Andrew Wakefield Attack Spells Death for These 3 Pharma Lies

CNN hatchet man and former CIA intern Anderson Cooper grills Dr. Andrew Wakefield


The forces are in motion against Andrew Wakefield, who is an iconoclast, a destroyer of public health myths, that vaccines can be consumed without risk. There’s mistrust by a swelling population of parents of vaccine-injured children, which has been growing steadily over the past two decades. Vaccine-injured children are now a global phenomenon.

Recent attacks on Andrew Wakefield, a medical doctor, make it painfully obvious that the pharmaceutical industry is getting very nervous and desperate. This is merely the next phase in the pharmaceutical industry’s attempt to isolate and discredit Andrew Wakefield per its own blueprint for physicians and researchers who do not interpret vaccine science according to Big Pharma, which believes that hazardous materials, e.g., mercury and toxins like formaldehyde and aluminum, are not harmful to a child’s central nervous system.

The general populace now has front row seats in seeing the systematic efforts of a well-oiled propaganda machine at work. This may be a last-ditch effort at saving a failed vaccine policy due not to Dr. Wakefield’s discredited work but to the damage vaccines cause in healthy children.

Why is this?

Believe it or not, there is more riding on whether vaccines cause autism. The argument is very complex and here are a few salient points to consider:

Lie #1 – Vaccines do not cause Autism.

If it is not already obvious, Andrew Wakefield is being made a scapegoat for the MMR vaccine link to the autism epidemic, which is becoming ‘pandemic’. If vaccine makers and peer review journals can discredit him and his work , anyone—researcher, scientist, or medical doctor—making a similar claim can—and probably will be discredited.

What are the implications of Andrew Wakefield’s findings? This man—as a medical doctor—simply made an observation that children with autism have gastrointestinal disorders, a clinical and diagnosable medical condition. Even more importantly, Wakefield’s work implies that autistic children are afflicted with much more than some type of mysterious social disorder.

As you can imagine, many parents have now been alerted that medical tests are available for their autistic children.

Autism currently is labeled an incurable psychiatric and social disorder as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV). The condition is managed medically by many of the anti-psychotic medicines created by the same pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines. These psychotropic drugs just happen to be one of the larger profit makers for the pharmaceutical industry. In 2001, $17.83 Billion in psychotropic drugs were sold. (http://www.macfound.org/atf…)

Why is this important?

If vaccines are shown to cause autism spectrum disorders, then vaccines will immediately become a marketing liability. Also, an enormous market share of drugs will be cut out of psychiatric medicines used to manage autism.

Lie #2 – The Media is Unbiased

It stands to reason if the major media outlets speak out against pharmaceutical products, the financial support for the network will be immediately dropped. Make no mistake, there is a major profit motive.

Anyone who’s ever watched television in the United States can vouch for the first-hand influence that pharmaceutical companies have on our media. A half-hour segment may contain up to ten to fifteen pharmaceutical advertisements in that short period of time.

Lie #3 – Industry Influenced by Pharmaceutical Interests

Where do we start with this? Historically speaking, if we look back at the landscape of organizations and journals, we can see that they are littered with the influence of the pharmaceutical industry. This is nothing new.

One of the most recent examples is former head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Julie Gerberding, MD, signing on as President of the Vaccine Division at Merck Pharmaceuticals after her tour of duty at the CDC.

Regarding medical journals, it is the opinion of the Public Library of Science (PLoS) that industry conflicts of interest abound in these journals. They concluded that

Publication of industry-supported trials was associated with an increase in journal impact factors. Sales of reprints may provide a substantial income. We suggest that journals disclose financial information in the same way that they require them from their authors, so that readers can assess the potential effect of different types of papers on journals’ revenue and impact. ” (http://www.plosmedicine.org/article…)

These are just two very short examples. However, in the interest of time they should serve as a good starting point.

Conclusion

Parents realize that their autistic child is sick, needs proper medical help, and there are services and treatments available, which conventional medicine seems to be ignoring if it does not include psychotropic drugs. Treating autism’s other health problems, including bowel syndrome anomalies that Dr. Wakefield identified, apparently is not in the best interest of helping an autistic child. One has to wonder what will happen if it’s determined that the viruses causing autism are the same strains that are in vaccines.

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

Facebook Twitter 

  • Kevin Dexter

    I have noticed that more children are sick too. Thanks for the article.

  • patrons99

    Excellent post, Jeffry – Yes! This may be a defining moment for pharma. It is certainly a death knell for the 3 pharma lies that you cite.

    “The pharmaceutical industry gangsters made one of their periodic fraudulent declarations of “victory” today. They repeat that “science” (the best their money can buy) now proves that injecting mercury and other known neurotoxins into the bloodstreams of small children Is a fine and entirely safe practice – and thus no liability to them for thousands of serious vaccine injuries over the years. The morning TV network shows in the US were crowing this BS with maximum enthusiasm today. (Why not? The pharmaceutical gangsters pay them to.)

    Here’s real story…

    Robert F Kennedy Jr speaking before an audience largely made up of the mothers of vaccine injured children…about the real vaccine scandal that the government and Big Pharma went to criminal lengths to cover up.”

    “The Mercury-Autism Cover Up”

    http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/644.html

    “Tobacco Science and the Thimerosal Scandal” by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. On June 22, 2005.

    http://www.robertfkennedyjr.com/docs/ThimerosalScandalFINAL.PDF

  • Sarah A’Court

    The points in your article seem to be common sense to me, but it appears that sense is not always common! :O I have a hard time figuring out why anyone can say this is a “conspiracy theory”. Who on here said that? I never did, and I resent the term when it comes to this issue. Why is it so hard to believe that money talks? Especially big money? Why is it so hard to believe parents who literally witnessed the quick decline of their child? I support Dr Wakefield….

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Andrew Wakefield Attack Spells Death for These 3 Pharma Lies vactruth.com - vactruth.com -- Topsy.com

  • http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/WeThePeopleUnitedForVaccinationEducation/ Marsha

    Thanks Jeffry. Good stuff. I’m forwarding it everywhere I can. And to think I used to like Anderson Cooper.

  • Christina England

    Excellent article once again Jeff!!

    Don’t forget that this form of bowel disease needs powerful drugs as well as well as ADHD. You only have to research the figures of children with ADHD to realise there is a problem. These illnesses and conditions need medication and medication is what Big Pharm is all about. Why would they as an industry want to damage their biggest form of income and decrease Autism? Easier to blame to doctor or specialist and discredit them.
    If this does not work then they go for the parent. Either way it is win win for them all the way to the
    bank for them.

    Christina

  • Sandy

    Many thousands of people are becoming more aware and are learning about the scandals and the unfathomable number of tragedies connected with vaccines. The mainstream media, known to have strong connections with pharma, is undoubtedly attempting to divert public attention away from all this.

    The disgraceful pursuit of Andrew Wakefield is obviously an attempt to turn public opinion against vaccine critics and to discredit them.

    Brian Deer, the unscrupulous journalist who is behind the nasty stories which attempt to persecute Andrew Wakefield, in addition to using shady tactics to emphasise his “news”, also refuses to publicly disclose his financial connections with pharma.

    More energy should be used in unveiling Brian Deer than in proving that Andrew Wakefield is right. Wakefield’s work has already been supported by considerable serious research and there will no doubt be more studies in the future which support him.

    A sensational story published by the media, discrediting a figurehead like Andrew Wakefield, is a strategic move. The media knows fully well that a large per cent of the public make opinions which are based only on headlines.

    If vaccine critics are discredited, many obviously may lose confidence in them and turn more towards vaccine promoters. The sensational story may not only be an attempt to turn public opinion towards being positive to vaccines in general, but may also help in promoting the dangerous six-in-one vaccine.

    When public attention concentrates on sensational scandals it is then diverted away asking questions such as “- Where are serious safety studies regarding multi/ co-administration of vaccines?” The answer is in fact: nowhere.

    It is a heartbreaking fact that billions of dollars are used to promote vaccines, yet if a research worker applies for funds to study vaccine injury they not only be refused funds, but may also risk being jeopardised.

    Thousands and thousands of families are struggling to support vaccine injured. Many are desperately tired because of their difficult everyday lives and financial problems.

    Perhaps the greatest problem of all is for the vaccine injured is that they are not believed.

    Many of those who are struggling, instead of being given the help they so sorely need are being prescribed antidepressives and psychiatric drugs which in turn frequently cause serious side effects and lead to addiction.

    Pharma’s pattern is the blood red thread which runs through it all: From vaccines – leading to injury – leading to more drugs – leading to money, money money.

  • Sandy

    I’m sorry that on reading my comment just posted here I see that I should have done better proofreading!

  • Steve Michaels

    Actually, I thought the important point of Wakefield’s research was that the measles virus found in the gut of the affected children was, in fact, the laboratory cultivated vaccine strain and NOT a wild strain. That is the determinate factor of the link between the vaccine and the intestinal disorders…

  • http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations barb

    Vaccines are also the direct cause of the fatal food allergies that now affect 1 in 125 children. It is the adjuvant that increases the body’s sensitivity to all of the protein in the vaccines. What most people do not know is that the FDA gave the pharmaceutical companies the authority to self affirm GRAS ingredients. What this means is that the pharmaceutical decides that it want to use wheat germ oil as an ingredient in vaccines. They have a “good reason” to use it and believe it is “as safe as other ingredients”. So all they have to do is have a “third-party” company test the ingredient for safety. If the test is fine, then the pharmaceutical company can use the ingredient WITHOUT putting it on the label OR submitting anything to the FDA. This is why if you research patents on line for vaccine adjuvants you will find that every food oil known to man is listed as an ingredient. Also the FDA regulates only the LAST culture that is used to produce vaccines. Before the final culture, vaccine manufacturers use FOOD WASTE to grow their ingredients. Trace amounts of food protein remain in the vaccines from both the cultures and the use of oils. This is why serious peanut allergies in children has skyrocketed and has similar statistics to that of autism. Parents of these highly allergic children are buying peanut sniffing dogs because their children could die from the odor of peanuts cooking or trace amounts in food. And it is not just peanut allergies; it is all food allergies. Shellfish oil is used in vaccines and pharmaceuticals. The worst thing about this is the use of these ingredients is a protected trade secret and no one, not the government, your doctor, or your pharmacist is allowed to know what the exact ingredients of the pharmaceuticals are.

  • Dai

    Like over here in the uk , James Murdoch, he is a non-executive chairman of British Sky Broadcasting, in which News Corporation has a controlling minority stake, and he is also Non-Executive Director of GlaxoSmithKline. Mega conflict of interest or what!

  • Barbara

    Excellent article, thank you. Smearing Dr. Wakefield is only going to have the reverse affect on us. We know we need people like him to unveil the real truth.
    It’s good to know that Big Pharma are getting jittery.
    Where are the real investigative journalists these days in the big media companies?? Cowards who will do anyone’s bidding for money.

  • TONY

    Well folks sometimes the truth is a little hard to digest when it comes to giving up the ingrained belief that we have all been conned into accepting that the alleged ‘pathogenic viruses’ are really out there and are the sole cause of many human diseases. However, until proven otherwise Dr Stefan Lanka’s claim that no natural human disease causing viruses have ever been physically isolated to date by ANYBODY remains unrefuted. That also applies to the viral constituents of the MMR vaccine which is alleged to be based on ‘a mixture of live, weakened viruses from measles, mumps and rubella’. First of all how can bit sof nucleic acid (a chemical) wrapped in a protein coat (another chemical) be alive in a vaccine????????????. Viruses are NOT living organisms (check it out) they are chemicals pure and simple – bits of RNA or DNA mainly with a protein coat. No scientist to date has ever physically isolated a human disease causing virus dead or alive, that’s right ,NOT ONE.This may come as a shock to most people, but that’s the truth as far as can be determined. Here’s an example of what is tantamount to scientific fraud.

    According to various past reports Dr Jeffrey Taubenberger, a molecular pathologist at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Rockville, Md., and his team toiled for 10 years to piece together the alleged deadly Spanish Flu virus in a high-security laboratory at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

    They obtained samples from small pieces of lung tissue, preserved in wax after the autopsies of two soldiers among the Spanish flu’s 675,000 American victims, and from the frozen body of an Inuit woman who died from the virus in November 1918 and was buried in the Alaska permafrost.

    The claim is then made that although the alleged virus’ eight gene segments, or strands of RNA, were in fragments (selected from numerous ‘other’ fragments), Taubenberger’s team was able to piece them back together using gene sequencing and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) — a biochemical multiplication method of creating copies of specific fragments of DNA.

    The glaring problem here is that the ‘Spanish Flu virus’ has NEVER been physically isolated, photographed and biochemically characterized in the first place scientifically by ANYONE to date. Taubenberger et al had to rely on a purely speculative conceptual ‘model’ and the magical PCR technique that produces something out of nothing – short bits of gene substance that were NEVER demonstrated to exist in the corpses in question!

    How is it possible to know what to look for and be able to identify and determine the Spanish Flu virus precisely from ‘virus-like particles’ such as cell debris and other organic contaminants if the model Taubenberger et al used was NEVER based on a real physically isolated and biochemically characterized virus?

    Thus with the magical PCR method it’s not only possible to multiply arbitrarily so that one detects only small fragments of new nucleic acid sequences that did not previously exist in the tissue samples from the corpses. It also means that a positive PCR is not proof for the existence of a whole genome (‘viral’ or otherwise).

    Dr Stefan Lanka has also commented on Taubenberger’s fiasco thus:
    If viruses had been present, then these could have been isolated, and out of them their gene substance could have been isolated too; there would have been no necessity for anyone to produce laboriously, by means of PCR technique- with clearly a swindle intention – a patchwork quilt of a model of the genetic substance of the idea of an influenza virus.

    Finally, and notwithstanding all this. PCR reproducibility and specificity have never been effectively determined using any isolated human pathogenic virus as a ‘gold standard’. Moreover, Kary Mullis, who received a Nobel Prize for inventing PCR, says that it is being misused in HIV research. It is a method for studying genetic code fragments and matching them to similar fragments, not for identifying viruses as the cause of AIDS or ANY OTHER ILLNESS [emphasis mine]. He says that humans are full of retroviruses, which have never been shown to kill anybody, and that the mystery of ‘HIV’ has been generated by the $2 billion a year being spent on it (FOTI, Roberts p. 191).

    In the case of influenza the problem thus remains: what is it that is producing the flu-like symptoms that are invariably credited to the so-called human ‘pathogenic viruses’ if none of them have ever been proven to physically exist let alone to have been effectively isolated and biochemically characterized to this day? What we have been led to believe about human pathogenic viruses is Alice in Wonderland phantasy along with the standard textbook pictures and speculative computer models of their alleged genome sequences. The same applies to measles, mumps and rubella symptom complexes and the alleged viruses that are blamed for their cause.

  • http://www.cryshame.com Joan Campbell

    http://www.ageofautism.com/2011/01/keeping-anderson-cooper-honest-is-brian-deer-the-fraud.html
    “It is quite clear that you do not understand English. Brian Deer is not a member of the Sunday Times staff. He is a freelance journalist who runs his own website and blog and is not under the control or direction of the Sunday Times. Mr. Deer should not represent himself as a Sunday Times journalist. He is not a member of staff, does NOT have a regular salary from us, is not on our pension scheme and pays his own tax as a freelance. If he says that he writes for the Sunday Times that would be correct. He is a contributor to The Sunday Times on an occasional basis but again we have no control over him …”
    - Alaistair Brett, Legal Manager, Sunday Times

  • http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/WeThePeopleUnitedForVaccinationEducation/ Marsha McClelland

    Dr. Wakefield is, finally, vindicated­. This round table interview is the beginning of the end for all we have been up against in this vaccine war. Hear the 27th. It will be the best 4 hours you’ve ever spent;

    http://www­.progressi­veradionet­work.com/t­he-gary-nu­ll-show-wn­ye/

    Be sure to hear Brian Deer’s awesome interview on the 25th where he’s revealed clearly for all who care to see. He hangs himself with his own words, dodging questions & changing the subject, in his obvious ploy to try to pull off the “Elaborate Fraud” he represents­.

    “Documents emerge proving Dr Andrew Wakefield innocent; BMJ and Brian Deer caught misreprese­nting the facts”

    http://www­.vaccinesa­fetyfirst.­com/pdf/BR­IAN%20DEER%20­IS%20THE%2­0LIAR%20.p­df

    “Dr Wakefield demands retraction from BMJ after documents prove innocence from allegation­s of vaccine autism data fraud/
    Uncovered Documents Prove There Was No Fraud in Lancet Case Series”

    http://www­.vaccinesa­fetyfirst.­com/pdf/BM­J%20MUST%20­RETRACT.pd­f

    “Wakefield Gives Proof: No Fraud. Brian Deer Lied”

    http://gai­a-health.c­om/article­s351/00039­4-wakefiel­d-proof-no­-fraud.sht­ml

    There you have it. Vindicatio­n for the good doctor. Charges will be brought against Brian Deer. See for yourself. Brian’s short interview gives him away & the four hour round table gave the proof.

  • David

    Rubella can cause autism.

    http://www.neurodiversity.com/library_chess_1971.pdf

    Measles is an immune suppressant.

    Does it really make sense to be giving a measles and rubella vaccine together????

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    David,

    It sure as heck doesn’t…

    If they *don’t* know, they ought to.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2475/

  • Tony

    Viruses sell vaccines pure and simple, ergo no pathogenic viruses implies no vaccines would be required to treat diseases allegedly caused by viruses. Its about time people started to question the real issue here instead of swallowing doses of an incoherent ‘germ theory’.

    Two good books prevail that question the whole idea that viruses are to blame as causes of disease. The first is by Janine Roberts entitled ‘Fear of the Invisible’ – the second is “Virus Mania” by Englebrecht & Kohnlein. Germ theory seems plausible only because it is hardly ever questioned – it has become an incoherent dogma and fails to take into consideration all other causes of the particular disease in question. To date nobody has ever directly isolated a ‘pathogenic virus’ from a diseased human being and proved that it can cause the same disease in another human being. If anybody out there can prove otherwise I would be very pleased to receive the conclusive scientific information, and I’m sure all other intersted scientific parties would as well.  

  • Tony

    Seems like we cannot get any virologists or doctors ‘out there’ to come clean about the nonexistence of human disease causing viruses, and their nonexistence IN the vaccines that are being foisted upon an otherwise ill-informed and gullible public for a long time.

    Ironically, the term ‘virus’ comes from the Latin meaning ‘poisonous liquid’ or ‘venom’ so really it would not be too far off the mark to say that the vaccines ARE viruses in a toxicological sense.

    If we take MMR vaccine as an example, there’s no scientific proof that any of the 3 alleged RNA viruses have ever been directly isolated from any diseased human using a direct scientifc method of isolation, and there is no scientific proof that any of these alleged viruses cause the diseases in question – NONE. It’s all speculation and smoke and mirrors.

    These alleged RNA viruses that have not been proven to exist are supposed to be ‘live’ in the MMR vaccine. However, the only thing that is ‘live’ in the vaccine as far as we know are the electrical charges and combined charge distributions of the chemicals that are constitutive of chick embryo, human foetal cells, neomycin, gelatine, sorbitol, and whatever else is being touted as the ‘live’ measles, mumps, and rubella viruses but are NOT. Bits of RNA are not whole viruses, and even if such strands of RNA are to be found in the MMR vaccine they do NOT qualify as viruses per se, and it is tantamount to scientific fraud to claim that they are ‘live’ viruses as such.

  • Poop

    Tony, you are insane.

  • redshoe

    If most of the parents of vaccine damaged children knew that the virus in their child’s system was a vaccine strain, that would set off alarm bells and possible law suits.
    I would love to see the collapse of the vaccination program in my life time. 
    You can never achieve health through a needle. 

  • redshoe

    If most of the parents of vaccine damaged children knew that the virus in their child’s system was a vaccine strain, that would set off alarm bells and possible law suits.
    I would love to see the collapse of the vaccination program in my life time. 
    You can never achieve health through a needle. 

  • redshoe

    If most of the parents of vaccine damaged children knew that the virus in their child’s system was a vaccine strain, that would set off alarm bells and possible law suits.
    I would love to see the collapse of the vaccination program in my life time. 
    You can never achieve health through a needle. 

  • redshoe

    If most of the parents of vaccine damaged children knew that the virus in their child’s system was a vaccine strain, that would set off alarm bells and possible law suits.
    I would love to see the collapse of the vaccination program in my life time. 
    You can never achieve health through a needle. 

  • Tony

    Chuck Berry once wrote a rock n’roll number called ‘Too Pooped to Pop’. Before casting further aspersions about my sanity and becoming overly ‘pooped’ about my posts, read the books suggested and not the offical propaganda  that virologists tout concerning the isolation/purification of alleged ‘pathogenic viruses’ then hopefully things might go pop!!

  • Tony

    I agree entirely the vaccine ie. a ‘poisonous liquid’ was the old way of definig a pathogenic virus (and still is as far as vaccines are concerned: Here’s an extract from Janine Robert’s book: ‘Fear of the Invisible’ regarding how the measles virus is ‘isolated’ for a vaccine. It’s great science NOT – enjoy:

    In an online paper entitled ‘Isolation and Identification of Measles Virus in Cell Culture,’ the CDC, the central Health Research authority of the USA,  lays out how isolation of this virus should be done so it can be used, say for a vaccine. It instructs, first obtain from the patient a small sample of urine or fluid from the nose or mouth.
    Next ‘sacrifice’ a marmoset monkey,  take some of its cells, then make these cancerous, perhaps by exposing them to radiation, and then give them, on top of this,  Epstein-Barr disease!   Such extremely sick cells, the CDC informs us, are ’10,000 times’ more sensitive to the measles virus than are normal human cells.
    Now add to these cells a toxin called trypsin. The CDC tells us to expect some cells to fall off the sides of the vessel as if they have been poisoned.  They have been. Now add nutrients and glucose and leave for two or three days so the cells can somewhat recover.
    Now add to the cells the sample gathered from the patient. After an hour, inspect the cells in the culture with a microscope to see if any of the cells are becoming distorted, or are floating free as they did when trypsin was added. If they are, the CDC says this is proof that measles virus is present and making the cells ill.
    This statement made me sit back and think. Why should this illness now be caused by a virus?  They had poisoned the cells, made them cancerous…..  and now the CDC was saying the cells must be ill because they had measles.  Where was the logic in this?  

    The next stage involves the addition of two antibiotics, Penicillin and Streptomycin, to the culture and leaving it alone for a day. Again the cells are inspected – and if small holes now appear between cells, it is  now presumed that measles virus has caused these. If no sign of such damage, this process is repeated. If after this there are still no signs of damage, then the culture is discarded.  However, if 50% or more of the cells are now seriously ill and distorted, the culture is set aside and kept in the fridge as  ‘isolated measles virus stock suitable for vaccines!’ All this without actually detecting the virus itself!


Vaccines Exposed!