This “Free” Vaccine Can Cause Brain Damage and Death — Propaganda from Authorities Promises Protection

Some adverse reactions from vaccines include brain damage and death.
Some adverse reactions from vaccines include brain damage and death.

Some adverse reactions caused by vaccines include brain damage and death.

According to a front page article of the St. Louis Post Dispatch, dated July 17, 2013, Missourians are being offered a free Tdap vaccine in July to protect them against the reported rising incidence of pertussis or “whooping cough.” The vaccine is being offered to residents aged 11 and older. [1]

It is reported that “the Tdap vaccine is a single vaccination that prevents tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis.” The cause of the rising incidence of whooping cough is reported to be related to the vaccine wearing off if given more than ten years earlier. According to the report, more than 41,000 pertussis cases occurred across the United States in 2012, compared to 18,719 cases in 2011.

The news story emphasized that whooping cough is highly dangerous and can lead to vomiting and death, especially in children. The report indicates that diphtheria is a bacterial disease that is highly contagious and can also lead to death.

Tetanus causes intense muscle spasms, according to the article.

This news piece fails to report on the serious health risks associated with the Tdap vaccinations, the relatively benign health complications commonly associated with these diseases, along with the important fact that vaccines have never been proven to prevent any disease.

Real Risk of Disease is Low

The risks that whooping cough, diphtheria and tetanus pose to health are low compared to the potential, serious dangers reported as a result of this vaccine. Whooping cough can be treated successfully through a vitamin C protocol developed by Dr. Suzanne Humphries which has been shown to greatly reduce symptoms. [2]

In contrast, antibiotic treatments, given routinely by conventional, allopathic physicians to treat whooping cough, have never been shown to positively impact the course of the illness. Regardless of treatment received, most people recover completely from the whooping cough, giving them lifelong immunity to the disease. If they do become re-infected, subsequent courses of the illness are quite mild.

Tetanus can be prevented by thoroughly washing and cleaning the area of infection. [3] The risk of contracting tetanus is quite low. Only 233 cases of tetanus were reported to the Center for Disease Control between 2001 and 2008. [4] The incidence of tetanus declined by more than 95% between 1947 and 2008. [5]

Diptheria is a very low risk disease, not widely seen in the United States since an outbreak in the 1970’s. Between 1980 and 2010, 55 cases of diphtheria were reported to the Center for Disease Control.[6]

Dangers of Tdap Vaccine Include Proven Brain Damage and Death

Health consequences resulting from the Tdap vaccine include encephalitis, brain damage and death. A comprehensive report made by the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) documents clearly the widespread health dangers associated with the Tdap vaccine. [7] Tdap and DTap vaccines are currently used in the United States, replacing the DTP vaccine in 1996, but all three vaccines contain the dangerous pertussis toxin with unsafe additives. [8]

As early as 1933, T. Madren reported that two babies died within minutes of vaccination with DPT. A study published in Pediatrics in 1981 revealed that children were experiencing brain damage as a direct result of the DPT vaccines. Research done by the Institute of Medicine in the 1990’s confirmed that the DPT vaccines were responsible for brain damage. The pertussis toxin, aluminum, mercury and endotoxin contained in the DPT vaccines have been well-documented through scientific studies to cause permanent brain damage. [9]

A search of the National Vaccine Information Center incidence reports for the DTap vaccine alone on July 21, 2013 showed 52,835 negative reactions were submitted. [10] A 7/21/13 review of the reactions to the Tdap vaccine indicated 20,179 negative reactions. [11]

As of August 2012, half of the 2,982 awards under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which totaled almost $2.5 billion dollars, were made to those damaged by the Tdap, DTap or DPT vaccines. Currently children in the U.S. routinely receive 6 dosages of the DTap or Tdap vaccine at ages 2, 4, 6 months, 15-18 months, 4-6 years and at age 12. [12]

No Evidence Supports Dtap Vaccines Prevent Disease, But There is Proof of Damage

Incidence of whooping coughs in vaccinated populations disproves the “theory” that vaccines prevent disease. Repeatedly, when there is an outbreak of whooping cough, population studies show that the majority of those who contract the illness are vaccinated. No actual research has ever shown that vaccines prevent disease, only that vaccines increase antibodies to a particular disease. [13]

Renowned neurologist Dr. Russell Blaylock has done extensive research demonstrating that vaccines decrease cellular immunity, which is more important than antibodies in fighting disease. [14] Studies comparing the health of children vaccinated to those unvaccinated consistently demonstrate superior health of unvaccinated children. [15]

Vaccinations inject poisons and toxins into the body, without allowing the body to eliminate the toxins through a cell-mediated immune response, which is critical for the elimination of these toxins. The result is often chronic disease, serious life-threatening reactions or death. The long term health consequences of injecting foreign substances and toxins directly into one’s bloodstream are unknown and have never been studied adequately.

Health Benefits of Naturally Occurring Diseases

Lifelong immunity to disease can only be achieved by natural contracting illnesses, not by immunizations. For most benign childhood illnesses such as chickenpox and whooping cough, natural exposure to a disease can be beneficial to long term health.

The cell-mediated reaction that occurs during a natural illness allows removal of the disease organism, along with other waste products in the body through diarrhea, rash, mucus, coughing and fever. Natural illness serves as a clean-up of the body. Many health benefits are claimed, including a stronger immune system, as a result of the body naturally fighting childhood diseases.

While whooping cough is uncomfortable, most individuals will recover from it with no long term consequences and the body will end up being stronger than it was prior to the illness.

Conclusion

It is quite typical for mass media to be biased, incomplete, and uninformed when reporting on the subject of vaccinations. Even the editorial section of major newspapers are often one-sided in their reporting, failing to print opposing viewpoints to the widespread vaccination propaganda.

Unless individuals do their own research, they will be victims of the continued media propaganda and scare tactics used to promote vaccinations. Once toxins are unnaturally injected into the bloodstream, the known and unknown damage cannot be easily undone.

To Learn More

For more information about the myths surrounding whooping cough, please read this fact sheet from the National Vaccine Information Center.

 

 

About the Author

Michelle Goldstein, MSW, LCSW, is a mental health therapist who incorporates holistic approaches into her counseling practice. She is a mother who found healing in the realm of alternative medicine for her daughter diagnosed with an “incurable disease.” Her two-year search involved tremendous research, experimentation, and consultation with over 12 different holistic practitioners.

Her daughter became ill after receiving the HPV vaccine series. After tremendous research on the subject of vaccines, she has concluded that vaccines damage health. Michelle is now passionate about alternative health care and the politics which impact it.

She is a writer for Naturalnews.com and has completed the first manuscript of a comprehensive book on holistic health. She can be found https://twitter.com/goldsteinhealth and https://www.facebook.com/goldsteinhealth.

 Photo Credit

  • SADHU-VEDANT-MUNI

    really it is the alarming sign. one side it for prevention and other side it is inviting death. it is a criminal offense. must be punished and banned.

  • TetraMom

    I’m not sure we got vaccinated for whooping cough, at least not as early as the kiddos nowadays. I do remember having something similar to it, and it really was not that bad, you just sounded terrible: It was really the ‘best’ ailment to come down with: No school, no fever, sounded bad, parents make you ALL of the special foods they make when you get whooping cough – nice! :0)

    Now, chicken pox is another story (itchy) but I survived it and have my scar (on my face) to prove it : Some people used to try to give their kids chicken pox by putting them near pox kids, especially if it was close to a school holiday/break.

    My kids don’t get these, and although it is nice for not missing work, I think sometimes these temporary ailments teach kids how to tough things through and survive in life.

  • Dave

    “Only 233 cases of tetanus were reported to the Center for Disease Control between 2001 and 2008. [4] The incidence of tetanus declined by more than 95% between 1947 and 2008.

    How do we know that’s not because of the vaccine?

  • Jim Bob

    “the relatively benign health complications commonly associated with these diseases” – really? Polio, Pertussis, Tetanus and Diptheria carry “benign” health complications? That is literally the worst understatement I have ever read.

    -10 dead infants due to pertussis in California in 2010. (9 of 10 were unvaccinated).

    - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYCkr3YxjIY & http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV0cxeg8xCY – Pertussis is not BENIGN and cannot be treated with vitamin C despite whatever snake oil cures are being sold by Humphries.

    - risk of encephalitis due to DTP, Tdap or Dtap is less than 1 in 1000000.

    – “natural exposure to a disease can be beneficial to long term health.” – incorrect. Suggesting that intentional exposure to disease is a good thing is absolutely ridiculous and irresponsible (and in my mind criminal and sociopathic). The blood will be on your hands for those that buy this non-sense.

    - I will poop in my own hand and eat it, if you think this was “unbiased, complete and informed”.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    You state the risk of encephalitis due to DTP, Tdap or Dtap is less than 1 in 1000000?

    Show me the measurements used.

  • Quickguy

    if you want to believe that because you inject poisons into your body is the reason why you don’t get sick, then, you’re a big fool.

  • Jim Bob

    Which poisons are you referring to?

  • Jim Bob

    Um…long term monitoring from essentially every public health agency in the world?

  • Argus

    Exactly right Dave, and a prime example of the brain-dead logic the authors of articles on this site use. They want to pretend that low incidence of a disease after preventative vaccination has been effective is ‘proof’ that the vaccine is not needed. As if morbidity and mortality rates would not return to previous levels if the disease were once again unchecked.

    This logical fallacy was made famous by reporter Fox Butterfield, who wrote a series of articles that marveled at an increase in the number of criminals going to prison at the same time that crime rates were falling. Just couldn’t grasp the concept that the ones going to prison were the ones that would commit the crimes if they were free.

    Of course, if the incidence of the disease does go all the way down to zero, as has happened with smallpox, then routine use of the vaccine does become unnecessary. Human nature being what it is, I’m not sure that crime will ever get to the level that makes prisons un-needed, though.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Looks like a non-answer.

  • guest

    First, if you put ANY weight into these stats Jim Bob you are sadly ignorant! I can tell you, these numbers are GREATLY under-reported. I can say this for a fact. Let’s just summarize this with a fact that everyone will admit to…..Fever is listed as an adverse event however parents do not report it because they do not know it is an adverse event but rather believe it is something that just goes with vaccines. A vast majority of children experience fever after vaccines yet their parents do not report it b/c their physician tells them “they might run a low-grade fever- just give them Ibuprofen or Tylenol”. Sooo.. as you can CLEARLY see, the rate of fever following vaccine is massively underreported as is the risk of encephalitis, etc from vaccines. I can also speak to the encephalitis b/c as a mother of a child who suffered GREATLY from a case of missed encephalitis as an infant and only until she was 18mo old and received her 4th dose did we finally clue in this is what had happened to her. SO, I suggest you do some research and use a bit of critical thinking into the effects of aluminum on the brain which is the culprit of the encephalitis from the DTaP. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin and causes demyelinization of the neural pathways similiar to that which is found in the brains of alzheimers patients as well as is found in the brains of some infants who have died from what their physician has dismissed as a case of “SIDS”.

  • RoyalinCharge

    What should be banned is one-sided people unwilling to listen to an alternative opinion w/out civility. Grow up people and come to the table of intellectual honesty and respect, so we can finally get to the truth.

  • Jim Bob

    Yes. You are correct. About 20% of patients will experience mild fever after vaccination. 50% will also have some sort of bruising or localized pain at the injection site (duh?- I’m being facetious not insulting).
    Comparing fever reporting to encephalitis reporting = logical fallacy. Assuming you are correct about underreporting of fever cases, you cannot apply the same logic to an entirely different (and more severe) condition that more often than not leads to hospitalizations (as opposed to fevers).
    Said many times (not by myself but independent research) before, the body burden for aluminum is more than capable of handling the miniscule quantities of aluminum found in vaccines. Moreover, aluminum exposure is unavoidable and found in many foods and breast milk. Why are you so sure its the aluminum?
    Another point, encephalitis hasn’t been linked to aluminum exposure otherwise we’d be putting our children at risk by breastfeeding. The most common cause of encephalitis is a viral agent.
    As for your final point, are saying those infants died of Alzeimer’s disease as opposed to SIDS?

  • Roxanne

    What “monitoring”… The same don’t look, don’t find, don’t report system that denies vaccine damage as perpetually
    “coincidental”. What a joke… The VAERS system is
    flooded with reports of vaccine denial even in the most blatant
    black and white cases of a almost definite link with the
    neurological damage and worse happening within hours.
    Even officialdom admits that vaccine injury is grossly under-reported – a miniscule fraction of the actual damage done
    -potentially as low as 1-2%.

  • Roxanne

    You prevent mortality from disease through a healthy, NORMAL immune
    system – not through artificial, dumbed down temporary vaccine-induced
    “immunity”… which only harbours the disease below the surface causing
    potential long-term damage including auto-immune conditions; and
    potentially shifts that disease to another age at which time it is FAR more
    serious. (natural immunity infers lifelong immunity) Children – especially poor children – are NOT vaccine deficient but deficient in proper nutrition, clean water, healthy living conditions. The human body is vastly more intelligent
    than the outdated, flawed vaccine paradigm that violates the frontier
    boundaries of the immune system. It’s tragic that you are so brainwashed
    like most doctors. As someone who has firsthand witnessed vaccine
    damaged children in India – many of them – I urge you to re-educate
    yourself on the real reasons proper immune function is thwarted. (I used
    to be super pro-vaccine – until three events – forced me to confront years
    of deeply entrenched brainwashing.)

  • guest

    Yes….I am saying encephalitis is under-reported….the numbers would not be as high as the under-reporting of fevers but still highly under-reported. Not all cases of encephalitis require hospitalization…..our baby screamed and cried from month 2 until month 5.5. We ran her through celiac testing, allergy testing, elimination diet by me (as I breastfed her- Oh and on the front of the breast milk….first of all, this is naturally occuring aluminum and at SIGNIFICANTLY low concentration- but most importantly this is how God designed it so the aluminum in breast milk is a non-issue), a pediatric GI doctor, etc etc and nothing was found but no one ever mentioned that the high pitched prolonged screaming that was inconsolible was from the DTaP (read it yourself….it is in the Merck manual and on the pamphlet as a contraindication for EVER receiving this vaccine again b/c it is known as Encephalitis. Furthermore…research the absorption percentages on parenteral (oral) versus intramuscular injection then I am pretty sure you will not compare the aluminum in foods to the injected or intravenous aluminum. Pediatric intensivists will tell you that they can only give babies receiving TPN a max. weight dose per day….don’t have the numbers off the top of my head but it is (X)mcg/kg/24 hrs….because going above this can cause brain damage from the aluminum in the TPN. SOOO….yes< i stand FIRM on my aluminum connection and there have been studies showing alzheimers type changes in the brains of mice given aluminum at doses similar to those give to our children as well as DOCUMENTED autistic behaviors in monkeys who received the vaccines as scheduled (the monkeys who did not receive the injections showed no autistic behaviors). And finally……i never said that SIDS was alzheimers…..I said that the aluminum caused changes the brain neural pathways that presented similar to alzheimers-type changes meaning that it caused brain injury. Which could help explain why we have so many children requiring speech and/or Occupational therapy today (similar to a stroke patient who loses speech or motor function- something caused them to suffer brain injury). Yes…some cases are attributed to such things as head injury, trauma, lack of oxygen, prenatal complications…what have you but I am speaking of those children who were meeting mile stones and then suddenly have loss of speech or function. Just like everything in medicine…nothing is 100% (which is why some children tolerate vaccines better than others). We know that not 100% of people can tolerate penicillin so it is ignorant to think 100% of people can tolerate vaccines. Also- another hot topic for me is that rates of asthma are higher in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. Also…..there has NEVER been a study on autism rates in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children b/c the government refuses to do it out of fear of what they will find! I could go on but I am done with this conversation but it was enjoyable! Good day.

  • Lowell

    Really, Jim Bob..you were shown this before, and yet you deny it. All you are is a paid shill, or someone has a lot to lose by the truth being known about vaccines! Perhaps you are just in deep denial personally. You need to back away because more children are being harmed by vaccines than they are being helped. This is a 100 yeasr plus lie, vaccines. All of it. Educate yourself from the actal unbaised information and available science that the to much to lose the truth be known, CDC and FDA will NEVER tell you about.

    Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain

    Abstract

    Background

    Long-term biodistribution of nanomaterials used in medicine is largely unknown. This is the case for alum, the most widely used vaccine adjuvant, which is a nanocrystalline compound spontaneously forming micron/submicron-sized agglomerates. Although generally well tolerated, alum is occasionally detected within monocyte-lineage cells long after immunization in presumably susceptible individuals with systemic/neurologic manifestations or autoimmune (inflammatory) syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA).

    Methods

    On the grounds of preliminary investigations in 252 patients with alum-associated ASIA showing both a selective increase of circulating CCL2, the major monocyte chemoattractant, and a variation in the CCL2 gene, we designed mouse experiments to assess biodistribution of vaccine-derived aluminum and of alum-particle fluorescent surrogates injected in muscle. Aluminum was detected in tissues by Morin stain and particle induced X-ray emission) (PIXE) Both 500 nm fluorescent latex beads and vaccine alum agglomerates-sized nanohybrids (Al-Rho) were used.

    Results

    Intramuscular injection of alum-containing vaccine was associated with the appearance of aluminum deposits in distant organs, such as spleen and brain where they were still detected one year after injection. Both fluorescent materials injected into muscle translocated to draining lymph nodes (DLNs) and thereafter were detected associated with phagocytes in blood and spleen. Particles linearly accumulated in the brain up to the six-month endpoint; they were first found in perivascular CD11b+ cells and then in microglia and other neural cells. DLN ablation dramatically reduced the biodistribution. Cerebral translocation was not observed after direct intravenous injection, but significantly increased in mice with chronically altered blood-brain-barrier. Loss/gain-of-function experiments consistently implicated CCL2 in systemic diffusion of Al-Rho particles captured by monocyte-lineage cells and in their subsequent neurodelivery. Stereotactic particle injection pointed out brain retention as a factor of progressive particle accumulation.

    Conclusion

    Nanomaterials can be transported by monocyte-lineage cells to DLNs, blood and spleen, and, similarly to HIV, may use CCL2-dependent mechanisms to penetrate the brain. This occurs at a very low rate in normal conditions explaining good overall tolerance of alum despite its strong neurotoxic potential. However, continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier or high constitutive CCL-2 production.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557144
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/99

    More real scientific studies:
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-vaccine-damage—science.html
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-unbiased-vaccine-science-and-data.html

  • Lowell

    Really, Jim Bob..you were shown this before, and yet you deny it. All you are is a paid shill, or someone has a lot to lose by the truth being known about vaccines! Perhaps you are just in deep denial personally. You need to back away because more children are being harmed by vaccines than they are being helped. This is a 100 yeasr plus lie, vaccines. All of it. Educate yourself from the actal unbaised information and available science that the to much to lose the truth be known, CDC and FDA will NEVER tell you about.

    Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain

    Abstract

    Background

    Long-term biodistribution of nanomaterials used in medicine is largely unknown. This is the case for alum, the most widely used vaccine adjuvant, which is a nanocrystalline compound spontaneously forming micron/submicron-sized agglomerates. Although generally well tolerated, alum is occasionally detected within monocyte-lineage cells long after immunization in presumably susceptible individuals with systemic/neurologic manifestations or autoimmune (inflammatory) syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA).

    Methods

    On the grounds of preliminary investigations in 252 patients with alum-associated ASIA showing both a selective increase of circulating CCL2, the major monocyte chemoattractant, and a variation in the CCL2 gene, we designed mouse experiments to assess biodistribution of vaccine-derived aluminum and of alum-particle fluorescent surrogates injected in muscle. Aluminum was detected in tissues by Morin stain and particle induced X-ray emission) (PIXE) Both 500 nm fluorescent latex beads and vaccine alum agglomerates-sized nanohybrids (Al-Rho) were used.

    Results

    Intramuscular injection of alum-containing vaccine was associated with the appearance of aluminum deposits in distant organs, such as spleen and brain where they were still detected one year after injection. Both fluorescent materials injected into muscle translocated to draining lymph nodes (DLNs) and thereafter were detected associated with phagocytes in blood and spleen. Particles linearly accumulated in the brain up to the six-month endpoint; they were first found in perivascular CD11b+ cells and then in microglia and other neural cells. DLN ablation dramatically reduced the biodistribution. Cerebral translocation was not observed after direct intravenous injection, but significantly increased in mice with chronically altered blood-brain-barrier. Loss/gain-of-function experiments consistently implicated CCL2 in systemic diffusion of Al-Rho particles captured by monocyte-lineage cells and in their subsequent neurodelivery. Stereotactic particle injection pointed out brain retention as a factor of progressive particle accumulation.

    Conclusion

    Nanomaterials can be transported by monocyte-lineage cells to DLNs, blood and spleen, and, similarly to HIV, may use CCL2-dependent mechanisms to penetrate the brain. This occurs at a very low rate in normal conditions explaining good overall tolerance of alum despite its strong neurotoxic potential. However, continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier or high constitutive CCL-2 production.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557144
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/99

  • Roxanne

    “Whooping Cough infections are common in an immunized population.”
    Journal of the American Medical Association, 1998

    “Dutch scientists are struggling to identify the exact cause of an epidemic of whooping cough that has swept throughout the country despite vaccination rates as high as 96% (“despite” or because of?) Similar problems are being reported in Norway and Denmark.”
    British Medical Journal, 1998Whooping Cough infections are common in an immunized population.” Journal of the American Medical Association, 1998

    “In 1979 Sweden abandoned the whooping cough vaccine. Out of 5,140 cases in 1978, it was found that 84% had been vaccinated three times.”
    British Medical Journal 283:696-697, 1981

  • Roxanne

    Re. the pertussis vaccine stats you cite, Jim Bob, some points to be considered:
    - Was pertussis lab verified as the cause- not assumed to be the cause
    - What was the vaccination status of the children who died (i.e. how many were totally unvaccinated (healthier) versus partially vaccinated – huge factor
    - How were they treated – current adherence to the outdated germ theory routinely employs suppression of outward symptoms only driving the disease process deeper thereby increasing the likelihood of serious complications and death
    - Vitamin C DOES work – and children who are malnourished and have a poor vitamin C profile are more likely to be vulnerable to pertussis to begin with than are children with a strong nutritional profile. Re. post treatment, I’ve seen vitamin C do all the things you “quackbusters” would like to deny.
    - How many children will suffer brain damage, seizures or SIDS because
    of the pertussis vaccine – these are the invisible victims which you would
    never see because you are too tied to the dogmas of the church of vaccinology.

  • Roxanne

    Ingestion DOES NOT EQUAL injection!
    How can anyone reasonably debate the injection of a substance versus the ingestion of a substance – two totally different processes physiologically with radically different
    consequences. You should educate yourself re. the implications of aluminum in vaccines particularly in re. to synergistic toxicity. Start with the research of UBC scientist
    Dr. Chris Shaw.

  • Roxanne

    Re. your comment on natural exposure… We live in soup of microbes – By your logic every species would need to injecting with a never ending plethora
    of vaccines to be “protected” from the endless slew of diseases they could
    succumb to… How utterly irrational

  • Lowell

    Well then you better start poopin in your own hand, Jim Bob; you mislead and for profit sheeple, Mr.Jim Bob…so knowlegeable… forget about the real facts …Jim Bob! Do some actual unbiased research. How much have you been shown and ignored it? http://www.vacfacts.info Hell, will have NO mercy on you!. There is a special place for you… and in hell ..you deceptive… child harming …LIARS, and deceivers for profit. Of course, with to much to lose!!!! And you know it. Get it right, today. You lied and the CDC has not a clue but to contnue to lie, just as you did.

  • Lowell

    Jim Bob, what a clueless piece of lying and in denial… trash. This is truth, let the readers decide.

  • Lowell Hubbs

    How do you explain then that there is no small pox vaccine used anymore and yet smallpox has not come back? Do some actual unbiased research and realize the the true historical record shows that small pox vaccine caused more small pox than it prevented, and as well that polio vaccine created more polio than it prevented. Then we have the SV 40 issue that has killed millions by inducing cancer, and through its exposure to the public in the polio vaccine. More harm than good.

    Polio Elimination by Vaccine Is a Hoax
    http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2013-07-08/polio-elimination-by-vaccine-is-a-hoax/

    Irrefutable Evidence Shows Historical Application of Vaccines Had No Health Benefit or Impact on Prevention of Infectious Disease
    http://preventdisease.com/news/13/052413_Irrefutable-Evidence-Historical-Application-Vaccines-No-Health-Benefit-Impact-on-Prevention-Infectious-Disease.shtml

    Scientific proof that the known cancer causing SV40 virus, a previous contaminant in the polio vaccine, is obviously either contagious; or the virus is still in the vaccine/s.
    http://www.vacfacts.info/scientific-proof-that-the-known-cancer-causing-sv40-virus-a-previous-contaminant-in-the-polio-vaccine-is-obviously-either-contagious-or-the-virus-is-still-in-the-vaccines.html

    Vaccine Contamination
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-contamination.html
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-contamination.html

  • guest

    Mewahahahaha! classic Lowell. You tell them (pharma shills)well and straight!

  • Jim Bob

    To all those questioning my motives, Go ahead. If its easier to attack me personally rather than the information I post, feel free.
    I’ll sum up a few responses:
    1) Lowell: bioaccumulation of aluminum in tissues around the body does not lend well to determining the cause of an adverse event. This is because the accumulation of heavy metals in the body will be relatively the same for everyone (based on vaccination dosage) and does not explain why some are more likely to experience an adverse event.
    2) Roxanne: On the injected vs ingested aluminum argument: If aluminum is the cause of adverse events and the cause of autism, why has there only been a spike in autism diagnoses recently even though aluminum adjuvants have been used extensively for more than 50 years?

  • Jim Bob

    Just a few small points:
    1) naturally occurring aluminum is WORSE than the aluminum salts used in vaccines.
    2) If the cause of autism et al. is caused by the bioaccumulation of aluminum why does it matter if its injected or ingested?
    Regardless of injection vs ingestion, aluminum molecules still end up in the same place (mostly in skeletal tissue with the vast majority being excreted shortly after vaccination).

  • Jim Bob

    Now, now Lowell. Let’s put the name-calling aside.
    If you expect me to believe that pharmaceutical companies have paid off every single public health authority in the world, I’ll believe it if you can show me proof.
    But I’m not going to fill in the scientific gaps with conspiracy theories. Moreover, I’m not going to pick out one study and say that one study constitutes proof (like you do). Moreover, I’m not going to pick out one study that agrees with me and say “this is what unbiased research looks like” without critically analyzing all the others that disagree with me. I’m also not going to dismiss those that disagree with me by saying “the authors must have had some sort of hidden agenda (of which I have no proof) but because I disagree with it, it must be biased and the authors were paid off.”
    Be honest about your bias, Lowell. When you do research, you dismiss the results that disagree with you and find the ones (the very few) that might in slightest way agree with you. At no point have you critically analyzed why the latest research showing the genetic links of autism are not valid or that recent research shows that autism can be diagnosed in utero (i.e. before any vaccinations take place). You simply label it junk science and refuse to refute.
    Why don’t you do that for a change? Show me why I’m wrong. Critically analyze my stance (from a scientific perspective rather than conspiratorial one) rather than my character.
    That is my challenge for you.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    1. Pharmaceutical companies were never said to have paid off public health authorities. What has been done is that they have been brainwashed by the lies and false propaganda we have all been fed for decades, and in fact since the first vaccine was ever made. Once these people, (the ethical and honest ones) learn of how much crap they have been fed as to vaccine safety and effectiveness, it is to late, and their only option is to shut up or quit. None of them want to lose their careers.

    2. I never said one study constitutes 100% proof; what I said was that it was a collection of the cross section of studies, and of course that the CDC refuses to acknowledge. I definitely have a collection of those studies put in front of you, and you can deny that all you want.

    3. I know of all the main line studies that have been done and promoted, claiming that vaccines do not cause ASD, and make denial of any harm at all. I actually have analysis sources for many of those studies of course funded by the CDC and AAP, and they are very well done, right on my website. Those studies are proven junk science and epidemiological study fraud. take a couple full days and actually find out what is on my site. http://www.vacfacts.info

    4. I have no bias because i have extensively studied the evidence claimed to, on both sides. If vaccines were actually safe and effective, few people would argue with their use. However, the opposite is true, and there are far better ways to protect yourself from pathogens. Thats what you refuse to see, and that is that the foundation of modern medicine have been false all along. But that chemical pharma was the only concept that would create large profits, and never get to real prevention nor healing of anything. Learn of the real history of how that corrupt system of health care came to be. Bechamp had it right, and not Pasteur! You have no clue do you, nor do you care to.

    5. I have several times made analysis of the genetic links so called studies, and they are not only always inconclusive, but only pertain to a small number of cases at best, providing if it actually were correct. All you want to do is desperately blame anything but vaccines. You are in denial.

    6. If you think there is some genetic link that has caused a now 1 in 50 ASD epidemic, when that increase directly is proportionate to the increase in no liability vaccines; you are delusional. There is nothing to debate as to that. Look at how many studies i have collected that show the vaccine/ASD link. Look at the Biomedical Treatment page. Its time you faced reality and started debating me on the issues of importance, and stop throwing your selective ignorance at keyboard. That is my challenge to you, to start seeking and seeing reality.

  • CEM130

    Knowing personally an infant who died of whooping cough, I find it blatantly offensive that you refer to it as a “benign childhood disease.”

  • Jammes

    My pediatrician told me one cannot gain lifelong immunity to whooping cough. Who is correct?

  • tv is brainwashing

    Eat sh*t then fool. Nobody wants to FORCE anyone not to vaccinate, but the Nazi corporate government and their buddies in big pharma ARE pushing mandatory vaccination. In another ten or fifteen years when they’ve come up with 100, 200, 300 vaccines for bad breath, foot odour, tinea or whatever else they can come up with, how much heavy metals and toxic chemicals is enough or ok to pump into a brand new baby when they know and admit if you care to look there is 50+ side effects from mild to instant death you stupid idiotic imbecile.

  • tv is brainwashing

    Jim Bob you obviously have never read the ingredients that are in these vaccines.TOXIC CHEMICALS! Don’t take my word for it, go and get the information, all you have to do is ask your doctor for the information sheet on any vaccine, or just for laughs ask them if they can tell you themselves and guarantee there is nothing toxic to the human body in these vaccines, i mean they should know exactly what they are pumping into people from birth. You will be shocked!

  • tv is brainwashing

    Get it through ya head Jim Bob, they admit their vaccines can kill and in the same breath say just take the risk and they are demanding people take that risk. They are withholding the full truth about everything in life. If you are not a paid troll, then you are a brainwashed obedient and willing slave sheep and they will lead you to the slaughter!

  • diversity

    Additives used in the production of vaccines may include

    suspending fluid (e.g. sterile water, saline, or fluids containing protein);

    preservatives and stabilizers to help the vaccine remain unchanged (e.g. albumin, phenols, and glycine); and

    adjuvants or enhancers to help the vaccine to be more effective.

    Common substances found in vaccines include:

    Aluminum gels or salts of aluminum which are added as adjuvants to help the vaccine stimulate a better response. Adjuvants help promote an earlier, more potent response, and more persistent immune response to the vaccine.

    See also: “Aluminum in Vaccines: What you should know” [ 579KB / 2 pages]Also available in Spanish [579KB / 2 pages]

    Antibiotics which are added to some vaccines to prevent the growth of germs (bacteria) during production and storage of the vaccine. No vaccine produced in the United States contains penicillin.

    Egg protein is found in yellow fever and most influenza vaccines, which are prepared using chicken eggs. Ordinarily, persons who are able to eat eggs or egg products safely can receive these vaccines.

    Formaldehyde is used to inactivate bacterial products for toxoid vaccines (these are vaccines that use an inactive bacterial toxin to produce immunity). It is also used to kill unwanted viruses and bacteria that might contaminate the vaccine during production. Formaldehyde is removed from the vaccine before it is packaged, leaving only a trace.

    Monosodium glutamate (MSG) and 2-phenoxy-ethanol which are used as stabilizers in a few vaccines to help the vaccine remain unchanged when exposed to heat, light, acidity, or humidity.

    Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative that is added to vials of vaccine containing more than one dose to prevent contamination and growth of potentially harmful bacteria.

    For children with a prior history of allergic reactions to any of these substances in vaccines, parents should consult their child’s healthcare provider before vaccination.

  • diversity

    That you get an itch at the injection place or a little fever is way better than the consequences of polio and other -through vaccines- preventable diseases

  • diversity

    the immune system is constructed for “memorizing” diseases. Vaccines are a training for the immune system. you can be a healthy person, but not necessarily able to lift 200 pounds. this is only possible with training

  • TV is brainwashing

    You don’t mention anything about animal DNA

  • diversity

    Yes because there is none. and Animal DNA doesnt do any harm in the human body

  • TV is brainwashing

    Buuuuullllshiiiiiit!! You are lying or you’ve got no idea what you’re talking about which is it?

  • diversity

    what does animal DNA do, if it really is in vaccines

  • TV is brainwashing

    That would be a question for your backwards eugenicists.

  • diversity

    You want the answer? Nothing

  • TV is brainwashing

    Well as long as you’re happy with that answer, continue getting your shots collective conformist slave.

  • diversity

    I studied medicine i KNOW better and more than you regarding the topic of vacccination

  • TV is brainwashing

    Yeah right so you got all your information from only approved works with the holy stamp of approval from the medical industry. Publications that only they ok and your “peer review” crap i know how that works, agree with the peers!

  • DeBaliviere

    “…vaccines have never been proven to prevent any disease”

    Ding ding ding! We have an award for the dumbest statement EVAH!

  • diversity

    No not the stamp of the pharma industry but the stamp of science

  • TV is brainwashing

    Yeah they stamp it with approval until it’s proven wrong, geez i wonder if science has ever been wrong? HHMMMM

  • diversity

    science is never wrong

  • TV is brainwashing

    HAHAHAHAHAH you idiot!

  • diversity

    only scientists are wrong, science is never wrong

  • TV is brainwashing

    Whatever, you’re obviously an extremist fanatic of the science religion. Feel free to practise your religion, just don’t push it onto everyone else!

  • diversity

    Science is no religion