diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis vaccines (http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation…)
If a USA governmental agency established a review system for vaccine damage, why, then, doesn’t it get out from under the clutches of vaccine makers who supply ‘bum dope’ science in support of neurotoxic adjuvants in the vaccines they produce?
In August 2010, the British court ruled a payout of 90,000 British pounds for one MMR vaccine adverse reaction case:
Robert Fletcher, 18, is unable to talk, stand unaided or feed himself. He endures frequent epileptic fits and requires round-the-clock care from his parents Jackie and John, though he is not autistic. He suffered the devastating effects after being given the combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine when he was 13 months old. (http://powerpointparadise.com/blog/2010…)
Furthermore, the British government supposedly has paid out 3.5 million pounds since 1997 to families with vaccine damaged children. In the United States, the Hannah Poling case was settled in September 2010 for $1.5 million, the First-ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award (http://networkedblogs.com…)
More and more parents are demanding their rights, and rightfully so. Pharmaceutical companies and health agencies cannot continue spouting false research; use the media to promote fear and intimidation campaigns; and mandate that parents hand over perfectly healthy infants and toddlers to become ‘wards of the state’ after being damaged by vaccines. The healthcare consumer is waking up to the facts of life after vaccinations: Damaged kids!
However, some parents also are damaged emotionally, socially, economically, and otherwise when slapped with Shaken Baby Syndrome legal charges for brain damage that results from vaccines. See http://vactruth.com/2010/09/16/brain-swelling-and-damage-associated-with-vaccines/
In a Purdue study on vaccines in dogs, this alarming information surfaced:
The vaccinated Purdue dogs also developed autoantibodies to laminin, which is involved in many cellular activities including the adhesion, spreading, differentiation, proliferation and movement of cells. Vaccines thus appear to be capable of removing the natural intelligence of cells. (http://www.dogsadversereactions.com/scienceVaccine…)
Shouldn’t the USA HRSA and vaccine makers be taking Purdue’s dog autoantibodies research seriously? After all, dogs are a form of life on Planet Earth from whom humans can learn; remember Pavlov’s dogs. Maybe vaccines are another means to an end just like the Pavlov dog experiment on conditioning. Ever think of that? (http://en.wikipedia.org…)
Since the USA news media, in particular, is not interested in presenting adverse-related vaccine damage and information from other countries, e.g., Australia, Finland, India, Sweden, parent-advocacy groups will be mushrooming all over that country and the world because of the physical, moral, and scientific damage that is injected with just about every vaccine/vaccination. When will real science prevail?