Interview Reveals DNA Fragments Discovered 6 Months After Vaccination

dna-vaccines

Interview With

Norma Erickson, President, S.A.N.E. VAX, Inc

Part 1 | Part 2

Sin Hang Lee, MD, is a medical practitioner historically qualified to practice medicine in the People’s Republic of China, the District of Columbia, New York State, and the State of Connecticut in the USA, plus in Canada and British Commonwealth countries via his registration with the General Medical Council of the UK. Currently Dr. Lee holds a medical license in the State of Connecticut, USA.

Dr. Lee has staff privileges at the Milford Hospital in Milford, Connecticut. He was certified by the American Board of Pathology in anatomical pathology (1966); certified in general pathology by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (1966); and granted the F.R.C.P. degree by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (1966). Dr. Lee has practiced diagnostic pathology in Canada and the USA continuously since 1966 with a special interest in developing new technologies in laboratory medicine. His most recent research is the use of low temperature (LoTemp®) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct automated Sanger DNA sequencing to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the molecular diagnosis of infectious diseases.

Using Dr. Lee’s new methods, PCR can detect HPV L1 gene DNA bound to nanoparticles; it can detect HPV L1 gene DNA of vaccine origin present in human blood and tissue samples.

 

Norma, given the above professional bio about Dr. Lee, one has to assume he is more than qualified to discuss his findings with regard to the Jasmine Renata case in New Zealand. I understand Dr. Lee was one of numerous experts and witnesses to testify at the recent (August 9, 2012) two-day inquest held to determine the cause of death, which could not be determined officially by autopsy. This case has gathered local interest and coverage. I understand the New Zealand press covered the event in real-time and reported on it. Here are two links to that coverage.

The Dominion Post

http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/7437620/Teens-brain-tissue-sent-for-examination

Ostago Daily Times

http://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/220882/biological-plausibility-vaccine-caused-death

Since we cannot discuss the inquest until the coroner releases that information, let’s talk about some of what we know. Dr. Lee tested 16 samples of Gardasil® in use from 9 countries, each with a different lot number. The lot numbers of the 5 New Zealand samples, the cities of origin and the HPV genotypes of the L1 gene DNA found in each sample are listed below:

 

Lot # Country/Source Results
NL01490 New Zealand, Tauranga HPV-18HPV-16
NK16180 New Zealand, Northland HPV-18HPV-16
NK00140 New Zealand, Tauranga HPV-11HPV-18HPV-16
NM08120 New Zealand, Christchurch HPV-11HPV-18HPV-16
NL13560 New Zealand, Wellington HPV-11HPV-18HPV-16

 

There seems to be a potential problem that falls back on to the Renata case insofar as Dr. Lee’s findings in Jasmine’s blood and spleen tissue and the above findings. Can you please tell us about that?

Yes, Catherine, there are multiple potential problems with discovering HPV-16 L1 DNA in Jasmine’s samples. We must emphasize that what was discovered in the Gardasil® vaccine and in Jasmine’s samples are viral DNA fragments, not the infective wild viruses.

First, HPV infection is confined to epithelium. This virus does not survive in the blood or in other organs of a healthy woman. Any naked HPV DNA fragments in the circulating blood would be degraded by serum or intracellular DNA nucleases (enzymes) if these fragments are taken up by the macrophages (a component of the white blood cells), and eliminated from the body in 24-48 hours.

Since the HPV-16 L1 gene DNA fragments were discovered 6 months after Jasmine’s last Gardasil® vaccination, we have to assume these HPV DNA fragments were either protected by being firmly bound to the aluminum adjuvant, or by integrating themselves into the human genome through poorly understood mechanisms.

 

Didn’t Jasmine’s mother contact Dr. Lee after she had read that the U.S. FDA announced that the Gardasil® vaccine contained residues of HPV L1 gene DNA?

Jasmine’s parents made contact with us after the discovery of genetically engineered HPV DNA in Gardasil® through an associate we work with in New Zealand. They were then put in direct contact with Dr. Lee because of his expertise.

 

I think our readers ought to know that the FDA affirmed Gardasil® samples do contain HPV L1 gene DNA fragments. That can be confirmed on FDA’s website:

http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm276859.htm

Wasn’t that an ‘after-the-fact’ FDA announcement to its certifying that Gardasil® was safe and effective, despite it being bound to insoluble adjuvant AAHS particles? How could that have slipped by the certifying process? I guess that does not appear on the vaccine package insert, does it?

The webpage you refer to was a public response to the SaneVax letter which informed the FDA of the contaminants Dr. Lee had discovered. Anyone reading the FDA’s announcement should note there are absolutely no scientific references to back up the claims, and I quote, “The presence of these DNA fragments is expected, is not a risk to vaccine recipients, and is not a safety factor.”

In stark contrast, readers can examine our original letter informing the FDA of this potential health risk here:

http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-to-fda-recombinant-hpv-dna-found-in-multiple-samples-of-gardasil/

Instead of conducting further investigation into our discoveries, including the finding of HPV DNA fragments firmly bound to the insoluble AAHS adjuvant, the FDA issued a blanket statement as to the vaccine’s safety.

AAHS is listed as an adjuvant on the package insert. But a molecular complex of HPV DNA or plasmid DNA fragments firmly bound to the AAHS particles (probably through a chemical reaction) are not.

 

Don’t those insoluble adjuvant AAHS [amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate] particles and the HPV L1 gene DNA encourage cytokine production, which apparently is not listed on the vaccine package insert?

AAHS is Merck’s proprietary mineral-based insoluble adjuvant with a very high binding capacity for HPV VLPs, the active major capsid protein antigen in Gardasil®. The vaccine manufacturer and the FDA might have known there would be residual HPV DNA and plasmid DNA in the Gardasil® vaccine, if there is evidence to support that claim.

However, they did not know (or, if they knew, did not disclose) the physical condition of these naked viral (HPV) and bacterial (plasmid) DNA in Gardasil®. For example, these DNA fragments could be in the aqueous phase (dissolved in water), encapsulated in the VLPs, or bound to the AAHS by electrostatic attraction or an irreversible chemical reaction between the aluminum in the AAHS and the phosphate backbone of the DNA molecules.

In his testimony, Dr. Lee presented experimental evidence to show that DNA/AAHS complexes may constitute a new chemical compound with unknown effects. As all AAHS nanoparticles are designed to be phagocytized by tissue macrophages after intramuscular injection, any foreign viral and/or plasmid DNA present would be carried into the cytoplasm of the macrophages along with the AAHS nanoparticles. Once in the cytoplasm, these foreign DNA fragments, protected from degradation, may act as long-acting stimulators to activate the macrophages to signal the production of cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF).

TNF is a known myocardial depressant capable of causing hypotension and lethal shock in animals and in humans, as well as other symptoms commonly reported by the girls vaccinated with Gardasil®.

Persistence of foreign DNA fragments in the cells increases the chance of integration of the foreign DNA into the human genome through poorly understood mechanisms, thus increasing the risk of gene mutations and cancer.

 

Should MDs who administer Gardasil® be aware of that key omission on package inserts because of the potentialities of what can happen to vaccinees, e.g., tumor necrosis factor, even sudden death syndrome from myocardial dysfunction or as a result of maldistribution of peripheral blood flow?

It is not standard practice to warn physicians or medical consumers of unproven scientific theories. To date, there has been no research in the area of the risks of foreign DNA being attached to aluminum particles included in vaccines. The research to discover the real risks just has not been done.

That being said, those who administer Gardasil® should be made aware of the fact that severe adverse reactions occur at a higher rate than deaths from cervical cancer in most developed countries, the United States being one. [Reference

http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/07853890.2011.645353]

 

What is the tumor necrosis factor?

TNF is a cytokine primarily secreted by macrophages (white blood cells). This cytokine is involved in the regulation of a wide spectrum of biological processes including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, lipid metabolism, and coagulation. It is one of the cytokines that have been implicated in a variety of diseases, including autoimmune disorders/diseases, insulin resistance, and cancer. [Reference:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/7124]

 

Isn’t the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) a recognized myocardial depressant? Isn’t TNF known to cause the release of cytokines?

TNF is one of the cytokines, which may be produced when either naked viral or bacterial DNA activates the macrophages. Yes, according to Dr. Lee, “It is a known myocardial depressant capable of inducing lethal shock in animals and in humans.”

[References: Parrillo JE, etal. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:1539-1553; Kumar A, etal. Am J Physiol Regul Interg Comp Physiol. 2007;292-:R1900-6; Cauweis A, etal. Immunity. 2000;13:223-231; Cauweis A, etal. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007;462:132-139; Cauweis A, etal. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:387-393.]

One may also consider since the medical profession currently uses TNF-blockers to treat inflammatory conditions such as Crohn’s disease, lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, that overproduction of TNF may be a precursor to these and possibly other autoimmune disorders.

[References:http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=25458, http://www.arthritis.org/tnf-inhibitor-b-cell.php]

 

If I’m not mistaken, don’t HPV L1 gene DNA residues left in Gardasil® bind to cationic AAHS[amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate] nanoparticles?

Yes, at pH 6.0-6.5, AAHS in the Gardasil® vaccine carries a positive charge and the DNA a negative charge. Therefore, there is an electrostatic attraction between the two. But as Dr. Lee testified at the Jasmine inquest, a highly stable, perhaps irreversible, new chemical compound of the cationic aluminum bound to the phosphate backbone of the DNA molecule may have been created in the Gardasil® vaccine. The toxicity of the DNA/AAHS complexes is totally unknown.

 

How much AAHS adjuvant is there in each Gardasil® 0.5ml dose?

There are 225 mcg of AAHS in each of the three recommended doses to complete the series.

Aren’t the proteins used as antigens in Gardasil® manufactured in yeast cells using genetic engineering? That’s not in the public knowledge, is it—especially genetic engineering manufacturing in association with the use of aluminum-based nanoparticles as adjuvant? What type of impact, if any, would that have in cytokine production?

Yes, the HPV L1 protein virus-like particles (VLPs) used as antigens in Gardasil® are manufactured with yeast cultures using genetic engineering. The method by which they were produced was explained, but in my opinion, the general public did not connect the explanation of the concept with genetic engineering. It is my understanding that any foreign (meaning non-human) DNA remaining in the vaccine, whether it be from HPV, bacteria, yeast, or any other ingredient used in the manufacturing process could pose unknown health risks. Viral DNA and bacterial DNA fragments firmly bound to aluminum salts are more of a concern than yeast DNA, particularly when it comes to the potential of causing lethal shock.

 

For those who doubt the HPV L1 gene DNA findings, what are the odds that prove that Jasmine’s samples were accurate and beyond a reasonable doubt?

As Dr. Lee testified, his findings are validated by DNA sequencing, the gold standard for HPV DNA detection and genotyping. A few split samples, which Dr. Lee has tested in Connecticut, are being retained in Auckland Hospital. Other interested scientists may reproduce Dr. Lee’s test results by testing those retained samples, which can leave New Zealand only with the Coroner’s authorization.

 

Macrophages—white blood cells—get involved. Can you explain what transpires in the body that implicates Gardasil®?

Honestly, I cannot explain what happens in the body. What we have here is HPV L-1 gene DNA in the vaccine firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant, a DNA/mineral complex, which was not expected. We have HPV-16 L-1 gene DNA in the macrophages of post-mortem blood and spleen samples, a finding which was not expected in a healthy woman. There are only two ways HPV DNA could have remained in post-mortem tissue – either it was protected from normal degradation by being firmly bound to the cationic aluminum; or it had integrated into the human genome. Either one poses serious potential consequences that need to be defined and disclosed. It is the job of the FDA/CDC/NCI and any other federal agency responsible for protecting the health and welfare of the American public to conduct the necessary studies to answer the questions about potential health risks. If your readers would like to learn about the potential consequences, I would suggest they search for ‘macrophage activation syndrome.’ They will find over 365,000 sites linking to the latest scientific data.

 

If all Gardasil® samples Dr. Lee tested were positive, what are the implications regarding genetic engineering in any vaccine manufacturing?

I would personally think it would bring any genetically engineered vaccine under scrutiny for the same potential risks.

 

That information about Gardasil® impacting white blood cells and tumor necrosis factor does not appear on the vaccine package insert. What do you have to say about that?

It would not appear on the package insert, as it was just recently discovered. However, that does not absolve the FDA of at least some culpability in the matter. When the FDA was informed of the contaminating HPV DNA, they did an immediate about-face from ‘no viral DNA’ to ‘it was known and expected.’

If indeed, it was ‘known and expected,’ medical consumers deserve the answers to the following:

  • Exactly when did Merck inform the FDA there is viral DNA in Gardasil®? In a letter dated April 19, 2006, Merck emphatically stated Gardasil® ‘contains no viral DNA.
  • If Merck did report this to the FDA, what did the report state about the physical condition of the HPV DNA fragments in the final product? Were they in the aqueous phase of the vaccine suspension? Were they encapsulated in the VLP’s? Were they bound to AAHS nanoparticles? If so, how were they bound? (Naked foreign DNA in different physical conditions may have different pathophysiologic impacts on the human body.)
  • Did Merck report the presence of plasmid DNA in addition to the HPV DNA? (Plasmid is DNA from bacterial origin and is attached to the HPV L1 gene for production of the vaccine protein. It may be expected to be present together with the HPV DNA in the vaccine.)
  • If Merck knew the HPV DNA was bound to AAHS to form DNA/AAHS complexes, where are the reports from the studies they must have performed on the pathophysiologic implications of using these complexes?

 

Now here’s something that should be a ‘clincher’, I think. I understand HPV DNA was reported in the plasma of patients with invasive cervical cancer, which was known to be the source of HPV DNA in plasma. Furthermore, HPV DNA was not detected in plasma samples of patients who did not have cervical cancer. Jasmine did not have cervical cancer, as determined by autopsy. Therefore, she/her body should not have any HPV DNA from a cancer. What do you have to say to that?

As stated previously, there are very few conditions under which HPV DNA would remain in a person’s blood and spleen long enough to be detected. This is one such circumstance. [References: Pornthanakasem W, etal. BMC Cancer. 2001;1:2; Shimada T, etal. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:420-424]

 

We’ve been talking about HPV L1 gene DNA in blood and spleen samples. Were any found elsewhere in Jasmine’s tissues?

We have learned via a report from New Zealand that:

Neuroscientist Professor Christopher Shaw of the University of Columbia in Vancouver told the inquest via video-link today that he was sent Ms Renata’s brain tissue to test.

He said there was aluminum in all the samples he tested and there were some abnormalities in the samples.

The human papillomavirus (HPV16) was found in her brain, which could have only got there through the vaccine.” Prof Shaw said.

http://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/220882/biological-plausibility-vaccine-caused-death

 

Do you think the FDA should be looking for a cause-effect link between HPV L1 gene DNA-activated macrophages and lethal shock?

Of course they should be looking! At the very least, they should be hunting down samples from every unexplained death after Gardasil® and sponsoring independent studies to determine if HPV L-1 gene DNA is present in others. They should also be looking at those reporting serious adverse events after Gardasil® for the same DNA.

As it stands, the FDA is not living up to their mission statement, which states:

FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation.

FDA is also responsible for advancing the public health by helping to speed innovations that make medicines more effective, safer, and more affordable and by helping the public get the accurate, science-based information they need to use medicines and foods to maintain and improve their health…..” [Reference:http://www.fda.gov/aboutfda/whatwedo/default.htm]

Medical consumers have trusted the FDA to do exactly that – protect the public health and help them get accurate, science-based information – these trusting medical consumers have been betrayed.

 

Norma, thank you so very much for this interview. I appreciate your cooperation in helping healthcare consumers understand issues authorities apparently don’t want to discuss.

 

Photo Credit

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    I am hoping this is the last nail needed to get this horridly dangerous and deadly vaccine off the market; but I know it will never be done soon enough. A vaccine that has left as well so many young women disabled with so called new medical conditions that have bankrupted parents with doctors looking for the cause as for anything but the vaccine. The amazing thing is that nothing is ever enough, and the CDC, doctors, pediatricians, and the so called health care authorities just keep mindlessly pushing this vaccine as needed and as well safe and effective. Just as long as the CDC and the FDA still ok it, they refuse to consider any other information out there, whatsoever. Cold hearted, and out rightly criminal, is the only way you can describe it all. And they must offer the vaccine or lose their jobs; as you just simply do not dishonor the savior cash cow vaccines and the vaccine program, based on your own medical judgement opinion. And Merck will never take a loss, as they are enjoying entirely their legal immunity brought to them by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and the resulting National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) – HRSA  http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/index.htmlThey know all to well at the CDC that they have not been able to clean these vaccines up with what they call their purification process and steps. They know as well that they never have had a workable solution for it. of course to question this highly touted and pressured vaccine by Merck, would put the whole vaccine industry under the microscope, and they simply can not allow that with the large vaccine truth movement that surely know exists. The CDC and Merck trying to battle back against all vaccine exemptions, and pulling the vaccine decision for parents in CA, through he legislature. Yes, thus leaving it in the hands of such as a 12 year old girl who just watched a fear mongering directed video a the school. It is all literally criminal, and it is out rightly sick.They attempt to tell us that all vaccines go through a purification process. Really? And there are some things so small that they obviously get through that purification process. Why didn’t they tell anyone? ”Designer” Cells as Substrates for the Manufacture of Viral Vaccines, (what they know is that there is no way to effectively prevent vaccine contamination, and they clearly know the result can cause chronic disease).

    http://www.sciencemag.org/content/187/4176/522.extractPhage in Live Virus Vaccines: Are They Harmful to People? (If phage is in live virus vaccines, it is all to possibly in attenuated or killed vaccines as well)Science 14 February 1975: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/187/4176/522.extracthttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17769154Autism Epidemic, Is Foreign DNA in MMR II Vaccine Responsible? CBCD Suggests CDC Study Microcompetition TheoryThe Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease (CBCD) believes that the cause of the epidemic is the foreign DNA in the MMR II vaccine. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/4/prweb9359508.htmForeign DNA Fragments Cause Major Diseaseshttp://www.cbcd.net/Vaccine Contamination: Pig Virus DNA Found in Rotarixhttp://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/april-2010/vaccine-contamination-pig-virus-dna-found-in-rota.aspxVaccine Contamination

    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-contamination/

    Vaccines And Immune Suppression http://preventdisease.com/news/articles/vaccines_and_immune_suppresion.shtmlGlobal Parental Concerns Regarding Safety and Efficacy of Gardasil and Cervarix part 5/7 http://youtu.be/LnhZci0lyJI
    Gardasil HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed, by Mike Adams
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XK97CHQZhq0

    The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed, (here it outlines more of what he stated in the video).
    http://www.naturalnews.com/Report_HPV_Vaccine_0.htmlIf you would like to read the actual 2006 Gardasil FDA pre-approval document that has been made reference to here, luckily Natural News in approximately 2008 had saved a copy of it to their files, just in case the FDA removed it, and sure enough it appears the FDA did. Ask what was known in that document that they as well do not want the public to know. There was a 44.6% increased chance of certain precancerous indicators found in those receiving the vaccine which having existing HPV of the targeted strain. The vaccine was approved in June, 2006; with the stipulation that Merck was supposed to study it further and report back at a later date. No one to my knowledge has seen that report. Mr. Sin Hang Lee, MD, had the diagnostic tools and technology at that time to actively test for exiting HPV prior to vaccination, and he applied for its use with the FDA, and was refused. Why? It would draw to much attention to the non glorious side of the promoted Gardasil, and add more cost to the already expensive vaccine. They didn’t care, and they  were going to sell this vaccine no matter what, with Merck pushing for legislation to make it mandatory in many states. That until the FDA told them to back off until it was tested more in the longer term. This vaccine was as well never tested against a true placebo, as the placebo contained the aluminum adjuvant, ask why no saline placebo. There has been some word as well that a second placebo was used containing the carrier solution; meaning all but the HPV antigen component. There was no way this was ever going to give any evidence of safety and while the vaccine contains over 600 mcg of aluminum in the combined three shots. New medical conditions were know of right during the clinical trials, just like it is now. They blew it off. http://www.vacfacts.info/the-gardasil-fda-vrbpac-preapp/ There are many good studies showing the route and mechanisms of harm regarding aluminum adjuvants; then add to that not the wild but the vaccine strain of HPV DNA being locked onto the aluminum adjuvant. And the FDA even in light of this, refuses to say, I think we need to pull this vaccine until more testing is done to find out what is going on. No, total denial of any problem from square one; like it all normal nothing different about this vaccine. Research 
    The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in neurotoxic prion peptide-induced microglial activation

    Results
    We found that that PrP106-126-induced IL-1β release depends on NALP3 inflammasome activation, that inflammasome activation is required for the synthesis of pro-inflammatory and chemotactic factors by PrP106-126-activated microglia, that inhibition of NF-κB activation abrogated PrP106-126-induced NALP3 upregulation, and that potassium efflux and production of reactive oxygen species were implicated in PrP106-126-induced NALP3 inflammasome activation in microglia. 

    Conclusions
    We conclude that the NALP3 inflammasome is involved in neurotoxic prion peptide-induced microglial activation. To our knowledge, this is the first time that strong evidence for the involvement of NALP3 inflammasome in prion-associated inflammation has been found.

    http://www.jneuroinflammation.com/content/9/1/73/abstract

    Lack Of Aluminum Adjuvant Safety DataExcerpts:

     

    Aluminum toxicity is a widespread problem in all forms of
    life, including humans, animals, fish, plants and trees, and causes widespread
    degradation of the environment and health. Over 7000 reference articles on
    aluminum toxicity exist in various data bases; ( as of 1996 ) all recognizing
    the toxicity but concluding the mechanism of action is unknown. — [ Search
    results - scirus.com ]

     

    http://www.scirus.com/srsapp/search?q=%22aluminum+toxicity%22&ds=mem=jnl&ds=web#results

     

    Despite the number of references to aluminum toxicity, the
    FDA has always exempted it from testing, by putting it on their “Generally
    Regarded as Safe” ( GRAS ) list. Aluminum can be added to foods, medicines
    or water without restriction from the FDA.

     

    (Continued excerpts)

     

    From: History of crime against
    the Food Laws (1929) by Dr. Riley, the prime mover behind the original Pure
    Food Law and Director of the FDA. He resigned in disgust in 1912 over
    exceptions granted to the law and lack of enforcement.

     

    Aluminum has been exempted from testing for safety by the
    FDA under a convoluted logic wherein it is classified as GRAS. (Generally
    Regarded As Safe.) It has never been tested by the FDA on its safety and there
    are NO restrictions whatever on the amount or use of aluminum. Diseases
    Associated with Aluminium Intoxication. H. Tomlinson, M.B., Ch.B., MRCS., LRCP.

     

    Since that time thousands of studies have been published
    indicating aluminum is involved in neurological dysfunction, immunocompetence,
    as well as a host of other morbidities.

     

    Read more:

    http://www.vacfacts.info/aluminum-vaccine-adjuvant-fa/Self-Organized Criticality Theory of AutoimmunityConclusions: SignificanceSystemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0008382Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populationshttp://lup.sagepub.com/content/21/2/118.fullhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235057The spectrum of ASIA: ‘Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome induced by Adjuvants’http://lup.sagepub.com/content/21/2/118.full Here in this link you will find several scientific references regarding acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and CNS demyelination after Gardasil.

    http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-to-fda-recombinant-hpv-dna-found-in-multiple-samples-of-gardasil/ 

    Home Page:
    http://sanevax.org/ Truth About Gardasil ( Glaxo Smith Klines, Cervarix; same problems, but different formulation).
    http://truthaboutgardasil.org/ 

    CDC REFUSES TO STUDY VACCINE INDUCED ENCEPHALOPATHY

    http://www.vacfacts.info/cdc-refuse-to-study-vaccine-in/ 

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Lowell,
    It is with great admiration for your research capabilities that I thank you for enhancing my article.  My only regret is that most healthcare consumers do not have your awareness nor zeal for realizing and trying to figure out what is going on in the name of ‘medical science’ that apparently is making us more sick than at any time in history with diseases that result from ‘delinquent research’.  Thank you very much.

  • Davidjohnkenna

    wow what a great article. thank you Catherine and thanks to Lowell for his magnificent efforts.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    Thank you, and for your public presents and regarding these very needed articles; and to the authors and site for being here. Actually anyone can do this, all they need is the desire and the time to find it all; I have been at it and looking at this whole picture of vaccines, etc. for about three years. There is not much I have not seen or had in front of me for denialist tactics, and that will likely always be present, due to the nature of the known public misinformation situation. We have essentially three sets of people, those that simply did not know the truth, and are at some point willing to learn more, and those that for one reason or another, must deny the truth. We have parents and as well those in various stages of understanding and that look for sites like this and information to gain a better understanding. We all were at one time in a beginning stage of learning and searching out the facts of the vaccine and general health care situation. There is much to research; however once you see the real and hidden history of how and why it all became this way, it then becomes all so simply and easily understood.

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    David,
    Your kind remarks are appreciated.  

  • Tony villar

     You have  done  a  great job.  More  power.

    Take  care.

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Tony,
    Thank you for your kind words.  More power to parents and healthcare consumers to know the facts about what they are not being told, I think.

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    According to Philippe A. P. M VanLangendonck, Lawyer, Brussels, Belgium, in his paper
    THE PROTECTION OF THE PHYSICAL INTEGRITY AND THE PRINCIPLE OF INVIOLABILITY 
    OF THE HUMAN BODY REGARDING COMPULSORY VACCINATIONS:
    “The Pasteur Institute had already developed vaccines free of heavy metals: ‘The Pasteur Institute has replaced the aluminium adjuvant by the calcium phosphate (CaP) in the 1970s, on scientific criteria (efficacy and safety of use of phosphate calcium, toxicity of the aluminium adjuvant. Work conducted by Professor Relyveld in particular)’ 12 , as noted by the French “Association of Mutual Aid to those affected by myofasciitis macrophages13″.  http://sanevax.org/compulsory-vaccination-versus-informed-consent/Please note that in the 1970s the aluminium (aluminum) adjuvant was found to be toxic and was replaced by phosphate calcium at The Pasteur Institute.  What happened that FDA has not kept up with the science developed in the 1970s and continues to approve aluminum in vaccines given to infants, toddlers, and adults, especially since aluminum has been proven to be toxic?  Congress should get involved in not shirking its oversight duties about this apparent malfeasance on the part of FDA regarding vaccines, I think.

  • JPower

    Thank you.  This is a great article/interview.  I will spread the word.