Vaccine Whistleblower Site Blacklisted by Facebook and Web of Trust (WOT)
VacTruth.com has recently published articles on SIDS, a child dying shortly after being vaccinated, Bill Gates, autism, and vaccine failures. This information is being classified as “abusive” and “malicious” by Facebook.com, ultimately censoring important information from you and other parents.
How does this happen?
When we want to share an article with you on Facebook, we post a hyperlink, which allows you to click and view the article on our website. Frequently when you click on our Facebook links, you will be warned with a scary looking “Security Alert” such as the one displayed below.
As you can see from the alert, Facebook uses a partner named Web of Trust (WOT), owned by Sami Tolvanen and Timo Ala-Kleemola of Finland, to filter out “abusive” websites. 
But the real question is who and what is Web of Trust?
This is How Censorship Works in the 21st Century
Have you ever seen old gangster movies in which they demand money from shop owners for “protection?”
If the shop owner pays the gangster thugs, their property remains safe from any violence or vandalism. But, if the owner refuses to pay, bad things often happen in the form of broken windows, bullying of customers, or firebombing the establishment. This is called blackmail or extortion.
How does this example relate to WOT?
WOT calls itself the “… leading crowdsourced website reputation service” and uses a feedback system to give sites a reputation score. 
You can purchase their basic monthly reputation service for over 450 dollars a year. 
On the surface, this type of ranking system appears to be helpful. However, when you look behind the scenes, it’s reminiscent of typical mafia extortion tactics. Here’s how …
The entire WOT system is based on anonymous user ratings – which only encourage troll-like activity. What do I mean by this?
Some users are considered to be power users, which gives their votes extra weight and access to mass ranking tools.  To show you how a few power users can tank ratings for a website, I want to share with you the graphic below. It currently reads:
Good site: 121 votes
Useful, informative: 199 votes
Child friendly: 2 votes
Spam: 1 vote
Hateful or questionable content: 5 votes
Ethical issues: 14 votes
Useless: 1 vote
Other: 5 votes
The system is gamed. If you want to know how, read on…
Notice how someone has disabled comment rankings for VacTruth.com. Before this functionality was disabled, you could rank a comment with a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down.” This means the comments with more “thumbs down” votes go to the back of the line and get buried.
At one point, this functionality was enabled for VacTruth.com, but now it has mysteriously been disabled. Why?
As you can see from the graphics, the responses to our site are overwhelmingly positive, yet the rating is extremely negative. This is one example of how a handful of power users have completely tanked the reputation rankings of the site.
Let’s take a look at one of the power users.
Holy Sock-Puppetry George Clooney!
I want to focus your attention on one power user in particular named SuperHero58 – trust me, you’ll want to stick around for this.
This particular power user can be seen posting negative comments on not only VacTruth.com, but also:
Natural News – http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/naturalnews.com
Natural Society – http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/naturalsociety.com
And if we look at the statistics for this particular power user, we can see he has rated over 561,760 websites since his account was created in May of 2010!
That is an average of 527 Ratings per Day, or 21 posts an hour for 1066 days. Does that seem a bit fishy – or better yet, spammy – to you? I seriously doubt this person visited all of the sites they rated. But, it gets better.
Since the whole premise of WOT is anonymity, we can’t actually prove the identity of SuperHero58. However, I think we can come close.
While doing a little digging, I came across this forum post showing SuperHero58 complaining about the WOT search engine in the first person, implicating that SuperHero58 is one of the owners, or someone highly vested in the company.
Here is what a Web of Trust forum post by SuperHero58 says:
“… I am not the average person and I do believe that my Wot Search, can and it will become # 1
We already have over 35 million users base, I do agree that we need a strong and super aggressive distribution, but also more exposure
I get very upset whenever I see advertised computer products, but never anything about WOT, not even a mention of it
I remember the first time I saw someone wearing a T shirt with the logo of Fire Fox, it caught my attention and that is how I got FF, I love word of mouth, but I will like for the people of the World to know that WOT has a search engine; money comes afterwards, never before
Are we good?
Yes, so let go for number one
Business angels will only come, if we believe and act on it
I would like WOT to opt in auto complete for those who want it and six month time to delete information, for those who want it to make it faster; if we pay attention to the reason so many made Google, and learn from the mistakes that drove so many away from them; I tell you that you will see billions flowing in for new projects with the WOT logo
I know that I sound like a dreamer, but most of the time dreams come true if we try
With all my respect to someone who knows more that I could ever imagine
In a light note , if a movie is made about WOT
I want George Clooney to play me : }” (emphasis mine) 
You are not a dreamer, SuperHero58. You are a THUG.
Think about this, as there are a few options to consider here.
First to ponder is this specific forum post could be complete nonsense and written by someone who is highly delusional. Or…
We can ask a question like, “Why would this person want a movie to be made about WOT and want ‘George Clooney to play me?’”
Who is “me” referring to?
Is this Sami or Timo – one of the owners? If it isn’t, it seems like someone close to them who is highly vested in the success of WOT. Don’t you think?
If this is one of the owners, then WOT is pushing their own agenda by negatively rating websites firsthand!
This issue isn’t to be taken lightly, as it is censoring important information. It would also bring into question who is privately investing in this company and what their agenda is. Who are these private investors? Pharmaceutical companies? Bankers?
I’m highly suspicious of WOT and deeply concerned about their ability to censor information. Furthermore, it appears that there are people in power that can affect your ability to get vital information with the stroke of a few keys.
Ultimately, it’s you – the parents – who are censored.[contentbox headline=”References” type=”normal”]