WWII Military Handbook Reveals Pesticide Chemicals Used In Infant Vaccines

US Serviceman Sprayed With Pesticides

A United States military handbook published in 1946 shows chemical compounds used in formulating the pesticide DDT are currently injected into babies.

The handbook entitled, “DDT and Other Insecticides and Repellents”, reveals Triton X-100, Tween 20, and Tween 80 were used as major components of spraying operations of DDT. Their stated purpose was to prevent separation of ingredients and increase absorption of DDT.

A major twist to the story is revealing the company owning the patent for DDT. More on that later.

Page 70 of the document states, “The studies of emulsifers have been confined primarily to their effects on the skin, since there is no hazard from ingestion and little from skin absorption and inhalation. They have also been studied to some extent from the standpoint of their relationship to increased absorption of DDT. All of those studied present little or no hazard under the conditions of use recommended, and have been approved for that purpose so far as the toxicology is concerned.” [emphasis mine]

Scientific studies on Triton X-100 and Tween 80 actually prove the statement above to be untrue, which would likely explain why studies were limited to only the effects on the skin.

Triton X-100 and Tween 80 actually cause cell suicide, called apoptosis.

Mixtures were sprayed directly onto vegetables and crops during the height of the polio epidemic in the late 1940s and early 1950s.

 

“What vaccines are these chemicals in?”

As a concerned parent, you may be wondering what vaccines contain these chemicals. The Centers for Disease Control website shows the chemicals mentioned above are in the following vaccines:

Tween 20 (Polysorbate 20) 

  • Hepatitis A (Havrix)
  • Hepatitis A-B (Twinrix)

Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) 

  • DtaP (Infanrix, Tripedia)
  • DtaP-HebB-IPV (Pediarix)
  • DtaP-Hib (TriHIBit)
  • Human Papillomavirus (Gardasil)
  • Influenza (Fluarix)
  • Rotavirus (RotaTeq)
  • Tdap (Adacel, Boostrix)

Triton X-100

  • Influenza (Fluarix, Fluzone) 

 

If you decide to bring this list to your doctor to educate him/her, prepare to be disappointed. Medical professionals are trained to ignore mothers concerned about vaccines. They parrot the following phrase:  “The poison is in the dose.”

In their arrogance, their response will go something like this, “It is just ridiculous to worry about such a tiny dose of something so innocuous.

If you want to read how most medical personnel are putting your baby in jeopardy, read on.

 The small amounts of ingredients in vaccines can hurt your child. This fact is often overlooked by arrogant doctors.

 

“What can these chemicals do to my child?”

What can these chemicals do to your child? A parent would think finding information on the safety record of Triton X-100, Tween 20, and Tween 80 would be easily available – but this isn’t the case.

What I discovered was shocking.

Tween 80 and Triton X-100 can:

  • Be used in pharmaceuticals to deliver nano-particles to the brain because they cross or disrupt the Blood Brain Barrier – which protects the brain.
  • Suppress the immune system
  • Promote epileptic seizures in rats
  • Accelerate the development of female organs in rats
  • Trigger cell death or ‘suicide’ called apoptosis
  • Cause cancer in rats at the injection site
  • Damage and promote intestinal damage in rats
  • Cause bleeding disorders, kidney failure, liver failure, and death in infants who received a vitamin E product combined with Tween 80
  • Possibly promote viral or bacterial infections
  • Break down Red Blood Cells
  • Cause damage to the heart when injected into rats

Read about them here: http://vactruth.com/2011/08/23/vaccine-ingredients-non-ionic-surfactants-tween-80-triton-x-100-nonoxynol-9/

To minimize the above information, you may hear arguments about the chemicals being safe because they are in hand soaps, ice cream, and in our lungs (natural surfactant).

For the record, I’ve never seen a mother feeding or injecting a newborn with soap or ice cream. My word of advice to mothers is follow your intuition and ask a lot of questions.

 

“Do pharmaceutical companies really care about my child?”

After many parents read vaccine ingredients, they may ask, “Pharmaceutical companies really care about my child’s health, don’t they?”

Pharmaceutical companies have yet to explain how injecting such toxic substances into a baby actually makes them healthier. You’ll see how they have known about this information for some time.

Consider page 71 of the handbook cautioning, It should be clearly kept in mind that most of the substances under consideration are poisonous. If they were not, they would probably be useless against the insects for which they are recommended. Therefore, the recommendations for the proper use of these substances should be followed. Careless, unnecessary exposure and misuse is [sic] fraught with hazard.”

Here is the twist I promised.

Using the chemicals in vaccines is easily understood by looking at who owns the patent for DDT.

On page 3 of the handbook it states,The Geigy company holds the patents on the use of the compound [DDT] as an insecticide. The United States patent is No. 2,329,074, issued September 7, 1943, to Paul Müller.” [emphasis mine]

Geigy company is now known as Novartis Pharmaceuticals, a vaccine manufacturer.

 

What does it all mean?

In a nutshell, the same companies who formulated and patented DDT, are putting the same industrial chemicals in childhood vaccines. To add insult to injury, their public relations campaigns brainwash doctors and the scientific community into believing that injecting babies, even in small amounts with these chemicals, is somehow okay. Even more bizarre are claims chemicals such as Triton X-100 or Tween 80 are involved in promoting health!

Mothers should carefully read the vaccine inserts and investigate vaccines before allowing physicians to inject their children with toxic chemicals that could permanently injure their children for life.

 

 ***

We are publishing this information to educate Congress, the media, and public regarding issues affecting the health and well-being of our citizens. It is not our intention to infringe upon anyone’s copyright. We believe we have used the U.S. Copyright’s Doctrine of Fair Use equitably and without incurring infringement or plagiarism.
Pesticide Chemicals Are In Vaccines

 

References:

DDT and Other Insecticides and Repellents”. Miscellaneous Publication No. 606, United States Department of Agriculture. Issued August 1946.

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/b/excipient-table-1.pdf

http://www.sailhome.org/Concerns/Vaccines/MAC.html

http://vactruth.com/2011/08/23/vaccine-ingredients-non-ionic-surfactants-tween-80-triton-x-100-nonoxynol-9/

http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/etc/medialib/docs/Sigma/Product_Information_Sheet/1/t8532pis.Par.0001.File.tmp/t8532pis.pdf

http://www.novartis.com/about-novartis/company-history/index.shtml

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=700465656 Sandy L

    Excellent article with interesting and shocking information. It does not seem to be of importance to companies, whatever they produce and however detrimental to health their products are, as long as there is money to be made.

    – Not only mothers, but also fathers and other carers should be concerned and should carefully read the vaccine inserts and investigate vaccines!

    Emulsifying agents reduce surface tension and are used in pesticides to prevent separation and increase absorption. They have similar functions in vaccines.

    In drug targeting polysorbate 80/Tween 80 is used to assist in the delivery of certain drugs (especially psychiatric, nano-drugs or chemotherapeutic agents) across the blood-brain barrier and into the brain tissue. Polysorbates act by rendering the barrier more porous (“open it up”).

    The obvious deduction is that this is likely to happen regarding vaccines so that passage of toxic substances through the barrier into the brain tissue is facilitated.  Why is there
    deafening silence when vaccine promoters are confronted with this fact?

    It should be of special concern in the case of small children and neo-nates as their blood-brain barriers are not fully developed.

    Doctor’s arrogance may be because of ignorance. These two go together. Many vaccine critics have studied the subject for years and know far more than the average doctor.

    It is disappointing and scaring to experience doctors who cannot answer questions about ingredients, interactions between them  (which do occur), side effects, also relevant questions concerning several vaccines administered within a short period of time.

    What is even more disappointing is doctors’ lack of interest in finding these answers.
    TINY AMOUNTS OF TOXICS ARE NOT HARMLESS
    Take mercury, for example. In addition to the fact that it accumulates:
    “Trace amounts” of thimerosal (approximately 49% mercury) range from 0.00012% to 0.0033%.
    That is equivalent to 1,200 ppb to 33,000 ppb.
    Thimerosal is toxic to neurons at 1 ppb.
    Those “trace amounts” are still 4 to 5 orders of magnitude higher.

    CHEMICALS ARE NOT SAFE IN INJECTIONS JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE IN FOODMedical students learn that substances behave differently when they are injected or ingested – why do so many appear to forget this basic fact?EVEN WATER IS NOT SAFE WHEN IT IS INJECTEDAs with other substances, water behaves differently when injected, in fact it is dangerous.

    Injections containing only water should never be administrated because they cause irreversible damage: hemolysis/bursting of blood cells.

    That is why if injection of water is required it must be mixed with another substance to regulate isotonicity so that blood cells will not be damaged. One example of a substance which is often used for this purpose is sodium chloride. An injection of 0.9 per cent sodium choride is ideal as it presents least damage to blood cells. 

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Congratulations!  Job well done.  Now it’s Congress’s turn to do a job well done and get on the ball investigating why these toxic chemicals are allowed by HHS, CDC, FDA, plus mandated by laws in states as ‘immunizing’ agents for infants, toddlers, teens, adults, and senior citizens.
    In my opinion, this PROVES they know what they are doing.  What’s behind it, is the million dollar question, I think.  Could the answer be population control?  Start asking questions of your 
    members of Congress.

  • Deborahmerlin

    I was exposed to DDT big time growing up in NJ where trucks sprayed DDT every summer. I did a homeopathic DDT detox (CEASE therapy). I blog about it on my website http://www.victoryoveradhd.com

  • David kenna

    excellent. very important information

  • Christina England

    Very interesting and important information that needs spreading. The more people who know about the ingredients being put in our vaccines, the more people will think twice before poisoning their bodies and the bodies of their children.

  • mike

    I guess they know where to go for the profits.
    http://www.novartis.com/about-novartis/company-history/index.shtml

    Thank you for your work.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Mike, thank you for sharing this information with others. You’re welcome and I appreciate you reading.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Deborah, I like your website – I have been on it before. Thank you for sharing the link as it has very valuable information for those seeking answers. Keep up the excellent work!

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Wonderful questions, Sandy. It would seem that a majority of them are conveniently ignored. Thank you for your important commentary.

  • Jenny

    Great reply, almost as informative as the article itself

  • http://www.facebook.com/bunny.st.marie Bunny Dayelle St. Marie

    Awesome job on this informative article Jeffry! I had a chance to read through the handbook you provided above, sure enough the information you referenced is all there! I recommend everyone download it and read through it for themselves, there are many interesting tidbits throughout.

    The chemical triton -x is one of the most irritating ingredients next to duponol C. Nevermind the fact that it KILLS sperm and is used as a contraceptive for that exact purpose, -if you can stand the skin irritation that is.

    On DDT; the ingredients in it were all found to be “safe-ish” and it wasn’t until AFTER widespread applications were used that people then began to question the environmental and severe human health ramifications. -This is sounding very familiar…

    One question if I may, the handbook mentions possible deleterious contaminants found in many of the ingredients, can contaminants also affect the surfactants used in vaccines?

  • http://blog.anarchic-teapot.net anarchic teapot

    Vaccinated my kids, vaccinated myself. Get flu jab every year. Everyone alive, healthy, sane, intelligent. More than I can say for this article.

  • Kurt

    Actually, if anyone reads your comment given the information in this article, they can plainly see the vaccines are working as designed. Cognitive dissonance at it’s finest.

  • Jon in Charlotte

    Please Correct me if I’m incorrect, but, if the chemicals assist in allowing particles to pass through the BBB then it is allowing the heavy metals used in vaccines, such as mercury and alluminum, to pass through as well. And, wouldn’t these heavy metals effect the brain’s neurotransmitters?

    Doesn’t logic suggest that the rise in neurological disorders (SIDS, ADHD, ALZHEIMERS, AUTISM, etc…) is directly related to our vaccination program?

  • Canuck

    Your feeble attempt at an insult might have worked if it actually made sense. Don’t use big words if you don’t know what they mean.

  • Kurt

    Sure, let me spell it out for you. He sees the poison but he sticks it in his family in the hopes it protects them. There are no data to support that it works outside of his anecdotal statement. Cognitive dissonance means that he sees, but chooses to ignore the evidence, due to his religious belief that vaccines saved mankind.

    You on the other hand. Yes, I would use a different word to describe you. And certain things should come to mind.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Sure seems that way, doesn’t it, Jon?

  • Ch Schaefer

    Wow! What an excellent article. Great research and presentation. Well done.

  • Jenny

    I was going to reply to Canuck, but thought, why waste the energy, Ignorance is bliss for some.
    They find out as time passes that Ignorance is not bliss but folly.
    Your reply was excellent

  • Canuck

    Kurt, since you clearly don’t get it  —
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance
    It’s interesting that you engage in ad hominem attacks just like most others on here. Perhaps it’s necessary since you can’t articulate your views in a convincing manner.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
    If you wish to continue insulting that of course is your prerogative, but it certainly seems to indicate that your views are probably wrong. If you were correct then you should be able to explain why. I predict more insults or silence.

  • Jerry

    Thank you for the information here and in your Aug 23rd article.  This gets me wondering about oral ingestion of polysorbate-80 and paralytic polio.  Can oral ingestion affect the blood-brain barrier?  Was polysorbate-80 used in ice cream in the 1940’s? 

    Here’s the idea.  Remember a study done by Dr. Benjamin Sandler who hypothesized that polio susceptibility was caused by low blood sugar.  He convinced many families in NC to reduce their sugar consumption in the summer when polio cases peaked, and this had a profound effect in reducing cases of polio.  What if, in addition to blood sugar stabilization, reduction in polysorbate-80 consumption had an impact?  That is, lower sugar consumption surely implied lower ice cream consumption, and hence, lower p-80 consumption.  And if p-80 was aiding polio in gaining access to the brain, less p-80 would mean less paralysis.

    Then again, I could be way off base.  But I think you are onto something here.

  • Nicetrynocigar

    Jerry,

    Your hypothesis has too many holes in it to be plausible, so yes, you are most likely way off base. There is no data to suggest people actually followed his advice and even if they did there is no record of how many. Further, ice cream was a very tiny part(or non-existent) in the average diet at that time. Therefore, reduction in ice cream intake could not possibly explain the reduction in polio case claimed by Dr. Sandler.

  • Rempe

    I was also exposed to it the same way, all summer long.  Never  bothered me or my family.  I’ve seen people drink a tablespoon of DDT mixed in water and they’re still alive and kicking.  Many people, millions, in fact, have died because the malaria that killed them could have been killed with DDT. But it’s banned in most countries.  Thankfully, not in India, where lives are being saved daily.

  • Rempe

    Not everyone will experience the negative effects of vaccines as described here.  Just depends on the person’s constitution. People can smoke all their lives and never get lung cancer, too.  But just be the parents of a child who becomes vacant after a vaccine, or gets seizures after a vaccine.  Or never communicates with you again after a vaccine, and you won’t be so flippant about your good blessings.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Rempe, I’ve seen these demonstrations as well, however, I have NEVER seen ANYONE drink a concoction of DDT mixed with the chemicals mentioned in the handbook.

    To base it’s safety upon these demonstrations is capricious — and last I had checked there are polio outbreaks in India. Coincidence? 

  • skeptic paren

    Could the rise in the neurological disorders also be explained by more people coming to the doctor with their concerns more than they did in the past?  Many behaviors are being diagnosed now because of a greater awareness. They have also relaxed the standards to diagnose these diseases.  It is a slippery slope.  

    My Grandfather contracted polio and walked with a severe limp for the rest of his life.  Many of his siblings and friends died.  I will vaccinate after being educated and doing my own research before I allow my children to contract diseases that will leave them with life long disabilities.

    I do not think anyone has been able to PROVE that vaccinations cause neurological disease.  Please provide scientific research by an objective source that will prove this.

  • LAdsit

    Thank you for posting this information. For the sake of all humanity, DO NOT STOP SHARING THIS INFORMATION WITH EVERYBODY YOU KNOW!!!!!!

  • skeptic

    Just found this post. Wonderful research. These ingredients could explain PANDAS and PANS. infectious agents and antibodies can cross the BBB compromised by Tween 80 or Triton-X 100 causing the neuro-autoimmune symptoms seen in PANDAS/PANS.

    Great work!