Thimerosal: From the 1930s to 2011

Thimersol DOES have neurotoxic effects on infants and toddlers! That’s a scientifically derived conclusion that’s been viciously kept from health consumers probably due to not wanting to have to scrape egg off the universal face of Big Pharma vaccine manufacturers, the medical professions, and government health agencies. Or, is there a more sinister reason? You be the judge after considering Dr. F. Edward Yazbak’s exceptional review of the literature regarding Thimerosal and vaccines at (http://www.vaccinationnews.com/20110405Thimerosal…)

There are three parts to this incomparable report regarding Thimerosal that every healthcare professional, federal, state, and local health agencies personnel should read to get the down and dirty facts about what’s been going on under their closed eyes regarding a neurotoxin they are pushing with such vigor as to make one wonder why. The following is taken from Dr. Yazbak’s report that you ought to read in order to connect the dots back to the very beginning of the Thimerosal issue.

Doctor Yazbak says, “In all, there were 64 PubMed listings related in some way to Thimerosal from the 1930s to 1999, an average of 1 publication a year.”

Furthermore, “Over 300 articles on issues related to Thimerosal in vaccines were written, peer-reviewed and published in the last 12 years. On average, there was 1 publication per year from the late 1930’s to 1999 vs. more than 25 publications per year from 1999 to April 2011.”

“Given the fact that pediatric vaccines have been recommended and used ‘since the 1930’s’, the paucity of research for decades into a key vaccine ingredient is at best shocking and at worst damning.”

In his article, Yazbak cites exceptional resources, but two has data that cannot be misconstrued. Keep in mind that the U.S. Army uses hair testing, so it definitely is no unscientific woo-woo stuff! Following are two hair test results studies regarding breast fed infants who were vaccinated with Thimerosal-containing vaccines.

Hair mercury in breast-fed infants exposed to thimerosal-preserved vaccines. Marques RC, Dórea JG, Fonseca MF, Bastos WR, Malm O. Eur J Pediatr. 2007 Sep;166(9):935-41. Epub 2007 Jan 20. PMID: 17237965 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17237965)

“…the Hg exposure corrected for body weight at the day of immunization was much higher from thimerosal- EtHg (5.7 to 11.3 microgHg/kg b.w.) than from breastfeeding (0.266 microgHg/kg b.w.). While mothers showed a relative decrease (-57%) in total hair-Hg during the 6 months lactation there was substantial increase in the infant’s hair-Hg (446%). We speculate that dose and parenteral mode of thimerosal-EtHg exposure modulated the relative increase in hair-Hg of breast-fed infants at 6 months of age.”

Neonate exposure to thimerosal mercury from hepatitis B vaccines. Dórea JG, Marques RC, Brandão KG. Am J Perinatol. 2009 Aug;26(7):523-7. Epub 2009 Mar 12. PMID:19283656 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19283656)

“Infant exposure to ethylmercury (EtHg) has not only increased but is starting earlier as a result of the current immunization schedule that uses thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCVs). Although vaccination schedule varies considerably between countries, infants in less-developed countries continue to be exposed to EtHg derived from more affordable TCVs. We studied the exposure of newborns to EtHg from hepatitis B vaccines; hospital records (21,685) were summarized for the years 2001 to 2005 regarding date of birth, vaccination date, and birth weight. Most of the vaccinations occurred in the first 24 hours postdelivery; over the 5 years, there was an increase in vaccinations within hours of birth (same day), from 7.4% (2001) to 87.8% (2005). Nearly 94.6% of infants are now being vaccinated within the first 24 hours. Range of mercury exposure spread from 4.2 to 21.1 microg mercury/kg body weight for those receiving TCVs with the highest thimerosal concentration; these exposure levels are conservative for 2% of children receiving vaccines within 2 to 3 postnatal days, when they are still going through physiological postnatal weight loss. Because of the particular timing (transitioning from in utero to ex utero metabolism) and specific aspects of exposure (i.e., parenteral mode, bypassing gastroenteric barriers) and dose (related to vaccine manufacturer and with variation in birth weight), this study reveals critical issues that can modulate toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of organomercurials in neonates.”

Did you note in the above that Nearly 94.6% of infants are now being vaccinated within the first 24 hour? That truly is outrageous, in my opinion, since Hepatitis B is transmitted via contaminated street drug needles and sexual intercourse. Newborn babies have not been exposed to either unless the baby’s mother has Hepatitis B.

After careful review by Dr. Yazbak regarding Dr. Jose Dórea’s study dealing with Thimerosal and vaccines out of Universidade de Brasilia, one of Brazil’s largest and most prestigious universities, “Integrating Experimental (In Vitro and In Vivo) Neurotoxicity Studies of Low-dose Thimerosal Relevant to Vaccines”, he says,

“Thimerosal in concentrations such as those presently in pediatric vaccines still used in many countries “is toxic to cultured human brain cells and to laboratory animals”

The present use of TCVs in developing countries “is counterintuitive to global efforts to lower Hg exposure and to ban Hg in medical products”

The continued use of TCVs requires evaluation of “a sufficiently nontoxic level of ethylmercury compatible with repeated exposure (co-occuring with adjuvant –Al) during early life.” (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21350943)

The last sentence by Dr. Yazbak quoting the Dόrea review is most revealing since the interaction of aluminum with TCVs has not been addressed by the U.S. HHS, CDC, FDA or even the pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturers, which doesn’t make sense since both are toxins and normally have neurotoxic effects—at least according to biochemistry.

Dr. Yazbak states, “The author ended by appropriately pointing out that more studies were urgently needed because ‘despite demonstrable toxicity of Ethyl Mercury’, Thimerosal-containing vaccines were still being used in increasing quantities in developing countries even though real concerns about pregnant women and newborns receiving such vaccines existed.”

In February 2004, Dr. Yazbak questioned the CDC’s action, “Why the CDC ever funded epidemiological studies in Denmark where the pediatric vaccination schedule was different from that of the United States, where fewer vaccines were administered and where Thimerosal had been banned for a decade are questions that just beg to be answered.” Note that Denmark had banned Thimerosal for ten years before 2004!

Dr. Yazbak contends, “Regardless, what no one knew or imagined was that the CDC was also clandestinely ghost-writing, in a fashion, a review of Thimerosal by a US academician and that the IOM committee wanted to see that review before the February 2004 hearing.” And, Dr. Yazbak includes the letters from July 2003 to December 2003 corroborating how that review would be written. They were obtained from CDC via the Freedom of Information Act. Interesting?

Dr. Yazbak’s conclusions are:

“The IOM Immunization Safety Review Committee was influenced by the CDC before and during its February 9, 2004 meeting. The committee’s decision concerning Thimerosal and autism was flawed, ill-advised and based on biased epidemiological studies, several of which funded or instigated by the CDC and its National Immunization Program. Moreover its timing was apparently designed to avoid imminent studies which could have demonstrated a connection between vaccines and autism.”

And, “Countries that have the means to buy preservative-free vaccines should ignore the WHO recommendations and do so. The minute added cost of preservative-free single dose vaccines is negligible when compared to the financial and human cost of autism.”

Furthermore, “HHS should order the Institute of Medicine to create a new Vaccine Safety Review Committee with a new chairperson.”

While, “The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program should be requested to ignore the IOM recommendations and to review the presently available information on Thimerosal.”

Plus, “The preponderance of available evidence strongly suggests that Thimerosal containing vaccines could have indeed caused neurological and developmental complications in genetically predisposed infants and children.”

You are so RIGHT, Dr. Yazbak in saying, “In fact, the preponderance of evidence seems overwhelming!”

The entire three-part series by Dr. Yazbak can be accessed from Vaccination News website at (http://www.vaccinationnews.com/20110405Thimerosal…)

Thank you so very much, Dr. Yazbak, for this exceptional research and Vaccination News for publishing this incriminating report. I hope my condensation of part 3 will entice researchers, health professionals and agencies, and health consumers to read it in its entirety because there is an awful lot to learn. I applaud your efforts.

Catherine J. Frompovich

Catherine J Frompovich is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting. Catherine is an editor and writing consultant who helps authors get into publication. For numerous semesters she taught several writing courses for a suburban Philadelphia school district’s Adult Evening School. Her passion is assisting and guiding authors into print. Catherine’s latest book, A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, will be available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook sometime in July 2012. Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008).

  • Dr. G

    Our government is still spending billions to scrape lead pain of wall and window sills to prevent the one in a thousand kid from sucking on the paint and causing mild lead exposure. There are 4 huge billboard I see on the way to the office every morning advertising this “pandemic” monumental crisis.

    Meanwhile that same government is spending $10s of billions to shove mercury into our baby’s veins. Another 10s of billions to enforce and advertise for it….. And yet another 10s of billions protecting the manufacturers of the products?????????

    I swear I must be living in some kind of altered bizzaroworld!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Dr. G

  • Chrisb59901

    The fact that the dangers of thimersol have been known for decades never ceases to amaze me! From the uterus to the grave! Our poor babies.

  • Dr. G,

    When one takes into consideration the words of Bertrand Russell, and the fact that mercury was put into vaccines, his statement certainly doesn’t appear radical at all!

    “Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.”

    — Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1953, p. 50.

  • Chris,

    The “Priesthood” simply changed clothes – they put on whitecoats now. Many have tossed aside their Hippocratic oath and worship the God of Vaccines and Pharmakeia now.

    Frederick T. Gates, the personal adviser to John D. Rockefeller, referred to the Rockefeller Institute as a “theological seminary” at a lecture. Gates continued,

    “I am not talking about the religion, not of the past, but of the future, and I tell you that as this medical research goes on you will…promulgate…new moral laws and new social laws, new definitions of what is right and wrong in our relations with each other.”

    — William H. Welch and the Rise of Modern Medicine pg 153

    How are we doing? Was Gates correct? Can we get a job or go to school w/o getting vaccines now — or at least signing a waiver saying ‘we don’t want it’? CPS harassing parents? Autism? I’d say he was right on target.

  • Marsha McClelland

    Wonderful synopsis, Catherine. I posted your article in the comment section at Sharyl Attkisson’s great article from CBS, in the comment section. I have never seen a media outlet allow our side be told without some censorship going on. Usually the comment sections get closed pretty quick when these type articles come out but this time we’re being allowed to tell truth on & on. That’s very hopeful because it tells us CBS is interested in the facts. Please add comments people. We have to show them we are many & well informed. Plus, I have kind of hogged the thread. This is the first time I’ve gotten to post all I have in my arsenal on this particular matter without getting censored so I did get carried away. Happily carried away. ^smile^

    “Vaccines and autism: a new scientific review”


  • Spearce

    This is a very good summary. Thank you. -Susan Pearce

  • Sandy L

    Thank you for a very informative article.

    All multidose injections (several doses in the same container) must contain a preservative, this is often thimerosal/mercury. To have preservative properties it must be in a strength of at least 0.01%. Equivalent to 50 microgram thimerosal per 0.5ml dose, or 25 microgram mercury.

    The preservative is present in order to reduce contamination from the surroundings when doses are withdrawn from the multidose vials.

    Single dose injections do not require preservatives as they are sterile undtil opened and discarded after injection, but they are more expensive than those multidose vials.

    During the manufacturing processes mercury may be used to prevent microbial contamination, even though it will not be present in PRESERVATIVE STRENGTH in the end product.(This is often the case with single dose injections ).

    The intention is to remove it, but because it is difficult and expensive to remove absolutely all, up to 1 microgram per 0.5ml dose is permitted to remain.

    This is termed “TRACE” mercury and is not sufficient to have preservative properties in the finished product.

    The misleading catch is that injections may be termed “preservative free” because they do not contain mercury in a high enough concentration to have preservative properties – but they may nevertheless contain “mercury traces”, up to 1 microgram per 0,5ml dose!