The American Medical Association Will Soon Be Able To Force People To Enter Experimental Vaccine Trials

Health professionals are questioning vaccine safety.

 

The American Medical Association (AMA) recently published a paper proposing the introduction of a new law to force you and your children into experimental vaccine trials against your wishes. Your only way out of this directive would be to sign an ‘opt out form.’

In January, the AMA published a paper by Susanne Sheehy, BM BCh, MRCP, DTM&H, and Joel Meyer, BM BCh, MRCP on the ‘Virtual Mentor’ website, stating that there has been a steady decline in the numbers of healthy volunteers willing to participate in clinical trials. [1]

The AMA believes that more people should want to help in the development of new vaccinations.  They stated:

“Reasons for this decline are unclear but are likely to be multifaceted. One familiar problem is the payment of volunteers. To date, the relatively meager compensation that participants often receive could be seen to belittle and undervalue the contribution of these individuals to global health.”

VOLUNTEER PARTICIPATION TO BECOME A THING OF THE PAST

Because of the decline in willing volunteers, the AMA has decided that volunteer participation in vaccination trials should become a thing of the past. They said:

“If progression of promising vaccines from the lab to the clinic is to remain unaffected and financial inducement is an ethically unacceptable solution to the recruitment shortage, other strategies need to be considered. Compulsory involvement in vaccine studies is one alternative solution that is not as outlandish as it might seem on first consideration. Many societies already mandate that citizens undertake activities for the good of society; in several European countries registration for organ-donation has switched from “opt-in” (the current U.S. system) to “opt out” systems (in which those who do not specifically register as non-donors are presumed to consent to donation, and most societies expect citizens to undertake jury service when called upon.”

That’s right; according to the AMA we should all sign ‘opt out’ forms if we do not want to participate in vaccination trials. If, for some reason, we should forget to do this, then we should automatically be classified as giving passive consent!

In my opinion, agreeing to be a guinea pig for a vaccination trial is a little different from undertaking jury service, whether it is for the good of society or not. As for organ donation, there is one small fact the AMA appears to have forgotten; when our organs are taken, we are already dead!

I say this because a paper released fresh off the press makes abundantly clear just how catastrophic mistakes can be when vaccinations are fast-tracked onto the market.

PROOF OF WHAT WE ALREADY KNEW

The paper, written by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic and Dr. Chistopher Shaw from the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, states:

In the past several decades, there have been numerous studies and case reports documenting neurological and autoimmune adverse reactions (ADRs) following the use of various vaccines. Arthritis, vasculitis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), encephalopathy, neuropathy, seizure disorders and autoimmune demyelinating disease syndromes are the most frequently reported serious adverse events.” [2]

The paper goes on to describe serious errors in the HPV vaccine Gardasil’s safety trials, which they say shows evidence of significant flaws in study design, data reporting and interpretation. They believe this has led to the death and injury of many young women.

Dr. Tomljenovic and Dr. Shaw have found the following alarming results after studying the brain samples of two young women who died shortly after they were administered with the Gardasil vaccination:

 “In both cases, the autopsy revealed no anatomical, microbiological nor toxicological findings that might have explained the death of the individuals. In contrast, our IHC analysis showed evidence of an autoimmune vasculitis potentially triggered by the cross-reactive HPV-16L1 antibodies binding to the wall of cerebral blood vessels in all examined brain samples. We also detected the presence of HPV-16L1 particles within the cerebral vasculature with some HPV-16L1 particles adhering to the blood vessel walls. HPV-18L1 antibodies did not bind to cerebral blood vessels nor any other neural tissues. IHC also showed increased T-cell signalling and marked activation of the classical antibody-dependent complement pathway in cerebral vascular tissues from both cases. This pattern of complement activation in the absence of an active brain infection indicates an abnormal triggering of the immune response in which the immune attack is directed towards self-tissue.”

Bearing this knowledge in mind makes a mockery of the AMA’s belief that we should offer ourselves willingly as guinea pigs for vaccination experiments.

THE AMA WANTS YOU … FOR DEADLY DISEASES!

If all this is a little hard to believe, the AMA goes on to state:

“Society is unlikely to accept compulsory recruitment to a trial for a vaccine against the common cold if the vaccine causes severe complications in vaccinees. Increase the severity of the disease in question, however, and compulsory recruitment becomes a more palatable option.”

Unbelievable! The AMA is actually naïve enough to believe that society will be more willing to be used as guinea pigs in their vaccination trials, if the trials are for deadly diseases!

In my opinion, members of society are highly unlikely to be too keen to offer themselves up as human sacrifices in the pharmaceutical industry’s sick experiments, whether the experiments are for deadly diseases or not. I believe that society will more likely remember past vaccine trial disasters and turn around and run in the opposite direction as fast as they can.

WHAT THE AMA FORGOT TO INCLUDE IN THEIR PAPER

In the same month that the AMA proposed compulsory involvement in experimental vaccination trials, GlaxoSmithKline Argentina Laboratories Company was fined 400,000 pesos by Judge Marcelo Aguinsky following a report issued by the National Administration of Medicine, Food and Technology (ANMAT in Spanish) for irregularities during lab vaccine trials conducted between 2007 and 2008 that allegedly killed 14 babies. [3]

Hardly a glowing recommendation, is it? The deaths of these  innocent young babies represent only a small fraction of the adverse reactions and deadly mistakes suffered by children and adults around the world who have participated in experimental vaccine trials.

EVEN MORE VACCINE TRIAL BLUNDERS

In 1991, The Chicago Tribune reported that during vaccine trials for the AIDS vaccine in Paris, at least three people died from adverse reactions out of the 19 participants that took part. [4]

According to The Tribune, these deaths were not reported to any medical journals or to the French and American authorities that sanctioned the experiments. The Tribune said:

“When the French and American scientists collaborating in the experiment published an account of their research last year, they reported that there had been no deaths among the subjects. At the time the article appeared, two of the subjects had died.

The vaccine experiment continued despite the deaths. French government records show that, nearly three months after the first volunteer died, the study was expanded to include more subjects.” 

In 2008, The Telegraph reported that three Polish doctors and six nurses were facing criminal prosecution after a number of homeless people died following medical trials for a vaccine to combat the H5N1 bird-flu virus. [5] The Telegraph reported:

“The medical staff from the northern town of Grudziadz, are being investigated over medical trials on as many as 350 homeless and poor people last year, which prosecutors say involved an untried vaccine to the highly-contagious virus.

Authorities claim that the alleged victims received £1-2 to be tested with what they thought was a conventional flu vaccine but, according to investigators, was actually an anti bird-flu drug.”

In 2011, The Independent reported that pharmaceutical industries were exploiting the illiterate, the poor and the ill by signing them up to drug trials without their consent. [6] It was alleged that between 2007 and 2010 1,730 people died in India during such trials. These trials included:

  • The recruitment of hundreds of tribal girls without parental consent for an immunization study sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation on the nod of the warden of their government hostel. Several girls subsequently died. The study was later halted by the federal authorities.

  • The use by drug companies of survivors of the world’s worst poisonous gas disaster in Bhopal as “guinea pigs” in at least 11 trials without proper informed consent.

  • The completion by doctors at a government hospital in Indore, located in central India, of dozens of private trials that a police investigation found “violated the ethical guidelines.” The doctors who conducted the trials decided that not one of 81 cases in which a participant suffered an adverse effect was linked to the treatment. New trials were stopped while the state government investigated. A whistle-blower was fired.

ANOTHER (LIABILITY) FREE PASS FOR BIG PHARMA

Of course, it is unlikely that the pharmaceutical industries will ever be brought to justice for their crimes against society because on February 22, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court shielded drug companies from all liability for harm caused by vaccines mandated by government when companies could have produced a safer vaccine. [7]

This basically means that any drug company selling vaccinations in America cannot be held accountable by a jury, in a court of law, if those vaccines give us brain damage but could have been made less toxic.  In other words, if you or your child becomes permanently disabled or autistic after receiving a vaccine mandated by the government you are on your own. [8]

CONCLUSION

It appears that pharmaceutical industries, medical professionals and government agencies have little regard for human life or indeed human suffering when it comes to vaccines. Their multi-billion dollar industry must go on at all costs. Whether it is the homeless, the poor or the vulnerable, they will exploit them and kill them without so much as a backwards glance.

If the AMA gets their way, then it will not be long before you or your child could be included into vaccination trials, if you have not signed an ‘opt out form.’ This means that if your child comes home with a form scrunched up at the bottom of their school bag and you do not find it, or if you forget to sign it, then the drug company will classify your absent-mindedness as passive consent and your child will be used as a pharmaceutical industry guinea pig.

References

  1. Virtual Mentor Susanne Sheehy, BM BCh, MRCP, DTM&H, and Joel Meyer, BM BCh, MRCP – Should Participation in Vaccine Clinical Trials be Mandated? http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2012/01/pfor1-1201.html

  2. Lucija Tomljenovic and Christopher Shaw – Death After Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Casual or Coincidental?  http://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/ArchivePROA/articleinpressPROA.php
  3. Buenos Aires Herald – GSK Fined Over Vaccine Trials; 14 Babies Reported Dead http://www.buenosairesherald.com/article/88922/gsk-lab-fined-$1m-over-tests-that-killed-14–babies

  4. Chicago Tribune – 3 Dead In Aids Vaccine Tests http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-04-14/news/9102030245_1_vaccine-experiment-vaccinia-disease-aids-vaccine-tests

  5. The Telegraph – Homeless People Die After Bird Flu Vaccine Trial in Poland http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/2235676/Homeless-people-die-after-bird-flu-vaccine-trial-in-Poland.html

  6. The Independent – Without Consent: How Drug Companies Exploit Indian ‘Guinea Pigs’ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/without-consent-how-drugs-companies-exploit-indian-guinea-pigs-6261919.html

  7. Supreme Court of the United States. Russell Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth et al No. 09-152. Argued October 12, 2010 – Decided February 22, 2011. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf

  8. Natural Health Strategies – No Pharma Liability for Vaccine Damages:
    Supreme Court http://www.naturalhealthstrategies.com/pharma-liability.html

 

 

  • Apresence1

    Why dont they experiment on themselves, or have ppl on their payroll to do the experiments on ?   Because the vaccines are not to help, they are designed to make lots of ppl sick. People, file a UCC-3 on yourself, your name, and all of your possessions, then if the Med ass. wants to force you to do anything, they must first pay off the 110 million dollar lien you just filed with the Secratary of state, of the state you reside in. The law says they may mess with you only after they pay the lien to the lienholder, thats you. Now you are rich. Uniform Commercial Codes supercede federal and local laws.Check it out…………………………..

  • Maureen

    Where do we get the opt out form?

  • 441019

    This is a very informative article, and I appreciate the information. However, I think the words “Will Soon Be Able to Force People to Enter Experimental Vaccine Trials” are not exactly true at this time.  The AMA is proposing compulsory involvement in vaccine trials, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it will actually happen. I don’t know how they could legally do this. But we need to do everything possible to prevent this from becoming true.

  • natasha

    As always, great article, just one thing: When organs are taken, the person is NOT dead, if they were, they wouldn’t be able to take the organs. The person has to be killed in order for their organs to be ‘harvested’. The term ‘brain dead’ is a term specifically invented in order to ‘harvest’ as quickly as possible. Who benefits?….. 
    http://www.initiative-kao.de/kao-english.html

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001359335487 Jock Doubleday

    Anyone who wants my free eBook, “Into the Labyrinth: Discovering the Truth about Vaccination,” can drop me a line and I’ll send it to you.

    The eBook is a conversational expose on the historical fraud of vaccination. It is based on a talk I gave at the AutismOne conference in Chicago in 2004.

    With updated links and information.

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=405830396138935&l=c6cdca3812

  • Chellethesouthernbelle

    I agree…I find it ironic that this website says Vax TRUTH, but does not value the truth….I was going to share this article, because I am anti-vaccine, but for it to say “will soon be able to force ppl to enter experimental trials” that is just not true…there is nothing in this article that I read that would support that statement as truth….just changing one word from “will” to “may”…change the link title and I’ll share it!!!

  • Mike Mars

     Hopefully you will never have to use it. This article is touching upon something that has been suggested, but not yet taken into serious consideration. If it was the backlash would be vicious.

  • Lou

    “There is one small fact the AMA appears to have forgotten; when our organs are taken, we are already dead!”  Or put another way we must be dead for our organs  to be taken. Quite a difference eh?

    Yes with the compulsory vaccine pincushion model the AMA hopes you will not die until the experiment is concluded! After all if you die a few weeks after the experiment has “concluded” your death will not “count”.

    We should not be surprised by ANYTHING the AMA does. The AMA from its inception has been about lying and poor to very negative health outcomes. I see today MANY doctors refuse to be associated with the anti-health AMA.

    AMA Positions

    o Poison in our water: Favor
    o Poison in our blood: Favor
    o Poison in our Food: Favor
    o Poison in our mouths: Favor

  • Cherry Misra

    It would be interesting to see how people respond when it is their own body to be given a vaccine rather than the body of someone else’s baby.   Well no, on second thought, the victims would surely be school children or defenseless people of some kind.  Thus, the general populace can go their merry way,  and not have to devote time to “negative thinking”. 
      Can you tell us what the medical ethicists have to say about these statements? 

  • lesliecarolbotha

     Christina England is a trailblazer…. and an excellent researcher – if she did not stretch these bounds many would remain complacent.  It is a wake up call none-the-less.

  • Dallas

    Well, it’s not a vaccine as such, but 3 months ago my son was diagnosed with AML (at least, that is what the doctor said) – and for the last 3 months I have been forced to sit here and watch the “money hungry” AMA pump my son full of all kinds of chemo poisons, antibiotics, and every other kind of poison you could think of – ALL AGAINST MY WILL! They basically informed me (in a politically correct manner) that I either sign the papers allowing them to do these procedures, or the state takes my child, and they give him the treatment anyway! (Rather tramatic for a family that is a firm believer in “Natural Remedies.” 
    So to see an article associating the AMA with the word “Force” does not surprise me at all! And the justice system works with them.

  • Lowell Hubbs

    This is a very good and well researched article, that shows us again the reality of the existing and very irresponsible and reckless vaccine madness. However I would agree that the AMA is yet a long ways away from ever pulling that off and any such thing, in the US. 

    This pro-vaccine situation simply refuses to exist in any form of the truth; nor in any sense of actual light and reality that would recognize any such thing as a balance of evaluation, regarding more harm done than good. The use as well of real and physiologically based science  is so amazingly and obviously lacking, in the promotion of vaccines, and always was. The safety studies in reality are simply not there; while they ignore the bulk of existing unbiased science, clearly showing the very real mechanisms of direct vaccine and as well neurological harm. How many studies as well would need to be done showing the direct link to autoimmunity. Nothing is enough. They lie to the public repeatedly, claiming that the over-all incidence of severe adverse reactions and resulting harm, is rare. That is because they simply refuse to recognize what is happening and has been happening on a large scale. They must deny it, and all of it. They have simply to much to lose, and to much they within their own minds and within their large egos, simply can not and refuse to accept, and in the admission of that they have been a large causative factor in the known outcomes and as well in certainly more harm than good having been done. 

    What in all is in the bulk of their claimed to safety studies? The most promoted have been simply and only epidemiological studies funded by the CDC of all places. Epidemiological studies done on simply one vaccine, (the MMR); and one single vaccine ingredient, (Thimerosal) are conclusively all the studies they need to do, to prove vaccine safety? And the entire medical establishment believes their sinking ship claim that all the needed studies have done, and that all the needed studies have been thoroughly looked at? Who would be ignorant enough to believe that entirely scientifically absent minded and irresponsible claim. But they obviously do.

    Why has not the CDC recognised any of these studies as significant? They can’t; as there is obviously to much to lose. http://www.callous-disregard.com/research.htm    

    Why have they not even mentioned these studies? 

    The spectrum of ASIA: ‘Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome induced by Adjuvants
    http://lup.sagepub.com/content/21/2/118.full

    Autoimmune or auto-inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA):
    http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/16063327/1870391070/name/ASIA3.pdf

    Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism? Lucija Tomljenovic, Christopher A. Shaw
    http://omsj.org/reports/tomljenovic%202011.pdf

    Ann Neurol. 2005 Jan;57(1):67-81. Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism.Vargas DL, Nascimbene C, Krishnan C, Zimmerman AW, Pardo CA. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15546155

    Or this one?

    PLoS ONE: Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity

    Conclusions/Significance Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0008382

    How about the collection of studies and data on these two pages? 
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-vaccine-damage—science.html

    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccines-cause-autism-and-more—the-scientific-explanation.html

    They want to have people simply believe that all they need is their main stream epidemiological studies, complete with predetermined outcomes and while riddled with flawed study design, and thus promoted as science. If anyone thinks that is all just fine and good enough, then they are really not actually concerned about what the real vaccine truth is.

  • http://www.ukcaf.org/ Douglas Cross

    The argument that anyone can give ‘passive consent’ in such circumstances is entirely fraudulent. Carrying out any invasive medical procedure without the active consent of the recipient is medical assault, and a criminal and civil offense.

    Casually assuming that consent is given to vaccination if the recipient does not specifically object to such an intervention is as offensive and meaningless as assuming that a person walking in the street consents to be attacked if they do not first inform their attacker that they do not consent to be mugged!

    The boundary between medicinal ethics and State-sponsored fascism has been steadily eroded over the past half century. 70% of USA public water supplies are now deliberately dosed with toxic fluoride that promotes the accumulation of aluminum in the brain and causes dementia (Thomljenovic and Shaw again). This is ‘justified’ on the spurious grounds that the benefits to the community greatly outweigh the deniable adverse effects, even though a very large proportion of the public actively object.

    This has established a clear and very dangerous precedent. It has paved the way to increasing pressures to add other pharmaceuticals to the public drinking water supplies, such as satins in the UK and lithium in Japan, regardless of either individual need or dose control, and is totally reliant on the spurious concept of ‘passive consent’ and the deliberate disregard of medical law..

    Mass vaccination has begun to veer wildly away from ethical medical science and, like water fluoridation, is becoming a fundamentalist religion. If you are against it, the argument goes, then you are an unspeakable infidel and must be disciplined. For the perfect example, take heed of of the treatment here in the UK of Dr Andrew Wakefield, in the violent reaction to his publicised concern over the safety of the MMR vaccine.

    There are a few pariah nations scattered around the world where the State itself embraces such absolutism in ensuring that a dominant religion becomes universal and compulsory. It is alarming to see that this is increasingly the trend in the USA, and a matter of far wider concern to those of us who live in external States whose governments eagerly parrot the antics of your own movers and shakers.

  • Heather

    So where do we get this paper to opt out?

  • Shawn Siegel

    While I understand the need to alert as many people as possible to the threat, an accurate title would have been, The American Medical Association Has
    Proposed Legislation Requiring Mandatory Participation in Vaccine Trials
    Unless An Opt-Out Form is Signed. The title as is gives a different impression.Douglas Cross – well said, but I’d have to disagree that vaccination was ever an ethical medical science. It has always been a matter of public disclosure of select facts – or fictions – that support the safety, efficacy and necessity of vaccines, and suppression of the chorus of refuting information.If vaccination is appropriate fodder for legislation, informed consent demands full provision and disclosure of all negative aspects of vaccines to every patient, and signature of consent. Failure to comply on the part of vaccine implementers should bring with it stiff penalties. What the medical industry is proposing extends the existing medical despotism even further.

  • Jfpupillo

    Gardisal , manufactured by Merck, conducted their own studies and concluded it was safe; hence, this is why flaws in the study exist.

  • Julie

    OMG, how horrible
    I would flea the country

  • Mleawicks

    sick people. shoot them up with them. oh wait they will make sure they are not included!

  • Mleawicks

     no my mom died. my brother was there in the H with her. everything came out poop throw up. they were there asking 5 min later for parts. he blew his top for asking so soon after she died. He knew she was gone. however they have about 15 to 30 min to get what they want or get body on system to keep parts viable or they are no good.

  • 441019

     I completely agree (about the title of the article and what it should have been, as well as your comment regarding informed consent).

  • 441019

     Dallas:  I feel terrible about your son and what they have done to him. Could you possibly find a good lawyer?

  • 441019

     I appreciate your comment–they should have said “may” rather than “will.” I think it is important to stick to the facts (something the AMA doesn’t do).

  • Get Aware

    “Forced” Vaccination? Sorry, they’ll have to kill me first

  • Sarah

    Good luck trying to force my participation. It is my body and I have the right to refuse any treatment or procedure.

  • Sarah

    Yes I would like to know this as well. Anyone?

  • Sciffy2001

    If the AMA is so concerned about declining rates of volunteers for vaccine trials, why don’t they step up and volunteer their own membership? No faith in their own convictions?

  • BunnyOlesen

    I completely DISAGREE.  Why would they make it MANDATORY ‘unless’ – that stinks to high heaven.  You ‘opt out’ of widgets on social networking sites, not the availability of your children for clinical research.  Are hundreds of millions of people supposed to ‘opt out’?  Who keeps the records, how will records of those who ‘opt out’ be paid for and maintained?  What about people who just don’t understand it?  

    Yeah, sure, failure to comply, I see all the ‘severe’ penalties doled out on pharmaceutical companies all the time (eye roll).

  • BunnyOlesen

    They will tell you about it AFTER they tell you you didn’t ‘opt out’ and your child is given an injection in the doctor’s office.