By: Carol Sanders
Winnipeg Free Press
28/10/2009 1:00 AM

THE H1N1 vaccine isn’t for everyone.

Since the mass immunization began in Winnipeg Monday, two people have had rare allergic reactions to it, according to the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority.

“We have had two incidents involving some allergic-type symptoms,” said Dr. Sande Harlos, a WRHA medical officer of health. “This is what we’re prepared to deal with.”

The maker of the H1N1 vaccine, GlaxoSmithKline, warns that up to one in 1,000 doses may result in an allergic reaction leading to a “dangerous decrease of blood pressure.”

“That’s why you’re asked to wait 15 minutes afterwards,” Harlos said. A severe reaction will happen within minutes of getting the shot.

By 3 p.m. Tuesday, 15,695 Winnipeggers had been immunized without incident. When someone reacts badly to the vaccine, there are medical staff on hand to help, Harlos said.

The vaccine recipient is taken to hospital to be kept under observation. Harlos said the two people who reacted badly to the vaccine — one on Monday and one on Tuesday — are OK. “They left in good condition.”

Meanwhile, Winnipegger Janice Dehod is worried about her allergy to the mercury-based preservative thimerosal used in the vaccine.

“I know if it is in eye drops or contact lens preserver, it will make my the skin around my eyes puff up and swell in a really ugly way,” she said. “I am not sure what thimerosal will do in my veins.”

Harlos said unless someone has a severe egg or thimerosal allergy, they shouldn’t have a severe reaction to the vaccine.

“Some people have a mild reaction when it’s used topically. That isn’t the same as a systemic whole-body reaction,” Harlos said.

A severe allergic reaction is an anaphylactic response — the throat closes, blood pressure plunges and airways tighten, said Dr. Joel Kettner, Manitoba’s chief medical officer of health.

Dehod said she has had an adverse reaction to a flu vaccine in the past, but doesn’t know if it contained thimerosal. She wishes Manitoba would obtain vaccine without thimerosal.

“I don’t want to be one of those people that falls through the cracks and gets H1N1 because Manitoba Health did a pretty good job for most people and gambled with the health of those that are a little more sensitive to preservative.”

Mercury downplayed

Thimerosal is a mercury-based preservative. In large concentrations, or over extended periods of exposure, mercury can cause damage to the brain and kidneys. However, the Public Health Agency of Canada says the amount of mercury in the H1N1 flu vaccine is significantly less than in a can of tuna.

The National Advisory Committee on Immunization has recommended a long-term goal of removing thimerosal from vaccines, provided that safe alternatives to this preservative can be found. “This will help to reduce unnecessary environmental exposure to mercury.”

By Barbara F. Gregory, September 24, 2009

NO COPYRIGHT!!! Copy this as much as you want along with anything else on this site! Spread the word. Tell your friends. Don’t let even one more child be injured from vaccinations!

For more of the evidence connecting vaccines and food allergies, please visit my website: http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/

Unless you have children in school, you might be unaware of the epidemic of severe and fatal food allergies. Imagine having a child in a town where fishing is a passion and your child has a fatal fish allergy. Just smelling fish cooking is enough to send this child to the emergency room. An epipen isn’t enough. I nearly cried as a friend told me about her fear for her child. Every time the telephone rings her first thought is “Is my child all right?”

Here are the food allergy statistics from FAAN:

• Food allergy is a growing health concern in the U.S.

• More than 12 million Americans suffer from food allergy. [3.9%]

• About 3.1 million children in the U.S. have food allergies.

• One out of every 25 Americans has a food allergy.

• One in every 17 children under the age of 3 has a food allergy.

• Eight foods account for 90 percent of all reactions in the United States: milk, eggs, peanuts, tree nuts (walnuts, almonds, cashews, pistachios, pecans, etc.), wheat, soy, fish, and shellfish.

• Severe reactions result in more than 50,000 emergency room visits each year.

• Food allergy is the leading cause of anaphylaxis outside of the hospital setting in the U.S.

• It’s estimated that 150 people die each year from severe food allergy reactions.

• Most individuals who have had a reaction ate a food they thought was safe.

• A government study has shown that food allergy rates in children increased 18 percent from 1997 to 2007.

• Scientists don’t know why the incidence of food allergy is increasing.

• Even trace amounts of a food allergen can cause a reaction.

• There is no cure for food allergy. ⁽¹⁾

It seems that food allergies are becoming so common that they are just accepted as a part of modern life. But food allergies are a recent phenomenon. The first case of food allergy (milk) was published in 1901.(2) First case of nut allergy -1920.(3) Sesame allergy – 1950^{. (4)} First case of Brazil nut anaphylaxis in the UK – 1983. ⁽⁵⁾ First known case of lupin allergy – 1994 ⁽⁶⁾

Our allergy “experts” would have us believe that food allergies are a side effect of being too “clean”. ⁽⁷⁾ This so-called “Hygiene theory” has been printed so many times now it isn’t even questioned in medical circles. And our medical community has no idea why our “clean” bodies suddenly start reacting to foods. According to the The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Food Allergies: the IgE antibodies that cause food allergies can just happen to be appear out of the ether:

“A baby can be born allergic, or a heretofore unafflicted adult can develop an allergy out of the blue.“⁽⁸⁾

Food Allergies for Dummies disagrees:

“A virgin immune system has no reason to launch an all-out attack on a harmless food. It has to be properly sensitized to the food first (through an initial exposure).”⁽⁹⁾

So what is going on with our scientific research and food allergies? How come we can have all that fancy medical equipment and so many people have studied allergies and nobody has a clue where these food allergies are coming from? Why do they have sesame allergies in Israel but no peanut allergies? They eat peanuts. They’re clean, too. Why does the Hispanic population of the United States have a lower incidence of food allergies? They’re living in the same “overly clean” country as the rest of us. Why have food allergies increased substantially in the last 6-7 years? Did we suddenly get “cleaner”?

My only claim to having any kind of learned abilities in compared to these highly trained physicians and scientists who have studied food allergies is I can read and write, add and subtract, and I actually looked at the ample data available. It doesn’t take a medical degree to see the connection between vaccines and food allergies.

I read the package inserts for vaccines. The first vaccine given to children, Hepatitis B⁽¹⁰⁾, contains casein. It is often given before the baby leaves the hospital.⁽¹¹⁾ Casein allergy usually appears in children in the first few months of life. ⁽¹²⁾ The same company that manufactures the Hepatitis B vaccine ⁽¹³⁾ also sells baby formula.⁽¹⁴⁾ Gee, what a coincidence!

One of the next vaccines given to children at two months of age is the Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV7) ⁽¹⁵⁾. The package insert states “Each serotype is grown in soy peptone broth”. Soy? “A soy allergy is most common in infants and is usually noticed by 3 months of age.” ⁽¹⁶⁾ Does the same manufacturer of this vaccine also make infant formula? Yep. ^{(17) (18)}

Highly refined food oils are a trade secret ingredient in vaccines. They can be mixed together. Patents for vaccine adjuvants list the oils used. ⁽¹⁹⁾

“8. The pharmaceutical emulsion of claim 1, wherein the oil phase further comprises almond oil; babassu oil; borage oil; black currant seed oil; canola oil; castor oil; coconut oil; corn oil; cottonseed oil; emu oil; evening primrose oil; flax seed oil; grapeseed oil; groundnut oil; mustard seed oil; olive oil; palm oil; palm kernel oil; peanut oil; rapeseed oil; safflower oil; sesame oil; shark liver oil; soybean oil; sunflower oil; hydrogenated castor oil; hydrogenated coconut oil; hydrogenated palm oil; hydrogenated soybean oil; hydrogenated vegetable oil; a mixture of hydrogenated cottonseed oil and hydrogenated castor oil; partially hydrogenated soybean oil; a mixture of partially hydrogenated soybean oil and partially hydrogenated cottonseed oil; glyceryl trioleate; glyceryl trilinoleate; glyceryl trilinolenate; a Ω3 polyunsaturated fatty acid triglyceride containing oil; or a mixture thereof.” ⁽²⁰⁾

Foods are also used in the culture medium.

“..In contrast, complex media will use extracts of a variety of things, including left-over animal parts (cow brains and hearts), yeast (from brewing) or digests of plants or animal slurries (peptones are one example of this category). The exact composition of these extracts is often unknown. The sources of these extracts often take advantage of waste products from other industries to save money….” ⁽²¹⁾

“Vegetables preferably used are of leaf and root types e.g. various cabbages, beets, rutabaga, carrot, pumpkin, spinach, beet, watermelon, melon, peanut, artichoke, eggplant, pepper sweet, asparagus, and tomato. Fruits to be preferably used are apples, pears, kiwi, plums, citrus, apricots, grapes/raisins, mango, guava, bananas, biwa, cornel, fig, cherry plum, quince, peach, pomegranate, avocado, pineapple, date, papaya. Berries preferably include raspberry, bilberry, guelder rose, dog rose, ash berry (red and black), currant (red, black, and white), sea-buckthorn berries, gooseberry, schizandra, blackberry, cowberry, bird cherry, cranberry, sweet cherry, cherry, and strawberry. Preferred herbs and their roots are ginseng, celery, parsley, dill, dandelion, nettle, ginseng, and spinach. Preferred high protein products are offals including spleen, kidney, heart, liver, brains, maw, and stomach as well as mushrooms, sea products (fish, mussel, plankton for example), eggs or nuts. Preferred products of beekeeping are propolis, honey, royal jelly, and pollen of flower.” ⁽²²⁾

“An adjuvant is a vaccine component that boosts the immune response to the vaccine. The adjuvant effects of aluminum were discovered in 1926. Aluminum adjuvants are used in vaccines such as hepatitis A, hepatitis B, diphtheria-tetanus-containing vaccines, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and pneumococcal vaccines, but they are not used in the live, viral vaccines, such as measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, or rotavirus.”⁽²³⁾

There is plenty of evidence that injections cause allergies. ^{(24) (25) (26) (27)} Injections have been used to create allergies in test animals. Any food protein remaining in the vaccine from the culture medium or diluent oils when injected along with an adjuvant can cause a food allergy.⁽²⁸⁾

So my question to you is: If the medicine in our country is so highly advanced and there is plenty of evidence connecting vaccines to food allergies, why are we being told that

“Scientists don’t know why the incidence of food allergy is increasing.” ⁽¹⁾

The evidence is elementary…. but since the “Dummies” book and the “Idiots” books don’t know what causes food allergies… maybe I should write a new book… The Incomplete Food Allergy Book for Really Really Stupid People because we are really, really stupid if we continue to listen to the medical lies being fed to us daily about vaccine safety.

By Barbara F. Gregory, September 24, 2009

NO COPYRIGHT!!! Copy this as much as you want along with anything else on this site! Spread the word. Tell your friends. Don’t let even one more child be injured from vaccinations!

For more of the evidence connecting vaccines and food allergies, please visit my website: http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/

(1) http://www.foodallergywalk.org/site/PageServer?pagename=DidYouKnow , Food allergy and Anaphylaxis Network, 2009

(2) Diseases of the small intestine in childhood, By John Walker-Smith, Simon Murch, page 206, published 1999

(3) Peanut Allergy Answer Book, by Michael C. Young, 2001

(4) http://www.kidswithfoodallergies.org/resourcespre.php?id=107&title=sesame_allergy , Kids with Food Allergies, Sesame Allergy: a growing food allergy, Updated 5/2/2009

(5) http://www.allergy-clinic.co.uk/food_allergy_for_doctors.htm , Surrey Allergy Clinic, Food Allergy and Additive Intolerance, by Dr. Adrian Morris, January 2006

(6) www.cbc.ca/health/story/2005/04/08/lupin-allergy050408.html , CBC News.CA, Avoid lupin flour, doctors tell patients with peanut allergies, April 8, 2005

(7) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17935569 , Hygiene theory and allergy and asthma prevention. Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80206, USA. liua@njc.org Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;21 Suppl 3:2-7. PMID: 17935569

[8] The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Food Allergies by Lee H. Freude, M.D., and Jeanne Rejaunier, Penguin Group, 2003, page 8

[9] Food Allergies for Dummies by Robert A. Wood, MD, Professor of Pediatrics and Chief of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine with Jo Kraynak, Wiley Publishing, Inc. 2007, page 33

(10) ‘http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/vis/downloads/vis-hep-b.pdf

(11) http://www.know-vaccines.org/faq.html , American Academy of Pediatrics Recommended Vaccination, Schedule for Infants & Pre-School Children, 2009

(12) http://www.babycareadvice.com/babycare/general_help/article.php?id=19 , Milk allergy or intolerance, Written by Rowena Bennett, RN, RM, RPN, CHN, Grad Dip Health Promotion., Added Nov 2003. Reviewed April 2004.

(13) http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/230466/the_hepatitis_b_vaccine_what_the_manufacturers.html?cat=71 , The Hepatitis B Vaccine: What the Manufacturer’s Insert Tells Us, May 08, 2007 by Alisa Elizabeth King Terry , …”GlaxoSmithKline’s package insert for the Hepatitis B vaccine…”

(14) www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/06/1998103.htm , Firms fight Philippine rules on baby milk, Updated Mon Aug 6, 2007, “… of multinational companies like Abbott, GlaxoSmithKline and Wyeth. Last year those companies and other infant formula producers”

(15) http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/vis/downloads/vis-pneumoconjugate.pdf

(16) http://www.uofmchildrenshospital.org/healthlibrary/content/pa_soyalle_pep.htm, University of Minnesota, Amplatz Children’s Hospital, Pedriatric Advisor, Soy allergy, Written by Terri Murphy, RD, CDE for RelayHealth. Published by RelayHealth. Last modified: 2009-01-22 , Last reviewed: 2008-11-11

(17) http://uk.sys-con.com/node/1033919 , Israel Adds Wyeth’s 7-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV7) to their National Immunisation Programme, By: PR Newswire, Jul. 14, 2009

(18) http://www.wyethnutritionals.com/Baby/baby_golden.htm , Wyeth Nutrition, “Extensively hydrolyzed cow’s milk formulas have had all of their protein broken down into smaller segments to make an allergic reaction less likely. These formulas are recommended for infants with severe food allergies. These formulas can be expensive and are less patatable.”

(19) http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5753234/description.html, US Patent 5753234 – Single-shot vaccine formulation

(20) http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6720001/claims.html, US Patent 6720001 – Emulsion compositions for polyfunctional active ingredients

(21) http://www.bionewsonline.com/3/what_is_growth_medium.htm, Microbiological growth medium

(22) http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6953574/description.html, US Patent 6953574 – Method for producing a fermented hydrolyzed medium containing microorganisms

(23) http://www.chop.edu/consumer/jsp/division/generic.jsp?id=88173, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia , Feature Article: Aluminum And Vaccines: What You Should Know, 2008

(24) Allergy 1978 Jun:33(3):155-9 Aluminum phosphate but not calcium phosphate stimulates the specific IgE response in guinea pigs to tetanus toxoid. It is hypothesized that the regular application of aluminum compound-containing vaccines on the entire population could be one of the factors leading to the observed increase of allergic diseases. PMID 707792

(25) eMJA The Medical Journal of Australia, http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/184_04_200206/eld10500_fm.html, Egg-related allergy is common, particularly in children with asthma or general allergies, and may be as high as 40% in children with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The risk of egg-related allergy after vaccination depends on the presence of egg protein in the final product.

(26) The more typical route of sensitization, however, is via the absorption of aluminum through hyposensitization injections and vaccines.[“ Dermatitis. 2005;16(3):115-120. ©2005 American Contact Dermatitis Society

(28) http://dermatology.cdlib.org/DOJvol5num1/reviews/black.html, Delayed Type Hypersensitivity: Current Theories with an Historic Perspective, C. Allen Black, Ph.D., Dermatology Online Journal 5(1): 7 , Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Magee-Womens Research Institute Pittsburgh, “

The Man-Made Peanut Allergy Epidemic

A revealing history of a medical mystery
By Heather Fraser

Copied with permission. Find it here.

It is seldom recognized, commented historian René Dubos, that each society and every civilization creates its own diseases.[1] Is the peanut allergy epidemic man-made? And if so, how has it been created in millions of children in just 20 years and who or what are its architects?

The features of the epidemic continue to puzzle doctors. In the US alone, 5.6 million people – 2% of the population – are allergic to peanuts and nuts almost all having experienced onset as toddlers. This epidemic tipped into critical mass around 1998 when the first flood of allergic children entered kindergarten sending a shock through education systems. Prevalence of the allergy increases with parental income, education and accessible health care. It does not increase with consumption. In developing countries where peanut consumption is high, the allergy is virtually unknown. In the west, children who have never eaten a peanut experience reactions on initial exposure to the food.

Immunologists claim that this allergy is an immune system abnormality. This view is contrary to that of Dr. Charles Richet, who identified and named the condition anaphylaxis in 1901. Richet proved that anaphylaxis is an inevitable side effect of vaccination. It is a universal reaction of animals to any protein injected into the bloodstream – the first injection sensitizes, the second injection or subsequent consumption of the protein unleashes the life threatening reaction.

Anaphylaxis

Since Richet’s Nobel Prize winning research, doctors have known “how to” create anaphylaxis using a needle. Without the invention of the convenient hypodermic needle in 1853, anaphylaxis would not have gained common currency much less become epidemic. The needle allowed doctors to deliver substances directly into the blood, by-passing the modifying effects of the digestive system. And with the introduction of compulsory vaccination for diphtheria in 1895, anaphylaxis arrived en mass. Thousands of children were made ill or died from what doctors labeled “serum sickness”. By 1906, the sickness was understood to be a systemic allergic reaction. Extreme sickness was characterized by anaphylaxis, swelling, shock, asphyxia and death.

Serum sickness was the first man-made mass allergic phenomenon.

The historical link between vaccination and mass allergy is rarely mentioned by doctors. Health officials have several rational arguments for not discussing the subject. One is that US Vaccine Injury Compensation Program guidelines make it impossible to prove a causal link between vaccination and a later “onset” of anaphylaxis – that is, when the toddler first eats peanut butter. The guidelines only recognize anaphylaxis that occurs shortly after injection.

The second argument was summarized by Richet himself who wrote that anaphylaxis “perhaps a sorry matter for the individual, is necessary to the species ….There is something more important than the salvation of the person and that is integral preservation of the race.[2]

And that “something” was protecting the whole of society from disease by vaccination – a goal that justifies the unavoidable casualties. A third rationalization is economic. Vaccine consumers absorb the cost of damage. Therefore, it makes financial sense to ignore the problem – which can’t be proven anyway. And if litigation brought by angry parents becomes unwieldy, government will intercede with legislation to protect them as it did in 2001 and again in 2008 in the wake of a leaked report that the mercury-based vaccine preservative Thimerosol, was contributing to the massive rise in childhood autism.[3][4]

The framework for disease management with the needle began as business-minded makers of
pharmaceuticals well over 100 years ago met the demands of government and doctors faced with massive immigrant influx during the first industrial revolution. Competition between pharmaceutical companies fed a media soon reliant upon lucrative and unregulated medical ads. In the early 20th century, a meld of compulsory vaccination for military and civilian populations and persuasive ads quickly transformed patients into medical consumers.

Consumers more afraid of disease than the side effects of treatment embraced the tradition of
vaccination. For vaccine makers, however, unwanted side effects were balanced with the cost of
production. They no longer used horse blood or mouse brain – the former was implicated in serum sickness and the latter was known to create encephalitis. However, an irreplaceable ingredient was vegetable oil. While cost effective and potent, oils could also be dangerous — they easily over stimulated the immune system.

Lulled perhaps by medical advance, officials were surprised by the second mass allergic phenomenon that began in the 1930s. This was the first outbreak of food anaphylaxis in history and it was caused by just one food: cottonseed oil.

Refined cottonseed oil was a primary excipient in the injected “wonder drug” antibiotics and in vaccines. Well documented issues had weakened the US seed crusher industry which with dropping standards was producing contaminated oils. Protein laden cottonseed oil was found to have been distributed to pharmaceutical and food manufacturers.

The outbreak might have been investigated more thoroughly if it hadn’t ended so soon. Prevalence of the allergy peaked in the late 1940s, gradually declined and then fell from the medical journals, history and memory. This decline may be attributed to a change in vaccine ingredients. After WWII, oil from cottonseed was replaced.

This replacement oil was inexpensive, tariff protected, US grown and controlled tightly by a more reliable industry infrastructure; it came from peanuts. Manufacturers improved their refining processes to remove as much of the protein as possible (although not all according to a 2008 FDA report) thus preventing now well understood allergic implications.

With trace peanut protein in some vaccines, the allergy built a profile very quietly in the 1950s but grew more noticeable through the late 1960s and early 70s. The first peanut allergy study in 1974 by S.A. Bock in the US identified its growing prevalence.

Vaccine innovations in this period included genetic modifications of proteins, manipulation of molecular weights to target specific antigens and the inclusion of an “adjuvant”. An adjuvant provokes the immune system to create antibodies while requiring less antigen (virus/bacteria). Adjuvant 65, dubbed the immunologists “dirty secret” increased antibody production 13 fold although no one knew exactly why or how. This useful, cost effective “black box” ingredient combined refined peanut oil with aluminum. It was added to childhood vaccines in the 1960s.

Two further changes to childhood vaccines were the introduction of the influenza Hib B in 1988 that was eventually rolled into an unprecedented 5 vaccines in one needle, the PENTA. Neither parents nor family doctors questioned these changes authorized by a WHO expert committee and recommended to governments in western countries. In the documented rush to pull this formula together, it seemed to escape notice that the molecular weights of proteins in the Hib B were almost identical to those in peanut.

Peanut allergy tipped quietly into epidemic between 1987 and 1994. ER records in westernized countries revealed the tip of the iceberg in the early 1990s – 90% of all admissions for allergy were for peanut. The allergy hit critical mass around 1998. The tipping point came when the first massive wave of food allergic children entered the public school systems at ages 4 and 5. Pre-school and kindergarten teachers and principals were taken by surprise[5] at the sudden appearance of not one but several food allergic kids in each school, hundreds in each school board, thousands across the US, the UK, Canada and other western countries.

Allergy researchers frantic for an answer to this deadly phenomenon questioned the role skin creams with poorly refined peanut oil, levels of peanut consumption, methods of peanut preparation. They examined long-shot risk factors such as birth month, blood type, gender and race. None pointed to vaccination, a common childhood event with a proven history of creating mass anaphylaxis. It is not without irony that in virtually every medical article on the allergy mice are made anaphylactic to peanut by injection.

If vaccination is the functional mechanism by which millions of children have been sensitized to peanut why isn’t every child allergic? One researcher pointed out in 2004 that “Adjuvant 65 offers the advantage over mineral oil used in [other adjuvants] that it can be metabolized”. “Metabolized” means that the body can break down and eliminate the waste vaccine. This ability to detoxify varies between individuals and is today an enormous challenge for western children increasingly weakened by digestive imbalance.

And even if one does not accept the Injection Hypothesis, the balance between fear of disease and risk of side effects has clearly shifted. Educated parents for whom official rationalizations now ring hollow are beginning to refuse vaccination.

In the wake of the Thimerosol debacle in 2000 and the ongoing celebrity endorsed media campaign (generationrescue.org) which insists that vaccination causes autism, vaccine makers have been quietly phasing out the use of mercury in vaccines used in the west. Stocked batches of these vaccines have been shipped to China and other Asian and African countries where they have been administered to children, populations of new medical consumers.

In China, where peanut consumption is high, the allergy was virtually unknown in 2001.[6] Recent studies in 2008 and 2009 indicate that peanut allergy is on the rise in Chinese and Singaporean children.[7]

1. Reneé Dubos, The Dreams of Reason: Science and Utopias (New York, 1961) p. 71.

2. Charles Richet, “Acceptance Lecture”, Nobel Prize for Medicine, 1913.

3. Defense of vaccine damage is explicit in the transcript of famed 2000 Simpsonwood
conference in which 48 government bodies and vaccine makers discuss a report linking mercury in vaccines to autism. This transcript was reviewed by R.F. Kennedy Jr., “Deadly Immunity,” Rolling Stone Magazine (June 20, 2005).

4. Anon, “The Man Behind the Vaccine Mystery”, CBS Evening News, Washington, Dec. 12, 2002. www.cbsnews.com In a post 9-11 world, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist stated, vaccine makers must be free from lawsuits so that they can protect Americans from bio-terrorist attacks.

5. Wendy Harris, “Abnormal Response to Normal Things,” Professionally Speaking Magazine, Ontario College of Teachers, Sept. 2000.

6. K. Beyer K, et al. “Effects of cooking methods on peanut allergenicity,” J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Jun;107(6):1077-81.

7. Europrevall.org and Chiang Wen Chin, “Food Allergy in Singapore,” SingHealth.com (2009)

1. Many thanks and gratitude go to Ms. Fraser for researching and writing this article. Also, take a look at Dr. Andrew Moulden’s work concerning the science behind how anaphalaxis is happening with all vaccines here.

Dr. Andrew Moulden’s website is here.

2. I was introduced to this article by Dr. Todd Elson who does fantastic research on vaccine cell lines and how pharmaceutical companies are using aborted fetal tissue to culture viruses for vaccines. Listen to his archived presentation here.(scroll down)

Dr. Todd Elson’s site is here.

3. Dr. Rebecca Carley speaks about serum sickness on her website here.