Jeffry John Aufderheide
vactruth.com
05/25/2010

History books proclaim with absolute certainty that the pinnacle of public health is defined by the polio vaccine program. Disease finally conquered by science. The polio effort was a benchmark for the public to mentally accept the concept “shots prevent disease.” However, hidden to most Americans was an elaborate Public Relations scheme being carefully applied by Rockefeller interests intended for social control.

Three central institutions where at the forefront of the polio war: the Roosevelt Warm Springs Foundation, the National Foundation of Infantile Paralysis or March of Dimes, and the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. Through these foundations and organizations, polio transmogrified into a major childhood disease. The massive public relations campaign pushing the polio agenda targeting the American people was organized by Carl Byoir, propagandist extraordinaire.

“When you set out to influence and persuade people to action, when the campaign is tremendous, nation-wide [sic] in scope, don’t think that it just happens; something has to be done to get millions of people to think the thought you want them to think and then to get them to act on that thought.”

-Carl Byoir

The PR campaign was intended to tug at the heart string of Americans by using stars such as Sammy Davis Junior, Tennessee Ernie, Lucile Ball and others. Why would the Rockefeller Institute, March of Dimes, and the Roosevelt Warm Springs Foundation use someone as powerful and costly as Carl Byoir simply to propagandize a childhood disease?

The big picture is that the Polio scare campaign would provide the everlasting foundation for all the future vaccine programs. Is it by chance the hypnotic words “life saving” and “effective” became synonymous with the word “vaccine” after the polio campaign?

The motive of these organizations is perhaps the best understood by author and researcher Lily E. Kay. She wrote about the motives of the Rockefeller family in her book, “The Molecular Vision of Life.” On page 8 she wrote, “The motivation behind the enormous investment in the new (“Science of Man”) agenda was to develop the human sciences as a comprehensive explanatory and applied framework for social control grounded in the natural, medical, and social sciences.” (notation mine)

“Applied social control”, simply stated, is the misuse of any branch of commerce, science, law, politics, or religion for compliance to an ulterior motive held by those in power. Examples, such as the Rockefeller-backed Federal Reserve Bank, is a perfect model of applied economic social control.

Lily Kay continues to elaborate, “With that agenda, the new biology (originally named “psychobiology”) was erected on the bedrock of the physical sciences in order to rigorously explain and eventually control the fundamental mechanisms governing human behavior, placing a particularly strong emphasis on (eugenics) heredity.” (notation on eugenics mine)

Ye shall know them by their fruits.

The success of the polio vaccine program was instrumental in implementing what euphemistically has become known as the “Gold Standard” in allopathic medicine: The American Childhood Vaccine Schedule. The vaccines listed within this program are predicated on the sole belief that polio was eradicated with a vaccine.

With strategically planned and executed applied social control systems as the backdrop, what are some of the unintended consequences of adopting a policy of “shots preventing disease?”

Firstly, parents are consistently, relentlessly, and blatantly lied to that their children must be up to date on their vaccines in order to attend school. Rarely are they informed that they have the option to apply for a vaccine exemption (religious, medical or philosophical depending on the state). However, new pharmaceutical-backed School Based Health Clinics are being implemented around the country and parents may soon find that they no longer have a choice in the matter.

Secondly, what about going to the pediatrician? The “Polio Question” is unsheathed immediately by many “brave” pediatricians to pierce through any parental doubt on vaccination. They constantly remind parents of the graphical pictures with children in iron lungs; memories which are etched in our collective consciousness. Parents are then scolded, “You don’t want polio to come back, do you?” When many sincere parents continue to ask questions the pediatrician cannot answer, they are encouraged to be promptly slain.

Third, the “Polio Question” has become a potent weapon of social ridicule. Parents attempting to offer “valid opinions”, empirical observations, and anecdotal stories of their personal experiences with their vaccine injured children have become the object of ridicule. They are marginalized as not “adequately educated” by a bonafide, scientific medical institution. More over, “rebellious parents” are regularly accused of child neglect and free loading on society. They are maliciously threatened with the heavy hand of Child Protective Services and the Judicial System. It matters not that a majority of the parents and family members who are actively questioning vaccines have observed first hand a life threatening reaction to vaccines.

Which brings us to the most egregious strategy of vaccine compliance: persecuting families with vaccine injured children. In the United Kingdom it is called Munchhausen by Proxy. In the United States it is called Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS). How many parents have had their children snatched away by social services after an adverse reaction from a vaccine? Victimized parents have likened this to organized kidnapping.

Wisdom can be found in the adage, “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” The new undercurrent in today’s society worships the type of science and authority that brought us the polio vaccine. Thus, understanding the motive of those in power is a primary principle.

After all, Dorthy didn’t discover who the “real” Wizard of Oz was until she pulled back the curtain and found one man pulling the levers. Throwing back the curtains of the Polio Vaccine Program, we will certainly see the Rockefeller’s masquerading as Oz.

.
.
.
.
Jeffry John Aufderheide
NaturalNews.com
3/29/10

The golden calf of public health was smashed in this recent flu season as many in the United States outright rejected the H1N1 vaccine. Pharmaceutical companies are now holding the bag, as millions of doses of the vaccine are rotting on shelves or being discarded as hazardous waste. Or are they? The manufacturer may find it more cost effective to dump them into the arms of our public school systems.

Parents would revolt if they knew that the pharmaceutical industry, the Department of Health and Human Services, and Centers for Disease Control have allocated millions of dollars in funding to establish vaccine clinics in the public schools. Pumping children with experimental vaccines in public school is about to be pursued as a matter of policy.

Denver Public Schools the Target

Recently, a news article (http://www.denverpost.com/commented…) in the Denver Post highlighted two grants issued by the Centers for Disease Control totaling $1.6 million dollars to vaccinate students attending Denver Public Schools (http://communications.dpsk12.org/an…).

One grant (http://communications.dpsk12.org/an…) funds an effort to establish a sustainable school-based vaccination program utilizing the yearly influenza and experimental H1N1 vaccine. The hope is to create a partnership between public health (Denver Health), school personnel (Denver Public Schools), and an entity (Kaiser Permanente) that would bill third party payers.

The second grant (http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/I…) provides cash for vaccinating children with the newly approved diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap), meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4), and human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV). The new vaccines for adolescents are among the most expensive vaccines (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/program…) recommended today for any age group.

Lead investigator of Denver In-School Immunization Project, Dr. Judith Shlay, of Denver Health, readily admits that if all goes well, plans are in place to implement school-base vaccine clinics (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHji… ) nation-wide (a high level overview of this plan (http://www.nasbhc.org/site/c.jsJPKW…) was presented to the National Assembly on School-Based Health Care by Dr. Shlay).

School Based Health Clinics As the Conduit

The Denver In-School Immunization Project (http://denverhealth.org/portal/Serv…) has long been in the works. It was paved in the late 1970s and early 1980s by incrementally creating School-Based Health Clinics (SCHC). In 1978, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), a non-profit organization funded by the Pharmaceutical Company, Johnson and Johnson (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d…), contributed $2.3 million dollars to the state of Colorado, (http://www.rwjf.org/reports/grr/032…) making SBHCs a reality.

Illnesses such as ADD/ADHD, Cervical Cancer, diabetes, asthma, obesity, and learning disabilities were of little consequence in the ’70s. However, these disabling syndromes and the medications aimed at treating them have all reached epidemic proportions and astronomically profitable sales.

In the past, parents have discovered challenging a school-based medical model can be extremely dangerous. In September, 2000, Ms. Patti Johnson, a former Colorado State education board member, testified before Federal Congress (http://www.politicalwatchdog.com/ps…) concerning Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). In the 1990s, the much-hyped drug, Ritalin, was maneuvered into public schools to address the growing epidemic of hyperactivity. Mrs. Johnson testimony was prophetic and foreshadowed a future scenario where parents could be charged with medical neglect if they refused to medicate their child per the school’s request.

Vaccines for All School Children is the Goal

If School Based Health Clinics are being used as the conduit to vaccinate children, the federally-funded Vaccines For Children (VFC) (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/program…) program and third party insurance coverage provide the finances. According to the grant approved by the CDC, the VFC program would provide “free” vaccines to an estimated forty percent of children in the United States who are not covered by third party insurance plans.

“The goal is for this (Denver In-School Immunization Project) to be a sustainable program that can immunize all children in the schools regardless of their insurance. And we need to see at the end of the day, when all the dust settles at the end of this school year, whether the amount that was reimbursed for all these different insurance companies, adds up to the amount of time and effort it took to actually have the clinic.” (Emphasis added)

Dr. Matthew Daley
Evaluator of the Denver In-School Immunization Project
Kaiser Permanente
Colorado Public Radio Interview
February 17th, 2010
(http://www.kcfr.org/index.php?optio…)

Put into context, the implications of the Denver In-School Immunization Project are enormous. We are speaking of a captured market for vaccine manufacturers (guaranteed purchase of vaccines), insurance companies (guaranteed rise in premiums), and government funding (VFC) all footed by taxpayer dollars. The total price per vaccinated adolescent in the private sector is approximately $500 (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/au…). That’s a lot of cash.

What Does Pharma Know?

Dr. Matthew Daley is very aware that a paltry 1/3rd of adolescents receive their yearly influenza vaccine, for example. In a semi-recent presentation, (http://www.preventinfluenza.org/NIV…) Dr. Daley shows obtaining parental consent is a barrier to mass vaccination in a school setting. Furthermore, the presentation suggests improved financial incentives for providing influenza vaccinations. Dr. Daley must be sharing his notes with RAND Corporation because it is almost the exact message RAND pitched to the pharmaceutical giant, Sanofi Pasteur.

In 2007, a study performed by RAND Corporation, funded by Sanofi Pasteur, investigated the most efficient way to vaccinate (http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented…) low-income adolescents. Nicole Lurie,(http://www.opensecrets.org/revolvin…) one authors of the white paper, is now an adviser to Kathleen Sebelius, the Secretary of Human Health Services (HHS). Mrs. Lurie has a long history of traversing the revolving door between private industry, government duties, and academic appointments (there is no difference from the former head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, (http://vactruth.com/2010/01/04/juli…) becoming President of Merck Pharmaceuticals Vaccine Division).

RAND’s report identifies barriers that would obstruct “alternative vaccination campaigns,” otherwise known as “in-school vaccination programs.” The list of legal issues includes parental consent laws, absence of a reliable medical home (where an adolescent receives medical treatment such as a doctor’s office), and access to vaccine registration information.

That’s right, mom and dad. Your current ability to refuse vaccines, which is protected by most state laws, is considered a barrier to Pharmaceutical Interests!

*As a side note, many states are taking steps to move parents out of the way and allow public officials the right to vaccinate children, without parental consent. By example, legislation is being considered in New York that would give absolute authority to health professionals to vaccinate children under 18 years old without the parental consent. Another bill in New York (http://vactruth.com/2010/02/12/new-…) seeks to mandate the controversial HPV vaccine (Gardasil) for school entry.

With Public Relations at the foreground, The RAND paper further recommends that Sanofi Pasteur create “Vaccine Champions” or “Registration Champions.” Vaccine champions are “ardent supporters of a cause … They can bring about change by educating those around them and spurring others into action through local events, meetings, or publications.” Coincidentally, non-profit organizations such as The Immunization Partnership are following lockstep with the RAND Corporation’s group-think. It also has “Immunization Champions.” (http://www.immunizeusa.org/iz-champ…)

If vaccines are mandated for public school attendance, and most likely they will be, you can bet that it won’t matter whether the vaccine is experimental or not. With rising awareness of the chronic effects of mass vaccination, public skepticism and outcries will likely be countered with fear mongering (http://www.scribd.com/doc/19212191/…) by fanatical vaccine advocates and lobbying groups funded by Big Pharma interests. The only real way to protect the safety of our children is to fiercely safeguard state exemption laws that uphold parents’ freedom to choose whether to vaccinate or not.

Yet, by blending society’s Federal Educational Framework with a superficial medical model, vaccine proponents have a road map to overcome any damaging future resistance to experimental vaccines. Could it be any clearer that if left unchecked, the pharmaceutical industrial complex soon will be calling the shots instead of parents?

About the author: Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

.
.
.
Don’t forget folks, MSG is an ingredient in your vaccines!

1. Link to the CDC’s vaccine ingredient webpage.
2. Check out the MSG Truth website here.

Revised Erb Report on MSG to the WHO

Jeffry John Aufderheide
1/29/10

There is a massive body of vaccine literature waiting to be discovered for the budding researcher. I have pared down a list of interesting studies and case reports on the topic of vaccines.

Many, as you can see, are not in the native English language. Most of the list is starting in the 1950′s and continues to the 1970′s. As time goes on, this list will grow… hopefully accompanied with the abstracts.

Please note the abundance of them refer to post-vaccine encephalitis.

Tip: If you go to your local library they can assist in obtaining these studies. Bombs away!

http://vactruth.com/research/list-of-studies/