Dr. Russell Blaylock on Who Created Orthodox Medicine

Dr. Russell Blaylock, Faked Medical Data, Top Stories, Undue Influence, Vaccine Propaganda

Dr. Russell Blaylock on Who Created Orthodox Medicine

No Comments 16 March 2010

“Who Created Orthodox Medicine?”

Dr. Russell Blaylock:

“Who created orthodox medicine? Where did that come from?”

“Well, it actually came from the Rockefeller Foundation back in 1901.”

“The Rockefellers at the time . . . because of the Standard Oil scandals, no one wanted to be called a Rockefeller.

“Everybody hated all the Rockefellers. And so his friend, Reverend Gates, went to John D. Rockefeller, Sr. and told him, he said, “Well, here’s a way we can repair your reputation.” And he gave him a good example. He said, “There was this man who everybody hated . . . and he started giving money out for all sorts of philanthropic enterprises, and soon people forgot all of the bad things.” . . .

“So the first thing, because Gates’ father was a physician, and John D. Rockefeller’s father was a quack snake-oil salesmen, he said, “Let’s form the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research.” And so they created this in 1901. . . .”

“Rockefeller owned what was called the drug trust: that’s the major drug manufacturing firms all over the world: Merck Pharmaceuticals, Lederle, all of these . . . pharmaceutical companies . . .”

“And of course, the aim was to remove all nutrition, references to nutritional type treatments, from the medical schools. They closed down half the medical schools in the United States. There were 165 medical schools at the time. . . . Then he had his anointed medical schools, which he poured his money into, appointed the professors from his own stock of professors. And so they created an educational system that taught the things that he wanted taught. And therefore every professor that came out of those programs taught the same thing.”

  1. http://russellblaylockmd.com
  2. The Regimentation in Medicine and the Death of Creativity
  3. Flexner Report (http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/sites/default/files/elibrary/Carnegie_Flexner_Report.pdf)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
SEBELIUS: HHS document EXTENDING THE PANDEMIC to 2012

H1N1, Influenza, Top Stories, Undue Influence, Vaccine Laws

SEBELIUS: HHS document EXTENDING THE PANDEMIC to 2012

No Comments 08 March 2010

.
.
.

*Special thanks goes to Eileen D. for bringing this to our attention.

See bolded Excerpt such as:

Therefore, pursuant to section 319F-3(b) of the Act, I have determined there is a credible risk that the spread of pandemic influenza A viruses and those with pandemic potential and resulting disease does or could constitute a public health emergency.

…and extends through February 28, 2012.

Section 319F-3(a)(4)(A) confers immunity to manufacturers and distributors of the Covered Countermeasure, regardless of the defined population.

…and amended on September 28, 2009 to provide targeted liability protections for pandemic countermeasures to enhance distribution


100226 Sec HHS Sebelius Pandemic Influenza Vaccines Amendment

[Federal Register: March 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 43)]
[Notices]
[Page 10268-10272]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05mr10-76]

=======================================================================
———————————————————————–

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary

Pandemic Influenza Vaccines–Amendment

Authority:  42 U.S.C. 247d-6d.

ACTION: Notice of amendment to the September 28, 2009 Republished
Declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act.

———————————————————————–

SUMMARY: Amendment to declaration issued on September 28, 2009 (74 FR
51153) pursuant to section 319F-3 of the Public Health Service Act
(“the Act”)

[[Page 10269]]

(42 U.S.C. 247d-6d) to revise covered countermeasures and extend
effective date and republication of the declaration to reflect the
declaration in its entirety, as amended.

DATES: The amendment of the republished declaration issued on September
28, 2009 is effective as of March 1, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Lurie, MD, MSPH, Assistant
Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20201, Telephone               (202) 205-2882         (202) 205-2882 (this is not a toll-free
number).
HHS Secretary’s Amendment to the September 28, 2009 Republished
Declaration for the Use of the Public Readiness and Emergency
Preparedness Act for H5N1, H2, H6, H7, H9 and 2009-H1N1 Vaccines:
Whereas there are or may be multiple animal influenza A viruses,
circulating in wild birds and/or domestic animals that cause, or have
significant potential to cause, sporadic human infections or have
mutated to cause pandemics in humans;
Whereas, these viruses may evolve into virus strains capable of
causing a pandemic of human influenza because these viruses may cause
infection in and spread among humans and because humans have little or
no immunity to these viruses;
Whereas, one such virus is the 2009 H1N1 Influenza Virus;
Whereas, vaccination may be effective to protect persons from the
threat of pandemic influenza;
Whereas, Secretary Michael O. Leavitt issued a Declaration for the
Use of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act dated
January 26, 2007 (“Original Declaration”), as amended on November 30,
2007 and October 17, 2008 with respect to certain avian influenza
viruses;
Whereas, I amended the declaration on June 15, 2009 with respect to
2009 H1N1 influenza virus and on September 28, 2009 to provide targeted
liability protections for pandemic countermeasures to enhance
distribution and to add provisions consistent with other declarations,
and republished the declaration each time in its entirety;
Whereas, the September 28, 2009 declaration extended through
February 28, 2010 for vaccines against influenza virus strains named in
the Declaration other than 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine;
Whereas, modifications are necessary to revise covered
countermeasures and to extend the effective date of the Declaration;
Whereas, the findings I made in the declaration issued on September
28, 2009 continue to apply;
Whereas, in accordance with section 319F-3(b)(6) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)), I have considered the desirability of encouraging
the design, development, clinical testing or investigation,
manufacturing, labeling, distribution, formulation, packaging,
marketing, promotion, sale, purchase, donation, dispensing,
prescribing, administration, licensing, and use of additional covered
countermeasures with respect to the category of disease and population
described in sections II and IV of the September 28, 2009 Republished
Declaration, as hereby amended, and have found it desirable to
encourage such activities for these additional covered countermeasures,
and;
Whereas, to encourage the design, development, clinical testing or
investigation, manufacturing and product formulation, labeling,
distribution, packaging, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase,
donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing, and use
of medical countermeasures with respect to the category of disease and
population described in sections II and IV of the September 28, 2009
Republished Declaration, as hereby amended, it is advisable, in
accordance with section 319F-3(a) and (b) of the Act, to provide
immunity from liability for covered persons, as that term is defined at
section 319F-3(i)(2) of the Act, and to include as such covered persons
other qualified persons as I have identified in section VI of the
September 28, 2009 Republished Declaration, as amended;
Therefore, pursuant to section 319F-3(b) of the Act, I have
determined that there is a credible risk that the spread of influenza A
viruses with pandemic potential and resulting disease could in the
future constitute a public health emergency and that spread of one of
these viruses (2009 H1N1 Influenza) has caused a disease that
constitutes a public health emergency.
In order to extend the scope of covered countermeasures and to
extend the effective date of the Declaration, the September 28, 2009
Republished Declaration, is hereby amended as follows:
In the title, delete “for H5N1, H2, H6, H7, H9 and 2009 H1N1
Vaccines” and replace with “for Vaccines Against Pandemic Influenza A
Viruses and Those with Pandemic Potential”.
In the recitals, delete the first through the fourth “whereas”
clauses, and insert two new recitals as follows:
Whereas there are or may be multiple animal influenza A viruses
circulating in wild birds and/or domestic animals that cause, or have
significant potential to cause, sporadic human infections or have
mutated to cause pandemics in humans;
Whereas, these viruses may evolve or have evolved into virus
strains capable of causing a pandemic of human influenza because these
viruses may cause infection in, and spread among, humans and because
humans have little or no immunity to these viruses;
In the sixth “whereas” clause, insert “October 1, 2009, and
December 28, 2009” after “July 24, 2009”.
In the “therefore” clause, delete “avian influenza viruses and
resulting disease could in the future constitute a public health
emergency, and that 2009 H1N1 influenza constitutes a public health
emergency” and replace with: “pandemic influenza A viruses and those
with pandemic potential and resulting disease does or could constitute
a public health emergency”.
In section I, first paragraph, delete “the pandemic
countermeasures influenza A H5N1, H2, H6, H7, H9, and 2009 H1N1
vaccines” each time it appears and replace with “vaccines against
pandemic influenza A viruses with pandemic potential”.
In section I, at the end of the second sentence, replace “IX”
with “X”.
In section II, delete “the virus with (1) highly pathogenic avian
influenza A (H5N1, H2, H6, H7, or H9) virus; or (2) 2009 H1N1
influenza” and replace with “animal and/or human influenza A viruses
against which most humans do not have immunity, except those included
in seasonal influenza vaccines and/or covered under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, that are circulating in wild birds
and/or domestic animals causing or having significant potential to
cause sporadic human infections or have mutated to cause pandemics in
humans”.
In section III, first paragraph, delete in its entirety and replace
with: “The effective period of time of this Declaration commenced as
described in the September 28, 2009 Republished Declaration, and
extends through February 28, 2012.
In section III, second paragraph, delete “; except that with
respect to 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine, the effective period commences
on June 15, 2009 and extends through March 31, 2013” and replace with
“through February 28, 2012.”
In section III, add to the end of the section as a new paragraph:
“With respect to any covered countermeasure subsequently covered under
the

[[Page 10270]]

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the effective time period
expires immediately upon such coverage.”
In section VIII, insert “and use” after “administration in the
first sentence, delete “the Act’s” from the second sentence and
replace with “this”, and delete “Countermeasure” from the second
sentence and replace with “Countermeasures”.
In section IX, add to the end of the first sentence: “; and
amended on September 28, 2009 to provide targeted liability protections
for pandemic countermeasures to enhance distribution and to add
provisions consistent with other declarations and republished in its
entirety.”
In section X, after the fifth paragraph, insert a new definition as
follows:
Pandemic influenza A viruses and those with pandemic potential:
Animal and/or human influenza A viruses, except those included in
seasonal influenza vaccines and/or covered under the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program, that are circulating in wild birds and/or
domestic animals, that cause, or have significant potential to cause,
sporadic or ongoing human infections, or historically have caused
pandemics in humans, or have mutated to cause pandemics in humans, and
for which the majority of the population is immunologically na[iuml]ve.
In Appendix I, title and item 32, add “H7,” after “H6”.
Throughout, insert “National” before “Vaccine Injury
Compensation Fund”.
All other provisions of the June 15, 2009 Republished Declaration
remain in full force.
Republication of HHS Secretary’s September 28, 2009 Republished
Declaration, as Amended, for the Use of the Public Readiness and
Emergency Preparedness Act for Vaccines Against Pandemic Influenza A
Viruses and Those with Pandemic Potential.
To the extent any term of the September 28 Republished Declaration,
as hereby amended, is inconsistent with any provision of this
Republished Declaration, the terms of this Republished Declaration are
controlling.
Whereas there are or may be multiple animal influenza A viruses
circulating in wild birds and/or domestic animals that cause, or have
significant potential to cause, sporadic human infections or have
mutated to cause pandemics in humans;
Whereas, these viruses may evolve or have evolved into virus
strains capable of causing a pandemic of human influenza because these
viruses may cause infection in, and spread among, humans and because
humans have little immunity to these viruses;
Whereas, on April 26, 2009, Acting Secretary Charles E. Johnson
determined under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act, (42
U.S.C. 247d), that a public health emergency exists nationwide
involving the Swine Influenza A virus that affects or has significant
potential to affect the national security (now called “2009-H1N1
influenza”);
Whereas, on July 24, 2009, October 1, 2009, and December 28, 2009 I
renewed the determination by the Acting Secretary that a public health
emergency exists nationwide involving the Swine influenza A virus (now
called “2009-H1N1 influenza virus”);
Whereas, vaccination may be effective to protect persons from the
threat of pandemic influenza;
Whereas, the possibility of governmental program planners obtaining
stockpiles from private sector entities except through voluntary means
such as commercial sale, donation, or deployment would undermine
national preparedness efforts and should be discouraged as provided for
in section 319F-3(b)(2)(E) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
247d-6d(b)) (“the Act”);
Whereas, immunity under section 319F-3(a) of the Act should be
available to governmental program planners for distributions of Covered
Countermeasures obtained voluntarily, such as by (1) donation; (2)
commercial sale; (3) deployment of Covered Countermeasures from Federal
stockpiles; or (4) deployment of donated, purchased, or otherwise
voluntarily obtained Covered Countermeasures from State, local, or
private stockpiles;
Whereas, the extent of immunity under section 319F-3(a) of the Act
afforded to a governmental program planner that obtains Covered
Countermeasures except through voluntary means is not intended to
affect the extent of immunity afforded other covered persons with
respect to such covered countermeasures;
Whereas, to encourage the design, development, clinical testing or
investigation, manufacturing and product formulation, labeling,
distribution, packaging, marketing, promotion, sale, purchase,
donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, licensing, and use
of medical countermeasures with respect to the category of disease and
population described in section II and IV it is advisable, in
accordance with section 319F-3(a) and (b) of the Act, to provide
immunity from liability for covered persons, as that term is defined at
section 319F-3(i)(2) of the Act, and to include as such covered persons
such other qualified persons as I have identified in section VI;
Whereas, in accordance with section 319F-3(b)(6) of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(b)) (“the Act”), I have
considered the desirability of encouraging the design, development,
clinical testing or investigation, manufacturing and product
formulation, labeling, distribution, packaging, marketing, promotion,
sale, purchase, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration,
licensing, and use of medical countermeasures with respect to the
category of disease and population described in sections II and IV
below, and have found it desirable to encourage such activities for the
Covered Countermeasures;
Therefore, pursuant to section 319F-3(b) of the Act, I have
determined there is a credible risk that the spread of pandemic
influenza A viruses and those with pandemic potential and resulting
disease does or could constitute a public health emergency.

I. Covered Countermeasures (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(1) of the
Act)

Covered Countermeasures are defined at section 319F-3(i) of the
Act.
At this time, and in accordance with the provisions contained
herein, I am recommending the manufacture, testing, development,
distribution, dispensing; and, with respect to the category of disease
and population described in sections II and IV, below, the
administration and usage of vaccines against influenza A viruses with
pandemic potential and any associated adjuvants. The immunity specified
in section 319F-3(a) of the Act shall only be in effect with respect
to: (1) Present or future Federal contracts, cooperative agreements,
grants, interagency agreements, or memoranda of understanding for
vaccines against pandemic influenza A viruses with pandemic potential
used and administered in accordance with this declaration, and (2)
activities authorized in accordance with the public health and medical
response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction to prescribe, administer,
deliver, distribute or dispense the pandemic countermeasures following
a declaration of an emergency, as defined in section X below. In
accordance with section 319F-3(b)(2)(E) of the Act, for governmental
program planners, the immunity specified in section 319F-3(a) of the
Act shall be in effect to the extent they obtain Covered
Countermeasures through voluntary

[[Page 10271]]

means of distribution, such as (1) donation; (2) commercial sale; (3)
deployment of Covered Countermeasures from Federal stockpiles; or (4)
deployment of donated, purchased, or otherwise voluntarily obtained
Covered Countermeasures from State, local, or private stockpiles. For
all other covered persons, including other program planners, the
immunity specified in section 319F-3(a) of the Act shall, in accordance
with section 319F-3(b)(2)(E) of the Act, be in effect pursuant to any
means of distribution.
This Declaration shall subsequently refer to the countermeasures
identified above as Covered Countermeasures.
This Declaration shall apply to all Covered Countermeasures
administered or used during the effective time period of the
Declaration.

II. Category of Disease (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(2)(A) of the
Act)

The category of disease for which I am recommending the
administration or use of the Covered Countermeasures is the threat of
or actual human influenza that results from the infection of humans
following exposure to animal and/or human influenza A viruses, against
which most humans do not have immunity, except those included in
seasonal influenza vaccines and/or covered under the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program, that are circulating in wild birds and/or
domestic animals causing or have significant potential to cause
sporadic human infections or have mutated to cause pandemics in humans.

III. Effective Time Period (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(2)(B) of
the Act)

The effective period of time of this Declaration commenced as
described in the September 28, 2009 Republished Declaration and extends
through February 28, 2012.
With respect to Covered Countermeasures administered and used in
accordance with the public health and medical response of the Authority
Having Jurisdiction, the effective period of time of this Declaration
commences on the date of a declaration of an emergency and lasts
through and includes the final day that the emergency declaration is in
effect including any extensions thereof through February 28, 2012.
With respect to any covered countermeasure subsequently covered
under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, the effective
time period expires immediately upon such coverage
.

IV. Population (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(2)(C) of the Act)

Section 319F-3(a)(4)(A) confers immunity to manufacturers and
distributors of the Covered Countermeasure, regardless of the defined
population.
Section 319F-3(a)(3)(C)(i) confers immunity to covered persons who
could be program planners or qualified persons with respect to the
Covered Countermeasure only if a member of the population specified in
the Declaration administers or uses the Covered Countermeasure and is
in or connected to the geographic location specified in this
Declaration, or the program planner or qualified person reasonably
could have believed that these conditions were met.
The populations specified in this Declaration are the following:
(1) All persons who use a Covered Countermeasure or to whom such a
Covered Countermeasure is administered as an Investigational New Drug
in a human clinical trial conducted directly by the Federal Government,
or pursuant to a contract, grant or cooperative agreement with the
Federal Government; (2) all persons who use a Covered Countermeasure or
to whom such a Countermeasure is administered in a pre-pandemic phase,
as defined below; and/or (3) all persons who use a Covered
Countermeasure, or to whom such a Covered Countermeasure is
administered in a pandemic phase, as defined below.

V. Geographic Area (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(2)(D) of the Act)

Section 319F-3(a) applies to the administration and use of a
Covered Countermeasure without geographic limitation.

VI. Other Qualified Persons (as Required by Section 319F-3(i)(8)(B) of
the Act)

With regard to the administration or use of a Covered
Countermeasure, Section 319F-3(i)(8)(A) of the Act defines the term
“qualified person” as a licensed individual who is authorized to
prescribe, administer, or dispense the countermeasure under the law of
the State in which such Covered Countermeasure was prescribed,
administered or dispensed. Additional persons who are qualified persons
pursuant to section 319F-3(i)(8)(B) are the following: (1) Any person
authorized in accordance with the public health and medical emergency
response of the Authority Having Jurisdiction to prescribe, administer,
deliver, distribute or dispense Covered Countermeasures, and their
officials, agents, employees, contractors and volunteers, following a
declaration of an emergency, and (2) Any person authorized to
prescribe, administer, or dispense Covered Countermeasures or who is
otherwise authorized under an Emergency Use Authorization.

VII. Additional Time Periods of Coverage After Expiration of
Declaration (as Required by Section 319F-3(b)(3)(B) of the Act)

A. I have determined that, upon expiration of the applicable time
period specified in Section III above, an additional twelve (12) months
is a reasonable period to allow for the manufacturer to arrange for
disposition of the Covered Countermeasure, including the return of such
product to the manufacturer, and for covered persons to take such other
actions as are appropriate to limit the administration or use of the
Covered Countermeasure, and the liability protection of section 319F-
3(a) of the Act shall extend for that period.
B. The Federal Government shall purchase the entire production of
Covered Countermeasures under the contracts specifically listed by
contract number in section I for the stockpile under section 319F-2 of
the Act, and shall be subject to the time-period extension of section
319F-3(b)(3)(C). Production under future contracts for the same vaccine
will also be subject to the time-period extension of section 319F-
3(b)(3)(C).

VIII. Compensation Fund

In addition to conferring immunity to manufacturers, distributors,
and administrators of the Covered Countermeasures, the Act provides
benefits to certain individuals who sustain a covered injury as the
direct result of the administration or use of the Covered
Countermeasure. The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP)
within the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
administers this compensation program. Information about the CICP is
available at               1-888-275-4772         1-888-275-4772 or http://www.hrsa.gov/countermeasurescomp/
default.htm
<http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/leaving.cgi?from=leavingFR.html\
&log=linklog&to=http://www.hrsa.gov/countermeasurescomp/default.htm> .

IX. Amendments

The Declaration for the Use of the Public Readiness and Emergency
Preparedness Act for H5N1 was published on January 26, 2007; amended on
November 30, 2007 to add H7 and H9 vaccines; amended on October 17,
2008 to add H2 and H6 vaccines; amended on June 15, 2009 to add 2009
H1N1 vaccines and

[[Page 10272]]

republished in its entirety; and amended on September 28, 2009 to
provide targeted liability protections for pandemic countermeasures to
enhance distribution and to add provisions consistent with other
declarations and republished in its entirety. This Declaration
incorporates all amendments prior to the date of its publication in the
Federal Register. Any future amendment to this Declaration will be
published in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 319F-2(b)(4) of
the Act.

X. Definitions

For the purpose of this Declaration, including any claim for loss
brought in accordance with section 319F-3 of the PHS Act against any
covered persons defined in the Act or this Declaration, the following
definitions will be used:
Administration of a Covered Countermeasure: As used in section
319F-3(a)(2)(B) of the Act includes, but is not limited to, public and
private delivery, distribution, and dispensing activities relating to
physical administration of the countermeasures to recipients,
management and operation of delivery systems, and management and
operation of distribution and dispensing locations.
Authority Having Jurisdiction: Means the public agency or its
delegate that has legal responsibility and authority for responding to
an incident, based on political or geographical (e.g., city, county,
Tribal, State, or Federal boundary lines) or functional (e.g., law
enforcement, public health) range or sphere of authority.
Covered Persons: As defined at section 319F-3(i)(2) of the Act,
include the United States, manufacturers, distributors, program
planners, and qualified persons. The terms “manufacturer,”
“distributor,” “program planner,” and “qualified person” are
further defined at sections 319F-3(i)(3), (4), (6), and (8) of the Act.
Declaration of Emergency: A declaration by any authorized local,
regional, State, or Federal official of an emergency specific to events
that indicate an immediate need to administer and use pandemic
countermeasures, with the exception of a Federal declaration in support
of an emergency use authorization under section 564 of the FDCA unless
such declaration specifies otherwise.
Pandemic influenza A viruses and those with pandemic potential:
Animal and/or human influenza A viruses, except those included in
seasonal influenza vaccines and/or covered under the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program
, that are circulating in wild birds and/or
domestic animals, that cause, or have significant potential to cause,
sporadic or ongoing human infections, or historically have caused
pandemics in humans, or have mutated to cause pandemics in humans, and
for which the majority of the population is immunologically na[iuml]ve.
Pandemic Phase: The following stages, as defined in the National
Strategy for Pandemic Influenza: Implementation Plan (Homeland Security
Council, May 2006): (4) First Human Case in North America; and (5)
Spread Throughout United States.
Pre-pandemic Phase: The following stages, as defined in the
National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza: Implementation Plan (Homeland
Security Council, May 2006): (0) New Domestic Animal Outbreak in At-
Risk Country; (1) Suspected Human Outbreak Overseas; (2) Confirmed
Human Outbreak Overseas; and (3) Widespread Human Outbreaks in Multiple
Locations Overseas.

Dated: February 26, 2010.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.

APPENDIX

I. List of U.S. Government Contracts–Covered H5N1, H2, H6, H7, H9, and
2009-H1N1 Vaccine Contracts

1. HHSN266200400031C
2. HHSN266200400032C
3. HHSN266200300039C
4. HHSN266200400045C
5. HHSN266200205459C
6. HHSN266200205460C
7. HHSN266200205461C
8. HHSN266200205462C
9. HHSN266200205463C
10. HHSN266200205464C
11. HHSN266200205465C
12. HHSN266199905357C
13. HHSN266200300068C
14. HHSN266200005413C
15. HHSO100200600021C (formerly 200200409981)
16. HHSO100200500004C
17. HHSO100200500005I
18. HHSO100200700026I
19. HHSO100200700027I
20. HHSO100200700028I
21. HHSO100200600010C
22. HHSO100200600011C
23. HHSO100200600012C
24. HHSO100200600013C
25. HHSO100200600014C
26. HHSO100200600022C (formerly 200200511758)
27. HHSO100200600023C (formerly 200200410431)
28. CRADA No. AI-0155 NIAID/MedImmune
29. HHSO100200700029C
30. HHSO100200700030C
31. HHSO100200700031C
32. All present, completed and future Government H5N1, H2, H6, H7,
H9, and 2009-H1N1 vaccine contracts not otherwise listed.

[FR Doc. 2010-4644 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Activists: Uzbekistan orders forced sterilizations

Top Stories, Undue Influence, Vaccine Propaganda, Vaccine Snafus

Activists: Uzbekistan orders forced sterilizations

No Comments 02 March 2010

Yahoo News

MOSCOW – An independent think-tank and a rights group in Uzbekistan claim that authorities have instructed health workers to surgically sterilize women as part of a government campaign to reduce the birth rate in the authoritarian ex-Soviet nation.

The Expert Working Group claimed Tuesday that a Health Ministry decree has ordered doctors to conduct hysterectomies on tens of thousands of women in the Central Asian nation.

The Najot rights group reported “numerous” cases of forced sterilization in maternity hospitals where doctors allegedly sterilize women without their consent.

Uzbek health officials did not answer repeated phone calls seeking comment.

A human right activist who made similar allegations in 2005 was jailed for alleged anti-government actions.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Victims of Vaccine Injury Silenced

Undue Influence, Vaccine Propaganda, Video

Victims of Vaccine Injury Silenced

No Comments 02 March 2010

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Bill Gates: Use Vaccines To Lower Population

By Author, Undue Influence, Vaccine Development, Vaccine Propaganda

Bill Gates: Use Vaccines To Lower Population

Comments Off 02 March 2010

.
.
.
.

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, March 1, 2010

Microsoft founder Bill Gates told a recent TED conference, an organization which is sponsored by one of the largest toxic waste polluters on the planet, that vaccines need to be used to reduce world population figures in order to solve global warming and lower CO2 emissions.

Stating that the global population was heading towards 9 billion, Gates said, “If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services (abortion), we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 per cent.”

Quite how an improvement in health care and vaccines that supposedly save lives would lead to a lowering in global population is an oxymoron, unless Gates is referring to vaccines that sterilize people, which is precisely the same method advocated in White House science advisor John P. Holdren’s 1977 textbook Ecoscience, which calls for a dictatorial “planetary regime” to enforce draconian measures of population reduction via all manner of oppressive techniques, including sterilization.

“I’m not sure what the nothing-to-see-here explanation is for Bill Gates’ theory that “new vaccines” can help lower the population of the world,” points out the Cryptogon blog, “But I thought about the incidents from the 1990s where the World Health Organization was providing a “tetanus vaccine” to poor girls and women (and just poor girls and women) that contained human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). For those who don’t want to delve into that, in short, it was a World Health Organization experiment; a test of a vaccine against pregnancy.”

After presenting an equation that included the number of people on the planet and CO2 emissions, Gates said, “Probably one of these numbers is going to get pretty near to zero.”

Later in the presentation, Gates mentions picking a vaccine, “which is something I love,” that would be used to lower global CO2 emissions.

He also advocates pouring more money into the global warming scam by way of the United Nations, as well as a “CO2 tax” and cap and trade, while making it clear that the developed world would have to reduce its living standards by cutting back on essential services that generate CO2.

Gates said that a 20 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions was necessary by 2020, a 50 per cent reduction by 2050, and ultimately that there had to be zero CO2 emissions globally, a measure that would completely reverse hundreds of years of technological progress and return man to the agrarian age, all in the name of preventing an alleged miniscule temperature increase that has been proven to be based on fraudulent data models in light of the Climategate scandal.

One of Gates’ proposals for reducing CO2 emissions is the use of biofuels, which as a new report highlights, has resulted in millions of acres of forests being destroyed, which ultimately means a net increase in CO2 emissions from biofuels when compared to fossil fuels, not to mention the massive devastation caused to wildlife.

As we have documented, a CO2 reduction of 50-80 per cent, not to mention 100 per cent, would inflict a new great depression in the United States, reducing GDP by 6.9 percent – a figure comparable with the economic meltdown of 1929 and 1930.

Additionally, the “post-industrial revolution” being proposed by Gates and his ilk would lead to massive job losses.

The implementation of so-called “green jobs” in other countries has devastated economies and cost millions of jobs. As the Seattle Times reported back in June, Spain’s staggering unemployment rate of over 18 per cent was partly down to massive job losses as a result of attempts to replace existing industry with wind farms and other forms of alternative energy.

In a so-called “green economy,” “Each new job entails the loss of 2.2 other jobs that are either lost or not created in other industries because of the political allocation — sub-optimum in terms of economic efficiency — of capital,” states the report.

The fact that Gates would be so open in his call to use vaccines to lower global population (without a word as to the human rights considerations), probably has a lot to do with the audience attending his speech.

The TED organization admits that it is elitist, “in a good way,” and charges a whopping $6,000 dollars membership fee which must be paid by conference attendees. TED also charges nearly $1,000 just for its live conference web stream. The organization’s sponsors include IBM and military-industrial complex kingpin General Electric, which has a notorious history of environmental misdeeds, being ranked fourth-largest corporate producer of air pollution in the United States, with more than 4.4 million pounds per year (2,000 Tonnes) of toxic chemicals released into the air. GE is also a major contributor to the toxic waste problem, rendering its sponsorship of an organization that claims to be seeking solutions to environmental problems completely hypocritical.

Watch Gates’ speech below.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Vaccine Teams Dispatched to Inject the Unsuspecting

Medical Cartel, Top Stories, Undue Influence

Vaccine Teams Dispatched to Inject the Unsuspecting

No Comments 01 March 2010

.
.
.

Seeing POD People? It’s No Sci-Fi Film

By ARIEL KAMINER
NYTimes
3/1/10

PODs are the sleeper cells of public health, assuming a different shape and observing different local mores each time a crisis emerges. When hepatitis A was diagnosed in a bartender at the Manhattan nightclub Socialista two years ago, POD people were on hand to vaccinate patrons, including some guests at Ashton Kutcher’s birthday party. In the case of a bioterrorism attack, they might turn up in your neighborhood dispensing anthrax antidote. On Feb. 18, they were in Anshe Sfard Hall in the Borough Park section of Brooklyn, rolling up the sleeves of Hasidic Jews. That’s a long way from Ashton Kutcher.

I entered the hall on the left, with the other women; men entered on the right. With stacks of gold-braided chairs in the corner and a divider to keep the sexes apart, the Anshe Sfard POD — short for Point of Distribution — could have been the day-before photo of an Orthodox wedding. Instead, it was the front line against one of the city’s more surprising outbreaks in years.

It started last year, when some children at a Jewish summer camp in the Catskills came down with mumps, one of those childhood diseases that were supposed to have been consigned to history. They brought it back home to the Hasidic enclaves in Borough Park, Crown Heights and Williamsburg. By last month, there were more than 900 cases, and more adults were getting sick.

Time to activate the PODs.

Mumps is not generally fatal, though it is painful and can cause deafness or infertility. In neighborhoods where families might have a dozen children, and young men spend long days together in yeshivas or synagogues, it spreads fast. But business was slow at Anshe Sfard, so Sheila Palevsky and Elissa Levine, two of the sharp, funny members of the POD team, were keeping each other amused with tales of former postings.

Hasidic Jews may be more inclined to visit their own doctors than to discuss bodily functions with strangers. (“When did you last go to the mikvah?” Ms. Levine asked while taking my medical history, referring to the ritual bath that many observant Jewish women visit after menstruating. I thought the euphemism was very sweet.) As for the antivaccine movement, its echoes are rare in these parts, but they ring out with a strong local accent. “Jews trust the Almighty, not vaccines,” one commenter wrote on the site of The Yeshiva World, an online newspaper, in a mix of Hebrew and English. On a Crown Heights Web site, someone else wrote, “I wish that folks would have as much faith and confidence in God as they do in doctors and scientists.”

But there is another reason things look different here: This outbreak has written a new chapter in epidemiological history.

The standard prescription is two doses of the M.M.R. (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine in childhood. That’s what most of the patients in Brooklyn had gotten, and it didn’t help them. Which has led medical professionals to reconsider some long-held notions about mumps in particular and communicable diseases in general.

“People that have measurable antibodies to mumps, which I was always taught meant you were immune, we found are getting the disease,” said Dr. Edward Chapnick, director of infectious diseases at Maimonides Medical Center. “And two vaccines, which we always thought had a very high effectiveness at preventing this, turns out to have a 75 to 80 percent effectiveness.”

The Department of Health still recommends two shots, but many doctors in the area — including Dr. Eli Rosen, a pediatrician who said he had treated 200 to 300 mumps cases so far — now favor three vaccinations, as do other private doctors in the area. “It appears that two vaccines are not effective in the vast majority of cases,” Dr. Rosen said. “Is this going to be a pattern we’ll see as we go out in vaccine years?” And, he added, would other vaccines also lose their effectiveness over time?

As a child I probably got my two M.M.R. shots, but who remembers. Everyone I spoke to assured me that so long as I wasn’t pregnant and did not have an immune disorder, there was no downside to an extra shot. But what’s the chance I would really need it? I don’t hang out in Brooklyn yeshivas.

In a city where people live so close to one another, it’s baffling that an outbreak could stay confined to a specific population, even an insular population. But that’s the paradox of city life, on an epidemiological scale: We are simultaneously a teeming megalopolis and a collection of little villages (or offices or apartment buildings), each with its own public health profile.

Still, a cluster of cases has already been documented in Orthodox and Hasidic neighborhoods of Westchester County. Unless that outbreak is halted, entropy will eventually win out.

So at the Quality Health Center in Williamsburg, which has reported hundreds of suspected cases, I decided to roll my sleeve up. Turns out it’s not just a fear of needles that makes little kids cry; the shot really did smart.

To distract me, Dov Landa, a physician assistant, shared the story of a 40-year-old Hasidic woman who had brought her large family in the day before. When it was her turn to get vaccinated, Mr. Landa, following protocol, asked if she was pregnant. The woman laughed. “I haven’t been pregnant in 10 years,” she said. He tested her anyway, just to be sure. And so it was that he got to tell her the happy news. Mazel tov.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Blundering Bureaucrats Forgot Cancel Clause in H1N1 Vaccine Contract

Conflicts of Interest, General, Top Stories, Undue Influence

Blundering Bureaucrats Forgot Cancel Clause in H1N1 Vaccine Contract

No Comments 25 February 2010

.
.
.

Victoria Fletcher
Express
02/24/10

BLUNDERING bureaucrats have spent £200million earmarked for hospital buildings on doses of the swine flu jab that will never be used.

Up to 132 million doses of the vaccine were ordered at the height of the panic over the H1N1 virus in 2009. But earlier this month it emerged that only 13 million doses had been delivered and more than four million were used on patients – three per cent of the total.

Now it is feared the millions of doses still on order cannot be stopped because officials forgot to add a cancel clause to the contract.

Yesterday the Department of Health admitted it had raided the coffers for hospital buildings and equipment – called the capital budget – “to meet existing commitments on pandemic flu”. Officials insisted that no projects had been axed due to the diverted cash.

But last night Shadow Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said it was outrageous that such a simple mistake would cost the NHS and the taxpayer so much money. He said: “Because there was no break clause in the GlaxoSmithKline contract, hundreds of millions will be spent on a vaccine for which the government has no use.”

“Today it has been revealed that the Government will take £200million out of the capital budget to pay for this. Who in the Government is going to take responsibility for this gross mistake in procurement? Which NHS Capital project was cut to pay for this?”

Ministers have refused to say how much money it spent on the swine flu contract with pharmaceutical giants GlaxoSmithKline and Baxter. But other nations have spent up to £9 per dose. Just months after the order for 132 million vaccines was signed providing enough for two jabs per person, it emerged that only one dose was needed to provide protection and that 66 million doses would have been ample.

The swine flu pandemic began to slow in autumn last year, despite Government warnings just months before that up to 65,000 could die in a “worst case scenario”. In fact, only 309 people have died of swine flu and most had underlying health conditions. Only 53 were killed by swine flu alone.

Although 14 million people were advised they should get vaccinated, only 4.5 million have taken up the offer. A bid to vaccinate all under-fives has also failed, with only 500,000 out of three million children having the jab.

And earlier this month, the flu threat faded to such low levels that the Health Department decided to close the National Pandemic Flu Service hotline and website. Most flu experts believe that a second wave of the virus in the spring is also unlikely although a revival next winter could occur.

Last night, a Health Department spokesman said the vaccines had been an “insurance policy”. “We can categorically confirm that no capital projects were cut as a result of the transfer,” he said.

“Ordering a vaccine and antivirals, and communicating how people can protect themselves from the pandemic, has been a worthwhile insurance policy that has undoubtedly saved lives. Every life saved from swine flu is worthwhile.”

In recent weeks, Germany has successfully negotiated a cut in its order for swine flu jabs by 30 per cent. Other countries are still negotiating.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Multigenerational Vaccine Indoctrination

By Author, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Undue Influence, Vaccine Propaganda

Multigenerational Vaccine Indoctrination

No Comments 14 February 2010

.
.
.

Posted on Dr. Sherri Tenpenny’s Facebook Page

I have frequently spoken about the multigenerational indoctrination about the belief in vaccines. Where did that come from? We need to unwind it.

The book, State of Immunity, by James Colgrove, is absolutely amazing and lays out in detail how the government, public health officials and life insurance companies coerced us into believing in the importance of vaccination.

We don’t study history anymore, which is a very sad state for our Country. If we did, we would see the patterns, and hopefully choose differently. Here’s a snip from Colgrove’s book (pg 92) about the 1920s diphtheria campaigns. The intensiveness of the process — and their success — have been repeated over and over, starting with polio and going through Swine flu.

We can’t fight them financially; they own all the money and have all the power. Now that we have seen the PlayBook, we need a different strategy. We have to be smarter…and get everyone to understand how the Game is Played.

Dr Sherri
PS. If you are interested in this topic, this book is a MUST for your personal library!
++++++++++++++++++++
In the nineteenth century, fear was proven to be a powerful motivation prompting people to seek vaccination. But the risk of diphtheria was much less than the disfiguring risk of smallpox. ….To get people to accept vaccination, the threat of diphtheria would have to be magnified and dramatized….

Campaigns were launched in 1926 across upstate New York and continued over three year. Families were reached by dozens of public health nurses that went door to door, canvassing patients and urging them to be vaccinated. Special immunization clinics offering fre or low-cost injections were set up in schools, dispensaries and other locations. Campaigns involved civic organizations and local businesses. Organizations such as the Lions Club donated lollipops to children following their shots.

Virtually every state newspaper ran advertisements, articles and editorial commentary. Radio broadcasts carried the message into homes. Billboards, posters, and placards were ubiquitous. Local schools held competitions between classes to achieve the highest rates of vaccination; students entered contests for the best essay and porter demonstrating the importance of diphtheria protection. Young people were awarded gold stars and badges after receiving their injections.

Parades, pageants and publicity stunts were staged. The mayor of Yonkers posed for news cameras as his three children receive their shots; in Yonkers and Mount Vernon, an army airplane scattered handbills urging immunizations. The Boy Scouts on the roofs of buildings wagging anti-diphtheria messages to kick off campaigns. ….Every effort included happy mothers pushing baby carriages down the street after being vaccinated.

The scope of the 1929 anti-diphtheria drive was remarkable. The health department sent almost 250,000 letters to mothers. The Catholic dioceses of Manhattan and Brooklyn sent letters to all parishioners and the principals of parochial schools and made announcements a t masses. Leaflets were included in the city’s electric and gas bills. Public schools distributed one million fliers to students.

Times Square had two rotating billboards and painted signs more than two hundred feet long were the largest pieces of outdoor advertising ever seen in the city. Some three hundred radio talks were broadcast. A series of four short films was shown in five HUNGDRED movie theaters. Virtually every newspaper in the city, including the large dailies, the foreign language press, local borough and neighborhood papers and trade journals, carried articles about the importance of immunizations. Subways, elevated trains, streetcars, and busses displayed placards. The city’s largest department stores donated advertising space in newspapers. Posters were displayed in chain stores. Posters, brochures and leaflets were translated into the ten most widely spoken foreign languages. Six ‘health mobiles” (which were snow removal trucks converted into traveling clinics), toured neighborhoods, parks and beaches.

The net effect was a change in professional ideology. The new perspective located the source of disease within the individual, rather than the environment, and saw persuasion rather than compulsion as the most appropriate and powerful tool for the implementation of mass vaccination.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Denver Public Schools Turned Into Vaccine Clinics

Conflicts of Interest, Top Stories, Undue Influence, Vaccine Propaganda, Video

Denver Public Schools Turned Into Vaccine Clinics

No Comments 31 January 2010

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine
Doctors Vaccinate for Profit

By Author, Christina England, Conflicts of Interest, Top Stories

Doctors Vaccinate for Profit

9 Comments 25 January 2010

.
.
.

Christina England
vactruth.com
1/25/2010

(vactruth.com) Years ago children were sent up chimneys or sold as servants to earn their parents extra money. Now they are being vaccinated by doctors, to boost their takings. Doctors, Governments and Pharma see our children as their property and are making thousands of pounds/dollars/euros out of them right under our noses. This, they call ‘Health Care’, I call it the legalization of child labour.

For years now we have been told that vaccines are good for us, that vaccines eradicate illness and that vaccines will save us from killer diseases. What we are not told is that the doctors and Governments telling us this are often linked to the drug companies who are manufacturing the vaccines that they promote and many are making thousands of pounds/dollars profit from vaccinating our children.

Let us begin at the bottom and start with the GP. In the UK every time a vaccine is given to us by our trusted GP they are paid. The British Medical Journal published an article GPs make deals with local NHS to vaccinate children against swine flu explaining how that every single child who is vaccinated with the H1N1 in the UK will earn the GP £5.25.

In Ireland the GP’s are paid five times this amount, for the seasonal flu shot. The article Irish Times – Irish GP’s paid five times UK rate for flu vaccine report that in Ireland a GP will earn a staggering €38.95 per vaccine, making vaccines a very lucrative business indeed.

As far back as 2002, GP’s were so keen to get their hands on this extra money that they were striking off their lists the children who had not had the MMR because if they (the GP’s ) did not meet the Government target rate of 90% immunization, they would not earn their £2865 vaccination bonus Daily Telegraph – Children without MMR jab struck off GP’s list reports tells the full story.

In another article The campaign for Gardasil Flawed it is reported that Merck actually seeks out and trains doctors to lecture for them on Gardasil, paying them $4,500 each time they lecture on the Gardasil vaccine. Doctors are making thousands of dollars doing this.

This is nothing new and is not just attributed to vaccines. Doctors have been doing this for years.

In the article Ex-Drug Sales Rep Tells All – ABC News

one drugs representative spills the beans and tells a Congressional committee what really goes on. Speaking about Eli Lilly he told the committee:-

To sell their drugs, pharmaceutical companies hire former cheerleaders and ex-models to wine and dine doctors, exaggerate the drug’s benefits and underplay their side-effects”

Shahram Ahari, who spent two years selling Prozac and Zypraxa for Eli Lily, told a Senate Aging Committee chaired by Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wisc., that his job involved ” rewarding physicians with gifts and attention for their allegiance to your product and company despite what may be ethically appropriate.”

Ahari claimed that drug companies like hiring former cheerleaders and ex-models, as well as former athletes and members of the military, many of whom have no background in science to wine and dine the doctors explaining the wonderful benefits of the drug they are employed to sell.


Higher up the you have leading figures in the medical profession who advise Governments on vaccine policies have strong links and alliances with the drugs companies helping them peddle their wares.

The article Children Risk Untested Flu Vaccines in Hyped Pandemic – Child Health Safety shows some very interesting links with the key figures who advise our Governments and drug companies.

Dr Salisbury the Medical Director for the Department of Health and a key figure in the JCV I who advises the UK Government on vaccine policies is shown to be linked by association with drug companies.

“Dr Salisbury is also linked by association to drug companies. Dr Salisbury as the Medical Secretary for the Department of Health is also a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. The JCVI has the task of approving UK vaccines. Many JCVI members have declared interests in a variety of drug companies when discussing the flu pandemic [ "JCVI meeting on 13th February 2008]. These financial ties include vaccine manufacturers Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur and Novartis. The JCVI is reportedly involved in attempts to hide evidence that the MMR vaccine can cause brain inflammation and permanent brain damage. ["Vaccine E-Newsletter March 20, 2009 Vaccine Bullies & Fighting Back by Barbara Loe Fisher]”

Another Government figure found to be linked to drugs companies is Kathleen Sebelius The US Health and Human Services Secretary. She has been found to have strong links to Glaxo Smith Kline.

In early 2009 the US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told The Associated Press that she was urging school superintendents around the USA to spend the summer preparing for the possibility that schoolchildren could be first in line for swine flu vaccine in the fall, if the USA Government decided to go ahead with mass vaccinations:-

“If you think about vaccinating kids, schools are the logical place,” She said. ["Kids May Get Swine Flu Shot First Lauran Neergaard June 16th 2009]

However, she did promise careful surveillance. Sebelius has strong alliances to drug companies. ["GlaxoSmithKline website] announced her appointment stating that she could work with them to save ‘World Health’ and get out of the ‘Healthcare mess’, if they (GSK) gave the Government the ‘right attention’”

So can we trust the doctors and the Governments to keep our children safe? Sadly it seems that many are not really putting the safety of their patients before their ever increasing pay packets. Their loyalty is to the drug companies and not their patients, so what is the truth about the vaccinations used today?

Fortunately for us, we have a strong and growing army of ‘real doctors‘, who are less interested in the ‘nice little earners’ are more interested in keeping the public informed and safe. They have a very different view of what vaccines are doing to our health and our immune systems.

Dr Viera Scheibner a well trusted doctor, Principle Research Scientist (Rtd) and now prominent public campaigner,is so sure of her facts she sent a letter to the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper. This letter by Dr Viera Scheibner , was sent to and published in the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper, in February 1999.

She challenged Simon Chapman who wrote an article challenging the anti- vaccination movement in Australia to ‘TAKE HIS OWN MEDICINE’

She began by saying

“On February 19, 1999, the Medical Observer published an article by Simon Chapman, in which he issued a challenge to the anti-vaccination movement in Australia.

My response to his provocative article is as follows:

If vaccines are such a blessing I challenge Simon Chapman to appear on television and allow himself to be injected with all baby vaccines, adjusted to his body weight by a doctor of my choice and in my presence.

The vaccines to be administered to Simon are as follows:

* DtaP: 3 doses within 4 months
* Hib (any conjugates): 3 doses within 4 months
* OPV or IPV: 3 doses within 4 months
* Hep B: 3 doses within 1 month of each other.

The time of the first dose represents month 0.

There isn’t a better way to demonstrate to us that vaccines are safe and effective than by Simon taking his own medicine.

Seems fair enough to me but as expected her letter was never answered.

Dr Scheibner has always had very strong views on vaccination and has been quoted making the following statements:-

Vaccination procedures are a highly politically motivated non-science, whose practitioners are only interested in injecting multitudes of vaccines without much interest or care as to their effects. Data collection on reactions to vaccines is only paid lip service, and the obvious ineffectiveness of vaccines to prevent diseases is glossed over. The fact that natural infectious diseases have beneficial effect on the maturation and development of the immune system is ignored or deliberately suppressed. Consequently, parents of small children and any potential recipients of vaccines and any orthodox medications should be wary of any member of the medical establishment (which is little more than a highly politicised business system) extolling the non-existent virtues of vaccination.”–Viera Scheibner

“I did not find it difficult to conclude that there is no evidence whatsoever that vaccines or any kind are effective in preventing the infectious diseases they are supposed to prevent. Further, adverse effects are amply documented and are far more significant to public health than any adverse effects of infectious diseases. Immunizations not only did not prevent any infectious diseases, they caused more suffering and more deaths than has any other human activity in the entire history of medical intervention. It will be decades before the mopping-up after the disasters caused by childhood vaccination will be completed.”—Dr. Viera Scheibner, PhD

She is not the only doctor to hold such strong views. Dr Harold Buttram M.D holds similar views. He has said:-

“Safety studies on vaccinations are limited to short time periods only: several days to several weeks. There are NO (NONE) long term (months or years) safety studies on any vaccination or immunization. For this reason, there are valid grounds for suspecting that many delayed-type vaccine reactions may be taking place unrecognized at to their true nature.Dr Buttram MD

“As reported in a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine in 1984, tests of T-lymphocyte subpopulations were done on 11 healthy adults before-and-after routine tetanus booster immunizations. Tests showed a significant though temporary drop in T-helper lymphocytes (a class of white blood cells which helps govern the immune system) in all of the subjects. Special concern rests in the fact that in 4 of the subjects the T-helper cells fell to levels found in active AIDS patients. (2) If this was the result of a single vaccine in healthy adults, it is sobering to think of the consequences of the multiple vaccines (twenty-one at last count) routinely given to infants with their immature systems during the first six months of life. However, we can only speculate as to the consequences, as this test has never been repeated. Dr Buttram MD

The list of doctors and professionals stating that vaccines are dangerous is growing. Dr Sherri Tenpenny says in a short article Defending the Right to Poison:-

“I have a little person in my office who had 10 rounds of antibiotics and 17 vaccines by 20 months of age. Yes, now autistic. That should be assault with deadly weapons and the doctor should be in jail. Instead, the parents were kicked out of their pediatrician’s practice for refusing more vaccines and wanting to get their child well. With these annoying, non-compliant parents out of the way, that doctor can continue to do what vaccinators do: Inject toxic substances into children, ruining their health and the lives of the child’s family members”

Dr Mayer Eisenstein Homefirst Medical Services treats thousands of never- vaccinated children. The Homefirst Medical Services director has said on many occasions that he is not aware of any cases of autism in unvaccinated children.

Dr Eisenstein said that the Homefirst Medical Services has taken care of about 30,000 to 35,000 unvaccinated children over the years and he does not remember a single case of autism in children who never received vaccines

For over 30 years Dr. Eisenstein has been fighting the good fight against vaccinations and struggling to legitimize alternative therapies. In recent years the evidence about the fantastic healing properties of Vitamin D has captured his attention along with that of other meaningful supplements which promote better health naturally. On his live radio show, he dispenses his wisdom and knowledge while his ever more popular Webinars continue to bring on great guests to tackle the most controversial health issues of the day

Recently in a disgusted interview he said-

“Now They Want to Inject Our Children with 2 Doses of H1N1 Vaccine!!! Not My Children!! …How pathetic! Tested on 474 children, and they want to give it to millions of children! Since the public overwhelmingly is rejecting this ineffective and dangerous vaccine the government needed to come up with a plan so as not to be accused of pork spending for a “pork vaccine”. Now I know what the Obama administration is planning to do with the millions of unused Swine Flu vaccines that they purchased. They will give 2 doses to our children and if that does not work they will give 3 doses. Just Say No!”Mayer Eisenstein MD, JD, MPH

Another real doctor is Dr Andrew Moulden who has said for years that vaccinations cause MASS Ischemia: Cellular Injury and the ischemic Penumbra – the progression of hypoxia in the Brain – Cores” neural tracts from the inside out. He says that this creates a series of disconnections to the brain’s wiring – locally and or systemically (autism) to progressively (dementia) and intermittently (Multiple sclerosis, CIDP, ADEM)..and more..including autistic enterocolitis and bowel disorders.

He explains everything on his website http://brainguardmd.com/ BrainGuard and shows fascinating videos that prove his theories.

Dr Mark Geier is another real doctor who is more interested in the welfare of children and the right to information than lining his own pocket. He has been fighting against mercury in vaccinations for years. For his beliefs the Governments and Big Pharma have trashed his reputation and even taken him to court but like many other professionals speaking on these issues, he battles on, speaking recently at a http://video.filestube.com/video,de70f8689a6c83f803ea.html Mercury Free Vaccine Rally out side the CDC building in front of hundreds of parents with autistic children.

He believes that it is the Mercury in the vaccines that causes Autism and has advocated for many years to rid all vaccinations of Mercury.

The real doctors are the ones who turn their back on dirty dealings and who remember their Hippocratic Oath. This is an old oath historically taken by doctors swearing to ethically practice medicine. It is widely believed to have been written by Hippocrates the father of western medicine, in Ionic Greek (late 5th century BC), or by one of his students, and is usually included in the Hippocratic Corpus. The phrase “first do no harm” said in Latin as Primum non nocere is often, incorrectly, attributed to the oath. Although mostly of historical and traditional value, the oath is considered a rite of passage for practitioners of medicine in some countries, although nowadays the modernized version of the text varies among the countries.

The Hippocratic Oath (orkos) is one of the most widely known of Greek medical texts. It requires a new physician to swear upon a number of healing gods that he will uphold a number of professional ethical standards.

The Oath says nothing about having links to drugs companies and lining ones pockets at the possible expense of the patient and it says nothing about injecting patients with doses of lethal cocktails of poisons and hoping for the best.

The real doctors are the ones that are not afraid to stand up and fight for the the rights of their patient. The real doctors ‘first do no harm’ and do not put money before the safety of our children.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • NewsVine

Newsletter

Click to Join Our Newsletter! Carl Bruning Constitutional Larimer County Sheriff

Users Online

Featured Vaccine Book

Dr. Todd Elsner's Book

 

Today, according to the CDC’s recommended vaccination schedule, a child receives 36 shots containing a total of 126 vaccines from birth through six years of age. This is quadruple the number of vaccines a child received in the 1980’s. In 1983 a child received only 10 shots containing 30 vaccines.

Could this quadrupling of the schedule be responsible for the drastic increase in childhood disorders we are seeing today?

 

Get the information your pediatrician will never tell you!

Live Healthy

Award Winning Inspirational Documentary by Valya Boutenko
Best Selling Books and DVDs from the Raw Family

Ads

Silver Lungs

Optimize Your Health

Vibrant Living with Delicious Green Smoothies