Aborted Human Fetal Cells in Vaccines

Catherine J. Frompovich

Doctor Nancy Snyderman, a very attractive, gregarious and outgoing physician, has real TV presence in more ways than one. Friday, September 17, 2010 Dr. Snyderman appeared on the MSNBC Today Show and promoted vaccines in a segment titled Vaccines 101 in a manner to which I personally took umbrage, especially when she said there was a small amount of medicine in the shot and the “rest is water or salt water.” Hel-l-l-o-o-o!

To hear Doctor Snyderman’s remarks that made me wonder, please access this link http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36691058/vp/39211550#39211550 . It’s a little over six minutes of what I call “medical spin” that sounds valid but, inadvertently, I think misleads because of non-disclosure. Why? Well, my answer is this.

I’ve been researching consumer health for over thirty-five years and I’ve found more in vaccines than I think Doctor Snyderman may want the public to know about or healthcare consumers have the right to know.

For example, cells from aborted human fetuses. I’m certain if most parents knew that about vaccines, they would have second thoughts about getting their kids vaccinated. How does the Roman Catholic Church regard the use of aborted fetuses in vaccines since it opposes abortion? Good question?

Muslim populations in Indonesia now are getting vaccine-phobia because they found out that the vaccines they’ve been injected with for the last ten years or so contain porcine/pig DNA, an item/food that is anathema to them and which they eliminate from their dietary because of religious beliefs.

According to Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, these vaccines contain aborted human fetus cells:

  • Polio Vaccines, Pentacel, DT Polio Absorbed, Quadracel—all by Sanofi
  • Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccines

MMR II, Meruvax II, MRVax, Biovax, ProQuad, MMR-V all
Merck vaccines
Priorix and Erolalix by GlaxoSmithKline

  • Varicella Vaccines for Chickenpox or Shingles

Verivax, ProQuad, MMR-V, and Zostavax all by Merck
Varilix by GSK

  • Hepatitis Vaccines

Vaqta by Merck
Havrix and Twinrix by GSK
Avaxim and Vivaxim by Sanofi
Epaxal by Crucell/Berna

  • Rabies Vaccine

Imovax by Sanofi

They are listed online at http://www.soundchoice.org/certification.html

Furthermore, there seems to be a correlation between the use of aborted human fetal cells with the coincidental rise of autism. Several online articles corroborate that coincidence, e.g., http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es902057k Timing of Increased Autistic Disorder Cumulative Incidence by Michael E. McDonald and John F. Paul, NHEERL/EPA, February 2010, Vol. 44, Environmental Science & Technology.

I encourage parents to investigate vaccine ingredients also known as adjuvants, excipients, and growing mediums for which I have six full pages listing some “things” that go into vaccines.

I think it’s about time that everyone involved in pushing vaccines levels with the healthcare consumer: Vaccines are not as safe as they are purported to be, and the public has a right to know that; what they contain; and to make an informed consent choice about allowing such things as formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum, antibiotics, foreign DNA from monkeys, pigs, and now insects, plus an entire shopping list of other toxic ingredients from being injected into one’s children or oneself. Doctor Snyderman, there’s more than water or salt water in vaccines! I hope you realize that.

Please contact your members of Congress and ask them for an investigation into the manufacture of vaccines, their adjuvants, excipients, and growing mediums before any mandates go out that we must vaccinate our kids by law. We deserve that kind of transparency and not bureaucratic, corporate, and media spin.

Catherine J. Frompovich

Catherine J Frompovich is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting. Catherine is an editor and writing consultant who helps authors get into publication. For numerous semesters she taught several writing courses for a suburban Philadelphia school district’s Adult Evening School. Her passion is assisting and guiding authors into print. Catherine’s latest book, A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, will be available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook sometime in July 2012. Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008).

  • Jackie

    Doctor Nancy Snyderman, a very attractive, gregarious and outgoing physician, has real TV presence in more ways than one. Friday, November 17, 2010 Dr. Snyderman appeared on the MSNBC Today Show and promoted vaccines in a segment titled Vaccines 101 in a manner to which I personally took umbrage, especially when she said there was a small amount of medicine in the shot and the “rest is water or salt water.” Hel-l-l-o-o-o!

  • Nicolene Hannan

    The date listed in the first paragraph is incorrect “Doctor Nancy Snyderman, a very attractive, gregarious and outgoing physician, has real TV presence in more ways than one. Friday, November 17, 2010 Dr. Snyderman appeared on the MSNBC Today Show ” I believe this aired on sept 16th 2010

  • Good attention to detail on the date, but I hope everyone will focus as much attention to the point of Catherine’s article. Everyone needs to learn that the “devil is in the details”–the ingredients in vaccines. It is a frightening brew of substances with known toxic health effects. The Nancy Snyderman’s of the world either don’t get that or don’t care about it. In either case, we are all at risk from vaccine Russian Roulette.

  • Catherine Frompovich

    As the author of this article I’d like to clarify something. When I accessed the link Friday morning while I was writing the article to check for accuracy, the listing said, “this morning”. Naturally I took for granted that it was the morning I was writing the article, Friday, September 17. Sorry!, and thanks for calling me on that.

  • Enter cell line technology
    Cell line technologies that use cells and animal tissues for growing viruses found in vaccines have been deployed since the 1950s. Examples include calf lymph for smallpox vaccines; African green monkey cells (AGMK cells) for polio vaccines and mouse brain cells for the Japanese encephalitis vaccine. In the 1960s, cells from aborted human fetal tissue, called MRC-5 and WI-38 cells, were developed and are still used for the manufacture of rubella chickenpox, hepatitis A and shingles vaccines.


  • Ted Seeber

    On the question of what the Roman Catholic Church teaches, I found this:

    Stated Fr. Stephen Torraco, Professor of Moral Theology at Assumption College regarding the need for these vaccines:

    “Saying that something is morally justifiable because I need it as a means to an end, and indeed, a good end (preservation of one’s life) is absolutely identical with the Machiavellian principle that the end justifies the means (or, that evil may be done in order to accomplish good) and, thus, absolutely unacceptable and morally indefensible…. Secondly, precisely because this Machiavellian principle is morally indefensible, one needs to examine the very thing needed in this particular case ¾ cell lines from aborted fetuses. To say that one needs the cell lines of aborted fetuses to preserve one’s life is inseparable from saying that one needs the abortions ¾ intrinsically evil actions ¾ that make the cell lines available… If I need the vaccine (and it is a need that can be satisfied only by an aborted fetus) and if I defend my need, I will the abortion. The person receiving the vaccination may well be living long after the fetus was actually aborted, and had no involvement in and may even have no knowledge of the particular and actual fetus that was aborted. However, the remoteness in time is not sufficient for arguing that there is no act of the will on the part of the recipient of the vaccine[54]”

  • Erwin Alber

    Vaccination is an organised criminal enterprise dressed up as disease prevention.

    Visit the ‘Vaccination Information Network’ (VINE) on Facebook:


  • Michelle Nemphos

    In answer to what the Catholic church has to say: Here it is:

    The Vatican document also upholds this right in the above document, stating: “It is up to the faithful and citizens of upright conscience (fathers of families, doctors, etc.) to oppose, even by making an objection of conscience, the ever more widespread attacks against life and the “culture of death” which underlies them… There is a grave responsibility to use alternative vaccines and to make a conscientious objection with regard to those which have moral problems… They should take recourse, if necessary, to the use of conscientious objection with regard to the use of vaccines produced by means of cell lines of aborted human foetal origin.”
    The Vatican further teaches in Donum Vitae (I, 4: 1987) that “The corpses of human embryos and fetuses, whether they have been deliberately aborted or not, must be respected just as the remains of other human beings.” We believe that using vaccines produced from aborted fetal cell lines shows a profound disrespect for the remains of these unfortunate children. Using vaccines that exploit these babies for profit violates the teachings of our Church.
    Moreover, the Catholic Church teaches as a tenet of our faith that Moral Conscience is sacred and must be obeyed as described in the Catechism and numerous encyclicals, especially by the Fourth Lateran Council, “The Divine Law is the supreme rule of actions; our thoughts, desires, words, acts, all that man is, is subject to the domain of the law of God; and this law is the rule of our conduct by means of our conscience. Hence it is never lawful to go against our conscience; as the Fourth Lateran council says, ‘Quidquid fit contra conscientiam, aedificat ad gehennam.'” [“Whatever is done in opposition to conscience is conducive to damnation.”]
    As instructed in Catholic Doctrine, Dignitas Humanae (Pope Paul VI, 1965),
    “It is through his conscience that man sees and recognizes the demands of divine law. He is bound to follow this conscience faithfully in all his activity so that he may come to God, who is his last end.”
    The Catechism of the Catholic Church, attested by Papal Authority as the sure teaching norm for the Catholic faith further instructs on the duty to adhere to Moral Conscience:
    1776 “Deep within his conscience man discovers a law which he has not laid upon himself but which he must obey. Its voice ever calling him to love and to do what is good and to avoid evil, sounds in his heart at the right moment…For man has in his heart a law inscribed by God…His conscience is man’s most secret core and sanctuary. There he is alone with God whose voice echoes in his depths.”
    1777“When he listens to his conscience, the prudent man can hear God speaking.” (CCC 1777)
    1782“Man has the right to act in conscience and in freedom so as personally to make moral decisions. He must not be forced to act contrary to his conscience. Nor must he be prevented from acting according to his conscience, especially in religious matters.”

  • Erwin Alber

    “Doctor Nancy Snyderman, a very attractive, gregarious and outgoing physician,…”

    She may appear to be on the surface, but this woman gives the creeps. Personally, I’d rather encounter a boa constrictor than this nasty piece of work. She and people like her are responsible for vaccine-related chronic ill-health including autism and other neurological disorders, as well as disablement and death in countless children. She has a lot to answer for.

  • Robert Wilson

    thanks for the post

  • Be Eazy

    You know, I hear and have read so much about the dangers of vaccines and I believe them to be totally true.

    My question is, what is the alternative?

  • Nancy

    The alternative is: eat healthy real food, preferable organic, get plenty of sunshine for vitamin D, exercise, drink clean water, get plenty of rest and consider homeopathic remedies which are safe and effective! It all works. The many unvaccinated children I know are very healthy.

  • Cibeles J. Gonzalez

    Can you please make the vaccine report available through other options. I have given twice my e-mail and still have received no link in order to obtain access. Thank you.

  • Thinkbeforetalking

    People that do write pages as this one should at least once consider to get sufficiently educated before transmitting a disease called misinformation.
    Vaccines are produced in cells BUT the cells are not part of the vaccine.
    This, in my opinion makes a huge difference!

    All you achieve by lying is to discredit those arguments that are true and those people that actually have a point beyond your stupid, unreflected christian blabla.

  • Mom2two

    “Thinkbeforetalking” gives differing opinion with no back up. Please provide links that disprove what is put forth in this article. And I think you’re splitting hairs by saying “Vaccines are produced in cells BUT the cells are not part of the vaccine.” shouldn’t I know a dead infant is used to make the vaccine?

  • jimmy corn


  • jimmy corn

    Please enlighten us on what an autoimmune disease is……..@thinkbeforetalking because autoimmune is caused when your body sees FOREIGN DNA in your body and attacks it. ABORTED HUMAN FETUS DNA IN YOUR BODY IS FOREIGN so it goes way beyond the Christian blabla.

  • marybridget

    Yes, and well done.