Vaccine Teams Dispatched to Inject the Unsuspecting

Medical Cartel, Top Stories, Undue Influence

Vaccine Teams Dispatched to Inject the Unsuspecting

No Comments 01 March 2010

.
.
.

Seeing POD People? It’s No Sci-Fi Film

By ARIEL KAMINER
NYTimes
3/1/10

PODs are the sleeper cells of public health, assuming a different shape and observing different local mores each time a crisis emerges. When hepatitis A was diagnosed in a bartender at the Manhattan nightclub Socialista two years ago, POD people were on hand to vaccinate patrons, including some guests at Ashton Kutcher’s birthday party. In the case of a bioterrorism attack, they might turn up in your neighborhood dispensing anthrax antidote. On Feb. 18, they were in Anshe Sfard Hall in the Borough Park section of Brooklyn, rolling up the sleeves of Hasidic Jews. That’s a long way from Ashton Kutcher.

I entered the hall on the left, with the other women; men entered on the right. With stacks of gold-braided chairs in the corner and a divider to keep the sexes apart, the Anshe Sfard POD — short for Point of Distribution — could have been the day-before photo of an Orthodox wedding. Instead, it was the front line against one of the city’s more surprising outbreaks in years.

It started last year, when some children at a Jewish summer camp in the Catskills came down with mumps, one of those childhood diseases that were supposed to have been consigned to history. They brought it back home to the Hasidic enclaves in Borough Park, Crown Heights and Williamsburg. By last month, there were more than 900 cases, and more adults were getting sick.

Time to activate the PODs.

Mumps is not generally fatal, though it is painful and can cause deafness or infertility. In neighborhoods where families might have a dozen children, and young men spend long days together in yeshivas or synagogues, it spreads fast. But business was slow at Anshe Sfard, so Sheila Palevsky and Elissa Levine, two of the sharp, funny members of the POD team, were keeping each other amused with tales of former postings.

Hasidic Jews may be more inclined to visit their own doctors than to discuss bodily functions with strangers. (“When did you last go to the mikvah?” Ms. Levine asked while taking my medical history, referring to the ritual bath that many observant Jewish women visit after menstruating. I thought the euphemism was very sweet.) As for the antivaccine movement, its echoes are rare in these parts, but they ring out with a strong local accent. “Jews trust the Almighty, not vaccines,” one commenter wrote on the site of The Yeshiva World, an online newspaper, in a mix of Hebrew and English. On a Crown Heights Web site, someone else wrote, “I wish that folks would have as much faith and confidence in God as they do in doctors and scientists.”

But there is another reason things look different here: This outbreak has written a new chapter in epidemiological history.

The standard prescription is two doses of the M.M.R. (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine in childhood. That’s what most of the patients in Brooklyn had gotten, and it didn’t help them. Which has led medical professionals to reconsider some long-held notions about mumps in particular and communicable diseases in general.

“People that have measurable antibodies to mumps, which I was always taught meant you were immune, we found are getting the disease,” said Dr. Edward Chapnick, director of infectious diseases at Maimonides Medical Center. “And two vaccines, which we always thought had a very high effectiveness at preventing this, turns out to have a 75 to 80 percent effectiveness.”

The Department of Health still recommends two shots, but many doctors in the area — including Dr. Eli Rosen, a pediatrician who said he had treated 200 to 300 mumps cases so far — now favor three vaccinations, as do other private doctors in the area. “It appears that two vaccines are not effective in the vast majority of cases,” Dr. Rosen said. “Is this going to be a pattern we’ll see as we go out in vaccine years?” And, he added, would other vaccines also lose their effectiveness over time?

As a child I probably got my two M.M.R. shots, but who remembers. Everyone I spoke to assured me that so long as I wasn’t pregnant and did not have an immune disorder, there was no downside to an extra shot. But what’s the chance I would really need it? I don’t hang out in Brooklyn yeshivas.

In a city where people live so close to one another, it’s baffling that an outbreak could stay confined to a specific population, even an insular population. But that’s the paradox of city life, on an epidemiological scale: We are simultaneously a teeming megalopolis and a collection of little villages (or offices or apartment buildings), each with its own public health profile.

Still, a cluster of cases has already been documented in Orthodox and Hasidic neighborhoods of Westchester County. Unless that outbreak is halted, entropy will eventually win out.

So at the Quality Health Center in Williamsburg, which has reported hundreds of suspected cases, I decided to roll my sleeve up. Turns out it’s not just a fear of needles that makes little kids cry; the shot really did smart.

To distract me, Dov Landa, a physician assistant, shared the story of a 40-year-old Hasidic woman who had brought her large family in the day before. When it was her turn to get vaccinated, Mr. Landa, following protocol, asked if she was pregnant. The woman laughed. “I haven’t been pregnant in 10 years,” she said. He tested her anyway, just to be sure. And so it was that he got to tell her the happy news. Mazel tov.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Doctor Fired After Warning Colleagues of H1N1 Vaccine Dangers

H1N1, Medical Cartel

Doctor Fired After Warning Colleagues of H1N1 Vaccine Dangers

No Comments 24 February 2010

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
The British Government refuse to compensate health workers who become ill after conditional vaccines

Hepatitis B, Medical Cartel, Top Stories

The British Government refuse to compensate health workers who become ill after conditional vaccines

No Comments 12 January 2010

.
.
.

Christina England
American Chronicle
1/11/2010

Yesterday a story broke in Great Britain where hundreds of front line workers had had routine vaccines as a condition of employment and had become vaccine damaged as a result. These workers, which included doctors, nurses, firefighters, prison officers, forensic scientists and binmen received vaccinations as a condition of employment and have since become ill. Once ill and leaving them effectively unable to perform the job the had trained for and loved they have been abandoned by the ever so caring British Government.

Lucy Johnston -Fury at Vaccine Scandal from the Express took up their story.

“Up to 200 doctors, nurses, firefighters, prison officers, police officers, forensic scientists and binmen say they have developed serious physical and mental health problems after injections essential for their work over the past 10 years. All have given up their jobs and some are up to 60 per cent disabled.”

The British Government should hang their heads in shame. Although these workers were not forced to have these vaccinations they did face losing their jobs if they didn’t receive them. These men and women put their lives in danger to keep Great Britain safe, they make life and death decisions and face some of the most dangerous situations known to man. This is how their Government treats them.

Lucy writes;-

“Frontline health workers, social workers. prison officers and binmen have to be vaccinated against Hepatitis B as a condition of their employment.

This is to protect them from contracting potentially fatal conditions from infected blood through needle injuries and physical assaults.

Although they are not legally forced to have the vaccinations, without them they are not allowed to work.”

This sounds like they are forced to me.

The conditions that these workers now have as a result of the vaccinations are reported to be , chronic fatigue, muscle pain and cognitive problems. These are problems that many experts say are associated with adverse reactions to vaccines.

Dr Charles Shepherd in his letter to the BMJ – Hepatitis B vaccination and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome says:-

“I wish to report some preliminary findings on a cohort of 91 CFS patients where the outset or a significant degree of relapse appears to have been associated with vaccination. Of particular interest is the fact that 50% (54/91) of these cases involve vaccination against hepatitis B”

His letter makes interesting reading especially the part that that states;-

“Of concern is the fact that (a) several health workers reported that they were persuaded to continue with their vaccination course despite the fact that they did not appear to be fully recovered from an adverse reaction (eg general malaise) following the first or second dose, (b) very few of these adverse reactions have been reported to the Committee on Safety of Medicines and (c) the manufacturers acknowledge that individual adverse reactions can include fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, headache, insomnia and lymphadenopathy but refuse to accept that any causal link has been established with a combination of the above (ie CFS).”

He is not alone in his findings.

Dr Byron Hyde – testimony before the Quebec College of Physicians Medical Board

Hepatitis B vaccination and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

“We looked at hep B immunisation in Quebec province because one nurse phoned us saying she had CFS after having hep B immunization…..About a month later the same nurse called again, she now had 5 other nurses in the area who had fallen ill with CFS-like symptoms after the vaccine, all were unable to return to work. I told her to phone the maker, Merck. She told me she did and they said the 6 nurses were the only persons in the whole world that had ever had a serious side effect and therefore there couldn’t possibly be a link. And, they told her that she was the only person who had ever phoned….she said that when her doctor phoned, he too was told he was the only person in the world that had ever called, and when each of the doctors of the other nurses called in, each was told the same thing”

One nurse explains how the Hep B vaccine she was required to have stole two years of her life in her response to an article in the BMJ.

Hep B vaccine stole two years of my life

Dawn C Etchell,

occupational health adviser

imperial Buildings Rotherham,

S60 1PA

“I was working as a dialysis nurse and attended for my first ever Hepatitis B vaccine without any worries. The following day I felt unusually tired. The tiredness gradually became totally out of charcter for me and gathered momentum over the following week. I even fell asleep during a routine filling at the dentist. Finally, I had a seizure one morning in the shower and had to call out my General Practitioner. I was unable to get out of bed for the next two weeks and slept for around 18 hours of every day for the next four weeks. If I tried to ‘come round’ my legs would give way and the feeling of pressure in my spine and head were frightening. My vision was constantly blurred and hard to understand. My thyroid was painful and swollen and I had palpitations that were disabling. Electric like shocks in my arms and legs were acute and came without warning. My brain was ‘foggy’ and Ifelt was living in a dreamlike state most of the time. I had difficulty finding words and my speech was slurred. I was referred to a neurologist – brain scan normal – blood tests normal except for raised Anti-Nuclear Antibodies initially – EEG normal – TSH 0.5 – T4 15 (3 months later TSH 0.46) Diagnosis – reactive seizure. All of my symptoms were pointing to a tentative diagnosis of Myalgic Encapelopathy/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. This I rejected after some six months and am now under annual review for thyroid blood tests. My health suffered greatly and it has taken two years to return to 80% of my previous health status. I never did receive a definite diagnosis and have had to resign myself to the fact that ‘this is as good as it gets’. I, of course, never returned for the full course of hep B vaccines and decided to leave dialysis and return to Occupational health – with a totally different view of administering such ‘preventative’ vaccines! I refused the lumbar puncture as this was offered at a time when I could feel some improvement in my general health and I did not want any further decline at this point. This vaccine should come with a very strict warning and anyone who administers the Hep B vaccine should have ALL the facts at their disposal. I was totally unaware of the dangers before I had the vaccine but found hundreds of cases similar and worse than my own after the event.

Competing interests: None declared”

Around the world Governments are putting the very people they rely on in a crisis in danger, by using emotional blackmail to force them to have vaccines. The very least they can do is when these people suffer adverse reactions is to compensate them for their injuries. After all they keep saying the vaccines are safe, perhaps they are worried that compensation may prove that they are not.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Big Pharma Planning to Fund Hollywood Production

Medical Cartel, Top Stories

Big Pharma Planning to Fund Hollywood Production

No Comments 07 January 2010

Diet Drug Maker Glaxo to Pay for a Film on Eating
By BROOKS BARNES
NYTimes.com
January 7, 2010
LOS ANGELES — GlaxoSmithKline is getting into the movie business, pursuing an unusual and most likely controversial strategy to increase interest in a weight-loss drug.

Glaxo, the pharmaceutical giant behind Alli, an over-the-counter weight-loss product, has decided that a good way to educate Americans about obesity — and increase sales of Alli — is to finance a “hard-hitting” documentary about eating.

Although a budget has not been set, an Academy Award-winning director will be named on Jan. 25 at the Sundance Film Festival, a spokesman for Glaxo said.

To lend credibility to the project, Glaxo sought out a partner: the Creative Coalition, a nonprofit social and political advocacy organization backed by prominent entertainers like Alec Baldwin, Tim Daly and Susan Sarandon. The organization has decided to produce the film with Glaxo, aiming to deliver a finished picture this year. Although theatrical distribution is a goal, distribution plans are incomplete.

“This won’t be a marketing tool at all,” said Robin Bronk, the Creative Coalition’s executive director, adding that working with Glaxo on the project is “a natural progression of our mission to develop educational projects.”

The organization has a track record. Showtime bought its most recent documentary, “PoliWood,” a look at politically active actors during the 2008 Republican and Democratic conventions that was directed by Barry Levinson, who made “Rain Man.” Ms. Bronk and Rachel Ferdinando, a Glaxo marketing executive, said there would be a signed agreement giving full creative control to the director and the Creative Coalition team. Ms. Ferdinando said Glaxo had no expectations that Alli, which blocks some fat from being absorbed into the body and can result in unpredictable flatulence and diarrhea, would be mentioned in the documentary.

“The filmmakers can make a decision about whether Alli is important,” she said. “We want it to be entirely transparent; we want it to have integrity. It’s a fantastic outcome if people are simply more educated.”

Even so, Glaxo’s financial backing is sure to raise eyebrows. While corporations back films all the time, it is rare for one to pay for a documentary with direct hopes that it will translate into bigger profits. As a rule, documentary makers are an aggressively anticorporate crowd.

“I’m skeptical that this won’t be an infomercial disguised as an independent documentary,” said Theodore Braun, the director of the 2007 film “Darfur Now” and an associate professor at the University of Southern California’s School of Cinematic Arts. “I can’t imagine that a company as legally and rhetorically sophisticated as GlaxoSmithKline is going to leave its interests unprotected.”

Other analysts of the documentary art form said that the film project should not be judged too hastily.

“Because we are in this era of strategic social media, we can’t think of this in that old way we used to,” said Pat Aufderheide, director of the Center for Social Media at American University. “If Glaxo signs an agreement saying that we will pay for it but we won’t look at a rough cut, then I think you have a case where this effort could have some real value.”

Neither Glaxo or the Creative Coalition would discuss a budget for the film, saying that would depend on negotiations with the director, among other factors. Ms. Ferdinando said Glaxo was investing “substantial resources” in the film and that the budget was “expected to be consistent with other documentary projects of a similar nature.”

The partners say they hope to emulate “An Inconvenient Truth,” Al Gore’s celebrated 2006 documentary on climate change. It cost an estimated $1.5 million to produce and sold $50 million in tickets worldwide. Ms. Ferdinando summarized the film as “the ‘Inconvenient Truth’ of mindless eating,” with the story taking a “behind-closed-doors, fly-on-the-wall” approach that highlights unhealthy relationships people have with food.

“This represents a new initiative for us as a company, to take a serious issue and make it more understandable to people,” Ms. Ferdinando said.

As part of the partnership, the Creative Coalition will organize a panel discussion at Sundance to promote Glaxo’s recent study findings about eating habits and talk about ways for the entertainment industry to get more involved in reducing obesity. Panelists will include Jeff Garlin of “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” Ricki Lake and Emme, the plus-size model

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
More Propaganda to Sell Vaccines: Swine flu virus ‘could still mutate’ WHO warns

H1N1, H5N1, Medical Cartel, Top Stories

More Propaganda to Sell Vaccines: Swine flu virus ‘could still mutate’ WHO warns

2 Comments 02 January 2010

.
.
.

BBC
December 29th, 2009

The head of the World Health Organisation (WHO) has warned the global swine flu pandemic is not yet over and the virus could still mutate.

Dr Margaret Chan said it was important to “guard against complacency” despite signs the disease had peaked in North America and parts of Europe. She said the virus was still active in countries including India and Egypt. More than 11,500 people are believed to have died in more than 200 countries and territories because of swine flu.

However Dr Chan said it would take at least two years before a true death toll could be established. The WHO’s director general said the US, Canada and the UK were among those countries where the worst of the swine flu outbreak had appeared to have passed.

Danger

But she added: “It is too premature and too early for us to say we have come to an end of the pandemic influenza worldwide.”
She said experts needed to continue monitoring the pandemic for another six to 12 months as it could mutate into a more dangerous strain. “We will watch this virus with eagle’s eyes,” she said. Dr Chan said it was fortunate the pandemic had been milder than expected.

“The fact that the long overdue influenza pandemic is so moderate in its impact is probably the best health news in a decade,” she said.

Millions of people are believed to have recovered after contracting the virus and displaying few symptoms. She said the demand for swine flu vaccinations in some European countries had been lower than expected and WHO was investigating whether superfluous vaccines could be sent to developing countries.

Dr Chan said drug makers and countries promised to donate nearly 190 million vaccine doses to WHO, with the first doses of the donated vaccines to be distributed in Azerbaijan, Mongolia and Afghanistan next month. However she admitted she had not yet had a vaccine but said she would have it soon.

She said that although countries are now better prepared to cope with a global disease outbreak, people still had to be aware of the dangers of bird flu (H5N1).

She said this was more toxic and deadly than swine flu and that many countries remained ill-prepared for mass outbreaks of this virus.

“The world is not ready for a pandemic to be caused by H5N1,” she said.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Medical sales reps work alongside doctors, even in operating rooms

Conflicts of Interest, Medical Cartel, Top Stories, Undue Influence

Medical sales reps work alongside doctors, even in operating rooms

1 Comment 27 December 2009

By David S. Hilzenrath

Washington Post
Sunday, December 27, 2009

(vactruth.com editor’s note: Here is a perfect example of how big companies influence the medical profession)

In a Florida operating room, a senior citizen with a collapsed vertebra lies face down and unconscious on the operating table, surrounded by members of a medical team.

If all goes well, they’ll insert a tiny inflatable balloon into the brittle bone and then stabilize it by injecting cement. It’s a delicate procedure that deploys needles close to the spinal cord, and it takes a coordinated effort.

There’s an anesthesiologist alternating with a nurse anesthetist, an X-ray technician and a circulating nurse; there’s a pair of scrub techs to handle surgical instruments; there’s the surgeon, a middle-aged orthopedist who has never performed this type of operation before.

And, at the foot of the operating table, there’s Chuck Bates, a guy who studied biology in college and always wanted to go to medical school but never did.

Instead, he began his career selling hot dogs to grocery stores.

As the surgeon prepares to make an incision, Bates stares at the X-ray monitor.

Come up one centimeter and make your incision there, Bates tells the surgeon.

A little later, when it appears that the doctor is going to use his hand to push a needle into the patient’s spine, Bates suggests that he try a mallet instead.

Just tap-tap-tap, Bates advises.

The job wholesaling hot dogs enabled Bates to get an MBA on the weekends, and then a friend told him about a career more in tune with his interests, which led to employment with Kyphon, a manufacturer of medical devices.

Devices used to repair fractured vertebrae.

That’s how Charles E. Bates III came to be standing at a patient’s feet several years ago, doing his part to advance a new procedure called kyphoplasty.

Bates was the salesman in the operating room.

Although patients may not be aware of their presence, sales representatives have become fixtures in operating rooms across America. They come bearing artificial hips and artificial knees, cardiac pacemakers and implantable defibrillators, spinal stabilizers and mesh used to support prolapsed bladders. They deliver screws to hold bones together, and protein substances meant to make bone grow again.

At a time when Washington is trying to find new economies in health care, salesmen in the operating room serve as simple reminders that medicine is a business, with all the potential that entails to promote efficiency, boost sales and extract profit.

But should they be there at all?

In an age of rapidly proliferating technologies, the salesmen may know more about their products than the doctors who use them do.

In an environment where data is often lacking about the relative effectiveness of one product vs. another, or even about the merits of doing a procedure such as kyphoplasty at all, sales reps can tip the balance.

In the business that is surgery, they deliver devices to hospitals as needed, and they make sure the scrub techs know precisely which instruments and components the surgeon will reach for next. They speed procedures along, making time for more.

“They are critical to the efficient execution of hip and knee replacements,” said Denver orthopedist Ted Parks.

Many medical devices could not be used — or used safely — without sales reps, said David Nexon, senior executive vice president of the Advanced Medical Technology Association, an industry group.

Richmond gynecologist Catherine A. Matthews said that’s a frightening argument.

“They’re not in any way motivated to recommend what might be the best thing for the patient,” Matthews said. “They’re there to sell their product.”

Doctors shouldn’t have to depend on reps for expertise, she added.

The legislation being crafted on Capitol Hill could nudge the nation’s medical system toward new ways of doing business — making doctors more sensitive to costs, giving patients more information about what works and what doesn’t, paying hospitals based on the quality of their outcomes.

In short, it might begin to weaken the influence of the doctor-salesman relationship.

In the meantime, sales reps fill a vacuum.

Vince Proffitt knows the business well. He sells spinal implants in the Washington area, and he’s on call 24-7. If someone’s been in a car wreck, he says, timely delivery is about more than just efficiency.

The best part of the job, the father of two said, is “the fact that I can actually make a difference and help people.”

He’s talking about the patient lying “pretty helpless on that table,” but he says he’s also there for the doctor. “Any surgeon likes to have his team. And I think what we try to do is become a part of that surgical team.”

A former U.S. Air Force intelligence officer, Proffitt said he preps medical teams with attention to detail, “much like I would prepare an air crew for their mission.”

He used to work for the big manufacturer Medtronic, where he was successful enough to make the President’s Club, earning a trip to Hawaii. Now he runs his own medical device distribution firm, Spartan Medical.

On LinkedIn, he made it clear that he means business.

“My goal is to build, train, and coach a team of hard-charging professionals to gain market domination,” Proffitt said in an online profile. “Our team hunts in packs, takes care of each other . . . and believes victory is the only option.”

The key to success, Jim Rogers says, is a technique he calls “Dynamic Psychological Selling.”

An enthusiastic talker with a gleaming smile, Rogers used to be a sales executive for Wright Medical Technology, a major manufacturer of surgical implants. Then last year he founded the American Institute of Medical Sales, whose mission is training people to be salesmen in operating rooms.

The curriculum at the institute ranges from how to perform a joint replacement to how to get inside a surgical suite without an invitation.

“Excuses to use to be in a hospital without a case,” an institute brochure says.

Using hours of videotaped role-playing, Rogers teaches would-be salesmen the art of engaging surgeons in conversation. Conversations lead to relationships, which lead to sales.

Rogers coaches students to research doctors’ medical writings and hobbies, so they can break the ice with a line like this: “By the way, I read your paper on ACL reconstruction in teens. Fantastic article!”

The idea is to sell without making the surgeon feel that he’s being sold.

“If you have a good relationship with a surgeon and you can convince the surgeon to use your product, that surgeon can then convince the hospital to use your product,” Rogers said.

To win surgeons over, sales reps must demonstrate that they can save time in the operating room, Rogers says.

“A surgeon is driven on how many cases can you do in one day. They want to be able to do as many cases as they can.”

To give aspiring reps a feel for surgery, the institute used to train them on cadaver parts, but that got expensive; now students work on anatomical models called sawbones. The institute also takes trainees into operating rooms to observe surgeons and reps in action. One of Rogers’s goals is to weed out the squeamish: Some people faint at the sight of blood.

Since it opened, the institute, which also runs a recruitment service, has received 46,000 résumés, Rogers said. All sorts of people are clamoring to get into the business, he explains. Real estate agents, stockbrokers, insurance salesmen. People who have sold copiers, software and uniforms. “It’s easily the hottest industry, bar none,” Rogers said. “There are sales reps in our business that make over $1 million a year.”

(The average for those who’ve been at it for at least three years is $150,000, based entirely on commissions, Rogers said.)

Now the institute is planning a new program — a television program. The title for the proposed reality show:

“Sell O.R. Go Home.”

The presence of the salesman in the operating room has long raised concerns that it can put the interests of manufacturers before those of patients.

The issue was brought sharply into focus in 2003, when Endovascular Technologies pleaded guilty to federal charges that it covered up malfunctions of a device used to treat aortic aneurysms.

The government alleged that sales representatives were part of the coverup.

When the device became stuck in patients’ bodies during surgery, sales representatives coached doctors in an unapproved technique to remove the device by breaking it, the government alleged. Use of that approach, which a sales representative helped develop, kept malfunctions below the radar of the Food and Drug Administration, the government said.

A dozen patients died from malfunctions, and many others had to undergo more invasive surgery, the government said.

A history of controversy surrounding medical device marketing may help explain why some companies want nothing to do with a story about sales reps in the operating room.

“I would hope that you would not mention Boston Scientific in your story,” a spokesman for that company e-mailed.

Major device makers such as Johnson & Johnson, Stryker and Zimmer declined to arrange interviews for this article.

In a statement, Medtronic spokesman Charles Grothaus said that “most surgeons who use medical devices in their procedures expect a technical field rep to be present during the procedure, because they understand that the rep’s special product expertise enhances patient safety.”

“Actual medical decisions and selection of components are left up to the operating surgeon, who uses the technical representative as a real time resource in making those decisions,” Grothaus said.

Chuck Bates worked as a salesman and regional sales manger for Kyphon from 2001 to 2005. His first task, he said, was getting doctors interested in Kyphon’s procedure. Once they were interested, Kyphon would give them one-day courses in which they practiced on cadavers. Other surgeons would lead the class, but “the hands-on training was done mostly by the sales reps,” Bates said.

After bonding over that experience, some reps became so close with physicians that they stayed with them as houseguests, Bates said.

Kyphoplasty, the procedure Bates and his colleagues were promoting, competed with an older approach known as vertebroplasty. Both could be used on patients with osteoporosis, a deterioration of the bone. A key difference was that kyphoplasty employed the Kyphon balloon tamp.

Then there was the price: Kyphoplasty was much more expensive.

A 2004 article in the American Journal of Neuroradiology said that both procedures had benefits but that additional trials were needed to determine their relative effectiveness. Meanwhile, the FDA warned of potentially dangerous complications.

Bates said that he promoted kyphoplasty as a way for doctors to increase their incomes and help their patients.

A 2003 document containing internal comments from the Kyphon sales force — which was later used in litigation — shed light on other reps’ agendas.

“Nora and I have developed a strong personal friendship with Dr. Graham and his wife. We meet at least once every three weeks for dinner, etc. Result — 21 levels in April,” one representative wrote, apparently referring to the number of vertebrae on which the doctor had operated. “My goal is to have the surgeon treat and the [primary-care physician] refer cases as much for me personally as for the patient,” the sales rep added.

A second sales rep reported that he was trying to persuade surgeons to operate on more vertebrae per case.

“My one problem is that all of my surgeons except one are doing only one level on each patient. This has kept me from reaching my goal of 100k per month,” the rep wrote.

A third rep spelled out a strategy to get patients into surgery sooner. The trouble, as that rep described it, was that operations were getting postponed “and eventually the patient’s symptoms subside which translates into a cancelled case.”

Why would surgery be warranted for anyone whose symptoms went away?

Their fractures might worsen, former Kyphon reps said.

Bates said in an interview that he helped solicit business for his surgeons by donning scrubs and going to the offices of potential referring physicians.

At the company’s urging, he and other Kyphon reps taught doctors and hospitals how to maximize the money the federal Medicare program would pay, Bates said.

Although the minimally invasive procedure could ordinarily be performed on an outpatient basis, Kyphon reps recommended that patients be admitted overnight to elicit higher federal reimbursements, he said.

“The good sales reps would always make sure the physician had admitted the patient,” Bates said.

With the overnight stay, hospitals could profit from the procedure, Bates said. “The last thing you wanted to do was have them lose money and then stop doing kyphoplasty,” he said.

In 2004, Bates had a change of heart. As he recalled, he heard that hospitals in Texas were increasingly uncomfortable billing for kyphoplasty as an inpatient procedure, and the result was a decline in Kyphon’s business there. “We were afraid it was going to become a nationwide thing,” he said.

Ultimately, Bates concluded that “what we were doing was wrong,” he said, and he prepared to throw away his career.

He found his way to the Washington law firm Phillips & Cohen, which specializes in representing whistleblowers. While it was reviewing Bates’s allegations, the firm heard independently from Craig Patrick, a former reimbursement manager at Kyphon who told a similar story, lawyer Mary Louise Cohen said.

In 2005, Bates and Patrick filed a whistleblower suit against Kyphon, alleging that the company was responsible for false or fraudulent Medicare claims.

Eric Roux, a former Kyphon sales manager, said he shook his head in disbelief when he heard about the lawsuit. “From the top on down, we were never, ever told to do anything inappropriate,” Roux said. “I know the good that we did.”

Kyphon denied any wrongdoing but last year agreed to pay the government $75 million. As their reward, the two whistleblowers and their attorneys shared $14.9 million.

By the time Kyphon settled the case in May 2008, it had been bought by Medtronic for $3.9 billion. Asked to address the allegations in Bates’s lawsuit, a Medtronic spokesman did not respond.

In a news release announcing the acquisition of Kyphon, Medtronic Chairman Art Collins looked toward a bright future.

As he put it: “Kyphon’s world-class, global sales force will play a central role in the continued development of our spinal business.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
EXPLOSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST: WHO PROFITS FROM THE NATIONAL HEALTH PLAN? AND FROM OTHER INVESTMENTS…

Conflicts of Interest, Jon Rappoport, Medical Cartel, Top Stories, Undue Influence

EXPLOSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST: WHO PROFITS FROM THE NATIONAL HEALTH PLAN? AND FROM OTHER INVESTMENTS…

1 Comment 26 December 2009

.
.
Source:
www.insolutions.info S.

By Jon Rappoport
www.insolutions.info
www.nomorefakenews.com
DECEMBER 25, 2009.

I have to begin by saying you need to know about Walter Burien.  http://CAFR1.com

Walter curls people’s hair.  For many years, he has been investigating the investments made by governments.  The what?  I know.  This sounds like a non-sequitur.  Governments aren’t businesses, are they?

It turns out they are.  Well, when you think about it, it’s obvious.  They run, for example, retirement funds for their employees, and those funds make investments, they don’t just store money in shoe boxes.

Recently, Walter provided a link to the New York State Retirement Fund Asset Listing (March 31, 2006).  You can find it at: http://cafr1.com/STATES/NEWYORK/RETIREMENT/NYRINV2006.PDF

This document shows the investments this fund makes, and the value of each stock holding.  The implications are enormous.  For example, when you pinpoint the many pharmaceutical stocks, you realize New York State government will be a primary beneficiary of any national health plan.  Why?  Because drug companies, under such a plan, will be selling far more drugs as millions of new, previously uninsured people come under the federal umbrella.

Any piece of news that makes the pharma landscape glow tends to shoot up stock values.

From a financial point of view, it would be ridiculous to assume New York State government would oppose national health insurance.  It’s good for business.  The business of, yes, New York State government.

And by the way, to the extent that some of these drug companies manufacture vaccines (and they do), the New York State government would be a big-time supporter of the mass vaccinations that accompany each new phony epidemic, such as Swine Flu.  Again, for business reasons.  In fact, we may now understand a new reason why, until huge protests derailed it, New York tried to make the H1N1 vaccine mandatory for all state health workers.

Here are some of the pharmaceutical listings in the New York Retirement Fund.  The value of each stock holding is as of Mar.31, 2006.

Schering-Plough: $138,013,129
Barr: $39,152, 525
Baxter: $105,606, 745
Gilead: $127,348,101
Roche: $87,762,875
MedImmune: $46,942, 968
Sanofi-Aventis:$153,887,891
Bayer: $39,318,918
Bristol-Myers Squibb: $195,807,422
GlaxoSmithKline: $137,729,350
Pfizer: $834,756,329
Novartis: $131,221,033
Merck: $344,768,742
Eli Lilly: $249,409,636
Vertex: $17,947,395

Drug companies.  $2.5 billion and change.  One retirement fund in one state.

Walter Burien goes much further—and here you would have to consult his site for supporting evidence.  He states that, when you look at the various investment funds of the 50 state governments, and when you consider the possibility that many of these funds act (invest) in concert, governments turn out to be controlling stockholders in some of the biggest corporations in America.

Turn that thought over in your mind a few times.

Here’s another explosion:  To what degree did the federal bailout bail out the New York State government?  Well, among the 2006 NY Retirement Fund listings, we have:

Goldman Sachs: $268,770,613
Bank of America: $896,993,638
Citigroup: $1,036,682,080.

This gives another perspective on what a fed bailout means.  It functions as profit protection.  For a state government.

Imagine state legislators and other state officials consulting THE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO of their state government before they vote for or against legislation.

The hits keep coming.

“As governor of your state, my friends, I am taking every action I can to assure the profits of this administration continue to rise.  As taxpayers, you are the stakeholders.  What you pay us, we invest.  Of course, we never show you the balance sheet, and we never indicate whether we need your taxes, or whether our profits alone are sufficient for running the state.  But that’s the way the game works.  You stay in the dark.  When we raise your taxes, we give you reasons—which may be accurate or sheer nonsense.  The point is, we keep taking your money and investing it…”

JON RAPPOPORT
www.insolutions.info
www.nomorefakenews.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Advisers on Vaccines Often Have Conflicts, Report Says

Conflicts of Interest, Medical Cartel, Top Stories, Undue Influence, Vaccine Development

Advisers on Vaccines Often Have Conflicts, Report Says

No Comments 24 December 2009

GARDINER HARRIS
New York Times
December 18, 2009

WASHINGTON — A new report finds that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did a poor job of screening medical experts for financial conflicts when it hired them to advise the agency on vaccine safety, officials said Thursday.

Most of the experts who served on advisory panels in 2007 to evaluate vaccines for flu and cervical cancer had potential conflicts that were never resolved, the report said. Some were legally barred from considering the issues but did so anyway.

In the report, expected to be released Friday, Daniel R. Levinson, the inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services, found that the centers failed nearly every time to ensure that the experts adequately filled out forms confirming they were not being paid by companies with an interest in their decisions.

The report found that 64 percent of the advisers had potential conflicts of interest that were never identified or were left unresolved by the centers. Thirteen percent failed to have an appropriate conflicts form on file at the agency at all, which should have barred their participation in the meetings entirely, Mr. Levinson found. And 3 percent voted on matters that ethics officers had already barred them from considering.

The inspector general recommended that the centers do a far better job of screening. In a reply, the agency’s new director, Dr. Thomas R. Frieden, agreed.

“Since the period covered in this review, C.D.C. has strengthened the financial disclosures and conflict-of-interest process by instituting improved business processes and realigning responsibilities and oversight,” Dr. Frieden wrote.

As numerous medicines have been pulled from the market in recent years, worries have grown that experts may be recommending medical products — even ones they know to be unsafe — in part because manufacturers are paying them.

As a result, government agencies, medical societies and medical journals have become increasingly insistent that experts disclose potential conflicts. And while the experts invariably insist that they have done so, government audits routinely find large gaps between these disclosures and the experts’ actual income from consulting.

Congress tightened the rules on outside consulting after similar conflicts were found among members of advisory panels to the Food and Drug Administration. But little attention has been paid to the potential conflicts of advisers to the C.D.C., even though that agency’s committees have significant influence over what vaccines are sold in the United States, what tests are performed to detect cancer and how coal miners are protected.

Most of the advisers identified by Mr. Levinson had either a job or a grant from a company or other entity whose interests were affected by the committees’ discussions, and a considerable number also owned stock in such companies, the report said.

Representative Rosa DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat who said she had long been a supporter of the C.D.C., said: “That is why I am so concerned about this report issued by the inspector general exposing serious ethics violations within the C.D.C. All members of the federal advisory committees, whose recommendations direct federal policy, should be without conflict of interest.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
How Pharma Creates A New Disease to Sell its Drug

Dr. Meryl Nass, Faked Medical Data, Medical Cartel, Top Stories, Undue Influence

How Pharma Creates A New Disease to Sell its Drug

No Comments 24 December 2009

.
.
.

Meryl Nass
http://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com
12/23/2009

How Merck Created a New Disease (Osteopenia) to Sell its New Drug, FOSAMAX/ NPR

MUST_READ from NPR (thanks to Marc Crispin Miller)

… armed with the firm conviction that he was about to do good in the world, and coincidentally sell a ton of drugs for Merck, Jeremy Allen set out to completely rework the way that bone was measured in America.

Now, to do this, he figured, the first thing he needed was an institution, an entity whose mission was not to sell drugs, but to serve the public good. So he decided to create one. In 1995, Allen convinced Merck to establish a nonprofit called the Bone Measurement Institute. On its board were six of the most respected osteoporosis researchers in the country. But the institute itself had a rather slim staff: Allen, you see, was its only employee.

Mr. ALLEN: There was no payroll, there was no building, there was no office with the name Bone Measurement Institute…

… Jeremy Allen says that to encourage other companies to take seriously Merck’s goal of dropping the price of measuring machines, Merck actually purchased a bone measurement business.

Mr. ALLEN: We bought one of the companies and showed how low the price could become purely to get everybody’s attention. And we got everybody’s attention. And subsequently, when everybody else moved, we let it go, and the company closed. And we cheered its demise…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
The Desperation of Pharma: Get a Flu Shot, Get a Pizza Party

H1N1, Medical Cartel, Top Stories, Undue Influence

The Desperation of Pharma: Get a Flu Shot, Get a Pizza Party

3 Comments 19 December 2009

.
.
.

Fighting Swine Flu With Pepperoni

7 Action News, Detroit
12/17/09

(WXYZ) – The Detroit Health Department is fighting swine flu with pepperoni. When kids return to school after the holiday break, each class has the opportunity to get a free pizza party – if they sign up for the shots.

It’s a simple fact–kids don’t like vaccinations – even when they can get them in a spray.
Their parents, like Leslie Ethridge however, are often eager to get their kids protected, “Your children get 20 some odd inoculations, this is just another one, so if it’s available you should get the shot.”

But when Detroit schools – both public and private– sent home permission slips for students to get H1N1 vaccine at school, the return rate was only about ten percent.

Dr. Walter Davis, Detroit Pandemic Flu Coordinator, told us, “talking to principals and some parents we find that a lot of them are never receiving consent forms.”

The Detroit Health Department has already been working especially hard to get the vaccine into the community.

For instance, today parents attending the Christmas program at the Foreign Language Immersion School on Outer Drive had the chance to get shots for themselves and their children before or after the program.

Mom, Kimberley Wallace said, “This is the easiest for me. This way I don’t have to take them to the doctor’s office, take them out of school or anything so it works out real well.”

But apparently not well enough. So Dr. Davis and his team came up with an innovative idea. They teamed up with Happy’s Pizza. And each class in the city that has a permission slip return rate of 80-percent or more will get a pizza party for the entire class.

According to Neil Master, Director of Advertising for Happy’s Pizza, “Kids love pizza and we love kids in Detroit and we take care of them whenever we can.”

And while the kids may sign up for the pizza, the parents need to know it’s important to sign the forms because flu season isn’t over just because the number of cases have leveled off.

Dr. Davis told us, “With our flu season, the peak is usually in February and it goes into March. I can tell you we will get hit again. We’re in December now. In January and February, the flu will increase tremendously.”

Another mom, L’Tonya Felder got shots for her children, “I think it’s extremely important. It’s important that the Detroit community come together and realize this is important for our health for our protection and we’re combating the h1n1 as well as the regular seasonal flu.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine

Newsletter

Click to Join Our Newsletter! Carl Bruning Constitutional Larimer County Sheriff

Users Online

Featured Vaccine Book

Dr. Todd Elsner's Book

 

Today, according to the CDC’s recommended vaccination schedule, a child receives 36 shots containing a total of 126 vaccines from birth through six years of age. This is quadruple the number of vaccines a child received in the 1980’s. In 1983 a child received only 10 shots containing 30 vaccines.

Could this quadrupling of the schedule be responsible for the drastic increase in childhood disorders we are seeing today?

 

Get the information your pediatrician will never tell you!

Live Healthy

Award Winning Inspirational Documentary by Valya Boutenko
Best Selling Books and DVDs from the Raw Family

Ads

Silver Lungs

Optimize Your Health

Vibrant Living with Delicious Green Smoothies