Postman Could Soon Deliver Your Nanopatch Vaccine in the Mail

In 2010, UK newspaper The Independent on Sunday reported that a collaborative research study undertaken by researchers from the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University in Atlanta had detailed a new way to deliver painless effective vaccines. [1]  Reporting on a study published in the online journal Nature Medicine, The Independent wrote that Mark Prausnitz, a professor at the Georgia Tech School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, had stated:

“We have shown that a dissolving microneedle patch can vaccinate against influenza at least as well, and probably better than, a traditional hypodermic needle.”

The Independent continued:

“The study’s lead author, Sean Sullivan, explained, ‘we envision people getting the patch in the mail or at a pharmacy and then self-administering it at home, because the microneedles on the patch dissolve away into the skin, there would be no dangerous sharp needles left over.'”


The Independent’s report appeared shortly after a study was published in the online edition of MBio, titled ‘Local Response to Microneedle-Based Influenza Immunization in the Skin’. [2] The report stated that Microneedle (MN) patches, provided a novel method of vaccine delivery to the skin, with the objective of targeting the large network of resident antigen-presenting cells to induce an efficient immune response.

Researchers believed that vaccinating patients using a skin patch could be beneficial to high-risk individuals such as infants, the elderly and the immune-compromised, stating:

Alternate routes of vaccination to the conventional intramuscular delivery have been found to produce enhanced immune responses, and in humans, a nasally administered live attenuated influenza vaccine has also proven to be effective. However, this vaccine is approved only for healthy individuals 2 through 49 years of age, which excludes those at highest risk for developing influenza-related complications, such as infants, elderly persons, and immunocompromised individuals.”

You may be wondering why I am writing on news reported in 2010. Well, far from being dead and buried, this scary prospect could soon become a reality.  An era in which vaccinations arrive in the post could be nearer than you think.


It was recently reported that Merck had agreed to work hand in hand with pharmaceutical company Vaxxas, Brisbane Australia, to help them develop their latest Nanopatch flu vaccine. According to Bloomberg Businessweek, Vaxxas had made an announcement stating that Merck, the manufacturer of the HPV vaccine Gardasil, had not only agreed to pay an undisclosed fee up front, to help fund research evaluating the Nanopatch, but had also agreed to make additional payments tied in to the development of the vaccine’s technology. [3]

Bloomberg Busineesweek reported that the Nanopatch should be ready to test on humans within the next two years, stating:

Vaxxas plans to test the Nanopatch on humans within two years after tests on mice found it could protect them against flu with 1 percent of the antigen used in needle-administered shots, said co-inventor Mark Kendall, a professor of biomedical engineering at the University of Queensland. The deal with Whitehouse Station, New Jersey-based Merck will fund “several” scientists to conduct the research.”


According to Bloomberg, the micro patches are designed to deliver the vaccine to the immune cells just below the skin’s surface via approximately 10,000 projections, which are contained on the one centimeter patch. According to the report, this vaccine could potentially be self-administered, either on the arm or the shoulder, producing a protective immune response in a few seconds. Mark Kendall told reporters:

It wouldn’t need to be refrigerated and, if mass-produced, may cost less than $1. In the event of a flu pandemic, it might be mailed to people.”

The Nanopatch Influenza Vaccination Team has been achieving accolades of excellence for their invention of the Nanopatch since 2010.  They were finalists in the Australian Museum’s Eureka prizes. [4]

The team also received US $16.3 million investment to help them develop the Nanopatch in 2011. The Asian Scientist reported:

“The investment is led by OneVentures, with co-investors Brandon Capital, the Medical Research Commercialization Fund (MRCF), and US-based HealthCare Ventures.”

Your postman could soon be delivering vaccines in the mail.


So, just how safe would it be to mail these vaccines to the public for self-administration?  In my opinion, vaccines arriving by post could potentially be very dangerous, especially in the UK, where all of the mail is delivered through letterboxes on the front door.  If small children or pets ingested them, this could surely be life-threatening.  Also, is the public fully equipped to deal with adverse reactions? 

I asked two professionals, Dr. Rebecca Carley, M.D., a Court-Qualified Expert in VIDS and Legal Abuse Syndrome, and Dr. Kenneth Paul Stoller, M.D., FACHM, and the President of the International Hyperbaric Medical Association, for their opinions.

Interestingly, Dr. Carley had also researched the subject and shared many of my own concerns. She gave a factual, thought-provoking response, which included her own research.

I felt her answer to my questions needed to be given in full. She states that, in her opinion, the research being used to launch this vaccine is fraudulent. She gives strong examples to support this. She said:

My primary problem with the article [6] that claims this patch approach to vaccination is a huge leap forward has to do with problems in the research itself.

First of all, this “patch vaccine” article states that the patch is made of silicon wafers coated with gold, then coated with methycellulose and “dried vaccine” (i.e., dried virus).  The mouse study used Fluvax 2008, a trivalent combo of 3 viral strains:  H1N1, H3N2, and a type B flu virus from Florida.  Interestingly, on page 11 of the article it is stated that mice CANNOT BE INFECTED WITH THESE HUMAN STRAINS OF INFLUENZA…yet on page 9 it is stated that serum IgG antibodies to these strains that mice cannot be infected with were measured.  If the viruses cannot infect the mice, how can they cause an immune response?  This makes no sense.

They injected the mice with “mouse adapted influenza virus A/Pueuto Rico” proving they are playing with the flu virus to make a strain that CAN infect mice.  They claim that inoculation with this virus using a patch protected the mice by causing less weight loss that the mice who received no patch.  All 5 mice in each group were “challenged” with 4 times the lethal dose of the mouse flu virus.  How were they “challenged”?  This is not mentioned.  Direct inoculation is the best way to cause an infection, which is why vaccines are insane to begin with (be they injected by a poisoned syringe or a patch with “10,000 tiny projections”).

The patches were placed on the “inner ear lobes” of the mice.  On page 15 of the study, it states that the ear tissue was soaked for 10-20 minutes in a solution of DMSO, which readily crosses tissue membranes before immunostaining was done.  In my opinion, this is a fraud designed to alter the results to make them more significant. [7]

On page 13, it mentions that the “microprojections” can be retained in the skin, but alleges that they will be “sloughed off” (no proof they will be sloughed off however).

We know that vaccines do not prevent disease, they GIVE the disease.  In this article, they claim they do not need adjuvants, do not need to be refrigerated (so can be mailed to people), can use less virus, and will be easier for people who do not like needles.  The article you sent me was from Bloomberg Business week; therefore, it is intended to attract investors. But the “science” is extremely questionable, in my opinion.

Dr. C”

I believe that, given the in-depth research she has outlined, she is one hundred percent correct.


Dr. Stoller was also unimpressed with idea of vaccine patches being mailed to the public. Like Dr. Carley, he believes that this is yet more Big Pharma fraud to make money. He said:

Vaccine is a medical intervention. What would people say if in a magazine there was something about helping you with you blood sugar and there was an insulin patch.  Would that be okay?

From Pharma’s point of view, it would be okay if they thought they could get away with it.

When a lab-created flu vaccine (and when I say lab-created, the evidence that the last swine flu outbreak was lab-created was uncontested) was released in a poor section of Mexico City, why was there no inquiry as to why or how that took place?

When Baxter put Bird flu virus in the seasonal virus vaccine they were shipping to Eastern and Central Europe, why was that just chalked up to a minor mistake? That was no mistake.

As the vaccine industry becomes the main source of income for Pharma they will create disease they can vaccinate for because that is what makes them money. If you die while they make money then all the better. Did Bayer care when they shipped HIV contaminated Factor VIII around the world… no.

Enough already. But Pharma buys academic institutions, they buy politicians, they buy the local governments, they bleed out federal agencies….. what a freaking mess!”


Dr. Carley and Dr. Stoller say it all.  Both professionals give excellent examples of fraudulent behavior that is being committed by the pharmaceutical industries. Bearing this in mind, the best thing that anyone can do if they receive a Nanopatch with their mail is to wrap it up securely, to protect wildlife, and put it out with the garbage. 


[contentbox headline=”References” type=”normal”]
  1. Independent on Sunday- Health in the Future: Mail Order dissolvable vaccine patches http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-in-the-future-mailorder-dissolvable-vaccine-patches-2031808.html#
  1. MBio – Local Response to Microneedle-Based Influenza Immunization in the Skin Maria del Pilar Martinet alhttp://mbio.asm.org/content/3/2/e00012-12.full
  1. Bloomberg Businessweek – Merck Acquires Licence for Experimental Skin Patch Immunizationhttp://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-08/merck-acquires-license-for-experimental-skin-patch-immunization
  1. The Australian Museum – Research by an Interdisciplinary Team
    Nanopatch Influenza Vaccination Team http://eureka.australianmuseum.net.au/4730DC80-59C8-11DF-A6AE005056B06558?DISPLAYENTRY=true
  1. Asian Scientist – Needle-Free Vaccine Delivery System, Nanopatch, Gets US$16.3 Million Investmenthttp://www.asianscientist.com/tech-pharma/needle-free-vaccine-delivery-system-nanopatch-vaxxas/
  2. Potent Immunity to Low Doses of Influenza Vaccine by Probabilistic Guided Micro-Targeted Skin Delivery in a Mouse Modelhttp://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.001026
  3. DMSO Background Literature

Additional Reference:

Science Daily – Painless Needles? Self-Adminstered Skin Patches for Vaccines Under Development http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101119204431.htm


Photo Credit


Christina England, BA Hons

  • Chatoyant68

    Mail the rubbish back to sender, if they think it’s so wonderful they can patch it on their own skin!
    (p.s. none of the above mentioned viruses have ever been found, proven to exist) 

  • Chatoyant68

    Mail the rubbish back to sender, if they think it’s so wonderful they can patch it on their own skin!
    (p.s. none of the above mentioned viruses have ever been found, proven to exist) 

  • Regarding the statement “We have shown that a dissolving microneedle patch can vaccinate against influenza at least as well”  since flu vaccines do  not work (even the famed  Cochrane Collaboration” decried this to be true 2 years ago) this statement iby logic can not be false.

  • Gretchen


  • Cherry Misra

    I would very much appreciate your writing about the proof that the swine flu was lab created and more about the information that it was released in Mexico city.  

  • Jon

    you know these studies are skewed to keep the revenue sources coming in…let big-pharma and all their buddies at the cdc, fda, etc be the guinea pigs for all these great vaccines.

  • Gretchen

    We have a big money machine that starts with Big Pharma & trickles on down.  Vaccines have cause too many illnesses & deaths.  The vaccines are worse on the body than the viruses or disease.

  • Anapd

    I would welcome administering vaccines at home, simply because I can just discard it and pretend that my child got vaccinated.  Instead, I feel like I’m being coerced into vaccinating my baby, which I don’t want to do, so she can attend school one day.  She hasn’t gotten any shots yet, but it’s only a matter of time.   

  • Gretchen

    I just don’t understand how all of this is happening.  There is not a safe vaccine out there.  My grandson who is autistic & blind, nor I will not let anyone come near with a needle or a patch!!  In the flu vaccines 2 of the ingredients is chick embryos & aborted fetal tissue.

  • AussieMum

    If I received this Nanopatch vaccine in the mail, it would go directly into the bin (rubbish).

    Who would ever know?

  • Sunshine Loire Brown

    How do you email this?

  • Christina England

    Sunshine if you mean how do you email this article to others then go to the top right hand corner of the page and click on the symbol of the envelope.


  • 441019

     Anapd: I hope you will protect your baby from shots; look into exemptions–if you are in the U.S., most states allow either a medical, religious, or philosophical exemption. Or maybe you could homeschool your child. I would not have her vaccinated just because you feel coerced into it.

  • 441019

    It’s important for the public to know that there is an elite group of people that have power in the world, and one of their goals is to reduce the world’s population. An easy way to do that would be through vaccination. During the H1N1 “swine flu” “pandemic” a few years ago, many pregnant women who got the H1N1 vaccine had a miscarriage. It is not terrorists that we should fear, it is governments and so-called health authorities.
    There is a website named “thewarningsecondcoming.com,” which contains messages of divine origin (I know this may seem unbelievable). One of the very latest messages states that a global vaccination will be introduced which, if you take it, will kill you. 

  • I think that Paul Offit should be the first one prove the safety and effectiveness of the patches. He can put enough patches on, to cover the CDC vaccine schedule, from 0 to 2 years old on a Monday, and then all the patches for 2 to 6 years old, the following friday. That should be an easy deal because he has stated that according to his calculations that infants and children could safely tolerate 10,000 vaccines in one day. He is the official CDC spokesman, so being that he does not have any actual vaccine safety science, nor as to those multiple vaccines; he should need to prove his statements and claims, any chance that he has. 

    From the looks of it all, and as to some of the latest information, he has a lot of proving that vaccine safety and effectiveness, yet to do. At what point would he need to admit to more harm than good being done by vaccines? At what point would Paul Offit need to at the very least, admit that there is a huge problem?

    Investigating Viruses in Cells Used to Make Vaccines; and Evaluating the Potential Threat Posed by Transmission of Viruses to Humans

    FDA ADMITS TO IMMEDIATE VACCINE-CANCER LINK: ‘Xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) is a recently discovered human retrovirus that has been found in both chronic fatigue syndrome & prostate cancer patients. There is a potential safety concern regarding XMRV in cell substrates used in vaccines…


    “Designer” Cells as Substrates for the Manufacture of Viral Vaccines


    Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populations

    The spectrum of ASIA: ‘Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome induced by Adjuvants 


    Published Papers – Dr. Russell Blaylock

    The Vaccine Damage-Science

    The entire vaccine industry is being exposed for unproven assumptions and misrepresentations of data

    Gardasil Destroys Girl’s Ovaries: It Should Have Been Predicted

    Vaccine Production With – Human Diploid Cells (aborted fetal cell tissue)

    Pharmaceutical Industry Negligence Leads To Record Fines

  • Can we get the names of the members in The Elite?

  • Can we get the names of the members in The Elite?

  • David Kenna

    Of course there must be someone in charge of health policy, budgets, research.etc. Isn’t that obvious?  Someone making money ? But who is it and what is the agenda?
    A way of thinking about this is that Health or more accurately illness policy involves money influence and power which rules out politicians who may appear to have power but are in fact mere puppets. Check out YouTube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHiicN0Kg10
    How Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff bought politicians to get legislation favourable to his
    clients passed by the US government. The 60 minute interviewer is appalled at the revelations
    that Abramoff talks of so glibly. “But you are making a nonsense of the whole concept of
    democracy.! “she says .. you are undermining everything the US stands for….heady stuff
    not for those who like to think that politicians are in the main acting in the best interests
    of the people and there is some benign old grandpa in charge… this is definitely a wake up call
    a confrontation with reality.  
    This leads on to who are the lobbyists how do they go about their business and centrally who are their clients?
    The clients are or represent the elite.
    In terms of the Pharmaceutical-Medical- Agri and Food complex that is the Rockerfeller family 
    and friends.
    For a clear expose of the main players and their interests may I suggest “Seeds of Destruction”.by F.William Engdahl. 
    Reading it will cause the veils of illusion to fall from your eyes and you will stare directly
    into “the heart of darkness”.
    It is because these people and their huge organisations operate the way they do that there is so much suffering in the world. They must be opposed at every turn. And the most important
    way individuals can help at the moment is to vote “yes” for proposition 37 in November
    Look into and inform yourself about the evils of GM foods.Tell all those you know in California who have the vote. This is a vote for sanity. 
    Prop 37 ” and the “Millions against Monsanto” could be a watershed moment where the evils
    of GMO are brought to light and the people turn against them and demand better quality food,
    the very basis of good health.
    And regarding the apparent incongruity between the Abramoff piece and voting for prop 37
    Every now and then the people wake up and make their voices heard. This is that moment.
    Act now for the good of the nation.


  • Ella G

    Breaking News: Gardasil Linked to Two Deaths – Full Study Out