Revealed Government Documents Show Vaccine Injured Children in Small African Village Used Like Lab Rats

Children vaccinated in Africa were severely harmed by vaccines.
Children vaccinated in Africa were severely harmed by vaccines.

Children vaccinated in Africa were severely harmed by vaccines.

In December 2012, vaccine tragedy hit the small village of Gouro, Chad, Africa, situated on the edge of the Sahara Desert. Five hundred children were locked into their school, threatened that if they did not agree to being force-vaccinated with a meningitis A vaccine, they would receive no further education. These children were vaccinated without their parents’ knowledge. This vaccine was an unlicensed product still going through the third and fourth phases of testing.

Within hours, one hundred six children began to suffer from headaches, vomiting, severe uncontrollable convulsions and paralysis. The children’s wait for a doctor began. They had to wait one full week for a doctor to arrive while the team of vaccinators just carried on vaccinating others from the village. More children became sick.

When the doctor finally came, he could do nothing for the children. The team of vaccinators, upon seeing what had happened, fled the village in fear.

Fifty children were finally transferred to a hospital in Faya and later taken by plane to two hospitals in N’Djamena, the capital city of Chad. After being shuttled around like cattle, these sick, weak children were dumped back in their village without a diagnosis and each family was given an unconfirmed sum of £1000 by the government. No forms were signed and no documentation was seen. They were informed that their children had not suffered a vaccine injury. However, if this were true, why would their government award each family £1000 in what has been described as hush money?

Interestingly, during the time the children spent in the hospital, two more children joined them from another village.

To read the full stories of this tragedy, please see references at the end of this article from previous Vactruth world-exclusive reports. [1,2,3,4]

Since this time, Vactruth has been passed a series of secret documents, which fill in some missing gaps in this story and expose just how corrupt the organizations behind this tragedy really are.

The Exclusive, Heartbreaking Details

On January 14, 2013, arrangements were made for seven female patients between the ages of 8-18 to be evacuated from the Hospital of Mother and Child (HME) and the General Hospital of National Referrals (HGRN)  in N’Djamena and transferred by air to a clinic in Tunisia. This was scheduled to take place between January 16 and 22.

The documents in our possession state that the Chadian government arranged for the patients to be accompanied by Dr. Joseph Mad-Toingue, Chief Service of Infectious Diseases of the National General Referral Hospital; Dr. Moumar Mbaileyo, anesthesiologist employee of the National General Referral Hospital; and Mr. Dihoulne Kakiang, state-certified nurse, employee of the National General Referral Hospital.

On January 29, 2013, a letter passed between The Chief Service of Infectious Diseases of HGRN-N’Djaména and Mr. Director General of the National General Referral Hospital, stating:

“Mr. Director General,

Herewith I have the honor of putting into your hands the report of the mission completed in Tunisia between 15 and 22 of January 2013 regarding the medical evacuation of 7 patients.

The Chief of Service.”

Vactruth now has this report.

A Parent’s Worst Nightmare

The report states that seven female patients between the ages of 8 and 18 had suffered adverse reactions after receiving the meningitis A vaccination during a national campaign, which took place on December 11, 2012, for the prevention of this illness. These patients had originally been taken to the Regional Hospital of Faya, before being transferred on December 26, 2012, to the Hospital of Mother and Child (HME) and the General Hospital of National Referrals (HGRN) in N’Djamena.

Arrangements were later made for a medical evacuation to transfer these patients to Tunisia for further tests and treatment.

According to the report, the departure took place in N’Djaména on January 15, 2013, at 10:50 pm after a long wait at the Hassan airport in N’Djamena because of the late arrival of the plane.

The journey took place on board a Tunisian plane chartered by the International Medical Society (SMEDI). The party consisted of seven patients, three members of the medical team and seven parents (two men and five women) who accompanied the sick children.

Interestingly, the document states that the party did not fly alone.

The government report states that twenty other passengers traveling to Tunisia for the same reason (medical evacuation) also joined the party. Sadly, there were no further details on these patients in the report.

Were these patients also vaccine-damaged by the meningitis A vaccination, and where did these twenty other sick patients come from?

Just before the plane took off, an 18 year-old patient had what the report describes as a ‘shaking episode,’ and was given a 10 mg vial of diazepam before boarding the plane. Other than this incident, the flight went well.

The Specialists Say “Case Closed”

The group arrived in Tunisia on January 16, 2013, and was received by SMEDI agents who took care of the police formalities (entry visa) before dividing the group into three parties. The patients were transported by ambulance to the clinic, the medical staff was taken to a hotel, and the patients’ parents were taken to a center.

On the afternoon of January 16, the three medical staff were introduced to SMEDI’s Director General, M. Ghazi Mejbri, to get acquainted. This was followed by a work session with the medical coordinator, Dr. Folla Amara. In the course of this meeting, the condition of the patients was discussed and plans were arranged for their care.

The patients were taken to the neurological department of SMEDI’s La Sourka clinic. The clinic had received the children’s medical records in advance and was reported to have conducted their own clinical and biological tests on the patients before meeting with the medical team that had accompanied them.

On January 17, a meeting took place with Professor Rachid Namai (“chef de clinique”), Dr. Kefi and Dr. Mabet. It was concluded that the children’s ‘shaking attacks’ or convulsions were of no consequence. On the paraclinical level, the report stated that the liquor tests of five patients did not reveal any anomalies, nor did the EEG of six patients.

The EEG of the seventh patient showed minor anomalies in the immediate post-critical phase, but was reported to have stabilized. An MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) was to take place of all seven patients. After the meeting, the team visited the patients who were all reported to be well, except for one child who had developed tonsillitis and had to receive appropriate treatment.

On January 19, a second meeting took place at the La Soukra Clinic during which they examined the patients’ medical records that gave the results of all the medical tests that had taken place. Among the biological perturbations there was reported to be one case of persistent thrombopenia (a lower than normal number of blood cell fragments called platelets), two cases of of elevated immunoglobulines E (Ig E) and five cases of gram negative bacteria directly upon examination — culturing has not been contributory.

The report stated that, generally speaking, the patients showed a raised tendency for hypoalbuminemia (swelling), hypo creatininemia (renal dysfunction), and hyper glucorrhagia (no definition found).

The MRI results showed no anomalies, and the HIV and hepatitis serologies were negative. The medical team found the children’s health to be satisfactory. The report states that the children had no infectious cause for their illness and the hypothesis of an immuno-allergic reaction was deemed to be more probable.

At this point, it was decided to close the investigation due to the advice from specialists and followed up with epidemiological and pharmacodynamical studies.

No Reason For Concern?

On January 21, the mission members visited the clinic at La Soukra for a last time. They found all patients waiting for their stay to end. The report states that a short meeting took place with the chief of service who promised to give his medical report shortly. The mission ended with a visit to the Dr. Naoui Mohamed Néjib’s laboratory where the biological tests of all the patients had been performed.

The mission members left Tunisia on January 22, 2013, around 2:00 pm and arrived in N’Djaména at 4:00 pm.

They concluded that the medical evacuation to Tunisia had given them the opportunity to investigate more thoroughly seven patients who had developed post-vaccination reactions during the national vaccination campaign against meningitis.

It was stated that, generally speaking, the clinical state of the patients did not give any reasons for concern and that the paraclinical balance of the majority did not show major perturbations.

The mission was deemed a success.

The report was signed by Dr. Joseph Mad-Toïngé in N’Djaména on January 28, 2013.

Determined Parents Won’t Give Up

The parents tell a very, very different story. According to parents and relatives, these children were locked into their school, threatened with no education and forcibly vaccinated without their parents’ knowledge.

They state that the children are still desperately ill and that they have no way of getting any medical care. After the mission, they were left in Faya and had to make their own way back to the village.

The children are still suffering severe convulsions. One relative told me:

“The children drop suddenly to the ground and shake violently before going paralyzed. We do not know what is wrong and we want answers. No one will help us. Our children were well and fit, we have never had meningitis in our area, so why did they vaccinate our children with this vaccination?

Our children have since become aggressive in their behavior and have a rash all over their bodies. They are having terrible frightening convulsions. Why won’t anyone help us?”

I have been informed that the parents have formed an activist group to put out their plea to the world.

Unanswered Questions

The parents ask:

Were the vaccines used on our children out-of-date?

Had some of the batches used been spoiled in the heat?

Did the vaccinators vaccinate our children inadvertently with an unsafe product?

Was the maximum duration of four days without refrigeration respected and adhered to?

Were the vaccinators adequately trained?

They state:

“All this disturbs us and makes us fear the worst effects for the future. We do not know what is going on behind the scenes and what the Minister of Health, the organizations involved with the tragedy (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, PATH WHO, MVP and UNICEF) are saying or are going to do. As parents, our priority is to get back the health our children. We feel that it is very sad that [our] entire city is paralyzed and is suffering from epilepsy. We were hoping that our government would make a stand and save our children but it has so far failed to do so. Therefore we call assistance for everyone in the world to intervene.

Our needs as listed below:

  • A health specialist, an organization or an individual to assist the sick children, who are innocent victims and help them to get their health back.
  • Human rights organization or an individual lawyer who could help the parents association with legal issues and get justice for the children against the Chad government, WHO, MVP, PATH, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Indian company Serum Institute of India Ltd.
  • Parents need independent and freelance journalists to help them to get media coverage and tell the world what has happened to the children of Gouro, Chad.”

Conclusion

The parents’ requests are simple and the same as any other parent left in this impossible situation. They feel deserted and betrayed by the Chadian government, who have left their children to die, while at the same time announcing the vaccination program to be a success. All the parents are very angry and are pleading with the world to help. They state they need lawyers, doctors, medication and above all, support.

This whole debacle has been a coverup from the very beginning. One of the children’s relatives has told me that there has never been a case of meningitis in this part of Africa. So, why vaccinate children needlessly for a disease that does not exist in this area? Worse still, according to my source, this particular part of Chad is not even on the meningitis belt, and yet this vaccine was given to these children. He could be right, as according to a map attributed to the Gates Foundation, it is not. [5]

The abnormal tests demonstrate that the vaccines caused these problems (especially the abnormal immunoglobin levels).  Had the doctors done more specific tests proving vaccine damage (especially anti-myelin antibodies), they would have found abnormal levels, which indicate vaccine injury. Did they avoid doing these tests on purpose?

It seems very likely that these children, who are now sick and vulnerable, were used as lab rats and have since been left to die by some of the biggest organizations known to mankind. Five months have passed and a lot of covering up the truth has gone on and still, the world waits for answers. The children of Gouro and their parents want the following organizations —  PATH, WHO, UNICEF,  and the Gates Foundation — to make a public apology and to own up to what has happened. They want and need accountability.

This is a violation of the Nuremberg code and these government “officials” are guilty of crimes against humanity.

Acknowledgement

VacTruth wishes to thank medical research journalist and author Desiree Rover who translated all reports and documents from French.

 

Photo Credit

  • Paxmannz

    Mr and Mrs Gates cannot be so ignorant of what is being done with their money and in their name .. this pair must know !

    The man and his wife needs to make a public statement to clarify a few matters .. the anti vaxxers have sufficient web space and the numbers to make a large petition .. what I have read represents an ongoing crime against humanity .. one that needs a serious challenge.

  • http://www.facebook.com/janel.hopper Janel Hopper

    I believe that I can offer help for their recovery.
    Janel@ha.com

  • Barb

    Thank you for shedding light on this tragedy, I’m happy to do my part by sending them love and blessings for healing and continuing to encourage others to examine the (misguided) logic behind vaccination.

    Eventually and hopefully in my lifetime, the truth will rise to the tipping point where this harmful practice can no longer be denied or allowed.

  • http://profiles.google.com/mhirzel Mary L. Hirzel

    I would love to know how antibodies to myelin proves vaccine injury. I would love to think it does, but have not heard how or why this was “proof.” Thanks!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    Bill Gates Surprised by Eugenics Question, (so surprised, he can not even say nor repeat the word, “Eugenics” He just goes on to sing the praises of vaccines, as the savior. Gates, refuses to face in the public light, any form of truth and reality.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ujsPl_YCtM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coHf5UEFUl8&feature=share&list=PLjPplef_K0tw7ut8iXkuOrL56s4zpTblu

    Globalist Genocide in India Exposed
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvqPREdctK8

    The Wicked Billionaire’s Depopulation Club
    http://youtu.be/xAsWmxTx7Lk

    VacFacts
    http://www.vacfacts.info

  • http://www.facebook.com/edna.rosenthal.50 Edna Rosenthal

    I am more and more furious about all the negative news in regard to these vaccination programms, that are nothing more than a genocide programm under the the name of humanity. Before a couple of months India stopped the GARDISAL vaccination at all and I hope, that all will follow and have their courage and not only in regard to this vaccination, all others also. Look only to the fraud of HIV+AIDS!!!! The greatest lie ever used for some 30 years and this treatment ( the most worse cancer treatment ) plan will kill all that fall in the this trapp. In addition look at the Hep B vaccine for babies just born, How many died or are crippled for all their life and the families are ruined, not to speak of DPT and MMR< Hib and whatever. You should know, that all this negativety of this industry is covered by law so that, whatever will happen to the injured, they will not hear them and agree, to be responsible, This is true for Bill Gates and for whatever organisation that puts around their shoulders the "GLORIA of HUMANITY". They are very content with the results. But I am sure, one day this whole Industry will pay for their doing. How many have to die and suffer before this will happen, I do not know, but the CRY has to be loud and courages and I hope, that some will stand up and give a voice to all this. From all my heart I want to find a way to make the truth again reign this world and real love and caring find a place here and now. Dr.Edna Rosenthal

  • 441019

    This is an outrage, and I agree that these officials are guilty of crimes against humanity. I’ll post a link on my “twitter” account–although I don’t have a huge number of followers. I’ll post it on Facebook also. I don’t know what to do except to try to inform as many people as possible. I hope that everyone who reads this article will try to inform others.
    I believe that God will intervene and bring an end to the corruption in the world–I just don’t know how soon.
    So many people think that vaccines are good and save lives–but all you need to do is go to “VAERS” (the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System), which can be found online, and you can see hundreds and thousands of reports of adverse reactions to vaccines, ranging from a mild reaction to autism to death.

  • Jean Navert

    Very well said Dr. Rosenthal. For your information, please look at the 4:23 minutes extremely revealing scientific video done by the University of Calgary, Canada regarding How Mercury Causes Brain Neuron Damage (link below). This is the same mercury that they inject directly in the blood of all new borne baby within 24 hours of birth in the United-States of America. And mercury is only one of the numerous toxic chemicals use in vaccine. These people are all evil and criminal and there would be a time for justice for all of them.
    They are literally poisoning our children with vaccine, GMOs, fluoride in drinking water, chemtrail, chemicals in all process foods, etc.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU8nSn5Ezd8

    Jean

  • AussieMum

    Where is Argus to support this Genocide?

  • Dr. Whatever

    Putting Dr. in front of your name does not excuse all the incoherent, unsubstantiated non-sense you wrote before it.

    Lets just pick one stupid thing you said.. Please attach proof that HIV is a ‘fraud’. Thats a great start. We could argue but since you certainly can’t prove that (excluding links to vactruth, vacfacts, and other similar blogs). Some raw data would be nice because I’m pretty sure all those African’s dying from Kaposi’s Sarcoma, Pneumocystis pneumonia, etc, would sure disagree. As would the entire scientific community.

    Dr. Whatever.

  • Instigator

    The parents need to file Criminal Complaints against all the offending parties, including the government and its agencies. Sue them individually and en masse to take them out of their jobs and put them behind bars. Crimes include collusion among networked institutions to commit fraud, commission of acts of fraud, conspiracy to commit genocide and commission of acts of genocide. Please see: http://www.genocidewatch.org for a complete definition of genocide, including the 8 steps of genocide, and see how we have all been subjected to these steps our entire lives. Parents and interested others need to form common law juries and take down the criminals, including the global criminal cabal. Nothing will change until we recognize that a war is being waged against us and that we each need to take responsibility for opposing tyranny by our own actions as individuals and as groups of individuals. And by the way ~ Don’t think for one minute that Bill and Melinda Gates don’t know they’re perpetrating genocide. They brag about it. Sue them as individuals and sue their foundation which funds genocide and crimes against humanity.

  • BS

    Where is the sanity to support an unsubstantiated article based in heresy reporting which self-references its own website for ‘proof’ of its veracity. Genocide would be allowing Polio to run rampant and kill 10s of millions of children every year as it did prior to the age of vaccination.

  • Argus

    “Revealed Government Documents Show Vaccine Injured Children in Small African Village Used Like Lab Rats”

    Another lying headline on this website that purports to tell the truth.
    Where can these ‘revealed government documents’ be found?

    More importantly, Christina, tell us what you have done to independently verify ANY of the information in this series of stories you have written? This is investigative reporting?

    Honestly, it’s impossible to tell if someone is feeding you this stuff and it is accepted by you uncritically, or if you are just making it all up.

    It’s probably both.

  • AussieMum

    BS

    Show me the studies that supports your comment about Polio killing 10s of millions of children every year as it did prior to the age of vaccination.

    Your title “BS” sums you up!

    Mum to child who was “grabbed & jabbed now vaccine injured”.

  • AussieMum

    Dr Whatever,

    …putting Dr in front of your name does not excuse all the incoherent, unsubstantiated non-sense you wrote before it…

    Then, Dr Rachel Dunlop should remove her Dr title because of all her incoherent, unsubstantiated nonsense she writes in support of vaccines.

    http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/rachael-dunlop-3731560.html

    Mum to vaccine injured child.

  • Fed Up Grandma

    All you have to do is look at the warning disclosure that comes with every vaccine or drug!!! Or, you could google search Bill Gates conference with investors on how he will implement genocide!!! Do your own reseach, Argus, it is hidden in plain sight.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    So Argus. You are thus stating that none of this happened, nor as stated, just because you do not have access to the documents? You are saying that the entire story is a fabrication, correct? Why then are several other sources of media reporting similar claims, and those sources do not come from vactruth? How do you explain that? I think I could best describe your problem as having a severe case of intellectual dishonesty, combined with a highly selective form of cognitive dissonance. Hope you would appreciate the free complementary diagnosis.

    Two of the sources:
    http://reliefweb.int/report/chad/38-children-hospitalised-after-meningitis-shot-chad

    http://sunatimes.com/view.php?id=2554

    Or perhaps Argus, it is that all you will allow yourself to consider reading about and accepting is the cover-up story in Chad, by their officials; claiming it all to be only in their head, and thus it is called features that fit a mass psychogenic illness? You know, the similar phenomenon that you apparently think happens when all those parents that have seen their healthy child regress into a lost world of ASD, after a load of vaccines, and then blame vaccination?. Now 1 in 50 with ASD.

    Meningitis Vaccine in Chad: Not the cause of anything except immunity to Meningitis A

    Excerpts:

    The symptoms observed in patients are similar to those described in the literature under several names:

    Collective hysteria

    Collective obsessive behavior

    Mass psychogenic phenomenon

    Source:
    http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2013/01/meningitis-vaccine-in-chad-not-the-cause-of-paralysis.html

  • Jim Bob

    Wow Lowell,
    Another case of cherry-picked “research”. Why not mention that several other children who did not receive the vaccine showed the same symptoms as the so-called “vaccine-injured” children?

  • Concerned

    I will agree that the article lacks sufficient data, however that does not make it false. Vaccines cause a large immunogenic response that so e can tolerate and others can not. Given unhealthy children these vaccines and causing this response is putting their bodies into hyperdrive and now we are seeing a surge in immune system causing the body to attack itself. Where are the unbiased studies?

  • Lowell Hubbs

    I see it appears that someone has been hacking again and switching stuff up with my account, and now my name is Guest, sick people that can’t handle the truth. Lets try it again.

    Jim Bob! What do you not understand about this? Quoted from the above linked to article.

    In total a number of 106 of around 500 vaccinated children fell ill after they were vaccinated.

    40 of those 50 evacuated out of the 106 sick children were paralysed. 38 children stayed admitted, while nobody reported until today about the fate of the other 68 cases.

    And you want to be so to nit pick at this with an unverified claim that there were several other children showed the same symptoms and were never vaccinated. Where is your verification for and of that? Excerpt it and provide the link, thus showing exactly where you find that claim having been made. And exactly what symptoms do you claim to that these said other children suffered? Cherry picking the research. Do you not at all think it past time that you start proving your claims with the evidence! Make a claim, Jim Bob; then you prove that claim. Get it?

  • Lowell Hubbs

    What specifically would you like a study on?

  • Jim Bob

    Lowell,

    Your supposedly really good at research. Google it and make sure to visit any website that isn’t biased by anti-vaccination quackery. I’m guessing you purposefully didn’t visit any of those sites because of your delusional paranoia.
    If non-vaccinated children showed the same symptoms, you really have to call into question your flawed hypothesis.
    PS. I saw your video on youtube about how vitamin C cures cancer. Hopefully, if you get cancer, you’ll stand around eating a bunch of oranges, thus deleting your stain from the gene pool. That kind of stupidity needs to be called out.

  • Lowell Hubbs

    So, Jim Bob; obviously you are unable to provide the evidence that you were asked to provide to back up your said claim that several unvaccinated children were equally affected with illness in the same way as that said for the 106 that became extremely ill, and in that group a certain number, at least 40 suffered as well paralysis; after this vaccine. I asked you to excerpt it, and as well provide the article or data information link. You have refused to. If you actually had that information, most certainly you would be more than high five giddy to rub that in my face, and if you had anything even close to verifiable evidence of that having happened.

    I do not need to nor do I intend to search every article on the internet and nor the entire internet, for information that does not exist in the standard available articles, and additionally for which in fact there is no evidence at all to claim those said articles are biased, and nor do those articles have anything to do with anti-vaccination sentiment. I am more than guessing from reading your statements that you never even read the the two articles I gave you the links to; but yet you present with the audacity to want to make me prove your said claim is true, by searching myself for some such data that you yourself refuse to provide, to validate your own claim. It just doesn’t get any more crazy nor twisted, than that.

    For your information as well; I have absolutely no video on youtube about how vitamin C cures cancer; and certainly nothing there that I have personally promoted. Vitamin C has been majorly overlooked in the treatment of several conditions; and as well in its successful use, and even more-so in regard to IV vitamin C, historically. There are several other choices and protocols that are far better than vitamin C alone; and that in regard to natural protocols for and in the treatment of cancer. I have as a fact never made any claim to vitamin C alone, curing cancer. So, thus you are very mistaken, or lying. Which is it?

    I clearly see that your anger in being unable to support your claims has gotten the best of you, and I think perhaps that you should do some reconsideration as to if it is appropriate to take that out on me personally. Especially when obviously the only way you have to do that is to create clearly inaccurate and blatantly false claims.

    By the way these are the two accounts I have on youtube, and I have removed nothing. There is nothing there regarding vitamin C and curing cancer, that I can find. Unless someone has created a fake one, you wont find that on mine. Perhaps you should go ahead and link to that as well, to prove your said claim? Looks like you have some explaining to do. I provide the links to the information for everything I put forth; so is there any reason that you continue to refuse to?

    http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJwoKI4HGrV6KNn88w8SRXA
    http://www.youtube.com/user/antivax2

  • Lowell

    So, Jim Bob; obviously you are unable to provide the evidence that you were asked to provide to back up your said claim that several unvaccinated children were equally affected with illness in the same way as that said for the 106 that became extremely ill, and in that group a certain number of at least 40 that suffered as well paralysis; after this vaccine. I asked you to excerpt it, and as well provide the article or data information link. You have refused to. If you actually had that information, most certainly you would be more than high five giddy to rub that in my face, and if you had anything even close to verifiable evidence of that having happened.

    I do not need to nor do I intend to search every article on the internet and nor the entire internet, for said and claimed to information that does not exist in the standard available articles. Additionally and as a fact there is no evidence at all to claim that those said articles are biased, nor the two articles I linked you to; and nor do those articles have anything to do with anti-vaccination sentiment. I am more than guessing from reading your statements that you never even read the the two articles I gave you the links to. And yet you present with the audacity to make the claims you do, and as well you want me to and thus require me to prove your said claim is true, by searching myself for some said data that you yourself refuse to provide, and to validate your own claim. It just doesn’t get any more asinine, crazy, and nor more twisted than that.

    If by the way, if you actually want to see exactly what I have promoted regarding vitamin C, you can go to this site page right here. Let me know if you have any argument against, or refute of that information?

    LIPOSOMAL ENCAPSULATED VITAMIN C
    http://www.vacfacts.info/anti-viral—liposomal-encapsulated-vitamin-c.html

    For your information as well; I have absolutely no video on youtube about how vitamin C cures cancer; and certainly nothing there that I have personally promoted. Vitamin C has been majorly overlooked in the treatment of several conditions; and in regard to its successful use, and even more-so in regard to IV vitamin C, historically. There are several other choices and protocols that are far better than vitamin C alone; and that in regard to natural protocols for and in the treatment of cancer. I have as a fact never made any claim to vitamin C alone, curing cancer. So, thus you are very mistaken, or lying. Which is it?

    These are the two youtube channels I have, and as a fact I have removed nothing.

    http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJwoKI4HGrV6KNn88w8SRXA

    http://www.youtube.com/user/antivax2

    This is what I actually put forth regarding natural protocols in the treatment of cancer, by the way. Let me know if you have a problem with that, and why?

    Natural Protocols Recovery From Cancer
    http://www.vacfacts.info/natural-protocols-recovery-from-cancer.html

    I clearly see that your anger in being unable to adequately nor properly debate these matters, and in your inability to support your claims, that it has has gotten the best of you, Jim Bob. However, perhaps you should reconsider if the level of hate in your comments is actually appropriate, when you have even the need to resort to making the blatantly false claims that you have.

  • Jim Bob

    Here are the studies you were asking for:

    1) Italian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 7, Iss. 3 “History of Polio Vaccination in Italy”

    2) History Compass, Vol. 10, Iss. 7 “Polio in Nigeria” – This study shows particularly how infections rates are inversely correlated to vaccination rates. It shows how vaccination rates have risen and fallen over time due to various political, societal and economical factors and it discusses how infections rates fluctuated along with them.

    I’ll find a few more for you when I have a moment.

  • Jim Bob

    Sorry Jean. You are incorrect on several points.

    1) The mercury in dental amalgams is NOT the same as the mercury in vaccines. And yes, the mercury in dental amalgams is bad (for lack of a better word). That being said, the amount of exposure and accumulation of mercury from dental amalgams is still a question of science at this moment.

    2) Mercury (thimerosal) was removed from almost all childhood vaccines 10 years ago.

    3) Vaccines are not injected directly into the bloodstream. Either your doctor is doing it wrong or you’re making up your facts.

  • Jim Bob

    C’mon Lowell. Pull you’re head out of the sand. Go look at the report given by the Chadian Ministry of Health. It’s not that hard.

  • Lowell Hubbs

    And you Jim Bob have the audacity to claim to me that everything I review and put forth is biased anti-vaccination quackery, while what I had as said put in front of you was not not connected to anti-vaccine nor better stated alternative vaccine truth at all; and then you turn around and claim everything to be fact as to information that comes from the document of the all to obvious Chad so called authorities, a government that has everything to lose in admitting the harm done by a vaccine in the numbers of 106 made ill, and at least 40 paralyzed; and that government can not even get honest about the numbers, much more in that they really do not know nor have any actual diagnostic means to even know actually happened.

    You Jim Bob trust a source that as excerpted below claims to that anything these said people experienced that it just has to be all in their head. Anything as irresponsible as that surely is not a trusted authority, but simply the devils own deceptive and in a grossly negligent, cold hearted, and careless cover-up. And you actually Jim Bob, believe a ridiculous story like that, and just because anything goes in the cold hearted denial of vaccine harm, anywhere it has ever happened. Fits your agenda perfectly, and no matter how senseless the claims.

    Here is the next item of interest, and I can see now why you did not and refused to excerpt it. Read it, the line below.

    A child that had not been vaccinated complains of similar symptoms.

    So, one child out of 106 claimed they had what thought were the same symptoms, and apparently there wasn’t anything even verified, nor to verify as to any descriptive documentation. And that in your mind, that one unverified for their condition child, and just a said claim alone; thus then proves to you that none of it was real. In that alone, and in your mind Jim Bob, that one child, thus allows you to believe then that none of it could true, nor an actual condition. And do you really believe that people just get hysterical over what; and somehow at least 40 become paralyzed by their own stress and hysteria? Wow, that’s all just really believable, isn’t it? And you couldn’t even link to that, and excerpt one single and short sentence. You couldn’t because you knew you were deceptive and misrepresented it, in stating it as children. These are your exact words right here, Jim Bob, read it. Quote, “”Why not mention that several other children who did not receive the vaccine showed the same symptoms as the so-called “vaccine-injured” children””? Unquote.

    And you reply on vactruth Jim Bob for what reason; to provide facts and build trust with parents who have questions, when your that deceptive? You know that’s not why your here; you here to deny all and throw into the mix more smoke and mirrors deception. Admit it.

    Do you as well have any excuse for and/or any reply to the misrepresentations and incorrect statements you made about me in your previous reply, and in which I told you what the real truth was? Nope, not going to answer that one either, are you?

    Below are a few more excerpts regarding what I am again referring to. All of it flat out irresponsible and just sicking that any such health authority would make that level of complete denial of the reality of what happened.

    Meningitis Vaccine in Chad: Not the cause of anything except immunity to Meningitis A

    A group of independent experts investigated, and reported that the children fell victim to a well-known syndrome, mass psychogenic illness. MenAfriVac® did not cause the symptoms. “it is all in your head”.

    The experts wish to specifically state that analysis of the epidemiological, medical, clinical, and diagnostic tests data, has not been able to establish a causal link between the clinical manifestations observed in the patients and the MenAfriVac vaccine.

    The symptoms observed in patients are similar to those described in the literature under several names:

    Collective hysteria

    Collective obsessive behavior

    Mass psychogenic phenomenon

    http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2013/01/meningitis-vaccine-in-chad-not-the-cause-of-paralysis.html

    2ND STATEMENT

    EXPERT FINDINGS

    The vaccination campaign organized in Gouro was conducted under normal conditions by staffs who are
    experienced in implementing mass campaigns and routine vaccination programs.

    The conditions of hospitalization, in particular the medical care at the psychological level, the dialogue between the community and the health staff, were insufficient.

    The crises are triggered by noise, visits by foreigners, and the occurrence of crises among other patients.

    Apart from these agitated periods, the children lead normal lives.

    The patients are aged between 8 and 25 years, and with 77% of them being girls, i.e. 27 out of a total of 35.

    A child that had not been vaccinated complains of similar symptoms.

    All the different medical examinations performed on the patients were normal. The neurological examination on patients at the request of the experts also concluded that all was normal.

    http://lizditz.typepad.com/files/2nd-statement-moh-chad_21jan2013.pdf

  • Lowell

    And you Jim Bob have the audacity to claim to me that everything I review and put forth is biased anti-vaccination quackery, while what I had as said put in front of you was not not connected to anti-vaccine nor better stated alternative vaccine truth at all. Then you turn around and claim everything to be fact as to information that comes from the document of the all to obvious Chad so called authorities. Chad, a government that has everything to lose in admitting the harm done by a vaccine in the numbers of 106 made ill, and at least 40 paralyzed; and that government can not even get honest about the number, much more in that they really do not know nor have any actual diagnostic means to even know actually happened.

    You Jim Bob trust a source that as excerpted below claims to that anything these said people experienced that it just has to be all in their head. Anything as irresponsible as that surely is not a trusted authority, but simply the devils own deceptive and in a grossly negligent, cold hearted, and careless cover-up. And you actually Jim Bob, believe a ridiculous story like that, and just because anything goes in the cold hearted denial of vaccine harm, anywhere it has ever happened. Fits your agenda perfectly, and no matter how senseless the claims.

    Here is the next item of interest, and I can see now why you did not and refused to excerpt it. Read it, the line below.

    A child that had not been vaccinated complains of similar symptoms.

    So, one child out of 106 claimed they had what thought were the same symptoms, and apparently there wasn’t anything even verified, nor to verify as to any descriptive documentation. And that in your mind, that one unverified for their condition child, and just a said claim alone; thus then proves to you that none of it was real. In that alone, and in your mind Jim Bob, that one child, thus allows you to believe then that none of it could true, nor an actual condition.

    And do you really believe that people just get hysterical over what; and somehow at least 40 become paralyzed by their own stress and hysteria? Wow, that’s all just really believable, isn’t it? And you couldn’t even link to that, and excerpt one single and short sentence. You couldn’t because you knew you were deceptive and misrepresented it, in stating it as children. These are your exact words right here, Jim Bob, read it. Quote, “”Why not mention that several other children who did not receive the vaccine showed the same symptoms as the so-called “vaccine-injured” children””? Unquote.

    And you reply on vactruth Jim Bob for what reason; to provide facts and build trust with parents who have questions, when your that deceptive? You know that’s not why your here; you here to deny all and throw into the mix more smoke and mirrors deception. Admit it.

    Do you as well have any excuse for and/or any reply to the misrepresentations and incorrect statements you made about me in your previous reply, and in which I told you what the real truth was? Nope, not going to answer that one either, are you?

    Below are a few more excerpts regarding what I am again referring to. All of it flat out irresponsible and just sicking that any such health authority would make that level of complete denial of the reality of what happened.

    Meningitis Vaccine in Chad: Not the cause of anything except immunity to Meningitis A

    A group of independent experts investigated, and reported that the children fell victim to a well-known syndrome, mass psychogenic illness. MenAfriVac® did not cause the symptoms. “it is all in your head”.

    The experts wish to specifically state that analysis of the epidemiological, medical, clinical, and diagnostic tests data, has not been able to establish a causal link between the clinical manifestations observed in the patients and the MenAfriVac vaccine.

    The symptoms observed in patients are similar to those described in the literature under several names:

    Collective hysteria

    Collective obsessive behavior

    Mass psychogenic phenomenon

    http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2013/01/meningitis-vaccine-in-chad-not-the-cause-of-paralysis.html

    2nd Statement from the Government

    -Gouro-Chad-

    EXPERT FINDINGS

    The vaccination campaign organized in Gouro was conducted under normal conditions by staffs who are

    experienced in implementing mass campaigns and routine vaccination programs.

    The conditions of hospitalization, in particular the medical care at the psychological level, the dialogue between the community and the health staff, were insufficient.

    The crises are triggered by noise, visits by foreigners, and the occurrence of crises among other patients.

    Apart from these agitated periods, the children lead normal lives.

    The patients are aged between 8 and 25 years, and with 77% of them being girls, i.e. 27 out of a total of 35.

    A child that had not been vaccinated complains of similar symptoms.

    All the different medical examinations performed on the patients were normal. The neurological examination on patients at the request of the experts also concluded that all was normal.

    http://lizditz.typepad.com/files/2nd-statement-moh-chad_21jan2013.pdf

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Jim Bob. Vaccines when injected, reach the blood stream immediately and to claim otherwise is simply preposterous. No, they are of course injected intravenously, but if you doubt what i am saying, then tell me how long does it take a typical hypo to reach the brain, once injected in the buttocks? How do the chemical ingredients of the hypo reach the brain, if not through the bloodstream?

    Go ahead and explain Jim Bob, why you believe that one form of mercury is harmful, while yet another form of mercury is not toxic nor harmful? All forms of mercury are neurologically toxic. In fact there is as well in reality little difference between the potential toxicity of ethyl verses methyl mercury, other than methyl mercury takes longer to detox and remove from the body in fact in some ways ethyl mercury reaches the brain faster. Both are harmful, and ethyl mercury is the type used in vaccines, (Thimerosal). Have you ever read the MSDS sheet on Thimerosal, Jim Bob; and have you realized just how little safety testing has been done?? No matter w

    what kind of mercury, once it is there in the brain, organs and tissues; it stays there, and there has never been any study showing that it was ever entirely detoxed from the brain, nor any other organ of the body. Just because a substance like ethyl mercury has been shown to be excreted by the human body at a faster rate, and in higher quantities than methyl mercury, and which is detoxed and excreted at a slower rate; does not mean there is any indication that there was not significant amounts left in the brain, organs, and tissues of the body. There is no safe form of mercury, and to claim so is just preposterous. Prove me wrong!

    Arch Toxicol. 1985 Sep;57(4):260-7.

    The comparative toxicology of ethyl- and methyl mercury.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4091651

    What about the individuals and children with inadequate glutathione levels? Does that matter? Actually educate yourself.

    What You Need to Know About the Different Forms of Mercury, the Next Generation of Mercury Testing, and How to Detox Safely

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/06/dr-shade-on-mercury-exposure.aspx

  • Jim Bob

    Lowell,

    All I can say is incorrect.

    1) Yes, everything eventually makes it into the bloodstream but your ignoring the fact that vaccines are injected into muscle tissue and how it reacts at that point before moving to the bloodstream.

    2) Again I say, Thimerosal was removed from vaccines more then ten years ago. During that span autism rates continued to rise. Ergo, Thimerosal DOES NOT cause autism.

    3) As for Ethyl vs. Methyl mercury, I see your 25 year old study on RATS and I raise you a 5 year old study on PEOPLE (see Pediatrics, Volume 121, issue 2.)

    4) Once again, thank you for your hypothesis regarding aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. Since we consume aluminum daily, you’ll have to show why its the aluminum in vaccines as opposed to other sources. For example, aluminum is present in both breast milk and drinking water (including bottled water). Small amounts are also located in most foods.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Again, you refuse to understand that injecting an aluminum adjuvant is not the same thing as eating such as baking powder as an ingredient in lets say a muffin, for example. The burden of proof is actually again on you, and yet you refuse the evidence that you are wrong, and you refuse to provide any support for your ridiculous claim that these are one and the same.

    I have repeatedly put in front of you a significant number of studies that show the direct mechanisms of harm caused by aluminum adjuvants. I have repeated given you data on the fact that no actual nor physiological safety studies have ever been done on aluminum adjuvants.

    You ignore it all and refuse it all. And yet all you again do is cite some obviously biased study from the AAP, that you are again either to lazy to even provide a link to. or you don’t want anyone to actually read the obviously preposterous information that is there. You are again simply playing disinformation games, Jim Bob.

    Provide me with one single vaccine aluminum adjuvant safety study, in comparison to the studies I have repeatedly put in front of you. You are in major denial, and you must deny it; and that is simply your own problem. How would anyone convince a person such as you, that your statements are incorrect, when you refuse any and all data and science? You do not even matter, because any reader that has been here can and could see exactly what I have been putting forth.

  • Jim Bob

    You’ve provided an untested hypothesis that says: Aluminum adjuvants cause harm.

    You have not tested this hypothesis. Moreover, you admit that there are no safety studies from which you can make this claim. But you have inferred this hypothesis based on other “relevant studies”.

    If you were following scientific method, you would test your hypothesis and present your conclusions. You skipped this step and are assuming your hypothesis is correct and are asking me to disprove something that isn’t proven. Bad science is bad.

    Please go back to high school. I beg you. They teach this stuff there. I swear.

    To your next point, I ask why the study is “obviously” biased? I’m guessing its because you believe it to be so therefore it must be true. I don’t understand why its disinformation. I provided the title, volume and issue numbers of where to find said article.

  • Jim Bob

    And yes. There is a study about injected aluminum adjuvants published in the journal Vaccine, Issue 20, supplement 3.

    “Elimination of aluminum adjuvants”

    -The in vitro dissolution and in vivo absorption studies indicate that aluminum-containing adjuvants which are administered intramuscularly are dissolved by alpha-hydroxycarboxylic acids in interstitial fluid, absorbed into the blood, distributed to tissues, and eliminated in the urine.

  • Periandros

    “disinformation games” (sic.) LOL!

    Pst lowell, its ‘misinformation…’

    First learn how to talk, then speak about “aluminium adjuvants” in vaccines FFS…

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Disinformation, is intentionally false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately. For this reason, it is synonymous with and sometimes called black propaganda. It is an act of deception and false statements to convince someone of untruth. Disinformation should not be confused with misinformation, information that is unintentionally false.

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Look it up!

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Again, this study you present with shows and proves nothing as to your Thimerosal and/or injected in a vaccine mercury safety claims, Jim Bob. The study as well disregards needed individual glutathione levels, to acquire detoxification, which are most often found to be low in children with ASD. You can as well read Response to this article, titled Invalidating Assumption, by Dr. Robert Indech, Researcher, IPD Associates. That response reiterates and validates everything I earlier stated in my reply, and as well is additionally validated again by The comparative toxicology of ethyl- and methyl mercury, study I linked to. So now you have both a human study and a rat study, coming up with essentially similar conclusions. The Pediatrics study as well compared the oral form or source of methyl mercury, to the injected form Thimerosal, (ethyl mercury); which is not even a logical nor equal comparison.

    PEDIATRICS Vol. 121 No. 2 February 1, 2008

    Mercury Levels in Newborns and Infants After Receipt of Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines

    CONCLUSIONS. The blood half-life of intramuscular ethyl mercury from thimerosal in vaccines in infants is substantially shorter than that of oral methyl mercury in adults. Increased mercury levels were detected in stools after vaccination, suggesting that the gastrointestinal tract is involved in ethyl mercury elimination. Because of the differing pharmacokinetics of ethyl and methyl mercury, exposure guidelines based on oral methyl mercury in adults may not be accurate for risk assessments in children who receive thimerosal-containing vaccines.

    Responses to this article
    Pediatrics published online March 30, 2008
    Invalidating Assumption
    Dr. Robert Indech, Researcher
    IPD Associates

    While the methodology for testing for the presence of ethyl and methyl mercury in blood and urine is quite sophisticated, it admits the underlying assumption that lowered levels of these chemicals results from bodily elimination of them. Perhaps the more rapid decline in measurement levels of ethylmercury is due to stronger (undetectable) binding to tissues in the central nervous system. The pharmacokinetics of such a process would be identical to that observed, yet such a process may give rise to autistic symptoms, whereas total excretion from the body would not.

    In short, simply because the levels decline, you can’t make the assumption that the toxin has been eliminated from the body. The paper is fundamentally flawed.

    Conflict of Interest:None declared

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    I already answered the question as to why Pediatrics studies are and should be considered as highly biased, Jim Bob. If you don’t like the answer, then reply to the answer, instead of asking the question again, and as if you seen and read nothing as to the reply that was already put in front of you.

    As far as the aluminum adjuvant studies that have been in the past put a list of those right in front of you; in regard to those studies the scientific method was never in question, and nor was there need for a hypothesis, as if you had paid any attention, those studies were clearly completed. I put that list back up here again today, but so far Vactruth apparently has not been to their moderation board and published that reply. As you appear to be aware of, recently their system has been un-predictable and sending most of the replies to moderation that contain any linked to urls in them. That list is as well on my site, and you darn sure know what that is and how to find that. So, do you have any more excuses left to deny the existence of that study information?

    This below that you referred to, is NOT even close to being an actual vaccine aluminum adjuvant safety study, Jim Bob. Nor is it actually a physiologically effect, based study. Why don’t you as well read the whole abstract, instead of just picking from it only what you want to see and interpret from it. Go to my collection of studies, Jim Bob; those are as well, physiological effect, based. The CDC itself admits the lack of safety data, regarding aluminum adjuvants, and as well the lack of safety studies. So do you wonder at all, as to your difficulty in finding any, and as I said?

    Elimination of aluminum adjuvants

    Abstract

    In vitro dissolution experiments although perhaps not at typical body concentrations and temperatures demonstrated that the α-hydroxycarboxylic acids present in interstitial fluid (citric acid, lactic acid, and malic acid) are capable of dissolving aluminum-containing adjuvants. Amorphous aluminum phosphate adjuvant dissolved more rapidly than crystalline aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. Intramuscular administration in New Zealand White rabbits of aluminum phosphate and aluminum hydroxide adjuvants, which were labelled with 26Al, revealed that 26Al was present in the first blood sample (1 h) for both adjuvants. The area under the blood level curve for 28 days indicated that three times more aluminum was absorbed from aluminum phosphate adjuvant than aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. In vivo studies using 26Al-labelled adjuvants are relatively safe because accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) can quantify quantities of 26Al as small as 10−17 g. A similar study in humans would require a whole-body exposure of 0.7 μSv per year compared to the natural background exposure of 3000 μSv per year. The in vitro dissolution and in vivo absorption studies indicate that aluminum-containing adjuvants which are administered intramuscularly are dissolved by α-hydroxycarboxylic acids in interstitial fluid, absorbed into the blood, distributed to tissues, and eliminated in the urine.

    Here is the last half of that study abstract, Jim Bob. It clearly does not show any proof of the safety of aluminum adjuvants, and as well gives no physiological explanation for where the aluminum is that was distributed to the tissues. The study does not determine how much is left in the tissues, nor what physiological effect that may have, or would have had, short or long term. Wake up!

    [Last half of the abstract] 26 Al-labelled adjuvants are relatively safe because accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) can quantify quantities of 26Al as small as 10−17 g. A similar study in humans would require a whole-body exposure of 0.7 μSv per year compared to the natural background exposure of 3000 μSv per year. The in vitro dissolution and in vivo absorption studies indicate that aluminum-containing adjuvants which are administered intramuscularly are dissolved by α-hydroxycarboxylic acids in interstitial fluid, absorbed into the blood, distributed to tissues, and eliminated in the urine.

    In short, Jim Bob, the real studies are showing aluminum adjuvants to be causing over activation of the brains microglia, and resulting chronic levels of brain inflammation, and this has been now in several studies a common finding in those with ASD, and as well ADHD, as to and in regard to that said inflammation. Vaccine antigens and inevitable potential vaccine contamination combined with aluminum adjuvants obviously compound the problem. Your study would have entirely missed that finding, no matter what.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    The Italian Journal study certainly does not address any such numbers as 10’s of millions, saved by the polio vaccine. The study as well discounts entirely the known natural immunity to polio that clearly developed through non asymptomatic or nearly nonasymptomatic carriers. Such carriers clearly as well speak to the issues of the false germ theory, and resistance/health of the host being actually more important in focusing on that, than the vaccine. When you read The Sabin Letters, and you can google that; those letters surely do not give any raving review of the oral polio vaccine. In fact it was a pre warning of what was to come, and as to what they are clearly seeing today in underdeveloped countries.The harm that the SV40 contaminant did (and was in the 60’s polio vaccine), seeded millions with potential for cancer; and how is that a success story. Even children today have had SV40 isolated from cancer tumors; so either that virus is still in some vaccine, or it is transferable from person to person. You can find a lot more on that on my site, Jim Bob.

    The current and recent past history regarding the use of oral polio vaccine in Nigeria, is not actually the success story you intend to paint a picture of, Jim Bob. The mutated vaccine strain polio virus with increased virulence that has been found, and over 50,000 cases of acute placid paralysis, worldwide, (which they of course deny any proof that it is caused by the vaccine), is not exactly all of that a raving success story. In a recent public question and answer session, Bill Gates refused to address the question of the 48,000 cases of AFP now known of in India; directly caused by his vaccine efforts. Instead he just continued to sing the praises of the vaccine. You can find that video of his statements on youtube, where he was directly asked the question on that, and he as said ignored the question, and refused to answer it.

  • Jim Bob

    Here is what’s wrong with the BS you just spouted:

    1) If its aluminum from vaccines, you have to show why its not the aluminum from all the other common sources. You haven’t shown this, ergo: UNTESTED HYPOTHESIS.

    2) “Vaccine antigens and inevitable potential vaccine contamination combined with aluminum adjuvants obviously compound the problem.” UNTESTED HYPOTHESIS THAT YOU JUST PULLED OUT OF YOUR RECTAL REGION.

    If you keep drawing your conclusions from pseudoscience, your going to get the wrong answers but I have a feeling that is your intention.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    The science and data clearly show that it is the aluminum adjuvants in vaccines, Jim Bob. It is beyond my control that vactruth can not get their systems in place and that allow reference urls to be published on their site. One day it works, and the next day nothing will publish as it goes to moderation, and nothing ever comes back out as published. Further more all of that was put in fron fo you before, and you ignored it.

    Are you going to tell me that you actually think it is aluminum in the environment and such a aluminum in baking powder, perhaps in a childs muffin, or a brownie that causes this harm, and chronic levels of brain inflammation as said, and as found in ASD?

  • Jim bob

    I will straight up tell you I don’t think aluminum causes autism.

    In the journal Autism (Volume 9, Issue 3), you will find a study comparing the levels of aluminum (and several other heavy metals) in two equal groups: 1) 40 autistic boys and 2) 40 non-autistic boys.

    The conclusions show that there is no statistical difference between the aluminum levels in Autistic children and non-Autistic children.

    In the Journal Neurosciences, (Volume 10, Issue 3): Similar study, same conclusions.

    Moreover, another study in pediatrics, (Volume 129, Issue 1): states the daily average aluminum exposure in children is 0.7mg. While in a single vaccine, the highest possible exposure is 1.2mg which is at most not even twice the amount of average daily exposure. Both figures, (even when combined) are well below the minimum risk level established by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Moreover, it goes on to demonstrate that there is a lack of data to support a correlation between aluminum exposure and bioaccumulation. Therefore, if the correlation you put forth is flawed, the adverse event you concluded is flawed.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Wrong, you keep repeatedly attempting to correlate dietary and or environmental exposure which is actually at near zero for a child, to that of injected exposure of aluminum adjuvants. So, in fact it is your correlation that is again flawed. In your hypocrisy you stated to me that, You haven’t shown this, ergo: UNTESTED HYPOTHESIS. Yet, you have put forth here nothing but repeat and obviously falsely claims, which even as much as basic common sense should tell you has no basis in any form nor kind of actual physiological understanding of the processes of the human body; even on the most basic level.

    So, Jim Bob, you gave me a study on hair analysis from Kuwait Autism Center- Kuwait University, Kuwait, and in the abstract it may be referring to aluminum as the other five toxic elements, but doesn’t even mention it. And do children in Kuwait get the same number of vaccines that children in the US get, on the CDC schedule? Obviously not. Second, I would not be so certain that hair analysis actually detects what effect aluminum has neurologically and on the brain, once it circulates in and through the brain, and or may be trapped after injection. However, your study irregardless, is obviously incorrect. The actual study evidence showing the vaccine link to ASD, is clearly much stronger than any studies that the CDC has ever and/or can come up with to defend against them. Period. I am going to give you a couple counter studies here as well if the reply post will hold, to show that the aluminum in hair analysis of those with ASD, has in fact been found high, and not what is considered, normal.

    It is not just aluminum, it is at times as well mercury, it is the damage done by the MMR vaccine, and it is vaccine contamination; all of it can trigger ASD, and the success of the variable protocols of biomedical treament as well show that beyond any doubt to be true. They are essentially detoxifying the vaccines and providing the body with what it needs to heal. Wake up! You are in deep denial.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Estimation of autistic children by metallomics analysis

    Clarification of the pathogenesis and treatment of autism spectrum disorders is one of the challenges today. In this study, we examine scalp hair concentrations of 26 trace elements for 1,967 children with autistic disorders (1,553 males and 414 females). Five-hundred and eighty-four (29.7%), 347 (17.6%) and 114 (5.8%) subjects was found deficient in zinc, magnesium and calcium, respectively, and 2.0% or less in the other essential metals. The incidence rate of mineral deficiency was highly observed in infants aged 0-3 year-old. In contrast, 339 (17.2%), 168 (8.5%) and 94 (4.8%) individuals was found suffering from high burden of aluminium, cadmium and lead, and 2.8% or less from mercury and arsenic burden. These findings suggest that infantile zinc- and magnesium-deficiency and/or toxic metal burdens may epigenetically play principal roles as environmental factors in autistic disorders and that metallomics approach may lead to early screening and prevention of the neurodevelopment disorders.

    http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130204/srep01199/full/srep01199.html

    Toxic Metals and Essential Elements in Hair and Severity of Symptoms among Children with Autism

    Conclusion: Our data supports the historic evidence that heavy metals play a role in the development

    of ASD. In combination with an inadequate nutritional status the toxic effect of metals increase along

    with the severity of symptoms.

    Level of Potentially Toxic Metals in the

    Hair of Autistic Children

    As shown in Table 2, the mean hair metal concentration was high for aluminum (15.21 ±9.0), arsenic (2.94±4.05), cadmium (0.62± 0.19), mercury (3.35±4.80), antimony (0.58± 0.09), nickel (2.37±1.28), and lead (4.56± 1.40). Of the 44 children, 13.5 showed vanadium values above the reference range. None of the children showed conspicuous values for uranium and the potentially toxic trace elements chromium.

    http://www.maedica.org/articles/2012/1/2012_Vol7(10)_No1_pg38-48.pdf

    Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?
    http://vaccinesafetycouncilminnesota.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Do-aluminum-vaccine-adjuvants-contribute-to-the-rising-prevalence-of-autism.pdf

    The Vaccine Damage – Science
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-vaccine-damage—science.html

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Go do some research as well Jim Bob, on glutahione and in regard to glutathione levels being low in children with ASD, and as well in the population including adults that can not detoxify heavy metals like mercury and aluminum, from either vaccines, and or mercury in amalgam dental fillings. You agreed the dental amalgam was bad, it surely seems to me, but you yet seem to think it is ok for these brain and neurologically toxic substances to be injected in vaccines. You are clueless by choice, and in denial by choice.

  • Jim Bob

    I saw that study you posted above but I didn’t include it because it had no control group. So it examined about 2000 children and said they have traces of heavy metals in hair and urine samples. Good so far, but compared to what? What if a group of non-autistic controls showed the exact same levels? These unanswered questions are why the study you posted is flawed. The study failed to show this which is why drawing a causal relationship is poor science.

    On the other hand, the studies I posted actually do have a basis for comparison with two groups including one control.

    Your comment comparing the Kuwaiti vaccine schedule to the American one reeks of poor logic. If we go back to your HYPOTHESIS: aluminum causes autism because higher levels of aluminum are found in autistic children. The studies I presented show there is no statistical difference in the aluminum levels of autistic and non-autistic children. Even if the overall exposure levels of aluminum in Kuwaiti children is lower then American levels, your hypothesis would predict that autistic children would have a higher level of aluminum in their bodies compared to other Kuwaiti children. THIS IS NOT THE CASE. ERGO, YOUR HYPOTHESIS IS FAULTY.

    More to the point, the Kuwaiti vaccine schedule is quite similar to the American one.
    Wake up! You’re in deep denial.

  • Jim Bob

    PS. For your claim there are no safety studies re: Aluminum Adjuvants, see here:

    1) “Aluminum toxicokinetics regarding infant diet and vaccinations” in Vaccine, Volume 20, Supplement 3

    2) “Updated aluminum pharmacokinetics following infant exposures through diet and vaccination” in Vaccine, Volume 29, Issue 51
    Further proof of the safety of aluminum adjuvants.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    For your information, Jim Bob; none of the vaccine safety studies funded and done by the CDC or promoted by the CDC, etc., have ever had an actual entirely unvaccinated control group. So, once again appears some of your obvious one sided hypocrisy.

    In the second study there was a control group, and the findings were quite specific, Jim Bob. Additionally, there was in that study referenced to another study done in Kuwait, that found the opposite of what your claimed to study did. 47 references were attached to the bottom of that said study titled, Toxic Metals and Essential Elements in Hair and Severity of Symptoms among Children with Autism. http://www.maedica.org/articles/2012/1/2012_Vol7(10)_No1_pg38-48.pdf

    Excerpt; [In 2009, Blaylock et al. reported that aluminum causes oxidative stress within brain tissue, exacerbating the clinical presentation of autism by worsening of excitotoxicity and by microglial priming (29). At the same time, a study of Kuwaiti children found significant elevations of environmental metals in children with autism. Mercury levels of the autistic group were 15 times higher than in the control group (30,31).]

    In your single and said promoted study Jim Bob, that study did find higher than normal levels of mercury in those with ASD, and as far as aluminum, that study references to as said 5 toxic elements, but does not name those elements in the abstract and the full study itself, is a paid for study; so if you can copy and paste the section that mentions aluminum as one of the 5 toxic elements they actually studied, go ahead and do that.

    Lets look at this below study. This study shows high aluminum content in hair analysis across the board in children, compared to adults. The study appears to either not take cases of ASD into consideration, or they were in the study all of the subjects, neurotypical. This would suggest that such hair analysis is or may not be a true reflection of what actually goes on as to such toxicity and related detoxification of heavy metals, and within the human body. This suggests that hair analysis may or may not be a reliable test factor at all in regard to the adverse effects of injected aluminum adjuvants.

    High accumulation of aluminum in hairs of infants and children

    Yasuda, Hiroshi; Yoshida, Kazuya; Segawa, Mitsuru; Tokuda, Ryoichi; Yasuda, Yuichi; Tsutsui, Toyoharu

    Biomedical Research on Trace Elements (2008), 19(1), 57-62

    This report demonstrates that infants and children have suffered from high aluminum accumulation, based on the evidence data of 1,720 children. For estimating its body burden, the scalp hair aluminum concns. were measured with inductively coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The geometric mean of hair aluminum concentration was 10.4 and 11.1 mg/g (ppm) for boys and 11.8 and 10.5 ppm for girls, in the groups aged 0-3 and 4-9 years, resp. These levels were high-significantly (p < 0.0000) and nearly 3-fold higher than those in the adults (3.8 and 4.0 ppm for male and female). Ten children exhibited higher aluminum levels exceeding 50 ppm, and the highest level observed was 116.8 ppm in a five-year-old boy. This wide-used metal should be monitored as toxic element risky to the young generation and its adverse effects remain to be clarified.

    http://chemport.cas.org/cgi-bin/sdcgi?APP=ftslink&action=reflink&origin=npg&version=1.0&coi=1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXosVagsr0%3D&pissn={printIssn}&pyear=2013&md5=6c30723f03f248050f58ccc24e451389

    In regard to the said differences specifically; 19 vaccines are given in Kuwait by the age of 2 yrs, and 24 vaccines by age 4, then only 3 vaccines after that, between the age of 10 and 18. 27 vaccines total by the age of 18. In the US, by my count, 19 vaccines are possible by the age of 6 months, and the numbers of vaccines just keep increasing, from that point. When you review this information from National Vaccine Information Center, by their count, it by the numbers, looks even worse.

    49 doses of 14 vaccines before the age of 6
    http://www.nvic.org/Downloads/49-Doses-PosterB.aspx

    Kuwait
    http://www.e.gov.kw/sites/KGOEnglish/Portal/Pages/CitizensAndResidences/Health/basicVaccinationsinKuwait.aspx

    US
    http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/downloads/parent-ver-sch-0-6yrs.pdf

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/can-we-continue-justify-injecting-aluminum-children

    Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(17):2630-7.
    Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe?
    Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA.
    SourceNeural Dynamics Research Group, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L8, Canada.

    Abstract
    Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community. We hope that the present paper will provide a framework for a much needed and long overdue assessment of this highly contentious medical issue.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21568886

    Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?
    Lucija Tomljenovic a, Christopher A. Shaw a,b

    Abstract
    Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are serious multisystem developmental disorders and an urgent global
    public health concern. Dysfunctional immunity and impaired brain function are core deficits in ASD. Aluminum (Al), the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant, is a demonstrated neurotoxin and a strong immune stimulator. Hence, adjuvant Al has the potential to induce neuroimmune disorders.When assessing adjuvant toxicity in children, two key points ought to be considered: (i) children should not be viewed as “small adults” as their unique physiology makes them muchmore vulnerable to toxic insults; and (ii) if exposure to Al from only few vaccines can lead to cognitive impairment and autoimmunity in adults, is it unreasonable to question whether the current pediatric schedules, often containing 18 Al adjuvanted vaccines, are safe for children? By applying Hill’s criteria for establishing causality between exposure and outcomewe investigatedwhether exposure to Al from vaccines could be contributing to the rise in ASD prevalence in theWesternworld. Our results showthat: (i) children from countries with the highest ASD prevalence appear to have the highest exposure to Al from vaccines; (ii) the increase in exposure to Al adjuvants significantly correlates with the increase in ASD prevalence in the United States observed over the last two decades (Pearson r=0.92, pb0.0001); and (iii) a significant correlation exists between the amounts of Al administered to preschool children and the current prevalence of ASD in seven Western countries, particularly at 3–4 months of age (Pearson r=0.89–0.94, p=0.0018–0.0248). The application of the Hill’s criteria to these data indicates that the correlation between Al in vaccines and ASD may be causal. Because children represent a fraction of the population most at risk for complications following exposure to Al, a more rigorous evaluation of Al adjuvant safety seems warranted.

    http://vaccinesafetycouncilminnesota.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Do-aluminum-vaccine-adjuvants-contribute-to-the-rising-prevalence-of-autism.pdf

    Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populations http://lup.sagepub.com/content/21/2/223.short
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235057

    Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism? Lucija Tomljenovic, Christopher A. Shaw http://omsj.org/reports/tomljenovic%202011.pdf

    Research Article: The Severity of Autism Is Associated with Toxic Metal Body Burden and Red Blood Cell Glutathione Levels
    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2009/532640/

    How the aluminum adjuvants cause this said inflammation.

    J Immunol. 2008 Sep 15;181(6):3755-9. Cutting edge: alum adjuvant stimulates inflammatory dendritic cells through activation of the NALP3 inflammasome.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18768827

    Ann Neurol. 2005 Jan;57(1):67-81.Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism.
    Vargas DL, Nascimbene C, Krishnan C, Zimmerman AW, Pardo CA.
    Source: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
    http://www.neuro.jhmi.edu/neuroimmunopath/pdf/4%20Neuroglial%20activation%20and%20neuroinflammation%20in%20the%20brain%20of%20patients%20with%20autism.pdf

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15546155

    Microglial Activation and Increased Microglial Density Observed in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Autism, (with a list of other related studies)
    http://www.journalogy.net/Publication/35542161/microglial-activation-and-increased-microglial-density-observed-in-the-dorsolateral-prefrontal

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20674603

    Immunity, neuroglia and neuroinflammation in autism
    http://www.journalogy.net/Publication/6149686/immunity-neuroglia-and-neuroinflammation-in-autism

    Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum Markers of Inflammation in Autism
    http://www.journalogy.net/Publication/5811041/cerebrospinal-fluid-and-serum-markers-of-inflammation-in-autism

    Proinflammatory and regulatory cytokine production associated with innate and adaptive immune responses in children with autism spectrum disorders and developmental regression
    http://www.journalogy.net/Publication/35705657/proinflammatory-and-regulatory-cytokine-production-associated-with-innate-and-adaptive-immune

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Here are your two studies and their sources, Jim Bob.

    The first one looked at again nothing but a comparison between the estimated amount of aluminum consumed dietarily, verses that of the amounts of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. The full study can not be found without payment, so just exactly what was done with the radioactive 26A1, can not be determined.

    Vaccine, Volume 20, Supplement 3

    Abstract

    Some vaccines contain aluminum adjuvants to enhance the immunological response, and it has been postulated that this aluminum could contribute to adverse health effects, especially in children who receive a vaccination series starting at birth. The pharmacokinetic properties and end-point toxicities of aluminum are presented. In assessing the relevance of dietary and medical aluminum exposure to public health, we estimated infant body burdens during the first year of life for breast milk and formula diets and for a standard vaccination schedule. We then compared those body burdens with that expected for intake at a level considered safe for intermediate-duration exposure. The methodology blends intake values and uptake fractions with an aluminum retention function derived from a human injection study using radioactive 26Al. The calculated body burden of aluminum from vaccinations exceeds that from dietary sources, however, it is below the minimal risk level equivalent curve after the brief period following injection.

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X02001652

    In this second follow up study, what it contains is nothing but another junk science study, and with their study conclusions ending up clearly NOT based on the actual data they produced. Those study conclusions are simply based on a huge guess, and without obviously ANY substantial data to back any such conclusion. The study and the studies on vaccine aluminum adjuvant safety in humans, has clearly not been done in humans nor animals!!! A study done on two New Zealand White rabbits, and co-comparisons made to a said study done one single human being; is that said data, conclusive evidence of injected aluminum adjuvant safety?

    In fact the residual effect they found in the data of this study, FULLY supports the several studies that have been done showing that aluminum adjuvants cause overactivation of the brains own several immune system, known as the microglia, and then in turn thus resulting in chronic levels of brain inflammation. That inflammation has been found in the brains of those with ASD, and as well ADHD, now in as said several studies. Some of the studies outline the vaccine aluminum adjuvant mechanism link, and some only point to the finding of that chronic level of brain inflammation, without a causation even suggested. They simply call and refer to it as inflammation syndromes. So, that would explain it, slow and steady release of aluminum bound in the injection site and the muscle, after injection. Thank you very much for helping make my point, Jim Bob. Together with the studies I have put forth, that makes for a far more incredible and conclusive package of information, data, and explanation.

    Updated aluminum pharmacokinetics following infant exposures through diet
    and vaccination
    http://www.medstat.hu/vakcina/Mitkus2011.pdf

    Selected excerpts from the above (Jim Bobs) study. Take a look.

    Flarend et al. [27] investigated the absorption into the blood of aluminum hydroxide and aluminum phosphate following intramuscular injection into New Zealand White rabbits.

    Therefore, based on the results of [27], we assumed: (1) that only 51% (for aluminum phosphate, AP) or 17% (for aluminum hydroxide, AH) of injected aluminum would be absorbed into the blood following a single intramuscular vaccine injection over the first 28 days after exposure, and (2) that absorption of the remaining adjuvant at the site of injection would take place at a constant rate over the next 28 days for AP and 137 days for AH, rather than instantaneously, as modeled in Fig. 2. In order to make this calculation, we assumed that the rate of absorption after 28 days was the same as that during the 28-day experimental period in [27], i.e., 0.51/28 day−1 for AP and 0.17/28 day−1 for AH. These rates are considered to be highly conservative, since blood concentrations of AH approached zero by the end of the experiment, thereby implying a very low rate of uptake into blood, and the blood concentration–time curve for AP appeared to be entering a terminal phase 28 days post-injection. Using these assumptions for the absorption of aluminum from intramuscular injection of vaccines, we repeated our analysis.

    Figs. 3 and 4 demonstrate that modeling the slower release of aluminum from the injection site eliminates the “excursions” of whole-body aluminum above MRL levels shown in Fig. 2. The body burden of aluminum is less than 50% of the oral safe level for either AP (Fig. 3) or AH (Fig. 4) at all times during the first year or so of life. Using the assumptions of slower release of aluminum adjuvant from the site of injection, the estimated level of aluminum in infants exceeds the MRL (safe) body burden at no time, and the margin of exposure between aluminum body burden from vaccine and the MRL increases with age.

    Although based on the most recent data available, there are several uncertainties in our analysis. First, the published retention function for aluminum (Eq. (1)) is based on results for only one person, albeit data have been acquired from this adult for twelve years [5]. Ideally, the retention function would have been derived from pharmacokinetic data in infants or in more than one adult; however, an expansion of this analysis is unlikely. An infant monkey study could provide these data, however, given the present lack of evidence of harm due to the current aluminum levels, such studies may be a low priority. Second, the results of Flarend et al. [27], from which we obtained our estimate of the rate and extent of absorption of aluminum hydroxide and phosphate following intramuscular injection, are based on data from only two rabbits per adjuvant tested. The low number of animals in that study is not surprising, given that it was primarily an exploratory investigation into the disposition of injected aluminum, utilizing, at that time, a new method for detecting radioactive Al in the body (accelerator mass spectrometry). Ideally, the results of that study should be confirmed using a larger number of animals, in order to increase our confidence in the results. Nevertheless, the study clearly showed that the absorption of aluminum, at least in rabbits, is neither instantaneous nor complete up to one month following intramuscular injection [27]. We consider this behavior to be more biologically plausible than complete and instantaneous absorption from the site of injection, and more consistent with the view of muscle tissue being a storage depot for aluminum adjuvant following intramuscular vaccination. A third uncertainty in the analysis is the extent to which the use of maximum aluminum exposures (modeled here) is relevant to aluminum body burdens estimated following more typical exposures to aluminum adjuvant, which are considered to be lower. Ideally, one would like to model aluminum exposures to reflect typical exposures in the population. However, modeling body burdens following maximum exposures to aluminum provides a “worst case” scenario, since more typical exposures to aluminum will obviously lead to a lower body burden and therefore a greater margin of exposure (safety), the distance between safe and expected body burdens of aluminum.

    Although aluminum toxicosis is known to occur in humans, it is found exclusively in individuals suffering from kidney disease or in those exposed to high levels of aluminum via occupational inhalation. However, for infants, our study demonstrates that there is little risk for aluminum toxicity following immunizations administered according to ACIP recommendations even with maximal exposures to aluminum adjuvant. For the general population of infants, who receive less than the maximal dose, the risk is even lower.

    Again, Jim Bob’s study source:
    http://www.medstat.hu/vakcina/Mitkus2011.pdf

    Here is some more of and another example of this promotion of JUNK science, and an irresponsible and non scientific article produced and published by one, Paul Offit. The article again contians absolutely no physiological science, nor actually relevant data on aluminum adjuvants, none whatsoever; and again a reference the same obviously non conclusive study Jim Bob put forth.

    Special Article
    Addressing Parents’ Concerns: Do Vaccines Contain Harmful Preservatives, Adjuvants, Additives, or Residuals?

    Paul A. Offit, MD, Rita K. Jew, PharmD

    Article excerpts: The safety of aluminum has been established by experience during the past 70 years, with hundreds of millions of people inoculated with aluminum-containing vaccines. Adverse reactions including erythema, subcutaneous nodules, contact hypersensitivity, and granulomatous inflammation have been observed rarely.35

    Aluminum-containing vaccines are not the only source of aluminum exposure for infants. Because aluminum is 1 of the most abundant elements in the earth’s crust and is present in air, food, and water, all infants are exposed to aluminum in the environment. For example, breast milk contains approximately 40 μg of aluminum per liter, and infant formulas contain an average of approximately 225 μg of aluminum per liter.36–40 Vaccines contain quantities of aluminum similar to those contained in infant formulas (Table 3). However, because large quantities of aluminum can cause serious neurologic effects in humans,41 guidelines were established by the ATSDR.

    For determining the quantity of aluminum below which safety is likely, data were generated in mice that were inoculated orally with various quantities of aluminum lactate.42 No adverse reactions were observed when mice were fed quantities of aluminum as high as 62 mg/kg/day. By applying uncertainty factors of 3 (for extrapolation to humans) and 10 (for human variability), the ATSDR concluded that the minimum risk level for exposure to aluminum was 2 mg/kg/day.43 The half-life of elimination of aluminum from the body is approximately 24 hours.41 Therefore, the burden of aluminum to which infants are exposed in food36–40 and vaccines (Table 3) is clearly less than the guideline established by the ATSDR and far less than that found to be safe in experimental animals.41,42

    http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/112/6/1394.full

    How do they actually know what they are doing to the brains of these children, when for the most part they can not even fully explain how aluminum adjuvants work? They do outline in several pubmed studies however, that one of the mechanisms of action is inflammation. In human health, and for thriving and good human health, the last thing you ever want injected into your body, is somthing that has the potential to cause any form of inflammation of any kind.

    Mechanisms of stimulation of the immune response by aluminum adjuvants

    Abstract excerpt:
    Aluminum adjuvants are widely used in human and veterinary vaccines. They are appropriate adjuvants for vaccines that confer protection by inducing antibodies via the induction of a type 2 immune response, but they do not induce cytotoxic T cell and cell-mediated immunity. The mechanisms by which aluminum adjuvants selectively enhance the immune response are poorly understood.

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X0200169X

  • Jim Bob

    So to sum up what you said here: I disagree.

    And then you ask this question: How do they actually know what they are doing to the brains of these children, when for the most part they can not even fully explain how aluminum adjuvants work?

    The answer 90% of aluminum leaves the body in urine. The majority of the remaining aluminum is stored in skeletal tissue. The teeny weeny amount of aluminum leftover that you say is causing autism can go to the brain or other soft tissues according to the this study.

    So the amount of aluminum in vaccines is already well below any threshold that is considered dangerous. And more to the point, only 1% of that amount is even possibly going to the brain. Please leave your speculation elsewhere.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Real data and studies that you can not refute, are not speculation. Real studies and analysis that refute your said claims, analysis, and said studies, are not speculation, Jim Bob. Face it.