10,000 Crazy Vaccines!

Parents are told not to worry about the many vaccines given to children.

Parents are told not to worry about the many vaccines given to children.

There was a storm of amazement  and disbelief when Dr. Paul Offit, vaccine industry insider and perhaps the most widely stated defender of vaccine safety, made the outrageous statement that each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at any one time.

Many denounced the statement as being downright crazy, but it was soon apparent that there was method in the madness.

The words originated from Dr. Offit’s and co-authors’ article in the Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics  “Addressing Parents’ Concerns: Do Multiple Vaccines Overwhelm or Weaken the Infant’s Immune System?”  (1)

The statement is not supported by facts. It is based on a purely theoretical calculation with no relation to reality and it should have been dismissed as having no practical application.

But it was not dismissed. On the contrary it is widely quoted completely out of context to promote concomitant administration of many vaccines.

The strategy is surely to lull parents into accepting introduction of even more vaccines in the childhood vaccination schedule, the more the merrier.

Whilst there are practically no unbiased safety studies concerning concomitantly administered vaccines, coupled with the fact that risk of adverse events increases with increasing numbers of vaccines, advocating even more is irresponsible and unethical.

By chance in February 2012 I found this in the National Health Information (England) Leaflet “MMR THE FACTS”: A baby could respond safely and effectively to around 10,000 vaccines at any one time. So the baby’s immune system can and does easily cope with the MMR vaccine.”

I sent an email message to the UK Department of Health requesting that the statement be deleted as it is not documented, it is incorrect and misleading. (2)

A polite answer was received referring to Dr. Offit’s  article and repeating his theory. (Worded simply it implies that toddlers are able to cope with an 10 000 vaccines because their immune systems are designed to build up resistance when they crawl around in dirt and pick up thousands of germs!) (3)

On asking epidemiologist  Tetyana  Obukhanych Ph.D, about the capacity of the immune system I gathered  the following information, in a nutshell: The immune system has a theoretical capacity to respond to an unlimited number of antigens, but not all at the same time.

A new message from the UK Department of Health was received explaining that the leaflet was revised in 2006  (- why didn’t they inform about this before?) and the statement now reads:

“In theory, a baby could respond effectively to around 10,000 vaccines at any one time. The baby’s immune system can and does easily cope with the MMR, pneumococcal and Hib/MenC vaccines at the same time.” (4)

Up to now the epidemiological issue had mainly been discussed, but what about the toxicological aspects?  We are often confronted with the argument that toxic substances are no safety risk because they are present in minute quantities in vaccines, but the argument certainly falls flat in the case of many concomitantly administered  vaccines.

My next message to the Department of Health included:

“It is hereby requested that a medically qualified person/toxicologist confirms the following statement (based on basic toxicology): In addition to antigens, vaccines normally contain several other substances, many of which are toxic in large doses. When many vaccines are administered concomitantly the amounts of these substances may be of such large quantities that a human being would in fact die within a very short time.” (5)

Some departmental feathers were obviously ruffled because their reply had undertones of sarcasm:

Dear Ms Lunoe,
Thank you for your email regarding the ‘MMR – The facts’ leaflet. Please find as requested, a reply to your correspondence from a medically qualified person.

The statement as provided deals specifically with the capacity of the infant immune system to respond to multiple antigens. It was not a calculation of the responses to other ingredients in vaccines such as water which is well known to be toxic to humans in large quantities. The statement should not be misinterpreted to imply inferences for which it was not intended.

Yours sincerely

Professor David Salisbury
MB BS, FRCP, FRCPCH, FFPH.

I hope this has been helpful.

Regards – Clarissa Hudson
Immunisation Policy Branch
Department of Health

The  “medically qualified person” with the long list of letters after his name was no other than Professor David Salisbury, director of immunisation at the Department of Health, also known as the ‘Basil Fawlty’ of the UK vaccines industry!  (Basil Fawlty is a comedian in a TV series, manager of a small hotel where everything goes hilariously wrong).

David Salisbury is like Basil Fawlty, well known for his antics. The difference is that Basil’s antics are funny whereas David’s antics are notoriously unethical. (6)

True to style Dr. Salisbury did not directly respond to my question concerning toxic substances, but he stated that water is toxic in large quantities. This was inappropriate as he surely knows that the reason why pure water cannot be injected is not toxicological, but physical – it causes irreversible damage to blood cells due to hemolysis.

As expected, he was not willing to confirm: “When many vaccines are administered concomitantly the amounts of these substances may be of such large quantities that a human being would in fact die within a very short time.”

(If “many tablets” had been substituted for “many vaccines”  he would surely have responded that they may be dangerous.  Is it the word vaccine which is holy and untouchable? )

Dissatisfied with the answer I sent a new message, again pointing out immunological and toxicological aspects and requesting that the statement regarding the 10 000 vaccines be removed from the leaflet. (7)

A reply was promptly received, this time suggesting that I take up matter with Dr. Offit!

Dear Ms Lunoe,
Thank you for your email of 22 March 2012. I have forwarded your comments onto Professor Salisbury as requested.
Professor Salisbury has replied to your comments and I have attached these below:

“The Department of Health stands by the statement which is a direct reflection of the published calculation on the capacity of an infant’s immune system to respond to multiple antigens made by Dr.Paul Offit. His calculation makes no reference to the consequences of other vaccine ingredients such as water and it should not be misrepresented as if it does so. If Ms. Lunoe objects to Dr.Offit’s analysis, I suggest she takes it up with him.”

Regards – Clarissa
Immunisation Policy Branch
Department of Health

So here is my polite message sent to Dr. Offit. It concludes with,

“With this in mind, trusting that you have the wellbeing of the general public at heart, I am asking that you consider making a public statement to clarify and to emphasize that the statement in the study “each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10 000 vaccines at any one time”  is based on a purely theoretical immunological calculation in a study, that it does not imply the toxicological aspect of a large number of vaccines administered concomitantly and that it should not be quoted out of context.” (8)

We are still waiting and hoping for a positive response from Dr. Offit – because he surely has peoples’ wellbeing at heart?

 

References

(1)    http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/109/1/124.full.html

(2)    http://www.scribd.com/doc/88452286/10-000-Vaccines-Message-No-1#fullscreen

(3)    http://www.scribd.com/doc/88454548/10-000-Vaccines-Answer-From-Dept-of-Health-1#fullscreen

(4)    http://www.scribd.com/doc/88458516/10-000-Vaccines-Answer-From-Dept-of-Health-2#fullscreen

(5)    http://www.scribd.com/doc/88460986/10-000-Vaccines-Message-No-2#fullscreen

(6)    http://www.whale.to/v/salisbury1.html

(7)    http://www.scribd.com/doc/88469920/10-000-Vaccines-Message-No-3#fullscreen

(8)    http://www.scribd.com/doc/88471340/10-000-Vaccines-Message-to-Dr-Offit#fullscreen

 

Photo Credit

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Smallacre-Homestead/100000208115607 Smallacre Homestead

    1 in 4 people are born allergic to chicken eggs, which they do not begin to outgrow until age 4. The MMR is the first vaccine given that is grown in chicken eggs. What would happen if we injected peanut oil directly into the bloodstream of someone allergic to peanuts? (Followed, of course, by a virus and neuro-toxic metals). I’m surprised that more children aren’t showing up with difficulties.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Sprout0912 Connie Lagle Daugherty

    May I use this comment on my status?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OKDIKZN4FA6AVPCMYASXK6VAA4 joe joe

    To bad we are not talking about theory here but the brutal reality that vaccines cause neurological damage, lasting a lifetime, and putting the families and the victims through a living hell. Maybe we should try this experiment on those families, and the scientists, and Dr.Offit to see how much they stand by this theory, since according to them it should work.

  • Maltajon

    Get Offit and Salisbury to take 150,000 vaccine shots, being adjusted for their adult weight. The quickest way of removing these evil men from the Planet.Salisbury was deeply implicated in the intro of the Urabe MMR vaccine into the UK which then killed and maimed, as it was known to have done in 1988 in Canada.Despite that knowledge there were no warnngs of the severe damage it had caused in 2 years in Canada.
    Letter To David Salisbury by Alan Golding: A Time To Revisit …
    SKB continued to sell the urabe strain vaccine without liability. Today David Salisbury is appealing to the nation to trust in his judgment. He is asking parents to revisit …
    vaccines.me/articles/qkdyh-letter-to-david-salisbury-by… – Cached

  • Suecampbell

    There was a South Australian company that came up with a non egg flu vaccine but our federal government went with CSL ‘s egg grown vaccine : the result was that there were deaths and severe reactions in small children that resulted in the vaccine being recommended not to be given to children under 12 years unless the risk of contracting flu was more than the potential reaction to the vaccine. Also flu vaccines are developed every year depending on the flu’s circulating; there is no real testing …they are tested on the population at large !

  • Jennifer Hutchinson

    At one point, Offit said the number was “probably closer to 100,000.”

    “Offit isn’t apologizing. He acknowledges that he got a ‘small
    percentage’ of the $182 million Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
    received when it sold its interest in future royalties for the vaccine
    RotaTeq. (He won’t give a precise amount, but says ‘it’s like winning
    the lottery.’)”
    See http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2008/10/24/stomping-through-a-medical-minefield.html.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=526473386 Ginger Taylor

    When I first came across this crazy claim, it was the 100,000 vaccines at once version.  (Offit upped the anti after making the 10,000 vaccines quote).  I assumed that it was a misprint, and that he actually said something like 100 vaccines, which of course if horrifying, but more in the ball park of what I thought he was capable of claiming.  So I wrote to him and asked him what the correct number was before I blogged about it.  His reply?

    “The figure of 100,000 is correct, and probably a little conservative”.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=526473386 Ginger Taylor

    At one point, I think he claimed that he ONLY got six million dollars from it. 

  • Jennifer Hutchinson

     And he’s no doubt more than a little crazy.

    I loved this, posted on April Fool’s Day:

    http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/dr-paul-offit-is-admitted-to-philadelphia-hospital-after-taking-100000-vaccines-reuters-health/

    Let’s ask him to do this on public television.

  • Maryfoulds

    LEAVE OUR CHILDREN ALONE!!!!

  • Maryfoulds

    LEAVE OUR CHILDREN ALONE!!!!

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    Yes Maryfoulds. Our children are OUR children!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Erwin-Alber/548856074 Erwin Alber

    When challenged about his ludicrous statement, Dr Offit responded by saying that even giving a child 100,000 vaccines would not be a problem.

    Anyone with even half a functioning brain would realise that even giving a child 100 vaccines would either cause severe disability if not death. Interestingly, no studies have ever been done concerning interactions between different vaccines given at the same time, or over a period of time. 

    Vaccination is purely a money-making and illness-promoting racket pushed under the pretext of preventing diseases.

  • Mizinformed

    Let us test this on lab mice…and see what happens. Do a proper lab trial before allowing the statement…and send out retractions in the mean time

  • Mizinformed

    Like that would be one of his bad deals?

  • Amy

    He may have thought it was compensation from working in the vaccine industry.

  • AussieMum

     Suecampbell

    The Australian government spent $200 million on the swine flu vaccine and could only shift 1/3 of the stock, (perhaps CSL wasn’t offering any refunds)!

    Whilst 2/3 of the stock remained, the following year Nicola Roxon (former Minister for Health and Ageing) mixed the swine flu with the flu vaccine thus resulting in a toxic vaccine that hospitalised thousands and prompting the government to act quickly. 

    Tanya Pliberseck (current Minister for Health & Ageing) will be hard at work  pushing the flu vaccine in the next couple of months as we (Australians) head into winter. I wonder if the vaccine will be mixed again????

    Elizabeth Gillespie

  • http://www.vaccinefraud.com/ Patrick Jordan

    The FAO Veterinary Vaccine manual states categorically that multiple vaccines and multiple antigens suppress immunity.  A Laboratory Antibody production manual says that the human immune system is finite with only 100,000 possible combinations of antibody molecule configurations.  Offit is NOT irresponsible or unethical, he is committing FRAUD AND CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE.  He does not deserve polite debate but public punishment and prison.  There is no separation of the toxins from the other vaccine components so there are no scriptural interpretations of what he said vs. what he meant when the poisons exceed the FDA limits for adults.  No one having the wellbeing of mankind in mind would ever say anything he has.

  • Christina England

    Well done Sandy a brilliant piece of writing.

    Offit did originally say 100,000 vaccines. Salisbury has used complete avoidance when faced with Ms Lunoe’s questions. We all know water in huge amounts is toxic but only he knows exactly what is in all the vaccines and he also knows of the dangers they pose to children. He has been a member of the JCVI, the ARVI and CSM all committees examining adverse reactions and authorizing vaccines in the UK for years. In fact he takes a very active role. http://www.profitableharm.com/sir_roy_medows_meetings_1.html He even comments on vaccine safety to Prof Roy Meadow’s. See for yourself, read all the papers on link above particularly these ones.

    Joint CSM – JCVI and ARVI 6th July1987

    Joint CSM – JCVI – ARVI 2nd October 1987

    Sub ARVI 8th March 1988

    Sub ARVI 6th October 1989

    Christina

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    Thank you Christina for all the information concerning Dr. Salisbury. He has obviously been deeply involved for many years in influential committees which operated confidentially and where the sole target seems to have been to hide vaccine danger information in order to retain the public’s confidence in vaccines. He seems to still follow that line.

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    For the records. In the article I wrote: “On asking epidemiologist Tetyana Obukhanych Ph.D, about the capacity of the immune system I gathered the following information, in a nutshell:

    The immune system has a theoretical capacity to respond to an unlimited number of antigens, but not all at the same time”.

    I (Sandy) informed Tetyana about the article and have received this reply:

    Hi Sandy,
    Thanks for sending me the link to your article.  The quote is fine, only wanted to mention
    that the best way to describe my specialty is immunologist, not epidemiologist,
    but it’s not at all important.

    Best regards,
    Tetyana

  • http://www.followingvaccinations.com/ Joan Campbell

    When anyone speaks out about Autism and vaccine injury they get slated.
    We have the same in the UK a total media blackout on any of our
    children’s vaccine injury. So I have made a site to collect parents
    voices who want to be heard. http://www.followingvaccinations.com
    I have collected over 1,200 voices and rising all the time. Thank you Sandy for helping us in any way you can to bring awareness to this very
    sad situation for generation of children and young adults. 

  • http://www.truth4dogs.com

    A study of adverse reactions in 1.2 million dogs published in the American Veterinary Medical Assoc Journal in 2005 showed that, on average, each additional vaccine given at one visit increased the chance of an adverse reaction by 24%. Read about the study at http://www.dogs4dogs.com/blog/2009/09/30/vaccinating-small-dogs-risks-vets-arent-revealing/  If you want the study, please write me and I’ll email it.

  • Lowell Hubbs

    What really speaks to the for profit and to much to lose to ever admit the truth, insanity of todays CDC vaccine program, is the fact that they even let this clown and fool such as Paul Offit, speak for them. Perhaps he is the only person they could find that was for profit insane enough to personally and willingly, publicly support and put his neck on the line in the putting forth of the complete misinformation that he has regarding vaccines and the current vaccine schedule.
     
    He states that theoretically based on some supposed theoretical calculation, that children can tolerate 10,000 vaccines at one time. The normal human body of an adult could not handle 10,000 antigens, allergens, nor pathogens at one time. To be exposed to that many at one time would without doubt cause a fatal cytokine storm in most or much of the population, especially when injected. That magnitude of exposure would likely cause a cytokine storm even if by natural exposure utilizing the 3 natural front line defenses.

    It is beleived that cytokine storms were responsible for many of the deaths during the 1918 influenza pandemic, which killed a disproportionate number of young adults.In this case, a healthy immune system may have been a liability rather than an asset.
     
    Cytokine Storm
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine
     
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_Storm
     
    There are studies showing altered T cell responses in children with autism. There are studies showing evidence of both immune dysregulation and autoimmune phenomena in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). What does this have to do with this article, and its subject matter; perhaps more than the average person would think.

    I have outlined the information on this page link right here, and you can see for yourself if you can follow what I have as to the related studies on autism I just mentioned. I see a pattern, and I think Paul Offit does not have even a basic comprehension of what unbiased vaccine science even looks like. The CDC has failed to acknowledge literally endless amounts of scientific studies that show the vaccine harm. They cant acknowledge it, they have at this point, far to much to lose.  
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-vaccine-science-and-unbias/
    I have outlined the information on this page link right here, and you can see for yourself if you can follow what I have as to the related studies on autism I just mentioned. I see a pattern, and I think Paul Offit does not have even a basic comprehension of what unbiased vaccine science even looks like. The CDC has failed to acknowledge literally endless amounts of scientific studies that show the vaccine harm. They cant acknowledge it, they have at this point, far to much to lose.  
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-vaccine-science-and-unbias/
    Where is Paul Offit’s actual science to back up any of the claims he has ever made? This CDC appointed court jester and bonified endless misinformation promoting buffoon, simply stands up and claims that everything in vaccines is the same thing as natural exposure to it all, and absolutely no different in any way. We are told as well that as to any ingredient in vaccines, if it is the same substance consumed my dietary menas, that it is handleed by the body and detoxified in exactly the same way/s. Such a claim is amounts to nothing but reckless and selective ignorance, if not outright intellectual dishonesty. How is it even possible for a true health care scientist to actually and in honesty believe that the physiological processes of the human body all work the same no matter what the route of exposure is to a pathogen, or chemical? How about multiple pathogens and a mix of chemicals? And there are no safety studies, and Paul Offit simply gets away with discounting it all by the simplied claims that he has. Claims that a 4th grade health class and science student could and should see as ridiculous.
    So, when is Paul Offit going to take even 50 vaccines in one day, to prove his claim? How about if he just took every vaccine on the CDC schedule for ages 0 to 6 years old? I won’t even hold him to doing that in one day. Offit; can do it over 3 weeks time, so we can make some observations and documentaion as to which vaccines had the worst effect. Don’t forget all three shots of Gardasil, with over 600 mcg. of aluminum adjuvant in it, as this dangerous and deadly vaccine is now approved as well for boys and men.

    The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposedhttp://www.naturalnews.com/report_HPV_Vaccine_0.html

    Why is not Offit addressing the current Gardasil HPV DNA contamination issue? Is that not important enough for him to address to the public?

    SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine

    Gardasil victim found to have HPV DNA in her blood 2 Years Post-Vaccination 13 different vaccine vials — 13 different lots of Gardasil from around the world tested Results – 100% contamination with HPV Recombinant DNA.

    Realize that this vaccine intended to prevent cancer is actually and obviously causing cancer and as well brain damage and autoimummune disorders. Reckless, negligent, and fraudulent are the descriptive words that might come close to a describing what went on here.

    SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine, (full explanation as to what the FDA and CDC now again deny as to the Gardasil harm.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcGz-Pl_SGA&feature=related

    http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=6B58C31C805404EA5D48718872D14CC3

    Gardasil Contamination: EMA Steps Up to the Plate, FDA drops the Ballhttp://sanevax.org/tag/gardasil-contamination/

    Dr. Sin Hang Lee: A case study in ethics don’t payhttp://sanevax.org/dr-sin-hang-lee-a-case-study-in-ethics-don%E2%80%99t-pay/

    S.A.N.E. Vax, Inc. and Sin Hang Lee, MD offers American consumers reliable HPV genotypinghttp://www.naturalnews.com/031535_HPV_screening.html

    So, here is what we need to demand from Paul Offit.

    1. Mr Offit, based on his own statements and said conclusions, needs to prove that the entire CDC vaccine schedule is safe, by providing the complete and ultimate proof of this by his documented taking as said, the entire schedule of vaccines himself. He doesn’t even need to go past the 6 year scedule if he doesn’t want to. This I believe will be proof enough.

    2. Then after he has completed that, he needs to address to the public these said issues with Gardasil, which the FDA and CDC have continued to white was ans sweep under the rug, while the damage continues. They have had since June of 2006 to correct this problem and remove Gardasil from the market, and they have yet failed to. So, in the alternative, the CDC spokeman Paul Offit, needs to address the HPV vaccine issues that exist here in a public forum, where parents can question him as well as to what happened to their daughters, or could. Fair enough? Sounds fair to me?      

     
     
      

  • Lowell Hubbs

    What really speaks to the for profit and to much to lose to ever admit the truth insanity of todays CDC vaccine program, is the fact that they even let this clown and fool such as Paul Offit, speak for them. Perhaps he is the only person they could find that was for profit insane enough to personally and willingly, publicly support and put his neck on the line in the putting forth of the complete misinformation that he has regarding vaccines and as well as to the large number of vaccine on the current schedule. Disregarding all of the vaccine ingredients, but the antigens; is simply the only way he could get around the truth; and actually addressing the truth of vaccine toxicity.

    So, lets just focus for a bit on what he has addressed then.
     
    He states that theoretically, based on some supposed theoretical calculation, that children can tolerate 10,000 vaccines at one time. The truth is that the normal human body of an adult obviously could not handle 10,000 antigens, allergens, nor pathogens at one time. To be exposed to that many at one time would without doubt cause a fatal cytokine storm in most or much of the population, especially when injected. That magnitude of exposure would likely cause a cytokine storm, even if by natural exposure and utilizing the 3 natural front line defenses. That is not even in consideration of it all being injected; which is of course obviously much worse.

    It is beleived that cytokine storms were responsible for many of the deaths during the 1918 influenza pandemic, which killed a disproportionate number of young adults.In this case, a healthy immune system may have been a liability rather than an asset.

    Doesn’t look like Offit can do even the most basic of scientific research?
     
    Cytokine Storm
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine
     
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_Storm
     
    There are as well studies showing altered T cell responses in children with autism. There are studies showing evidence of both immune dysregulation and autoimmune phenomena in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). What does this have to do with this article, and this subject matter; perhaps more than the average person would think.

    I have outlined the information on this page link right here, and you can see for yourself if you can follow what I have as to the related studies on autism I just mentioned. I see a specific pattern that should be of concern, and I think Paul Offit does not have even a basic comprehension of what unbiased vaccine science even looks like. The CDC has failed to acknowledge literally endless amounts of scientific studies that show the vaccine harm. They can’t acknowledge it, they have at this point, far to much to lose.  

    Here:
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-vaccine-science-and-unbias/

    Where is Paul Offit’s actual science to back up any of the claims he has ever made? This CDC appointed court jester and bonified endless misinformation promoting buffoon, simply stands up and claims that everything in vaccines is the same thing as natural exposure to it all, and that absolutely no way is it any different. We are told as well that as to any ingredient in vaccines, if it is the same substance consumed by dietary means, that it is handled by the body and detoxified in exactly the same way/s. Such a claim is and amounts to nothing but reckless and selective ignorance, if not outright intellectual dishonesty and fraud. How is it even possible for a true health care scientist, to actually and in honesty believe that the physiological processes of the human body all work the same, no matter what the route of exposure is to a pathogen, or chemical? How about multiple pathogens and a mix of chemicals? And there are no safety studies, and Paul Offit simply gets away with discounting it all by the elementary and simplied claims that he has? Claims that a 4th grade health class and science student could and should see as ridiculous.

    So, when is Paul Offit going to take even 50 vaccines in one day, to prove his claim? How about if he just took every vaccine on the CDC schedule for ages 0 to 6 years old? I won’t even hold him to doing that in one day. Offit; can do it over 3 weeks time, so we can make some observations and documentation as to which vaccines had the worst effect. Don’t forget all three shots of Gardasil, with over 600 mcg. of aluminum adjuvant in it, as this dangerous and deadly vaccine is now approved as well for boys and men.

    The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed
    http://www.naturalnews.com/report_HPV_Vaccine_0.html

    Why is not Offit addressing the current Gardasil HPV DNA contamination issue? Is that not important enough for him to address to the public?

    SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine

    Gardasil victim found to have HPV DNA in her blood 2 Years Post-Vaccination 13 different vaccine vials — 13 different lots of Gardasil from around the world tested Results – 100% contamination with HPV Recombinant DNA.

    Realize that this vaccine intended to prevent cancer is actually and obviously causing cancer and as well brain damage and autoimummune disorders. Reckless, negligent, and fraudulent are the descriptive words that might come close to a describing what went on here.

    SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine, (full explanation as to what the FDA and CDC now again deny as to the Gardasil harm.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcGz-Pl_SGA&feature=related

    http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=6B58C31C805404EA5D48718872D14CC3

    Gardasil Contamination: EMA Steps Up to the Plate, FDA drops the Ball

    http://sanevax.org/tag/gardasil-contamination/

    Dr. Sin Hang Lee: A case study in ethics don’t pay

    http://sanevax.org/dr-sin-hang-lee-a-case-study-in-ethics-don%E2%80%99t-pay/

    S.A.N.E. Vax, Inc. and Sin Hang Lee, MD offers American consumers reliable HPV genotyping

    http://www.naturalnews.com/031535_HPV_screening.html

    So, here is what we need to demand from Paul Offit.

    1. Mr Offit, based on his own statements and said conclusions, needs to prove that the entire CDC vaccine schedule is safe, by providing the complete and ultimate proof of this by his documented taking as said, the entire schedule of vaccines himself. He doesn’t even need to go past the 6 year scedule if he doesn’t want to. This I believe will be proof enough.

    2. Then after he has completed that, he needs to address to the public these said issues with Gardasil, which the FDA and CDC have continued to white was ans sweep under the rug, while the damage continues. They have had since June of 2006 to correct this problem and remove Gardasil from the market, and they have yet failed to. So, in the alternative, the CDC spokeman Paul Offit, needs to address the HPV vaccine issues that exist here in a public forum, where parents can question him as well as to what happened to their daughters, or could. Fair enough? Sounds fair to me? Put up, or shut up!

  • Lowell Hubbs

    What really speaks to the for profit and to much to lose to ever admit the truth insanity of todays CDC vaccine program, is the fact that they even let this clown and fool such as Paul Offit, speak for them. Perhaps he is the only person they could find that was for profit insane enough to personally and willingly, publicly support and put his neck on the line in the putting forth of the complete misinformation that he has regarding vaccines and as well as to the large number of vaccine on the current schedule. Disregarding all of the vaccine ingredients, but the antigens; is simply the only way he could get around the truth; and actually addressing the truth of vaccine toxicity.

    So, lets just focus for a bit on what he has addressed then.
     
    He states that theoretically, based on some supposed theoretical calculation, that children can tolerate 10,000 vaccines at one time. The truth is that the normal human body of an adult obviously could not handle 10,000 antigens, allergens, nor pathogens at one time. To be exposed to that many at one time would without doubt cause a fatal cytokine storm in most or much of the population, especially when injected. That magnitude of exposure would likely cause a cytokine storm, even if by natural exposure and utilizing the 3 natural front line defenses. That is not even in consideration of it all being injected; which is of course obviously much worse.

    It is beleived that cytokine storms were responsible for many of the deaths during the 1918 influenza pandemic, which killed a disproportionate number of young adults.In this case, a healthy immune system may have been a liability rather than an asset.

    Doesn’t look like Offit can do even the most basic of scientific research?
     
    Cytokine Storm
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine
     
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_Storm
     
    There are as well studies showing altered T cell responses in children with autism. There are studies showing evidence of both immune dysregulation and autoimmune phenomena in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). What does this have to do with this article, and this subject matter; perhaps more than the average person would think.

    I have outlined the information on this page link right here, and you can see for yourself if you can follow what I have as to the related studies on autism I just mentioned. I see a specific pattern that should be of concern, and I think Paul Offit does not have even a basic comprehension of what unbiased vaccine science even looks like. The CDC has failed to acknowledge literally endless amounts of scientific studies that show the vaccine harm. They can’t acknowledge it, they have at this point, far to much to lose.  

    Here:
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-vaccine-science-and-unbias/

    Where is Paul Offit’s actual science to back up any of the claims he has ever made? This CDC appointed court jester and bonified endless misinformation promoting buffoon, simply stands up and claims that everything in vaccines is the same thing as natural exposure to it all, and that absolutely no way is it any different. We are told as well that as to any ingredient in vaccines, if it is the same substance consumed by dietary means, that it is handled by the body and detoxified in exactly the same way/s. Such a claim is and amounts to nothing but reckless and selective ignorance, if not outright intellectual dishonesty and fraud. How is it even possible for a true health care scientist, to actually and in honesty believe that the physiological processes of the human body all work the same, no matter what the route of exposure is to a pathogen, or chemical? How about multiple pathogens and a mix of chemicals? And there are no safety studies, and Paul Offit simply gets away with discounting it all by the elementary and simplied claims that he has? Claims that a 4th grade health class and science student could and should see as ridiculous.

    So, when is Paul Offit going to take even 50 vaccines in one day, to prove his claim? How about if he just took every vaccine on the CDC schedule for ages 0 to 6 years old? I won’t even hold him to doing that in one day. Offit; can do it over 3 weeks time, so we can make some observations and documentation as to which vaccines had the worst effect. Don’t forget all three shots of Gardasil, with over 600 mcg. of aluminum adjuvant in it, as this dangerous and deadly vaccine is now approved as well for boys and men.

    The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed
    http://www.naturalnews.com/report_HPV_Vaccine_0.html

    Why is not Offit addressing the current Gardasil HPV DNA contamination issue? Is that not important enough for him to address to the public?

    SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine

    Gardasil victim found to have HPV DNA in her blood 2 Years Post-Vaccination 13 different vaccine vials — 13 different lots of Gardasil from around the world tested Results – 100% contamination with HPV Recombinant DNA.

    Realize that this vaccine intended to prevent cancer is actually and obviously causing cancer and as well brain damage and autoimummune disorders. Reckless, negligent, and fraudulent are the descriptive words that might come close to a describing what went on here.

    SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine, (full explanation as to what the FDA and CDC now again deny as to the Gardasil harm.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcGz-Pl_SGA&feature=related

    http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=6B58C31C805404EA5D48718872D14CC3

    Gardasil Contamination: EMA Steps Up to the Plate, FDA drops the Ball

    http://sanevax.org/tag/gardasil-contamination/

    Dr. Sin Hang Lee: A case study in ethics don’t pay

    http://sanevax.org/dr-sin-hang-lee-a-case-study-in-ethics-don%E2%80%99t-pay/

    S.A.N.E. Vax, Inc. and Sin Hang Lee, MD offers American consumers reliable HPV genotyping

    http://www.naturalnews.com/031535_HPV_screening.html

    So, here is what we need to demand from Paul Offit.

    1. Mr Offit, based on his own statements and said conclusions, needs to prove that the entire CDC vaccine schedule is safe, by providing the complete and ultimate proof of this by his documented taking as said, the entire schedule of vaccines himself. He doesn’t even need to go past the 6 year scedule if he doesn’t want to. This I believe will be proof enough.

    2. Then after he has completed that, he needs to address to the public these said issues with Gardasil, which the FDA and CDC have continued to white was ans sweep under the rug, while the damage continues. They have had since June of 2006 to correct this problem and remove Gardasil from the market, and they have yet failed to. So, in the alternative, the CDC spokeman Paul Offit, needs to address the HPV vaccine issues that exist here in a public forum, where parents can question him as well as to what happened to their daughters, or could. Fair enough? Sounds fair to me? Put up, or shut up!

  • Lowell Hubbs

    What really speaks to the for profit and to much to lose to ever admit the truth insanity of todays CDC vaccine program, is the fact that they even let this clown and fool such as Paul Offit, speak for them. Perhaps he is the only person they could find that was for profit insane enough to personally and willingly, publicly support and put his neck on the line in the putting forth of the complete misinformation that he has regarding vaccines and as well as to the large number of vaccine on the current schedule. Disregarding all of the vaccine ingredients, but the antigens; is simply the only way he could get around the truth; and actually addressing the truth of vaccine toxicity.

    So, lets just focus for a bit on what he has addressed then.
     
    He states that theoretically, based on some supposed theoretical calculation, that children can tolerate 10,000 vaccines at one time. The truth is that the normal human body of an adult obviously could not handle 10,000 antigens, allergens, nor pathogens at one time. To be exposed to that many at one time would without doubt cause a fatal cytokine storm in most or much of the population, especially when injected. That magnitude of exposure would likely cause a cytokine storm, even if by natural exposure and utilizing the 3 natural front line defenses. That is not even in consideration of it all being injected; which is of course obviously much worse.

    It is beleived that cytokine storms were responsible for many of the deaths during the 1918 influenza pandemic, which killed a disproportionate number of young adults.In this case, a healthy immune system may have been a liability rather than an asset.

    Doesn’t look like Offit can do even the most basic of scientific research?
     
    Cytokine Storm
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine
     
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_Storm
     
    There are as well studies showing altered T cell responses in children with autism. There are studies showing evidence of both immune dysregulation and autoimmune phenomena in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). What does this have to do with this article, and this subject matter; perhaps more than the average person would think.

    I have outlined the information on this page link right here, and you can see for yourself if you can follow what I have as to the related studies on autism I just mentioned. I see a specific pattern that should be of concern, and I think Paul Offit does not have even a basic comprehension of what unbiased vaccine science even looks like. The CDC has failed to acknowledge literally endless amounts of scientific studies that show the vaccine harm. They can’t acknowledge it, they have at this point, far to much to lose.  

    Here:
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-vaccine-science-and-unbias/

    Where is Paul Offit’s actual science to back up any of the claims he has ever made? This CDC appointed court jester and bonified endless misinformation promoting buffoon, simply stands up and claims that everything in vaccines is the same thing as natural exposure to it all, and that absolutely no way is it any different. We are told as well that as to any ingredient in vaccines, if it is the same substance consumed by dietary means, that it is handled by the body and detoxified in exactly the same way/s. Such a claim is and amounts to nothing but reckless and selective ignorance, if not outright intellectual dishonesty and fraud. How is it even possible for a true health care scientist, to actually and in honesty believe that the physiological processes of the human body all work the same, no matter what the route of exposure is to a pathogen, or chemical? How about multiple pathogens and a mix of chemicals? And there are no safety studies, and Paul Offit simply gets away with discounting it all by the elementary and simplied claims that he has? Claims that a 4th grade health class and science student could and should see as ridiculous.

    So, when is Paul Offit going to take even 50 vaccines in one day, to prove his claim? How about if he just took every vaccine on the CDC schedule for ages 0 to 6 years old? I won’t even hold him to doing that in one day. Offit; can do it over 3 weeks time, so we can make some observations and documentation as to which vaccines had the worst effect. Don’t forget all three shots of Gardasil, with over 600 mcg. of aluminum adjuvant in it, as this dangerous and deadly vaccine is now approved as well for boys and men.

    The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed
    http://www.naturalnews.com/report_HPV_Vaccine_0.html

    Why is not Offit addressing the current Gardasil HPV DNA contamination issue? Is that not important enough for him to address to the public?

    SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine

    Gardasil victim found to have HPV DNA in her blood 2 Years Post-Vaccination 13 different vaccine vials — 13 different lots of Gardasil from around the world tested Results – 100% contamination with HPV Recombinant DNA.

    Realize that this vaccine intended to prevent cancer is actually and obviously causing cancer and as well brain damage and autoimummune disorders. Reckless, negligent, and fraudulent are the descriptive words that might come close to a describing what went on here.

    SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Biohazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine, (full explanation as to what the FDA and CDC now again deny as to the Gardasil harm.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcGz-Pl_SGA&feature=related

    http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=6B58C31C805404EA5D48718872D14CC3

    Gardasil Contamination: EMA Steps Up to the Plate, FDA drops the Ball

    http://sanevax.org/tag/gardasil-contamination/

    Dr. Sin Hang Lee: A case study in ethics don’t pay

    http://sanevax.org/dr-sin-hang-lee-a-case-study-in-ethics-don%E2%80%99t-pay/

    S.A.N.E. Vax, Inc. and Sin Hang Lee, MD offers American consumers reliable HPV genotyping

    http://www.naturalnews.com/031535_HPV_screening.html

    So, here is what we need to demand from Paul Offit.

    1. Mr Offit, based on his own statements and said conclusions, needs to prove that the entire CDC vaccine schedule is safe, by providing the complete and ultimate proof of this by his documented taking as said, the entire schedule of vaccines himself. He doesn’t even need to go past the 6 year scedule if he doesn’t want to. This I believe will be proof enough.

    2. Then after he has completed that, he needs to address to the public these said issues with Gardasil, which the FDA and CDC have continued to white was ans sweep under the rug, while the damage continues. They have had since June of 2006 to correct this problem and remove Gardasil from the market, and they have yet failed to. So, in the alternative, the CDC spokeman Paul Offit, needs to address the HPV vaccine issues that exist here in a public forum, where parents can question him as well as to what happened to their daughters, or could. Fair enough? Sounds fair to me? Put up, or shut up!

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Perhaps there is a way to settle the validity of the Offit statement.  Parents should demand and federal and state health agencies should suspend further vaccination schedules and mandates until the following has been verified by independent non-paid-by-Big-Pharma scientists:

    A research vaccine trail with 10,000 vaccines injected into Dr. Offit’s grandchildren AND the FDA and CDC head honchos children and grandchildren over a course of 3 days because it may be impossible to do it in one injection. I think the above would prove the validity of the Offit statement and settle once and for all what would happen to children who receive 10,000 vaccines.  I think vaccine inventors must prove their statements scientifically before government health agencies parrot them and peer review journals publish them.  Where’s the recall of the Offit statement article from the Journal of American Academy of Pediatrics since there is no scientific proof?

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Perhaps there is a way to settle the validity of the Offit statement.  Parents should demand and federal and state health agencies should suspend further vaccination schedules and mandates until the following has been verified by independent non-paid-by-Big-Pharma scientists:

    A research vaccine trail with 10,000 vaccines injected into Dr. Offit’s grandchildren AND the FDA and CDC head honchos children and grandchildren over a course of 3 days because it may be impossible to do it in one injection. I think the above would prove the validity of the Offit statement and settle once and for all what would happen to children who receive 10,000 vaccines.  I think vaccine inventors must prove their statements scientifically before government health agencies parrot them and peer review journals publish them.  Where’s the recall of the Offit statement article from the Journal of American Academy of Pediatrics since there is no scientific proof?

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Perhaps there is a way to settle the validity of the Offit statement.  Parents should demand and federal and state health agencies should suspend further vaccination schedules and mandates until the following has been verified by independent non-paid-by-Big-Pharma scientists:

    A research vaccine trail with 10,000 vaccines injected into Dr. Offit’s grandchildren AND the FDA and CDC head honchos children and grandchildren over a course of 3 days because it may be impossible to do it in one injection. I think the above would prove the validity of the Offit statement and settle once and for all what would happen to children who receive 10,000 vaccines.  I think vaccine inventors must prove their statements scientifically before government health agencies parrot them and peer review journals publish them.  Where’s the recall of the Offit statement article from the Journal of American Academy of Pediatrics since there is no scientific proof?

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Perhaps there is a way to settle the validity of the Offit statement.  Parents should demand and federal and state health agencies should suspend further vaccination schedules and mandates until the following has been verified by independent non-paid-by-Big-Pharma scientists:

    A research vaccine trail with 10,000 vaccines injected into Dr. Offit’s grandchildren AND the FDA and CDC head honchos children and grandchildren over a course of 3 days because it may be impossible to do it in one injection. I think the above would prove the validity of the Offit statement and settle once and for all what would happen to children who receive 10,000 vaccines.  I think vaccine inventors must prove their statements scientifically before government health agencies parrot them and peer review journals publish them.  Where’s the recall of the Offit statement article from the Journal of American Academy of Pediatrics since there is no scientific proof?

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    Perhaps there is a way to settle the validity of the Offit statement.  Parents should demand and federal and state health agencies should suspend further vaccination schedules and mandates until the following has been verified by independent non-paid-by-Big-Pharma scientists:

    A research vaccine trail with 10,000 vaccines injected into Dr. Offit’s grandchildren AND the FDA and CDC head honchos children and grandchildren over a course of 3 days because it may be impossible to do it in one injection. I think the above would prove the validity of the Offit statement and settle once and for all what would happen to children who receive 10,000 vaccines.  I think vaccine inventors must prove their statements scientifically before government health agencies parrot them and peer review journals publish them.  Where’s the recall of the Offit statement article from the Journal of American Academy of Pediatrics since there is no scientific proof?

  • Lowell Hubbs

    Perhaps next time Mr. Offit should be more specific as to his selection of the worded terms he uses.

    His public statement was that “each infant does and would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at any one time”.

    But then it is immediately by the authorities interpreted and turned around to claim to this:

    The statement as provided deals specifically with the capacity of the infant immune system to respond to multiple antigens.

    And then this:

    To state that this is based on a purely theoretical immunological calculation in a study, that it does not imply the toxicological aspect of a large number of vaccines administered concomitantly and that it should not be quoted out of context.”

    First of all, LETS see this theoretical immunological calculation!!!! Where has that ever been provided? What? It is not publically nor professionally needed to be provided any proof???
    “The Department of Health stands by the statement which is a direct reflection of the published calculation on the capacity of an infant’s immune system to respond to multiple antigens made by Dr.Paul Offit. His calculation makes no reference to the consequences of other vaccine ingredients such as water and it should not be misrepresented as if it does so. If Ms. Lunoe objects to Dr.Offit’s analysis, I suggest she takes it up with him.”

    Ok, so other than the antigen there is only sterile water in these vaccines, is that what is being referenced to? Really? There are no other ingredients to be concerned about?

    Ok, Mr. Offit??? We are taking it up with you??? Any comments??? Surely you have your scouts out there doing google searches for the level of damage out there, and the need for damge control??? Have they seen this article? Please respond?

  • http://www.facebook.com/ellendiann Ellen Diann Messer

    I think it is TIME to stop assuming that the drug industry which OWNS the medical profession has the well-being of people in their heart.  I think it is time to go to WAR against the drug companies and the doctors who push their toxic potions.  They have been warring against the people using weapons of mass destruction and then denying any wrong doing.  I think to assume they are INNOCENT is NAIVE at best.  Go to WAR and stop buying their toxic potions, their research and STOP arguing with them as they only LIE and continue to use research as a delay mechanism to divert attention away from the.  WHY do you think the doctors readily admit toxins in FOOD cause health issues while they IGNORE the toxic potions they push on the people?   THEY KNOW WHAT they are doing and their babble is ONLY to continue their deception with NO intent to ever confess their evil doing.  GO TO WAR against the drug companies.  Demand freedom for doctors to practice natural cures as YOU DON’T WANT to PATRONIZE the doctors who are owned by drug companies and push their toxic potions.  Stop giving these drug company murderers power by going to their quack doctors and buying their toxic potions and expecting them to do good to you!  

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    Dr Offit says “the dose makes the poison” which means that he agrees that some ingredients may be present in toxic amounts when many vaccines are given – and he advocates that it’s safe to have many vaccines administered concomitantly *˜”#*°•¸☆ ★.•°*¤?˜”*°•.¸☆★☆.•°

  • Watson

    dr unfitt  should get the 10,000 vaccines himself to show how wrong he is . No flowers send a donation  to the damaged.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ursula.stouffer Ursula Pasche Stouffer

    Do you realize that there IS peanut oil in many childhood vaccines, but not enough for them to be forced to put it into the ingredients list? Peanut allergy was fairly rare before mass vaccinations, but, thanks to vaccines containing peanut oil, it has become an epidemic.