This ‘Misdirection Tactic’ is Used by Mainstream Media When Reporting Outbreaks

baby-looking

Many of the published mainstream media news reports outlining the recent outbreaks of measles and mumps in the US have blamed unvaccinated children for the problem.

All of the reports have strong, accusatory titles, with reporters repeatedly emphasizing the need for vaccination. They stress how parents who do not vaccinate their children are putting thousands of children at risk from potentially deadly diseases.

However, if you examine what is being written more closely, what they are actually saying is something entirely different. Hidden somewhere in the report will be a sentence with crucial information that many parents may miss. This information is hidden so well by the reporter that by the time most readers get to it, they will have been completely brainwashed by the rest of the information and are therefore unlikely to notice its significance.

This tactic is known as misdirection. [1]

Misdirection At Its Best

One particular news report that caught my eye refers to the recent outbreak of mumps in the state of Illinois. The website 5KSDK.com released a news bulletin titled Mumps Outbreak Caused by Vaccination Backlash. During the bulletin, a mother with fully vaccinated children is seen on film stating:

“All of my children have been vaccinated as scheduled their whole lives. I am a little disturbed that – eh – you know, if there is mumps here then that means that somebody’s children aren’t vaccinated.”

The news clip stated that:

“Health officials say a recent backlash against vaccines is helping aid the resurgence of the disease.”

The reporter continued by stating that nine of the reported mumps cases were students from the University of Illinois, Champaign.

Interestingly, the reporter then ended the report by stating that:

“All of those students have been vaccinated, but the vaccine is only 80 to 85 percent effective.” [2] (emphasis added)

This one sentence makes the whole report nonsensical, especially when you consider that both the mother used in the film and the report clearly blamed the unvaccinated population for the problem.

Yet More Misdirection

It appears that mainstream media are not only blaming the unvaccinated community for the current mumps “epidemic,” but also for the cases of measles that are being reported.

Or are they?

One article covering the measles outbreak in New York City reported that it is “the loons who refuse to vaccinate their children who put everyone at risk.” To make matters even worse, the article, which was published by The Daily Beast, titled Thanks, Anti-Vaxxers. You Just Brought Measles Back in NYC, was written by a doctor.

Let’s examine his article in more detail.

About halfway through his poorly written article, he stated:

“But now, shoppers in Boston-area supermarkets get to worry that they may have been exposed when they stopped by for groceries. Commuters in the Bay Area now have to contend with the possibility that they or their children may contract the illness because they happened to get on the wrong train. Over a dozen people around Los Angeles have been diagnosed with measles already this year, nearly half of them intentionally unvaccinated. (emphasis added)

Now, if nearly half of the cases of measles were intentionally unvaccinated, then this would mean that over half of them were intentionally vaccinated!

He continued his report by stating:

“The explanation is simple, and is as accessible as the nightly news. Vaccine-deniers are responsible to the resurgence of once-eliminated illnesses. Their movement is responsible for sickening people. They are to blame for the word ‘outbreak’ appearing in headlines from coast to coast.”

He followed his accusation by adding:

“The anti-vaccine crowd may think they’re only making a decision for their own family. In fact, they’re threatening to make the rest of us sick. Refusing to vaccinate your children means you are contributing to a worsening public health crisis. There is no denying it, and there is no point in sugar-coating it.” [3]

I wonder, however, if by the time readers had read the remainder of his waffle, just how many of them actually noticed that one sentence hidden at the end of a paragraph which changed the whole meaning of his article.

Let’s face it: if his article had been correct, this would mean that all parents choosing not to vaccinate their children would be putting the whole population at risk, including vaccinated children!

How could that be true if vaccinations protect children against disease?

Are Parents Being Fooled Into Believing Vaccinations Protect Children?

Parents have been fooled for many years into believing that by having their children vaccinated, it will protect them against deadly disease.

In fact, the CDC recommends vaccination, by stating the following information on their website:

“There’s no greater joy than helping your baby grow up healthy and happy. That’s why most parents choose immunization. Giving your baby the recommended immunizations by age two is the best way to protect him from 14 serious diseases, like measles and whooping cough.” [4]

However, this appears not to be the case, because yet another news report which I have chosen for us to examine says the complete and utter opposite. A report published by Wyoming News Source titled Anti-Vaccine Movement Puts Children at Risk stated that parents who refuse to vaccinate are irresponsible and are putting other children’s lives at risk. They stated:

“It’s important to note that the vast majority of children in Wyoming are properly vaccinated before they start school, and we commend their families for that. But just one unvaccinated child puts others at risk, whether that’s in the classroom or the emergency room. Some doctors won’t even treat unvaccinated children. The waiting room situation is just too fraught with risk. Parents who wisely vaccinate might think twice about taking their children to a place where they’d be at increased risk.” [5] (emphasis added)

Do they know something that we do not?

The Mayo Clinic Admits That Vaccines Do Not Work

It is entirely possible that they do. I say this because just a few days ago, a report was published by the Financial Post titled Vaccines Cannot Prevent Measles Outbreaks. Its author, Lawrence Solomon, reported on a paper written by Professor of Medicine and founder and leader of the Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group, Professor Gregory A. Poland, titled The Re-emergence of Measles in Developed Countries, which was published two years ago.

Describing the paper in huge detail, Solomon explained how Professor Poland had stressed that the reason the measles vaccine was not working was hidden in our genes. Solomon stated:

“ … Because different people have different genetic makeups, the vaccine is simply a dud in many, failing to provide the protection they think they’ve acquired.” [6]

According to Solomon, Professor Poland had reported that the re-emergence of measles was due to a failure to vaccinate as well as the failure of the measles vaccine.

Curious to know exactly what Professor Poland had written, I decided to research the report for myself. In the pre-edited version of the report, sure enough, Professor Poland had indicated that he believed that the re-emergence of measles was due to a failure to vaccinate, as well as the failure of the measles vaccine itself. However, he had also written the following very interesting couple of sentences:

“ … As illustrated in the Table, since 2005 these outbreaks have also occurred in the U.S. – with surprising numbers of cases occurring in persons who previously received one or even two documented doses of measles-containing vaccine. In fact, as of September 2011, the U.S. has had 15 measles outbreaks with 211 confirmed cases – the highest number of cases since 1996.”

Professor Poland acknowledged the fact that:

“Thus, while an excellent vaccine, a dilemma remains. As previously mentioned, measles is extraordinarily transmissible. At the same time, measles vaccine has a failure rate measured in a variety of studies at 2 –10%, and modeling studies suggest that herd immunity to measles requires approximately 95% or better of the population to be immune.” [7]

He indicated, however, that this may not be possible, because the vaccination cannot be administered to the immuno-compromised, pregnant woman and anyone who may be allergic to certain components of the vaccine.

For these reasons, he recommended that a new vaccination should be developed, stating that the following measures should take place:

“The practical answer to the dilemma of measles re-emergence is the development of better, next-generation vaccines. Given recent public opinion and large numbers of parents rejecting the current vaccine, combined with practical and immunologic limitations, new vaccines appear to be necessary. The ideal vaccine would require only one dose to be given at or soon after birth; it would lack contraindications and permit administration without highly trained health care personnel; it would be inexpensive, and heat stable. (emphasis added)

(To read this report in full, refer to reference six at the end of this article, or, to purchase the final edited version of the paper, follow the link provided in this version.)

So, who is telling the truth and whom do we believe?

Conclusion

It is difficult for parents to know who is right and who is wrong when it comes to vaccination. It is even more difficult to know whom to trust.

As parents, it appears that we are ‘damned if we do and damned if we don’t.’

When Professor Poland stated that the new vaccination “would lack contraindications and permit administration without highly trained health care personnel; it would be inexpensive, and heat stable,” could he inadvertently have been saying that the current MMR vaccination does have contraindications, is not always being administered by highly trained health care personnel and is not heat stable?

The answer would depend on how you interpret what he has written.

However, if that is indeed what he meant to say, this would have huge implications for hundreds of thousands of parents who believe that the MMR vaccination was responsible for their children’s disabilities. It also has implications for the many parents whose children have died after receiving this vaccination.

Whatever the real truth is, these articles, reports and papers have certainly given us something to think about, haven’t they?

Photo Credit

  • St_Ann

    It is mind boggling that a vaccine only works if 95% of people have taken it. What if you get a vaccine against hepatitis because you are traveling to India – you expect it to protect you, but how do you know if 95% of Indians have taken it? You don’t, you can’t. That you should not have to care if the purpose of the vaccine, to protect you so that you don’t have to worry. Unless, of course, the vaccine is not so effective, OR the pathogens have adapted over the years, as we know they do. The measles brought into Alberta, Canada, was from Philippines and it was a wild strain not covered by the vaccine. There were cases in Japan and Jerusalem where scientists found mutated vaccine strains of polio in city sewers. I think we should look at the effectiveness of vaccines with a calm mind.

  • Guest

    “Now, if nearly half of the cases of measles were intentionally unvaccinated, then this would mean that over half of them were intentionally vaccinated!” Well, actually, no. It could mean that some were unintentionally unvaccinated–that they had missed their booster shot appointment (which the medical/research community insists on calling “unvaccinated,” which is erroneous, but that’s a whole other discussion), or that they had somehow slipped through the cracks,or even that they’d never been vaccinated for that particular illness because they’d already had it.

    It doesn’t necessarily mean that the rest were intentionally vaccinated. That IS likely to be the case–but, unfortunately, we don’t get to jump to conclusions in the face of no evidence. When they do it, it’s bad journalism, right? Well, it’s bad journalism when we do it, too. We have no right to complain about their lousy journalism and then turn around and do exactly the same thing.

    I do expect full truth from VacTruth. You’ve made many good points in your article, but even one error drags down the whole thing.

  • Bill

    What this article fails to point out is that if you are immunized you are 85% to 95% immune, and if you are not immunized you are 0% immune. But it goes on to state unequivocally that immnization is a failure. Give your heads (collectively) a shake, boys and girls. The truth is not a vast conspiracy by the governments, medical establishment and drug companies. Rather it’s the stupidity and narcissistic psychosis of those who always know better.

  • disqus_k3oycamN0W

    Who said measles vaccine has 95-98 efficiency ? Merck, vaccine manufacturer, said. Their lies were exposed by the very same people who developed this vaccine. Samples were artificially spiked with animal antibodies to make vaccine look more efficient than It really is. And it is not the first time vaccine industry is caught in outright fraud. Read more at

    http://www.naturalnews.com/042864_measles_outbreak_mumps_vaccines_scientific_fraud.html

    From the False Claims Act complaint:

    Merck also added animal antibodies to blood samples to achieve more favorable test results, though it knew that the human immune system would never produce such antibodies, and that the antibodies created a laboratory testing scenario that “did not in any way correspond to, correlate with, or represent real life … virus neutralization in vaccinated people,” according to the complaint.

    Merck, of course, denies the claims, just like all the drug companies deny ever engaging in bribery, or using children for medical experiments, or ghostwriting “scientific” studies that get published in science journals, and so on. All the top drug companies are routinely engaged in widespread criminal behavior, including conspiracy, fraud, bribery and more.

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/042864_measles_outbreak_mumps_vaccines_scientific_fraud.html#ixzz325aIgyUA

  • disqus_k3oycamN0W

    Study: 97% of children affected by 2009 mumps outbreak were vaccinated for condition
    http://www.naturalnews.com/038554_mumps_outbreaks_vaccinations_children.html
    Measles also occur among vaccinated children;
    http://www.naturalnews.com/033399_vaccines_measles.html

    Pertussis occurs in vaccinated population, because new, more virulent strains, emerged (similar to vaccine resistance).
    VAPP (vaccine associated polio paralysis) is a new threat, with the same symptoms as polio, but spread by vaccines.
    Plus, vaccines compromise natural immunity, so vaccinated person can not fight infections properly.
    Vaccinated people also shed the virus for about a month, putting others around them at risk.

  • elnura

    The author of the article: Thanks, Anti-Vaxxers. You Just Brought Measles Back in NYC, IMHO, is written by a Ghost Writer for the Vaccine Industry & CDC. His name is not Russell Saunders. Here is what I found on Green Med:

    Russell Saunders is the pseudonym for a pediatrician in New England. He is also a contributor at Ordinary Times, where he writes about medicine, gay rights issues and popular culture.

    How many Pro-Vaccine Doctors are NOT willingly to give their name. In the world of Vaccines , any one who draws attention to their cause is eventually rewarded and with as much play Daily Beast gave this article and his subsequent one:
    Anti-Vaxxers Will Fuel the Next Pandemic, thus guy would have gotten a big pat on the back and a “we’ll get back to you in the future” comment from the industry. I pointed all this out to the posters on Daily Beast and stated why would anyone believe the rantings of someone who is unwilling to identify himself. He certainly wouldn’t be concerned about backlash from the anti-vaxx or choice communities because that’s not how they roll. Pharma trolls and bots wouldn’t attack him, they would close ranks so this is why I think he/she is a Ghost Writer and therefore whatever is written is not creditable.

  • Evan Eberhardt

    These news outlets have zero evidence unvaccinated kids are spreading diseases. It’s just an assumption. Sure, it’s possible, but it is also possible the vaccination failures are just as responsible (more likely really, because parents then assume their kids can’t have the illness and don’t quarantine properly). These “news” pieces are clearly big pharma concocted trash anyway. Yeah, how many deaths have resulted from all the dangerous ‘loons’ rejecting garbage vaccines? Hmmm, don’t recall a single one. But let the hysterics fly! Yet ‘medical care’ is now the 3rd leading cause of death and people just react with a shrug. Hey, let the sheep be led to the slaughter, but excuse me if I will have no part in this dark age charade. http://chriskresser.com/medical-care-is-the-3rd-leading-cause-of-death-in-the-us

  • Kayla

    Ding dong! Exactly! The MMR and VARACILLA vaccine are live yet weakened viruses! We need to join together! You’ve got it right! I’ve tried telling people this!

  • elnura

    Reading the comments below, people are stating that vaccines have a
    efficiency of up to 95% and people are anywhere from 85%-95% immune. There are no studies that confirm that. That’s one of the issues with vaccines, there
    are:
    -No INDEPENDENT double blind placebo based controlled studies on the
    safety and effectiveness of vaccines.
    -There is no INDEPENDENT scientific evidence on ANY study which can confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines.

    Also, vaccination does not confer immunization.
    *The gold standard of scientific study requires a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to isolate the effects of one particular intervention. In order to evaluate vaccines properly, it would be necessary for vaccine makers to take every vaccine on the market and compare a group of vaccinated individuals with a group of unvaccinated individuals under the above conditions to ascertain whether vaccines were effective and provided lasting immunity. This type of
    study has yet to be done. Nor has a retrospective analysis of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals been undertaken. Why not? The possible result might be that we find we have been sold a bill of goods about the long term immunity and effectiveness of vaccines.

    Instead we have clinical trials in which individuals are vaccinated and
    success is measured by attaining a certain antibody titer in the blood. The
    protective level is arbitrarily assigned by the researcher. If enough vaccinated
    subjects attain the designated level, the vaccine is proclaimed to have
    efficacy. But is this the same as being effective? No. To be effective a vaccine
    would have to prevent disease, but effectiveness is never put to the test. The
    problem with proving efficacy is that antibody levels do not necessarily
    correlate with the immune system’s ability to fight off disease. One rare
    prospective study which attempted to evaluate this issue as it relates to
    vaccinating the elderly with the flu vaccine found that pre- and
    post-vaccination antibody titers – whether high or low — did not distinguish
    between subjects who would subsequently develop influenza and those who would not. How can we know if a vaccine will work or not prior to it being released to the public? We can’t!

    According to an article in the peer-reviewed journal Clinical Infectious
    Diseases, since it is too difficult to prove effectiveness, the only way to try to evaluate vaccines is to scrutinize the epidemiological data obtained from real-life conditions. In other words, researchers simply cannot — or will not — adequately test a vaccine’s effectiveness and immunogenicity prior to its release onto an
    unsuspecting public. The true testing occurs after the fact. Only instead of “surveillance,” it is more likely that vaccine manufacturers will try to keep adverse reactions and evidence of vaccine failure from the public. The party line is always that since actual results occur outside the limits of a clinical study, they are not
    reliable. THE MYTH THAT VACCINATION EQUALS IMMUNIZATION:
    http://www.whale.to/v/myth2.html

    -There is only one kind of immunity and that is natural immunity which is achieved by battling the infectious diseases itself. Vaccination is merely the artificial triggering of temporary responses to manmade pathogens. Vaccines are both harmful and dangerous and are leading to generations of humans with no natural defenses to disease. Vaccines do not provide long-term immunity; only temporary at best.

    In vaccines, an antigen is injected into the body to produce a reaction and the
    immune system responds in the form of antibodies, but antibody presence does not confer immunity. People still catch the diseases that they are vaccinated
    against. Vaccines actually skip the normal immune responses to activate killer
    cells which can trigger an overproduction of cytokines in response to the toxic
    vaccine adjuvants and can damage tissues and organs and even stop the heart and block air pathways.

    Vaccines should never be called immunizations because that is a misnomer.
    Immunity and vaccinations are two different subjects altogether. In fact, breast
    milk is so potent with immune energizing effects in the infant that researchers
    at the CDC recommend women withhold breastfeeding their children in order to
    boost the “effectiveness” of childhood vaccines. The paper claims that women
    should stop breastfeeding long enough for the man-made poison to work on
    artificial/temporary “immunity.” Vaccination is not immunization
    http://www.24medica.com/content/view/2780/73/

    It’s no question that the Vaccines are causing the outbreak and the CDC/Vaccines Industry know this. There are enough information to demonstrate that the outbreaks are occurring in highly vaccinated communities. It has happened too often for it to be a coincidence. What’s been reported in the media is only a tip of the iceberg. This video provides insight as to how this is happening:
    You will never look at vaccinated children the same!- Shedding Viruses
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKSeiAs_A4w

  • notsofree

    God created “free” human beings. Free to do good or free to do bad. He doesn’t even mandate we be vaccinated against evil, he exposes us to sin so as to strengthen our spiritual immunity.

    America was built on a similar platform but forsook it. Now the “new” god is Govt. and this god has determined what is good and forces you to comply. ie. vaccine, insurance social security….

    I love the Original God, He doesn’t force us to take His medicine, He just invites.
    The new god mandates what it believes to be true today and forces you to take the bitter pill, before it’s recalled and replaced with the the next “new” truth!

  • Lilie Mnuk

    Actually, if your parents had natural immunity and breasted you, you case, if you catch it, becomes more and more mild with each generation, I.e. Real herd immunity where only 65% is needed. But herd immunity is still just a theory and has never been proven, even when acquired naturally.

  • humanati

    Can you see where this campaign against people who refuse to vaccinate their children is going?
    As educated people refuse to trust their children at the hands of these criminal companies & their dangerous & ineffective vaccines, the pool of unvaccinated children grows & as it does so, the iatrogenic harm caused by vaccines becomes apparent to everyone.
    Pharma knows this. They also know that unless they can stop & reverse this trend, they not only face losing profits, they face the very real possibility of being put out of business & prison time for those who covered up what they have known for decades.
    Vaccines cause the diseases they are meant to prevent.
    Vaccines cause neurological damage.
    Vaccines cause chronic autoimmune disease.
    This is a crime against humanity in our lifetime.

  • Robert Stewart

    Hi Everyone,

    I really appreciate all of the great information this site provides my family and I, however I just came across a story in the “news” that is quite unsettling and I was hoping the Vac Truth community could help shed some light on this egregious nonsense and how I can respond to my friends when they bring up this pro-vaccination advertisement disguised as ‘ scientific evidence’.

    Thanks in advance, I’m looking forward to everyone’s thoughts!

  • Robert Stewart

    http://animals.io9.com/study-of-1-3-million-kids-reveals-vaccines-arent-associ-1577691180?asdfghj

    Sorry everyone, here is a link to the article I’m referring to.

  • Roxanne

    Studies can be manipulated to get any outcome desired, and with
    billions on the line, the vaccine industry has a clear vested industry
    in defending their turf. (Can we expect a pro-vaccine journal to
    publish anything remotely critical of vaccines) Here’s the bottom line, the only REAL research that matters is comparing autism rates
    in vaccinated versus fully unvaccinated populations. Something
    the so-called trusted “authorities” refuse to do. Studies comparing
    vaccinated versus unvaccinated dogs (University of Purdue); comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated primates (Hewitson etc.
    multi-university); raised alarming health concerns re. vaccines including behavioral differences. Common sense dictates that the truth re. vaccines and autism can be simply determined by such an
    obvious study instead of a lot of mumbo jumbo “analysis” that can
    be readily manipulated to serve a favoured outcome.

  • Roxanne

    Just to add to the comment below, read what was said when
    Congressman Posie, put the question to the test re. studies comparing the vaccinated versus unvaccinated…

    http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/04/26/a-major-development-in-the-vaccine-autism-link-exposes-the-cdcs-cover-up-2/utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Collective-evolution+%28Collective+Evolution%29

    “Adverse events reported during post approval use of Tripedia
    (DTaP vaccine) include thrombocytopenic…, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, AUTISM, grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia (etc.)” Tripedia Insert, 12/05 page 11.

    ‘The incidence/prevalence of data indicate the timing of introduction of vaccines & changes in the type & increasing number of vaccines given at one time implicate vaccines as a cause of autism. The MMR II vaccine is contaminated with human DNA from the cell line. This human DNA could be the cause of the spikes in incidence.’ Journal of Immunotoxicology, 2011; 8(1): see pages 68–79

    ‘The evidence convincingly supports a causal relationship between MMR vaccine and measles inclusion body encephalitis in individuals with demonstrated immune deficiencies.’ P.110 Institute of Medicine Report on Adverse Effects of Vaccines/2011

    http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13164&page=110

    Also, important to mention that in the GSK Hexa Infanrix scandal, the company’s OWN internal confidential report listed “autism” as one of over 700 potential reactions (exposed by a Belgium watch dog group)

  • Roxanne
  • Sharon Angelina Stefankiewicz

    Thank you for this well thought out story. I had never occurred to me before that a growing number of unvaccinated children would expose vaccines as much less efficient than they were claimed to be. Of course! Wave the red herring of blame at the unvaccinated to distract the masses from the truth. What a lame way to grapple for control, and what an obvious way to see that the whole mess is slipping into obsolescence.

  • jjbruder

    Tell them not to worry. If their vaccinated kid(s) are protected, how can your unvaccinated kid harm them…..IF THE VACCINATION REALLY WORKS?

  • Lou

    “a growing number of unvaccinated children would expose vaccines as much less efficient than they were claimed to be.”

    Yes I agree.

    IMO the whole “vaccination” game is all one grand deadly scam. I can give you a magic incantation that will, with an effectiveness of 100%, keep ALL unicorns from impaling your child. Want studies? How do all these “germs” we are supposed to fear differ from unicorns? How do we know these magic “vaccinations” are doing ANY good?

    We do not. We trust; we fear; we “vaccinate”

    As more and more of us REFUSE to trust demonstrated LIARS; REFUSE to believe in unicorns and instead trust ourselves and our creator and his body, the grand “vaccination” deadly scam is DYING the death of all frauds.

    An enterprise dealing in a deadly poison like “vaccination” priced in the hundreds of billions/year will not die without a FIGHT. Just look at our “war” in Afghanistan with its heroin.

  • FMK

    As a physician and as a Muslim, thank you for your comment.

  • Lou

    “Findings of this meta-analysis suggest that vaccinations are not
    associated with the development of autism or autism spectrum disorder.”

    Why look at a few pieces of paper; why not look at the most populous sub-continent on this EARTH. The evidence is COMPLETE and completely DAMNING. If more of us just took the few hours the autism/ASD/PDD inducing deadly game of “vaccination” would be OVER.

    “In New Delhi, India, prior to 2000, ASD/PDD (autism spectrum disorder/pervasive developmental disorder) symptoms were rare – typically only occurring in children who were vaccinated abroad. However, after the Indian pediatricians began recommending,
    in 2000, the addition of triple-dose Thimerosal-preserved Hib (Haemophilis influenza B) and Hep B (hepatitis B) vaccination programs to the existing Thimerosal-preserved triple dose DTP (diphtheria toxin, tetanus toxin and pertussis toxins) vaccination program recommended by the Government of India, the incidence of a childhood ASD/PDD diagnosis increased to 2 % to 4 % of
    vaccinated New Delhi children.” Doctor Paul King PhD, Note folks here it is. Read and reread this PLEASE

    http://dr-king.com/docs/100711_ParallelsinNewDelhiIndia_AnEpidemic_b.pdf

  • G

    There is only ONE TRUTH: I am the way, the TRUTH, and the Life, no man cometh to the Father, but by me. Jh. 14:6
    Jesus is the great Healer for body, mind, and spirit. He says in James 5:14 that “If any among you is sick, go to the elders(of the church) and ask them to PRAY – and! ANOINT THEM WITH (pure, food grade, genuine essential )OIL IN THE NAME OF THE LORD JESUS.” …..It is actually very easy to understand…..
    Our family has found a company in Young Living (youngliving.com) that provides toxic free, natural products for home, health and overall wellness of the most superior quality I have ever seen anywhere. We join their community to benefit from their amazing products and as a family be able to reduce the toxins coming into our home and the ones being introduced to our bodies for various reasons. If you are interested to do the same for your family, go to their website to check them out. They are a FULL – closure company : ) No hidden ingredients, or such you can not pronounce ♡ Compair their ingredients also on the Skin Deep site on the EWG website -you will be pleasantly surprised! You can use my member# 1408868 to get started. Then go to healthyscents.younglivingconnect.com to get more info on how the products can provide wellness, purpose and abundance in your life, check out the resource room to learn more on how to use those UNADULTERATED, UNDILUTED, UNSTRETCHED essential oils and oil infused products to support your family’s overall health and longevity, as well as to get in contact with me if you have questions : ) I will be glad to help you get started and to make those same easy and very beneficial changes for your own family.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Oh yes, and as well the level of CDC deception, and that of so called local and fear mongering vaccine authorities; it never ends

    Whooping Cough Outbreak- Largest in 50 yrs

    Its all over the news, the internet and the newspapers. Largest whooping cough outbreak in 5 decades….go get vaccinated and protect your children…oh my…thats the LAST THING you should do. Heres why.

    http://www.educate4theinjured.org/#!pertussis-outbreak-4567008830/c1oa5

    “Our unvaccinated and under-vaccinated population did not appear to contribute significantly to the increased rate of clinical pertussis. Surprisingly, the highest incidence of disease was among previously vaccinated children in the eight to twelve year age group.”

    Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(12):1730-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis287. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

    Unexpectedly limited durability of immunity following acellular pertussis vaccination in preadolescents in a North American outbreak.

    Conclusons: Our data suggests that the current schedule of acellular pertussis vaccine doses is insufficient to prevent outbreaks of pertussis. We noted a markedly increased rate of disease from ages 8-12 years, proportionate to the interval since the last scheduled vaccine. Stable rates of testing ruled out selection bias. The possibility of earlier or more numerous booster doses of acellular pertussis vaccine either as part of routine immunization or for outbreak control should be entertained.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22423127

    Data Reveals Measles Outbreaks Have Nothing to Do With Non-Vaccination Trends
    http://politicalblindspot.com/data-reveals-measles-outbreaks-have-nothing-to-do-with-non-vaccination-trends/

    The Current Failure of Pertussis and Measles Vaccine
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-current-failure-of-pertussis-and-measles-vaccine.html

    The Antibody Deception, (a good article on the subject matter of understanding the issue of vaccine effectiveness, and in regard to showing and proving actual vaccine effectiveness)
    http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/the-antibody-deception.html

  • elnura

    I would ask Friends to prove that Unvaccinated children are spreading any illness. First-clarify the terminology. Childhood illnesses are an illness not diseases. That’s the fear factor the CDC/Vaccine industry has indoctrinated the culture with.

    “pro-vaccination advertisement disguised as ‘ scientific evidence’.”
    I would ask them to provide the Gold Standard of Scientific Study

    -An INDEPENDENT double blind placebo based controlled studies on the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.
    -Any INDEPENDENT scientific evidence on ANY study which can confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines. Independent means no Industry based studies done by anyone, institution, hospital, researcher, scientist or university that has any ties to the government or the vaccine Industry.

    Next send these links:
    -You will never look at vaccinated children the same!- Shedding Viruses:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKSeiAs_A4w

    -Mayo Clinic Expert Confirms Measles Vaccine Is Failing – So it’s NOT the unvaccinated: http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2014/05/04/mayo-clinic-expert-confirms-measles-vaccine-is-failing-so-its-not-the-unvaccinated/

    -17 Examples of Admitted Vaccine Failure: http://vactruth.com/2013/02/23/17-examples-of-vaccine-failure/

    -Vaccines Are Causing Measles. Child Who Caught Measles From Vaccine Was Shedding Live Vaccine Measles Virus In Throat and Urine: http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2014/04/26/more-vaccine-failures-measlesmmr-vaccines-cause-measles-child-who-caught-measles-from-vaccine-was-shedding-live-vaccine-measles-virus-in-throat-and-urine/

    -US MMR Measles Vaccine Failing – Vaccinated New Yorker Causes Measles Outbreak In Other Vaccinated New Yorkers – Not Caused By
    Unvaccinated Children: http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2014/04/12/us-mmr-measles-vaccine-failing-vaccinated-new-yorker-causes-measles-outbreak-in-other-vaccinated-new-yorkers-not-an-unvaccinated-child/

    -Whooping Cough Vaccine – Doesn’t Work – GSK Says “We Never Bothered to Check”: http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2012/04/08/whooping-cough-vaccine-doesnt-work-gsk-says-we-never-bothered-to-check/

    -Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics: http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/

    -Vaccine Failure: Twice-Vaccinated Individual Contracts and Transmits Measles – Clinical Infectious Diseases Journal: http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/vaccine-failure-twice-vaccinated-individual-contracts-and-transmits-measles-clinical-infectious-diseases-journal/

    -Vaccine Failure: Flu Vaccine Has No Effect On Hospitalisation Or Sick Days Cochrane Review: http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/vaccine-failure-flu-vaccine-has-no-effect-on-hospitalisation-or-sick-days-cochrane-review/

    -Ohio Mumps Outbreak 97% Vaccinated: http://experimentalvaccines.org/2014/04/03/ohio-mumps-outbreak-97-vaccinated/

    -Mumps Outbreak Involves Highly Vaccinated Students: http://experimentalvaccines.org/2014/03/25/mumps-outbreak-involves-highly-vaccinated-students/

    -Whooping Cough Outbreak Involved 90% Vaccinated Kids: http://experimentalvaccines.org/2013/01/14/whooping-cough-outbreak-involved-90-vaccinated-kids/

    -Hepatitis B Vaccination Causing Liver Damage: http://experimentalvaccines.org/2013/03/26/hepatitis-b-vaccination-causing-liver-damage/

    Let them know this is just a drop in the bucket of all the outbreaks that have been happening for years that the CDC and the pharmaceutical owned media have suppressed.

    Exclusive: an interview with investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson:
    http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/04/25/exclusive-an-interview-with-investigative-reporter-sharyl-attkisson/

    *(Rappoport) You’ve revealed serious problems caused by vaccines. Have you run into opposition as a result of covering these stories?

    (Attiksson)This is a long discussion but yes, it is one of the most well funded, well orchestrated efforts I’ve ever seen on a story. Many reporters, if not all, who have tried to factually cover this topic have experienced the same opposition as have researchers who dared to uncover vaccine side effects. Those who don’t want the stories explored want to censor the information from the public entirely, lest the public draw the “wrong” conclusions about the facts. The media has largely bought into the conflicted government, political and medical complex propaganda on the topic that marginalizes researchers, journalists and parents who dare to speak to the scientific facts they’ve uncovered or to their own experiences. It’s a giant scandal of its own. (read remainder of article at the above website)

    Inform your friends that once they have read all of the above information and reviewed the videos than they are up to speed with you and now a serious discussion can occur.

  • Argus

    How is this report ‘unsettling’, Robert? It merely summarizes and confirms what dozens of other studies have already established.

  • Argus

    “This information is hidden so well by the reporter that by the time most readers get to it, they will have been completely brainwashed by the rest of the information and are therefore unlikely to notice its significance.”
    And right there is the big lie in Christine’s article. By characterizing – without any evidence – the substance of these reports as ‘propopaganda’, she conveniently disregards what would put the one thing she wants to harp about in proper perspective.
    In fact, you can accurately label what Christine is trying to pull here as MISDIRECTION.

  • Argus

    Really, Lilie? Then why is it that before there were vaccines for measles, mumps, and the like, generation after generation contracted these diseases and they never got milder?
    Think about that.

  • Free People

    Excellent article Christina England; thank you for pointing out the ‘misdirection tactics’ used by the vaccine pushers on these articles. In my opinion, the vaccine industy and medical mafia have been using the misdirection tactics since the inception of vaccines.

    “There is no scientific study to determine whether vaccines have really prevented diseases. Rather disease graphs show vaccines have been introduced at the end of epidemics when the disease was already in its last stages. In case of Small Pox the vaccine actually caused a great spurt in the incidence of disease before public outcry led to its withdrawal.

    There are no long-term studies on vaccine safety. Very short-term tests are
    carried out where the vaccinated subjects are checked against another group who are given another vaccine. Technically the tests should be carried out against a non-vaccinated group. No one really knows what protocols are followed at such industry based or industry sponsored trials.

    There has never been any official attempt to compare a vaccinated population
    against a non- vaccinated population to know what vaccines are doing to the
    children and the society. Independent private studies (Dutch & German and
    the most recent KIGGS (Aug 2011) study involving 7724 children worldwide) have revealed that vaccinated children suffer much more than their un-vaccinated counterparts.”

    Source: healthfreedoms dot org. (Health Freedom Alliance) – “50 Reasons to NOT Vaccinate your Child” – posted 3/29/2014 – #1, #2 and #3.

  • Lucy Hill

    Excellent article! And let’s not forget that the CDC recommend Tylenol / Paracetamol for post-vaccination fever, studies have shown that this can prevent the vaccine from working. So they clearly don’t care about the herd immunity, if anything it’s in their interest to keep the diseases in circulation so as they can keep on pushing the vaccines.

    The Pharmaceuticals must be furious that Small Pox was eradicated, now they can’t sell us their dangerous Small Pox vaccines which often leave people with autoimmune diseases, leaving people dependent on drugs for life. Yes, you got it, that’s what vaccines are for; every vaccines is a ticket for the autoimmune disease lottery, if you lose then you end up on drugs for life to treat your symptoms, meaning the pharmaceuticals make serious money out of you!

  • TheCannabisGeek.com

    Awful article. You’ve have a big title saying that Mayo Clinic ‘admits’ vaccines do not work, but then you bury the salient point which says they fail to work in only a small number of people. Which is well-known and even mentioned elsewhere. Either have journalistic integrity or admit you are just a propaganda piece.

  • TheCannabisGeek.com

    Jesus was a myth invented to control people and guilt them into following the cult of Christianity. You should grow up and stop existing in fantasy land.

  • Lucy Hill

    Educate before you vaccinate!

  • TheCannabisGeek.com

    So when world-leading scientists disagree with you, you claim that they are shills/studies can be manipulated, but when a random personal blog with an anti-science bias agrees with you, this is perfect proof? You are just seeking information which backs your opinion, and finding any desperate excuse to ignore the facts. This is a very childish approach to a serious subject.

  • Free People

    Nope! It’s no secret that the BIG 3.. the indoctrinated Organized Medical
    Establishment (AMA Mafia), Federal Death Administration (FDA), and
    pHARMaceutical Industry are all in it together, with help from the dis-Organized
    Media, Centers for Disease Creation and Proliferation (CDC), and Federal
    Government, all profiting from CHRONIC illnesses and diseases. The Big Three
    have collectively engaged in a medical conspiracy for the better part of 70
    years to influence legislative bodies on both the state and federal level to
    create regulations that promote the use of drug medicine while simultaneously
    creating restrictive, controlling mechanisms (licencing, government
    approval, etc) designed to limit and stifle the availability of non-drug,
    alternative modalities.

    Most studies are funded by pHARMaceuticals or government agencies and they
    have an agenda that has nothing to do with sincere scientific inquiry. The Big
    Boys can and will skew a ‘study’ in any direction they wish it to go. Scientific
    honesty among cartel sponsored investigative groups is a MYTH. Nothing has
    changed when it comes to the politics of Big Medicine. Only the most naive and
    uninformed among us (fondly referred to as sheeple) continue to believe the
    party line spouted by the pHARMaceutical/medical establishment and their
    propaganda flunkies.

    Investigate before you vaccinate!

  • notsofree

    I shall say a prayer for you. That Jesus will bless your hands and guide your heart!

  • Winona Kitto

    The word propaganda makes sense for the pro-vaccine argument. For anti-vaccine rhetoric, how can that be considered propaganda? Doctors do not benefit by giving warnings about the danger of vaccines. Or do they? My concern about vaccines is that the vaccine schedule is insatiable. More and more are added to the vaccine requirements. Our poor kids…

  • truthwarrior

    Hi Lucy: I actually read that Tylenol is dangerous after vaccination because it is supposed to block the body from excreting the vaccine toxins.

  • N. E. 914

    Well said and right on target.

  • pegasi

    Funny that it never claims that vaccination has no connection with brain damage which certainly exacerbates autism if it doesn’t trigger/cause it with the aluminum and mercury at least. My DPT vaccination led to vaccine encephalopathy, dysentary and paralytic polio with an autism diagnosis. It’s just magic. They make up studies that direct results and use language that distracts from real outcomes and voila’ the media gobbles it up.

  • Ben William

    The corporate media is sourcing the CDC when blaming non vaccinated for various outbreaks even though the majority of the children effected are fully vaccinated.

    Vaccinated, MEANING… heavy metal / toxic chemically and viral injected poor souls. If you can even call that a ‘vaccination’ with a straight face.

    The millions of us who do NOT want our children inject with these toxic cocktails need to come together and file a class action lawsuit against the CDC for falsely accusing our children for something THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY THING TO DO WITH!

    I’m sick and tied of these shills using these FAULSE ACCUSATIONS to further the agenda of FORCED VACCINATION.

  • Ben William

    Forced vaccination = ‘Vaccine Equity’ according to Mr. Vaccine “for population control” himself, Bill Gates.

  • Justin Herrass

    Even if a vaccine only has 85% effectiveness rate it still better then being unvaccinated with a 0% effectiveness rate.

  • Roxanne

    Gee, how have all those unvaccinated people survived Scarlet Fever which
    in the pre-sanitation etc. days had a higher mortality rate than measles?
    Oh yeah, there was NO vaccine ever administered against SF…

  • elnura

    Prove that a vaccine has a 85% efficiency rate. Please provide any study that validates that. Provide a study that confirms any vaccine is effective and safe at any rate.

  • elnura

    From this comment board and other Pro-Choice/Anti-Vaccine comment boards it seem the new Troll Mantra is EVEN IF VACCINES ARE 85% effective it’s better than 0% effectiveness of not being vaccinated. So….the new number is 85%. Be on the lookout for this number and ask the person who made the comment to confirm that with studies-the Gold Standard of studies; An INDEPENDENT double blind placebo based controlled studies on the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. The idea behind this move is to place in the minds of people who are seriously looking at these articles such as: Thanks, Anti-Vaxxers. You Just Brought Measles Back in NYC, and articles reporting how outbreaks of childhood illnesses are occurring in highly populated communities , is to convince them that vaccines are not 100% effective but 85% is better than nothing. That idea needs to be slammed as soon as you read it.

  • mehfooz ahmad

    in my country india,a massive pulse polio programme is underway for many years,each child upto the age of 5 yrs has to get compulsory dose of this vaccine,many cases of sudden death & severe health complaints are observed after taking the dose

  • Justin Herrass

    So don’t vaccinate and run a higher risk of getting a highly contagious disease it’s your life and the life of your innocent children that you gamble with.

  • Justin Herrass

    I didnt just make up 85%, if you did your research you would see mumps vaccine is has an efficacy of 80-90%, hence the 85%, still better then 0%.

  • pookey56

    Wrong. Mass vaccinations only equals more deaths,maimings, and ruined lives over a procedure backed by no science, doesn’t work, and is there for only one reason. PROFITS

  • elnura

    It’s all well and good to quote stats but please provide the studies. The study must meet the Scientific Gold Standard and that means:

    “NO INDUSTRY OR GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT”. Independent means no Industry based studies done by anyone,
    institution, hospital, researcher, scientist or university that has any
    ties to the government or the vaccine Industry.

    Now the Mumps vaccine that’s commonly used is by Merck.

    -Merck: Mumps vaccine fraud (Whistleblower court case 2012)
    Merck vaccine fraud exposed by two Merck virologists; company faked mumps vaccine efficacy results for over a decade, says lawsuit

    According to Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, both former Merck virologists, the Merck company engaged in all the following behavior:

    • Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test results to fabricate a “95% efficacy rate.”
    • In order to do this, Merck spiked the blood test with animal antibodies in order to artificially inflate the appearance of immune
    system antibodies. As reported in Courthouse News.com
    -Class Says Merck Lied About Mumps Vaccinettp://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/documents/Merck-False-Claims-Act.pdf

    -http://beyondthecurtain.wordpress.com/2012/06/28/merck-vaccine-fraud-exposed-by-two-merck-virologists-company-faked-mumps-vaccine-efficacy-results-for-over-a-decade-says-lawsuit/

    *Mumps outbreak at Ohio State a threat despite vaccinations.
    Jose Rodriguez, spokesman for Columbus Public Health stated:
    Rodriguez said those who have received two doses of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine still have a 10 to 20 percent chance of being infected. Rodriguez called the group of cases in the outbreak “highly vaccinated,” meaning most of the people had their vaccinations. “Even within folks that are vaccinated, they are still at risk of illness,” Rodriguez said.
    Rodriguez said one-third of those infected with mumps are just carriers who don’t show symptoms of the disease. “(Carriers) don’t get a chance to isolate,” Rodriguez said. http://thelantern.com/2014/03/mumps-outbreak-ohio-state-threat-despite-vaccinations/

    *Mumps Outbreak Involved 97% Vaccinated Children: The New England Journal of Medicine has recently released the conclusions to the media manufactured mumps outbreak of 2009 which occurred in New York City, two upstate New York counties, and one New Jersey County. There were a total of 3,502 cases of salivary-gland swelling and other symptoms clinically compatible with mumps of which 1,648 were confirmed with clinical specimens. The results indicate that 97% of the cases tested involved students who have been previously vaccinated against the mumps and even more overwhelming is that 89% had receive two doses of the MMR vaccination which is claimed to provided immunity from the mumps.

    *U.S. Mumps Outbreak: After two vaccine doses, 89% still contracted disease: http://www.examiner.com/article/u-s-mumps-outbreak-after-two-vaccine-doses-89-still-contracted-disease An outbreak of mumps in the United States between 2009 and 2010 occurred mostly in children who had been vaccinated, according to a study published today in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). During the outbreak, 3,502 cases were reported over a one-year period. The outbreak began in June 2009 in New Jersey, New York City and New York State’s Orange and Rockland counties. The source of the mumps outbreak was a camp in the Catskill Mountains.

    *Mumps Outbreak in Orthodox Jewish Communities in the United States (2010): A large mumps outbreak occurred among highly vaccinated U.S. Orthodox Jewish communities during 2009 and 2010. Of the teenagers vaccinated -89% had previously received two doses of a mumps-containing vaccine -8% had received one dose. Those infected who received a vaccine: 97%

    *Mumps Epidemic in Iowa (2006). In March, 2006, a total of 219 mumps cases had been reported in Iowa – the largest epidemic of mumps in the United States since 1988. Of the 219 cases reported in Iowa, the average age of infection was 21. Of the 133 patients investigated with a vaccine history:
    -87 (65%) had received 2 doses
    -19 (14%) had received 1 dose
    -8 (6%) had no doses
    -19 (14%) vaccine status could not be documented
    Those infected who received a vaccine: 79% (at least).

    *Mumps Outbreak at a Summer Camp in New York (2005). On July 26, 2005, the New York State Department of Health identified 31 cases of mumps, possibly introduced by an unvaccinated camp counselor from the United Kingdom (UK). The vaccine coverage for the entire camp was 96%. Of the infected 31,
    -16 (52%) had received 2 doses
    -4 (13%) had received 1 dose
    -9 (29%) had no doses
    -2 (6%) vaccine status could not be documented 20 of the 31 people infected (65%) of the people infected were vaccinated.
    Vaccine coverage for the camp: 96%.

    Please provide INDEPENDENT STUDY. The first clue to determine if a study is bias is to look for the funding source and the researchers.

  • elnura

    Please state how many people have died from any of the childhood illnesses in the last decade.

    Also, real scientist and immunologist know that there are long term benefits for contracting childhood illnesses such as measles in childhood. Scientist have recently put cancer in animals in remission by injecting them with the measles virus. This has been know since the 1970’s.

    -Carmona Mota (1973) described a remission of infantile Hodgkin’s disease after natural measles. They wrote, “A 23-months-old Caucasian male was seen for the first time in April 1970 with a large mass in the neck due to hypertrophy of the left cervical lymph nodes. Before radiotherapy could be started the child developed measles. Much to our surprise the large cervical mass vanished without further therapy.”

    Many others started researching and writing about the oncolytic (cancer-destroying) effect of measles virus.

    Msaouel et al. (2009) conducted clinical testing of engineered oncolytic measles virus strains in the treatment of cancer. Even though the virus they
    used was a vaccine-type virus, the research was done in vitro with a virus directly injected into the tumour. They wrote, “It is of note that a number of viral strains, including certain derivatives of the attenuated live measles
    virus Edmonston (MV-Edm) vaccine strain, demonstrate a propensity to preferentially infect, propagate in, and destroy cancerous tissue.

    http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2013/01/29/measles-vaccines-part-ii-benefits-of-contracting-measles-by-dr-viera-scheibner-phd/

    Don’t underestimate the potential of mumps to cause long term damage. A child must stay indoors and get a lot of rest to avoid complications. An adult with mumps is even more vulnerable to complications. Mumps affects the salivary glands so that the jowls swell up and the person looks hilarious. The virus can also cause inflammation in the pancreas, the ovaries, the testicles, the brain
    and the ears. Sterility, brain damage or deafness can result from improper care of a person with mumps.

    By affecting the pancreas, the virus can cause diabetes. This was first documented in 1899. The ovaries and
    testicles cannot be damaged in a person who has not yet reached puberty, which is one good reason for getting mumps over with in childhood. [2005] Raising A Vaccine Free Child by WENDY LYDALL

    “Mumps is a common childhood disease which is benign in the in the vast majority of cases. It is desirable that mumps be contracted in early childhood because, when
    contracted in adulthood, the disease may cause meningitis and/or damage to the testes,ovaries, auditory nerves or pancreas. However, and equally importantly, women are less likely to contract ovarian cancer if they have had mumps during childhood (West1966).”—Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

    *Mumps Protects Against Ovarian Cancer: Vaccine Steals
    the Protection:
    It has long been suspected that there’s a connection between having the mumps vaccination and developing ovarian cancer. A new study published in Cancer
    Causes and Control1 starts with the statement:

    Epidemiologic studies found childhood mumps might protect against ovarian cancer. To explain this association, we investigated whether mumps might engender immunity to ovarian cancer through antibodies against the
    cancer-associated antigen MUC1 abnormally expressed in the inflamed parotid gland.

    In other words, it’s well accepted that having had mumps provides women with protection against developing ovarian cancer. This is not absolute protection, but the fact is that it’s long been known through anecdotal evidence to be true. http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2012-10-09/mumps-protects-against-ovarian-cancer-vaccine-steals-the-protection/

    Think about all the babies, babies in ureto, children and young adults that have contracted cancers, rare neurological and immunological disease in the last 40 years. Chronic illnesses in children are the norm states pediatricians and the reason is vaccines:

    -Hemophilus Vaccine Study in Finland Proves a
    Causal Relationship Between Vaccines and Diabetes
    (published Autoimmunity 35:247-253,2002) http://www.vaccines.net/newpage16.htm

    There is growing evidence that immunization cause a large number of other chronic diseases including diabetes, obesity,metabolic syndrome, autoimmune diseases, allergies, asthma, cancers, and Gulf War Syndrome. Data linking these diseases to vaccines includes human and
    animal data. In some cases the increased risk of
    developing these diseases following immunization exceeds the risk of the infectious complications prevented by immunization.
    Read peer reviewed papers:
    http://www.vaccines.net/newpage11.htm

    Dr. Bart Classen immunologist is a former NIH Researcher.

  • Roxanne

    Yes, the dreaded chicken pox… For crying out loud, the death rate for measles, diphtheria, pertussis etc. (like SF!)
    drastically plummeted well before the advent of vaccinations thanks to improved nutrition, sanitation etc. The human immune system is not stupid and deficient in need of a vaccine fix. Vaccines “at best” offer temporary inferior artificial “immunity”, as opposed to superior life long immunity. Moreover, vaccines can backfire by shifting mostly benign childhood illnesses – that in the vast majority of cases are not severe and even in rare severe cases can have success with other therapies – to OTHER age groups where the reactions (such as babies and adults) where reactions could be much more severe. Consider that mothers vaccinated against measles cannot confer immunity to their babies, now making babies more vulnerable to a mostly benign childhood illness. This is a huge concern!! Furthermore, vaccines can shed and potentially spread disease (read the insert); and
    other develop new more serious strains of disease.
    Lastly, bypassing the critical mucosal membranes and
    violating the blood-brain barrier of mere infants,
    inducing demyelination and synergistic toxicity, is a potential recipe for a slew of vaccine induced diseases.
    It’s no accident that children today are so incredibly sickly
    and that auto-immune diseases have shot up.

  • Justin Herrass

    You want independent studies but you start quoting from natural news and other heavily biased sources so you are not following your own rules.

  • Justin Herrass

    Ah yes the mortality rate defense, its true deaths started to drop before vaccines because of treatments like the iron lung for polio. But if you research the number of infection the rate doesn’t drop until after vaccinations began.

  • elnura

    So you’re a web site snob??? Hmmmm. Courthouse News.com is not Natural News. Did you go to that site? How about the NEJM: *Mumps Outbreak Involved 97% Vaccinated Children: The New England Journal of Medicine.

    Don’t ATTACK OR TRY AND DISCREDIT the source of the information -DISCREDIT THE INFORMATION ITSELF. The other sources are newspaper reports on Vaccine Failure. You haven’t even attempted to provide anything. All you’re doing parroting numbers you read somewhere. Provide the studies that confirm a 85% effectiveness rate in any vaccine.

    PS: Natural News, as well as other sites you may turn your nose up at ALWAYS cites their sources and in over 50% of their articles the sources are PUBMED or the CDC website. You’d know that if you bothered to read anything on it and the sources listed at the bottom of the article.

    Still waiting for the study that meets the Scientific Gold Standard and that means:
    Independent, no Industry based studies done by anyone, institution, hospital, researcher, scientist or university that has any ties to the government or the vaccine Industry.

  • Justin Herrass

    PS natural news and other sites may cite pub med studies but when you look closely you find they cite very specific lines they conform to their beliefs.Also its OK for them to cite the CDC? I thought they weren’t suppose to be trusted? Oh wait they can be trusted when it alligns with your views, correct, that’s how this works. I am not a website snob you attempt to discredit anything and everything that you consider bias and then cite bias sources yourself. So I see it as a double standard. And yes I looked at NEJM article, I have read it before, all it shows is there is room for improvement and research as to why.

  • elnura

    Iron Lung for Polio progressed to the oxygen tent, than the respirator. Polio is alive and well under the new names that the CDC changed it to in 1958 when it was obvious that the Polio vaccine was a failure as stated by Jonas Salk in 1976:

    -In 1976, Dr. Jonas Salk, creator of the killed-virus vaccine used in the 1950s,testified that the live-virus vaccine(used almost exclusively in the U.S.from the early 1960s to 2000) was the “principal if not sole cause” of all reported polio cases in the U.S. since1961. (Washington Post Sept 24, 1976 and (Science 4/4/77 “Abstracts” – Control of influenza and poliomyelitis with killed virus vaccines).

    – In 1992, the Federal Centers for Disease Control and
    Prevention (CDC)published an admission that
    the live-virus vaccine had become the dominant causeof polio in the United States. In fact,according to CDC figures, every case of polio in the U.S. since 1979 was caused by the oral polio vaccine. (Strebel PM., et al. Epidemiology poliomyletis in U.S. one decade after the last reported case of indigenous wild virus
    associated disease, Clinical Infectious Diseases CDC, February
    1992:568

    Jonas Salk, along with all the other labs working on race for the polio vaccine during the age of the electronic microscope COULD NOT ISOLATE THE WILD POLIO VIRUS that was supposed be crippling all these children in the US during the 1930′s-1950′s. As a matter of fact the polio strains Salk used to develop his three polio vaccines from WERE ALL CONCOCTED IN A LAB. Not one of Salks polio viral strains were the so-called “wild strain” the entire scientific community was looking for. The Polio Vaccine was made from the feces of three children who had recovered from POLIO. Many Doctors and Scientist KNEW that Polio was not caused by a virus but was the averse reaction to DDT and other heavy metal poisoning. Most people, with proper treatment recovered fully within two years of symptoms. A small percentage of people whose chest muscles or other muscles were badly damaged by the illness retained life long damage to those muscles.

    By 1964 the polio vaccines had created so many new polio cases in theUS and abroad that the CDC was forced to either admit that the polio vaccine was one of the biggest hoaxes since the small pox vaccine or they had to hide the FACT by reclassifying polio to mask the polio
    epidemic caused by the polio vaccine.

    It was at this point the CDC changed the diagnostic criteria for Polio;
    In 1958, the CDC formally adopted the “Best available paralytic poliomyelitis case count” or BAPPCC:
    “Cases must be clinically and epidemiologically compatible with poliomyelitis, must have resulted in paralysis, and must have a residual neurological deficit 60 days after onset of initial symptoms. .. the BAPPCC does not include cases of nonparalytic poliomyelitis, of those in which paralysis is more transient. The original purpose of developing these criteria was to omit cases possibly due to enteroviruses other than polioviruses.” People who showed polio like symptoms that previously would have been diagnosed as Polio were now being diagnosed as: Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP), Transverse Myelitis, Viral or Aseptic Meningitis, Guillaine Barre Syndrome (GBS), Chinese Paralytic Syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Epidemic Cholera, Cholera Morbus, Spinal Meningitis, Spinal Apolexy, Inhibitory Palsy, Intermittent Fever, Famine Fever, Worm Fever, Bilious Remittent Fever, Ergotis, ME, Post-Polio Syndrome aka GBS. Coxsackie virus and echo viruses can cause paralytic syndromes that are clinically indistinguishable from paralytic poliomyelitis. Changing the diagnostic criteria for Polio from being paralyzed for only 72 hours to being paralyzed fro 60 days gave the impression that vaccine was working.

    Polio cases rose about 300 to 400% in these 5 places that made the Salk vaccine compulsory by law:
    -North Carolina: 78 cases in 1958 before compulsory shots. 313 cases in 1959.
    -Connecticut: 45 cases in 1958 before compulsory shots. 123 cases in 1959.
    -Tennessee: 119 cases in 1958 before compulsory shots. 386 cases in 1959.
    -Ohio: 17 cases in 1958 before compulsory shots. 52 cases in 1959.
    -Los Angeles: 89 cases in 1958 before compulsory shots. 190 cases in 1959. (there are more state numbers but this gives you an idea the vaccine didn’t work)

    Only two months into the Salk campaign, the U.S. Public Health Service, on June 23, 1955, announced that there had been 168 confirmed cases of poliomyelitis among the vaccinated with six deaths. The News Chronicle of May 6, 1955, reported:

    “The interval between the inoculation and the first sign of paralysis ranged from 5 to 20 days and in a large proportion of cases it started in the limb on which the injection had been given. Another feature of the tragedy was that the numbers developing polio were far greater than would have been expected had no inoculations been given. In fact, in the state of Idaho, according to a statement by Dr. Carl Eklund, one of the government’s chief virus authorities, polio struck only vaccinated
    children in areas where there had been no cases of polio since the preceding autumn; in 9 out of 10 cases the paralysis occurred in the arms in which the vaccine had been injected.”

    In June, 1955, James C. Spaulding, a staff writer for the Milwaukee Journal covered an American Medical Association convention. Here is what Spaulding learned and reported on June 19, 1955:
    “A policy of secrecy and deception has been followed by the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis and the U.S. Public Health Service in the polio vaccine programs. As a result the nation’s physicians were prevented from learning vital information about the trouble in making
    and testing Salk vaccine… The secrecy and deception started before the field trials.”

    “One of the things the AMA was not told was that the USPHS had an advisory group made up almost entirely of scientists who were receiving money from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, which body was exerting pressure to go ahead with the program, even after Salk vaccine was found to be dangerous.”

    The editor of “The Lancet” (June 11, 1955) wrote: “In addition to the possibility of producing the very disease the vaccine is used to prevent, there is a risk, of unknown dimensions, that repeated injections of a vaccine prepared from monkey kidney may eventually sensitize the child in some harmful way.”

    By 1960, the Salk vaccine had proven to be so hazardous and ineffective, that the Journal of the American Medical Association (February 25, 1961) carried an article admitting that, “It is now generally recognized that much of the Salk vaccine used in the U.S. has been worthless.”

  • elnura

    Don’t change the subject. Please provide the study that confirms an 85% effectiveness rate for any vaccine. Independent please.

    In regards to what you read, you can’t see or read what’s in front of you if you have a motive not to.

  • elnura

    Also its OK for them to cite the CDC? I thought they weren’t suppose to
    be trusted? Oh wait they can be trusted when it alligns with your views,
    correct, that’s how this works.

    I didn’t say they could be trusted, I said NN cites them. they also cite Pub Med.

  • Roxanne

    No, death rates plummeted because of better living conditions shown is stats going back to the late 1800’s
    well before vaccines, or antibiotic intervention.
    Your comment re. iron lung and polio shows how well you’ve been programmed to believe vaccine heroic myths. Something I totally bought into, until I was confronted by witnessing children in India in the early 90’s who all got polio from the vaccine (family there was involved in helping these children) Talk about a rude awakening…
    No media here, just invisible victims, that along with two
    other wake up calls forced me to truly look at vaccines critically for the first time in my life.

    Re. paralysis, the irony is that vaccines have played a historical role in inducing such:

    “In regions in which there is no organized vaccination of the population, general paralysis is rare…” JAMA, July 1926
    Polio rates rose sharply after the introduction of the diphtheria and pertussis vaccine in the 40’s from 5.8 per
    100,000 between 1935-39 to 24.8 per 100,000 between
    1950-1954. Source national morbidity reports from U.S.
    public surveillance reports, Lancet, 4/18/1950

  • elnura

    First, it’s not a INDEPENDENT STUDY. It’s financed by the Japanese
    Government:

    Funding: This study was funded by a grant in aid from the Ministry of
    Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

    It’s like the CDC funding studies in the US on Measles, Flu vaccines etc.
    The authors of the study have ties to medical schools and hospitals. Despite it
    being labeled as a double blind placebo based controlled study-it’s bias.

    -Conclusions – Implications for practice

    We believe the case for more
    widespread use of the vaccine is not unequivocally proven.

    The decision to offer
    vaccinationmust rest upon a difficult estimate of its local value in

    preventing invasive
    pneumococcal pneumonia, combined with a hope that it may
    afford some

    protection against pneumonia
    and death.

    Given the seeming
    effectiveness of the vaccine in protecting individuals against IPD, commencing new randomized
    trials in populations at risk (principally, the elderly)
    would face ethical difficultiess. The
    question of whether this class of vaccines prevents
    pneumonia and death to a measurable degree may be
    accessible only through ecological studies, comparing entire populations under different vaccination policies. Polysaccharide vaccines
    may however have a place as control treatmentsin randomized trials of the newer conjugate vaccines,
    which this review does not consider.

    Synopsis

    Polysaccharide pneumococcal
    vaccines do not appear to reduce pneumonia or
    pneumonia-

    related deaths in adults, but
    may be ableto reduce invasive pneumococcal disease
    Pneumococcal bacteria are one of the main causes of pneumonia, a lung infection with a high
    mortality rate (about 25%). It is especially life-threatening in older people and people with
    immune system problems (including HIV/AIDS). The review of trials of polysaccharide
    pneumococcal vaccines found that they do not reduce the
    incidence of pneumonia or deaths from pneumonia. However,
    research from other types of studies suggest that the
    vaccine may be able to reduce the incidence of another serious disease caused by these bacteria,
    invasive pneumococcal disease.

    The Cochrane Database of
    systematic Reviews: http://www.rima.org/web/medline_pdf/cd000422.pdf

    -Pneumococcal
    protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccines are now ready for testing in adults,
    and common protein vaccines may be ready soon. Many people continue to develop
    serious pneumococcal disease in spite of vaccination; whether vaccines that
    might be available in the next decade can improve on the performance of the
    polysaccharide vaccine is unknown. New vaccines will need to be compared with
    the polysaccharide vaccine in terms of immune response, effectiveness, safety,
    duration of protection, and economic impact. The short-term challenge for
    prevention of pneumococcal disease in adults, however, is to improve delivery of
    pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine to all people who can benefit from it.
    http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/33/5/662.long

    -Use in children, some
    studies state:

    “The pneumococcal conjugate
    vaccine produces a significant effect regarding prevention of invasive
    pneumococcal disease. Results on prevention of otitis or pneumonia have been
    less striking, but considering the high burden of these diseases in infants,
    even a low efficacy has potential for tremendous impact on the health
    of infants in developing and industrialized countries.”

    Vaccination Does Not
    Prevent Pneumonia In Older People

    New England Journal of
    Medicine (NEJM)http://www.docguide.com/news/content.nsf/news/8525697700573E1885256D1800803879

    (there is also a contradictory article in the
    NEJM stating the opposite)

    Without all the scientific
    jargon:

    Efficacy of 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in
    preventing pneumonia and improving survival in nursing home residents: double
    blind, randomized and placebo controlled trial.

    RESULTS: Pneumonia
    occurred in 63 (12.5%) participants in the vaccine group and 104 (20.6%) in the
    placebo group. Pneumococcal pneumonia was diagnosed in 14 (2.8%) participants in
    the vaccine group and 37 (7.3%) in the placebo group (P<0.001). All cause
    pneumonia and pneumococcal pneumonia were significantly more frequent in the
    placebo group than in the vaccine group:

    Wow, 63 in the vaccine group
    still got pneumococcal pneumonia? If the vaccine really worked none of them
    would have? Is it worth it? And some of those 4 vaccines have aluminum, mercury,
    and or latex as ingredients.

    This study is no
    different than the ones that the American Academy of pediatrics puts out title
    "The Fourteen Studies" and the other one with 40 studies. Government paid for.
    To be honest, even though I cited The Cochrane Collaboration I have some issues
    with them because they have taken money from pharmaceutical companies in
    Europe. However they do try and maintain a balance but I'm constantly vigilant.

    I'm leaving for a road trip so I will respond to each of the studies you sent in other replies-they are Government funded. They are not Independent. The one is the above comment was sent to me last year and I had a lengthily reply with all the information on the authors but it didn't transfer over from my last hard drive crash so this brief comment will do.
    Also, I can't find the actual data for the study which discusses the placebo and an adjuvant. There is one critical analysis I read that said something to the effect since this vaccine was mandatory the adjuvant was so the usual. Since you presented the study how about providing the link to the actual data. If not so gracious I'll just research it when I return.

    President Eisenhower warned about when he left office about how the federal government was beginning to put so much
    funding into universities to do studies that the government was
    interested in the outcome that that eventually was going to create a
    situation where science would be largely controlled by the federal
    government.

    This is the problem. Lack of Independence in Science and Medical research.

  • elnura

    First, it’s not a INDEPENDENT STUDY. It’s financed by the Japanese Government:
    Funding: This study was funded by a grant in aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

    It’s like the CDC funding studies in the US on Measles, Flu vaccines etc. The authors of the study have ties to medical schools and hospitals. Despite it being labeled as a double blind placebo based controlled study-it’s bias.
    There are other similar studies unfortunately they are funded by governments or researchers who have strong pharma ties. That a problem that’s difficult to overcome.

    -Conclusions – Implications for practice
    We believe the case for more widespread use of the vaccine is not unequivocally proven.
    The decision to offer vaccination must rest upon a difficult estimate of its local value in preventing invasive
    pneumococcal pneumonia, combined with a hope that it may afford some protection against pneumonia and death.

    Given the seeming effectiveness of the vaccine in protecting individuals against IPD, commencing new randomized trials in populations at risk (principally, the elderly) would face ethical difficulties. The
    question of whether this class of vaccines prevents
    pneumonia and death to a measurable degree may be
    accessible only through ecological studies, comparing entire populations under different vaccination policies. Polysaccharide vaccines may however have a place as control treatmentsin randomized trials of the newer conjugate vaccines, which this review does not consider.

    Synopsis
    Polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines do not appear to reduce pneumonia or pneumonia-related deaths in adults, but may be ableto reduce invasive pneumococcal disease Pneumococcal bacteria are one of the main causes of pneumonia, a lung infection with a high
    mortality rate (about 25%). It is especially life-threatening in older people and people with
    immune system problems (including HIV/AIDS). The review of trials of polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines found that they do not reduce the
    incidence of pneumonia or deaths from pneumonia. However, research from other types of studies suggest that the vaccine may be able to reduce the incidence of another serious disease caused by these bacteria,
    invasive pneumococcal disease.

    The Cochrane Database of systematic Reviews: http://www.rima.org/web/medline_pdf/cd000422.pdf

    -Pneumococcal protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccines are now ready for testing in adults,
    and common protein vaccines may be ready soon. Many people continue to develop serious pneumococcal disease in spite of vaccination; whether vaccines that
    might be available in the next decade can improve on the performance of the polysaccharide vaccine is unknown. New vaccines will need to be compared with
    the polysaccharide vaccine in terms of immune response, effectiveness, safety, duration of protection, and economic impact. The short-term challenge for
    prevention of pneumococcal disease in adults, however, is to improve delivery of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine to all people who can benefit from it.
    http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/33/5/662.long

    -Use in children, some studies state:
    “The pneumococcal conjugate vaccine produces a significant effect regarding prevention of invasive
    pneumococcal disease. Results on prevention of otitis or pneumonia have been less striking, but considering the high burden of these diseases in infants,
    even a low efficacy has potential for tremendous impact on the health of infants in developing and industrialized countries.”

    Vaccination Does Not Prevent Pneumonia In Older People
    New England Journal of
    Medicine (NEJM)http://www.docguide.com/news/content.nsf/news/8525697700573E1885256D1800803879
    (there is also a contradictory article in the
    NEJM stating the opposite)

    Without all the scientific jargon:
    Efficacy of 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in
    preventing pneumonia and improving survival in nursing home residents: double blind, randomized and placebo controlled trial.
    RESULTS: Pneumonia
    occurred in 63 (12.5%) participants in the vaccine group and 104 (20.6%) in the placebo group. Pneumococcal pneumonia was diagnosed in 14 (2.8%) participants in
    the vaccine group and 37 (7.3%) in the placebo group (P<0.001). All cause pneumonia and pneumococcal pneumonia were significantly more frequent in the
    placebo group than in the vaccine group:

    Wow, 63 in the vaccine group still got pneumococcal pneumonia? If the vaccine really worked none of them
    would have? Is it worth it? And some of those 4 vaccines have aluminum, mercury, and or latex as ingredients.

    This study is no different than the ones that the American Academy of pediatrics puts out title "The Fourteen Studies" and the other one with 40 studies. Government paid for. To be honest, even though I cited The Cochrane Collaboration I have some issues with them because they have taken money from pharmaceutical companies in
    Europe. However they do try and maintain a balance but I'm constantly vigilant.

    I'm leaving for a road trip so I will respond to each of the studies you sent in other replies-they are Government funded. They are not Independent. The one is the above comment was sent to me last year and I had a lengthily reply with all the information on the authors but it didn't transfer over from my last hard drive crash so this brief comment will do.

    Also, I can't find the actual data for the study which discusses the placebo and an adjuvant. There is one critical analysis I read that said something to the effect since this vaccine was mandatory the adjuvant was so the usual. Since you presented the study how about providing the link to the actual data. If not so gracious I'll just research it when I return.

    President Eisenhower warned about when he left office about how the federal government was beginning to put so much funding into universities to do studies that the government was interested in the outcome that that eventually was going to create a situation where science would be largely controlled by the federal government.

    This is the problem. Lack of Independence in Science and Medical research.

    Ben Goldacre states in his book "Bad Pharma"
    How Drug companies Misled Doctors and harm Patients:

    He writes in the introduction that the book aims to
    defend the following paragraph:
    Medicine is Broken. Drugs are tested by the people who manufacture them, in poorly designed trials, on hopelessly small numbers of weird, unrepresentative patients, and analyzed using techniques which are flawed by design, in such a way that they exaggerate the benefits of treatments. Unsurprisingly, these trials tend to produce results that favour the manufacturer. When trials throw
    up results that companies don't like, they are perfectly entitled to hide them from doctors and patients, so we only ever see a distorted picture of any drug's true effects. Regulators see most of the trial data, but only from early on in a drug's life, and even then they don't give this data to doctors or patients, or even to other parts of government. This distorted evidence is then communicated and applied in a distorted fashion. In their forty years of practice after leaving medical school, doctors hear about what works through ad hoc oral
    traditions, from sales reps, colleagues or journals. But those colleagues can be in the pay of drug companies – often undisclosed – and the journals are too. And
    so are the patient groups. And finally, academic papers, which everyone thinks of as objective, are often covertly planned and written by people who work directly for the companies, without disclosure. Sometimes whole academic journals are even owned outright by one drug company. Aside from all this, for several of the most important and enduring problems in medicine, we have no idea what the best treatment is, because it's not in anyone's financial interest to conduct any trials at all. These are ongoing problems, and although people have
    claimed to fix many of them, for the most part they have failed; so all these problems persist, but worse than ever, because now people can pretend that everything is fine after all.

  • Justin Herrass

    You cite natural news, natural news cite CDC (when their views match up and when natural news isn’t citing themselves) so natural news isn’t to be trusted.

  • Justin Herrass

    That is a lot of outdated information from the CDC and AMA, I thought they were a source that couldn’t be trusted.

  • Justin Herrass

    correlation isn’t causation

  • Justin Herrass

    Then please explain what is wrong with statistical analysis and methods to show bias in the study. Where did the authors and peer review get it wrong. You said there were no gold standard studies to show efficacy and safety and there is, so you again are wrong. Now with time I can start going through every study you have cited I’m sure I can find excuses to discredit them blindly on bias, without analyzing the data like you do. Bias as an empty label because if you don’t have raw data you don’t know what you are talking about. Its not one study discredits another its what hundreds of studies say and there are hundreds that’s show safety and efficacy that you can’t prove bias. There will also be a study showing the opposite results, poor controls, small details missed, human error, clusters of abnormal data. So in the end consensus from the world of science says I’m right and YOU are wrong.

  • Roxanne

    Correlation isn’t always causation but it certainly could be,
    though never according to vaccine apologists… Yup, that’s the mantra vaccine apologists use to deny the most black and white vaccine reactions such as girls having strokes within hours of the HPV, babies dying of “SID” within a day or two of the DPT…. It’s invariably written often as a “coincidence.”

  • Justin Herrass

    But you have no evidence to back up your theories, the number of people who tripped over their own two feet and died and the number of lawyers in Nevada correlates but I don’t think one is causing the other.

  • Argus

    Elnura’s instructions to her critics:
    “Don’t ATTACK OR TRY AND DISCREDIT the source of the information -DISCREDIT THE INFORMATION ITSELF.”
    Yet all he/she does all day is reject studies and publications from other posters because (in her mind) “they aren’t INDEPENDENT”. Which is attacking the source.
    He/she never even attempts to discuss the methodology, statistical analysis or interpretation of results – which would be about “THE INFORMATION ITSELF”.
    Hypocritical much, Elnura?

  • Roxanne

    Please wake up and smell the coffee, Justin… You’ve offered the most absurd, irrational example… The next time you stub your toe and feel pain, remember, “correlation is not causation”. Gee, maybe the sharp pain in your toe is a delayed response from something you ate three hours earlier! Yes, don’t connect the most obvious dots, it’s all a “coincidence”…

    And in the case of vaccines, it’s always a “coincidence”… And that dismissal and ASSUMPTION of innocence, is what passes for “science”!!! … ‘Don’t look, don’t find, don’t report’ – Yeah, that’s really “scientific”

    Please take five minutes out of your day and watch this. These young women are not “my theories”… They’re real
    living, invisible victims (well, except those that died!)

    http://tv.greenmedinfo.com/maimed-dead-girls-post-hpv-shot-coincidence/

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    When have YOU ever attempted to discuss the methodology, statistical analysis or interpretation of results, Argus? Hypocritical much?

    Sometimes we as well have to rely on the independent alternative information, as the studies have not kept up. But none of that is ever good enough for you. You must keep your head in the misinformation.

    Data Reveals Measles Outbreaks Have Nothing to Do With Non-Vaccination Trends
    http://politicalblindspot.com/data-reveals-measles-outbreaks-have-nothing-to-do-with-non-vaccination-trends/

    Whooping Cough Outbreak- Largest in 50 yrs

    Its all over the news, the internet and the newspapers. Largest whooping cough outbreak in 5 decades….go get vaccinated and protect your children…oh my…thats the LAST THING you should do. Heres why.

    http://www.educate4theinjured.org/#!pertussis-outbreak-4567008830/c1oa5

    This ‘Misdirection Tactic’ is Used by Mainstream Media When Reporting Outbreaks
    http://vactruth.com/2014/05/18/doctors-misdirect-vaccine-concerns/

    “Our unvaccinated and under-vaccinated population did not appear to contribute significantly to the increased rate of clinical pertussis. Surprisingly, the highest incidence of disease was among previously vaccinated children in the eight to twelve year age group.”

    Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(12):1730-5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis287. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
    Unexpectedly limited durability of immunity following acellular pertussis vaccination in preadolescents in a North American outbreak.

    Conclusons: Our data suggests that the current schedule of acellular pertussis vaccine doses is insufficient to prevent outbreaks of pertussis. We noted a markedly increased rate of disease from ages 8-12 years, proportionate to the interval since the last scheduled vaccine. Stable rates of testing ruled out selection bias. The possibility of earlier or more numerous booster doses of acellular pertussis vaccine either as part of routine immunization or for outbreak control should be entertained.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22423127

    The Current Failure of Pertussis and Measles Vaccine
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-current-failure-of-pertussis-and-measles-vaccine.html

    The Antibody Deception, (a good article on the subject matter of understanding the issue of vaccine effectiveness, and in regard to showing and proving actual vaccine effectiveness)
    http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/the-antibody-deception.html

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    The CDC can as well be used as a source, when you can use their information, and against them, to make a point.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Oh Mr Herass, but the, and your vaccine trails here are clearly not paved with gold. This a small sample of the information you are either ignoring, or you are unaware of.

    Gardasil-The Flagship Example of the Failure of Vaccine Authorities to Regulate and Assure Vaccine Safety- Gardasil: I am not a coincidence

    http://www.vacfacts.info/gardasil-the-flagship-example-of-the-failure-of-vaccine-authorities-to-regulate-and-assure-vaccine-safety.html

    Death after Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Causal or Coincidental?

    Conclusions: Our study suggests that HPV vaccines containing HPV-16L1 antigens pose an inherent risk for

    triggering potentially fatal autoimmune vasculopathies.

    http://www.rescuepost.com/files/ltshaw-death-after-quadrivalent-hpv-vaccination-pharma-reg-affairs-2012.pdf

    Gardasil: Are you paying for your own bullet?

    The temperature of the heated controversy concerning Gardasil was recently raised even more when Dr. Bernhard Dalbergue (France), former pharmaceutical industry physician with Merck, recently predicted that the vaccine will become the greatest medical scandal of all times.

    In an interview in the April 2014 issue (no. 66) of the magazine Principes de Santé (Health Principles), Dr. Dalbergue, who has worked for over twenty years with the industry, describes the widespread corruption and his concern that the health of patients is sacrificed on the altar of profitability.

    Dr. Dalbergue stated:

    I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all times because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers.

    According to Dr. Dalbergue the pharmaceutical industry has hardened considerably during the last decade, as shown by increased violations of ethics, manipulation of clinical trial data, widespread corruption, gross conflicts of interest and generally less emphasis on pharmacovigilance.

    Read more: http://sanevax.org/gardasil-paying-for-your-own-bullet/

    SaneVax Announces Medical Surprise: Gardasil® HPV DNA Discovered in Post-Mortem

    Blood and Spleen Tissue

    http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120808006480/en#.UvWdWn7Tncs

    Brit Scientists Show HPV Vaccine Is Not Justified Anywhere

    http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2012-06-24/brit-scientists-show-hpv-vaccine-is-not-justified-anywhere/

    Gardasil Contamination Article – Archives

    http://sanevax.org/tag/gardasil-contamination/

    Gardasil-The Real Truth

    http://www.vacfacts.info/gardasil—the-real-truth.html

    Merck Researcher Admits: Gardasil Guards Against Almost Nothing

    http://www.pop.org/content/merck-researcher-admits-gardasil-guards-against-almost-nothing-985

    Pentavalent vaccine: Doing more harm than good?

    Jacob Puliyel, Head of Paediatrics, St Stephens Hospital Delhi, questions whether the time has come to stop using pentavalent vaccine for immunisation

    Excerpts: Deaths in several countries where the vaccine is used

    The two deaths whose autopsy reports are discussed above are not the only deaths associated with this vaccine. This vaccine is used mostly in developing countries. There were eight deaths in Bhutan.2 There were 25 instances of serious adverse events in Sri Lanka including five deaths.3 There were three deaths in Pakistan.4 There were 10 children who suffered serious adverse events of whom seven died in Vietnam.5 There were at least 15 deaths in Kerala6 and two in Tamil Nadu 7and one in Haryana8 making the total 18 deaths in India. These deaths, in different countries using vaccine from varied manufacturers, rules out defects in some specific batch of the vaccine, and also indicate that they are unlikely to be because of incorrect administration of the vaccine. The WHO considers two deaths due to vaccination as a cluster9 that mandates rapid evaluation of the risk to public safety.10 That there are 41 deaths are a matter of serious concern. Should the programme be now suspended?

    Infant mortality rate and coincidental death on day of immunisation

    Information obtained under the right to information suggests that in the first six months, when the vaccine was administered to 40,000 children in Kerala, five children died. If this is extrapolated and the 25 million babies in India born each year are vaccinated we can expect 3125 deaths.

    These deaths from the vaccine would seem to outweigh any benefit that immunisation can yield. In Kerala 14 babies die before their first birthday per 1000 live births. This is called the infant mortality rate (IMR). Half of these deaths occur in the first month of life. The other seven deaths per 1000 occur in the remaining 11 months. Pentavalent vaccine is administered after six weeks of age, and so it is administered to babies who have survived the first month of life. Four out of five deaths occurred with the first dose of the vaccine and on the day or the next day of vaccination. The death of babies in the first day after vaccination works out to be four times higher than the expected number. The vaccine meant to save lives seems to be increasing mortality rather than reducing it.

    Read more:

    http://healthcare.financialexpress.com/sections/strategy/1454-pentavalent-vaccine-doing-more-harm-than-good

    The Times of India Two infant deaths after vaccination in Tamil Nadu http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-13/chennai/32662981_1_pentavalent-vaccine-immunization-programme-aefi

    The Refusers Four children die in Kerala after administration of pentavalent vaccine – Pharmabiz http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/four-children-die-in-kerala-after-administration-of-pentavalent-vaccine-pharmabiz/

    Fact: Vaccinations are Killing Our Kids

    http://vactruth.com/2012/08/12/vaccinations-killing-kids/

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    All that amounts to J.H., is false fear mongering, based only on the misinformation you were fed, and that you refuse to stop being spoon fed. What as well about the evidence of the high risk of vaccine injury, that you have entirely ignored? That one in one million vaccine doses figure the CDC quotes as being the odds of occurring vaccine injury, is actually an in denial and majorly incorrect figure that borders on a criminal level of negligence in the direct support and advocation for and of a high level of direct public endangerment.

    Of course they are going to deny their liability, and because they have everything to lose if the real vaccine truth were known.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Polio Symptoms and Statistics

    Approximately 72% of persons infected with polio will have no symptoms. About 24% of infected persons have minor symptoms, such as fever, fatigue, nausea, headache, flu-like symptoms, stiffness in the neck and back, and pain in the limbs, which often resolve completely. Fewer than 1% of polio cases result in permanent paralysis of the limbs (usually the legs). Of those paralyzed, 5-10% die when the paralysis strikes the respiratory muscles. The death rate increases with increasing age.

    http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/polio/in-short-both.htm

    So, it is not actually as fear mongering scary as they make it to be, now is it, J.H.?

    That means that in regard to polio less than one percent of the population ever ended up in an iron lung. Yet mainstream and the CDC would have us believe that people were dropping like flies from polio, and that polio paralysis and the use of the iron lung were simply, everywhere.

    In about 98% of cases, polio is a mild illness, with no symptoms or with viral-like symptoms. In paralytic polio, the virus leaves the digestive tract, enters the bloodstream, and then attacks nerve cells. Fewer than 1%-2% of people who contract polio become paralyzed. In severe cases, the throat and chest may be paralyzed. Death may result if the patient does not receive artificial breathing support.

    A full discussion of both these issues can be found in the Polio section of my book The Vaccine Guide. The criteria for diagnosing polio did change when the vaccine was introduced in the 1950s and this change in diagnosis apparently reduced the statistic for the number of polio cases dramatically. Monkey kidney cells are used to produce the oral vaccine and controversy rages about the contamination of OPV with monkey viruses. For a complete review of these issues, see the book. Here is one quote from the book. Dr. Bernard Greenberg, a biostatistics expert, was chairman of the Committee on Evaluation and Standards of the American Public Health Association during the 1950s. He testified at a panel discussion that was used as evidence for the congressional hearings on polio vaccine in 1962. During these hearings he elaborated on the problems associated with polio statistics and disputed claims for the vaccines effectiveness. He attributed the dramatic decline in polio cases to a change in reporting practices by physicians. Less cases were identified as polio after the vaccination for very specific reasons. Prior to 1954 any physician who reported paralytic poliomyelitis was doing his patient a service by way of subsidizing the cost of hospitalization and was being community-minded in reporting a communicable disease. The criterion of diagnosis at that time in most health departments followed the World Health Organization definition: Spinal paralytic poliomyelitis: signs and symptoms of nonparalytic poliomyelitis with the addition of partial or complete paralysis of one or more muscle groups, detected on two examinations at least 24 hours apart. Note that two examinations at least 24 hours apart was all that was required. Laboratory confirmation and presence of residual paralysis was not required. In 1955 the criteria were changed to conform more closely to the definition used in the 1954 field trials: residual paralysis was determined 10 to 20 days after onset of illness and again 50 to 70 days after onset…. This change in definition meant that in 1955 we started reporting a new disease, namely, paralytic poliomyelitis with a longer-lasting paralysis. Furthermore, diagnostic procedures have continued to be refined. Coxsackie virus infections and aseptic meningitis have been distinguished from paralytic poliomyelitis. Prior to 1954 large numbers of these cases undoubtedly were mislabeled as paralytic poliomyelitis. Thus, simply by changes in diagnostic criteria, the number of paralytic cases was predetermined to decrease in 1955-1957, whether or not any vaccine was used.

    The Present Status of Polio Vaccines (Document copy written in the 1950’s)
    http://www.greatmothersquestioningvaccines.com/uploads/2/8/8/8/2888885/ratner_1960.pdf

    The whole situation has clearly been nothing but a corrupt lie.

    Polio Vaccine – Page 1

    http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/polio.htm

    Polio Vaccine – Page 2
    http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/polio2.htm

    Polio Vaccine – Page 3
    http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/polio3.htm

    Shawn Siegel & Marcella Piper-Terry “The Vaccine Myth: An Issue of Trust” 3-14-2013 (The change in and the manipulation of the polio numbers, listen closely to what is stated).
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVTbXdh_JBA

    In regard to polio eradication by use of the oral vaccine, they have done the kind of same spin the numbers thing, in India.

    Polio eradication & the future for other programmes: Situation analysis for strategic planning in India

    Excerpts: Residual paralysis in non-polio AFP: Concentrating on this programme resulted in a decline in routine immunization and increase in incidence of vaccine preventable disease1,16,17. There was also an unexplained increase in AFP – especially non polio AFP. In 2005 there were 10,055 non polio AFP cases in Uttar Pradesh (UP) where 561 cases were expected11. A delegation from the Public Report on Health (PRoH) (Council for Social Welfare, New Delhi) in November 2006 investigated the problem of residual paralysis in ‘non polio AFP’. The PRoH found that most cases of AFP were not being followed up (unless they cultured virus in the stools). Information provided under the Right to Information Act and available from National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP) is shown in the Table8

    Of the 10264 cases of AFP, 209 were cases of polio or compatible with polio. Of the remaining 10055, only 2553 were followed up; of these, 898 had residual paralysis (that would qualify them to be diagnosed as polio using the old definition) and 217 died. Projecting these figures on those not followed up, it will appear that approximately 4800 cases had residual paralysis or died in UP after acquiring non polio AFP in the year 2005. This figure must be compared to the all India figures of 4793 polio cases in 199411. It is not surprising the NPSP is not keen on the follow up of these cases. The data from 2006, after 6 doses of mOPV had been administered in 2005, in districts of UP, are worse8
    .
    Benefits claimed: WHO claims five million children have been saved from polio paralysis18. It is instructive to see how this figure is arrived at. In 1988, there were 32,419 cases of paralytic poliomyelitis19. The WHO arbitarily raised this number ten-fold to 350,000 claiming incomplete reporting5

    In 2004 with the changed definition, only culture positive paralysis was considered polio and there were 2000 such cases. Subtracting 2000 from 350,000, the WHO calculated that 348,000 children were saved from paralysis that year.

    http://medind.nic.in/iby/t07/i1/ibyt07i1p1.pdf

    The Polio “Emergency”

    Excerpts: I know, this might be asking the obvious here, but for the sake of not jumping to any conclusions, is that 417 cases of vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) or wild polio? You see, the boy in the picture above is getting the oral polio vaccine which we finally stopped using in the United States in 2000 because, for 27 years there were more cases of vaccine-associated paralytic polio in our country than wild-strain polio due to this monstrosity of a vaccine. Apparently it’s not good enough for our children anymore, but totally okay for the babies in third-world countries.

    Each year during National Immunization Days we vaccinate millions of third-world, little children, with OPV and turn a blind eye to the vaccine-associated paralysis it can leave behind, unless of course we need it to boost our polio numbers to put pressure on others to vaccinate – then we’ll pretend its wild polio and we might call it an “emergency.”

    Here’s what the CDC says about VAPP from the oral polio vaccine:

    A vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) is a strain of poliovirus that was initially contained in OPV and that has changed over time and behaves more like the wild or naturally occurring virus. This means it can be more easily spread to others who are unvaccinated against polio and who come in contact with the stool or oral secretions (e.g., saliva) of an infected person. These viruses may cause illness, including paralytic poliomyelitis.

    So let me get this straight: the oral polio vaccine can cause vaccine-associated paralytic polio, sheds and infects others, and “has changed over time” and “behaves more like” the wild virus it’s supposed to protect us against? Is that code for…mutated vaccine virus? Logic of course would suggest we should all get vaccinated. It’s cool, we will just cross our fingers and hope we don’t get paralysis or that the virus doesn’t mutate and infect other populations. If it does, we’ll just pretend the vaccine has nothing to do with it and push more vaccines since eradicating paralysis with something that causes paralysis makes compete sense.

    http://www.livingwhole.org/the-polio-emergency/

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Empirical Data Confirm Autism Symptoms Related to Aluminum and Acetaminophen Exposure
    http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/Entropy/entropy-14-02227.pdf

    More info: Glutathione, Tylenol, Vaccine Adverse Reactions, and ASD
    http://www.vacfacts.info/glutathione-tylenol-vaccine-adverse-reactions-and-asd.html

    But of course don’t plan on the CDC ever taking note of this information, nor relaying any such information to the public, any day soon.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Is this level of correlation in reference to causation, at all concerning to you J.H.? How many vaccines before the age of 6 would ever be to many? Don’t forget as well that all of corporate pharma enjoys complete protection from any legal liability for vaccine injury, and they have now since 1998.

    Graph of the day: The United States has a really high infant mortality rate
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/09/graph-of-the-day-the-united-states-has-a-really-high-infant-

    Multiple Infant Vaccines Linked To Dramatically Increased Mortality
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/multiple-infant-vaccines-linked-dramatically-increased-mortality

    Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
    http://het.sagepub.com/…/early/2011/05/04/0960327111407644​

    Mortality rate, infant (per 1,000 live births)
    http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.IMRT.IN/countries/1W?display=graph

    Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
    http://het.sagepub.com/…/early/2011/05/04/0960327111407644​

    Truth In Media: Vaccine Court and Autism
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfqpZqEP6gg

    Congressional Briefing on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, (an address of the currently problematic issues with proper compensation for vaccine injuries)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4CwROrKG8A

    Ahh yes, this situation with vaccines is largely one with huge issues regarding denial and cover-up of the vaccine harm being done.

    Statistics Reports
    Totals 3,540 approved, and with now to date 9,734 claims DENIED.
    http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreports.html

    Here are the epidemiological studies that have used in that federal vaccine court, (VICP); to deny thousands of cases for vaccine caused injury and resulting autism. Take a look and read this well done analysis of those larger epidemiological studies they did on one single vaccine, the MMR, and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. Then they called it good, and no further research was needed; thus proclaiming that all the science was looked at and vaccines do not cause autism. If this analysis does not show nor prove to you as well that all of those claimed top epidemiologiocal studies are nothing but junk science; then what would ever be enough to show you that?

    VACCINES AND AUTISM – WHAT DO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES REALLY TELL US?
    http://www.rescuepost.com/files/vaccines-and-autism-epidemiology-rebuttal.pdf

  • Argus

    Again with the wall of impenetrable gibberish, Lowell.

    Shakespeare said it best:

    “. . .Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury
    Signifying nothing.”

  • Argus

    And many, many, more cases of death and paralysis occured every year due to polio disease before the vaccination program was stepped up.
    The good news is that very soon India will be able to switch from live attenuated polio vaccine to the injectable “killed” vaccine, which has a very, very low incidence of serious side effects.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Here is some interesting information for you Argus, regarding that said study.

    The Rehash Of ONLY The Old Vaccine So Called Safety Studies – Presented As A Current And New Study
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-rehash-of-only-the-old-vaccine-so-called-safety-studies—presented-as-a-current-and-new-study.html

    Let me as well ask you why this information would not be important enough to be addressed by Paul Offit and the CDC? Why are they not doing follow up studies to confirm or deny the existence of this vaccine risk, and its very likely connection to the increased rates of diagnosed autism?

    Published on Dec 5, 2012
    Dr. Deisher testifies at the MN House about vaccine safety. She presents research demonstrating a link between the rise in the rates of autism and the use of aborted fetal cells in the production of vaccines. Dr. Deisher is the president and founder of SoundChoice, a non-profit that works to provide safe vaccination alternatives.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsCAUKUTb20

    Dr. Deisher testifies on the connection between vaccines and rising rates of autism (2 of 4).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5b9xsGZs1E

    Dr. Deisher testifies on the connection between vaccines and rising rates of autism (3 of 4).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UVZSs9vgYQ

    Dr. Deisher testifies on the connection between vaccines and rising rates of autism (4 of 4).
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5y9mYQQmt4

    Dr. Theresa Deisher: Moral Vaccine Development
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTEh_BsGwZQ​

    This is an excellent and informative read, as to the situation we are talking about here, in regard to aborted fetal cell production types of vaccines. You can as well easily see how strong this research is. And the CDC is doing what?

    Testimony Submitted by:
    Dr. Theresa A. Deisher
    Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute
    President
    AVM Biotechnology
    CEO and Managing Member

    Excerpted:

    Some childhood vaccines that are mandated prior to entering kindergarten are only available in the US produced using aborted fetal cells, these include MMR (mumps measles rubella) and chickenpox. Other mandated childhood vaccines are available from both animal or human sources, and yet parents and grandparents are not informed of this so that they can choose a vaccine compatible with their consciences.

    When pharmaceutical companies switched from using animal cell lines to using aborted human fetal cells lines to produce these vaccines, in the mid to late 1970s, they assumed, without any evidence, that using aborted fetal cells would result in a more efficient production system. Brief discussions about potential adverse health consequences of using aborted human cell lines for vaccine production were captured in minutes from FDA advisory meetings about this switch. However, no studies have been done to actually measure the extent of those potential adverse consequences.

    Vaccines and biologics (engineered proteins as drugs) are too large to make in a test tube, so companies harness the normal machinery used to make these, cells. No final drug is ever completely ‘pure’ and you will find contaminating DNA and cellular debris from the production cell in your final product. When we switch from using animal cells to using human cells we now have human DNA in our vaccines and our drugs.

    Contaminating human DNA in these vaccines has the potential to trigger auto-immune responses and also the potential to become incorporated into our own genes, a process called homologous recombination.

    Read more:
    https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/transcripts/sept08/deisher_statement.pdf

    Computational Detection of Homologous Recombination Hotspots in X-Chromosome Autism Associated Genes
    Friday, May 21, 2010
    http://download.pdf-world.net/Computational-Detection-of-Homologous-Recombination-Hotspots-in-X-download-w4554.html

    Excerpt from the abstract:
    http://www.cogforlife.org/scpiautisminsarabstract.htm

    June 3, 2010
    SCPI Study on Aborted Fetal DNA in Vaccines Presented at International Meeting for Autism Research
    http://www.cogforlife.org/scpiautismstudypress.htm

    For Scientific Data: Homologous Recombination Study
    http://www.cogforlife.org/SCPIIMFARHR.pdf

    Autism

    The dangers of using aborted fetal cell lines for vaccine manufacture have been debated by the FDA for over 50 years, and yet they have not done sufficient safety studies. The active component of a vaccine is a virus. Viruses are too large to manufacture in test tubes. Therefore, vaccine manufacturers exploit the natural method of producing virus– they inoculate
    cells and the cells produce the virus for them. Each vial of vaccine contains contaminants from the cells used to make the virus. When we use animal cells to make viruses, the residual material is not human and so we mount an immune response to it and eliminate it. However, in the case of vaccines produced using aborted human fetal cell lines, we have the dangers of triggering an autoimmune response and insertion of the contaminating DNA to disrupt the child’s own genes.

    In the US, autism has spiked up in 3 distinct years, called changepoints. The first changepoint occurred in 1981, the second in 19881, and the third in 1996. These spikes coincide with the introduction of vaccines that are produced in aborted fetal cells. In 1979, aborted fetal cell produced MMR II was approved in the US. Compliance campaigns brought MMR II use up from as low as 49% for children born before 1987 to over 82% for children born in 1989 and later. A second dose of MMR II was also introduced to the vaccination schedule for children born in 1988 and later. The third changepoint corresponds to the approval of aborted fetal cell produced Varivax (chickenpox) in 1995 (See figure below).

    Read more: http://soundchoice.org/autism/

    Using Homologous Recombination to Manipulate the Genome of Human Somatic
    Cells
    http://download.pdf-world.net/Using-Homologous-Recombination-to-Manipulate-the-Genome-of-Human-download-w4540.html

    Non-homologous DNA end joining – Acta Biochimica Polonica
    http://download.pdf-world.net/Non-homologous-DNA-end-joining—Acta-Biochimica-Polonica-download-w4566.html

    Mechanism of Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination
    http://download.pdf-world.net/Mechanism-of-Eukaryotic-Homologous-Recombination-download-w4524.html

    Genomic disorders: A window into human gene and genome evolution

    Claudia M. B. Carvalhoa, Feng Zhanga, and James R. Lupskia,b,c,1
    Author Affiliations
    Edited by Diddahally R. Govindaraju, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, and accepted by the Editorial Board November 5, 2009 (received for review July 22, 2009)
    http://www.pnas.org/content/107/suppl_1/1765.full

    IS ABORTED FETAL DNA LINKED TO AUTISM?
    August 12, 2009 – By Judie Brown
    By Theresa A. Deisher, Ph.D.
    http://www.all.org/article/index/id/NDAzOQ

    Vaccine Production With – Human Diploid Cells (aborted fetal cell tissue)
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-production-with—human-diploid-cells-aborted-fetal-cell—tissue.html

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    The False Theory of Vaccine Derived – Herd Immunity
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-false-theory-of-vaccine-derived—herd-immunity.html

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    What about the currently existing 54,719 cases of acute flaccid paralysis existing in India alone? Why are we not hearing and nor reading anything about that in the US major news media? Many deaths and permanent disability are taking place due to those numbers of AFP. And before you go to claiming none of it was caused by the oral polio vaccine, and the huge drive to push multiple doses of that vaccine; I suggest that you review all of the related information on this page.

    Failure Of The Continued Polio Vaccine Campaign
    http://www.vacfacts.info/failure-of-the-continued-polio-vaccine-campaign.html

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    That is again and as always a high level of denial you have going on there, Argus. The evidence of vaccine failure is all to obvious, and you can deny that all you want. Why is the CDC continuing to tell us an incomplete and opposite story? As well they are still continuing to falsely fear monger the public, in claiming that it was caused by the un-vaccinated; when the largest percentage of those outbreaks were actually in the vaccinated? The reality of it all is that it doesn’t leave you with much of a vaccine promoting sales pitch; now does it. Even more so when you realize the true risks of those vaccines; and all of which of course you also deny.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Varicella and Shingles Vaccine – For Profit Quackery
    http://www.vacfacts.info/varicella-and-shingles-vaccine—for-profit-quackery.html

  • Roxanne

    Thanks for the links.

  • Jennifer Symonds

    If the vaccines work how come the vaccinated kids are getting mumps & measles? Aren’t these vaccinations supposed to protect from such disease? These are the 2 questions I often ask of the pro-vaxers, Ill bet you can all guess the reply ( or dumb/ half baked look I get when they can’t think of one)!!!

  • what?

    the way I look at the MMR specifically is if your healthy and have good nutrition you have a .01% of death. If you get either disease your 99.99% immune for life and you pass on the immunity to your children genitically and through breastmilk. the vaccine is only 85% effective, but gives you the false security of immunity and so you will be less likely to live a healthy life in general. All of the other side effects of the vaccine from asthma to autoimmune diseases, and brain damage concern me. It has been studied that children who get these diseases have lower rates of asthma and autoimune diseases, as well as brain damage.
    now if you get sick and are weak or malnurished then you have a higher chance of an adverce effect to the disease. as well as the vaccine. so I feel that good hygeine, healthy food high in vit A, C, D, E, B’s Zinc, Magniese, etc is more important than getting a Vaccine. But the medical society can’t make a proffit from this so it isn’t pushed as hard as the vaccines. maybey that is why they are trying to controll the food industry but that is for another discussion.

  • Kara

    I met a mum in the playground recently who was recovering from scarlet fever and her two kids. She said the kids bounced back really quickly but it really knocked her out. I was shocked to hear this since I understood it was gone. I live in London in a posh suburb.

  • Kara

    Oh my goodness! You will never give up. But I have to thank you because if it wasn’t for your antagonism these other responders with all this info wouldn’t have posted and I would be none the wiser. Cheers.

  • Kara

    Can you please post a link to your book – looks like there is a few with the same title. Thanks

  • Touchofsanity

    There’s no gibberish or fury in his post. And certainly no idiocy. He seems to be correct about your refusal to discuss though. Resorting to personal insults does nothing for your credibility.

  • Touchofsanity

    You have no evidence to back up yours, but that doesn’t stop you. And actually there is a plethora of evidence to conclusively show that vaccines are largely ineffective, when they are effective, they give max 5 years protection, and that they cause horrific and sometimes fatal side effects. But you brush off these findings, and simply ignore compelling evidence that certainly deserves further consideration, instead choosing to rely on information from what we know is a corrupt pharma/big med/media/government system. Go for it – those of us who aren’t too scared to think for ourselves will allow our children to retain the natural immunity they get genetically, without poisoning and weakening it with unproven vaccines.

  • Roxanne

    Hi Kara, yes, I don’t think it’s that there is zero SF out there but rather that both mortality and morbidity from the disease
    plummeted drastically before vaccines or antibiotics. Glad
    the kids bounced back; adults generally have a rougher time
    with these things, though I’d surmise it depends on the health
    history of each and what treatment modalities were chosen.

  • the housewife

    Yes you are correct.
    Her in Pakistan its even worse.
    But its even worse by now.
    Check the tribune in Pakistan .
    Now even adults are forced to get anti polio drops traveling inside or outside Pakistan. Its complete against the fairy tales of WHO, CDC and alike and against the scientific resources of polio .
    They have to show the vaccine certificates , otherwise vaccination is done at force at the airports, check posts and alike. birth certificates and school admissions and NID cards are refused if no polio vaccine has been given.
    All under pressure of the american government, WHO, UNICEF, CDC….

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    What book? There was one duplicate title and link in that post, since removed.

  • http://www.vacfacts.info/ Lowell Hubbs

    Whooping cough vaccine fades in pre-teens: study

    I also noticed that under Results in the abstract it lists vaccine effectiveness was 41%, 24%, and 79% for children aged 2–7 years, 8–12 years, 13–18 years, respectively. That as well does not seem to be real good, nor very impressive. Thus indeed that figure of 81% in the outbreak that were found to be fully vaccinated and up to date, would have likely been quite predicable and probable. ( Abstract link below)

    Excerpts:

    “We have a real belief that the durability (of the vaccine) is not what was imagined,” said Dr. David Witt, an infectious disease specialist at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California, and senior author of the study.

    The pertussis vaccine, a five-shot series referred to as DTaP, is recommended for children at ages two-, four-, six- and 18-months, and at four to six years old.

    The CDC recommends that at age 11 or 12 kids get the booster shot called Tdap.

    In early 2010, a spike in cases appeared at Kaiser Permanente in San Rafael, and it was soon determined to be an outbreak of whooping cough — the largest seen in California in more than 50 years.

    Witt had expected to see the illnesses center around unvaccinated kids, knowing they are more vulnerable to the disease.

    “We started dissecting the data. What was very surprising was the majority of cases were in fully vaccinated children. That’s what started catching our attention,” said Witt.

    To figure out just how well the vaccine was working, Witt and his colleagues collected information on every patient who had tested positive for pertussis between March and October, 2010.

    Of the 132 patients under age 18, 81 percent were up to date on recommended whooping cough shots and eight percent had never been vaccinated. The other 11 percent had received at least one shot, but not the complete series.

    The rate of cases for each age, two through 18 years old, peaked among kids in their pre-teens.

    Read more:
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/03/us-whoopingcough-idUSBRE8320TM20120403

    The said abstract:

    Unexpectedly Limited Durability of Immunity Following Acellular Pertussis Vaccination in Pre-Adolescents in a North American Outbreak
    Maxwell A. Witt1, Paul H. Katz, MD, MPH2, and David J. Witt, MD3
    http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/03/13/cid.cis287.full.pdf+html

    Whooping Cough Outbreak- Largest in 50 yrs

    Its all over the news, the internet and the newspapers. Largest whooping cough outbreak in 5 decades….go get vaccinated and protect your children…oh my…thats the LAST THING you should do. Heres why.

    http://www.educate4theinjured.org/#!pertussis-outbreak-4567008830/c1oa5​

    Data Reveals Measles Outbreaks Have Nothing to Do With Non-Vaccination Trends
    http://politicalblindspot.com/data-reveals-measles-outbreaks-have-nothing-to-do-with-non-vaccination-trends/

    The Antibody Deception
    http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/the-antibody-deception.html

    Pertussis Vaccine Study Shatters Illusion of Vaccine-Induced Immunity
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/12/10/whooping-cough-pertussis-vaccine.aspx

    Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model
    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/11/20/1314688110.abstract

    In that baboon study, pertussis vaccine was shown to not prevent transmission of the pertussis pathogen, in the vaccinated; even though being challenged and remaining non symptomatic. Then how is it possible that the claim is true that vaccination protects the unvaccinated, or those that can not be vaccinated? Obviously it does not. Why did they not do that kind of a study years ago, and as well in regard to all vaccines given? You see some of the most important issues have been overlooked; and but yet you people all present with that you are the purveyors of the needed vaccine safety and effectiveness science.

  • Educated Jane

    Idiots.

  • arctain2

    Fool.
    The Measles vaccine was released in 1963.
    In 1962, there were about 450,000 cases of measles in the US. The US population at the time was about 196 million people.
    In 2005, there were 66 cases of measles in the US. The US population was 297 million people.
    You said:
    It doesn’t work – completely proven false from 450,000 cases per year before the vaccine, to 66 cases 43 years later. In this cases ‘A’ caused ‘B’ to happen
    Backed by no science – utterly false. The science behind vaccination has been ongoing (in the modern sense) since the mid-17th century. Inoculation is proven, repeatable, peer-reviewed science.
    Equals More Deaths – completely false. Just looking at Measles alone in the US, measles had about a 30% mortality rate in the 1920’s (about the same as a strain of ebola). At the 500,000 yearly infection cases in the 1920’s, that’s about 150,000 people per year in the US who died from Measles. In 2011 there were 222 cases reported (86% of the cases were in un-vaccinated people), and ZERO deaths. Only an idiot or a death cultist would make the statement that vaccines equals more deaths.

  • arctain2

    Talk about misdirection…

    Since 1990, there have been approximately 6,000 adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. These include anything from feeling light-headed to death. 6,000 out of millions and millions of MMR vaccines given.

    To claim that vaccines are unsafe is pure fantasy. You don’t have the numbers to back up your paranoia and stupidity.
    Oh, and by the way, there have been a total of 56 deaths attributed to MMR vaccine administration… once again, out of millions and millions and millions of MMR vaccines given.
    You are a fool, a bad parent, and a bad member of society if you don’t immunize yourself and your children.

  • pookey56

    Show me the evidence. I am no fool. Perhaps you are.
    It’s you, who knows absolutely nothing.(Hint: there isn’t any evidence)

  • arctain2

    What evidence would you accept? CDC data? WHO data? NIH data? Kaiser Foundation data? A vast plethora of academic studies? Just tell me what you will accept, and if possible (i.e. its not some whacked out pseudoscience quackery), I’ll supply it gladly.
    And yes, you are a fool . If you think that i just made the numbers up in my previous post, instead of actually basing it on published reports easily verified with a simple online search, then you are an idiot. But, then again, you are so blinded by `feelings` ( “I just KNOW vaccines are wrong….), that you probably think that. It goes hand in hand with your anti vaccine activism.

  • Barack Obama: A Black Man

    I’mma call the CIA on yo asses. Dis shiyut is too wack

  • Bee

    Clearly, some sort of social engineering is going on. We’re being hammered to death by vaccination agents. Last fall/winter while shopping at Walgreens, not only was every clerk wearing a ‘Did you get your flu vaccination yet?’ t-shirt, but everywhere I looked, I saw posters advertising the vaccination. I think the store even offered some sort of discount if a customer got one that day.

    It’s sinister.

  • Diane

    If you’d left out your second and last sentences, you’d have made your point without making us think you’re irrationally emotional about your opinion and abusive to anyone who doesn’t share it.

    “56 deaths attributed to MMR vaccine administration”… Yes, that doesn’t sound bad, but what about an exact quote? Here’s a more well-rounded view from http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Measles.aspx. People can form their own opinions after reading this. This is not an anti-vaccination site.

    ———

    Measles Vaccine

    Currently there is one measles containing vaccine being used in the U.S. – a combination measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) live virus vaccine the CDC recommends children get between 12 and 15 months of age with a second dose given between 4 and 6 years old.

    Common side effects from the MMR vaccine include low-grade fever, skin rash, itching, hives, swelling, reddening of skin, and weakness. Reported serious adverse reactions following MMR vaccination include seizures, brain inflammation and encephalopathy; thrombocytopenia; joint, muscle and nerve pain; gastrointestinal disorders; measles like rash; conjunctivitis and other serious health problems;

    As of March 1, 2012, there have been 898 claims filed in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) for injuries and deaths following MMR vaccination, including 56 deaths and 842 serious injuries.

    Using the MedAlerts search engine, as of July 9, 2012 there have been 6,058 serious adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in connection with measles vaccine since 1990, with over half of those occurring in children 3 and under.

    Evidence has been published in the medical literature that vaccinated persons can get measles because either they do not respond to the vaccine or the vaccine’s efficacy wanes over time and vaccinated mothers do not transfer long lasting maternal antibodies to their infants to protect them in the first few months of life;

    —————–

  • Diane

    Further, I don’t believe the 56 number. I think that countless more deaths are attributed to other factors but the timing is very suspicious. Motivations for hiding the truth…? Fear, indoctrination, profit to be lost, danger of malpractice suits….probably many more, and we know where all the money is.

    http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?EVENTS=ON&PAGENO=33&VAX=MMR&DIED=Yes

    This number will keep changing as the years go by. Currently deaths after MMR are at 326, and this is only people who happened to find this website and decided to report their case. Looks like it’s only been in place since 1982.

    Here’s a government site…with all the disclaimers: http://vaers.hhs.gov/data/index

    Much harder to find answers there, but it seems that’s where the initially quoted number (56) is from.

  • J.D.

    Why point to reporters? Who cares about mainstream media. Look at FACTS. There ARE more kids without vaccines, and in the exact same time, there ARE more kids dying of illnesses preventable from vaccinations. There’s really no misdirection there.

    For that matter, this entire article is misdirection away from the facts. You can point to media all you like but the facts remain: there is a rise in children dying from preventable diseases as a result of sites like these.

  • Eric Glover

    Hold-up. You failed to address where vaccinated children were getting sick from unvaccinated children… How is that possible sir? The facts are the same illnesses are going to make sick the vaccinated and the unvaccinated especially since there is no GUARANTEE about immunity… In fact, I had a MMR titer drawn where I had NO immunity after having two boosters..

  • Eric Glover

    Actually, from what I understand only doctors can post to VAERS.

  • Eric Glover

    I wonder the same. I am vaccinated because of my occupation. I have to get a WAIVER because I have no immunity after two boosters of the MMR from blood titers.

  • Common sense

    get your damn kids immunized. it’s about builing a collection of antibodies. stop being bad parents. what, next you’ll tell your kids not to read books because it gives them headaches? vaccinations work. polio and small pox didn’t go away because people ate their vegetables. at some point you have to be responsible and get over your irrational fears.

  • J.D.

    That’s a good question. People have a hard time actually understanding the physiology of this topic. We’re dealing with biology here. All immune systems are not created equal. Even though we try to “teach” them what to be immune to, the lesson doesn’t always stick. Same goes with 5th grade math lessons.

    So yeah, there’s no guarantee in anything with biology. However, it is well documented that the majority of people do benefit from the immunity, and we also know that the risks (which do exist) are extremely rare.

    In other words, the risks of not being vaccinated far outweight the risk of being vaccinated. Put another way, the benefits of being vaccinated are far greater than not, but nothing is guaranteed in biology.

  • J.D.

    so your grand refutation to the benefits of vaccination is that Walgreens was advertising the flu shot? You’re going to need to do better.

  • J.D.

    you forgot that adverse events reported to that database include TURNING INTO THE INCREDIBLE HULK, and becoming wonder woman. Not making this up. Anyone can put anything they want into that database.

  • J.D.

    Not a single study has ever shown that getting vaccinated leads to less-healthy lifestyles.

    Let’s use your 0.01% death risk for not getting vaccinated. That’s literally one in ten thousand children dying, or about SEVEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED children dying. To give that number some perspective, that’s over twice as many people dying compared to 9/11.

    Tell me: how many children dying is acceptable to you?

  • arctain2

    You think I was abusive??? Your ‘feelings’ were hurt?
    Wow.
    You idiots – and yes, I sincerely mean you are personally on the lower end of intelligence and emotional maturity if you subscribe to the virulent anti vaccination dogma fostered by this site – are actually killing people in the name of anti science…. And you accuse me of insensitivity??? You and your ilk are pure evil. There is just no other word for the inhumanity you are fostering – and fostering in the face of persistent facts. It willful evil, and someone needs to call you on it. Might as well be me…

  • arctain2

    Biology isn’t computer programming. Smooth variability across a broad base negates the misconception that individual singularities are exceptions to homogeny.
    Put another way – individual results may vary… But across the entire population results fall into a well defined and beneficial outcome.

  • Diane

    Thanks. That would again make the numbers likely to be lower than actual. If “just anyone” could report an adverse event, they would skyrocket (whether the event was factual or not).

  • Diane

    My feelings weren’t hurt (I never said so, so I don’t know why you “quoted” me), and when I happened to see this while resetting my password, I was perplexed by your outburst till I reviewed the whole thread. My emotions are uninvolved in this discussion, thanks anyway, but yes, you are rude and your language continues to be abusive and full of vitriol. You don’t strengthen your credibility that way, and originally I pointed it out in case you wanted to step back and take a look at yourself.

    You call others’ beliefs “pure fantasy” (and what are your credentials to judge this?). You accuse others of “paranoia and stupidity,” you call them “a fool, a bad parent, and a bad member of society.” Then you call them “idiots, “pure evil,” adding “inhumanity” and “willful evil” to the list of insults. Sounds like verbal abuse to me…unless I’m akin to Hitler somehow. Why are you so angry? Have you been badly hurt? Most of us who participate in discussions like this are just searching for truth–or as close as we can get to it. I’ve seen people change their mind one way or the other after weighing the evidence. Why should it get personal?

    I was an A/B student (so I don’t think I’m stupid), I have never stopped someone from getting a shot (so I haven’t influenced society), I don’t have children (so I can’t be a bad parent), and I have said very little to anyone about my recent research. If you hope to have an effect, you’d better find someone else to attack. I am trying to figure out what caused my autoimmune disease, and various paths have led me here. I had dozens of vaccines as a child, more than usual because I lived overseas, I played with a blob of mercury as a child, and I have a mouthful of fillings. What I have recently learned about mercury is very concerning. I’m almost ready to believe it’s the main cause of my autoimmune disease. I suppose you’re not interested, but this is who I am…just a sick person looking for information that might help. I’ve found a lot already.

    Here’s an upcoming documentary I’ll be very interested in:
    http://youtu.be/vsT5xSBa4Jc

    This will probably make you roll your eyes, but even if only half of it were true, it would be alarming:
    http://youtu.be/r8FCJ_VPyns

    There you go…I’m all done being helpful. =)

  • AutismDad

    When you say “well documented” then nothing to back it up its hollow, but that’s a ploy used often. Ever hear the “1,000 studies show no autism/ vaccine connection”? Now try to find those 1,000 studies. And after you realize there are only weak excuses for studies, bought and paid for, and that their true value is in its CONCLUSION you realize what trash it really is.

  • AutismDad

    No it shows its a for profit product like a toaster or vaseline. Consider a comparisson between veterinarians who offer vaccines and Walgreens. Its no different, and its no different coming from Pediatricians. It makes stock holders wealthy. They have parents so frightened and have also turned the flu into the Black Plague. Certain death comes to the unvaccinated. But lets ask, how did our ancesters survive all the “DISEASES” and how come they didn’t all die off? Its because they could survive them, even living in filth. The public’s medical knowledge comes from main stream marketing campaigns, and most are too stupid and lazy to look elsewhere.

  • AutismDad

    Hey sign yourself up as a vaccine tester, that’s a real way to prove your loyalty and dedication. Then get back to us.

  • AutismDad

    They say only 10% of adverse effects are reported

  • AutismDad

    Take your meds and have your aid get you a puzzle

  • AutismDad

    yes you are

  • AutismDad

    In order to have $$ for futher research they need sales. They also have to recoup what they have spent. They MUST have and move product. What sells? Fear sells, its bigger that Sex sells. Ever see people lined up for vaccines unless its campaign time? They are well aware of our fears, of mother’s fear. Call them child abusers for not vaccinating. Tell them their child can’t enter school. Its all pressure meant to indoctrinate and control. Most cave because they don’t have the courage to fight.

  • AutismDad

    Anyone have a shovel? I’d like to bury this load of crap.

  • AutismDad

    Live polio vaccines cause many outbreaks because of the hygiene issues and lack of clean water.

  • AutismDad

    Yea and since Pharma has moved its experimental departments to pretend they are helping, they can prey on the poor and ignorant by using them as free test subjects.

  • AutismDad

    No industry or government involvement? Buh Wah Ha Ha on what planet? Who’s going to pay? Who’s going to do it independantly without being asked? Ludicrous.

  • AutismDad

    So do it for him/her. You’re the genius

  • Diane
  • Lea

    Watch the documentary ‘Bought’
    The current childhood schedule of 49 doses before age six, has NEVER been tested for safety. The cumulative effects can be devastating for babies!!

    In the documentary you will see the Government, Doctors, Scientists, PhD’s, & Researchers admit that the schedule IS NOT SAFE, and several vaccines ARE causing the autism epidemic and many autoimmune disorders & deaths.

    PROFIT$ trump safety now unfortunately!!