15

How Does Vaccinated Children’s Health Compare to Unvaccinated Children?

While there have been no official US government-sponsored studies comparing the health of vaccinated to unvaccinated children, several independently funded studies have been done in the US and overseas. The majority of these studies have been conducted abroad, but many involve American children.

What do these studies show? The research demonstrates conclusively that unvaccinated children enjoy far superior health when compared to those vaccinated. Unvaccinated children experience almost no incidence of autism, autoimmune disorders, asthma, allergies, diabetes and other common childhood diseases which have reached epidemic proportions in recent years.

The Research Studies

One of the most comprehensive studies is an ongoing comparative survey by German homeopathic physician Andreas Bachmair. Bachmair is conducting an independent study comparing the health of vaccinated to unvaccinated children with 17,461 participants.

This research has found a significant increase in the following diseases in those vaccinated: asthma, allergies, bronchitis, otitis media (ear infections), hay fever, herpes, neurodermatitis, hyperactivity, scoliosis, epilepsy, autoimmune disorders, thyroid disease, autism and diabetes. Furthermore, Bachmair discovered three other studies which substantiated his findings. To see the chart with the comparison in diseases, visit this link provided by the Vermont Coalition for Vaccine Choice.

For comprehensive survey results for this published study, see this link.

The majority of those who participated were Americans, with 25 percent of participants comprised of Germans. Ninety-nine percent of those who chose not to vaccinate their children reported to be happy with their decision. Because this study is ongoing, study numbers will vary depending on the report viewed. [1]

Bachmair’s reports further demonstrated that the unvaccinated children very rarely suffered from the following heath conditions: dyslexia, speech delays, bed wetting, celiac disease, gluten sensitivity, GERDs. [2]

In a Salzberger study, of 1,004 unvaccinated children, zero children had asthma, compared to 8-12 percent of the vaccinated population; 1.2 percent of unvaccinated children suffered with dermatitis while 10-20 percent of children vaccinated experienced dermatitis; three percent of unvaccinated children compared to 25 percent of vaccinated experienced allergies; and less than one percent of unvaccinated children were diagnosed with ADHD, compared to 5-10 percent of those vaccinated.

A study in Guinea-Bissau, West Africa, which studied the children of 15,000 mothers between 1990-1996, demonstrated that the death rate for children vaccinated against diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough was double for those who had been vaccinated.

A New Zealand study involved 254 children in which 133 children were vaccinated while 121 remained unvaccinated. This comparative study found that the unvaccinated children enjoyed far superior health when the following diseases were studied: tonsillitis, asthma, allergic rashes, SIDS, ear infections and hyperactivity.

Vaccinated children experienced 2 to 10 times higher rates of illness compared to those unvaccinated. [3]

Research On Autism And Neurological Disorders

In the Amish community of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, one in 4,875 children were diagnosed with autism. Of the four total Amish children diagnosed, one had been exposed to high levels of mercury from a power plant and three others, including one adopted outside of the community, had been vaccinated. This rate is extremely low to non-existent compared to those vaccinated. Similarly, the Amish of Ohio show that one out of 10,000 children are diagnosed with autism.  In the general US population, one in 45 children is now being diagnosed with autism. [4, 5]

In a Homefirst Health Services survey in which 90 percent of children have had no vaccinations, none of the 35,000 children had an autism diagnosis. Furthermore, these children had extremely low asthma rates.

In a Cal-Oregon survey of 9,000 boys, those children vaccinated experienced a 155 percent greater chance of having a neurological disorder such as autism or ADHD.
[6]

More Science On Vaccines

In Sally Fallon’s Nourishing Tradition’s Book of Baby and Childcare, five studies are reported, including the Africa and German study previously discussed. The studies all conclude that unvaccinated children enjoy better health than those who have been vaccinated.

A 2004 British study of 8,000 unvaccinated children, which included medical documentation for each child, revealed that vaccinated children experienced two to five times more illness and disorders compared to unvaccinated children. [7]

In a 1997 New Zealand study, 1265 children were surveyed. Of those children who were vaccinated, 23 percent were reported to suffer from asthma and 30 percent suffered from allergies, compared to none in the unvaccinated group. [8]

A 1992 New Zealand study of 495 children concluded that vaccinated children suffer far more compared to unvaccinated children. Diseases studied included tonsillitis, ear infections, sleep apnea, hyperactivity and epilepsy. Vaccinated children suffered up to ten times more from these illnesses. [9]

Conclusion

While government groups maintain that no studies have been done to compare the health of vaccinated to unvaccinated, the reality is that several comparative studies have been completed by independent researchers in the US and in other countries.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention refuses to conduct such studies, claiming they would be unethical to perform. In reality, these studies could easily be performed, since many educated parents choose to not vaccinate their children.

The evidence is overwhelming. Studies completed in New Zealand, Germany, Africa, Great Britain and the United States have come to the same conclusion. Unvaccinated children enjoy far superior health on all measures of disease entities.

References:

  1. http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/survey-results…
  2. http://vactruth.com/2014/02/26/unvaccinated-children-health
  3. http://www.vaxchoicevt.com/science/studies-comparing…
  4. http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/quick-compare-2/
  5. http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2015/12/cdc-1-in-45-children…
  6. http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/quick-compare-2/
  7. McKeever and TM. American Journal of Public Health. June 2004. V 94.
  8. Kemp, T. et al. Epidemiology. November 1997. 678-80.
  9. Fallon, Sally, Cowan, Thomas, MD. The Nourishing Traditions Book of Baby and Childcare. New Trends Publishing, 2013. 112, 317.

About the Author:

Michelle Goldstein is a mental health therapist who is passionate about holistic health, natural healing, nutrient-dense foods and the politics that impact them. She has published articles for Natural News, VacTruth, and other health websites. All of her published articles to date can be found at her health website, Holistic Health to Go. She can also be followed on her Facebook Page, Holistic Health to Go.

Photo Credit

Michelle Goldstein
 

Michelle Goldstein is a mental health therapist who is passionate about holistic health, natural healing, nutrient-dense foods and the politics that impact them. She has published articles for Natural News, VacTruth, and other health websites. All of her published articles to date can be found at her health website, Holistic Health to Go. She can also be followed on her Facebook Page.

  • Gloria Harris

    I can tell you that the delivery system of the vaccines includes a plastic fungus that is almost impossible to get out of the body. Titanium and silicon dioxide that gets into every system of the body. It destroys body tissue. Drugs have this, too. I am detoxing vaccinations I got years ago that is coming out on my skin and is called Morgellon’s disease. It leaves a plastic scab at the site of injection and is responsible for infections within the body. I’ve found out that natural antibiotics such as echinacea, garlic and wild indigo root will kill it over time, but it’s a very long process. I’m an adult that has gone through the Natural Healing Paradigm, and now the tissues as well as the digestive tract and kidneys are detoxing this stuff. It most definitely breaks the immune system down so you can have any disease, even cancer, has been my experience. sure is a plot against humanity. I recommend everyone stay away from any vaccination as they have not been proven to work. The worst crime is against babies who get all these vaccines that re meant to not protect, but kill them. The CDC is obviously proud of their ability to murder both children and adults who are unsuspecting. Truth gained by experience.

  • Adam Barlow

    Fact: my kids are not vaccinated and are very healthy. They are fed a nutritious diet, get lots of rest and exercise, and are cared for daily by my stay at home wife. We read to them, sing to them, and spend all our extra time with THEM. Most children are not treated equally. This study comparing vaccinated against unvaccinated is flawed and completely rubbish. You need controls in a study to gain accurate data and arise at convincing conclusions. How many of the kids studied were malnourished and neglected? If we are to prove a point scientifically then we need to speak science and play by the rules, otherwise, we are no better then the pharmaceutical companies spreading information that conforms to our bias.

  • Matthew Reid

    Look into bamboo salts to detoxify.

  • Lee Reikert

    And the “scientists” and those funding those scientists are playing by the rules? Think again. Most “science” today is corrupt with results skewed to a particular outcome benefiting the funder. When there are multiple independent studies not funded by corporations then you start to see reality and that’s what this article is about. There will always be variables, but I personally have known about the studies on the Amish community for years. They’re certainly not a perfect society either, but the general health of their unvaccinated children says a lot. If you think these studies are rubbish then why aren’t you listening to your general practitioner or Bill Gates and getting your kids vaccinated? Your first statement is “my kids are not vaccinated and are very healthy.” Seems you DO have concern about vaccines. Or are you concluding that your other choices of child raising are enough to guarantee health and the unvaccinated part is just a choice?

  • Adam Barlow

    Lee, my point is that both sides on this issue can declare bunk data to support their beliefs. And, just because a study is independent does not mean it’s motives are pure. Amish communities generally grow their own fruits, and vegetables. And for the most part separate themselves from the toxic lifestyle choices of the modern world. Comparing the Amish community to the general public to prove vaccines cause the difference in health is like comparing a private school to a public school and concluding, the kids in public school are less educated because the vaccines lowered their study habits. Next, I do listen to “the” pediatricians who offered their advice regarding vaccination, I simply disagreed with them. I also looked for evidence that vaccines create immunity to disease and was unconvinced. I studied subjects like molecular biology, nutrition, political science, sociology, and business which opened my eyes to how the vaccine industry has manipulated its way to fame and fortune. It’s obvious that doctors and scientists are corrupt when they refuse to investigate vaccines as a cause for an injury. When a child receives a vaccination and a few days later ends up in the hospital with swelling of the brain…..and the doctors retaliate on the parents for even questioning the vaccination as the cause, then you know there is politics involved. When pharmaceutical companies invest into medical schools and train up nurses and doctors in their vaccine doctrines, its obvious vaccines are a business that is heavily protected and financially driven. The organization and industry are more protected than the people. This is just a few reasons, the most basic reasons, that caused me to look deeper into vaccines before injecting my children. Money causes delusion and thwarts information. The business of pediatrics, pharmaceuticals, and insurance are all part of the food chain. Think about it, they make money injecting us, which than makes us sick, which makes us go back to the doctors to get more drugs…..more sickness means higher insurance premiums for all the people which makes the insurance companies even richer. I don’t have any proof of this yet but I think the people who own the insurance companies also own the hospitals who bill them. The money flows in a circular pattern right back into their pockets all at the price of the blood they spill and the lives they ruin. Its the modern day technologically advanced form of control. The people do not even know who is responsible or who to blame for their miserable lives, so they just accept their circumstances and continue feeding the system. Now you have caught me in a rant, and I sound like a crazy conspiracy theorist. That’s okay because I work very hard to prove myself wrong and continually challenge my beliefs so I continue to get closer to the truth. I appreciate the intent of this article which I ultimately believe is trying to make parents think about the possibility that vaccines are the cause of the health issues children are having. Lastly, I do believe my healthy choices for my children are why they are healthy, but do not expect a guarantee on health. If health ever came with a guarantee then a lot of people would be very disappointed. I also believe the vaccines could have harmed my children and was not going to take the chance of that happening, I couldn’t forgive myself if that happened. And lastly, lastly, Bill Gates is a software-business-man, and anyone who takes his word on a medical choice to vaccinate their children is an idiot.

  • Lee Reikert

    Adam, I seriously appreciate your reply. You’re obviously not a sheeple and are quickly discovering how much deception is out there running our lives. The media is bought and paid for, most of our government, most of our colleges, military, weather…….we’re fed incredible lies day in and day out. Our earth is actually dying all around us, but most people are so focused on themselves or Facebook that they don’t notice the forests are gone, most of the birds are gone, the massive amount of birds and marine life washing up on shore dead, the ice melting at an amazing rate, the weather modification programs going on overhead desperately trying to cool the planet when instead it’s making it much worse. The powers that be are desperate to keep the curtain up, but it won’t last much longer as a lot of the population is finally seeing what a small minority of us have been screaming about for a long time. What will happen over the next year or two is going to be horrendously ugly. As your mind continues to open up, you’ll be sickened at what you ultimately find. I’m also well educated (well brainwashed) and it took me a long time to finally see it. If you’re also well educated (brainwashed) it will be the same for you. We’ve just been too conditioned to accept what we’re taught and not to question. Good luck as you really seem like an awesome person and an excellent father.

  • Adam Barlow

    Thank you Lee, its good to know others are awake and sober to the ugly truth of this world system. I have learned to blend into the herd and for the most part hide my position on most topics. I am able to hold a job and have semi good relations with the general public. When I first discovered how sick our system was, I had a tough time but now it doesn’t bother me as much. After much research into ancient history I learned the same shit has been going on for thousands of years. We may have more time than it appears before any catastrophic melt downs and social unrest occur. I though 2015 was going to have some issues but nothing happened. The world leaders are still a ways away from totally brain washing the masses. The people here in Oregon, at least in the small town I live in all own guns and hate government telling them how to live. If there’s more places like this which I feel there is than their plan for world domination through a new world order through universal law is far off from being adopted by the public. Vaccines are most likely used to weaken the mind so people can be easier to control and have less success thinking for themselves. Sadly a lot of people don’t want to think for themselves. Have you seen the parody called “Idiocracy,” it’s a good picture of what things will look like in the future on our current path we are heading in. We are definitely not taking good care of this earth and its resources. The advent of plastic has been unfortunate for the earth. Nothing worse than garbage that never breaks down. Anyways here I go ranting again….nice talking to you.

  • What ever happened to the decision to do, or not do this vaccinated verses un-vaccinated health outcome study, and who voted against it???….Bill Posey’s HR 1757? You no longer can find any record of the bill having been there in the federal legislative system voting record.

    This might explain it.

    Big Pharma

    With the help of staggering profits and 1,100-plus paid lobbyists, the industry has gained powerful leverage on Capitol Hill. From 1998 to 2014, Big Pharma spent nearly $2.9 billion on lobbying expenses — more than any other industry. The industry also doled out more than $15 million in campaign contributions from 2013-14.

    How irresponsible are our legislators when they allow the frivolous spending that they do, but yet refuse to protect infants and children from vaccine injury and multiple vaccines obvious deleterious effect on over-all human health?

    Read more:
    https://www.drugwatch.com/manufacturer/

    More corruption.

    Drug Companies Donated Millions to California Lawmakers Before Vaccine Bill SB277 was Drafted http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/drug-companies-donated-millions-to-california-lawmakers-before-vaccine-bill-sb277-was-drafted/

    The text of the bill below is as of Apr 25, 2013 (Introduced).
    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr1757/text

    Summaries for the Vaccine Safety Study Act (No more studies are needed, and nothing to see here, folks)
    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr1757/summary

    Advanced Search for Legislation
    https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/browse#text=H.+R.+1757&sponsor=412309

    113th CONGRESS

    1st Session

    H. R. 1757

    To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct or support a comprehensive study comparing total health outcomes, including risk of autism, in vaccinated populations in the United States with such outcomes in unvaccinated populations in the United States, and for other purposes.

    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    April 25, 2013

    Mr. POSEY (for himself and Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

    A BILL

    To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct or support a comprehensive study comparing total health outcomes, including risk of autism, in vaccinated populations in the United States with such outcomes in unvaccinated populations in the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ‘Vaccine Safety Study Act’.

    SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds as follows:

    (1) Securing the health of the Nation’s children is our most important concern as parents and stewards of the Nation’s future.

    (2) The Nation’s vaccine program has greatly reduced human suffering from infectious disease by preventing and reducing the outbreak of vaccine-preventable diseases.

    (3) Total health outcomes are the best measure of the success of any public health effort, including security from both chronic and infectious disease.

    (4) Childhood immunizations are an important tool in protecting children from infectious disease.

    (5) The number of immunizations administered to infants, pregnant women, children, teenagers, and adults has grown dramatically over recent years.

    (6) The incidence of chronic, unexplained diseases such as autism, learning disabilities, and other neurological disorders appears to have increased dramatically in recent years.

    (7) Individual vaccines are tested for safety, but little safety testing has been conducted for interaction effects of multiple vaccines.

    (8) The strategy of aggressive, early childhood immunization against a large number of infectious diseases has never been tested in its entirety against alternative strategies, either for safety or for total health outcomes.

    (9) Childhood immunizations are the only health interventions that are required by States of all citizens in order to participate in civic society.

    (10) Public confidence in the management of public health can only be maintained if these State government-mandated, mass vaccination programs–

    (A) are tested rigorously and in their entirety against all reasonable safety concerns; and

    (B) are verified in their entirety to produce superior health outcomes.

    (11) There are numerous United States populations in which a practice of no vaccination is followed and which therefore provide a natural comparison group for comparing total health outcomes.

    (12) No comparative study of such health outcomes has ever been conducted.

    (13) Given rising concern over the high rates of childhood neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and other chronic conditions, the need for such studies is becoming urgent.

    SEC. 3. STUDY ON HEALTH OUTCOMES IN VACCINATED AND UNVACCINATED AMERICAN POPULATIONS.

    (a) In General- The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this Act referred to as the ‘Secretary’), acting through the Director of the National Institutes of Health, shall conduct or support a comprehensive study–

    (1) to compare total health outcomes, including the incidence and risk of autism, in vaccinated populations in the United States with such outcomes in unvaccinated populations in the United States; and

    (2) to determine whether exposure to vaccines or vaccine components is associated with autism spectrum disorders, chronic conditions, or other neurological conditions.

    (b) Rule of Construction- Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize the conduct or support of any study in which an individual or population is encouraged or incentivized to remain unvaccinated.

    (c) Qualifications- With respect to each investigator carrying out the study under this section, the Secretary shall ensure that the investigator–

    (1) is objective;

    (2) is qualified to carry out such study, as evidenced by training experiences and demonstrated skill;

    (3) is not currently employed by any Federal, State, or local public health agency;

    (4) is not currently a member of a board, committee, or other entity responsible for formulating immunization policy on behalf of any Federal, State, or local public health agency or any component thereof;

    (5) has no history of a strong position on the thimerosal or vaccine safety controversy; and

    (6) is not currently an employee of, or otherwise directly or indirectly receiving funds from, a pharmaceutical company or the Centers for Disease Control.

    (d) Target Populations- The Secretary shall seek to include in the study under this section populations in the United States that have traditionally remained unvaccinated for religious or other reasons, which populations may include Old Order Amish, members of clinical practices (such as the Homefirst practice in Chicago) who choose alternative medical practices, practitioners of anthroposophic lifestyles, and others who have chosen not to be vaccinated.

    (e) Timing- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a request for proposals to conduct the study required by this section. Not later than 120 days after receipt of any such proposal, the Secretary shall approve or disapprove the proposal. If the Secretary disapproves the proposal, the Secretary shall provide the applicant involved with a written explanation of the reasons for the disapproval.

    (f) Transparency- To facilitate further research by the Secretary or others, the Secretary shall ensure the preservation of all data, including all data sets, collected or used for purposes of the study under this section.

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr1757/text

  • Dennis Picknett

    Good words folks. I think we are all in agreement. But MORE, much more of these vax vs. non vax surveys are needed and will probably continue to tell the same story. If it’s done enough times independently it is the irrefutable evidence that is sorely needed. Can’t understand why it hasn’t been done before. Someone mentioned it’s unethicall??? Can’t see that. Probably unethical NOT to do it.

  • Nikka80

    What is a “plastic fungus”? Plastic is chemicals and a fungus is a tiny living organism.

  • Nikka80

    I got curious about this HR 1757 and looked it up. It died without any congressional action in 2013 but was rezubmitted by Rep. Posey in 2015. Still no committee action as yet.

  • Big pharma and their minions spend millions on direct lobbying against such bills. They have everyone mislead that all the needed research has been done, and they simply without doing any independent research assume that it is true. All the corruption just continues to be swept under the rug.

    Big Pharma

    With the help of staggering profits and 1,100-plus paid lobbyists, the industry has gained powerful leverage on Capitol Hill. From 1998 to 2014, Big Pharma spent nearly $2.9 billion on lobbying expenses — more than any other industry. The industry also doled out more than $15 million in campaign contributions from 2013-14.

    How irresponsible are our legislators when they allow the frivolous spending that they do, but yet refuse to protect infants and children from vaccine injury and multiple vaccines obvious deleterious effect on over-all human health?

    Read more:
    https://www.drugwatch.com/manufacturer/

    How Much of Big Pharma’s Massive Profits Are Used to Influence Politicians?

    More Money Spent on Lobbying

    The pharmaceutical industry’s lobbying expenditures steadily increased from 1998 to 2009, when spending hit a $273 million peak as Congress debated the Affordable Care Act, according to CRP. In 2014, drug companies and their lobbying groups spent $229 million influencing lawmakers, legislation and politicians.

    The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the industry’s lead lobbying group, has spent nearly $150 million on lobbying since 2008, and ranks sixth among the nation’s top lobbying spenders, outspending powerful interests like defense contractors and the oil and gas industry, according to records retrieved from the MapLight lobbying database.

    Read more:
    http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/33010-how-much-of-big-pharma-s-massive-profits-are-used-to-influence-politicians

    More corruption.

    Drug Companies Donated Millions to California Lawmakers Before Vaccine Bill SB277 was Drafted
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/drug-companies-donated-millions-to-california-lawmakers-before-vaccine-bill-sb277-was-drafted/

    New Federal Bill Lowers Standards for Experimental Vaccine Licensing

    It has only been a few weeks since the forced vaccination lobby rammed a bill (SB 277) through the California legislature eliminating the personal belief vaccine exemption so children will have to get dozens of doses of federally recommended vaccines or be denied a school education. While California was being subjected to one of the most aggressive and expensive state lobbying campaigns ever mounted by the pharmaceutical industry in partnership with medical trade associations funded by industry and government that same lobby was pulling an even bigger fast one on the American people in Washington, D.C. Here comes the 21st Century Cures Act, which is a Pharma-driven bill blessed by the FDA that seriously compromises the integrity of the FDA drug and vaccine licensing process. The 362-page bill sailed through the U.S. House of Representatives on July 10, 2015 and mandates that about $9 billion dollars be given to NIH to develop more drugs and vaccines and $550 million be given to the FDA to fast track products to market. The 21st Century Cures Act is being sold as a way for the FDA to quickly license experimental pharmaceutical products for people suffering with rare or life threatening diseases, whether or not those products have been adequately tested. However, greasing the FDA licensure skids to make experimental drugs available for the sick and dying, who voluntarily choose to use them, is one thing, while greasing the skids to bum rush experimental vaccines to licensure that government will legally require healthy children and adults to buy and use, is something quite different.

    Read more…
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/new-federal-bill-lowers-standards-for-experimental-vaccine-licensing/

  • janem1276

    McKeever and TM. American Journal of Public Health. June 2004. V 94.
    “Conclusions. Our data suggest that currently recommended routine vaccinations are not a risk factor for asthma or eczema”

  • janem1276

    I was thinking the same thing. Sounds like delusory parasitosis to me

  • janem1276

    Why exactly would insurance companies push for vaccines if they cause so many problems? It’s counter intuitive