The Roast of a Science Based Vaccine Skeptic

Jennifer Craig, Smallpox, Top Stories, Vaccine Propaganda

The Roast of a Science Based Vaccine Skeptic

No Comments 13 March 2010

.
.
.
.
.
.
.

—–Original Message—–
From: Jennifer Craig
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:58 AM
To: Harriet Hall
Subject: smallpox

Would you please provide the mortality stats for smallpox in the UK in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and explain how smallpox vaccination affected those.

The smallpox vaccine, made from the secretions from a diseased cow and containing orthopox vaccinia is supposed to create immunity to orthopox variola. Please explain why this is the case when great care is taken to ensure that flu vaccines contain the current pathogenic virus.

Jennifer Craig

.

.

At 12:35 PM 12/03/2010, you wrote:
(Response from Harriet Hall)

There are lies, damned lies and statistics. You are referring to statistics
commonly cited by anti-vaccine activists purporting to discredit smallpox vaccination.

In the first place, accurate statistics were hard to come by in those days,
and the primitive techniques of variolation were nowhere near as safe or
effective as more modern smallpox vaccines, so those numbers don’t mean much. In the second place, there are many, many more and better statistics showing a clear benefit of vaccines, even prior to the 19th century.

Nettleton 1724 “nineteen out of every hundred, or near one fifth of those,
who have had the natural Small Pox, have died; whereas out of sixty one
which have been inoculated hereabouts, not one has died …”

Shortly thereafter Jurin found that the probability of death from
variolation was roughly 1 in 50, while the probability of death from
naturally contracted smallpox was 1 in 7 or 8.

In the American colonies, “The practice was, at first, widely
criticized.[10] However a limited trial showed that 6 deaths occurred out of 244 who were vaccinated (2.5%) while 844 out of 5980 died of natural
disease, and the process was widely adopted throughout the colonies.”

Anti-vaccination activists keep citing the same 19th century numbers from the UK because those are the ONLY data they can find to contradict the overwhelming mass of evidence for the efficacy and safety of smallpox
vaccines.

Cowpox and smallpox shared antigens so that antibodies to one disease
protected against the other. The flu virus is constantly mutating and
changing its antigens. Even so, vaccination against one strain of flu
provides a small degree of protection against other strains. Adding
adjuvants to vaccines increases this cross-reactivity. For a brief
explanation of the principle of cross-reactivity see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-reactivity

Harriet Hall, MD
The SkepDoc
www.skepdoc.info
www.sciencebasedmedicine.org


From: Jennifer Craig
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 3:29 PM
To: Harriet Hall
Subject: RE: smallpox

Thank you for your response.

I think you are confusing inoculation with vaccination. Inoculation was the insertion of smallpox pus under the skin with the intent of introducing a case of smallpox. Vaccination was the introduction of cowpox pus under the skin with the intent of preventing smallpox. As Jenner’s so called experiment with vaccination on one boy was on May 14, 1796, clearly Nettleton is inaccurate.

I am referring to statistics from several sources. At least two sources indicate that as vaccination campaigns took place, the incidence of smallpox rose. For example: Tebb wrote in 1884, “Vaccination was made compulsory by an Act of Parliament in the year 1853; again in 1867; and still more stringent in 1871. Since 1853, we have had three epidemics of small-pox, each being more severe than the one preceding.” Between the first and second epidemic there was a 50% increase in smallpox cases; between the second and third, a 120% increase.

In answer to a parliamentary question by the British Minister of Health on July 16th, 1923, a written list of figures of vaccinations and deaths from 1872 – 1921 was presented.   These figures demonstrate that as compliance with vaccination went down so did the smallpox death rate. For example, between 1872 and 1881 vaccinations as per cent of births was 85% and deaths from smallpox per 100,000 persons was 15.2. Between 1912 and 1921 the figures were 43.5% and 0.1 deaths.

Please cite at least three studies from “the overwhelming mass of evidence for the efficacy and safety of smallpox vaccines.”

I don’t consider Wikipedia to be a scientific source.

Please cite the studies that demonstrate that the antigens for smallpox and cowpox are the same.

Jennifer Craig

.

.

(Response from Harriet Hall)
You are not looking for information. You are looking for validation of your beliefs.  I won’t play your game.

Harriet Hall, MD
The SkepDoc
www.skepdoc.info
www.sciencebasedmedicine.org


I was looking for an informed person to debate with. Debate with facts, not beliefs. Clearly you are not it. Yet, without data, you feel free to promote inaccurate ideas.
Some sceptic!

Jennifer Craig


  1. Jennifer Craig is the author of the book, Jabs, Jenner, and Juggernauts.
  2. From the Editor of Vactruth.com: One suggestion is for Dr. Hall and others to investigate if Edward Jenner was the ‘true inventor’ of vaccines. What other assumptions could be incorrect?

Who discovered smallpox vaccination? Edward Jenner or Benjamin Jesty?http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2279376/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Cervical Cancer Vaccine Documents Presented to FDA Show Evidence of Harm

Blindness, Cervarix, Death, Gardasil, Guillian Barre, HPV, Infection, Paralysis, Top Stories

Cervical Cancer Vaccine Documents Presented to FDA Show Evidence of Harm

5 Comments 12 March 2010

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

The documents presented below were distributed in a meeting with FDA officials detailing adverse reactions to HPV vaccines in young women. Please feel free to distribute, copy, paste, print, link to, and share all of them. This information will assist parents and young adults in the future deciding the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

A special “Thank You” to InTheory.tv for recording this interview with Leslie Botha.

03.06.10 Table of Contents

03.12.10.FDA PPT Script Final1[1]

03 06 10 FDA Presentation Final

1.International Concerns regarding Gardasil and Cervarix

2. HPV Vaccine Injury Chart All

3. Investigate Gardasil Vaccine Risk Now! Petition1

4. Menstrual Cycle Evaluation

5. Vaccines and Autoimmune Diseases of the Adult

6. Visual Loss Following Immunization Against Human Papilloma Virus

7. Reports of Deaths

If you wish to link to this article, please use the following code on your website:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Hypogammaglobulinemics Estimated 10,000 Times More Susceptible to Vaccine-Induced Polio

Polio

Hypogammaglobulinemics Estimated 10,000 Times More Susceptible to Vaccine-Induced Polio

No Comments 10 March 2010

.
.
.
.

Poliomyelitis in Hypogammaglobulinemics
Author(s): H. V. Wyatt
Source: The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 128, No. 6 (Dec., 1973), pp. 802-806
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30061657

(excerpt)

“The incidence of natural poliomyelitis in hypogammaglobulinemics has been esti- mated to be similar to that in nonimmune normal children of the same age group exposed to virulent poliovirus. Poliomyelitis that afflicts hypogammaglobulinemics after the feeding of oral polio vaccine is characterized by an incubation period of longer than 28 days, a high rate of mortality after a long chronic illness, abnormal lesions in the central nervous system, and no reversion of the vaccine virus to viru- lence. Nearly 10% of vaccine-associated cases are in hypogammaglobulinemics, who are estimated to be 10,000 times more susceptible to vaccine-induced polio- myelitis than normal persons. It is suggested that only inactivated poliovaccine be given to hypogammaglobulinemics, that all suspected cases of vaccine-induced poliomyelitis be tested for y-globulin status, and that persons be tested for anti- bodies to poliovirus before treatment with immunosuppressive drugs…”

P.S. Did your doctor check for anemic conditions prior to vaccinating?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
FDA Requests Meeting With Activists Exposing Gardasil Adverse Reactions

Christina England, Gardasil, HPV, Top Stories

FDA Requests Meeting With Activists Exposing Gardasil Adverse Reactions

4 Comments 08 March 2010

.
.
.
.

Christina England
Vactruth.com
03/08/10

Throughout history there have been strong women debating big issues and changing history, amongst them are Joan of Arc, Emrneline Pankhurst and Amelia Earhart. On the 12th March 2010 in an extraordinary move, six strong, brave women of the world will come forward to present their research, documents and findings involving probably the most controversial vaccine of all times Gardasil to the FDA. What they have uncovered does not make easy reading.

Calling themselves ‘Little Women with Big Voices’ they have been formally invited by the FDA to present their information. The women making the presentation on behalf of the parents whose daughters have died or have been injured by the HPV vaccines are: Karen Maynor; mother of the late Megan Hild, New Mexico; Rosemary Mathis: whose daughter Lauren was adversely injured, North Carolina; Freda Birrell; political activist and lobbyist, Scotland and the United Kingdom; Leslie Carol Botha; broadcast journalist, Colorado; Cynthia Janak: research analyst, Illinois; and Janny Stokvis: research analyst, Netherlands.

The press release released today, Monday 8th 2010 says

“Over 17,500 adverse reactions and 64 deaths have been reported to VAERS (estimated 1 to 10% of the population reporting). The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has posted 272 VAERS reports of abnormal pap tests post-vaccination. Reports of deaths and injuries are now coming in from the United States, New Zealand, Australia, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain and India.

Birrell has compiled 40 pages of reports of deaths and injuries from the above countries for the FDA. Stokvis and Mathis have compiled data of vaccine injuries and deaths from VAERS. Botha is presenting studies on menstrual cycle evaluation to prevent vaccine injury – and the impact of aluminium on the endocrine system. Janak has researched vaccine ingredients and believes that she has found the reason as to why “healthy” girls have been injured or have died suddenly and unexpectedly within days weeks, months or potentially years after vaccination.”

According to Botha, it has been an amazing effort to mobilize a group of mothers and concerned women internationally to address the dangers of the HPV vaccines. A colleague of Botha’s, publicist Bobbi Cowan from Los Angeles joined the ranks providing here expertise in organizing a national media campaign. A press release was written and the group of six plus Stephen Tunley from Australia, whose daughter was injured by the vaccine, raised $600 to buy a major news release list through a professional news wire service. According to Botha, the group of ‘Little Women’ is now playing on the same marketing level as Merck and GSK. “They will be shocked at our savvy, expertise and determination to get our message out to the media and to the public.”

The presentation will be presented by the women to the FDA, on Friday, March 12 in the form of a power point presentation which will include 54 slides. Each member in the group will receive a file containing with over 236 pages of research, data and parental concerns. As soon as the presentation is over the data will be released to the public and media.


I have been told that the information contained in file will send shock waves around the world. There have been problems with this vaccine from the onset. Over the four years that Gardasil has been in use, the media has reported deaths, cases of Guillian Barre Syndrome, paralysis, seizures, blindness, problems with menstrual cycles, miscarriage and yet still this vaccine has been given to our children and women. Warnings have not been heeded and the problems have continued. This vaccine has now approved for use in males.

Merck has stated over and over that this vaccine is safe, the FDA and CDC have stated this vaccine is safe. This has been taken from the Merck website

“How safe is GARDASIL?

The safety of a vaccine is an important part of its story.

The common side effects include pain, swelling, itching, bruising, and redness at the injection site, headache, fever, nausea, dizziness, vomiting, and fainting. Fainting can happen after getting GARDASIL. Sometimes people who faint can fall and hurt themselves. For this reason, your health care professional may ask you to sit or lie down for 15 minutes after you get GARDASIL. Some people who faint might shake or become stiff. This may require evaluation or treatment by your health care professional.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the FDA have reviewed all the safety information available to them. Based on data available to them as of May 2009, the CDC and FDA determined that GARDASIL continues to be safe and effective, and its benefits continue to outweigh its risks. In August 2009, the CDC reaffirmed its continued recommendation for vaccination with GARDASIL in females. In October 2009, the FDA approved the use of GARDASIL in boys and young men ages 9 to 26 to protect against 90% of genital warts cases.

For more information on GARDASIL, talk to your doctor or health care professional.”

Karen Maynor one of the women involved in the presentation has told me her daughter Megan died after using this vaccine. Megan’s story along with the many others is included on the website The Truth About Gardasil a site dedicated to the girls who have lost their lives to Gardasil a vaccine manufactured by Merck to help protect women against cervical cancer.

‘Truth About Gardasil’ was designed to remember the girls who have lost their lives but also to alert the public to the dangers of Gardasil. The mission statement is firm stating “This website is dedicated to the girls whose lives have been taken way too early because of this vaccine. It is also dedicated to their families who continue on in this fight. We must unite to get this vaccine off the market, together we CAN make a difference!”

In a recent interview with journalist Marcia G. Yerman, Huffington Post , Expert Dr Diane Harper outlines these issues when speaking about the pros and cons of Gardasil.

Harms of HPV Vaccination:
• Duration of efficacy is key to the entire question. If duration is at least fifteen years, then vaccinating 11-year-old girls will protect them until they are 26 and will prevent some pre-cancers, but postpone most cancers. If duration of efficacy is less than fifteen years, then no cancers are prevented, only postponed.
• Safety: There is at least one verified case of auto-immune initiated motor neuron disease declared triggered by Gardasil [presented by neurologists at the 2009 American Neurological Association meeting in Baltimore, Maryland). There are serious adverse events, including death, associated with Gardasil use.
No population benefit in reduction of cervical cancer incidence in the United States with HPV vaccination as long as screening continues.
• Incidence rate of cervical cancer in the United States based on screening is 7/100,000 women per year.
• Incidence rate of cervical cancer if women are only vaccinated with Gardasil is 14/100,000 per year (twice the rate of cervical cancer if young women vaccinated with Gardasil do not seek Pap testing at 21 years and the rest of their life).
• Incidence rate of cervical cancer with Cervarix vaccination is 9/100,000 per year– better than with Gardasil, but still more than with screening alone.
• Incidence of cervical cancer without screening and without vaccination is nearly 90/100,000 per year. The combination of HPV vaccine and screening in the U.S. will not decrease the incidence of cervical cancer to any measurable degree at the population level. Those women who do not participate in Pap screening, and who are vaccinated, will have some personal benefit for five years for Gardasil and 7.4 years for Cervarix (maybe longer), but they will not affect the population rates.

Boosters for Gardasil after antibodies wane makes the cost of vaccination escalate significantly, and cause implementation challenges to reach those women who might want to be revaccinated.”

Slightly different to what Merck are saying don’t you agree?

Jeffry John Aufderheide from VacTruth.com agrees that he feels that it is big bucks that is driving the vaccine saying :-

“In general, many are becoming wise to the fact that young women are being monetized with the cervical cancer vaccines. At $130.27per vaccine, Gardasil is the most expensive on the market. What we know from the documents made available is the Gardasil vaccine has been one gigantic experiment. The FDA is now between a rock and a hard place. Do they continue protecting the brand of corporations or will management recognize a moral responsibility to protect these young women from an experimental product?”

The USA Government seem to have few concerns about Gardasil and have pushed for its use.

The Republican Governor Rick Perry has been reported to have pushed for all girls in Texas to be vaccinated at 11 – 12 signing an executive order requiring this to be mandatory for entry to 6th grade.

ON GUARD – GARDASIL

A critical look at a new and controversial vaccine by Ralph W. Moss, PhD says

“Despite vocal opposition from some religious groups and worried parents, on February 2, 2007, the Republican governor of Texas Rick Perry signed an executive order requiring all 11- and 12-year-old Texas schoolgirls to be vaccinated with Gardasil. This is a newly approved vaccine, manufactured by the pharmaceutical giant, Merck, Inc. It is designed to prevent infection with four strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV): types 6 and 11, which cause genital warts, and types 16 and 18, which are among the 30 or more strains that are capable of causing cervical cancer.

By signing this executive order, Gov. Perry bypassed the Texas legislature, and thereby avoided an open political debate on this controversial issue. Grassroots opposition in the Texas legislature may yet reverse this unilateral decision (see below). But at this writing the order stands: any girl who wants to enter sixth grade next September in the Lone Star State will have to show proof that she has received three Gardasil injections before school begins.”

Of course if you trace Mr Perry’s activities the usual conflicts of interest emerge. He has been reported to have links to Merck including the following as reported in Rick Perry’s Ties With Merck Run Deep – KBTX.com

“One of the drug company’s three lobbyists in Texas is Mike Toomey, his (Perry’s) former chief of staff. His current chief of staff’s mother-in-law, Texas Republican state Rep. Dianne White Delisi, is a state director for Women in Government.

Toomey was expected to be able to woo conservative legislators concerned about the requirement stepping on parent’s rights and about signalling tacit approval of sexual activity to young girls. Delisi, as head of the House public health committee, which likely would have considered legislation filed by a Democratic member, also would have helped ease conservative opposition.

Perry also received $6,000 from Merck’s political action committee during his re-election campaign.”

Another report Larry Flynt.com describes Perry as snarky, scheming, and slimy.

However, from my research into vaccines this seems to be the usual dodgy pattern when you study the wheeling and dealing that goes on behind the scenes of the Governments we trust and it is easy to see why. It benefits Merck hugely to get officials on side if you consider the fact that every child vaccinated with Gardasil is worth $360 to Merck. If this vaccine becomes mandatory throughout the USA it is a nice little earner for the drug giants.

If the drug companies and Governments were honest with the public it would not take brave women of the world prepared to take risks to expose and uncover the truth. The truth would already be there and so to would our trust.

.

A personal message from Leslie Botha concerning Gardasil…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
SEBELIUS: HHS document EXTENDING THE PANDEMIC to 2012

H1N1, Influenza, Top Stories, Undue Influence, Vaccine Laws

SEBELIUS: HHS document EXTENDING THE PANDEMIC to 2012

No Comments 08 March 2010

.
.
.

*Special thanks goes to Eileen D. for bringing this to our attention.

See bolded Excerpt such as:

Therefore, pursuant to section 319F-3(b) of the Act, I have determined there is a credible risk that the spread of pandemic influenza A viruses and those with pandemic potential and resulting disease does or could constitute a public health emergency.

…and extends through February 28, 2012.

Section 319F-3(a)(4)(A) confers immunity to manufacturers and distributors of the Covered Countermeasure, regardless of the defined population.

…and amended on September 28, 2009 to provide targeted liability protections for pandemic countermeasures to enhance distribution


100226 Sec HHS Sebelius Pandemic Influenza Vaccines Amendment

[Federal Register: March 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 43)]
[Notices]
[Page 10268-10272]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05mr10-76]

=======================================================================
———————————————————————–

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary

Pandemic Influenza Vaccines–Amendment

Authority:  42 U.S.C. 247d-6d.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to the September 28, 2009 Republished
Declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act.

———————————————————————–

SUMMARY: Amendment to declaration issued on September 28, 2009 (74 FR
51153) pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act
(“the Act”)

[[Page 10269]]

(42 U.S.C. 247d-6d) to revise covered countermeasures and extend
effective date and republication of the declaration to reflect the
declaration in its entirety, as amended.

DATES: The amendment of the republished declaration issued on September
28, 2009 is effective as of March 1, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Lurie, MD, MSPH, Assistant
Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201, Telephone               (202) 205-2882         (202) 205-2882 (this is not a toll-free
number).
HHS Secretary’s Amendment to the September 28, 2009 Republished
Declaration for the Use of the Public Readiness and Emergency
Preparedness Act for H5N1, H2, H6, H7, H9 and 2009-H1N1 Vaccines:
Whereas there are or may be multiple animal influenza A viruses,
circulating in wild birds and/or domestic animals that cause, or have
significant potential to cause, sporadic human infections or have
mutated to cause pandemics in humans;
Whereas, these viruses may evolve into virus strains capable of
causing a pandemic of human influenza because these viruses may cause
infection in and spread among humans and because humans have little or
no immunity to these viruses;
Whereas, one such virus is the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Virus;
Whereas, vaccination may be effective to protect persons from the
threat of pandemic influenza;
Whereas, Secretary Michael O. Leavitt issued a Declaration for the
Use of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act dated
January 26, 2007 (“Original Declaration”), as amended on November 30,
2007 and October 17, 2008 with respect to certain avian influenza
viruses;
Whereas, I amended the declaration on June 15, 2009 with respect to
2009 H1N1 influenza virus and on September 28, 2009 to provide targeted
liability protections for pandemic countermeasures to enhance
distribution and to add provisions consistent with other declarations,
and republished the declaration each time in its entirety;
Whereas, the September 28, 2009 declaration extended through
February 28, 2010 for vaccines against influenza virus strains named in
the Declaration other than 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine;
Whereas, modifications are necessary to revise covered
countermeasures and to extend the effective date of the Declaration;
Whereas, the findings I made in the declaration issued on September
28, 2009 continue to apply;
Whereas, in accordance with section 319F-3(b)(6) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)), I have considered the desirability of encouraging
the design, development, clinical testing or investigation,
manufacturing, labeling, distribution, formulation, packaging,
marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, donation, dispensing,
prescribing, administration, licensing, and use of additional covered
countermeasures with respect to the category of disease and population
described in sections II and IV of the September 28, 2009 Republished
Declaration, as hereby amended, and have found it desirable to
encourage such activities for these additional covered countermeasures,
and;
Whereas, to encourage the design, development, clinical testing or
investigation, manufacturing and product formulation, labeling,
distribution, packaging, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase,
donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing, and use
of medical countermeasures with respect to the category of disease and
population described in sections II and IV of the September 28, 2009
Republished Declaration, as hereby amended, it is advisable, in
accordance with section 319F-3(a) and (b) of the Act, to provide
immunity from liability for covered persons, as that term is defined at
section 319F-3(i)(2) of the Act, and to include as such covered persons
other qualified persons as I have identified in section VI of the
September 28, 2009 Republished Declaration, as amended;
Therefore, pursuant to section 319F-3(b) of the Act, I have
determined that there is a credible risk that the spread of influenza A
viruses with pandemic potential and resulting disease could in the
future constitute a public health emergency and that spread of one of
these viruses (2009 H1N1 Influenza) has caused a disease that
constitutes a public health emergency.
In order to extend the scope of covered countermeasures and to
extend the effective date of the Declaration, the September 28, 2009
Republished Declaration, is hereby amended as follows:
In the title, delete “for H5N1, H2, H6, H7, H9 and 2009 H1N1
Vaccines” and replace with “for Vaccines Against Pandemic Influenza A
Viruses and Those with Pandemic Potential”.
In the recitals, delete the first through the fourth “whereas”
clauses, and insert two new recitals as follows:
Whereas there are or may be multiple animal influenza A viruses
circulating in wild birds and/or domestic animals that cause, or have
significant potential to cause, sporadic human infections or have
mutated to cause pandemics in humans;
Whereas, these viruses may evolve or have evolved into virus
strains capable of causing a pandemic of human influenza because these
viruses may cause infection in, and spread among, humans and because
humans have little or no immunity to these viruses;
In the sixth “whereas” clause, insert “October 1, 2009, and
December 28, 2009” after “July 24, 2009”.
In the “therefore” clause, delete “avian influenza viruses and
resulting disease could in the future constitute a public health
emergency, and that 2009 H1N1 influenza constitutes a public health
emergency” and replace with: “pandemic influenza A viruses and those
with pandemic potential and resulting disease does or could constitute
a public health emergency”.
In section I, first paragraph, delete “the pandemic
countermeasures influenza A H5N1, H2, H6, H7, H9, and 2009 H1N1
vaccines” each time it appears and replace with “vaccines against
pandemic influenza A viruses with pandemic potential”.
In section I, at the end of the second sentence, replace “IX”
with “X”.
In section II, delete “the virus with (1) highly pathogenic avian
influenza A (H5N1, H2, H6, H7, or H9) virus; or (2) 2009 H1N1
influenza” and replace with “animal and/or human influenza A viruses
against which most humans do not have immunity, except those included
in seasonal influenza vaccines and/or covered under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, that are circulating in wild birds
and/or domestic animals causing or having significant potential to
cause sporadic human infections or have mutated to cause pandemics in
humans”.
In section III, first paragraph, delete in its entirety and replace
with: “The effective period of time of this Declaration commenced as
described in the September 28, 2009 Republished Declaration, and
extends through February 28, 2012.
In section III, second paragraph, delete “; except that with
respect to 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine, the effective period commences
on June 15, 2009 and extends through March 31, 2013” and replace with
“through February 28, 2012.”
In section III, add to the end of the section as a new paragraph:
“With respect to any covered countermeasure subsequently covered under
the

[[Page 10270]]

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the effective time period
expires immediately upon such coverage.”
In section VIII, insert “and use” after “administration in the
first sentence, delete “the Act’s” from the second sentence and
replace with “this”, and delete “Countermeasure” from the second
sentence and replace with “Countermeasures”.
In section IX, add to the end of the first sentence: “; and
amended on September 28, 2009 to provide targeted liability protections
for pandemic countermeasures to enhance distribution and to add
provisions consistent with other declarations and republished in its
entirety.”
In section X, after the fifth paragraph, insert a new definition as
follows:
Pandemic influenza A viruses and those with pandemic potential:
Animal and/or human influenza A viruses, except those included in
seasonal influenza vaccines and/or covered under the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program, that are circulating in wild birds and/or
domestic animals, that cause, or have significant potential to cause,
sporadic or ongoing human infections, or historically have caused
pandemics in humans, or have mutated to cause pandemics in humans, and
for which the majority of the population is immunologically na[iuml]ve.
In Appendix I, title and item 32, add “H7,” after “H6”.
Throughout, insert “National” before “Vaccine Injury
Compensation Fund”.
All other provisions of the June 15, 2009 Republished Declaration
remain in full force.
Republication of HHS Secretary’s September 28, 2009 Republished
Declaration, as Amended, for the Use of the Public Readiness and
Emergency Preparedness Act for Vaccines Against Pandemic Influenza A
Viruses and Those with Pandemic Potential.
To the extent any term of the September 28 Republished Declaration,
as hereby amended, is inconsistent with any provision of this
Republished Declaration, the terms of this Republished Declaration are
controlling.
Whereas there are or may be multiple animal influenza A viruses
circulating in wild birds and/or domestic animals that cause, or have
significant potential to cause, sporadic human infections or have
mutated to cause pandemics in humans;
Whereas, these viruses may evolve or have evolved into virus
strains capable of causing a pandemic of human influenza because these
viruses may cause infection in, and spread among, humans and because
humans have little immunity to these viruses;
Whereas, on April 26, 2009, Acting Secretary Charles E. Johnson
determined under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act, (42
U.S.C. 247d), that a public health emergency exists nationwide
involving the Swine Influenza A virus that affects or has significant
potential to affect the national security (now called “2009-H1N1
influenza”);
Whereas, on July 24, 2009, October 1, 2009, and December 28, 2009 I
renewed the determination by the Acting Secretary that a public health
emergency exists nationwide involving the Swine influenza A virus (now
called “2009-H1N1 influenza virus”);
Whereas, vaccination may be effective to protect persons from the
threat of pandemic influenza;
Whereas, the possibility of governmental program planners obtaining
stockpiles from private sector entities except through voluntary means
such as commercial sale, donation, or deployment would undermine
national preparedness efforts and should be discouraged as provided for
in section 319F-3(b)(2)(E) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
247d-6d(b)) (“the Act”);
Whereas, immunity under section 319F-3(a) of the Act should be
available to governmental program planners for distributions of Covered
Countermeasures obtained voluntarily, such as by (1) donation; (2)
commercial sale; (3) deployment of Covered Countermeasures from Federal
stockpiles; or (4) deployment of donated, purchased, or otherwise
voluntarily obtained Covered Countermeasures from State, local, or
private stockpiles;
Whereas, the extent of immunity under section 319F-3(a) of the Act
afforded to a governmental program planner that obtains Covered
Countermeasures except through voluntary means is not intended to
affect the extent of immunity afforded other covered persons with
respect to such covered countermeasures;
Whereas, to encourage the design, development, clinical testing or
investigation, manufacturing and product formulation, labeling,
distribution, packaging, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase,
donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing, and use
of medical countermeasures with respect to the category of disease and
population described in section II and IV it is advisable, in
accordance with section 319F-3(a) and (b) of the Act, to provide
immunity from liability for covered persons, as that term is defined at
section 319F-3(i)(2) of the Act, and to include as such covered persons
such other qualified persons as I have identified in section VI;
Whereas, in accordance with section 319F-3(b)(6) of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)) (“the Act”), I have
considered the desirability of encouraging the design, development,
clinical testing or investigation, manufacturing and product
formulation, labeling, distribution, packaging, marketing, promotion,
sale, purchase, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration,
licensing, and use of medical countermeasures with respect to the
category of disease and population described in sections II and IV
below, and have found it desirable to encourage such activities for the
Covered Countermeasures;
Therefore, pursuant to section 319F-3(b) of the Act, I have
determined there is a credible risk that the spread of pandemic
influenza A viruses and those with pandemic potential and resulting
disease does or could constitute a public health emergency.

I. Covered Countermeasures (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(1) of the
Act)

Covered Countermeasures are defined at section 319F-3(i) of the
Act.
At this time, and in accordance with the provisions contained
herein, I am recommending the manufacture, testing, development,
distribution, dispensing; and, with respect to the category of disease
and population described in sections II and IV, below, the
administration and usage of vaccines against influenza A viruses with
pandemic potential and any associated adjuvants. The immunity specified
in section 319F-3(a) of the Act shall only be in effect with respect
to: (1) Present or future Federal contracts, cooperative agreements,
grants, interagency agreements, or memoranda of understanding for
vaccines against pandemic influenza A viruses with pandemic potential
used and administered in accordance with this declaration, and (2)
activities authorized in accordance with the public health and medical
response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction to prescribe, administer,
deliver, distribute or dispense the pandemic countermeasures following
a declaration of an emergency, as defined in section X below. In
accordance with section 319F-3(b)(2)(E) of the Act, for governmental
program planners, the immunity specified in section 319F-3(a) of the
Act shall be in effect to the extent they obtain Covered
Countermeasures through voluntary

[[Page 10271]]

means of distribution, such as (1) donation; (2) commercial sale; (3)
deployment of Covered Countermeasures from Federal stockpiles; or (4)
deployment of donated, purchased, or otherwise voluntarily obtained
Covered Countermeasures from State, local, or private stockpiles. For
all other covered persons, including other program planners, the
immunity specified in section 319F-3(a) of the Act shall, in accordance
with section 319F-3(b)(2)(E) of the Act, be in effect pursuant to any
means of distribution.
This Declaration shall subsequently refer to the countermeasures
identified above as Covered Countermeasures.
This Declaration shall apply to all Covered Countermeasures
administered or used during the effective time period of the
Declaration.

II. Category of Disease (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(2)(A) of the
Act)

The category of disease for which I am recommending the
administration or use of the Covered Countermeasures is the threat of
or actual human influenza that results from the infection of humans
following exposure to animal and/or human influenza A viruses, against
which most humans do not have immunity, except those included in
seasonal influenza vaccines and/or covered under the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program, that are circulating in wild birds and/or
domestic animals causing or have significant potential to cause
sporadic human infections or have mutated to cause pandemics in humans.

III. Effective Time Period (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(2)(B) of
the Act)

The effective period of time of this Declaration commenced as
described in the September 28, 2009 Republished Declaration and extends
through February 28, 2012.
With respect to Covered Countermeasures administered and used in
accordance with the public health and medical response of the Authority
Having Jurisdiction, the effective period of time of this Declaration
commences on the date of a declaration of an emergency and lasts
through and includes the final day that the emergency declaration is in
effect including any extensions thereof through February 28, 2012.
With respect to any covered countermeasure subsequently covered
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the effective
time period expires immediately upon such coverage
.

IV. Population (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(2)(C) of the Act)

Section 319F-3(a)(4)(A) confers immunity to manufacturers and
distributors of the Covered Countermeasure, regardless of the defined
population.
Section 319F-3(a)(3)(C)(i) confers immunity to covered persons who
could be program planners or qualified persons with respect to the
Covered Countermeasure only if a member of the population specified in
the Declaration administers or uses the Covered Countermeasure and is
in or connected to the geographic location specified in this
Declaration, or the program planner or qualified person reasonably
could have believed that these conditions were met.
The populations specified in this Declaration are the following:
(1) All persons who use a Covered Countermeasure or to whom such a
Covered Countermeasure is administered as an Investigational New Drug
in a human clinical trial conducted directly by the Federal Government,
or pursuant to a contract, grant or cooperative agreement with the
Federal Government; (2) all persons who use a Covered Countermeasure or
to whom such a Countermeasure is administered in a pre-pandemic phase,
as defined below; and/or (3) all persons who use a Covered
Countermeasure, or to whom such a Covered Countermeasure is
administered in a pandemic phase, as defined below.

V. Geographic Area (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(2)(D) of the Act)

Section 319F-3(a) applies to the administration and use of a
Covered Countermeasure without geographic limitation.

VI. Other Qualified Persons (as Required by Section 319F-3(i)(8)(B) of
the Act)

With regard to the administration or use of a Covered
Countermeasure, Section 319F-3(i)(8)(A) of the Act defines the term
“qualified person” as a licensed individual who is authorized to
prescribe, administer, or dispense the countermeasure under the law of
the State in which such Covered Countermeasure was prescribed,
administered or dispensed. Additional persons who are qualified persons
pursuant to section 319F-3(i)(8)(B) are the following: (1) Any person
authorized in accordance with the public health and medical emergency
response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction to prescribe, administer,
deliver, distribute or dispense Covered Countermeasures, and their
officials, agents, employees, contractors and volunteers, following a
declaration of an emergency, and (2) Any person authorized to
prescribe, administer, or dispense Covered Countermeasures or who is
otherwise authorized under an Emergency Use Authorization.

VII. Additional Time Periods of Coverage After Expiration of
Declaration (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(3)(B) of the Act)

A. I have determined that, upon expiration of the applicable time
period specified in Section III above, an additional twelve (12) months
is a reasonable period to allow for the manufacturer to arrange for
disposition of the Covered Countermeasure, including the return of such
product to the manufacturer, and for covered persons to take such other
actions as are appropriate to limit the administration or use of the
Covered Countermeasure, and the liability protection of section 319F-
3(a) of the Act shall extend for that period.
B. The Federal Government shall purchase the entire production of
Covered Countermeasures under the contracts specifically listed by
contract number in section I for the stockpile under section 319F-2 of
the Act, and shall be subject to the time-period extension of section
319F-3(b)(3)(C). Production under future contracts for the same vaccine
will also be subject to the time-period extension of section 319F-
3(b)(3)(C).

VIII. Compensation Fund

In addition to conferring immunity to manufacturers, distributors,
and administrators of the Covered Countermeasures, the Act provides
benefits to certain individuals who sustain a covered injury as the
direct result of the administration or use of the Covered
Countermeasure. The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP)
within the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
administers this compensation program. Information about the CICP is
available at               1-888-275-4772         1-888-275-4772 or http://www.hrsa.gov/countermeasurescomp/
default.htm
<http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leavingFR.html\
&log=linklog&to=http://www.hrsa.gov/countermeasurescomp/default.htm> .

IX. Amendments

The Declaration for the Use of the Public Readiness and Emergency
Preparedness Act for H5N1 was published on January 26, 2007; amended on
November 30, 2007 to add H7 and H9 vaccines; amended on October 17,
2008 to add H2 and H6 vaccines; amended on June 15, 2009 to add 2009
H1N1 vaccines and

[[Page 10272]]

republished in its entirety; and amended on September 28, 2009 to
provide targeted liability protections for pandemic countermeasures to
enhance distribution and to add provisions consistent with other
declarations and republished in its entirety. This Declaration
incorporates all amendments prior to the date of its publication in the
Federal Register. Any future amendment to this Declaration will be
published in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 319F-2(b)(4) of
the Act.

X. Definitions

For the purpose of this Declaration, including any claim for loss
brought in accordance with section 319F-3 of the PHS Act against any
covered persons defined in the Act or this Declaration, the following
definitions will be used:
Administration of a Covered Countermeasure: As used in section
319F-3(a)(2)(B) of the Act includes, but is not limited to, public and
private delivery, distribution, and dispensing activities relating to
physical administration of the countermeasures to recipients,
management and operation of delivery systems, and management and
operation of distribution and dispensing locations.
Authority Having Jurisdiction: Means the public agency or its
delegate that has legal responsibility and authority for responding to
an incident, based on political or geographical (e.g., city, county,
Tribal, State, or Federal boundary lines) or functional (e.g., law
enforcement, public health) range or sphere of authority.
Covered Persons: As defined at section 319F-3(i)(2) of the Act,
include the United States, manufacturers, distributors, program
planners, and qualified persons. The terms “manufacturer,”
“distributor,” “program planner,” and “qualified person” are
further defined at sections 319F-3(i)(3), (4), (6), and (8) of the Act.
Declaration of Emergency: A declaration by any authorized local,
regional, State, or Federal official of an emergency specific to events
that indicate an immediate need to administer and use pandemic
countermeasures, with the exception of a Federal declaration in support
of an emergency use authorization under section 564 of the FDCA unless
such declaration specifies otherwise.
Pandemic influenza A viruses and those with pandemic potential:
Animal and/or human influenza A viruses, except those included in
seasonal influenza vaccines and/or covered under the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program
, that are circulating in wild birds and/or
domestic animals, that cause, or have significant potential to cause,
sporadic or ongoing human infections, or historically have caused
pandemics in humans, or have mutated to cause pandemics in humans, and
for which the majority of the population is immunologically na[iuml]ve.
Pandemic Phase: The following stages, as defined in the National
Strategy for Pandemic Influenza: Implementation Plan (Homeland Security
Council, May 2006): (4) First Human Case in North America; and (5)
Spread Throughout United States.
Pre-pandemic Phase: The following stages, as defined in the
National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza: Implementation Plan (Homeland
Security Council, May 2006): (0) New Domestic Animal Outbreak in At-
Risk Country; (1) Suspected Human Outbreak Overseas; (2) Confirmed
Human Outbreak Overseas; and (3) Widespread Human Outbreaks in Multiple
Locations Overseas.

Dated: February 26, 2010.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.

APPENDIX

I. List of U.S. Government Contracts–Covered H5N1, H2, H6, H7, H9, and
2009-H1N1 Vaccine Contracts

1. HHSN266200400031C
2. HHSN266200400032C
3. HHSN266200300039C
4. HHSN266200400045C
5. HHSN266200205459C
6. HHSN266200205460C
7. HHSN266200205461C
8. HHSN266200205462C
9. HHSN266200205463C
10. HHSN266200205464C
11. HHSN266200205465C
12. HHSN266199905357C
13. HHSN266200300068C
14. HHSN266200005413C
15. HHSO100200600021C (formerly 200200409981)
16. HHSO100200500004C
17. HHSO100200500005I
18. HHSO100200700026I
19. HHSO100200700027I
20. HHSO100200700028I
21. HHSO100200600010C
22. HHSO100200600011C
23. HHSO100200600012C
24. HHSO100200600013C
25. HHSO100200600014C
26. HHSO100200600022C (formerly 200200511758)
27. HHSO100200600023C (formerly 200200410431)
28. CRADA No. AI-0155 NIAID/MedImmune
29. HHSO100200700029C
30. HHSO100200700030C
31. HHSO100200700031C
32. All present, completed and future Government H5N1, H2, H6, H7,
H9, and 2009-H1N1 vaccine contracts not otherwise listed.

[FR Doc. 2010-4644 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Gardasil Primer: Doctors & vaccine injured families speak out

Gardasil, HPV, Top Stories, Vaccine Snafus, Video

Gardasil Primer: Doctors & vaccine injured families speak out

No Comments 03 March 2010

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
16 Year Old Girl Goes Blind After HPV Vaccine

Blindness, HPV, Top Stories

16 Year Old Girl Goes Blind After HPV Vaccine

1 Comment 26 February 2010

.
.
.

Journal of Child Neurology
J Child Neurol 2010; 25; 321
Francis J. DiMario, Jr, Mirna Hajjar and Thomas Ciesielski

A 16-Year-Old Girl With Bilateral Visual Loss and Left Hemiparesis Following an Immunization Against Human Papilloma Virus

Visual loss is a symptom that can occur from lesions anywhere along the visual pathways. Binocular visual loss can be further localized depending on
the size and location of the scotoma identified on examination. Lesions affecting the chiasm, in particular, may produce bitemporal visual field loss and the additional
involvement of the optic nerves and/or retrochiasmatic visual pathways will induce more complete degrees of blindness.

There are a multitude of etiologies that produce this latter pattern of visual loss; however, the pace of progression, the anatomic localization of the process, and the precipitating circumstances will aid in pathophysiologic classification as compressive or noncompressive. Noncompressive etiologies involving the chiasm include processes within the spectrum from acute to a more chronic temporal course.

This slower time course is characteristic of infiltrative lesions, granulomatous diseases, axonal dieback phenomenon secondary to multiple sclerosis,1 and Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Acute noncompressive lesions of the optic chiasm have been described in infectious settings with Lyme disease,2 Epstein-Barr virus,3,4 varicella zoster virus5 and mumps,6 systemic lupus erythematosus, 7,8 and demyelinating processes (eg, neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis).

Tumefactive demyelinating lesions are those defined as large (>2 cm) lesions with a surrounding zone of edema with or without accompanying mass effect. There have been a few case reports and case series in the literature where tumefactive lesions have been described in the context of both multiple
sclerosis and acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis.

However, chiasmal neuritis as part of acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis has not to our knowledge been reported in the medical literature. Although chiasmal neuritis generally tends to have a more favorable outcome with eventual return of vision over time, when it is caused by neuromyelitis optica and Leber hereditary optic neuropathy the outcomes have been poorer with sustained visual loss.

We report the case of a 16-year-old girl who suffered an acute and sustained onset of bilateral visual loss and transient left hemiparesis following an immunization against human papilloma virus, who was found to have both a tumefactive demyelinating lesion and chiasmal neuritis as part of a presentation of acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis.

Read the full case report here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Military Biological Weapons Exposed by Don Scott

AIDS, Auto Immunity, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Lymes, Top Stories

Military Biological Weapons Exposed by Don Scott

4 Comments 24 February 2010

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.




Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Doctor Fired After Warning Colleagues of H1N1 Vaccine Dangers

H1N1, Medical Cartel

Doctor Fired After Warning Colleagues of H1N1 Vaccine Dangers

No Comments 24 February 2010

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated With Streptococcal Infections

Streptococcus

Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated With Streptococcal Infections

No Comments 24 February 2010

.
.
.

Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated With Streptococcal Infections: Clinical Description of the First 50 Cases

Link to Journal Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of a novel group of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and tic disorders, designated as pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal (group A ß-hemolytic streptococcal [GABHS]) infections (PANDAS).

METHOD: The authors conducted a systematic clinical evaluation of 50 children who met all of the following five working diagnostic criteria: presence of OCD and/or a tic disorder, prepubertal symptom onset, episodic course of symptom severity, association with GABHS infections, and association with neurological abnormalities.

RESULTS: The children’s symptom onset was acute and dramatic, typically triggered by GABHS infections at a very early age (mean=6.3 years, SD=2.7, for tics; mean=7.4 years, SD=2.7, for OCD). The PANDAS clinical course was characterized by a relapsing-remitting symptom pattern with significant psychiatric comorbidity accompanying the exacerbations; emotional lability, separation anxiety, nighttime fears and bedtime rituals, cognitive deficits, oppositional behaviors, and motoric hyperactivity were particularly common. Symptom onset was triggered by GABHS infection for 22 (44%) of the children and by pharyngitis (no throat culture obtained) for 14 others (28%). Among the 50 children, there were 144 separate episodes of symptom exacerbation; 45 (31%) were associated with documented GABHS infection, 60 (42%) with symptoms of pharyngitis or upper respiratory infection (no throat culture obtained), and six (4%) with GABHS exposure.

CONCLUSIONS: The working diagnostic criteria appear to accurately characterize a homogeneous patient group in which symptom exacerbations are triggered by GABHS infections. The identification of such a subgroup will allow for testing of models of pathogenesis, as well as the development of novel treatment and prevention strategies. (Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:264–271)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine

Newsletter

Click to Join Our Newsletter! Carl Bruning Constitutional Larimer County Sheriff

Users Online

Featured Vaccine Book

Dr. Todd Elsner's Book

 

Today, according to the CDC’s recommended vaccination schedule, a child receives 36 shots containing a total of 126 vaccines from birth through six years of age. This is quadruple the number of vaccines a child received in the 1980’s. In 1983 a child received only 10 shots containing 30 vaccines.

Could this quadrupling of the schedule be responsible for the drastic increase in childhood disorders we are seeing today?

 

Get the information your pediatrician will never tell you!

Live Healthy

Award Winning Inspirational Documentary by Valya Boutenko
Best Selling Books and DVDs from the Raw Family

Ads

Silver Lungs

Optimize Your Health

Vibrant Living with Delicious Green Smoothies