27 Dirty Little Vaccine Secrets Every Parent Needs to Know About

Do vaccine makers really have a clue?

Judging by the huge amount of publicity around vaccine promotion many are under the impression that the manufacturers know all about their products in detail. It may be shocking to discover that this is far from the truth.

 

Here are some examples of what Merck the manufacturer does not know about Gardasil:

1. Whether Gardasil prevents cancer
Gardasil is promoted as a vaccine which prevents cancer. Here is what immunologist Charlotte Haug M.D. Ph.D writes in her article in New Scientist (1)

Despite claims that the vaccine will cut cancer deaths by two-thirds or more, its overall effectiveness in the prevention of cervical cancer remains unknown and will not be known for decades.”

 

2. Necessity for boosters
Information regarding the possible necessity and intervals for booster doses is unknown.

 

3. Whether Gardasil increases the risk of cancer.
The vaccine has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity(2). Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!

There may be increased risk of cancer due to replacement of some virus strains with new strains which may be more carcinogenic.
“If HPV-16 and HPV-18 are effectively suppressed, will there be selective pressure on the remaining strains of HPV? Other strains may emerge as significant oncogenic serotypes” (3)

Rosemary Mathis, director of SaneVax asks:” Gardasil and Cervarix: Are strains targeted by the vaccines replaced by other HPV viruses?”(4)

4. Whether there is increased risk of cancer due to the unexpected discovery of aluminium bound recombinant HPV DNA
Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist at the Milford Hospital pathology laboratory was contracted by SaneVax to examine Gardasil for possible contamination. The samples tested positive for recombinant viral HPV-11 and viral HPV-18 residues, both of which were firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant (5)

It is unknown whether the recombinant (genetically engineered) HPV DNA is capable of altering human DNA potentially initiating cancer (5)

 

5. Whether there is increased risk of autoimmune disorders due to the recombinant HPV DNA
It is unknown whether the genetically engineered HPV DNA, or adventitious DNA, is capable of altering human DNA potentially initiating a host of autoimmune disorders (5)

 

6. If HPV is necessarily an infection transmitted by sexual intercourse
Merck states that HPV is sexually transmitted. However, they surely are aware that HPV infection has been found in placentas, umbilical cord blood and in infants, so it is not necessarily an infection which is transmitted by sexual intercourse (6)

A May 2006 FDA VRBPAC document stated girls previously exposed to vaccine-relevant human papillomavirus and get inoculated with Gardasil have a 44.6% increase in getting cervical cancer in their life time” (31)

Dr.Jim Howenstine, M.D:“HPV vaccine increases the risk of developing a precancerous cervical lesion by 44.6% in women .previously infected with a HPV viral type found in the vaccine”(7)

An unknown but extremely large number of girls across the world who are already exposed to HPV are being pressured into taking the vaccine with the consequential risk of cervical cancer being increased by 44.6% (32).. Not only is this unethical and cynical, it is downright criminal.

 

7. Whether Gardasil causes genotoxicity
According to product information this has not been evaluated (2)

 

8. Whether the vaccine targets the relevant virus strains in different demographics
A May 2008 study on high-risk and multiple human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in cancer-free Jamaican women presented at the Second Annual International African-Caribbean Cancer Consortium Conference cited:

“The most important finding was that unlike the genotype distribution patterns seen in North America, Europe and some parts of Asia, HPV types 16 and 18 were not the most common high-risk genotype”(8) “Why is Gardasil marketed globally through the Gardasil Access Program when HPV 16 & 18 may not even be prevalent amongst the targeted populations?”

“HPV genotype distribution in this group of Jamaican women differs from the patterns found in Europe, North America and some parts of Asia. It may be necessary therefore to consider development of other vaccines which target genotypes found in our and similar populations. HPV genotyping as well as Pap smears should be considered”(28)

 

9. Whether the strains change in the course of time
Rosemary Mathis, SaneVax, writes “A graph clearly shows that HPV 16 & 18 are not even prevalent in Colombian women until their mid-20s – long after vaccine efficacy has worn off if a girl is administered Gardasil or Cervarix in her adolescent years”(8)

10. Adverse events due to concomitant administration with other vaccines
There are very few studies regarding relevant concomitant administration (2)

 

11. The true numbers and extent of serious adverse events
National Vaccine Information Center: “It is estimated that only between 1 and 10 percent of all adverse health outcomes which occur following vaccination are reported to VAERS” (9)(26)(32)

Dr. Russell Blaylock also discussed the low rate of reports of vaccine problems, being somewhere in the range of 2%, due to the passive and voluntary nature of the system. According to Blaylock’s estimate, it is likely that there are more than 600 deaths and over 100,000 serious adverse events from this vaccine (10)

SaneVax regularly publishes updates from VAERS reports regarding adverse events and deaths (11)

A fact of which Merck is well aware:
Merck has not disclosed to the public that during the trials 73.3% of the participants who received Gardasil acquired a new medical condition”(32)

 

12. Long term serious side effects
Jagannath Chatterjee:“Vaccine long term effects may span the lifetime particularly as the inflammatory process set in motion does not stop. Many of the vaccine ingredients lodge themselves permanently in the tissues, fat cells and the brain and continue to inflict a steady and progressive damage permanently. Attenuated live viruses introduced by vaccines may stay dormant for long periods, often mutate, and can become virulent when the immune system becomes weak due to any reason. As vaccines adversely affect the immune system viruses and bacteria present in humans that were not virulent earlier are today causing diseases”.

 

13. What the results would be if a true placebo had been used in all the clinical trials
The FDA allowed Merck to use a potentially reactive aluminum containing placebo as a control for most trial participants, rather than a non-reactive saline solution placebo. A reactive placebo can artificially increase the appearance of safety of an experimental drug or vaccine in a clinical trial” (12)(29)

 

14. What the results of clinical trials would be if Merck had not used their own exclusion criteria
The vaccine has been tested on handpicked groups (2, 13). These are not representative of the groups who have been, or will be vaccinated. Exclusion criteria:

1) Allergies to any component of the vaccine
2) History of a severe allergic reaction
3) Known history of any allergies to food or medicine
4) Immunocompromised, Immunodeficient or has an autoimmune condition
5) History of any condition, therapy, lab abnormality or other circumstance such that it is not in the best interest of the participant to participate
6) Clinically significant disease or clinically significant findings during the screening medical history or physical examination that, in the investigator’s opinion, would compromise the outcome of this study.
7) Have a weakened immune system or other immune problems

”If these “exclusion criteria” were known by, and applied to families in the United States of America, prior to the vaccination of their child, virtually none of the 22,000 girls and boys listed by the CDC’s VAERS reporting system as being injured by the Gardasil HPV vaccine, would have been allowed to be vaccinated, and 100 deceased HPV vaccinated children, would still be alive today”(13)

Summary: With the way the clinical trials are conducted as to which people they allow to participate the average population that the HPV vaccines are being administered to are omitted. Consequently, because of this practice it is now unknown how many have the potential to be at risk of having an adverse event.


15. Whether there is increased risk of blood clots when Gardasil is combined with hormonal contraceptive pills
Studies regarding the combination of Gardasil and contraceptive pills have focused on potential impairment of immune response (2), but not on the issue of increased risk of blood clots.

CDC states: “There have been some reports of blood clots in females after receiving Gardasil. These clots have occurred in the heart, lungs, and legs. Most of these people had a risk of getting blood clots, such as taking oral contraceptives (the birth control pill), smoking, obesity, and other risk factors” (14)

The reported cases of blood clots after Gardasil in VAERS may be blamed on other factors when the actual cause may in fact be due to the vaccine.

16. Whether there is an increased risk of brain damage
The ingredient polysorbate renders the blood-brain barrier more porous and possibly facilitates passage of neurotoxic aluminium, sodium borate and other toxic substances through the blood-brain barrier into the brain tissue (15)

Many girls who suffer from injuries after Gardasil exhibit symptoms of brain damage (16)

There have been few if any autopsies which include thorough investigation of brain tissue of girls who have died after Gardasil.

 

17. Consequences of “bridging”, the extrapolation of study results from one group to another
In her article in the American Chronicle Christina England writes: “Gardasil has never been tested in young girls under fifteen years old, says whistleblower Diane Harper” (17). The vaccine has been advised for different age groups, also for boys, although it is not known whether similar results may be extrapolated to the different groups.

There is generally a lack of knowledge regarding the effects of vaccines in connection with hormonal changes in the body (for example puberty, menstrual cycles, pregnancy and menopause).

 

18. Consequences if the vaccine is not thoroughly shaken
Instructions for administration include thorough agitation (2) No studies can be found regarding the consequences if this instruction is not followed although this is a realistic situation in practice.

 

19. Whether the vaccine will increase the risk of infertility due to polysorbate.
Polysorbate has been shown to cause infertility in lab rats (18),(19)

 

20. Whether polysorbate is carcinogenic
Jeffrey J. Aufderheide in his article “Vaccine Ingredients: Non-Ionic Surfactants” asks: Could Tween 80 (polysorbate 80), being a carcinogen or co-carcinogen, also be one of the reasons vaccines are not tested for causing cancer?” (20)

 

21. Health consequences due to the presence of polysorbate and l-histidine
Cynthia A. Janak has written about this in her article “Polysorbate 80 and Histidine, a Marriage of Disaster” (21)

 

22. Whether aluminium adjuvant is safe
In her article “Aluminium in Vaccines. Where are the safety studies?” (22) Catherine Frompevich writes:
Since the 1930s vaccine makers have been using aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines. However, from what I’ve been able to gather over years of researching vaccines and vaccinations, there doesn’t seem to be studies determining aluminum safety issues”.

“- although aluminum adjuvants have been used in vaccines for decades, they were never tested for safety in clinical trials”(30)

In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences”.

Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminium adjuvants,medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor” (23)(31)

 

23. Consequences due to the presence sodium borate (borax)
Sodium borate is used as a food additive in some countries, but it is now banned in many places. For example, one Australian government recall site notes: “Product is Borax (sodium borate) which is a non permitted food additive and is harmful to health. So, if it’s harmful to health, why is it being added to the HPV vaccine?”(24)

 

24. Whether the vaccine will increase the risk of miscarriages, stillbirths or babies born with anomalies
“There are however no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women”(2)

Gardasil has been included in the childrens’ vaccination program in Norway for 12 year old girls.

Norway has been chosen for studies because there are several well organised obligatory population registers including ones for birth, cancer and other illnesses and death. A research contract has been negotiated between FDA, Merck and the Norwegian Government (25)

The contract includes this statement from FDA to Merck: “You have committed to conduct a study in collaboration with the Norwegian Government, if GARDASIL ® is approved in the European Union and the Government of Norway incorporates HPV vaccination into its national guidelines, to assess the impact of HPV vaccination on the following in Norway:
e) The interaction between administration of GARDASIL ® and pregnancy outcomes, especially congenital anomalies, by linking the vaccination registry with the Medical Birth Registry.”

 

25. Whether Gardasil is excreted in human milk
According to product information studies have not been carried out. (2)

 

26. The complete list of ingredients
Unbelievable though it may seem, Merck does not know the complete composition of Gardasil.

Unexpected vaccine ingredients have been revealed from time to time. Investigations may be carried out by independent research workers as there is no incentive for manufacturers to search for substances in their products which might be detrimental to health.

Discoveries have been made long after vaccines have been marketed. These include the SV40 (suspected of causing cancer) in polio vaccines, pig DNA in retrovirus vaccines, cytomegaloviruses and the recent discovery of aluminium bound recombinant HPV DNA in Gardasil, the consequences of which are unknown and may be horrific.

SaneVax: ”If Merck and Co., Inc. and the FDA knew small quantities of residual recombinant HPV L1-specific DNA fragments remain in Gardasil, why do marketing and information packets from around the world specifically state the vaccine contains ‘no viral DNA?”

It is reasonable to assume that the vaccine would not have gained approval had the manufacturers informed the authorities of the presence of the aluminum bound gene manipulated DNA due to potential health risks (27)

 

27. Whether possible benefits outweigh the risks
When Merck and other promoters know so little about the vaccine it is impossible for the risks to be weighed against possible benefits. Consequently, there are no grounds whatsoever on which safety may be evaluated.

Sources

  1. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20928-we-need-to-talk-about-hpv-vaccination–seriously.html?full=true
  2. http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_pi.pdf
  3. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe0804638
  4. http://www.naturalnews.com/031901_Gardasil_vaccines.html
  5. http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-announces-the-discovery-of-viral-hpv-dna-contaminant-in-gardasil/
  6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18972230
  7. http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james170.htm
  8. http://www.naturalnews.com/031901_Gardasil_vaccines.html
  9. http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/NVICGardasilvsMenactraVAERSReportFeb2009.pdf
  10. http://looktruenorth.com/limited-government/17688-the-real-reasons-michele-bachmann-is-being-pilloried-about-gardasil.html
  11. http://sanevax.org/vaers-report/
  12. http://www.bmj.com/content/334/7605/1182.1/reply
  13. http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak/110927
  14. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/HPV/gardasil.html
  15. http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2009/06/10/aluminum-and-vaccine-ingredients-what-do-we-know-what-don’t-we-know/
  16. http://sanevax.org/bioethicists-not-so-ethical-when-it-comes-to-gardasil-injuries
  17. http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/125647
  18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8473002?dopt=Abstract
  19. http://www.whale.to/vaccine/polysorbate.html
  20. http://vactruth.com/2011/08/23/vaccine-ingredients-non-ionic-surfactants-tween-80-triton-x-100-nonoxynol-9/
  21. http://www.whale.to/vaccine/janak.html
  22. http://vactruth.com/2011/05/26/aluminum-in-vaccines-where-are-the-safety-studies/
  23. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21568886
  24. http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sb.html
  25. http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm111283.htm
  26. http://www.nvic.org/reportreaction.aspx
  27. http://sanevax.org/gardasil-contamination-ema-steps-up-to-the-plate-fda-drops-the-ball/#comment-972
  28. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2638456/
  29. http://www.free-press-release.com/news-truth-about-gardasil-demands-department-of-justice-investigate-hpv-vaccines-part-1-of-3-1317134493.html
  30. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FDL/is_4_14/ai_n24354801/
  31. http://vaccinexchange.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/tomljenovic_shaw-cmc-published2.pdf
  32. http://www.onemoregirlfilm.com/about.html

 

Photo Credit: EPhotography

  • Lynne Habermacher

    This should be given to every girl and parent considering HPV vaccination

  • Anonymous

    Thank you Lynne. I (Sandy) was amazed when I started investigating and discovered how much the Gardasil manufacturers don’t know about their own product. If we study other vaccines we’ll probably be able to make long lists too.
    We don’t buy a car from a salesman who tries to force a sale, specially when he knows very little about cars!

  • Heather White

    Sandy,

    Thank you for such a well researched article!  When you look at it as a whole it’s astonishing the lack of data that allowed when we’re talking about injection of substances into our children.  

  • Kathy

    Great article – sums up the issues and questions quite well!  Thank you for this!

  • Concerned Mama

    Great article.  It loves one questioning how this vaccine is on the market and why I would want anyone I know to get it.

  • Christina England

    Brilliant well done Sandy!! Thank you for all of your hard work and research.

  • Anonymous

    After reading this article, I truly can’t believe why anybody would vaccinate their child.

  • Suzanne

    One of the great battles parents have against the behemoth pharamceutical and government influence behind our paediatricians and health visitors pushing vaccines on our children is our abilty to understand the science. As time passes, we are inding more and more that parents understand and know the science better than the health practitioners pushing the drug.

    Sandy, thank you for putting this all on one page so coherently and clearly. It makes the information so much more useful to parents trying to acquire the relevant information in order to make an informed consent with regard to our children’s health..

  • Barb

    And why would California have children make the decision about whether or not to get this shot? People are nuts.

  • Ktsphotography

    This is the most ridiculous article I have ever read. 

  • Anonymous

    Please elaborate on your statement.

  • Norma

    Sandy – you have done an absolutely marvelous job of illustrating the fact that there are more questions than answers with HPV vaccines. I am constantly amazed at how easy it is for pharmaceutical companies to make billions of dollars while leaving parents nothing more than a ‘poke and hope’ scenario.

  • Jstnodnsmle

    I have a question. Number 3 in the article says, “The vaccine has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity.” and then Number 6 says, “A May 2006 FDA VRBPAC document stated girls previously exposed to
    vaccine-relevant human papillomavirus and get inoculated with Gardasil
    have a 44.6% increase in getting cervical cancer in their life time.” Can you please explain this contradiction?Thank you for your time in both producing a great, thought-provoking article and in answering my question.

  • Dag Fallet

    Brilliant article Sandy,think this one need to be printed out and spread in other ways as well:)

  • Anonymous

    Thank you for your question Jstnodnsmle. We see in most package inserts the information that the vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity. If the vaccine manufacturers wish to do this (which is not certain!), it would involve extensive clinical trials over long periods of time with large groups for different types of cancer and it would be very expensive indeed.

    In the case of Gardasil, which is now being promoted for several age groups and for both sexes it would mean extremely extensive trials over several years in order to evaluate carcinogenicity.

    The studies which have been carried out are limited to a group of girls who have been exposed to HPV infection and then injected with Gardasil or with the other HPV vaccine, Cervarix. 

    SaneVax: “Peer-reviewed analysis and studies many of them on the FDA, NCI and CDC web sites point out the dangers of many of the vaccine ingredients including the potential for the HPV vaccines to increase the risk for pre-cancerous lesions if adolescents have been previously exposed to the human papillomavirus and then get vaccinated: 44.6% increase post Gardasil; 32.5% post Cervarix”.  (Sandy)

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Dr. Richard Shope of the Rockefeller University, and a good friend of Francis, discovered the Cottontail Rabbit Papilloma Virus (CRPV), which is better known as the Shope papilloma virus, a close cousin to the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV).  According to Francis’ memoir, “We (Peyton Rous and Thomas Francis) went to the library where he (Rous) told me they had just found that a number of rabbits they had kept for a long period after inoculation with the Shope papilloma had developed genuine cancers.”

    Paul, J. (1974). A Biographical Memoir: Thomas Francis, Jr. – 1900-1969 (pp. 79). Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved August 17th, 2010 from http://books.nap.edu/html/biomems/tfrancis.pdf

  • Janette

    My goodness Sandy – you have been busy! Thank you for gathering all this info together for us to read. It’s brilliant!

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    #13 “The FDA allowed Merck to use a potentially reactive aluminum containing placebo as a control for most trial participants, rather than a non-reactive saline solution placebo. A reactive placebo can artificially increase the appearance of safety of an experimental drug or vaccine in a clinical trial” —————-This type of deliberately  manipulated scientific study should disallow the sale of this or any product since it seems a “bait and switch”  trial study was conducted.  Bait and switch is  ILLEGAL.#24 The contract includes this statement from FDA to Merck: “You have committed to conduct a study in collaboration with the Norwegian Government, if GARDASIL ® is approved in the European Union and the Government of Norway incorporates HPV vaccination into its national guidelines, to assess the impact of HPV vaccination on the following in Norway:
    e) The interaction between administration of GARDASIL ® and pregnancy outcomes, especially congenital anomalies, by linking the vaccination registry with the Medical Birth Registry.”—————So, here’s proof that Merck has not done any such studies, which should have been required by the U.S. FDA as part of the approval process.  Now–how many years later–Merck and the FDA are relying on post-marketing studies by a foreign government  to confirm risks to pregnancy, congenital anomalies, etc. What kind of cockamamie FDA is the U.S. Congress ignoring, since Congress does have oversight?  The modus operandi at FDA apparently is corporate–Big Pharma–oversight, which has to stop because people, and children in particular, are being damaged daily, in my opinion.

    Excellent job and well done, Sandy.  Thank you.

  • John H.

    2. Necessity for boosters
    Information regarding the possible necessity and intervals for booster doses is unknown.
    I’ll add:
    If the science of vaccine is legitimate, one would NOT even need booster shots.  This is how vaccine sceinece was FIRST SOLD to the public.
    I added these two:
    28: Will Gardasil make the girls who take sterileIf doesn’t make the fist generation of girls that took this vaccine sterile, will it effect the genetics of the girls who took it making there children sterile?  Or there children’s children sterile?  Considering one of the side effects with Gardasil is that it attacks the female ovaries.29 Same question as 28 BUT applied to boys.

  • Decomanjoel

    This will not be given to my grandchildren!  I have already had a rather “testy’ discussion with my grandson’s pediatrician because he had assumed that he would be allowed to inject Gardasil. I told him that this would not be allowed and I was called “ignorant.” I told the doctor that there is no valid conclusion that it is effective and that it was just “Big Pharma” trying to make a buck! Oh well, I tell it as I see it. Sorry Doc!

  • Anonymous

    Thank you Catherine for your constructive response. 
    Thousands of young Norwegian girls are unknowingly being used as research objects for the manufacturers Merck.

    We regularly hear about young girls who are suffering after being vaccinated but who are not being believed and their parents get nowhere when they try to report the injuries.

    Norway is very well organised with obligatory registries. Everyone has a unique personal number which is registered in practically every situation imaginable. 

    In addition, there are exceedingly close connections between the Norwegian health authorities and the pharmaceutical industry.

    Under these circumstances it was perhaps natural that Norway was chosen for research on Gardasil.

    The agreement between FDA, Merck and the Norwegian government was that the vaccine would be approved in USA under the condition that extensive follow up studies would be carried out in Norway.

    In practice this meant that the vaccine would have to be included in the children’s vaccination program. There was considerable corruption revealed in connection with the contract negotiations but as expected this was not followed up! (Sandy)

  • Smared

    this should give you much more..
    a good reason to consider other vaccines.
    you will find out there is no vaccine protect you for this
    or another sickness

  • AL

    This is a dangerous and reckless article, that clearly ignores the scientific method and preys on people’s emotions. A little internet surfing on the part of the author is a VERY dangerous thing!

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    It clearly ignores what, Al? That vaccines haven’t been tested for causing cancer? I challenge you to read the scientific literature and come back with your findings. Start with the product information sheets.

  • Anonymous

    The list of what Merck does not appear to know about their own product Gardasil is even longer than the 27 stated items.

    Here’s an article by SaneVax which poses several more unanswered questions:

    “Contaminated Gardasil Vaccine May Be Infectious – Potentially Causing Millions More to Become Sick via Blood Transference”.

    http://sanevax.org/contaminated-gardasil-vaccine-may-be-infectious-potentially-causing-millions-more-to-become-sick-via-blood-transference-merck-doctor-admits-contaminant-does-not-belong-in-the-vaccine/
    (Sandy)

  • Northerntracey

    The HPV vaccine is by far the silliest! Hoiw can they KNOW it prevents cancer???? There is already evidence that vaccines CAUSE cancer!! The stupidity just amazes me!

  • twcs

    jeffry, it looks pretty clear from here that “al” works somewhere in the pharmaceutical industry. shame on you al, you douchebag. come and meet my 15 year old son who was vaccine injured at the age of 2 & 1/2. merck’s MMR vaccine containing mercury (in the thimerosal preservative) forever altered his life and future. you can’t tell me otherwise. i was there from the day he was born, as he was developing perfectly normally up to the time of the MMR injection and then all hell broke loose. we have been fighting our way back to normalcy ever since. and there are thousands upon thousands of parents with my same story. so f*** you, al. 

  • Lyn Pilolla

    This is not a contradiction – read more closely. Statement 1 says the vaccine ITSELF is not tested for potential to cause cancer (in general). Statement 2 says that women PREVIOUSLY exposed to HPV (the types targeted by the vaccine) have increased risk of cancer in their life after getting the vaccine. These are different situations/statements; you have to grasp the subtlety.

  • Lyn Pilolla

    Al, IF you are an actual pharma troll or some other hired gun you really BLOW at it. You provide no information of actual refute. Of course you are more likely to be a fairly ignorant layperson, again, with no references or facts to speak of. Try some more internet surfing on these critical human health topics yourself.

  • Asset

     Check out the newly founded Canary Party in the USA.  

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    There is an additional, extremely interesting and unanswered question which Merck, the manufacturers and other Gardasil promoters should be asked: Where is the evidence that Gardasil actually removes the HPV 16 and HPV 18 strains?

    Studies may well show the presence of these strains in vaccinated subjects, giving yet one more signal that the vaccine is a scandalous and gigantic hoax. 

     
     
     
     

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    The FDA asserts that the foreign DNA fragments found in Gardasil pose no risk. In contrast, Dr. Hanan Polansky, from the Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease, uses his highly acclaimed discovery of Microcompetition to explain how these DNA fragments can cause major diseases
    http://holyhormones.com/global

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1451506790 Charise Sadig

    We are being too civilized about vaccines, allowing ourselves to be lied to about the safety. We should be in the streets screaming NO, NO, Never Again! If a parent were to give a child of any age a glass of raw milk that parent would immediately be arrested for endangering that child’s health!
    Parents that refuse to vaccinate are being targeted and persecuted AS ENDANGERING THE CHILD HEALTH!
    NO MEDICATION THAT HARMS IN ANY WAY SHOULD BE ALLOWED!
    IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AT ANY TIME TO GIVE KNOWN POISONS TO CHILDREN!
    STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1451506790 Charise Sadig

    We are being too civilized about vaccines, allowing ourselves to be lied to about the safety. We should be in the streets screaming NO, NO, Never Again! If a parent were to give a child of any age a glass of raw milk that parent would immediately be arrested for endangering that child’s health!
    Parents that refuse to vaccinate are being targeted and persecuted AS ENDANGERING THE CHILD HEALTH!
    NO MEDICATION THAT HARMS IN ANY WAY SHOULD BE ALLOWED!
    IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AT ANY TIME TO GIVE KNOWN POISONS TO CHILDREN!
    STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS!

  • Lou

    Please Sir point out your SPECIFIC objections.

    I await with baited breath.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cindy-Bevington-Olmstead/1486905696 Cindy Bevington Olmstead

    As far as boosters goes– the women in Merck’s clinical trials actually got a 4th “challenge” dose of the vaccine in order to make the efficacy numbers higher. But only 3 doses are included in the series the girls are getting in post-marketing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dawnpapple Dawn Babcock Papple

    This is the PERFECT addition to supplement a school vaccine waiver.  When signing philosophical exemption, a “see attached document” could be added near the signature.  Is this available in PDF?  Actually, I think many of your posts should be made into PDF file for such purchases.  They’d be great to bring along to the doctor for when he asks why the hesitation….

  • http://sanevax.org/ Norma

    Thank you for all of your efforts to get the truth out to those who really need it. Your efforts make it easier for those wishing to exercise their right to informed consent. 

  • Green Bag

    Excellent article Sandy. Very thought provoking. I shutter at the thought at what damage these vaccines are capable of and the amount of young women that are harmed. What’s most disturbing about the whole matter is the authorities are blantantly ignoring the colateral damage of these *coincidences* of harm. Anyway, who in their right mind would put their hand up to be used in these trials. I wonder who they test on if they don’t test on the average person. Just wondering… :/