Part I: Saying “No” to vaccines says “No” to Rockefeller social control

Part I | Part II

History books proclaim with absolute certainty that the pinnacle of public health is defined by the polio vaccine program. Disease finally conquered by science. The polio effort was a benchmark for the public to mentally accept the concept “shots prevent disease.” However, hidden to most Americans was an elaborate Public Relations scheme being carefully applied by Rockefeller interests intended for social control.


Three central institutions where at the forefront of the polio war: the Roosevelt Warm Springs Foundation, the National Foundation of Infantile Paralysis or March of Dimes, and the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. Through these foundations and organizations, polio transmogrified into a major childhood disease. The massive public relations campaign pushing the polio agenda targeting the American people was organized by Carl Byoir, propagandist extraordinaire.

“When you set out to influence and persuade people to action, when the campaign is tremendous, nation-wide [sic] in scope, don’t think that it just happens; something has to be done to get millions of people to think the thought you want them to think and then to get them to act on that thought.”

-Carl Byoir

The PR campaign was intended to tug at the heart string of Americans by using stars such as Sammy Davis Junior, Tennessee Ernie, Lucile Ball and others. Why would the Rockefeller Institute, March of Dimes, and the Roosevelt Warm Springs Foundation use someone as powerful and costly as Carl Byoir simply to propagandize a childhood disease?

The big picture is that the Polio scare campaign would provide the everlasting foundation for all the future vaccine programs. Is it by chance the hypnotic words “life saving” and “effective” became synonymous with the word “vaccine” after the polio campaign?

The motive of these organizations is perhaps the best understood by author and researcher Lily E. Kay. She wrote about the motives of the Rockefeller family in her book, “The Molecular Vision of Life.” On page 8 she wrote, “The motivation behind the enormous investment in the new (“Science of Man”) agenda was to develop the human sciences as a comprehensive explanatory and applied framework for social control grounded in the natural, medical, and social sciences.” (notation mine)

“Applied social control”, simply stated, is the misuse of any branch of commerce, science, law, politics, or religion for compliance to an ulterior motive held by those in power. Examples, such as the Rockefeller-backed Federal Reserve Bank, is a perfect model of applied economic social control.

Lily Kay continues to elaborate, “With that agenda, the new biology (originally named “psychobiology”) was erected on the bedrock of the physical sciences in order to rigorously explain and eventually control the fundamental mechanisms governing human behavior, placing a particularly strong emphasis on (eugenics) heredity.” (notation on eugenics mine)


Ye shall know them by their fruits.

The success of the polio vaccine program was instrumental in implementing what euphemistically has become known as the “Gold Standard” in allopathic medicine: The American Childhood Vaccine Schedule. The vaccines listed within this program are predicated on the sole belief that polio was eradicated with a vaccine.

With strategically planned and executed applied social control systems as the backdrop, what are some of the unintended consequences of adopting a policy of “shots preventing disease?”

Firstly, parents are consistently, relentlessly, and blatantly lied to that their children must be up to date on their vaccines in order to attend school. Rarely are they informed that they have the option to apply for a vaccine exemption (religious, medical or philosophical depending on the state). However, new pharmaceutical-backed School Based Health Clinics are being implemented around the country and parents may soon find that they no longer have a choice in the matter.

Secondly, what about going to the pediatrician? The “Polio Question” is unsheathed immediately by many “brave” pediatricians to pierce through any parental doubt on vaccination. They constantly remind parents of the graphical pictures with children in iron lungs; memories which are etched in our collective consciousness. Parents are then scolded, “You don’t want polio to come back, do you?” When many sincere parents continue to ask questions the pediatrician cannot answer, they are encouraged to be promptly slain.

Third, the “Polio Question” has become a potent weapon of social ridicule. Parents attempting to offer “valid opinions”, empirical observations, and anecdotal stories of their personal experiences with their vaccine injured children have become the object of ridicule. They are marginalized as not “adequately educated” by a bonafide, scientific medical institution. More over, “rebellious parents” are regularly accused of child neglect and free loading on society. They are maliciously threatened with the heavy hand of Child Protective Services and the Judicial System. It matters not that a majority of the parents and family members who are actively questioning vaccines have observed first hand a life threatening reaction to vaccines.

Which brings us to the most egregious strategy of vaccine compliance: persecuting families with vaccine injured children. In the United Kingdom it is called Munchhausen by Proxy. In the United States it is called Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS). How many parents have had their children snatched away by social services after an adverse reaction from a vaccine? Victimized parents have likened this to organized kidnapping.

Wisdom can be found in the adage, “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” The new undercurrent in today’s society worships the type of science and authority that brought us the polio vaccine. Thus, understanding the motive of those in power is a primary principle.

After all, Dorthy didn’t discover who the “real” Wizard of Oz was until she pulled back the curtain and found one man pulling the levers. Throwing back the curtains of the Polio Vaccine Program, we will certainly see the Rockefeller’s masquerading as Oz.

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of the website www.vactruth.com he promotes well-educated pediatricians, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

Facebook Twitter 

  • Christina England

    Interesting and factual article which is well researched.

    I have often wondered about the large rise in GBS and Bells Palsy in recent years. Could these be forms or Polio that have lain dormant until another vaccine triggers a reaction?

    It is an established fact that not all adverse reactions to a vaccine are immediate and with vaccine after vaccine being added to the vaccine schedule do vaccines have a knock effect a bit like what is suggested with the MMR. it has now been suggested that the Autism after the MMR is caused by its interaction with the aduvants in the DPT.

    Christina

  • Michelle Nemphos

    Simply one of the best and most succinct articles I have ever read about the “reasoning” which people follow in succumbing to the government-run vaccine program.

  • Anonymous

    My questions would be, then: Were there not real cases of polio? (i.e. I know people who still have adverse affects of the disease they had as a child.)

    And if so, what prevents polio from becoming a problem now?

  • Anonymous

    My questions would be, then: Were there not real cases of polio? (i.e. I know people who still have adverse affects of the disease they had as a child.)

    And if so, what prevents polio from becoming a problem now?

  • Anonymous

    My questions would be, then: Were there not real cases of polio? (i.e. I know people who still have adverse affects of the disease they had as a child.)

    And if so, what prevents polio from becoming a problem now?

  • Anonymous

    My questions would be, then: Were there not real cases of polio? (i.e. I know people who still have adverse affects of the disease they had as a child.)

    And if so, what prevents polio from becoming a problem now?

  • Anonymous

    My questions would be, then: Were there not real cases of polio? (i.e. I know people who still have adverse affects of the disease they had as a child.)

    And if so, what prevents polio from becoming a problem now?

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Thanks for the comment. Check out Lloyd Aycock who stated the origins of polio were from milk. We should listen to what this man had to say because he was one of the most knowledgable persons concerning polio in his day. Here are some contemporary examples:

    1. “Food was first recognized as a vehicle for the transmission of viruses in 1914 when a raw milk-associated outbreak of poliomyelitis was reported. Additional milk-borne outbreaks were recognized after this time, but with the development of a vaccine for poliovirus, no outbreaks were reported in the developed world after the early 1950s.” (“Viruses in Foods” (2006) by Sagar M. Goyal  pp.1)

    2. “The virus [enteroviruses] is spread through the fecal-oral route mainly among small children who are not yet toilet trained, by adults changing the diapers of an infected infant, and through consumption of fecally contaminated food or water.” (“Viruses in Foods” (2006) by Sagar M. Goyal  pp.31)

    3. “The first recorded outbreak associated with food-borne viruses was an outbreak of poliomyelitis linked to consumption of raw milk in 1914 (Jubb, 1915). A further 10 outbreaks associated with raw milk consumption were reported in the United States and United Kingdom over the following 35 years (Sattar and Tetro, 2001). The widespread introduction of pasteurized milk in the 1950s decreased transmission by this route.” (“Viruses in Foods” (2006) by Sagar M. Goyal  pp.31-32)

    3. “Poliomyelitis was the first reported foodborne viral disease, having been transmitted via raw milk as early as 1914. Raw milk predominated as the vehicle among the 10 outbreaks recorded through 1949, the last year in which foodborne poliomyelitis is known to have occurred in the United States or other reporting, developed countries.” (“Foodborne Diseases” (1990) by Dean O. Cliver. pp. 283)

    I also discovered a military handbook showing that while the military was heavily spraying DDT, one of the other components mixed with the pesticide was petroleum oil and non-ionic surfactants.

    See the handbook here:
    http://vactruth.com/2011/09/10/wwii-military-handbook-reveals-pesticide-chemicals-used-in-infant-vaccines/

    You might also want to research the ‘dairy indemnity program’ in where the government, on the surface, was saying pesticides were harmless … but in private were paying farmers for milk being tainted with DDT.

    Of course, the Rockefellers supported both the spraying of pesticides, the research of a solution to polio (the vaccine), the media blitz, and the approval mechanisms.


Vaccines Exposed!