It’s difficult to say, but we have an idea.

Do you remember the H1N1 flu scam? As covered in the interview below, she helped protect nurses from mandatory vaccination. Consequently, experimental vaccines worth millions of dollars went unused. Think Big Pharma can keep their doors open when parents start rejecting vaccines wholesale?

It isn’t difficult to see why Ms. Finn is such a threat to their bottom line. The problem is, I don’t think they anticipated Patricia’s courage.

In life, you will find very few people willing to stand on principle as Patricia Finn does. In my opinion, she defines the word courage. During our interview she said, “I will not, under any circumstances, give up those names… I’ll go to jail first.”

We need more people like her!

Below is of condensed interview that I had with her due to YouTube time restrictions.  The full interview will be made available in the very near future.

(Condensed Interview Runtime - 15:01)

The AMA suppressed cancer cures.

“Public and private funds have been thrown around like confetti at a country fair to close up and destroy clinics, hospitals, and scientific research laboratories which do not conform to the viewpoint of medical associations,” stated Benedict Fitzgerald. [1]

Fitzgerald was special counsel to the Senate Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee in 1953. He was commissioned by Congressman Charles Tobey of Massachusetts to investigate the obstruction of natural cancer treatments by the American Medical Association.

His report to the committee is known as “The Fitzgerald Report” of 1953.

Alone, this information is a bombshell. But, to my knowledge the information you are about to read hasn’t been put into the same or connect-the-dots context before.

If anything else, know this simple fact: While the AMA was actively suppressing natural cures for cancer, millions of Americans were being injected with vaccines contaminated with a cancer-causing monkey virus, SV40.

Before I tell you what Fitzgerald concluded, you may be thinking this information is from the 1950s so it is outdated and can be discredited.

Please realize, though, the ‘success’ of the Rockefeller-funded polio vaccine program set the precedent for the entire U.S. vaccine program, which apparently is being followed to this day. With the explosion of cancer in the United States, this information deserves serious consideration and further investigation.

Additionally, I’m going to give you evidence of congressional testimony that cancer was in those vaccines, and that fact was covered up. If you want to know more, read on.

Fact #1: Fitzgerald Exposes the American Medical Association for Suppressing Cancer Cures

It’s my opinion treating cancer in the United States is still big business. It’s important for parents to know, vaccines have not been tested for causing cancer. I’ll tell you more how cancer and vaccines are related in a moment, but first let’s cover the main points of the Fitzgerald Report.

Fitzgerald vividly described what he uncovered stating,

“…There is reason to believe that the AMA (American Medical Association) has been hasty, capricious, arbitrary, and outright dishonest, and of course if the doctrine of ‘respondeat suprior‘ to be observed, the alleged machinations of Dr. J.J. Moore (for the past 10 years the treasurer of the AMA, could involve the AMA and others in an interstate conspiracy of alarming proportions.” [2]

And if that’s not enough, Fitzgerald continues…

“Behind and over all this is the weirdest conglomeration of corrupt motives, intrigue, selfishness, jealousy, obstruction, and conspiracy that I have ever seen.” [3]

Head of AMA Exposed

Fitzgerald then specifically refers to the (Harry) Hoxsey Cancer Clinic because they revealed the true nature of the AMA in court. It was uncovered that,

“A running fight has been going on between officials, especially Dr. Morris Fishbein, of the American Medical Association through the journal of that organization, and the Hoxsey Cancer Clinic…”

“Morris Fishbein, who admitted that he had never practiced medicine one day in his life, and never had a private patient…admitted that Hoxsey could cure external cancer but contended that his medicine for internal cancer had no therapeutic value.”

“It is significant to note that a great number of these doctors (testifying in the Hoxsey case) admitted that X-ray therapy could cause cancer.” [4]

What did the report conclude?

“Accordingly, we should determine whether existing agencies, both public and private, are engaged and have pursued a policy of harassment, ridicule, slander, and libelous attacks on others sincerely engaged in stamping out this curse (cancer) of mankind. Have medical associations, through their officers, agents, servants and employees engaged in this practice? My investigation to date should convince this committee that a conspiracy does exist to stop the free flow and use of drugs in interstate commerce which allegedly has solid therapeutic value. Public and private funds have been thrown around like confetti at a country fair to close up and destroy clinics, hospitals, and scientific research laboratories which do not conform to the viewpoint of medical associations.” [5]

And here’s the kicker, at the same time Americans were lining up by the millions to get injected with contaminated polio vaccines! But, please remember this …

Fact #2: Cancer Virus Discovered in the Vaccine

Jonas Salk developed the polio vaccine with heavy funding from the Rockefeller Foundation and National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (March of Dimes).

In order to make the vaccine, Salk grew the poliovirus on ground monkey kidneys and testicles.

It was later discovered by Merck researchers, Benjamin Sweet and Maurice Hilleman, the monkey tissues used for vaccine manufacturing were contaminated with a cancer virus called SV40. [6] The scientific literature well-establishes this fact along with testimony at a Congressional hearing some fifty years later.

But, more to the point of this article, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) supported and published Salk’s work. [7, 8]

If you recall, the same person named in the Fitzgerald Report for destroying cancer clinics, head of the American Medical Association, Morris Fishbein, was heavily involved with poliomyelitis and vaccine research information. As you will see, the AMA was certainly not ignorant to the methods employed by Jonas Salk to create a polio vaccine.

Head of AMA an Officer to International Poliomyelitis Conference

Morris Fishbein was an officer at the International Poliomyelitis Conferences.

The most important question should be asked, “Was Morris Fishbein ignorant to Jonas Salk using monkey tissue to make the polio vaccine?” 

The answer is, “No!” Not only is it likely Fishbein knew the methods of Jonas Salk and vaccine development, he actually held the title ‘Chairman Committee on Publications’ to the First International Poliomyelitis Conference [9] and was Vice-President to the Second and Third International Polio Conferences. [10, 11]

This places Fishbein at the same conferences in which Jonas Salk presented his methods and materials used to create the vaccine.

Therefore, it stands to reason, once it became known the polio vaccine was contaminated with a cancer-causing virus, the AMA was suppressing certain cancer treatments while supporting others is especially important to note due to possible conflicts of interest and lack of transparency in medical research.

You will read below how polio vaccines containing the cancer virus were actually kept on the shelves, as not to erode public confidence in the (at the time) newly established vaccine program.

Perhaps that explains why the AMA dogmatically supported vaccines instead of informing the public about the impending epidemic of cancer (a lack of transparency in medical research).

Virus Research and Cancer Acknowledged at Polio Conference

Another strange piece of information for your consideration is Basil O’Connor, head of the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, discussing cancer research at the Third International Poliomyelitis Conference,

“There is reason to think that the changes that occur in normal cells when cancer occurs are similar to those caused by virus invasion. It is within the limits of possibility, therefore, that, out of researches on viruses-perhaps the virus of poliomyelitis-a new understanding of cancer will emerge.”  [12]

It’s out of the ordinary acknowledging this fact: millions of Americans were injected with viruses. Given in context, it’s a tragically profound and revealing statement. Maybe Basil and Morris knew something the rest of us wouldn’t discover until many years later.

Fact #3: A Hero’s Discovery is Suppressed; Vaccines With Cancer Virus Left On Shelves

There is evidence in the Fitzgerald Report that supports a cancer cover-up. The story is best told in the Congressional papers of a courageous scientist, Bernice Eddy. The Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session [1972] states on page 502,

“In 1954 Eddy, as a polio control officer, found live virus in supposedly killed polio vaccine; in 1955 she was relieved of her duties as polio control officer…After her discoveries concerning the SV40 virus, her staff and animal space were reduced and she was demoted from head of a section to head of a unit.” [13]

Page 500,

“The next and only serious vaccine crisis that has occurred since the polio episode was the realization in mid-1961 that a monkey virus later shown to cause tumors in hamsters was contaminating both polio and adenovirus vaccines. The virus, known as SV40, was entering the vaccines and, just as in the polio case were surviving the formalin treatment.

There were several states by which the full extent of the SV40 problem became known. First was the discovery in 1959-1960 by a DBS scientist, once again Bernice Eddy, that an unknown agent in the monkey kidney cells used to produce polio and adenovirus vaccines would cause tumors when the cells were injected into hamsters.” [14]

Page 505,

“…even when the contaminating virus was found to be oncogenic [cancer causing] in hamsters, the DBS [Division of Biologics Standards] and its expert advisory committee decided to leave existing stocks on the market rather than risk eroding public confidence by a recall.“ [15]

and…

“There has been a tendency on the part of certain higher government circles to play down any open discussion of problems associated with vaccines…” [16]

Let me repeat that vaccines with a cancer-causing virus were left on the shelf because YOU, the person into whom they would be injected, would lose confidence in the vaccine program!

This is a very important piece of the puzzle. But why?

Product Inserts State Vaccines Are Not Tested for Causing Cancer

To this day, vaccines are still not tested for causing cancer! Let me tell you more.

If you look at any vaccine product insert and search for the term ‘carcinogenesis’ (causing cancer), you will discover the following common phrase regarding most vaccines, “This vaccine has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility.”

See a list of vaccine product inserts here: http://vactruth.com/vaccine-inserts

What happens when millions of children are injected with a cancer-causing virus? No one would really want to take responsibility for that, would they?  That is especially the case if private corporations were discovered profiting heavily from cancer treatments.

Summary

Reading the Fitzgerald Report of 1953 will give you a different perspective on perhaps why there is such an explosion of cancers. And, yet, we are not offered treatment answers outside of chemotherapy and chemical-based solutions. Why?

According to the Fitzgerald Report, the AMA actively suppressed natural cures for cancer. It’s pretty evident to me, at least, that the AMA has been propping up the pharmacological pseudo-science of vaccinology, pharmaceuticals, and the industry known as Big Pharma. Over 50 years later, they’re still attempting to cover their tracks. [17]

We have to wonder what kind of coincidence it is that the same men and organizations were also involved in millions of Americans being injected with vaccines contaminated with a cancer-causing monkey virus, SV40.

References:

[1] A Report to the Senate Interstate Commerce Committee on the Need for Investigation of Cancer Research Organizations. “The Fitzgerald Report”. August 3, 1953.
http://www.communicationagents.com/chris/Fitzgerald%20Report%201953.pdf

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid.

[6] B.H. Sweet & M.R. Hilleman, The Vacuolating Virus, S.V.40, 105 Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 420, 420–27 (1960).

[7] Studies in human subjects on active immunization against poliomyelitis, JAMA 158 (1953):1081-98.
http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/suppl/2008/08/14/300.7.839.DC1/JAMAclassics082008.pdf

[8] Considerations in the preparation and use of the poliomyelitis virus vaccine, JAMA 158 (1955).
http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/251/20/2700

[9] Morris Fishbein, Chairman Committee on Publications. Poliomyelitis. Papers and Discussions Presented at the First International Poliomyelitis Conference. 1949. pg vii.

[10] Morris Fishbein, Chairman Committee on Publications Vice-President. Poliomyelitis. Papers and Discussions Presented at the Second International Poliomyelitis Conference. 1952. pg vii.

[11] Morris Fishbein, Chairman Committee on Publications Vice-President. Poliomyelitis. Papers and Discussions Presented at the Third International Poliomyelitis Conference. 1955. pg vii.

[12] Basil O’Connor addressing Polio Conference. Poliomyelitis. Papers and Discussions Presented at the Third International Poliomyelitis Conference. 1955. pp. xxii

[13] Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session. Page 499-505. April 20,21; and May 3,4, 1972.

[14] Ibid.

[15] Ibid.

[16] Ibid.

[17] The SV-40 Virus: Has Tainted Polio Vaccine Caused an Increase In Cancer? Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness of the Committee on Government Reform House of Representatives. One Hundred Eight Congress, First Session. September 10, 2003.

Further Research:

• Documentary: Hoxey Cancer Cure: How Healing Becomes a Crime (Time 1hr 21min) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8918515481465736414

• SV40 Foundation: http://www.sv40foundation.org/CPV-link.html

• http://vactruth.com/2010/08/18/rockefeller-vaccine-secret-revealed/
  

• Association of autism with polyomavirus infection in postmortem brains. Journal of Neurovirology. April 2010, Vol. 16, No. 2 , Pages 141-149. http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/13550281003685839

Photo Credit: Dionne Hartnett

Stealth viruses, like SV40, have contaminated vaccines in the past.

Would you like to know a definition of radically insane? How about you or your child being forced to participate in experimental vaccine trials?

Somehow right off the bat the idea of forced participation in experimental vaccine trials reminds me of the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment the U.S. government undertook that was profoundly and morally wrong.

“For 40 years, the U.S. Public Health Service has conducted a study in which human guinea pigs, not given proper treatment, have died of syphilis and its side effects,” Associated Press reporter Jean Heller wrote on July 25, 1972. “The study was conducted to determine from autopsies what the disease does to the human body.”  http://www.npr.org/programs/morning/features/2002/jul/tuskegee/

According to a paper published by the American Medical Association’s Virtual Mentor, current enrollment in vaccine trials is extremely low. There is now talk of creating a federal law to force individuals to ‘opt-out’ of vaccine trials for the greater good of society. Read the paper here: http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2012/01/pfor1-1201.html

Authors Susanne Sheehy and Joel Meyer float the idea of creating a system where a law forces an individual to make a “mandated choice” to participate in vaccine trials. This suggested policy not only is dangerously naïve but downright unconstitutional and ought to be regarded as such by every entity whether medical, legal, or taxpayer.

In reality, what is being proposed is complete medical tyranny.  Here’s why…

Mandatory Participation Creates a Customer List for Big Pharma

It sounds harmless. Hey, they even suggested we have a ‘mandated choice’, right? In order to see the bigger picture, we need to take this logic a few steps further.

For example, everyone would be required to enroll into a database. This is the case now even if you exempt your child from vaccines! Yes! You’re still in a database.  What about HIPAA violations and privacy rules?  Don’t they apply?

The ‘volunteer’ information would have to be shared with the Pharmaceutical Companies, which is the full intent, so as to gather trial and field test data Big Pharma can document before introducing a new product to FDA for approval. Of course, Pharma could call upon those who would want to volunteer.

What if they couldn’t get the numbers they needed – then what?

My prediction is they’d either force citizens to participate, or use a helpless population that could be gathered from any segment of society they designate.  The Willowbrook Institution ‘studies’ in New York is an example of ‘how they do things’.

Just in case you’re not familiar with the travesty at Willowbrook, Dr. Saul Krugman fed feces to children in order to test the effectiveness of the Hepatitis B vaccine they were researching to produce.  Read more about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willowbrook_State_School

Truly, can it get any more sinister? I think it can.

Here’s even more proof.

Vaccine Manufacturers Are Protected From Lawsuits if Your Child is Harmed

Please remember this point: If your child is given a vaccine and harmed, vaccine manufacturers are not responsible financially or morally.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act passed in 1986 shields vaccine manufacturers from any liability. If vaccines are 99.99% safe, as medical professionals tell us, having such a law doesn’t make much sense.

That law is a travesty of justice and should be rescinded by Congress who put it into place at the apparent behest of Big Pharma and its thousands of lobbyists with deep pockets informing members of Congress how to go about establishing Big Pharma’s corporate governance.

Nevertheless, the next logical question to answer would be, “What happens if your child is harmed?”

I speak from personal experience—my son is vaccine damaged—when I say there is little help waiting for you. Parents of vaccine-injured children are discovering the next-to-impossible task of being compensated by the government vaccine court.

Parents also ought to be aware pharmaceutical companies treat children with callous disregard, especially in vaccine trials. A recent article written by Christina England spells out how pharmaceutical researchers skew adverse reactions to vaccines to make it look like the vaccine is safe, when it is not. Read how premature babies had vaccines tested on them here: http://vactruth.com/2012/01/23/babies-used-as-lab-rats/

But what if vaccine injuries take other forms, like causing cancer?

We should also be mindful of the long-term effects, too, especially recombinant DNA.

Even if viruses causing cancer, among other things, subsequently are discovered in the vaccine—as was the case with the polio vaccine of the 1950s and ‘60s—past experience shows government will keep the vaccines on the shelves. They don’t want to risk eroding confidence in any aspect of the vaccine program.

Their job is to protect Big Pharma’s apparent policy over the health of your child. If you think you or your child will be compensated, expect years of dealing with government bureaucracy and probable rejection, as thousands of families experience to date.

Summary

Parents are told pharmaceutical companies exist for the ‘Greater Good’ of society. Yet, a quick check on the Department of Justice website shows that major Pharma corporations have been convicted of serious criminal offenses with only ‘slaps on the wrists’—monetary fines, unless there have been class action law suits filed in which harmed individuals sometimes receive compensation for pain and suffering.

Give me a break!

Any time a law has to be created mandating participation, you can bet there’s BIG money involved! As I mentioned above, such a law would give Big Pharma a guaranteed customer list plus immunity from injuring the ‘volunteers’. Can pharmaceutical companies get a much sweeter deal? I don’t think so; how about you?

The suggestion of mandating participation in medical trials has no place in a free society. It ought to go where it rightly belongs – in the trash along with their vaccines.

References:

1. Should Participation in Vaccine Clinical Trials be Mandated? http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2012/01/pdf/pfor1-1201.pdf
2. http://www.npr.org/programs/morning/features/2002/jul/tuskegee/
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Childhood_Vaccine_Injury_Act
4. http://vactruth.com/2012/01/23/babies-used-as-lab-rats/
5. http://vactruth.com/2011/12/30/3-filthy-truths-about-vaccines-cancer/

Photo Credit: Kanijoman

Merck pays big money to doctors for speaking about their products.

Sometimes gems are difficult to come by. However, when we find them, just clean them up a bit and we can appreciate their ‘real value’.  The little treasure I discovered was a document located on Merck Pharmaceutical’s website. It disclosed how much Merck paid doctors as speaking fees in the third and fourth quarter of 2009 alone.

The 72-page document is titled, “Merck & Co., Inc., Disclosure of Payments to U.S. Speakers for Promotional (non-CME) Medical Education Activities conducted in 3Q and 4Q 2009.” And, according to my calculations the sum was a hefty $18,810,495.52. [1]

Keep in mind that, that amount is just for speaking fees!

You may be wondering why this information was made available.

Merck said it was because of transparency. According to one article, “[Merck] has started disclosing payments to U.S.-based medical and scientific professionals who speak on behalf of our company or our products.” [2]

It’s a good start, but apparently the reports were going to be available annually thereafter (July 1, 2009). Well, where are they?  It is now 2012.

Document Shows Heavy Vaccine Promotion

Have you ever wondered why some doctors may be so rabidly in favor of promoting vaccines?  Or, haven’t you considered that aspect?  Well, here’s the answer:  Pharmaceutical companies pay doctors to talk about the ‘problem.’

Not only is it subtle, it’s legal and has financial rewards.

For example, Merck was pushing two new vaccines: Gardasil and Rotateq. After filtering the results in the PDF file for the terms, “HPV, Vaccine, and Rotavirus” the total amount paid came to $2,313,942.81.

Let’s do something mathematically radical. Since Merck reported numbers for only half the year, I’m going double the amount they paid to see what a year’s worth could possibly be.

This would mean Merck spent roughly $4,627,885.62 to encourage doctors to promote their solutions/products, which definitely include vaccines. After reading this, aren’t you sick to your stomach thinking about the ‘Ask Your Doctor’ commercials? I know I am.

But what does this all mean?

‘Rotten to the Core’

Think about this, parents. Who do you trust for reliable information? Maybe a better question would be, “Can you trust pharmaceutical companies?”

Outside of the money being doled out to doctors, consider other ways Big Pharma uses its money.  Here are some other examples:

• Julie Gerberding, former head of the Centers for Disease Control, paved the way for eventual approval for Merck’s Gardasil vaccine, guaranteeing billions in profits for her future employer. After her tenure at the CDC, she became President of the Vaccine Division at Merck Pharmaceuticals.  [3]
• Dr. Paul Offit [4] is often seen in the media promoting vaccines as being safe. As a matter of fact, he states children can safely get up to 10,000 of them. [5][6] What isn’t often discussed is the royalties he made from vaccine sales.
• Dr. Andrew Wakefield identified the measles virus from the MMR vaccine in the intestines of autistic children. For his reward, this heroic doctor was stricken from the medical registry. Furthermore, his professional reputation was targeted to be destroyed. One website details how Merck deals with doctors who threaten vaccine profits. They say, “Court evidence now available on-line at the University of California library shows drug giant Merck systematically targetted [sic] “hit-lists” of doctors to discredit, neutralise or destroy critics of the safety and effectiveness of Merck’s drugs… One memo stated: ’we may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live….’” [7]

Summary

Parents want healthy children and straight answers from their pediatricians, the CDC and FDA. Do you think your doctor really believes what he or she is telling you, regarding vaccines? Or, were they paid to believe it? As it stands now, most doctors will deny vaccines have any contributory role in autism or can cause harm.

At the very least, this little document shines sunlight on what many parents of vaccine injured children have been saying all the while: Maybe it’s the cost of keeping the herd quiet.

“Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. . . .” -Bertrand Russell,1953

Sources:

[1] Merck & Co., Inc., Disclosure of Payments to U.S. Speakers for Promotional (non-CME) Medical Education Activities conducted in 3Q and 4Q 2009. http://www.merck.com/corporate-responsibility/docs/business-ethics-transparency/3Q09-Transparency-Report.pdf (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[2] Merck Statement on U.S. Speaker Fees.  http://www.fiercebiotech.com/press-releases/merck-statement-u-s-speaker-fees (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[3] Julie Gerberding. http://vactruth.com/2010/01/04/julie-gerberding-primed-big-pharmas-pump-with-flu-and-hpv-vaccines/

[4] Paul Offit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Offit (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[5]Paul Offit says children can get 10,000 vaccines. http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/05/paul-offits-10000-vaccines-and-the-milgram-experiment.html (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[6] http://www.whale.to/vaccines/offit23.html (Accessed 01/07/2012)

[7] Memo from Merck discussing how to destroy doctors. http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/merckdestroydoccritics/ (Accessed 01/07/2012)

Photo Credit: Kevin Dooley

Vaccines have not been tested for causing cancer.

Parents, if biological material was used to create a vaccine and it caused cancer when injected into hamsters, would you want that vaccine injected into your child?

Of course not!

But, that is exactly what happened to over 98 million Americans – and likely many more! Let me explain.

In the 1950s the poliovirus was cultured on monkey kidney cells to produce polio and adenovirus vaccines. A cancer-causing virus called SV40 was discovered, however, that fact was covered up and silenced.

That is important because, to my knowledge, that congressional information hasn’t been made available to the general public until now. I’m making available some snippets of the cover-up and its relevance to you, especially if you received a polio vaccine during the 1950s and ‘60s. Before that information is revealed, you must know…

Filthy Truth #1 – Vaccines are NOT Tested for Cancer-Causing Capabilities

Parents want peace of mind. They want to know their children are safe, and they want to trust their doctors. But, more parents are doing the opposite. Why?

I suspect that many parents are getting savvy to the potential inherent problems in vaccines. They’re educating themselves more on vaccine adverse reactions. Most parents know a child or have a friend with a child on the autistic spectrum. Here’s a relevant example.

We’ve all gone grocery shopping.

You know if you look at the product label, you get a general idea of what is contained in the product. That is how you find most of the nasty ingredients in processed foods. Vaccines are not quite the same, plus there’s a deceptive catch.

By law, doctors only have to give parents the vaccine information sheets. Parents, you want to request, read, and keep the vaccine product inserts! You can find them located here: http://vactruth.com/vaccine-inserts/

Do a search for the term “carcinogenesis,” literally ‘cancer creation’, on the product insert for any vaccine. You’ll see the following common phrase regarding most vaccines, “This vaccine has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility.” (Emphasis mine)

Personally, this should be the legal loophole at law for parents exempting their children from vaccinations. If a product manufacturer cannot guarantee that a product won’t make a person infertile, cause cancer or malformations, then parents have every right to protect themselves and their children from such life-long risks.

Can you imagine the horrified look on parents’ faces when they discover vaccines haven’t been tested for cancer causing capabilities? Maybe parents would ask more demanding questions and require better explanations from their pediatricians.

Filthy Truth #2 – Cancer Virus Contaminates Vaccine

Vaccines were never as safe as moms and dads were—or are—led to believe!

Here’s why.

In order to make the vaccine in the 1950s, the poliovirus was cultured on monkey kidney cells. Researchers discovered the cells were contaminated with a virus called SV40.

Contamination of vaccines became so well known in scientific circles, ‘radical vaccine enthusiast’ and vaccine patent holder Dr. Paul Offit reluctantly admits,

“The polio vaccine used in the late 1950s and early 1960s was contaminated with a monkey virus called simian virus 40 (SV40) present in monkey kidney cells used to grow the vaccine. Recently, investigators found SV40 DNA in biopsy specimens obtained from patients with cancers such as mesothelioma (lung), osteosarcoma (bone) and non-Hodgkins lymphoma (lymph nodes)… Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis that SV40 virus contained in polio vaccines administered before 1963 cause cancers. In addition, available evidence suggests that SV40 virus is likely be transmitted to people by a mechanism other than vaccines.” http://www.chop.edu/service/vaccine-education-center/hot-topics/sv40.html

Dr. Offit also forgot to mention SV40 infections also are found in the brain of autistic children. Hmmmm. Read about it here: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/13550281003685839

There is very good reason for people like Dr. Paul Offit to downplay the contamination of vaccines.

Bernice Eddy, who at the time was a scientist at the Division of Biologics Standards (DBS), discovered a major problem. Page 500 of the Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session. April 20, 21; and May 3, 4, 1972, states,

“The next and only serious vaccine crisis that has occurred since the polio episode was the realization in mid-1961 that a monkey virus later shown to cause tumors in hamsters was contaminating both polio and adenovirus vaccines. The virus, known as SV40, was entering the vaccines and, just as in the polio case was surviving the formalin [form of formaldehyde] treatment.

There were several states by which the full extent of the SV40 problem became known. First was the discovery in 1959-1960 by a DBS [Division of Biologics Standards] scientist, once again Bernice Eddy, that an unknown agent in the monkey kidney cells used to produce polio and adenovirus vaccines would cause tumors when the cells were injected into hamsters.” (Emphasis mine)

How does the above information play with your—or anyone’s—sense of integrity? What about trusting federal health agencies, their research, and data? What will be revealed next is shocking.

Filthy Truth #3 – Contamination is Hidden from Parents

In my opinion what happened next is borderline criminal: The information was suppressed.

Rather than admitting to the problem and taking measures to correct it, those in high places of science and trust allowed contaminated vaccines to be injected into millions of unwitting and helpless women and children.

Page 502 of the same congressional document states,

“In 1954 Eddy, as a polio control officer, found live virus in supposedly killed polio vaccine; in 1955 she was relieved of her duties as polio control officer…After her discoveries concerning the SV40 virus, her staff and animal space were reduced and she was demoted from head of a section to head of a unit.”

Page 505,

“…even when the contaminating virus was found to be oncogenic [cancer causing] in hamsters, the DBS [Division of Biologics Standards] and its expert advisory committee decided to leave existing stocks on the market rather than risk eroding public confidence by a recall.” (Emphasis mine)

And…

“There has been a tendency on the part of certain higher government circles to play down any open discussion of problems associated with vaccines…”

Government officials knew parents definitely would reconsider injecting biological agents, especially vaccines, into their children so they perpetrated a BIG lie that became buried in the annals of vaccine history, which they probably thought they could hide forever. Unfortunately, the SV40 cover-up may not be the only ‘sleeping dog’ story in vaccinology. There just may be some interesting factual stories regarding how some influenza strains either came into being or became so potent.

Summary

I think parents want one thing: Assurance of scientific information to have peace of mind. They want to know their children are safe—and they want to trust their doctors, especially pediatricians. But, more parents are doing the opposite. Why? I suspect many parents not only are getting savvy to the potential problems with vaccines, but also know of serious health problems from children of neighbors and friends who suffer adverse vaccine reactions, which scares them.

Parents definitely ought to look at vaccines with a skeptical eye. They must read and keep the vaccine product inserts. If you’re not comfortable getting your child vaccinated, exempt your child. You have every legal right to do that.

Given the unethical happenings surrounding some of the above information, I suspect that it just may be the tip of the iceberg when it comes to all vaccines and carcinogenicity.

*Note: The information in this article is posted as a Public Service by Vactruth.com and taken from U.S. Printing Office Washington, DC 20402–0001  

Source:

Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session. Page 499-505. April 20,21; and May 3,4, 1972.

Photo Credit: GE Healthcare

Congress often passes laws benefiting corporations.

Just imagine this: Health officials coming to your house and force-vaccinating your children.

It seems a bit outrageous initially. But, put into context, that is small potatoes compared with the U.S. Congress recently passing the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

I’ll show you later on in this article how public health and school officials will probably make up the bulk of these ‘Task Forces’. If you want to know more and what you can do about it, please read on.

California = A TEST

Before I explain the law, you should have an example, I think.

You may recall recently that school officials in Natomas, California, were going door-to-door searching for unvaccinated children. http://www.news10.net/news/local/article/156068/2/Natomas-school-officials-go-door-to-door-to-find-unvaccinated-students

School officials attempted to vaccinate children (mostly home-schooled children) with a whooping cough vaccine.  Parents were infuriated and used some salty language when slamming doors in officials’ faces.

During a recent newscast, Heyman Matlock, a public education servant, is seen attempting to intimidate a mother by stating, “Okay, we are coming today to give her, her TDaP if she hasn’t had it done yet.”

However, there’s a dirty little secret involved. That secret is, who is funding the Natomas operation.  It is likely buried in over 2000 pages of congressional red tape. Parents who don’t vaccinate their child(ren) can expect similar goons knocking at their doors.

Let me explain.

Congress Authorizes ‘Vaccine Squads’

On Christmas Eve, 2009, the U.S. Senate passed H.R. 3590. The bill eventually became Public Law No. 111-148, which gives the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) authorization to create “vaccination squads” in local communities and seek out unvaccinated children. The ‘vaccine squads’ are called the “Community Preventive Services Task Force.”

Not only will the Task Force be working with the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, as Cindy Loveland notes in an article, but on page 1202 of that law, the most relevant responsibilities are listed as:

“(D) carrying out immunization-promoting strategies for participants or clients of public programs, including assessments of immunization status, referrals to health care providers, education, provision [provide] of on-site immunizations, or incentives for immunization;

“(E) providing for home visits that promote immunization through education, assessments of need, referrals, provision of immunizations, or other services;”

“(F) providing reminders or recalls for immunization providers;”

“(G) conducting assessments of, and providing feedback to, immunization providers;”

“(H) any combination of one or more interventions described in this paragraph; or”

“(I) immunization information systems to allow all States to have electronic databases for immunization records.”

These aggressive measures are the fruits of pharmaceutical industry’s lobbying and influence. I can only imagine police or sheriffs escorting the vaccine squad(s) for “non-compliant” parents. This should be of great concern to parents.  To understand how such things become a reality, you have to understand that ‘money talks’.

Just check out how much Big Pharma contributes to Congressional members campaign coffers.

But, the bigger question that I have is, “Who is in charge?”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Says, “It’s good to be king!”

The most troubling aspect of Public Law No. 111-148 is it puts the director of the Centers for Disease Control in the driver’s seat for creating the Task Force.

Page 1126 admits,

“SEC. 399U. COMMUNITY PREVENTIVE SERVICES TASK FORCE.
(a) ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE.—The Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shall convene an independent Community Preventive Services Task Force (referred to in this subsection as the ‘Task Force’) to be composed of individuals with appropriate expertise.”

Why should this be of concern?  The concern is that pharmaceutical companies ‘own’ public health officials, almost literally.

A blatant example is explained by health expert Robert Scott Bell writing about former head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, “The most recent in a long list of government bureaucrats to leave the public dole and take up the high-paying cause of Big Pharma is none other than former head of the CDC Julie Gerberding. One year and one day from the date of departure from the Taxpayer payroll, Ms. Gerberding takes the reins as president of the vaccine division of the principle descendant of I.G. Farben: Merck Pharmaceuticals.”

FACT: Pharmaceutical Companies Have Significant Influence Over Public Health Officials.

SMASH Fear – Positive Steps You Can Take Right Now To Make a Difference!

1. Learn how much money pharmaceutical companies spend on influencing congressional representatives.
2. Understand that corporations are considered a ‘person’. See how much money the pharmaceutical companies have paid in criminal charges. Do a search for the key terms “Criminal [company name]”.
3. Research your state’s vaccine exemption laws and know your rights. Even though you will be pressured, it’s okay to say ‘NO!’
4. Know how to keep yourself healthy by reading articles on Mercola.com and NaturalNews.com.
5. Listen to powerful and hard-hitting Internet radio programs like the Robert Scott Bell Show and InfoWars.
6. Educate yourself about the toxic chemicals and dangerous biological agents pharmaceutical companies want to inject into your children.

Summary

Vaccines are not making children healthier!  Demographics say otherwise with children who are vaccinated contracting the very same disease(s) for which they supposedly have been ‘immunized’. Parents should realize there is a choice. Parents and legal guardians have the power—and legal right—to say “NO!” to those who want to inject their children with dangerous biological and neurotoxic agents.

With the growing population of informed parents, it’s obvious pharmaceutical companies are running scared and doing whatever it takes to vaccinate children.  How do you feel about that?  Are they YOUR children, or are they the states and Big Pharmas?  That really is the issue here and at law, I think.

Maybe there ought to be a law mandating all Congresspersons get every vaccination a child receives up to 18 years of age on the very first day of his or her congressional term to prove they are efficacious. What do you think?

Sources:

http://www.news10.net/news/local/article/156068/2/Natomas-school-officials-go-door-to-door-to-find-unvaccinated-students

http://vactruth.com/2009/12/19/health-care-bill-creates-peek-a-boo-squads-to-enforce-in-home-vaccinations/

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf

http://vactruth.com/2010/01/04/julie-gerberding-primed-big-pharmas-pump-with-flu-and-hpv-vaccines/

Photo Credit: Kyle Rush

Parents are recognizing injecting biological agents into babies is dangerous.

Contributions by Patricia Jordan, DVM, Catherine J Frompovich, and Jeffry John Aufderheide.

Parents are seeing the vast amounts of children being injured by vaccines. Below are 8 stories indicating parents are waking up and getting savvy to the damage vaccines are causing to children.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anti-vaccine movement grows in many states
The News Tribune
Link: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2011/11/30/1926232/anti-vaccine-movement-grows-in.html
Summary: A rising number of parents in more than half of states are opting out of school shots for their kids. And in eight states, more than 1 in 20 public school kindergartners do not get all the vaccines required for attendance, an Associated Press analysis found.
 
 
Many Parents Request Delays in Vaccine Schedule
Fox News.com
Link: http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/11/29/many-parents-request-delays-in-vaccine-schedule/
Summary: More than three quarters of pediatricians said they sometimes or often get asked by parents to use an “alternative” vaccination schedule that strays from national recommendations, according to a new survey of doctors.
 
 
Colorado parents rank second in nation for vaccine refusals
DenverPost.com
Link: http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_19429560
Summary: A new survey puts Colorado second-highest in the nation for parents refusing vaccines for their school-age kids, part of an anti-shot trend that increasingly troubles state health officials.
 
 
Vaccines for kids shirked in eight states (PICTURES)
CBS News
Link: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57331905-10391704/vaccines-for-kids-shirked…
Summary: Have parents given the cold shoulder to immunizations for their kids? In eight states, more than 1 in 20 public school kindergartners fail to get all the vaccines required for attendance, according to a new Associated Press analysis. That apparent trend has health officials worried about outbreaks of diseases that once were all but eliminated.
 
 
Many parents request delays in vaccine schedule
The Baltimore Sun
Link: http://www.baltimoresun.com/health/sns-rt-us-many-parents-request-delays…
Summary: More than three quarters of pediatricians said they sometimes or often get asked by parents to use an “alternative” vaccination schedule that strays from national recommendations, according to a new survey of Washington State doctors.
 
 
More Parents Are Opting Out of Vaccines
The Atlantic Wire
Link: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/11/more-parents-are-opting-out-vaccines/45423/
Summary: A study of exemption rates by the Associated Press finds that more and more parents are skipping required vaccines for their children, often out of fear that shots do more harm than good. More than half of all states have seen an increase in the number of exemptions and in eight states, mostly in the Northwest and Midwest, the percentage of kids not getting the full recommendation of shots is over 5 percent.
 
 
More Children Skipping Vaccines In Some States
Pharmalot
Link: http://www.pharmalot.com/2011/11/more-children-skipping-vaccines-in-some-states/
Summary: To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? That is a question that continues to concern parents nationwide. And a new analysis found that, in eight US states, more than 1 in 20 public school kindergartners are not receiving all the vaccines required for school attendance. And in more than half of all states, there has also been a slight increase in the rate of exemptions over the past five years.
 
 
Doctors in a Bind When Parents Want to Delay, Skip Vaccines
Health.com
Link: http://news.health.com/2011/11/28/doctors-in-a-bind-when-parents-want-to-delay-skip-vaccines/
Summary: Mistrust of childhood vaccines is causing some parents to request “alternative” schedules from doctors, either delaying or skipping some shots.

 
 
Photo Credit: The Jordan

Monkeys are used in cruel vaccine experiments.

When I discovered vaccine makers were putting spermicidal chemicals and neurotoxic mercury in the H1N1 vaccine several years ago back during the 2009 ‘pandemic’, I had one nagging question: “Are children tested to see if vaccines cause neurological injury and how is that done?” If you want the answer, read on.

It turned out there weren’t any tests on children.

I know that for certain because I had a face-to-face interview with the doctor performing the vaccine trial. He was quite evasive when answering questions specific to vaccine safety. Why? Because…

Vaccines DO Cause Neurological Injury

Please remember this point: vaccines cause neurological injury. For example, in one case report, a child experienced cranial nerve palsy after the MMR vaccine. The investigators stated, “MMR viruses are neurotropic [a virus that infects nerve cells]. Therefore, although the vaccine is obtained by live attenuated viruses, vaccination may produce neurological disorders.” http://www.ijponline.net/content/36/1/59

What about the 4,000 injuries caused by the swine flu vaccines in 1976? The cost of those injuries, according to some reports, amounted to over 3.5 BILLION U.S. dollars. http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x9mh9f

Can you understand now why many vaccine injuries are swept under the carpet? It’s expensive to admit a mistake! Shortly in this article I will reveal the “Gold Standard” for testing neurological diseases caused by live virus vaccines.

Ignoring Death and Harm Caused By Vaccines

What you will discover below is that tests are performed by injecting live viral vaccines into monkeys to determine if they those vaccines cause neurological disease. If a monkey dies within 48 hours of injection, the death is attributed to a “non-specific cause” and can be replaced (see below). What? Hold the phone.

It seems rather incredulous to believe that research scientists ignore death—even in a research study animal—after an animal is injected with a biological agent. But that is exactly the gold standard for testing live virus vaccines.

What is the source for that information? None other than a standard for pharmaceutical drugs, the European Pharmacopeia, 5th Edition.

Under the title of Methods of Analysis, 2.6.18 – Test for neurovirulence of live virus vaccines, you will find the following information:

• “For each monkey, inject not more than 0.5 ml of the material to be examined into the thalamic region of each [brain] hemisphere, unless otherwise prescribed”
•  “The total amount of virus inoculated in each monkey must be not less than the amount contained in the recommended single human dose of the vaccine.”
•  “Observe the inoculated monkeys for 17 to 21 days for symptoms of paralysis and other evidence of neurological involvement; observe the control monkeys for the same period plus 10 days.”
•  “Animals that die within 48 h[ours] of injection are considered to have died from non-specific causes and may be replaced. The test is not valid if: more than 20 per cent of the inoculated monkeys die from nonspecific causes;”
•  “Serum samples taken from the control monkeys at the time of inoculation of the test animals and 10 days after the latter are killed show evidence of infection by wild virus of the type to be tested or by measles virus.”
•  “At the end of the observation period, carry out autopsy and histopathological examinations of appropriate areas of the brain for evidence of central nervous system involvement.”
•  “The material complies with the test if there is no unexpected clinical or histopathological evidence of involvement of the central nervous system attributable to the inoculated virus.” [Emphasis added]

Source: Methods of Analysis
2.6.18 – Test for neurovirulence of live virus vaccines
EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA 5th Edition

2.6.18. TEST FOR NEUROVIRULENCE OF LIVE VIRUS VACCINES
01/2005:20619

How does this sit with you? Here’s the shocking reality…

Your Children In Essence Are Being Experimented On

As a parent, you could simply walk away at this point and ignore this information. But shouldn’t parents, MDs, nurses, health agencies, school districts, and the media be asking some questions?

For example, the second bullet states, “the total amount of virus inoculated in each monkey must be not less than the amount contained in the recommended single human dose of the vaccine.”

Let’s pause right here for just a moment.

Usually vaccines are not administered as a single valent vaccine, but in multiple combination doses, e.g., 3 infectious diseases in one vaccine, i.e., the MMR or DTaP.

When vaccines are tested, they are tested individually, never in combination, as is the common vaccinating practice recommended by pharmaceutical companies. In reality, infants are given much more than single doses of live viral vaccines. They are known as trivalent vaccines. Then trivalent vaccines can be combined with others.

• Three doses of live viruses in the Measles, Mumps and Rubella vaccine
• One dose of Hepatitis B vaccine
• One dose of Rotavirus vaccine
• One dose of Chickenpox vaccine
• One dose of Influenza vaccine

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) often recommends that children receive several live virus vaccines at the same time. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/downloads/child/0-6yrs-schedule-pr.pdf

How many pediatricians or health professionals are willing to give blood tests or do a full neurological examination before and after vaccination? The simple truth is they don’t. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ1Tqx1YpYY

Just imagine the implications of simply testing children prior to vaccinating. That would be a screening process that would look for mitochondrial proclivities that could be impacted by vaccines, something the Hannah Poling vaccine-damage case that was settled by the vaccine court points to. Hannah’s unfortunate vaccine damage could be a learning curve for the medical profession about injecting children with multiple vaccines at one time/visit. Perhaps, like with the monkeys, they want to disregard that information.

Summary

Consistently MDs and the media tell parents that vaccines are harmless. Furthermore, the spin is that the chance for an adverse reaction is slim to none. How do doctors really know when ‘dead monkeys aren’t allowed to talk’? It’s pretty clear from research that vaccines cause neurological injury.

Some mistakes of believing the medical profession in my experience have taught me to start asking hard questions. I’m the parent of a vaccine-damaged child. Parents need to know this hidden and suppressed information BEFORE they permit anyone to vaccinate their child. Let me ask you, “From what you read, is this ‘safe’ science”?

Please pass this along to a friend and start waking people up!

Sources:

Methods of Analysis  2.6.18 – Test for neurovirulence of live virus vaccines. EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOEIA, 5th Edition.

http://vactruth.com/2009/09/11/ingredients-found-in-spermicides-cleaners-and-cosmetics-along-with-thimerosal-and-squalene-present-in-experimental-h1n1-vaccine/

http://www.ijponline.net/content/36/1/59

http://www.dailymotion.com/swf/x9mh9f

http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM093833

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/downloads/child/0-6yrs-schedule-pr.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ1Tqx1YpYY

Photo Credit: Night Owl

US Serviceman Sprayed With Pesticides

A United States military handbook published in 1946 shows chemical compounds used in formulating the pesticide DDT are currently injected into babies.

The handbook entitled, “DDT and Other Insecticides and Repellents”, reveals Triton X-100, Tween 20, and Tween 80 were used as major components of spraying operations of DDT. Their stated purpose was to prevent separation of ingredients and increase absorption of DDT.

A major twist to the story is revealing the company owning the patent for DDT. More on that later.

Page 70 of the document states, “The studies of emulsifers have been confined primarily to their effects on the skin, since there is no hazard from ingestion and little from skin absorption and inhalation. They have also been studied to some extent from the standpoint of their relationship to increased absorption of DDT. All of those studied present little or no hazard under the conditions of use recommended, and have been approved for that purpose so far as the toxicology is concerned.” [emphasis mine]

Scientific studies on Triton X-100 and Tween 80 actually prove the statement above to be untrue, which would likely explain why studies were limited to only the effects on the skin.

Triton X-100 and Tween 80 actually cause cell suicide, called apoptosis.

Mixtures were sprayed directly onto vegetables and crops during the height of the polio epidemic in the late 1940s and early 1950s.

“What vaccines are these chemicals in?”

As a concerned parent, you may be wondering what vaccines contain these chemicals. The Centers for Disease Control website shows the chemicals mentioned above are in the following vaccines:

Tween 20 (Polysorbate 20) 

• Hepatitis A (Havrix)
• Hepatitis A-B (Twinrix)

Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) 

• DtaP (Infanrix, Tripedia)
• DtaP-HebB-IPV (Pediarix)
• DtaP-Hib (TriHIBit)
• Human Papillomavirus (Gardasil)
• Influenza (Fluarix)
• Rotavirus (RotaTeq)
• Tdap (Adacel, Boostrix)

Triton X-100

• Influenza (Fluarix, Fluzone) 

If you decide to bring this list to your doctor to educate him/her, prepare to be disappointed. Medical professionals are trained to ignore mothers concerned about vaccines. They parrot the following phrase:  “The poison is in the dose.”

In their arrogance, their response will go something like this, “It is just ridiculous to worry about such a tiny dose of something so innocuous.”

If you want to read how most medical personnel are putting your baby in jeopardy, read on.

“What can these chemicals do to my child?”

What can these chemicals do to your child? A parent would think finding information on the safety record of Triton X-100, Tween 20, and Tween 80 would be easily available – but this isn’t the case.

What I discovered was shocking.

Tween 80 and Triton X-100 can:

• Be used in pharmaceuticals to deliver nano-particles to the brain because they cross or disrupt the Blood Brain Barrier – which protects the brain.
• Suppress the immune system
• Promote epileptic seizures in rats
• Accelerate the development of female organs in rats
• Trigger cell death or ‘suicide’ called apoptosis
• Cause cancer in rats at the injection site
• Damage and promote intestinal damage in rats
• Cause bleeding disorders, kidney failure, liver failure, and death in infants who received a vitamin E product combined with Tween 80
• Possibly promote viral or bacterial infections
• Break down Red Blood Cells
• Cause damage to the heart when injected into rats

Read about them here: http://vactruth.com/2011/08/23/vaccine-ingredients-non-ionic-surfactants-tween-80-triton-x-100-nonoxynol-9/

To minimize the above information, you may hear arguments about the chemicals being safe because they are in hand soaps, ice cream, and in our lungs (natural surfactant).

For the record, I’ve never seen a mother feeding or injecting a newborn with soap or ice cream. My word of advice to mothers is follow your intuition and ask a lot of questions.

“Do pharmaceutical companies really care about my child?”

After many parents read vaccine ingredients, they may ask, “Pharmaceutical companies really care about my child’s health, don’t they?”

Pharmaceutical companies have yet to explain how injecting such toxic substances into a baby actually makes them healthier. You’ll see how they have known about this information for some time.

Consider page 71 of the handbook cautioning, “It should be clearly kept in mind that most of the substances under consideration are poisonous. If they were not, they would probably be useless against the insects for which they are recommended. Therefore, the recommendations for the proper use of these substances should be followed. Careless, unnecessary exposure and misuse is [sic] fraught with hazard.”

Here is the twist I promised.

Using the chemicals in vaccines is easily understood by looking at who owns the patent for DDT.

On page 3 of the handbook it states, “The Geigy company holds the patents on the use of the compound [DDT] as an insecticide. The United States patent is No. 2,329,074, issued September 7, 1943, to Paul Müller.” [emphasis mine]

Geigy company is now known as Novartis Pharmaceuticals, a vaccine manufacturer.

What does it all mean?

In a nutshell, the same companies who formulated and patented DDT, are putting the same industrial chemicals in childhood vaccines. To add insult to injury, their public relations campaigns brainwash doctors and the scientific community into believing that injecting babies, even in small amounts with these chemicals, is somehow okay. Even more bizarre are claims chemicals such as Triton X-100 or Tween 80 are involved in promoting health!

Mothers should carefully read the vaccine inserts and investigate vaccines before allowing physicians to inject their children with toxic chemicals that could permanently injure their children for life.

 ***

We are publishing this information to educate Congress, the media, and public regarding issues affecting the health and well-being of our citizens. It is not our intention to infringe upon anyone’s copyright. We believe we have used the U.S. Copyright’s Doctrine of Fair Use equitably and without incurring infringement or plagiarism.
Pesticide Chemicals Are In Vaccines

References:

“DDT and Other Insecticides and Repellents”. Miscellaneous Publication No. 606, United States Department of Agriculture. Issued August 1946.

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-1.pdf

http://www.sailhome.org/Concerns/Vaccines/MAC.html

http://vactruth.com/2011/08/23/vaccine-ingredients-non-ionic-surfactants-tween-80-triton-x-100-nonoxynol-9/

http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/etc/medialib/docs/Sigma/Product_Information_Sheet/1/t8532pis.Par.0001.File.tmp/t8532pis.pdf

http://www.novartis.com/about-novartis/company-history/index.shtml