Vaccines Can Cause Infertility

Vaccines have not been evaluated for causing infertility (read the vaccine insert).

I have been investigating whether there is a proven link between vaccines and infertility. What I have uncovered will shock many readers because I have discovered that innocent women and girls in developing countries have been deliberately experimented on, with the use of infertility vaccines, for many years.

They are not the only victims. Recently several vaccines used worldwide have also been found to cause infertility, including the HPV vaccines and many of the swine flu vaccines.

My interest in the subject began after it was reported that the Japanese government had decided to withdraw its support for the HPV vaccine schedule. This decision came after the government received approximately 2000 reports from women and girls suffering adverse reactions, including long-term pain, numbness, paralysis and infertility. [1]

This does not mean that Japan has banned or suspended the program, as the vaccines will still be available to anyone wishing to receive them. However, the medical provider will automatically inform anyone wishing to receive the HPV vaccines Gardasil or Cervarix that the Japanese government no longer supports the HPV vaccine program.

This Shot Changed One Girl’s Life Forever

Over the years, a range of adverse reactions have been reported worldwide after the HPV vaccinations. However, the discovery that the HPV vaccine has been found to cause infertility in some women has only been publicized more recently.

In 2012, the British Medical Journal published a paper by Dr. Deidrie Little titled Premature Ovarian Failure 3 Years After Menarche in a 16 Year-Old Girl Following Human Papillomavirus Vaccination, in which Dr. Little detailed the case of a sixteen year-old girl suffering from premature menopause after receiving the HPV vaccine Gardasil. The summary of the paper states:

“Premature ovarian failure in a well adolescent is a rare event. Its occurrence raises important questions about causation, which may signal other systemic concerns. This patient presented with amenorrhoea after identifying a change from her regular cycle to irregular and scant periods following vaccinations against human papillomavirus. She declined the oral contraceptives initially prescribed for amenorrhoea. The diagnostic tasks were to determine the reason for her secondary amenorrhoea and then to investigate for possible causes of the premature ovarian failure identified.

Although the cause is unknown in 90% of cases, the remaining chief identifiable causes of this condition were excluded. Premature ovarian failure was then notified as a possible adverse event following this vaccination. The young woman was counselled regarding preservation of bone density, reproductive implications and relevant follow-up. This event could hold potential implications for population health and prompts further inquiry.” [2]

As the BMJ charges a fee to read their articles, interested readers can find a report about the case on the Weekly Briefing of the Population Research Institute’s website. The report states that Dr. Little said that before the sixteen year-old received the vaccine Gardasil during the fall of 2008, her menstrual cycle was perfectly normal. However, by January 2009, her cycle had become irregular, and over the course of the next two years, her menses (bleeds) had become increasingly irregular. By 2011, she had ceased menstruating altogether.

The Weekly Briefing stated:

“In the Australian case, after testing the levels of numerous hormones, and the function of various internal organs, the girl was diagnosed by Dr. Little as having “premature ovarian failure”, which is defined as “the presence of menopausal gonadotrophin levels in association with over 3 months of amenorrhoea or oligomenorrhoea before age 40 years.”

Further testing confirmed that all of her eggs—every last one—were dead. She was and is totally and irrevocably infertile.”

The Weekly Briefing article has since been removed, but a complete copy of the article can be found on several websites, including Population Research Institute. [3]

Thousands of Women Are Now Infertile Because of Vaccines

It is extremely unusual for a girl of this age to enter early menopause. So, we must ask ourselves, was it the vaccine that caused her symptoms or was it something else?

I decided to research if there were any other reports or papers on the subject of vaccination and infertility. I was horrified by what I discovered.

I found a total of 56 research papers listed on PubMed relating to contraceptive vaccines, dating as far back as 1977. No doubt a researcher entering a range of different search terms could come up with many more. [4]

This led me to question whether or not vaccines were being manufactured deliberately to cause infertility. One paper in particular, published in 1989, written by G.P. Talwar and R. Raghupathy titled Anti-Fertility Vaccines appears to suggest that they are. The authors stated:

“Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females. This review discusses developments in anti-fertility vaccines at the National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.

A single injection procedure for the sterilization or castration of male animals depending on the site at which the injection is given, has passed through field testing and is expected to be on the market in the near future.” [5]

It is difficult to judge from this abstract whether these vaccines were being developed for use on humans or animals. However, further research has led me to believe that these vaccines were being developed for humans, because not long after this paper was published, vaccines were administered to women and children in a number of countries, including Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines, causing many of them to become infertile.

Why Weren’t Men or Boys Given This “Tetanus” Vaccine?

In 1994, the World Health Organization gave many women in developing countries aged between 15 and 45 a tetanus vaccine containing a birth control drug.

An organization known as The Comite became suspicious of the protocols surrounding the vaccines and obtained several vials for testing. It was discovered that some of the vials contained human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy.

However, when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, this vaccine essentially causes a woman’s body to produce antibodies against pregnancy, forcing her body to abort her unborn baby. The ThinkTwice Global Vaccine Institute, reporting on the story, stated:

“In nature the hCG hormone alerts the woman’s body that she is pregnant and causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but for the elevated presence of hCG.

However, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.” [6]

Curiously, no men, boys or babies were vaccinated during the program. The only people vaccinated with this particular vaccine were women aged between 15 and 45. Was it a coincidence that these vaccines were only given to women of childbearing age? After all, anyone can contract tetanus, can’t they?

If The Comite had not become suspicious, then no one would have been any wiser. However, the question now remains: Was this a deliberate attempt by the WHO to reduce the population? The answer may lay in a paper written in 1997.

Girls and Women as Fertility Control Guinea Pigs

In 1997, another paper by G.P. Talwar titled Vaccines for Control of Fertility and Hormone Dependent Cancers was published by Immunology and Cell Biology. The author stated in the introduction:

“The twentieth century is marked by an unprecedented rise in the population. Four billion people will be added to the world population in 73 years of this century, whereas the global population attained the two billion mark only in 1927. In India, the population increases by 18 million per year, equivalent to the entire population of Australia.

Although a number of methods are available for contraception, they are not suited to many people in economically developing countries and according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the contraceptive needs of 350 million couples are unmet.” [7]

At first glance, it appears that the scientists were trying to develop a vaccine to use as an alternative method of contraception, to be offered at fertility clinics; that is, until you read deeper into the paper.

On page 185 in the section titled Operational Strategy, the author stated:

“Both hCG and LHRH are self hormones in humans and are poor antigens. To improve their immunogenicity, they are derivatized with haptenic groups as followed by Stevens ct al. in their initial studies or they are chemically linked to carriers to enlist T helper cell activity. We used carriers, first tetanus toxoid (TT) and later diphtheria toxoid (DT) or cholera toxin chain B (CTB). Tetanus accounts a large mortality of women at the time of delivery, which in developing countries, often occurs in places other than maternity homes/clinics. TT conjugates conferred immunoprophylactic benefit against tetanus, besides overcoming immunological tolerance to the self hormone. Diversification of carriers on repeat immunization avoided hyperimmunization against a given carrier and carrier-induced immunosuppression.”

Reading on, the section titled Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, reads as follows:

“Human chorionic gonadotropin was a preferred choice as a target for a contraceptive vaccine of three groups of investigators. Although the existence of’ leaky genes making small amounts of hCG in the non-pregnant state has been observed by William Odell. the hormone thus made is not conspicuous in its bioactivity nor appreciable in amount, hCG is a definite marker of pregnancy, when trophoblastic and other tumours are excluded. Its synthesis and secretion begins at the pre-implantation stage, as observed in the vitro-fertilized human embryo. It is involved in implantation since marmoset (south or central American monkey) embryos exposed to anti-phCG antibodies do not implant.’”

The author continued by adding:

“Interception of conception by anti-hCG antibodies is also supported by phase II clinical trials where no lengthening of the luteal phase was observed in women who were protected from becoming pregnant. As pregnancy is deemed to begin only after implantation of the embryo to the endometrium. hCG vaccine by preventing it is not an abortifacient but a contraceptive vaccine. hCG is also required for corpus luteum support and production of progesterone during the first 7 weeks until the placenta takes over. It thus has a role in both establishing and supporting pregnancy. Its chemistry was known by the early 1970s and it could be purified from pregnancy urine.”

These vaccines appear to be strikingly similar to the vaccines that were given to the women in developing countries for tetanus in 1994, just three years earlier, which were also found to contain the hormone hCG.

So, were the women and children living in developing countries in 1994 deliberately experimented on? It certainly appears that they were, as the vaccine trials using the tetanus vaccine on women and girls of childbearing age took place three years before this paper was written.

Another point that should be mentioned here is the fact that these trials were unethical, and yet there is no mention of an ethics committee. Were members of an ethics committee ever consulted before any of these vaccines were administered?

Massive Increase in Fetal Deaths After Pregnant Moms Receive Flu Vaccine

The tetanus vaccines were given in the 1990s and yet vaccines are said to be causing infertility still today. Other than the HPV vaccines, which I discussed earlier, Fluarix, the vaccine manufactured by GSK against the swine flu, has also been reported to cause infertility. [8]

In fact, the information given on the prescribing information sheet states that the vaccine has not been evaluated for the impairment of fertility and that it is not known whether Fluarix can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or if it can affect reproduction capacity. [9]

In other words, it is possible that this vaccine can lead to infertility!

Despite this information being readily available on the Internet, pregnant women are still being recommended to receive various flu vaccines every year.

Documentation received from the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) states that between 2009 and 2010, the mercury-laden combined flu vaccinations increased Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Systems (VAERS) fetal death reports by 4,250 percent in pregnant women.

Eileen Dannerman from NCOW stated that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) deliberately misled the nation’s obstetricians and gynecologists and colluded with the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) to mislead the public by advertising the flu vaccine as a safe vaccine for pregnant women when they knew fully well that it was causing a massive spike in fetal deaths. [10]

Conclusion

What I have discovered, I am sure that many would agree, is absolutely horrific. It appears that many of the recommended vaccinations are known by the governments and pharmaceutical industries to cause infertility. Many of these vaccines are mandatory. We need to ask ourselves why our governments are deliberately force-vaccinating us with vaccines known to cause infertility.

Another question we need to ask is why are so many studies being funded to study the subject area surrounding vaccines and infertility.

Many leading professionals believe that these vaccines are being offered as part of a global depopulation plan. We need to ask ourselves whether or not our governments have the right to play God with our lives without our knowledge or consent.

I believe it is high time that we took back the control of our own lives and researched all vaccinations thoroughly before we agree to be vaccinated. Ultimately, it is each person’s decision whether or not they should be vaccinated, and the only way that we can make an informed choice about vaccinations is to be fully informed of the facts before agreeing to be vaccinated.

I have proven, by referencing documents, articles and scientific papers, that a series of vaccines are being developed that are known to cause infertility. These vaccines have been and still are being administered to innocent people without their knowledge or consent. Surely, this practice is not only unethical, it is criminal.

 

Additional Information:

To learn more, please read this article on the Natural News website.

 

Photo Credit

  • http://gaia-health.com/ Heidi Stevenson

    You can read an in-depth report of Dr. LIttle’s study in a two part series on Gaia Health:

    Gardasil Destroys Girl’s Ovaries: Research on Ovaries Never Considered

    Gardasil Destroys Girl’s Ovaries: It Should Have Been Predicted

    The first of these articles reveals that the vaccine was tested on rat testes, but not on ovaries! That is simply shocking, since the vaccine was originally intended for use on girls, not boys.

  • Matthew

    Hi: you should check out use of tetanus toxoid on Akha women for spontaneous abortion, akha.org see content vaccinations tetanus toxoid. Once again no vacination of job site men working sround nails. “Eradicate” is a US funded project kiawanas buy TT vaccine for unicef. What an incredible scam. Gates too.

  • Jock Doubleday

    Not to mention that vaccines have never been shown by science to prevent disease.

    One of my eBooks on natural health – a conversational expose on the historical fraud of vaccination, based on a talk I gave at the 2004 AutismOne conference in Chicago . . . with updated clickable links and information:

    “Into the Labyrinth: Discovering the Truth about Vaccination”
    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=446054885449819&l=3783435bec

  • Bonzai

    I’m not sure why the author seems shocked that “the information given on the prescribing information sheet states that the vaccine has not been evaluated for the impairment of fertility and that it is not known whether Fluarix can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or if it can affect reproduction capacity.” This is true of all vaccines, read the package inserts. NONE have been tested for whether they cause cancer, mutations or fertility issues. Although I’m cynical and suspect at least some have been deliberately tested to ensure they cause fertility issues, but putting that on the package inserts would decrease the number of people they could get to have the vaccines.

    I don’t actually buy they never tested the HPV vaccines effects on the ovaries, I’m certain they did and buried the results. It’s easier and safer to claim a study was never done than to try to spin the promotion of a vaccine that studies showed harmed female fertility.

  • http://www.desireerover.nl Desiree Rover

    Great article. AGAIN, Christina!

    Vaccines always have been part of the eugenic agenda. They have always had a population reduction function.

    In his book ‘History and Pathology of Vaccination’ (1889) dr. Edgar Crookshank cites a letter from 1722 in which one physician writes to another how he sees the cowpox vaccination as “an artificial way to depopulate a country”.
    Most of mainstream science is a total fake. On purpose!

    Vaccine ‘science’ beats the lot…

  • VaccineRisks

    Excellent and most important article.

    Merck subscribes to the Norwegian vaccination and medical birth registries which are linked. How much have Merck paid for this subscription? Who has received this money?
    Gardasil approval letter From FDA to Merck:
    http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm111283.htm
    Includes the following
    3. You have committed to conduct a study in collaboration with the Norwegian Government, if GARDASIL is approved in the European Union and the Government of Norway incorporates HPV vaccination into its national guidelines, to assess the impact of HPV vaccination on the following in Norway:

    e. The interaction between administration of GARDASIL and pregnancy
    outcomes, especially congenital anomalies, by linking the vaccination registry with the Medical Birth Registry.

    (Gardasil was included in the childrens’ vaccination schedule, corruption being implicated in connection with the negotiations. Thousands of young Norwegian girls are unknowingly part of a gigantic research project).

  • John Lagan

    If vaccines were just a placebo then this phenomenally profitable $23 billion business would just be a gigantic fraud, but add in all the gunk, and it’s sinister beyond words.

    Tetanus jabs deceit from ‘ Assault on the Species’ by Patrick Rattigan:

    “During World War II there were 12 recorded cases of tetanus, of which, 4 were vaccinated.

    Persons wishing to contract tetanus, or to endow their offspring with it, should first collect samples from the soil, dustbins, sewers etc. This should then be sent for analysis to determine the presence of tetanus spores. When the confirmed spores are returned, a deep gash should be made in the arm into which the spores should be placed, the skin pinched to trap the spores and the arm bandaged to exclude the air. Persons not immune to tetanus should then contract the disease.

    As the above practice is widespread, it is understandable why every child and every hospital case involving broken skin needs to be jabbed routinely with a vaccine whose side effects include seizures, high fever, Guillane-Barre Syndrome, fatal anaphylactic shock, neurological damage, abscess, inner ear damage, myelin damage etc.”

  • Jim Bob

    So over 6.5 million doses of HPV vaccines given over a 6 year period in Australia and Dr. Little identifies one patient who had ovarian failure and somehow she draws a conclusion that the HPV vaccine is the culprit? POF was identified three-years after vaccination. What happened between that time?

    What the deuce? How did this shit get published?

    How did she draw that conclusion with absolutely no causal mechanism identified or no attempt to verify her findings elsewhere or even a remote explanation of how her hypothesis works? How did the vaccine cause POF?

    More to that point, how come no one else here asks these questions?

  • Markus Heinze

    At it again Jim Bob? Questioning the independent minded while supporting special interests. I believe you never showed any of your expertise. Here again a chance to show us how to design a study proving safety and effectiveness of vaccines.

  • Jim Bob

    Yup. I’m at it again. I know that you have distaste for critical thinking but its what I do.

    As for your second point, I see no point in creating a fictional experiment that won’t be implemented. Dealing in hypotheticals is not scientific. Its a useless and pointless exercise that you continue use to detract and evade from the information I post.

    Perhaps you would like to do something useful like tell me why my comments are incorrect or invalid?
    I’d love to engage in a meaningful debate but I don’t see any takers.

  • Markus Heinze

    Jim Bob … Methods and design to prove causation should always be the same. Proving causation (whether in social science or in medicine) should be based on the same design no matter the variables introduced. The reason why you will not provide such a design is because you need to know the outcome first in order to match your methods and design to that outcome. I don’t understand your hesitance as all you comment on is based on fictional studies. There are no independently funded and conducted trials and when it comes to doing a real and not fictional study proving safety and effective as of vaccine you object. Such a study would of course consist of true placeboes and withing independently conducted trials and comparing vaccinated to non vaccinated in double blind studies. Vaccines have never been proven to be effective and you are not willing to show how to design a study that would prove effectiveness as, for your own safety, need to stay within the boundaries of the studies designed to prove an already determined outcome. That makes you either uneducated or a coward.

  • Jim Bob

    I’m a coward because I won’t design my own fictional study? Or do I just see it as a waste of time?

    As for your double-blind study, everyone knows why its not done and it has nothing to do with who funds it.

    Taking two groups of people, giving one group a vaccine and the other a placebo and then intentionally exposing both groups to a viral agent is unethical. Especially knowing that one group is completely unprotected. I’m surprised that you don’t value human life enough to see this.

    There are loads of epidemiological studies showing the inverse relationship between vaccination rates and infection rates. That is scientific despite your attempt to suggest otherwise.

  • courageandhope

    Yes, and here is Norma Erickson’s debunking of the recent study purporting to show that Gardasil has decreased incidence of HPV infection in teens

    http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccines-resounding-success-or-future-failure/

    and another article from last July http://sanevax.org/new-study-hpv-vaccine-and-evidence-of-herd-immunity-or-type-replacement/ Search Sanevax.org for HPV and a list of articles comes up, including two articles on how in Japan doctors must tell people Japan no longer recommends HPV vaccines due to too many serious adverse reactions. See also Dave Mihalovic’s June 17, 2013 article:

    http://preventdisease.com/news/13/061713_Japans-Health-Ministry-Withdraws-Cervical-Cancer-Vaccine.shtml

  • courageandhope

    A person could also look at each individual ingredient in a vaccine for reproductive toxicity. For example, thimerosal, or for that matter, mercury in any form, is a reproductive toxin, although thimerosal is too toxic to have been ever adequately studied (and yet it is still present in some vaccines given to children and pregnant women, and the World Health Organization was fighting to keep it in vaccines given in third world countries–which happen to have high birth rates:
    http://shotofprevention.com/2012/12/17/worldwide-ban-on-thimerosal-would-cost-lives/). There are safer vaccine preservatives that are not cost-prohibitive. It is odd that when eugenics is the goal, human life is no longer inestimably precious.
    A few material safety data sheets for thimerosal: http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=US&language=en&productNumber=T5125&brand=SIGMA&PageToGoToURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Fsigma%2Ft5125%3Flang%3Den (p. 6)

    http://www.putchildrenfirst.org/media/1.13.pdf

  • courageandhope

    There is Imravax (or Improvax, various brands I guess), the vaccine given to male pigs to cause sterility to prevent “boar taint.” They call it “immunocastration.” FAQ’s said if a person should accidentally get injected with it, it “….may produce similar effects in people to those seen in pigs. These may include a temporary reduction in sexual hormones and reproductive functions in both men and women and an adverse effect on pregnancy. The risk of these effects occurring is greater after a second or subsequent accidental injection than after a first injection. A single injection, however, may prime the immune system to react to subsequent injections, in the same way it does in the pig so anyone experiencing a single injection should not use the product again.”

    http://www.improvac.com/sites/improvac/en-NZ/pages/betterwayforward.aspx

  • Markus Heinze

    You don’t have to design your own study. The design is already established. You just have to pick the correct one and show us that you actually know what you are talking about. I see Jim Bob as a fake and cowardly character not only hiding behind a fictional character, rather than disclosing his full name, but more importantly hiding behind a scientific community that relies on methods and design created to match a predetermined outcome. You have yet to put anything in writing that stems from your own creation. For once, step up to the plate and let us know what methods and design look like to determine safety and effectiveness of vaccines.

  • Lowell

    What would it take, Jim Bob. the evidence of more harm than good being done by such as Gardasil and Cervarix is everywhere. How many young womens lives need to be destroyed before it is enough? Again, the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines remain highly unproven. These vaccines need to be taken off the market until proven safe and effective, and they never will be. They clearly never should have been approved. Studies funded and connected to the corrupt pharmaceutical company Merck, are simply no longer unacceptable, at this point.

    Gardasil Victim Speaks Out After Two Years
    http://youtu.be/0gCVCP8BFrU

    Gardasil, The Real Truth
    http://www.vacfacts.info/gardasil—the-real-truth.html

  • courageandhope

    All safety and effectiveness studies should have been done before the vaccine was given to our kids. Pharma is pushing hard to give this vaccine to every young person, male and female, of childbearing age or approaching it, even full knowing that cervical/anal/throat cancer–with which HPV is associated only as a co-factor–are diseases of older adults.

    When you think about it, the whole thing is ridiculous. By the time the kids are old enough to get these cancers, surely any possibly immunity to the rare, cancer-causing strains (out of 40 sexually transmitted HPV strains known, out of 150 known strains total) will be long gone. Regular pap smears and early treatment are still needed and effective to save lives. HPV is so common, with 50% of adults and 40% of children infected with it at any one time, according to Dr. Christiane Northrup’s book, “Women’s Bodies, Women’s Wisdom,” Ch. 9 on HPV; worth reading. A healthy immune system clears an HPV infection within a reasonable time on its own, so why is this vaccine necessary? We have trusted; perhaps our trust has been misplaced.

  • Jim Bob

    Or we could look at the established evidence and critically evaluate it instead of completely pulling new data when the data already exists. Which is what I did by asking those questions above about said research. You can choose to ignore my analysis or you can choose to tell me why I’m wrong. You chose the former.

    As for not disclosing my identity, given that you and your ilk tend to threaten death and other harms to those with pro-scientific views (see Offit death threats or McCaffery hate mail), I’m inclined to keep myself and my family safe.
    That being said, my identity (or lack there of) doesn’t erase the critical analysis that was posted above.

  • Markus Heinze

    Yes, it is unfortunate that some people will stoop so low as to threaten others. As far as you implicating me threaten ANYONE, please provide the evidence as I can assure you I haven’t. On the other hand I can post some of the threats and derogatory messages I received from your friends for the simple fact of sharing stories of vaccine injured children. So, back up your words and provide the evidence.

    I chose to put forth my own ideas as in my book and the articles I am writing. I haven’t seen anything that establishes you as having a valid opinion. Please provide me with anything you have written. Or simply provide me with some expertise – for instance the design of a study proving vaccine safety and effectiveness. Here too, back up your words by providing anything you have created.

  • Seattle Girl

    Wake up Jim Bob! There have been many complications, even death, from the HPV vaccine…she simply pointed to one. Brain injury, neurological effects, ALS or MS type symptoms….on ad on…and on….Not only that, topical flea treatments. These flea treatments work by causing parasitic or bacteria infection in the fleas causing parasitic castration so they can’t reproduce. One of my cats is very ill. I gave him this topical flea treatment a few months ago. He lost the use of his back legs, and I thought he had had a stroke or heart attack. I also noticed that the hair on his hind side was growing like cracy. I had lost or threw away the package accidentially, when I was looking for it to put on my other cat – thank goodness. I have brought the sick kitty back by use of DMSO, sodium chlorite, artimisinin (antiparasitic) B50 (full b vitamins), unrefined seasalt and ACV (also antiparasitics).

  • Seattle Girl
  • Seattle Girl

    You have no supporting evidence for what you say. How about you take and injection of this HPV vaccine, and tell us how you feel 6 months from now. Can you say, Chemical Castration, Jim Bob???

  • Seattle Girl

    Take the vaccine, Jim Bob (here, drink the koolaide) We are all waiting to see how you fare. Don’t go whining when your gonads shrivel and rot.

  • Seattle Girl

    There are thousands of serious adverse reactions to this vaccine. Just research it. Better yet, get the vaccine and try it for yourself.

  • http://whyarethingsthisway.com/ Nat Philosopher

    A survey of the scientific literature:

    The Published Data Shows Early Adjuvanted Vaccines are Dangerous

    Abstract: We survey numerous publications on injections of
    antigens or vaccine relevant quantities of aluminum salts into infant
    animal models, all of which report that they induce autoimmune disease
    or brain damage if they occur during critical periods in development or
    are sufficiently repeated. We survey epidemiological studies bearing on
    the same issues, and find they support similar conclusions. We are
    unable to find cogent support in the peer-reviewed literature for the
    safety of injecting vaccines into infants. We make a few predictions
    about what other proposed epidemiological analyses would show. We remark
    on previous surveys that have failed to include any of the evidence
    surveyed here.

    http://whyarethingsthisway.com/2014/03/08/example-1-pediatrician-belief-is-opposite-the-published-scientific-evidence-on-early-vaccine-safety/

  • Huff

    You know why Whopping Cough was eliminated-vaccines. See a lot of Polio-oh vaccines again. You people are literal idiots. The reason we have outbreaks of these diseases (like mumps on the Ohio State campus-also preventable with a vaccine) is because you people are ignorant-can’t follow correlation, probabilities, or basic empirical evidence.

  • Guest

    Basic imperial evidence – of the 28+ people who have contacted mumps in Ohio, only 1 has not been vaccinated. — now, for some basic logic, if the vaccine works, the vaccinated person has nothing to fear. If it doesn’t work, it’s not the miracle you’re claiming it to be. Finally, for some basic morality. Vaccines do cause harm to some people. If you are in doubt, go research the basic empirical evidence. VAERS was set up for a reason. However, trying to file a VAERS Report is a bit of a joke since they ask the filer to state which vaccine caused the problem when there is a good chance the victim was vaccinated with several all at once making it hard to pinpoint the culprit. I don’t acknowledge that anyone has a moral right to forcibly or deceitfully harm one individual to possibly save another. To argue that you must force a child to get vaccinated to possibly save another child from a possible future disease is no better than to argue that you are going to take food away from and possibly starve one child to possibly save another. In fact, I would argue that the first case is worse given that the danger is not imminent.

  • Guest

    Probabilities are under reported and frankly are quite irrelevant when it’s your child who has died or seriously been harmed by a vaccine. Neither whooping cough nor polio have been eliminated. Perhaps you should evaluate the empirical evidence before you berate others as being literal idiots rather than just parroting the standard bylines. The Bill Gates Foundation is actively vaccinating for polio in India, with a form discontinued here that already caused lots of harm in the past, and in 2011, almost 48K children were harmed by the vaccines and those harmed by the vaccine are twice as likely to die than those who contract polio. Trying to get these children access to more hygienic conditions would probably be a more effective use of the money and go a long way toward combating disease in general. Here’s one link regarding the polio vaccine campaign in India. http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/08/bill-gates-polio-vaccine-program-caused-47500-cases-of-paralysis-death/

  • Lou

    “What I have discovered, I am sure that many would agree, is absolutely
    horrific. It appears that many of the recommended vaccinations are known
    by the governments and pharmaceutical industries to cause infertility.
    Many of these vaccines are mandatory. We need to ask ourselves why our
    governments are deliberately force-vaccinating us with vaccines known to
    cause infertility.”

    The UN Agenda 21 is THE master political plan being implemented in almost every country on this poor earth. UN Agenda 21 has a population reduction [Depopulation] section.

    If we fail to see what is right in front of our noses we are finished.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/rockefeller-funded-anti-fertility-vaccine-coordinated-by-who/20906

    http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wildlife_damage/nwrc/publications/00pubs/00-46.PDF

    http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wildlife_damage/nwrc/publications/10pubs/miller103.pdf

    The freedom to say NO is in the end our MOST important freedom. Please use it and use it OFTEN.

    When they start to truly “force vaccinate” by smashing our bloody bodies into the pavement as they force in the poisoned needle, It will be obvious to ALL they do not intend to help us. Is this what it takes? I hope not but if it is required to save our children and the human race I hope we have the stomach for it. IMO anything but the stealth genocide we now have with “vaccination”.

    Depopulation is just the FIRST evil use they have in mind for “vaccination”. How can anyone accept a needle and syringe of SOMETHING from people have repeatedly lied, misrepresented, covered up and then lied about it all?

  • Lou

    About 70 people die of mumps each year. Many of these people have received NUMEROUS “mumps vaccines”.

    Now what is the COST of injecting the MMR and other “vaccines” into hundreds of millions humans?

    https://www.google.com/search?site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=821&q=autism+graph+2013&oq=autism+graph+2013&gs_l=img.12…0.0.2.11998.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0….0…1ac..38.img..0.12.1382.oIJzWq-wuT0#facrc=_&imgdii=_&imgrc=3XM11YYBzo-hKM%253A%3BUfodVgGxCKtEtM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fblogs.discovermagazine.com%252Fneuroskeptic%252Ffiles%252F2013%252F09%252Fautism_research.png%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fblogs.discovermagazine.com%252Fneuroskeptic%252F2013%252F09%252F04%252Fare-we-heading-for-peak-autism%252F%3B650%3B579

  • Lou

    “Trying to get these children access to more hygienic conditions would probably be a more effective use of the money and go a long way toward combating disease in general.”

    Yes this is what CLEARLY what has solved our “Childhood Diseases” problem.

    http://healthyprotocols.com/image_nochange2.jpg

    http://healthyprotocols.com/image_scarlet.jpg

    http://healthyprotocols.com/image_pertussis.gif

    http://healthyprotocols.com/image_pertussis2.gif

    http://healthyprotocols.com/2_vaccine.htm

  • Lou

    “What would it take, Jim Bob; the evidence of more harm than good being
    done by such as Gardasil and Cervarix is all to clear, and those cases
    are everywhere.”

    Let us expand this thinking a little. Our children are the most “vaccinated” and “medically treated” in the world; often by a factor of three to five times. Naturally one would expect EXCELLENT results from this “EXCELLENT” care and treatment.

    How then do we explain that US Childhood Mortality ranks 46th in the world? Our children 1 – 5 are DYING at a greater rate than 45 of the 187 or so countries in this world. Is BIG Medicine INC helping to kill our children?

    Something is VERY wrong and we had better figure it out.

  • WebDebunker

    That you believe everything you read on the internet, is the issues with most of these discussion. nsnbc. is not a new or credible source for information:

    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Nsnbc.me

    Just a blog started by someone who wanted to get people to find him by mis-typing msnbc in their browser. It’s Cyber-squatting at it’s best, journalism at its worst.

  • anon

    Strange when the first CowPox vaccination given was in 1796. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Phipps

  • not an idiot

    No huff you are an idiot. If a doctor plainly said that getting a vaccine could possibly cause infertility, no one in their right mind would take it. Would you agree to go into an operation where the surgeon said there is a chance I’ll take out your reproductive organs while I’m at it and the surgery may not even help what I’m trying to do? Hell no. Vaccines are not 100 percent effective and the new world order has made no attempt at hiding their depopulation agenda from vaccines to putting fluoride into drinking water. If you don’t think it’s true, call your local water treatment plant and ask if they do, also ask about the Federal regulation requiring all water treatment facilities to chlorinate the water, even better test your tap with a pool tester. I bet you anything it test ideal for a swimming pool. You say we’re ignorant, but just take the word of people in power assuming they give a crap about you. Lol sure I’m the idiot. Oh and by the way I have an I.Q. of 148. So yes I’m the ignorant one.

  • D Thomas

    Best argument FOR vaccines evvaar. I mean.. uhm if this is true it is morally in the darker shades of grey, but environmentally and pragmatically brilliant.