The FDA Approves a New HPV Vaccine Containing Over Twice as Much Aluminum As its Predecessor

According to recent reports, the FDA has approved yet another HPV vaccine, despite documented safety issues and the new vaccine containing an exceptionally high level of aluminum, a known neurotoxin.

Until now, only two vaccines have been manufactured to protect men and women against human papillomavirus (HPV), a virus believed to be the leading cause of cervical cancer: Cervarix, which is believed to protect against strains 16 and 18 of the virus, and Gardasil, which is believed to protect against strains 6, 11, 16 and 18.



A Third HPV Vaccine Hits the Market

In December 2014, Gardasil 9 vaccine, manufactured by Merck Sharp and Dohme, was approved by the FDA. This vaccine appears to be somewhat of a “super” vaccine in comparison to the previous versions, as the FDA has claimed it can protect men and women against no less than NINE strains of the HPV virus.

In a press release published on December 10, 2014, the FDA stated:

“Gardasil 9 is a vaccine approved for use in females ages 9 through 26 and males ages 9 through 15. It is approved for the prevention of cervical, vulvar, vaginal and anal cancers caused by HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58, and for the prevention of genital warts caused by HPV types 6 or 11. Gardasil 9 adds protection against five additional HPV types—31, 33, 45, 52 and 58— which cause approximately 20 percent of cervical cancers and are not covered by previously FDA-approved HPV vaccines.”

Despite the FDA’s impressive press release, however, can parents really believe that this HPV vaccine is any safer than its predecessors?

Many are skeptical and have begun to question whether or not this vaccine is yet another unsafe, fast-tracked vaccine.

Parents Question Whether or Not They Can Really Trust the FDA’s Claims

In a recent paper, titled HPV Vaccines, the American Cancer Society stated that:

“All of the HPV vaccines were tested in thousands of people around the world before they were approved. These studies showed no serious side effects and no deaths have been linked to either vaccine. Common, mild side effects include pain where the shot was given, fever, dizziness, and nausea.”

However, parents should question the validity of this statement, especially since it has been proven in court that the HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix were licensed for use before safety trials had been completed.

In 2013, Leslie Carol Botha wrote an article titled India Women Activist’s Historic Writ of Petition over Unethical Trialing of HPV Vaccines, Gardasil® and Cervarix® Accepted by Supreme Court.

Ms. Botha’s article was based on a press release issued by Kalpana Mehta, Nalini Bhanot and V. Rukmini Rao, representing Gramya Resource Centre for Women from Andhra Pradesh. The press release, entitled India Supreme Court Accepts Writ of Petition on Gardasil® & Cervarix® Licensing & Trial Violations, implicated the drugs controller of India, PATH, ICMR and others, ordering the government of India to immediately respond.

Ms. Botha wrote:

“The Petition implicates the: Indian Drugs Controller for licensing the HPV vaccines without sufficient research on their safety and efficacy, and the Health Ministry for not carrying out an enquiry into licensing of these vaccines as ordered by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health and Family Welfare in April 2010. The Parliamentary committee also neglected to take any action on the report of the enquiry committee (set up by its own organization) despite confirmation of the ‘gross violations’ found in the PATH project with “respect to procedures for taking informed consent, inadequate health facilities for dealing with adverse events and medical emergencies.”

The three petitioners won their landmark case, making vaccine history and their success was reported by Health Impact News in 2014. (See Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Vaccine Empire on Trial in India.)

HPV Vaccines Found to be Associated with Disability and Death

Over the years, the HPV vaccines have been seen to cause more cases of pain and suffering than any other vaccine, another worrying fact that parents need to consider before having their children vaccinated.

In 2013, Dr. Mercola wrote an article titled Oncology Dietician Exposes Fraud in CDC’s HPV Vaccine Effectiveness Study, that stated, according to Merck’s own research, if a patient has been exposed to HPV strains 16 or 18 prior to receipt of a Gardasil vaccine, the vaccine could increase their risk of developing precancerous lesions, or worse, by 44.6 percent.

This is extremely worrying, especially as Mercola also reported that not only had Gardasil been associated with many serious health problems, such as Guillain-Barre Syndrome and permanent disability, but the vaccine had also been associated with many women dying suddenly soon after receiving the vaccine.

This information has left parents wondering whether it is safer not to vaccinate their children against HPV and whether the new Gardasil 9 vaccine really is any safer than its two predecessors.

Possibly not, according to the Forbes website:

“Safety data on Gardasil 9 is based on adverse reactions tracked in more than 13,000 males and females. Headaches and swelling, redness and pain at the injection site were the ones most commonly reported. Among these participants, five individuals reported serious adverse events that were determined to be vaccine-related. These events included fever, allergy to the vaccine, asthmatic crisis, headache and tonsillitis.”

However, the facts get worse.

Adverse Reactions Including Death Reported

During my research, I came across the Gardasil 9 package insert, which, unsurprisingly, reported a wide range of adverse reactions, ranging from pain at the injection site to death.

Page six and seven of the insert stated:

“Serious Adverse Events in Clinical Studies

Serious adverse events were collected throughout the entire study period (range one month to 48 months post-last dose) for the six integrated clinical studies for GARDASIL 9. Out of the 13,236 individuals who were administered GARDASIL 9 and had safety follow-up, 305 reported a serious adverse event; representing 2.3% of the population. As a comparison, of the 7,378 individuals who were administered GARDASIL and had safety follow-up, 185 reported a serious adverse event; representing 2.5% of the population. Five GARDASIL 9 recipients each reported at least one serious adverse event that was determined to be vaccine-related. The vaccine-related serious adverse reactions were pyrexia, allergy to vaccine, asthmatic crisis, headache, and tonsillitis.

Deaths in the Entire Study Population

Across the clinical studies, ten deaths occurred (five each in the GARDASIL 9 and GARDASIL groups); none were assessed as vaccine-related. Causes of death in the GARDASIL 9 group included one automobile accident, one suicide, one case of acute lymphocytic leukemia, one case of hypovolemic septic shock, and one unexplained sudden death 678 days following the last dose of GARDASIL 9. Causes of death in the GARDASIL control group included one automobile accident, one airplane crash, one cerebral hemorrhage, one gunshot wound, and one stomach adenocarcinoma.”

As usual, the deaths were said not to be vaccine-related. However, without any definitive medical analysis, we only have Merck’s word for this.

So, how concerned should parents be?

Sane Vax Inc. Speaks Out about the FDA’s Decision

This vaccine contains over twice as much aluminum as its predecessor, Gardasil, one fact that should be noted by all parents considering the new vaccine, as highlighted in a recent article written by Sane Vax Inc. They stated that:

“The proposed Gardasil 9 package insert and the current Gardasil package insert are a good place to start a critical examination. The table below lists the ingredients of both Gardasil and Gardasil 9. All differences from one HPV vaccine package insert to the next are highlighted.

GardasilIngredientGardasil 9
225 mcgAAHS (aluminum adjuvant)500 mcg
9.56 mcgSodium Chloride9.56 mcg
.78 mcgL-Histidine.78 mcg
50 mcgPolysorbate 8050 mcg
35 mcgSodium Borate35 mcg
<7 mcgYeast Protein<7 mcg
20 mcgHPV 6 L1 protein30 mcg
40 mcgHPV 11 L1 protein40 mcg
40 mcgHPV 16 L1 protein60 mcg
20 mcgHPV 18 L1 protein20 mcg
HPV 31 L1 protein20 mcg
HPV 33 L1 protein20 mcg
HPV 45 L1 protein20 mcg
HPV 52 L1 protein20 mcg
HPV 58 L1 protein20 mcg


Sane Vax continued:

“Take a look at the first line in the chart to the left. Aluminum is a known neurotoxin. A quick search of PubMed for ‘aluminum toxicity human’ returns no less than 1652 peer-reviewed and published scientific papers on the subject. Why did Merck more than double the amount of aluminum adjuvant in Gardasil 9?”

Taking all of this information into account, parents need to read the following research before they consider vaccinating their children against cervical cancer.

Scientists Find Evidence Linking Gardasil to Autoimmune Disease

The Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute, an organization that has provided grants for an investigation into the link between aluminum adjuvants, vaccination and autoimmune disease, is supporting independent research on HPV vaccine safety.

Several recent studies have been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals that have evaluated both biological and epidemiological evidence from reports of adverse reactions, autoimmune diseases and deaths after Gardasil.

In 2011, Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic and Professor Christopher Shaw published an assessment of the post-marketing surveillance data in The Annals of Medicine, which indicated that there was a 2.5 times greater rate of a serious adverse reactions from the vaccine than deaths from cervical cancer.

In their paper, titled Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: Are they at odds?, they wrote:

“Currently, governmental health agencies worldwide state that HPV vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ and that the benefits of HPV vaccination outweigh the risks (6,23,24). Moreover, the US CDC maintains that Gardasil is ‘an important cervical cancer prevention tool ’ and therefore ‘ recommends HPV vaccination for the prevention of most types of cervical cancer ’ (6,7). However, the rationale behind these statements is unclear given that the primary claim that HPV vaccination prevents cervical cancer remains unproven. Furthermore, in the US, the current age-standardized death rate from cervical cancer according to World Health Organization (WHO) data (1.7/100,000) (Table I), is 2.5 times lower than the rate of serious adverse reactions (ADRs) from Gardasil reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) (4.3/100,000 doses distributed) (Table II). In the Netherlands, the reported rate of serious ADRs from Cervarix per 100,000 doses administered (5.7) (Table II) is nearly 4-fold higher than the age-standardized death rate from cervical cancer (1.5/100,000) (Table I).”

The findings from their research are extremely worrisome and contain some outstanding research and facts.

Subsequently, Dr. Mark Geier, MD, and Dr. David Geier, PhD, published an analysis of the relationship between Gardasil and certain autoimmune diseases. In October 2014, they wrote a paper titled A case–control study of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine-associated autoimmune adverse events. Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) website, they studied whether or not Gardasil was linked to the rise in the number of autoimmune diseases being reported. They wrote that:

“An epidemiological study was undertaken to evaluate concerns about the potential for HPV4 vaccination to induce serious autoimmune adverse events (SAAEs). The vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) database was examined for adverse event reports associated with vaccines administered from January 2006 through December 2012 to recipients between 18 and 39 years old with a listed residence in the USA and a specified female gender.”

They continued:

“The question of a connection between vaccination and autoimmune illness has long been debated in the literature and is surrounded by controversy, but it was suggested that the same mechanisms that act in infectious invasion of the host apply equally to the host response to vaccination. As recently reviewed, the introduction of HPV vaccine was associated with several cases of onset or exacerbations of autoimmune diseases following immunization in the literature and pharmacovigilance databases, triggering concerns about its safety.”

The results of their study demonstrated that Gardasil is indeed linked to a variety of autoimmune diseases, including arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. They stated that:

“It was observed that the SAAEs of gastroenteritis, arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, vasculitis, alopecia, and CNS conditions were associated with HPV4 vaccine administration, whereas the SAAEs of Guillain-Barre syndrome and thrombocytopenia were not associated with HPV4 vaccine administration. In addition, it was observed that the general health outcomes of infection, conjunctivitis, and diarrhea were not associated with HPV4 vaccine administration. The importance of these findings is that the present study provides epidemiological evidence to support an association between HPV4 vaccine administration and specific SAAEs.”

They concluded that:

“In conclusion, the present study provides epidemiological evidence supporting a significant relationship between HPV4 vaccine administration and SAAEs. The results are consistent with a number of previous case-series of SAAEs observed following HPV4 vaccine administration, and are also consistent with the known biological plausibility of vaccine administration to induce SAAEs in some vaccine recipients. In light of the findings of the present study, we recommend that additional studies be conducted to further evaluate the potential biological mechanisms involved in HPV4 vaccine-associated SAAEs in animal model systems, and to examine the potential epidemiological relationship between HPV4 vaccine-associated SAAEs in other databases and populations.”

If the Geiers’ study is correct and Gardasil really is linked to an increase in autoimmune disease, than can parents expect to see a further increase now that the amount of aluminum used in the new Gardasil 9 vaccine has more than doubled?

Is the FDA Fit for Its Purpose?

Sane Vax believes that the FDA is no longer fit for its purpose and concluded their article by stating:

“The FDA needs to be removed from the responsibility of ‘assuring the safety, efficacy and security’ of vaccines. It is quite obvious they are not up to the task. They are most certainly not acting in the best interests of the public.”

Evidence suggests that a growing number of parents from around the world believe that they are absolutely correct.


Taking all of this information into consideration, do we need to be worried that yet another HPV vaccine has been approved? Many professionals are concerned that this vaccine has once again been fast-tracked without sufficient research and testing.

If they are correct, then can we as parents expect even more of our children to be vaccine-injured, especially given the fact that this vaccine contains an exceptionally high content of aluminum?

Parents need to ask themselves whether or not a third vaccine for the HPV virus is one vaccine too many and why the governments and pharmaceutical industry deemed it necessary to manufacture another vaccine against cervical cancer in the first place.

Photo Credit

Christina England, BA Hons

  • guest

    1. The is just the continuation of the medical industrial complexes flim-flam. The public should be made aware of how this poisonous injection came to be.

    -HPV Virus Infects the Nobel Prize Committee? By Kent Heckenlively, Esq.

    Just when you thought things couldn’t get any stranger, comes a story from Newsmax that “The Nobel Prize Committee is facing criminal investigation of bribery and corruption after allegedly taking huge payments from a pharmaceutical company that directly benefits from the work of this year’s Nobel Prize in medicine.” (Newsmax, December 12, 2008, “Swedish Officials Investigating Nobel Prize Board”)

    According to the Swedish trade journal Dagen Medicina, Nobel Media and Nobel Webb, (Nobel affiliated corporations) are accused of taking “many millions” of dollars from Astra-Zeneca, which holds patents for the two human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines on the market, Gardasil in the United States, and Cerverix in Europe.

    According to the Swedish prosecutor in the case, Christer van der Kwast, “The criminal charges that may become formalized are bribery and corruption.”

    The 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine was given to German scientist Harald zur Hauser for his discovery of the human papilloma virus and its link to cervical cancer.

    In response to the accusations, AstraZeneca spokesman Zhou Yi claimed
    the company had no influence on the selection of the Nobel Prize, and
    its only connection was to the two Nobel subcommittees, Nobel Media and
    Nobel Webb, organizations which get the word out globally about “the
    benefits of medical breakthroughs.”

    According to the Newsmax article, however, “Yi did confirm that AstraZeneca board member Bo Angelina also sits on the committee that votes on Nobel candidates, but said it was still unclear whether he had actually voted for Hauser.”

    Let’s break this down, because at times it seems like one of those plots from “Mission Impossible.”

    A pharmaceutical representative from AstraZeneca sits on a board which votes on Nobel Prize candidates in medicine. That board voted for Dr. Hauser because of his discovery that the human papilloma virus causes cervical cancer. In turn, AstraZeneca gave several million dollars to Nobel-affiliated corporations to spread the word about “medical breakthroughs.” Just by coincidence, the vaccine
    patents against the human papilloma virus are owned by AstraZeneca.

    Maybe a few positive words from the Nobel committee might be just enough to make some parents ignore all those reports about bad reactions, including death from the Gardasil vaccine.

    Or am I reading too much into a potential criminal charge against a pharmaceutical company? Maybe it’s all just a terrible misunderstanding.


  • guest

    2. Julie Gerberding Primed Big Pharma’s Pump with Flu and HPV Vaccines

    Julie Gerberding serves her future master well

    Gerberding’s January 2004 Report to Congress “Prevention of Genital Human Papillomavirus Infection”
    paved the way for eventual approval for Merck’s Gardasil vaccine,
    guaranteeing billions in profits for her future employer. Perhaps the
    vaccine presidency is Julie’s reward for cementing the relationship
    between government and Merck via the CDC, the agency that behaves as the
    de facto marketing arm of the vaccine industry.
    Nobel prize probe launched
    Swedish anti-corruption agents are investigating allegations that pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca influenced the awarding of this year’s Nobel Prize in medicine.

    The brewing controversy involves Nobel Media and Nobel Web, two Nobel companies that help translate into layman’s language the value of the work of Nobel laureates and also publicize thelaureates’ medical breakthroughs. The two companies are partly funded by AstraZeneca.

    It also involves two Karolinska professors who participate in awarding the medical prize. Both have ties to AstraZeneca. Nobel Assembly member Bo Angelin sits on the company’s board of directors, which pays $50,000 (Cdn) a year, while Nobel
    Committee chair Bertil Fredholm was a consultant for AstraZeneca until

    Nobel prize row over pharmaceuticals firm link

    The reputation of the Nobel prize has been dented after it emerged that a
    member of the jury and a Nobel representative had links to a pharmaceuticals
    giant that benefited from this year’s prize for medicine.

  • guest

    By Janine Roberts

    On December 10th, a Nobel Prize will be awarded for finding HPV and proving its link to cervical cancer to Dr Harad zur Hausen. However this is a missing link in this – for he failed to find a way to persuade cells to make his virus.
    human papillomavirus (HPV); virus-like particles, capsomers; immunogens
    What if HPV does NOT cause cervical cancer?
    The title of a paper recently published by McCormack et al in Molecular Cytogenetics says it all, ”Individual karyotypes at the origins of cervical carcinomas. If the findings in this paper are true, a vaccine against human
    papillomavirus (HPV) is extremely unlikely to protect against cervical cancer.
    *Vaccines Do Not Cover Most Common HPV Types in Black Women*
    The HPV subtypes that are most common in black women in the United States are not targeted by the currently available vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix, according to new research.

    The findings suggest that current HPV vaccination will be less beneficial
    for black women in the US than for their white counterparts, said study
    coauthor Catherine Hoyo, PhD, MPH, of Duke University, in Durham,
    North Carolina.

    If “HPV vaccination will be less beneficial for black women” is a matter of genetics, there are other ethnic groups that share similar traits so this shot is probably equally ineffective in them. However, this vaccine, and I use the world lightly, has not been shown to be effective in anyone and won’t be known for decades so all the MSM article about how Gardasil has reduced the number of cervical cancer cases in young girls is ridiculous because young girls don’t get cervical cancer. The mean age of a female with cervical cancer is 45-55. Yes, there have been a few exceptions of young girls getting cervical cancer. One of the side effects of Gardasil is that it can give a person cancer. Also, cancer is a know side effect of vaccines overall (SV-40). It’s time to start looking at the type of cancer cells being removed and finding out their origins.

  • Free People

    FACT: “In the Netherlands, the reported rate of serious ADRs from Cervarix per 100,000 doses administered is nearly 4-fold higher than the age-standardized DEATH rate frorm cervical cancer.” Never believe World Holocaust Organization (WHO), or USA stats.

    Federal Death Administration (FDA) needs to be abolished! When the lead developer of the HPV vaccine, Diane Harper, claims it’s useless and dangerous, why the hard pu$h? Anyone who listens to the Centers for Disease Creation and Proliferation (CDC), the government, or the lamestream media, Tel-LIE-Vision and MedMafia needs to have their head examined.

    Right out of the horses mouth:

  • European American

    ““All of the HPV vaccines were tested in thousands of people around the world before they were approved. These studies showed no serious side effects and no deaths have been linked to either vaccine”

    So, “thousands of people” were guinea pigs? This is outrageous, but nonetheless, their m.o. The medical industry makes most of their money treating dis-ease, not preventing it. It’s a trillion dollar industry; Illness, and they know how to increase revenues, intentionally.

  • Christine P. S.

    I like how you call the FDA, CDC, WHO exactly what they are!

  • DisgustedW/This

    I had looked it up. Based on what I had seen….the evidence is not good…they indeed had approved it. I can’t trust this vaccine!

  • Angry Mother

    My daughter was completely vaccinated prior to sexual activity. She still got a CIN 111 cervical dysplasia diagnosis 5 years later and was being pushed to have surgery immediately to avoid cervical cancer. Fortunately I found an alternative treatment that has been used by one US Naturopath for 20 years with 100% success. I am confident it would work on cervical cancer as well. They vaccinate unnecessarily and still surgically mutilate when the vaccine fails. Our daughters cervixes need protection from medical criminals.

  • Lowell Hubbs

    Gardasil-The Flagship Example of the Failure of Vaccine Authorities to Regulate and Assure Vaccine Safety-“I am not a coincidence”.


    Study: HPV Infections Not Necessary for Development of Cervical Cancer – Are HPV Vaccines Worthless?

    The title of a paper recently published by McCormack et al in Molecular Cytogenetics says it all, ”Individual karyotypes at the origins of cervical carcinomas.” If the findings in this paper are true, a vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) is extremely unlikely to protect against cervical cancer.

    According to this paper neither genetic predisposition nor HPV infections are necessary for the development of cervical cancer. All cervical cancer cells investigated during the course of this study contained new abnormal karyotypes. The clonality (genetic makeup) of these new abnormal karyotypes indicates the cervical cancers originated with these karyotypes – NOT from a virus.

    In order to grasp the potential significance of these statements, one must have a basic understanding of karyotypes. Most living things have chromosomes, or units of genetic information, in their cells. The human-karyogramnumber and appearance of chromosomes varies from one species to another. A karyotype is the number, size, and shape of chromosomes in any given organism.

    See the graphic representation of the human karyotype to the right. Every human has 23 pairs of chromosomes (46 total) as illustrated, with the last pair on the bottom right determining the sex of any particular human. Any different number would indicate a different species. For example, apes have 48 chromosomes and kangaroos 20. The number, size and shape of the chromosomes in any given cell reveals the species of origin for that cell.

    Cancer-specific karyotypes explained

    Read more: http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/study-hpv-infections-not-necessary-for-development-of-cervical-cancer-are-hpv-vaccines-worthless/

    What if HPV does NOT cause cervical cancer?


    Total proof that HPV is NOT the cause of cervical cancer! Gardasil has been a complete and very dangerous sham from the start. And now they have the so called new and improved version with more HPV strains in it; which of course they caused with the vaccine to be come more dominant and virulent. They seen that happening right in the clinical trials, and was listed that observation as a concern, in the 2006 FDA VRBPAC preapproval document.

    Research: Individual karyotypes at the origins of cervical carcinomas


    To test the prediction of the speciation theory that individual carcinomas have individual clonal karyotypes and phenotypes, we have analyzed here the phenotypes and karyotypes of nine cervical carcinomas. Seven of these contained papilloma virus sequences and two did not. We determined phenotypic individuality and clonality based on the morphology and sociology of carcinoma cells in vitro. Karyotypic individuality and clonality were determined by comparing all chromosomes of 20 karyotypes of carcinomas in three-dimensional arrays. Such arrays list chromosome numbers on the x-axis, chromosome copy numbers on the y-axis and the number of karyotypes arrayed on the z-axis. We found (1) individual clonal karyotypes and phenotypes in all nine carcinomas, but no virus-specific markers, (2) 1-to-1 variations between carcinoma-specific karyotypes and phenotypes, e.g. drug-resistance and cell morphology, (3) proportionality between the copy numbers of chromosomes and the copy numbers of hundreds of over- and under-expressed mRNAs, (4) evidence that tobacco-carcinogens induce cervical carcinomas via aneuploidy, consistent with the speciation theory.


    Since the individual clonal karyotypes of nine carcinomas correlated and co-varied 1-to-1 with complex individual transcriptomes and phenotypes, we have classical genetic and functional transcriptomic evidence to conclude that these karyotypes encode carcinomas – much like the clonal karyotypes that encode conventional species. These individual karyotypes explain the individual “DNA contents”, the endless grades of malignancies and the complex individual transcriptomes and phenotypes of carcinomas.


    A License to Kill? Part 3: After Gardasil’s Launch, More Victims, More Bad Safety Analysis and a Revolving Door Culture

  • Lowell Hubbs

    Do you think there is any evidence yet that vaccine manufacturers (big pharma) do not and have not known what they are doing with vaccines? Money and power and saving careers are obviously far more important to them than protecting the public health good.

    HPV Vaccine Maker’s Study Proves Natural HPV Infection Beneficial, Not Deadly

    Behind every vaccine is an assumption. That HPV causes cervical cancer, that cervical cancer causes death, and that a vaccine can effectively interfere with this linear relationship is the assumption to be examined in this article. Cervarix is a vaccine recommended to girls beginning as early as 9 years old, intended to protect against HPV strains 16 and 18 upon completion of a 3 dose series. It is an aluminum-containing product, with notable “immunogenicity”.

    A new GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) funded study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases has revealed that HPV infection, resulting in naturally acquired human papilloma virus (HPV) antibodies, reduces the risk for new infection and cervical abnormalities linked to cancer in non-HPV vaccinated subjects.

    In addition to this startling finding – additional GSK-funded research from this year revealed that the HPV vaccine may not protect women against high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, dysplasias.

    If, in fact, the HPV vaccines do not work as widely advertised, and natural HPV infectious exposures actually protect against the progression of HPV linked cervical changes to cancer, then taken together, both these findings challenge the most fundamental assumptions within vaccine science (aka vaccinology), and render highly dubious the oft repeated rhetoric that natural HPV infection is juggernaut –like deadly force the best defense against which are universal immunization campaigns.

    HPV Infection Protects Against New Infection and Cervical ‘Premalignancies’

    The groundbreaking new study titled, Risk of newly detected infections and cervical abnormalities in women seropositive for naturally-acquired HPV-16/18 antibodies: analysis of the control arm of PATRICIA, analyzed data from the non-vaccinated control arm of the Papilloma Trial against Cancer in Young Adults (PATRICIA), to ascertain whether natural HPV16 and HPV18 antibodies reduced the risk for new HPV infection and/or cervical abnormalities over a 300 day period. A total of 16,656 women were included in the study’s control arm (8,193 women in the HPV16 analysis and 8,463 women in the HPV18 analysis), with none of the women being administered the HPV vaccine.

    Read more:

    Pharmakeia (aka sorceries) of Babylon

  • lowell hubbs

    Im sorry everyone, Ive been lying and I am ashamed of my inability to be coherent. Not only that but I lost my Ipod.

  • European American

    Silent Epidemic, by award winning film director Gary Null, is the first documentary to investigate thoroughly the true medical record and the historical evidence about vaccine marvels.

  • bradf

    No that’s not how it works and this assumption shows that you probably don’t know too much about scientific procedure. It would have started with lab tests and model organisms to show that there is no reasonable amount of risk in doing human trials. Also only in america is healthcare a business where you make money off of disease treatment. In Canada where thank god the healthcare system is government run treating people with disease costs billions of dollars that is all government funded. But we still use the same vaccines and standards of care as most american systems because they work. If the point was to cause disease then it would be costing the Canadian government an insane amount of money and there is no way they would do that and risk the lives of millions.

  • Chuck Robey

    I will never allow my daughters to be injected with any of these HPV Vaccines nor any other Vaccine..


    These people must be nuts if they think anyone is going to take them seriously after what has already happened to so many young girls.

  • Ben William

    Now let me get this straight…

    the HPV virus is a cancerous causing virus. OK, there are (correct me if I’m wrong) over a hundred of these ‘different’ cancer causing viruses associated with cervical cancer.

    Now, modern medical thinking is that a person needs additional cancer viruses every time the Gardasil gets an upgrade to be injected into their bodies. i.e. HPV 31 L1 protein, HPV 33 L1 protein… and so on.

    Forgive my skepticism but doesn’t injecting cancer viruses into a person UP their chances of getting ah, cancer?

    OH WAIT JUST A MINUTE!! That’s just what the original package insert said it could do by 45% more than if someone didn’t get the shot!

    Who would have thunk it?

  • Ben William

    They won’t hear these poor girl’s cries (like I personally have) because TV, print, radio and doctor parrots ‘safe and effective’.

    If TV, print, radio and doctor parroted “sun rises in the west” over and over and over people would be very upset with you if you told them… “look to the east”.

  • Department of Public Health

    Since when did HPV vaccines contain actual viruses?

    Oh, that’s right….never.

  • Ben William

    So the V in the ‘HPV’ 33 L1, ‘HPV’ 31 L1… ingredient list which is in the ‘Gardasil package insert’ stands for ‘VACATION’ from the department of health? lol.

    If this was just some protein strain why would the VIRAL strains be called by MERK ‘human papillomVIRUS’ HPV’ 33 L1, ‘HPV’ 31 L1 in the package insert?

    Thanks for all the help.

  • AutismDad
  • AutismDad

    You are right…unfortunately. They brainwash prents with false promises and fear mongering.

  • Ben William

    It was once said… “There is nothing to fear but fear itself.” Now the motto is ‘FEAR SELLS’ and SELL SELL SELL!

  • AutismDad

    And cover up all vaccine adverse events by having no reporting system or compensation program. Only QUEBEC does.

  • yolanda

    I cant even begin to believe that they are still trying to push out this hpv vaccine on people. Crazy!!! Girls have died from the other ones but this one is supposedly safer??? Give me a break!!! Wouldnt not getting the shot be much safer then getting the shot??? So ridiculous….as parents we have to start educating ourselves on these chemicals they are putting in us and in our children…and we must fight against doctors that bully parents into taking these chemicals…we have to remember that WE ARE THE CONSUMERS!!!! These doctors are paid to help us…it is our choice on what help we receive since we are paying them….they dont have the right to make those choices for you but they pretend to

  • cookie

    I remember when I was younger the doctors basically forced this one on me. I did not want it and did not get the other 2. It was extremely painful for a very long time and was upset considering I did not want it at all.
    I was 12, and thats the same year I developed an autoimmune disorder and 10 years later still the doctors are stumped as to why and where it came from. ..how someone as healthy as I became so sickly and now suffer every single second of every day of my life this REALLY makes me wonder……..

  • Capt Ron

    However, that “twice as much” of aluminum is still magnitudes below the amount of aluminum that is naturally found in many food consumed on a daily basis! And… Breast feeding babies will consume about as much from their mothers while feeding within just a couple of days.

  • Capt Ron

    FYI – HPV vaccines do not contain fully functional virulent viruses capable of producing the active disease. They only contain antigenic fragments to stimulate anti-body production.

  • Ben William

    Well first of all, antigenic fragments do NOT ‘stimulate’ anti-body production. The entire argument for putting heavy metals and toxic chemicals in vaccines is, according to the manufactures, “to stimulate antibody production”. The HOPE and the prayer is that once toxins injected into the body have ‘stimulated’ antibody production some of those viral fragments will simply get “caught up’ in the ‘stimulation’ process and (somehow) translate into full antibody protect for the full viral strain.

    The debate on the ‘validity’ of the THEORY that these ‘specific’ anti-bodies actually get produced from this process is anther separate debate all together.

    Second of all, there is an ongoing debate today in the scientific circles what or what is NOT a virus. Because so little is still NOT understood about viruses themselves, even less is understood about viral fragments, as far as what they could ‘DO’ once inside the body.

    Because of such lack of knowledge of what these viral fragments could ‘do’, Merck pharmaceutical has a disclaimer in their Garadasil vaccine insert that states Gardasil CAN possibly give rise to HPV itself and that ANYONE with HPV stands a 46% (+or-) GREATER chance of getting cervical cancer by taking the vaccine.

    The Gardasil 9 insert has so many disclaimers on their vaccine with regards to the viral strains and how they can affect pregnant women I don;t have enough space here to cover it all.

    The bottom-line is to anyone CLAIMING these viral strains in vaccines are ‘inert’ do nothing but ‘hangout’ waiting for anti-bodies to wipe them out is simply putting out a fairy tail.

    I am personally alarmed with all the research in genetically ALTERD viral strains for vaccines.

    Since most of the USA vaccines are manufactured in China, the person getting an injection has a.) No clue what GAV’s (and other goodies) maybe in the vaccine that is NOW in their body and, be what these GAV’s will give rise to and… will they alter their own alter DNA / RNA or their children or their children’s children DNA / RNA.

    The entire vaccine operation is completely out of control and legally licensed NOT to have ANY regard for safety what-so-ever. Our governments’s have green lighted us ALL to be Guinea pigs.

  • Guest

    Spoke like a real pHarma-insider. Thanks for showing your colors.

  • Guest

    The aluminum adjuvant levels are too high and dangerous.
    Boric acid in the vaccine,what for??? Did you know that boric acid may contain trace amount of heavy metals like arsenic?

  • Ben William

    Second reply

    Viral fragments can be anything but ‘non-
    malevolent’. Viruses, ‘stealth virus, viral fragments in vaccines are well known in science and medicine to give rise to cytokine reactions.

    Here is an excerpt for just one of MANY ‘independent’ lab studies on Gardlisil’s HPV-16-L1 viral fragment giving rise to a specific cytokine reaction by the HPV-16-L1 virus where, the virus breaches cell barriers in brain cells and nervous system. Which would explain the suffering of so many Gardasil VICTIMS.

    “we identified up-regulation of genes involved in cytotoxic (CTSC, GZMA, GZMB, TNFSF10,
    FASLG) and important immunoregulatory functions (INDO,HSD11B1, CTLA4, SOCS1). These results suggest that the immune response to HPV-16 L1 VLP induces a complex modulation of various components of the cell-mediated immuneresponse, in-cluding cytokine secretion, cytotoxic response, and activation offeedback mechanisms involving immunoregulatory genes. Theseresults raise the need for future studies”


    The CDC / NHI typical ‘knee jerk,’ ‘follow the orders of their masters’ at big pharma is to make every irrelevant claim under the sun NOT to investigate this further.

    Which is evidence by itself that the system is beyond broken but in fact is ROGUE and completely out of control.

  • Guest

    You do not seem to understand that it is DIFFFERENT when the aluminum is injected directly into the tissues and the liver can not detoxify and the kidneys can not eliminate these metals. This aluminum adjuvants can easily reach the brain and also causes neuron injuries and immune system damages.

  • Guest

    Those antigenic fragments hardly stimulate anti-body production,that is why pHarma includes high levels of aluminum adjuvants-because these hyper stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies. They do not understand if this really works well or not. Do some research on Gulf War Syndrome and other aluminum studies by Dr.Shaw please.

  • Guest

    HPV was not an issue until 2006 when they had to create market in hurry for their fast-tracked vaccine Gardasil. Vioxx was to messy at the end and they needed to move on and expand their market (girls+boys)and increase their stock value.$$$$$$$$$$$$

  • Guest

    Exactly.They look at young girls and women and see the dollar sign in their pelvis.I truly believe the risks and the adverse side-effects just NOT worth to risk your daughter’s health.

  • Guest

    They were using aluminum filled placebo (instead of saline) to mislead the public about the dangers of the vaccine – so the testing was NOT than properly.Big pHarma just manipulates testing and data to fit their agenda.

  • Capt Ron

    The injected Al is a salt compound, not ground up aluminum foil! Elemental Al is very DIFFERENT when compared to an Al salt. Al salts are slowly absorbed by the body from an intramuscular injection and easily excreted by the kidneys. Not sure where you learned the body cannot excrete Al compounds – Likely it’s an erroneous meme perpetrated by the ant-vax crowd. Perhaps you should enroll in university coursework in elemental chemisty, biochemistry and human physiology before you make comments.

  • Guest

    If they have kidney issues or other immune health issues their body may have more difficulty clearing it. How about if the polysorbate/boric acid acid emulsifier combo just takes the aluminum salts to the central nervous system and it causes damage rather quickly before the body can clear it???

  • Lowell Hubbs

    I have gone through the 460 some page document that Merck submitted to the FDA and that indeed is true. Merck got away without the use of a true saline placebo in the comparison of systemic reactions. They used it in the injection site reactions comparisons, but not nor during the systemic reactions comparisons. One so called placebo was and contained the aluminum adjuvant, and the other contained the HPV virus like particles. Now that we know those particles are firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant, the adverse reactions, deaths, and un-recovered from neurologically based outcome, and now so many of them; it all makes sense. The actual FDA document since this article, is on another url page now, but it is still there, last I looked.

    July 23, 2008
    Gardasil clinical trials — Placebo

    Vaccine mechanism of harm exposed

  • Capt Ron

    Do you realize how small a micro-gram is?

  • Capt Ron

    So… A real active case of HPV infection generates MAGNITUDES more HPV antigen as an assault on the human body. Why aren’t we seeing horrendous effects like you describe for the fragments of HPV in a vaccine?

  • Ben William

    Who is to say we are NOT seeing a rise in HPV due to the vaccine? The corrupt CDC admits that only 1% of ANY serious adverse effect from a vaccine is ever reported. The medical system is so corrupt that doctors are encouraged NOT to report, not only vaccine reactions, but adverse reactions to drugs as well.

    A sudden rise in HPV? That’s a very good point. You maybe onto something.


    Doctors see rise in HPV-related cancers


    … HPV cancer rates have been steady for decades but, golly gee bob, we’re NOW seeing a rise


  • James

    There is a reason that the MAXIMUM amount of aluminum for injectable
    solutions is only 25 mcg (per the FDA) – of course, vaccines have a free pass on this.

  • Guest

    Aluminum is a known neuro-toxin.Please stop protecting big pharma,look at some aluminum studies from Dr. Shaw and educate yourself.

  • Guest

    That is why they (pharma)has a blanket protection.

  • FishLady

    Capt Ron – no disrespect intended, I was wondering do you work for the FDA? My second question is, would you allow your daughter to be injected with a vaccine which just doubled the amount of aluminum in it knowing that aluminum is a health risk? Regardless of how much aluminum you feel is dangerous, would you allow your child to have this injected into their body? Again, I do not intend my questions contain any disrespect what so ever, just your opinion.

  • Lindaxox

    No thanks! Just how much “junk” can you pump into the blood steam before everything crashes or slowly falls apart. It seems we have hit that mark. Vaccines started with good intentions although crude and a lot of mistakes were made including many injuries and death. Today the vaccines are to make money, billions of dollars, the health of the masses is almost not even considered. The FDA, CDC need to be dismantled, the drug companies are fined billions a year for consistent FRAUD, to them it’s just the cost of doing business. The head of the CDC is a Dr Offit with personal vaccine interests, he patented one, makes millions, First time around did a horrific amount of damage and deaths, it was taken off the market. No problem, a few years later it was back. Dr. Offit stated a child could have 10,000 vaccines a day. OK on this statement alone this man should be fired. They think most people don’t even realize – their families and kids and grandkids don’t have these vaccines, Drs will continue to have exemptions, Gone are the days when one Dr. vaccinated his grandkids with the polio vaccine and one grandkid died within 48 hrs and one was paralyzed. One researcher said of Dr. Offit, let him have 10,000 vaccines and donate his brain to science and then we will see what happen to him. The drug companies do their own safety studies or buy them, they heavily influence what will be published even in “peer reviewed journals”. I personally do not believe a word they say.

  • Lindaxox

    Only a short time ago and published in “peer reviewed journals” we were advised to throw out any and all Al pots or cooking utensils, the small amount of Al that leaked into the food was considered very dangerous and a major cause of dementia. Remember that? Now we can just inject it into our blood stream……..no problem.

  • Lindaxox

    Many who have Phd, MD degrees along with virologists, scientists, neurologists etc. know that vaccines are dangerous and causes a lot of sickness, some very immediate and some long term. When the country is 34th for mortality under the age of 5, 1.3 billion with autism, millions with autoimmune diseases etc. you should definitely be doing something about it but NO the answer seems to be to come out with yet another vaccine!!

  • Grammar Police(state)

    And they’ll run the risk of cervical cancer every time they have sex. They will definitely thank you later…

  • Chuck Robey

    Not if we raise our kids to not have Premarital Sex and God willing they will also find a Spouse who is also a Virgin when they get married.. However should they slip up and have sex before marriage then that will be dealt with accordingly. As for your assumption that they will be subject to cervical cancer just because they have sex is laughable the Gardasil Vaccine only covers a small percentage of HPV viruses and it’s side effects are far greater then you seem to realize..

  • Grammar Police(state)

    You keep those fingers crossed, but try not to act too shocked when your teens turnout to be teens