What Happens When…
With Child Protective Services (CPS) virtually in every city, county, and state in the USA, what happens when a parent harms a child? Child Protective Services removes the child from the parents’ care and custody and then places the child under the agency’s foster care program with parents facing legal charges.
So, what would happen if someone were to feed formaldehyde-laced milk or formula to an infant or toddler? Wouldn’t CPS become involved? Why then, is formaldehyde injected into infants and toddlers in vaccines/vaccinations? Where’s Child Protective Services? What would happen if a parent injected formaldehyde into a child?
What would happen to a person who would have mercury residue in a child’s play area? Wouldn’t CPS and the local Department of Environmental Services become involved? Why is mercury in the form of Thimerosal, which is 49.6% mercury, injected into infants, toddlers, pregnant woman, and anyone who receives an influenza vaccination? Where’s Child Protective Services?
What would happen to a parent who would give antibiotics to a child without due cause? Wouldn’t that parent be accused of medical abuse? Numerous antibiotics that can cause allergic reactions are injected into infants and toddlers with mandatory vaccines given at 2, 4 and 6-month schedules? Where is Child Protective Services because many children have been damaged by vaccinations?
Why do schools have specially designated “peanut-free” rooms for children with peanut allergies? Because peanut allergies are so prevalent now that children are suffering all sorts of reactions from other children’s snacks, birthday goodies, and lunches in the cafeteria.
The problem of food anaphylaxis is serious. Some schools mandate that no type of peanut product be given to children to take to school. In 2002 the Commonwealth of Massachusetts produced “Managing Life Threatening Food Allergies in Schools,” a 76-page set of food allergy guidelines for all schools in Massachusetts. Check it out at Massachusetts Department of Education at www.doe.mass.edu/cnp. So why is this necessary whereas years ago, there were no such problems?
Peanut oil is part of what is considered an adjuvant carrier and is considered by vaccine manufacturers as an ‘inactive’ ingredient so it’s not listed on vaccine package inserts.
Peanut oil thus gained a history of use so that by the 1960s, peanut oil was a simple choice for Merck to include in its new aluminum based vaccine additive, Adjuvant 65-4. Since then, peanut oil has been a common ingredient in vaccines. http://www.allergysense.com/blog/peanut-oil-labeling-exemptions-and-the-real-purpose-of-the-new-%E2%80%9Chypoallergenic%E2%80%9D-peanut/
Shouldn’t peanut oil be listed because peanuts are a major allergen and it is an ingredient in vaccines? Parents and legal guardians should be warned about [informed consent] that their children are being injected with a potentially life-threatening allergen, peanut oil. Shouldn’t the truth-in-advertising police be after the vaccine manufacturers? How come they and HHS, CDC, and FDA, at least, aren’t on the case?
Wouldn’t a mom-and-pop food producing establishment be shut down, fined, and criminally prosecuted for such false advertising and/or mis-labeling a product? Why aren’t the vaccine manufacturers made to follow the same rules as everyone else?
So, what happens when parents and others harm children? They are taken to task by law enforcement—right?
Then why aren’t vaccine makers required by law to:
stop harming infants, toddlers, and children by placing allergens, neurotoxins and other poisons in vaccines?
place every ingredient in vaccines on package inserts? How about in FDA’s online information too?
place vaccines on the market that have no safety studies and, in essence, make the consumer partake in real-time safety studies using the vaccine?
It’a about time that the double standard applying to Big Pharma and vaccine makers be revisited, made right and equitable. If parents and others are held responsible at law for harming children, then by God, Big Pharma also should be prosecuted for vaccine harm. Worldwide harm and deaths to children from vaccines cannot go on any longer.