VacTruth.com http://vactruth.com Your Child. Your Choice. Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:45:49 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1 Teachers Are Being Mandated To Get the Flu Vaccine or Wear a Mask and Gloves http://vactruth.com/2014/12/14/teachers-mandated-to-wear-mask-and-gloves/ http://vactruth.com/2014/12/14/teachers-mandated-to-wear-mask-and-gloves/#comments Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:44:41 +0000 http://vactruth.com/?p=16391 A concerned citizen from College Station, Texas, came forward voicing concerns about a new flu vaccine mandate. Candice Darnold advised VacTruth that a friend is frustrated with her daughter’s daycare. The daycare sent out a letter recently, stating that their board had a meeting and decided that all staff members will be mandated to get the flu vaccine. Any staff that didn’t comply would have to wear a face mask and gloves throughout the flu season, through February.

Employers should promote a stigma-free workplace, and making employees wear a mask and gloves while teaching is discriminatory. Concerned about being discriminated against for refusing the vaccine, a staff member submitted a response letter to the daycare. The Board replied in defense of their decision on the matter, not giving employees any other option.

Some staff members worried they would lose families who learned they didn’t vaccinate or because they didn’t want to associate with “mask wearers.” Staff members refusing the vaccine were left wondering what can be done, if anything, to support their choice without being discriminated against. Starting a teacher’s union could give them a needed voice.

 

According to the CDC, There is No Proof Wearing a Mask Will Prevent Influenza

This practice of wearing a mask and gloves won’t effectively prevent the spread of germs, either. People still have to touch things in their environment; with or without gloves, germs will get around. And the recipients of certain flu vaccines can shed for a few weeks, exposing many around them to the influenza virus.

Stated directly from the CDC:

“No recommendation can be made at this time for mask use in the community by asymptomatic persons, including those at high risk for complications, to prevent exposure to influenza. If unvaccinated high-risk persons decide to wear masks during periods of increased respiratory illness activity in the community, it is likely they will need to wear them any time they are in a public place and when they are around other household members.”

“However, no studies have definitively shown that mask use by either infectious patients or health-care personnel prevents influenza transmission.” [1]

Health Doesn’t Comes Through a Needle

There are life and death consequences from getting the flu shot. This is why many decline the vaccine. One major concern of those being mandated to get a flu shot is the high amount of adverse reactions reported. There was no mention of this in the letter from the CPCC Board, but research shows many dangerous adverse reactions to the flu vaccine:

“As of November 2013, there have been more than 93,000 reports of reactions, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following influenza vaccinations made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), including 1,080 related deaths, 8,888 hospitalizations, 1,801 related disabilities and over 1,700 cases of GBS. In 2013 the Federal Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) voted to add GBS to the Vaccine Injury Table within the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).” [2]

Please note that most reactions go unreported. Multiply these numbers by ten to paint a more accurate picture. According to the FDA, only one to ten percent of reactions are reported to VAERS.

Wearing a Mask Disrupts Teaching

It would be difficult for a teacher to communicate and bond with children while wearing a mask and gloves. It would be harder to speak clearly and harder for the students to understand their teachers. Requiring a teacher to wear a mask while teaching children who are at a young age, when language development and conversation is so critical, would diminish the student’s ability to see their teacher smiling at them or witness other facial expressions in detail.

Can An Employee Be Forced to Wear a Mask that Stigmatizes Them?

An employee can be asked to wear a mask if they don’t agree with this policy and do not accept the risks of getting the flu vaccine. Like any other job, employers can make requirements of their employees, but the presence of that mask places a stigma on the person, and it also shows that they questioned authority.

Others may not want to associate with “mask wearers,” not because they are spreading disease by not getting vaccinated, but rather to avoid peer pressure from society. They don’t want to associate with those who stand out because they don’t want to be ridiculed.

Can Claiming a Religious Exemption Help Employees?

There are legitimate reasons people are religiously against vaccines because of what they are made of. If one claims a religious exemption, bear in mind that “religion” is a matter of “ultimate concern” or something you take very seriously, as defined in US vs. Seeger. If you claim a religious exemption, it becomes a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for an employer to force you to wear a mask.

There is no law that a person has to wear a mask, so there’s no exemption. However, if you opt to file a religious exemption to avoid the vaccine, it’s always recommended that you use the language in your state law as it applies to school children if there is no exemption for healthcare workers or educators.

Although this doesn’t directly prevent your employer from asking you to wear a mask, it is the language recognized in your particular state and will often stand up in court.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Title VII states, “it shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer -

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or

 (2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. [3]

 

This isn’t necessarily a way out, but if a person writes a letter stating that vaccines conflict with their religious beliefs, and that Title VII prevents them from discriminating with respect to conditions, one could have a shot. No pun intended!

Here is the Letter the Board Sent to Staff and Parents

“Dear Parents,

We have implemented a flu vaccine policy for CPCC staff this year, and we want to make you aware.

Licensing requires that we include our flu shot policy in the employee handbook, so we reviewed it during one of our regular board meetings. Last year, the Bear teachers were required to get the flu shot since they handle babies that are not old enough to receive the vaccine. Knowing that other teachers are in and out of the baby room from time to time, and some of the babies have siblings at CPCC that can spread the virus, we decided it would be best to require the flu shot for all staff. If staff do not have health insurance, CPCC will pay for the shot. We are also having an on-site flu clinic Friday, November 14th. If staff choose not to get the vaccine, they will be required to wear a mask at all times while in the building for the remainder of the flu season which runs through February.

We’ve done our research and spoken with numerous health professionals, and we maintain that this is the best policy in order to protect the children at CPCC which is our number one priority. This is not an uncommon policy for children’s centers. Several others in town including TAMU, St. Joes, and St. Thomas Aquinas are instating the same or similar policies. Also, anyone working in the medical field including the administrative side are generally required to get a flu vaccine.

If you have any questions or concerns, please reach out to the board. We’re happy to speak with you any time.

Blessings,

The CPCC Board”

This is a Letter Written by One Staff Member in Response

CPCC Board,

I wanted to take the time to share my thoughts on your recent digression into health care policy making.

With the start of Obamacare and the forced requirement of mandatory health insurance, I have seen a continued trail down more and more oversight by public and private entities looking to invoke what they deem best for all individuals. Removing individual rights in a vain attempt to improve overall outcomes is akin to the fallacy that socialism is built on.

One of your stated reasons below include that by forcing teachers to get the flu shot, you are protecting OUR children from getting the flu. How does a teacher getting a flu shot / wearing a mask prevent our children from coming in contact with:

  • other children at the school?
  • people outside of school?
  • the child’s own parents?
  • anyone other than the 20 teachers who take the flu shot/wear a mask?

Secondly, ostracizing individual teachers who don’t conform to your personal health care views by requiring them to wear a mask is very reminiscent of an oppressor enacting their rule.

Also, you cited the “me too” mentality that everyone is doing it, but in doing so, you have not seen the litigation and creation of workplace unions. These same cited entities are backing down due to the negative fiscal downside that their decisions cause. With your decision to mandate health care, you increase the chance of litigation and creation of teacher unions, which put the entire school at risk. (References: http://bit.ly/1wvnutX ) Ask any small or large business who has experienced what the hourly cost of a corporate trained union negotiator is and they will say resoundingly “too much!” The AFL-CIO is only too happy to bring in more dues and its super simple to start a union in ANY business. (Reference: Wal-Mart forced to close its meat packing department companywide after small group started union vote).

In closing, I’m all for protecting our children, and this job of taking care of our children’s health care needs is best left to the parents, not boards, business, or governments.

Regards,
XXX”

To read the Board’s response and have access to this letter for your use, click here.

Concerns About Flu Vaccine Mandates Will Continue

People from all over are concerned about flu vaccine mandates. Learn what is in these drugs if you don’t already know. If you tell an employee to get the flu shot or be stigmatized, you should also discuss with them what to do if they get injured from the vaccine.

How would you feel if your employee’s health declined because of your new policy? Will you help them pay for medical costs? Vaccine recipients don’t have much recourse if they get injured, paralyzed, or die from the vaccine. Vaccination is at your own risk.

In recent times, people have come forward with concerns about school kids and staff suffering immediate and severe nosebleeds after getting the Flumist vaccine. Nosebleeds, drooping of the eyelid or mouth, and many more side effects worse than getting the flu naturally are listed on the package insert. It is stated you may not be protected from the flu and that the vaccine has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or its potential to impair fertility.

Considering the side effects listed are worse than getting the flu naturally, those are big risks some people may not want to take. Some teachers will fall ill from the vaccine and will not be able to come to work, requiring substitute teachers to fill in.

Students are missing days from school after getting the flu vaccine or from getting sick from newly vaccinated teachers through shedding. Students and teachers are being hospitalized after these mass vaccinations at school, caused by the vaccines even though the relation is denied.

The Board mentioned nothing about these concerns in their letter; why not? Staff members are frustrated because the Board doesn’t seem too concerned that they are asking their employees to receive a possibly lethal vaccine, and one that is well-documented to cause nerve damage.

US News recently published this:

“The Government Accountability Office’s report, released Friday, noted how a program established a generation ago to help children injured by government-recommended vaccinations such as measles and chicken pox is now dominated by claims filed by adults who received a flu shot. Those cases typically claim that the adult suffered from Guillain-Barre Syndrome, in which the immune system attacks the nerves.” [4]

Conclusion

Many of us who choose not to vaccinate used to trust the vaccines until they harmed us or someone we love. Teachers’ concerns are understandable and they are discussing the start of a teacher’s union to help give them a voice because these mandates can negatively affect their overall health or cause discrimination in the workplace.

If you decline the vaccine and cannot get around the mandate, maybe your students can help you decorate your mask with pride. Perhaps this will lead to a new trend when they learn why you didn’t vaccinate.

 

 

Photo Credit

]]>
http://vactruth.com/2014/12/14/teachers-mandated-to-wear-mask-and-gloves/feed/ 57
10 Reasons Not To Vaccinate http://vactruth.com/2014/12/12/10-reasons-not-to-vaccinate/ http://vactruth.com/2014/12/12/10-reasons-not-to-vaccinate/#comments Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:30:46 +0000 http://vactruth.com/?p=16386 The decision to vaccinate is yours alone, but it is a decision that should not be taken lightly or done under duress or pressure by others. Once vaccinated, the potential side-effects cannot be easily undone, if at all. These include death, sudden infant death syndrome, auto-immune disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, allergies, asthma, ADHD, autism, Guillian-Barré Syndrome and other neurological damage.

Your physician will most likely NOT connect the development of these unnatural disease states with vaccination, whether they occur immediately after vaccinations, several days or months later. You alone will be responsible for treating your child or yourself for these life-long diseases.

The decision to vaccinate SHOULD include extensive research to determine if it is right for your family.

 

The following are ten reasons not to vaccinate. Additional educational resources follow.

1. Vaccines have never been proven safe or effective. Vaccine studies funded by pharmaceutical companies compare vaccine “side-effects” from one vaccine to another. True, scientific, double-blind placebo studies have never been conducted on vaccines to determine their safety. Effectiveness cannot be determined unless one is then knowingly exposed to the disease entity following vaccination. Only antibody production is measured. See How Pharmaceutical Companies Hide the Dangers of Vaccines from Parents.

2. Vaccines do NOT work. They may create a temporary increase in antibodies for a particular disease, but this does not equate to immunity to disease. Vaccines, with all of their toxins and their unnatural way of introducing disease directly into one’s blood stream, decrease cellular immunity, which is more critical for one’s immune system. Neurologist Russell Blaylock has lectured and written extensively on this subject.

When there are outbreaks of disease, unvaccinated children are often blamed. Whenever the outbreaks are examined more closely, the data show that the majority of those suffering have been vaccinated for the disease.

Disease charts show that diseases were mostly eliminated prior to the creation of vaccinations. What is truly responsible for most communicable disease elimination is clean water and improved sanitation. See the following graphs: Disease Graphs Showing Decline of Childhood Illnesses Prior to Vaccines.

3. The very first vaccine was a disaster. Vaccine safety and effectiveness is a created myth, strongly embedded in Americans’ psyche and reinforced by the health care system.

The history of small pox vaccines demonstrates that the first vaccine resulted in an increase in the disease and created additional serious health consequences including syphilis and deaths. Physician groups met repeatedly to discuss the “vaccine problem” and concluded that as long as vaccines remained profitable, they would be impossible to eliminate, in spite of the evidence against them. Nothing has changed since this time.

The polio vaccine was another one linked to serious health consequences, including cancer and AIDS. Statistics were manipulated to try and prove this vaccine’s effectiveness. With each new vaccine has come new health damage and created illness. See Small Pox Vaccine: Origins of Vaccine Madness.

4. Vaccines are highly profitable for pharmaceutical companies and the health care industry. Strong financial incentives exist to continue this practice, not effectiveness. You cannot trust brochures on vaccines provided by pharmaceutical companies because they are corporations with a profit motive. Their objective is NOT to protect health but to sell vaccines.

5. All vaccines contain a number of toxic poisons and chemicals that are linked to serious neurological damage including aluminum, thimerosal (methyl mercury), antibiotics, monosodium glutamate (MSG) and formaldehyde. Other dangerous substances found in vaccines include antifreeze, lead, cadmium, glycerine, acetone, and yeast proteins.

6. Every study comparing unvaccinated to vaccinated children demonstrates that unvaccinated children enjoy far superior health. Unvaccinated children generally do not suffer from upper respiratory illnesses, ear infections, autism, ADHD, asthma, allergies, auto-immune disorders and other diseases, in comparison to those vaccinated. (See Sally Fallon Morell’s The Nourishing Tradition’s Book of Baby and Child Care, 2013.)

7. Vaccines cause a host of “chronic, incurable, and life threatening diseases,” including autism, asthma, ADHD, auto-immune disorders, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, food allergies and brain damage. [1]

8. The only way to create true life-long immunity to a disease is through natural exposure to the disease in which the body creates true antibodies and immunity on many levels.

9. Vaccines kill infants, children and adults. Strong evidence links vaccines to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). [2] More than one hundred previously healthy young women have died as a result of the HPV vaccine. [3] The flu vaccine has been documented as awarding the most money for serious health injuries, including death. [4] [5]

The long term effects of vaccines are unknown. It is a medical experiment of one’s health for which no one knows the long term health consequences.

US children are given far more vaccines at younger ages compared to other countries. Infant mortality rates for US children are one of the worst in the world, especially compared to countries who vaccinate their children less and who have wisely raised vaccination ages. [6]

10. If you or a loved one suffers from a vaccine injury, pharmaceutical companies and physicians hold no medical liability. In 1986, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was formed, eliminating the ability to directly sue pharmaceutical companies or health care practitioners responsible for vaccine injuries.

Conclusion

You are on your own to try and regain your health in the event that you are vaccine injured. The expense and suffering is yours alone to face. Very few individuals will be awarded money from funds set up by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. The system is designed for individuals to fail in making their claim of vaccine injury. The public pays for this injury fund in the cost of taxes on vaccinations.

To learn more, read my other in-depth articles on vaccinations which have been published on VacTruth or Natural News, here: Vaccinations

You may also check the resources below. Most important is to remember that vaccinations are a medical intervention and procedure which carries tremendous risks, so it is important to educate yourself first, prior to making the decision to go forward. Weigh the risks and benefits and be an informed consumer of medical care.

 

About the Author

Michelle Goldstein is a mental health therapist who is passionate about holistic health and healing. She has published articles for Natural News, VacTruth and Kelly the Kitchen Kop. She can be found at Holistic Health to Go. Her other vaccination articles can be found here: Vaccinations.

Photo Credit

]]>
http://vactruth.com/2014/12/12/10-reasons-not-to-vaccinate/feed/ 699
African Women Injected With Vaccines Laced with Anti-fertility Hormones http://vactruth.com/2014/12/10/tetanus-vaccines-cause-infertility/ http://vactruth.com/2014/12/10/tetanus-vaccines-cause-infertility/#comments Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:42:40 +0000 http://vactruth.com/?p=16390 Recently, there has been a flurry of reports in the media claiming that women of childbearing age in Kenya have been vaccinated with tetanus vaccinations containing the anti-fertility hormone hCG, rendering them infertile.

The reports came in after doctors from the Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association found an antigen causing miscarriage in the tetanus vaccinations that were administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. [1]

In October 2014, Dr. Wahome Ngare, a member of the Catholic Doctors Association, told Points of View at KTN Weekend Prime that the women of Kenya had been vaccinated with a new tetanus vaccine that had not come through the usual channels and stated that the Catholic Church administers 65 percent of all vaccines.

 

One Brave Doctor Speaks Out

Dr. Ngare told KTN:

“There is a new batch of vaccine that have come from WHO through the Ministry; it is not coming through the normal channels, so it is not the ordinary vaccine that we have been using. That is the big proof that there, the third one is that we have actually tested this vaccine and found it to contain hCG. The batch that was used in March.”

On hearing this statement, KTN interviewer Ms. Yvonne Okwara asked:

“Right, urm – that was the batch that was used in March; however they have just concluded the third phrase today. Does the vaccine used today contain this hormone that you are saying causes sterility?”

Dr. Ngare answered her with a question of his own:

“Whose moral position is it to do that?”

And added:

“It is the Ministry of Health’s responsibility to protect the health of Kenyans.”

Ms. Nyakwae appeared undeterred by his comment and simply repeated her question, to which Dr. Ngare answered:

“No tests have been done on this batch because it is very hard to access them, but we are trying to get access to these vaccines, and if we do run the tests, then …”

Sadly, Ms. Nyakwar prevented Dr. Ngare from continuing because she interrupted him by directing her next question to Dr. Collins Tabu from the Ministry of Health.

Dr. Tabu opened his statement by saying how shocked he was that there were allegations being made from what he called very responsible people and leaders of society. He stated that they had been vaccinating in Kenya for the past thirty years and that they had used the same vaccine for the past thirty years.

This leaves us to question who exactly is telling the truth.

Doctor Continues His Efforts to Protect Kenyan Girls and Women

Dr. Ngare remains adamant that the vaccine given in March is a different tetanus vaccination than the one that had been given to women previously, and in a signed statement written on November 4, he wrote:

“Our concern and the subject of this discussion is the WHO/UNICEF sponsored tetanus immunization campaign launched last year in October ostensibly to eradicate neonatal tetanus. It is targeted at girls and women between the ages of 14 – 49 (child bearing age) and in 60 specific districts spread all around the country. The tetanus vaccine being used in this campaign has been imported into the country specifically for this purpose and bears a different batch number from the regular TT. So far, 3 doses have been given – the first in October 2013, the second in March 2014 and the third in October 2014. It is highly possible that there are two more doses to go.”

He continued by adding that:

“Unlike other mass vaccination exercise, this particular WHO/UNICEF organized and sponsored tetanus vaccination campaign was launched at the New Stanley Hotel in Nairobi which is extremely unusual for a public campaign.”

He also said:

“Normally in Kenya, TT vaccination is given as follows:
(i) Immunize all children (both boys and girls) against tetanus with the first 3 primary vaccinations in early childhood.
(ii) Pregnant women get two doses of tetanus vaccine at least one month apart.
(iii) A booster can be given every three to five years.
(iv) After any injury with resultant broken skin.

Giving three or five doses of tetanus vaccination at six months intervals is not usual and will definitely not eradicate neonatal tetanus!”

Dr. Ngare concluded his fierce rebuttal by stating:

“Doctors Association have performed their moral and civic duty of speaking the truth and alerting the government and the people of Kenya. It is now up to each individual Kenyan to make an informed choice.

As for Dr. Osur’s chama members, kindly Google “Fertility regulating vaccines” and “Are New Vaccines Laced with Birth-Control Drugs?” for further insight.

Yours faithfully,

For: Kenya Catholic Doctors Association.

Dr. Wahome Ngare
Obstetrician/Gynecologist.”

What happened next will come as no surprise.

WHO Covers Up the Truth

Obviously worried that news of the contaminated vaccines had been leaked, the World Health Organization stepped in, attempting to calm things down.

During a press conference that took place on November 13, 2014, Professor Marleen Temmerman, Director of Reproductive Health and Research for the World Health Organization (WHO), was filmed trying to reassure the public. Capital News FM Kenya reported the story.

I found it almost laughable that during her impressive speech taking all of two minutes, Professor Temmerman managed to state on camera that tetanus vaccines were absolutely safe, four times, which, you must agree, was somewhat excessive.

Temmerman began by stating:

“On the tetanus vaccine, erm, we can only confirm that the tetanus vaccine is absolutely safe; it is not the WHO who’s importing the vaccine, it is the vaccine that is made, is manufactured by companies, em, what UN is doing is amongst other quality control but we can assure you that the vaccine is absolutely safe and is free of hCG.”

After even more, what can only be described as waffle, trying to reiterate that fact the vaccines are safe, Temmerman ended her short speech by recommending the vaccine to PREGNANT WOMEN, which, according to her, would protect newborn babies from the disease. She concluded her announcement by stating:

“The tetanus jab has to be continued because every day that you stop the vaccination program that you stop the chapter of the pregnant mothers who will not have received the vaccination and whose children whose babies are at a higher chance of dying because of missing the vaccine, because of tetanus. So please continue to check through what ever investigation is needed, we are very confident that the tetanus vaccine is absolutely safe.”

Although Professor Temmerman’s announcement may have been able to convince the majority of the public that all is well, she appears to have forgotten a paper titled Fertility Regulating Vaccines that was written in 1992.

WHO Papers From 1992 Tell A Different Story

In 1992, a meeting took place between the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the World Bank, in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss the then-current status for the development of “fertility regulating vaccinations.” [2]

At first glance, it appeared as if the WHO were discussing various methods of family planning with women’s health advocates and scientists from developing countries. On further reading, something far more worrying emerged.

During the introduction, the WHO discussed “fertility regulation” and how their specialist program would carry out activities to strengthen the research capabilities of developing countries, enabling them to meet their own research needs and participate in the global effort in human reproduction research.

The Meeting Takes a Sinister Turn

There were twenty participants at the meeting: ten scientists and clinicians from Australia, Europe, India and the USA involved in funding fertility regulatory vaccines (FRVs) research; and ten women’s health advocates from Africa, North and South America, Asia and Europe, with backgrounds in immunology, service delivery and social and clinical research, as well as a wide experience of working with women.

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss a new approach to “fertility regulation.”

On page 12 of the report, the groups can be found discussing the development of vaccinations against hCG, a hormone produced by the cells surrounding the early embryo and later, by the placenta, during pregnancy.

Primates are Rendered Infertile

WHO stated that hCG is a hormone produced by the body to establish and maintain a pregnancy and further stated that when primates were vaccinated using anti-hCG vaccines, they were rendered infertile without any detectable alteration to their menstrual cycle!

What I found even more worrying was the lack of indication as to whether their infertility was permanent or temporary.
According to WHO, anti-hGC vaccinations were being developed independently by the National Institute of Immunology (NII) in New Delhi, the Population Council in New York and Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP).

The report stated that most of the work was still in the experimental stages; however, vaccines using other hormones had reached the clinical testing stages.

The Plot Deepens

On page 15, the report stated that it had been “noted that the research on all three anti hCG vaccines was still at an early stage and that a further 5-10 years of testing, evaluation and further development would probably be needed before any of these vaccines would be suitable for marketing.”

Nothing strange here; however, on page 17, alarm bells began to ring as the authors revealed that the main carriers being used in the prototype vaccines were the diphtheria toxoid DT and the tetanus toxoid TT.

The WHO is Caught Red-Handed Experimenting on Women in India

Two years later, in 1994, the World Health Organization was discovered to be vaccinating females aged between 15 and 45 in developing countries with a tetanus vaccine containing the hCG hormone.

The vaccines were given to thousands of women in Mexico, Nicaragua and the Philippines. This was discovered after an organization called Comité Pro Vida de Mexico became suspicious of the protocols surrounding the vaccines and obtained several vials for testing.

It was discovered that some of the vials contained human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This is the exact same hormone that WHO, UNDP, UNFPA and the World Bank were discussing just two years earlier.

When combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, the vaccines cause a woman’s body to produce antibodies against pregnancy, forcing her body to abort the fetus spontaneously. The ThinkTwice Global Vaccine Institute, reporting on the story, stated:

“In nature the hCG hormone alerts the woman’s body that she is pregnant and causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but for the elevated presence of hCG.

However, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.” [3]

Curiously, no men, boys or babies were vaccinated during the program. The only people vaccinated with this particular vaccine were women aged between 15 and 45. Was it a coincidence that these vaccines were only given to women of childbearing age? After all, anyone can contract tetanus, can’t they?

This is Nothing New

According to J. A. Miller, WHO began what he calls their “Special Program” in human reproduction in 1972. In a paper titled Are New Vaccines Laced With Birth Control Drugs?, published in 1995 by HLI Reports, Miller stated the following information in a section titled The Known Facts:

“The WHO began its “Special Programme” in human reproduction in 1972, and by 1993 had spent more than $356 million on “reproductive health” research. It is this “Programme” which has pioneered the development of the abortificant vaccine. Over $90 million of this Programme’s funds were contributed by Sweden; Great Britain donated more than $52 million, while Norway, Denmark and Germany kicked in for $41 million, $27 million, and $12 million, respectively. The U.S., thanks to the cut-off of such funding during the Reagan-Bush administrations, has contributed “only” $5.7 million, including a new payment in 1993 by the Clinton administration of $2.5 million. Other major contributors to the WHO Programme include UNFPA, $61 million; the World Bank, $15.5 million; the Rockefeller Foundation, $2.5 million; the Ford Foundation, over $1 million; and the IDRC (International Research and Development Centre of Canada), $716.5 thousand.” [4]

Interestingly, just like today, when reports came in from the Comité Pro Vida de Mexico stating that the vaccines being used in the Philippines and Mexico were found to be contaminated with the hCG hormone, WHO and the Department of Health (DOH) denied this vehemently. Miller wrote:

“Confronted with the results of laboratory tests which detected its presence in three of the four vials of tetanus toxoid examined, the WHO and DOH scoffed at the evidence coming from “right-to-life and Catholic” sources. Four new vials of the tetanus vaccine were submitted by DOH to St. Luke’s (Lutheran) Medical Center in Manila — and all four vials tested positive for hCG!

From outright denial the stories now shifted to the allegedly “insignificant” quantity of the hCG present; the volume of hCG present is insufficient to produce anti-hCG antibodies.”

It will be interesting to see if history repeats itself, won’t it?

The best part of Miller’s extremely enlightening and thought-provoking paper is written in the next paragraph:

“But new tests designed to detect the presence of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of women vaccinated with the tetauns toxoid vaccine were undertaken by Philippine pro-life and Catholic groups. Of thirty women tested subsequent to receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine, twenty-six tested positive for high levels of anti-hCG! If there were no hCG in the vaccine, or if it were present in only “insignificant” quantities, why were the vaccinated women found to be harboring anti-hCG antibodies? The WHO and the DOH had no answers.”

No surprises there, then!

Conclusion

Looking back through the history of hCG-spiked tetanus vaccines, there is no doubt in my mind that vaccines containing the hCG hormone have been used on women of childbearing ages in Kenya in what can only be described as a deliberate attempt to reduce the population.

I feel that, instead of criticism that the masses are currently lobbying at Dr. Wahome Ngare, they should instead applaud his brave actions. After all, not many doctors would have been prepared to put their life on the line for young women in Kenya and around the world by sharing the truth about these dangerous vaccines.

 

 

Photo Credit

]]>
http://vactruth.com/2014/12/10/tetanus-vaccines-cause-infertility/feed/ 19
Vaccines Will be Made from Human Cancer Tumors http://vactruth.com/2014/11/30/vaccines-made-from-cancer-tumors/ http://vactruth.com/2014/11/30/vaccines-made-from-cancer-tumors/#comments Sun, 30 Nov 2014 17:29:04 +0000 http://vactruth.com/?p=16380 Unbelievably, the method of producing vaccines using cells that are derived directly from human cancer tumors has been approved even though the vaccines may induce cancer in recipients. This method is cheaper and faster than breeding animals for the culture media – and human cancer tumors are readily available.

At a meeting of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in September 2012, the discussion which led to approval was no less than a scandal. [1]

The health authorities and vaccine manufacturers blatantly revealed their uncertainty regarding the safety of vaccines made from cancer tumors. Some of the incredible statements from the meeting are quoted directly. A more detailed account is given in this article. [2]

The statements in italics are directly quoted from the meeting.



The vaccines may cause tumors in recipients

“We have really identified three major factors that could potentially convey risk from tumor derived cells.  And these include the cells themselves … and if they were tumor-derived cells then maybe they themselves could form tumors in a vaccine recipient.” (Dr. K)

A fact: tumor cell lines can cause tumors
“What I think is qualitatively different about the tumor cell lines is the fact that they can cause tumors.”
(Dr.L)

Tumors may occur decades after vaccinations
“But certainly, if you are going to address this question about tumor risk of vaccines made in tumor cell lines, it’s going to have to be a decade’s question.” (Dr.C)

FDA is there to help vaccine manufacturers
“… but we are here to consider the issues that we would like to advise the agency to consider in helping the company continue the manufacturing process, what should they be concerned about, what should they be watching for.” (Dr. D, leader of the meeting)

Doubt regarding test animals for assessing oncogenicity
“I’m not optimistic that we’re going to find animal models to assess oncogenicity of DNA. That’s why I’m feeling that maybe it’s the clearance aspect that we have to deal with, with respect to DNA.” (Dr.P)

Uncertainty about length of time for safety testing
“Are they watching these animals long enough? Should it be longer?” (Dr.D)
“Is it relevant to safety that a cell forms a tumor after a year, a year and a half?”
(Dr.P)

Poor testing for prions including mad cow disease
“There are a lot of things to be done in post-licensure. The field of the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, mad cow disease) is really, in terms of sensitivity, of detection, pretty poor”
(Dr.C)

Doctors and the public may say “Oh, my God”!
How is this group (of vaccines) going to be able to be accepted by the consumers … As soon as you hear “a tumor-derived cell line”, how do you explain that, put the public at ease?” (Dr.B)
“… the practicing medical community and also the lay public. They are going to hear that we are recommending or that the manufacturers are making vaccines with tumorigenic cell lines and say, oh, my God, even if there’s no scientific basis to say, oh, my God.” (Dr.D)

Framing information to convince doctors and the public
“… because it’s a discussion of how one communicates these issues and how the public will perceive them. But I’m not completely sure that we have a complete answer on the fundamental scientific question. So how can you communicate a scientific concensus that the product is safe unless we’re sure that you, the experts we are asking to advise us are convinced that it’s safe?”  (Dr.K)

Plan to hide information and omit it from package inserts
“The minute you describe something in the package insert in terms of potential clinical safety concerns, I think that really precludes using these cell substrates.” (Dr. G)

“When it gets right down to what’s in the vial and what the patient is going to ask me about, whether it’s safe, I’m not going to say, well, you know, HeLa cells kill nude mice.”
(Dr. C)

“I don’t know that our charge is to micromanage the package insert today. I think that’s a new discussion, with lots of issues that we haven’t really aired completely.”
( Dr.D)

Authorities uncertain about safety
“So I’m not sure that we can give a certainty – there’s no risk, don’t worry about this. – It’s sort of a brave new world. We’re all doing it together. But I think that you are doing a beautiful job.” (Dr. D)

Will learn about the risks as time goes by
“… even though there are challenges to using the new technologies, they have to be embraced and we have to continue to try to learn from them and struggle through that learning curve.” (Dr.M)

Leader of the committee says “I’m a vaccine guy”, then suggests approval
“I’m a vaccine guy. They are wonderful to prevent infectious diseases … I hope that I’m speaking for everybody when I say that’s the answer to your question. If not, please chime in now.” (Dr.D)

The committee formally approves the method of making vaccines from human cancer tumors
“To come back to the agency’s question of whether this Committee believes it’s correct scientifically to go forward with the development of these vaccines, our answer is yes.” (Dr.D)

Conclusion

  • Making vaccines with cells that are directly derived from human cancer tumors is faster and cheaper than breeding animals for the culture media.
  • Millions of potentially cancer-causing vaccines will be produced.
  • The vaccines may possibly cause genetic mutations.
  • Millions of dollars will be made by vaccine promoters.
  • The health of millions of consumers may be jeopardized.
  • Information about how these vaccines are made will be hidden from doctors and consumers.

Sometimes reality is even more frightening than horrific science fiction
Millions of consumers will be injected with vaccines which may cause cancer tumors, then cancer tumors will be used to make millions of vaccines. Think about it.

 

 

Photo Credit

]]>
http://vactruth.com/2014/11/30/vaccines-made-from-cancer-tumors/feed/ 141
Vaccine-Injured Child Stolen by the State and Her Caring Mother Accused of Child Abuse http://vactruth.com/2014/11/22/vaccine-injured-child-stolen/ http://vactruth.com/2014/11/22/vaccine-injured-child-stolen/#comments Sat, 22 Nov 2014 21:23:11 +0000 http://vactruth.com/?p=16370 On November 4, 2014, the website Medical Kidnap told the tragic story of four month-old Kathryn Hughes, who was stolen by Child Protective Services (CPS) after she suffered an adverse reaction to a vaccine.

Kathryn was a fragile baby, suffering from a wide range of complex medical needs. Born with Pierre Robin Sequence, a condition in which an infant has a smaller-than-normal lower jaw, a tongue that falls back in the throat and breathing difficulties, Kathryn certainly has had her fair share of problems.

Despite her daughter’s problems, Lorie, her mother, had always trusted the doctors and tried to do the best that she could for her daughter.

Baby is Vaccinated Without Her Mother’s Permission

Due to her own problems with vaccinations, Lorie requested when Kathryn was born that her daughter would only receive the vitamin K injection. Sadly, her requests were ignored and Kathryn was vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine. A few weeks later, Kathryn began suffering seizures, a common side effect of the vaccine. [1]

Medical Kidnap reported:

“On September 4, baby Kathryn had an ALTE (acute life threatening event) where she stopped breathing. Her family took her to the local hospital, where they airlifted her to UMC in Lubbock. That is where mother and baby would spend the next two weeks. It was determined that they would do surgery to insert a gbutton in order to insert a long-term feeding tube into her stomach. It would remain until she could have surgery to correct the cleft palate.” [2]

(Note: G-button or Gastrostomy Button is a tube placed directly into the stomach of a child who needs supplemental feeding or who has difficulty swallowing. This allows feeding to be given directly into the stomach.) [3]

The surgery went well, and despite the many tests, medications and wires, Kathryn remained a happy and secure little girl. However, despite her apparently happy disposition and the constant love and attention given to her by her mother, the reasons behind her seizures remained a mystery.

Before leaving the hospital, the nurses instructed Lorie how to give Kathryn the correct dosage of medications, via the G-button, and they returned home on Thursday, September 18.

Sadly, their happiness was short lived and just two days after returning home from the hospital Kathryn seizures returned and she was rushed back to the UMC.

Medical Kidnap stated:

“The next day, CPS and the staff at UMC informed Lorie that they were taking custody of Kathryn over the medical condition. She was only out of the hospital’s care for two days between September 4th and the 21st. Her mother had to beg to be able to at least say goodbye.

Lorie was stunned and devastated as they literally took baby Kathryn out of her arms, accusing her of not giving her the medications. She insists that she followed their instructions on how to give it to a T, detailing every step of the complicated process to me. The basis for the accusation was simply a test that showed that the level of phenobarbital in her bloodstream was 9.5 mg, but it should have been at least 10 mg.”

Since her kidnap by the CPS, the state of Texas has been trying to terminate all parental rights and they have reduced Lorie’s contact to just twice a month.

Lorie is reported to be distraught by their decision. On October 19, 2014, she wrote this heart-wrenching post on Facebook:

“Can’t sleep. Everyone is asleep but me and all I can think about is my baby girl. Just have this gut wrenching heart twisting feeling something is wrong … don’t know why but I just do. And I know she is crying extremely bad I can feel it in my breasts … still every cry and severity of cry I feel … and feel milk fill up … Even though there is very little milk left …

Miss her and love her so much and would do anything to comfort her and hold her skin to skin on my chest and let her listen and relax to my scent my touch the sound of my heartbeat!!!!

Please pray that she is okay! That God keeps his protecting arms wrapped around her and heals her!!!!!”

Sadly, Kathryn is now a ward of court and that doctors have asked the judge in her case to grant permission to vaccinate her fully, against her parents’ wishes, which, as we understand, also includes participation in an experimental ebola vaccine trial.

Given her medical conditions, I feel that her life is now in danger.

Did Kathryn’s mother fail to care for her daughter by failing to give her the medications prescribed as suggested, or was there something else behind Kathryn’s continued ill health and seizures?

What Really Happened to Baby Kathryn?

If we look at the history of this case, there is one detail that jumps out and that is the fact that Kathryn was vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine against her mother’s wishes. The hepatitis B vaccine can cause seizures.

In a lengthy report on the hepatitis B vaccination and possible adverse reactions, the Vaccination Liberation Army wrote:

“After many newborns died or suffered seizures, brain swelling and permanent brain damage following their hepatitis B injections, the dangers of the vaccine were brought to public attention by a documentary on ABC’s 20/20. Finally in July, 1999, the CDC reversed its ill-advised mandate on giving the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns.. Nevertheless, despite a decade of problems, and virtually no clinical control studies proving safety or efficacy, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices once again recommends in its 2002 immunization schedule that newborns be injected with the hepatitis B vaccine.” [3]

Their paper is full of facts and includes information written by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

In 2000, the AAPS became concerned that children were being vaccinated with too many mandated vaccines that they felt were unnecessary. One of the vaccines mentioned in their report was the hepatitis B vaccine. They wrote:

“’Our children face the possibility of death or serious long-term adverse effects from mandated vaccines that aren’t necessary or that have very limited benefits,’ said Jane M. Orient, MD, AAPS Executive Director.

‘This is not a vote against vaccines,’ said Dr. Orient. ‘This resolution only attempts to halt blanket vaccine mandates by government agencies and school districts that give no consideration for the rights of the parents or the individual medical condition of the child.’

Forty-two states have mandatory vaccine policies, and many children are required to have 22 shots before first grade. On top of that, as a condition for school attendance, many school districts require vaccination for diseases such as hepatitis B — primarily an adult disease, usually spread by multiple sex partners, drug abuse or an occupation with exposure to blood.”

They continued:

“And yet, children under the age of 14 are three times more likely to suffer adverse effects — including death — following the hepatitis b vaccine than to catch the disease itself.” [4]

Their report had little effect.

CDC Called Liars For Stating That the Hepatitis B Vaccine is Safe

In 1999, obviously shocked by what he had discovered, Michael Belkin, a former quantitative strategist at Salomon Brothers and Director of the Hepatitis B Vaccine Project of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) wrote:

“The NVIC has studied Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act covering the last nine years on hepatitis B vaccine adverse events — and in 1996 there were more than three times as many reported serious adverse reactions as reported cases of the disease in the 0 to 14 age group. Of the total 2,424 adverse event reports made between 1990 and October 1998 in children under age 14 who only received hepatitis B vaccine, there were 1,209 serious events and 73 deaths. Thus, one half of the reports for children under age 14 who received only hepatitis B vaccine were for serious events that required an emergency room visit, hospitalization, or caused life-threatening health problems or permanent disabilities.

As a UC Berkeley graduate and advisor to some of the largest financial institutions in the world, I am qualified to analyze and make conclusions about statistics. Based on that experience, I am astonished that the scientists on this Committee would disregard or cover up data showing the number and severity of adverse reactions to this vaccine. Science is observing and learning from what is observed. The assertions of the CDC that the many reported adverse reactions to this vaccine do not exist or are a coincidence violates the basic principle of science, which is rooted in the observation and analysis of data.”

Mr. Belkin concluded by stating:

“At the NVIC, we are overwhelmed following up constant new reports of deaths, seizures and autoimmune reactions following hepatitis B vaccination. Because the CDC refuses to acknowledge this large number of serious adverse reactions, hospitals and doctors who have been misled about the risks continue to administer the vaccine and then deny any vaccine connection when children die, get ill or have seizures within hours or days. CDC officials tell parents they have never heard of hepatitis B vaccine reactions.

That is a lie. For this government to continue to insist that hepatitis B vaccine adverse reaction reports do not exist is negligent, unethical — and is a crime against the children of America. It is a sad day for the US when the nation’s children need protection from the official medical authorities who are charged with protecting them from disease.” [5]

Yet Another Professional Speaks Out

Registered nurse Patti White became so concerned over the growing number of babies and young children being damaged by the hepatitis B vaccination, she wrote a letter to the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives, asking them to reconsider their decision to vaccinate newborns with the hepatitis B vaccine. She wrote:

“For the past three or four years our school district has noted a significant increase in the number of children entering school with developmental disorders, learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders and/or serious chronic illness such as diabetes, asthma and seizure disorders. Each of the past four years has been worse than the year before. There is only one common thread we have been able to identify in these children: they are the children who received the first trial hepatitis B injections as newborns in the early 1990s.”

She continued by adding the following two very powerful and worrying paragraphs:

“As the hepatitis B compliance rate in newborns has gone up in our community, so has the percentage of damaged children. This is very alarming. Because of having so many damaged children we have tried to find the long-term clinical trials that ruled this vaccine “safe and effective”. We discovered through an exhaustive Medline search that the FDA based its decision to approve hepatitis B vaccine for administration in the first hours of a newborn baby’s life upon clinical trials and upon post-marketing surveillance studies in which patients and their doctors were asked to report any adverse effects they noticed within 4-5 days after each injection [4 days for SmithKline, 5 days for Merck].

The problems being reported in increasing numbers as occurring after hepatitis B vaccination appear to be autoimmune and neurological in origin. Such problems take weeks to months to produce noticeable symptoms, and cannot be spotted in a 4-5 day observation period. These are the only clinical studies that have been done by Merck or SmithKline. There is not one long-term study that we could find.”

In other words, she believed that the vaccine damage suffered by these children fell into two categories: it was either autoimmune or neurological in origin, and, through its very nature, was unlikely to show up for several weeks or months after the vaccination.

Nurse White continued with possibly one of most damning and worrying paragraphs in her letter. She wrote:

“The CDC and FDA have no idea what the long-term effects will be on the newly developing neurological and immune systems of the infants who are injected with this vaccine. They seem to only be concerned with denying the connection between these damaged children and the hepatitis B shot they received within a few hours of birth. The CDC even admits the lack of study and states they do not even know how long the vaccine will be effective. We found this amazing since the vaccine was developed for a population at risk for hepatitis B: IV drug users, high-risk medical professionals and those who are involved in high risk sexual practices.” [6]

If White’s statement is true, and there is no reason to suggest that it is not, there is evidence to suggest that new born babies are being vaccinated with a vaccine that has not been fully tested for its safety or its long-term efficacy.
Looking back at the number of professionals raising concerns over this vaccine, one has to wonder whether or not Kathryn should have been vaccinated in the first place. After all, Kathryn had already had her fair share of medical problems and a mother who had reacted adversely to vaccinations.

Conclusion

For many years, I have been writing about such cases. There are now a growing number of parents who have been falsely accused of harming their vaccine-damaged children. Sadly, this case is yet another example.

Loving, caring parents are having their children taken away from them because the majority of health care professionals and social workers are burying their heads in the sand and choosing to ignore the fact that no vaccine or medication is one hundred percent safe. All vaccines have the potential to cause adverse reactions.

When you have such groups as the AAPS stating, “And yet, children under the age of 14 are three times more likely to suffer adverse effects — including death — following the hepatitis b vaccine than to catch the disease itself,” you have to wonder what on earth is going on.

This story highlights the need for reform and the need for change. It is highly unlikely that this mother harmed her baby, and in my opinion, this baby should be returned to her mother as soon as possible.


If readers would like to help Baby Kathryn be returned to her mother, her family has found a competent lawyer and they need to raise $20,000. Please see the GoFundMe campaign titled Bring Baby Kathryn Home and consider giving as generously as you are able.

You can also like and share the Facebook page Bring Baby Kathryn Home or follow Kathryn's story on Twitter.

Please sign the petition asking Governor Rick Perry and Governor-Elect Greg Abbott to intervene on Baby Kathryn's behalf.

 

]]>
http://vactruth.com/2014/11/22/vaccine-injured-child-stolen/feed/ 40
This is How Doctors are Puppets for Vaccine Manufacturers http://vactruth.com/2014/11/21/doctors-are-puppets/ http://vactruth.com/2014/11/21/doctors-are-puppets/#comments Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:15:24 +0000 http://vactruth.com/?p=16366 Manufacturers hide information from doctors about ingredients and conceal their sinister plans for vaccine production so that doctors will continue to feel comfortable recommending vaccines.

Doctors have no possibility whatsoever of knowing the complete composition of vaccines, nor do health authorities – or, in fact, anyone else.

Here are some of the methods manufacturers use to conceal the presence of ingredients in vaccines:

Trade Secrets

Some “GRAS” (acronym for Generally Recognized as Safe) substances are not revealed due to trade secrets. This includes many oils, including peanut oil.

This is one reason why there are millions of people in the world who are allergic to peanuts and other vaccine ingredients. [1]

Dispensation from Labeling Requirements

Incredibly, the presence of almost any substance may be concealed on the condition that manufacturers apply for dispensation to official labeling requirements.

This exemption applies even to the presence of neurotoxic substances such as aluminium, which is included in many vaccines to stimulate immune response.

Regarding concealment of the presence of aluminium in vaccines, Dr. Paul King states:

“Because aluminum adjuvants are “regulated” substances used in vaccines before the FDA came into existence, they are subject to the regulations set forth in 21 CFR Sec. 610.15a.

However, the FDA has added a subsection (d) to these requirements that states,

(d) The Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research or the Director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research may approve an exception or alternative to any requirement in this section. Requests for such exceptions or alternatives must be in writing.”

Mercury in “Mercury-Free” Vaccines

“Many vaccine manufacturers voluntarily began producing ‘supposed’ mercury-free vaccines in 1999. The June 2006 lab result from Doctor’s Data run counter to vaccine manufacturers’ claims. For example, some product inserts currently claim that a trace amount of mercury exists in the final product but the amount has been greatly reduced. Others claim to be producing completely mercury-free products. All four vaccine vials tested contained mercury despite manufacturer claims that two of the vials were completely mercury-free. All four vials contained aluminum, one contained nine times more than the other three, tremendously enhancing the toxicity of mercury.” (Health Advocacy in the Public Interest, 8/12/04)

Presence of Traces of Food Protein is Concealed

“Only the FINAL culture is listed on the package insert. Until then they use FOOD WASTE! This is another source of minute traces of food protein that some unlucky child will get in a vaccine. Every food oil known to man can be used in the vaccines. They are highly refined which only means not all children will get a food allergy, only the unlucky ones who get the remaining protein particles in their vaccine. The oils and who knows what else fall under “self-affirmed generally recognized as safe ingredients,” not even our government is entitled to know what is in the vaccines.”

“Charles Richet, a Nobel Prize winning doctor discovered (over a hundred years ago) that proteins injected into the bloodstream will result in the development of allergy to that protein. In other words, food proteins in vaccines can cause the development of food allergies!” (Barbara Feick Gregory) [1]

Foreign DNA Residue in Vaccines

Manufactures are aware that vaccines contain residue from culture media used in production. This includes tissue from insect cells; yeast; mouse brains; tissue from pigs, guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs, and calf lymph; hens’ eggs; chick embryos; monkey kidney and testicle cells; retinal cells; aborted human fetal cells; and cancer cells. [2]

Impossible to Remove All Foreign DNA Residue

“Manufacturers have been instructed to ensure the final vaccine contains less than 1 million residual animal cells and the amount of stray DNA is less than 10 ng per vaccine dose. These regulations admit that animal DNA is injected into human babies and adults with every shot.” [3]

Presence of Foreign DNA May Be Unknown Even to Manufacturers

As analysis methods have become more advanced, some ingredients are unexpectedly discovered long after vaccines have been marketed.

One of many examples is SV40 DNA in polio vaccines, which has been administered to millions. [4] [5] It has been detected in human malignancies and can be passed through generations.

Other examples of contamination include the unexpected discovery of pig virus DNA in rotavirus vaccines and retrovirus avian (bird) leukosis virus in a measles vaccine. [6]

An independent researcher discovered aluminium-bound recombinant DNA in Gardasil, classed as a biohazard. The consequences are unknown and may be horrific. [7] [8]

Doctors do not know the amount in each dose of the following:

Mercury:

Mercury in the form of thimerosal is included as a preservative in multi-dose vials. If vials are not shaken thoroughly between each dose withdrawal, the last doses will contain large amounts of mercury. This is because mercury is heavier than water and sinks to the bottom of the vials.

Latex allergen:

Amounts vary according to the degree of leaching from rubber components of syringes and vial stoppers.

Microbial contamination:

Increases according to the number of times doses are withdrawn from vials.

Virus antigen:

May be in the form of particles which are suspended in the vaccine fluid. The amount of antigen varies according to the technique of the person who administers the vaccine.

As more doctors pose pertinent questions, manufacturers and health authorities are planning to conceal even more information from them so that doctors may feel comfortable and positive about vaccines.

Sinister Plans For Manufacture of Vaccines From Human Cancer Tumors Will Be Kept Secret From Doctors

At a meeting of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on September 19, 2012, at which FDA and vaccine manufacturers were represented, the topic was Consideration of the Appropriateness of Cell Lines Derived From Human Tumors For Vaccine Manufacture.

Part of the transcript of the meeting was salvaged and has revealed that authorities and manufacturers are concerned that doctors may feel uncomfortable about the intention to use human cancer tumors for vaccine production.

There was a discussion, as follows, about several ways to conceal this information from doctors and the public, including its omission from package inserts and how to present the disgusting method of vaccine production to doctors so that they may find it acceptable:

DR. DAUM (Chair, VRBPAC):

“ … a few people have said it directly — is the scientific community’s perception, including the practicing medical community, and also the lay public. They are going to hear that we are recommending or that you are doing or that the manufacturers are making vaccines with tumorigenic cell lines and say, oh, my God, even if there’s no scientific basis to say, oh, my God.

I think we’re better off heading that discussion off at the pass and starting some of the ideas that Dr. Marcuse said, which is a Scientific American type of article informing practitioners — and I had some lunch conversations with other people that talked about some of the vaccine-consuming community that might perceive a very great difference even if scientifically there isn’t one.”

Conclusion

  • Relevant information is intentionally hidden from doctors so that they may feel more comfortable about recommending vaccines.
  • It is impossible for doctors and health authorities to know the complete composition of vaccines.
  • The moral ethics of vaccine promoters, including health authorities and doctors who recommend or administer vaccines should be questioned, when the compositions of vaccines are unknown.
  • The legal justification for official approval of vaccines should be questioned when the ingredients are not known.
  • “Informed consent” is impossible when relevant information is concealed.

 

photo credit

]]>
http://vactruth.com/2014/11/21/doctors-are-puppets/feed/ 42
Vaccine-Injured Child Kidnapped from Family by Child Protective Services http://vactruth.com/2014/11/15/medical-kidnapping-vaccine-injuries/ http://vactruth.com/2014/11/15/medical-kidnapping-vaccine-injuries/#comments Sat, 15 Nov 2014 15:25:01 +0000 http://vactruth.com/?p=16363 Vaccine injury and medical kidnapping stories are becoming commonplace. They are often connected. One mother never thought for a second that vaccinating her child would tear her family apart.

Rebekah McClain wants parents to learn what her family is almost unbelievably dealing with because they chose to vaccinate. No child deserves to suffer through this pain. This is her true story.

 

One Family’s Heartbreak

“I have a son named Kacer Lee Harris. He was born on December 25, 2013. He is my Christmas miracle. I have been praying for years to have a child on Christmas Day. It’s all I’ve ever wanted. When they told me my son was due on January 28, I knew he wouldn’t be born that day.

I got the flu and hepatitis B vaccines during pregnancy at 34 weeks, then had him at 35 weeks. My doctor told me I needed to get them. I remember because they were talking about if I had contracted either illness, for any reason, they didn’t want the baby to get it.

I knew something was off after the shots but no one would listen. I did not connect the dots, though. When my body started hurting, I started walking around to try and stop the pain. It helped a little. That morning, my water broke at 5:30 am. I went to the hospital and gave birth to my son at 12:41 am on Christmas morning.

During labor, I was given two epidurals, but neither of them worked (although the pain wasn’t bad). Then they gave me Pitocin to speed up the process. My son’s breathing slowed too much, so they stopped the Pitocin.

As soon as I had him, they took him and gave him the hepatitis B vaccine, even though he was born five weeks premature and I was vaccinated for the flu and hepatitis B less than a week before. Right afterwards, he became jaundiced and was in a billi blanket for a week.

A few days after he was born, I got sick. The doctors gave me a steroid that dried up my breastmilk. I tried to relactate, with no luck. Then our baby started to get sick. He was on soy formula at the time and was spitting up a lot of his bottles.

One week we got snowed in and the closest gas station only had milk formula. So we tried it. He almost stopped breathing after the first bottle.

We tried to tell the doctors about his reactions to the formulas, but with no results. So I started feeding him rice cereal and baby food. He was so hungry, he would cry when I didn’t feed him fast enough. This was around eight to ten weeks old. I didn’t know that there were milk banks where mothers donate their milk. I wish I had.

At his two-month checkup, he was given Hep B, Hib, DTaP, IPV, PCV and Rota. The doctor did not adjust the vaccine schedule for him even though he was born five weeks early. He still got the shots any normal two month-old would.

As the months went by, his condition worsened. And even before then, he was only nine pounds, seven ounces. And through it all they still vaccinated him: second doses of Hib, PCV, IPV, DTaP and Rota were given at his four-month checkup.

During these months, I had taken him to the ER nearby several times. They said nothing was wrong and sent him home. He started to lose weight at five months. At this time he was deemed failure to thrive.

When he was almost six months old, he was puking so much. We were really concerned. Kacer started puking up everything he ate.

I called his doctor and she told me to take him to the hospital in town and she would send in paperwork to have him moved to Children’s Hospital immediately.

I took him to the nearby Emergency Room at Ozark Health Medical Center in Clinton, Arkansas. The same place I’d taken him numerous times before. Then we were taken by ambulance to Arkansas Children’s Hospital in Little Rock.

After a week at Children’s Hospital, we were able to take Kacer home, and during that time, he turned six months old on June 25, 2014.

We were home for about a week when the Department of Human Services (DHS) showed up for their first visit. They were in and out fast and didn’t show much interest.

We had just gotten him to smile for the first time, because they finally changed his formula to Nutramegan. He had started to grow a little and was trying to roll over.

That same week after he came home and DHS first visited, we took him for his six-month checkup and the doctor gave him the six month shots: influenza, DTaP, Hib, PCV and Rota. He was vaccinated on schedule even though he had been puking before his shots and just kept getting worse after these latest.

Then the DHS lady came back the next week to take him, on July 9, 2014. I didn’t know they were making a claim to take our son away. During this visit, she kept making excuses to take our son.

She walked through the house alone. Asked to use the restroom and tore up the bedroom connected to it. She told us to pack his stuff and give him to her.

When she told me to give her my baby, I couldn’t do it. I stood there crying, staring at my baby. My mother-in-law had to do it. She didn’t have a warrant.

My fiancé and I packed his things. I only helped because I knew what he needed. He was always so sick and fragile. I never let him out of my sight. I’m 22. We are both pretty young. It was very hard.

We didn’t know the doctors reported seeing bruises when we took him in. Never once did they admit vaccines caused these reactions. Kacer’s dad, (my fiancé) Rickey Harris, was accused of abuse.

We were both interrogated and threatened with jail time. The DHS worker that came was determined to take him. She stayed at our house for five hours, looking for a reason to take him. She did a lot of illegal things that we couldn’t get her in trouble for.

After she took him, she had them do a skeletal scan the following Monday at one of the hospitals. His sixth and seventh left ribs were broken. We had no idea what had happened.

The first thing she did when she took him was block all of his records and cut all contact with his doctors. So I have no access to his records.

She also told my mother all the information on our case. My mom knew about his injuries before I did. And my mom wasn’t a part of the case. What she did was illegal.

After Kacer was taken, they wouldn’t let his dad come to the visits until he took a paternity test. It took a month or so for that process to complete. It was sad for all of us. Now Kacer watches his dad wherever he goes and gets upset if he’s not there.

Then, I started to notice he was getting sick again. Possible seizures that I believe I have seen him start to have. We noticed at the visits he wouldn’t smile anymore. He slept through most of the visits.

I found out they had stopped feeding him rice cereal and baby food. They were only giving him bottles. It was affecting him.

He is now ten months old. I know they continued to vaccinate him but I don’t know which ones at this point because his records were blocked from me.

Since he was taken at six months old, they’ve done a number of tests on him: MRI, EEG, etc. They found bleeding in his brain and damage behind his eyes.

He weighs 17 pounds, nine ounces now. That’s still small for his age. He weighs about as much as a six to seven month-old.

His foster parents reported seeing him having staring spells often, which I’ve seen him have as well. They said it looked like SBS. So then police came in. We were interrogated and told we should tell the truth because he had been abused. And if we didn’t, we would go to jail.

The doctors’ reports came back a week or so ago and advised that while his injuries look bad, they don’t prove he was abused. But we still have things to finish in our case plan and hope this will be over soon.

Children’s Hospital is the one saying his injuries aren’t proof of abuse. He had his six-month shots after being released from Children’s. That would be why he acted sick after they took him, too. And any subsequent vaccines he was given are making him sick even more.

People ask why I got vaccinated while pregnant. I always thought it was required. I didn’t know getting vaccinated while pregnant could cause me to go into labor or risk me losing my baby. I didn’t question anything at the time. I didn’t really question anything until after Kacer was taken.

I trusted them …  stupidly, yes, but I did. We both did. We just never knew this could happen. Not until my grandma told us what she knew and that vaccinations could do this. Then I looked into it. She sent me some printouts and I read through them.

After that, I thought about all that had happened to Kacer. Then I realized that I had trusted the wrong people. His father has been here the whole time. He suffers a lot. Our family was ripped apart for something he didn’t do. He was the one accused of abuse. And he didn’t do anything.

They took our son because he had injuries; fractured ribs, bruises, bleeding in the brain and damage behind his eyes. All of these injuries, including the fractured ribs, are caused from vaccines.

I kept getting him vaccinated because I didn’t know they could do these things. I was raised to think that vaccinations were good. That doctors and government officials are here to protect us. But I’ve seen that I was taught wrong.

I can’t have contact with his foster parents. I don’t know them. The visit is at my home. We only get to see our son once a week for two to four hours. We had a major drug bust in our town recently, so DHS is always busy now. Our amount of visitation depends on their availability.

It is hard. I cry every time I have to let him go again. It’s hard to see his room ready for him, but he’s not there. The DHS worker that brings him over wants us to have him back.

I hope our story helps someone. My son should have never been taken. I now know many families go through this. Our children deserve better. They need to be protected.

Please … don’t vaccinate your children. They don’t deserve to suffer the pain that comes with vaccines.

This page was made for our son. Bring Baby Kacer Home. I wanted to ask everyone to please like this page. I plan on using this page to show him later on in life what happened, and that through it all, people cared for him.” [1]

 

 

Doctors Ignored Kacer’s Vaccine Injuries

Rebekah’s grandmother advised her that Kacer’s injuries were known to be caused by vaccines. These injuries have been well-documented and are noted on vaccine package inserts.

Not once did any of the doctors inform Kacer’s parents about vaccine injuries. Instead, they were denied and Kacer continued to be assaulted by them.

Rebekah mentioned how thankful she is to have received help from her grandmother, Maria Rosatto, to find a good lawyer. “She’s always stuck by me when the others didn’t support me through this. I’m so thankful for her. I thank the Lord my grandmother didn’t abandon me. She is the one who told me to look into vaccines being the problem.”

Her fiancé also needed a lawyer, since he was charged with Kacer’s vaccine injuries, similar to thousands of parents behind bars charged with causing their child’s vaccine injuries, including shaken baby syndrome. They don’t know who arranged to pay for his lawyer but were blessed to find out a really good lawyer would be representing him.

The parents would like to say thank you to whomever helped them in their situation. They also have a Court-Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) for Children worker to help them get their son back. [2]

 

Blaming the Parents for Vaccine Injuries

According to an article explaining how vaccine injuries often misdiagnosed as shaken baby syndrome, “When a medical professional suspects that a baby has been violently shaken, they will examine the baby for the “triad” of injuries associated with SBS. These are subdural hematoma (bleeds inside the brain), retinal hemorrhages (bleeds behind the eyes) and cerebral edema (swelling or inflammation inside the brain).” [3]

There is a very informative book available titled Legally Kidnapped: The Case Against Child Protective Services. Whistleblower Carlos Morales exposes the dangerous tactics and overt corruption that he witnessed as a CPS investigator. [4]

 

The Fight Isn’t Over Until Kacer Returns Home

As I was finishing writing this story, the family was wrapping up their weekly visit with Kacer and had to say good bye to him till next week. Rebekah said he is teething and dealing with allergies and was a little fussy. They are feeding him rice cereal and baby food now. He’s smiling more now.

She said, “The best part about today, he’s finally saying mama. He’s been saying Dada for a while but we couldn’t get him to say Mama. He came in the door saying it nonstop today. It was so cute. He is my life. My everything.”

Let’s send this family some positive energy and help them get their son back. There is no better place he should be than with his super-loving family. Wishing you a safe return home, Kacer. You are truly a strong boy and survivor.

 

 

]]>
http://vactruth.com/2014/11/15/medical-kidnapping-vaccine-injuries/feed/ 775
India Holds Bill Gates Accountable For His Vaccine Crimes http://vactruth.com/2014/10/05/bill-gates-vaccine-crimes/ http://vactruth.com/2014/10/05/bill-gates-vaccine-crimes/#comments Sun, 05 Oct 2014 18:02:44 +0000 http://vactruth.com/?p=16342 As Bill Gates faces a lawsuit for the illegal testing of tribal children in India, it appears that his crimes against humanity have finally caught up with him.

A recent report published by Health Impact News has reported that the Gates Foundation has found itself facing a pending lawsuit, due to an investigation that is being carried out by the Supreme Courts of India.

Health Impact News stated:

“While fraud and corruption are revealed on almost a daily basis now in the vaccine industry, the U.S. mainstream media continues to largely ignore such stories. Outside the U.S., however, the vaccine empires are beginning to crumble, and English versions of the news in mainstream media outlets are available via the Internet.

One such country is India, where the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and their vaccine empire are under fire, including a pending lawsuit currently being investigated by the India Supreme Court.” [1]

The Health Impact News article centered largely on a four-page report that was recently published by Economic Times India.

Eager to know more, I investigated their story and discovered that the World Health Organization, the Gates Foundation and two organizations funded by them, PATH (Program for Appropriate Technology in Health) and GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization), have found themselves under fire, after a writ of petition originally submitted to the Supreme Court of India, by Kalpana Mehta, Nalini Bhanot and Dr. Rukmini Rao in 2012, was finally heard by the courts.

The petitioners submitting the petition stated:

“BMGF, PATH and WHO were criminally negligent trialling the vaccines on a vulnerable, uneducated and under-informed population school administrators, students and their parents who were not provided informed consent or advised of potential adverse effects or required to be monitored post-vaccination.” [2]

 

Young Tribal Girls Tested With HPV Vaccines

The Economic Times India published their report August 2014. They stated that in 2009, tests had been carried out on 16,000 tribal school children in Andhra Pradesh, India, using the human papiloma virus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil.

According to the report written by KP Narayana Kumar, within a month of receiving the vaccine, many of the children fell ill and by 2010, five of them had died. A further two children were reported to have died in Vadodara, Gujarat, where an estimated 14,000 tribal children were vaccinated with another brand of the HPV vaccine, Cervarix, manufactured by GlaxoSmitheKline (GSK).

Shockingly, the report stated that many of the consent forms used to vaccinate the girls were signed “illegally,” either by the wardens from the hostels where many of the girls resided, or using thumbprints from illiterate parents.

This travesty was not discovered until a team of health activists from the non-government organization SAMA, an organization specializing in women’s health, decided to investigate what had been going on.

According to the report, they were shocked to discover that a total of 120 girls had been taken ill, suffering from a variety of symptoms, including “epileptic seizures, severe stomach aches, headaches and mood swings.”

The Economic Times stated:

“The Sama report also said there had been cases of early onset of menstruation following the vaccination, heavy bleeding and severe menstrual cramps among many students. The standing committee pulled up the relevant state governments for the shoddy investigation into these deaths.

It said it was disturbed to find that ‘all the seven deaths were summarily dismissed as unrelated to vaccinations without in-depth investigations …’ the speculative causes were suicides, accidental drowning in well (why not suicide?), malaria, viral infections, subarachnoid hemorrhage (without autopsy) etc.”

This information is even more shocking when you discover that the organization funding the study was none other than the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who declared the project a total success.

Kumar wrote:

“According to the BMGF, the WHO, the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and the Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India have all recommended vaccination ‘as a proven and highly effective preventive measure for cervical cancer.’ The project used vaccines that are licensed in India and that have been administered safely around the world tens of millions of times, preventing countless cases of cervical cancer illness and death, ‘maintains a BMGF spokesperson in an emailed response (see GAVI & PHFI create incentives …’”

He continued:

“BMGF’s role in funding the controversial studies, however, has led to many healthcare activists in India voicing their apprehensions. ‘BMGF has to take full responsibility because PATH is funded by them. It is also unethical when people championing the cause of vaccines are the same ones who are also investing in vaccine development,’ said V Rukmini Rao, one of the activists who filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court in connection with the HPV vaccine studies.” [3]

Absolutely, and this is not the first time that these organizations have been caught illegally testing vaccines in developing countries.

Gates Foundation, WHO, PATH, GAVI, UNICEF Behind Chad Vaccine Disaster

In December 2012, in the small village of Gouro, Chad, Africa, situated on the edge of the Sahara Desert, five hundred children were locked into their school, threatened that if they did not agree to being force-vaccinated with a meningitis A vaccine, they would receive no further education.

These children were vaccinated without their parents’ knowledge. This vaccine was an unlicensed product still going through the third and fourth phases of testing.

Within hours, one hundred and six children began to suffer from headaches, vomiting, severe uncontrollable convulsions and paralysis. The children’s wait for a doctor began. They had to wait one full week for a doctor to arrive while the team of vaccinators proceeded to vaccinate others in the village.

When the doctor finally came, he could do nothing for the children. The team of vaccinators, upon seeing what had happened, fled the village in fear.

The original report written in a small, local newspaper called La Voix, the only newspaper to have published the original story, stated that forty children were finally transferred to a hospital in Faya and later taken by plane to two hospitals in N’Djamena, the capital city of Chad.

Link to VacTruth Article

After being shuttled around like cattle, many of these sick, weak children were finally dumped back in their village without a diagnosis and each family was given an unconfirmed sum of £1000 by the government. No forms were signed and no documentation was seen. They were informed that their children had not suffered a vaccine injury.

However, if this were true, why would their government award each family £1000 in what has been described as hush money?

The only mainstream news channel to have highlighted the plight of these poor children was a local channel called Tchad, which filmed footage of the then-Prime Minister of Chad visiting the children in hospital.

VacTruth has copies of both reports, along with medical and government documents.

Despite this evidence and VacTruth’s detailed and extensive coverage, including highlighting television footage, once again, the vaccine program was hailed a success. To watch videos reporting the story, see the references at the end of this article. [4] [5]

The groups involved with this project were PATH, WHO, UNICEF, and the Gates Foundation. During investigations, it was discovered that the whole project was being run by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

In a press release, the Gates Foundation stated:

“MenAfriVac is a tremendous success story for the global health community. It is the first vaccine developed specifically for Africa, and it proves that global partnerships can develop and deliver high-quality, low-cost vaccines.

Ten years ago, we invested in the Meningitis Vaccine Project,  an innovative model that brought together PATH, the World Health Organization, African health ministers and the Serum Institute of India today, we celebrate the result: a modern vaccine selling for less than US 50 cents per dose with the potential to end Africa’s deadly meningitis epidemics.

We believe that vaccines are one of the best buys in global health. In January, Bill and Melinda Gates called on the global community to make this the Decade of Vaccines. There is no better way to launch this decade than with a new vaccine that will improve and save lives.” [6]

VacTruth can prove otherwise.

Government Inquiry Holds GAVI Accountable for Multiple Deaths

Despite the fact the Gates Foundation call vaccines “one of the best buys in global health,” a government inquiry in Pakistan has found the complete opposite.

In 2011, the Express Tribune published a story stating that:

“ISLAMABAD: A government inquiry has found that polio vaccines for infants funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunisation are causing deaths and disabilities in regional countries including Pakistan.

The startling revelation is part of an inquiry report prepared by the Prime Minister’s Inspection Commission (PMIC) on the working of the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). The PMIC, headed by Malik Amjad Noon, has recommended that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani immediately suspend the administration of all types of vaccines funded by the GAVI.”

According to the Express Tribune, the main vaccinations in question were the polio vaccine and the 5-in-1 pentavelent vaccine, which were said to be responsible for the deaths and disability of a number of children in Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Japan.

The vaccines were funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunization (GAVI) an organization financed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Program, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, the Rockefeller Foundation, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank.

Writing on the official report, made exclusive to the newspaper, the Express Tribune stated:

“The report states, ‘The procured vaccines are not tested in laboratories to confirm their efficacy and genuineness. This leaves room for use of spurious and counterfeit vaccines.’” [7] (emphasis added)

If this is true, then once again the Gates Foundation has been linked to mass vaccination initiatives using untested, unsafe vaccinations.

The Gates Foundation and WHO Labeled Unethical by Medical Experts

In 2012, Ramesh Shankar Mumbai, an author writing for the Pharmabiz website, reported that two medical experts from India had accused the Gates Foundation and WHO of being unethical.

In his report, Mumbai stated that Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of the Department of Pediatrics at St. Stephens Hospital in Delhi, wrote the following information in their report in the April issue of Indian Journal of Medical Ethics.

“It was unethical for WHO and Bill Gates to flog this program when they knew 10 years back that it was never to succeed. Getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical.”

Pharmabiz.com reported that Dr. Vashisht and Dr. Puliyel had continued their report by stating:

“Another major ethical issue raised by the campaign is the failure to thoroughly investigate the increase in the incidence of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) in areas where many doses of vaccine were used. NPAFP is clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly.”

Pharmabiz.com continued:

“The authors noted that while India was polio-free in 2011, in the same year, there were 47500 cases of NPAFP. While data from India’s National Polio Surveillance Project showed NPAFP rate increased in proportion to the number of polio vaccine doses received, independent studies showed that children identified with NPAFP ‘were at more than twice the risk of dying than those with wild polio infection.’” [8]

The corruption and deceit by these organizations does not stop there.

The Gates Foundation Blamed for 10,000 Vaccine-Related Deaths

In 2013, yet another report named the Gates Foundation and GAVI as being responsible for multiple deaths using untested vaccinations on children from the developing world.

The report, published on the website Occupy Corporatism and written by Susanne Posel stated:

“It was found out through an investigation, that GAVI was using an untested vaccine; giving this dangerous vaccine to Pakistani children shows the lack of empathy associated with these organizations.

GAVI was blamed for the deaths of 10,000 children in Pakistan when they came in and administered polio vaccines that resulted in casualties.” [9]

As we know, GAVI is heavily funded by the Gates Foundation. [10]

So, what was the name of the organization that investigated GAVI and found them using untested polio vaccinations in Pakistan?

According to the Express Tribune article, which I referred to earlier in this article, it was none other than the Indian government, who, upon discovering the shocking truth, recommended the immediate suspension of the administration of all types of vaccines funded by GAVI. [7]

In a recent radio show hosted by Sallie O. Elkordy, Susanne Posel gave her frank and honest views on the whole sorry mess that we find ourselves in today.

Warning: This report is not for the faint-hearted. [11]

Conclusion

It is difficult to believe that, despite the mounting evidence outlining the many crimes against humanity that have been committed by the Gates Foundation, GAVI, UNICEF and PATH, Bill Gates is portrayed as a hero among many.

However, according to the definition of hero in the Oxford Dictionary, the word hero means:

“A person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.” [12]

The dictionary I used said nothing about vaccinating innocent, vulnerable children with untested and unsafe vaccinations, causing them to suffer agonizing, untimely deaths.

 


Photo Credit

]]>
http://vactruth.com/2014/10/05/bill-gates-vaccine-crimes/feed/ 213
Boy Gets Diagnosed with Autism After 32 Shots http://vactruth.com/2014/10/02/autism-after-32-shots/ http://vactruth.com/2014/10/02/autism-after-32-shots/#comments Thu, 02 Oct 2014 06:02:56 +0000 http://vactruth.com/?p=16341 Like millions of parents before her, Natalie Steffen was faced with her children receiving pediatric vaccines starting after birth and during subsequent well child visits. This story is one mother’s journey to exempt her children from further vaccinations.

Natalie gave birth to her firstborn daughter Skylar in October 2004. Skylar received all the shots on the schedule, starting with the hepatitis B vaccine, given within the first 12 hours of life. Skylar reacted to the vaccines, but her parents didn’t know their daughter was suffering side effects and adverse reactions to them.

This is How the Nightmare Began

After her first hep B shot, Skylar immediately began to suffer from colic. Up until age one, she would cry every night at the same time for about an hour and a half before she went to sleep. She had horrible night terrors from age 2-4 years before these finally ceased.

When Natalie had Skylar, she had no idea vaccine injuries were prevalent and never thought to question this link. Skylar’s pediatrician said this behavior was normal and led her to believe this is what normal babies go through.

Natalie gave birth to her second child, Landen, in 2009, four years later. He was also given the hepatitis B vaccine within 12 hours of life and started receiving the vaccines on schedule. Landen was born perfectly healthy. Once he started receiving the vaccinations on schedule, he suffered from the toxins. His reactions were much more severe. He was reaching the typical milestones until he was given the MMR, Varicella and flu shots at his 14 month pediatric visit, and by 18 months old, he lost everything and was later diagnosed with autism.

In Natalie’s words, this is what happened to her son after he received those shots at 14 months old:

  • “Landen lost all his speech (he can parrot now here and there)
  • He stems by running back-and-forth
  • He flaps, raising his arms and screaming
  • He chews on everything including wood and walls
  • He is still not potty trained and is now 5 years old
  • He went through a stage where he would smear his feces all over himself and the walls
  • He is relearning to eat with utensils
  • He is constantly plugging his ears
  • He had horrific tantrums for 2 years, but now instead of tantrum meltdowns, when his surroundings are too loud, he goes into a laughing state in which he drops onto the ground and laughs uncontrollably
  • He hums when he is eating
  • He has an extremely high level of pain tolerance
  • 50 percent of the time, he walks on his tippy toes
  • He is constantly jumping or moving very quickly
  • He can walk through the house repeatedly without looking while touching the same objects
  • He breaks and eats his toys instead of playing with them
  • He flips all his toys and furniture upside down (we had to move all the furniture out of his bedroom except his bed)
  • He always wants to eat and can eat as much as my husband
  • He has no sense of fear or what is dangerous
  • He will take off running without looking at any moment”

All of these symptoms hit Landen at 18 months of age after receiving the MMR, Varicella, and flu shots. He had received a total of 32 shots before he was diagnosed with autism by age three, and that was when Natalie finally figured out that the vaccines were the source of her children’s ill health.

What Did This Brave Mother Do Next?

Natalie was never told a thing about vaccines except that they protect against diseases, until her son was diagnosed with autism and she started researching. That was when the blinding veil was lifted and she learned the truth behind the injections and their ingredients.

Once Natalie learned the truth about these man-made drugs, she stopped vaccinating her children. By this time, her oldest daughter, Skylar, was seven years old and had received all her routine vaccinations up to the recommended kindergarten round.

During the break in the vaccine schedule for her daughter, it became clear to Natalie that Landen’s autism was vaccine-induced. At that time, all vaccines were stopped on both children; Skylar at age seven and Landen at age three. Natalie had to re-focus to heal her children through detoxing them and learned how to manipulate their gut by healing them from the inside with a good, healthy, organic and non-genetically modified food diet.

At age nine, Skylar is a highly intelligent, straight-A student. Landen, at age five, still suffers from autism but is healing slowly through the help of his parents. Notice, those responsible are not being held responsible. It is the parents who deal with the burden of feeling guilty for trusting the lies and now they have to pay for them while their child suffers.

Natalie later gave birth to another beautiful and healthy daughter, Haven, in 2013. Because of what her older brother and sister had endured, her parents felt the best route to protect Haven was NOT to vaccinate. Natalie stopped all vaccines and Haven never received one shot. Haven is now one year old and is completely unvaccinated. She has never had any unusual behavior.

Natalie has informed us:

“Haven goes to the chiropractor every other week to get adjusted (she started going when she was two days old). She has never been sick or had a temperature, just a runny nose here and there. She eats all organic food and drinks such as coconut milk or organic juice. She is healthy and happy, hitting all her milestones, naps on schedule, says ‘momma’ and ‘dada’ and interacts with her brother and sister every day. She has never been taken to a pediatrician, just our primary care chiropractor doctor.”

Two of Natalie Steffen's three children were harmed by vaccines.

Where Do Parents Go From Here?

Natalie and her husband were not informed on the subject of vaccines, vaccine ingredients and vaccine injuries. Nor were they aware a reporting system is set in place named the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to which they or their child’s pediatrician or their health care provider's staff should’ve reported all of these events. [1]. This is something their pediatrician should have been forth coming about and recognized.

They were also not aware that a vaccine compensation fund has been set up to receive compensation to help cover the financial burden of treating a vaccine-injured loved one. There is also compensation given to those who lost their child or loved one after vaccination. One down side to this program is that two-thirds of these cases are denied. Parents are left without much-needed help.

Different countries have different laws. In the United States, if your child is harmed by a vaccine, there is little action you can take legally. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was passed to protect pharmaceutical companies from anyone claiming a vaccine injured their child. Under this law, no parent can sue a vaccine manufacturer, regardless if the FDA or CDC helped get an untested vaccine approved. [2]

Doctors, nurses, vaccine manufacturers and those mandating and forcing these vaccines, sometimes through illegal threats, are not held responsible when you or your child suffers from a vaccine injury. If you decide to vaccinate yourself or your children, you do so at your own risk.

Parents can still have their children enrolled in school or daycare by filing a vaccine exemption allowed in the state they live in. Schools rarely advise parents about their rights to opt out of vaccinating. The National Vaccine Information Center has a portal to which you can sign in to retrieve important information on the current laws being set forth to restrict or expand your states vaccine exemption rights. [3]

VAERS Did Not Help This Family

Like the majority of parents before her, Natalie didn’t question vaccines. She trusted her child’s doctor to make these decisions for her family. Natalie filed a case with VAERS as soon as she learned Landen was vaccine-injured back in early 2012, only after doing her own research. She was informed VAERS would send a case number in the mail, which she has still not received, even after requesting this information again three weeks ago in 2014. When she filed a case with VAERS, Natalie also requested the forms to fill out a claim for the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) and never received anything. [4]

It’s been more than two years since she requested this paperwork and the three-year limit to file a vaccine injury claim has now passed. So, Landen will never be compensated for the drugs his doctor was taught to give him. Imagine if Landen’s pediatrician had informed these parents that these were vaccine injuries instead of telling the parents vaccines weren't the cause; they could’ve moved faster to file their claim before the short statute ended and prevented further harm from future shots. Sadly, this is the norm. Doctors rarely admit vaccines cause their patients ill health or death.

After reading reports and seeing how claims were denied when the parents had so much documentation, Natalie gave up hope her family would receive anything and figured it wasn't worth taking the time away from her family to follow up and go through the horrendous and inconvenient, time-consuming process of dealing with the vaccine court while dealing with their vaccine-injured children. Watch this short video to understand how the law does not protect your family but rather is set in place to protect the vaccine program. [5]

Natalie can no longer file a vaccine injury claim due to the statute of limitations having passed for her son Landen. It is noted on the HRSA website, “You must file your claim within 3 years after the first symptom of the vaccine injury or within 2 years of a death and 4 years after the start of the first symptom of the vaccine injury that resulted in the death.” [6]

The Ugly Truth About VICP

One major problem with this statute is that vaccine ingredients contain untold carcinogens and pathogens that can cause cancer, mutations, infertility and diseases worse than the disease the vaccines were supposed to protect against. These severe adverse health conditions would not likely show up till years later. If parents were informed of this, people would be in an uproar due to high cancer and infertility rates in the vaccinated population. Vaccine manufacturers avoid testing for these things and by not doing these causation studies, they can say we never tested for it, so we didn’t know. Then they are not held liable.

The ruling in the late '80s that made vaccine manufacturers exempt from any kind of lawsuit resulted in more dangerous vaccines being made and more vaccines being fast-tracked without proper safety tests done. This also led to a dramatic increase on the children’s vaccine schedule.

The package inserts state vaccines are not tested for cancer, mutations, and infertility. For confirmation, you can view the vaccine package inserts on VacTruth.com. [7] This severely limits people from filing a vaccine injury claim before the deadlines set forth. Skylar and Landen won’t be taken care of by those who are responsible for what future health problems arise due to being vaccinated.

This is what autism looks like, in a video of Landen who is now autistic because he was vaccinated.

From now on, Natalie will be filing for a vaccine exemption for all of her children.

Conclusion: Leaving You with Words from Natalie

“As a woman of faith I must speak the truth in love, and sometimes it can come across harsh. Not everyone who sees Autism really understands what Autism is. Yes, our children look normal on the outside and occasionally we can get a great picture of them making eye contact and smiling into the camera, but that is not easily done. When someone says that their child is blessed with Autism, and that God made him/her that way... maybe your child really doesn't have Autism, just enough symptoms for them to be placed on the spectrum?

Autism is not a curse; it is a damaged brain and gut/immune system disorder that our child got from something ingested, not genetically. You may have an autoimmune disorder that passes down in your family making you believe that your child was made this way for a reason, when really it was our decision to place toxins into their small developing bodies through vaccines, food, etc.; anything consumed.

The side that parents and teachers deal with in the cases of Autism that isn't seen by others may include: chewing and eating anything, screaming, crying, humming, flapping, walking on their tippy toes, groaning, cannot sleep, holding their gut in pain, laying on furniture to put pressure on their gut, unable to speak, behave in lashing out tantrums, smearing their feces everywhere and eating it, cannot understand simple vocabulary words, no instinct of danger, bang their heads on walls repeatedly, biting themselves to the point they bleed and are severely hurt, and have extremely high pain tolerance. There is so much more that I can list, but you should now have a better idea of what is behind the label Autism.

When parents warn you in love to please protect your child, it's because they know what the truth is and care about you. My son was vaccine injured and I will stand by him every step we take with tremendous love, and heal what I have injured. My son was not born Autistic, he was injured by my poor decisions. One day he will be able to tell you his story because this Mom is never stopping, and my son Landen Von Steffen will be healed."

 

]]>
http://vactruth.com/2014/10/02/autism-after-32-shots/feed/ 134
The CDC: A Truly Corrupt and Dangerous Organization http://vactruth.com/2014/09/10/cdc-corrupt-and-dangerous/ http://vactruth.com/2014/09/10/cdc-corrupt-and-dangerous/#comments Thu, 11 Sep 2014 03:20:02 +0000 http://vactruth.com/?p=16332 Over the years, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) has repeatedly deceived and lied to the public, yet they continue to state that their mission is to protect America from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and in the U.S.

They boldly announce on their website that the “CDC increases the health security of our nation. As the nation’s health protection agency, CDC saves lives and protects people from health threats. To accomplish our mission, CDC conducts critical science and provides health information that protects our nation against expensive and dangerous health threats, and responds when these arise,” and yet there is more and more evidence to suggest that their so called ‘scientific evidence’ has been skewed and deliberately tampered with to gain the desired results. [1]

During the course of this article, I am going to give five recent examples of CDC fraud or deception. Each one of my examples will demonstrate when the CDC has deliberately altered or withheld scientific evidence in a bid to misinform the public.

Example #1: CDC Whistleblower Announces That the MMR Vaccine Causes Autism

Last month, Dr. Andrew Wakefield revealed that, during telephone conversations between biochemist Brian Hooker and a CDC whistleblower, later named as William Thompson, Thompson admitted that the CDC had deliberately withheld crucial evidence proving that the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine caused autism.

Dr. Thompson told Dr. Hooker that, in 2003, research carried out by the CDC in Atlanta, Georgia, revealed that when African-American boys under the age of 36 months were given the MMR vaccine, the rate of autism in this group rose by 340 percent.

In a desperate bid to cover up this tragedy, the CDC decided to fix the data and eliminated all African-American boys without a Georgia birth certificate. In doing so, the number of children suffering from autism caused by the vaccine reduced significantly, giving the CDC the results they desired.

In an article sourced from Focus Autism Foundation, referenced by Roger Landry, founder of The Liberty Beacon, the authors stated:

“According to Dr. Hooker, the CDC whistleblower informant— who wishes to remain anonymous (since named as William Thompson)— guided him to evidence that a statistically significant relationship between the age the MMR vaccine was first given and autism incidence in African-American boys was hidden by CDC researchers. After data were gathered on 2,583 children living in Atlanta, Georgia who were born between 1986 and 1993, CDC researchers excluded children that did not have a valid State of Georgia birth certificate — reducing the sample size being studied by 41%. Hooker explains that by introducing this arbitrary criteria into the analysis, the cohort size was sharply reduced, eliminating the statistical power of the findings and negating the strong MMR-autism link in African American boys.” [2]

On August 27, 2014, William Thompson, PhD, issued this statement. He wrote:

“FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE-AUGUST 27, 2014
STATEMENT OF WILLIAM W. THOMPSON, Ph.D., REGARDING THE 2004 ARTICLE EXAMINING THE POSSIBILITY OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MMR VACCINE AND AUTISM

My name is William Thompson.  I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998.

I regret that my co-authors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism.

Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.

I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines have saved and continue to save countless lives.  I would never suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race. Vaccines prevent serious diseases, and the risks associated with their administration are vastly outweighed by their individual and societal benefits.

My concern has been the decision to omit relevant findings in a particular study for a particular sub­ group for a particular vaccine. There have always been recognized risks for vaccination and I believe it is the responsibility of the CDC to properly convey the risks associated with receipt of those vaccines.”

He continued:

“I have had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker over the last 10 months regarding studies the CDC has carried out regarding vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorders. I share his belief that CDC decision-making and analyses should be transparent. I was not, however, aware that he was recording any of our conversations, nor was I given any choice regarding whether my name would be made public or my voice would be put on the Internet.” [3]

In other words, if Dr. Hooker had not had the tenacity and foresight to record those telephone calls, lifting the lid on the CDC’s deception, it is unlikely that this information would have ever been made public.

Example #2: Fact – Thimerosal in Vaccinations Can Cause Children to Develop Tics

It appears that Dr. Thompson’s guilty conscience has caught up with him, because during his many telephone conversations with Dr. Hooker, he dropped yet another bombshell. The whistleblower revealed that not only had the MMR been responsible for an increase in the cases of autism seen in African-American boys, but that vaccinating pregnant women with vaccinations containing the preservative thimerosal is known to cause children to suffer from tics (sudden, repetitive movements or sounds that can be difficult to control) after they are born.

In an extremely revealing recording of the conversation between whistleblower Dr. William Thompson and Dr. Brian Hooker, we can clearly hear Thompson state:

“Thimerosal from vaccines causes tics. You start a campaign and make it your mantra. Do you think a pregnant mother would want to take a vaccine that they knew caused tics? Absolutely not, I would never give my wife a vaccine that I thought caused tics. I can say tics are four times more prevalent in kids with autism. There is a biological plausibility right now to say that Thimerosal causes autism like features!” [4]

These are strong words from the whistleblower, because during that conversation, he actually verified that giving a pregnant women a vaccination containing thimerosal could heighten the risk of their unborn child developing autism as a result.

Note: although thimerosal, a form of mercury, has been removed from many of the vaccinations in use today, the preservative still remains in flu vaccines given to pregnant women.

Example # 3: CDC Found to be Responsible for the Death of Thousands of Unborn Children

Carrying on with the theme of vaccinations being given to pregnant women, in 2012, Eileen Danneman from the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) accused the CDC of “willful misconduct,” stating that she believed the CDC was responsible for causing the deaths of thousands of unborn babies.

She stated that the CDC had deliberately misled the nation’s obstetricians and gynecologists and colluded with the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) to mislead the public by advertising the flu vaccine as a safe vaccine for pregnant women when members of the CDC knew fully well that the vaccine was causing a massive spike in fetal deaths.

Documentation received from Ms. Dannemann revealed that that between 2009 and 2010, mercury-laden combined flu vaccinations increased Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Systems (VAERS) fetal death reports by 4,250 percent in pregnant women. Dannemann, NCOW’s director, made abundantly clear that despite these figures being known to the CDC, the multiple-strain, inactivated flu vaccine containing mercury (thimerosal) had been recommended to pregnant women as a safe vaccination.

In a letter to Dr. Mercola, Dannemann wrote:

“The Advisory Committee on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) and CDC were confronted with the VAERS data from NCOW on September 3, 2010, in Washington, D.C., and then again by conference call on September 10, and then again in Atlanta, Georgia, on October 28, 2010. On both September 3 and September 10, Dr. Marie McCormick clearly denied that there were any adverse events for pregnant women from the 2009 flu vaccine.”

However, despite being presented with the facts and figures regarding the dangers of the vaccination by the NCOW, evidence revealed that the CDC deliberately concealed this fact.

At a conference a few weeks after the CDC had received the information from the NCOW, the CDC’s Dr. Shimabakuru gave a presentation on significant adverse reactions to the H1N1 vaccine, such as cases of Guillan-Barre syndrome, which appeared to have risen three percent, claiming it as an insignificant signal.

He made no mention of the adverse events related to pregnant women.

As luck would have it, however, his attempts to pull the wool over the eyes of the audience were foiled when he was challenged by a member of the audience asking if the vaccine caused adverse events in pregnancy. Feeling cornered, he reluctantly looked in his bag and rather sheepishly presented a slide that corroborated the NCOW data, confirming that the CDC knew of the spike in fetal deaths in the fall of 2010. [5]

So, why did Dr. Shimabkauru have a slide containing compromising evidence in his bag? Why did he decide to hide the slide? Surely, if he had prepared a slide outlining this crucial data, it would have made sense to include the slide in his presentation. After all, a 4,250 percent increase in fetal deaths is far more significant that a three percent increase in Guillan-Barre syndrome, don’t you agree?

See reference [6] for full story and documents to support this.

Example #4: The CDC Admitted That Polio Vaccinations Cause Polio but Promote Them Anyway

In 2012, the CDC wrote a press release titled Update on Vaccine-Derived Polioviruses — Worldwide. They wrote:

“In 1988, the World Health Assembly resolved to eradicate poliomyelitis worldwide. One of the main tools used in polio eradication efforts has been the live, attenuated oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). This inexpensive vaccine is administered easily by mouth, makes recent recipients resistant to infection by wild polioviruses (WPVs), and provides long-term protection against paralytic disease through durable humoral immunity. Nonetheless, rare cases of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis can occur both among immunologically normal OPV recipients and their contacts and among persons who are immunodeficient. In addition, vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) can emerge to cause polio outbreaks in areas with low OPV coverage and can replicate for years in persons who are immunodeficient.” (emphasis added)

They continued:

VDPVs can cause paralytic polio in humans and have the potential for sustained circulation. VDPVs resemble WPVs biologically and differ from most vaccine-related poliovirus (VRPV) isolates by having genetic properties consistent with prolonged replication or transmission. VDPVs were first identified by sequence analyses of poliovirus isolates.” (emphasis added)

The CDC recommended that the best way to deal with this problem was “mass vaccination” and stated:

“To prevent VDPV emergence and spread, all countries should maintain high vaccination coverage against all three poliovirus serotypes.” [7]

This proves that yet again the CDC actively promote vaccinations despite knowing their dangers.

Finally – Example # 5: CDC Caught Changing the Risk Criteria for Ebola Transmission

It appears that the CDC has been secretly changing their data on the risks of ebola entering the US on their website. Could this be in preparation for an onslaught of new vaccinations that are heading our way?

On August 29, 2014, the CDC announced:

“On August 28, 2014, NIH announced that initial human testing of an investigational vaccine to prevent Ebola virus disease will begin next week by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health.

The early-stage trial will begin initial human testing of a vaccine co-developed by NIAID and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and will evaluate the experimental vaccine’s safety and ability to generate an immune system response in healthy adults. Testing will take place at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland.

The study is the first of several Phase 1 clinical trials that will examine the investigational NIAID/GSK Ebola vaccine and an experimental Ebola vaccine developed by the Public Health Agency of Canada and licensed to NewLink Genetics Corp. The others are to launch in the fall. These trials are conducted in healthy adults who are not infected with Ebola virus to determine if the vaccine is safe and induces an adequate immune response.” [8]

Given this fact, it is hardly surprising that the CDC has been quietly changing certain ebola facts on their website, is it?

John Galt from the website Shenandoah has clearly demonstrated that the CDC has been quietly revising the information regarding transmission risks on their website, while steadfastly maintaining that there is little chance of airborne transmission. He stated:

“On Thursday, August 7, the CDC quietly revised the transmission risks while maintaining there was little chance of airborne transmission of Ebola via their minions and bureaucrats speaking out in the mainstream media. The shocking part of the revision is within the footnotes which few civilians bother to read and put their trust in government officials to protect their families and their livelihoods.”

Mr. Galt continued:

“From the CDC website, I took these screen shots just in case they decided to “delete” or revise the changes made above so I can keep a permanent record of what is happening with this latest contagious disease outbreak.”

It is a good job he did, because, if he is correct, then the screenshots that he has given on his website clearly show that on August 7, 2014, the CDC stated:

“Low risk exposures

A low risk exposure includes any of the following:

  • Household member or other casual contact with an EVD patient
  • Providing patient care or casual contact1 without high-risk exposure with EVD patients in health care facilities in EVD outbreak affected countries” (emphasis added)

The CDC carried on to state:

“Casual contact is defined as a) being within approximately 3 feet (1 meter) or within the room or care area for a prolonged period of time (e.g., healthcare personnel, household members) while not wearing recommended personal protective equipment (i.e., droplet and contact precautions–see Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations); or b) having direct brief contact (e.g., shaking hands) with an EVD case while not wearing recommended personal protective equipment (i.e., droplet and contact precautions–see Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations). At this time, brief interactions, such as walking by a person or moving through a hospital, do not constitute casual contact.”

John Galt continued his article by adding the following witty comment:

“Excuse me? Low risk exposure? Before this update on August 7th the running mainstream media theme that there was little if any risk of airborne exposure and suddenly they quietly revise the page among numerous internet stories about aerial transmission of the disease in West Africa. Perhaps if one is standing in one of these famous TSA check in lines, they might start to think about the “low risk” propaganda the government is having everyone believe at this time with the sudden revision.” [10]

He could be right, but could this sudden change have been made with a new vaccine program in mind?

Conclusion

It is clear that the CDC cannot be trusted when it comes to giving advice about vaccinations. Over the years, evidence has shown that the CDC continually lies, withholds evidence and fixes data to obtain the results that they want to achieve.

Due to their continual dishonesty, many children have suffered lifelong disabilities as a result. Although, for many of their parents, the latest revelations have offered a glimmer of hope in a very dark world, it has also caused many parents to just break down and weep, like one mother known to myself.

This is a tragic waste of the future potential of thousands of children worldwide. How much longer are parents going to continue to trust this corrupt and dangerous organization when it comes to the health of their children?

 

]]>
http://vactruth.com/2014/09/10/cdc-corrupt-and-dangerous/feed/ 343