Dogs And Cows And Toxic Vials, That’s What Vaccines Are Made Of!

On December 3, 2013, UK newspapers reported that in the future, doctors will be given the power to lecture any parent who refuses to have their child vaccinated with the MMR vaccine. This move is a part of a government campaign to boost falling vaccination rates in the UK. [1]

Critics argue that the move will intimidate parents, stating that parents want more choice. They feel that instead of bullying parents and making them feel as if big brother is watching them, the government should reintroduce the single vaccinations as an alternative to the MMR.

Parents Want Information and Choices

The Daily Mail reported:

“Under Department of Health plans, parents who refuse MMR would receive a general practitioner’s letter.

Doctors or nurses would then use an information pack sent by the Department of Health to 35,000 staff to make the case for the vaccine, says a report in the Nursing Standard journal.

A Department of Health spokesman said the plan was just one of a range of options being discussed in a move to get the message across.

He said, ‘Our research shows that parents want more information about MMR and that is what we are intending to provide.’”

Jackie Fletcher, from the vaccination campaign group JABS, whose son was awarded £90,000 after suffering severe brain damage as a result of the MMR, told the Mail that:

“Parents don’t trust the government’s advice on this, so why are they going to trust a doctor who is just going to read out what he’s been told to say?”

Mrs. Fletcher joins the growing number of parents calling for single vaccines and told reporters that parents want choice, not lectures.

I agree. However, does this choice also include choosing not to vaccinate?

Single Rubella Vaccine Includes Fetal Bovine (Cow) Serum and Numerous Side Effects

Mounting evidence suggests that the single measles, mumps and rubella vaccinations are no safer than the three-in-one MMR and are packed full of gruesome ingredients.

First, let us discuss MERUVAX® II (rubella live virus vaccine), the single rubella vaccine. [2]

The list of ingredients is enough to put anyone off. It includes:

  • RA 27/3 strain of live attenuated rubella virus
  • Fetal bovine serum
  • Human serum albumin
  • Neomycin
  • Hydrolyzed gelatin
  • Rubella virus
  • Sodium phosphate
  • Sodium chloride

Fetal bovine serum, for those parents who are not sure, is a common component of animal cell culture media. It is harvested from calf fetuses taken from pregnant cows during slaughter. To use this in vaccines, the serum has to be harvested by means of cardiac puncture. The procedure takes place without any form of anesthesia, which has to be not only cruel but also inhumane. [3]

Human serum albumin is the most abundant protein in human plasma and it is produced by the liver.

I felt that the first section of the rubella single vaccine leaflet was so unsavory that I would include it in full:

“MERUVAX® II (Rubella Virus Vaccine Live) is a live virus vaccine for vaccination against rubella (German measles).

MERUVAX® II is a sterile lyophilized preparation of the Wistar Institute RA 27/3 strain of live attenuated rubella virus. The virus was adapted to and propagated in WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts.

The growth medium is Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) [a buffered salt solution containing vitamins and amino acids and supplemented with fetal bovine serum] containing human serum albumin and neomycin. Sorbitol and hydrolyzed gelatin stabilizer are added to the individual virus harvests.

The cells, virus pools, fetal bovine serum, and human albumin are all screened for the absence of adventitious agents. Human albumin is processed using the Cohn cold ethanol fractionation procedure.

The reconstituted vaccine is for subcutaneous administration. Each 0.5 mL dose contains not less than 1,000 TCID50 (tissue culture infectious doses) of rubella virus.

Each dose of the vaccine is calculated to contain sorbitol (14.5 mg), sodium phosphate, sucrose (1.9 mg), sodium chloride, hydrolyzed gelatin (14.5 mg), human albumin (0.3 mg), fetal bovine serum (

Before reconstitution, the lyophilized vaccine is a light yellow compact crystalline plug. MERUVAX® II, when reconstituted as directed, is clear yellow.”

According to the fact sheet, adverse reactions to this vaccination appear extensive and include:

  • Fever
  • Syncope
  • Headache
  • Dizziness
  • Malaise
  • Irritability
  • Vasculitis
  • Diarrhea
  • Vomiting
  • Nausea
  • Thrombocytopenia
  • Purpura
  • Regional lymphadenopathy
  • Leukocytosis
  • Arthritis
  • Arthralgia
  • Myalgia
  • Encephalitis
  • Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS)
  • Polyneuritis
  • Polyneuropathy
  • Paresthesia
  • Sore throat
  • Cough
  • Rhinitis
  • Stevens-Johnson syndrome
  • Erythema multiforme
  • Urticaria
  • Rash
  • Pruritis
  • Burning/stinging at injection site
  • Wheal and flare
  • Redness (erythema)
  • Pain
  • Induration
  • Nerve deafness
  • Otitis media
  • Optic neuritis
  • Papillitis
  • Retrobulbar neuritis
  • Conjunctivitis

Anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions have been reported, as well as related phenomena such as angioneurotic edema (including peripheral or facial edema) and bronchial spasm in individuals with or without an allergic history.

Death from various, and in some cases unknown, causes has been reported rarely following vaccination with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines.

These are the adverse reactions that Merck will actually admit to; of course, the real list of side effects is probably far longer. As the list was so extensive, I copied it directly from the fact sheet. I particularly loved the way that Merck added ‘death’ at the end under the heading entitled ‘other’ as if they thought they had better add it in as an extra to cover themselves.

The upside to all this, of course, is if your child does come through this vaccination unscathed, then according to our governments, the medical profession and the pharmaceutical industry, your children are unlikely to catch rubella. But then again, there is no guarantee.

Single Measles Vaccine Has Been a Major Safety Concern for Decades

The ingredients of the single measles vaccine manufactured by Sanofi are as impressive as the ingredients of the rubella vaccine and include hyperattenuated live measles virus, human albumin, neomycin, lactose, and others. [4]

The single measles vaccine fairs no better as far as adverse reactions are concerned, either. The list of reactions seems endless and includes:

  • Redness
  • Local pain
  • Swelling at the injection site
  • Allergic reactions such as rash and urticaria
  • Anaphylactic shock
  • A rise in temperature to around 38-39 degrees C
  • A temporary rash may occur 5-12 days after vaccination
  • Erythema multiforme
  • Congestion
  • Coughing
  • Inflammation of the throat
  • Eye infection: may occur 5-12 days after immunization
  • High fever (over 103 degrees F/39.4 degrees C)
  • Diarrhea
  • Transient convulsions
  • Syncope
  • Thrombocytopenia up to two months after vaccination
  • Purpura
  • Vasculitis
  • Optic neuritis
  • Retrobulbar neuritis
  • Papillitis
  • Retinitis
  • Ocular palsies
  • Guillain-Barre syndrome
  • Ataxia
  • Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis (SSPE)

There have been major safety concerns surrounding the single measles vaccine for decades. In 2010, I discovered secret government documents revealing that the UK government had been aware from as far back as 1972 that the measles vaccine was causing children to suffer from the debilitating neurological disorder subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE).

SSPE is a degenerative neurological condition which affects a person’s behavior, memory and coordination, leading to fits, blindness and eventually death.

To read about the secret group that the UK government set up to deal with the growing problem and exactly what information the leading professionals sitting on that group revealed and much more, it is advisable to read my article on the subject, titled At Last! Government Documents Locked Up for 30 Years Proving This Vaccine Unsafe Finally Revealed. [5]

At Least Two Single Mumps Vaccines Have Been Banned

Early in 2012, I wrote an article stating that the single mumps vaccine Medi-Mumps was available in private clinics from June 2012. [6]

Medi-Mumps, manufactured by Almac Pharma, was said to be cultured on canine kidney cells instead of chick embryos, making it suitable for those children allergic to eggs, but sadly, my research found that instead it appeared to be less suitable for those children allergic to dogs.

For those of you who are unaware, although the mumps vaccine was available in private clinics until 2009, it was only being offered as an unlicensed product. This was because if a parent specifically requests a single vaccine, a private clinic needs to apply to the MHRA for permission to use an unlicensed product in the patient’s name.

Ms. Blears referenced this in the Hansard document dated December 4, 2002:

“Single mumps vaccines being prescribed and administered, as part of single measles, mumps and rubella vaccination programs such as MMR SepVax, are unlicensed imported medicines. Medicine legislation allows a doctor or dentist to prescribe an unlicensed medicine to meet the special clinical needs of his individual patients, on his direct personal responsibility.” [7]

Medi-Mumps has since been banned.

Was Medi-Mumps Banned Due To VacTruth’s Intervention?

Interestingly, since VacTruth’s intervention and a letter sent to the MHRA by an interested party, Medi-Mumps is no longer available at private clinics. [8, 9]

This is probably because our article mentioned the fact that Medi-Mumps was extremely similar to the banned mumps vaccine Pavivac that had also been cultured on canine kidney cells and manufactured in the Czech Republic.

However, Pavivac had been rejected by the CSM (Committee on the Safety of Medicines) in 2002 due to safety concerns. [10]

Shortly after the VacTruth article was published and the letter was sent by an interested party, it appears that the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) carried out an investigation into the MediMumps vaccine. In September 2012, they released the following statement:

“13 September 2012

The MHRA was made aware of information presented on the Children’s Immunisation Centre (CIC) website about Medi-Mumps and a related press release. The MHRA was concerned that the information provided an unbalanced view of the safety and efficacy of the vaccine because it did not mention the MHRA’s concerns and previous CSM advice or that the product was unlicensed.

We understood that the Medi-Mumps vaccine is manufactured from the same stock and processed in the same way as Pavivac mumps vaccine. The MHRA, acting on advice from an independent advisory committee, the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM), has for a number of years objected to the importation of the Pavivac product because there is insufficient information available to assure its safety, quality and efficacy. See statement from the committee on safety of medicines for more details.

CIC amended the websites to remove the information about Medi-Mumps.
Date case raised: 3 April 2012
Date action agreed: 2 May 2012
Date of publication: 13 September 2012” [11]

Since Medi-Mumps and Pavivac vaccines were banned, single mumps vaccines have become thin on the ground.

Therefore, I have been unable to give a long list of adverse reactions, but that does not mean that single mumps vaccines do not produce any.


It is apparent that our vaccinations include some very strange and unsavoury ingredients. The three single vaccines were certainly not the only vaccines I came across containing parts of animals, humans and insects. In fact, I found a huge list of them on a PDF which I have included as extra research.

For some reason, many parents are perfectly happy to have their tiny babies vaccinated with everything from insect cells to pigs’ gelatin, without a moment’s hesitation, arguing that the vaccines are to protect their children and keep them strong and healthy. Others remain totally unaware of the vaccines’ contents and may have religions banning abortions and the consumption of many of the vaccines contents.

I believe that:

1. Parents should be given the product insert to read in full before they have their child vaccinated.
2. Parents should be made fully aware of what the vaccine contains before vaccination.
3. Parents should be made fully aware of all possible adverse reactions the vaccine can cause.
4. Parents should sign a consent form before their child is vaccinated.

Like Jackie Fletcher, I believe that parents should be allowed to have choices, not only between the MMR vaccine or the single vaccines, but also whether or not they wish to have their child vaccinated at all.

[contentbox headline=”References” type=”normal”]

1. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-101498/Lecture-threat-parents-refuse-MMR-vaccination.html

2. www.fda.gov/…/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/…/ucm142553.pdf

3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11971757

4. http://theindependentgeneralpractice.co.uk/downloads.html

5. http://vactruth.com/2012/08/30/government-document-vaccine-unsafe/

6. http://vactruth.com/2012/05/25/vaccine-dog-cells-allergy/

7. http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200203/cmhansrd/vo021204/text/21204w28.htm

8. http://www.childrensimmunisation.com/mumps/

9. http://www.surreygp.com/measles?gclid=CJCGz6OioLsCFSjlwgodRgoAqw

10. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/pl-p/documents/websiteresources/con2031109.pdf

11. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Howweregulate/Medicines/Advertisingofmedicines…

Additional research:  http://vaclib.org/docs/BibleFlyer.pdf



Photo Credit

Christina England, BA Hons

  • DebbyBruck

    Very thorough and would be beneficial for this to be a handout for each parent who takes the child for a vaccination. In addition, parents may inquire about each and every ingredient regarding the side effects and use historically. One more missing item would include any alternative practices that have been and are still being used globally to maintain health. And, one more thing…. include the countries who have banned the use of individual vaccinations and the reasons for the ban; such as, adverse effects including death. Now, the parent has all of the information with which to make a sound and personal choice.

  • Lou

    “MERUVAX® II is a sterile lyophilized preparation of the Wistar
    Institute RA 27/3 strain of live attenuated rubella virus.”

    IMO we CERTAINLY do not want anything to do with ANY product coming out of the Wistar Institute. The Wistar Institute has a long. dark history in the development of AIDS and many other bio-weapons. They have been caught using orphan children as unwilling subjects for their bio-weapons testing.



  • Sallie

    I was interviewing a doctor the other day and used your article about NYC flu shot mandates to reference adverse reactions to the flu shot. You have critical information in all of your articles Christina England. Many thanks for being as conscientious as you are. Here’s the interview I reference above: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/publicadvocate/2013/12/17/flu-shots-eileen-dannemann-dr-paul-g-king

  • elnura

    It’s not just the listed ingredients that are listed on the CDC’s webpage, it’s the entire solution that’s contaminated. Janine Roberts discusses in her book “Fear of the Invisible” the vaccine incubation vat/tub and how it’s impossible to make it sterile so every vaccine is contaminated but the MMR seems to hold a special place among contaminates.

    How Vaccines Are Made
    – Janine Roberts, Investigative Journalist, writes…
    “The fluid in the vaccines is never sterile. It is filtered straight from the bird cell culture incubators in which the measles virus is produced – and nothing the size of a virus or smaller than a virus can be filtered out before it is put into our children. I have obtained previously unpublished NIH transcripts of the meetings of the top UK and US vaccine scientists in which they admit this.

    I quote them extensively in my new book -Fear of the Invisible. They state that the

    …vaccines are both “crude” and “primitive’”..to quote our Dr Phil Minor of the UK Health Department, They are full of bits of dead cells – including DNA and RNA fragments that the doctors at this conference described as

    ‘possible causes of cancer and autoimmune diseases’

    as well as bird proteins, toxins, bird viruses. A scientist from WHO also admits extraordinarily in these transcripts that the measles vaccine is extensively contaminated with ‘Bird Leukosis Virus’ and that they cannot remove it.

    None of this has been reported to parents. This is from a highly authoritative source – an NIH transcript of named leading scientists from the top scientific institutions and pharmaceutical companies in meetings that were not attended by parent organizations or by journalists.”

    This is an extract from Janine’s new book – ‘Fear of the Invisible’.

    ‘Since many parents have reported serious illnesses in their children after MMR, we have to ask: When measles virus is injected into our children, what else might be in the needle? How sterile is the procedure?

    In a paper entitled ‘Isolation and Identification of Measles Virus in Cell Culture,’the US Government’s leading virus research institution, the CDC, currently lays out how isolation of this virus should be done. It instructs; first obtain from a patient suspected of having measles a small sample of urine or fluid from the nose or mouth.

    Next, states the CDC, prepare a culture of cells from marmoset monkeys by making these cancerous and giving them Epstein-Barr disease!

    Cells from this species of monkeys, it informs us, are ’10,000 times’ more sensitive to the measles virus than are normal human cells (i.e. they are much more likely to fall gravely ill in this experiment). The monkey cells are then settled into a monolayer (one cell deep layer) in a laboratory vessel. (The measles and MMR vaccine manufacturers are currently using instead cells from mashed chicken embryos rather than from very expensive marmoset monkeys.)

    Next, using rubber gloves and splash goggles, add to the cells a dangerous toxin called trypsin.

    More information in Fear of the Invisible or medical veritas: The Dangerous impurities of vaccines; http://medicalveritas.com/Janine.pdf

    The CDC tells us to expect some of the cells to fall off the sides of the vessel as if they have been poisoned. They have been. It then instructs: add nutrients and glucose and leave the cells alone for two or three days so they can recover.

    Next add to the cell culture the sample gathered from the patient and place the culture in a warm incubation chamber. After an hour, inspect these cells with a microscope to see if are rounded, distorted, or floating free as they were after trypsin was added. If they are, the CDC calls this proof that measles virus is present and causing this illness! If 50% of the cells are now distorted, the CDC tells scientists to put this cell culture in the fridge as an “isolated measles-virus stock!”

    This will contain many particles and toxins from terribly sick monkey cells – yet it is said to be an ‘isolate’ that may be used for a measles vaccine! In fact, no measles-like symptoms have been observed in the culture. The CDC does not even look to see if the measles virus were present. It is the fluid filtered off from such an incubator that is used as a vaccine. When I read this paper, I was horrified by the inadequacy of the science.

    The child vaccinated would have to produce many antibodies against all the contaminants – irrespective of whether they were measles virus.

    I found that John Enders, the scientist who developed the measles vaccine in 1954, said he had modelled its development on the work he had done to help make the polio vaccines. His team first obtained some fluid, ‘throat washings and blood’, from an 11-year-old boy with measles called David Edmonston. When this was added to ‘human post-natal’ cells, these cells fell ill. This was taken as indicating a measles virus might be present. This cell culture was then added to
    human cervical cancer cells (HeLa) and to ‘human carcinoma cells’. The
    cells became still sicker. When the microscope then revealed ‘giant multinuclear cells’ in the cultures, they took this as a sign that the measles virus had distorted them, not that the cancers were becoming more malignant.

    When they tested the resulting cell culture fluid in Cynomologus monkeys, they found some got a ‘mild’ illness that in ‘some aspects’ was like measles. This was taken as evidence that this toxic fluid was a ‘measles virus isolate’. They called it the ‘Edmonston’ isolate after the name of the boy.They then transfered this process over to using bird cells rather than monkey cells in order to save costs in making vaccines. Enders at first failed in his attempt to grow the ‘Edmonston’
    sample in cheap fertilized bird eggs. But then he thought – maybe the highly distorted cell culture produced after 42 passages through human and monkey cell cultures might be what they needed. He gave this fluid another 9 passages though amnion cells. It now contained mutant cells with ‘fusiform and stellate’ shapes.

    He then added this to fertilised eggs. ‘After incubating for 9 days at 35 degrees’ in ‘developing chicks,’ some chick cells took on the same deformed shapes that he had earlier seen and blamed solely on the unseen virus. He and his colleagues then concluded that the resulting cell culture was ‘the most suitable material for the preparation of vaccines’ and that their method would ‘also greatly reduce the cost of manufacture’ Thus the ‘Edmonston strain’ became the basis of our current
    vaccines. This is also how the measles vaccine became as contaminated. It is poisoned bird cells, some of which, the vaccine safety experts confessed, might cause ‘autoimmune diseases and cancers’ in the vaccinated. Could this contamination also have a role in causing Autism Spectrum Disorders? Could injecting such a fluid into our children overwhelm the immune systems of some – or do some other long term damage?

    It seems all the major live or dead virus vaccines were developed similarly. It is to this contaminated fluid that mercury or aluminum is sometimes added.

    In Gary Null’s documentary: Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines

    Many knowledgeable scientist provide very in-dept information on vaccines. You can download a copy at: http://vimeo.com/77798815

  • Free People

    Excellent article, thank you.
    This link will be included in the laminated cards I make to hand out to any ‘expectant mother’ I run into in supermarkets or anywhere else. Many have thanked me profusely upon running into them again. The truth needs to be spread ‘Paul Revere’ style to counteract the media LIES and the cover up secrecy of what vaccines are really about and what they contain. Proof is, people who have become aware are horrified just by the ingredients and will never vaccinate again, so I’m very happy to spread this link, and in turn they spread it.

    What is happening in UK is also happening with California’s new vaccine exemption law, and New York, mandating Flu vacines for all children, and I’m sure elsewhere. Vaccine rates are falling because more people are being directly affected and experiencing the damage first hand, so now governments are using FORCE.

    In my opinion, this is one of the best sites to become informed on not only the hazards of vaccination, but also the abomidable ingredients. It’s at the top of my list. Spread the word, it’s the only way to get the information to the people.

    Saving one baby at a time.

  • Lorna Roberts

    Any parent who does not research the adverse effects of vaccinations before sacrificing their child’s health should be utterly ashamed. Ignorance is no excuse any more as there is a wealth of information readily available to anyone who bothers to look for it.If you allow your child to be vaccinated and they end up damaged you are responsible, unless you are illiterate.

  • Christine P. S.

    Good work. So agree with doing these links and getting the truth out there person to person. I suggest also putting these cards in parenting magazines and books etc. at the library or where ever mothers to be might meet. Be sure to include the must-view documentary ‘Silent Epidemic, The Untold Story of Vaccines’ at vimeo.com.

  • sabelmouse

    on the other hand it’s hard sifting through and making the right decision. and always worry that one’s independent decision and stepping away from the mainstream might have been wrong.

  • bluelite

    No, not really. Once you throughly research from the right sources its black and white. You need to invest time and patience to throughly research reputable professionals who have dedicated themselves to providing the facts and correct science. Plenty to read from! Remember your kids can’t do this and are relying on you to keep them from harm. The more you educate yourself the less fearful you become. Feeling fearful is part of breaking from the mainstream bubble. It’s confronting for some. Its not easy. Gumption is required.

  • sabelmouse

    gumption is indeed required though nothing is ever black and white.

  • bluelite

    Yes life in general is certainly not black and white but however, I think this topic sure is! When you read enough it’s a no brainer to me. The debate against vaccination is far far greater. Just my thoughts and opinions:) good luck

  • sabelmouse

    i agree generally . i just have issues with absolutes.

  • bluelite

    With any decision we make in life, it involves a degree of risk but you can difinately increase the better odds in your favor! Knowledge is power :) Just wondering, have you checked out www. think twice.com. That site is another great site that may answer some questions or lingering doubts you may still have with this subject.

    Neil Z Miller is a brillant medical researcher who has a thorough understanding on this topic and has the full support of other medical professionals on what he researches and writes about. He just puts the unknown facts out there for the public to decide as he knows that everyone has to make the decision for themselves. I totally recommend his book ” Vaccine Safety Manual: For concerned families and health practitioners”. It contains 1,000 scientific studies. I think he has done the global community a tremendous service with his findings. excuse the rambling! :/

  • Jim Bob

    Hopefully you don’t include vac”truth” in the “wealth of information” category.
    To be honest, I’d believe my doctor before I believe the internet when it comes to my child’s wellbeing. But hey, that’s just me.

  • Jim Bob

    Exactly who are the right people and reputable professionals?

    And how did you determine they have the actual facts and the correct science as opposed to the broader scientific community?

    Moreover, what about feeling fearful of the mainstream bubble? What if the fear is being created by a delusional minority?

    For example, if you did your research from vactruth, you would leave fearful and less informed than had you spoken with a medical profession.

  • sabelmouse

    i have, thanks. my children are 18 and 23 now ans as we went along we’ve vaccinated less. i’m pretty happy with the decision. i mainly meant that it’s hard and uncomfortable to step outside of the mainstream like this. it’s taking full responsibility instead of giving it over to an agency.

  • Vaccines are dangerous.

  • louise40

    What about families who are vegetarian or vegetarian by religion, having animal matter injected into their children and babies?

    See this link which is one of the first comprehensive package inserts of a list of vaccines which I found about 7 years ago but it is now very out of date, as they are filled with even more unsavoury things nowadays. Pay particular attention to the column on the far righhand side. These things should never be injected into children and babies’ bodies that have barely had a chance to mature.

    In addition, vaccines are injected directly into the blood stream, which is the deepest level of the immune system. Far more dangerous than toxins that must go through, for example, the digestive system. Much harder to get them out of the body.

  • Roxanne

    Elnura, have you read Janine Robert’s ‘The Vaccine Papers’? I’m wondering
    how the two books compare in terms of material covered? Is there a fair degree of overlap or do they deal with different aspects of vaccine dangers
    and cover-up? Thanks for any feedback you can offer.

  • Barb

    Thank you for adding such relevant info to another excellent article by Christine England; I’m never surprised yet always amazed at the arrogance, close-mindedness and complete disregard for natural sciences found among researchers, doctors, scientists (and lay people) who promote the junk science of vaccines while withholding critical info/full disclosure parents need for informed consent. Thank God the illusion is crumbling…

  • Stacey Borenstein Clay

    The rubella vaccine gave me arthritis. I can tell you from experience, you do not want to risk your child getting arthritis. It’s painful and i’ll have to live with the pain for the rest of my life. I wish I could go back in time and undo what I did.

  • guest

    I’d much rather trust an honest scientist, researcher, neurosurgeon etc, (who are fully aware of how vaccination works and have studied the factual research), than believe what a general practitioner, who only parrots what their been told by medical school and big pharma reps. But hey, that’s just me.

  • bluelite

    Yes I absolutely agree. I think it’s because we have been conditioned that way. I’ve come across a lot of people would much rather leave the responsibility of their health decisions to a Dr. It pays to know your options. It’s best to make decisions based on knowledge and not fear.

  • bluelite

    Jim Bob in my opinion, the only thing that sells vaccination is fear and authority. The rest is smoke and mirrors created by the medical industry and our lamestream media. I’m certainly haven’t become more fearful and less informed since reading this site. No vested interests here. The internet has mutiple sources of information but the medical industry is only one source. People would have to be foolish or ignorant to only believe the information coming from the one side that has everything to gain.

    More and more people are starting to realise there is more to the picture of vaccination. Let’s admit it Jim, vaccination is a highly questionable and profitable practice. Modern medicine is founded on vaccination and is the bread and butter of this industry. The downside is there is absolutely no accountability or transparency in this practice when things go horribly wrong. No wonder people are loosing respect for dr’s today. They have brought it on themselves by being dishonest or misinformed by their own profession. Sorry Bob, truth is authority not the other way round. Nor does truth need laws to protect it.

  • Roxanne

    Totally agree with you. Appallingly, far too many physicians are just talking head, yes men who follow the herd, parrot what the “medical authorities” tell them, ignorant or oblivious to the power and politics behind the vaccine profit making machine. Then there are those who connect the dots but keep silent for fear of professional repercussions, and
    then there’s those who hold their ground and – like scientists,
    doctors and whistle blowers on a range of topics – often pay the price for dissenting from officialdom.

  • elnura

    I’ve not read it yet but I’ve read many excerpts online. I’m hoping to get it for Christmas. There’s bound to be some overlap which is fine as long as the research is as solid as it is in “Fear of the Invisible”. She has a website-Spark of Light that has a lot of good information.

    Found a mind blowing article of HPV she wrote that I don’t think got the attention it deserved. It


    -On December 10th, a Nobel Prize will be awarded for finding HPV and proving its link to cervical cancer to Dr Harald zur Hausen. However there is a missing link in this – for he failed to find a way to persuade cells to make his virus.

    -Extraordinarily, at no point during vaccine production is the HPV virus claimed to be present. The reason for this is very simple. So far scientists have failed to persuade any cell culture to produce this virus, even cultures made of cervical cancer cells. A statement by the International Agency for Research on Cancer reported that this type of virus, the papilloma viruses (HPV), “cannot be propagated in tissue culture.

    -MAKING A VACCINE FOR AN ABSENT VIRUS. Why is HPV virus thought to cause this cancer? It seems only because
    Harald zur Hausen found certain genetic codes in or near the cervical cancer cells; for, in about 90% of cases, ‘DNA and transcripts of specific HPV types are regularly detected in biopsies from cervical cancer and in its precursor lesions.’ [2]

    He presumed these codes were from proteins that were unique to this virus. We have to say, “presumed,” as most viruses have not yet been studied so logically it is impossible for us to be certain that a protein is unique to any virus. Also, finding them in these cancer cells does not mean that they cause the cancers. The cells may produce them for other purposes.

    Thus, because this virus cannot be grown, the vaccine is instead based on ‘Virus-Like Particles;’ made from synthetic versions of proteins said to be parts of HPV. In reality, human skin cells make these proteins – but these same cells have not confirmed their ability to make HPV itself by doing so in the laboratory. This makes it near impossible to prove that these proteins come from this virus.
    Read the entire article at: http://blackherbals.com/hpv_vaccine_mysteries.htm

    That read this short piece at: Age of Autism. http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/12/bribing-the-nob.html
    A pharmaceutical representative from AstraZeneca sits on a board
    which votes on Nobel Prize candidates in medicine. That board
    voted for Dr. Hauser because of his discovery that the human papilloma virus causes cervical cancer. In turn, AstraZeneca gave several million dollars to Nobel-affiliated corporations to spread the word about “medical breakthroughs.” Just by coincidence, the vaccine patents against the human papilloma virus are owned by AstraZeneca.

    Maybe a few positive words from the Nobel committee might be just enough to make some parents ignore all those reports about bad reactions, including death from the Gardasil vaccine.
    I hope she goes into more details in “The Vaccine Papers”

  • elnura

    I had a parent comment to me on the website Natural News, if vaccines don’t work what are parents suppose to do? I think they have given up so much control of their health to “others” they have become complacent in making health care choices for their children and themselves. They also are afraid. With a vaccine people figure well that’s covered and there is nothing ever to worry about in that area of my life. Little do they know the very vaccines they embrace are what’s causing all the diseases and illness in children today and probably is responsible for all the health problems that have been plaguing humanity the last 50 years.

  • Wrusssr

    “. . . doctors will be given the power to lecture any parent who refuses to have their child vaccinated with the MMR vaccine. . .”

    And how will doctors go about lecturing their patients? Oh wait. . .the pharmaceutical companies’ talking points just arrived from their stock holders and beneficiaries. You know, the ones who taught the doctors in med school.
    Threaten to fine or dock the doctors for not forcing vaccine sales and what do
    you have? Bureaucrats and doctors street walking for BigPharma! Is this a world of opportunity or what?

    This sort of intimidation works on mud and bamboo hut third worlders. But not in outback Afghanistan. See, people plugged into the information reformation and this global vaccine scam are aware of the faux flu pandemic the WHO tried to force on the globe to sterilize and sicken and “thin” humanity—another
    goal being to use it to declare martial law once an engineered “Class 6
    world pandemic emergency” was underway courtesy contaminated vaccine— in one nice, neat, tidy package. This tactic relies on patients who believe doctors to be omnipotent. In reality, they’re little better than greedy
    witchdoctors hawking pharmaceutical poisons for tic marks towards their annual
    club med vacation. They are useful for setting bones and hacking off limbs, though.

    People are aware.
    Movements are afoot.

  • Christine P. S.

    “…truth is authority not the other way round. Nor does truth need laws to protect it”
    So true!!!

  • Debbie

    Very interesting comments you make here. Modern medicine love to scream quackery at natural healing practices but they are the ones that are full of quackery. The hypocrisy is nauseating.

  • sabelmouse

    it sure is. amazing how one can get vilified for just trying to find out. i do believe it’s mainly because of our believe in science replacing old religion. i think this sums it up well.


  • Jim Bob

    Okay. But what if they are “parroting” what honest scientists, researchers and neurosurgeons are saying?
    Realistically, an “honest scientist” in the anti-science community is one that does not support vaccination. In my eyes, that’s not honest and they shouldn’t be calling themselves scientists since they have pre-determined outcomes and bias.
    They teach science-based medicine at recognized universities here in Canada. All doctors receive the same training and must study further to receive a specialization. And I can’t think of any doctor who after spending 10 years receiving their qualifications would then rely on a pharmaceutical rep’s knowledge rather than their own. That is, keeping in mind that many pharma reps that make the rounds tend to be younger (and attractive) females fresh out of college/university.

  • Jim Bob

    There are many things wrong about what you said. But I’ll start with the main one. When you look at multiple sources of information, you shouldn’t be looking at quack sites like vactruth, age of autism, natural news etc. These are conspiracy sites with no actual scientific information. That is why there are no reputable doctors or scientists that write for them. Mainly because the scientific consensus believes that they are wrong about assertions of the prevalence of “vaccine injury”.
    Vaccination is not highly questionable. I have seen zero evidence of it being questionable. As for profitable, you’ll need to do a little more research on that one. Vaccines are an extremely small (miniscule) part of pharmaceutical revenues.
    Modern medicine is not built on vaccination. Its built on the scientific method.
    There is plenty of accountability and transparency. In addition to the American CDC and FDA, there are other public health agencies around the world that have their own system of monitoring adverse events and licensure. NONE, and I mean none, have even come close to finding any of the conspiratorial non-sense posted here even remotely credible.
    Moreover, you are suggesting that 99% of doctors and scientists are misinformed. I ask you what is most likely:
    1) that the vast majority of the scientific community is wrong or being paid off, and the tiny minority of “independent thinkers” is right.
    2) the vast majority of the scientific community is right, and there exists a tiny delusional minority who are trying to spread an incorrect paranoid message.
    I choose option 2. In my eyes, anti-vax advocates are in the same boat as holocaust deniers, 9/11 truthers and non-believing moon landers.
    Also, truth does need the law to protect it. See anything related to libel, defamation. Also, for a more relevant example, see the case involving the Australian Vaccination Network. I’m glad the courts saw reason.

  • Roxanne

    “Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy
    of truth” Albert Einstein

    Hmm… Here’s just a sampling of comments – mostly from insiders within the regulatory/medical system – re. corruption of your venerated, trusted “authorities” in the U.S. and beyond…

    “Health Canada is the most corrupt federal government agency in Canada. They are corrupt to the core and agents of the pharmaceutical lobby.”
    **Dr. Shiv Chopra, Microbiologist, 35 year Scientist with Health Canada (who paid a heavy price for becoming a whistleblower and has called vaccines “CLUSTER BOMBS”)

    “Behind the call for compensation for vaccine-damaged children lies a story of government incompetence, neglect and even deceit. Healthy children whose lives have been shattered by blindness, deafness, paralysis or screaming convulsions have been brushed aside by successive Governments. The risks of vaccination have been hidden from their parents. And unsuspecting families have become the tragic victims of crass official ineptitude.”
    ** Jack Ashley, British MP 1977

    “… There are very powerful people in positions of great authority in Britain and elsewhere who have staked their reputations and careers on the safety of the MMR vaccine and they are willing to do almost anything to protect themselves… The refusal by governments to evaluate the risks properly will make this one of the greatest scandals in medical history.”
    **Dr. Peter Fletcher, former Chief Scientific Officer, Dept. of Health, Great Britain

    “The thing that bugs me is that the people think the FDA is protecting them. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks its doing are as different as night and day.”
    **Dr. Herbert Ley, former Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration

    “Only about one percent of serious events are reported to the FDA.”
    ** David Kessler, former Head, U.S. Food and Drug Administration

    “The CDC routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts of interest to serve on influential advisory committees… for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased oversight.”
    **Dan Burton, former U.S. Congressional Representative
    whose grandchild was vaccine damaged

    “Members of the CDC’s Vaccine Advisory Committee get money from vaccines manufacturers. Relationships include: sharing a vaccine patent; owning stock in a vaccine company, payments for research getting money to monitor manufacturer’s tests and funding academic departments.”
    **UPI (United Press International) Investigates the Vaccine Conflict

  • Roxanne

    “…This (pharmaceutical) industry uses its weight & power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the U.S. Congress, the FDA, academia, medical centers and the medical profession itself…. It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”
    **Dr. Marcia Angell, former Editor, New England Journal of Medicine
    In 2009, medical students from Harvard University protested the undue influence of industry in the class and labs plus in over a dozen affiliated teaching institutes and hospitals to the tune of over $8,500,000 in 2008… I think that one has been grossly naïve to believe that
    training and research at Canadian universities isn’t compromised or influenced by pharmaceutical funding much like Dr. Angell referred to… How many
    doctors coming out of these institutions can list the ten
    categories of vaccine ingredients, never mind the many
    dozens of ingredients themselves? How many of these
    doctors are even aware of, let alone investigate, how poorly inadequate vaccine trials are? How many of these
    doctors routinely dismiss parents whose child suffered
    serious reactions post vaccination as “coincidental”? ETC.

  • Roxanne

    Had to add this one in, given the revolving door alluded to
    in my submission below:
    “Vaccines by their very nature with or without mercury are inherently dangerous… We must prevent our corrupt government from forcing these poisons down our throats. This is simply socio-pathetic control and greed by the cash-fed revolving door… We must stop this insanity by every means necessary.”

    Arthur Evangelista, former FDA Investigator, Public Health and Medical Fraud Research

  • Roxanne

    I thought the following is an apt quote in light of what you just wrote….

    “Seventeen years in this domain has taught me that people believe what they want to believe. This applies to journalists, scientists, doctors and parents. Most of us believe what were trained to believe by the actions of our parents, and the dictates of the system. The majority belief rules by force of numbers. It’s only when something happens which turns your world upside down and rips your ‘belief’ values open and forces you to admit that your beliefs were based on the shifting sands of convenience and ignorance. This was how I became involved. It was a painful process and once it happens in one area, you find that your conditioning starts to be stripped away in many others.”

    Hilary Butler, Founder, Immunization Awareness Society

  • Roxanne

    I’ll look into getting at least one of Janine’s books as she
    clearly is a real, investigative journalist who digs up and
    exposes what the comatose, cowardly, controlled, researched challenged media fail to…. Re. the HPV info,
    what an Orwellian world we live in, and true to form
    not surprised that the pharma-cartel is greasing hands yet again. Remember how stocks went up for Myriad Genetics after “brave” Angelina Jolie mutilated herself to “prevent cancer”?… Off on a tangent, but do you have any
    links re. larger upcoming events/talks where the vaccine savvy can gather to learn and exchange info?

  • Really, Jim Bob? Not only was HPV/DNA (the same DNA Merck had said was not in the vaccine), found in Gardasil, but it was also found firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant. The FDA and CDC have done nothing even though there are uncounted likely thousands with now unrecovered from neurologically based outcomes in those that received Gardasil. Then additionally now, guess what? Now glass has been found in vials of Gardasil, and still no actual FDA recall was made, but the situation was put on only a voluntary recall. Face it, the FDA and CDC have clearly and flat out refused to do their duty and their job, in protecting the public. They are in the bed of and pockets of Big Pharma. The doctors go to medical schools that are essentially run by Big Pharma, and the whole thing has been based on false foundations in regard to health care for now near to 100 years. Wake up!

    Merck issues voluntary recall of 743,360 vials of Gardasil HPV vaccine

    Blood Donations are Potential Biohazard from Those Vaccinated with Gardasil

    The False Foundations of Modern Medicine

    You Jim Bob, should actually THANK vactruth for the service of truth information they provide!

  • Jim Bob, are you aware that the real vaccine science and data show and tell an entirely different story as to the harm of vaccines, that you are claiming to? Now do not even attempt to falsely discredit this and me, claiming that its only a personal “anti-vaccine” website. There are just loads of scientific studies listed there, and right from Pubmed and more.

    The Vaccine Damage Science

    The Unbiased Vaccine Science and Data

    Want to see and realize something even more frightening in regard to vaccine truth, here you go.

  • elnura

    . larger upcoming events/talks where the vaccine savvy can gather to learn and exchange info?

    I’ve not heard of anything but Lowell who comments on this thread may have some idea. His website is phenomenal. http://www.vacfacts.info/index.html

  • Roxanne

    So agree. It’s the parent who auto-pilot vaccinates their child who should
    be criticized, not those who refuse to subject their child to injection of foreign
    proteins, neuro-toxins etc., that have no place in the human body.

  • So now we know for sure that doctors are purposefully being prepped and forced to act as proper dr. Mengele’s… Finally i is out in the open!

  • celphelp

    Good Job Vac Truth! I would love to jump into the arguments below but eh, it gets a bit time consuming. ;)

  • AutismDad

    Actually Government has willingly joined forces with vaccine makers to keep vaccine supplies available. Makers threatened to stop making them because they were being litigated out of business by the families of victime. We see the protectionism through government’s inaction on an autism epidemic, and through the NVICP’s definitions of what are vaccine injuries. They take the most serious adverse reaction, autism and eliminate it from contention, along with others, then PROCLAIM side effects are rare and mild, giving the public a false sense of security.

  • AutismDad

    Many people are physically and mentally lazy, but when the so-called professional experts are allowed to exaggerate and lies about safety and efficacy and no one can stop them, weak willed parents will cave. New parents too are lead to believe its best. We might be able to accept adverse effects if we weren’t told they aren’t connected to vaccines, but authorities won’t admit that.

  • AutismDad

    A bit unfair to blame young parents who don’t realize that vaccine promotion is fraught with lies and misinformation. They and their baby pay a terrible price for believing the pediatrician, but these low level hacks are promoted as vaccine experts. There is a lot of blame to spread around, but parents don’t make faulty fradulent vaccines. They don’t promote, sell or inject them. They don’t publish trash science and fake safety studies. They don’t mandate vaccines for school attendance. Lay the blame on those who deserve it.

  • AutismDad

    bee-yuk- buck buck