Proof Armed Forces are Given Untested and Experimental Vaccines

Are military personnel regularly given experimental vaccines?

In October 2000 a letter was written to the editor of JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association) from the Ministry of Defense in Italy. The Italian Military wrote that they had decided to introduce the MMR vaccination containing the Schwarz measles, Urabe Am9 mumps and Wistar RA27/3 rubella strains, as mandatory in 1998 to examine the vaccines efficiency.  (1) However, they were in for more than they bargained for because within one month of the soldiers receiving the vaccine the incidence of mumps had increased significantly.

The letter states:

The recent (April 1998) introduction of mandatory vaccination of military recruits provided an opportunity to examine the effectiveness and adverse effects of MMR vaccine (containing Schwarz measles, Urabe Am9 mumps, and Wistar RA 27/3 rubella strains) in a military setting.

The letter continues by adding:

To assess the efficacy of the MMR vaccine and the Urabe Am9–related reactogenicity, the incidence rates of MMR diagnosed in the Italian armed forces during 1999 (postvaccine period) were compared with those diagnosed during 1997 (prevaccine period).


The wording of the letter suggests that the Italian Military were carrying out a vaccination trial and at the time the soldiers were given the MMR it was a new untested Urabe Am9 vaccine and not Pluserix which had been banned in 1992 due to adverse reactions. It is difficult to determine whether or not the soldiers were given the Pluserix vaccine as there was no indication as to which vaccine the military was using.

If it was the Pluserix vaccination which also contained an Urabe strain of mumps then the Italian Military was knowingly giving a banned and dangerous vaccination to their soldiers as Pluserix had been banned in several countries including the UK.

I believe that the vaccine being used was a test vaccine because when a scientist tests a vaccine for reactogenicity they are looking to see how likely it is for the vaccine to produce adverse reactions. (2)

The next paragraph is possibly the most interesting paragraph of the whole letter because whilst they report a fall in the incidence of measles and rubella the incidence of mumps increased, indicating that the Urabe strain of mumps that they were using was problematic:

As expected, the incidence rates for measles and rubella decreased dramatically in 1999. By contrast, the incidence rate for mumps increased after the introduction of MMR immunization (own emphasis)

So much for herd immunity then!

There were several charts and diagrams outlying the military’s findings before they reached the conclusion that:

The Schwarz measles and Wistar RA 27/3 rubella strains seem to be highly effective in this population. The efficacy of the Urabe Am9 mumps strain could not be determined because of difficulties in defining new mumps cases in the vaccinees, but it is at least 70% effective, which is consistent with other recent data.However, the close temporal association between the vaccination and onset of mumps suggests a mumps-like disease due to some residual virulence of vaccine strain. (own emphasis)

I find it very odd that this letter has remained hidden in the archives for so many years and has not been discussed fully and I was extremely disturbed by the fact that unsafe and untested vaccinations were being forced onto soldiers offering their lives to serve their country.

Mumps can be an extremely dangerous especially in adult males and can lead to infertility. It is a proven fact that Pluserix caused many children in the UK to go deaf and some are still fighting for compensation from the UK government today. (3) About.com (4) says:

Complications of mumps, although potentially very serious, are quite rare. In men these complications include:

  • Orchitis: is an inflammatory condition that causes swelling of one or both testicles. Orchitis, although painful, rarely leads to sterility.
  • Meningitis: is infection and inflammation of the membranes and fluid surrounding the brain and spinal cord. Meningitis is a rare complication of mumps but can be life threatening.
  • Encephalitis: is inflammation of the brain caused by a viral infection, in this case, mumps. Encephalitis is a serious but rare complication of mumps but can be life threatening.
  • Pancreatitis: is a complication of mumps that causes swelling of the pancreas.
  • Hearing loss: is a rare complication of mumps. Mumps can cause temporary or permanent hearing loss in one or both ears.

Despite knowing these facts vaccines containing the Urabe strain of mumps are still being used in the third world today. Alan Golding exposes this fact in an open letter to Professor David Salisbury: (5)

Today David Salisbury is appealing to the nation to trust in his judgment. He is asking parents to revisit decisions made 15 years ago, at around the time when he appears to have been responsible for the introduction into the UK of a vaccine known, to him, to have already damaged substantial numbers of children around the world. David Salisbury seems also to have denied knowledge of a deal with the UK government, indemnifying the manufacturers of this vaccine against any potential claims from damaged children in the UK. Ultimately he appears to have ignored consistent evidence to suggest that the effects observed in countries where the vaccine had been withdrawn were beginning to appear, identically, in UK children soon after the vaccine had been introduced. These devastating adverse effects were acknowledged long before the public were made aware, and even longer before the vaccine was withdrawn and distributed to the 3rd World.

Alan Golding’s letter proves beyond doubt that this man has very little conscience and that he has little interest in the safety of children worldwide. He certainly does not like to be intimidated or shown up as being anything less than honorable. He became very angry indeed when the action group OneClick exposed his misdemeanors regarding the MMR vaccine on their website. He even threatened to sue them for publicizing the truth. He demanded that evidence was to be taken down from their website by instructing solicitors Blake Lapthom based in Eastleigh, to initiate legal proceedings against The One Click Group unless they complied with his demands.  OneClick (6) writes:

Salisbury not only wants these evidence based factual documents removed from the website, he also wants One Click to apologize to him for having the temerity to publish them. Both these papers deal with vaccine damage that has now reached epidemic proportions in Britain and around the world today.  

It appears that Professor Salisbury may have been less than honorable once again, this time sanctioning the unsafe vaccination Pluserix to be used on soldiers serving within the UK armed forces. The letter written by the Italian Military is not the only document that I have found proving that the armed forces have been vaccinated with unsafe, untested vaccinations. The original supply agreement between the UK government and Smith Kline French shows that Smith Kline French agreed to distribute 1,400,000 Pluserix vaccinations (Urabe MMR) to the UK for use on UK’s babies and the armed forces… (7) The agreement states:

This Agreement’s designated contract reference is NID0288,

SK&F have agreed to supply and NHS have agreed to purchase for onward sale to United Kingdom Health Authorities and the Armed Forces 1,400,000 doses of Pluserix (Measles, Mumps, Rubella) vaccine at a cost of 3.80 per dose (exclusive of Value added tax) to NHS of as NHS shall require to facilitate The United Kingdom Measles, Mumps and Rubella vaccination campaign which commences on 3r.d October- 1988.

The supply of vaccine shall be upon the terms of this agreement

Unfortunately this agreement was supplied under FOI and had the name of the person signing the agreement on behalf of the National Health Service redacted but it is highly probable that it was Professor Salisbury himself. After all he was named as the assessor in the minutes of the JCVI (Joint Committee for Vaccination and Immunization) meeting held on the 8th March 1988. (8) This proves that if he did not sign the agreement he was certainly part of the team of so called experts who agreed to this banned and dangerous vaccination to enter the UK in the first place. He also would have been fully aware that this vaccine was going to be given to the armed forces and vulnerable babies with incomplete immune systems.

From these documents we can clearly see that the armed forces are being given untested, unsafe vaccinations in what appears to be vaccination trials. What other untested, dangerous vaccinations are being forced on to these courageous men and women, and could these vaccinations contribute to the many soldiers suffering from the Gulf War Syndrome that we see so much of today?


References

  1. JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine in the Italian Armed Forces http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=193199
  2. Glossary of Malaria Vaccine http://www.malariavaccine.org/malvac-glossary.php
  3.  MMR Victim Refused Compensation for Not Being Disabled Enough http://vactruth.com/2011/09/02/mmr-victim-refused-compensation-for-not-being-disabled-enough/
  4. About.com Mens Health Mumps in Men http://menshealth.about.com/od/diseases/a/mumps.htm
  5. A Time to Revisit Decisions?  An open letter for the attention of David Salisbury from Alan Golding http://alan-golding.blogspot.co.uk/
  1. THE ONE CLICK GROUP REPONSE Professor David Salisbury Threatens Legal Action http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/documents/vaccines/David%20Salisbury%20Threatens%20One%20Click.pdf
  2. Smith Kline French Pluserix Supply Agreement   http://www.profitableharm.com/pdf/Pluserix%20supply%20agreement0001.pdf
  3. Minutes of the JCVI meeting 8th March 1988 http://www.whale.to/v/McDevitt%20Minutes%20-%20biog%20etc.pdf

 

Photo Credit

  • Aliciadlopez

    Sum Fucked Up Shit for the Troops…..and for Us All !!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/MKarnakz Gina de Miranda

    READ THIS BOOK:  Vaccination A by Gary Matsumoto.  It is all about the vaccines and WHY they mess soldiers up.  THE SCIENCE FOR VACCINES SIMPLY ISN’T THERE.  

  • http://www.facebook.com/MKarnakz Gina de Miranda

    READ THIS BOOK:  Vaccination A by Gary Matsumoto.  It is all about the vaccines and WHY they mess soldiers up.  THE SCIENCE FOR VACCINES SIMPLY ISN’T THERE.  

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Christina,
    Could these vaccines along with depleted uranium ordnance be causing U.S. soldiers to commit suicide at such heretofore unknown rates?

  • Max

    I got out in 1998 because I did not want the Anthrax vaccine to redeploy to Iraq. Refusal was not an option and I was asked several times. I told them I was not re-upping so there was no chance of me deploying, hence no need for the vax. I’ve read that many service men & women that experience Gulf War Syndrome ironically come from two groups…Those that were deployed, and those that were not. How do you explain similar illness in two separate groups? The common denominator was the anthrax vax.

    I also remember during bootcamp getting vaccinated for everything under the sun. Then we were given a pill. When I asked what it was I was told it was MMR. I said isn’t that an injection? He said no, it comes in a pill…I would love to know what that pill was.

    There is a history of using service men and women as guinea pigs that goes way back…Why would today be any different?

  • Max

    I got out in 1998 because I did not want the Anthrax vaccine to redeploy to Iraq. Refusal was not an option and I was asked several times. I told them I was not re-upping so there was no chance of me deploying, hence no need for the vax. I’ve read that many service men & women that experience Gulf War Syndrome ironically come from two groups…Those that were deployed, and those that were not. How do you explain similar illness in two separate groups? The common denominator was the anthrax vax.

    I also remember during bootcamp getting vaccinated for everything under the sun. Then we were given a pill. When I asked what it was I was told it was MMR. I said isn’t that an injection? He said no, it comes in a pill…I would love to know what that pill was.

    There is a history of using service men and women as guinea pigs that goes way back…Why would today be any different?

  • Max

    I got out in 1998 because I did not want the Anthrax vaccine to redeploy to Iraq. Refusal was not an option and I was asked several times. I told them I was not re-upping so there was no chance of me deploying, hence no need for the vax. I’ve read that many service men & women that experience Gulf War Syndrome ironically come from two groups…Those that were deployed, and those that were not. How do you explain similar illness in two separate groups? The common denominator was the anthrax vax.

    I also remember during bootcamp getting vaccinated for everything under the sun. Then we were given a pill. When I asked what it was I was told it was MMR. I said isn’t that an injection? He said no, it comes in a pill…I would love to know what that pill was.

    There is a history of using service men and women as guinea pigs that goes way back…Why would today be any different?

  • Robertbonan1

    What other untested, dangerous vaccinations are being forced on to these courageous men and women, and could these vaccinations contribute to the many soldiers suffering from the Gulf War Syndrome that we see so much of today? YEA, YES, YES the syndrome is real and what makes matters worst is that when soldiers come home they emprignate their wives and many of the TOXIC generic materials is being passed on to the fetus. Right now they are forced vaccinating people here in the US with the motive to sterilize women. I did a blog post called (Forced Vaccination Sterilization and DNA Contamination) http://wp.me/p1Crrw-9h
    So its NOT just the soldiers that they are targetting. Lets continue the fight for freedom of choice and our natural alternitaves that save lifes.

  • esdave

    Salisbury your a joke, trust in your judgement, I would not let YOU judge a flower show, another cretin in the pockets of big pharma trying to find a market for their poison,s, I shall pass this exposure far and wide, soldiers can not do anything but we can and will.

    Thank you VAC TRUTH keep them coming.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Marsha-McClelland/1447061602 Marsha McClelland

    Shared. Thank you.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Marsha-McClelland/1447061602 Marsha McClelland

    Here’s more concerning our poor soldiers embedded in my comment in reply to>>>

    http://www.causes.com/causes/786814-the-anti-anti-vaccine-campaign/actions/1662697?fb_comment_id=fbc_10150888858037944_22544843_10150888903962944#f17f3b4bd8Yes, we are noisy & our voice is getting louder. We are angry & frantic & we will be heard. Not only worried about our children but yours, too.The CDC’s own numbers are now 1 in 88 & growing. Not just because of vaccines which are the worst of the worst but many toxins delivered on us by air, food, water & bad drugs. All while those like the FDA, supposed to be looking out for us, turned their heads for profit.

    And now a new scare is upon us & it’s really scary & epidemic. Look it up. That 1 in 88 taking our children out is about to get worse!

    Foreclosed homes, Sheriff sale actions & especially government housing are deadly toxic traps.

    This is being thrust upon, like vaccines, unsuspecting parents. They are contaminated with toxic chemicals from meth labs. Look it up. They do not even board these homes up any more & leave the chemical waste to take its toll. 

    The organs of the unborn & young children will be damaged & destroyed. Ill & elderly adults will have much toll taken on them also.

    Hitler used meth on his Military & so did Japan as did our USA. That proof is all there for the research.

    That is why more soldiers commit suicide than die in combat I would think. Along with the fact they are overly vaccinated as is common knowledge.

    This drug depletes the dopamine & people can no longer feel pleasure. Our poor soldiers & now this horror has come home to roost to take out more of our children.

    Wake up whoever you are writing this deception & help us save the children.

    PLEASE! 

    This was the original article & the above was one of the notes at the bottom of this article.

    http://www.causes.com/causes/786814-the-anti-anti-vaccine-campaign/actions/1662165?fb_comment_id=fbc_10151316546779657_40539759_10151323223714657#f2a3a361f 

    Here’s the latest ploy of the coward who deletes instead of debating>>>

    Update #1The comments that are coming in are over 95% anti-vax. I don’t know if they are an organised bunch or just can’t stop themselves. Quite a few are abusive. Some sound reasonable. But I don’t really want any of them here. In order to keep my workload from becoming overwhelming I’ve started to ban the commenters so I don’t have to see them over and over again. Hopefully this campaign will get a chance to operate without too much distraction.

  • Mzthang856

    My husband nearly died from vaccines he received while in the military.  When he went to obtain his medical records upon discharge, there were none….they had been destroyed.

  • Ella G

    Wow, I just read the anti-anti-vac campaign and am amazed at their stupidity. Firstly the pledge that they are taking is to ‘respond whenever you see anti-vaccine propoganda’ and yet they delete any anti-vaccine comments, also they state to challenge us anti-vaxers because we ‘do not expect to be challenged’ i think most here would agree that we welcome their opinions to have any mature and informed discussion yet they obviously refuse these discussions by deleting the posts

  • Spearce

    My son was in the military for only a week and a half (boot camp) but fortunately got discharged because of a physical abnormality they couldn’t accept (subluxation of the shoulder), but when I asked them (with my son’s permission) for his medical records a few years later, they didn’t have them. I was wanting to know what vaccines they’d given him. When he was discharged, the medical records didn’t show the vaccines he had been given and since they “lost” his shot records when I asked for them, he will never know what they gave him. How convenient for them. Lose the records so the young man never knows what experimental drugs/vaccines he was given.

  • Gillianbroughton

    Lab rats , shame on the Corrupt Goverments ande DOH !!

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Here’s a link I think VacTruth readers ought to check out, especially since the story involves a U.S. military person http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7-492718,00.htm
    Of course, you will  note that the story was published in the UK, not the good ole USA!
    What does that tell you?  Where is the U.S. media on reporting vaccine damage to U.S. service people? l

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Problems with the above link since it’s an old article and The Times takes you to its current issue.  Try this http://www.whale.to/a/anthrax9.html 
    then find ”The Poison Vaccine” on The Times Nov.26, 2002 for the Ronda Wilson story of how she was damaged by the Anthrax vaccine.

  • Ellen Lovering

    Max the information for Uk Troops is on the document: British Chemical Warfare Defence during the Gulf War Conflict 1990 91 http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyre/3D4D5935-7FAE-4429-BD38-321FID64E893/0/Dec-99-British-CW-Defence.pdf
    -_
     

    Further
    information about the use of medical countermeasures can be found in the MOD
    paper ‘Background to the Use of Medical Countermeasures to Protect British
    Troops during the Gulf War (Operation GRANBY)’, published in October 1997. In
    addition, a Fact-Finding Team has conducted a study into how the
    anti-biological warfare agent immunisation programme and the administration of
    NAPS were implemented in-theatre. A report is being prepared on the basis of
    their work, and will be published when complete.  

    NAPS :Nerve Agent Pretreatment
    Set

    Research indicated that pyridostigmine bromide (PB) would provide
    protection against exposure to all nerve agents, including Soman. PB mimics the
    action of nerve agent by binding to acetylcholinesterase at exactly the site
    that would be attacked by a nerve agent. Therefore, PB effectively prevents the
    nerve agents having access to the enzyme, and thus prevents the enzyme from
    being irreversibly inhibited. However, unlike nerve agent, PB only binds to
    acetylcholinesterase temporarily. Within minutes a proportion of
    acetylcholinesterase that has been protected by PB will regenerate
    spontaneously. The standard dose of PB protects approximately 30% of the total
    acetylcholinesterase in the body from being inhibited by nerve agent, so that
    this amount of enzyme is available to be used for the restoration of nerve
    transmission. The human body will survive if this proportion of its
    acetylcholinesterase remains free.

    145. Therefore, it was decided to use PB as a pre-treatment to
    protect British troops from poisoning by all nerve agents. NAPS tablets consist
    of 30mg doses of PB, and are to be taken orally every eight hours.

    146. NAPS is not an alternative to the ComboPen. Both treatments
    are to be used in the event of a nerve agent threat and actual poisoning. When
    used in advance of poisoning NAPS increases the level of protection provided
    against Tabun (GA), Soman (GD) and Cyclosarin (GF) and enhances the condition
    of survivors of poisoning by Sarin (GB).

    NAPS and Operation GRANBY

    147. During Operation GRANBY, the authority for instructing
    personnel to take NAPS was delegated to the Commander British Forces Middle
    East (CBFME).

    148. The decision to start taking NAPS appears to have been taken
    on 18 January 1991, although there is evidence that personnel in the FMA began
    to take NAPS the day before. Also on 18 January , JHQ High Wycombe warned that
    all personnel waiting for definite deployment to the Gulf should start taking
    NAPS 48 hours prior to their arrival in theatre, and, on 21 January, JHQ gave
    permission for forces out of theatre to start taking NAPS as well.

    149. It is not entirely clear why the order to start taking NAPS
    was given on 18 January 1991. However, it is likely that this was in response
    to Iraq’s first use of SCUD missiles. The first SCUDs were fired by Iraq at
    approximately 03:00 hours (local time) on 18 January. It is likely, therefore,
    that the decision to start taking NAPS was prompted by this particular threat,
    and by the threat that these SCUDs could carry chemical warheads.

  • Ellen Lovering

    Max the information for Uk Troops is on the document: British Chemical Warfare Defence during the Gulf War Conflict 1990 91 http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyre/3D4D5935-7FAE-4429-BD38-321FID64E893/0/Dec-99-British-CW-Defence.pdf
    -_
     

    Further
    information about the use of medical countermeasures can be found in the MOD
    paper ‘Background to the Use of Medical Countermeasures to Protect British
    Troops during the Gulf War (Operation GRANBY)’, published in October 1997. In
    addition, a Fact-Finding Team has conducted a study into how the
    anti-biological warfare agent immunisation programme and the administration of
    NAPS were implemented in-theatre. A report is being prepared on the basis of
    their work, and will be published when complete.  

    NAPS :Nerve Agent Pretreatment
    Set

    Research indicated that pyridostigmine bromide (PB) would provide
    protection against exposure to all nerve agents, including Soman. PB mimics the
    action of nerve agent by binding to acetylcholinesterase at exactly the site
    that would be attacked by a nerve agent. Therefore, PB effectively prevents the
    nerve agents having access to the enzyme, and thus prevents the enzyme from
    being irreversibly inhibited. However, unlike nerve agent, PB only binds to
    acetylcholinesterase temporarily. Within minutes a proportion of
    acetylcholinesterase that has been protected by PB will regenerate
    spontaneously. The standard dose of PB protects approximately 30% of the total
    acetylcholinesterase in the body from being inhibited by nerve agent, so that
    this amount of enzyme is available to be used for the restoration of nerve
    transmission. The human body will survive if this proportion of its
    acetylcholinesterase remains free.

    145. Therefore, it was decided to use PB as a pre-treatment to
    protect British troops from poisoning by all nerve agents. NAPS tablets consist
    of 30mg doses of PB, and are to be taken orally every eight hours.

    146. NAPS is not an alternative to the ComboPen. Both treatments
    are to be used in the event of a nerve agent threat and actual poisoning. When
    used in advance of poisoning NAPS increases the level of protection provided
    against Tabun (GA), Soman (GD) and Cyclosarin (GF) and enhances the condition
    of survivors of poisoning by Sarin (GB).

    NAPS and Operation GRANBY

    147. During Operation GRANBY, the authority for instructing
    personnel to take NAPS was delegated to the Commander British Forces Middle
    East (CBFME).

    148. The decision to start taking NAPS appears to have been taken
    on 18 January 1991, although there is evidence that personnel in the FMA began
    to take NAPS the day before. Also on 18 January , JHQ High Wycombe warned that
    all personnel waiting for definite deployment to the Gulf should start taking
    NAPS 48 hours prior to their arrival in theatre, and, on 21 January, JHQ gave
    permission for forces out of theatre to start taking NAPS as well.

    149. It is not entirely clear why the order to start taking NAPS
    was given on 18 January 1991. However, it is likely that this was in response
    to Iraq’s first use of SCUD missiles. The first SCUDs were fired by Iraq at
    approximately 03:00 hours (local time) on 18 January. It is likely, therefore,
    that the decision to start taking NAPS was prompted by this particular threat,
    and by the threat that these SCUDs could carry chemical warheads.

  • Ellen Lovering

    Max the information for Uk Troops is on the document: British Chemical Warfare Defence during the Gulf War Conflict 1990 91 http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyre/3D4D5935-7FAE-4429-BD38-321FID64E893/0/Dec-99-British-CW-Defence.pdf
    -_
     

    Further
    information about the use of medical countermeasures can be found in the MOD
    paper ‘Background to the Use of Medical Countermeasures to Protect British
    Troops during the Gulf War (Operation GRANBY)’, published in October 1997. In
    addition, a Fact-Finding Team has conducted a study into how the
    anti-biological warfare agent immunisation programme and the administration of
    NAPS were implemented in-theatre. A report is being prepared on the basis of
    their work, and will be published when complete.  

    NAPS :Nerve Agent Pretreatment
    Set

    Research indicated that pyridostigmine bromide (PB) would provide
    protection against exposure to all nerve agents, including Soman. PB mimics the
    action of nerve agent by binding to acetylcholinesterase at exactly the site
    that would be attacked by a nerve agent. Therefore, PB effectively prevents the
    nerve agents having access to the enzyme, and thus prevents the enzyme from
    being irreversibly inhibited. However, unlike nerve agent, PB only binds to
    acetylcholinesterase temporarily. Within minutes a proportion of
    acetylcholinesterase that has been protected by PB will regenerate
    spontaneously. The standard dose of PB protects approximately 30% of the total
    acetylcholinesterase in the body from being inhibited by nerve agent, so that
    this amount of enzyme is available to be used for the restoration of nerve
    transmission. The human body will survive if this proportion of its
    acetylcholinesterase remains free.

    145. Therefore, it was decided to use PB as a pre-treatment to
    protect British troops from poisoning by all nerve agents. NAPS tablets consist
    of 30mg doses of PB, and are to be taken orally every eight hours.

    146. NAPS is not an alternative to the ComboPen. Both treatments
    are to be used in the event of a nerve agent threat and actual poisoning. When
    used in advance of poisoning NAPS increases the level of protection provided
    against Tabun (GA), Soman (GD) and Cyclosarin (GF) and enhances the condition
    of survivors of poisoning by Sarin (GB).

    NAPS and Operation GRANBY

    147. During Operation GRANBY, the authority for instructing
    personnel to take NAPS was delegated to the Commander British Forces Middle
    East (CBFME).

    148. The decision to start taking NAPS appears to have been taken
    on 18 January 1991, although there is evidence that personnel in the FMA began
    to take NAPS the day before. Also on 18 January , JHQ High Wycombe warned that
    all personnel waiting for definite deployment to the Gulf should start taking
    NAPS 48 hours prior to their arrival in theatre, and, on 21 January, JHQ gave
    permission for forces out of theatre to start taking NAPS as well.

    149. It is not entirely clear why the order to start taking NAPS
    was given on 18 January 1991. However, it is likely that this was in response
    to Iraq’s first use of SCUD missiles. The first SCUDs were fired by Iraq at
    approximately 03:00 hours (local time) on 18 January. It is likely, therefore,
    that the decision to start taking NAPS was prompted by this particular threat,
    and by the threat that these SCUDs could carry chemical warheads.

  • Ellen Lovering

    Have to say thank you Christina for exposing the truth and for your diligent research and factual analysis.I believe that here you have finally shown us all the links to one big cover up that has been going on for far too long. In my opinion,what ever way you look you up and down the path from the cradle to the grave, it all points to what is beginning to look like evidence of dangerous mass experimental vaccination programmes from the people in charge of health, who have abused their position.And not even for the right reasons, just because they could!

  • Spearce

     I agree, Ellen. I have a friend who has two sons in the military and she worries about them getting whatever vaccines they get there.

  • Spearce

     I agree, Ellen. I have a friend who has two sons in the military and she worries about them getting whatever vaccines they get there.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    It is clearly not just the Italian military that were adversely affected by war time vaccines. How many people have thought, oh well it must have been something they were exposed to while there, perhaps some agents that such as Saddam perhaps exposed them to. Such is not the case, because those who never left and stayed state side, have had the same demise.

    The truth information is there, and the unbiased vaccine harm information and all the the science a person should need, is all clearly there in nearly massive amounts. If anyone from the typical main stream side attempts to tell you they are, and as well that the medical and vaccine information system, is all about being evidence and science based; you need to rethink that claim, here and now. They claim no proof of anything ever, right; you are expected to be and you are supposed to remain as clueless as they are. Look them in the eye, and laugh; then begin and/or stay on your journey to real truth information, immediately.

    Squalene: Used in Pandemrix and Arepanrix (being distributed in Canada and the European Union)

    Squalene, infertility and auto-immune disease:

    Excerpts:

    GULF WAR SYNDROME:

    The WHO denies any association between squalene adjuvants and GWS, as does the pharmaceutical company, Novartis, makers of the adjuvanted influenza vaccine known as Fluad. However, there is considerable evidence that the presence of squalene, in parts per billion, in military anthrax vaccine (AVA) did contribute to GWS. Below is an excerpt from the Military Vaccine Resource Directory.

    Although the Dept. of Defense denied the presence of Squalene in the anthrax vaccine for many years, the FDA tested several lots for the presence of the adjuvant, and found it – in varying levels. Those lots are (ppb=parts per billion):

    “Date: 2002-07-15 Received August 15, 2001, and in revised form October 26, 2001″
    “We previously reported that antibodies to squalene, an experimental vaccine adjuvant, are present in persons with symptoms consistent with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) (P. B. Asa et al., Exp. Mol. Pathol 68, 196-197, 2000). The United States Department of Defense initiated the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP) in 1997 to immunize 2.4 million military personnel. Because adverse reactions in vaccinated personnel were similar to symptoms of GWS, we tested AVIP participants for anti-squalene antibodies (ASA). In a pilot study, 6 of 6 vaccine recipients with GWS-like symptoms were positive for ASA. In a larger blinded study, only 32% (8/25) of AVIP personnel compared to 15.7% (3/19) of controls were positive (P 0.05). Further analysis revealed that ASA were associated with specific lots of vaccine.

    These results suggest that the production of ASA in GWS patients is linked to the presence of squalene in certain lots of anthrax vaccine. 2002 Elsevier Science (USA)”

    Read More:
    http://thetruthergirls.com/Toxic_Ingredients.html

    Squalene – A History Of Vaccine Development And The Newest Adjuvant

    Squalene

    “The most effective adjuvants are formulated with oils but have long been considered too reactive for use in humans. Immunologists have known for decades that a microscopic dose of even a few molecules of adjuvant injected into the body can cause disturbances in the immune system and have known since the 1930s that oil-based adjuvants are particularly dangerous, which is why their use has been restricted to experiments with animals,” West wrote.

    The following (in italics) is from West’s article. Keep in mind that the FDA determined that squalene was present in varying amounts in specific lots of anthrax vaccine administered to tens of thousands of Desert Storm personnel (without their informed consent). Not surprisingly, tens of thousands of Desert Storm veterans have suffered permanent neurological damage and exhibit symptoms commonly referred to as “Gulf War Illness.”

    My note: [So, the military obviously used squalene oil it anyway, irregardless of for how long this was known far to reactive to use in a human vaccine].

    http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/squalene-a-history-of-vaccine

    Mycoplasma and Squalene Discussion

    Military Vaccine Resource Directory.

    Excerpt:

    In his Jan. 29, 2002 Congressional testimony, Dr. Garth Nicolson writes: “…the types of infection caused by Mycoplasma and Brucella species that have been found in GWI patients, can cause complex problems found in GWI [reviews: 23,40,41]. These microorganisms are now considered important emerging pathogens in causing chronic diseases as well as being important cofactors in some illnesses, including AIDS and other immune dysfunctional conditions [23,40,41].”

    Read more:
    http://www.mvrd.org/showpage.cfm?ID=69+

    Deadly Mycoplasma in Vaccines – Garth Nicolson – microbiologist
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W4tu5qgaWA

    A Glimpse into the Scary World of Vaccine Adjuvants
    By Edda West

    Excerpt:
    The immune system does in fact “see” squalene and recognizes it as an oil molecule native to the body. The key is “route of administration”.  As Gary Matsumoto says, “Squalene is not just a molecule found in a knee or elbow – it is found throughout the nervous system and the brain.”  When it is injected into the body, the immune system sees it as an enemy to be attacked and eliminated.(6)

    http://www.vaclib.org/basic/adjuvants.htm#eddawest

    Subject: Dr. Scheibner Article – Adjuvants in Vaccines
    http://www.vaclib.org/basic/adjuvants.htm#scheibner

    Adjuvant Index page
    http://www.vaclib.org/basic/adjuvants.htm

    Vaccine A: The Covert Government Experiment That’s Killing Our Soldiers–and Why GI’s Are Only the First Victims [Paperback]

    Vaccine-A uncovers a story of betrayal—the betrayal of the men and women who serve in the armed forces, the betrayal of medical ethics, and the betrayal of the American people by military and civilian leaders sworn to defend and protect. Veteran journalist Gary Matsumoto shows that the worst friendly-fire incident in military history came from something no soldier had any reason to think would harm him: a vaccine administered by the military’s own medics. When troops went to the Middle East to fight the Gulf War in 1991 and the Iraq War in 2003, many—perhaps thousands—received an experimental anthrax vaccine instead of the FDA-approved vaccine. Without their knowledge or consent, the U. S. government used them as human guinea pigs in a massive medical experiment that went disastrously wrong.

    http://www.vaccine-a.com/

    Vaccines show sinister side
    http://www.straight.com/article/vaccines-show-sinister-side

    Aluminum-hydroxide in vaccines causes serious health problems By Tenna Merchent

    Excerpts:  

    Many believe the anthrax vaccine is the cause of Gulf War illness (GWI). ALS and other neurological disorders are associated with some cases of GWI. There was a study done that looked at the effect aluminum-hydroxide and squalene had on GWI, both being adjuvants in the anthrax vaccine. Adjuvants are agents that increase a specific immune response to an antigen.

    They injected young male mice with either aluminum hydroxide or squalene, or a combination of aluminum-hydroxide and squalene. They performed motor and cognitive-behavioral tests on the mice when they were alive, and after sacrifice they examined central nervous system tissues for evidence of inflammation and cell death.

    The mice that received the aluminum showed motor deficits that were seen by decreased strength. The also found apoptotic neurons, which means suicidal neurons, or neurons that are destroying themselves (225%), and neuron loss (35%) in the lumbar spinal cord.7
    Aluminum hydroxide is an adjuvant used in the following vaccines: DTaP, BioThrax, DPT, Engerix-B, Gardasil, Havrix, LYMErix, Prevnar, Rabies Vaccine Adsorbed, Recombivax, and Tripedia.

    So what can we conclude from all of this? Science has proven that the following conditions may all be caused by the aluminum-hydroxide in vaccines: Chronic fatigue, Multiple sclerosis , Lou Gehrig’s disease, Demyelinating central nervous system disorders, Plymyalgia rheumatica and rheumatoid arthritis, Motor delay, Hypotonia or diminished muscle tone, Failure to thrive, Apoptic neurons, which are self-destructing neurons in the lumbar spinal cord, Neuron loss in the lumbar spinal cord.

    Read more:
    http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20071206.htm

    Neuromolecular Med. 2007;9(1):83-100.

    Aluminum adjuvant linked to Gulf War illness induces motor neuron death in mice.

    Petrik MS, Wong MC, Tabata RC, Garry RF, Shaw CA.

    Source: Department of Ophthalmology and Program in Neuroscience, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

    Abstract
    Gulf War illness (GWI) affects a significant percentage of veterans of the 1991 conflict, but its origin remains unknown. Associated with some cases of GWI are increased incidences of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other neurological disorders. Whereas many environmental factors have been linked to GWI, the role of the anthrax vaccine has come under increasing scrutiny. Among the vaccine’s potentially toxic components are the adjuvants aluminum hydroxide and squalene. To examine whether these compounds might contribute to neuronal deficits associated with GWI, an animal model for examining the potential neurological impact of aluminum hydroxide, squalene, or aluminum hydroxide combined with squalene was developed. Young, male colony CD-1 mice were injected with the adjuvants at doses equivalent to those given to US military service personnel. All mice were subjected to a battery of motor and cognitive-behavioral tests over a 6-mo period postinjections. Following sacrifice, central nervous system tissues were examined using immunohistochemistry for evidence of inflammation and cell death. Behavioral testing showed motor deficits in the aluminum treatment group that expressed as a progressive decrease in strength measured by the wire-mesh hang test (final deficit at 24 wk; about 50%). Significant cognitive deficits in water-maze learning were observed in the combined aluminum and squalene group (4.3 errors per trial) compared with the controls (0.2 errors per trial) after 20 wk. Apoptotic neurons were identified in aluminum-injected animals that showed significantly increased activated caspase-3 labeling in lumbar spinal cord (255%) and primary motor cortex (192%) compared with the controls. Aluminum-treated groups also showed significant motor neuron loss (35%) and increased numbers of astrocytes (350%) in the lumbar spinal cord. The findings suggest a possible role for the aluminum adjuvant in some neurological features associated with GWI and possibly an additional role for the combination of adjuvants.
     
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17114826

    Neurotoxicology of the brain barrier system: new implications.
    Zheng W.

    J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2001;39(7):711-9.

    College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.

    The concept of a barrier system in the brain has existed for nearly a century. The barrier that separates the blood from the cerebral interstitial fluid is defined as the blood-brain barrier, while the one that discontinues the circulation between the blood and cerebrospinal fluid is named the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier. Evidence in the past decades suggests that brain barriers are subject to toxic insults from neurotoxic chemicals circulating in blood. The aging process and some disease states render barriers more vulnerable to insults arising inside and outside the barriers. The implication of brain barriers in certain neurodegenerative diseases is compelling, although the contribution of chemical-induced barrier dysfunction in the etiology of any of these disorders remains poorly understood. This review examines what is currently understood about brain barrier systems in central nervous system disorders by focusing on chemical-induced neurotoxicities including those associated with nitrobenzenes, N-methyl-D-aspartate, cyclosporin A, pyridostigmine bromide, aluminum, lead, manganese, 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine, and 3-nitropropionic acid. Contemporary research questions arising from this growing understanding show enormous promises for brain researchers, toxicologists, and clinicians.
    Squalene has also been found in the vaccine administered in Great Britain, although the Ministry also denied its presence. See MOD (Ministry of Defense – UK – ANTHRAX VACCINE CONTAINS SQUALENE)Recent research by Pamela B. Asa, Russell B. Wilson, and Robert F. Garry links the anthrax vaccine to Gulf War Syndrome through the presence of squalene antibodies, as noted in the introduction to their report:

    Read more:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11778669

    Safety of Aluminum Added to Vaccines as a Vaccine Adjuvant

    More studies:

    http://www.iaomt.org/testfoundation/aluminumvaccines.htm

    Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity

    Conclusions: SignificanceSystemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0008382

    Dr. Russel Blaylock, (published studies)
    http://www.russellblaylockmd.com/

    Foreign DNA Fragments Cause Major Diseases
    http://www.cbcd.net/

    100 Compiled Studies on Vaccine Dangers
    http://www.activistpost.com/2011/09/100-compiled-studies-on-vaccine-dangers.html

    Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants – Facts and (Unbiased) Science
    http://www.vacfacts.info/facts-about-vaccine-aluminum-a/

  • Weareright

    Ella, deleting posts and even banning contributors is standard practice right here. I used to enjoy reading the comments from “Black Light” as he often brought up points that would then be clarified by others here. I saw on another site that he was banned by Jeffry. I think this is a mistake as debating him makes us sharper and clarifies our argument against the pro-vaccinationists. But it’s not my website so I can only express an opinion but I wonder? You said, “ 
     i think most here would agree that we welcome their opinions to have any mature and informed discussion yet they obviously refuse these discussions by deleting the posts.”  Maybe they are following the lead of Vactruth by deleting the posts.

  • ponerology

    Weren’t the WW1 soldiers used as test cases/guinea pigs  with influenza?

    None of this should be a surprise. It’s par for the course. DON’T join the military; I don’t care what they promise you; you are being lied to.  Kissinger stated military men are “dumb animals”.  He meant it. 
    As for non-military people; you need your head examined if you voluntarily accept any inoculation/vaccination. In fact, if you voluntarily accept it you are simply playing into the massive confidence game that is being perpetrated.

  • ponerology

    Weren’t the WW1 soldiers used as test cases/guinea pigs  with influenza?

    None of this should be a surprise. It’s par for the course. DON’T join the military; I don’t care what they promise you; you are being lied to.  Kissinger stated military men are “dumb animals”.  He meant it. 
    As for non-military people; you need your head examined if you voluntarily accept any inoculation/vaccination. In fact, if you voluntarily accept it you are simply playing into the massive confidence game that is being perpetrated.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    Yes, you are exactly right; and it was during WW1. This has been going on since day one, with the military. And then the truth is always covered up.
     
    The 1918 Influenza Epidemic was a Vaccine-caused Disease
    http://spktruth2power.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/the-1918-influenza-epidemic-was-a-vaccine-caused-disease/

    Swine Flu Expose
    a book by Eleanora I. McBean, Ph.D., N.D.

    Excerpt: CHAPTER 2: THE SPANISH INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC OF 1918 WAS CAUSED BY VACCINATIONS
    http://www.holistic-helper.com/articles/articlevaccinecaused1918flu.htm

    Another source:
    http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf1.html

    Eleanor McBean: Quotes
    http://www.whale.to/a/mcbean1.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eleanor_McBean

    US Vaccines Caused ‘Spanish Flu’ – More InformationFrom Ingri CasselVaccination Liberation – Idaho Chapter
    http://www.rense.com/general45/USvaccinescaused.htm

    http://proliberty.com/observer/20051017.htm

    An analysis by Eleanor McBean written in her book, Vaccination Condemned, “It has been said that the 1918 flu epidemic killed 20,000,000 people throughout the world. But, actually, the doctors killed them with their crude and deadly treatments and drugs. This is a harsh accusation but it is nevertheless true, judging by the success of the drugless doctors in comparison with that of the medical doctors.”

    That said book is appearing to be a rare find today, and expensive. If you do find it, it will be used.

    You see they, didnt learn anything from the small pox vaccine, that also caused far more harm than good; because they covered it all up, and the historical record on it as well. So they then as well went forward vaccinating the military for anything they could come up with from A to Z, and what resulted was was a 1918 cytotoxic storm, so called flu pandemic), that ended up as the account of it states it did; killing the numbers in the thousands that it states it did.

    VACCINES ARE NOT SAFE OR EFFECTIVE 
    by Physicist Gary Wade (11/17/07)
    http://www.rifeenergymedicine.com/VACCINES.html

    VACCINATION: THE HIDDEN FACTSWritten and Published by: Ian Sinclair, 1992
    http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020132sinclair/vaccinaion.htm

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    Yes, you are exactly right; and it was during WW1. This has been going on since day one, with the military. And then the truth is always covered up.
     
    The 1918 Influenza Epidemic was a Vaccine-caused Disease
    http://spktruth2power.wordpress.com/2009/07/11/the-1918-influenza-epidemic-was-a-vaccine-caused-disease/

    Swine Flu Expose
    a book by Eleanora I. McBean, Ph.D., N.D.

    Excerpt: CHAPTER 2: THE SPANISH INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC OF 1918 WAS CAUSED BY VACCINATIONS
    http://www.holistic-helper.com/articles/articlevaccinecaused1918flu.htm

    Another source:
    http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf1.html

    Eleanor McBean: Quotes
    http://www.whale.to/a/mcbean1.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eleanor_McBean

    US Vaccines Caused ‘Spanish Flu’ – More InformationFrom Ingri CasselVaccination Liberation – Idaho Chapter
    http://www.rense.com/general45/USvaccinescaused.htm

    http://proliberty.com/observer/20051017.htm

    An analysis by Eleanor McBean written in her book, Vaccination Condemned, “It has been said that the 1918 flu epidemic killed 20,000,000 people throughout the world. But, actually, the doctors killed them with their crude and deadly treatments and drugs. This is a harsh accusation but it is nevertheless true, judging by the success of the drugless doctors in comparison with that of the medical doctors.”

    That said book is appearing to be a rare find today, and expensive. If you do find it, it will be used.

    You see they, didnt learn anything from the small pox vaccine, that also caused far more harm than good; because they covered it all up, and the historical record on it as well. So they then as well went forward vaccinating the military for anything they could come up with from A to Z, and what resulted was was a 1918 cytotoxic storm, so called flu pandemic), that ended up as the account of it states it did; killing the numbers in the thousands that it states it did.

    VACCINES ARE NOT SAFE OR EFFECTIVE 
    by Physicist Gary Wade (11/17/07)
    http://www.rifeenergymedicine.com/VACCINES.html

    VACCINATION: THE HIDDEN FACTSWritten and Published by: Ian Sinclair, 1992
    http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020132sinclair/vaccinaion.htm

  • Wondering

    What happened to the comment from Weareright?