Is the FDA About To Eat Their Words on the Safety of Vaccines?

Cervarix, Christina England, Death, Gardasil, Medical Cartel, Top Stories, Vaccine Propaganda

Is the FDA About To Eat Their Words on the Safety of Vaccines?

9 Comments 15 March 2010

.
.
.
.

Christina England
Vactruth.com
3/15/2010

March 12th 2010 saw six very special women from around the world, present documents and research about the HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix to the FDA by request. Never before have the FDA turned to members of the public regarding vaccine safety but in an extraordinary move this is exactly what happened. Dubbed the ‘Little Women’ by the FDA the group presented evidence that will shock the world and could have the FDA eating their words.

The six women who had become increasingly concerned about the HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix presented a power point presentation accompanied with documents showing the dangers of the HPV vaccines to the FDA. Their hope was to prove to the FDA that these two vaccines are so dangerous that they should be removed from the vaccine schedule as soon as possible.

Megan Hild passed away after an adverse reaction to a cervical cancer vaccine.

The women who were involved in this unusual move are Karen Maynor; mother of the late Megan Hild, New Mexico; Rosemary Mathis: mother of Lauren, adversely injured; co-founder of WWW.TRUTHABOUTGARDASIL.ORG, North Carolina; Freda Birrell; political activist,Scotland/UK; Leslie Carol Botha; women’s health educator and broadcast journalist, and founder of Holy Hormones Honey , Colorado; Cynthia Janak: research analyst, journalist writing for Renew America and founder of Only the Truth Illinois; and Janny Stokvis: research analyst, Netherlands.

The reports that were presented, detailed worldwide data, proving that women and young girls have suffered severe adverse reactions, including death, after being vaccinated with the HPV vaccines.

Detailed charts were shown to the FDA clearly outlining evidence of girls from around the world showing very similar adverse reactions after having these vaccines. Only a few of these adverse reactions have ever been listed by either manufacturer on their leaflets. It is my belief that Merck and Glaxo Smith Kline should to study the findings very carefully indeed.

USA – Reports show girls have suffered from

  • Chronic Fatigue

  • Digestive Problems

  • Dizziness and Nausea

  • Encephalitis

  • Facial Paralysis

  • Hair Loss

  • Headaches

  • Joint and Muscle Pain

  • Loss of vision

  • Menstrual Problems

  • Paralysis

  • Rashes/allergies

  • Respiratory and Heart Problems

  • Seizures

  • Syncope

  • Miscellaneous

Spain – Reports show girls have suffered from

  • Chronic Fatigue

  • Dizziness/Nausea

  • Encephalitis/MS/ADEM

  • Facial Paralysis

  • Hair Loss

  • Headaches

  • Joint/Muscle Pains

  • Loss of Vision

  • Menstrual Changes

  • Paralysis

  • Rashes/Allergies

  • Respiratory Heart

  • Seizures

  • Syncope

  • Miscellaneous

Australia – Reports show girls have suffered from

  • Chronic Fatigue

  • Digestive/pancreatitis

  • Dizziness/Nausea

  • Encephalitis/MS/ADEM

  • Hair Loss

  • Headaches

  • Joint/Muscle Pains

  • Loss of Vision

  • Menstrual Changes

  • Paralysis

  • Rashes/Allergies

  • Respiratory Heart

  • Seizures

  • Syncope

  • Miscellaneous

United Kingdom – Reports show girls have suffered from

  • Chronic Fatigue

  • Dizziness and Nausea

  • Encephalitis

  • Headaches

  • Joint and Muscle Pain

  • Paralysis

  • Respiratory and Heart Problems

  • Seizures

  • Syncope

  • Miscellaneous

New Zealand – Reports show that girls have suffered from

  • Chronic Fatigue

  • Digestive Problems

  • Facial Paralysis

  • Headaches

  • Joint and Muscle Pain

  • Paralysis

  • Rashes/allergies

  • Respiratory and Heart Problems

  • Miscellaneous

There is a clear pattern from many countries, of girls suffering from the same side effects and yet up to now this fact has not been picked up, by either the committees who regulate our vaccines, or the Governments who sanction them. More worryingly the six women found that there were a huge number of deaths recorded on VAERS after HPV vaccines.

VAERS is the reporting system used in the USA for adverse events that happen after vaccination.

Strangely however, the system does not appear to be examined in great detail by the either Big Pharma or the Government and many adverse events are not even recorded at all, as it has now been discovered that some doctors are completely unaware of it’s existence.

The six women involved in the presentation to the FDA have been able to show research papers from top scientists and researchers showing that blindness can occur after the HPV vaccine . Papers on Menstrual evaluation were also seen for the first time as were papers on Vaccine and Autoimmune problems.

Janny Stokvis one of the women who researched the side effects of these vaccines after watching a YouTube clip said that she was horrified that so little has been done to protect women. She said she became involved completely by chance.

In September 2008 I was looking for music on Youtube and I ended up watching a video the father of Brooke Petkevicius made. Brooke died 14 days after her first dose of Gardasil from a pulmonary embolism or blood clot on March 26th, 2007. I was shocked by her story. In our family we have a rare blood clotting disease. I have had a pulmonary embolism twice myself. Few weeks later I saw a Dutch documentary about the marketing tactics of Merck. that alarmed me even more. My daughter was in the age group to get the HPV vaccine so I started to do my own research.”

She has since studied the VAERS reporting system and now firmly believes that the reporting system is only the tip of the iceberg because it only has a small number of the actual side effects from these vaccines on. She was shocked to learn that many of the doctors she spoke to had not heard of the reporting system and said :-

Adverse reactions do not always start within a minute after inoculation like some people think. A lot of physicians have never heard of VAERS or know how to file a report. I was surprised when I heard this the first time. Physicians do not agree with parents when they tell that they think theirs daughter got sick because of the HPV vaccine and do not want to file a report.Mothers who find their way to the Gardasil groups did not always succeed in getting a report filed at VAERS.

HPV-vaccine victims can be very ill, but tests can show-up to be normal. Girls who have seizures several times a day or who are paralysed get diagnosed as “Psychogenic”.

Parents are often told the illness of their daughter is not vaccine related This has to change, because too many girls are not getting the proper treatment yet.”

She said up until she looked into the HPV vaccines she had always believed in the Governments vaccine programmes but her confidence has now been badly shaken.

Rosemary Mathis whose daughter was changed after she had Gardasil vaccine and one of the six women told me she became involved with the group because she wanted answers. She says:-

My 12 year old daughter was disabled by Gardasil.  Her life as she knew it completely changed after her third vaccination.  She could no longer attend school, go to church, or live a normal life.  She was always in pain and we spent thousands of dollars and many hours going to doctors who could not help her. I spent countless hours on the internet researching how to treat my daughter. I quickly learned that I was not alone and many other parents were doing the same thing. Every night was spent researching trying to figure out what do to not only help my daughter, but many others. This led me to Gardasil Mom groups on Yahoo Groups, Twitter, and Facebook. That is where I met Marian Greene, another mother whose girl was affected that lives about 30 minutes from me. Her daughter was disabled also. Both our daughters were disabled by the exact same lot # 0067X.Night after night, we were trying to help the mothers figure out what to do and trying to comment on stories on the internet to warn others. We quickly learned that many of the girls stories are not recorded in VAERS. Either the parents do not know about VAERS and haven’t reported them or the doctors do not. I filed my daughter’s report in VAERS and then asked my doctor to after continuously expressing that the vaccine is what made her sick. The parents were struggling to find a way to express their stories and to find data. Each night, new victims were appearing on the boards with no idea of what to do.

That is when we decided to created WWW.TRUTHABOUTGARDASIL.ORG. The board represents the TRUTH as we the parents of the victims of Gardasil see it. It is a central repository used to house the girls stories for view by others, has the latest news, and has a Guardian Angel page by location to give the parents contacts in their area who may be able to help them. It has videos, other site links, a forum so you can talk to other parents/victims, etc. It has made it easier for parents to quickly identify side effects, treatments that may have helped victims, etc. It takes about one year worth of research off the parents and allows them to quickly identify what occurred and what can be done to help the victims.”

Since her research began Rosemary says she has met thousands of girls who have been adversely affected by the Gardasil and the Cervarix vaccines.

I asked Leslie Botha how the FDA had become aware of the six women and had asked the group to do the presentation.

Leslie said that originally Karen Maynor had contacted the FDA after her daughter had died after she had the Gardasil vaccine. Her letter to Dr Margaret Hamberg MD contained many reports and details of young girls who have either died like her daughter Megan, or had become seriously ill.

The reports contained in her letter do not make comfortable reading. She wrote how one child ‘Samantha Hendrix’ who had once been described as a ‘walking encyclopaedia’ has been left with no concentration and failing her exams.

Also In the case of young Samantha, she had a serious history of illnesses prior to vaccination, have you ever discovered if Merck carried out research on impaired immune responsiveness to establish if young girls with a medical history would be well enough to have this vaccine? In the case of Cervarix, GlaxoSmithKline did not carry out this research prior to the commencement of the vaccination programme in the United Kingdom. This young girl had many health problems before being vaccinated but now she is far worse off and what the future holds for her we just do not know. Perhaps, if more care and attention had been given by the pharmaceutical company in all of this, if they had taken more time to carry out the research into all aspects of safety and just had given it a few more years, exactly the same advice that Dr Harper gave to the UK regarding Cervarix, then perhaps these young ladies would not be so ill and I would not be writing to you today to ask for your help. With respect to Cervarix, many of the same “Gardasil” illnesses are occurring in the United Kingdom also so there appears to be a common thread that exists between these two HPV vaccines.”

She wrote.

She has a point, as on the Glaxo Smith Kline original GP advert it does state that ‘there are no data in the use of Cervarix in subjects with impaired immune responsiveness’.

Leslie said that the FDA do not just contact people but that they respond to letters. They contacted Karen and Karen knowing that she could not do what the FDA wanted alone asked the other women if they were prepared to help her.

Leslie says:-

The first meeting conference call was in September/October with Cynthia, Freda, Rosemary and myself – where we expressed our concerns.

There was a second Webinar in November that the FDA presented for us on how their organization operates.

It was at this meeting that a third meeting was initiated – to be held at first before the holidays so that we could present research and data that backed up our concerns.

It was at this point that we asked Janny to join us since she spent so much time going through the VAERS reports.

By agreement, the meeting was pushed back until after the holidays – until the presentation.

We were in discussion many times about how to proceed – and found the people in the Patient Representative Program Office of Special Health Issues - to be open, and supportive as they shared the guidelines for the presentation.

The FDA has just initiated “listening sessions” and our group was one of the first to participate in them.

It has been an honor and a very positive experience from beginning to end.

We started out by gathering data, Rosemary, Freda and Janny did a fabulous job of creating and presenting graphs, and outlines of VAERs deaths.Freda was in contact with women in Spain, New Zealand and Australia as she gathered reports of adverse injuries from the girls in these countries.

Cynthia and I kept coming from different angles on what was causing the problem with this vaccine – mine was on menstrual cycle influence and she was focused on histamine and IgE.  We spent hours on the phone searching for studies.We would then do searches on histamine and IgE and the menstrual cycle and that is when we realized that our differing angles were beginning to blend into one perfect storm. It was the peer reviewed study that came out on the blind girl and HPV that nailed this for us – and we realized that we had discovered the REAL DANGERS with this vaccine.

We were shocked and awed that we had come across something no on had ever considered that founded both of our concerns.”

The conclusion slide 52 in the powerpoint shows exactly what was discovered and one has to agree the implications this has on many girls is quite shocking.

During the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, the production of estrogen releases histamine. During the luteal phase the protective effects of estradiol sharply decline, the production of progesterone increases and the immune system becomes more easily compromised; succumbing to the overdose of histamine from three sources: L-Histidine in the vaccine, increased amounts of estradiol in the body from natural production plus environmental toxins (estrogen mimickers) and the body’s own natural production of histamine. The rise and decline in hormones; the rise and decline in immunity and the overproduction of histamine – may be a factor as to why the health of the girls adversely affected by the HPV vaccines is not improving.

Both HPV vaccines are VLP’s (virus like particles). This can be termed ‘molecular mimicry’ and when an antigen in a vaccine is structurally similar to an antigen in the host antibodies are produced that react with the host’s normal tissue.

Allergy sufferers with moderate to severe asthma have IgE levels greater than 1,000 U/ml.


Normal serum IgE levels in individuals without allergies is less than 70 U/ml. An increase in IgE means more free IgE is available for binding to the activated mast cells. More mast cell activation and degranulation may lead to an increased release of inflammatory histamine. This reaction also leads to TH2 cytokine and leukotriene secretion, resulting in systemic anaphylaxis in the form of allergy.

This proves an increased risk of injury due to an overload of histamine being released from the mast cells causing a more severe inflammatory response throughout the body. Tissue damage due to this process can cause hypertrophy of smooth muscles. Smooth muscles are evident in the heart. With the rechallenge to an already active immune response we could have more smooth muscle damage especially to the heart and damage to the Central Nervous System.

With all our research completed, due to the lack of safety testing in regards to hormone, histamine and IgE level effects due to challenge and rechallenge on the female and male physiology the risks of the HPV vaccines outweigh the benefits.”

To learn exactly how this conclusion was reached read the full powerpoint presentation and documents

Freda Birrell another member of the group became involved in 2009, when her friend wrote to her asking for her help, saying that her daughter Bridget had become injured after the Gardasil vaccine.

Freda said that she asked me to find out if Cervarix was having the same effect on British girls as the Gardasil vaccine. After research I found that both vaccines were having serious adverse reactions.

Freda feels disillusioned with the British and Scottish Governments she said:-

Both of the Health Ministers are too ready to come back with the usual information – any incidents which have occurred are either coincidental or part of population related illnesses.  At no time, to my knowledge or satisfaction, do they investigate any of these illnesses.  There are serious cases of arthralgia after vaccination with Cervarix and this condition has been researched and it is known that it is and can be vaccine related.  Sadly, our Ministers do not wish to recognise that fact.  There are many other serious illnesses which have occurred, eg a rare form of encephalitis, paralysis, blindness, seizures to name but a few. They are hiding their heads in the sand in the hope that it will all go away.  That will never happen where the lives of our young girls are involved.”

I asked Freda as she had studied both vaccines in detail if she felt that Cervarix was as dangerous as Gardasil. She said:-

For the most part Cervarix elicits a much higher percentage of adverse events in the initial days after inoculation over Gardasil.  The comparison suggests that Cervarix is much less safe than Gardasil.  High percentages of fatigue, headache and myalgia may also be initially construed as the flu and not Cervarix related and therefore would not be reported as an adverse event related to the vaccination until the symtpoms persist past the one week time frame for the flu,  Gardasil has incurred many deaths.  Only one girl to our knowledge has died following a Cervarix vaccination and her case was attributed to her underlying illness, cancer.  She was undergoing tests apparently at the time.  Whilst we cannot say that Cervarix caused her death, the authorities likewise cannot say with 100% proof that it didnt.  What we can say with 200% certainty is she should not have been vaccinated whilst undergoing medical testing”

Also discovered by the group was the fact that neither vaccine worked if the girls already had an HPV infection.

Slide 15 states:-

Conclusions: Evidence detailed here regarding the poor efficacy of both Gardasil and Cervarix on already infected women has to be investigated further. If this is occurring in established infected groups of women then what will be occurring in the bodies of adolescent girl’s who in many cases may already be sexually active and be infected at the time of vaccination? In the United States and United Kingdom, HPV SCREENING DOES NOT TAKE PLACE TO DETERMINE IF HPV INFECTION IS ALREADY PRESENT.”

The group had discovered that contrary to belief HPV is not only a STD but can be transmitted through other means. This was discussed on slide 9.

The next series of slides will address whether HPV is transmitted solely via sexual contact”.

Slide 9

In the first research paper there is growing evidence that HPV infection is acquired through non-sexual routes and that one potential route is mother-to-child transmission in the perinatal period; referenced as vertical transmission.

In the second paper, it was noted that HPVs have been detected in virgins, infants/children, and juvenile Laryngeal papillomatosis was shown to be caused by these viruses. It has been acknowledged that HPVs may be transmitted by other non-sexual routes as well.”

Another very important point raised was the fact that over 250 girls who have had the vaccine have since had abnormal PAP Smear tests. This was thought to be because this group already had the HPV virus when they had the vaccine.

We now await the FDA’s verdict on the impressive array of documents and factual information that this group of so called ‘little women’ put before them. Will the FDA acknowledge that far from the wonder vaccines that Gardasil and Cervarix were supposed to be, these vaccines were more like poison darts thrown at girls in a crucial stages of their sexual development? These vaccines were given to young girls in many different stages of puberty and at many different stages of their menstrual cycles. We are now left wondering if the manufacturers Merck and Glaxo Smith Kline ever even considered this when developing these vaccines.

I will finish with a dedication to Megan from the very special mother Karen Maynor who wrote to the FDA and started this whole series of amazing events.

She writes:-

Megan

As I stand here and watch as your brother receives his award for Academic Excellence I cannot help but think of you now and how proud I know you would have been. It was hard for him Megan as he hurts so much because you are not here. When we come together as a family for these occasions it never feels right. We miss you so…………………

We are working hard for you babe to get this information out there so others will know what can happen with this vaccine. Help others to become informed. To keep other moms and dads from having to feel this pain.

There are so many now that are fighting for ones just like you and for the many that are injured. You should see them, facing the GIANTS of the FDA and Big Pharma with no fear. They are strong because they have the truth. They never got to know you but they are fighting for you.

We love you and miss you……………………………………..”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
FDA Requests Meeting With Activists Exposing Gardasil Adverse Reactions

Christina England, Gardasil, HPV, Top Stories

FDA Requests Meeting With Activists Exposing Gardasil Adverse Reactions

4 Comments 08 March 2010

.
.
.
.

Christina England
Vactruth.com
03/08/10

Throughout history there have been strong women debating big issues and changing history, amongst them are Joan of Arc, Emrneline Pankhurst and Amelia Earhart. On the 12th March 2010 in an extraordinary move, six strong, brave women of the world will come forward to present their research, documents and findings involving probably the most controversial vaccine of all times Gardasil to the FDA. What they have uncovered does not make easy reading.

Calling themselves ‘Little Women with Big Voices’ they have been formally invited by the FDA to present their information. The women making the presentation on behalf of the parents whose daughters have died or have been injured by the HPV vaccines are: Karen Maynor; mother of the late Megan Hild, New Mexico; Rosemary Mathis: whose daughter Lauren was adversely injured, North Carolina; Freda Birrell; political activist and lobbyist, Scotland and the United Kingdom; Leslie Carol Botha; broadcast journalist, Colorado; Cynthia Janak: research analyst, Illinois; and Janny Stokvis: research analyst, Netherlands.

The press release released today, Monday 8th 2010 says

“Over 17,500 adverse reactions and 64 deaths have been reported to VAERS (estimated 1 to 10% of the population reporting). The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has posted 272 VAERS reports of abnormal pap tests post-vaccination. Reports of deaths and injuries are now coming in from the United States, New Zealand, Australia, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain and India.

Birrell has compiled 40 pages of reports of deaths and injuries from the above countries for the FDA. Stokvis and Mathis have compiled data of vaccine injuries and deaths from VAERS. Botha is presenting studies on menstrual cycle evaluation to prevent vaccine injury – and the impact of aluminium on the endocrine system. Janak has researched vaccine ingredients and believes that she has found the reason as to why “healthy” girls have been injured or have died suddenly and unexpectedly within days weeks, months or potentially years after vaccination.”

According to Botha, it has been an amazing effort to mobilize a group of mothers and concerned women internationally to address the dangers of the HPV vaccines. A colleague of Botha’s, publicist Bobbi Cowan from Los Angeles joined the ranks providing here expertise in organizing a national media campaign. A press release was written and the group of six plus Stephen Tunley from Australia, whose daughter was injured by the vaccine, raised $600 to buy a major news release list through a professional news wire service. According to Botha, the group of ‘Little Women’ is now playing on the same marketing level as Merck and GSK. “They will be shocked at our savvy, expertise and determination to get our message out to the media and to the public.”

The presentation will be presented by the women to the FDA, on Friday, March 12 in the form of a power point presentation which will include 54 slides. Each member in the group will receive a file containing with over 236 pages of research, data and parental concerns. As soon as the presentation is over the data will be released to the public and media.


I have been told that the information contained in file will send shock waves around the world. There have been problems with this vaccine from the onset. Over the four years that Gardasil has been in use, the media has reported deaths, cases of Guillian Barre Syndrome, paralysis, seizures, blindness, problems with menstrual cycles, miscarriage and yet still this vaccine has been given to our children and women. Warnings have not been heeded and the problems have continued. This vaccine has now approved for use in males.

Merck has stated over and over that this vaccine is safe, the FDA and CDC have stated this vaccine is safe. This has been taken from the Merck website

“How safe is GARDASIL?

The safety of a vaccine is an important part of its story.

The common side effects include pain, swelling, itching, bruising, and redness at the injection site, headache, fever, nausea, dizziness, vomiting, and fainting. Fainting can happen after getting GARDASIL. Sometimes people who faint can fall and hurt themselves. For this reason, your health care professional may ask you to sit or lie down for 15 minutes after you get GARDASIL. Some people who faint might shake or become stiff. This may require evaluation or treatment by your health care professional.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the FDA have reviewed all the safety information available to them. Based on data available to them as of May 2009, the CDC and FDA determined that GARDASIL continues to be safe and effective, and its benefits continue to outweigh its risks. In August 2009, the CDC reaffirmed its continued recommendation for vaccination with GARDASIL in females. In October 2009, the FDA approved the use of GARDASIL in boys and young men ages 9 to 26 to protect against 90% of genital warts cases.

For more information on GARDASIL, talk to your doctor or health care professional.”

Karen Maynor one of the women involved in the presentation has told me her daughter Megan died after using this vaccine. Megan’s story along with the many others is included on the website The Truth About Gardasil a site dedicated to the girls who have lost their lives to Gardasil a vaccine manufactured by Merck to help protect women against cervical cancer.

‘Truth About Gardasil’ was designed to remember the girls who have lost their lives but also to alert the public to the dangers of Gardasil. The mission statement is firm stating “This website is dedicated to the girls whose lives have been taken way too early because of this vaccine. It is also dedicated to their families who continue on in this fight. We must unite to get this vaccine off the market, together we CAN make a difference!”

In a recent interview with journalist Marcia G. Yerman, Huffington Post , Expert Dr Diane Harper outlines these issues when speaking about the pros and cons of Gardasil.

Harms of HPV Vaccination:
• Duration of efficacy is key to the entire question. If duration is at least fifteen years, then vaccinating 11-year-old girls will protect them until they are 26 and will prevent some pre-cancers, but postpone most cancers. If duration of efficacy is less than fifteen years, then no cancers are prevented, only postponed.
• Safety: There is at least one verified case of auto-immune initiated motor neuron disease declared triggered by Gardasil [presented by neurologists at the 2009 American Neurological Association meeting in Baltimore, Maryland). There are serious adverse events, including death, associated with Gardasil use.
No population benefit in reduction of cervical cancer incidence in the United States with HPV vaccination as long as screening continues.
• Incidence rate of cervical cancer in the United States based on screening is 7/100,000 women per year.
• Incidence rate of cervical cancer if women are only vaccinated with Gardasil is 14/100,000 per year (twice the rate of cervical cancer if young women vaccinated with Gardasil do not seek Pap testing at 21 years and the rest of their life).
• Incidence rate of cervical cancer with Cervarix vaccination is 9/100,000 per year– better than with Gardasil, but still more than with screening alone.
• Incidence of cervical cancer without screening and without vaccination is nearly 90/100,000 per year. The combination of HPV vaccine and screening in the U.S. will not decrease the incidence of cervical cancer to any measurable degree at the population level. Those women who do not participate in Pap screening, and who are vaccinated, will have some personal benefit for five years for Gardasil and 7.4 years for Cervarix (maybe longer), but they will not affect the population rates.

Boosters for Gardasil after antibodies wane makes the cost of vaccination escalate significantly, and cause implementation challenges to reach those women who might want to be revaccinated.”

Slightly different to what Merck are saying don’t you agree?

Jeffry John Aufderheide from VacTruth.com agrees that he feels that it is big bucks that is driving the vaccine saying :-

“In general, many are becoming wise to the fact that young women are being monetized with the cervical cancer vaccines. At $130.27per vaccine, Gardasil is the most expensive on the market. What we know from the documents made available is the Gardasil vaccine has been one gigantic experiment. The FDA is now between a rock and a hard place. Do they continue protecting the brand of corporations or will management recognize a moral responsibility to protect these young women from an experimental product?”

The USA Government seem to have few concerns about Gardasil and have pushed for its use.

The Republican Governor Rick Perry has been reported to have pushed for all girls in Texas to be vaccinated at 11 – 12 signing an executive order requiring this to be mandatory for entry to 6th grade.

ON GUARD – GARDASIL

A critical look at a new and controversial vaccine by Ralph W. Moss, PhD says

“Despite vocal opposition from some religious groups and worried parents, on February 2, 2007, the Republican governor of Texas Rick Perry signed an executive order requiring all 11- and 12-year-old Texas schoolgirls to be vaccinated with Gardasil. This is a newly approved vaccine, manufactured by the pharmaceutical giant, Merck, Inc. It is designed to prevent infection with four strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV): types 6 and 11, which cause genital warts, and types 16 and 18, which are among the 30 or more strains that are capable of causing cervical cancer.

By signing this executive order, Gov. Perry bypassed the Texas legislature, and thereby avoided an open political debate on this controversial issue. Grassroots opposition in the Texas legislature may yet reverse this unilateral decision (see below). But at this writing the order stands: any girl who wants to enter sixth grade next September in the Lone Star State will have to show proof that she has received three Gardasil injections before school begins.”

Of course if you trace Mr Perry’s activities the usual conflicts of interest emerge. He has been reported to have links to Merck including the following as reported in Rick Perry’s Ties With Merck Run Deep – KBTX.com

“One of the drug company’s three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, his (Perry’s) former chief of staff. His current chief of staff’s mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

Toomey was expected to be able to woo conservative legislators concerned about the requirement stepping on parent’s rights and about signalling tacit approval of sexual activity to young girls. Delisi, as head of the House public health committee, which likely would have considered legislation filed by a Democratic member, also would have helped ease conservative opposition.

Perry also received $6,000 from Merck’s political action committee during his re-election campaign.”

Another report Larry Flynt.com describes Perry as snarky, scheming, and slimy.

However, from my research into vaccines this seems to be the usual dodgy pattern when you study the wheeling and dealing that goes on behind the scenes of the Governments we trust and it is easy to see why. It benefits Merck hugely to get officials on side if you consider the fact that every child vaccinated with Gardasil is worth $360 to Merck. If this vaccine becomes mandatory throughout the USA it is a nice little earner for the drug giants.

If the drug companies and Governments were honest with the public it would not take brave women of the world prepared to take risks to expose and uncover the truth. The truth would already be there and so to would our trust.

.

A personal message from Leslie Botha concerning Gardasil…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Who Really Owns Your Child When It Comes to Vaccination?

By Author, Christina England, Top Stories

Who Really Owns Your Child When It Comes to Vaccination?

1 Comment 15 February 2010

.
.
.

Christina England
vactruth.com
02/15/10

Drug companies foster many techniques when it comes to vaccinating our children. These range from taking away full parental rights, to dangling nice ‘juicy carrots’ in front of our unsuspecting and trusting children. This is done in the way of gift vouchers and pizza parties. Parents from around the world are finding that there is no longer the freedom of choice when it comes to vaccination, as the drug companies are employing their very own ‘child catchers’ to trap their little ones with freebies that they are unable to resist.

Firstly, I am going to discuss how drug companies and the Governments are taking away our parental rights from right under our noses.

Stories from around the world are pouring in stating that children as young as 12 years old, are being given the right to agree to have the HPV vaccine, even if their parents have said no to the vaccine.

In the USA, the Government is trying to pass laws which will enable schools to give the HPV vaccine to children even if their parent has said no.

“Two bills in the New York State legislature would, if passed, allow healthcare practitioners to vaccinate children under 18 against HPV without their parent’s consent. The bills would require the vaccinations before children could attend school, leading to the interesting potential scenario of schools vaccinating kids without their parents’ consent simply because the child wants to stay in school.

Even without the inevitable controversy over whether under-18s should be able to get preventive care from their doctors without their parents hearing the details of their sex lives, the bills read like full-employment acts for Merck (MRK)’s Gardasil and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)’s Cervarix.”

The Republic Broadcasting Network report the full story.

However, in the UK this is no longer under discussion, it is a reality and has been for a while. This was first reported by the Daily Mail – The worries over the cervical cancer jab and the questions that must be answered by Barbara Davies. She stated :-

“According to Department of Health guidelines, the decision over whether or not to have the jab lies with the patient, whatever her age, if she is deemed capable of making the decision by her GP or school nurse.

One leaflet sent out by schools poses the hypothetical question: ‘What if my daughter wants the vaccination but, as her parents, we’d rather she didn’t have it?’ The answer reads: ‘The decision is legally hers as long as she understands the issues in giving consent, but the nurse would much rather have your permission as well.”


I contacted my member of parliament Nick Gibb MP who in turn wrote to the Department of Health on my behalf.

Gillian Merron the Secretary of State for the Department of Health wrote back the following:-

“The courts have stated that under 16s will be competent to give valid consent to a particular intervention such as a vaccine, if they have sufficient understanding and intelligence to understand fully what is proposed.

This is sometimes known as ‘Gillick competence’.”

Freda Birrell a political advisor for the UK Government on HPV vaccines and a fellow member of ICAP.org feels very strongly on the subject. In emails concerning the subject she says that if a child goes against her parents decision and is vaccinated with Cervarix and then has a serious reaction immediately after the vaccine, ending up in hospital as a result, then the responsibility for the child reverts back to the parents.

This is because the hospital cannot get the child’s permission to carry out surgery or tests, it has to be be parents. Freda asks who would be held responsible for the child having this reaction and continues by adding that it cannot be the child and it cannot be the parents because they did not want their child to be vaccinated in the first place, therefore has to revert back to those who accepted the child’s decision.

If when there is a school trip parents have to give permission for their children to go on this, if permission is not given then the teachers cannot take the child because if anything happened to him or her on the trip, then no doubt they could be sued. Same applies to eye checking, getting new glasses, going to the pharmacy, these all come under the control of the parents.

Both Freda and myself want to know how this all changes with vaccines. How does a law that will not allow a child to have medical intervention, such as an Xray without the parents consent and yet  allows the same child have a vaccine without the parents consent, make any sense? The simple answer is, it doesn’t. Freda and I have put this to the Government and are still waiting for a reply.

We believe this is totally disgusting and an outrage. Children are young and vulnerable that is why parental permission is needed for basic healthcare needs. A child cannot go into a pharmacy and buy even a tablet for a headache and yet when it comes to vaccines they suddenly are given adult responsibilities.

Just to make the decision really easy for the child a few British boroughs are using incentives. These were first introduced for the HPV vaccine shortly after the HPV vaccine hit the market.

In 2008 the Stockport Express interviewed Dr David Baxter consultant in communicable disease control who had this to say:-

“The vaccination can prevent around 70 percent of the viruses that cause cervical cancer. I don´t know the details of Jade Goody´s case but it is possible that if she had received the vaccine it could have prevented her cancer.

“We have tried writing to girls who are missing out on the vaccine but it doesn´t seem to work. We have also tried texting and ringing but we still can´t reach everyone, so we have been talking to a college in Stockport to see if their beauty therapists would be interested in giving manicures and pedicures to girls who receive the vaccination.”

He added: “We need to think of other initiatives to get them to come in.”

No need to worry Dr Baxter as Birmingham have done this for you in the way of shopping vouchers. The Birmingham Mail tells all in an article entitled Cervical cancer jab teens being ‘bribed’ with vouchers

Birmingham, apparently is giving away to every child who completes the programme, which includes three Cervarix shots, shopping vouchers worth £45. These vouchers are Love2Shop store vouchers. Love2shop Gift Vouchers are accepted at over 18,000 top UK stores and days out. These include-

Argos, Alton Towers, Boots, Bhs, Barratts, Brantano, Bonmarche, Bella Italia, Comet, Carphone Warehouse, ,Debenhams, D2, Ethel Austin, Ernest Jones, Goldsmiths, JJB Sports,Halfords, H.Samuel, House of Fraser.  HMV, La Senza, Legoland, Laithwaites, Matala,New Look,Principles, Peacocks, Priceless Shoes, River Island, Ryman,Shoe Zone,TJ Hughes,Waterstones, Warehouse, WH Smith, and Wilkinsons.

One parent called the scheme ‘bribery’ another said that her 17-year-old daughter was offered the vouchers after she refused the vaccine, she said the whole scheme was ‘unethical cohesion’, adding that where money is concerned, it will deter children away from what they really want.

As we all know there are very few children who can resist a free shopping spree, especially when top fashion stores are involved, to bribe an unwilling child to have a vaccine with lures of free shopping is pure evil and is the sort of behaviour that is frowned upon in parenting classes. Obviously not when it is the drugs companies dishing out the treats.

The website Seroxat Secrets had this to say on the matter-

“Dangle a carrot huh?

Now I’ve heard of doctor’s being given incentives to prescribe drugs, even key opinion leaders in the world of psychiatry paid wads of cash to hype up drugs when they haven’t even looked at all the data… but patients being paid?

A better incentive would be to tell these young woman how long the vaccine was trialled out for and whether or not they have conclusive evidence that everything will be okay 10 or 20 years down the line. They may also want to tell them that GlaxoSmithKline, the manufacturer of Cervarix, have already admitted using young girls (as young as 9 in some areas) as human Guinea Pigs in HPV vaccine Cervarix trials”

This can be backed up with the article I wrote Girls used as Guinea Pigs in HPV Trials Admits GSK

where I show documents proving GSK are using our girls to experiment on. I suppose it does make sense to pay a patient if they are part of experiment but usually it is ethical to tell the patient first.

Bribery has been used around the world to coerce parents and children to sign up for vaccines. It seems that drug companies will stoop to any level to also give us freebies to have their vaccines.

One recent initiative offered Pizza parties, Detroit Public Health Department decided to hold pizza parties in exchange for vaccines saying that pizza parties were a great idea.

They decided that these should take place in schools. The new ‘tasty scheme’ was offered to Detroit schools after the Christmas holidays (well why not?) Autism Today Online explained how this worked in their article Public “Health Department” Sinks to an all time low When Detroit school children returned from the Christmas holiday break, each class had the opportunity to hold a free pizza party. The Detroit Health Department teamed up with Happy´s Pizza  setting the guidelines for the free party: if 80% of the returning children from each class bring a signed permission slip to receive the H1N1 vaccination, their class will get the “free” party.

First the drug companies and Governments take away parental rights to refuse vaccines then they team up with stores and food outlets and use bribes to tempt our children whilst they are at school. This reminds me very much of the scene from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang on YouTube entitled the The Child Catcher That begins “Here we are little children, come and get your lollipops” sadly, just like the film the man offering the lollipops  is actually offering something much more sinister instead.

Have you signed up for the vactruth.com newsletter? Sign up today!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Are mothers natural protectors or baby killers? Shaken Baby Syndrome and vaccines

Christina England, Shaken Baby Syndrome, Top Stories

Are mothers natural protectors or baby killers? Shaken Baby Syndrome and vaccines

No Comments 26 January 2010

.
.
.

Christina England
American Chronicle
1/25/2010

For many years around the world, doctors, scientists and professors of medicine have been debating as to whether ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ or SBS as it is known, actually exists. For a diagnoses of SBS a baby will need to display a serious acquired brain injury, which is said to be caused when a frustrated or angry adult holds an infant or toddler by the trunk or arms and shakes back and forth in a jerking, whiplash motion. Most cases occur in children under one year of age, although there are documented cases of SBS in older children.

Shaken Baby Syndrome” (SBS) is the term used to describe the collection of signs and symptoms resulting from a child being shaken violently. However,Shaken Baby Syndrome is sometimes difficult to recognize and even more difficult to prove. Which is why many parents claim they have been falsely accused. The doctors say the reason for this is, that many babies who are shaken show no outward signs of abuse, their injuries only become evident when a CT scan or MRI of the head detects subdural haematomas. Another test used in SBS to detect injuries is a simple eye exam, which can detect the presence of retinal haemorrhages. Which doctors claim is another symptom of a shaken baby.

However, common sense tells us, that if a baby was shaken this hard there were be at least some bruising. Sadly it seems that this does not convince doctors as more and more parents are being accused of SBS, which is worrying some doctors, especially as many of these cases are occurring shortly after vaccines and seem to occur particularly in the two to four month age range.

Dr Viera Scheibner in Shaken Baby Syndrome Diagnoses on Shaky Ground said:-

“An epidemic of accusations against parents and baby sitters of Shaken Baby Syndrome is sweeping the developed world. The United States and the United Kingdom are in the forefront of such questionable practise. Brain (mainly subdural, less often subarachnoid) and retinal haemorrhages, retinal detachments and rib and other bone ‘fractures’ are considered pathognomic. However, the reality of these are very different and well documented: the vast majority occur after the administration of childhood vaccines and a minority of cases are due to the documented birth injuries and pre-eclamptic and eclamptic staes of the mothers.”

So why are more parents than ever being falsely accused of shaking their babies? Is it one big cover up, to hide that many of these injuries are being caused by the vaccines?

Dr Buttram believes that all parents accused of Shaken Baby Syndrome are 100% innocent as he believes the syndrome is physiologically impossible.

In an email to me he said:-

“As far as I am concerned, parents accused of shaken baby syndrome are 100 percent innocent, as the syndrome is physiologically impossible, having been totally discredited by the scientific (Ph.D.) speciality known as bio-engineers, which has found that if such violent shaking were actually taking place, it would be fatal in virtually all cases, not from head injury but from a broken neck. The same is true for multiple fractures in infants, the vast majority of which are from metabolic bone disease,.the biggest risk factors being congenital rickets (vitamin D deficiency) and prematurity.”

Harold Buttram, MD

In a paper written by him on SBS called Shaken Baby Syndrome and Non-Accidental Injury: Are Parents and Caretakers Being Falsely Accused Dr Buttram proves his theories by using examples of experiments that have been used to dispel the theory. He shows how an experiment on monkeys used to show how babies can have bleeding inside the brain with no sign of any other injury, which has since been used to prove SBS cases, actually falls down because there is no comparison between the head and neck of an adult monkey and the head and neck of a small infant child who is barely able to hold their head up.

Quoted from his paper he says:-

“As pointed out in the Uscinski report,(1) the brain and head of an infant is nearly seven times larger and heavier than that of a monkey. In addition, adult monkeys are known to be incredibly strong, approximately four times stronger than humans. There would be no comparison, therefore, between the neck muscle strength of an adult monkey and that of an infant, barely able to hold up his or her head by age six months, so that if violent shaking were actually taking place, the incidence of neck injuries in the SBS should be exponentially greater than in monkeys. With these facts in mind consider the following:

Most SBS cases in the USA take place during the first six months of life, when there are negligible infant neck muscles. As will be shown further on, the major impact of violent shaking would fall at the junction between the base of the skull and brainstem area and upper cervical spinal cord. In most if not all nstances this would result in instant death or paraplegia from brain stem or cervical spinal cord injuries.

11 of the 19 monkeys (over 50 percent) in the Ommaya experiments had significant neck as well as brain injuries.

Although human brain injuries may occur in rear-end vehicle collisions, whiplash injuries to the neck comprise an overwhelming majority of adult injuries, in which ligaments and muscles are torn, resulting in estabilization of the cervical (neck)vertebral column. Since infants have only rudimentary neck muscles and connective tissues as cushions, the full impact of shaking would fall on the highly vulnerable cervical spinal cord at the base of the brain, which almost certainly would cause death or paraplegia.

In view of these considerations, one would expect a far greater incidence of severe cervical skeletal and spinal cord injuries in infants than took place in the monkeys, and yet this type of injury has not been documented in any SBS case to date. In view of these

facts, the Shaken Baby Syndrome theory defies both reason and common observation. As a simple statement, it is physiologically impossible.

As a final observation concerning “Non accidental Injury,” in which it is assumed that

there is a head impact in the process of shaking, there must be substantiating evidence in

the forms of head/scalp bruising and/or subgaleal (scalp) hematoma in order to justify

such an assumption.”

Dr Buttrams papers and his evidence has been used in many cases.

Over the years it has been proven that vaccines have been the cause of the death of babies and have caused symptoms seen in cases of SBS. The most famous of those being that of Alan Yurko. The Yurko Project: Triumph Over Tragedy tells the tragic story of baby Alan. Alan died aged 2 months of suspected SBS, his father was accused of his murder and given a life sentence plus 10years. Alan had always been a sickly baby. One should always question whether a baby this sick should be given multiple vaccinations all at one time.

This is from one website and is written by his mother:

“Alan and Francine Yurko’s baby boy, Alan, was born on September 16, 1997. Francine’s pregnancy was severely compromised with refractory and recurrent E. coli infection, gestational diabetes, group b Streptococcal infection, and an overall weight gain of only two pounds. Labor was induced at 35 weeks because of life-threatening oligohydramnios (loss of amniotic fluid). Baby Alan was born grayish blue with respiratory distress and hypoglycemia. He spent the first week of his life in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Special Nurseries, where his parents spent their days with him until his release. A breathing monitor was sought because Baby Alan was rasping and grunting; however, insurance would not cover it, and the doctors assured that it wasn’t necessary.

Over the next six weeks, the family went to weekly pediatrician visits. Baby Alan was seriously jaundiced during his entire neonatal period, and was still rasping and grunting with short periods of apnea. In addition, on November 2, 1997, Alan and Francine rushed the baby to the hospital late in the night because they noticed blood on a burp rag. He was examined by several doctors and nurses, and it was decided that he must have scratched the inside of his nose with his fingernails. Francine pointed out that his fingernails were very trimmed and that, as a preemie, her baby didn’t have such muscle control to have scratched himself. However, the doctors disregarded the concerns, and remarks were made about being “overprotective parents.”

On November 11, 1997, at his weekly pediatrician visit, baby Alan was still not well: He was congested, rasping and grunting, and he had abnormal bowel movements. Despite this and other concerns, such as prematurity, he was injected with six vaccines. Within 24 hours he became lethargic, feverish, fussy. His feeding and sleeping patterns were markedly reduced and changed. The doctor warned that he could be this way for a week or so, but not to worry because it´s “normal” for some babies after their vaccinations. This desensitized the parents to those reactions.

Over the next ten days, baby Alan’s condition did not improve, and he then developed a high-pitched cry. Francine and Alan became concerned, but the doctor said this was normal, and they’d already been chastised for being “overprotective.” On November 23, 1997, they decided that if baby Alan did not improve, they would take him to the pediatrician the next day after Francine returned from work. They never got the chance.”

Alan his father spent over six years in prison for his murder but eventually was freed on appeal when it was found that a combination of adverse reactions to vaccines and the drug Heparin caused his death and it was not SBS.

Dr Mohammed Ali Al-Bayati PhD, DABT, DABVT had this to say:-

My review of the medical evidence in baby Alan’s case clearly shows that he died as result of adverse reactions to vaccines and medications. The tissue bleedings were caused by his treatment of heparin following his respiratory/cardiac arrest. The medical examiner and other physicians who evaluated failed to consider heparin’s ability to cause bleeding in tissue. They also overlooked the role of the adverse reactions to vaccines in the baby’s health problems. Detailed descriptions of the clinical data and other medical literature explaining the pathogenesis of the baby’s illness and supporting my conclusions are presented in this report. Analysis of Causes That Led to the Bleedings in the Subdural Spaces and Other Tissues in Baby Alan Ream Yurko´s Case

In March 2010 another case very similar to the case of baby Alan Yurko goes to court. This is the case of baby T who became ill less than 48 hours after he received a selections of vaccines. His mother Emily says:-

“This story begins August 13th, the day he received his shots. He received his DTaP-IPV-HIB, second dose of Hep B, and oral rotavirus vaccines. Less than 48 hours later, on August 15th, T***** began projectile vomiting. He would not keep much of anything down. I took him in to the local ER, where they rehydrated him and sent him home. He kept vomiting. I took T***** in again on August 18th to the ER. The doctors checked him for pyloric stenosis, which was found to not be ailing him. The doctors suggested switching his formula, that perhaps he was becoming intolerant of the formula he was on. No other explanation was offered as to why he kept vomiting. I followed up with his pediatrician August 21st, and again he could not offer any explanation for his vomiting. I had been feeding him often, and with smaller amounts. He would keep the feeding down for a while, and then sometimes vomit at the next feeding. It was almost always projectile. He was progressively sleeping more and when he was awake, he seemed fussier, almost in pain.

Early morning August 24th, 2009, T***** was at home with his father, Patrick. I work 3rd shift and was at work. T******s older brother and sister were also home sleeping. Patrick called me at work, saying T*******had awoken him with a high-pitched screaming and was acting funny. He said he was pale and crying in a whining fashion. He wasn’t sure what was going on with him. He was later holding him when he stiffened up and arched his back, rolled his eyes and then became limp. 911 was called.

When T****** was admitted into the local ER, he was unresponsive. He was not breathing well on his own and was intubated. Once stabilized, he was transferred across the street to the PICU. T****** heart was not functioning properly and an echocardiogram was performed. It showed diminished heart function. A CT scan was also performed, which showed subdural bleeding in his head. T***** was transferred by helicopter to the University of ***** Hospital.

Once at the University Hospitals, T*****’s father and I were questioned by the Department of Human Services and the ********* Police as to the events which led up to his hospitalization. We hadn’t even been allowed to see him yet and had no idea what was going on with him, yet we were being questioned as to whether we had shaken him. Patrick was at home with the children at the time of his collapse, so he has been the main target of their investigations.

T****** was in very grave condition. The doctors did not expect him to live. They said there was bleeding in his subdural spaces, both acute and sub-acute, or chronic. The doctors stated that his projectile vomiting was a sign that pressure was building in his head, though during the three trips we had made to the doctor that was never discovered. T***** had also had a stroke.They said he was intentionally hurt. Non-accidental Head Trauma, or Shaken Baby Syndrome.”

Like Alan Yurko, baby T was also given Heparin and also became ill within 48 hours of vaccination. Baby T had no bruising, no fractures and no bleeding anywhere else on his body. Baby T survived his injuries and is now in foster care, the older two children were also removed and live with their father.

Emily said in an email:-

“From the first hospital and CT scan he had, they thought SBS, or non-accidental trauma. They never stepped outside of that box. Sure, they tested for bleeding disorders, but that was it. None of the 3 times I took him to the doctor after he began vomiting did they ever think vaccine reaction. I even asked. I had no idea what was going on, only that my other two children had never thrown up like this after their shots. They told me that his vaccines wouldn’t cause that. That since he hadn’t vomited within the first 24 hours, it wasn’t a reaction. I know now how ridiculous that idea is.”

Of course she is right this is ridiculous ,as vaccines were found to be the cause of Alan Yurkos death and he had his reaction the day after his vaccinations. The doctor at the hospital in his case had said “The doctor warned that he could be this way for a week or so, but not to worry because it´s “normal” for some babies after their vaccinations”

I am not medically trained but common sense would tell me that vaccines followed by a combination of the huge number of medications listed for me by his mother, is more like feeding him from a witches cauldron than hospital treatments, especially considering this child was only two months old.

This young mother entrusted her beloved son to the care of hospitals who she believed would help her son. Instead they fed him a massive cocktail of drugs that combined with the lethal ingredients in the vaccines, may have contributed to yet further problems. Then when things became so bad that this small baby was fighting for his life ,they ban her from being with him and accuse her and her partner of shaking him so violently that they caused bleeding to the brain.

It really is time for parents to be believed and the medical profession to take on board that vaccines in some cases can and do cause brain damage.

For more information on SBS, Vaccinations and false accusations and papers by Dr Harold Buttram and Dr Michael Innis on Shaken Baby Syndrome go to Profitable Harm SBS

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Doctors Vaccinate for Profit

By Author, Christina England, Conflicts of Interest, Top Stories

Doctors Vaccinate for Profit

9 Comments 25 January 2010

.
.
.

Christina England
vactruth.com
1/25/2010

(vactruth.com) Years ago children were sent up chimneys or sold as servants to earn their parents extra money. Now they are being vaccinated by doctors, to boost their takings. Doctors, Governments and Pharma see our children as their property and are making thousands of pounds/dollars/euros out of them right under our noses. This, they call ‘Health Care’, I call it the legalization of child labour.

For years now we have been told that vaccines are good for us, that vaccines eradicate illness and that vaccines will save us from killer diseases. What we are not told is that the doctors and Governments telling us this are often linked to the drug companies who are manufacturing the vaccines that they promote and many are making thousands of pounds/dollars profit from vaccinating our children.

Let us begin at the bottom and start with the GP. In the UK every time a vaccine is given to us by our trusted GP they are paid. The British Medical Journal published an article GPs make deals with local NHS to vaccinate children against swine flu explaining how that every single child who is vaccinated with the H1N1 in the UK will earn the GP £5.25.

In Ireland the GP’s are paid five times this amount, for the seasonal flu shot. The article Irish Times – Irish GP’s paid five times UK rate for flu vaccine report that in Ireland a GP will earn a staggering €38.95 per vaccine, making vaccines a very lucrative business indeed.

As far back as 2002, GP’s were so keen to get their hands on this extra money that they were striking off their lists the children who had not had the MMR because if they (the GP’s ) did not meet the Government target rate of 90% immunization, they would not earn their £2865 vaccination bonus Daily Telegraph – Children without MMR jab struck off GP’s list reports tells the full story.

In another article The campaign for Gardasil Flawed it is reported that Merck actually seeks out and trains doctors to lecture for them on Gardasil, paying them $4,500 each time they lecture on the Gardasil vaccine. Doctors are making thousands of dollars doing this.

This is nothing new and is not just attributed to vaccines. Doctors have been doing this for years.

In the article Ex-Drug Sales Rep Tells All – ABC News

one drugs representative spills the beans and tells a Congressional committee what really goes on. Speaking about Eli Lilly he told the committee:-

To sell their drugs, pharmaceutical companies hire former cheerleaders and ex-models to wine and dine doctors, exaggerate the drug’s benefits and underplay their side-effects”

Shahram Ahari, who spent two years selling Prozac and Zypraxa for Eli Lily, told a Senate Aging Committee chaired by Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wisc., that his job involved ” rewarding physicians with gifts and attention for their allegiance to your product and company despite what may be ethically appropriate.”

Ahari claimed that drug companies like hiring former cheerleaders and ex-models, as well as former athletes and members of the military, many of whom have no background in science to wine and dine the doctors explaining the wonderful benefits of the drug they are employed to sell.


Higher up the you have leading figures in the medical profession who advise Governments on vaccine policies have strong links and alliances with the drugs companies helping them peddle their wares.

The article Children Risk Untested Flu Vaccines in Hyped Pandemic – Child Health Safety shows some very interesting links with the key figures who advise our Governments and drug companies.

Dr Salisbury the Medical Director for the Department of Health and a key figure in the JCV I who advises the UK Government on vaccine policies is shown to be linked by association with drug companies.

“Dr Salisbury is also linked by association to drug companies. Dr Salisbury as the Medical Secretary for the Department of Health is also a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. The JCVI has the task of approving UK vaccines. Many JCVI members have declared interests in a variety of drug companies when discussing the flu pandemic [ "JCVI meeting on 13th February 2008]. These financial ties include vaccine manufacturers Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur and Novartis. The JCVI is reportedly involved in attempts to hide evidence that the MMR vaccine can cause brain inflammation and permanent brain damage. ["Vaccine E-Newsletter March 20, 2009 Vaccine Bullies & Fighting Back by Barbara Loe Fisher]”

Another Government figure found to be linked to drugs companies is Kathleen Sebelius The US Health and Human Services Secretary. She has been found to have strong links to Glaxo Smith Kline.

In early 2009 the US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told The Associated Press that she was urging school superintendents around the USA to spend the summer preparing for the possibility that schoolchildren could be first in line for swine flu vaccine in the fall, if the USA Government decided to go ahead with mass vaccinations:-

“If you think about vaccinating kids, schools are the logical place,” She said. ["Kids May Get Swine Flu Shot First Lauran Neergaard June 16th 2009]

However, she did promise careful surveillance. Sebelius has strong alliances to drug companies. ["GlaxoSmithKline website] announced her appointment stating that she could work with them to save ‘World Health’ and get out of the ‘Healthcare mess’, if they (GSK) gave the Government the ‘right attention’”

So can we trust the doctors and the Governments to keep our children safe? Sadly it seems that many are not really putting the safety of their patients before their ever increasing pay packets. Their loyalty is to the drug companies and not their patients, so what is the truth about the vaccinations used today?

Fortunately for us, we have a strong and growing army of ‘real doctors‘, who are less interested in the ‘nice little earners’ are more interested in keeping the public informed and safe. They have a very different view of what vaccines are doing to our health and our immune systems.

Dr Viera Scheibner a well trusted doctor, Principle Research Scientist (Rtd) and now prominent public campaigner,is so sure of her facts she sent a letter to the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper. This letter by Dr Viera Scheibner , was sent to and published in the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper, in February 1999.

She challenged Simon Chapman who wrote an article challenging the anti- vaccination movement in Australia to ‘TAKE HIS OWN MEDICINE’

She began by saying

“On February 19, 1999, the Medical Observer published an article by Simon Chapman, in which he issued a challenge to the anti-vaccination movement in Australia.

My response to his provocative article is as follows:

If vaccines are such a blessing I challenge Simon Chapman to appear on television and allow himself to be injected with all baby vaccines, adjusted to his body weight by a doctor of my choice and in my presence.

The vaccines to be administered to Simon are as follows:

* DtaP: 3 doses within 4 months
* Hib (any conjugates): 3 doses within 4 months
* OPV or IPV: 3 doses within 4 months
* Hep B: 3 doses within 1 month of each other.

The time of the first dose represents month 0.

There isn’t a better way to demonstrate to us that vaccines are safe and effective than by Simon taking his own medicine.

Seems fair enough to me but as expected her letter was never answered.

Dr Scheibner has always had very strong views on vaccination and has been quoted making the following statements:-

Vaccination procedures are a highly politically motivated non-science, whose practitioners are only interested in injecting multitudes of vaccines without much interest or care as to their effects. Data collection on reactions to vaccines is only paid lip service, and the obvious ineffectiveness of vaccines to prevent diseases is glossed over. The fact that natural infectious diseases have beneficial effect on the maturation and development of the immune system is ignored or deliberately suppressed. Consequently, parents of small children and any potential recipients of vaccines and any orthodox medications should be wary of any member of the medical establishment (which is little more than a highly politicised business system) extolling the non-existent virtues of vaccination.”–Viera Scheibner

“I did not find it difficult to conclude that there is no evidence whatsoever that vaccines or any kind are effective in preventing the infectious diseases they are supposed to prevent. Further, adverse effects are amply documented and are far more significant to public health than any adverse effects of infectious diseases. Immunizations not only did not prevent any infectious diseases, they caused more suffering and more deaths than has any other human activity in the entire history of medical intervention. It will be decades before the mopping-up after the disasters caused by childhood vaccination will be completed.”—Dr. Viera Scheibner, PhD

She is not the only doctor to hold such strong views. Dr Harold Buttram M.D holds similar views. He has said:-

“Safety studies on vaccinations are limited to short time periods only: several days to several weeks. There are NO (NONE) long term (months or years) safety studies on any vaccination or immunization. For this reason, there are valid grounds for suspecting that many delayed-type vaccine reactions may be taking place unrecognized at to their true nature.Dr Buttram MD

“As reported in a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine in 1984, tests of T-lymphocyte subpopulations were done on 11 healthy adults before-and-after routine tetanus booster immunizations. Tests showed a significant though temporary drop in T-helper lymphocytes (a class of white blood cells which helps govern the immune system) in all of the subjects. Special concern rests in the fact that in 4 of the subjects the T-helper cells fell to levels found in active AIDS patients. (2) If this was the result of a single vaccine in healthy adults, it is sobering to think of the consequences of the multiple vaccines (twenty-one at last count) routinely given to infants with their immature systems during the first six months of life. However, we can only speculate as to the consequences, as this test has never been repeated. Dr Buttram MD

The list of doctors and professionals stating that vaccines are dangerous is growing. Dr Sherri Tenpenny says in a short article Defending the Right to Poison:-

“I have a little person in my office who had 10 rounds of antibiotics and 17 vaccines by 20 months of age. Yes, now autistic. That should be assault with deadly weapons and the doctor should be in jail. Instead, the parents were kicked out of their pediatrician’s practice for refusing more vaccines and wanting to get their child well. With these annoying, non-compliant parents out of the way, that doctor can continue to do what vaccinators do: Inject toxic substances into children, ruining their health and the lives of the child’s family members”

Dr Mayer Eisenstein Homefirst Medical Services treats thousands of never- vaccinated children. The Homefirst Medical Services director has said on many occasions that he is not aware of any cases of autism in unvaccinated children.

Dr Eisenstein said that the Homefirst Medical Services has taken care of about 30,000 to 35,000 unvaccinated children over the years and he does not remember a single case of autism in children who never received vaccines

For over 30 years Dr. Eisenstein has been fighting the good fight against vaccinations and struggling to legitimize alternative therapies. In recent years the evidence about the fantastic healing properties of Vitamin D has captured his attention along with that of other meaningful supplements which promote better health naturally. On his live radio show, he dispenses his wisdom and knowledge while his ever more popular Webinars continue to bring on great guests to tackle the most controversial health issues of the day

Recently in a disgusted interview he said-

“Now They Want to Inject Our Children with 2 Doses of H1N1 Vaccine!!! Not My Children!! …How pathetic! Tested on 474 children, and they want to give it to millions of children! Since the public overwhelmingly is rejecting this ineffective and dangerous vaccine the government needed to come up with a plan so as not to be accused of pork spending for a “pork vaccine”. Now I know what the Obama administration is planning to do with the millions of unused Swine Flu vaccines that they purchased. They will give 2 doses to our children and if that does not work they will give 3 doses. Just Say No!”Mayer Eisenstein MD, JD, MPH

Another real doctor is Dr Andrew Moulden who has said for years that vaccinations cause MASS Ischemia: Cellular Injury and the ischemic Penumbra – the progression of hypoxia in the Brain – Cores” neural tracts from the inside out. He says that this creates a series of disconnections to the brain’s wiring – locally and or systemically (autism) to progressively (dementia) and intermittently (Multiple sclerosis, CIDP, ADEM)..and more..including autistic enterocolitis and bowel disorders.

He explains everything on his website http://brainguardmd.com/ BrainGuard and shows fascinating videos that prove his theories.

Dr Mark Geier is another real doctor who is more interested in the welfare of children and the right to information than lining his own pocket. He has been fighting against mercury in vaccinations for years. For his beliefs the Governments and Big Pharma have trashed his reputation and even taken him to court but like many other professionals speaking on these issues, he battles on, speaking recently at a http://video.filestube.com/video,de70f8689a6c83f803ea.html Mercury Free Vaccine Rally out side the CDC building in front of hundreds of parents with autistic children.

He believes that it is the Mercury in the vaccines that causes Autism and has advocated for many years to rid all vaccinations of Mercury.

The real doctors are the ones who turn their back on dirty dealings and who remember their Hippocratic Oath. This is an old oath historically taken by doctors swearing to ethically practice medicine. It is widely believed to have been written by Hippocrates the father of western medicine, in Ionic Greek (late 5th century BC), or by one of his students, and is usually included in the Hippocratic Corpus. The phrase “first do no harm” said in Latin as Primum non nocere is often, incorrectly, attributed to the oath. Although mostly of historical and traditional value, the oath is considered a rite of passage for practitioners of medicine in some countries, although nowadays the modernized version of the text varies among the countries.

The Hippocratic Oath (orkos) is one of the most widely known of Greek medical texts. It requires a new physician to swear upon a number of healing gods that he will uphold a number of professional ethical standards.

The Oath says nothing about having links to drugs companies and lining ones pockets at the possible expense of the patient and it says nothing about injecting patients with doses of lethal cocktails of poisons and hoping for the best.

The real doctors are the ones that are not afraid to stand up and fight for the the rights of their patient. The real doctors ‘first do no harm’ and do not put money before the safety of our children.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Website Documents Over 300 Gardasil Horror Stories

Christina England, HPV, Top Stories

Website Documents Over 300 Gardasil Horror Stories

2 Comments 13 January 2010

.
.
.

Christina England
vactruth.com
1/13/2010

The numbers of people who have suffered from Gardasil side effects mount daily, Medications.com – Gardasil side effects now has a total of 300 side effects posted for Gardasil. Over 300 children and parents tell their harrowing stories how their lives changed forever, the day they had the Gardasil vaccine. On the 10th January 2010 one devastated mother posted her daughters story:-

“Our 17 year old daughter Jessica Ericzon had a side affect from her Gardasil vaccines. SHE DIED INSTANTLY. AFTER WEEKS OF HEADACHES, SORE MUSCLES AND JOINTS AND ALWAYS BEING TIRED HER HEART STOPPED. We are devastated. we read all the other girls and there families stories and cry. What kind of world is this that would allow such a thing to happen? The United States government killing its own. allowing Merck to kill young women and mame thousands of others for life.”

Another mother says this :-

“My daughter had Gardasil and started losing her hair, going through menopause, migraines, dehydration, etc. Please join our group at Truth_About_Gardasil@yahoogroups.com … to learn more and get support. Another helpful site is TRUTHABOUTGARDASIL.org … there are lots of stories and lots of parents trying to get this vaccine pulled. Make certain you file a VAERS report – it’s the best way for us to make this vaccine go away. Thanks and God bless you all. BB”

One 21 year old said this:-

“I am 21 years old and had my third shot last December. Since then I have been suffering from dizzy spells, bad anxiety and irregular periods. I am not completely sure that all these are because of my shot, but i really wish i had never had that last dose. My anxiety has been absolutely horrible, and lasts for days or weeks on end. My last few periods lasted for several weeks, and there seems to be no other explanation for the way i have been feeling since the end of last year. My friend works at a local hospital in cancer cell research, and amongst some of the papers she has read she has told me over 1000 girls have appeared with psychotic symptoms for no apparent reason, all after having gardasil. I hope we can all do something about this and get the word out, because i know it is affecting so many people in such a horrible way”

In fact reading through this site is a truly traumatic experience, what makes everything said on this site a million times worse is that the FDA have absolutely no proof what so ever that this vaccine even works. In fact Gardasil may actually increase the risk of precancerous cervical lesions by an alarming 44.6 percent in some women according to a News Target report  by Mike Adams -The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed who says that Gardasil has been proven worthless in clearing the HPV virus from those women already infected.


One thing that is striking in many of the reports that were documented on Medications.com were that the vast majority of the reports included reports of disturbances in their menstrual cycles. Leslie Carol Botha, Women’s Health Educator,  a member of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research, author, publisher, television, and radio talk show host wonders why the clinical researchers, FDA and CDC staffers, and other frontline experts and professionals who have approved and administered Gardasil to many of theses women have not considered how the injection of this chemical cocktail might affect a still-maturing female body during the premenstrual phase. She feels after speaking to many of these women that this vaccine could interfere with the bodies natural hormones at a crucial time in their development.

She could be right.  In her article Vaccinating teens during menstrual phase may increase adverse reactions she writes;

“Why is it that women are constantly forced into a male medical model which blatantly ignores their menstrual health and administers drugs, surgeries, and vaccinations without any regard to where they are in their hormone cycle?

This is outrageous. Even though women are asked to fill out the date of their last menstrual period (LMP) that information is used primarily to note that a woman is not pregnant. But it is much more valuable than that; the date of the LMP could actually be indicative of why that woman is in the doctor’s office to begin with.

Every cycling woman, who is aware of the changes that her body goes through prior to menstruation, knows that she is more prone to infections, colds, fatigue, irritability and a general feeling of malaise at this time. All of these issues are a direct result of hormonal changes that are cycling through her entire body, from the brain right on down to the uterus. Why haven’t the clinical researchers, FDA/CDC oversight committees, gynaecologists, paediatricians or family practice physicians who have approved and administered Gardasil® considered how the injection of this chemical cocktail might affect a still maturing female body that is least able to defend itself during the paramenstrum?

As the female hormone levels of oestrogen and progesterone decrease during the premenstrual phase, the female body begins the process of releasing the uterine lining in the act of menstruation. The decrease in hormones actually affects a woman’s energy levels and her emotions. The immune system becomes more compromised, and that translates to a lowered defence system to fight off invading, foreign toxins.

Due to limited access to women’s menstrual health education, many women are totally unaware of the systemic aspects of their feminine hormone cycle. The medical, pharmaceutical industrial complex continues to ignore the premenstrual phase of menstrual cycle as a factor in testing and administration of drugs and vaccines. The only question women have to ask themselves is, “Is that policy based in ignorance, arrogance or methodical design?”

Another factor very much being ignored and covered up is the rising number of girls dying after the Gardasil Vaccine.

According to reporters in New Zealand 3 girls died in their sleep after a Gardasil shot.

Gardasil Kills Three New Zealand Girls & Debilitates Hundreds of Others (opinion)

The reports tells the story of how three girls have died in their sleep – including Jasmine Renata a well documented case, all shortly after receiving Gardasil.

In the USA reports are mounting many reported on the site Only the Truth owned and run by Renew America’s journalist Cynthia Janak. Cynthia has a memorial page with photos and stories of the girls reported to have died after Gardasil shots.

One story tells the story of Christine Richelle Tarsell

“Christina Richelle Tarsell, 21, died in her sleep June 23 at her home in Tivoli, N.Y. Her death was unexpected. After an extensive autopsy, the cause of death is still a mystery. My family has concerns about the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, which I had received only days before my death.

She was a member of the National Honor Society and Amnesty International, and art editor of the literary magazine Brillig. She graduated from Hereford in 2005. Chris played baseball on the boy’s team in middle school, varsity softball in high school and tennis in college.

She had completed her junior year at Bard College in Annandale-on-Hudson, N.Y., where she was an honor student in studio art.”

Here are a selection of reports from VAERS or the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. This is a system used in the USA to report adverse reactions after any vaccine.

279592 – Cause of death from a blood clot.

278865 – Respiratory failure on 3/6/07.  6/1/07 Received Death Certificate from epidemiologist which reveals COD asmultiorgan system failure and influenza B viral sepsis with contributing cause of staphylococcal secondary infection. (NOTE: 3/5 & rapid strep was negative & diagnosis was probable influenza.)

280163 – “the death was due to an anaphylactic reaction to Gardasil.”

297528 – the patient died in her sleep.

275428 – Autopsy Report which reveals COD as acute probable viral etiology myocarditis & manner of death as natural.  (NOTE: Aortic & mitral valve insufficiency of unknown etiology.)

275438 – Sudden cardiac death and pulmonary embolism.

All these deaths were after a GARDASIL VACCINE.

Of course as usual Merck deny that any of the above deaths were caused by the Gardasil Vaccine.

Drug Firm, FDA Deny Link Between Deaths and HPV Vaccine – Fred Lucas report that Federal officials and Gardasil’s manufacturer, Merck Co. insist that none of the eight young women that have recently been reported to have died  ages 11 to 22 who reportedly died after the injection of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine, died because of the vaccine.

What every parent considering letting their child have the Gardasil vaccination in the next few months should be asking is it all JUST hype and are these women just unfortunate coincidences or are Merck playing what some call ‘Russian Roulette’ with your child’s life for profit? Only time will tell.

For more information and reports on Gardasil including the very powerful article by journalist Lisa Bastian entitled ‘One Less ‘Yes’ for Gardasil’ go to Profitable Harm

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Governments don’t lie, do they?

By Reactions, Christina England, HPV, Top Stories

Governments don’t lie, do they?

4 Comments 06 January 2010

.
.
.

Christina England
vactruth.com
01/06/2010

How many damaged children does the world have to see before the answer to this question becomes obvious? Yes, Governments do lie! They lie every time a child is vaccinated by assuring parents vaccines are completely safe. We have a world of the unhealthiest children ever. The incidence of conditions like Autism, ADHD, GBS, Obesity, Eczema, Asthma and Allergies have never been so high and yet still the Governments around the world tell us vaccines are safe and will help our children to stay fit and well, well they are not working that well then, are they?

Yesterday, I received two emails both telling sad heart wrenching tales of children damaged by these ‘oh so safe vaccines’. One in particular is the story that will make every mother with a young girl about to be vaccinated with the ‘wonder vaccine Gardasil’ think twice .

My daughter, age 15, received the 3rd dose of Gardasil on December 28th, 2009. Within 10 minutes after the injection into her left arm she felt extremely dizzy, her eyes rolled back into her head several times, her head wobbled like a newborn baby who can’t support their head, she broke out in a sweat, her legs were like rubberbands and down she went!! Passed out even before reaching the exit door of her pediatricians office! She lay there twitching and shaking with seizure movements and the nurse took her blood pressure which was 92/30!! Nurse said this was very low, and that this is happening to a LOT of their patients that are receiving Gardasil! Tell me why and how this vaccine is considered to be safe and necessary when it is slowing girls heart rate down so low that they are passing out and not getting enough oxygen to their brain?!?! My daughter is extremely healthy, and active in sports, never fainted or had seizures in her life, came into the office walking on her own two feet and wound up on the floor shaking and twitching with seizures!! I am highly concerned and angry with this topic!! Why isn’t this being looked into more and possibly pulled off the market? The doctors office said they do NOT need to report this to the FDA because it’s listed as a possibly side effect. BULL!!!!!! How is anyone going to know what’s happening with our girls if nothing is being documented and reported! Mom’s and daughters out there, please get online and report this yourselves to the website VAERS. This needs to be addressed. It’s killing girls! Go onto the internet and research side effects of Gardasil, up to 30 some women have died shortly after receiving this vaccine! The heart is something we should not be messing with, would the drug company Merck & Co. want to have a vaccine injected into their arm that drops them to the floor and have seizures?? And possibly DEATH!!!!”

I would like to bring your attention to the line – “The doctors office said they do NOT need to report this to the FDA because it’s listed as a possibly side effect.” Sadly the doctor is partially right here, seizure like activity has now been listed as a side effect of Gardasil, Merck you see covered their backsides on this, a while ago. This was done by adding ’seizures’ to the list of side effects on their packaging. Of course this was probably due to the high volume of reports of young girls fainting and having so called ‘non epileptic’ seizures after the Gardasil vaccine, however, lets make it quite clear all side effects should be reported.

Merck finally conceded to add seizures to their packaging
Merck finally conceded to include these side effects to their packaging and labelling as from 9th June 2009.

Information Pertaining to Labelling Revision for Gardasil

“On June 9, 2009, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a revised label for Gardasil, a vaccine to protect against cervical, vulvar and vaginal cancers caused by Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 and genital warts caused by HPV types 6 and 11. In the new label, information pertaining to syncope (fainting) is now also included in the Warnings and Precautions section, and this section has new information noting that individuals who faint sometimes have tonic-clonic (jerking) movements and seizure-like activity.


The addition of syncope to the Warnings and Precautions section emphasizes that healthcare providers and consumers should be alert that fainting may occur following vaccination with Gardasil, sometimes resulting in falling and injuries. To prevent falls and injuries all vaccine recipients should remain seated or lying down and be closely observed for 15 minutes following vaccination.”

Mind you, it only took this giant drugs company a total of three years to achieve and was only due to the high level of girls having seizure like episodes after a Gardasil vaccination.

What has always mystified me and I find extremely confusing, is the difference between “individuals who faint, sometimes having tonic-clonic (jerking) movements and seizure-like activity,” and those who have an actual epileptic seizure. As I understand it a full ‘Grand Mal’ fit is an episode where a person drops to floor which could be described as a faint and begins to jerk uncontrollably. I wonder can someone from Merck please enlighten me to the difference here? The Epilepsy Foundation could not, as they seem to describe a Grand Mal Seizure, in the same way as Merck are now describing them as a side effect on their new labeling.

Many people have become confused and do not understand the difference between the terms “seizure” and “epilepsy”, so let me explain. A person can have a single seizure without going on to develop Epilepsy. A seizure is simply caused by an abnormal electrical discharge in the brain and sometimes happens when a person as a fever. So what is causing seizures in the girls receiving the Gardasil vaccination? Many doctors and professionals fully believe it is the ingredients in the vaccination that are causing young women to have seizures after vaccinations. The papers on Profitable Harm has references from professionals worldwide stating that in their medical professional opinion Gardasil is unsafe and has the full ingredients of Gardasil listed but for clarity I will list them here .

Ingredients in GARDASIL

The ingredients are

  1. proteins of HPV Types 6, 11, 16, and 18,
  2. amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate,
  3. yeast protein,
  4. sodium chloride,
  5. L-histidine, polysorbate 80,
  6. sodium borate,
  7. and water for injection.

Dr Diane Harper speaks out

Dr. Diane Harper says young girls and their parents should receive more complete warnings before receiving the vaccine to prevent cervical cancer. She feels that not enough information is offered to parents. Dr. Harper helped design and carry out the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies to get Gardasil approved, and has written many of the published papers about it. She has been a paid speaker and consultant to Merck. It is extremely unusual for a researcher to publicly criticize a medicine or vaccine that she has helped get approved however, she is fast becoming well known for her outspokenness and indeed her criticism of the HPV vaccines.

In a recent interview Diane Harper made the following statement:-

Interview with Marcia G. Yerman – An Interview with Dr. Diane M. Harper — HPV Expert

Statement:

“The most important point that I have always said from day one, is that the use of this vaccine must be done with informed consent and complete disclosure of the benefits and harms of Pap screening and HPV vaccines. The decision to be vaccinated must be the woman’s (or parent’s if it is for a young child), and not the physician’s or any board of health, as the vaccination contains personal risk that only the person can value.”

As all of the information in the United States concerned Gardasil, since that was the only vaccine approved in the U.S. from June 2006 until this past October 2009, my comments have been focused on Gardasil.

My points are as follows:

The Benefits of Pap Screening:

• Individual benefit to detect early pre-cancers.

• Public health benefit: Only when 70% of the population has been screened will the population incidence of cervical cancer drop.

• Pap tests do not kill or handicap.

The Harms of Pap Screening:
• Screening must be repeated throughout a woman’s life. One screen is not sufficient to protect her from cervical cancer

• False negative rate of cytology screening: Among the women who develop cervical cancer in the U.S., 30% are women who have been routinely screened, and all their Paps have been normal.

• False positive rate of cytology screening: Women who screen abnormal are psychologically upset, anxious and left doubting the medical process (i.e. Her Pap was abnormal, but her colposcopy and biopsy were normal, with no explanation why her Pap was abnormal).

• Quality of life harms: Women with abnormal Paps have anxiety as high as women diagnosed with cervical cancer undergoing their surgical treatment. The stress of going to colposcopy and biopsy can be high for many women. The contemplation of a cervical biopsy and a scraping of the endocervical canal can lead to fear of pain.

• Relationship harms: Once women are told they have an abnormal Pap and that the Pap is abnormal because of a STD called HPV, most relationships are stressed as the partners attempt to understand who brought the infection to the relationship.

• Excisional treatments for detected precancerous lesions cause preterm deliveries in subsequent pregnancies, with concomitant low birth weight infants (which puts the infant at risk for life). In addition, scarring from the treatments lead to an increased cesarean section delivery method (as the cervix does not dilate normally due to scarring from prior excisions). These reproductive morbidities occur between 70%-300% more often in women with excisions.

• Recurrence of HPV associated cervical/vaginal/anal cancers at a rate of 3-12 times higher than those women who never had a cervical cancer precursor or cancer. These recurrences happen around ten years after treatment with peak recurrences between ten and twenty years from the initial treatment.

The Benefits of HPV vaccination:

• Cervarix protects against five cancer-causing types of HPV, which lead to CIN 2+ (precancers and cancers).

• Gardasil protects against three cancer-causing types of HPV, which lead to CIN 2+ (precancers and cancers).

• Cervarix induces antibody titers for HPV 16 and 18 that are at least ten fold higher than natural infection titers; the antibody titers for the other three cancer causing types (HPV 31, 45, 33) are also significantly higher than natural infection titers, and the titers stay high for at least 7.4 years – lasting the longer of either vaccines.

• Gardasil only maintains antibody titers for HPV 16 (not 18, not 11, not 6) at five years, making the true long lasting (five years) coverage of Gardasil only for one type of cancercausing HPV.

• If vaccination occurs within one year of the onset of sexual activity, there will be 57/1000 cases of all CIN 2+ types and persistent HPV 16/18 infections prevented, as compared to only 17/1000 cases prevented if virgins are vaccinated.

The Harms of HPV Vaccination:

• Duration of efficacy is key to the entire question. If duration is at least fifteen years, then vaccinating 11-year-old girls will protect them until they are 26 and will prevent some precancers, but postpone most cancers. If duration of efficacy is less than fifteen years, then no cancers are prevented, only postponed.

• Safety: There is at least one verified case of auto-immune initiated motor neuron disease declared triggered by Gardasil (presented by neurologists at the 2009 American Neurological Association meeting in Baltimore, Maryland). There are serious adverse events, including death, associated with Gardasil use.

• No population benefit in reduction of cervical cancer incidence in the United States with HPV vaccination as long as screening continues.

• Incidence rate of cervical cancer in the United States based on screening is 7/100,000 women per year.

• Incidence rate of cervical cancer if women are only vaccinated with Gardasil is 14/100,000 per year (twice the rate of cervical cancer if young women vaccinated with Gardasil do not seek Pap testing at 21 years and the rest of their life).

• Incidence rate of cervical cancer with Cervarix vaccination is 9/100,000 per year– better than with Gardasil, but still more than with screening alone.

• Incidence of cervical cancer without screening and without vaccination is nearly 90/100,000 per year. The combination of HPV vaccine and screening in the U.S. will not decrease the incidence of cervical cancer to any measurable degree at the population level. Those women who do not participate in Pap screening, and who are vaccinated, will have some personal benefit for five years for Gardasil and 7.4 years for Cervarix (maybe longer), but they will not affect the population rates.

Boosters for Gardasil after antibodies wane makes the cost of vaccination escalate significantly, and cause implementation challenges to reach those women who might want to be revaccinated.”

I recommend readers read the whole interview. Here we have an expert who clearly says in her first paragraph “ The decision to be vaccinated must be the woman’s (or parent’s if it is for a young child), and not the physician’s or any board of health, as the vaccination contains personal risk that only the person can value.” She later says “There is at least one verified case of auto-immune initiated motor neuron disease declared triggered by Gardasil (presented by neurologists at the 2009 American Neurological Association meeting in Baltimore, Maryland). There are serious adverse events, including death, associated with Gardasil use.”

However the FDA, CDC and the USA Government says that this vaccine is safe and recommends it. This is a lie as how can a vaccine that has death as side effect be safe? How can a vaccine that has seizures as a side effect be safe?

The FDA state the following:-

“Based on the review of available information by FDA and CDC, Gardasil continues to be safe and effective, and its benefits continue to outweigh its risks.”

However when Diane Harper was asked by Marcia the following question :-

Do you believe that the Gardasil vaccine, as it currently stands, could present more risks to a young girl or woman than the possibility of cervical cancer?

She replied

“Pap smears have never killed anyone.

Pap smears are an effective screening tool to prevent cervical cancer Pap smears alone prevent more cervical cancers than can the vaccines alone.

Gardasil is associated with serious adverse events, including death. If Gardasil is given to 11 year olds, and the vaccine does not last at least fifteen years, then there is no benefit – and only risk – for the young girl. Vaccinating will not reduce the population incidence of cervical cancerif the woman continues to get Pap screening throughout her life.

If a woman is never going to get Pap screening, then a HPV vaccine could offer her a better chance of not developing cervical cancer, and this protection may be valued by the woman as worth the small but real risks of serious adverse events. On the other hand, the woman may not value the protection from Gardasil as being worth the risk knowing that 1) she is at low risk for a persistent HPV infection and 2) most pre-cancers can be detected and treated successfully. It is entirely a personal value judgment.”

This indicates to me that Diane Harper believes this vaccine is not only ineffective but in some cases extremely dangerous.

Governments worldwide are lying

It seems Governments worldwide are lying to us, they are doing this by brainwashing us into believing that vaccines are safe.

We were lied to when the told us that the vaccinations do not cause Autism and yet studies show worldwide that more vaccinated than unvaccinated children are Autistic.

Dr Eisenstein has said that Homefirst Medical Services has taken care of about 30,000 to 35,000 unvaccinated children over the years and he does not remember a single case of autism in children who never received vaccines.

Studies over the years have proven that unvaccinated children are healthier.

No Autism in Never- Vaccinated Children quotes:-

“In Chicago, Homefirst Medical Services treats thousands of never- vaccinated children whose parents received exemptions through Illinois’ relatively permissive immunization policy. Homefirst’s medical director, Dr. Mayer Eisenstein, told us he is not aware of any cases of autism in never-vaccinated children; the national rate is 1 in 175, according to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. “We have a fairly large practice,” Eisenstein told us. “We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we’ve taken care of over the years, and I don’t think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines. “We do have enough of a sample,” Eisenstein said. “The numbers are too large to not see it. We would absolutely know. We’re all family doctors. If I have a child with autism come in, there’s no communication. It’s frightening. You can’t touch them. It’s not something that anyone would miss.”

Governments have lied to us when they said that the H1N1 vaccine is safe.

The Local (Swedish News in English) reports of four cases where people have died after receiving the Swine flu vaccine.

The Jerusalem Post reports the death of a 75 year old, who died two days after receiving the Swine Flu vaccine

Bild.com reports on the agonising death of a toddler after the Swine Flu vaccine.

MSNBC News reports that a 14 year old boy has been struck down with GBS after Swine Flu Vaccine

Prison Planet reports that several women are speaking out after they have miscarried after the Swine Flu vaccine

BreakingNews.ie reports two deaths in China after Swine Flu vaccine

Belfast Telegraph reports boy rushed into hospital after Swine Flu Vaccine

Clearly for these and many others it was not.

And Governments are lying to us when they say that Gardasil and Cervarix are safe.

Katherine Kimzey a 14-year-old girl who experienced headaches, fainting, and stiff joints after receiving the second shot of her three-dose Gardasil vaccine battery. A few weeks later, Katherine had a seizure and was eventually diagnosed with epilepsy. Katherine is one girl of many who has encountered a serious adverse reaction after receiving Gardasil.

Here are a few more I found on Gardasil and epilepsy : Medications.com

1. “Hi, my name is Hannah and I am a senior in college. At the age of 19, I was diagnosed with epilepsy. I was a sophmore in college at the time, had a job, and was a completely HEALTHY girl. I have been living with the disease for two year now, and my doctors still can’t come up with the cause for my seizures. Recently my sister called me to ask if I had received the gardasil shot, because on CNN talk radio that people were starting to think that the garasil shot might be linked to paralysis,seizures, and even death. I immediately called my OBGYN to ask the dates in which I had received my shots. My first dose was given on Oct.17, 2006. I had my first set of seizures on Nov. 24, 2006. WOW…I was in shock. I feel like I now have an answer for the cause of my illness. I talked to my Neurologist about this and he said we will have to wait until more research is done. I am convinced that Gardasil was the reason for my epilepsy. I am so sad to think that other girls are going in to receive a vaccine that is suppose to help their lives, and instead they could have crippling side effects that never go away. I can no longer drive, I had to choose between school and a job, and now I have to plan my day around taking my medicine. All because a drug company wanted to make some money before their completely researched their product.”

2. “Hi. My 17 year old daughter’s story is similar. She had her second Gardasil vaccination during the end of January 2008. During the month of February and March, she had abdominal problems. Beginning on March 30th, she had seizures. She had a CT of the head, MRI of the brain, EEG, 24 hour EEG and as I type this note, she are in the epilepsy center at Jefferson Hospital in Philadelphia and the doctor just came in to tell me that every test is coming back normal and that my daughter is having “stress” seizures. My daughter has no more stress than any other 17 year old girl does.
I related to the doctor my thoughts pertaining to Gardasil and I feel as though he has dismissed my idea.
I have found some many stories similar to yours and my daughter’s but I believe because Gardasil is so new, nothing is coming out yet about it.
If anyone has any other information, please advise!! We are desperate here in Philadelphia.
Jodi”

3. “My daughter received her first shot on 6/20/2007 when she was 14 years old and second shot on 12/27/2007. During this time frame she complained of having headaches daily. On 1/8/2008 my daughter had a seizure. She had been a healthy, dancer and scholastic student. Since her shot she has had a total of 12 seizures and has been in and out of hospitals numerous times. She was diagnosed with epilepsy in March of 2008. She has been on Topamax, Keppra, Lamictal and Zonegran and continues to have seizures. The side effects from the medications that my daughter has suffered with along with depression has been tremendous.
We thought we were protecting our daughter and found that we have only hurt her. The doctors need to stop pushing the shot and it needs to be taken off the market. Because of this shot she has to be dependent on more drugs. She has missed so much school, which were important years (freshman & sophmore) that she will never get back. How many more girls need to suffer!”

Girls in the UK have reported epileptic seizures after th UK HPV vaccine Cervarix.

Ashleigh Cave has had a couple of seizures since her vaccination of Cervarix. Ashleigh is now partially paralysed and her mother has been accused of Munchausen by Proxy or making her symptoms up to gain attention.

Carley Steele now has blackouts, since her Cervarix vaccine.

“And that’s when the blackouts started,’ says Amanda. Several times she found Carly collapsed after what she described as a ’split-second blackout’.”

Petit Mal seizures perhaps?

Paige Brennan also has had seizures, her mother says:-

“She was “perfectly normal” until she came home from school with a headache. Within hours she was having seizures and ended up in intensive care.”

In each case doctors have blamed other reasons for these seizures and blackouts but in all cases these children only started to have the problems after the oh so safe Cervarix or Gardasil vaccination.

Clearly our vaccinations are not safe. I will leave you to ponder with a poem written by the mother of a vaccine damaged child.

This Journey…Melissa Saunders

I read the books, I went to classes
I ate good food, and drank 8 glasses.
I took it easy, as my belly grew
I did it all…All for You!
I felt you move, I felt you kick
I forgave you when you made me sick :)
I loved you more with each passing day
I couldn’t wait ‘til you were here to stay.
Well that day came, and I’ll never forget
As that’s the day my world was lit.
Your eyes so bright, your hair so fine
Couldn’t be more proud to call you Mine!
As the weeks flew by, so did the months…
And before I knew it, you had turned ONE!
Up ‘til then, you progressed so well
But that all changed, and you went down hill.
My beautiful girl, as smart as can be
Regressed into Autism after your vaccine
I never questioned, I had no clue
What this needle could actually do.
Now you struggle, with everyday tasks
The simple things, you cannot ask.
It’s taken your words, the one’s you once had
And turned them to screaming, driving you mad!
At times I just lay here, and can’t help but cry
I question God, wondering why?
But the answer’s clear, so plain to see
The people I trusted, had deceived me.
They all should hang, their heads in shame
Admit the truth and take the blame.
They know the danger, but turn away
And continue to injure our kids each day.
But I’ve chosen to put, my anger aside
Along with my hopes and dreams that’s died.
And focus on making more parents aware
Share our story, cuz the proof’s right there!
Although I hate to see you like this
You have fulfilled my life with eternal bliss
We’ll always take, this journey together
And I promise to love you, forever and ever!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Child Protection stole Christmas from families around the world with SBS accusations

Christina England, Shaken Baby Syndrome, Top Stories

Child Protection stole Christmas from families around the world with SBS accusations

1 Comment 30 December 2009

.
.
.

Christina England
American Chronicle
December 30th, 2009

Christmas time is a time for families and a time for children but sadly many families this year faced a Christmas without their children because child protection agencies and paediatricians misdiagnosed very real conditions, opting instead to accuse parents of shaking their babies. As a result many families could not join in the seasons festivities with the children they love, they could not buy them presents or prepare their Christmas stockings and some were left with no idea where their children were or even who they were with. One such family is Zabeth and Paul Baynes, their children were removed from their care on October 22, 2007 after they say they were falsely accused of Shaken Baby Syndrome.

Their story began after their baby daughter of just a few weeks old, lay on the floor on a blanket, her two year old brother came running along, tripped and fell, landing on her, banging her head with his. The baby showed no visible injuries at the time but just to be safe Zabeth and Paul had her checked by their GP who also found no apparent injury. A few days later however, she vomited after a feed and gasping for air she suddenly became listless, her parents rushed her to emergency giving her CPR on the way. Despite the need for emergency resuscitation on route the hospital were dismissive and Zabeth and Paul were surprised when, after initially hooking her up to oxygen she was given a brief examination and sent home as the hospital said that they were not equipped to treat infants. No further tests took place at the time.

Over the next few weeks the infant was repeatedly taken to the hospital, Zabeth was worried as she remained dazed and began refusing her feeds. Eventually she was transferred to another hospital where she was diagnosed with anaemia and reflux and began medication. This medication included Domperidone, Ranitidine and at one point Diazepan, it should be noted that Zabeth was also taking Domperidone to stimulate breast milk. Over the next few weeks the babies vomiting became worse and she became weaker. Zabeth also noticed that she began to have fit like episodes. On the 6th October a CT scan was requested due to the swelling of her head, however, due to sickness of the technician this could not be done for another 12 days, eventually some weeks after her initial injury had taken place a CT scan finanlly revealed subdural haemorrhaging. As soon as a bleed was identified, instead of the facts of this case being examined in detail, Dr. Colbourne a child protection doctor was brought in and accused Zabeth and Paul of shaking their little girl in a fit of rage, an accusation this couple have always refuted.

So lets examine the facts.

It took a total of 22 days from the first visit to a hospital for this vital CT scan to take place despite swelling to the head being noted. This child had endured several episodes where she stopped breathing and at one point she flat lined altogether, this is an obvious sign that all is not well, she visited a total of four hospitals, was seen by eight doctors which included the GP, she had been given a combination of various drugs including Domperidone a drug known to be dangerous and a drug that her mother was also on.

Zabeth said

“There were many other visits that I have lost track of. We went many times to the Hope Clinic, went to the Public Health Department, called the 24 Hour Nurse Helpline and also went to office visits to Dr. Sorial and Dr. Ebesch. There were also more visits to the Fraser Valley Emergency as she would not stop vomiting and the nurse helpline advised me to go back. I was always sent home.”

Immediately after the accusation of child abuse their two boys were placed in the care of their grandparents, even though both boys were reported to be healthy. Due to the couple making a TV appearance they were then abruptly removed from their grandparents care in the middle of their sons third birthday party which caused two very young children a great deal of unnecessary distress and trauma.

“They told us to pass the children to their arms, while our children were reaching out to us to come back out of these strangers arms. They were shoeless, coatless and they did not wait for any of their supplies like training diapers, clothes, stuffy toys, etc.

My screams had caught our neighbors ears and they were standing outside their homes looking at what was happening. I cried so hard my nose was bleeding.” Zabeth said.

What stands out about this case is not only was a highly potent cocktail of drugs including the highly controversial drug Domperidone given to this sick baby but that no one even noticed that Zabeth had also been prescribed Domperidone at the time for the stimulation of breast milk and that this would drastically alter the intake of Domperidone that this small baby was taking, it beggars belief that this major fact was totally overlooked and instead this family was accused of shaking this child so violently that it caused severe bleeding in the brain and behind her eyes.

Another very interesting fact is that this is not the only case where Domeridone has featured and parents have been falsely accused of injuring their children.

English case paves way for woman to appeal salt death-bid

Ordeal of innocent mother in salt baby death investigation | Mail

In fact in the USA Domperidone has been banned completely for mothers breastfeeding because it has been found to be unsafe, the FDA also have chosen against its use for gastric conditions. In 2004 in the paper FDA Warns Against Women Using Unapproved Drug, Domperidone, to Increase Milk Production the FDA said :-

“Although domperidone is approved in several countries outside the U.S. to treat certain gastric disorders, it is not approved in any country, including the U.S., for enhancing breast milk production in lactating women and is also not approved in the U.S. for any indication.”

Another major fact not picked up until this child was in care was that she had the genetic condition Glutaric Acidemia. This was innocently divulged by one of the other children’s foster carers to the mother, although this diagnoses has since been denied by the MCFD or Ministry of Children and Family Development . It is easy to see why it may be denied because it would be crucial to the Baynes defence, this is because it has been repeatedly reported that some individuals with Glutaric Acidemia have developed bleeding in the brain or eyes that could be mistaken for the effects of child abuse.

Med Pedia – Glutaric Acidemia Type reports the following:-

“Glutaric Acidemia type I is an inherited disorder in which the body is unable to process certain proteins properly. People with this disorder have inadequate levels of an enzyme that helps break down the amino acids lysine, hydroxylysine, and tryptophan, which are building blocks of protein. Excessive levels of these amino acids and their intermediate breakdown products can accumulate and cause damage to the brain, particularly the basal ganglia, which are regions that help control movement. Mental retardation may also occur.

Some babies with glutaric acidemia type I are born with unusually large heads (macrocephaly). Affected individuals may have difficulty moving and may experience spasms, jerking, rigidity, or decreased muscle tone. Some individuals with glutaric acidemia have developed bleeding in the brain or eyes that could be mistaken for the effects of child abuse. Strict dietary control may help limit progression of the neurological damage. Stress caused by infection, fever or other demands on the body may lead to worsening of the signs and symptoms, with only partial recovery.”

Sadly, instead of receiving the treatment that this vulnerable and ill baby needed in foster care, and despite the fact she was ill and continuing to vomit despite being removed from her parents this baby was given yet another cocktail of lethal chemicals, this time in the form of her routine vaccines.

Zabeth said:-

“We were told she was sick, but that she was scheduled to have her vaccinations that day. Both my father and I called the social worker trying to get them to stop the vaccinations. She was vomiting and had even been taken to the hospital the night before due to fever and vomiting.

They called late that night to tell us that the vaccines had been done anyways and that they gave her Tylenol. They promoted the caregiver and told us that they thought she was a medically fragile baby.

On Nov 9, 2007 the social worker called to tell us that she was bleeding still behind the left eye. I don’t know if this was true or not. I do know that she has been constantly sick while in care.”

I am not a medical professional but common sense tells me that something in this case does not add up. Here is an obviously sick child, who not only has had a lethal mixture of medications in her short life but has a genetic illness which has according to her family been left untreated, then whilst in care an environment meant to protect her she is vaccinated with a combination of vaccines which according to a growing number of physicians are also known to cause bleeding in the brain as seen in the on Shaken Baby Syndrome the Vaccination Link Were these vaccinations so important they could not wait until this little girl was stronger?

Ten leading professionals agree and all have written reports saying that in their professional opinion this baby was not a victim of child abuse.

In a lengthy report Dr Peter J Stephens M.D Board certified in Anatomic, Clinical and Forensic Pathology summarized:-

“In summary I see no evidence whatsoever of any intentionally inflicted injury.”

Dr Harry J Bonnell M.D Pathology says:-

“I agree with the comments made by Dr John Plunkett and opine that the findings are totally consistent with the history of accidental injury. To say anything more would be repetitively verbose: suffice it to say that there is no evidence of abuse in the manner in which these injuries were suffered.”

So why is this family, who have no less than ten full medical reports written by some of the top SBS experts in the world, including Dr Michael Innis and Dr Horrace B Gardner stating that in their opinion there is no evidence to support that this case is a case of child abuse, still being hounded and why are their three children still in care? Could it be that the hospital that diagnosed this as a SBS case have a massive conflict of interest? It has since materialised that at the same time as this case came to light that this hospital received $1.4 million of government money in an education and prevention program that will give every new parent in B.C. resources and information to better understand inconsolable crying in infants and help lower the incidence of Shaken Baby Syndrome, Children and Family Development. It has now been revealed that are they involved very heavily in a programme with specialists from around the world including UK’s very own Prof Roy Meadows, an expert who has been proven to get it wrong time and time again Great Britain and who has been found guilty of sending innocent parents to prison.

Prof Meadow has appeared as an expert witness for the prosecution in several trials. His evidence has seen many mothers go to jail for murder of their babies. The General Medical Council (GMC) struck off Meadow after he was found to have offered “erroneous” and “misleading” evidence in the Sally Clark case. Clark was a lawyer wrongly convicted in 1999 of the murder of her two baby sons, largely on the basis of Meadow’s evidence; her conviction was quashed in 2003 after she had spent three years in jail. In 2006 an appeal court reversed the decision on Meadow and the GMC reinstated him.

It has also been revealed that the child protection doctor that the hospital brought in, who should have been impartial had lectured worldwide on Shaken Baby Syndrome at some very impressive conferences along with others involved in this case. This surely shows that this doctor was not impartial and had possible conflicts of interest.

In two weeks from now this case goes to court. So far reports from experts have been ignored and good character witnesses have also been ignored and this has resulted in this family being torn apart for not just one Christmas but two. This time let justice be done and the truth be seen, there is a strong possibility that this was not a case of Shaken Baby syndrome and any number of other causes could so easily have led to this babies head trauma.

Zabeth says:-

“We feel heartbroken daily as we wake up in the morning. We no longer feel a little hand pushing our shoulders to wake up. We no longer have a tiny one crawling into bed with us to wrap our arms around. We have no one to make breakfast for and to dress in the morning. We pass by empty rooms and toys placed neatly around the room. We long for the sound of children laughing, crying and running around the home. We long to have toys to clean up, eyes to dry, times of sharing the good and the bad life brings. We long for the privilege to care for our children and to bring them the security of a loving and caring home, where they feel unconditionally loved by both of their parents and extended family. We long for the opportunity to have our rights restored that belong to so many other families to raise their children with their own values, ethics and religious beliefs.

Our thoughts are constantly with our dear children and our hearts will always mourn them until they are returned.

We also however feel the sting of being falsely accused. We abhor child abuse and to live under the blanket of that title is one that brings such humiliation. We are seen as guilty and have not had the opportunity to defend ourselves in court. We have endured the disregard of the protection of our rights and our children’s rights under the Act and are frustrated with the disrespect seen here regarding the Law. We have been horrified to learn that it is not about what is the best interests of the children, but rather making a case and when the facts don’t stand then the manipulation and introduction of false information to try to make the case. We have been appalled by the lack of care from the government regarding the conditions our children must do visitations with us in and other issues regarding our children’s safety and well being in care. We have been disappointed in the governments one track focus on making a case around a medical misdiagnosis and not seeking further medical opinion, instead of looking at the possibility of the ten experts reports we submitted that support the accident that occurred. It is hard to be branded as guilty of such a horrific crime and are in fact innocent.

This case does not seem to be mindful of the truth, ethical practices, justice, the welfare of our children or justice. We pray that in a legal system where so many innocent people slip through the cracks our family does not wind up another statistic. Daily the tears flow. We weep after visitations. We cry as we hear of the problems our children have in care and our hearts break as we hear their pleas to come home.

After you have children. there is no life without them. They are your very heart and soul and life is devoted to their needs, welfare and complete unconditional undying love.

Yesterday when we had to put our children back in the drivers van to take them away our son ***** pulled Daddy to the back of the van and whispered. “Daddy do I have to go in her van again. When can I come home?” Daddy told him that it would be soon…..In the van as I hugged them goodbye I said in three more sleeps we will see you again. He kicked his feet and said yeah in three sleeps I can come home. Sadly I told him no we would only be visiting, but we see the king (judge) in I think sixteen sleeps and we are asking him to have you come home. Our children are praying too.”

To prove a case of abuse, there has to be proof that goes beyond all reasonable doubt that abuse took place. There are several sound possibilities as to why this baby had subdural haemorrhaging, ranging from her brother falling on her, a genetic condition, Hypoxia from an Apparent Life Threatening event causing subdural and retinal haemorrhages (as mentioned in report from Dr Michael Innis) through to the possible overdose of Domperidone and poor medical care from the hospital.For a guilty verdict the court will have to disprove ten reports from leading experts and prove this couple shook this baby so hard that they caused her brain to bleed.

I would like to thank Zabeth and Paul for giving me their permission to highlight this case and wish them all the best in their court case. May God Bless you all.

I would also like to congratulate Mike and Elizabeth Bruce, a case I highlighted some months ago and who I featured in my webinar in October, this family were reunited just before Christmas, when Dalton their beautiful son was returned home to them. Daltons return was down to the dedication and love of his devoted family and especially Mike his father who researched over many months to uncover the truth of what happened to Cameron, Daltons twin brother who sadly died aged two months.

The Zabeth Case goes to Court January 12th.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Swine flu vaccines appear to be causing more ill health than the swine flu

Christina England, H1N1, Top Stories

Swine flu vaccines appear to be causing more ill health than the swine flu

2 Comments 14 December 2009

.
.
.

Christina England
American Chronicle
December 14th, 2009

The panic buttons have been pressed and the public have panicked but instead of this enormous pandemic, killing hundreds of thousands of people worldwide, we have seen very few deaths from the giant ‘pig’ of a disease that we were threatened with and instead we have seen a mere ‘piglet’ of a disease as it was described recently, killing far fewer people than a normal flu outbreak.

Many of us, have been left wondering if instead of a the killer pandemic , the Swine Flu, was little more than a ruse to tuck yet another vaccine into the already crammed full schedule. If so, it has certainly been effective, as a vaccine to protect us all from this deadly disease appeared as if by magic and was advertised as the must have protection against this ‘killing machine’ of an illness. However, it appears that the Swine Flu is not the threat that we were led to believe and has since disappeared into little more than a whimper of an illness.

Channel 4 news reported that only 6,200 people worldwide have died from swine flu. These were the figures reported by the World Heath Organisation. However these figures and extremely minimal when compared to those deaths expected to be seen from an annual flu epidemic.

The WHO have also reported that worldwide, Influenza kills about 250,000 to 500,000 people in an annual epidemic.

The Daily Mail reported that the Swine Flu pandemic has turned out to be less lethal than first feared. “About 1 percent of the population in England has had swine flu with symptoms, of which 0.026 percent died, the research added.”

Well that certainly puts things into perspective doesn’t it?

The H1N1 vaccine that was brought in to protect the world against this so called ‘monster disease’ on the other hand has proved to be yet ‘another vaccine disaster’ as adverse reactions from around the world rise at an alarming rate. Deaths and serious side affects have been reported worldwide including Guillain Barre Syndrome and Anaphylaxis.

One leaked document which turned out to be a swine flu vaccine insert, shows admissions of Guillain Barre Syndrome, Anaphylaxis, Death, and much more.

Profitable Harm Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine

This is extremely worrying as this proves beyond doubt that these adverse reactions were clearly known about before these vaccines were given to vulnerable groups of the general public. These include the chronically ill, babies, the elderly and pregnant women. This also makes the following adverse reactions from around the world even more tragic.

The China Daily reported that China mainland has seen 3,631 adverse reactions from the vaccine.

The Flu Case report that in Sweden 5 people are said to have died after the swine flu shot compared with only 3 that have died from the complications of the Swine flu itself.

The Daily Telegraph has reported that one person has died after the swine flu vaccine and 1300 have had adverse reactions.

Dr Mercola reports that deaths and serious side affects including GBS from around the world are now beginning to emerge.

The Canadian press are still reporting problems with the vaccine stating they now have had 24 cases of anaphylaxis after the swine flu vaccine and one reported death.

MSNBC reports that a teen now suffers from the rare illness Guillain Barre Syndrome after becomming ill just hours after after the shot.

The Mail on Sunday reported this week that because of adverse reactions the UK Government has recommended that children receiving the swine flu vaccine should now only be given half the original dose.

One paragraph from this article states

“Meanwhile, the medicines watchdog.the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency MHRA, reported four people had died after receiving the Pandemrix vaccine, although all had serious underlying health conditions and the deaths are not being linked to the jab.”

No disrespect here but of course the people who died after the vaccine had underlying illnesses, as these are the people that are currently being vaccinated.

As shown on the Government website

“Swine flu vaccinations have begun for people in high-risk groups, such as people with chronic conditions and pregnant women. You will be contacted by your GP if you are in a high-risk category. Vaccination of children under the age of five will begin once vaccination of these groups is complete.”

It seems to me that Governments target the most vulnerable first and then when they die they immediately blame the underlying cause as being the reason for their death. This is in my opinion to divert attention away from the vaccine in a deliberate attempt to mislead the public.

In the UK midwives are so concerned about this vaccine that they are refusing to vaccinate the pregnant women in their care despite warnings.

The Telegraph reports that Members of the online forum Mumsnet had said that their midwives had told them ‘not to touch the vaccine with a barge pole’.

On Mumsnet David Salisbury from the JCVI and the Department of Health had this to say:-

“DavidSalisbury: We do recommend that pregnant women with flu risk factors should be vaccinated every year and we know that seasonal flu vaccine is safe in pregnant women. With H1N1 swine flu virus it is clear that younger people are more likely to get the disease as opposed to seasonal flu that mostly affects older people. Some of those younger people are going to be pregnant.

The latest WHO advice shows that between 7% and 10% of all hospitalised patients are pregnant women in their second or third trimesters and pregnant women are up to 10 times more likely to need admission into intensive care than the general population.

vaccine_exemptions_328x169

The WHO data also shows that between 5% and 30% of the deaths are in pregnant women. This means it is really clear that pregnant women are at risk from H1N1 swine flu and it is circulating now.

We don’t test drugs or vaccines in pregnant women but we do test them on pregnant animals and this has been done with our swine flu vaccines. We also know that over 90 women became pregnant shortly after having the GSK vaccine and 50 of them have now completed their pregnancies and have normal babies. The others are still being followed up, which explains why it is so difficult to do clinical trials in pregnant women.”

So this means then if we take the worst case scenario from the figures of deaths reported by the WHO, then this actually represents 30% of 6200 people who have died from the Swine flu were pregnant, which with my mathematics is a figure of 1860 people worldwide.

Many pregnant women having had the vaccination are reporting that they have miscarried.

These are real cases taken from an article written on The Flu Case

“October 9, 2009 at 2:41 pm

(1) Jo says:

I got the flu vaccine (regular not H1N1) at 8 weeks pregnant. Three days later I miscarried. I am not going to get the H1N1.

October 26, 2009 at 11:07 am

(2) Regrets says:

I got both vaccines on Thursday. I was 9 weeks pregnant. I miscarried on Sunday. I was told by several doctors to get these vaccines. Now I wish I followed my gut feeling and not get them at ALL!

October 29, 2009 at 8:33 am

(3) says:

I work in a hospital like setting and was told ‘the benefits outweigh the risks” 1am I got the vaccine, 3am I started bleeding and cramping, 3pm miscarried. you decide

October 31, 2009 at 1:29 pm

(4) sue says:

I had the H1N1 vaccination and 24 hours later had a miscarriage.

October 31, 2009 at 8:25 pm

(5) Linda Hill says:

My daughter in law was 10 weeks pregnant and had the H1N1 vaccine on Friday that night she miscarried.

November 1, 2009 at 9:58 pm

(6) Stephanie says:

I received the H1N1 over a week ago. I am now 5 weeks. I am doing well so far.

November 2, 2009 at 10:52 pm

(7) SoSorry says:

I was so ready to get the H1N1 vaccine last week and they were only giving them to pregnant women. I was 6 weeks along and got it and the next day I started cramping and miscarried. I already had two healthy pregnancies and never miscarried or had any problems. My doctors think I am crazy to think it was the H1N1 but if no one looks into this than other women will not know. I am so sorry that I got it.

November 3, 2009 at 4:30 pm

(8) Connie says:

I also received the H1N1 vaccination on October 22nd, 2009 and went into labor on October 25th, at 16 weeks pregnant and we just heard the heartbeat and everything was fine with my pregnancy on October 16th, 2009, then on October 28th my water broke then on October 29th, I delivered a stillborn baby boy, and no one can tell me why…Everyone wants to say it did not come from the shot but I believe it did. My baby was growing at the correct pace and everyone wants to brush off the vaccination. I say if you have the vaccination and suffer a miscarriage if they are able to perform an autopsy have it done.

November 3, 2009 at 4:34 pm

(9) Connie says:

I also agree something needs to be done and looked more into with this vaccination because most women are being advised it’s just something that happens, but I also had two healthy children normal pregnancies and when I received this vaccination with my third pregnancy, my baby is gone. Contact me at connie.adams@rocketmail.com This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

November 4, 2009 at 10:12 pm

(10) sioux falls, south dakota says:

I received the H1N1 vaccine on October 16th and started experiencing cramping on the 22nd. I was nearly 17 weeks pregnant and gave birth to a stillborn baby boy on the 23rd. Like many of the other women here, the first thing I suspected was the H1N1 vaccine. I immediately asked a nurse at the hospital if that would have anything to do with it. Without hesitation, she told me “absolutely not.” I had reservations about getting the vaccine, but followed the advice of my long trusted family doctor. In a follow up appointment with my doctor 3 days after I lost my baby, I asked him if the vaccine would have had any adverse effects on my baby. He also said that it was not possible. I don’t believe that my doctor was necessarily lying to me, he was simply following the accepted practices and opinions of his field. I do, however, believe that as a nation, we are being lied to. This vaccine is NOT safe during pregnancy. There has not been enough testing done to determine this and there are far too many “coincidences” for this to be anything but a result of a vaccine that was hastily pushed into production and distribution in an effort to stop widespread panic. I have read so many stories in defense of the vaccine that will talk about how common miscarriages are, but I would challenge you to ask ANY health care professional how common second trimester miscarriages are. My baby was doing perfect developmentally and I had felt him move earlier that day. My heart goes out to all of you out there who have had to go through the same heartache and loss that I have had in the last couple of weeks. There is no reason that any woman or family should have to go through this. Get the word out to all of the pregnant women that you know. I know that if I had heard that women had been losing their babies shortly after they received the vaccine, I would have followed my gut and not gotten it myself. Maybe then Wyatt would have had a chance at life.

November 5, 2009 at 11:51 am

(11) sue field says:

If you read the novatis or baxter pkg insert available on the web you will find that 1. there is not sufficient testing on pregnant women so they dont know how safe it is….its not recommended for children under 2 is not a fetus a child under 2? there is no conclusion on safety with breastfeeding….. Md’s just want to scare the hell out of you for the 1% that can get very sick..If folks would just wash hands frequently, stay away from sick contacts as much as possible and take supplements and live a healthy way…you likely can avoid the flu altogether… SOOOOO Sorry for your losses….my heart breaks for you all

So are these horror stories made up? This is highly unlikely as clearly research over the years has proven it is unwise to vaccinate pregnant women.

In an article by Dr Blaylock he clearly points out the dangers of pregnant women having vaccines.

He states:-

“There is compelling research that shows that stimulating a pregnant animal during mid-term pregnancy dramatically increases the risk of the newborn having autistic or schizophrenic behaviour as it ages or reaches adulthood. The risk is increased in the order of 14-fold, which is tremendous.

We know that women who get the flu during pregnancy have a similar increase risk of their child developing autism or schizophrenia. At first, you may assume that the flu virus entering the baby’s brain would cause the effect, but careful research found that the virus does not enter the baby’s brain. Rather, it is immune cytokines from the mother’s immune reaction to the virus that causes the problem. Unlike the flu virus, the offending cytokine passes through the placenta and damages the developing brain of the baby. In essence, they found that anything that stimulated the mother’s immune system could raise the risk of autism and schizophrenia in the baby. To show that it is not the virus they stimulated the pregnant animals immune system with special chemicals alone and got the same effect.

Another set of studies found that stimulating the mother’s immune system during pregnancy not only increased the baby’s risk of having a seizure, but increased seizure risk even when the child became an adult. So we see that activating immunity, as with vaccination, can significantly raise the risk of your child having a seizure, even extending into adulthood.

Its is also known that stimulating the mother’s immune system during pregnancy can trigger preclampsia in the mother and hypertension in the baby, when the baby becomes an adult. The bottom line is vaccinating a pregnant women is vary hazardous to the mother’s health as well as the baby.

At this point you may ask but if a natural flu infection can cause this as well as vaccination, shouldn’t we protect pregnant women by vaccination? If the vaccine was effective you might make that conclusion, but there is no evidence the vaccine has any effectiveness. Pregnant women have a state of immune suppression and vaccines are notorious for not working in immune suppressed people.

Even more important is the fact that a woman’s risk of getting the flu and having the genetic risk factors for autism or schizophrenia is small overall, but if you vaccinate all pregnant women, as the CDC is calling for, you will have a large number of babies affected by autism, schizophrenia or seizures because they will all have had intense immune stimulation by the vaccine.”

Reports from all over the world are coming in about women who have miscarried shortly after they have had the swine flu vaccination. So it is a fact that these vaccinations are putting some pregnant mothers at risk. For years now we have been told not to take drugs when pregnant, not to drink when pregnant and not to smoke when pregnant but despite these warnings the drug companies promote vaccines for women who are pregnant.

To me this utter madness and totally irresponisble!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Parents Continue to Support Doctor Andrew Wakefield

Christina England, Top Stories

Parents Continue to Support Doctor Andrew Wakefield

No Comments 10 December 2009

posted on AutismTodayOnline.com

Tension mounts in the UK, as Dr Andrew Wakefield’s case, has continued behind the closed doors of the the General Medical Council, or as it is sometimes referred to,  the ‘lions den‘ for over three years.  Parents have raged, protesting openly outside the gates of this massive building and around the UK, parents await anxiously for the GMC decision.

On the first day of Dr Wakefield’s trial, parents gathered outside the GMC, holding placards, clapping and cheering and patting him on the back as he mounted the steps of the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Chants of “There’s only one Andrew Wakefield” and shouts of “It’s a witch hunt” echoed all around.

Martin Walker – Cry Shame  has continued throughout the trial, to report daily and while some parents in the UK feel that this trial is justified, others can only show sadness as they prepare for the loss of a great advocate.

The British Government pay little attention to the the parents who support this doctor or it seems the goings on in the GMC . It has been shown that even before a decision has been reached, they are so sure that Wakefield is guilty of professional misconduct, that they have been promoting the teaching that his findings were not based on scientific evidence and that the MMR is safe in British secondary schools. In fact any student who agreed that the MMR was safe and his research was bad science was awarded extra marks in their GCSE exams.

lGCSE pupils ‘brainwashed to support the MMR vaccine’ | Mail Online

Of course this maybe because the Government is aware that many of the doctors promoting the safety of the MMR vaccine are linked to major drug companies. Professor Michael Langman who sits on the JCVI , the committee that approves vaccines and their safety for the Government,is one such doctor. He has been proven to receive money for research from Merck and Dohme, both of whom manufactures the MMR vaccine. He and others were reported by Fionnuala Burke, icBirmingham – MMR docs’ links with drugs firms  Sunday Mercury to have links to various MMR vaccine manufacturers.

Read More Here…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine

Newsletter

Click to Join Our Newsletter! Carl Bruning Constitutional Larimer County Sheriff

Users Online

Featured Vaccine Book

Dr. Todd Elsner's Book

 

Today, according to the CDC’s recommended vaccination schedule, a child receives 36 shots containing a total of 126 vaccines from birth through six years of age. This is quadruple the number of vaccines a child received in the 1980’s. In 1983 a child received only 10 shots containing 30 vaccines.

Could this quadrupling of the schedule be responsible for the drastic increase in childhood disorders we are seeing today?

 

Get the information your pediatrician will never tell you!

Live Healthy

Award Winning Inspirational Documentary by Valya Boutenko
Best Selling Books and DVDs from the Raw Family

Ads

Silver Lungs

Optimize Your Health

Vibrant Living with Delicious Green Smoothies