Stealth viruses, like SV40, have contaminated vaccines in the past.

Would you like to know a definition of radically insane? How about you or your child being forced to participate in experimental vaccine trials?

Somehow right off the bat the idea of forced participation in experimental vaccine trials reminds me of the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment the U.S. government undertook that was profoundly and morally wrong.

“For 40 years, the U.S. Public Health Service has conducted a study in which human guinea pigs, not given proper treatment, have died of syphilis and its side effects,” Associated Press reporter Jean Heller wrote on July 25, 1972. “The study was conducted to determine from autopsies what the disease does to the human body.”  http://www.npr.org/programs/morning/features/2002/jul/tuskegee/

According to a paper published by the American Medical Association’s Virtual Mentor, current enrollment in vaccine trials is extremely low. There is now talk of creating a federal law to force individuals to ‘opt-out’ of vaccine trials for the greater good of society. Read the paper here: http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2012/01/pfor1-1201.html

Authors Susanne Sheehy and Joel Meyer float the idea of creating a system where a law forces an individual to make a “mandated choice” to participate in vaccine trials. This suggested policy not only is dangerously naïve but downright unconstitutional and ought to be regarded as such by every entity whether medical, legal, or taxpayer.

In reality, what is being proposed is complete medical tyranny.  Here’s why…

Mandatory Participation Creates a Customer List for Big Pharma

It sounds harmless. Hey, they even suggested we have a ‘mandated choice’, right? In order to see the bigger picture, we need to take this logic a few steps further.

For example, everyone would be required to enroll into a database. This is the case now even if you exempt your child from vaccines! Yes! You’re still in a database.  What about HIPAA violations and privacy rules?  Don’t they apply?

The ‘volunteer’ information would have to be shared with the Pharmaceutical Companies, which is the full intent, so as to gather trial and field test data Big Pharma can document before introducing a new product to FDA for approval. Of course, Pharma could call upon those who would want to volunteer.

What if they couldn’t get the numbers they needed – then what?

My prediction is they’d either force citizens to participate, or use a helpless population that could be gathered from any segment of society they designate.  The Willowbrook Institution ‘studies’ in New York is an example of ‘how they do things’.

Just in case you’re not familiar with the travesty at Willowbrook, Dr. Saul Krugman fed feces to children in order to test the effectiveness of the Hepatitis B vaccine they were researching to produce.  Read more about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willowbrook_State_School

Truly, can it get any more sinister? I think it can.

Here’s even more proof.

Vaccine Manufacturers Are Protected From Lawsuits if Your Child is Harmed

Please remember this point: If your child is given a vaccine and harmed, vaccine manufacturers are not responsible financially or morally.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act passed in 1986 shields vaccine manufacturers from any liability. If vaccines are 99.99% safe, as medical professionals tell us, having such a law doesn’t make much sense.

That law is a travesty of justice and should be rescinded by Congress who put it into place at the apparent behest of Big Pharma and its thousands of lobbyists with deep pockets informing members of Congress how to go about establishing Big Pharma’s corporate governance.

Nevertheless, the next logical question to answer would be, “What happens if your child is harmed?”

I speak from personal experience—my son is vaccine damaged—when I say there is little help waiting for you. Parents of vaccine-injured children are discovering the next-to-impossible task of being compensated by the government vaccine court.

Parents also ought to be aware pharmaceutical companies treat children with callous disregard, especially in vaccine trials. A recent article written by Christina England spells out how pharmaceutical researchers skew adverse reactions to vaccines to make it look like the vaccine is safe, when it is not. Read how premature babies had vaccines tested on them here: http://vactruth.com/2012/01/23/babies-used-as-lab-rats/

But what if vaccine injuries take other forms, like causing cancer?

We should also be mindful of the long-term effects, too, especially recombinant DNA.

Even if viruses causing cancer, among other things, subsequently are discovered in the vaccine—as was the case with the polio vaccine of the 1950s and ‘60s—past experience shows government will keep the vaccines on the shelves. They don’t want to risk eroding confidence in any aspect of the vaccine program.

Their job is to protect Big Pharma’s apparent policy over the health of your child. If you think you or your child will be compensated, expect years of dealing with government bureaucracy and probable rejection, as thousands of families experience to date.

Summary

Parents are told pharmaceutical companies exist for the ‘Greater Good’ of society. Yet, a quick check on the Department of Justice website shows that major Pharma corporations have been convicted of serious criminal offenses with only ‘slaps on the wrists’—monetary fines, unless there have been class action law suits filed in which harmed individuals sometimes receive compensation for pain and suffering.

Give me a break!

Any time a law has to be created mandating participation, you can bet there’s BIG money involved! As I mentioned above, such a law would give Big Pharma a guaranteed customer list plus immunity from injuring the ‘volunteers’. Can pharmaceutical companies get a much sweeter deal? I don’t think so; how about you?

The suggestion of mandating participation in medical trials has no place in a free society. It ought to go where it rightly belongs – in the trash along with their vaccines.

References:

1. Should Participation in Vaccine Clinical Trials be Mandated? http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2012/01/pdf/pfor1-1201.pdf
2. http://www.npr.org/programs/morning/features/2002/jul/tuskegee/
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Childhood_Vaccine_Injury_Act
4. http://vactruth.com/2012/01/23/babies-used-as-lab-rats/
5. http://vactruth.com/2011/12/30/3-filthy-truths-about-vaccines-cancer/

Photo Credit: Kanijoman

Jeffry John Aufderheide

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

  

Merck pays big money to doctors for speaking about their products.

Sometimes gems are difficult to come by. However, when we find them, just clean them up a bit and we can appreciate their ‘real value’.  The little treasure I discovered was a document located on Merck Pharmaceutical’s website. It disclosed how much Merck paid doctors as speaking fees in the third and fourth quarter of 2009 alone.

The 72-page document is titled, “Merck & Co., Inc., Disclosure of Payments to U.S. Speakers for Promotional (non-CME) Medical Education Activities conducted in 3Q and 4Q 2009.” And, according to my calculations the sum was a hefty $18,810,495.52. [1]

Keep in mind that, that amount is just for speaking fees!

You may be wondering why this information was made available.

Merck said it was because of transparency. According to one article, “[Merck] has started disclosing payments to U.S.-based medical and scientific professionals who speak on behalf of our company or our products.” [2]

It’s a good start, but apparently the reports were going to be available annually thereafter (July 1, 2009). Well, where are they?  It is now 2012.

Document Shows Heavy Vaccine Promotion

Have you ever wondered why some doctors may be so rabidly in favor of promoting vaccines?  Or, haven’t you considered that aspect?  Well, here’s the answer:  Pharmaceutical companies pay doctors to talk about the ‘problem.’

Not only is it subtle, it’s legal and has financial rewards.

For example, Merck was pushing two new vaccines: Gardasil and Rotateq. After filtering the results in the PDF file for the terms, “HPV, Vaccine, and Rotavirus” the total amount paid came to $2,313,942.81.

Let’s do something mathematically radical. Since Merck reported numbers for only half the year, I’m going double the amount they paid to see what a year’s worth could possibly be.

This would mean Merck spent roughly $4,627,885.62 to encourage doctors to promote their solutions/products, which definitely include vaccines. After reading this, aren’t you sick to your stomach thinking about the ‘Ask Your Doctor’ commercials? I know I am.

But what does this all mean?

‘Rotten to the Core’

Think about this, parents. Who do you trust for reliable information? Maybe a better question would be, “Can you trust pharmaceutical companies?”

Outside of the money being doled out to doctors, consider other ways Big Pharma uses its money.  Here are some other examples:

• Julie Gerberding, former head of the Centers for Disease Control, paved the way for eventual approval for Merck’s Gardasil vaccine, guaranteeing billions in profits for her future employer. After her tenure at the CDC, she became President of the Vaccine Division at Merck Pharmaceuticals.  [3]
• Dr. Paul Offit [4] is often seen in the media promoting vaccines as being safe. As a matter of fact, he states children can safely get up to 10,000 of them. [5][6] What isn’t often discussed is the royalties he made from vaccine sales.
• Dr. Andrew Wakefield identified the measles virus from the MMR vaccine in the intestines of autistic children. For his reward, this heroic doctor was stricken from the medical registry. Furthermore, his professional reputation was targeted to be destroyed. One website details how Merck deals with doctors who threaten vaccine profits. They say, “Court evidence now available on-line at the University of California library shows drug giant Merck systematically targetted [sic] “hit-lists” of doctors to discredit, neutralise or destroy critics of the safety and effectiveness of Merck’s drugs… One memo stated: ’we may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live….’” [7]

Summary

Parents want healthy children and straight answers from their pediatricians, the CDC and FDA. Do you think your doctor really believes what he or she is telling you, regarding vaccines? Or, were they paid to believe it? As it stands now, most doctors will deny vaccines have any contributory role in autism or can cause harm.

At the very least, this little document shines sunlight on what many parents of vaccine injured children have been saying all the while: Maybe it’s the cost of keeping the herd quiet.

“Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. . . .” -Bertrand Russell,1953

Sources:

[1] Merck & Co., Inc., Disclosure of Payments to U.S. Speakers for Promotional (non-CME) Medical Education Activities conducted in 3Q and 4Q 2009. http://www.merck.com/corporate-responsibility/docs/business-ethics-transparency/3Q09-Transparency-Report.pdf (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[2] Merck Statement on U.S. Speaker Fees.  http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/merck-statement-u-s-speaker-fees (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[3] Julie Gerberding. http://vactruth.com/2010/01/04/julie-gerberding-primed-big-pharmas-pump-with-flu-and-hpv-vaccines/

[4] Paul Offit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Offit (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[5]Paul Offit says children can get 10,000 vaccines. http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/05/paul-offits-10000-vaccines-and-the-milgram-experiment.html (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[6] http://www.whale.to/vaccines/offit23.html (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[7] Memo from Merck discussing how to destroy doctors. http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/merckdestroydoccritics/ (Accessed 01/07/2012)

Photo Credit: Kevin Dooley

Jeffry John Aufderheide

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

  

Vaccines have not been tested for causing cancer.

Parents, if biological material was used to create a vaccine and it caused cancer when injected into hamsters, would you want that vaccine injected into your child?

Of course not!

But, that is exactly what happened to over 98 million Americans – and likely many more! Let me explain.

In the 1950s the poliovirus was cultured on monkey kidney cells to produce polio and adenovirus vaccines. A cancer-causing virus called SV40 was discovered, however, that fact was covered up and silenced.

That is important because, to my knowledge, that congressional information hasn’t been made available to the general public until now. I’m making available some snippets of the cover-up and its relevance to you, especially if you received a polio vaccine during the 1950s and ‘60s. Before that information is revealed, you must know…

Filthy Truth #1 – Vaccines are NOT Tested for Cancer-Causing Capabilities

Parents want peace of mind. They want to know their children are safe, and they want to trust their doctors. But, more parents are doing the opposite. Why?

I suspect that many parents are getting savvy to the potential inherent problems in vaccines. They’re educating themselves more on vaccine adverse reactions. Most parents know a child or have a friend with a child on the autistic spectrum. Here’s a relevant example.

We’ve all gone grocery shopping.

You know if you look at the product label, you get a general idea of what is contained in the product. That is how you find most of the nasty ingredients in processed foods. Vaccines are not quite the same, plus there’s a deceptive catch.

By law, doctors only have to give parents the vaccine information sheets. Parents, you want to request, read, and keep the vaccine product inserts! You can find them located here: http://vactruth.com/vaccine-inserts/

Do a search for the term “carcinogenesis,” literally ‘cancer creation’, on the product insert for any vaccine. You’ll see the following common phrase regarding most vaccines, “This vaccine has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility.” (Emphasis mine)

Personally, this should be the legal loophole at law for parents exempting their children from vaccinations. If a product manufacturer cannot guarantee that a product won’t make a person infertile, cause cancer or malformations, then parents have every right to protect themselves and their children from such life-long risks.

Can you imagine the horrified look on parents’ faces when they discover vaccines haven’t been tested for cancer causing capabilities? Maybe parents would ask more demanding questions and require better explanations from their pediatricians.

Filthy Truth #2 – Cancer Virus Contaminates Vaccine

Vaccines were never as safe as moms and dads were—or are—led to believe!

Here’s why.

In order to make the vaccine in the 1950s, the poliovirus was cultured on monkey kidney cells. Researchers discovered the cells were contaminated with a virus called SV40.

Contamination of vaccines became so well known in scientific circles, ‘radical vaccine enthusiast’ and vaccine patent holder Dr. Paul Offit reluctantly admits,

“The polio vaccine used in the late 1950s and early 1960s was contaminated with a monkey virus called simian virus 40 (SV40) present in monkey kidney cells used to grow the vaccine. Recently, investigators found SV40 DNA in biopsy specimens obtained from patients with cancers such as mesothelioma (lung), osteosarcoma (bone) and non-Hodgkins lymphoma (lymph nodes)… Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis that SV40 virus contained in polio vaccines administered before 1963 cause cancers. In addition, available evidence suggests that SV40 virus is likely be transmitted to people by a mechanism other than vaccines.” http://www.chop.edu/service/vaccine-education-center/hot-topics/sv40.html

Dr. Offit also forgot to mention SV40 infections also are found in the brain of autistic children. Hmmmm. Read about it here: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/13550281003685839

There is very good reason for people like Dr. Paul Offit to downplay the contamination of vaccines.

Bernice Eddy, who at the time was a scientist at the Division of Biologics Standards (DBS), discovered a major problem. Page 500 of the Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session. April 20, 21; and May 3, 4, 1972, states,

“The next and only serious vaccine crisis that has occurred since the polio episode was the realization in mid-1961 that a monkey virus later shown to cause tumors in hamsters was contaminating both polio and adenovirus vaccines. The virus, known as SV40, was entering the vaccines and, just as in the polio case was surviving the formalin [form of formaldehyde] treatment.

There were several states by which the full extent of the SV40 problem became known. First was the discovery in 1959-1960 by a DBS [Division of Biologics Standards] scientist, once again Bernice Eddy, that an unknown agent in the monkey kidney cells used to produce polio and adenovirus vaccines would cause tumors when the cells were injected into hamsters.” (Emphasis mine)

How does the above information play with your—or anyone’s—sense of integrity? What about trusting federal health agencies, their research, and data? What will be revealed next is shocking.

Filthy Truth #3 – Contamination is Hidden from Parents

In my opinion what happened next is borderline criminal: The information was suppressed.

Rather than admitting to the problem and taking measures to correct it, those in high places of science and trust allowed contaminated vaccines to be injected into millions of unwitting and helpless women and children.

Page 502 of the same congressional document states,

“In 1954 Eddy, as a polio control officer, found live virus in supposedly killed polio vaccine; in 1955 she was relieved of her duties as polio control officer…After her discoveries concerning the SV40 virus, her staff and animal space were reduced and she was demoted from head of a section to head of a unit.”

Page 505,

“…even when the contaminating virus was found to be oncogenic [cancer causing] in hamsters, the DBS [Division of Biologics Standards] and its expert advisory committee decided to leave existing stocks on the market rather than risk eroding public confidence by a recall.” (Emphasis mine)

And…

“There has been a tendency on the part of certain higher government circles to play down any open discussion of problems associated with vaccines…”

Government officials knew parents definitely would reconsider injecting biological agents, especially vaccines, into their children so they perpetrated a BIG lie that became buried in the annals of vaccine history, which they probably thought they could hide forever. Unfortunately, the SV40 cover-up may not be the only ‘sleeping dog’ story in vaccinology. There just may be some interesting factual stories regarding how some influenza strains either came into being or became so potent.

Summary

I think parents want one thing: Assurance of scientific information to have peace of mind. They want to know their children are safe—and they want to trust their doctors, especially pediatricians. But, more parents are doing the opposite. Why? I suspect many parents not only are getting savvy to the potential problems with vaccines, but also know of serious health problems from children of neighbors and friends who suffer adverse vaccine reactions, which scares them.

Parents definitely ought to look at vaccines with a skeptical eye. They must read and keep the vaccine product inserts. If you’re not comfortable getting your child vaccinated, exempt your child. You have every legal right to do that.

Given the unethical happenings surrounding some of the above information, I suspect that it just may be the tip of the iceberg when it comes to all vaccines and carcinogenicity.

*Note: The information in this article is posted as a Public Service by Vactruth.com and taken from U.S. Printing Office Washington, DC 20402–0001  

Source:

Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session. Page 499-505. April 20,21; and May 3,4, 1972.

Photo Credit: GE Healthcare

Jeffry John Aufderheide

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

  

Congress often passes laws benefiting corporations.

Just imagine this: Health officials coming to your house and force-vaccinating your children.

It seems a bit outrageous initially. But, put into context, that is small potatoes compared with the U.S. Congress recently passing the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

I’ll show you later on in this article how public health and school officials will probably make up the bulk of these ‘Task Forces’. If you want to know more and what you can do about it, please read on.

California = A TEST

Before I explain the law, you should have an example, I think.

You may recall recently that school officials in Natomas, California, were going door-to-door searching for unvaccinated children. http://www.news10.net/news/local/article/156068/2/Natomas-school-officials-go-door-to-door-to-find-unvaccinated-students

School officials attempted to vaccinate children (mostly home-schooled children) with a whooping cough vaccine.  Parents were infuriated and used some salty language when slamming doors in officials’ faces.

During a recent newscast, Heyman Matlock, a public education servant, is seen attempting to intimidate a mother by stating, “Okay, we are coming today to give her, her TDaP if she hasn’t had it done yet.”

However, there’s a dirty little secret involved. That secret is, who is funding the Natomas operation.  It is likely buried in over 2000 pages of congressional red tape. Parents who don’t vaccinate their child(ren) can expect similar goons knocking at their doors.

Let me explain.

Congress Authorizes ‘Vaccine Squads’

On Christmas Eve, 2009, the U.S. Senate passed H.R. 3590. The bill eventually became Public Law No. 111-148, which gives the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) authorization to create “vaccination squads” in local communities and seek out unvaccinated children. The ‘vaccine squads’ are called the “Community Preventive Services Task Force.”

Not only will the Task Force be working with the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, as Cindy Loveland notes in an article, but on page 1202 of that law, the most relevant responsibilities are listed as:

“(D) carrying out immunization-promoting strategies for participants or clients of public programs, including assessments of immunization status, referrals to health care providers, education, provision [provide] of on-site immunizations, or incentives for immunization;

“(E) providing for home visits that promote immunization through education, assessments of need, referrals, provision of immunizations, or other services;”

“(F) providing reminders or recalls for immunization providers;”

“(G) conducting assessments of, and providing feedback to, immunization providers;”

“(H) any combination of one or more interventions described in this paragraph; or”

“(I) immunization information systems to allow all States to have electronic databases for immunization records.”

These aggressive measures are the fruits of pharmaceutical industry’s lobbying and influence. I can only imagine police or sheriffs escorting the vaccine squad(s) for “non-compliant” parents. This should be of great concern to parents.  To understand how such things become a reality, you have to understand that ‘money talks’.

Just check out how much Big Pharma contributes to Congressional members campaign coffers.

But, the bigger question that I have is, “Who is in charge?”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Says, “It’s good to be king!”

The most troubling aspect of Public Law No. 111-148 is it puts the director of the Centers for Disease Control in the driver’s seat for creating the Task Force.

Page 1126 admits,

“SEC. 399U. COMMUNITY PREVENTIVE SERVICES TASK FORCE.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE.—The Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shall convene an independent Community Preventive Services Task Force (referred to in this subsection as the ‘Task Force’) to be composed of individuals with appropriate expertise.”

Why should this be of concern?  The concern is that pharmaceutical companies ‘own’ public health officials, almost literally.

A blatant example is explained by health expert Robert Scott Bell writing about former head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, “The most recent in a long list of government bureaucrats to leave the public dole and take up the high-paying cause of Big Pharma is none other than former head of the CDC Julie Gerberding. One year and one day from the date of departure from the Taxpayer payroll, Ms. Gerberding takes the reins as president of the vaccine division of the principle descendant of I.G. Farben: Merck Pharmaceuticals.”

FACT: Pharmaceutical Companies Have Significant Influence Over Public Health Officials.

SMASH Fear – Positive Steps You Can Take Right Now To Make a Difference!

1. Learn how much money pharmaceutical companies spend on influencing congressional representatives.
2. Understand that corporations are considered a ‘person’. See how much money the pharmaceutical companies have paid in criminal charges. Do a search for the key terms “Criminal [company name]”.
3. Research your state’s vaccine exemption laws and know your rights. Even though you will be pressured, it’s okay to say ‘NO!’
4. Know how to keep yourself healthy by reading articles on Mercola.com and NaturalNews.com.
5. Listen to powerful and hard-hitting Internet radio programs like the Robert Scott Bell Show and InfoWars.
6. Educate yourself about the toxic chemicals and dangerous biological agents pharmaceutical companies want to inject into your children.

Summary

Vaccines are not making children healthier!  Demographics say otherwise with children who are vaccinated contracting the very same disease(s) for which they supposedly have been ‘immunized’. Parents should realize there is a choice. Parents and legal guardians have the power—and legal right—to say “NO!” to those who want to inject their children with dangerous biological and neurotoxic agents.

With the growing population of informed parents, it’s obvious pharmaceutical companies are running scared and doing whatever it takes to vaccinate children.  How do you feel about that?  Are they YOUR children, or are they the states and Big Pharmas?  That really is the issue here and at law, I think.

Maybe there ought to be a law mandating all Congresspersons get every vaccination a child receives up to 18 years of age on the very first day of his or her congressional term to prove they are efficacious. What do you think?

Sources:

http://www.news10.net/news/local/article/156068/2/Natomas-school-officials-go-door-to-door-to-find-unvaccinated-students

http://vactruth.com/2009/12/19/health-care-bill-creates-peek-a-boo-squads-to-enforce-in-home-vaccinations/

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf

http://vactruth.com/2010/01/04/julie-gerberding-primed-big-pharmas-pump-with-flu-and-hpv-vaccines/

Photo Credit: Kyle Rush

Jeffry John Aufderheide

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

  

Parents are recognizing injecting biological agents into babies is dangerous.

Contributions by Patricia Jordan, DVM, Catherine J Frompovich, and Jeffry John Aufderheide.

Parents are seeing the vast amounts of children being injured by vaccines. Below are 8 stories indicating parents are waking up and getting savvy to the damage vaccines are causing to children.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anti-vaccine movement grows in many states
The News Tribune
Link: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2011/11/30/1926232/anti-vaccine-movement-grows-in.html
Summary: A rising number of parents in more than half of states are opting out of school shots for their kids. And in eight states, more than 1 in 20 public school kindergartners do not get all the vaccines required for attendance, an Associated Press analysis found.
 
 
Many Parents Request Delays in Vaccine Schedule
Fox News.com
Link: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/11/29/many-parents-request-delays-in-vaccine-schedule/
Summary: More than three quarters of pediatricians said they sometimes or often get asked by parents to use an “alternative” vaccination schedule that strays from national recommendations, according to a new survey of doctors.
 
 
Colorado parents rank second in nation for vaccine refusals
DenverPost.com
Link: http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_19429560
Summary: A new survey puts Colorado second-highest in the nation for parents refusing vaccines for their school-age kids, part of an anti-shot trend that increasingly troubles state health officials.
 
 
Vaccines for kids shirked in eight states (PICTURES)
CBS News
Link: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57331905-10391704/vaccines-for-kids-shirked…
Summary: Have parents given the cold shoulder to immunizations for their kids? In eight states, more than 1 in 20 public school kindergartners fail to get all the vaccines required for attendance, according to a new Associated Press analysis. That apparent trend has health officials worried about outbreaks of diseases that once were all but eliminated.
 
 
Many parents request delays in vaccine schedule
The Baltimore Sun
Link: http://www.baltimoresun.com/health/sns-rt-us-many-parents-request-delays…
Summary: More than three quarters of pediatricians said they sometimes or often get asked by parents to use an “alternative” vaccination schedule that strays from national recommendations, according to a new survey of Washington State doctors.
 
 
More Parents Are Opting Out of Vaccines
The Atlantic Wire
Link: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/11/more-parents-are-opting-out-vaccines/45423/
Summary: A study of exemption rates by the Associated Press finds that more and more parents are skipping required vaccines for their children, often out of fear that shots do more harm than good. More than half of all states have seen an increase in the number of exemptions and in eight states, mostly in the Northwest and Midwest, the percentage of kids not getting the full recommendation of shots is over 5 percent.
 
 
More Children Skipping Vaccines In Some States
Pharmalot
Link: http://www.pharmalot.com/2011/11/more-children-skipping-vaccines-in-some-states/
Summary: To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? That is a question that continues to concern parents nationwide. And a new analysis found that, in eight US states, more than 1 in 20 public school kindergartners are not receiving all the vaccines required for school attendance. And in more than half of all states, there has also been a slight increase in the rate of exemptions over the past five years.
 
 
Doctors in a Bind When Parents Want to Delay, Skip Vaccines
Health.com
Link: http://news.health.com/2011/11/28/doctors-in-a-bind-when-parents-want-to-delay-skip-vaccines/
Summary: Mistrust of childhood vaccines is causing some parents to request “alternative” schedules from doctors, either delaying or skipping some shots.

 
 
Photo Credit: The Jordan

Jeffry John Aufderheide

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

  

Monkeys are used in cruel vaccine experiments.

When I discovered vaccine makers were putting spermicidal chemicals and neurotoxic mercury in the H1N1 vaccine several years ago back during the 2009 ‘pandemic’, I had one nagging question: “Are children tested to see if vaccines cause neurological injury and how is that done?” If you want the answer, read on.

It turned out there weren’t any tests on children.

I know that for certain because I had a face-to-face interview with the doctor performing the vaccine trial. He was quite evasive when answering questions specific to vaccine safety. Why? Because…

Vaccines DO Cause Neurological Injury

Please remember this point: vaccines cause neurological injury. For example, in one case report, a child experienced cranial nerve palsy after the MMR vaccine. The investigators stated, “MMR viruses are neurotropic [a virus that infects nerve cells]. Therefore, although the vaccine is obtained by live attenuated viruses, vaccination may produce neurological disorders.” http://www.ijponline.net/content/36/1/59

What about the 4,000 injuries caused by the swine flu vaccines in 1976? The cost of those injuries, according to some reports, amounted to over 3.5 BILLION U.S. dollars. http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x9mh9f

Can you understand now why many vaccine injuries are swept under the carpet? It’s expensive to admit a mistake! Shortly in this article I will reveal the “Gold Standard” for testing neurological diseases caused by live virus vaccines.

Ignoring Death and Harm Caused By Vaccines

What you will discover below is that tests are performed by injecting live viral vaccines into monkeys to determine if they those vaccines cause neurological disease. If a monkey dies within 48 hours of injection, the death is attributed to a “non-specific cause” and can be replaced (see below). What? Hold the phone.

It seems rather incredulous to believe that research scientists ignore death—even in a research study animal—after an animal is injected with a biological agent. But that is exactly the gold standard for testing live virus vaccines.

What is the source for that information? None other than a standard for pharmaceutical drugs, the European Pharmacopeia, 5th Edition.

Under the title of Methods of Analysis, 2.6.18 – Test for neurovirulence of live virus vaccines, you will find the following information:

• “For each monkey, inject not more than 0.5 ml of the material to be examined into the thalamic region of each [brain] hemisphere, unless otherwise prescribed”
•  “The total amount of virus inoculated in each monkey must be not less than the amount contained in the recommended single human dose of the vaccine.”
•  “Observe the inoculated monkeys for 17 to 21 days for symptoms of paralysis and other evidence of neurological involvement; observe the control monkeys for the same period plus 10 days.”
•  “Animals that die within 48 h[ours] of injection are considered to have died from non-specific causes and may be replaced. The test is not valid if: more than 20 per cent of the inoculated monkeys die from nonspecific causes;”
•  “Serum samples taken from the control monkeys at the time of inoculation of the test animals and 10 days after the latter are killed show evidence of infection by wild virus of the type to be tested or by measles virus.”
•  “At the end of the observation period, carry out autopsy and histopathological examinations of appropriate areas of the brain for evidence of central nervous system involvement.”
•  “The material complies with the test if there is no unexpected clinical or histopathological evidence of involvement of the central nervous system attributable to the inoculated virus.” [Emphasis added]

Source: Methods of Analysis
2.6.18 – Test for neurovirulence of live virus vaccines
EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 5th Edition

2.6.18. TEST FOR NEUROVIRULENCE OF LIVE VIRUS VACCINES
01/2005:20619

How does this sit with you? Here’s the shocking reality…

Your Children In Essence Are Being Experimented On

As a parent, you could simply walk away at this point and ignore this information. But shouldn’t parents, MDs, nurses, health agencies, school districts, and the media be asking some questions?

For example, the second bullet states, “the total amount of virus inoculated in each monkey must be not less than the amount contained in the recommended single human dose of the vaccine.”

Let’s pause right here for just a moment.

Usually vaccines are not administered as a single valent vaccine, but in multiple combination doses, e.g., 3 infectious diseases in one vaccine, i.e., the MMR or DTaP.

When vaccines are tested, they are tested individually, never in combination, as is the common vaccinating practice recommended by pharmaceutical companies. In reality, infants are given much more than single doses of live viral vaccines. They are known as trivalent vaccines. Then trivalent vaccines can be combined with others.

• Three doses of live viruses in the Measles, Mumps and Rubella vaccine
• One dose of Hepatitis B vaccine
• One dose of Rotavirus vaccine
• One dose of Chickenpox vaccine
• One dose of Influenza vaccine

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) often recommends that children receive several live virus vaccines at the same time. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/downloads/child/0-6yrs-schedule-pr.pdf

How many pediatricians or health professionals are willing to give blood tests or do a full neurological examination before and after vaccination? The simple truth is they don’t. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ1Tqx1YpYY

Just imagine the implications of simply testing children prior to vaccinating. That would be a screening process that would look for mitochondrial proclivities that could be impacted by vaccines, something the Hannah Poling vaccine-damage case that was settled by the vaccine court points to. Hannah’s unfortunate vaccine damage could be a learning curve for the medical profession about injecting children with multiple vaccines at one time/visit. Perhaps, like with the monkeys, they want to disregard that information.

Summary

Consistently MDs and the media tell parents that vaccines are harmless. Furthermore, the spin is that the chance for an adverse reaction is slim to none. How do doctors really know when ‘dead monkeys aren’t allowed to talk’? It’s pretty clear from research that vaccines cause neurological injury.

Some mistakes of believing the medical profession in my experience have taught me to start asking hard questions. I’m the parent of a vaccine-damaged child. Parents need to know this hidden and suppressed information BEFORE they permit anyone to vaccinate their child. Let me ask you, “From what you read, is this ‘safe’ science”?

Please pass this along to a friend and start waking people up!

Sources:

Methods of Analysis  2.6.18 – Test for neurovirulence of live virus vaccines. EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA, 5th Edition.

http://vactruth.com/2009/09/11/ingredients-found-in-spermicides-cleaners-and-cosmetics-along-with-thimerosal-and-squalene-present-in-experimental-h1n1-vaccine/

http://www.ijponline.net/content/36/1/59

http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x9mh9f

http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM093833

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/downloads/child/0-6yrs-schedule-pr.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ1Tqx1YpYY

Photo Credit: Night Owl

Jeffry John Aufderheide

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

  

US Serviceman Sprayed With Pesticides

A United States military handbook published in 1946 shows chemical compounds used in formulating the pesticide DDT are currently injected into babies.

The handbook entitled, “DDT and Other Insecticides and Repellents”, reveals Triton X-100, Tween 20, and Tween 80 were used as major components of spraying operations of DDT. Their stated purpose was to prevent separation of ingredients and increase absorption of DDT.

A major twist to the story is revealing the company owning the patent for DDT. More on that later.

Page 70 of the document states, “The studies of emulsifers have been confined primarily to their effects on the skin, since there is no hazard from ingestion and little from skin absorption and inhalation. They have also been studied to some extent from the standpoint of their relationship to increased absorption of DDT. All of those studied present little or no hazard under the conditions of use recommended, and have been approved for that purpose so far as the toxicology is concerned.” [emphasis mine]

Scientific studies on Triton X-100 and Tween 80 actually prove the statement above to be untrue, which would likely explain why studies were limited to only the effects on the skin.

Triton X-100 and Tween 80 actually cause cell suicide, called apoptosis.

Mixtures were sprayed directly onto vegetables and crops during the height of the polio epidemic in the late 1940s and early 1950s.

“What vaccines are these chemicals in?”

As a concerned parent, you may be wondering what vaccines contain these chemicals. The Centers for Disease Control website shows the chemicals mentioned above are in the following vaccines:

Tween 20 (Polysorbate 20) 

• Hepatitis A (Havrix)
• Hepatitis A-B (Twinrix)

Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) 

• DtaP (Infanrix, Tripedia)
• DtaP-HebB-IPV (Pediarix)
• DtaP-Hib (TriHIBit)
• Human Papillomavirus (Gardasil)
• Influenza (Fluarix)
• Rotavirus (RotaTeq)
• Tdap (Adacel, Boostrix)

Triton X-100

• Influenza (Fluarix, Fluzone) 

If you decide to bring this list to your doctor to educate him/her, prepare to be disappointed. Medical professionals are trained to ignore mothers concerned about vaccines. They parrot the following phrase:  “The poison is in the dose.”

In their arrogance, their response will go something like this, “It is just ridiculous to worry about such a tiny dose of something so innocuous.”

If you want to read how most medical personnel are putting your baby in jeopardy, read on.

“What can these chemicals do to my child?”

What can these chemicals do to your child? A parent would think finding information on the safety record of Triton X-100, Tween 20, and Tween 80 would be easily available – but this isn’t the case.

What I discovered was shocking.

Tween 80 and Triton X-100 can:

• Be used in pharmaceuticals to deliver nano-particles to the brain because they cross or disrupt the Blood Brain Barrier – which protects the brain.
• Suppress the immune system
• Promote epileptic seizures in rats
• Accelerate the development of female organs in rats
• Trigger cell death or ‘suicide’ called apoptosis
• Cause cancer in rats at the injection site
• Damage and promote intestinal damage in rats
• Cause bleeding disorders, kidney failure, liver failure, and death in infants who received a vitamin E product combined with Tween 80
• Possibly promote viral or bacterial infections
• Break down Red Blood Cells
• Cause damage to the heart when injected into rats

Read about them here: http://vactruth.com/2011/08/23/vaccine-ingredients-non-ionic-surfactants-tween-80-triton-x-100-nonoxynol-9/

To minimize the above information, you may hear arguments about the chemicals being safe because they are in hand soaps, ice cream, and in our lungs (natural surfactant).

For the record, I’ve never seen a mother feeding or injecting a newborn with soap or ice cream. My word of advice to mothers is follow your intuition and ask a lot of questions.

“Do pharmaceutical companies really care about my child?”

After many parents read vaccine ingredients, they may ask, “Pharmaceutical companies really care about my child’s health, don’t they?”

Pharmaceutical companies have yet to explain how injecting such toxic substances into a baby actually makes them healthier. You’ll see how they have known about this information for some time.

Consider page 71 of the handbook cautioning, “It should be clearly kept in mind that most of the substances under consideration are poisonous. If they were not, they would probably be useless against the insects for which they are recommended. Therefore, the recommendations for the proper use of these substances should be followed. Careless, unnecessary exposure and misuse is [sic] fraught with hazard.”

Here is the twist I promised.

Using the chemicals in vaccines is easily understood by looking at who owns the patent for DDT.

On page 3 of the handbook it states, “The Geigy company holds the patents on the use of the compound [DDT] as an insecticide. The United States patent is No. 2,329,074, issued September 7, 1943, to Paul Müller.” [emphasis mine]

Geigy company is now known as Novartis Pharmaceuticals, a vaccine manufacturer.

What does it all mean?

In a nutshell, the same companies who formulated and patented DDT, are putting the same industrial chemicals in childhood vaccines. To add insult to injury, their public relations campaigns brainwash doctors and the scientific community into believing that injecting babies, even in small amounts with these chemicals, is somehow okay. Even more bizarre are claims chemicals such as Triton X-100 or Tween 80 are involved in promoting health!

Mothers should carefully read the vaccine inserts and investigate vaccines before allowing physicians to inject their children with toxic chemicals that could permanently injure their children for life.

 ***

We are publishing this information to educate Congress, the media, and public regarding issues affecting the health and well-being of our citizens. It is not our intention to infringe upon anyone’s copyright. We believe we have used the U.S. Copyright’s Doctrine of Fair Use equitably and without incurring infringement or plagiarism.
Pesticide Chemicals Are In Vaccines

References:

“DDT and Other Insecticides and Repellents”. Miscellaneous Publication No. 606, United States Department of Agriculture. Issued August 1946.

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-1.pdf

http://www.sailhome.org/Concerns/Vaccines/MAC.html

http://vactruth.com/2011/08/23/vaccine-ingredients-non-ionic-surfactants-tween-80-triton-x-100-nonoxynol-9/

http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/etc/medialib/docs/Sigma/Product_Information_Sheet/1/t8532pis.Par.0001.File.tmp/t8532pis.pdf

http://www.novartis.com/about-novartis/company-history/index.shtml

Jeffry John Aufderheide

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

  

Interview with Dr. Tim O’Shea

http://www.thedoctorwithin.com

  Get the Interview in PDF Format!

Jeffry John Aufderheide

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

  

Vaccine ingredients are known to affect the brain.

VacTruth Notice

We are publishing this information to educate Congress, the media, and public regarding issues affecting the health and well-being of our citizens.  It is not our intention to infringe upon anyone’s copyright.  We believe we have used the U.S. Copyright’s Doctrine of Fair Use equitably and without incurring infringement or plagiarism.  All sources are cited in detail.

VacTruth Comment:
Tween 80, Triton X-100, and Nonoxynol-9 are used in vaccines. Nonoxynol-9 (N-9) also is used as a spermicide in vaginal gels to prevent contraception and was used in a H1N1 Vaccine Trial.

Triton X-100 and Tween 80 were mixed with DDT to spray on crops in the 1940s and 1950s – combinations of these chemicals are still in pesticides today. Polysorbate 80, also known as Tween 80, is a surfactant in these vaccines: DTaP, DTaP-HebB-IIPV, DTaP-Hib, Gardasil, Influenza, Rotavirus, and Tdap.

Most of the following information regarding these non-ionic surfactants is taken from the National Institutes of Health web sites.

Specific role of polysorbate 80 coating on the targeting of nanoparticles to the brain

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14967540

“Being bound to nanoparticles that were overcoated by T-80 [Tween-80] later, was necessary for the loading to be delivered to brain. Partial coverage was enough for T-80 coating to play a specific role in brain targeting. It seemed that brain targeting of nanoparticles was related to the interaction between the T-80 coating and BMECs [brain micro-vessel endothelial cells]. The mechanism of endocytosis was more reasonable for nanoparticle-mediated drugs across BBB [Blood Brain Barrier]. The specific role of T-80 coating on nanoparticles in brain targeting was thus confirmed.” [Emphasis added]

Colloidal carriers and blood–brain barrier (BBB) translocation: A way to deliver drugs to the brain?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15896933

“3.1.1. Disruption of the BBB

One of the earliest techniques to circumvent the BBB for therapeutical purpose and the first to be used in humans was developed by Neuwelt et al. (1979). The idea behind this approach was to break down the barrier temporarily by injecting a sugar solution (mannitol) into arteries in the neck. The resulting high sugar concentration in brain capillaries sucks water out of the endothelial cells, shrinking them thus opening tight junctions. In current practice, the effect lasts for 20–30 min, during which time drugs that would not normally cross the BBB diffuse freely.”

…

“However, disrupting the BBB even for brief periods leaves the brain vulnerable to infection and damage from toxins. Even substances that circulate harmlessly through the peripheral bloodstream, such as albumin, can have deleterious effects if they enter the brain.”  [Emphasis added]

…

VacTruth Comment:

Neurotoxins in vaccines can enter the brain easily, which this confirms.

“The “Trojan horse” mechanism postulates that infected macrophages crossactivate brain endothelial cells to take up residence in the CNS as infected microglial cells. BMEC and immune cells, activated by cytokines, overexpress adhesion molecules and their ligands, which promotes the binding of circulating immune cells to brain vasculature.Such binding could be the first step in diapedesis, the passage of immune cells across the BBB. This proximity could also facilitate the passage of viral particles between the infected immune cell and the brain endothelial cell, analogous to the transfer of virus betweeninfected immune cells.” [Emphasis added]

…

“After peripheral administration, these molecules themselves do not exhibit any therapeutic effect because they do not diffuse through the BBB. But, when dalargin or loperamide were absorbed onto the surface of poly(butylcyanoacrylate) (PBCA) nanoparticles further coated with the detergent, polysorbate-80 (PS-80), a pronounced analgesic effect was obtained, reaching a maximum 45 min after administration. The mechanism behind the translocation of those nanoparticles into the brain remains, however, not fully understood.”

Disclosure by triton X-100 of NMDA-sensitive [3H] glutamate binding sites in brain synaptic membranes.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2838020

“Pretreatment of brain synaptic membrane homogenates with Triton X-100 resulted in a drastic disclosure of [3H]glutamate (Glu) binding activity which was sensitive to one of the central GIu receptor agonists, N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA)… These results suggest that Triton-treatment may disclose NMDA-Sensitive [3H]GIu binding sites in brain synaptic membranes.”

VacTruth Comment:

Polysorbate 80 and Tween 80 are regarded as the same chemical. For vaccines, see information under Polysorbate 80.

Interference of the Detergent Tween 80 in Protein Assays

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1481978

“Detergents are often used to dissociate cell membrane components in biological systems. The nonionic detergent, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80) has been widely used at concentrations of 0.051.0% to increase secretion of enzymes or other exoproteins in both bacteria and fungi.”

“Tween 80 is one of the polyoxyethylene family of nonionic detergents which includes, among others, the Tritons (X-100 and X-114) and the Genapols (X-080, X-100, and X-150). These detergents are gentle in their action, and most enzymes retain their activity after exposure to levels of l-3% w/v (26). Because of their mild action and their compatibility with most chromatographic systems, these detergents have found widespread application as extractive agents for proteins which are structurally associated with organelles such as mitochondria, chloroplasts, plasmalemma, endoplasmic reticulum, and nuclear membrane.” [Emphasis added]

Tween 80 Immunosuppression

Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol 20. No. 6 pp. 983.

“Tween 80 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate), an emulsifier, is yet another example or a commonly used chemical being implicated in the suppression of the immunological response. Barnett reports that recent work in his laboratory has suggested that the primary IgE and IgG, MS suppressed in mice pretreated with Tween 80 followed by an immunizing dose of ovalbumin adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide (an antigenadjuvant combination known to produce high levels of IgE and IgG,)… The authors conclude from these findings that the immunosuppression caused by Tween 80 is restricted to the primary humoral response.” [Emphasis added]

VacTruth Comment:

The adjuvant aluminium hydroxide is in the following vaccines: Anthrax, DTaP, DTaP-HepB-IPV, Td, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis A-Hepatitis B, Hepatitis B, Tdap.

Tween 80 and Epileptic Seizures

Some solvents for antiepileptics have proepileptic potencies in the WAG/Rij rat model for absence epilepsy

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1393624

“To suppress these symptoms [of epilepsy], anticonvulsants or antiepileptics have been developed…that can be used in experimental studies as a solvent, emulsifier, or dispersing agent for these difficult to dissolve drugs. Tween-80 is used to dissolve benzodiazepines and P-carbolines. Carbamazepine and trimethadione are dissolved in a mixture of saline, ethanol, and propylene glycol.

…

These solvents, however, are also known to disrupt the bloodbrain barrier, change receptor affinity, and manipulate membrane structure…It is not clear why the used solvents are proepileptic but their usage in experimental absence epilepsy research should be avoided.” [Emphasis added]

Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8473002

“Tween 80 is a classical non-ionic surface-active detergent. It is widely used as an additive in pharmaceuticals and in the food industry. Some of the Tweens are considered to be carcinogens or cocarcinogens. Several of the stimulating properties of tweens are already known.” [Emphasis added]

and …

“In our study, we found that 4-day administration of Tween 80 to female rats during the period crucial for the development and function of reproductive organs accelerates the maturation of these organs. We found significant prolongation of the oestrous cycle and induction of persistent vaginal oestrus. The persistence of vaginal oestrus after the perinatal exposure of female rats to oestrogens used to be ascribed to oestrogens.” [Emphasis added]

VacTruth Question:

Could Tween 80, being a carcinogen or co-carcinogen, also be one of the reasons vaccines are not tested for causing cancer? Please research the vaccine inserts (http://vactruth.com/vaccine-inserts) to confirm.

Treatment of Cells with Detergent Activates Caspases and Induces Apoptotic Cell Death

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10833528

“The biochemical properties of detergents and biomembranes suggest that the initial event of apoptosis induction may occur at the cell membrane. Although the Triton concentration required for apoptosis induction did not immediately disrupt the cell membrane, detergent molecules may be incorporated into the lipid bilayer. This may result in subtle alterations of the physical properties of the membrane including an increased permeability for small charged and neutral solutes… In conclusion, treatment of human and nonhuman cells with detergent at concentrations below the level that causes cytolysis induced apoptotic death.”

Cancer and Tween-80 Injections

Effects of repeated subcutaneous injection of Tween-80 in rats 
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5914564

“In the rats injected with Tween-80, 1 subcutaneous sarcoma was found at the site of injection, and 2 similar sarcomas were also found in the rats injected with Tween-80 and small amounts of 3′-me-DAB. In mice 2 subcutaneous sarcomas were induced by injections of Tween-80 alone. These results raise the possibility that Tween-80 may be directly involved in carcinogenesis.” [Emphasis added]

Triton X-100 and Tween 80 Damage the Gut (Ciba-Geigy Corporation)

Evaluation of mucosal damage of surfactants in rat jejunum and colon

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7766919

“In particular, surfactants, which are commonly used adjuvants in oral pharmaceutical preparations to improve wetting and solubilization for insoluble drugs, have come under investigation as absorption enhancers. The goal of an enhancer is to improve membrane permeability without unwanted side effects. However, this is a formidable task because absorption is often increased due to intestinal damage.”

…

“Tween 80 is an orally approved surfactant routinely used in drug formulations and food products (FDA Inactive Ingredient Guide, 1991). In contrast, Triton X-100 is not approved for oral use and is regarded as toxic.”

…

“Denudation of villous tips, desquamation of the epithelial surface, and intervillous adhesion by LM and SEM were noted with Triton X-100 exposure, while minimal changes were noted with Tween 80 and controls. These results are consistent with the known systemic toxicity of Tween 80 and Triton X-100 and suggest that this method is valuable for the early assessment of intestinal damage and irritation.”

VacTruth Comment:

Triton X-100 is a nonionic surfactant used in influenza vaccines.

Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology Vol. 11
Authors James Swarbrick & James C. Boylan
1995 New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

“The addition of surfactants to ophthalmic solutions is permitted, even though their use is greatly restricted. The toxicity of surfactants is on the order anionic > cationic > nonionic. Nonionics are used in low concentrations to increase the dispersion of suspended drugs, such as steroids, and thereby improve solution clarity. The ability of these compounds to bind and thereby inactivate certain preservatives, coupled with their irritation potential, limits their use to low concentrations. For example, the FDA limits the concentrations of Tween 20 and Tween 80 to 1%.” (page 61)

“In the early 1980s, reports appeared in the literature about deaths in neonates associated with the administration of IV E-Ferol, a product that contained Vitamin E (dl-a-tocopherol) and the emulsifiers polysorbate 80 (9%) and polysorbate 20 (1%). Some infants who received this vitamin E product developed coagulopathy, renal failure, hepatic failure, and death. On autopsy, the infants who died from hepatic failure demonstrated cholestasis similar to that associated with parenteral nutrition. Toxic reactions may have occurred because of the high doses of vitamin E, the presence of polysorbate(s), a contaminant in the pharmaceutical preparation, or a combination of all three.” (page 345) [Emphasis added]

VacTruth Comment: 

Medical personnel often ignore the potential side effects of the chemicals in vaccines because of the ‘trace’ amounts in vaccines, or because an ingredient is labeled inactive. The same text referenced above notes,

“Pharmaceutical products may contain, in addition to the active or therapeutic agent(s), a variety of other ingredients, termed inactive or inert, which are categorized as excipients or additives (flavorings, sweeteners, preservatives, stabilizers, diluents, lubricants, etc.). The words inert or inactive may be misnomers for some excipients because some have been shown to cause adverse effects. Neonates and young children are at risk for such effects because they may not be able to metabolize or eliminate an ingredient in a pharmaceutical product in the same manner as an adult.” (pp. 344) [Emphasis added]

Nonoxynol-9 Induces Apoptosis of Endometrial Explants by Both Caspase-Dependent and -Independent Apoptotic Pathways

http://www.biolreprod.org/content/73/2/382.full.pdf

“This study demonstrates for the first time that N-9 induces apoptosis in human endometrial explants. As a membrane- active surfactant spermicide, N-9 induces membrane permeability and membrane fusion. It is well known that cell membrane integrity is essential to maintain intracellular homeostasis, viability, and function. It was recently reported that detergents such as Triton X-100, Nonidet P-40 (NP-40), n-octylglucoside, and the bile salt sodium deoxycholate similarly induce apoptosis, indicating that apoptosis induction in the setting of this study may be not a feature peculiar to N-9 but a more general effect of the interaction of detergents with tissue … such damage could facilitate infection with bacterial or viral pathogens such as HIV.” [Emphasis added]

VacTruth Comment:

Apoptosis means cell death or cell ‘suicide’.

and

“The N-9-triggered apoptosis of endometrial explants appears to be mediated through involvement of FAS/FASLG mechanism, followed by CASP3 activation leading to final cell death…These findings may have important practical implications to future microbicide development by demonstrating that vaginally administered agents may cause upper reproductive tract toxicity and possibly facilitate HIV infection.” [Emphasis added]

Solubilization of membranes by detergents

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1091302

“Lysis by surfactants has been studied mainly using erythrocytes [Red Blood Cells], since the process can be measured quantitatively by following the release of haemoglobin… The lytic process can, however, be divided into five stages: (1) The surfactant monomers absorb to, and (2) penetrate into the membrane, where (3) they induce a change in molecular organization. This leads to an alteration in permeability (4) and in the osmotic equilibrium, and finally (5) to the leakage of haemoglobin. Stages 2, 3 or 4 are rate limiting. It is generally believed that lysis results from an interaction between surfactant and the lipids of the membrane. Haydon and Taylor have suggested that surfactants may act as ‘wedges’ which destroy the natural orientation of the lipid bilayer.”

VacTruth Comment:

Lysis means dissolution or breakdown of cells.

Vascular endothelial dysfunction contributes to myocardial depression inischemia-reperfusion in the rat

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9564547

“This study was designed to evaluate whether the direct contractile modulatory effects of endocardial and (or) vascular endothelium were altered and whether these alterations contributed to contractile dysfunction in a model of ischemia-reperfusion. Sixty-two perfused rat hearts as Langendorff preparations were randomized to no intervention, intracoronary Triton X100 injection (to render vascular endothelium dysfunctional), ischemia (30 min)-reperfusion (20 min), and ischemia-reperfusion followed by intracoronary Triton X100 injection. Coronary endothelial-dependent vascular reactivity and vascular smooth muscle reactivity were assessed by serotonin and sodium nitroprusside, respectively. Myocardial damage was assessed by coronary effluent creatine phosphokinase and by morphologic studies. Papillary muscles were then excised and contractile characteristics evaluated at varying extracellular calcium concentration prior to and after endocardial endothelial removal with Triton X100…We conclude that vascular but not endocardial endothelial dysfunction contributes to the myocardial dysfunction that occurs during ischemia-reperfusion injury.” [Emphasis added]

VacTruth Comment:

Ischemia is tissue damage due to lack of adequate blood flow (which brings oxygen and nutrients to the tissue).

PATHOGENESIS OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEURONAL DEATH AFTER HYPOXIA–ISCHEMIA CHANGES DURING BRAIN DEVELOPMENT

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15219674

“Apoptotic neuronal death takes place during brain development under genetic control. Nuclear chromatin condensation or clumping characterized by electron microscopy (EM) is a hallmark of apoptosis and is remarkably conserved among cell types (Kerr et al., 1972; Wyllie, 1997). It is well documented that pathological conditions including brain hypoxia–ischemia (HI) are able to initiate apoptotic machinery to facilitate cell death through activation of caspase-3 (Blomgren et al., 2003; Olney, 2003). In comparison with apoptosis, necrotic cell death occurs always under pathological conditions.Two types of neuronal injury-induced necrotic morphologies characterized by EM have been described in the literature: one is the conventional cellular lysis with cell swelling followed by rupture to release cell contents; the second type of necrosis is characterized by dilation of subcellular organelles followed by shrinkage of the entire cell. Neuronal cell lysis takes place in the infarct core area after focal brain ischemia (Dodson et al., 1974), while the shrinkage type of necrosis occurs in a delayed manner in vulnerable brain regions after transient brain ischemia, in the penumbral regions after focal ischemia, as well as in regions of excitotoxic neuronal death (Siesjo¨, 1985; Deshpande et al., 1992; Fukuda et al., 1999; Colbourne et al., 1999; Hu et al., 2000b; Olney, 2003). In some cases, mixed features of apoptosis and necrosis can be seen in the same neurons after brain injury (Martin et al., 1998;Ishimaru et al., 1999). The neurons dying during development also adopt one of at least three different morphological types: “apoptotic,” “autophagic,” and “non-lysosomal vesiculate,” which probably reflect the various mechanisms underlying both nuclear and cytoplasmic destruction during cell death in developing neurons (Clarke, 1990). [Emphasis added]

….

It is, therefore, likely that immature neurons are liable to apoptosis after injury (Ikonomidou et al., 1989; Johnston, 1995), and thus both necrosis and apoptosis remain effective therapeutic targets for developing neurons after brain injury (Han et al., 2000; Cheng et al., 1998; Nakajima et al., 2000; Northington et al., 2001; Blomgren et al., 2001). However, both apoptotic morphology and biochemical machinery fade out during brain development. Therefore, traditional approaches targeting to necrotic cell death mechanisms such as energy failure, acidosis, calcium influx, oxidative stress and protein aggregation in adult brain remain valid.”

Ischemic preconditioning prevents protein aggregation after transient cerebral ischemia.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15939539

“A short period of ischemia (ischemic preconditioning) that does not lead to neuronal death (sublethal), is able to induce neuronal tolerance to a subsequent longer or lethal period of ischemia. This phenomenon is known as “ischemic tolerance.” Although definitive mechanisms underlying ischemic tolerance remain incompletely understood, induction of molecular chaperones and folding enzymes has long been proposed to contribute to the acquisition of ischemic tolerance.” [Emphasis added]

Jeffry John Aufderheide

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.