Multiple Deaths Linked to Childhood Vaccines

Oct 26th, 2010 | By | Category: Christina England, Top Stories

On 24th October 2010, the Sunday Times reported new evidence suggesting that forty children have died over the past seven years following a routine childhood vaccination. This was revealed after the Sunday Times sent a Freedom of Information (FOI) data request to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA). The FOI data revealed that childhood vaccinations are suspected to have caused forty deaths, of leaving two young children with brain injuries and causing more than 1,500 other neurological reactions, including 11 cases of inflammation of the brain, 13 cases of epilepsy and a coma.

In the article ’40 deaths linked to child vaccines over seven years’ by Sarah-Kate Templeton (http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news…), Templeton reported that when asked about the deaths the MHRA appeared to play down the deaths, saying that they should be seen in the context of the 90m doses of childhood vaccines which have been given since 2003.


Fair enough, however, I would like to point out to the MHRA that this is approximately 6 deaths and 214 serious adverse reactions a year if taken on an average. Their figures also failed to take into consideration the hundreds of adverse reactions that are less significant or those left unreported. I feel the overall picture should be taken into consideration and the public should realize that this report only looked at the childhood vaccinations.
This week a report on the Mail Online website (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1323208…) revealed that the MHRA received nearly 8,600 reports of suspected adverse reactions to the swine flu jab during the pandemic last winter. Most reactions involved pain or swelling at the site of the jab, vomiting and headaches. Many of these adverse reactions were children receiving the swine flu vaccine. Were these reactions taken into consideration? Probably not as this is not a routine childhood vaccine.

The Mail said:

The Mail on Sunday revealed last week that Government experts are examining a possible association between the H1N1 swine flu jab and the paralysing nerve disease Guillian-Barre Syndrome.

The vaccine has also been linked to fevers in young children, temporary paralysis and narcolepsy.”

When revealing their figures, did the MHRA take into consideration the comparatively new vaccine the HPV vaccine Cervarix? The MHRA said on their website that 4,445 adverse reactions to this vaccine have been reported. Although, they suspect the total number of reactions to be over double this figure:

Suspected Adverse Reaction Analysis CERVARIX Human papillomavirus (http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/…)

Total number of reports received: 4,445

Total number of suspected reactions: 9,673

Estimated number of doses administered across the UK: at least 4 million doses

I believe that the MHRA may have been somewhat economic with the truth when they revealed their data and the figures stated show a mere snippet of the problem, .By revealing data on childhood vaccinations in the schedule only, vital data could be kept from the public as many vaccinations are not included.

This is the childhood vaccination schedule from the (http://www.nhs.uk/Planners/vaccinations…) National Health Service website UK

2 months:

  • Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib, a bacterial infection that can cause severe pneumonia or meningitis in young children) given as a 5-in-1 single jab known as DTaP/IPV/Hib
  • Pneumococcal infection

3 months:

  • 5-in-1, second dose (DTaP/IPV/Hib)
  • Meningitis C

4 months:

  • 5-in-1, third dose (DTaP/IPV/Hib)
  • Pneumococcal infection, second dose
  • Meningitis C, second dose

Around 12 months:

  • Meningitis C, third dose
  • Hib, fourth dose (Hib/MenC given as a single jab)

Around 13 months:

  • MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), given as a single jab
  • Pneumococcal infection, third dose

3 years and 4 months, or soon after:

  • MMR second jab
  • Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and polio (DtaP/IPV), given as a 4-in-1 pre-school booster

Around 12-13 years:

  • Cervical cancer (HPV) vaccine, which protects against cervical cancer (girls only): three jabs given within six months

Around 13-18 years:

  • Diphtheria, tetanus and polio booster (Td/IPV), given as a single jab

As we can see, the vaccines for flu, swine flu, rotavirus and chickenpox are not included in the schedule, therefore the side effects from these vaccines can be missed from the data given to the Sunday Times. Another point to consider is that many of the above vaccines were not in the vaccine schedule in 2003 for example Cervarix, and the 5 in 1 vaccine.

So which vaccines were included in the figures revealed to the Times? It is very easy to bend statistics to suit. I believe that the statistics that the MHRA gave to the Sunday Times revealed only the tip of the iceberg and that the true figures are still unknown.

First Name Email
Tags: , , ,
  • http://fiddaman.blogspot.com Bob Fiddaman

    The Yellow Card reporting system is flawed. Multiply what ever figures they give you by 10 for a truer picture.

  • http://www.facebook.com/pages/Vaccination-Information-Network-VINE/69667273997 Erwin Alber

    The reported reactions are IMO the equivalent of the proverbial tip of the iceberg. As far as I am concerned, EVERY vaccinated child is a vaccine-injured child, even if such injury may not be evident.

    Vaccines do not have side-effects, because the harm they cause is their ONLY effect.

    Vaccines have never prevented anything apart from health, sanity and common sense.

    Vaccination is an organised criminal enterprise dressed up as disease prevention.

    What we now have is a vaccine-induced holocaust of vaccine-induced reactions, ill-health, disorders, disabilities and deaths.

    Vaccination is a gigantic medical experiment being inflicted on the human race without informed consent and without a control, in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code.

    The people responsible should be held accountable for this crime against humankind, in the form of an irreversible biological disaster of global proportions.

  • Christina England

    Mr Alber

    Thank you for your valuable comment.

    I believe you are right. We are the unhealthiest we have ever been. Cases of Autism, ADHD, Allergies, Obesity and Diabetes plague our children. We have soaring numbers of infant deaths and more falsely accused parents than our justice system can cope with. It needs to stop.The only way I see an end to this is if parents educate themselves and take action.

    Christina

  • Erwin Alber

    Thank you for your response Christina! I agree that change is unlikely to come from the top, but will come as more and more parents become aware of the harmful nature of vaccination, hopefully due to accessing information and learning from parents of affected children, rather than learning the hard way by ending up with a vaccine injured child themselves.

    I’d feel honoured if you visited my ‘Vaccination Information Network’ (VINE) on Facebook and – if you wish – signed up as a fan!

    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Vaccination-Information-Network-VINE/69667273997

  • Sandy

    Once again an excellent article, thank you Christina!

    I beg to make a small remark on your statement: “Cervical cancer (HPV) vaccine, which protects against cervical cancer”. The vaccine removes some virus strains which may possibly cause cervical cancer, but it has not been proved that the vaccine actually protects against cervical cancer. On the contrary, some of the ingredients may be cancerogenic; also the phenomenon of replacement may occur where new virus strains replace the ones which have been removed. This is a normal event in virology. The new ones may be more aggressive and cancerogenic than the original strains. In other words, we do not know if the vaccine itself actually increases the risk of cancer. It would then surely be inappropriate to call it a cancer vaccine!

    Vaccine manufacturers, health authorities and others who promote vaccines do not have reliable and sufficient information about long term side effects and they probably never will have this information. They no doubt don’t want to know it. That is one reason why parents receive insufficient and often misleading information. It is therefore impossible for them to be able to make an informed choice regarding whether or not to vaccinate.

    Regarding “I believe that the MHRA may have been somewhat economic with the truth when they revealed their data and the figures stated show a mere snippet of the problem” – that is a kind way of saying that statistics are “fixed”! Highly paid statisticians are employed for this very purpose by the pharmaceutical industry and health authorities.

    Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital! ~ Aaron Levenstein.

  • Christina England

    Hi Sandy

    The first quote you mentioned was not mine I cut and pasted the vaccine schedule from the NHS website as it was relevant and necessary to the aricle, I then referenced the site and gave the link as per copyright law.

    I totally go along with what you state as you will see from a new article I hope will be published in the next couple of days.

    As for the statistics being fixed Mmmm well in my opinion most statistics are fixed to benefit whoever has the most to gain from them. It would not have been in the best interest of the MHRA to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth now would it? However, that is only in my opinion.

    I love the quote btw :) Excellent!!

    Mr Alber thank you for your invite.

    Christina

  • Jackie Hogan

    Dear Christina,
    Presently here in Ireland the HPV vaccine programme is underway despite all the reports from around the world regarding the adverse effects being experienced by young girls. I have written to the Minister for Health and political parties forwarding the information and reports of young girls whose deaths have been linked to the HPV vaccine and also the reports of the adverse effects that have been linked to the Gardasil vaccine. I felt sure our Government would learn from all of this pain and suffering and choose to protect our children by suspending the vaccine…….. but no it went through. What I find so unfair is that this information is NOT being passed on to parents. Those in authority are choosing to conceal this important information and by so doing parents are giving consent for their daughters to be vaccinated unaware of the controversey regarding the safety and efficacy of Gardasil that is being voiced by parents on a global level.
    I feel we as parents have to take back our power and to claim responsibility for the wellbeing and safety of our children. We are more than capable of making right decisions for our children afterall no bond is stronger than that between parent and child. We have trusted people in authority for so long choosing to go along with most of the beliefs they feed us. Believing they know better or are smarter or wiser than us. We have given them a Free Hand to do as they choose . We have been gripped by fear, and afraid to Think for ourselves. Well I believe the time has come and we are waking up and finally we are questioning and researching what is in these vaccines. And for me it really does not feel right, it makes no sense at all to want to inject any child with these harmful toxic chemicals.
    With Love and Gratitude,
    Jackie Hogan ,

  • Christina England

    Hi Jackie

    Thank you for you comments which are very valuable.

    Currently my research is showing that the HPV vaccines Cervarix and Gardasil are the most feared and the most reported of all the vaccines.

    An article due to go up here will highlight what is going on around the world.
    It is true Gardasil has been responsible for many deaths I believe as many as 84 from my latest research.

    I feel that it is paramount that parents like yourself and as many as possible should be writing to UK M.P.’s and the UK government and complaining.

    Please warn parents that in the UK the Gillick law is used. This means that schools CAN vaccinate WITHOUT a parents consent if the child agrees to the vaccine and the school feels the child is capable of making an informed choice. http://www.paediatrics.ox.ac.uk/ovg/Vaccsline/Consent121010.pdf please read right through this. The interesting thing is that a child can be vaccinated if they agree and the parent does not but if they refuse and the parent agrees they will still be vaccinated.

    I am in England and am very willing to write on behalf of yourself to the government or pass your details to the UK political adiviser on this issue.
    Please pass your contact details to Jeff Aufderheide who runs this site.

    Christina

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for this link.. Really awareness article about multiple deaths linked to childhood vaccines..
    Aluminium Kozijnen