Gardasil May Cause Cancer

Healthy teenage girls are a huge market for HPV vaccine makers.

When we see the term “cancer vaccine” in connection with the HPV (human  papilloma virus) vaccine Gardasil we may naturally assume that  it prevents cervical cancer, yet there is no evidence whatsoever that this is the case. (1)  On the contrary, the term is incorrect because unbelievable though it may sound Gardasil may actually cause cancer. This fact is being ignored by Merck the manufacturer and other promoters including doctors and health authorities.

NOT TESTED FOR CARCINOGENICITY

Information in the package insert states that the vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity. (2) Why has this not been done?  Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!  There appears to be no official requirement for vaccines to be tested for carcinogenicity and no incentive for manufacturers to do so.  Many experts consider that vaccines are conducive towards the dramatic worldwide increase in cancer cases.

REPLACEMENT MAY CAUSE DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER

A normal phenomenon in virology is that virus strains which have been removed are replaced by new ones.  It is not known by anyone, including the vaccine manufacturer  whether the new virus strains are more carcinogenic than the original ones which have been removed.

The chief editor of the Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association, immunologist Charlotte Haug writes about several unanswered questions including that of replacement in her article “We Need to Talk about HPV Vaccination – Seriously”:

Abhorred vacuum.There is another serious question that may be answered sooner:  what effect will the vaccine have on the other cancer-causing strains of HPV? Nature never leaves a void, so if HPV-16 and HPV-18  are suppressed by an effective vaccine, other strains of the virus will take their place. The question is, will these strains cause cervical cancer?

Results from clinical trials are not encouraging. Vaccinated women show an increased number of precancerous lesions caused by strains of HPV other than HPV-16 and HPV-18. The results are not statistically significant, but if the trend is real – and further clinical trials should tell us in a few years – there is reason for serious concern. (3)

In an article in the New England Journal of Medicine  “ Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination – Reasons for Caution”,  Dr. Haug again poses the question of replacement:

“How will the vaccine affect other oncogenic strains of HPV? If HPV-16 and HPV-18 are effectively suppressed, will there be selective pressure on the remaining strains of HPV? Other strains may emerge as significant oncogenic serotypes”. (4)

Replacement was obviously one of several  unanswered questions when FDA, Merck and the Norwegian government signed a contract which involved research studies on  thousands of young Norwegian schoolgirls. The agreement was that Gardasil would be approved in US under the condition that extensive research projects were carried out in Norway. There was implication of corruption in connection with introduction of Gardasil in the childrens’ vaccination program. (5)

The contract includes this statement from FDA to Merck:

“You have committed to conduct a study in collaboration with the Norwegian Government, if GARDASIL  is approved in the European Union and the Government of Norway incorporates HPV vaccination into its national guidelines, to assess the impact of HPV vaccination on the following in Norway … to assess whether administration of GARDASIL will result in replacement of these diseases due to vaccine HPV types with diseases due to non-vaccine HPV types.” (6)

ABNORMAL PAP SMEARS AFTER GARDASIL VACCINATION

It is worrying to note that many cases of abnormal Pap smears, cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer are registered after Gardasil vaccination. Reports from VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System regarding HPV vaccines are regularly published by SaneVax.(7)  The numbers registered with VAERS may be as low as one percent of the actual cases.

 

INCREASE IN CERVICAL CANCER RISK FOR THOSE PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED TO THE HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUS

One of the most disturbing observations which deserves serious investigation  concerns the considerable potential  increase in risk of cancer after Gardasil vaccination for those who have been pre- exposed to the human papilloma virus.

Sanevax writes:

Peer-reviewed analysis and studies many of them on the FDA, NCI and CDC web sites point out the dangers of many of the vaccine ingredients including the potential for the HPV vaccines to increase the risk for pre-cancerous lesions if adolescents have been previously exposed to the human papillomavirus and then get vaccinated: 44.6% increase post Gardasil.

Judicial Watch writes in their Special Report “Examining The FDA’s HPV Vaccine Records”:

A chart in the committee’s report revealed that efficacy in subjects already exposed to “relevant HPV types” had an observed efficacy rate of -44.6%. The disturbing efficacy rate raises questions as to who should be receiving the vaccine, and why the FDA allows Gardasil to be administered without prescreening for HPV. The outcomes that can result from pre-exposure are disconcerting and deserve far more attention.(8)

 

HPV IS NOT JUST A SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTION – ALSO BABIES MAY BE INFECTED!

It is dangerous and  unethical of promoters to recommend Gardasil  when it is unknown whether there has been prior exposure to HPV infection. In an obvious attempt to encourage  thousands of young people to get vaccinated with Gardasil it is widely published that the vaccine should be given prior to sexual relations because HPV infection is sexually transmitted.  This is not necessarily the case. The promoters hide the fact that HPV may be transmitted from mother to child and has been detected in the placenta and in umbilical cord blood.(9)

 

NEWLY DISCOVERED INGREDIENT GENE MODIFIED DNA MAY LEAD TO MALIGNANCIES

The recent discovery of yet one more potentially cancer causing element connected to Gardasil sent shock waves across the world. This is the story which lead to its discovery:

A sexually naive girl developed acute juvenile rheumatoid arthritis at age 13 within 24 hours after  the third Gardasil injection and her blood sample – tested two years later – was found to be positive for HPV DNA by a local clinical laboratory. On request for more information by her mother  the Sanevax team contracted  an independent laboratory  for analysis of 13 samples of Gardasil, all from different lots.

The results showed that all the samples contained recombinant (genetically  modified) HPV DNA which was firmly attached to the aluminium adjuvant. (10)

The consequences of the presence of recombinant HPV DNA which is  considered a biohazard are unknown and may be horrific. The pathologist Dr. Lee stated:

“Based on medical literature and some of the FDA/Merck’s own publications, adventitious (coming from an outside source) DNA in an injectable protein-based vaccine may increase the risk of autoimmune disorders and gene mutation which may lead to malignancies.” (10)

Merck’s Gardasil product inserts stated “No viral DNAs in the vaccine” – until April 2011 when the line was glaringly absent from U.S. product inserts. (10)

It is shocking to see that FDA admits that it is generally impossible to remove DNA contaminants from vaccines. (11)

On contacting the authorities about the worrying discovery of recombinant HPV DNA in Gardasil, Sanevax received a prompt reply from the Department of Health referring to a statement by the CHMP  (European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use) that  the presence of recombinant DNA fragments does not represent a case of contamination and is not considered to be a risk to vaccine recipients. (12)

No supporting documentation whatsoever has been provided to support this statement!

It is reasonable to assume that the vaccine would not have gained approval had the manufacturers informed the authorities of the presence of the aluminum bound gene manipulated DNA due to potential health risks.

The following issues which may be connected to increase of cancer risk should have been seriously addressed and results from unbiased studies presented before the vaccine was approved:

  • Lack of carcinogenicity testing of the vaccine
  • Replacement
  • Increase in cancer risk for those previously exposed to human papilloma virus
  • Presence of recombinant DNA (rDNA)

These important studies have not been presented.  Gardasil should therefore immediately be withdrawn from the market until satisfactory documentation has been provided.

When vaccine critics maintain that the vaccine is dangerous and that it should never have been approved the response from promoters is often a request  for evidence of proof to support the statements.

It is not vaccine critics who must provide evidence that vaccines are dangerous;  it is the vaccine promoters’  responsibility to prove that vaccines are safe and effective and that the benefits outweigh the risks.”  - Marcella  Piper-Terry

 

 

References:

(1)    http://www.cancermonthly.com/blog/2007/12/gardasil-cervical-cancer-vaccine.html

(2)    http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_pi.pdf

(3)    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20928-we-need-to-talk-about-hpv-vaccination–seriously.html?full=true

(4)    http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe0804638

(5)    http://vactruth.com/2010/06/28/merck-paying-experts-gardasil/

(6)    http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm111283.htm

(7)    http://sanevax.org/

(8)    http://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/2008/JWReportFDAhpvVaccineRecords.pdf

(9)    http://www.prlog.org/11554580-hpv-not-just-sexually-transmitted-disease.html

(10)http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-discovers-potential-bio-hazard-contaminant-in-merck%e2%80%99s-gardasil%e2%84%a2-hpv-4-vaccine/

(11)http://vactruth.com/2012/01/21/fly-in-my-vaccine-soup/

(12)http://sanevax.org/freda-birrell-sane-vax-letter-to-committee-for-medicinal-products-for-human-use-gardasil-contamination/

 

Photo Credit

  • Marijke

    This is in my opinion the most idiotic of all vaccines. Parents, read this before you decide! Women, did we all walk around in our early teens, petrified we would develop cervical cancer from a HPV infection? Were our parents worried about this? Most of us walk around healthily with the HPV virus, it’s lots of other factors that could cause the cancer. Getting this vaccine and just hoping that you get a few anti bodies against only 3 of the 100 or so strains of the HPV virus does not mean no cancer! Think parents, think!!! And inform yourself, for the sake of our children. (there are plans to vaccinate boys as well. Anybody there who can explain the logic of this to me?)

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    Yes it is idiotic. They have already started giving Gardasil injections to boys and many are already suffering after the vaccine. The one and only answer to your question asking for an explanation of the logic – it is to make money at the expense of peoples’ health.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jdazcr Jo Barlow

    the only logical explanation i can find is ££££ :( after all if they were really concerned about cervical cancer deaths they would be promoting healthy eating, not smoking, avoiding sex when young, and not taking the pill – all which HAVE been shown to increase your risk of cervical cancer with NO SIDE EFFECTS (but they dont make money either!)

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    If ever there could be a Pulitzer Prize for investigative journalism in vaccine safety advocacy, THIS article deserves it. Exceptional reporting, Sandy!

  • http://www.facebook.com/kpstollermd Kenneth P Stoller

    If there were a REAL interest in ending cervical cancer, health authorities would make sure women and girls get adequate folic acid… that is all it would take…. in fact, cervical dysplasia can be reversed with folic acid and DIM (the metabolite of indole 3 carbinol found in cruciferous veggies). Furthermore, HPV infection can be treated with the drug Isoprinosine. While this drug is not available in the USA (think about that) – it is generic and available everywhere but the USA. Those in the USA can obtain a personal supply online from Europe. So, this was never about cervical cancer… this was only about making money.

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    I AGREE totally! Back when I was in practice as a natural nutritionist, I had women seek my advice
    via diet and lifestyle changes on managing #4 test results after a cervical dysplasia cone biopsy. For what it’s worth, when women changed their diets to exclude edibles that do damage to the body, and as you say, include MORE cole family veggies –cruciferous vegetables: cabbage, Brussels sprouts, cauliflower, broccoli, etc., and took the entire complex of B vitamins PLUS extra folic acid (B9), in 4 to 6 months when their physicians re-did their cone biopsies, the results were phenomenal, e.g., 2s for previous 4s, and nothing for previous 1s and 2s. Needless to say, the women and their physicians were impressed.

  • MK

    Those that really want insight into what is going on should take a gander at the NIH grantmaking lists. You will find FASCINATING grants being put out just before the Gardasil travesty began. There were a huge number of grants relating to microprotectants. (These are gels, creams and foams that kill specific pathogens). From the descriptions, it was clear that THE POWERS THAT WERE believed that there was about to be an EPIDEMIC of some sort of New STD. WHY WOULD THAT BE? I suspected then and I still believe that these disgusting asses created gardasil to (a) create large scale infertility among young people hence the targeting on young women (b) engender an epidemic using young women as a vector that would also infect young men with a new and horrible STD that killed and (c) deliberately did this as a prelude to a large KILL OFF of the population.

    There are many people who might find what I am writing to be unbelievable. Well, I have been correct in similar deductions in the past. I am appalled at the lunatic actions of the eugenicists amongst us. Not only do these idiots NOT understand genetic or “selective” breeding, but they are woefully ignorant of science. They don’t appear to understand that there is nothing precise about the things that they are wielding. They have repeatedly exposed large segments of the population to a number of infections for nefarious reasons and then been dismayed when there was collateral damage. I don’t think that we can afford to keep them around much longer. Their ill-advised forays into science and medicine have cause the current diabetes epidemic (Hep B vaccinations), wide spread autoimmune disorders and allergies (adjuvants that cause sensitivity and not immunity) and greatly increased the cost of medical treatments in this country (chronic illnesses are the number one expense today).

    I would write about this, but I am too busy trying to finish the articles on their other misdeeds. If anybody wants to cover this, get in touch: madame_karnak@yahoo.com

    MK

  • Lou

    Lets see what we have with the “Gardascam vaccine”

    “Doctor Diane Harper, lead researcher in the development of two human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, said the controversial drugs will do little to reduce cervical cancer rates and, even though they’re being recommended for girls as young as nine, there have been no efficacy trials in children under the age of 15.”
    Note when asked why she was coming forward with this startling information Doctor Harper stated “I have to be able to sleep with myself

    “The breakdown of good medical practice, unfortunately a reality in our profession nowadays, cannot be fixed simply by introducing an unproven cancer vaccine. The opportunists took advantage of the imperfect Pap smear prevention technology which had been further destroyed by business greed in the 1980’s, to promote a series of even
    less perfect systems, including a vaccine.” Doctor Sin Hang Lee, MD, Note Doctor Lee is commenting on how we got into this cervical cancer mess. IMO it was no accident,
    HHS has known of the pap smear test problems for decades. IMO HHS wanted the
    “solution” to be another toxic “vaccine”

    “Only 27 percent of girls who have received the Gardasil vaccine have gotten all
    three shots in the vaccine’s series. Merck blames it on forgetfulness, and has
    launched a “reminder” program that contacts vaccines, and urges them to complete
    the series. CNN Money suggests that it has to do with the vaccine’s
    high cost – just under $400 for a three-shot series, although some private doctors charge up to $875 for a three-shot series. But neither has considered the third
    possibility – that the reported reactions girls are suffering after getting one or two shots of Gardasil are so severe that they decide not to go back for more.“ Doctor Joseph Mercola MD

    “Polysorbate 80 injected into prepubescent rats caused a rapid growth of reproductive organs, but growth was abnormal and the rats were sterile, unable to have children. When used intravenously with vitamins it has been known to cause anaphylactic shock. According to the Polysorbate 80 MSDS, it may be a carcinogenic, (cause cancer), as well as a mutagenic, (birth defects).” Gardasil Ingredient caused sterility in lab rats

    o So Toxic and IMMEDIATE adverse reaction prone most do not get the three “vaccination” set
    o “Vaccination” horror stories by the thousands
    o MANY adverse intermediate reactions reported, many circulatory
    o Associated with thousands of psychotic events
    o May be associated with about 2 million adverse events
    o Poses increased risk for cervical cancer
    o Contaminated with Genetically Modified HPV rDNA
    o Contains Polysorbate 80 a suspected CARCINOGEN
    o Polysorbate 80 used in infertility “vaccinations”
    o Polysorbate 80 is proven to disrupt the reproductive cycle
    o UN is testing Polysorbate 80 to damage fertility for population control
    o Infertility promotion strongly suspected
    o Many dozens of documented deaths
    o Active in the body for five years max
    o Cancer threat to develop decades later
    o Evidence of Political Corruption
    o An “Anti-Cancer Vaccination” which may cause cancer
    o Not proven to prevent any type of cancer
    o As Doctor Moulden has shown us PROMOTES cancer through ischemia
    o An expensive dangerous “solution” for a simple to solve medical problem
    o “Vaccine” developer says it is useless and untested
    o Precautionary principle trampled

    My gosh folks what have we become? If I put a hammer in your right hand and told you to put your left hand on a chopping block and smash it with the hammer; would you do it?

    “Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.” Albert Einstein

  • http://profiles.google.com/mothman717 Dave Glover

    Years ago in Cuba they found that ozonated olive oil (or any other suitable carrier oil) smeared on even the most severe condyloma gives a 100% cure rate for lesions caused by HPV with no instances of recurrence. Saul Pressman, an oxygen therapist/researcher in the US was the guy whose information I read. They should give this out rather than the vaccines.

  • courageandhope

    The vaccine literature states it should not be given to pregnant females because of the higher number of birth defects in the clinical trials when given to pregnant girls. A young girl may not know if she is pregnant and may be reluctant to say she might be. Yet they are targeting young girls of childbearing age for this vaccine. I remember when I was 13 and my doctor refused to give me a rubella vaccine because of the “chance” I might be pregnant, simply because I was of childbearing age. He took that responsibility on himself to prevent birth defects. How times have changed. Our experience: my daughter had the first two doses of this vaccine and was sick for over a year with a strange respiratory infection. It was not asthma. A lung specialist was unable to determine a diagnosis. It did not respond to antibiotics. I figure we were lucky it was not paralysis or death, but it was obvious to me my daughter’s immune system was affected. You can keep your third dose, Merck, thank you.

  • Jan

    This vaccine is a farce! it’s going to give girls cancer.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    If you would like to read the actual 2006 Gardasil FDA pre-approval document that has been made reference to here, luckily Natural News in approximately 2008 had saved a copy of it to their files, just in case the FDA removed it, and sure enough it appears the FDA did. Take a look.

    From my site page:
    http://www.vacfacts.info/gardasil/

    Excerpting from the article titled, The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed
    http://www.naturalnews.com/Report_HPV_Vaccine_3.html

    Do HPV Vaccines Increase the Risk of Precancerous Lesions?

    The reclassification petition cited above also reveals that Gardasil vaccines may increase the risk of developing precancerous lesions by 44.6 percent in some groups of women. This is found in a quote referencing a document mentioned in the petition, which states:

    “PCR-based HPV detection device with provision for accurate HPV genotyping is more urgently needed now because vaccination with Gardasil of the women who are already sero-positive and PCR-positive for vaccine-relevant genotypes of HPV has been found to increase the risk of developing high-grade precancerous lesions by 44.6%, according to an FDA VRBPAC Background Document : Gardasil HPV Quadrivalent Vaccine. May 18, 2006 VRBPAC Meeting.

    http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4222B3.pdf%22 [No longer exists - on the FDA site].

    NaturalNews tracked down the correct URL of the document referenced above and found it in the FDA docket archives. We have placed a safe backup copy at:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/downloads/FDA-Gardasil.pdf

    Sure enough, that FDA document has now been removed from their site.

    Further excerpts.

    Sure enough, this document reveals startling information about the extreme dangers apparently posed by Gardasil vaccinations. On page 13, this document states:

    “Concerns Regarding Primary Endpoint Analyses among Subgroups

    There were two important concerns that were identified during the course of the efficacy review of this BLA. One was the potential for Gardasil to enhance disease among a subgroup of subjects who had evidence of persistent infection with vaccine-relevant HPV types at baseline. The other concern was the observations of CIN 2/3 or worse cases due to HPV types not contained in the vaccine. These cases of disease due to other HPV types have the potential to counter the efficacy results of Gardasil for the HPV types contained in the vaccine.

    1. Evaluation of the potential of Gardasil™ to enhance cervical disease in subjects who had evidence of persistent infection with vaccine-relevant HPV types prior to vaccination. The results of exploratory subgroup analyses for study 013 suggested a concern that subjects who were seropositive and PCR-positive for the vaccine-relevant HPV types had a greater number of CIN 2/3 or worse cases as demonstrated in the following table:
    Observed Efficacy
    - 44.6%

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/Report_HPV_Vaccine_3.html

    Again here is the url for the now missing FDA VRBPAC 2006 Preapproval Meeting Document
    http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4222B3.pdf%22

    And again, here is the back up copy of that 2006 document VRBPAC pre-approval document, here:
    http://www.naturalnews.com/downloads/FDA-Gardasil.pdf ]

    NOW, would the FDA like to explain WHY they removed that document from their site??? What do they have to hide? That is legal justification for criminal charges, because it proves that they knew, and they know, and with the power they hacve they thought they could get away with it, and no one would take it seriously, and the harm would never be connected; nor to their reckless approval.

    This references the contents of that said FDA VRBPAC document, but is not the actual said document: it is only the approval letter.
    http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm111283.htm

    Nor is this the actual document: just want to make that distinction.
    http://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/2008/JWReportFDAhpvVaccineRecords.pdf

    SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine, (this is an amazing video that clearly outlines the found contamination of Gardasil, that of course the FDA has since again, white washed. No proof of the harm, ever).
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcGz-Pl_SGA&feature=related

    SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Bio-hazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine
    http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-discovers-potential-bio-hazard-contaminant-in-merck%E2%80%99s-gardasil%E2%84%A2-hpv-4-vaccine/

    SANE Vax to FDA: Recombinant HPV DNA found in multiple samples of Gardasil
    http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-to-fda-recombinant-hpv-dna-found-in-multiple-samples-of-gardasil/

    Vaccine ingredients: (Look healthy?)
    http://www.novaccine.com/vaccine-ingredients/

    Gardasil HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed, Mike Adams, (also a very informative video)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XK97CHQZhq0

    The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed, (Page 1)
    (a significant amount of written information and documents)
    http://www.naturalnews.com/report_HPV_Vaccine_0.html

    Dr. Sin Hang Lee: A case study in ethics don’t pay

    Excerpted:
    In the fall of 2010, without Dr. Lee’s knowledge or having an opportunity to defend himself, the newly appointed Chairperson of the Pathology Department at Milford Hospital informed the hospital’s credentialing committee that she was not recommending for approval or supporting Dr. Lee’s application for renewal of his medical staff privileges. For those who do not know, medical staff privileges at a hospital are a major asset to a medical doctor and they establish the relationship that permits among other things, the doctor to practice at a particular hospital. When medical staff privileges at a hospital are revoked or not renewed, the doctor no longer has permission to practice at the hospital or use its facilities. The non-renewal of the medical staff privileges, may also adversely affect the doctor’s license to practice medicine. In Dr. Lee’s case, the non-renewal of his medical staff privileges at Milford Hospital is under appeal.

    Although Dr. Lee still maintains his medical staff privileges during the appeal, his position as director of the laboratory was summarily terminated along with his employment relationship at Milford Hospital on December 13, 2010 and he has been prevented from using the hospital’s laboratory to continue his testing and research there ever since that time. A lawsuit addressing the wrongful termination claim has been brought against the Milford Hospital.

    http://sanevax.org/dr-sin-hang-lee-a-case-study-in-ethics-don%E2%80%99t-pay/

    Still think vaccines and Gardasil, are all safe and effective, like you have been told? Welcome to the real truth.

    09 Andrew Moulden En 06 de 11
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58KLLm1q0_Y&feature=relmfu
    09 Andrew Moulden En 07 de 11
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hUOVChsJ9w&feature=relmfu
    09 Andrew Moulden En 08 de 11
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96oYJ6rOABg&feature=relmfu
    09 Andrew Moulden En 09 de 11
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHBwyNYJUYM&feature=relmfu
    09 Andrew Moulden En 10 de 11
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Wgyzh3KwaI&feature=relmfu

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    Thank you for many very interesting and informative comments. They contribute excellently towards the information in the article.

    Thanks also to SaneVax for publishing the article. It is important to warn about this dangerous vaccine.
    http://sanevax.org/does-gardasil-cause-cancer/

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    Thank you for many very interesting and informative comments. They contribute excellently towards the information in the article.

    Thanks also to SaneVax for publishing the article. It is important to warn about this dangerous vaccine.
    http://sanevax.org/does-gardasil-cause-cancer/

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    Thank you for many very interesting and informative comments. They contribute excellently towards the information in the article.

    Thanks also to SaneVax for publishing the article. It is important to warn about this dangerous vaccine.
    http://sanevax.org/does-gardasil-cause-cancer/

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cynthia-Janak/731288970 Cynthia Janak

    Over the last four and a half years I have written extensively on the HPV vaccines and how the immune response works in the body. If you want to read them just go to http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak My articles on this started back in February of 2007. Enjoy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cynthia-Janak/731288970 Cynthia Janak

    Over the last four and a half years I have written extensively on the HPV vaccines and how the immune response works in the body. If you want to read them just go to http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak My articles on this started back in February of 2007. Enjoy.

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    Cynthia we are many who deeply appreciate your brilliant articles. You do wonderful work. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/Ingaorama Ingibjörg Gunnlaugsdóttir

    “On request for more information by her mother  the Sanevax team
    contracted  an independent laboratory  for analysis of 13 samples of
    Gardasil, all from different lots.
    The results showed that all the samples contained recombinant
    (genetically  modified) HPV DNA which was firmly attached to the
    aluminium adjuvant. (10)” 
    Does this not actually say that all who are vaccinated with the Gardasil will test positive with HPV virus when they go for pap smear test? As I understand this then it means YES they will test as they have the virus HPV!

  • SaneVax Inc.

    Someone who has used Gardasil may, or may not test positive for HPV when going for a pap smear test.  A normal pap smear is to detect abnormal cervical cells, not necessarily HPV…..that is a separate test although it can be done with the same sample taken for the pap smear. 
    The problem is no one knows what will happen to the HPV DNA fragments attached to the aluminum adjuvant once injected. Theoretically, it could come to rest in virtually any part of the body not necessarily in the cervical cells where it might be detected.

  • SaneVax Inc.

    Someone who has used Gardasil may, or may not test positive for HPV when going for a pap smear test.  A normal pap smear is to detect abnormal cervical cells, not necessarily HPV…..that is a separate test although it can be done with the same sample taken for the pap smear. 
    The problem is no one knows what will happen to the HPV DNA fragments attached to the aluminum adjuvant once injected. Theoretically, it could come to rest in virtually any part of the body not necessarily in the cervical cells where it might be detected.

  • http://sanevax.org/ Norma

    As a society, we have already experienced antibiotic resistant bacteria such as MRSA due primarily to the overuse of antibiotics. We have become victims of SV40 virus discovered in polio vaccines, which is now known to cause cancer. Are we going down the same road with HPV vaccines by attempting to suppress what is normally a relatively benign entity while we have no idea whether or not more virulent HPV types will emerge to replace those suppressed?

  • Tiffany R.

    My daughter which is just 13 not sexually active.(THANK GOD) has had the vaccines. However we had an ultrasound done because she hasnt had a period in over a year. Now we find out that she has a lesion and or a mass on her cervix. I am not sure if it is from the vaccines or not just yet we are doing further test to see if this is cancerous. However I was told she HAD to take the shots and didnt know that they were completely optional. Any advice would be greatly appreciated

  • Aussie Mum

    By believing the lies about Gardasil and vaccinations in general, I have forever affected the future health and fertility of my daughters.
    My 24 year old was one of the first to receive the vaccinations (before sexual activity) but has NEVER had a normal pap smear and now has a precancerous lesion. So do three of her friends.
    The most shocking thing is that by questioning the doctor, I found out that fully vaccinated girls and women are not having their biopsies investigated to determine the viral cause of the problem.
    So governments are vaccinating our children against 4 types of HPV which are supposedly causing 70% of cervical cancers but they are not checking whether any of these 4 are still actually causing cancer among the vaccinated.
    I call THAT a scam! A life changing, health altering scam! Don’t vaccinate.