Who is actually in favor of mandatory vaccinations, other than the pharmaceutical industry and world governments? Very few of us, it appears, and yet, despite various petitions, public outcry and proof of adverse reactions, more and more governments from around the world are making their position very clear: vaccinate your child, or else!
As many of you are aware, SB 277 is a bill recommending that all children must be vaccinated in the state of California. Any child who has not been vaccinated with all state-mandated vaccines will be denied the right to a public education.
Many parents, caregivers, and professionals are against the bill and are making their feelings on the subject very clear.[adrotate banner=”9″]
One Mother Speaks Out
One mother, Caitlan Sullivan, has become so concerned about her rights as a parent being taken away that she has made her views on the subject abundantly clear in a letter she wrote to California Governor Jerry Brown :
“Governor Brown, I’m sure you recognize that children today are subject to no less than 3 times as many vaccines as the previous generation. Parents today are facing a much more significant question about vaccines than parents 30 years ago were facing.
Something is broken, Governor Brown. Our children have never been sicker, and our requirement for vaccines has never been higher. I understand correlation doesn’t equal causation, but please point me to a study that shows the benefit of heavy metal exposure on the human body. Children in the U.S. are fraught with auto-immune diseases, deadly allergies, asthma, eczema, perpetual ear infections, and childhood cancers. Autism rates are staggeringly high (1 in 68).
According to the CDC, our infant mortality rate is higher than any of the other 27 first world countries! This wasn’t the case 30 years ago. Don’t you think we should figure out what is happening to our babies? I personally know four people that have lost their baby to SIDS. Is that normal?”
Ms. Sullivan is one mother who is certainly not afraid to speak her mind and her letter to the governor is crammed full of facts, figures and meticulous research. She completed her extremely long and detailed letter by appealing to his better nature, stating:
“Please ask yourself before casting your deciding vote, am I sacrificing the people’s liberty for a real threat? Do you really know better than me what is best for my child? There is no reason for us to be blindly supportive of the vaccine initiative.
I understand that this is a tough position for you to be in, but that doesn’t waive your responsibility to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, to which you swore an oath. You are in a position to make a unique and lasting change to protect our children, and the way to do this is to demand answers, not force these unsafe, untested, pharmaceutical drugs on our children.
We are all worried about making the right decisions for the protection of our children. Governor Brown, you were always the champion of a women’s right to choose. There should be NO disconnect on this issue. Women should not only have the right to choose, we should have the right to protect our children once they are born!
My understanding is that the Democratic Party is the party that champions itself as being a protector of individual rights and liberty. I ask you to look at this issue through those eyes. Removing the philosophical and religious exemptions to vaccines is akin to declaring martial law. Do you really want to be imposing a medical police state over cold and flu-like symptoms?
I know you are a highly educated, and thoughtful man. Please think about this! Again, I truly appreciate you taking the time to write me on behalf of this issue and welcome any response.”
It will be interesting to see if her time, effort and opinions are deemed worthy enough of a reply from Governor Brown or if she will receive the usual standard reply of “Thank you for your letter, your points have been duly noted.”
The African-American Community Say NO to SB277
Just days ago, Minister Tony Muhammad, Western Regional Representative for the Nation of Islam, identifying himself as a representative of Minister Louis Farrakhan, spoke out against the bill in no uncertain terms.  [video_player type=”youtube” width=”525″ height=”315″ align=”center” margin_top=”0″ margin_bottom=”20″ border_color=”#b8b8b8″]aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cueW91dHViZS5jb20vd2F0Y2g/dj1wZ3IzTkFoWGw4OCZmZWF0dXJlPXlvdXR1LmJl[/video_player]
Speaking on behalf of the African-American community, he stated:
” … This heinous bill has now come to the attention of the black community. I’m here to represent a man who told me to tell you that this fight is a universal fight. This fight is a fight from God down. And the man of whom I come to represent to you, we met with Bobby Kennedy in Chicago, IL. And when the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan heard about what’s happening through the vaccine makers, he told me to tell you, this is nothing new.
If you go into the Bible, there was a mindset like the minds behind me today. And there was the mind of a pharaoh–when the pharaoh saw that he could not control the people, pharaoh called his enchanters, or his magicians, and he made a decree to destroy all boy babies two and under. Could this be a bill to destroy all boy babies? And I’m letting you know that the black community, we are not going to stand by and let another Tuskegee experiment happen again.
So, we are in this together. And the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan said that this year, on October, we’re going back to Washington, DC. for the 20 year anniversary of the Million Man March with five million people. And we will make this platform a part of him talking to the government, that you will not vaccinate our children in the name of the pharma companies.
And I’m here to warn particularly those black elected officials that we sent up here. We want them to know that this building don’t belong to them, it belongs to us. And in south central Los Angeles, in two weeks, we will be having a tribunal meeting and we are going to bring our black politicians who vote for this vaccine bill, we will bring them up on charges of treason, because you did not ask us. You did not educate us. So we stand with you.” (emphasis added)
Mr. Mohammed continued by making it clear that the African-American communities had not forgotten what the CDC whistleblower William Thompson had recently revealed in reference to the MMR vaccine  by stating:
“So not only is this being heard in California, but we intend to take a million people to Atlanta, GA. And we will stand in front of the CDC and ask them, we must hear from Dr. Thompson on his findings …”
He concluded his speech:
“So I close. In the Koran it says, ‘Corruption has appeared on the land and the sea on account of what man’s hands has wrought.’ And these babies is our future, and you must know what you’re shooting into the bodies of our babies. And this is why Jesus, Jesus wanted to protect the children. So he would say, ‘Suffer the little children unto me.’ We will never allow the vaccine makers to take advantage of our children who can’t speak for themselves.
So I say to you, let us stay united, and let us say no to SB 277. Thank you. God bless us all.”
His words are powerful, making it abundantly clear that the black communities of America were not in favor of mandatory vaccination.
More Strong Words from Religious Leaders
In another powerful speech, given by the leader of the religious group the Nation of Islam, the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakham attempted to warn his people against the dangers of vaccines.  Minister Farrakhan told his followers that both Congress and the media had been paid off by the pharmaceutical companies. He stated that he had been told by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., that Kennedy had been unable to get a congressman or a senator to bring him before Congress and subpoena the CDC whistle blower William Thompson because the pharmaceutical companies had bought off members of Congress.
In other words, the public is being denied the truth about vaccines. We are being denied access to the truth because not only has the pharmaceutical industry bought off Congress and the media, but it also pays for the majority of the research and studies that are presented to the public as scientific evidence that vaccines are safe and effective. 
Catholic Communities Join the Fight
In the May-June edition of the Catholic pro-life magazine Celebrate Life  author Debi Vinnedge wrote an article discussing vaccinations containing fetal DNA and exemptions. She wrote:
“Data recorded as early as the 1930s reveals that hundreds of innocent babies were sacrificed to find suitable cell lines for virus cultivation used in polio and rubella vaccine research. Eventually, two cell lines, both taken from the lung tissue of electively aborted babies, came to be used in vaccines for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR); chickenpox; Hepatitis-A; and shingles; in addition to some polio and rabies vaccines.
For years, scientists have known that these cell lines will age and die off, thus needing replacement. Could vaccine companies use a source other than aborted babies? Absolutely! But because the industry perceives widespread public acceptance of these vaccines, it has no intention of doing so. Instead, other aborted fetal cell lines are emerging and are currently being used in clinical trials to develop vaccines for diseases such as Ebola, hepatitis-A, rabies, flu, Marburg, and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), and they will eventually replace the earlier cell lines.”
Speaking about the elimination of religious exemptions, she stated:
“First, 48 of 50 states allow religious exemptions from vaccination. However, due to the Disneyland measles outbreak earlier this year, several states were considering legislation that would eliminate such exemptions until, in at least four states, concerned parents informed state officials about vaccines made from aborted babies’ tissue.
Second, prior to 2009, Merck, the sole manufacturer of MMR and chicken pox vaccines in the US, provided morally acceptable separate vaccines for measles and mumps, but has since stopped. At Children of God for Life, we’re urging legislators, parents, and physicians to request that Merck again provide morally produced separate vaccines. It will take massive protest—especially from physicians—to sway Merck. Please ask your doctors to do this!
Third, we continue to look into other avenues for obtaining morally produced vaccines, such as the research being conducted by our partner, Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute and efforts to obtain US licensing of a Japanese MMR vaccine. We won’t rest until we have safe, effective, and moral alternatives for parents. To learn more, visit Children of God for Life at CogforLife.org or call 727-483-9251.”
However, is this the answer and is there such a thing as a morally acceptable vaccination? If the SB 277 bill is passed, then parents who are opposed to vaccinations that contain fetal DNA may not have any choice as religious exemptions are going to be limited.
Will Governor Jerry Brown think twice and really risk the wrath of the black community? Will he even read Mrs. Sullivan’s letter or care about the many religious groups opposing vaccinations due to their ingredients?
It appears that more governments worldwide are mandating vaccinations on a daily basis and parents are completely powerless to stop them. Who are these people who make all the decisions, and what right do they have to impose their largely unproven theories that ALL vaccinations are safe and effective for ALL children?
Let’s face it, it does make you wonder what their real agenda is, doesn’t it?
[feature_box style=”17″ title=”References” alignment=”center”]