2109

The True Causes of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Having a newborn baby can and should be a time of tremendous joy for parents. Most parents trust their pediatricians to provide them with guidance and care that is in the best interest of their infants and children. However, when it comes to preventing the tragedy of sudden infant death syndrome, most parents are left with worthless and dangerous advice from the experts, including recommendations to vaccinate, which can actually cause SIDS.

This current state of medical practice is both tragic and criminal. Pediatricians are not evil individuals, but they are greatly misinformed in their training and highly influenced by the pharmaceutical companies. [1]

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

According to the Mayo Clinic, sudden infant death syndrome is defined as the unexplained death, usually during sleep, of a seemingly healthy baby less than a year old. SIDS is described as crib death because the infants often die in their cribs. The cause, while considered to be unknown, appears to be associated with abnormalities of an infant’s brain, which controls breathing and arousal from sleep. [2]

Physical factors associated with SIDS are low birth weight, brain abnormalities and respiratory infection. Infants who sleep with parents, on a soft surface and on their side or stomach are also reported to be at higher risk for SIDS. [3]

Additional risk factors are the following:

  • Sex: Boys are more at risk for SIDS
  • Age: Infants are more vulnerable during the second and third month of life.
  • Race: Blacks, Native Americans and Alaskan Native infants are at higher risk.
  • Family history: Babies with siblings or cousins who died of SIDS are at higher risk of SIDS.
  • Secondhand smoke increases the risk of SIDS.
  • Premature babies are at higher risk. [4]

Standard Practice Medicine, Prevention of SIDS and Prevalence

The Mayo Clinic recommends placing an infant on their back as the most important measure to prevent SIDS. The American Academy of Pediatrics also maintains the importance of placing a baby on their back as important for preventing SIDS, and credits this sleep recommendation change, made in 1992, with a decrease in SIDS incidence. [5]

While most medical groups credit a change in sleeping position with decreasing the incidence of SIDS, others argue that statistical manipulation may be responsible for the reported decrease. A report published in the New England Journal of Medicine claimed that:

“…the true incidence of SIDS may be masked by a so-called diagnostic shift, or the use of diagnoses other than SIDS on death certificates (e.g., accidental suffocation, positional accidental asphyxia, and indeterminate cause). Diagnostic shift may explain, in part, why post-neonatal death rates for both SIDS and non-SIDS have remained static since approximately 2000.” [6]

Diagnostic manipulation, not changes in infant sleep positions, can also more accurately explain the reported reduction in SIDS between 1994 and 2000, according to research done by Miller and Goldman. Miller and Goldman’s report argues that in fact there has been no reduction of SIDS incidence related to the 1994 sleep change recommendation. [7]

CDC Maintains that Vaccines Do NOT Cause SIDS

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledges that SIDS often occurs at the same time as vaccinations received by most infants. They are staunch in their assertions that vaccines do not cause SIDS. [8]

However, the CDC also maintains that the current aggressive vaccine schedule in the US is safe, effective and important for the public’s health. Substantial evidence argues that vaccines are dangerous for health and neither safe, nor effective in preventing disease. [9, 10]

Tremendous Evidence Proves Vaccines Can Cause Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

While medical groups maintain that vaccines have nothing to do with SIDS, independent research and statistical data supports the opposite.

In a detailed report by Miller and Goldman in Human and Experimental Toxicology, the researchers found significantly that sudden infant death syndrome was nonexistent prior to the 1960s and the creation of new multiple infant vaccinations. The United States now has the highest infant vaccination rate of 26 vaccines prior to age one, when compared to 33 other industrialized countries.

The US also has the highest infant mortality rates. Miller and Goodman also found that two thirds of infants who died from SIDS had been vaccinated with the DPT vaccine prior to their deaths.

Their research paper also explains the reported decline in SIDS as being caused by diagnostic changes for SIDS cases, not by an actual decline.

The report stated:

“In 1992, to address the unacceptable SIDS rate, the American Academy of Pediatrics initiated a ‘Back to Sleep’ campaign, convincing parents to place their infants supine, rather than prone, during sleep. From 1992 to 2001, the post-neonatal SIDS rate dropped by an average annual rate of 8.6%.

However, other causes of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) increased. For example, the postneonatal mortality rate from ‘suffocation in bed’ increased during this same period at an average annual rate of 11.2%. The postneonatal mortality rate from ‘suffocation other,’ ‘unknown and unspecified causes,’ and due to ‘intent unknown’ in the External Causes of Injury section, all increased during this period as well.

(In Australia, Mitchell et al. observed that when the SIDS rate decreased, deaths attributed to asphyxia increased. Overpeck et al. and others, reported similar observations.)

A closer inspection of the more recent period from 1999 to 2001 reveals that the US postneonatal SIDS rate continued to decline, but there was no significant change in the total postneonatal mortality rate. During this period, the number of deaths attributed to ‘suffocation in bed’ and ‘unknown causes,’ increased significantly.

According to Malloy and MacDorman, “If death-certifier preference has shifted such that previously classified SIDS deaths are now classified as ‘suffocation,’ the inclusion of these suffocation deaths and unknown or unspecified deaths with SIDS deaths then accounts for about 90 percent of the decline in the SIDS rate observed between 1999 and 2001 and results in a non-significant decline in SIDS.’’

While medical groups continue to credit sleep position change with decreases in SIDS, data clearly shows that SIDS cases are often diagnosed differently and that these diagnosed infant deaths have not decreased.”

Research has also linked the hepatitis B vaccine with SIDS. As of March 2012, 1500 infant deaths, including those classified as SIDS, have been linked to the hepatitis B vaccination. As reported earlier, many actual SIDS cases are diagnosed with other causes of death. [11]

In the mid 1970s, Japan raised their vaccination age to 2 years and their infant mortality rates from SIDS dropped dramatically. They have the lowest infant mortality of all industrialized nations. This statistic certainly argues for vaccines causing SIDS. [12]

Documentation exists for many infant deaths following vaccination, including cover-ups by pharmaceutical companies who are aware of these deaths. An Italian court made public a confidential report by GlaxoSmithKline which hid the known fact that 72 babies died from SIDS within 20 days of receiving their Infanrix hexa vaccine. GSK initially denied that the vaccines caused the deaths.

When a large number of Tennessee babies died from SIDS after receiving vaccines from a particular lot of DTP vaccines, the manufacturer moved to break up the lots so that deaths would not be highly clustered and suspicious. [13]

Dr. Vera Scheibner performed some of the most important early research in 1991, connecting the DPT vaccinations as an important cause of SIDS. Scheibner analyzed infant breathing for periods when breathing either stopped or became very shallow, named stress-induced breathing.

Scheibner reported:

“For seventy babies who succumbed to cot death, although babies could die on any day after DPT injection, there were significantly more deaths on the days which closely correlated with flare-ups of Stress-Induced Breathing after DPT injections.

The data on the time interval between the DPT injection and cot death in most of the seventy babies was taken from the published reports which concluded that there was no connection between DPT and cot death. The authors of these papers had little idea what they were looking at or what to look for. Most researchers arbitrarily accept that only deaths within 24 hours of administration of the vaccine can be attributed to the effect of the vaccine. Yet, babies may and do die for up to 25 or more days after vaccination, and still as a direct consequence of the toxic effects of the vaccines.” [14]

Other Possible Causes of SIDS

An accumulation of other toxic exposures are suspected as contributing to SIDS, with vaccinations being one of the most prominent toxins. Other toxic exposures which overload an infant’s immune system can include pain medication and induction drugs given to the mother at birth. It makes sense that medications, toxic foods, fluoridated water and other toxins in our environment could all work to overload an infant’s immune system.

Another theory is that the fungi which grows in PVC, a soft plastic commonly used as a mattress covering, can cause SIDS. Another suspect is the use of flame retardant chemicals for mattresses, required after 1950, about the same time that infant deaths skyrocketed. [15]

How to Prevent Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

It appears the most prudent course of action to prevent SIDS would be to stop the practice of vaccination, which is highly correlated with causing SIDS. At the very least, one should consider lessening the vaccine schedule and waiting until a child is older, as Japan has done.

Reducing a child’s overall exposure to toxins makes sense as well. Purchasing organic infant bedding or at the least an inexpensive gas-impermeable mattress cover is recommended.

Conclusions

Conventional medicine claims that infants sleeping on their backs is the best prevention for SIDS and has lowered the rates of SIDS. Research shows that statistical manipulation explains away any decline in SIDS, which continues to be a serious problem in the US. The US has the highest infant mortality rates compared to 34 other industrialized nations, while we also have the highest infant vaccination rates.

Substantial evidence links vaccinations to being the primary cause of sudden infant death syndrome.

References:

  1. https://vactruth.com/2016/03/22/why-doctors-recommend-vaccinations/
  2. http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/sudden-infant-death…
  3. http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/sudden-infant-death…
  4. http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/sudden-infant-death…
  5. http://www.sids-network.org/experts/slppos.htm
  6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3268262/
  7. http://www.nvic.org/pdfs/infant-mortality-study.aspx
  8. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Concerns/sids.html
  9. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/why.htm
  10. https://vactruth.com/2014/12/12/10-reasons-not-to-vaccinate/
  11. http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/hepatitis-b-vaccine-linked-to-sids…
  12. http://www.truthlibrary.info…the-mmr-vaccine-and-the-sids-connection/
  13. http://vaccine-injury.info/sudden-infant-death-syndrome.cfm
  14. http://u2.lege.net/whale.to/vaccines/cot_death.html
  15. Fallon, Sally. The Nourishing Traditions Book of Baby and Child Care. New Trends Publishing: 2013; PP158-159.

Photo Credit

 

Michelle Goldstein
 

Michelle Goldstein is a mental health therapist who is passionate about holistic health, natural healing, nutrient-dense foods and the politics that impact them. She has published articles for Natural News, VacTruth, and other health websites. All of her published articles to date can be found at her health website, Holistic Health to Go. She can also be followed on her Facebook Page.

  • John

    I am appalled at our medical terrorists that hold the position they don’t know what causes SIDS. The typical way of blaming vaccines is to use the correlation of an infant dying of SIDS after they have been vaccinated and then say “We have no proof of the cause.” This only creates an argument no one can win and the problem just continues. Has ANYONE looked at the Amish community to see if they experience high SIDS rates? NO.

    Vaccines are a major cause of SIDS, but other factors are also involved. The REAL PROBLEM is that medical diagnostics cannot see the problem. If you can’t see the problem, how can you know the cause. We see the result and that is death of an infant. Why are their extremely rare adults dying of SADS?

    The solution to this problem is to concentrate on the medical diagnostics that can clearly identify the problem instead of continuing to use diagnostics that are inadequate. To assume we have such advanced technology that sees everything and ignore just how bad those diagnostics are is to just promote the problem and not admit our inadequacies. Recent discoveries such as finding a lymphatic duct that follows nerve structures into the brain or discovering another organ in the abdomen are just two pieces of evidence as to how bad our medical knowledge really is.

    SIDS is a lack of oxygen being available in the respiratory area of the brain causing the cells to die and doctors not being able to see this happen. All vital signs look normal, yet the infant dies of this very basic problem.

    There is technology that can see the problem, but one has to go outside the typical diagnostic equipment being used and consider this problem to be a SYSTEM problem, not a one cause problem. Vaccines are the major factor, but other assaults on the infant are also being ignored. What is interesting about this problem is that every factor is a man-made assault. Our modern medical paradigm is focused on symptom treatment and not going after the causation.

    The answer to SIDS will be costly to the medical industry and other industries that are driving our economy and a willingness to accept the problems and a willingness to make the changes necessary to fix the problem. I can now have empathy for the doctor that discovered why so many babies and women were dying at child birth before they discovered working on cadavers in the basement of the hospital and then delivering babies was caused by not washing their hands. That doctor was demonized for suggesting that, lost his license, and not redeemed until after his death that he was right. Nothing has changed from those days. A lot of “standard of care” processes and remedies are damaging large numbers of people, yet, who is in charge? The “Fox!”

  • Jill

    I talked with a woman who was sadly sharing with me that she lost who newborn daughter. I asked her if her baby had had her shots. She reponded, “Oh yes, she had her shots,” I let the conversation drop, not having the heart to say what I really believed, that her daughter died of SIDS due to the shots.

  • Madeleine Innocent

    It shows how really ignorant drs are. They can’t see something staring them in the face.

  • Free People

    That vaccines cause SIDS has been known for a long time, but the criminal, globalist government keeps covering up and pushing their customary LIES about the (UNPROVEN) “safety” of vaccination.

    In 1933, Madsen reported on two infants who received immunizations against pertussis shortly after birth and died within 2 hours of their second shot at ages 4 and 11 days, respectively.

    In addition to those just cited, case reports of SIDS include the deaths of 5- and 10-month-old twins within 3 and 24 hours, respectively, of DPT immunization (Roberts, 1987; Werne and Garrow, 1946). Episodes of death following administration of DPT vaccine were reported for six additional children, five of whom died within 48 hours of immunization (Coulter and Fisher, 1985). Torch (1986) summarized case reports of more than 150 deaths, post-DPT immunization, which had been reported by 37 authors in 12 countries; approximately 50 percent of these deaths occurred within 24 hours, 75 percent within 72 hours, and 90 percent within 1 week following DPT administration. For most of these events, no specific cause of death could be found, and many of these cases were designated as SIDS. (This summary of case reports was published in abstract form only.)

    Since SIDS occurs primarily in the first year of life, and since in the United States most children receive three DPT immunizations during this first year, some cases of SIDS are to be expected in the early postimmunization period. Accordingly, in the United States, approximately 55 cases of SIDS per year would be expected to occur within 24 hours of receipt of DPT vaccine (Stetler et al., 1985). If one member of a twin pair dies of SIDS, the other twin, who is also at higher risk of dying of SIDS, could, by coincidence, die on the same day (Roberts, 1987). Thus, the deaths in twins cited above could be coincidental.

    Torch (1982) reported, though only in abstract form, preliminary data on 70 of 200 (35 percent) “randomly reported” cases of SIDS. He reported clustering of cases within the first 2 to 3 weeks following DPT immunization. Autopsy findings in children who died in this early postimmunization interval were no different from those in other children who died from SIDS. Baraff and colleagues (1983) were able to interview parents of 145 of 382 (38 percent) identified cases of SIDS that occurred in Los Angeles County during a 20-month period. Fifty-three cases had received DPT vaccine prior to death, 11 percent within 1 day of death, 32 percent within 1 week of death, and 51 percent within 4 weeks of death. The authors assumed that cases should have occurred with uniform frequency throughout the 28 days following immunization, but noted instead a significant increase in the frequencies of reported cases in both the first day and the first week following DPT vaccination.

    The globalist government knows this and not only keeps vaccinating, they INCREASE the amounts of poison needle vaccines to the population. The globalist Agenda 21 plan is working as they want it to.

    The best vaccine is the one that’s NEVER TAKEN. Reject all vaccines. Poison needle.

  • Jesus baby

    The ole globalist Agenda 21 plan, huh?

  • So obviously you not have anything of informational substance to offer, and/or any refuting claim and/or any directly outlined argument to contribute here? So why do you continue to post your worthless replies?

  • Jesus baby

    What?

  • Is your cognitive ability deliberately and intentionally failing you again?

  • Free People

    You need to find a real job..this vaccine HOAX is OVER. Centers for Disease Creation and Proliferation (CDC) are going down. NWO GLOBALISM..it’s OVER.

    Robert F Kennedy Jr: CDC an “edifice of fraud”

    By Jon Rappoport – January 16, 2017

    Robert Kennedy, Jr. “All the things that I do are bent on forcing this [vaccine] debate out into the open—because once the science is in the open, the CDC’s position is so fragile, it’s an edifice of fraud, fraud stacked upon fraud, so high and so wobbly, that even a slight breeze of public scrutiny will topple it.”

    Kennedy states that President Trump has appointed him to head up a task force investigating vaccine safety. The above quote indicates Kennedy, would, if given the green light, probe much more than the use of mercury in vaccines—his main topic of interest thus far.

    This would be a very good thing. The CDC is most certainly an edifice of fraud. It has concealed many of its crimes over the years.

    If he hasn’t already, Kennedy should make contact with an anonymous group of scientists at the CDC who call themselves Spider. They have written a letter to the CDC chief of staff accusing the agency of widespread “unethical practices…influenced and shaped by outside parties…[that] threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.”

    In my recent open letter to Spider, I presented three shocking areas of fraud at the CDC that they should expose:

    Swine Flu, a dud and phony “epidemic,” presented as a dire global threat requiring vaccination;

    A structural conflict of interest, in which the CDC buys billions of dollars of vaccines and, at the same time, carries out many studies assessing vaccine safety—with this much money on the line, the Agency would never, under any circumstances, admit vaccines are dangerous;

    A massive overestimation of annual flu deaths in the US, in order to push the necessity of the flu vaccine.

    In this second memo, I present two more shocking areas which should receive the immediate attention of the dissident Spider scientists at the CDC, and Mr. Kennedy:

    ONE: THE CASE OF JULIE GERBERDING.

    On August 27, 2014, CDC scientist William Thompson came out of the shadows and revealed that he had participated in a major scientific fraud:

    Ten years earlier, he and his co-authors had published a study claiming there was no MMR-vaccine connection to autism. They had omitted vital data which contradicted that finding.

    The MMR vaccine was increasing the risk of autism. Thompson knew it. So did his co-authors. They buried that chilling fact.

    Before their fake study was published, Thompson wrote to the head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, informing her that, at an upcoming conference, he would be “presenting the summary of our results from the Metropolitan Atlanta Autism Case-Control Study [and]…I will have to present several problematic results relating to statistical associations between the receipt of MMR vaccine and autism.”

    In other words, Thompson was ready to blow the whistle on the MMR vaccine-autism connection. He received no reply from CDC Director Gerberding, and his presentation at the conference was canceled.

    Fast forward: in 2009, Gerberding left the CDC.

    She eventually went to work as the president of the vaccine division at Merck.

    Merck. Manufactures. The. MMR. Vaccine.

    Get it?

    TWO: OVERWHELMINGLY, FLU IS NOT FLU. THEREFORE, EVEN PEOPLE WHO BELIEVE IN THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FLU VACCINE ARE BEING DECEIVED.

    Peter Doshi, PhD, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals a monstrosity.

    As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.

    This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.

    So they don’t have the flu.

    Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases.

    The vaccine couldn’t possibly work.

    The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.

    Here’s the exact quote from Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):

    “…even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.

    “…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for most flus, they can’t.”

    Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren’t the flu.

    So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on the short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off. The CDC is supposed to be doing an accurate count of case numbers of diseases in the US. They’re lying and covering up the facts.

    —Those of you in the Spider group of rebel scientists at the CDC, get busy. There are many more instances of massive corruption at your Agency. Dig in. Don’t let the American people down.

    Go all the way.

    You, too, Mr. Kennedy.

    God bless President Donald J. Trump for draining the SWAMP of corrupt government agencies.

  • Free People

    Hello Lowell…long time no see. Been so busy fighting the leftist, liberal, moronic lunatics and pushing for our President Donald J. Trump’s election to POTUS. It’s been a battle and no matter how hard they tried to cheat, steal, and LIE, WE WON Big League!

    On this biggest HOAX in history…VAXassinations, Trump is on it already. Hope those CDC criminals go to prison for life. Hopefully all the ABC agencies in this ROTTEN government are exposed for the frauds they are and are drained in the swamp. Trump keeps his promises. God bless him.

  • Free People

    Go home to mommy. Get your diaper changed, and get your pacifier. You’ll need it SOON.

  • We are potentially in and at a turn around point in our history, as a fact.

    Trump: Vaccines Cause Autism And Will Be Investigated
    http://www.usanewsflash.com/trump-vaccines-cause-autism-will-investigated/

  • Free People

    YES! In the first debate on FAUX news, Ben Carson said he would make vaxassinations mandatory across the board. Trump jumped in and clearly stated he has many friends (he sure does), whose kids were healthy and happy until they got vaxassinated and got autism and other disorders. Trump is the MAN! He’s already on it – appointed the great Robert Kennedy Jr to investigate. I’m sure the cockroaches in the CDC are scrambling now…haha ’bout time!

    Thanks for the link..had not seen that one yet.

  • Ben Carson I think in this, has steadily received an education in vaccine reality, and I hope that he continues to.

    I ran across this today. Even their own are waking up and turning on them, and against them. We need more of that.

    Brand new podcast–listen to the doctor! Know a couple expecting their first child? Someone with young children? PLEASE share!!

    Dr. Thomas has the largest practice of pediatrics in Portland, OR for a reason–he tells the truth about vaccines and practices true informed consent. Please listen, please share!

    6. Brand new podcast–listen to the doctor! Know a couple expecting their first child? Someone with young children? PLEASE share!!

    Dr. Thomas has the largest practice of pediatrics in Portland, OR for a reason–he tells the truth about vaccines and practices true informed consent. Please listen, please share!

    6. Dr. Paul Thomas Interview, How to End the Autism Epidemic
    https://soundcloud.com/user-507883655/6-dr-paul-thomas-interview-how-to-end-the-autism-epidemic

    http://integrativepediatricsonline.com/

    Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D. – Preserve Medical Freedom – Vaccines Linked to Autism
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

  • Free People

    They’re not ‘ignorant’, they’re money hungry, and they don’t care. Doctors/pediatricians, are given thousands in bonus $$$ at the end of the year after proving 100% vaccination on their patients for that year. This is why they push so hard and give so many vaccines, and why they turn away patients who won’t vaccinate. They don’t care about the kids or people, they only care about the $$$$$.

    ask Dr Sears link has entire article where Doctors told Dr Sears of their bonuses.

  • Free People

    Thanks Lowell…you always have the best stuff. Just saved these links and will be looking at them and SURELY passing them around. That’s the point..SPREAD THE WORD!

    I’m so glad that after fighting this vaxassination agenda for years now, I have been able to finally convince many to STOP the criminality of vaccines. We have to keep spreading the word until they ‘get it’. When they get it, they spread the word too. It works!

  • Any time we can get the vaccine truth message to even one family that decided to end this childhood multiple vaccine destruction of health, it was a good day, and well worth it. I will never know how many I have reached. All I know is that I did all that I could.

  • Jesus baby

    What do you think about globalist Agenda 21 plan, Lowell/tripnasty84?

  • Jesus baby

    Ha ha stupid humans we already initiated plan 27 RFK Jr and Trump are under our mind control KLAATU BARADA NIKTO

  • Free People

    I’m with you there Lowell. I thank God I’ve been able to help people WAKE UP to the criminal, globalist FRAUD and biggest HOAX in our history, of killer vaccines. The people are waking up. We continue to fight the good fight!

    Reject ALL injects!

  • Jesus baby

    Well let us know when the shuttle lands.

  • Free People

    Haha…on Drudge this morning…LYI’N Los Angeles Times rag reports: “Measles outbreak grows in L.A.’s Orthodox Jewish community despite California’s strict new vaccination law.”…when it should read “Measles outbreak grows in L.A.’s Orthodox Jewish community BECAUSE of California’s strict new vaccination law.”… Vaccines CAUSE the disease poor victims are diabolically injected for.

    Wake UP America! REJECT ALL INJECTS!

  • 655321

    hes a diaper troll.

  • LeAnn Addleman

    We now have a president who is at least willing to listen to parents and knows that the current vaccine schedule and the increase in vaccines to come are the cause of many of the childhood illnesses that were not prevalent in childhood decades ago. He has added Robert Kennedy to his administration who has been very outspoken on the dangers of vaccines and the increase in children on the autism spectrum. With the plethora of new videos and movies addressing the issue of vaccine injuries, how can anyone still believe the status quo?

  • First of all your continuing to attach what you falsely claim is a sock puppet I created, tripnasty84; is nothing more and but continued false harassment. You were told before that I have not known who that poster is, or was. In your mind then anyone that expresses the real truth about you, just has to somehow be one and the same person as me. Then you just make up a baseless lie that there were somehow wording similarities to what I post, and just continue on with your asinine claim. Believe me, I kick your ignorance promoting butt here quite well enough, and without needing any alternate so called sock puppet acct.

    Where did you see me post anything about Agenda 21? You need to take that issue up with someone who has. All you want to do again is further disrupt and distract from any discussion about this articles subject matter, and content.

  • Free People

    Hahaha..looks like your ‘mind controllers’ are sleeping on the job. Keep dreaming fool..don’t forget to change that dirty diaper. Go home to mommy.

    Trump signs Executive Order killing “O”s Legacy Trade Deal. Trump signs Executive Order reinstating BAN on funding and promoting abortions overseas.

    Trump just placed a hiring freeze on federal workers, and cut off funding to international groups who perform abortions!

    Next: Can’t wait to see criminal CDC corrupt NWO globalist go to prison for massive Vaxassination FRAUD on the people.

  • Jesus baby

    One of my old clinic attendings worked part time for the CDC, and we were on the same men’s fast-pitch men’s softball team for one season. Does that mean he’s part of the criminal New World Order globalist conspiracy? He also played soccer.

  • Jesus baby

    “And where did you see me reply post anything about Agenda 21?”
    Why Lowell/tripnasty84, you responded to my question about the globalist Agenda 21 conspiracy just yesterday.

  • And this was what was responded with, and which is a clear indication that it was only you that had responded with it, and the said subject matter. But yet you attempt to continue to falsely twist it into anything that suits you, and that you can make out of it.

    Jesus baby Free People • 18 hours ago
    The ole globalist Agenda 21 plan, huh?
    • Reply•Share ›

    Lowell Hubbs Jesus baby • 18 hours ago
    So obviously you do not have anything of informational value or substance to offer here, and/or any refuting claim and/or any directly outlined argument to contribute here? So why do you continue to simply post again and again your worthless and falsely antagonizing replies on these articles?
    1 • Edit• Reply•Share ›

  • Jesus baby

    So you admit it. Disqus can be your friend when you’ve lost a lot of your short-term memory.

  • Obviously if that were true I couldn’t have gone back and found it at all, fool. And its not to hard when this article has only been online a short time. So, I showed you to be wrong and again you refuse to admit it; and you just simply and only throw more false insults at me. How impressive for you.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, you asked “where did you see me reply post anything about Agenda 21?” Both of us have now quoted you responding to my question about Agenda 21. Yet you’re claiming, “…I showed you to be wrong and again you refuse to admit it…”?

  • Jesus baby

    I think you left out this part of the article:

    “At least 15 of the 18 L.A. County patients either knew one another or had a clear social connection, said Dr. Jeffrey Gunzenhauser, interim health officer for the L.A. County Department of Public Health. None of the 18 could provide proof of vaccination, he said.”

    http://www.latimes.com/local/california/

  • You can easily see that my response was not about any Agenda 21, but about your reply posting in general. So all you are going to do here is continue to post more of your repeat falsely harassing and mindless level of posts, against me?

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, Free People stated,

    “The globalist government knows this and not only keeps vaccinating, they INCREASE the amounts of poison needle vaccines to the population. The globalist Agenda 21 plan is working as they want it to.”
    So he is a conspiracy theorist, WHICH GOES DIRECTLY TO HIS MOTIVE FOR POSTING HERE. Generally, anti-vaxxers become anti-vaxxers because they think someone they know is vaccine-damaged, or they believe in government (or in this case global) conspiracy theories. By having him reinforce his paranoid, pathologic beliefs I’m destroying his credibility.

  • So why then are you not addressing it with them, and directly? Don’t be addressing with me quoted replies made by someone else.

    And by the way, generally vaccine truther’s become that way after seeing their own child severely vaccine injured, know of other vaccine injured children, and or they simply took up the vaccine truth cause after long periods of direct independent research.

    Anti-vaccine is a misnomer, as if vaccines had worked historically and currently as advertised, and if they were actually safe and not causing an epidemic of chronically ill children, with all forms of health disorders and disability; we would not be needing to put forth what we do here. And in fact most all of us and to include me, once believed that vaccines were a necessary and good thing. That, until we learned the real truth through an open mind and a lot of endless and real research.

  • Free People

    Lowell, Is this TRUE! President Trump orders FBI to conduct massive raid on CDC HQ in Georgia early this morning. Making America GREAT again starting with the NWO globalist Vaxassination agenda.

    Search youtube for FBI RAIDS CDC HQ IN ATLANTA – CONFIRMED

    I have the link but don’t know if Vactruth will allow links.

    So glad to see this and hope this is FACT. Guy on youtube states we’ll hear about it tomorrow.

  • Jesus baby

    “So why then are you not addressing it with them, and(sic) directly?”
    I WAS addressing it with Free People when you butted in. Do you not remember that already?

  • Look up to the left corner of the screen in the first part of this video. You see that the source appears to be Sorcha Faal, a known disinformation source that has previously produced multiple articles that were fake, and nothing but actual satire. As much as I would like to believe that this story is true, and that actually does need to happen under, Trump; it appears to be a hoax. Until there is an official source reporting on this and such a matter, I would not yet at this point believe a word of it. This is as well being reported on other various articles out there, but it appears to be all only a continuation from that same original source.

    I did otherwise find the videos vaccine risk information to be directly correct, and that in itself was worth viewing.

    FBI RAIDS CDC HQ IN ATLANTA – CONFIRMED
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pxx_9HRG-m8

    Sorcha Faal… Internet Hoax Queen Courtesy of David Booth…
    http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread304918/pg1

    Sorcha Faal: Intelligence Briefs or Disinformation? How To Tell the Difference
    http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=17901

    Sorcha Faal Continues to Fool the Unwary
    http://goldenageofgaia.com/2011/09/25/sorcha-faal-continues-to-fool-the-unwary/

    Sorcha Faal
    http://www.waronwethepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Sorcha-Faal-RationalWiki.pdf

  • Do YOU remember, or have you conveniently forgotten what actually took place? And that is not butting in, but just simply responding directly and appropriately to your continued level of absolutely worthless to anyone, reply posting on these articles.

    Jesus baby Free People • 9 hours ago
    Well let us know when the shuttle lands.
    • Reply•Share ›

    Lowell Hubbs Jesus baby • 21 hours ago
    So obviously you do not have anything of informational value or substance to offer here, and/or any refuting claim and/or any directly outlined argument to contribute here? So why do you continue to simply post again and again your worthless and falsely antagonizing replies on these articles?
    1 • Edit• Reply•Share ›

  • So zero identity Jesus baby, if 18 individuals could not provide proof of vaccination, does that automatically determine that they were never vaccinated? Just like as for the over 60 Disneyland measles cases that were originally determined that no vaccine status was available, they just simply wrote it all off then that at least 57 had not been vaccinated.

    Measles outbreak grows in L.A despite California’s strict new vaccination law
    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/measles-outbreak-grows-in-la-despite-californias-strict-new-vaccination-law/ar-AAm6408?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=iehp

    This was my response and which I posted on the article. Enjoy.

    Oh, the so scary and so fear mongered about, measles; “GO GET …toxic and known contaminated vaccine …VACCINATED”. If your vaccines actually work and protect so well, what are you worried about? Vaccine derived herd immunity is an impossibility, and simply an existing non-scientifically based, myth. I have not had a vaccine in now well over 4 decades, and there exist millions of adults that have never been re-vaccinated since childhood. Thus millions of existing adults as well have not had the measles, and as well obviously do not have any longer existing any vaccine derived antibody induced protection against the measles; or at best a very low level of it.

    From the article. [At least 15 of the 18 L.A. County patients either knew one another or had clear social connections, said Dr. Jeffrey Gunzenhauser, interim health officer for the L.A. County Department of Public Health. None of the 18 could provide proof of vaccination, he said.] This is as well very weak evidence of not having ever been vaccinated, and as well the ages of the individuals affected are not given. This is thus quite low level and shoddy reporting of the situation.

    It is the same false fear mongering scam they were running in regard to the previous so called Disneyland measles outbreak and which since has resulted in Senator Pans passage of SB277, and the attempted passage of SB18.

    If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?
    http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/295562-if-only-half-of-america-is-properly-vaccinated-where-are-the

    Disney, Measles and the Fantasyland of Vaccine Perfection

    8. If vaccines work, the vaccinated should be protected. If they don’t work, ask yourself why are you allowing them and exposing your child to such incredible risks?

    http://www.ageofautism.com/2015/01/disney-measles-and-the-fantasyland-of-vaccine-perfection.html

    Only 14% of People in Disneyland Measles Outbreak Were Unvaccinated, but It’s 100% their Fault, Claims The False Propaganda
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/only-14-of-people-in-disneyland-measles-outbreak-were-unvaccinated-but-its-100-their-fault-claims-propaganda/5442774

    The Measles Vaccine Deadly Scam
    “As many as 86% of those who caught measles at Disneyland were fully up to date on their MMR.”
    http://healthyprotocols.com/2_vac_measles.htm

    The already long existing and the real study science has already long since, shown us what the REAL truth is.

    Lets as well take a look at all the existing measles vaccine failures, in the fully vaccinated. I was one of those years ago, both I and my brother had the measles vaccine, and we still had the measles; and I actually couldn’t make that up if I tried.

    The Current Failure of Pertussis and Measles Vaccine
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-current-failure-of-pertussis-and-measles-vaccine.html

    Measles jab reduces inherited immunity

    A recent study found that women vaccinated with the measles vaccine pass on far less immunity to their offspring than women who are not vaccinated. Measles jab reduces inherited immunity

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/503025.stm

    Waning of Maternal Antibodies Against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella in Communities With Contrasting Vaccination Coverage

    Conclusions. Children of mothers vaccinated against measles and, possibly, rubella have lower concentrations of maternal antibodies and lose protection by maternal antibodies at an earlier age than children of mothers in communities that oppose vaccination. This increases the risk of disease transmission in highly vaccinated populations.

    http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/04/29/infdis.jit143.long

    Protective Effect of Childhood Measles Against Degenerative Diseases in Later Life

    The above study indicates that a lack of rash in measles is associated with an increased incidence of autoimmune and degenerative diseases in later life. As the rash is the means through which the toxin is expelled from the body, its absence leads to the measles virus remaining in the body. The widespread use of vaccination has led to the appearance of “atypical measles” and “mild measles” where no rash develops. This can expose children to diseases in later life.

    Read more:
    http://www.vaccines.me/articles/afcjt-protective-effect-of-childhood-measles-against-degenerative-diseases-in-later-life.cfm

    Measles Virus Infection Without Rash In Childhood Is Related To Disease In Adult Life.
    The Lancet, January 5 1985

    Abstract
    The presence of measles specific antibodies is usually taken as evidence of typical measles in the past; in the present study it was regarded as evidence of infection with measles virus, but not necessarily of the common disease accompanied by a typical rash. The association between a negative history of measles in childhood and certain diseases later in life was investigated by a historical prospective method, based on school health records combined with self-reporting in adulthood, and tests for specific IgG measles antibody. There was evidence of association between a negative history of measles, exposure in early life (possibly injection of immune serum globulin after exposure), and development of immunoreactive diseases, sebaceous skin diseases, degenerative diseases of bone and cartilage, and certain tumours. It is suggested that the presence of measles virus specific antibodies at the time of acute infection interferes with development of specific cytolytic reactions, and enables intracellular measles virus to survive the acute infection. If this hypothesis is verified, use of immune serum globulin after measles exposure has to be reconsidered.

    http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2885%2990961-4/abstract

    The truth about the measles, natural immunity, and the vaccine
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-truth-about-the-measles-natural-immunity-and-the-vaccine.html

    Autism Parents Reply to CNN: ‘Hear This Well’
    Correspondent’s remark sparks grassroots video campaign in which parents tell their stories
    http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/933954-autism-parents-reply-to-cnn-hear-this-well/?photo=2

    Hear This Well Parents Speak Out
    by Hear This Well: Breaking the Silence on Vaccine Violence 263 videos 317,704 views
    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJpPObXpZncOfT0bG2ghgkVb2Nxjd_bNe

    “Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship to restrict the art of healing to one class of Men and deny equal privileges to others; the Constitution of the Republic should make a Special privilege for medical freedoms as well as religious freedom.”

    ― Benjamin Rush

    http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/44458-unless-we-put-medical-freedom-into-the-constitution-the-time

    Benjamin Rush
    https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Rush

  • Jesus baby

    You’re mixing up different conversations idjit. Your brain is mush, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • No I am not. That is directly on target.

  • Jesus baby

    tl;dr Lowell/tripnasty84 As always you’re gonna hide behind a wall of link-spam.

  • Jesus baby

    Mush.

  • Actually the one hiding is you, and with no ability to respond to it and that kind of information. And you can quit just making it up and lying about your falsely alleged connection to tripnasty84, as I have had none at all. Just more false harassment, and that is all you are ever capable of.

  • Jesus baby

    Well then I guess we’ve reached an impasse Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Free People

    I thought you would know if this was legit or not…thanks. Sure was happy to see CDC being raided which like you state…needs to be done. This vaccine fraud needs to be stopped. Enough is enough.

    Keep up the good fight!

  • This is the same level of evil mentality that resides in you …Jb.

    CDC Employee Flips off Mother of Vaccine Damaged Son at Oct 14 2016 Rally
    http://www.aircrap.org/2016/10/18/cdc-employee-flips-off-mother-vaccine-damaged-son-oct-14-2016-rally/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY0GEtTP7d4

    Image
    http://www.aircrap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/CDC-flipper.jpg

  • No impasse exists; and as you just simply failed. And again thanks for the additional false harassment.

  • Jesus baby

    What a [email protected]

  • I think that everyone has more than had it with your level of evil, and your obvious sickness, posting on this site. The editor really needs to start doing his job and stop refusing to do any moderation and as well removal of people such as you. People like you, that obviously need to go.

  • Jesus baby

    What is false harassment anyway? Doesn’t that mean I’m being nice?

  • The continual addition of /tripnasty84 to my name. That is harassment. And you obviously have no human level of comprehension of the term, being nice. Likewise you should have no expectation of anyone replying to you with any respect.

    This article is about the vaccine issue that it states that it is. This site is about similar articles of information.

    All you have ever done here, and as you do on all articles here, is to continually disrupt and distract from any real and honest debate on the vaccine risk issues.

    As for any vaccine truth information that is posted here and in honesty and diligence; all you ever do is disrespect and attempt to belittle those people.

    So let me ask you, for what reason would and should the editor of this site allow you to stay, and in that allow you to endlessly continue with what you do here?

  • Jesus baby

    She didn’t even know who the guy was, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • She, meaning who? What guy? Just quit paying games.

  • Jesus baby

    If you think it’s harassment then just call it harassment, not false harassment. That just sounds stupid.

  • No it its worse when that harassment is obviously and blatantly false. The only person who is being entirely asinine and beyond stupid here, is you.

  • You are just simply attempting to switch it up and by lying to evade the obvious truth.

  • Free People

    Lowell, kept looking for evidence and seems Before it’s news has a more extensive article on this FBI raid on criminal CDC.

    http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2017/01/fbi-to-conduct-massive-raid-on-cdc-3468118.html

  • Free People

    The only one who butts in is you, with your dirty diapers…go away. Not replying to anymore of your LYI’N rubbish. Don’t waste my time.

  • Jesus baby

    “She, meaning who? What guy?”
    You just posted a YouTube video of an anti-vaxxer woman (that would be the ‘she’) verbally harassing a man (that would be the ‘guy’) on a sidewalk, who then flipped her off, Lowell/tripnasy84. Remember now? You seriously need to get help with your memory deficits.

  • Jesus baby

    It’s like using a double negative, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • There is no link to the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report that the article claims to be quoting; all it is is a general link to the SVR.

  • Jesus baby

    The obvious truth is that your brain is mush, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    I think the little black helicopters are coming for you, Free People.

  • You obviously need to be more specific when you post; and you simply pulled that on purpose, and which is a known asinine and typical stunt that you shills are known to intentionally do.

    She (the woman in the video) quite obviously knew the man was a CDC employee, or she would not have approached and talked to him directly. There is nothing you won’t try to belittle and make false accusations about it That is all you are here for, and that is as I said all you will ever provide for. Meaning only more disruption and distraction, and that without providing anything at all of substance regarding the issues addressed in these articles, and its reply posting section of the article. .

  • How is it then that you are the one that is always shown to be an asinine fool?

  • Jesus baby

    She had no idea who he was and deserved what she got.

  • Jesus baby

    You live in a fantasy world, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • what2put

    They tell you on the FDA website that Dtap vaccines side affects are SIDS and Autism and yet people still wont believe it!

  • Kathy Fuller

    Many advocates for vaccine safety know the truth about the lack of scientific integrity in the supposedly “definitive science” on vaccines. I certainly hope you aren’t going to try to tell us that you know more than three of the world’s top authorities on peer reviewed research:

    From Dr. Richard Horton, the current editor-in-chief of the
    Lancet:

    The case against
    science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half,
    may simply be untrue. Afflicted by
    studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses,
    and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing
    fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards
    darkness.

    Quote provided from the following source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/editor-in-chief-of-worlds-best-known-medical-journal-half-of-all-the-literature-is-false/5451305

    This link provides the comment section written by Dr. Horton
    that contains his quote:

    http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960696-1.pdf

    The next quote is from Dr. Marcia Angell who served as
    editor-in-chief of the New England Medical Journal:

    It is simply no longer
    possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely
    on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines (like
    vaccine recommendations). I take no
    pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two
    decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.

    Dr. Angell’s quote is from her book The Truth About Drug
    Companies but can also be found at:
    https://ethicalnag.org/2009/11/09/nejm-editor/

    Quote from Arnold Seymour Relman (Harvard Professor of
    Medicine and Former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal:

    The medical profession
    is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the
    practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are
    allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.

    Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1126053/#ref15

  • Jesus baby

    If that’s true it applies to all research, so I don’t see how it helps the anti-vax argument any more than it hinders proponents of evidence-based medicine.

  • Kathy Fuller

    Since the evidence I have presented is generally directed at the 69% sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry then it does help. The simple fact is the pharmaceutical industry isn’t going to allow “research” to be published that doesn’t meet their agenda. That means the remaining less than a third has a much better chance of being accurate. That is where you will find the research that lists the negative along with the positive and that is the research that supports the vaccine safety advocates.

  • Jesus baby

    Who would you like to pay for all these studies exactly?And if you want to point out a specific corrupted vaccine safety study that’d be great.

  • Kathy Fuller

    For certain not the pharmaceutical industry. Once enough people wake up to what is happening I am certain we can collectively come up with a solution to the funding issue. Why should I point out the studies? I am merely presenting the evidence from top authorities in the field. Contact the three experts who are making the claims. They know far more than you and I do.

  • Jesus baby

    So all the vaccine safety studies are corrupt but you can’t actually name any. I should go talk to those other people.

  • Kathy Fuller

    Absolutely!

  • Jesus baby

    OK I’ll give Rick, Marcia and Arnold a call. Maybe have them over for dinner next week.

  • Kathy Fuller

    Enjoy!

  • James Peters

    Kennedy is an anti-vaxxer so he would say something like that. But there is no good evidence anywhere that vaccines or certain adjuvants increase the risk or cause ASD or other neurodevelopmental disorders.

  • I think the studies listed and directly linked to on these pages, show more than enough study evidence of the harm that vaccine aluminum adjuvants can do, and as well in regard to a connection to the development of autism. Aluminum adjuvants are just one of several ways that vaccines are connected to triggering autism. In fact autism is as well just one of many adverse health conditions that vaccines are causing.

    Vaccine aluminum adjuvant causation of neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism- Page 2
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-aluminum-adjuvant-causation-of-neuroglial-activation-and-neuroinflammation-in-the-brain-of-patients-with-autism–page-2.html

    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-aluminum-adjuvant-causation-of-neuroglial-activation-and-neuroinflammation-in-the-brain-of-patients-with-autism.html

    9 Questions For The Pro-vaxxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    http://www.vacfacts.info/my-response-to-antonio-baduy-caacutemara-and-the-blog-skeptical-raptor-as-to-their-response-to-9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    Take a minute and review what Paul Offit states here. He is stating and admitting that a person or a child gets more aluminum in into their body by injection of vaccines than they do by means of ingestion of foods. Then he counters that with that the amounts of aluminum are much higher in foods and in the environment than exist in vaccines. Where are his studies on actual human beings or even any type of animals or primates? Where are his studies that show exactly how much aluminum adjuvant from the injection of vaccines travels to the human brain, and throughout the human body.

    Again, here Paul Offit is just simply asking you to take his word for it and without any scientific study backing as to his claims, and in this case, false and unsubstantiated claims. Offit apparently has never seen the studies and nor the explanatory data which show that injected aluminum adjuvants can cause over-activation of the immune system, and as well the brains microglia cells, with resulting chronic levels of brain inflammation. This said inflammation has as well been found in many children with autism.

    Is There a Difference Between Aluminum That Is Injected vs. Ingested? By Paul Offit

    Paul A. Offit, MD, explains the difference between aluminum injected in a vaccine and aluminum ingested through food and water.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8H3sOzma22U

    Danger of Aluminum in Vaccines

    “Parents can be reassured that the trace quantities of aluminum in vaccines can’t possibly do harm.“

    -Dr Paul Offit: Vaccine promoter, vaccine patent licensor, and self-appointed autism pundit, 2015

    Vaccines Contain Too Much Aluminum

    http://vaccinepapers.org/danger-aluminum-vaccines/

    Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct, (one very important and informational article to read).
    http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/

    Here again, Offit insists in this next short video, that the amounts of aluminum in vaccines and injected in vaccines, are to small to matter. Again, Offit has zero scientific studies to support his views, as in fact no such supporting studies have ever been done, much more any studies that adequately support his said view point. In fact, several independent studies that have been done, and which clearly, and entirely contradict his said viewpoint, and as well have shown directly the physiologically based mechanisms, of the aluminum adjuvant harm done. Not only that but exponentially when combined with the immunologically reactive antigens in vaccines.

    Is the Aluminum in Vaccines Safe? By Paul Offit
    The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

    Paul A. Offit, MD, discusses why aluminum is in vaccines and the safety of those small amounts.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfyNgFxygLc

    We can all clearly see that he Offit is lying and that nothing he states is based on any existence of scientific studies that back his claims.

    The source of the videos, (a CHOP publication)
    http://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-ingredients/aluminum#.V5AxF1QrIdU

    Here in the next video, Paul Offit attempts to minimize and explain away the risks of injecting vaccines that are developed the antigen portion of the vaccine, by and with the use of aborted fetal cells tissue. Offit limits his talk to that of only an issue of if or not this is against the Catholic religion’s beliefs to use such a vaccine. Offit even admits that residual DNA from the use aborted fetal cell material is in fact existing and left in the vaccines. Here again, obviously Offit is ignoring the findings of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, and head researcher Teresa Deisher. More information is below this video link.

    Are Fetal Cells Used to Make Vaccines?
    Paul A. Offit, MD, discusses the use of fetal cells to make vaccines, highlighting how and why fetal cells are involved in the vaccine development process and the Catholic Church’s interpretation of the use of these vaccines. Obviously, Offit as well has no concerns about the issues of known incorporation of injected foreign human DNA, into the cells of your child and/or you as an adult. He has no concern as well for the implications of this situation triggering as well asutoimmune disease, and by the process of molecular mimicary
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lMBzHLB704

    Vaccine Production With – Human Diploid cells (aborted fetal cell tissue)
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-production-with—human-diploid-cells-aborted-fetal-cell—tissue.html

    Molecular Mimicry as a Mechanism of Autoimmune Disease

    Chronic autoimmune diseases are the byproduct of the immune system recognizing self-antigens as foreign, which can lead to inflammation and destruction of specific tissues and organs (immunopathology) [1]. The impact of these diseases is global and heterogeneous with over 100 million people afflicted with more than 80 different autoimmune diseases [2]. While the etiology of autoimmune diseases is not fully elucidated, the causes are likely based on a combination of hereditary and environmental factors [3]. Although host genetic background contributes to the induction of an immune response to self, epidemiological and molecular evidence implicates infectious agents (viral and bacterial) as the principal environmental insults responsible for the induction of autoimmune diseases (reviewed in [4–6]). Prolonged proinflammatory responses to infections have been associated with the initiation and exacerbation of autoimmune diseases (reviewed in [4, 7, 8]). Inflammation is facilitated by proinflammatory cytokines such as type I interferon (IFN), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-12, IFNγ, IL-17 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α (reviewed in [7, 9, 10]). However, these proinflammatory cytokines are critical for clearance of pathogens, suggesting that environmental factors are able to divert the immune response towards immunopathogenesis.

    Read more:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3266166/

    Molecular Mimicry: The Unseen Risk in Vaccines
    https://jameslyonsweiler.com/molecular-mimicry-the-unseen-risk-in-vaccines/

    Med Hypotheses. 2008;70(2):346-8. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
    Acquired autoimmunity after viral vaccination is caused by molecular mimicry and antigen complimentarity in the presence of an immunologic adjuvant and specific HLA patterns.

    Waisbren BA Sr1.

    Abstract
    Acquired autoimmunity syndromes occur after viral vaccinations. Molecular mimicry is involved in these phenomena as is the necessity for the presence of two chemically complimentary antigens and an immunologic adjuvant. The HLA pattern of the host is also an important factor. The example used to explain these phenomena is demyelinating disease that follows hepatitis B vaccination. The somatic antigen of the hepatitis B virus in the vaccine has chemical complimentarity with the Epstein-Barr virus antigen in the vaccine recipient. The Epstein-Barr virus shows molecular mimicry with human myelin. The immunologic adjuvant is either present in the vaccine or muramyl peptides in the individual who is vaccinated. Why more than one type of autoimmune disease occurs is explained by the fact that specific autoimmune T-cells have been shown to develop clones that attack multiple human tissues.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17630224

    ACQUIRED AUTOIMMUNITY AFTER VIRAL VACCINATION IS CAUSED BY MOLECULAR MIMICRY AND ANTIGEN COMPLIMENTARITY IN THE PRESENCE OF AN IMMUNOLOGIC ADJUVANT AND SPECIFIC HLA PATTERNS (Waisbren BA Sr[Author]
    http://www.waisbrenclinic.com/autoimmunity-viral-vaccination.pdf

    Molecular Mimicry and Autoimmune Disease
    Mar 24, 2014 by Chandler Marrs, PhD

    Over the last several years the debate over whether the molecular mimicry observed in vaccines, viruses and other pathogens can evoke autoimmune disease has garnered considerable interest. The argument behind molecular mimicry is that if foreign pathogens like bacteria, viruses and vaccines are similar enough in structure or function to our innate, ‘self’ peptide sequences, they can evoke an autoimmune response in the exposed individual. This suggests that a molecular mimic contained in a pathogen is the Trojan horse that tricks the body into activating or over-activating an immune response. Recent reports suggest some evidence that this may be true. Other research suggests that the entire notion is fundamentally flawed. On which side one falls, rests upon how one understands immunity. Is the immune system an army that identifies self from non-self invaders and fends off the foreigners or is it a more finely tuned system that only activates when danger or damage is present?

    Read more:
    https://www.hormonesmatter.com/molecular-mimicry-autoimmune-disease/

    Autism and the Microbiome:Can Vaccination Cause Molecular Mimicry?
    http://www.ageofautism.com/2014/11/autism-and-the-microbiomecan-vaccination-cause-molecular-mimicry.html

    In vivo absorption of aluminium-containing vaccine adjuvants using 26Al
    Flarend, R E. Hem, S L. White, J L. Elmore, D. Suckow, M A. Rudy, A C. Dandashli, E A. Vaccine ; 15(12-13):1314-8
    PubMed Link
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557144

    Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain
    Khan Z, Combadière C, Authier FJ, Itier V, Lux F, Exley C, Mahrouf-Yorgov M, Decrouy X, Moretto P, Tillement O, Gherardi RK, Cadusseau J. BMC medicine 2013 Apr 4;11:99.
    PubMed Link
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557144

  • So being you are able to reply post here 15 or more hours a day, 7 days a week; that appears to suggest that you have no other job and/or employment at all beyond your task here of being an all day and half the night, vaccine trolling shill? Thanks for establishing that obvious reality.

    Ok, so how about if you get back on track with this article and actually respond to the vaccine issues that matter?

    How about starting with some of this? Let me ask you, in your world do you actually believe that none of this is real? If so, then go ahead and explain why it is that you conclude and believe that?

    Mainstream Media Finally Exposing Shaken Baby Syndrome as False Diagnosis – How Many Innocent Parents Have Suffered?
    http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/mainstream-media-finally-exposing-shaken-baby-syndrome-as-false-diagnosis-how-many-innocent-parents-have-suffered/

    Is Shaken Baby Syndrome Often Misdiagnosed and Caused by Vaccine-Induced Rickets?
    http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/01/06/is-shaken-baby-syndrome-often-misdiagnosed-and-caused-by-vaccine-induced-rickets/

    New Film Exposes Shaken Baby Syndrome Myth – Opponents Want to Silence it at Film Festivals
    http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/03/11/new-film-exposes-shaken-baby-syndrome-myth-opponents-want-to-silence-it-at-film-festivals/

    Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles Isn’t A Virus; He Wins In German Federal Supreme Court
    http://anonhq.com/anti-vaxxer-biologist-stefan-lanka-bets-100k-measles-isnt-virus-wins-german-federal-supreme-court/

    THE FRANKENSTEIN VIRUS
    http://www.shotsoftruth.com/

  • You keep lying about that, and obviously she did know he was a CDC employee. If he were not a CDC employee he as well would have directly stated that, quite obviously. Otherwise as well he would have had zero reason to treat this woman that way, and as well to angrily flip off this mother of a vaccine injured child that was addressing that issue in front of him. How many times have you continually lied in regard to your replies on these articles. And if you support that man and as you just said, and against that said mother; then you are just as evil and entirely sick as he is.

  • I have already given you direct examples of that corrupt vaccine safety study research, and in particular that regards the known 14 to 16 epidemiological studies that were done on only one single vaccine and one single vaccine ingredient. You ignored it each and every time this information was posted in front of you.

    It is all directly outlined right here on this page.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • The person actually living in a vacuum of crazed and mentally defective nonsense, is you.

    Lets get back to the applicable vaccine issues, here. I would be interested in your reaction to this information?

    Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles Isn’t A Virus; He Wins In German Federal Supreme Court
    http://anonhq.com/anti-vaxxer-biologist-stefan-lanka-bets-100k-measles-isnt-virus-wins-german-federal-supreme-court/

    THE FRANKENSTEIN VIRUS
    http://www.shotsoftruth.com/

  • Jesus baby

    “So being you are able to reply post here 15 or more hours a day, 7 days a week; that appears to suggest that you have no other job and/or employment at all…”
    Lowell/tripnasty84, you have over 13,000 posts here, and I have less then 1,000. You must be the biggest Mercola shill they have.

  • Jesus baby

    Well then you and she must know his name and occupation, Lowell/tripnasty84. What are they? (you have no idea nor did she)

  • Jesus baby

    Well, Lowell/tripnasty84, if you want to pick your best example and explain in your own words specifically how it is a corrupt study (you won’t) I’d be happy to look at it.

  • Jesus baby

    “The person actually living in a vacuum of crazed and mentally defective nonsense, is you.”
    Does that mean you believe in the global conspiracy theory about Agenda 21 also, Lowell/tripnasty84?

  • Jesus baby

    “And someone as obviously lying and delusional as you, still has an opinion that matters to anyone, here? I don’t think so.”
    What a contradiction! You butted into my conversation with Free People, Lowell/tripnasty84. In your muddled mind how do you do that yet claim my opinion doesn’t matter to you?

  • Asking him to describe anything in his own words is unfair. You know he only has ten or twelve of them!

    Death to fascists.

  • No one butts into a conversation here because this is an open forum for all, and you do not dictate who can post where and nor who can post a reply to who. Furthermore you had no direct point or valid question put forth or made to Free People, and that left the entirely floor open to me. Get off your rotted stump pedestal and your twisted mind high horse, and face some reality.

  • Again, go ask the one you originally asked. As for my view on it if you actually believe that Agenda 21 is a good thing, and as you are implying; then you absolutely dumber than a wooden post, and more mislead than a senseless sheep simply following the herd to slaughter.

    http://www.activistpost.com/2016/05/six-issues-that-are-agenda-21.html

  • It doesn’t work that way. You are supposed to actually review the page, and you are to asinine to do. This is just one section of that page, and as to what I was referring to. And no I do not need to further explain it in my own words, as I am the author of thee page and has all quite obviously been explained well enough already.

    Lets also take a look at the existing studies that allegedly show no connection between vaccines and autism. Actually, general vaccine injury, and immunological harm done, and without the evidence of autism, is an equally as serious an issue.

    As for their known epidemiological studies.

    And, what did they study in those so called and claimed to larger epidemiological, (population based), vaccine safety studies? In fact they only studied one single vaccine, the MMR; and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. None of the larger epidemiological studies compared vaccinated to entirely unvaccinated. None of the studies looked at the safety profile of the entire CDC vaccine schedule. None of those studies as well looked at the safety profile of giving from 5 to up to 9 vaccines or more to and infant or small child, in a single day and office visit.

    Every one of the larger MMR, and Thimerosal epidemiolgical studies were clearly COOKED, for the results, period. Found were the use of flawed study designs, use of unrealiable data, predetermined outcomes unsupported by the data, and as well major conflicts of interest in the studies funding sources; none of them being independent and nor unbiased.

    VACCINES AND AUTISM – WHAT DO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES REALLY TELL US?

    We have 16 studies already that clearly state that vaccines do not cause autism.”
    — Amy Pisani, Executive Director, Every Child By Two

    “16 studies have shown no causal association between vaccines and autism, and these
    studies carry weight in the scientific industry.”
    — Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC Today Show Medical Editor

    “The science is largely complete. Ten epidemiological studies have shown MMR vaccine
    doesn’t cause autism; six have shown thimerosal doesn’t cause autism.”
    — Dr. Paul Offit, “Autism’s False Prophets”

    Read more:
    http://www.rescuepost.com/files/vaccines-and-autism-epidemiology-rebuttal.pdf

    14 Studies
    http://www.fourteenstudies.org/

  • So who paid you to write it? Obviously, you must have a funder, there is no other possibility. Don’t even bother denying it.

    Death to fascists.

  • Not necessary; and for the reasons I just stated. He was obviously a CDC employee. Go harass and falsely antagonize people on the Skeptical Raptor blog, or the sick and twisted Gorski blog. Your type does not belong here, and nor are you welcome here.

  • Jesus baby

    I like to watch him squirm:)

  • That is because I have been reply posting here for several years, and you have been here far less time than that. I have a full time job working 12 hour shifts on a rotating shift weeks. Unlike you I have few days off during the week, and work every other weekend. You are and by the times you have posted here, continually here 7 days a week all day and half the night, and you can not deny that. You obviously have no other job, period. So who pays you?

  • Jesus baby

    As always when you know you’re wrong you start dodging the questions.

  • Jesus baby

    Another dodge. Do you believe in the global conspiracy theory about Agenda 21 or not?

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, if you can’t explain why a single vaccine safety study is corrupt, why do you believe it?

  • Jesus baby

    “He was obviously a CDC employee.”
    He was obviously a CDC employee because…why? Who was he, Lowell/tripnasty84?

  • Wow, that sure is a desperate level reply. And how many times have I seen Jesus baby get his butt kicked here, and then who comes right in back to back but Ken S. So, I will ask you again, are you both one and the same person and posting with a sock puppet account?

    And no there is no funder and I have done everything that I have and as for my activism since 2009, and all of it was done without a single penny paid to me from anyone at all. And you know that. I simply do it because it is needed, and I am obviously damn good at it.

  • You have had nothing at all to dodge. How seriously dumb are you?

  • I just told you and you ignored it. And then you just keep on harassing me anyway, and because you refuse to be wrong. Your claims were ridiculous to start with. Get your diaper changed, your bottle and your blanky, and just go to bed. People with the mind and mental capacity of a baby do not belong posting on article sites like this.

  • That’s obviously false and beyond sick, you as well expect me to believe that you do this all out of the goodness of your heart? That is dumb and as well delusional.

    Death to fascists.

  • Jesus baby

    You tell me, Lowell/tripnasty84. How’s the investigation going?
    THE SQUIRRELS HAVE FOUND THREE ACORNS BUT EATEN ONLY TWO WINTER IS COMING

  • No, they don’t. Why are you lying?

    Death to fascists.

  • The explanation is right here and as I explained in my post. Why do you keep ignoring it all? You know you will never face it. Everything you post is a lying and in denial sham. Go back the Shilliversity and learn some new lines; as everything you have is long ago warn out.

    http://www.rescuepost.com/files/vaccines-and-autism-epidemiology-rebuttal.pdf

  • Jesus baby

    You obviously haven’t a clue, but how would the woman know who he was then, Lowell/tripnasty84? Did she have a list with photos of all CDC employees or something?

  • Nothing has been dodged here at all. Believe in it as a global conspiracy? What did the article just inform you of? You didn’t even read it. Agenda 21 has no rightful place in out society, period. Again, how beyond dumb are you, anyway?

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, you need help, bro. Why do you butt into my conversations with other people if my opinions don’t matter to you? How do you rationalize that?

  • Jesus baby

    So you believe it just…BECAUSE?

  • With again a twisted reply like that, it is obvious who really needs the help here. All you do is simply continue to endlessly waste my time.

  • Jesus baby

    Another dodge, Lowell/tripnasty84. Lot’s of people oppose Agenda 21 but don’t believe it’s a global conspiracy. Do you just think the proponents are misguided, or do you think they’re trying to take over the world?

  • Use your head for once. You are wrong and so just simply admit it. There is no reason for anyone to need to continue replying to your major levels of obvious stupidity and denial.

  • Jesus baby

    You’re not even trying now, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • I think the squirrels found more acorns than that; and perhaps they have eaten more of them than you know.

  • Jesus baby

    So she just knew it…BECAUSE?

  • You obviously don’t even know what a global conspiracy is, much more how to define it. I never said it was a global conspiracy; is that what you are stating that it is? The article more than answered any questions I would be concerned about. In your madness you just keep twisting it around until you don’t even know yourself what you are talking about. I actually pity a person with a warped mind like yours.

  • Wow, and are you really that beyond dumb? With your low level of cognitive ability, how did you even make it through grade school? Or did you?

  • No, because it was obvious. But something that is obvious is something your mind obviously can not comprehend.

  • Same old stupid one liners as always; as I said go back to the Shillary and learn some new lines, fool.

  • Jesus baby

    The squirrel thing was just making fun of you, Lowell/tripnasty84. Or it could be a secret code.

  • Jesus baby

    No, silly, in the discussion you butted into Free People said it was a global conspiracy. So are you saying it is or it isn’t? You don’t want to answer that for some reason.

  • Jesus baby

    Well that’ all the evidence you seem to have, so…

  • Jesus baby

    How was it obvious, Lowell/tripnasty84?

  • Jesus baby

    Well, ARE you still trying? It appears not, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Hows your effort at trying to be intelligent, logical, and honest going? Looks like it fell off the map.

  • Again, that was already explained to you. And the editor just allows as$holes like you to continue on with this kind of endless and mindless attempted harassment. Even more reason to just leave this gig and let you dooshie douche bags run out of funding money. I am going to enjoy that, and potentially what gets drawn in later.

  • GOOD MORNING BALTIMORE

    Death to fascists.

  • what2put

    http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM101580.pdf

    Page 11
    line 21 and 22

    Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, AUTISM, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolenceand apnea

    You will find this document on the FDA website.

    THE ULTIMATE IGNORANCE IS THE REJECTION OF SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT AND REFUSE TO INVESTIGATE.

  • what2put

    FDA admits vaccines cause AUTISM and SIDS

    http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM101580.pdf

    Page 11
    line 22 and 23

    Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, AUTISM, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolenceand apnea

    You will find this document on the FDA website.

    THE ULTIMATE IGNORANCE IS THE REJECTION OF SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT AND REFUSE TO INVESTIGATE.

  • Jesus baby

    You’re certainly a poor judge of all that, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    “Again, that was already explained to you.”

    “If he were not a CDC employee he as well would have directly stated that, quite obviously”
    He only spoke to her to tell her to leave him alone, Lowell/tripnasty84. She had no idea who he was and got what she deserved. You are an idjit.
    And David was obviously right about you when he said you’d never leave and that this was your addiction. Why haven’t you left yet? Because this is all you have.

  • Proponent

    Lowell Hubbs: “.. and without needing any alternate so called sock puppet accts.”

    Do you not know what a sock puppet account is, Lowell?

    ‘Cause..

    The Vaccine Conspiracy Theorist | “The Many “Faces” of Lowell Hubbs”

    … oh.. my.

  • Proponent

    TL;DR

  • Proponent

    Oh.. booooo!

    – 1,100%

  • Proponent

    From the article here..

    “How to Prevent Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

    It appears the most prudent course of action to prevent SIDS would be to stop the practice of vaccination, which is highly correlated with causing SIDS.”

    No.. that is incorrect and the wrong answer.

    The CJ Foundation for SIDS | “SIDS and Vaccines – A Review of Recent Literature”

    I.e. “A study in 2007 from Vennemann et al in Germany reviewed data from 307 cases of SIDS deaths and 971 control cases. They found that the SIDS babies were immunized less often and were older than the control babies. Their data showed there was not an increase risk of SIDS after vaccination in the 14 days following immunization. They concluded that their data supports the notion that vaccinations may decrease the risk of SIDS.”

    Why.. would you cite the VAERS dumpster diving activities of Miller and Goldman?

    … …

    Oh, and..

    “The US also has the highest infant mortality rates.”

    Citation (/context) needed.

  • Because these events are
    reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to
    establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine.”

    You might also look at line 3 of the same page. By the way, did you know Tripedia was discontinued anyway?

    Death to fascists.

  • I don’t think you even know what the term fascist means, as actually that term is far more applicable to the description of you. The closest term I can think of to describe you would be an unwitting, sheeple. You however take it one step further and as to your no matter what, shill level of rabid support for the big pharma directed and profiting in the billions of dollars, corrupt, entirely controlling, and now for the past 100 years, an existing tyrannical monopoly on health care.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

    “Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship to restrict the art of healing to one class of Men and deny equal privileges to others; the Constitution of the Republic should make a Special privilege for medical freedoms as well as religious freedom.”

    ― Benjamin Rush

    http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/44458-unless-we-put-medical-freedom-into-the-constitution-the-time

    Benjamin Rush
    https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Rush

  • That is because FDA has not actually looked at the situation in any responsible way, and they never will.

  • Don’t worry about it, Lowell. It’s my tagline for the present. Thanks for actually, literally saying “sheeple,” though! It’s pretty hilarious.

    Death to fascists.

  • Just because they won’t agree with your lies and delusions doesn’t make them irresponsible, Lowell. It’s not the FDA’s fault that you’re wrong about…everything.

    Death to fascists.

  • Why do you need scientific study citations to show that “the US also has the highest infant mortality rates.”, when your own CDC itself has stated this to be fact? Notice the CDC link, and the graph.

    Our infant mortality rate is a national embarrassment

    The United States has a higher infant mortality rate than any of the other 27 wealthy countries, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control. A baby born in the U.S. is nearly three times as likely to die during her first year of life as one born in Finland or Japan. That same American baby is about twice as likely to die in her first year as a Spanish or Korean one.

    Despite healthcare spending levels that are significantly higher than any other country in the world, a baby born in the U.S. is less likely to see his first birthday than one born in Hungary, Poland or Slovakia. Or in Belarus. Or in Cuba, for that matter.

    The U.S. rate of 6.1 infant deaths per 1,000 live births masks considerable state-level variation. If Alabama were a country, its rate of 8.7 infant deaths per 1,000 would place it slightly behind Lebanon in the world rankings. Mississippi, with its 9.6 deaths, would be somewhere between Botswana and Bahrain.

    We’re the wealthiest nation in the world. How did we end up like this?

    Read more:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/09/29/our-infant-mortality-rate-is-a-national-embarrassment/?utm_term=.957701ecdac6

    National Vital
    Statistics Reports
    Volume 63, Number 5
    International Comparisons of Infant Mortality and
    Related Factors: United States and Europe, 2010
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr63/nvsr63_05.pdf

    As for the issue if SIDS and vaccines, I would suggest that you first thoroughly review the below referenced article, so called Proponent.

    Could this be Driving the Epidemic of Sudden Infant Death (SIDS)?
    Is The Epidemic of Sudden Infant Deaths A Medically Induced ‘Syndrome’?
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/epidemic-sudden-infant-deaths-medically-induced-syndrome-1#_ftnref1

    Lets move on to some of the studies that clearly contradict your posted study. Looks like the CJ Foundation for SIDS did not actually do a complete review of recent study literature. And do you really and actually expect as well that such sources as the IOM and Pediatrics are going to do any form of an unbiased study of the issue, and as to the research? They are of course only going to focus on the studies that benefit the pro-vaccine agenda; and which as well appear to be nothing but again entirely biased junk science. Any other independently existing studies are simply as well then just swiped off the table of consideration.

    Stat Med. 2011 Mar 15;30(6):666-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.4120. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
    A modified self-controlled case series method to examine association between multidose vaccinations and death.
    Kuhnert R1, Hecker H, Poethko-Müller C, Schlaud M, Vennemann M, Whitaker HJ, Farrington CP.

    Abstract
    The self-controlled case series method (SCCS) was developed to analyze the association between a time-varying exposure and an outcome event. We consider penta- or hexavalent vaccination as the exposure and unexplained sudden unexpected death (uSUD) as the event. The special situation of multiple exposures and a terminal event requires adaptation of the standard SCCS method. This paper proposes a new adaptation, in which observation periods are truncated according to the vaccination schedule. The new method exploits known minimum spacings between successive vaccine doses. Its advantage is that it is very much simpler to apply than the method for censored, perturbed or curtailed post-event exposures recently introduced. This paper presents a comparison of these two SCCS methods by simulation studies and an application to a real data set. In the simulation studies, the age distribution and the assumed vaccination schedule were based on real data. Only small differences between the two SCCS methods were observed, although 50 per cent of cases could not be included in the analysis with the SCCS method with truncated observation periods. By means of a study including 300 uSUD, a 16-fold risk increase after the 4th dose could be detected with a power of at least 90 per cent. A general 2-fold risk increase after vaccination could be detected with a power of 80 per cent. Reanalysis of data from cases of the German case-control study on sudden infant death (GeSID) resulted in slightly higher point estimates using the SCCS methods than the odds ratio obtained by the case-control analysis.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21337361

    Another 2011 study published in PLoS titled “Sudden unexpected deaths and vaccinations during the first two years of life in Italy: a case series study,” investigated a signal of an association between vaccination in the second year of life with a hexavalent vaccine and sudden unexpected deaths (SUD) in the two day window following vaccination, which was reported in Germany in 2003. The Italian study sought to establish whether hexavalent vaccines increased the short-term risk of SUD in infants. The study analyzed 604 infants who died of SUD, 244 (40%) of whom had received at least one vaccination. Four deaths occurred within two days from vaccination with the hexavalent vaccines, representing a 50% increase in relative risk. The relative risk for SUD for the risk periods 0-7 and 0-14 days were 100% [2.0 RR] and 50% [1.5 RR] higher, respectively. The study concluded that there was a 120% [2.2 RR] increased risk associated with the first dose of hexavalent vaccine.

    Clearly, both case studies and broad epidemiological studies confirm the possibility that hexavalent vaccination can be lethal in susceptible individuals. The next important question is what is the mechanism?

    Sudden Unexpected Deaths and Vaccinations during the First Two Years of Life in Italy: A Case Series Study
    http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016363

    One of the first studies to offer an explanation was published in 2006 in the international journal of pathology, Virchows Archives titled, “Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: another pathology in suspected SIDS?“. The study discussed how previous expert analysis performed by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products in 2003, following an investigation they conducted into the emergence of a link between hexavalent vaccines and 5 cases of infant deaths that occurred, paid little attention “to examination of the brainstem and the cardiac conduction systems on serial sections, nor was the possibility of a triggering role of the vaccine in these deaths considered.” The study goes on to report on the autopsy findings of a 3-month old female infant who died suddenly and unexpectedly immediately after the administration of the hexavalent vaccine. The autopsy revealed “The cardiac conduction system presented persistent fetal dispersion and resorptive degeneration.” The author hypothesized, “[T]he unexpected death of this vulnerable baby (infant with bilateral hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus) could have been triggered by the hexavalent vaccination. This case is consistent with the triple-risk model of SIDS,[1] a hypothesis comprising an underlying biological vulnerability to exogenous stressors and some triggering factors in a critical developmental period.”

    The report concluded:

    “This case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby. Any case of sudden unexpected death occurring perinatally and in infancy, especially soon after a vaccination, should always undergo a full necropsy study according to our guidelines.”

    Virchows Arch. 2006 Jan;448(1):100-4. Epub 2005 Oct 18.
    Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: another pathology in suspected SIDS?
    Ottaviani G1, Lavezzi AM, Matturri L.

    Abstract
    Experts from panels of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical Products have investigated whether there might be a link between hexavalent vaccines and some cases of deaths that occurred. Participants included pathologists with experience in the field of vaccines and sudden infant death syndrome who conducted autopsies. However, to the best of our knowledge, little, if any, attention was paid to examination of the brainstem and the cardiac conduction systems on serial sections, nor was the possibility of a triggering role of the vaccine in these deaths considered. Herein we report the case of a 3-month-old female infant dying suddenly and unexpectedly shortly after being given a hexavalent vaccination. Examination of the brainstem on serial sections revealed bilateral hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus. The cardiac conduction system presented persistent fetal dispersion and resorptive degeneration. This case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby. Any case of sudden unexpected death occurring perinatally and in infancy, especially soon after a vaccination, should always undergo a full necropsy study according to our guidelines.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16231176

    Another case study published in Forensic Science International in 2008 titled, “Beta-tryptaseand quantitative mast-cell increase in a sudden infant death following hexavalent immunization,” described a fatal case of a 3-month-old female infant, who died within 24 hours of vaccination with hexavalent vaccine from vaccine-induced shock. They concluded:

    “…that acute respiratory failure likely due to post hexavalent immunization-related shock was the cause of death.”

    The potential for hexavalent vaccine induced shock has even been acknowledged by the vaccine’s manufacturer. GlaxoSmithKline’s hexavalent vaccine (INFANRIX) PDF insert describes post-marketing surveillance data on adverse reactions which include within the section on ‘Nervous system disorders’ the following side effect: “Collapse or shock-like state (hypotonic-hyporesponsiveness episode).”

    The aforementioned information clearly indicates that hexavalent vaccine is a possible cause of infant death mistakenly or intentionally attributed to an idiopathic syndrome – SIDS – in order to hide the lethal risks associated with routine immunizations. This leaves parents with the question: could the slippery slope of simultaneous vaccine delivery represent a lethal intervention for my newborn? One that is unlikely to be recognized as such, but for which the literature suggests is a real and present danger? It seems that it may have required the design of hexavalent vaccines to demonstrate the true hubris in reckless injection of immunogenic material into our most vulnerable.

    Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Aug 6;179(2-3):e25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.04.018. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
    Beta-tryptase and quantitative mast-cell increase in a sudden infant death following hexavalent immunization.
    D’Errico S1, Neri M, Riezzo I, Rossi G, Pomara C, Turillazzi E, Fineschi V.
    Author information
    Abstract
    The association between sudden infant death syndrome and immunization is frequently discussed. Serious adverse events following vaccination have generally been defined as those adverse events that result in permanent disability, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, life threatening illness, congenital anomaly or death. They are generally referred to the inherent properties of the vaccine (vaccine reaction) or some error in the immunization process (programme error). The event could also be totally unrelated but only temporally linked to immunization (coincidental event). A fatal case of a 3-month-old female infant, who died within 24 h of vaccination with hexavalent vaccine is presented. Clinical data, post-mortem findings (acute pulmonary oedema, acute pulmonary emphysema), quali-quantitative data collected from immunohistochemical staining (degranulating mast cells) and laboratory analysis with a high level of beta-tryptase in serum, 43.3 microg/l, allows us to conclude that acute respiratory failure likely due to post hexavalent immunization-related shock was the cause of death.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18538957

    Unexplained cases of sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination.
    Vaccine. 2005 May 18; [Epub ahead of print]
    Zinka B, Rauch E, Buettner A, Rueff F, Penning R.

    Vaccinations are considered to be the most effective and safe method preventing
    infectious diseases. Although hexavalent vaccines like Hexavac((R)) and Infanrix
    Hexa((R)) are assumed to be well tolerated and safe regarding the rate of immunity
    [Liese JG, Stojanov S, Berut F, Minini P, Harzer E, Jow S, et al. Large scale safety study of
    a liquid hexavalent vaccine (D-T-acP-IPV-PRP-T-HBs) administered at 2, 4, 6 and 12-14
    months of age. Vaccine 2002;20:448-54; Mallet E, Fabre P, Pines E, Salomon H, Staub T,
    Schodel F, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a new liquid hexavalent combines
    vaccine compared with separate administration of reference licensed vaccines in
    infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:1119-27], it was noticed that several cases of death
    occurred shortly after the vaccination. We report six cases of sudden infant death that
    occurred within 48h after hexavalent vaccination. At post-mortal examination, those
    cases showed unusual findings, especially in the brain and in laboratory tests. Crude
    calculations of local epidemiology are compatible with an association between
    hexavalent vaccination and unusual cases of sudden infant death. If confirmed in
    systematic studies, our findings would have potentially serious clinical implications.

    Full study:
    http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/SID-after-hexavalent-vaccination121.pdf

    Direct source:
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X05004688

    Sudden Infant Death Following Hexavalent Vaccination: A Neuropathologic
    Study

    L. Matturri1, G. Del Corno1,2 and A.M. Lavezzi*

    “Lino Rossi” Research Center for the Study and Prevention of Unexpected Perinatal Death and SIDS – Department of
    Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan; 2
    University of Milan Bicocca, Italy

    Abstract: We examined a large number of sudden infant death syndrome victims in order to point out a possible causal relationship between a previous hexavalent vaccination and the sudden infant death. We selected 110 cases submitted to in-depth histological examination of the autonomic nervous system and provided with detailed clinical and environmental information. In 13 cases (11.8%) the death occurred in temporal association with administration of the hexavalent vaccine (from 1 to 7 days). In none of these victims congenital developmental alterations of the main nervous structures regulating the vital functions were observed. Only the hypoplasia of the arcuate nucleus was present in 5 cases. In one case in particular an acquired hyperacute encephalitis of the tractus solitarii nucleus was diagnosed in the brainstem. This study does not prove a causal relationship between the hexavalent vaccination and SIDS. However, we hypothesize that vaccine components could have a direct role in sparking off a lethal outcome in vulnerable babies. In conclusion, we sustain the need that deaths occurring in a short space of time after hexavalent vaccination are appropriately investigated and submitted to a post-mortem examination particularly of the autonomic nervous system by an expert pathologist to objectively evaluate the possible causative role of the vaccine in SIDS.

    Full Study:
    http://www.informasalus.it/it/data/allegati_docsc/lavezzi_cmc.pdf%20final.pdf

    Alternate source for the study.
    http://www.eurekaselect.com/115921/article

    Pubmed source:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24083600

    This is by no means the first report in the medical literature linking hexavalent vaccines to SIDS. A quick search on pubmed.gov will reveal quite a few others, dating back to an initial 2006 report published in the journal Vaccine. Many of these studies directly question the relationship between vaccines and SIDS, and with a significant level of concern, and in addressing the need for better pathology, and more needed studies
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=hexavalent+vaccine+infant+death
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?db=pubmed&cmd=link&linkname=pubmed_pubmed&uid=16081190

    Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0960327111407644

    Multiple Infant Vaccines Linked To Dramatically Increased Mortality
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/multiple-infant-vaccines-linked-dramatically-increased-mortality#_edn1

    U.S. Infant Mortality Rate Stays High, Report Finds
    http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/us-infant-mortality-rate-still-one-highest-developed-world-n404871

    Coincidentally the US is also one of the most highly vaccinated for numbers and doses.

    Graph of the day: The United States has a really high infant mortality rate
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/09/graph-of-the-day-the-united-states-has-a-really-high-infant-mortality-rate/

    Infant Death Rate: U.S. Falls Behind 68 Countries, According To Save The Children
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/08/infant-death-rate-in-us_n_3237776.html

    WHAT’S BEHIND THE HIGH U.S. INFANT MORTALITY RATE
    http://stanmed.stanford.edu/2013fall/article2.html

    U.S. has highest first-day infant mortality out of industrialized world, group reports (coincidentally most infants as well get the Hep B vaccine within those first 24 hours)
    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-has-highest-first-day-infant-mortality-out-of-industrialized-world-group-reports/

  • So you think that your obvious and actual status, is somehow funny. Only in a seriously twisted mind would and could that somehow take place. Don’t blame me for placing that mirror of reality in front of you; as only you have posted here what you have.

  • Sure thing, Lowell. Whatever you say.

    Death to fascists.

  • Is that second line a threat to anyone specifically? Perhaps you should be banned.

  • That, my dear Mr. Hubbs, is left as an exercise for the reader. It would spoil everything if I just told you!

    Death to fascists.

  • So it obviously is a threat.

  • Since when is all evidence of truth considered to be a lie and a delusion? Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! Isaiah 5:20

    The FDA is clearly irresponsible and because they have not done their job in protecting the public against dangerous vaccines. Of course haven’t, as the FDA as to their staff, is nothing but a revolving door with big pharma. They serve and protect the interests and the profit interests of nothing but big pharma, and while protection of public health is just a misleading illusion.

  • In a few weeks, I might agree with parts of that.

    Death to fascists.

  • 😌

    Death to fascists.

  • “too long; didn’t read”, Then you have no business here and in reply posting on this article, as you refuse to educate yourself as to the evidence and the identification of false vaccine propaganda, verses the evidence of real vaccine truth. But then you don’t get paid to deal in the truth, and nor do you care what the truth actually is.

  • I see through anything you post, fool.

  • I see your personally attacking desperation. That blog is all lies. And is that all you have? You should as well know that breaks the rules of posting here; the few there are.

  • That is obviously more than enough evidence to back what I stated. You didn’t even bother to review that analysis of the said studies.. Nothing you are posting here is ever about the truth, but only about more denial.

  • That in fact is why I do it and there is no other reason, period. Being an activist for and in regard to what you know is right; is something your twisted and evil mind obviously can not understand. You as well must insist on continuing to insult and falsely degrade; but it not working, and as a fact. What kind of people raise sick and dishonest people like you, Ken S.?

  • Squirm, really? I have annihilated you both with the real vaccine truth information, and on every front; but of course you must continue to deny that, and as well continue to personally attack by any means that you can dig up within your obviously warped mind.

  • In your warped and twisted mind you want to believe that; but you know it is not true at all. Your posts are actually at nothing more than at a very slow learners special education level. And you are as well obviously to slow to even realize that.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasy84, I’m only asking you to explain why just one vaccine safety study is corrupted. It’s laughable. You can’t even do that. Why are you here?

  • Jesus baby

    You’re flailing right here on this thread Lowell/tripnasty84. Where’s that study big boy?

  • Oh, so you are you telling me then that you are going to work for big pharma, or the FDA? I bet they are and would be so proud of the level of stupidity you have been posting on these articles. Present with you actual name and so they can become informed of that. I was told that you shills were being paid to attempt to make the anti-vax/vaccine truth posters here look as stupid as you could possibly attempt to make them; and that was what you funder was wanting. It look like just the opposite of that has repeatedly been happening here. Obviously your funder is not smart enough to even realize that has been your outcome.

  • Jesus baby

    THE SQUIRE IS IN THE BARN WE HAVE NO BANANAS

  • Jesus baby

    You can’t even spell “too”, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Well then why don’t you see what you can do about making good on your threat? Good advice would be to tell you not to be threatening what you can’t and have no ability to carry out.

  • That one I judge as being just plain senseless stupidity.

  • What is laughable is the fact that you refuse to realize that all of the epidemiological studies have been shown to be corrupted, and for the reasons that I directly outlined when I explained what was in the analysis of them. You refuse knowledge, and you simply refuse to learn. The troll/shill agenda is only about more denial.

  • They are all listed in this document, and as you were told before; and thus you are only playing avoidance games.

    As for their known epidemiological studies.

    And, what did they study in those so called and claimed to larger epidemiological, (population based), vaccine safety studies? In fact they only studied one single vaccine, the MMR; and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. None of the larger epidemiological studies compared vaccinated to entirely unvaccinated. None of the studies looked at the safety profile of the entire CDC vaccine schedule. None of those studies as well looked at the safety profile of giving from 5 to up to 9 vaccines or more to and infant or small child, in a single day and office visit.

    Every one of the larger MMR, and Thimerosal epidemiolgical studies were clearly COOKED, for the results, period. Found were the use of flawed study designs, use of unrealiable data, predetermined outcomes unsupported by the data, and as well major conflicts of interest in the studies funding sources; none of them being independent and nor unbiased.

    VACCINES AND AUTISM – WHAT DO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES REALLY TELL US?

    We have 16 studies already that clearly state that vaccines do not cause autism.”
    — Amy Pisani, Executive Director, Every Child By Two

    “16 studies have shown no causal association between vaccines and autism, and these
    studies carry weight in the scientific industry.”
    — Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC Today Show Medical Editor

    “The science is largely complete. Ten epidemiological studies have shown MMR vaccine
    doesn’t cause autism; six have shown thimerosal doesn’t cause autism.”
    — Dr. Paul Offit, “Autism’s False Prophets”

    Read more:
    http://www.rescuepost.com/files/vaccines-and-autism-epidemiology-rebuttal.pdf

    14 Studies
    http://www.fourteenstudies.org/

    And as found in:

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • Oh, so now its all only about a spelling bee. Typical avoidance of the real issues, shill. Just admit that you are a pathetic liar?

  • Jesus baby

    Actually that was the most important one.

  • My funder? Ah, retreating back to your lies and false accusations. I see you’ve also falsely flagged my comments because you disagree with them. What a deceitful worm you are.

    Death to fascists.

  • Are you identifying yourself as a fascist or something?

    Death to fascists.

  • Jesus baby

    You won’t do it because all you can do is copy/paste stuff other people wrote, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • THE CHALICE WITH THE PALACE HAS THE BREW THAT IS TRUE

    Death to fascists.

  • Jesus baby

    Stop copy/pasting other people’s work, Lowell/tripnasty84. All you have to do is pick one vaccine safety study and explain how it is corrupt.

  • That’s just unfair, JB. He doesn’t know how to read a study well enough to evaluate it. Isn’t it enough for him to just claim that everything he doesn’t like is crooked lies? Asking him to show what’s specifically wrong with a single study is beyond his abilities. Now, when I showed multiple specific reasons to doubt his J. B. Adams study about heavy metals and autism, that was obviously fake, lies, bad, nuh-uhn.

    Death to fascists.

  • Jesus baby

    You’re such a hypocrite, Lowell/tripnasty84. I wrote better than you in 2nd grade. Of course I WENT to 2nd grade.

  • Jesus baby

    HERE’S TO THE BREEZES THAT BLOW THROUGH THE TREESES

  • Sorted Rachel out yet?

  • Your beliefs do not affect reality and if you read the package inserts, you’ll find that vaccinated infants have LESS SIDs.

    Of course, had your beliefs been reality then this would have been cowardice. Luckily, you bit your tongue and avoided giving misinformation.

  • What about Gadad et al?

  • No, I am calling you out on your threat, hypocrite.

  • Huh. Okay, consider me “called out.” I’m gonna keep my tagline, though.

    Death to fascists.

  • Really? And you can see who flagged comments; no you can not. So are you hacked into discus? Your death threat containing replies deserve to be flagged, and regardless of who does it; and you need to be banned; and just like so called Jesus baby. And in your can do no wrong hypocrisy you actually call that deceitful and lying? And there is nothing ever that you won’t deny. You are a complete ..scumbag. Now just leave on your own and allow the rest of us to get on with the issue of vaccines.

  • What tagline, and who cares. Are you going to make good on your death to fascists threat; and if not, then quit making it. And in your hypocrisy you can not even see that you are the real fascist, and a complete scum bag.

  • I’m pretty confident it was you, Lowell. You’re a dishonest, lying, paranoid, abusive pro-disease nutjob with no language skills. You can’t interpret my tagline, so it upsets you.

    When are you going to show that evidence that I’m being funded, anyway?

    Death to fascists.

  • What you post, is a double negative.

  • A tagline is a phrase which follows a person’s posts as an expression of some opinion. I’ve adopted the phrase “Death to fascists” as mine. It is not a threat of any specific action on my part, but an expression of my hatred for fascism. There is nothing to “make good on,” because it is not a promise of any action. I use a two word definition of fascism which does not apply to me: “authoritarian nationalism.” What makes you think that I’m a fascist? I’m not much of an authoritarian or a nationalist, so I don’t see it.

    Death to fascists.

  • You don’t know what a double negative is? It’s a sentence like “I don’t have none of that” or “He ain’t never done nothing like this.”

    Death to fascists.

  • Oh wow, and just look at the hypocritical and refuse to admit any wrong doing level of crazed name calling insanity in that post. And where have I see that before, and in always blaming everyone but you for the result of your own actions? And I don’t give stinking crap about your dumb tagline. Still making threats, and you still think that is just fine and ok. Lets see how that turns out for you. When are you going to get a real job?

  • You clearly care a lot about my tagline if you’ve made eight replies about it…

    Death to fascists.

  • Lets see how that turns out for you.

    OH MY GOD, STOP THREATENING ME!!

  • Any honest readers here can now see just how twisted you really are. Stating death to anyone at all, is clearly a specific threat, and no matter how you twist it and claim it to be your tag line, or not. That does not at all then simply become something different, and acceptable. I determined you to be the real fascist and simply by comparing the definition to what actually goes on with you, and as for the content of what have posting here.

  • LOL, OK, so what definition do you use? Did you pull it out of the same dictionary where you get the rest of your warped, false definitions?

    Death to fascists.

  • No I have simply addressed the unacceptability level of your said threat. We will see what happens.

  • We will see what happens.

    Woah, take it easy with the threats there, Lowell. I don’t want to have to get the police involved!

  • Wow, your mind, how would someone like you even begin to function in any normal form and in a real society? So now you are claiming that I used an incorrect source as for the definition of fascist, and what I found as the definition doesn’t mean what I know it does? I already gave you the source of the definition. Go ahead and show how that source is wrong? Give us the best twisted reply that you can come up with. You are stating that you actually know and found an online dictionary source that did not have the correct meaning? Really, where? And how is my source somehow wrong? And you are as well saying that you know of existing sources for definitions that provide me with the rest of my warped, and false definitions, and as to what I reply to. Really, and where does that alleged source exist?

    Do see how you just talk continually out of your arse end and without even any basic common sense put to anything at all? Its all warped mind thinking and one load of twisted BS after another. Just face it.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

  • So you’re calling me an authoritarian nationalist? This is just like your pathetic showing on the weed/flower question. You obviously didn’t read, understand, or use the source you cited. You simply linked it as a reflex while making triumphant sounds as though it agreed with you. No wonder you’re terrified of ever answering a straight question in your own words. Deep down, you know that you’re an imbecile.

    Death to fascists.

  • Are YOU calling me an authoritarian nationalist? And you aren’t, but I am, correct? How so? There is far more to the description of that definition than that. Do you remember how I have always told you that you shills when you lose an argument, the very first thing you will move onto is falsely arguing definition of works and terms; and it never fails. “Oh it didn’t mean what you think it does, and it didn’t mean that at all, but somehow something different than that”. Do you yet see how insane your false claims and arguments are?

  • Are YOU calling me an authoritarian nationalist?

    Nope. Cute Jabberwocky costume, though!

    Death to fascists.

  • LOL, what entirely paranoid nut job. What that meant was we will see what the editor does about it, and it appears that he already put two at least two of your posts into moderation. You see, unlike you some people actually have jobs and work for a living. He likely did not have time yet tonight to deal with it. You made the threat, so just accept what results from it. By the way, I don’t call the police for threats, I deal with it on my own; but then you probably know that.

  • Maybe I can get a job shilling for altmed like you?

    Death to fascists.

  • So you can’t answer to my questions and comments. So then you might as well admit that you were full of BS all along.

    Why are more of your posts with that threat continuing to go into moderation? Oh, I think you really done it this time.

  • No one will pay you, and they surely don’t pay me. You better stick with the corrupt and on the side supporting criminal activity funding that you have.

  • The question was if I was calling you an authoritarian nationalist. The answer was no.

    Presumably, those comments which you are flagging are being sent into moderation.

    Death to fascists.

  • Evidence for that lie, please..?

    Death to fascists.

  • I think its the vactruth flagging ghost.

  • Is that what you call yourself now?

    Death to fascists.

  • You can connect up with me and I will show you my only banking account and you can see if there are any so called altmed payments, yourself. I have all the evidence I need, and that is all that matters.

  • No, there actually must be one. When you get to bed it may come to haunt you in your sleep.

  • Ah, I see. Now how about proving your lie that I am being paid?

    Death to fascists.

  • Are you that scared of the editor, and if and when he bans you? You know that should have been done months ago, already. You sure are paranoid and worried about something? How and why is that?

  • Prove that you aren’t. Everything points to that you are.

  • Oh, I guess your fear rubbed off on me. Sorry!

    Death to fascists.

  • Obviously it was your own. I have no fear, try me?

  • You made the claim, Lowell. It’s up to you to back it up, not for me to provide proof against a bare assertion. What you’ve done is as easy and hollow as if I simply claimed that you’re a murderer. Obviously, I’m not a shill, you have no evidence, and your false accusation is just a dishonest reflex from a habitual liar.

    Death to fascists.

  • You seemed awfully worked up about my tagline that has nothing to do with you!

    Death to fascists.

  • Really? Obviously it does, and because you called me a fascist. Then who exactly does it have to do with? This should be a good one.

  • I never called you a fascist, Lowell. Not once. I’ve repeatedly explained that to you. I defy you to show one example of me ever accusing you of being a fascist. As for with whom it has to do, it has to do with…fascists!

    Death to fascists.

  • I don’t need to back anything up for you, period. Some of your previous posts have as well admitted to your connection, and even thought you deny it when it was copied and put right in front of you. You think you are so smart writing between the lines and as if you are camouflaging it.

    [as if I simply claimed that you’re a murderer.] …”LOL”

    [Obviously, I’m not a shill] Then in the alternative you would have to be seriously sick and twisted man.

    You in your stupidity as well accused me of shilling for altmed and Mercola. Where is your evidence for that; you have none.

    And no, you are the only habitual liar.

  • You have got to be kidding; what a lying piece of garbage.

    Again, then who exactly does the term fascists have to do with?

  • Some of your previous posts have as well admitted to your connection

    This is a lie and you are a liar.

    and even thought you deny it when it was copied and put right in front of you.

    This is a lie and you are a liar. I have asked you many times to share my supposed “admissions.” You have refused every time.

    You in your stupidity as well accused me of shilling for altmed and Mercola. Where is your evidence for that; you have none.

    I’m just following your example, Lowell. Who needs evidence when you can just lie and make false accusations?

    Death to fascists.

  • It has to do with fascists. Learn what a tagline is. I say “Death to fascists.” when I’m talking to Jesus Baby. I say it when I’m talking to WJM51 about a Danny Kaye movie. I say it when I’m talking to Dreezeez about religion. It’s not about you. I’m not calling you a fascist, I’m not calling for your death, I have no reason to believe that you’re a fascist. Get over yourself.

    Death to fascists.

  • Oh, your getting desperate now, and using the syntax to cut everything to shreds. Like I said there is nothing you will not deny, no matter what; and I had read enough of your repeat denial. Just another load of again twisted trash.

    You don’t come on this article site and make threats to anyone. And again, who are the fascists?

  • Fascists are authoritarian nationalists.

    Death to fascists.

  • There’s a lot of stuff I won’t deny. I will, however, deny the false accusations and lies that you tell about me because of your filthy dishonesty. The fact that I refute your lies doesn’t change the fact that they are lies. If you had a shred of evidence, you’d present it. The reason you don’t is that YOU ARE A LIAR.

    Death to fascists.

  • You don’t think everybody’s bumper sticker is about you, too, do you??

    Death to fascists.

  • Its obviously not about me getting over myself, as I have nothing to get over. It is about you getting over yourself. And that still doesn’t explain who are the fascists are, and how does that apply to somehow people connected to this site, articles, and its reply section. You are clearly now running away from it …Kenny. You remind me of a bad version and episode of Kenny, on South Park. How crazy do you actually look right now? I think it should be beyond embarrassing for you, and apparently and as always, you don’t even see it.

  • It’s a bumper sticker. It’s not specific to this site.

    Death to fascists.

  • So, again you refuse to answer. What does my repeated and direct question have to do with bumper stickers, Mr. Looney Tunes?

  • You are incapable of intelligent thought, so I’m gonna turn in. Good night!

    Death to fascists.

  • I think you are a liar. If that were true you would have no reason to post that said threat on this site. I realize that there is no help for your level of idiocy, and that I have wasted more than enough time addressing that, and this issue.

  • I am the one person at this point in time, and unlike you, that is capable of intelligent thought. All you do is twist things around, falsely harass and and as well repeatedly antagonize me. To add to that and in your hypocrisy, you do nothing again but repeatedly and falsely accuse me of what clearly and actually only exists with you. Like I said, I have wasted enough time on this issue, and your Looney Tunes level of crazy.

  • Explain Japan.

    And SIDs only occurs in the first year of life – after that, it’s childhood.

  • Kathy Fuller

    I am assuming you mean Jadad? This is only one aspect out of many that these experts are referring to and if you look closely at what they are saying I feel certain they will have addressed this or left it out as irrelevant to the point they are making. Once again I am relaying the information they have given. Feel free to talk to them since they are the experts. Dr. Angell has written an entire book on the subject that you might want to read as well. I gave reference to that in my original post.

  • No, I mean Gadad et al.

    Books enrich the authors, regardless of whether they are correct or not.

    http://www.pnas.org/content/112/49/E6827.full

  • Kathy Fuller

    So you are trying to make a point with one study when the experts are claiming a lack of research integrity with basically anything sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry? Exactly what does that prove?

  • I only need one example to counter a universal – I don’t need a counter-universal. Plus, explain other countries in the world like UCH system countries.

    Have you actually read Gadad et al?

  • Kathy Fuller

    Yes, I did pull up Gadad and read it. I still say pulling out one study proves nothing. Until you can provide evidence that these experts are wrong that the vast majority of research sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry lacks scientific integrity then we don’t have a debate. Since they are the ones who determine scientific integrity, you are trying to argue with the wrong person. Once again, I reiterate that your debate is not with me. It is with the experts who gave us this information. I am certain they will be happy to include the UCH issue in their discussion as well.

  • You can’t have because that is not what Gadad et al is about. Monkeys.

    Besides, you are the one making the claim.

  • what2put

    It’s OK I accept your apology for calling me a liar.

    Don’t blame yourself, it’s not your fault. You still have a lot to learn about the real world

    It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.

    Please don’t reply I’m not interested in anything you have to say.

  • You mean from when you described events with no established correlation as side effects? Yeah, that’s still false.

  • Kathy Fuller

    The study you provided is about the lack of a discovery of autism in monkeys. That has absolutely nothing to do with the main point these experts are stating that research sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry lacks scientific integrity. They are discussing issues such as funding bias, ghostwriting, etc. How you think your study provides evidence against anything they are stating is beyond me. Even if your one study is sound and is sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry, it is a drop in the bucket when you realize just how much pharmaceutical research has been published. Pardon me if I continue to believe what they say since it is their job to deal with scientific integrity on a regular basis and they are experts at the top of their field. You have presented absolutely nothing to change my mind about what they are saying. Once again it is not my job to prove them right since I am claiming nothing and just providing their information, it is your job to prove them wrong if you disagree with them. My constant need to remind you of the main point is becoming monotonous so please don’t expect another response from me until you address the main issue. In the mean time, I suggest you read Dr. Angell’s book (which you so flippantly assert is based on monetary gain) to see if she has valid points and take time to analyze (and rip apart if you think you have the expertise) the National Institute of Health article I provided. Dr. Horton’s commentary also gives some great points. Moving on to a more lucrative conversation.

  • So you don’t understand what a study done by safeminds has to do with funding by pharma lacking integrity? REALLY?

  • AutismDadd

    I think J Baby has shaken baby syndrome

  • The real kind, and not the falsely alleged and vaccine caused kind.

  • You have not refuted anything at all on any level, ever; and much more anything that you call and refer to as a false accusation. If you had the evidence that I do, you wouldn’t present it either. Its a private investigation, and off limits to you. You and dirty Jesus baby make a good pair. A pair of shill …nitwits.

  • In other words, you’re lying and making excuses for it. I don’t care if it’s from a “private investigation.” What have you got?

  • James Peters

    All adverse events that are reported during clinical trials or post-approval will be listed on the package insert, regardless of whether there is good scientific reason to believe it’s due to the vaccine/drug or not.

  • Like I have said before, you obviously are not getting that information, and a previous post you made as well, and no matter how you tried to disguise it, said it all. You aren’t getting $hit, sick man. Go badger, falsely antagonize, harass, and falsely belittle someone else with your sick garbage, as that doesn’t work, with me.

  • And what does the CDC actually investigate as to the study science? Actually nothing. The pro-vax side has created little more than corrupt and biased epidemiological studies in regard to only one vaccine, and as well one single vaccine ingredient, as a basis to claim to vaccine safety, and that as well no evidence shows a vaccine connection to autism. Does that at all sound reasonable to you? Does that actually sound like they are doing their job in assuring vaccine, and as well multiple injected vaccine safety?

    Yet when a vaccine insert comes along and states what has been reported post FDA approval and in the usage of a vaccine; then anything reported is immediately off swiped off the table for and as to you, and as well anything in VAERS, and with their known existing only 1 to 10% reporting factor.

    Anything reported by parents and no matter how many reports there are, be it even in video form; and no matter how many reports exist of a normal health child being multiple vaccine vaccinated, and then that child losing all their milestones, regressing into autism, and much more with or without the result of autism; is again entirely swept off the table for you, and disregarded as to any consideration.

    Anything and any information that has not been presented with by the CDC, and/or any of their other co-partner minions, is considered as un-considerable. No matter how many infants, children, teens, or adults are vaccine injured, and/or even die; in your mind it is all only yet anecdotal evidence, and not worth any consideration at all.

    I am simply exposing only a small part of your one sided and biased denial, here.

    As for their known epidemiological studies.

    And again, what did they study in those so called and claimed to larger epidemiological, (population based), vaccine safety studies? In fact they only studied one single vaccine, the MMR; and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. None of the larger epidemiological studies compared vaccinated to entirely un-vaccinated. None of the studies looked at the safety profile of the entire CDC vaccine schedule. None of those studies as well looked at the safety profile of giving from 5 to up to 9 vaccines or more to and infant or small child, in a single day and office visit.

    Every one of the larger MMR, and Thimerosal epidemiolgical studies were clearly COOKED, for the results, period. Found were the use of flawed study designs, use of unrealiable data, predetermined outcomes unsupported by the data, and as well major conflicts of interest in the studies funding sources; none of them being independent and nor unbiased. And THIS is the extent of their vaccine safety so called study science? Really?

    VACCINES AND AUTISM – WHAT DO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES REALLY TELL US?
    http://www.rescuepost.com/files/vaccines-and-autism-epidemiology-rebuttal.pdf

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • Reynaud

    The FDA has admitted nothing, they just compile and report all observed events seen during clinical trials phase testing, as required by federal regulations (CFR). The key thing here is the word “REPORTED” because causal relationship is scientifically or medically established unless another study is initiated when valid statistical triggers occur. With the rotavirus vaccine, thresholds were met to warrant further investigation. A couple of largely anecdotal observations when 50 million doses of a vaccine are administered do not reach statistical significance to warrant further study, especially when the adverse event can be more easily attributed to many other well known causes. These events are always seen in both vaccinated and unvaccinated populations and often there is no difference between the populations. You, yourself, can review VAERS reports (vaers.hhs.gov) and clinical trials data for vaccines (clinicaltrials.gov). In the clinical trials data, you will see the frequency of adverse events with the denominators for number of subjects in the trials, it’s usually 10,000 to 20,000 subjects in each trial. And then VAERS reports are received while there are 30-40-50 million or even more doses given. What would you say that the threshold for investigation of an adverse event should be, even when there could be a dozen other causes? Should it be 5, 10, 15, 1000, what? While it’s always a tragedy when a child unexpectedly succumbs and parents fervently strive for answers, sometimes the answers aren’t there. These accounts here at Vactruth are always single anecdotal cases and ONE divided by 50 million doses equals 0.000002% of the millions who received the vaccine. All othjers experienced only minor and temporary sequelae. It’s the woefully unsupported conjecture that the vaccine ABSOLUTELY caused the issue at hand.

  • Reynaud

    The infant mortality reporting algorithms world-wide are a non standardized bio-statistical patchwork quilt. The late Dr. Bernadine Healy analyzed USA infant mortality rates in her “On Health” column in the U.S. News and world Report. The 2006 article was entitled “Behind the baby count”. She was the former NIH director, American Red Cross president AND Age of Autism’s 2008 “Person of the Year.” She pointed out in the article that the USA records ALL deaths where an infant showed any signs of life while the European countries compute their rates with different parameters like minimum weight, minimum infant length, length of gestation, how long the infant survived, etc. Direct comparison of data is not advisable but when adjusted for the factors she cited, the USA is on a par with most of the European countries.

    The World Health Organization’s definition of infant mortality rate: The number of infants who die between birth and age one, per 1,000 live births. Sounds straightforward, doesn’t it? However, here are the many variables in the way that infant mortality rates per 1000 live births are calculated in the USA in comparison with other countries world-wide:

    > The USA counts deaths of premature infants, some countries don’t
    > In the USA, any sign of life is counted as a live birth – Even if a premature infant takes one breath or one heartbeat is detected. In many countries, they do not count these live births.
    > In Austria & Germany, a live birth counted must be at least 500 grams weight (~1 lb.), this is not the case in the USA.
    > In Switzerland, a fetus must be at least 30 centimeters long (~12 inches) to be counted.
    > In Belgium & France, birts at less than 26 weeks are not counted.
    > Some countries don’t reliably count any infant that dies within the first 24 hours of birth.
    > As an example, Norway appears to have one of the lowest infant mortality rates but when adjusted for disparate variables between calculating methodologies, their infant mortality rate is comparable to the USA.
    > The most prominent infant death causes aren’t related to substandard healthcare. The causes are preterm birth, injuries (both perinatal & in homes and automobiles), suffocation, genetic birth defects, and infections like pneumonia.

  • Ahh, more excuses to cover up your filthy little lies… *yaaaawn*

  • There is no one more sick and filthy than a person like you that advocates for the murder and the destruction of health that vaccines have cased; and then turns around and denies it when you know by now and damn well that it is clearly going on. You sold your soul to the devil and you don’t even realize it and nor care. The only person here that has got you beat and for being the most twisted and sickest of the shills, is the puke, so called Jonathan Graham. In your own way though you are seriously the most demented and sickest of the sick. Just face it; you are what you are.

  • Oh! I thought I was the one advocating for infants and children to be protected from disease with real, effective medicine instead of debunked crackpot theories and death-dealing scammers, and you were the one advocating for child abuse, disease, injury, and death.

  • And as to everything you falsely claim to stand for; all of that has been shown and proven to be a major crack pot false vaccine propaganda, lie. But you don’t care, it simply remains shill business as usual. Your false claims have been proven to be that, and on every front of the vaccine issues. You should be highly ashamed of yourself; but instead and in your continued level of mindlessness, you simply just continue on with the same lies and the same false vaccine propaganda claims; and again simply re-parroted.

  • More deflection and distraction from the fact that you’re lying about having any kind of evidence to back up your false accusations. You’re a depraved, dishonest fraud, Lowell.

    Where’s your evidence, baby killer?

  • You have been reading about that all along on these articles, but somehow in your denial you missed it; really? And use your real name and your full name identity, when you post your said and repeated lies; you major and obviously gutless coward.

  • I like my privacy, so no. You didn’t need my full name to make your false accusations, so you don’t need it to back them up. If your “private investigation” has turned up so much imaginary dirt on me, then you should already know my full name anyway.

    Where’s your evidence, baby-killer?

  • Jesus baby

    Lol you don’t know what a double negative is:)

  • And no one cares about your level of stupidity. Its interesting that every time Ken S., gets in a bind and with his back to the wall, in comes immediately so called Jesus baby, the socket puppet account.

  • You always make that false excuse, but there is actually no excuse at all for any of it, and but that you are a coward. And I didn’t say I was investigating anything, but certain people have. I don’t have the info that they do, but I still know what you are, and what you are obviously connected to. You are not only a hiding coward, but a complete coward

  • Okay, then get the information from them. Where’s your evidence, baby killer?

  • Again you are owed nothing and you will get nothing, sick man.

  • So, you’ve got nothing but lies and excuses. Par for the course, baby killer.

  • Jesus baby

    It’s about YOUR level of stupidity, Lowell/tripnasty84. And the day you get Ken S in a bind I’ll eat my hat. Hell, I’ll eat one of your nasty hats.

  • Proponent

    Lowell Hubbs: “As for the issue if SIDS and vaccines, I would suggest that you first thoroughly review the below referenced article, so called Proponent.”

    So.. in your opinion, Lowell Hubbs..

    Which is the *best* and *strongest* (methodologically, statistically, et al) study that you want to direct readers to, on the note of vaccinations and SIDS?

    … …

    Who am I trying to kid.. including myself.. you will refuse to directly answer any and all questions.

    Let’s go back to..

    “TL; DR”

    … for the rest of your gished galloped nonsensical bloviating.

  • Proponent

    Lowell Hubbs: “”too long; didn’t read”, Then you have no business here and in reply
    posting on this article, as you refuse to educate yourself as to the
    evidence and the identification of false vaccine propaganda, verses the
    evidence of real vaccine truth.”

    You are under the mistaken impression that anyone is beholden to read your crap.. simply because you posted it.

    Sheesh.. grow up, get a grip.

  • shay simmons

    Nobody reads Lowell; he admits it himself.

  • AutismDadd

    How long have you been an industry minion?

  • AutismDadd

    Ken S(hill) is losing it.

  • [She pointed out in the article that the USA records ALL deaths where an infant showed any signs of life while the European countries compute their rates with different parameters like minimum weight, minimum infant length, length of gestation, how long the infant survived, etc. Direct comparison of data is not advisable but when adjusted for the factors she cited, the USA is on a par with most of the European countries.]

    …….What a load of completely biased and misleading ….bull$hit.

    [Sounds straightforward, doesn’t it? However, here are the many variables in the way that infant mortality rates per 1000 live births are calculated in the USA in comparison with other countries world-wide:]

    Again, all of the biased and FALSE analysis excuses that YOU can come up with do NOT cover up for the fact that the US DOES have the highest infant/child morality rate. Nothing you have and can put forth, will explain that away.

    The US has the highest infant mortality rates.”, and when your own CDC itself has stated this to be fact? Notice the CDC link, and the graph.

    Our infant mortality rate is a national embarrassment

    The United States has a higher infant mortality rate than any of the other 27 wealthy countries, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control. A baby born in the U.S. is nearly three times as likely to die during her first year of life as one born in Finland or Japan. That same American baby is about twice as likely to die in her first year as a Spanish or Korean one.

    Despite healthcare spending levels that are significantly higher than any other country in the world, a baby born in the U.S. is less likely to see his first birthday than one born in Hungary, Poland or Slovakia. Or in Belarus. Or in Cuba, for that matter.

    The U.S. rate of 6.1 infant deaths per 1,000 live births masks considerable state-level variation. If Alabama were a country, its rate of 8.7 infant deaths per 1,000 would place it slightly behind Lebanon in the world rankings. Mississippi, with its 9.6 deaths, would be somewhere between Botswana and Bahrain.

    We’re the wealthiest nation in the world. How did we end up like this?

    Read more:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/09/29/our-infant-mortality-rate-is-a-national-embarrassment/?utm_term=.957701ecdac6

    National Vital
    Statistics Reports
    Volume 63, Number 5
    International Comparisons of Infant Mortality and
    Related Factors: United States and Europe, 2010
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr63/nvsr63_05.pdf

    As for the issue if SIDS and vaccines, I would suggest that you first thoroughly review the below referenced article, so called Proponent.

    Could this be Driving the Epidemic of Sudden Infant Death (SIDS)?
    Is The Epidemic of Sudden Infant Deaths A Medically Induced ‘Syndrome’?
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/epidemic-sudden-infant-deaths-medically-induced-syndrome-1#_ftnref1

    U.S. Infant Mortality Rate Stays High, Report Finds
    http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/us-infant-mortality-rate-still-one-highest-developed-world-n404871

    Coincidentally the US is also one of the most highly vaccinated for numbers and doses.

    Graph of the day: The United States has a really high infant mortality rate
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/09/graph-of-the-day-the-united-states-has-a-really-high-infant-mortality-rate/

    Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?
    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0960327111407644

    Infant Death Rate: U.S. Falls Behind 68 Countries, According To Save The Children
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/08/infant-death-rate-in-us_n_3237776.html

    WHAT’S BEHIND THE HIGH U.S. INFANT MORTALITY RATE
    http://stanmed.stanford.edu/2013fall/article2.html

    U.S. has highest first-day infant mortality out of industrialized world, group reports (coincidentally most infants as well get the Hep B vaccine within those first 24 hours)
    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-has-highest-first-day-infant-mortality-out-of-industrialized-world-group-reports/

  • I do not need to answer any such question because what you are attempting to do is censor the number of and the level of studies that were put forth. You stinking and rotten cowards and in your denial attempt to ask the same question every time, and which is actually an irrelevant question considering the scope of what exists in front of you. Perhaps there is no single best study, as they are all good. And when you take away the focus on the complete picture of all the studies and as to what they show, you narrow and attempt to minimized what is there for direct study information. Again, not playing your as always SICK and in denial game. You have those said studies right in front of you. Pick any study within that list and that you want, and refute it directly. Now there is the real challenge, and the one you are deliberately and entirely ignoring. Get started. YOU will in fact refuse that direct challenge, and to give any direct answers to that said question, at all. Come on, prove me wrong? Get started.

  • For those of you that actually care about the level of vaccine risks, and the truth.

    One of the most vaccine truth informative articles, ever; and as to the existing politics, the false scare mongering tactics, and as well the continued and lying false vaccine propaganda that continues to go on.

    Oklahoma docs lying and crying, lawsuits flying — all to mandate vaccines
    BY J.B. HANDLEY January 24, 2017

    Excerpts: Yesterday, Oklahoma Channel 9 News reported that, “for a third year in a row, State Senator Ervin Yen has introduced legislation making mandatory for just about every Oklahoma school student to be vaccinated. The Oklahoma City Anesthesiologist wants to eliminate a parent’s ability to check a box and keep their school-attending child from being vaccinated.”
    As is often the case, Senator Yen has become masterful at using scare tactics to justify a draconian bill, while also violating simple, basic truths of public health (meaning he is lying).

    Noted author and neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD, offers this analysis:
    “It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.”

    If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?

    Doctor vs. Doctor — most crushing debate I have ever seen

    Dr. Yen is one of the least informed doctors I have ever seen on the topic of vaccination (and, reminder, he’s an anesthesiologist, which has nothing to do with vaccines), as the slaughtering he took in a filmed debate on the topic of mandatory vaccination shows back in 2016:

    Dr. Yen’s buffoonery on a small stage in an Oklahoma church has been making the Facebook rounds, where it’s had over 100,000 views. What might surprise you is that the person administering the beating in the debate with Senator Yen was also an Oklahoma Doctor, in this case Dr. Stephanie Christner who, aside from having an excellent grasp of the science of vaccination and the weaknesses of Senator Yen’s arguments, has another reason to care very much about this issue: her young daughter died from a vaccine injury.

    Read more:
    https://healthcareinamerica.us/oklahoma-docs-lying-and-crying-lawsuits-flying-all-to-mandate-vaccines-aa4f14f947#.wtfegc4xy

    If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?
    http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/295562-if-only-half-of-america-is-properly-vaccinated-where-are-the

    They told us vaccines were safe. They lied. They told us vaccines were effective. They lied. They told us vaccines were necessary. They lied. It’s time to learn the truth and see the information they don’t want you to see. Join The Drs. Wolfson for a rare full-length cinema seminar presentation regarding the danger of vaccination, why the viruses and bacteria are beneficial, and ways to boost your immune system naturally.

    https://vimeo.com/ondemand/wideawakeseminar/199392943?autoplay=1

    https://vimeo.com/ondemand/wideawakeseminar

    Wide Awake!, a vaccine workshop with Drs. Wolfson.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY96WI66nn8

    The Drs. Wolfson
    https://www.youtube.com/user/TheDrsWolfson

    My Vaccine Controversy
    by thedrswolfson
    https://www.thedrswolfson.com/vaccine-controversy/

  • More like, now banned.

  • You replied to me, and thus you are so called beholden to read it, and honestly reply to it. And if it is to much for you, and if you can’t and refuse to debate this subject matter on an even laying field and honestly with all information on the table, then you need to get off the field, period. So what part of the article are you saying I didn’t read? I will ask you this then, and as you have made that claim; what is your corresponding and specific point here in relation to your said claim? There is none.

  • He already got himself in a bind. Get to eating your hat. Somehow you still think that your endless denial continues to carry you through this informational mine field, but it never has, and it never will.

  • I have already shown you who the real baby killers are. Your mind refuses to accept it, but you must. Don’t blame me for that existing dose of reality.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, it’s not an “informational minefield”. You just see it that way because you don’t have the background/education. That’s why you gish gallop, son.

  • Just another load of bull$hit. You can’t even begin to face and or answer to the truth and the reality of what I continue to post. Hey, where is your buddy and sock puppet, Ken S?

  • Jesus baby

    OK, Lowell/tripnasty84, can you name something in Dr. Paul’s testimony to the Oregon senate about vaccines that was true? Just go through the studies he “interpreted” for them and find one true statement for us, and please be specific. It should be child’s play for you.

  • Jesus baby

    It must suck being only able to find quack doctors to quote from, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • And that is a really cheap reply when you can’t even begin to back up your claim with any evidence. It must as well suck for you to be able to throw only mud, your own rotten feces, and as well only more false discreditation, at everything here.

  • VAERS has a known existing only 1 to 10% reporting factor, did you know that? What would these figures look like for example, and if all HPV vaccine adverse reactions and the resulting deaths, were actually reported?

    HPV VACCINE VAERS REPORTS TO DEC 2016

    Description Total
    Disabled 1,656
    Deaths 300
    Did Not Recover 8,981
    Abnormal Pap Smear 627
    Cervical Dysplasia 281
    Cervical Cancer 120
    Life Threatening 788
    Emergency Room 14,063
    Hospitalized 4,445
    Extended Hospital Stay 293
    Serious 6,222

    Total Adverse Events 49,033

    http://sanevax.org/

  • It is all true, and exactly true. I don’t play your sick and in denial child’s play games. You see in your twisted mind you have it all backwards. What you actually need to do is go through that information and point out what you specifically claim to is not true, and then provide the argument and the evidence for it. Get started.

  • It is exactly an informational mine field, and if you are to lying and or dumb to realize that, then you better get your own background and education, in order.

    My background and education here exists as being obviously far better than yours, and as well far better than that of your existing mislead and brainwashed doctors and average Pediatricians. You simply can not face that, and you refuse to face that truth and reality. You as well are obviously to ignorant to realize that people like you are simply a means to putting forth even more information. It actually doesn’t matter what in your denial that you reply to it all; the truth informational damage is already done to the pro-vax agenda.

    What you reply here really does not matter. All that matters is that the people looking for the correct information see that it has been put in front of them, and all while you continue to look like the false vaccine propaganda promoting and obviously paid shill stooge that continues to deny any form of real truth that is put in front of them. That is what really goes on here, and you can continue to deny that all you want.

  • Jesus baby

    Readers here looking for the “vaccine truth” take notice. Lowell Hubbs (aka tripnasty84) posts a video of an anti-vax pediatrician testifying before the Oregon senate, but can’t name ONE vaccine statement made that was true. Not even one. What does that tell you?

  • Jesus baby

    What vaccine/immunology studies have they published, Lowell/tripnasty84? (they haven’t published any)
    What training do any of them have on these issues?

  • Jesus baby

    What fantasy world do you live in, Lowell/tripnasty84? You don’t believe in germ theory for starters. You don’t even understand the long-debunked concepts of Bechamp that you continue to copy/paste for some reason.

  • For your corrective information, you don’t even as much as properly comprehend and understand the germ theory in its modern form. There are still important things that are not fully understood, and your so called big pharma scientists never will get it understood, (and deliberately), and they are the only ones funded with the study money to do so. Bechamp’s theories have never actually been scientifically debunked, unless you call the twisted and sick blogging of no science there Gorski, being debunked.

    I heard you shill funder pays you to try to make the vaccine truthers/antivax people look crazy and stupid. In his ignorance he seems to think he is getting his moneys worth, and gets off on it. Guess what? In all truth and reality the only people made here to look stupid, lying, in denial, and crazy; are repeatedly the shill people like you. When are you going to face that?

    You have been asked to make a refuting reply to this before, and you refused to.

    Anti-Vaxxer Biologist Stefan Lanka Bets Over $100K Measles Isn’t A Virus; He Wins In German Federal Supreme Court
    http://anonhq.com/anti-vaxxer-biologist-stefan-lanka-bets-100k-measles-isnt-virus-wins-german-federal-supreme-court/

    THE FRANKENSTEIN VIRUS
    http://www.shotsoftruth.com/

  • Of course in your deliberate ignorance and denial you will continue to entirely miss the point. The vaccine safety study truth is not found in the big pharma connected journals, it is found in the more-so independent health care journals. The vaccine truth is not found at the CDC, nor at Pediatrics, Paul Offit’s CHOP, or any other industry connected source. The truth is found through independent research, and a lot of it. You need to simply face reality, and stop being so obviously beyond stupid. What real person knowing the truth or looking for the truth, do you actually think is falling for your sick and blatant level of continued in denial ignorance?

  • Wow, are you really stupid enough to think that is going to fly? Go ahead and tell me of one statement that Dr Paul made, that is a false statement? You can’t do it, go ahead and try. So therefore in your asinine expectations, you expect me state one vaccine statement he made that was true, and when I just told you that all of them are true. I wouldn’t have posted it if they weren’t true. So quit stalling and tell me precisely which statements that were made, were not true? Your false harassment and antagonizing simply does not make information like that, go away. You clearly have made the claim that the statements made, were untrue. Again, I am asking you to get started in proving your said claim. You can’t do it; prove me wrong.

  • Jesus baby

    Germ theory in its modern form is germ theory. Bechamp’s long-disproven theory relied on microzymes. Where are all those microzymes, Lowell/tripnasty84? (they don’t exist)

  • Jesus baby

    So where are their independent studies published? (they don’t have any)

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, I didn’t claim his statements were untrue. I asked you to show us ONE of his true statements on vaccine research. You haven’t.

  • [Jesus baby Lowell Hubbs • 2 hours ago
    Readers here looking for the “vaccine truth” take notice. Lowell Hubbs (aka tripnasty84) posts a video of an anti-vax pediatrician testifying before the Oregon senate, but can’t name ONE vaccine statement made that was true. Not even one. What does that tell you?]

    LIAR!!! That is the very same thing as saying the statements made are untrue. So get to telling me which statements made are untrue, and why? Just quit dancing around it, as you know you are caught directly in a situation you now can’t get out of, but to change and twist your story, and to lie about it. Again, get started!!!

  • I did not say the Wolfson’s had published them. What I said is that the independent studies are available from many sources, and in general. You have seen me post examples of those studies, many times before. Again, now get to outlining which of their said statements are untrue, and specifically why. Just quit dancing around it. You made the claim, so now support it. And as well just stop simply changing your story.

  • Jesus baby

    What are you so afraid of, Lowell/tripnasty84?

  • Jesus baby

    So none of the anti-vax quacks you quote have published any vaccine research. Thank you.

  • Blaylock has published several good studies. Again you deliberately miss the point. The studies I speak of are generally available independent studies which are published by several different health care journals and that show the real truth regarding what is taking place with vaccines, and as to multiple subject matter categories. All your replies ever amount to are just more deliberate denial, false harassment, and just more deliberate and without any merit, antagonizing.

    We can all see directly and if we look, how tremendously poor the level of vaccine safety studies are, and which are promoted by the CDC. The below page information describes that in much more detail.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • So now its not about if or not Mr Thomas’s statements are true, but if his statements are true regarding the vaccine research. If first of all you state that you didn’t claim Paul Thomas’s statements were untrue; then why do you need have them be shown to be true? Again, until you show them to be untrue; you have nothing, and that responsibility is obviously yet still all on you. You keep changing up your claims and so called goal posts like the wind changes directions in the middle of a tornado. That is because you are again grasping for nothing but straws flying in the breeze. So which one of Paul Thomas’s statements regarding the issue of research, are you saying is untrue? And again you can’t answer that question either, and because all you are doing here again is attempting to falsely harass, and antagonize me.

    And by the way I have never used any posted name here but my own; you continued liar. And that too, is just another form of your false harassment.

  • Jesus baby

    “Blaylock has published several good studies.”
    Which is why you didn’t copy/paste any, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    The original challenge to you, Lowell/tripnasty84, was, “OK, Lowell/tripnasty84, can you name something in Dr. Paul’s testimony to the Oregon senate about vaccines that was true?”
    You have now dodged 3 times. Wanna go for a new record?

  • Where are Paul Offit’s studies? He has none, and simply uses the existing junk science that corrupt industry has provided. On your bases of said rationalization, then Offit is entirely discredited because he has not published his own studies in regard to the vaccine subject matters that he speaks of.

    These are the real vaccine studies, data, and information; and which again additionally discredit Offit on the existing study science level, as well. You can’t have it both ways, and your major level of existing bias is all to obvious … J…b.

    Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct (one very important article, to read)
    http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/

    The Defense of Aluminum Adjuvant, Debunked
    http://vaccinepapers.org/rigorous-defense-al-adjuvant-wrong/

    Part 1: Immune Activation and Autism
    http://vaccinepapers.org/rigorous-defense-al-adjuvant-wrong/

    See all posts on Immune Activation

    Part 1: Immune Activation and Autism
    Part 2: Interleukin-6 and Autism
    Part 3: Monkey Experiments
    Part 4: (Coming Soon) Prenatal vs. Postnatal Immune Activation

    http://vaccinepapers.org/immune-activation/

    Scientific Papers Library
    Immune Activation
    http://vaccinepapers.org/scientific-papers-library/

    A More Rigorous Defense of Al Adjuvant, and Why it is Wrong
    http://vaccinepapers.org/rigorous-defense-al-adjuvant-wrong/

    VRM: The Problem With Vaccines Part 2 – Synergistic Effect of Heavy Metal Toxicity On The Body
    http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=6097

    The Mechanisms of Vaccine Injury and Via Cytokine Storm
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-mechanisms-of-vaccine-injury-and-via-cytokine-storm.html

    Vaccine aluminum adjuvant causation of neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism- Page 2
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-aluminum-adjuvant-causation-of-neuroglial-activation-and-neuroinflammation-in-the-brain-of-patients-with-autism–page-2.html

  • No it is not, and on the only Bechamp theory terms you are continuing to try to make it. You refuse to get it because to actually get it, clearly …makes you wrong. I have explained this all to you before, and of course you deliberately ignored it.

  • I don’t need to. And as well I have in the past reply posted those studies to you and in front of you before. How about if you as well got off your lazy and funder freeloading arse, and for once did you own independent research? Your replies are endlessly nothing but worthless and pathetic.

  • The only person that has dodged anything at all here, is you, hypocritical, twisted, and sick man. You asked what was true; I said it is all true. Thus obviously I have no obligation to, and not need to pick out any one certain claim made.

    You make a claim, you prove a claim; that is how it works here. You claim information is false, then you have the responsibility to explain and show that it is false. Specifically, YOU have the responsibility to show the error in the claims Paul Thomas made, and to show directly why you are stating it. How much more twisted can anything here yet get. Those are the facts, so get started on putting forth what was not true in regard to what Pediatrician Paul Thomas states in this information. Again, the information is posted for you below. And quit repeatedly dodging the said question that I have again just stated. And this time as well don’t deliberately forget the first audio interview link that is listed there.

    Brand new podcast–listen to the doctor! Know a couple expecting their first child? Someone with young children? PLEASE share!!

    Dr. Thomas has the largest practice of pediatrics in Portland, OR for a reason–he tells the truth about vaccines and practices true informed consent. Please listen, please share!

    6. Dr. Paul Thomas Interview, How to End the Autism Epidemic
    https://soundcloud.com/user-507883655/6-dr-paul-thomas-interview-how-to-end-the-autism-epidemic

    Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D. – Preserve Medical Freedom – Vaccines Linked to Autism
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

  • Jesus baby

    “Where are Paul Offit’s studies?”

    It took longer to type this than to find them. You are one ignorant anti-vaxxer, Lowell/tripnasty84.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Offit%20P%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=24126848

  • Jesus baby

    You don’t understand Bechamp’s theory if you can’t see how microzymes are one of its 2 central premises. Or you’re just lying because microzymes don’t exist. It doesn’t really matter, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    “How about if you as well got off your lazy and funder freeloading arse, and for once did you own independent research?”

    Here you go, Lowell/tripnasty84. Which of those papers do you consider vaccine research? (there aren’t any)

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

  • Jesus baby

    That’s dodge #4, Lowell/tripnasty84. While it might seem I am IMPLYING everything he testified about vaccine research was false, I have not implicitly stated that. I am simply asking you to tell us one thing he testified to concerning vaccine research that was true.

  • Not paying your asinine game. So as long as you actually keep dodging and refuse to do what you obviously need to do and provide here, and as to what you rightfully should do here; lets move on to another issue.

    How many vaccines have you yourself had in lets say the last ten years; and I think you previously dodged this question as well, so called Jb. This is the current CDC adult vaccine schedule. How many of those vaccines have you had?

    You aren’t skipping out on your duty in providing for the assumed existing vaccine derived herd immunity of the adult public, are you?

    Being you are pro-vaccine and advocate for everyone to be vaccinated, which vaccines have you had, and what is your age; unless you are to cowardly to even tell us your age. Are you yourself then fully up to date as to this adult vaccine schedule? Which vaccines on that list, have you not had? If you are 26 or under you as well need the so proven harmless and so effective Gardasil 9. Or you have had the original Gardasil, you still need additionally the newly FDA approved Gardasil 9. Roll up your sleeves, and maybe even lower your pants?

    Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule—United States – 2016
    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-schedule.pdf

    Go ahead and answer directly my questions.

    Oh, and by the way, here is a recent study you should be interested in.

    New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Microand
    Nanocontamination

    Abstract
    Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope
    equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and
    whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that
    are mentioned and briefly discussed.

    http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

    They have wondered where all the heavy metals were coming from when vaccine injured and/or autistic children received such as DMSA or DMPS chelation of existing heavy metals. Perhaps the vaccines are the source after all. And then when removed many children were seen to have significant levels of recovery. So now we are not only talking about Nagalase possibly being present in vaccines, but as well various metallic and unknown nano-particles. How much worse can it get?

    Research Article
    The Severity of Autism Is Associated with Toxic Metal Body Burden and Red Blood Cell Glutathione Levels

    Abstract

    This study investigated the relationship of children’s autism symptoms with their toxic metal body burden and red blood cell (RBC) glutathione levels. In children ages 3–8 years, the severity of autism was assessed using four tools: ADOS, PDD-BI, ATEC, and SAS. Toxic metal body burden was assessed by measuring urinary excretion of toxic metals, both before and after oral dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). Multiple positive correlations were found between the severity of autism and the urinary excretion of toxic metals. Variations in the severity of autism measurements could be explained, in part, by regression analyses of urinary excretion of toxic metals before and after DMSA and the level of RBC glutathione (adjusted of 0.22–0.45, in all cases). This study demonstrates a significant positive association between the severity of autism and the relative body burden of toxic metals.

    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2009/532640/ (full study)

  • So you are now telling that no vaccine research studies exist in Pubmed and through a general Pubmed search. You were told to do your own research, and your answer is that it doesn’t exist, and that there aren’t any existing research papers. That is what you just reply posted.

    This what real research looks like, and for example.

    In regard to aluminum vaccine adjuvants. Take a look.

    From: History of crime against the Food Laws (1929) by Dr. Riley, the prime mover behind the original Pure Food Law and Director of the FDA. He resigned in disgust in 1912 over exceptions granted to the law and lack of enforcement.

    Aluminum has been exempted from testing for safety by the FDA under a convoluted logic wherein it is classified as GRAS. (Generally Regarded As Safe.) It has never been tested by the FDA on its safety and there are NO restrictions whatever on the amount or use of aluminum. Diseases Associated with Aluminium Intoxication. H. Tomlinson, M.B., Ch.B., MRCS., LRCP. Since that time thousands of studies have been published indicating aluminum is involved in neurological dysfunction, immunocompetence, as well as a host of other morbidities. I cannot begin to reference them all. Sepsis: a cause of aluminum release from tissue stores associated with acute neurological dysfunction and mortality. Davenport A. – Williams P.S. – Roberts N.B. – Bone J.M. From: Clin Nephrol (1988 Jul) 30(1):48-51.

    We report six cases of patients with renal failure and exposure to aluminum who developed septicemia. In all cases the serum aluminum increased markedly. This may have contributed to the neurological dysfunction seen in five, and the deaths of four of the patients. We suggest that the rise in serum aluminum was due to the release of tissue-bound aluminum, resulting in an increase in free, diffusable aluminum and that this jeopardized both neurological function and immunocompetence.
    http://www.raysahelian.com/aluminum.html

    Understanding Colloidal Suspensions – Help from Frank Hartman & Thomas Riddick

    SOME EFFECTS OF REDUCED CARRYING CAPACITY
    Aluminum toxicity is a widespread problem in all forms of life, including humans, animals, fish, plants and trees, and causes widespread degradation of the environment and health. Over 7000 reference articles on aluminum toxicity exist in various data bases; ( as of 1996 ) all recognizing the toxicity but concluding the mechanism of action is unknown. — [ Search results – scirus.com ]
    Scirus is now a defunct site and another site study locator has replaced it.

    Aluminum toxicity
    Search results: 58,290 results found.
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleListURL&_method=list&_ArticleListID=-1135999402&_sort=r&_st=13&view=c&md5=dfd98a38cd78068b0ccf0cd6806d25bb&searchtype=a

    Despite the number of references to aluminum toxicity, the FDA has always exempted it from testing from testing by putting it on their “Generally Regarded as Safe” ( GRAS ) list. Aluminum can be added to foods, medicines or water without restriction from the FDA.
    [ Aluminum is known to stop cell division during the “S Phase”, at levels less than 4 ppm. ]

    The mechanism of action of aluminum toxicity is aluminum’s effect on carrying capacity or Zeta Potential. Aluminum is relatively non-toxic in and of itself. However, it destroys the carrying capacity of a liquid.

    Aluminum has three ( 3 ) positive ions, so a single ion of aluminum will reduce surface charge, reduce carrying capacity and increase surface tension by 6,000 times the amount that an ion of Sodium, which has one ( 1 ) positive charge, would.

    Read more:
    http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/info/colloid.htm#Altox

    Control of Colloid Stability through Zeta Potential
    Copyright © 1968 by Thomas M. Riddick

    (This was known then, and what has the so called scientific community done with it since that time? They have done of course nothing but ignore it).

    http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/riddick/

  • I and we have already discussed that, and I have as well told you exactly where the issue of microzymes and the Bechamp issue rest. As I said and until modern science catches up with history from 100 years ago or more. I can’t do anything about that lack of study research, on their part. It would be as simple as investigating it with live blood cell darkfield blood microscopy. This was the same thing that Antoine Bechamp used and at as well the time of Pasteur, but in a much more crude form of it than what is found in and with the very similar existing technology today. Bechamp at that time clearly had working form of that known technology. You see so called modern pharma medicine is no interested in understanding actual causation of health issues, and nor are they interested in any real cures. That is why the needed study science has never much progressed since the days that those two said men lived.

    And so no, the current and modern understanding of the immune system and the germ theory does not need depend on exclusively the Bechamp’s theory, or Pasteur’s theory. In fact it does not even need to depend on an acceptance or not of the existence of viruses, or microzymes. You could classify it as simply pathogens, if you choose to.

    The main focus is on the soil and the seed theory, and which is obviously much more than just a theory. If the terrain is weakened by toxins and lack of cellular nutrition, and as well blockages anywhere easily corrected through chiropractic; then your susceptibility to illness and human health degenerative conditions, is greatly increased.

    Pharmaceutical drugs in the bigger picture and for the most part, do nothing to correct that said situation. Largely, many drugs only mask and treat symptoms, and little more. It is not a real correction of the problem, nor any form of a cure As said, in the bigger picture big pharma is doing more harm than good, and as a result reaping massive profits. When you hear a drug commercial on TV, what is the longest part of the commercial? It is always the list of possible warnings and side effects.

    You can refuse to get it all you want, but a growing number of our population has fully understood this for a long time, and more are learning it and of it every day.

  • Jesus baby

    So instead of admitting Blaylock (or any other of the quacks you quote) hasn’t published any vaccine studies you want to talk about something else.

  • Jesus baby

    Readers, please note Lowell Hubbs (aka tripnasty84) has given up trying to defend “Dr. Paul” and now wants to talk about something else.

    And that’s dodge #5.

  • Jesus baby

    So you’re recanting your support of Bechamp’s theory, but you still don’t believe in germ theory. You still have a long, long way to go, but for once we can say you have learned something, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Those are not studies that Offit himself has done. They are nothing but opinion piece articles, and that kind of thing does not even qualify as a study, and should not even be published in Pubmed. Just because of his name, they allowed that of course.

    Where are Offit studies on lets say the safety of vaccine aluminum adjuvants, he has none. Where are his vaccine safety studies regarding known issues of vaccine contamination? Where are his studies on anything but running his no science to back his opinion claims, big mouth?

    As I said, Offit himself, does not have any studies published on his own. That was exactly my point. Yet he being pro-vaccine is allowed spout his opinion, and yet the the vaccine truth promoting health providers such as chiropractors and even in this case a well known Pediatrician with a large practice, is NOT allowed to have and to promote their opinions at all; and they are immediately disqualified in your view, correct?

    How beyond pathetic do you look at this point? And no, it is you, and you are actually one ignorant pro-vax shill. And what qualifications do you yourself have ..so called Jb? Obviously the answer is, zero.

    Go to this link and as well view the video titled, Bonus Features, the Challenge Trailer. Mrs. Wolfson on that stage makes a direct challenge to Paul Offit. Did you hear that challenge? Would you yourself like to volunteer for that challenge …Jb? Why not? Offit states that 10,000 vaccines are entirely safe and can be tolerated by a young child. You trust CDC spokesman Offit, don’t you??? Sign up for the said challenge then; and get it done.

    https://vimeo.com/ondemand/wideawakeseminar

    Here Offit states it directly. All of it backed by a copy of the October 2005 issue of the CHOP magazine in which he made that said and idiotic claim which was of course based on zero scientific study evidence for it at all. Now tell me, who should parents actually listen to, Paul Offit, or people like Dr Paul Thomas, Pediatrician, and the Wolfson chiropractic team? The answer is obvious.

    [Here Offit says kids can take 100,000 vaccines at once. He then changed it to 10,000: “In fact, Dr. Offit’s studies show that in theory, healthy infants could safely get up to 100,000 vaccines at once.” pdf copy and pdf copy of Parenting magazine article where he says the same thing.]

    http://www.whale.to/vaccine/Offit%20June%202006.pdf

    http://www.whale.to/vaccine/Parenting-Offit.pdf

  • For you to continue arguing you have to insist on that being the case, but clearly it is not. For you to continue arguing, you have to ignore and deny everything I have just stated, and as well previously stated. I clearly already knew what I needed to know, and it is you that still refuses to get it, and just so you in your paid shill sickness, you can continue arguing, and which you must of course continue to insist on. Just give it up, you lose.

  • And who do you think will be stupid enough to simply believe that dishonest and twisted trash? Again, the only one dodging anything here, is you. But then if twisted levels of lying hypocrisy were not available for use, the Pro-vax Shillary would of course have been finished, long ago.

    And you have not answered yet my question about by age how many vaccines have you had in the past ten years, and are you up to date with the current CDC adult vaccine schedule? You need to take vaccines yourself, to support the use of vaccines for others, Where is your answer?

    What does Offit have to say about this study information, by the way? The correct answer will be, absolutely nothing, and nor as for the CDC. When as well will the FDA be directly addressing this issue?

    Perhaps the last straw: Our worst nightmare come true — nanoparticles in vaccines.
    ________________________________________________
    Intro by J.B. Handley

    Breaking!! New published study (This week: 1/23/17) from Italy shows vaccines contaminated with undeclared micro and nano-sized particles!

    Good luck finding one mention of this study from the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination in the U.S. media!

    What does the study say? It’s jaw-droppingly bad, just start with the discussion at the end, the scientists were “baffled”, they found a bunch of stuff in ALL pediatric vaccines that they didn’t expect to find like Lead, Tungsten, Zirconium, Iron, Nickel, Antimony, stainless steel, and chromium–to name a few! (The one vaccine that was 100% free from inorganic contaminants? A pet vaccine!)

    Discussion:

    “The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity which, in any case, is still there, that typical of foreign bodies. For that reason, they induce an inflammatory reaction.”

    and,

    “Specific researches on components of the vaccines like adjuvants (in most instances, Aluminum salts) are already indicated as possible responsible of neurological symptoms”

    and,

    “The investigations verified the physical-chemical composition of the vaccines considered according to the inorganic component as declared by the Producer. In detail, we verified the presence of saline and Aluminum salts, but further presence of micro-, sub- micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases, whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product.”

    and,

    “As can be seen, the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).”

    and,

    “Figure 3a-3d show particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).
    Figure 6a & 6b show one of the foreign bodies identified in Agrippal. The particle is composed of Cerium, Iron, Titanium and Nickel. (Figure 7a & 7b) present an area of Repevax where the morphology of red cells – we cannot tell whether they are human or animal- is clearly visible.”

    and,

    “The link between these two entities generates an unfolding of the proteins that can induce an autoimmune effect once those proteins are injected into humans.”

    Study name and journal:

    New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination. International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination

    “The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible.”

    Save your own copy before it disappears–a really bad time for this study to come out (if you are a vaccine maker.) What are they gonna say? Sorry, we didn’t know that stuff was in there?? Lead? Tungsten? Stainless Steel? Read the whole discussion, it’s genuinely disturbing:

    “As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein- corona effect (due to a nano-bio-interaction [18]) can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way [19-22]. It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA [23].”

    WTF??? This alone should be a reason for an RFKcommission

    http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

    Discussion
    The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important
    to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of
    the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity which, in any case, is still there, that typical of foreign bodies. For that reason, they induce an inflammatory reaction.

    After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas [17]. But they can also be carried by the blood
    circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination. We believe that in many cases they get distributed throughout the body without causing any visible reaction, but it is also likely that, in some circumstances, they reach some organ, none excluded and including the microbiota, in a fair quantity. As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect (due to a nano-bio-interaction [18]) can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way [19-22]. It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA [23].

    Conclusion
    The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g., filtration) used to produce vaccines, not investigated and not detected by the Producers. If our hypothesis is actually the case, a close inspection of the working places and the full knowledge of the whole procedure of vaccine preparation would probably allow to eliminate the problem.

    http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

    New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Microand
    Nanocontamination

    Abstract
    Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new nvestigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.

    http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

    Research Article
    The Severity of Autism Is Associated with Toxic Metal Body Burden and Red Blood Cell Glutathione Levels

    Abstract

    This study investigated the relationship of children’s autism symptoms with their toxic metal body burden and red blood cell (RBC) glutathione levels. In children ages 3–8 years, the severity of autism was assessed using four tools: ADOS, PDD-BI, ATEC, and SAS. Toxic metal body burden was assessed by measuring urinary excretion of toxic metals, both before and after oral dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). Multiple positive correlations were found between the severity of autism and the urinary excretion of toxic metals. Variations in the severity of autism measurements could be explained, in part, by regression analyses of urinary excretion of toxic metals before and after DMSA and the level of RBC glutathione (adjusted of 0.22–0.45, in all cases). This study demonstrates a significant positive association between the severity of autism and the relative body burden of toxic metals.

    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2009/532640/ (full study)

    ——–

    Not paying your asinine game. So as long as you actually keep dodging and refuse to do what you obviously need to do and provide here, and as to what you rightfully should do here; lets move on to another issue.

    How many vaccines have you yourself had in lets say the last ten years; and I think you previously dodged this question as well, so called Jb. This is the current CDC adult vaccine schedule. How many of those vaccines have you had?

    You aren’t skipping out on your duty in providing for the assumed existing vaccine derived herd immunity of the adult public, are you?

    Being you are pro-vaccine and advocate for everyone to be vaccinated, which vaccines have you had, and what is your age; unless you are to cowardly to even tell us your age. Are you yourself then fully up to date as to this adult vaccine schedule? Which vaccines on that list, have you not had? If you are 26 or under you as well need the so proven harmless and so effective Gardasil 9. Or you have had the original Gardasil, you still need additionally the newly FDA approved Gardasil 9. Roll up your sleeves, and maybe even lower your pants?

    Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule—United States – 2016
    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-schedule.pdf

    Go ahead and answer directly my questions.

    They have wondered where all the heavy metals were coming from when vaccine injured and/or autistic children received such as DMSA or DMPS chelation of existing heavy metals. Perhaps the vaccines are the source after all. And then when removed many children were seen to have significant levels of recovery. So now we are not only talking about Nagalase possibly being present in vaccines, but as well various metallic and unknown nano-particles. How much worse can it get?

    Research Article
    The Severity of Autism Is Associated with Toxic Metal Body Burden and Red Blood Cell Glutathione Levels

    Abstract

    This study investigated the relationship of children’s autism symptoms with their toxic metal body burden and red blood cell (RBC) glutathione levels. In children ages 3–8 years, the severity of autism was assessed using four tools: ADOS, PDD-BI, ATEC, and SAS. Toxic metal body burden was assessed by measuring urinary excretion of toxic metals, both before and after oral dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). Multiple positive correlations were found between the severity of autism and the urinary excretion of toxic metals. Variations in the severity of autism measurements could be explained, in part, by regression analyses of urinary excretion of toxic metals before and after DMSA and the level of RBC glutathione (adjusted of 0.22–0.45, in all cases). This study demonstrates a significant positive association between the severity of autism and the relative body burden of toxic metals.

    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2009/532640/ (full study)

  • So let me put that question in front of you again, and because you deliberately evaded it and dodged it. In fact I just addressed directly what I needed to and as to your previous reply. It is YOU that diverted away from it and failed to reply. We were talking about independent research, and in addition to my reply, I simply showed you an example of how it is done. Again, you are obviously nothing but a lying and twisted hypocrite, so called …J b.

    Again. So you are now telling that no vaccine research studies exist in Pubmed and through a general Pubmed search. You were told to do your own research, and your answer is that it doesn’t exist, and that there aren’t any existing research papers. That is what you just reply posted.

    And as for Dr Blaylock and your false claim that there are no published studies.

    This man right here is a retired board certified, neurosurgeon. Academically speaking, he obviously has a high level of understanding in regard to the human brain, and as well in regard to actual human physiology. You obviously couldn’t even begin to compare to that, and as for your knowledge.

    Session 22, The Vaccine Safety Conference: Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD, CCN

    THE CENTRAL ROLE OF IMMUNOEXCITOTOXICITY IN ALUMINUM AND MERCURY-CONTAINING ADJUVANT-TRIGGERED NEURODEVELOPMENTAL AND NEURODEGENERATIVE DISORDERS

    Dr. Russell Blaylock is a board certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer. He attended the Louisiana State University School of Medicine in New Orleans and completed his general surgical internship and neurosurgical residency at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina. During his residency training he worked with the eminent neurosurgeon, Dr. Ludwig Kempe. Together they developed the transcallosal removal of intraventricular tumors, a technique still used today. For the past 25 years he has practiced neurosurgery in addition to having a nutritional practice. He recently retired from his neurosurgical duties to devote his full attention to nutritional studies and neuroscience research.

    Blaylock has authored three books on nutrition and wellness: Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, Health and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life and Natural Strategies for The Cancer Patient. He co-authored the book Cellular and Molecular Biology of Autism Spectrum Disorders with Dr. Anna Strunecka and written over 40 papers for peer-reviewed journals. Blaylock serves on the editorial staff of the Fluoride Journal, the Journal of the American Physicians and Surgeons and the Journal of the American Nutriceutical Association. Blaylock has been appointed to serve on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Life Extension Foundation. He is the 2004 recipient of the Integrity in Science Award granted by the Weston A. Price Foundation. An in-demand guest for radio and television programs, he lectures extensively to both lay and professional medical audiences on a variety of nutrition-related subjects. He previously served as clinical assistant professor of neurosurgery at the University of Mississippi Medical Center in Jackson, Miss. and is currently a visiting professor of biology at Belhaven University, also in Jackson.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9DkcpEEBPI

    How Vaccines Harm Child Brain Development – Dr Russell Blaylock

    If you are a parent of a baby or young children, expecting a baby or if you are a health professional you need to watch this lecture filmed at a Radio Liberty Seminar in October 2008 in which Russell Blaylock MD discusses the effect of vaccines on the developing brain and his concerns about the increasingly crowded infant vaccination schedule.

    Dr Blaylock also provides compelling arguments why the vaccination of pregnant women is harmful and a hidden cause of neurological disorders. He also discusses the toxic ingredients in vaccines such as formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum and MSG and the detrimental effects they have on the brain and nervous system. He also touches on other vaccine-related topics, such as the conflicts of interests influencing vaccination policy due to the influence the pharmaceutical industry exerts on the government and the pharmaceutical industry, the polio epidemics in Africa, mercury toxicity and other medical scandals.

    CDC officials claim vaccines are safe and effective. Is that true? If vaccines are safe, why has the incidence of autism increased from one case of autism in 10,000 to one case of autism in every 50 American children in the past few years, in parallel with a huge increase in the number of vaccines the government is promoting as part of the childhood vaccination schedule?

    If childhood vaccines are safe, why are well over half a million vaccinated American children afflicted with autism, while non-vaccinated Amish and Mennonite children rarely suffer from the disorder? Why has the incidence of asthma, allergies, autoimmune disease, Type 1 diabetes and neurological conditions also dramatically increased in vaccinated children?

    Furthermore, why do obstetricians give pregnant women influenza vaccines that contain a toxic dose of mercury and why are new babies injected with the Hepatitis B vaccine within hours of birth when there is no medical justification for it?

    In this informative lecture, Dr Blaylock addresses these and many other vaccine-related issues. If you are concerned about your and your family’s health and want to make an informed decision on behalf of your child or children, this is a really important video for you to watch. You will never look at vaccination and the so-called health care system the same way again.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QBcMYqlaDs

    Aluminum Induced Immunoexcitotoxicity in Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders
    Current Inorganic Chemistry 2012, Vol. 2, No. 1
    Russell L. Blaylock, MD
    Visiting Professor Biology Belhaven University Theoretical Neurosciences Research, LLC Ridgeland, Mississippi, USA
    This article has 85 references

    Abstract

    A great deal has been learned about the neurotoxicity of aluminum over the past two decades in terms of its ability to disrupt cellular function. Newer evidence suggests that a more central pathophysiological mechanism may be responsible for much of the toxicity of aluminum and aluminofluoride compounds on the brain. This mechanism involves activation of the brainâ € ™ s innate immune system, primarily the microglia, with a release of neurotoxic concentrations of excitotoxins and pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and immune mediators. A large number of studies suggest that excitotoxicity plays a significant role in the neurotoxic action of a number of metals, including aluminum. Recently, researchers have found that while most of the chronic neurodegenerative effects of these metals are secondary to prolonged inflammation, it is the enhancement of excitotoxicity by the immune mediators that is responsible for most of the metalâ € ™ s toxicity. This enhancement occurs via a crosstalk between cytokine receptors and glutamate receptors. The author coined the name immunoexcitotoxicity to describe this process. This paper reviews the evidence linking immunoexcitotoxicity to aluminums neurotoxic effects.

    http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/Aluminum-Blaylock.pdf

    Autism Spectrum Disorders and Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants
    Lucija Tomljenovic, Russell L. Blaylock, Christopher A. Shaw

    Abstract
    Impaired brain function, excessive inflammation, and autoimmune manifestations are common in autism. Aluminum (Al), the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant, is a demonstrated neurotoxin and a strong immune stimulator. Hence, adjuvant Al has the necessary properties to induce neuroimmune disorders. Because peripheral immune stimuli in the postnatal period can compromise brain development and cause permanent neurological impairments, the possibility that such outcomes could also occur with administration of Al vaccine adjuvants needs to be considered. In regard to the risk of adjuvant toxicity in children, the following should be noted: (i) children should not be viewed as “small adults” as their unique physiology makes them more vulnerable to toxic insults; (ii) in adult humans Al adjuvants can cause a variety of serious autoimmune and inflammatory conditions including those affecting the brain, yet children are routinely exposed to much higher amounts of Al from vaccines than adults; (iii) compelling evidence has underscored the tight connection between the development of the immune system and that of the brain. Thus, it appears plausible that disruptions of critical events in immune development may also play a role in the establishment of neurobehavioral disorders; (iv) the same immune system components that play key roles in brain development appear to be targeted for impairment by Al adjuvants. In summary, research data suggests that vaccines containing Al may be a contributing etiological factor in the increasing incidence of autism.

    http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-4788-7_89

    Journal of American Nutraceutical Association 6: 21-35, 2003.
    Interaction of Cytokines, Excitotoxins, and Reactive Nitrogen and Oxygen Species in Autism Spectrum Disorders, Russell Blaylock, MD* Medical Director, Advanced Nutritional Concepts Ridgeland, Mississippi

    ABSTRACT

    There is growing and compelling evidence that excessive peripheral as well as central immune activation of brain microglia can result in alterations in brain growth and connectivity during rapid brain growth, the so-called “brain growth spurt.” A considerable amount of evidence, presented in this paper, demonstrates the deleterious effects of immune factors, such as cytokines, chemokines, and excitotoxins, when present in excess. The interaction between excitotoxicity, ROS and RNS injury and immune dysfunction is discussed. It is concluded that excessive activation of the brain’s immune system during critical growth periods can occur when vaccines are given as combination vaccines, using schedules that are too close together or by the use of certain live viruses in the vaccines.

    http://www.nutrimedical.com/news.jhtml?method=view&news.id=1084

  • Your own reply is a direct dodge in itself, and you are not fooling anyone.

  • Jesus baby

    “Those are not studies that Offit himself has done.”
    He has over 100, Lowell/tripnasty84. His name is on all of them because he was either the coauthor or author. All of your quacks combined have ZERO vaccine research papers.

  • Jesus baby

    So that leaves you at what we must call the Hubbs theory. Explain with the Hubbs theory how someone who is otherwise healthy could contract an infection, or is that impossible?

  • Jesus baby

    Readers, notice Lowell (aka tripnasty84) has fallen back on one of his classic defenses – the gish gallop. Well, yes, and insults and the tiresome pharma shill gambit, but link-spamming in all its glory is Hubbsie’s bread and butter.

  • Jesus baby

    Wow! He gave a talk at an anti-vax conference! 1 of the other 3 links does mention vaccines, but it’s an anti-vax book chapter. Keep looking Lowell/tripnasty84!

  • Jesus baby

    Dodge #5, Lowell/tripnasty84!

  • Wow how twisted, sick, and desperate was that reply? And yet you can answer to nothing and you can address nothing. You really should quit your obviously paid shilling and get a real job and before you look any more entirely mindless and foolish.

    I am going to ask you again.

    How many vaccines have you yourself had in lets say the last ten years; and I think you previously dodged this question as well, so called Jb. This is the current CDC adult vaccine schedule. How many of those vaccines have you had?

    You aren’t skipping out on your duty in providing for the assumed existing vaccine derived herd immunity of the adult public, are you? You can not advocate for vaccines and yet take no vaccines yourself.

    Being you are pro-vaccine and advocate for everyone to be vaccinated; which vaccines have you had, and what is your age; unless you are to cowardly to even tell us your age. Are you yourself then fully up to date as to this adult vaccine schedule? Which vaccines on that list, have you not had? If you are 26 or under you as well need the so proven harmless and so effective Gardasil 9. Or you have had the original Gardasil, you still need additionally the newly FDA approved Gardasil 9. Roll up your sleeves, and maybe even lower your pants?

    Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule—United States – 2016
    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-schedule.pdf

    Go ahead and answer directly the questions you see here.

  • You have presented with the same question before and again that was answered before. No one ever said that a health person can never get sick with an illness. However, their odds of not getting sick are much higher, and their recovery will be much easier and with far less risk of any serious problems.

    AGAIN, Mr Trolling Pro-vax Shill.

    How many vaccines have you yourself had in lets say the last ten years; and I think you previously dodged this question as well, so called Jb. This is the current CDC adult vaccine schedule. How many of those vaccines have you had?

    You aren’t skipping out on your duty in providing for the assumed existing vaccine derived herd immunity of the adult public, are you? You can not advocate for taking vaccines, if you are not taking them, yourself.

    Being you are pro-vaccine and advocate for everyone to be vaccinated, which vaccines have you had, and what is your age; unless you are to cowardly to even tell us your age. Are you yourself then fully up to date as to this adult vaccine schedule? Which vaccines on that list, have you not had? If you are 26 or under you as well need the so proven harmless and so effective Gardasil 9. Or you have had the original Gardasil, you still need additionally the newly FDA approved Gardasil 9. Roll up your sleeves, and maybe even lower your pants?

    Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule—United States – 2016
    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-schedule.pdf

    Go ahead and answer directly my questions.

  • Again, and as I said and you ignored it. Those are not studies, and certainly he has nothing of any scientific study relevance to the current vaccine risk issues. What those are-are article opinion pieces, and little more. They should not have been published in Pubmed and because they are not actually studies, and they are there just because his false status as an assumed authority. And you just had studies posted and replied with by me, showing you claim to be wrong. Several of those people do in fact have published studies. There is nothing you will not lie about, and there is nothing you will not attempt to deceive the readers with. The real quacks exist right at the CDC, FDA, IOM, and Pediatrics, etc.

  • Again claimed to by the only and the real questions dodger here. You really need to grow up. Get a real job.

  • What an in denial, demented, and twisted bunch of garbage. And really, what anti-vax book is that? You keep looking, fool. You have nothing and you are losing on every issue, and in ever reply you make. And how many times as as well were told that tripnasty84 name has nothing to do with me, and yet you ignore it. You have zero evidence at all for claiming that person as me, and you know it. And this is the existing puke level of twisted sickness found within the pro-vax shill side of the tracks, wow. Just keep exposing that.

  • Jesus baby

    Readers, see Lowell/tripnasty continue to try to steer the conversation away from his inability to give us one example of truthful vaccine research testimony given by the quack in the video he posted.

  • Jesus baby

    “No one ever said that a health(y) person can never get sick with an illness. However, their odds of not getting sick are much higher, and their recovery will be much easier and with far less risk of any serious problems.”
    That’s not a theory, Lowell/tripnasty84. That’s just everyday common sense. How does that in any way negate germ theory?

  • Again, you made the claims and it was clearly you that had the responsibility to show and prove that the statements made in that information were incorrect and false claims. You could not do it, and you know that you can’t. Again, I told you as well that every claim in both of those links was precisely true, and you simply can not refute that whatsoever. All you continue to do is play your sick games, and nothing more. Who here has actually answered to noting at all? Obviously that is you.

    Try it again. Continued harassment and falsely antagonizing me, has not and does not get you anywhere, as to debating and/or arguing the vaccine truth.

    Brand new podcast–listen to the doctor! Know a couple expecting their first child? Someone with young children? PLEASE share!!

    Dr. Thomas has the largest practice of pediatrics in Portland, OR for a reason–he tells the truth about vaccines and practices true informed consent. Please listen, please share!

    6. Dr. Paul Thomas Interview, How to End the Autism Epidemic
    https://soundcloud.com/user-507883655/6-dr-paul-thomas-interview-how-to-end-the-autism-epidemic

    Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D. – Preserve Medical Freedom – Vaccines Linked to Autism
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, as you can see from the extensive listings on PubMed, some of his papers are review articles/opinion pieces, but many are scientific studies. Some are bench work studies, some are actual clinical trials with people and stuff – about vaccines and immunology. All of your favorite quacks together have zippo.

  • Jesus baby

    Counting your dodges is boring, Lowell/tripnasty84, but that’s #6.

  • There are no studies on actual vaccine safety and nor actually showing vaccine safety.

    Millions of Children Infected with ‘Vaccine Safety Experts’ Rotateq Vaccine: Dr. Paul Offit

    Unfortunately for Dr. Offit (not so affectionately named Dr. Profit), a 2010 study published in Journal of Virology revealed that his multi-million dollar grossing patent on the Rotateq vaccine contains a live simian retrovirus (with a 96% match of certainty) that has likely infected millions of children over the past few years with a virus that causes great harm. Retrovirus infections are permanent, and can carry on indefinitely into future generations. In other words, once they are inserted into the human genome they can not be removed. View the entire PDF here.

    Moreover, a 2014 study published in Advances in Virology found Dr. Offit’s vaccine contains a “a baboon endogenous virus strain M7…likely due to the monkey cell line in which RotaTeq was produced from.” View the entire PDF here.

    Read more:
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/breaking-news-millions-children-infected-vaccine-safety-experts-rotateq-vaccine

    VACCINE CONTAMINATION: A THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH
    http://www.nvic.org/Downloads/Rotavirus-Campaign/VACCINE-CONTAMINATION–A-THREAT-TO-HUMAN-HEALTH.aspx

    Rotavirus Vaccines Still Contaminated With Pig Virus DNA
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/rotavirus-vaccines-still-contamined-pig-virus-dna

    Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct
    http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/

    Vaccine Papers
    Articles
    Aluminum

    Debunking Aluminum Adjuvant, Part 1
    The Foundation for Al Adjuvant Safety Is False
    RETRACTED PAPER: Brain Damage from Al Adjuvant and Gardasil
    UPDATE: Adjuvant Transport Gets Complicated
    Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #1: 100mcg/kg
    Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #2: 300mcg/kg
    Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #3: 550mcg/kg
    Danger of Aluminum in Vaccines
    Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct
    Vaccine Aluminum Travels Into The Brain

    http://vaccinepapers.org/

  • Again, no one said it was necessarily negated. You said that. I said the needed research continues to have not been done. I said as well that there is clearly sufficient cause and reason to do that research and which has actually been neglected for the past 100 years or more.

  • Idiot!!!

  • Jesus baby

    “And really, what anti-vax book is that?”
    It’s tedious spoon-feeding you, but that’s the quickest way to show our readers how clueless you are. In your last gish gallop the only potential paper that mentioned vaccines at all was in the Springer.com link. When you click the link it actually shows you a picture of the book it comes from. See? It’s just to the right of the title. It’s called “Comprehensive Guide to Autism”.
    So keep looking, Lowell/tripnasty84!

  • Jesus baby

    Readers, Lowell/tripnasty84 has now come full circle, reposting the same YouTube video about an anti-vax pediatrician giving testimony on vaccine research to the Oregon state senate, and from which he can’t point to a single truthful item.

  • Jesus baby

    “There are no studies on actual vaccine safety and nor actually showing vaccine safety.”

    Oh what tangled webs we weave when we practice to deceive:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14760258

  • Jesus baby

    So you DO believe in germ theory now?

  • Jesus baby

    Yawn. #7.

  • The only one being fed here with a spoon is you, and as to the doses of reality that you refuse to face and admit to. You didn’t even have the balls to post the actual link to the study, but just a general springer link. You, keep looking, desperate shill so called Jesus baby.

    When you click the book link titled Comprehensive Guide to Autism, it doesn’t give you anything but more specifics on the full study. Look as well at the long list of other study references that also go with that study. Nothing wrong with that. Pretty impressive all in all, if you ask me.

    http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-4788-7_89#page-1

    Autism Spectrum Disorders and Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants
    Lucija Tomljenovic, Russell L. Blaylock, Christopher A. Shaw

    Abstract

    Impaired brain function, excessive inflammation, and autoimmune manifestations are common in autism. Aluminum (Al), the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant, is a demonstrated neurotoxin and a strong immune stimulator. Hence, adjuvant Al has the necessary properties to induce neuroimmune disorders. Because peripheral immune stimuli in the postnatal period can compromise brain development and cause permanent neurological impairments, the possibility that such outcomes could also occur with administration of Al vaccine adjuvants needs to be considered. In regard to the risk of adjuvant toxicity in children, the following should be noted: (i) children should not be viewed as “small adults” as their unique physiology makes them more vulnerable to toxic insults; (ii) in adult humans Al adjuvants can cause a variety of serious autoimmune and inflammatory conditions including those affecting the brain, yet children are routinely exposed to much higher amounts of Al from vaccines than adults; (iii) compelling evidence has underscored the tight connection between the development of the immune system and that of the brain. Thus, it appears plausible that disruptions of critical events in immune development may also play a role in the establishment of neurobehavioral disorders; (iv) the same immune system components that play key roles in brain development appear to be targeted for impairment by Al adjuvants. In summary, research data suggests that vaccines containing Al may be a contributing etiological factor in the increasing incidence of autism.

    http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-4788-7_89

  • So you can’t answer any of the questions that I have put in front of you. You continue to ignore them, and falsely call me the person who is dodging the questions. You do that even though I have repeatedly answered directly to the replies you have made, and more than sufficiently. Your credibility level at this point is obviously in the negative numbers; but then it always was.

  • Jesus baby

    It’s not a study, Lowell/tripnasty84. It’s a chapter in a book. It’s not even a review article, really. It’s more of an anti-vax opinion piece.
    So keep looking!
    And why would I need balls to repost your own link, idjit. Did you forget already?

  • That was already clearly answered. Just quit repeatedly doing nothing but falsely badgering, harassing, and antagonizing.

  • Jesus baby

    Zzzzzz. #8.

  • Jesus baby

    Lol you never clearly answer anything, Lowell/tripnasty84, just like with this answer. We’ll just say you’ve given up on Bechamp’s theory and believe in but are moderately skeptical about germ theory. I think you’re almost ready to put on your big boy pants!

  • Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of a live, quadrivalent human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine in healthy infants. (thats your study)

    It has already been determined that Offits rotavirus vaccine was not safe due to more than one reason.

    Rotavirus vaccine clearly sheds to other children the virus, and thus does more harm than good.

    Lancet Infect Dis. 2008 Oct;8(10):642-9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70231-7.
    Rotavirus vaccines: viral shedding and risk of transmission.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18922486

    Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Jul;34(7):763-8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000715.
    Risk of Intussusception After Rotavirus Vaccination: Meta-analysis of Postlicensure Studies.

    CONCLUSIONS:
    This meta-analysis showed a similar increased risk of intussusception, during the first 7 days after administration of dose 1 and, to a lesser extent, dose 2, for both currently available rotavirus vaccines. This suggests that intussusception may be a class effect of currently available oral rotavirus vaccines.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069948

    They didn’t care about the intestinal damage that the MMR vaccine did, either. Just sell the vaccine and profit from it.

    Millions of Children Infected with ‘Vaccine Safety Experts’ Rotateq Vaccine: Dr. Paul Offit

    Unfortunately for Dr. Offit (not so affectionately named Dr. Profit), a 2010 study published in Journal of Virology revealed that his multi-million dollar grossing patent on the Rotateq vaccine contains a live simian retrovirus (with a 96% match of certainty) that has likely infected millions of children over the past few years with a virus that causes great harm. Retrovirus infections are permanent, and can carry on indefinitely into future generations. In other words, once they are inserted into the human genome they can not be removed. View the entire PDF here.

    Moreover, a 2014 study published in Advances in Virology found Dr. Offit’s vaccine contains a “a baboon endogenous virus strain M7…likely due to the monkey cell line in which RotaTeq was produced from.” View the entire PDF here.

    Read more:
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/breaking-news-millions-children-infected-vaccine-safety-experts-rotateq-vaccine

    VACCINE CONTAMINATION: A THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH
    http://www.nvic.org/Downloads/Rotavirus-Campaign/VACCINE-CONTAMINATION–A-THREAT-TO-HUMAN-HEALTH.aspx

    Rotavirus Vaccines Still Contaminated With Pig Virus DNA
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/rotavirus-vaccines-still-contamined-pig-virus-dna

  • Start answering those questions instead of simply and only attempting to bury them behind you with more of your actually uneducated, and continued mindless replies.

  • It is not just an opinion piece and that study of the data described is as well backed with endless scientific study references; and that as I just said. That obviously does make a review article and just as much as any CDC listed study in which they claim it to be a review article. Did you read through those supporting references? Of course not, and your level of hypocrisy is endless.

    You didn’t post the actual link because you were deceptively evading it and deliberately; and that is why you have no balls, fool.

  • Again. How many vaccines have you yourself had in lets say the last ten years; and I think you previously dodged this question as well, so called Jb. This is the current CDC adult vaccine schedule. How many of those vaccines have you had?

    You aren’t skipping out on your duty in providing for the assumed existing vaccine derived herd immunity of the adult public, are you? You can not advocate vaccines for others, and then refuse to take them yourself. Just answer the question, here.

    Being you are pro-vaccine and advocate for everyone to be vaccinated, which vaccines have you had, and what is your age; unless you are to cowardly to even tell us your age. Are you yourself then fully up to date as to this adult vaccine schedule? Which vaccines on that list, have you not had? If you are 26 or under you as well need the so proven harmless and so effective Gardasil 9. Or you have had the original Gardasil, you still need additionally the newly FDA approved Gardasil 9. Roll up your sleeves, and maybe even lower your pants?

    Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule—United States – 2016
    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-schedule.pdf

    Go ahead and answer directly my questions.

  • As I said the only way you can keep on arguing, falsely harassing and antagonizing, is to ignore everything I have said. That is what you are doing. That and as well in addition to that, you are obviously lacking in the research and education department enough to continue to fail to understand almost anything and everything put forth. You wouldn’t be able to put big boy pants on and run along side me in any honesty, and in way and/or any form at all, and if you tried …fool. But your delusions will keep caring you as far as you choose that to happen, and in your obviously delusional world.

  • Jesus baby

    I was destroying your ignorant claim that Offit hadn’t published vaccine safety research. I could not care less what anti-vaxxers write about the vaccine, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    #9

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, I told you it was the Springer link. You only had one Springer link in that gish gallop so I tried to make it simple enough for you to understand . I failed. And anyway it’s just a book chapter so keep looking.

  • Jesus baby

    #9? I think I’ve lost count.

  • Jesus baby

    What?

  • Get your BIG boy pants on fool. Obviously you do not want to discuss the issue of vaccines and vaccine risk, and on a vaccine truth article site. Its long past time that you put up or shut up. You cant even begin to address the existing, issues. Just like the 9 question for the pro-vaxers that you can not address and answer to. Get started with going to the CDC or Offit and acquire some counter studies and data to refute this information?

    Realize the major differences between natural immunity, and so called vaccine derived immunity. They are entirely different pathways, the vaccine derived type, being actually very unatural.
    How Do Vaccines Work? Immune Mechanisms and Consequences
    by Stephen C. Marini, DC, PhD

    From Dr. Moskowitz’s previous article in Pathways (issue 10), we learned that the theoretical effect of vaccines on the infectious diseases they are designed to protect against is misleading at best…..

    Read more:
    http://pathwaystofamilywellness.org/Informed-Choice/how-do-vaccines-work-immune-mechanisms-and-consequences.html

    Your Immune System, How It Works And How Vaccines Damage It
    https://authenticenlightenment.com/2015/03/24/your-immune-system-how-it-works-and-how-vaccines-damage-it/

    How Vaccines Dysregulate The Immune System
    http://gdsajj.wordpress.com/2011/08/05/how-vaccines-dysregulate-the-immune-system/

    Vaccinations Cause Chronic Immune System Dysregulation
    http://www.liveto110.com/vaccinations-cause-chronic-immune-system-dysregulation/

    Anatomy and Physiology of the Immune System, Part 4
    How pharmaceuticals destroy nature
    http://jonbarron.org/article/anatomy-and-physiology-immune-system-part-4#.UwH0pvldXbY

    Understanding immunity requires more than immunology
    http://www.nature.com/ni/journal/v11/n7/full/ni0710-561.html

    An Immune Disorder at the Root of Autism
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/26/opinion/sunday/immune-disorders-and-autism.html/?pagewanted=all&_r=0

    A Mouse Model for the Immune Dysregulation Subtype of Autism, (And they would still claim to that there is no way vaccines have and can cause autism? That conclusion is of course clearly preposterous.)
    http://tacanowblog.com/2012/07/23/a-mouse-model-for-the-immune-dysregulation-subtype-of-autism/

    N Am J Med Sci. 2009 July; 1(2): 28–47.
    What is regressive autism and why does it occur? Is it the consequence of multi-systemic dysfunction affecting the elimination of heavy metals and the ability to regulate neural temperature?
    Graham E. Ewing

    Abstract
    There is a compelling argument that the occurrence of regressive autism is attributable to genetic and chromosomal abnormalities, arising from the overuse of vaccines, which subsequently affects the stability and function of the autonomic nervous system and physiological systems. That sense perception is linked to the autonomic nervous system and the function of the physiological systems enables us to examine the significance of autistic symptoms from a systemic perspective. Failure of the excretory system influences elimination of heavy metals and facilitates their accumulation and subsequent manifestation as neurotoxins: the long-term consequences of which would lead to neurodegeneration, cognitive and developmental problems. It may also influence regulation of neural hyperthermia. This article explores the issues and concludes that sensory dysfunction and systemic failure, manifested as autism, is the inevitable consequence arising from subtle DNA alteration and consequently from the overuse of vaccines.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/ (Full study)

    Vaccines and Autism, ADHD and Asthma
    Immunizations and the Immunocompromised

    “Yet, no doctor is trained to look for this type of immunodeficiency and/or the kind of immune dysregulation that multiple vaccine can cause; which lead to so called inflammatory syndromes and resulting overactivation of the brains microglia cells and resulting chronic levels of brain inflammation now ever more increasingly found in studies of those with autism. Vaccine aluminum adjuvants in several studies have been fund as well to in itself cause this stated inflammation.

    http://www.epidemicanswers.org/vaccines-and-autism-adhd-and-asthma/

    Case Report – Open Access
    Evidence that Food Proteins in Vaccines Cause the Development of Food Allergies and Its Implications for Vaccine Policy

    Abstract

    Nobel Laureate Charles Richet demonstrated over a hundred years ago that injecting a protein into animals or humans causes immune system sensitization to that protein. Subsequent exposure to the protein can result in allergic reactions or anaphylaxis. This fact has since been demonstrated over and over again in humans and animal models. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) confirmed that food proteins in vaccines cause food allergy, in its 2011 report on vaccine adverse events. The IOM’s confirmation is the latest and most authoritative since Dr. Richet’s discovery. Many vaccines and injections contain food proteins. Many studies since 1940 have demonstrated that food proteins in vaccines cause sensitization in humans. Allergens in vaccines are not fully disclosed. No safe dosage level for injected allergens has been established. As a result, allergen quantities in vaccines and injections are not regulated. Allergen quantities in vaccine excipients are also not regulated. It has been demonstrated that a smaller quantity of allergen is needed to cause sensitization than elicitation. It is well recognized that many currently approved vaccines have enough allergen to cause anaphylaxis. Therefore, they contain more than enough allergen to cause sensitization. Children today have fewer childhood infectious diseases. They have less exposure to helminths. C-section birth rates have increased in the last few decades by 50%. C-section births are known to result in sub-optimal gut micro biome in the newborn. All the above result in an immune imbalance biased towards atopy. Vaccineschedules today include 30-40 shots. Up to five shots may be simultaneously administered in one sitting. Vaccines contain adjuvants such as pertussis toxins and aluminum compounds that also bias towards allergy. Adjuvants also increase the immunogenicity of injected food proteins. This combination of atopic children and food protein injection along with adjuvants, contributes to millions developing lifethreatening food allergies. Given the scale and severity of the food allergy epidemic, urgent action is needed to change vaccinepolicy concerning vaccine specifications, manufacture, vaccine package insert documentation requirements, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the National Vaccine Injury compensation program. Many researchers have called for the removal of food proteins from vaccines and re-evaluation of adjuvants such as aluminum compounds. In the interim, food allergy warnings can be included in vaccine package inserts. Simultaneous administration of multiple vaccines can be stopped to avoid the combined negative effects of multiple food proteins and adjuvants.

    http://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/evidence-that-food-proteins-in-vaccines-cause-the-development-of-foodallergies-and-its-implications-for-vaccine-policy-2329-6631-1000137.php?aid=60994

    PDF of the study:
    http://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/evidence-that-food-proteins-in-vaccines-cause-the-development-of-foodallergies-and-its-implications-for-vaccine-policy-2329-6631-1000137.pdf

    Continued:

  • Continuation:

    The latest bulwark of aluminum adjuvant and heavy metals related vaccine studies. (There exist as we,, many more studies, all of which the CDC will never address.)

    N Am J Med Sci. 2009 July; 1(2): 28–47.
    What is regressive autism and why does it occur? Is it the consequence of multi-systemic dysfunction affecting the elimination of heavy metals and the ability to regulate neural temperature?
    Graham E. Ewing

    Abstract
    There is a compelling argument that the occurrence of regressive autism is attributable to genetic and chromosomal abnormalities, arising from the overuse of vaccines, which subsequently affects the stability and function of the autonomic nervous system and physiological systems. That sense perception is linked to the autonomic nervous system and the function of the physiological systems enables us to examine the significance of autistic symptoms from a systemic perspective. Failure of the excretory system influences elimination of heavy metals and facilitates their accumulation and subsequent manifestation as neurotoxins: the long-term consequences of which would lead to neurodegeneration, cognitive and developmental problems. It may also influence regulation of neural hyperthermia. This article explores the issues and concludes that sensory dysfunction and systemic failure, manifested as autism, is the inevitable consequence arising from subtle DNA alteration and consequently from the overuse of vaccines.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/ (Full study)

    Evidence of oxidative damage and inflammation associated with low glutathione redox status in the autism brain
    S Rose1, S Melnyk1, O Pavliv1, S Bai1, T G Nick1, R E Frye1 and S J James1
    1Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Little Rock, AR, USA
    Accepted 31 May 2012

    Abstract
    Despite increasing evidence of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of autism, most studies have not evaluated biomarkers within specific brain regions, and the functional consequences of oxidative stress remain relatively understudied. We examined frozen samples from the cerebellum and temporal cortex (Brodmann area 22 (BA22)) from individuals with autism and unaffected controls (n=15 and n=12 per group, respectively). Biomarkers of oxidative stress, including reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG) and glutathione redox/antioxidant capacity (GSH/GSSG), were measured. Biomarkers of oxidative protein damage (3-nitrotyrosine; 3-NT) and oxidative DNA damage (8-oxo-deoxyguanosine; 8-oxo-dG) were also assessed. Functional indicators of oxidative stress included relative levels of 3-chlorotyrosine (3-CT), an established biomarker of a chronic inflammatory response, and aconitase activity, a biomarker of mitochondrial superoxide production. Consistent with previous studies on plasma and immune cells, GSH and GSH/GSSG were significantly decreased in both autism cerebellum (P<0.01) and BA22 (P<0.01). There was a significant increase in 3-NT in the autism cerebellum and BA22 (P<0.01). Similarly, 8-oxo-dG was significantly increased in autism cerebellum and BA22 (P<0.01 and P=0.01, respectively), and was inversely correlated with GSH/GSSG in the cerebellum (P<0.01). There was a significant increase in 3-CT levels in both brain regions (P<0.01), whereas aconitase activity was significantly decreased in autism cerebellum (P<0.01), and was negatively correlated with GSH/GSSG (P=0.01). Together, these results indicate that decreased GSH/GSSG redox/antioxidant capacity and increased oxidative stress in the autism brain may have functional consequence in terms of a chronic inflammatory response, increased mitochondrial superoxide production, and oxidative protein and DNA damage.

    http://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v2/n7/full/tp201261a.html

    Here is the said and so called Adams study.

    Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013 Feb;151(2):171-80. doi: 10.1007/s12011-012-9551-1. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
    Toxicological status of children with autism vs. neurotypical children and the association with autism severity.
    Adams JB, Audhya T, McDonough-Means S, Rubin RA, Quig D, Geis E, Gehn E, Loresto M, Mitchell J, Atwood S, Barnhouse S, Lee W.

    Abstract
    This study investigates both the level of toxic metals in children with autism and the possible association of those toxic metals with autism severity. This study involved 55 children with autism ages 5-16 years compared to 44 controls with similar age and gender. The study included measurements of toxic metals in whole blood, red blood cells (RBC), and urine. The autism group had higher levels of lead in RBC (+41 %, p = 0.002) and higher urinary levels of lead (+74 %, p = 0.02), thallium (+77 %, p = 0.0001), tin (+115 %, p = 0.01), and tungsten (+44 %, p = 0.00005). However, the autism group had slightly lower levels of cadmium in whole blood (-19 %, p = 0.003). A stepwise, multiple linear regression analysis found a strong association of levels of toxic metals with variation in the degree of severity of autism for all the severity scales (adjusted R(2) of 0.38-0.47, p < 0.0003). Cadmium (whole blood) and mercury (whole blood and RBC) were the most consistently significant variables. Overall, children with autism have higher average levels of several toxic metals, and levels of several toxic metals are strongly associated with variations in the severity of autism for all three of the autism severity scales investigated.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23192845

    Surg Neurol Int. 2011;
    Published online 2011 July 30.
    Immunoexcitotoxicity as a central mechanism in chronic traumatic encephalopathy—A unifying hypothesis

    Russell L. Blaylock* and Joseph Maroon1

    Abstract
    Some individuals suffering from mild traumatic brain injuries, especially repetitive mild concussions, are thought to develop a slowly progressive encephalopathy characterized by a number of the neuropathological elements shared with various neurodegenerative diseases. A central pathological mechanism explaining the development of progressive neurodegeneration in this subset of individuals has not been elucidated. Yet, a large number of studies indicate that a process called immunoexcitotoxicity may be playing a central role in many neurodegenerative diseases including chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). The term immunoexcitotoxicity was first coined by the lead author to explain the evolving pathological and neurodevelopmental changes in autism and the Gulf War Syndrome, but it can be applied to a number of neurodegenerative disorders. The interaction between immune receptors within the central nervous system (CNS) and excitatory glutamate receptors trigger a series of events, such as extensive reactive oxygen species/reactive nitrogen species generation, accumulation of lipid peroxidation products, and prostaglandin activation, which then leads to dendritic retraction, synaptic injury, damage to microtubules, and mitochondrial suppression. In this paper, we discuss the mechanism of immunoexcitotoxicity and its link to each of the pathophysiological and neurochemical events previously described with CTE, with special emphasis on the observed accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157093/

    Autism Spectrum Disorders and Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants
    Lucija Tomljenovic, Russell L. Blaylock, Christopher A. Shaw

    Abstract
    Impaired brain function, excessive inflammation, and autoimmune manifestations are common in autism. Aluminum (Al), the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant, is a demonstrated neurotoxin and a strong immune stimulator. Hence, adjuvant Al has the necessary properties to induce neuroimmune disorders. Because peripheral immune stimuli in the postnatal period can compromise brain development and cause permanent neurological impairments, the possibility that such outcomes could also occur with administration of Al vaccine adjuvants needs to be considered. In regard to the risk of adjuvant toxicity in children, the following should be noted: (i) children should not be viewed as “small adults” as their unique physiology makes them more vulnerable to toxic insults; (ii) in adult humans Al adjuvants can cause a variety of serious autoimmune and inflammatory conditions including those affecting the brain, yet children are routinely exposed to much higher amounts of Al from vaccines than adults; (iii) compelling evidence has underscored the tight connection between the development of the immune system and that of the brain. Thus, it appears plausible that disruptions of critical events in immune development may also play a role in the establishment of neurobehavioral disorders; (iv) the same immune system components that play key roles in brain development appear to be targeted for impairment by Al adjuvants. In summary, research data suggests that vaccines containing Al may be a contributing etiological factor in the increasing incidence of autism.

    http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-4788-7_89

    Acetaminophen as well reduces glutathione levels, in addition to that caused by vaccines, in the depletion of glutathione. The more vaccines given, the worse it gets. If you have a child that is having a serious reaction to vaccines, the last thing you should ever give them is Tylenol.

    Study: Evidence that Acetaminophen, Especially in Conjunction with Vaccines, is a Major Cause of Autism and Asthma
    http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/study-evidence-that-acetaminophen-especially-in-conjunction-with-vaccines-is-a-major-cause-of-autism-and-asthma/

    Evidence that Increased Acetaminophen use in Genetically Vulnerable Children Appears to be a Major Cause of the Epidemics of Autism, Attention Deficit with Hyperactivity, and Asthma
    http://www.greatplainslaboratory.com/home/eng/Acetaminophen.asp

    Journal of Neuroinflammation
    The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in neurotoxic prion peptide-induced microglial activation

    Results
    We found that that PrP106-126-induced IL-1β release depends on NALP3 inflammasome activation, that inflammasome activation is required for the synthesis of pro-inflammatory and chemotactic factors by PrP106-126-activated microglia, that inhibition of NF-κB activation abrogated PrP106-126-induced NALP3 upregulation, and that potassium efflux and production of reactive oxygen species were implicated in PrP106-126-induced NALP3 inflammasome activation in microglia.

    Conclusions
    We conclude that the NALP3 inflammasome is involved in neurotoxic prion peptide-induced microglial activation. To our knowledge, this is the first time that strong evidence for the involvement of NALP3 inflammasome in prion-associated inflammation has been found.

    Read more:
    http://jneuroinflammation.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-2094-9-73

    Nanomolar aluminum induces pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic gene expression in human brain cells in primary culture
    Walter J. Lukiw a,*, Maire E. Percy b, Theo P. Kruck b

    Excerpt:

    The promoters of genes up-regulated by aluminum are enriched in binding sites for the stress-inducible transcription factors HIF-1 and NF-kappaB, suggesting a role for aluminum, HIF-1 and NF-kappaB in driving atypical, pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic gene expression. The effect of aluminum on specific stress-related gene expression patterns in human brain cells clearly warrant further investigation.

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162013405001182

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15961160

    BRAIN’S IMMUNE SYSTEM TRIGGERED IN AUTISM
    http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2004/11_15a_04.html

    Ann Neurol. 2005 Jan;57(1):67-81.
    Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism.
    Vargas DL, Nascimbene C, Krishnan C, Zimmerman AW, Pardo CA.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15546155

    Neuro-inflammation, blood-brain barrier, seizures and autism
    http://jneuroinflammation.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-2094-8-168

    Autism Spectrum Disorders and Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants
    Lucija Tomljenovic, Russell L. Blaylock, Christopher A. Shaw

    Abstract
    Impaired brain function, excessive inflammation, and autoimmune manifestations are common in autism. Aluminum (Al), the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant, is a demonstrated neurotoxin and a strong immune stimulator. Hence, adjuvant Al has the necessary properties to induce neuroimmune disorders. Because peripheral immune stimuli in the postnatal period can compromise brain development and cause permanent neurological impairments, the possibility that such outcomes could also occur with administration of Al vaccine adjuvants needs to be considered. In regard to the risk of adjuvant toxicity in children, the following should be noted: (i) children should not be viewed as “small adults” as their unique physiology makes them more vulnerable to toxic insults; (ii) in adult humans Al adjuvants can cause a variety of serious autoimmune and inflammatory conditions including those affecting the brain, yet children are routinely exposed to much higher amounts of Al from vaccines than adults; (iii) compelling evidence has underscored the tight connection between the development of the immune system and that of the brain. Thus, it appears plausible that disruptions of critical events in immune development may also play a role in the establishment of neurobehavioral disorders; (iv) the same immune system components that play key roles in brain development appear to be targeted for impairment by Al adjuvants. In summary, research data suggests that vaccines containing Al may be a contributing etiological factor in the increasing incidence of autism.

    http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-4788-7_89

    And what do multiple vaccines combined with aluminum adjuvants do? They over-activate the brains microglia cells and with resulting long term levels of brain inflammation. The studies and the data are all there on the page that I gave you

    Journal of American Nutraceutical Association 6: 21-35, 2003.
    Interaction of Cytokines, Excitotoxins, and Reactive Nitrogen and Oxygen Species in Autism Spectrum Disorders, Russell Blaylock, MD* Medical Director, Advanced Nutritional Concepts Ridgeland, Mississippi

    ABSTRACT

    There is growing and compelling evidence that excessive peripheral as well as central immune activation of brain microglia can result in alterations in brain growth and connectivity during rapid brain growth, the so-called "brain growth spurt." A considerable amount of evidence, presented in this paper, demonstrates the deleterious effects of immune factors, such as cytokines, chemokines, and excitotoxins, when present in excess. The interaction between excitotoxicity, ROS and RNS injury and immune dysfunction is discussed. It is concluded that excessive activation of the brain's immune system during critical growth periods can occur when vaccines are given as combination vaccines, using schedules that are too close together or by the use of certain live viruses in the vaccines.

    http://www.nutrimedical.com/news.jhtml?method=view&news.id=1084

    Front Neurol. 2015; 6: 4.
    Published online 2015 Feb 5. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00004
    PMCID: PMC4318414
    Biopersistence and Brain Translocation of Aluminum Adjuvants of Vaccines

    Abstract
    Aluminum oxyhydroxide (alum) is a crystalline compound widely used as an immunological adjuvant of vaccines. Concerns linked to the use of alum particles emerged following recognition of their causative role in the so-called macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF) lesion detected in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue/syndrome. MMF revealed an unexpectedly long-lasting biopersistence of alum within immune cells in presumably susceptible individuals, stressing the previous fundamental misconception of its biodisposition. We previously showed that poorly biodegradable aluminum-coated particles injected into muscle are promptly phagocytosed in muscle and the draining lymph nodes, and can disseminate within phagocytic cells throughout the body and slowly accumulate in brain. This strongly suggests that long-term adjuvant biopersistence within phagocytic cells is a prerequisite for slow brain translocation and delayed neurotoxicity. The understanding of basic mechanisms of particle biopersistence and brain translocation represents a major health challenge, since it could help to define susceptibility factors to develop chronic neurotoxic damage. Biopersistence of alum may be linked to its lysosome-destabilizing effect, which is likely due to direct crystal-induced rupture of phagolysosomal membranes. Macrophages that continuously perceive foreign particles in their cytosol will likely reiterate, with variable interindividual efficiency, a dedicated form of autophagy (xenophagy) until they dispose of alien materials. Successful compartmentalization of particles within double membrane autophagosomes and subsequent fusion with repaired and re-acidified lysosomes will expose alum to lysosomal acidic pH, the sole factor that can solubilize alum particles. Brain translocation of alum particles is linked to a Trojan horse mechanism previously described for infectious particles (HIV, HCV), that obeys to CCL2, signaling the major inflammatory monocyte chemoattractant.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318414/

    Research Article
    The Severity of Autism Is Associated with Toxic Metal Body Burden and Red Blood Cell Glutathione Levels

    Brain translocation of alum particles is linked to a Trojan horse mechanism previously described for infectious particles (HIV, HCV), that obeys to CCL2, signaling the major inflammatory monocyte chemoattractant.

    Read more:
    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2009/532640/ (full study)

    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;20(7):598-601.
    Infants' exposure to aluminum from vaccines and breast milk during the first 6 months.

    Pragmatic vaccine safety needs to embrace conventional toxicology, addressing especial characteristics of unborn fetuses, neonates and infants exposed to low levels of aluminum, and ethylmercury traditionally considered innocuous to the central nervous system.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20010978

    10 Signs of Vaccine Reaction and Damage

    #1 High-Pitched Crying or Arching Back

    High-pitched crying and discomfort, such as arching the back when laid down, is a clear indication of encephalitis, brain inflammation, which is a common vaccine reaction. Large amounts of bacteria, viruses, and toxins create a hyper- immuneresponse, prompting severe, sometimes deadly, inflammation in the brain.

    If your child will not sleep, is uncomfortable, and crying incessantly post vaccination (up to 21 plus days), take them to the emergency room immediately.

    #2 Severe Swelling at Site

    Severe inflammation at the injection site can be a sign of an allergic reaction or other hyper- immune reaction. Review the vaccine insert (before vaccinating) and try to outline what allergy (peanut, milk, egg) may have been created. If your doctor cannot explain what reaction occurred, then you should consider not vaccinating to prevent any further damage.

    Read the vaccine insert before vaccinating, and be sure the doctor is using the correct method of injection. Injecting in the incorrect method can deliver a serious reaction.

    10 Signs of Vaccine Reaction and Damage

    #1 High-Pitched Crying or Arching Back

    High-pitched crying and discomfort, such as arching the back when laid down, is a clear indication of encephalitis, brain inflammation, which is a common vaccine reaction. Large amounts of bacteria, viruses, and toxins create a hyper- immuneresponse, prompting severe, sometimes deadly, inflammation in the brain.

    If your child will not sleep, is uncomfortable, and crying incessantly post vaccination (up to 21 plus days), take them to the emergency room immediately.

    #2 Severe Swelling at Site

    #3 High Fever and/or Febrile Seizures

    #4 Rash

    #5 Eczema, Allergies and Asthma

    #6 Anaphylaxis and Slowed Breathing Patterns

    #7 Loss of Facial and Eye Symmetry and Itching/Numbness in Extremities

    When your immune system responds to a threat, it produces more white blood cells. Your white blood cells are substantially larger than your red, and this becomes an issue when your immune system is kicked into overdrive and delivers large quantities of white blood cells to your smallest blood vessels, your capillaries. Your capillaries are so small that white blood vessels have to squeeze through one by one.

    The smallest of these vessels are located in your hands, feet, nose and brain, particularly by the area which controls speech. When too many white blood cells are released, they cannot squeeze through and the blood and oxygen supply is limited for a period of time, and if severe enough, forever. This causes stroke in the brain, and can be seen by loss of facial asymmetry (one side of the face looks different than the other) and loss of tone around the eyes, cheeks, and mouth.

    Read more:
    http://my.personalmedicare.com/10-signs-of-a-vaccine-reaction-and-damage/

    Continued:

  • Continuation:

    A Parent’s Primer: Vasculitis and Vaccines, (more inflammation problems, likely due to the aluminum adjuvants, this time its in the blood vessels)
    http://sanevax.org/a-parents-primer-vasculitis-and-vaccines/

    Here, you want evidence that vaccines do far more harm than good, read this extensive article, with 371 references. Same thing that Dr Russell Blaylock puts forth in regard to vaccine caused brain inflammation,

    Neurological and Immune Reactive Conditions Affecting Kids

    Brain inflammation has been found to be a major factor in autism, and in the sometimes related metabolic syndrome. Causes of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidative-related brain inflammation that have been documented include vaccines, mercury, aluminum, excitotoxins, such as MSG, aspartame, food additives, and overconsumption of high-fructose corn sweetener. These cause high glutamate levels in the brain and oxidative damage, resulting in inflammation of the brain and immune system, as well as damage to brain microglia cells and the mitochondrial DNA, high triglycerides, metabolic syndrome, etc. These have been found to be factors in most chronic neurological diseases including autism and diabetes.

    Read more:
    http://amalgam.org/373-2/

    Lesson 2—Explore/Explain
    Neurons, Brain Chemistry, and Neurotransmission
    The Brain Is Made Up of Nerve Cells and Glial Cells
    https://science.education.nih.gov/supplements/nih2/addiction/guide/lesson2-1.html

    Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2013 Apr;9(4):361-73. doi: 10.1586/eci.13.2.
    Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (Shoenfeld’s syndrome): clinical and immunological spectrum.
    Vera-Lastra O, Medina G, Cruz-Dominguez Mdel P, Jara LJ, Shoenfeld Y.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23557271

    Curr Med Chem. 2013;20(32):4030-6.
    Autoimmune (auto-inflammatory) syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA)–animal models as a proof of concept.
    Cruz-Tapias P, Agmon-Levin N, Israeli E, Anaya JM, Shoenfeld Y.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23992328

    Reumatismo. 2011;63(2):63-6.
    ‘ASIA’ – Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants: even and odd.
    Perricone C, Alessandri C, Valesini G.
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21776441

    Evidence of oxidative damage and inflammation associated with low glutathione redox status in the autism brain

    Together, these results indicate that decreased GSH/GSSG redox/antioxidant capacity and increased oxidative stress in the autism brain may have functional consequence in terms of a chronic inflammatory response, increased mitochondrial superoxide production, and oxidative protein and DNA damage.

    Read more:
    http://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v2/n7/full/tp201261a.html

    Neuro-inflammation, blood-brain barrier, seizures and autism
    Theoharis C Theoharides1234* and Bodi Zhang12

    Abstract
    Many children with Autism Spectrum Diseases (ASD) present with seizure activity, but the pathogenesis is not understood. Recent evidence indicates that neuro-inflammation could contribute to seizures. We hypothesize that brain mast cell activation due to allergic, environmental and/or stress triggers could lead to focal disruption of the blood-brain barrier and neuro-inflammation, thus contributing to the development of seizures. Treating neuro-inflammation may be useful when anti-seizure medications are ineffective.

    http://www.jneuroinflammation.com/content/8/1/168

    And where does that inflammation come from? It comes from aluminum adjuvants and the cytokine reactivity of the immune system after receiving vaccines, and more-so after getting multiple vaccines.

    Microglia in the developing brain: A potential target with lifetime effects
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161813X12000277

    Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Jul;20(2):467-73.
    Complete Freunds adjuvant-induced peripheral inflammation evokes glial activation and proinflammatory cytokine expression in the CNS.

    These findings further support a unifying theory that glial activation and enhanced cytokine expression at the CNS have a role in eliciting behavioral hypersensitivity.

    Read more:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15233755

    Vaccines and Brain Inflammation, Harold Buttram, MD , and Catherine Frompovich
    http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2011/06/01/vaccines-and-brain-inflammation/

    Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity

    Conclusions/Significance

    Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.

    http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0008382 (Full study)

    Aluminum Adjuvants – Lack of Safety Data – Lack of Aluminum Adjuvant Safety Studies, (there are zero actually existing vaccine safety studies on aluminum adjuvants)
    http://www.vacfacts.info/aluminum-vaccine-adjuvants.html

    3 IMPORTANT REASONS WHY ALUMINUM SHOULD NOT BE PUT INTO VACCINES, (all of this is backed by multiple source studies)

    No Safety Assessments (Toxicity Studies) For Vaccine Ingredients

    Aluminum Is An Experimentally Demonstrated Neurotoxin

    The Body Reacts Differently To Aluminum Adjuvants In Vaccines Than To Aluminum Absorbed Into The Body From Food, Water, Medicine, etc…

    Read more:
    http://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/09/19/3-important-reasons-why-aluminum-should-not-be-put-into-vaccines/

    Infant Immunity Part II: Aluminum, vaccines, and fetal brain development, with Dr. Suzanne Humphries
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdSCY7W-BUo

    Vaccine aluminum adjuvant causation of neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism, (more studies)
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-aluminum-adjuvant-causation-of-neuroglial-activation-and-neuroinflammation-in-the-brain-of-patients-with-autism.html

    Vaccine aluminum adjuvant causation of neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism- Page 2
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-aluminum-adjuvant-causation-of-neuroglial-activation-and-neuroinflammation-in-the-brain-of-patients-with-autism–page-2.html

    More Aluminum Adjuvant Harm Done Studies
    http://www.vacfacts.info/more-aluminum-adjuvant-harm-done-studies.html

    Zeta Potential
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeta_potential

    Using “Zeta Potential” as a Healing Tool
    http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/new/mcdaniel.htm

    — You Must Avoid Aluminum —

    In Your Water, Your Food, and in things you put “In” and “On” Your Body !

    Aluminum is used to treat waste water. It is added to waste water to cause materials to come out of solution and settle to the bottom of the tank.

    The same thing can happen inside your body. 3–4 parts per million* of Aluminum in our blood Will Cause materials to come out of the blood plasma solution forming plaque on blood vessel walls. It also causes blood cells to clump together, thereby blocking blood flow to organs — causing strokes, heart attacks and other problems!

    [ * About 27 milligrams of elemental aluminum in our body’s 7 liters of blood will cause coagulation. ]

    The reason this happens, is because Aluminum has a strong effect on Zeta Potential.

    Aluminum is used in many Vaccinations as a stabilizer, and is known to cause learning disabilities. It can also STOP CELL DIVISION during the “S Phase”.

    Aluminum is Especially Harmful to Children! (And they are injecting multiple vaccines with aluminum adjuvants).

    4 ppm of aluminum in human blood can cause it to colagulate.

    Aluminum in humans is documented to inhibit learning.

    http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/new/mcdaniel.htm

    Zeta Potential is a measure of the electrical force that exists between atoms, molecules, particles, suspensoids, cells, etc., in a fluid.

    Understanding Colloidal Suspensions – Help from Frank Hartman & Thomas Riddick

    SOME EFFECTS OF REDUCED CARRYING CAPACITY

    Aluminum toxicity is a widespread problem in all forms of life, including humans, animals, fish, plants and trees, and causes widespread degradation of the environment and health. Over 7000 reference articles on aluminum toxicity exist in various data bases; ( as of 1996 ) all recognizing the toxicity but concluding the mechanism of action is unknown. — [ Search the results – scirus.com ]

    Despite the number of references to aluminum toxicity, the FDA has always exempted it from testing from testing by putting it on their “Generally Regarded as Safe” ( GRAS ) list. Aluminum can be added to foods, medicines or water without restriction from the FDA.

    [ Aluminum is known to stop cell division during the “S Phase”, at levels less than 4 ppm. ]

    The mechanism of action of aluminum toxicity is aluminum’s effect on carrying capacity or Zeta Potential. Aluminum is relatively non-toxic in and of itself. However, it destroys the carrying capacity of a liquid.

    Aluminum has three ( 3 ) positive ions, so a single ion of aluminum will reduce surface charge, reduce carrying capacity and increase surface tension by 6,000 times the amount that an ion of Sodium, which has one ( 1 ) positive charge, would.

    Read more:
    http://customers.hbci.com/~wenonah/info/colloid.htm#Altox

    The Chemistry of Aluminum toxicity, side effects

    As I understand the literature, most aluminum is eliminated renally, bound to albumin or transferrin. If this system is fully utilized, the excess aluminum is sequestered in various organ systems, the brain being one, with highest concentrations in the limbic system. As aluminum levels are not often called for, many primary care physicians might not know to use a mobilizing agent prior to checking the blood level, and miss the presence of the metal altogether. (I know of such a case).

    Generally, findings from an aluminum level blood test are unreliable, as most of the body’s stores are bound in bone and tissue and are not reflected in the serum value. A deferoxamine infusion test can be performed but may take more than 48 hours to yield a result (see Medical Care). Deferoxamine liberates aluminum from tissues by chelating it and leads to an increased serum level compared to one taken prior to infusion. The combination of a baseline immunoreactive parathyroid hormone level of less than 200 mEq/mL and a change in serum aluminum value of 200 ng/mL after deferoxamine is 90% specific and has a positive predictive value of 85% for aluminum toxicity. From WEBMD Michael R. Edwards M.D. Bebe Medical Center. Further complicating the issue, regarding aluminum (aluminium, for any Brits reading this) the FDA has never tested this element for safety!

    From: History of crime against the Food Laws (1929) by Dr. Riley, the prime mover behind the original Pure Food Law and Director of the FDA. He resigned in disgust in 1912 over exceptions granted to the law and lack of enforcement.

    Aluminum has been exempted from testing for safety by the FDA under a convoluted logic wherein it is classified as GRAS. (Generally Regarded As Safe.) It has never been tested by the FDA on its safety and there are NO restrictions whatever on the amount or use of aluminum. Diseases Associated with Aluminium Intoxication. H. Tomlinson, M.B., Ch.B., MRCS., LRCP. Since that time thousands of studies have been published indicating aluminum is involved in neurological dysfunction, immunocompetence, as well as a host of other morbidities. I cannot begin to reference them all. Sepsis: a cause of aluminum release from tissue stores associated with acute neurological dysfunction and mortality. Davenport A. – Williams P.S. – Roberts N.B. – Bone J.M. From: Clin Nephrol (1988 Jul) 30(1):48-51.

    We report six cases of patients with renal failure and exposure to aluminum who developed septicemia. In all cases the serum aluminum increased markedly. This may have contributed to the neurological dysfunction seen in five, and the deaths of four of the patients. We suggest that the rise in serum aluminum was due to the release of tissue-bound aluminum, resulting in an increase in free, diffusable aluminum and that this jeopardized both neurological function and immunocompetence.

    http://www.raysahelian.com/aluminum.html

    Same thing as Dr Andrew Moulden put forth.

    Vaccination toxicity: The Zeta phase of MASS and “blood sludging”
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccination-toxicity-the-zeta-phase-of-mass-and-ldquoblood-sludgingrdquo.html

  • Continuation:

    Perhaps the last straw: Our worst nightmare come true — nanoparticles in vaccines.
    ________________________________________________
    Intro by J.B. Handley

    Breaking!! New published study (This week: 1/23/17) from Italy shows vaccines contaminated with undeclared micro and nano-sized particles!

    Good luck finding one mention of this study from the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination in the U.S. media!

    What does the study say? It’s jaw-droppingly bad, just start with the discussion at the end, the scientists were “baffled”, they found a bunch of stuff in ALL pediatric vaccines that they didn’t expect to find like Lead, Tungsten, Zirconium, Iron, Nickel, Antimony, stainless steel, and chromium–to name a few! (The one vaccine that was 100% free from inorganic contaminants? A pet vaccine!)

    Discussion:

    “The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity which, in any case, is still there, that typical of foreign bodies. For that reason, they induce an inflammatory reaction.”

    and,

    “Specific researches on components of the vaccines like adjuvants (in most instances, Aluminum salts) are already indicated as possible responsible of neurological symptoms”

    and,

    “The investigations verified the physical-chemical composition of the vaccines considered according to the inorganic component as declared by the Producer. In detail, we verified the presence of saline and Aluminum salts, but further presence of micro-, sub- micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases, whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product.”

    and,

    “As can be seen, the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).”

    and,

    “Figure 3a-3d show particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).
    Figure 6a & 6b show one of the foreign bodies identified in Agrippal. The particle is composed of Cerium, Iron, Titanium and Nickel. (Figure 7a & 7b) present an area of Repevax where the morphology of red cells – we cannot tell whether they are human or animal- is clearly visible.”

    and,

    “The link between these two entities generates an unfolding of the proteins that can induce an autoimmune effect once those proteins are injected into humans.”

    Study name and journal:

    New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination. International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination

    “The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible.”

    Save your own copy before it disappears–a really bad time for this study to come out (if you are a vaccine maker.) What are they gonna say? Sorry, we didn’t know that stuff was in there?? Lead? Tungsten? Stainless Steel? Read the whole discussion, it’s genuinely disturbing:

    “As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein- corona effect (due to a nano-bio-interaction [18]) can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way [19-22]. It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA [23].”

    WTF??? This alone should be a reason for an RFKcommission

    http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

    Discussion
    The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity which, in any case, is still there, that typical of foreign bodies. For that reason, they induce an inflammatory reaction.

    After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas [17]. But they can also be carried by the blood
    circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination. We believe that in many cases they get distributed throughout the body without causing any visible reaction, but it is also likely that, in some circumstances, they reach some organ, none excluded and including the microbiota, in a fair quantity. As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect (due to a nano-bio-interaction [18]) can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way [19-22]. It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA [23].

    Conclusion
    The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g., filtration) used to produce vaccines, not investigated and not detected by the Producers. If our hypothesis is actually the case, a close inspection of the working places and the full knowledge of the whole procedure of vaccine preparation would probably allow to eliminate the problem.

    http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

    New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Microand
    Nanocontamination

    Abstract
    Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new nvestigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.

    http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

    Practioners have wondered where all the heavy metals were coming from when vaccine injured and/or autistic children received such as DMSA or DMPS chelation of existing heavy metals during bio-medical treatment. Perhaps the vaccines are the source after all. And then when removed many children were seen to have significant levels of recovery. So now we are not only talking about Nagalase possibly being present in vaccines, but as well various metallic and unknown nano-particles. How much worse can it get?

    Research Article
    The Severity of Autism Is Associated with Toxic Metal Body Burden and Red Blood Cell Glutathione Levels

    Abstract

    This study investigated the relationship of children’s autism symptoms with their toxic metal body burden and red blood cell (RBC) glutathione levels. In children ages 3–8 years, the severity of autism was assessed using four tools: ADOS, PDD-BI, ATEC, and SAS. Toxic metal body burden was assessed by measuring urinary excretion of toxic metals, both before and after oral dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA). Multiple positive correlations were found between the severity of autism and the urinary excretion of toxic metals. Variations in the severity of autism measurements could be explained, in part, by regression analyses of urinary excretion of toxic metals before and after DMSA and the level of RBC glutathione (adjusted of 0.22–0.45, in all cases). This study demonstrates a significant positive association between the severity of autism and the relative body burden of toxic metals.

    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2009/532640/ (full study)

  • How beyond stupid and foolish do you look? Get your big boy pants on and actually debate the real vaccine, and vaccine risk issues?

  • Jill

    Thanks for all your information Mr. Hubbs. I have appreciated it! I will never understand people who visit a site they are obviously against and then hounding others rather than stating their beliefs and then leaving it at that.

  • Again, I had one Springer study link and in your reply you failed to repost that exact study link, and then you just generally linked to the said Springer site, and that as an attempted falsely discrediting, evasion. You are simply creating a distortion and a lie. It is not just a chapter in a book, and it is actually a review of the available studies that full support the claims put forth in that study review. In your hypocrisy you allow Paul Offit to get away with the garbage that he does, and then publish opinion articles in Pubmed as if it is a study; but then you throw your own falsely discrediting feces at it when it is actually a review of study literature. Anything goes for you, if the message is pro-vaccine, but absolutely nothing goes or is worth consideration if the literature’s outcome message, does not support vaccines and the pro-vax agenda. See how you are, and how you work? A person has to just keep on rubbing your nose in it.

    References (108)
    http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-4788-7_89#page-1

    Agarwal SK, Ayyash L, Gourley CS, et al. Evaluation of the developmental neuroendocrine and reproductive toxicology of aluminium. Food Chem Toxicol. 1996;34(1):49–53.PubMed
    Agmon-Levin N, Paz Z, Israeli E, et al. Vaccines and autoimmunity. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5(11):648–52.PubMed
    Agmon-Levin N, Hughes G, Shoenfeld Y. The spectrum of ASIA: ‘Autoimmune (auto-inflammatory) Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants’. Lupus. 2012;21(2):118–20.PubMed
    Authier FJ, Cherin P, Creange A, et al. Central nervous system disease in patients with macrophagic myofasciitis. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 5):974–83.PubMed
    Avishai-Eliner S, Brunson KL, Sandman CA, et al. Stressed-out, or in (utero)? Trends Neurosci. 2002;25(10):518–24.PubMed
    Aydin H, Ozgul E, Agildere AM. Acute necrotizing encephalopathy secondary to diphtheria, tetanus toxoid and whole-cell pertussis vaccination: diffusion-weighted imaging and proton MR spectroscopy findings. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:1281–4.PubMed
    Banks WA, Kastin AJ. Aluminum-induced neurotoxicity: alterations in membrane function at the blood-brain barrier. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1989;13(1):47–53.PubMed
    Barrientos RM, Frank MG, Watkins LR, et al. Aging-related changes in neuroimmune-endocrine function: implications for hippocampal-dependent cognition. Horm Behav. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.02.010.PubMed
    Belmonte MK, Allen G, Beckel-Mitchener A, et al. Autism and abnormal development of brain connectivity. J Neurosci. 2004;24(42):9228–31.PubMed
    Berin MC, Mayer L. Immunophysiology of experimental food allergy. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2(1):24–32.PubMed
    Besedovsky HO, Rey A. Brain cytokines as integrators of the immune–neuroendocrine network. In: Lajtha A, Besedovsky HO, Galoyan A, editors. Handbook of neurochemistry and molecular neurobiology. 3rd ed. Springer; 2008. p. 1-17.
    Bilbo SD, Biedenkapp JC, Der-Avakian A, et al. Neonatal infection-induced memory impairment after lipopolysaccharide in adulthood is prevented via caspase-1 inhibition. J Neurosci. 2005;25(35):8000–9.PubMed
    Blaylock RL. Aluminum induced immunoexcitotoxicity in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Curr Inorg Chem. 2012;2(1):46–53.
    Blaylock RL, Maroon J. Immunoexcitotoxicity as a central mechanism in chronic traumatic encephalopathy-a unifying hypothesis. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:107.PubMed
    Blaylock RL, Strunecka A. Immune-glutamatergic dysfunction as a central mechanism of the autism spectrum disorders. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(2):157–70.PubMed
    Boisse L, Mouihate A, Ellis S, et al. Long-term alterations in neuroimmune responses after neonatal exposure to lipopolysaccharide. J Neurosci. 2004;24(21):4928–34.PubMed
    Buller KM, Day TA. Systemic administration of interleukin-1beta activates select population of central amygdala afferents. J Comp Neurol. 2002;452(3):288–96.PubMed
    Carvalho JF, Shoenfeld Y. Status epilepticus and lymphocytic pneumonitis following hepatitis B vaccination. Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19:383–5.PubMed
    Cohen AD, Shoenfeld Y. Vaccine-induced autoimmunity. J Autoimmun. 1996;9(6):699–703.PubMed
    Couette M, Boisse MF, Maison P, et al. Long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminum hydroxide is associated with chronic cognitive dysfunction. J Inorg Biochem. 2009;103(11):1571–8.PubMed
    Dantzer R, Kelley KW. Twenty years of research on cytokine-induced sickness behavior. Brain Behav Immun. 2007;21(2):153–60.PubMed
    Dietert RR, Dietert JM. Potential for early-life immune insult including developmental immunotoxicity in autism and autism spectrum disorders: focus on critical windows of immune vulnerability. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2008;11(8):660–80.PubMed
    Dinarello CA. Cytokines as endogenous pyrogens. J Infect Dis. 1999;179 (Suppl 2):S294–304.PubMed
    Dorea JG, Marques RC. Infants’ exposure to aluminum from vaccines and breast milk during the first 6 months. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2010;20(7):598–601.PubMed
    Du X, Fleiss B, Li H, et al. Systemic stimulation of TLR2 impairs neonatal mouse brain development. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19583.PubMed
    Dunn AJ. Effects of cytokines and infections on brain neurochemistry. Clin Neurosci Res. 2006;6(1–2):52–68.PubMed
    Eisenbarth SC, Colegio OR, O’Connor W, et al. Crucial role for the Nalp3 inflammasome in the immunostimulatory properties of aluminium adjuvants. Nature. 2008;453(7198):1122–6.PubMed
    Eroglu C, Barres BA. Regulation of synaptic connectivity by glia. Nature. 2010;468(7321):223–31.PubMed
    Eskandari F, Webster JI, Sternberg EM. Neural immune pathways and their connection to inflammatory diseases. Arthritis Res Ther. 2003;5(6):251–65.PubMed
    Exley C. Aluminium and medicine. In: Merce ALR, Felcman J, Recio MAL, editors. Molecular and supramolecular bioinorganic chemistry: applications in medical sciences. New York: Nova Science Pub Inc; 2009. p. 45–68.
    Exley C, Swarbrick L, Gherardi RK, et al. A role for the body burden of aluminium in vaccine-associated macrophagic myofasciitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2009;72(2):135–9.PubMed
    Exley C, Siesjo P, Eriksson H. The immunobiology of aluminium adjuvants: how do they really work? Trends Immunol. 2010;31(3):103–9.PubMed
    Fantuzzi G, Sironi M, Delgado R, et al. Depression of liver metabolism and induction of cytokine release by diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccines: role of Bordetella pertussis cells in toxicity. Infect Immun. 1994;62(1):29–32.PubMed
    Fombonne E. The epidemiology of autism: a review. Psychol Med. 1999;29(4):769–86.PubMed
    Galic MA, Riazi K, Heida JG, et al. Postnatal inflammation increases seizure susceptibility in adult rats. J Neurosci. 2008;28(27):6904–13.PubMed
    Galic MA, Spencer SJ, Mouihate A, et al. Postnatal programming of the innate immune response. Integr Comp Biol. 2009;49(3):237–45.PubMed
    Gallagher CM, Goodman MS. Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997–2002. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2010;73(24):1665–77.PubMed
    Garay PA, McAllister AK. Novel roles for immune molecules in neural development: Implications for neurodevelopmental disorders. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2010;2:136.PubMed
    Gerber JS, Offit PA. Vaccines and autism: a tale of shifting hypotheses. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(4):456–61.PubMed
    Gherardi R, Authier F. Macrophagic myofasciitis: characterization and pathophysiology. Lupus. 2012;21(2):184–9.PubMed
    Gherardi RK, Coquet M, Cherin P, et al. Macrophagic myofasciitis lesions assess long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminium hydroxide in muscle. Brain. 2001;124 (Pt 9):1821–31.PubMed
    Glenney AT, Pope CG, Waddington H, et al. XXIII – the antigenic value of toxoid precipitated by potassium alum. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1926;29:38–9.
    Gulino A, De Smaele E, Ferretti E. Glucocorticoids and neonatal brain injury: the hedgehog connection. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(2):243–6.PubMed
    Gunnar MR, Brodersen L, Krueger K, et al. Dampening of adrenocortical responses during infancy: normative changes and individual differences. Child Dev. 1996;67(3):877–89.PubMed
    Havik B, Le Hellard S, Rietschel M, et al. The complement control-related genes CSMD1 and CSMD2 associate to schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;70(1):35–42.PubMed
    Herbert MR, Ziegler DA, Deutsch CK, et al. Dissociations of cerebral cortex, subcortical and cerebral white matter volumes in autistic boys. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 5):1182–92.PubMed
    Hewitson L, Lopresti BJ, Stott C, et al. Influence of pediatric vaccines on amygdala growth and opioid ligand binding in rhesus macaque infants: a pilot study. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2010;70(2):147–64.
    Ibi D, Nagai T, Kitahara Y, et al. Neonatal polyI:C treatment in mice results in schizophrenia-like behavioral and neurochemical abnormalities in adulthood. Neurosci Res. 2009;64(3):297–305.PubMed
    Israeli E, Agmon-Levin N, Blank M, et al. Adjuvants and autoimmunity. Lupus. 2009;18(13):1217–25.PubMed
    Jansen LM, Gispen-de Wied CC, Van der Gaag RJ, et al. Unresponsiveness to psychosocial stress in a subgroup of autistic-like children, multiple complex developmental disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2000;25(8):753–64.PubMed
    Johnson JD, O’Connor KA, Deak T, et al. Prior stressor exposure sensitizes LPS-induced cytokine production. Brain Behav Immun. 2002;16:461–76.PubMed
    Johnston MV. Neurotransmitters and vulnerability of the developing brain. Brain Dev. 1995;17(5):301–6.PubMed
    Khamaisi M, Shoenfeld Y, Orbach H. Guillain-Barre syndrome following hepatitis B vaccination. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22(6):767–70.PubMed
    Khan Z, Combadiere C, Authier FJ, et al. Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain. BMC Med. 2013. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-99.
    Konat GW, Lally BE, Toth AA, et al. Peripheral immune challenge with viral mimic during early postnatal period robustly enhances anxiety-like behavior in young adult rats. Metab Brain Dis. 2011;26(3):237–40.PubMed
    Konstantinou D, Paschalis C, Maraziotis T, et al. Two episodes of leukoencephalitis associated with recombinant hepatitis B vaccination in a single patient. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(10):1772–3.PubMed
    Lambert JC, Heath S, Even G, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Genet. 2009;41(10):1094–9.PubMed
    Lee AL, Ogle WO, Sapolsky RM. Stress and depression: possible links to neuron death in the hippocampus. Bipolar Disord. 2002;4(2):117–28.PubMed
    Lewis M, Thomas D. Cortisol release in infants in response to inoculation. Child Dev. 1990;61(1):50–9.PubMed
    Li H, Willingham SB, Ting JP, et al. Cutting edge: inflammasome activation by Alum and Alum’s adjuvant effect are mediated by NLRP3. J Immunol. 2008;181:17–21.
    Li X, Zheng H, Zhang Z, et al. Glia activation induced by peripheral administration of aluminum oxide nanoparticles in rat brains. Nanomedicine Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2009;5(4):473–9.
    Lujan L, Perez M, Salazar E, Alvarez N, Gimeno M, Pinczowski P, et al. Autoimmune/autoinflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA syndrome) in commercial sheep. Immunol Res. 2013.doi: 10.1007/s12026-013-8404-0.
    Marichal T, Ohata K, Bedoret D, et al. DNA released from dying host cells mediates aluminum adjuvant activity. Nat Med. 2011;17(8):996–1002.PubMed
    McKee AS, Munks MW, MacLeod MK, et al. Alum induces innate immune responses through macrophage and mast cell sensors, but these sensors are not required for alum to act as an adjuvant for specific immunity. J Immunol. 2009;183(7):4403–14.PubMed
    Melendez L, Santos D, Luna Polido L, et al. Aluminium and other metals may pose a risk to children with autism spectrum disorder: biochemical and behavioural impairments. Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2013. doi: 10.4172/2161-1459.1000120.
    Mendoza Plasencia Z, Gonzalez Lopez M, Fernandez Sanfiel ML, Muniz Montes JR. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis with tumefactive lesions after vaccination against human papillomavirus. Neurologia. 2010;25:58–9.PubMed
    Miles JH, Takahashi TN, Bagby S, et al. Essential versus complex autism: definition of fundamental prognostic subtypes. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;135(2):171–80.PubMed
    Mosca F, Tritto E, Muzzi A, et al. Molecular and cellular signatures of human vaccine adjuvants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(30):10501–6.PubMed
    Offit PA, Jew RK. Addressing parents’ concerns: do vaccines contain harmful preservatives, adjuvants, additives, or residuals? Pediatrics. 2003;112(6 Pt 1):1394–7.PubMed
    Olney JW. New insights and new issues in developmental neurotoxicology. Neurotoxicology. 2002;23(6):659–68.PubMed
    Orbach H, Agmon-Levin N, Zandman-Goddard G. Vaccines and autoimmune diseases of the adult. Discov Med. 2010;9(45):90–7.PubMed
    Ortega-Hernandez OD, Kivity S, Shoenfeld Y. Olfaction, psychiatric disorders and autoimmunity: is there a common genetic association? Autoimmunity. 2009;42(1):80–8.PubMed
    Pardo CA, Vargas DL, Zimmerman AW. Immunity, neuroglia and neuroinflammation in autism. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2005;17(6):485–95.PubMed
    Passeri E, Villa C, Couette M, et al. Long-term follow-up of cognitive dysfunction in patients with aluminum hydroxide-induced macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF). J Inorg Biochem. 2011;105(11):1457–63.PubMed
    Petrik MS, Wong MC, Tabata RC, et al. Aluminum adjuvant linked to gulf War illness induces motor neuron death in mice. Neuromolecular Med. 2007;9(1):83–100.PubMed
    Polimeni MA, Richdale AL, Francis AJ. A survey of sleep problems in autism, Asperger’s disorder and typically developing children. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005;49(Pt 4):260–8.PubMed
    Porges SW. The vagus: A mediator of behavioral and physiologic features associated with autism. In: Bauman ML, Kemper TL, editors. The neurobiology of autism. 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2005. p. 65–78.
    Prat A, Biernacki K, Wosik K, et al. Glial cell influence on the human blood–brain barrier. Glia. 2001;36:145–55.PubMed
    Purcell AE, Jeon OH, Zimmerman AW, et al. Postmortem brain abnormalities of the glutamate neurotransmitter system in autism. Neurology. 2001;57(9):1618–28.PubMed
    Quiroz-Rothe E, Ginel PJ, Pérez J, et al. Vaccine-associated acute polyneuropathy resembling Guillain-Barré syndrome in a dog. EJCAP. 2005;15(2):155–9.
    Redhead K, Quinlan GJ, Das RG, et al. Aluminium-adjuvanted vaccines transiently increase aluminium levels in murine brain tissue. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1992;70(4):278–80.PubMed
    Rhawn J. Normal and abnormal amygdala development. In: Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and clinical neuroscience. 2rd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
    Rose NR. Autoimmunity, infection and adjuvants. Lupus. 2010;19(4):354–8.PubMed
    Seneff S, Davidson RM, Liu J. Empirical data confirm autism symptoms related to aluminum and acetaminophen exposure. Entropy. 2012;14:2227–53.
    Seubert A, Monaci E, Pizza M, et al. The adjuvants aluminum hydroxide and MF59 induce monocyte and granulocyte chemoattractants and enhance monocyte differentiation toward dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2008;180(8):5402–12.PubMed
    Shaw CA, Petrik MS. Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. J Inorg Biochem. 2009;103(11):1555–62.PubMed
    Shimmura C, Suda S, Tsuchiya KJ, et al. Alteration of plasma glutamate and glutamine levels in children with high-functioning autism. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25340.PubMed
    Shinohe A, Hashimoto K, Nakamura K, et al. Increased serum levels of glutamate in adult patients with autism. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006;30(8):1472–7.PubMed
    Shoenfeld Y, Agmon-Levin N. ‘ASIA’ – Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants. J Autoimmun. 2011;36(1):4–8.PubMed
    Siegrist CA, Aspinall R. B-cell responses to vaccination at the extremes of age. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(3):185–94.PubMed
    Soumiya H, Fukumitsu H, Furukawa S. Prenatal immune challenge compromises the normal course of neurogenesis during development of the mouse cerebral cortex. J Neurosci Res. 2011;89(10):1575–85.PubMed
    Spencer SJ, Heida JG, Pittman QJ. Early life immune challenge–effects on behavioural indices of adult rat fear and anxiety. Behav Brain Res. 2005;164(2):231–8.PubMed
    Spencer SJ, Hyland NP, Sharkey KA, et al. Neonatal immune challenge exacerbates experimental colitis in adult rats: potential role for TNF-alpha. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007;292(1):R308–15.PubMed
    Stevens B, Allen NJ, Vazquez LE, et al. The classical complement cascade mediates CNS synapse elimination. Cell. 2007;131(6):1164–78.PubMed
    Theoharides TC, Zhang B. Neuro-inflammation, blood-brain barrier, seizures autism. J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8(1):168.PubMed
    Theoharides TC, Kempuraj D, Redwood L. Autism: an emerging ‘neuroimmune disorder’ in search of therapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10(13):2127–43.PubMed
    Tomljenovic L. Aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease: after a century of controversy, is there a plausible link? J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(4):567–98.PubMed
    Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA. Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe? Curr Med Chem. 2011a;18(17):2630–7.PubMed
    Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA. Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism? J Inorg Biochem. 2011b;105(11):1489–99.PubMed
    Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA. Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity in pediatric populations. Lupus. 2012;21(2):223–30.PubMed
    Tsumiyama K, Miyazaki Y, Shiozawa S. Self-organized criticality theory of autoimmunity. PLoS One. 2009;4(12):e8382.PubMed
    Tuchman R, Rapin I. Epilepsy in autism. Lancet Neurol. 2002;1(6):352–8.PubMed
    Vargas DL, Nascimbene C, Krishnan C, et al. Neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism. Ann Neurol. 2005;57(1):67–81.PubMed
    Vojdani A, Campbell AW, Anyanwu E, et al. Antibodies to neuron-specific antigens in children with autism: possible cross-reaction with encephalitogenic proteins from milk, chlamydia pneumoniae and streptococcus group A. J Neuroimmunol. 2002;129(1–2):168–77.PubMed
    White SW, Bray BC, Ollendick TH. Examining shared and unique aspects of social anxiety disorder and autism spectrum disorder using factor analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1325-7.
    Xu Y, Day TA, Buller KM. The central amygdala modulates hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to systemic interleukin-1beta administration. Neuroscience. 1999;94(1):175–83.PubMed
    Zafrir Y, Agmon-Levin N, Paz Z, et al. Autoimmunity following Hepatitis B vaccine as part of the spectrum of ‘Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome induced by Adjuvants’ (ASIA): analysis of 93 cases. Lupus. 2012;21(2):146–52.PubMed
    Zinka B, Rauch E, Buettner A, et al. Unexplained cases of sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination. Vaccine. 2006;24(31–32):5779–80.PubMed

  • Again, 9 fails for you. When are you going to answer the questions I put in front of you?

  • The information is obviously NOT just something antivaxers wrote. The example used was Offit’s Rotavirus vaccine and which you referenced the correlating Offit study. The reply I made as well includes two Pubmed studies which support entirely that the Rotavirus vaccine is not safe and nor effective, and for the reasons that I put forth in that reply. The information as to the said Rotavirus pig virus contamination, is something as well that the CDC and even webmd have obviously recognized,

  • Exactly, and thank you.

  • Then go get a copy of your medical vaccine record, I’m waiting for your direct answer.

  • Jesus baby

    “Obviously you do not want to discuss the issue of vaccines and vaccine risk, and on a vaccine truth article site.”
    That’s an ignorant thing to say, Lowell/tripnasty84. We were discussing germ theory and your as still unclear understanding/acceptance of it. Don’t you think germ theory is important when it comes to vaccines?

  • Jesus baby

    Way tl;dr but whatever it is you’re gish galloping it doesn’t seem to be about germ theory.

  • Jesus baby

    Again, tl;dr. But nice gish gallop, Lowell/tripnasty84! You are a master of that at least.

  • Jesus baby

    And again, tl;dr. The gish galloping continues I see, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    All you have to do is tell us one true statement your boy made in front of the Oregon state senate concerning vaccine research, Lowell/tripnasty84. I think we are up to 10 dodges, son.

  • In case you haven’t noticed it, we are long past that level and kind of mindless stupidity here; and that question has been more than fully addressed by me here. Get to directly replying to my posts, and the questions I have put forth. The only one dodging anything at all here, is clearly you.

  • So what you are telling me again, is that you can not participate and respond to an intelligent vaccine risks discussion, and with all evidence on the table. What you are telling me is that you refuse to do that, and instead that you choose to do nothing but throw only the same old well known and failed pro-vax shill evasion and avoidance level of reply comments at it. So there is where you stand.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, sweetheart, if it wasn’t just a chapter in a book where else was it published? (it wasn’t published anywhere else) Anyone can write a book. YOU could write a book. The editor would have a heart attack but you could do it.
    And if I type the letters S-P-R-I-N-G-E-R-.-C-O-M in a reply Disqus automatically creates a link. Try it!

  • Jesus baby

    Why do you think I’d want to discuss something you’re just trying to deflect with, Lowell/tripnasty84? It’s like training a dog or a horse. If one rewards bad behavior it just continues.

  • So again you are admitting to your refusal and your failure to participate in any actual discussion and debate regarding the known vaccine risks. A discussion with the real study science as well put right on the table. You simply refer to the existing reality of the real vaccine study science, as only a gish gallop, and then you simply scurry your pathetic disinformation promoting arse, away from it all. Being the master of avoidance is what you really and only amount to. And you do this as well without having any public identity. How cowardly is that?

  • Jesus baby

    Are you really still claiming Dr. Offit has not published vaccine safety studies, Lowell/tripnasty84?

  • Jesus baby

    Again, Lowell/tripnasty84, you’re deflecting and I won’t encourage that. That’s #10 I think.

  • Jesus baby

    “… that question has been more than fully addressed by me here.”
    Really? Which statement was true then? You’ve hit 11 dodges, Lowell/tripnasty84!

  • Jesus baby

    I’m not interested in promoting your constant deflection, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    You’re just deflecting, Lowell/tripnasty84. I’m giving you negative reinforcement for your bad behavior.

  • And that might work for you, “sweetheart”; and if it were the ONLY study on the planet earth that has ever defined the harm of what goes on with vaccine aluminum adjuvants. It is not the only study, and there obviously exists a large amount of data and study evidence. So in other words your decision is to just simply ignore it all. And in your audacity, you do this while reply posting here on a vaccine risks information articles, website.

    Here again is the study that you demand to disregard. The study is a research article in regard to the existing studies which were reviewed and on the subject topic of the harm to health done by vaccine aluminum adjuvants. And by the way, Springer is obviously a well known and recognized source of health care study information.

    Autism Spectrum Disorders and Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants
    Lucija Tomljenovic , Russell L. Blaylock, Christopher A. Shaw

    Abstract
    Impaired brain function, excessive inflammation, and autoimmune manifestations are common in autism. Aluminum (Al), the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant, is a demonstrated neurotoxin and a strong immune stimulator. Hence, adjuvant Al has the necessary properties to induce neuroimmune disorders. Because peripheral immune stimuli in the postnatal period can compromise brain development and cause permanent neurological impairments, the possibility that such outcomes could also occur with administration of Al vaccine adjuvants needs to be considered. In regard to the risk of adjuvant toxicity in children, the following should be noted: (i) children should not be viewed as “small adults” as their unique physiology makes them more vulnerable to toxic insults; (ii) in adult humans Al adjuvants can cause a variety of serious autoimmune and inflammatory conditions including those affecting the brain, yet children are routinely exposed to much higher amounts of Al from vaccines than adults; (iii) compelling evidence has underscored the tight connection between the development of the immune system and that of the brain. Thus, it appears plausible that disruptions of critical events in immune development may also play a role in the establishment of neurobehavioral disorders; (iv) the same immune system components that play key roles in brain development appear to be targeted for impairment by Al adjuvants. In summary, research data suggests that vaccines containing Al may be a contributing etiological factor in the increasing incidence of autism.

    http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-4788-7_89

    Aluminum toxicity
    Search results: 58,290 results found.
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleListURL&_method=list&_ArticleListID=-1135999402&_sort=r&_st=13&view=c&md5=dfd98a38cd78068b0ccf0cd6806d25bb&searchtype=a

    2011-02-01 The Impact of Vaccines on the First Two Years of Life
    http://sandrafinley.ca/?p=1223

    Insight into the cellular fate and toxicity of aluminium adjuvants used in clinically approved human vaccinations, (multiple articles)
    http://sanevax.org/research-blog/vaccine-adjuvants-2/

    Chris Shaw, PhD: Neurotoxicity of Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants

    Neuroscientist Dr. Chris Shaw discusses the role of aluminum in Alzheimer’s and autism; and explains how his own studies and those of other expert researchers internationally leave little room to doubt the neurological damage caused by the aluminum adjuvants contained in the majority of the 27 or so vaccines given kids in the first two years of life.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E239fjCh2Dk

    Immunol Res. 2013 Jul;56(2-3):304-16. doi: 10.1007/s12026-013-8403-1.
    Aluminum in the central nervous system (CNS): toxicity in humans and animals, vaccine adjuvants, and autoimmunity.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23609067

    J Inorg Biochem. 2011 Nov;105(11):1489-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
    Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism?
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159

    Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2011, 18, 2630-2637
    Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?
    http://homeoint.ru.91-194-77-203.web10.garmtech.net/pdfs/Aluminum_adjuvants.pdf

    Another long list of said studies, below.

    Vaccine aluminum adjuvant causation of neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism- Page 2
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-aluminum-adjuvant-causation-of-neuroglial-activation-and-neuroinflammation-in-the-brain-of-patients-with-autism–page-2.html

  • Your question demanding that I tell you what statement, or what statements in a speech made by (one of your own) Pediatrician Paul Thomas, were true, and after telling you that they were all true, is dead in the water long ago, and for exactly the reasons that I said it is. You have simply kept on using that asinine and irrelevant question, to evade any further reply and as well any diligent and honest reply discussion regarding vaccine risk, and the study evidence of it. In reality, any dog or horse known on the planet would have obviously been far more trainable than you, and as you exist on these articles, so called and without any identity ..J baby. I would question how slime like you would even look in the mirror and retain any form of your own personal respect, and self worth. Obviously none of that matters to people like you.

  • So again that is a direct admission that you can not and that you refuse to respond to anything at all that I have posted in response to you. So why are you still here and wasting the readers time? Its all about the payment.

  • And Dr Paul Thomas Pediatrician is actually YOUR boy, fool. Hopefully many more doctors and Pediatricians will see the light and have the same courage to stand up and be heard. That is a kind of courage that you will obviously never have and never know personally in your lifetime. Hiding chicken vaccine shill on the internet. You should change your J baby name, to that.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, we aren’t debating aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. We’re debating whether your boy Blaylock has ever published a vaccine study (he hasn’t). Once you come to grips with that we can discuss something else maybe.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, you’ve been tasked with specifying one true statement on vaccine research he made. I mean you posted the YouTube video. Just claiming “everything ” was true doesn’t cut it. You want me to spoon feed you like a baby. I smell your fear.

  • Jesus baby

    No, Lowell/tripnasty84, I simply won’t respond to your deflections. You’re just spinning it around because you’re such a coward.

  • Jesus baby

    Look Lowell-tripnasty84, can we just agree you’re going to stonewall and move on? I know you’re too scared to make any kind of commitment but no one will think any less of you. The readers know you have a lot of limitations. I think it’s great that you still try to overcome them. It’s just maybe this time you need to say, “Whoa there tiger. I think I’ve bitten off more than I can chew.”

  • I have told you at least 15 times that it is your responsibility to state what is not true in that information, and when you are implying that what exists in that information is not true. The only fear existing here is your own and in your asinine attempt to refuse to address the load of information and studies that I have put in front of you continually before and as well the load I posted in front of you today. This is where you refused to tell me what you found in that which was not true. You can do that now, and there is your chance to, again.

    Lets put you to the test here. To put this behind you as for the information I previously posted. This is the information right here, and exactly as I previously posted it, and as you see below. You demanded that I point out what in the second article link, is a statement that is true. This is the link below that we are going to, and as you demanded.

    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

    The article states, and I quote. Starting right from the top.

    Dr. Paul starts out his comments by mentioning how SB 442 will remove all philosophical and religious exemptions to vaccines, and that the only medical exemptions that would be allowed would be from “certain pre-selected medical providers.”

    He states: “This is a travesty.”

    Dr. Paul then stated why this bill is such a travesty:

    This is powerful. This is important. This is for our children. We need to protect our children and preserve the right for freedom of choice, and the right to give informed consent when your child is about to get a vaccine.

    Dr. Paul then begins his testimony by stating that he represents 11,000 patients and that 500 new babies come into his practice each month wanting informed consent about vaccines.

    He states that it is his responsibility as a physician to point out the risks and benefits of every medical procedure, but that this proposed bill would not allow him to do this for his patients.

    Next, Dr. Paul addresses the Hepatitis B vaccine routinely given to newborn babies in hospitals. He states that the amount of aluminum contained in this vaccine is 10 to 15 times the limit allowable for infants.

    He provided handouts for each committee member showing the peer-reviewed studies linking toxic aluminum exposure to brain damage and autism.

    (As well on the article page are listed 4 separate studies that support his claim).

    According to Dr. Paul, the only people who need the Hepatitis B vaccine are moms who are positive for Hepatitis B, which is less than 1% in Oregon and the rest of the country:]

    Source:
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

    These statements made by Paul Thomas are indeed well researched, and indeed they are true. The rest of the article as well contains equally as correct statements and as well they are backed up with research data.

    Any more questions?????????? No, you have no excuse for not progressing and that in conducting here an honest debate regarding vaccine risk. If you unable and unwilling to do that, then you should just leave. Better yet, you should just simply be banned from making any more harassing reply posts on these articles.

    ——–

    As it was previously reply posted.

    Brand new podcast–listen to the doctor! Know a couple expecting their first child? Someone with young children? PLEASE share!!

    Dr. Thomas has the largest practice of pediatrics in Portland, OR for a reason–he tells the truth about vaccines and practices true informed consent. Please listen, please share!

    6. Dr. Paul Thomas Interview, How to End the Autism Epidemic
    https://soundcloud.com/user-507883655/6-dr-paul-thomas-interview-how-to-end-the-autism-epidemic

    Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D. – Preserve Medical Freedom – Vaccines Linked to Autism
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

  • Just more entirely lying and false harassment. That is all you can ever accomplish, and that is all you can ever do. When are you going to comprehend that your such continued antagonizing is not working?

    By the way, just minutes ago I directly answered your question regarding the article titled, Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D. – Preserve Medical Freedom – Vaccines Linked to Autism. You have no more false excuses. Go check your replies, unless you want me to post it again, and if you refuse to respond to it.

  • So in your mind the evidence of and the study evidence of vaccine risk and truth, is somehow a deflection? And you refuse to acknowledge that it is actually you that is repeatedly deflecting. You have to be one of the most twisted and hypocritical people to ever reply post here. But of course you know that what you are doing is nothing more than posting again and again simply more lying harassment.

  • What else do you call this, if not Dr Blaylocks published vaccine risk study research? And we ARE indeed debating aluminum adjuvants in vaccines; the risks and obviously unproven safety. You don’t even know what you are talking about; and much more what you are reply responding about.

    Aluminum Induced Immunoexcitotoxicity in Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders
    Current Inorganic Chemistry 2012, Vol. 2, No. 1
    Russell L. Blaylock, MD
    Visiting Professor Biology Belhaven University Theoretical Neurosciences Research, LLC Ridgeland, Mississippi, USA
    This article has 85 references

    Abstract

    A great deal has been learned about the neurotoxicity of aluminum over the past two decades in terms of its ability to disrupt cellular function. Newer evidence suggests that a more central pathophysiological mechanism may be responsible for much of the toxicity of aluminum and aluminofluoride compounds on the brain. This mechanism involves activation of the brainâ € ™ s innate immune system, primarily the microglia, with a release of neurotoxic concentrations of excitotoxins and pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and immune mediators. A large number of studies suggest that excitotoxicity plays a significant role in the neurotoxic action of a number of metals, including aluminum. Recently, researchers have found that while most of the chronic neurodegenerative effects of these metals are secondary to prolonged inflammation, it is the enhancement of excitotoxicity by the immune mediators that is responsible for most of the metalâ € ™ s toxicity. This enhancement occurs via a crosstalk between cytokine receptors and glutamate receptors. The author coined the name immunoexcitotoxicity to describe this process. This paper reviews the evidence linking immunoexcitotoxicity to aluminums neurotoxic effects.

    http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/Aluminum-Blaylock.pdf

    Autism Spectrum Disorders and Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants
    Lucija Tomljenovic, Russell L. Blaylock, Christopher A. Shaw

    Abstract
    Impaired brain function, excessive inflammation, and autoimmune manifestations are common in autism. Aluminum (Al), the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant, is a demonstrated neurotoxin and a strong immune stimulator. Hence, adjuvant Al has the necessary properties to induce neuroimmune disorders. Because peripheral immune stimuli in the postnatal period can compromise brain development and cause permanent neurological impairments, the possibility that such outcomes could also occur with administration of Al vaccine adjuvants needs to be considered. In regard to the risk of adjuvant toxicity in children, the following should be noted: (i) children should not be viewed as “small adults” as their unique physiology makes them more vulnerable to toxic insults; (ii) in adult humans Al adjuvants can cause a variety of serious autoimmune and inflammatory conditions including those affecting the brain, yet children are routinely exposed to much higher amounts of Al from vaccines than adults; (iii) compelling evidence has underscored the tight connection between the development of the immune system and that of the brain. Thus, it appears plausible that disruptions of critical events in immune development may also play a role in the establishment of neurobehavioral disorders; (iv) the same immune system components that play key roles in brain development appear to be targeted for impairment by Al adjuvants. In summary, research data suggests that vaccines containing Al may be a contributing etiological factor in the increasing incidence of autism.

    http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-4788-7_89

    Journal of American Nutraceutical Association 6: 21-35, 2003.
    Interaction of Cytokines, Excitotoxins, and Reactive Nitrogen and Oxygen Species in Autism Spectrum Disorders, Russell Blaylock, MD* Medical Director, Advanced Nutritional Concepts Ridgeland, Mississippi

    ABSTRACT

    There is growing and compelling evidence that excessive peripheral as well as central immune activation of brain microglia can result in alterations in brain growth and connectivity during rapid brain growth, the so-called “brain growth spurt.” A considerable amount of evidence, presented in this paper, demonstrates the deleterious effects of immune factors, such as cytokines, chemokines, and excitotoxins, when present in excess. The interaction between excitotoxicity, ROS and RNS injury and immune dysfunction is discussed. It is concluded that excessive activation of the brain’s immune system during critical growth periods can occur when vaccines are given as combination vaccines, using schedules that are too close together or by the use of certain live viruses in the vaccines.

    http://www.nutrimedical.com/news.jhtml?method=view&news.id=1084

  • Jesus baby

    You still don’t get it, Lowell/tripnasty84. Pick one true statement he made on vaccine research in the senate testimony video. Did anyone ask you for an account of the anti-vax site article? (no)

  • Jesus baby

    You didn’t answer it, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    You just hate to be called out on your bull$hit, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Really? You’re lying and just looking for a lying excuse way out of it.

    Here it is again, your direct answer and in no uncertain terms. Something as well that you were not deserving of, and was done just to shut your typing responses, pie hole.

    https://disqus.com/home/discussion/vactruth/the_true_causes_of_sudden_infant_death_syndrome/#comment-3129020210

    I have told you at least 15 times that it is your responsibility to state what is not true in that information, and when you are implying that what exists in that information is not true. The only fear existing here is your own and in your asinine attempt to refuse to address the load of information and studies that I have put in front of you continually before and as well the load I posted in front of you today. This is where you refused to tell me what you found in that which was not true. You can do that now, and there is your chance to, again.

    Lets put you to the test here. To put this behind you as for the information I previously posted. This is the information right here, and exactly as I previously posted it, and as you see below. You demanded that I point out what in the second article link, is a statement that is true. This is the link below that we are going to, and as you demanded.

    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

    The article states, and I quote. Starting right from the top.

    Dr. Paul starts out his comments by mentioning how SB 442 will remove all philosophical and religious exemptions to vaccines, and that the only medical exemptions that would be allowed would be from “certain pre-selected medical providers.”

    He states: “This is a travesty.”

    Dr. Paul then stated why this bill is such a travesty:

    This is powerful. This is important. This is for our children. We need to protect our children and preserve the right for freedom of choice, and the right to give informed consent when your child is about to get a vaccine.

    Dr. Paul then begins his testimony by stating that he represents 11,000 patients and that 500 new babies come into his practice each month wanting informed consent about vaccines.

    He states that it is his responsibility as a physician to point out the risks and benefits of every medical procedure, but that this proposed bill would not allow him to do this for his patients.

    Next, Dr. Paul addresses the Hepatitis B vaccine routinely given to newborn babies in hospitals. He states that the amount of aluminum contained in this vaccine is 10 to 15 times the limit allowable for infants.

    He provided handouts for each committee member showing the peer-reviewed studies linking toxic aluminum exposure to brain damage and autism.

    (As well on the article page are listed 4 separate studies that support his claim).

    According to Dr. Paul, the only people who need the Hepatitis B vaccine are moms who are positive for Hepatitis B, which is less than 1% in Oregon and the rest of the country:]

    Source:
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

    These statements made by Paul Thomas are indeed well researched, and indeed they are true. The rest of the article as well contains equally as correct statements and as well they are backed up with research data.

    Any more questions?????????? No, you have no excuse for not progressing and that in conducting here an honest debate regarding vaccine risk. If you unable and unwilling to do that, then you should just leave. Better yet, you should just simply be banned from making any more harassing reply posts on these articles.

    ——–

    As it was previously reply posted.

    Brand new podcast–listen to the doctor! Know a couple expecting their first child? Someone with young children? PLEASE share!!

    Dr. Thomas has the largest practice of pediatrics in Portland, OR for a reason–he tells the truth about vaccines and practices true informed consent. Please listen, please share!

    6. Dr. Paul Thomas Interview, How to End the Autism Epidemic
    https://soundcloud.com/user-507883655/6-dr-paul-thomas-interview-how-to-end-the-autism-epidemic

    Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D. – Preserve Medical Freedom – Vaccines Linked to Autism
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

  • Jesus baby

    That’s right, Lowell/tripnasty84, just keep posting the same links. One doesn’t mention vaccines, the other is just a book chapter, and neither is a study. You wouldn’t know a study if it smacked you on the a$$.

  • Jesus baby

    Great Lowell/tripnasty84. Like I didn’t just tell you I don’t want a blow by blow account of the anti-vax article. I want you to look at the senate video testimony that you, Lowell/tripnasty84, linked. I then want you to give us one (not 2 or 6 or any other number) statement in his testimony that is a.) true, and b.) about vaccine research.

  • I just did that, and exactly that. It is all there, liar. What are you going to do now; just keep on lying and falsely claiming that it wasn’t ever done? So now that you have nothing more to use for false excuses and complain about, you simply attempt to move the answer goal posts. You failed this and in your twisted effort to divert from any need for yourself to give any honest and knowledgeable responses, and as to your replies here, period. Just accept it and move on.

    [Did anyone ask you for an account of the anti-vax site article? (no)]

    You falsely call that an account of only the article? That article contains as well the exact testimony that took place at that said senate testimony event. The video of that testimony which is and was as well in the article, shows also and directly the video footage of that said testimony, and which verifies that Dr Paul Thomas actually made that said and stated testimony.

    Parents Right to VACCINE INFORMED CONSENT | Dr. Paul’s Senate Testimony, Dr Paul Thomas
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNQVdOx87Ak

    Here is another vaccine risk informative video presentation by Dr Paul Thomas. It sure is a good one.

    The UNADULTERATED TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES & Informed Consent | Dr. Paul Thomas, Pediatrician
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlXdTYeEv8k

  • And you just keep proving my point. Clearly the only one being actually called out here on their bullshit, is you. And that dollar sign comes only from your own on the shill take, wallet.

  • Again, what is stated in the article is said Paul Thomas testimony at the Oregon Senate and on Bill 442 and Amendment 3, which if passed would have eliminated a parents choice to acquire a philosophical and/or religious vaccine exemption in that state. Those exemptions have previously existed in that state. The details of that testimony and as written in the article can as well easily be verified to have been testified to exactly that, and much more in the video footage of him giving that testimony. That said video was also provided in the article.

    This is the said video of that testimony. Tell me, how does that differ at all from what was stated in the article? You are just grasping for straws here, and you know that level of now as well attempting to move the answer goal posts, proves you to be one of the most sick, lying, falsely deceptive, and demented pro-vax shill reply posters to have ever posted replies on vactruth.

    Parents Right to VACCINE INFORMED CONSENT | Dr. Paul’s Senate Testimony
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNQVdOx87Ak

    Here again is another good one. All of it again contains as well obviously true statements.

    The UNADULTERATED TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES & Informed Consent | Dr. Paul Thomas, Pediatrician
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlXdTYeEv8k

  • The study that you claim doesn’t mention vaccines follows exactly the same and similar data that Blaylock puts forth in regard to vaccines and aluminum adjuvants in his public speeches, and as well his other connected studies.

    You obviously wouldn’t know how to read and interpret a study if it smacked you right in the head. Those studies are just as much as study and far more-so a direct study than anything Paul Offit has ever put forth.

    All the mostly independent studies that exist as to these subject matters of vaccine harm done and risk, when all put together as well really put forth a damning picture as to the lack of vaccine safety.

    When you as well compare that to the study sources that the CDC maintains, you can see that they have absolutely nothing present in that which has ever sufficiently determined any claim of vaccine safety, and much more multiple injected vaccine safety.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell-tripnasty84, I already told you, after I linked Offit’s list on PubMed, that some of his publications WERE NOT STUDIES. However, many were. The Blaylock book chapter you keep copy/pasting IS NOT A STUDY EITHER.

  • Jesus baby

    How’s the fictional shill investigation coming along anyway, Lowell/tripnasty84?

  • Jesus baby

    This is as pathetic as it is fascinating. Let’s try it this way. Type out something that Dr. Paul says in the video about vaccine research that is true. Use his exact words. Put it in quotes. Make it just one thing. I’ll give you an example. This is a hypothetical, Lowell/tripnasty84. I’m aware he didn’t actually said what I’m going to quote. Again, it’s just a hy-po-the-tI-cal. Here is a sample answer though:

    “All the research in the packets you’ve been given shows that all vaccines are safe and effective.”

    Now it’s your turn.

  • Jesus baby

    I’ll refer you to my other post that gives you an example.

  • Your point is? Just admit that you are lying and that you are a complete embarrassment to the pro-vaccine side, and as well the side the trolling shillary side. You have failed to do anything but make yourself them all look entirely lying stupid. Of course I have been again here a big help in that outcome and realization. Your funder should fire you.

  • I already did that. You can verify exactly what was said in the testimony video and which you were given.

    Next, Dr. Paul addresses the Hepatitis B vaccine routinely given to newborn babies in hospitals. He states that the amount of aluminum contained in this vaccine is 10 to 15 times the limit allowable for infants.

    He provided handouts for each committee member showing the peer-reviewed studies linking toxic aluminum exposure to brain damage and autism.

    (As well on the article page are listed for separate studies that support Dr Thomas’s said claim. Did you review those studies Jb? Why not? They are right there in plain side and listed on the said article page).

    According to Dr. Paul, the only people who need the Hepatitis B vaccine are moms who are positive for Hepatitis B, which is less than 1% in Oregon and the rest of the country:]

    Source:
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

    Parents Right to VACCINE INFORMED CONSENT | Dr. Paul’s Senate Testimony, Dr Paul Thomas
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNQVdOx87Ak

    Now you go and quote from testimony exactly what Paul Offit states and word for word, and then give me reference, data, and direct study evidence that what he states is true. Lets make the subject matter be, vaccine aluminum adjuvants and which Offit has made many false and unscientifically backed statements on and thus false claims of proven safety. Get started, Jb.

  • There isn’t anything you wouldn’t lie about and as I said before. The real question is why hasn’t your funder fired you yet for major trolling shill incompetence? You are making them all look bad, and when there was of course a delusional level of and an opposite outcome being expected. They need to replace you.

  • Proponent

    Lowell Hubbs: “.. and as well the load I posted in front of you today.”

    … …

    Speaking of loads..

    Translational Neurodegeneration | “Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data”

    What does.. “Retraction” mean, Lowell Hubbs?

  • Oh right exactly, if Offit’s opinion based article and literature listings are listed and found in Pubmed, then they are automatically considered as studies and not opinion pieces. If Dr Russel Blaylock Publishes anything at all it is automatically considered to be not a study and thus immediately swiped off the table of interest and debate consideration. As well any other studies which show and explain the truth of what is really happening with vaccines are found in Pubmed those too are as well swiped off the table of consideration.

    Hail to Paul Offit the most unscientific and lacking any actual study based backing to anything his opinions claim to on vaccines; that has ever been.

    So go ahead and list the Pubmed or any other studies that Offit has in or directly been connected to, and which directly show the safety of vaccines. List the study and the link to it? I have as well already, and directly addressed the junk science study falsely claiming to the safety and effectiveness of the Rotavirus vaccine.

  • Proponent

    Have another question for you, Lowell Hubbs..

    What does ‘gish gallop’ mean or refer to?

  • Jonathan Graham

    and for the daily double see if he can tell you what “Chi-squared” means.

  • This article will directly explain what happens, and what always happens to such studies.

    Fake Science: When is Medical “Science” Not Science?

    Bias #1. Piracy: Regulatory Capture of Agencies
    Bias #2. The Block: Non-Objective Peer Review (Grant Application Stage)
    Bias #3. The Check: Non-Objective Peer Review (Submitted Manuscript Stage)
    Bias #4. Mob Censorship/Study Assassination: Retraction of Published Studies Unfavorable to Corporate Agenda
    Bias #5. Flawed Meta-analyses, Inflated Presumption of Statistical Power
    Bias #6. Flawed Medical Education and Kick-Backs
    Bias #7. Failure of Duty to Warn, Neglect of Rights to Informed Consent
    Bias #8. News Media Blackout
    Bias #9. Government Agency Censorship of Informed American Citizens

    https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2016/12/30/fake-science-when-is-medical-science-not-science/

    August 27, 2014 Press Release, “Statement of William W. Thompson, Ph.D., Regarding the 2004 Article Examining the Possibility of a Relationship Between MMR Vaccine and Autism”
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE-AUGUST 27,2014

    STATEMENT OF WILLIAM W. THOMPSON, Ph.D., REGARDING THE 2004 ARTICLE EXAMINING THE POSSIBILITY OF A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MMR VACCINE AND AUTISM

    My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998.

    I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.

    My concern has been the decision to omit relevant findings in a particular study for a particular sub­ group for a particular vaccine. There have always been recognized risks for vaccination and I believe it is the responsibility of the CDC to properly convey the risks associated with receipt of those vaccines.

    I have had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker over the last 10 months regarding studies the CDC has carried out regarding vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorders. I share his belief that CDC decision-making and analyses should be transparent. I was not, however, aware that he was recording any of our conversations, nor was I given any choice regarding whether my name would be made public or my voice would be put on the Internet.

    Read more:
    https://morganverkamp.com/statement-of-william-w-thompson-ph-d-regarding-the-2004-article-examining-the-possibility-of-a-relationship-between-mmr-vaccine-and-autism/

    CDC Whistleblower Scientist Given Huge Bonus and Asked to Rewrite Fraudulent Vaccine-Autism Study

    Brian Hooker, Ph.D., issued a press release today clarifying some issues related to his past relationship to Dr. William Thompson of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Dr. Thompson originally contacted Dr. Hooker and confessed that the CDC had covered up data in a 2004 article published in the Journal of Pediatrics that linked the MMR vaccine to autism. When the phone conversations between Brian Hooker and William Thompson went public, Dr. Thompson hired a whistleblower attorney. However, in spite of the confessions of fraud at the CDC by Dr. Thompson, he retained his position at the CDC, and no committee chair in Congress dared to take on the pharmaceutical cartel and hold hearings on the matter. Dr. Thompson was never subpoenaed to be questioned about the alleged fraud at the CDC. Congressman Bill Posey was the lone voice in Congress calling for hearings, and he allegedly received documents from Dr. Thompson as well as an affidavit. Dr. Thompson appeared willing to testify, but only under oath before Congress. It never happened. With the recent popularity of the film VAXXED, which features the story of Dr. Thompson becoming a whistleblower and revealing fraud at the CDC, more information has come forward about just why it is believed Dr. Thompson retained his position at the CDC, and just how the CDC is going to handle this story, which for the most part has been censored in the mainstream media, but been on fire in the Alternative Media and Social Media. Dr. Brian Hooker made some comments at one of the Q & A sessions of the film’s premiere in Manhattan recently, and today he issued a formal press release explaining the basis of those comments.

    Regardless of the content of Dr. Thompson’s reanalysis paper, these facts remain: Read 1 through 6.

    http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/cdc-whistleblower-scientist-given-huge-bonus-and-asked-to-rewrite-fraudulent-vaccine-autism-study/

    CDC Scientist Whisteblowers Confirm Corruption Within the CDC

    The avalanche of bad news for the CDC hit breakaway speed with the public statement released by the CDC Spider — which stands for CDC Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research. Echoing the admissions of Dr. Thompson two years earlier, the CDC Spider scientists do not mince words in their opening paragraph stating: “We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics atour agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders.”

    Read More…
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2017/cdc-scientist-whisteblowers-confirm-corruption-within-the-cdc/

    Author Stands by Research

    The study author, California biomechanical engineer Brian Hooker, did a re-analysis of a 2004 autism study after one of its co-authors, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention health scientist William Thompson, said he had qualms about the original findings. Thompson said data was omitted, which skewed the results to show that there was no link. So Hooker got the data, added to it and ran his own calculations.

    Hooker said he never intended to dupe anyone and stands by his research –- though he admits he has some bias because he has an autistic son whom he believes has been “vaccine-injured.”

    “If I was just attempting to defraud people, why would I put myself through such scrutiny,” Hooker told ABC News in a phone interview, adding that he’s had more than 50 other studies published in scientific journals — albeit in other fields –- without ever having a retraction. “Why would I go to the effort and risk in terms of my career?”

    Hooker also serves on the board of Focus Autism, a nonprofit organization whose mission includes education about how vaccinations play a role in “chronic illnesses in general,” according to its website.

    “Do vaccines cause every case of autism? No. Do they play a major role in autism epidemic? The government’s own research points to ‘yes,’” the site reads.

    Source:
    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/now-retracted-autism-study-viral/story?id=25248179

    The U.S. Centers For Disease Control – A History of Corruption

    The recent controversy over the documentary “Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe,” despite being attacked by so many who haven’t seen it, is bringing public attention to real life episodes of vaccine damaged children and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) whistleblower Dr. William Thompson’s attempt to reveal fraud in the CDC. But this accurate CDC episode reveals only one episode of hiding data to deal disinformation publicly that doesn’t support vaccine safety. There have been several other vaccine report cover-ups and other types of fraudulent activity in addition to the Dr. Thompson whistleblower episode. They all support the need to dismantle the bloated budgetary expanse of CDC headquarters and activities. The CDC’s financial waste was investigated in great detail by Senator Tom Coburn in 2007, unfortunately nothing substantial came of his work. The CDC keeps demanding and getting more funding. We’ll start from the most recent discovery of lies and cover-ups and work back chronologically to earlier episodes of CDC outright blatant deception and fraud that serve to protect various industries instead of the people that are harmed by pharmaceutical interventions, especially vaccines.

    Read More…
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/the-u-s-centers-for-disease-control-a-history-of-corruption/

    CDC Corruption is Rampant
    https://worldmercuryproject.org/cdc-corruption-rampant/

    The CDC is being influenced by corporate and political interests
    http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/301432-the-cdc-is-being-being-influenced-by-corporate-and-political

    CDC Scientists Expose Agency Corruption

    The group, which claimed to represent scientists across the CDC’s diverse branches, calls itself SPIDER (Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research). The letter to CDC Chief of Staff, Carmen Villar, expressed alarm “about the current state of ethics at our agency.” The scientists complained that “our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests” and “circumvented by some of our leaders.”

    The scientists told Villar that, “questionable and unethical practices, occurring at all levels and in all of our respective units, threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.” The letter charged that staff level scientists “are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right,” and that, “Senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors.”

    Read more:
    https://worldmercuryproject.org/cdc-scientists-expose-agency-corruption/

    CDC EXPOSED

    As more and more ‘vaccination’ propaganda appears in the main stream media, it is crucial that the American people become aware of the outrageous scam the CDC and the medical industrial complex are running. It is important to understand that the CDC is a for-profit corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet and partnering with Big Pharma.

    The Center for Disease Control is a rogue institution engaged in the destruction of the health of the American population . . .

    Each one of these is hyperlinked with articles as to more information on the specific subject matter.

    CDC is a for-profit corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet
    CDC partners with big pharma
    CDC deceives health practitioners as well as the public
    CDC is rife with corruption
    CDC orchestrates propaganda campaigns based on nonexistent threats
    CDC wastes millions of dollars
    CDC hires researchers to create bogus studies
    CDC does not protect the population, but promotes whatever agenda those who control the White House [the international banksters] wish advanced
    CDC pays public health institutions and even has employees stationed in their state offices
    CDC ignores congressional reports and/or hearings
    CDC actively discredits/destroys reputable researchers
    CDC bilks insurance companies out of billions of dollars by knowingly creating disease through their massive vaccination programs
    CDC hires private think-tank corporations to produce phoney consensus reports
    CDC promotes the dumping of toxic wastes from the chemical fertilizer industry into public drinking water in the name of ‘fluoridation’ contributing to ill health
    CDC has a long and nasty relationship with the CIA
    While most physicians and public health workers may be unaware of the depth of the cover-up regarding vaccines, the harm they are causing is incalculable and the damage being inflicted on us and our children is devastating. Since the illnesses or injuries caused by toxic vaccines frequently don’t show up for weeks or even years, the medical industrial complex maintains plausible deniability.

    Read more:
    https://anticorruptionsociety.com/center-for-disease-control-exposed/

    More CDC corruption.

    Allegations of Scientific Misconduct by GACVS/WHO/CDC Representatives et al An open-letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization, Dr. Margaret Chan
    http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Allegations-of-Scientific-Misconduct-by-GACVS.pdf

    Gardasil Vaccine Becomes International Scandal: Deceptive Emails by Health Officials Exposed to Public
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/gardasil-vaccine-becomes-international-scandal-deceptive-emails-by-health-officials-exposed-to-public/

    Is HPV Vaccine Safety an Illusion Maintained by the Suppression of Science?
    http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccine-safety-an-illusion-maintained-by-suppression-of-science/

    SEVERE GARDASIL INJURIES & COVER-UP! ~ Mothers Speak at NYC City Hall 1-20-16
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4I1_bcj4Ow&list=LL8me2gYHgXwUdkWqb1DW0SQ&index=1

  • Jesus baby

    “Oh right exactly, if Offit’s opinion based article and literature listings are listed and found in Pubmed, then they are automatically considered as studies and not opinion pieces.”
    Lowell/tripnasty84, I JUST TOLD YOU some of Offit’s publications aren’t studies and are review articles or even opinion pieces, although MANY ARE STUDIES. I already linked you one of his rotavirus vaccine safety studies. Now contrast that to your boy Blaylock. He has NEVER PUBLISHED A VACCINE STUDY. NEVER. He is a coauthor on a speculative book chapter. THAT IS ALL.

  • What’s the problem JG and Proponent? Did they have to fire so called Jesus baby, for obvious incompetence?

    Obviously the term chi-squared has nothing to do with vaccines and/or providing of vaccine safety. So all you can keep pushing and in your major arrogance is how smart you are? How smart you are and when you can’t even reply to this.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    It has been only tried once to answer those questions, and it was a proven smoke screen, fail.

    My response to Antonio Baduy Cámara, and the blog Skeptical Raptor, as to their response to 9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxer’s
    http://www.vacfacts.info/my-response-to-antonio-baduy-caacutemara-and-the-blog-skeptical-raptor-as-to-their-response-to-9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    And nor can you reply to this.

    Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct
    http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/

    Vaccine Papers

    Articles

    Aluminum

    Debunking Aluminum Adjuvant, Part 1
    The Foundation for Al Adjuvant Safety Is False
    RETRACTED PAPER: Brain Damage from Al Adjuvant and Gardasil
    UPDATE: Adjuvant Transport Gets Complicated
    Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #1: 100mcg/kg
    Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #2: 300mcg/kg
    Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #3: 550mcg/kg
    Danger of Aluminum in Vaccines
    Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct
    Vaccine Aluminum Travels Into The Brain

    http://vaccinepapers.org/

    A chi-squared test, also written as χ2 test, is any statistical hypothesis test wherein the sampling distribution of the test statistic is a chi-squared distribution when the null hypothesis is true. Without other qualification, ‘chi-squared test’ often is used as short for Pearson’s chi-squared test. Chi-squared test – Wikipedia

    Such asinine arrogance and complete stupidity.

    You as well need to review and read through this information and as to your alleged statistical power in regard to studies. How can you have any such statistical power as to the studies showing vaccine safety, and when in reality those studies do not even exist? See how far out on the crazed and in denial lunacy trip you are? You aren’t even human.

    Fake Science: When is Medical “Science” Not Science?

    Bias #1. Piracy: Regulatory Capture of Agencies
    Bias #2. The Block: Non-Objective Peer Review (Grant Application Stage)
    Bias #3. The Check: Non-Objective Peer Review (Submitted Manuscript Stage)
    Bias #4. Mob Censorship/Study Assassination: Retraction of Published Studies Unfavorable to Corporate Agenda
    Bias #5. Flawed Meta-analyses, Inflated Presumption of Statistical Power
    Bias #6. Flawed Medical Education and Kick-Backs
    Bias #7. Failure of Duty to Warn, Neglect of Rights to Informed Consent
    Bias #8. News Media Blackout
    Bias #9. Government Agency Censorship of Informed American Citizens

    https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2016/12/30/fake-science-when-is-medical-science-not-science/

  • Scientific study evidence and supporting data information are not gish gallop, you demented shill.

  • Jesus baby

    “There isn’t anything you wouldn’t lie about and(sic) as I said before.”
    Are you saying I’m lying about your claiming there’s a shill investigation or that it isn’t fictional?

  • You are blatant liar, period. You can have the linked to evidence of published studies right in front of you, and you still lie about it all and in claiming that no studies have been published. Those as well are really damning studies in regard to vaccine safety and as well vaccine aluminum adjuvants, regardless of it they are a review study, or a straight up study. No specialist, nor doctor, nor so called scientist has even been able to direct refute the information that Dr Blaylock puts forth, and as to those facts. His information is as well quite readily publically available. And here sits so called Jesus baby posting and thinking they know it all, and as well without any scientific study evidence to the opposing contrary.

    I see as well and again that you entirely ignored my challenge to post all of the Pubmed and/or any other studies that Offit has done or directly been connected to, and which directly show the safety of vaccines. Again, list the study and the link to it? I have as well and as I said previously and directly addressed already the junk science study falsely claiming to the safety and effectiveness of the Rotavirus vaccine. So just admit that you can’t do it and that you can not support your exaggerated claims, regarding Offit.

  • It’s none of your business and beyond what I have stated. There is nothing fictional; and you can’t even form as much as a coherent statement.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, when you here back from your fantasy shill investigation please let us know. It’s been what, 3 weeks now?

  • So when you are cornered again, you just simply change the subject matter.

    So as well when are you going to just admit that I provided exactly what you in your stupidity requested? What kind of a false excuse will you come up with now and to avoid any responsibility to conduct an honest debate regarding vaccine risks? What else can you find and come up with for false excuses to evade responding to and directly addressing what I put in front of you?

  • Jesus baby

    Well, Lowell/tripnasty84, since you can’t provide a statement I guess I’ll have to spoon feed you after all.

    Dr. Paul in the video says, regarding the hepatitis B vaccine, “What makes this tragic is we now have data – it’s in your package – that shows this policy is not giving lasting immunity.”

    He claims this study showed that: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/133/6/e1500
    What did the study really find?
    He also threw up Brian Hooker’s retracted MMR/vaccine reanalysis at some point. Why?
    He also states, “Did you know that the hepatitis B vaccine contains 250 mcg of aluminum? That is 10-15X the maximal allowable dose for an infant.” He then posts a reference stating the recommended FDA limit for aluminum IN DAILY INTRAVENOUS FEEDING SOLUTIONS is 5 mcg/kg/day.
    Does he think the hepatitis B vaccine is given daily? If not, isn’t he misleading the senators, if not outright lying?
    Once you’ve answered these questions we can move on. It’s entirely up to you.

  • Jesus baby

    Look, Lowell/tripnasty84, I’m not going to argue with you when you’re just going to lie about the proven fact that your boy Blaylock has never published a vaccine study. I already gave you a link to all his publications on PubMed and all you’ve countered with was a speculative anti-vax book chapter he co-wrote.
    And for the third time, I also linked all of Dr. Offit’s publications on PubMed and even linked one example of a vaccine safety paper he authored, so you can lie about that too. The readers can clearly see who is right.

  • Jesus baby

    You want me to have my “funder” call your phone?

  • Jesus baby

    Oh Lowell/tripnasty84, you’re so cute sometimes. No, you didn’t provide anything specific (as I knew would happen). So I decided to spoon feed you. You now have 3 examples of your boy “Dr. Paul” lying to the Oregon state senate. I just gave them to you on the other thread. Have fun!

  • So then just comment on the other thread, and stop lying about it all on multiple threads.

  • So now you admit there is a funder. Perhaps we can get his phone pinged.

  • Oh good grief, that is of course what I have claimed to all along here, and that anything he has been putting forth is not supported by any form of proven scientific study. And you know that is what I have stated in multiple posts.

  • Jesus baby

    I did comment on the other thread. That’s what I just told you, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    I didn’t admit to anything of the sort, Lowell/tripnasty84. I’m just trying to ascertain your level of crazy. So, Lowell/tripnasty84, you want me to have my “funder” call you?

  • Jesus baby

    So you didn’t look at the link I gave you earlier showing just one of his examples of authoring a vaccine safety study? Or the list of over 100 PubMed publications I also linked for you? Open your eyes, Lowell aka tripnasty84.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Obviously the term chi-squared has nothing to do with vaccines and/or providing of vaccine safety.

    Guess you never read Hooker’s reanalysis of DeStefano et. al.

  • I knew you would attempt to come up with more false excuses to refuse to debate the vaccine risk issues and the reference material that I have continued to put in front of you.

    You asked for one single statement made by Dr Paul Thomas that was true, and I gave you exactly that, and specifically. It was as well backed up with the studies and as to the research that he as well put forth on the issue during that said testimony.

    Look, the insanity alone of injecting a new born infant with that much aluminum adjuvant and as well the other known toxic ingredients in the Hep B vaccine at birth, is simply another mindless exercise in a sheeple level of unquestioning, vaccine compliance. No infant is at any real risk of Hep B, unless the birth mother is positive.

    Hepatitis B Vaccine for Infants: Is it Worth It?
    http://www.vacfacts.info/hepatitis-b-vaccine-for-infants-is-it-worth-it-and-the-risk.html

    Lets look at the vaccine ingredients.

    Hepatitis B Vaccine (Recombinant) Recombivax
    Merck & Co., Inc. 2014
    Yeast protein, soy peptone, dextrose, amino acids, mineral salts, alum (potassium aluminum sulfate), amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, formaldehyde

    Hepatitis B Vaccine (Recombinant) Engerix-B
    GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals 2016

    Aluminum hydroxide, yeast protein, phosphate buffers, sodium chloride, sodium dihydrogen, phosphate dihydrate

    http://vaccines.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=005206#hep-b

    As for the Pediatrics study you put forth, what Dr. Paul has on that power point side bar appears to be not the study but what is titled as the Pediatrics Summary version of it. Do you have a copy of that, as it wasn’t available online. Until we have that there is no conclusive reference to be had, and read. That as well was not the only study that Dr Paul referenced to.

    How about if we used this below study, also from Pediatrics? You can’t have it both ways, study claims in the 2004 Pediatrics that claims to and I quote, Anti-HBs disappeared by 5 years of age in most children who were vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine from birth, unquote. And then as well claims in a 2014 study that conclude that: More than 90% of study participants immunized against HB as infants exhibited a seroprotective response to a challenge dose of vaccine. Duration of protection from the primary infant HB vaccine series extended through the adolescent years in the setting of low HB endemicity. (And how did they actually prove that, by the way; and it doesn’t look like they actually did)? Making that just another JUNK science study.

    Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004 Jul;23(7):650-5.
    Duration of hepatitis B immunity in low risk children receiving hepatitis B vaccinations from birth.
    Petersen KM1, Bulkow LR, McMahon BJ, Zanis C, Getty M, Peters H, Parkinson AJ.

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:
    The duration of protection after hepatitis B vaccination of infants is unknown.

    METHODS:
    We determined antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) at 4-13 years of age in 363 low risk children who had been vaccinated starting at birth with hepatitis B vaccine. Those with nonprotective titers ( or = 10 mIU/mL) of anti-HBs at 9 and 13 years, respectively. Of those who did not have protective antibody titers, 61% (33 of 54) and 67% (8 of 12), respectively, responded to a booster dose. In children of HBsAg-positive mothers, 31% retained protective anti-HBs at 12 years, and 90% (9 of 10) with nonprotective titers responded to a booster. In low risk children initially receiving a recombinant vaccine, 12.5% (26 of 208) and none (0 of 36) retained protective anti-HBs titers at 5 and 7 years of age, respectively. Of those who did not have protective titers, 90% (120 of 134) and 91% (32 of 35), respectively, responded to a booster.

    CONCLUSIONS:
    Anti-HBs disappeared by 5 years of age in most children who were vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine from birth. Although most children showed immunologic memory, one-third failed to demonstrate an anamnestic response to a booster dose. Additional long term studies of low risk infants are needed to determine duration of protection and the necessity for or timing of booster doses.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15247604

    J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2010;73(24):1665-77. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2010.519317.
    Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002.
    Gallagher CM1, Goodman MS.

    Abstract
    Universal hepatitis B vaccination was recommended for U.S. newborns in 1991; however, safety findings are mixed. The association between hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and parental report of autism diagnosis was determined. This cross-sectional study used weighted probability samples obtained from National Health Interview Survey 1997-2002 data sets. Vaccination status was determined from the vaccination record. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds for autism diagnosis associated with neonatal hepatitis B vaccination among boys age 3-17 years, born before 1999, adjusted for race, maternal education, and two-parent household. Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life. Non-Hispanic white boys were 64% less likely to have autism diagnosis relative to nonwhite boys. Findings suggest that U.S. male neonates vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1999 (from vaccination record) had a threefold higher risk for parental report of autism diagnosis compared to boys not vaccinated as neonates during that same time period. Nonwhite boys bore a greater risk.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170

    Chronic Hepatitis B Infection in Adolescents Who
    Received Primary Infantile Vaccination

    Conclusion: Having maternal HBeAg positivity is the most important determinant for HBsAg positivity in adolescents who received postnatal passive-active HB vaccination 15 years before. A significant proportion of complete vaccinees may have lost their immunological memories against HBsAg. (HEPATOLOGY 2013;57:38-45)

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hep.25988/pdf

    Hepatology. 2013 Jan;57(1):37-45. doi: 10.1002/hep.25988. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
    Chronic hepatitis B infection in adolescents who received primary infantile vaccination.
    Wu TW1, Lin HH, Wang LY.

    CONCLUSION:
    Having maternal HBeAg positivity is the most important determinant for HBsAg positivity in adolescents who received postnatal passive-active HB vaccination 15 years before. A significant proportion of complete vaccinees may have lost their immunological memories against HBsAg.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22858989

    FAIL: Infant Hep B Vaccines Perform Shamefully; Time To End Them?
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/fail-infant-hep-b-vaccines-perform-shamefully-time-end-them

    Hepatitis B vaccination with or without hepatitis B immunoglobulin at birth to babies born of HBsAg-positive mothers prevents overt HBV transmission but may not prevent occult HBV infection in babies: a randomized controlled trial.

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvh.12102/abstract

    HEPATITIS B VACCINE

    The hepatitis B vaccine became commercially available in the US in 1982 and was recommended for certain high-risk groups of people. However, when vaccination programs aimed at these groups did not stem an increase in hepatitis B infections, the ACIP recommended universal immunization of infants against this disease in 1991.[100]

    An analysis of reports made to VAERS over 11 years – from 1991 to 2001 – found that hepatitis B was the most frequently mentioned vaccine in 1991-1995 reports and the second-most commonly mentioned (after varicella) in 1996-2001 reports.[101]

    An earlier study found that 12,520 adverse reactions to hepatitis B were reported to VAERS from 1991 to 1994, with 14% of these reactions involving newborns and infants.[102] Approximately one-third of reactions involved an emergency room visit or hospitalization, according to the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). There were 440 deaths, about 180 of which were attributed to SIDS.[103]

    Dr. Jane M. Orient, executive director of AAPS, has stated that according to a federal government study, “Children younger than 14 are three times more likely to die or suffer adverse reactions after receiving hepatitis B vaccines than to catch the disease.”[104]

    In adults, hepatitis B vaccination was associated with serious autoimmune disorders in one analysis of VAERS data and a review of the literature, published in 2004. These disorders included arthritis, pancytopenia/ thrombocytopenia, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, myelitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, and optic neuritis. In adult use of the hepatitis B vaccine, there were 465 positive re-challenge adverse events.[105]

    Source:
    http://cognitiveliberty.net/2015/vaccination-an-updated-analysis-of-the-health-risk-part-ii/

  • I did look at the link and in looking through what was there, I realized just how ridiculous that link is and as to Offit’s lack of any studies to support his vaccine safety claims. I already knew that regarding Offit long ago, and because I have looked at this situation and all of it before. No one is interested in his opinion pieces. You open your eyes, fool; and realize that I am correct about what I am stating. As I asked you for previously, where are the studies? You can keep on evading the truth and dancing around it all you want, but as I said the only one here that has been seriously duped, is you.

  • Guess you never read this article that i put in front of you. You obviously ignored it and so I will put it in front of you again, and which is directly and descriptively applicable to this said study retraction situation.

    Fake Science: When is Medical “Science” Not Science?

    Bias #1. Piracy: Regulatory Capture of Agencies
    Bias #2. The Block: Non-Objective Peer Review (Grant Application Stage)
    Bias #3. The Check: Non-Objective Peer Review (Submitted Manuscript Stage)
    Bias #4. Mob Censorship/Study Assassination: Retraction of Published Studies Unfavorable to Corporate Agenda
    Bias #5. Flawed Meta-analyses, Inflated Presumption of Statistical Power
    Bias #6. Flawed Medical Education and Kick-Backs
    Bias #7. Failure of Duty to Warn, Neglect of Rights to Informed Consent
    Bias #8. News Media Blackout
    Bias #9. Government Agency Censorship of Informed American Citizens

    https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2016/12/30/fake-science-when-is-medical-science-not-science/

    Of course I read it. How in your mind do you actually rationalize that the CDC’s William Thompson stated directly to Brian Hooker that they had covered up that said statistical evidence, and now claim that it did not happen? And journal Translational Neurodegeneration after first accepting the study, later claims that they retract the study because of and due to these reasons below. This clearly amounts to first rate silencing and censoring of existing scientific research.

    Retraction

    The Editor and Publisher regretfully retract the article [1] as there were undeclared competing interests on the part of the author which compromised the peer review process. Furthermore, post-publication peer review raised concerns about the validity of the methods and statistical analysis, therefore the Editors no longer have confidence in the soundness of the findings. We apologize to all affected parties for the inconvenience caused.

    Transl Neurodegener. 2014 Aug 8;3:16. doi: 10.1186/2047-9158-3-16. eCollection 2014.
    Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data.
    Hooker BS1.

    RESULTS:
    When comparing cases and controls receiving their first MMR vaccine before and after 36 months of age, there was a statistically significant increase in autism cases specifically among African American males who received the first MMR prior to 36 months of age. Relative risks for males in general and African American males were 1.69 (p=0.0138) and 3.36 (p=0.0019), respectively. Additionally, African American males showed an odds ratio of 1.73 (p=0.0200) for autism cases in children receiving their first MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age versus 24 months of age and thereafter.

    CONCLUSIONS:
    The present study provides new epidemiologic evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25114790?dopt=Abstract

  • It is obvious who is actually crazy, and I just answered that question. Are you really that cognitively challenged?

  • Jesus baby

    So you’ve not addressed any of Dr. Paul’s 3 lies, Lowell/tripnasty84. I gave you the hep B study he misrepresents in his slide presentation. The title of the study is on the slide. You claim you don’t have the study…SMH.
    You don’t even address the other 2 lies.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowe/tripnast84 you are a dishonest goal-post moving fraud. You claimed Offit never published a study, then that he never published a vaccine study, then that he never published a vaccine safety study, and now that he never published a vaccine safety study that an ignorant anti-vaccine nut job like you would find persuasive. Wipe your eyes stop your sniveling.

  • Jesus baby

    So you DO want me to have my “funder” call you? So you all can get his phone pinged? Is that part of your crack team’s shill investigation? I mean you have to have the subject of your investigation CALL you? So you can find out who it is? And THEN you can start investigating? Who’s running this investigation? Barney Fife?

  • I suspect I already know who the person is and they have posted right here on this site and admitted to it. Have them call and see what happens. You know they won’t.

  • I see how it works. Whatever you are guilty of doing, you just turn that round and in your hypocrisy falsely accuse me of the same thing.

    I have never said that Offit has never been part of a published a study. I never said that Offit never published a vaccine safety study. In fact I directly responded to and refuted the one single study that you posted, regarding the Rotavirus vaccine.

    What I asked you was where are all of Offit’s vaccine safety studies, and to support his known claims of vaccine safety. After now the ongoing continuance of your repeatedly evading the question posts and that you have made now, you still have not answered that question. In your typically errant style you even went so far as to try to tell me to find them. I am not searching from your link to find something that I already know is not there, and as I have described it. You find them. Get started. The only one actually yet dancing around it all and sniveling, is you.

  • I have that study and read that study; what I said was that we don’t have the Pediatrics Summary version of it that clearly Dr Paul was using. I asked you, do you have it?

    In fact I have quite clearly more than sufficiently addressed all of this said issue and matter. Keep lying about it. That is all you can ever do.

  • Jesus baby

    You said there were other people running this investigation, Lowell/tripnasty84. You implied they were a rough bunch not to be messed with lightly. Shouldn’t the “finder” be calling them?

  • Jesus baby

    “I have never said that Offit has never been part of a published study.”

    Liar. When I posted the 100+ PubMed papers he has authored you said, “Those are not studies that Offit himself has done.”

  • Jesus baby

    The link is to the entire study, Lowell/tripnasty84, that your boy referenced and claimed was proof the hep B vaccine didn’t work.

    I’ve given you 3 blatant examples of just some of the lies he told the Oregon state senate about vaccine research. You’ve given nothing to counter them. Zippo.

  • David W

    Hint: not two cups of tea

  • Jonathan Graham

    uess you never read this article that i put in front of you.

    I’m only going to read something that you have made sufficiently clear to me as being relevant. At the time I was talking about Hookers article so I’ll be responding to things which have been made sufficiently clear to me as relevant.

    Of course I read it.

    Then you don’t really understand what the chi-squared test is. If you did and you read it. You would see that Hooker had chosen entirely the wrong statistical tool here and biased his data. He also fudged a few other things.

    How in your mind do you actually rationalize that the CDC’s William Thompson stated directly to Brian Hooker that they had covered up that said statistical evidence, and now claim that it did not happen?

    If Thompson does really believe that the data in DeStefano et al. is strongly indicative of a relationship then he is simply not a very good statistician. Everything else is noise once you realize that the data doesn’t support Thompson’s conclusion very well.

  • If that wasn’t made sufficiently clear and relevant to you, then you must have a large hole in your head, and as for the information titled, Fake Science: When is Medical “Science” Not Science? What it speaks to is entirely relevant in regard to the false claims that you always continue to make regarding the inflated presumption of statistical power in regard to the level of actual junk science that you believe in.

    The rest of that said expose is obviously as well directly relevant to both the known 2004 DeStefano study, and as well the Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data, study produced by Hooker BS1; and then was retracted, and do to exactly the political and control of information issues that were described and outlined in the said expose that I gave you, titled …Fake Science: When is Medical “Science” Not Science?

    So you are again lying, as a fact.

    Claim: [You would see that Hooker had chosen entirely the wrong statistical tool here and biased his data. He also fudged a few other things.]

    That has not been shown or proven to be the case. Again, you make claims with no evidence to support it.

    Claim: [If Thompson does really believe that the data in DeStefano et al.(or in Hookers reanalysis or in what has been provided as his original analysis) is strongly indicative of a relationship then he is simply not a very good statistician.]

    Again, all talk and with nothing to back it up but your own alleged claims and false assumptions. Again, you are misrepresenting a questionable piece of study research, and simply manipulating it with your own biased and favored assumptions. Your claims amount to simply nothing more than your biased opinion.

    Claim: [Everything else is noise once you realize that the data doesn’t support Thompson’s conclusion very well.]

    Which is again just another biased and unsupported claim.

    I recently ran across this informational video, and the first thing I thought of was you. You could learn well from this information, but of course in your pathetic denial that this is what really goes on with you, you will again entirely disregard it.

    Cognitive Dissonance, Willful Ignorance and the War on Consciousness
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZsCfsT8ZDU

  • So where is the Pediatrics Summary version of that study and which you can see is what he actually used? And he is actually your boy, as he is a well known vaccinating Pediatrician. I viewed that video and I know what I seen. If that data he produced was not in the study, then where did he get it from? Can you answer that? Do you actually think he just simply lied about it? If just 24% of these teens had protective [anti-Hep B surface antigen antibody] levels of >10 IU/ml; then that is the end of the story right there. The vaccine is actually ineffective in regard to the said long term and assumed antibody levels of protective immunity;

    And what about all the rest of the information and study data I posted, and that you of course and again entirely ignored?

    When you get the chance, sit down and listen to this informational video. You could learn a lot from that if you ever had the honesty to admit that information is actually talking straight to and directly about you …so called Jesus baby. Wake up.

    Cognitive Dissonance, Willful Ignorance and the War on Consciousness
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZsCfsT8ZDU

  • And just to keep arguing, you repost that and of course in taking it entirely out of context.

    Again, opinion pieces are not vaccine safety studies, and nor are they review studies.

    How long are you yet going to continue to dance around it and what I previously replied to you? Get to listing all the studies that Offit has done or that he has been connected to, in regard to showing the proof and evidence of vaccine safety? Apparently, you don’t understand the simplest of questions, and nor what your responsibility level actually is here. Get started.

  • You said that. I didn’t say that and nor make any claim to any such thing one way or the other, arsehole. So do you know something that you are not saying, and it sure appears so? Where would you get such information? The misguided funder can try and call anyone he wants to. And your point is?

  • Jesus baby

    ” If just 24% of these teens had protective [anti-Hep B surface antigen antibody] levels of >10 IU/ml; then that is the end of the story right there.”
    Readers, let this statement serve as an example of why Lowell Hubbs, aka tripnasty84, cannot interpret medical literature. He simply doesn’t have the educational background or intellect to do so. If he can’t copy/paste or plagiarize someone else’s interpretation his contributions are worthless.

  • And by the way you are nothing but the Barney Fife of vaccine injury and risk investigation. Leaving it to you-you and by the time you actually find and admit to the truth of serious vaccine risks, Mayberry will have elected Bugs Bunny as mayor, and our President will be Howdy Doody.

  • Jesus baby

    How in the world do you imagine your statement was taken out of context, Lowell/tripnasty84?

  • First of all, you simply made up the claim that I am associated with some falsely alleged sock puppet known as aka tripnasty84. In fact it may be highly probable that you created that poster yourself. That is as well likely the real reason they never reply posted again.

    – 16 year olds in the US that had completed their 3 shot series by age one

    – Just 24% of these teens had a protective (anti-Hep B surface antibody) levels of >10 IU/ml

    That is what the said Oregon Senate testimony video stated. Where did that figure some from, if not from that Pediatrics study? You still cant answer that. What appeared on the screen was clearly a Pediatrics Summary version of that study, and not the standard study itself.

    I also see again that you conveniently ignored the other statements, and the questions in my previous reply.

    All so called Jesus baby can do is plagiarize the misleading work of such misinformation and disinformation specialists as David Gorski, and Micheal Simpson, aka the No Science There blog and that of Skeptical Raptor.

    I simply do my own research from the most determined unbiased and independent data, and study sources available.

  • Jesus baby

    Lol, Lowell/tripnasty84, that’s why you said, “You wouldn’t want to know or meet them; trust me.” You liar.

  • Jesus baby

    Is the situation serious enough that Andy let Barney have a bullet for his gun, Lowell/tripnasty84?

  • No, because you would likely shoot yourself in the foot,
    Jesus baby/tripnasty84.

  • Jonathan Graham

    If that wasn’t made sufficiently clear and relevant to you, then you must have a large hole in your head

    Lowell it’s up to you to make your points clear to the audience you are speaking to. Given how much copypasta you indulge in the less likely I’m going to bother.

    When is Medical “Science” Not Science? What it speaks to is entirely relevant in regard to the false claims that you always continue to make regarding the inflated presumption of statistical power in regard to the level of actual junk science that you believe in.

    The problem Lowell is that you have somewhere between zero and negative a million in terms of skill at statistical analysis so YOUR word that something is relevant doesn’t carry might weight. If you want to make an argument go ahead but just saying “It’s really really relevant to statistical analysis” is of course nothing but a claim about something you know less than nothing about. See the issue?

    So you are again lying, as a fact.

    Nope. Sorry.

    Claim: [You would see that Hooker had chosen entirely the wrong statistical tool here and biased his data. He also fudged a few other things.]
    That has not been shown or proven to be the case. Again, you make claims with no evidence to support it.

    Again this should be obvious if you understand what’s going on in the chi-squared. So I ask again, do you understand what the chi-squared is and how it works. Say “no” and I’ll explain it. Say “yes” and I’ll assume you are lying.

    Claim: [If Thompson does really believe that the data in DeStefano et al.(or in Hookers reanalysis or in what has been provided as his original analysis) is strongly indicative of a relationship then he is simply not a very good statistician.]
    Again, all talk and with nothing to back it up but your own alleged claims and false assumptions.

    It’s not a claim Lowell it’s a consequence. Someone who understands statistics wouldn’t make the error of believing a very fragile analysis.

    Claim: [Everything else is noise once you realize that the data doesn’t support Thompson’s conclusion very well.]
    Which is again just another biased and unsupported claim.

    Again, it’s not a claim, it’s a consequence.

  • Jesus baby/tripnasty84, that doesn’t specify anything specific. However, what I said is quite true. You already know who they are, so just quit lying about it, and as if you don’t. Is your funder ready to make the call yet?

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, it’s frequently hard to tell from your replies whether you’re just stupid or whether you pretend not to understand questions that have embarrassing answers.

    The lie your boy told on this IS NOT ABOUT THE 24% BASELINE ANTIBODY TITERS

    I don’t want to spoon feed you like a grumpy baby sitting in a highchair with a bib and a sippy cup. I want you to read the study. I want you to pay particular attention to the conclusions of the study, and I want to see you explain how your boy’s summary that “we now have data – it’s in your package – that shows this policy is not giving lasting immunity” is truthful.
    There are some key words in the study that you’ll need to concentrate on, such as “90%”, “postchallenge seroprotection” and “anamnestic response”.

  • Because it clearly was, Jesus baby/tripnasty84.

    “Those are not studies that Offit himself has done.” ..means that the large majority of that Pubmed literature is not a study at all, but a scientifically unsupported, opinion piece.

    So quit ignoring my previous replies, and get to and as I said, listing all of the studies from that Pubmed list that Offit has done, and/or has been part of, and which demonstrate the proven safety of vaccines, and as well multiple vaccines given in one day and over an extended period of years. So far you came up with one study on the Rotavirus vaccine, and which I refuted with evidence that-that vaccine is neither safe and nor effective, and for the reasons that I outlined with reference.

  • Jesus baby

    ” You already know who they are…”
    Lowell/tripnasty84, “they” are just visions in your dreams and fantasies, or voices in your head.

  • Jesus baby

    Or is it the Keystone cops you’re using? Maybe you should call Scooby Doo and the gang. I dunno. I’m just trying to help, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • So in all honesty and seriousness here, you admit to having nothing to actually respond to my previous reply with. And even creating all that crazy smoke screen of bullshit, simply and falsely claiming that I am not qualified to discuss anything at all here; you still have NOTHING. And you never do. All you ever have is more of your sick denial, and a perpetual smoke screen of your cognitive dissonance; and just like i said.

    Why don’t you cut this post up as well and create your own outcome of looking again even more bizarre, lying, and crazed than you already do.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, learn what “taken out of context” means. It doesn’t mean you can make up ridiculous explanations to justify stupid statements.
    I already gave you a 100+ list of his PubMed articles and one very specific vaccine study just to shut you up. But you won’t shut up. Let me explain something to you again. The definition of a vaccine safety study is NOT – I repeat – is NOT a study that must persuade your average anti-vax idiot to believe vaccines are safe and effective. Nothing in the world can do that.

  • Who are the Keystone cops, Jesus baby/tripnasty84?

  • So called Jesus baby/tripnasty84, see again, that is what demented level losers always do; they falsely argue what words and terms mean, and then say oh that is not what I meant, and that is not what I said, and that is not the meaning of the words and terms I used. Around and around it goes; and that when the obvious truth is right front and center, yet being and remaining entirely denied.

    You gave me that said list of 100+ Pubmed articles and just by googling Paul Offit on Pubbmed. Yet you can not beyond one single study on the Rotarvirus vaccines, and which I have already refuted; you can not from that list formulate a list of studies done by Offit, or anyone else that Offit did a study with; and that which that list of studies can and does support the issue of vaccine risk safety?

    You fail and fail again; and.still you come back in here making again your senseless replies, that entirely ignore the issue of and the claim that Offit has never had any real vaccine safety study science to back up, any of his known vaccine safety claims. .

  • Jonathan Graham

    you admit to having nothing to actually respond to my previous reply with.

    This is kind of an interesting discussion. To me, Lowell you are standing in broad daylight and denying that the sun is in the sky. Again, I can think of only two reasons for that: a) You are in denial or b) you don’t understand what I mean by ‘the sun is in the sky’.

    So which is it Lowell? Do you understand what a chi-squared test is or do you not. If the former then it’s as obvious as the sun being in the sky the problem with Hooker’s reanalysis and if you’re still denying it then I suspect there’s something wrong with you. If not, then I’ll explain it.

    You just let me know.

  • Jesus baby/tripnasty84, and so now that you had nothing left to argue, (and just to keep on arguing), you simply change it up, change your claim, and move again the goal posts.

    Look, you can try to spin it, and spin, and spin around all around again, and all you want. I have directly and specifically addressed here in my previous replies what you continue to claim to. I did that in no uncertain terms. I read the study and of course I know what it stated.

    Again, you as well have not answered my previous question. Where did Dr Paul get this said data? if not in the said Pediatrics study, where did he get it? Are you going to tell me that he lied about it all and in front of the Oregon state senate, deliberately? And are you are going tell me that no one there realized that and made an issue regarding it? There were other doctors and people connected to the biased interests of getting that bill based in that state, and as well their health department. And no one caught it, and you are claiming Dr Paul pulled off the lie of the century and got one over on the pro-vax crowd in that state? You are arguing about nothing, period.

    All of what I also put forth in my previous replies as well fully supports the fact that vaccinating a just born infant with an aluminum containing Hep B vaccine, is not only doing more obvious harm than good, but that it is majorly irresponsible, and in only looking after the vaccine profits of big pharma. Do you know how much profit on that vaccine big pharma makes when every last infant born in the US is given an unneeded Hepatitis B vaccine? But profits never dictate vaccine policy, do they?

    I am actually the person who doesn’t want to continue to spoon feed you like a grumpy baby sitting in a highchair with a bib and a sippy cup, little Jesus baby. You hypocrite.

    – 16 year olds in the US that had completed their 3 shot series by age one

    – Just 24% of these teens had a protective (anti-Hep B surface antibody) levels of >10 IU/ml

  • Jesus baby

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystone_Cops

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8jphxpi1ro

    Do they resemble your crack detective team, Lowell/tripnasty84?

  • You again talk your complete bullshit and with never any means to back it up with facts, honesty, and even as much as common sense and reason.

    Your chi-squared test quackery is something you can just flush straight down the toilet. It is entirely worthless in this debate, and/or as to applying it to any debate of these matters.

    Again, this is what you actually should be focusing on, but you refuse to.

    Fake Science: When is Medical “Science” Not Science?

    Bias #1. Piracy: Regulatory Capture of Agencies
    Bias #2. The Block: Non-Objective Peer Review (Grant Application Stage)
    Bias #3. The Check: Non-Objective Peer Review (Submitted Manuscript Stage)
    Bias #4. Mob Censorship/Study Assassination: Retraction of Published Studies Unfavorable to Corporate Agenda
    Bias #5. Flawed Meta-analyses, Inflated Presumption of Statistical Power

    Once the scientific literature has been sanitized of any studies that could show harm for a corporation’s product, someone is funded (usually by the corporation with financial interest) to conduct a special type of study called a meta-analysis. In a meta-analysis, a supposedly unbiased sample of available studies are pulled together, and their statistical analyses and results condensed into one, large conclusion. Well, if the previous four biases were not enough to sanitize the literature, there is always obfuscation by combining studies of different types, or rejection of studies with significant effects for having too small sample sizes – even though the positive result already demonstrated sufficient power at the sample size at which the study was conducted. The meta-analysis then finds no overall significant negative effect, and is cited as being “the largest study to date”, based on “over a million patients”, both of which are non-sequitur descriptors of meta-analyses, and are therefore patently untrue. One hundred poorly designed, under-powered studies that found no significant negative effect will result in one large meta-analysis that conclude no significant effect – so the citation of hundreds of thousands of patients involved in a meta-analysis does not imply increased power.

    Bias #6. Flawed Medical Education and Kick-Backs
    Bias #7. Failure of Duty to Warn, Neglect of Rights to Informed Consent
    Bias #8. News Media Blackout
    Bias #9. Government Agency Censorship of Informed American Citizens

    Source:
    https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2016/12/30/fake-science-when-is-medical-science-not-science/

    You say that YOU are the only one qualified here to discuss the vaccine issues, and even though you have never once put forth your credentials. You say that anything you claim to automatically invalidates anything I have put forth here on these articles, based on assumable your education; yet you have never identified if in fact you have had any education in this area at all. You claim to be only some sort of an IT tech security/consult. You conveniently and falsely claim to not understand anything I put forth and thus it is not satisfactory enough and nor well enough put forth to respond to anything I put for for facts and study research.

    So in your real of twisted thinking, would you consider this man and which is a well known Pediatrician with a large practice in Oregon state, to be qualified to address the vaccine harm and as well the vaccine risks issue? If not, why not? You have direct questions here.

    The UNADULTERATED TRUTH ABOUT VACCINES & Informed Consent | Dr. Paul Thomas, Pediatrician
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlXdTYeEv8k

    Brand new podcast–listen to the doctor! Know a couple expecting their first child? Someone with young children? PLEASE share!!

    Dr. Thomas has the largest practice of pediatrics in Portland, OR for a reason–he tells the truth about vaccines and practices true informed consent. Please listen, please share!

    6. Dr. Paul Thomas Interview, How to End the Autism Epidemic
    https://soundcloud.com/user-507883655/6-dr-paul-thomas-interview-how-to-end-the-autism-epidemic

    Parents Right to VACCINE INFORMED CONSENT | Dr. Paul’s Senate Testimony, Dr Paul Thomas
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNQVdOx87Ak

    Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D. – Preserve Medical Freedom – Vaccines Linked to Autism
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, the whole point of giving you the long list of PubMed articles authored by Dr.Offit was because you claimed stupidly that he hadn’t done any studies – that all he did was write opinion pieces based on other people’s research. When you started moving the goal posts and stupidly claimed he never did a real “study”, then a vaccine study, then a vaccine safety study, I linked you one I found on page 3 of his extensive list. That took about 25 seconds.
    Now, stupidly, you’re claiming I have to link a Dr.Offit vaccine safety study that would convince you, a science-denying Neanderthal, that vaccines are safe and effective. Those goal posts are moved back so far no one in the universe could score.
    If God Himself, in all His Glory, parted the heavens right over your head and poked your forehead with His finger and said, with rolling thunder and blinding flashes of lightning all around Him, “Lowell Hubbs, aka tripnasty84, you sinner, vaccines are safe and effective. Stop trying to mislead My children!” I imagine you’d think He was a pharma shill.

  • Jesus baby

    Of course I have to spoon feed you once again, Lowell/tripnasty84. I do this primarily for the readers, not you, because you are an idiot.

    When your boy testified to the Oregon state senate about hepatitis B vaccination in infants, he claimed the Pediatrics study “shows this policy is not giving lasting immunity”. The conclusion of the study’s authors, however, was:

    CONCLUSIONS: More than 90% of study participants immunized against HB as infants exhibited a seroprotective response to a challenge dose of vaccine. Duration of protection from the primary infant HB vaccine series extended through the adolescent years in the setting of low HB endemicity.

    So, again, you are an idiot who shouldn’t be giving medical advice on the internet, and your anti-vax pediatrician is a lying sack of $hit.

  • Jesus baby/tripnasty84. In all your twisted and hypocritical claims filled dishonesty, you still have not produced anything more than one study which Offit participated in and from that list. That study was refuted on the grounds that Rotavirus is clearly not safe and nor is ti effective, and for the vaccine shedding reasons to other children that makes it not effective, and as for the risk of Intussusception, it is not safe. As well I showed you that the Rotavirus vaccine is contaminated with a pig virus, and that-that situation remains unresolved; as well as the contamination risk remains unresolved as for all vaccines. Whatever the antigen is grown on presents for contamination and risk issues that can not be removed from the vaccine. .

    What more does Offit have for studies on that Pubmed list, and as for showing the evidence of vaccine safety? Lets make one category for studies he has been directly involved in, and one category for studies he has reviewed and that he feels support the issue of vaccine safety. Lets as well make a third category for the studies that show the vaccine safety of aluminum adjuvants? You can go get that from your Pubmed list that you referenced to. Get started.

    Lancet Infect Dis. 2008 Oct;8(10):642-9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70231-7.
    Rotavirus vaccines: viral shedding and risk of transmission.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18922486

    Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Jul;34(7):763-8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000715.
    Risk of Intussusception After Rotavirus Vaccination: Meta-analysis of Postlicensure Studies.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069948

    Millions of Children Infected with ‘Vaccine Safety Experts’ Rotateq Vaccine: Dr. Paul Offit
    Unfortunately for Dr. Offit (not so affectionately named Dr. Profit), a 2010 study published in Journal of Virology revealed that his multi-million dollar grossing patent on the Rotateq vaccine contains a live simian retrovirus (with a 96% match of certainty) that has likely infected millions of children over the past few years with a virus that causes great harm. Retrovirus infections are permanent, and can carry on indefinitely into future generations. In other words, once they are inserted into the human genome they can not be removed. View the entire PDF here.

    Moreover, a 2014 study published in Advances in Virology found Dr. Offit’s vaccine contains a “a baboon endogenous virus strain M7…likely due to the monkey cell line in which RotaTeq was produced from.” View the entire PDF here.

    Read more:
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/breaking-news-millions-children-infected-vaccine-safety-experts-rotateq-vaccine

    VACCINE CONTAMINATION: A THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH
    http://www.nvic.org/Downloads/Rotavirus-Campaign/VACCINE-CONTAMINATION–A-THREAT-TO-HUMAN-HEALTH.aspx

    Rotavirus Vaccines Still Contaminated With Pig Virus DNA
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/rotavirus-vaccines-still-contamined-pig-virus-dna

    Vaccine Contamination
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-contamination.html

    Vaccine Production With – Human Diploid cells (aborted fetal cell tissue used to grow vaccine antigens, and with more unresolved containation issues)
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-production-with—human-diploid-cells-aborted-fetal-cell—tissue.html

    Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct
    http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/

    Vaccine Papers
    Articles
    Aluminum

    Debunking Aluminum Adjuvant, Part 1
    The Foundation for Al Adjuvant Safety Is False
    RETRACTED PAPER: Brain Damage from Al Adjuvant and Gardasil
    UPDATE: Adjuvant Transport Gets Complicated
    Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #1: 100mcg/kg
    Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #2: 300mcg/kg
    Aluminum Adjuvant Injection Experiment #3: 550mcg/kg
    Danger of Aluminum in Vaccines
    Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct
    Vaccine Aluminum Travels Into The Brain

    http://vaccinepapers.org/

  • Jonathan Graham

    Your chi-squared test quackery is something you can just flush straight down the toilet. It is entirely worthless in this debate, and/or as to applying it to any debate of these matters.

    Let’s see if I can ask you an easier question. Have you, Lowell Hubbs ever PERFORMED a chi-squared test on an analysis?

  • Irrelevant. You should just stop posting and before you make yourself look any more in denial insane; and as if that anyone could imagine that would even be possible, I am sure you will yet accomplish it.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Irrelevant.

    No it’s not.

    See Proponent was talking about Hookers article.
    Hooker’s article uses the chi-squared method for it’s significance testing.
    Hooker was wrong to do so, so his conclusions are nonsense.

    See, relevant. The only question left is do you understand this rather larger problem. Which is the same as asking: “Do you understand how the Chi-squared test works?”.

    Well Lowell…..do you? A simple “yes” or “no” will do. :-)

  • Jesus baby/tripnasty84, I read the study and I know what it said. Again, where did the this come from? Until you can explain that way, you have nothing.

    – 16 year olds in the US that had completed their 3 shot series by age one

    – Just 24% of these teens had a protective (anti-Hep B surface antibody) levels of >10 IU/ml

    Here is the Oregon Senate testimony again that it comes from.

    Parents Right to VACCINE INFORMED CONSENT | Dr. Paul’s Senate Testimony
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNQVdOx87Ak

    Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D. – Preserve Medical Freedom – Vaccines Linked to Autism
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2015/dr-paul-thomas-m-d-preserve-medical-freedom-vaccines-linked-to-autism/

    As far as that video why do you as well entirely continue to ignore the information in regard to the risk of aluminum adjuvant exposure? Do you really think it is ok to inject a newborn with a vaccine that contains an aluminum adjuvant? Aluminum adjuvants have been known to cause to cause major levels of inflammation due to the fact that aluminum adjuvant use is a very inexact science that caused the immune system to go on high alert to anything and everything it determines to be not only a pathogen but as well non self. In fact studies have shown aluminum adjuvants to cause as well over-activation of the brains microglia cells and with resulting long term brain inflammation. Is that good for as just born baby? Is that worth it for a Hepatitis B exposure and infection that no baby has a risk for?

    What about that study as well that Dr Paul put forth in that said hearing in which it was found that male infants that were injected with the Hep B vaccine had a 300% increased change of developing autism. But none of that means anything to you right? And who is the person that really has to keep spoon feeding this stuff, and to you over and over again, and as you repeatedly and intentionally ignore it?

    Hepatitis B Vaccination of Male Neonates and Autism

    J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2010;73(24):1665-77. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2010.519317.
    Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002.
    Gallagher CM1, Goodman MS.

    Abstract
    Universal hepatitis B vaccination was recommended for U.S. newborns in 1991; however, safety findings are mixed. The association between hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and parental report of autism diagnosis was determined. This cross-sectional study used weighted probability samples obtained from National Health Interview Survey 1997-2002 data sets. Vaccination status was determined from the vaccination record. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds for autism diagnosis associated with neonatal hepatitis B vaccination among boys age 3-17 years, born before 1999, adjusted for race, maternal education, and two-parent household. Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life. Non-Hispanic white boys were 64% less likely to have autism diagnosis relative to nonwhite boys. Findings suggest that U.S. male neonates vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1999 (from vaccination record) had a threefold higher risk for parental report of autism diagnosis compared to boys not vaccinated as neonates during that same time period. Nonwhite boys bore a greater risk.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170

    http://www.annalsofepidemiology.org/article/S1047-2797(09)00207-5/abstract?rss=yes

    Hepatitis B Vaccine Triples the Risk of Autism in Infant Boys
    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/08/hepatitis-b-vaccine-triples-the-risk-of-autism-in-infant-boys.aspx

    As for your giving medical and vaccine advise, again I will ask you which vaccines you have taken in the past 10 years, and in regard to the current adult CDC vaccine schedule? You refuse to answer so obviously you have had none, and that makes you a complete hypocrite. Tell us as well of your educational and medical credentials? You know you have none, and beyond just simply being hired by the Shillary.

    Again, we can clearly see wh is actually spoon feeding who, Jesus baby/ the real tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, you can’t hide the fact that you were wrong about Dr. Offit not publishing vaccine research studies. You can’t admit it so you just play your stupid games.

  • Chi-squared test
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chi-squared_test

    JG states Hooker used the chi-squared method in regard to a reanalysis of the known 2004 DeStefano study, JG states that Hooker was wrong to do so, so his conclusions are nonsense.

    JG never showed any evidence for his claims and nor any support for his conclusions. JG just simply thinks and in his arrogance that anything goes, and that anything he states is absolute fact and to be considered to be fact, and just because he says it is so.

    JG. Simply make a list of Brian Hookers data conclusions as to that said reanalysis of the study, and then explain why they were wrong? Do you understand that basic question and why that is required here? A simple “yes” or “no” will do. Then get to doing what you need to do.

  • Jesus baby

    “Again, where did the this come from?”
    Readers, obviously those 2 statements are brief summaries of important points from the Pediatrics study that our lying anti-vax pediatrician pasted onto his YouTube video. They are true. But the lying sack of $hit used them to imply the study showed only a 24% long-term efficacy for the hep B vaccine, while the authors clearly demonstrated the efficacy was over 90%. These are the kinds of tactics anti-vaxxers have to resort to because the science is never behind them.
    On a cute side note notice how Lowell Hubbs aka tripnasty84 is trying to talk about something else.

  • Oh good grief, how large is the hole in your head? Did you even read anything that was put forth in my previous post? No, you just simply ignored it and so you can continue with your mindless and hypocritical level of arguing. That funder money must really be good; and of course you are specifically directed to go after me.

    Does it not matter how the readers realize here just how lying and deceptive you are? Does it as well not matter how deliberately harassing and and falsely antagonistic that you endlessly appear to be?

    Again, Jesus baby/tripnasty84 where are the studies that scumbag and corrupt Paul Offit has done, that support his known claims of vaccine safety? I asked you for a list? In multiple posts now I have specifically outlined and asked you for that list; and you continue to fail to provide that list. Just admit that you can not do it.

  • You respond to this again as if being addressed to the readers, and as if you actually have some readers left here..”LOL”. In your sick and twisted, dreams. The only posts they (the real people looking for facts and truth) will ever take seriously, are my posts. Wake up and face it. I told you they should fire you.

    No one is talking about something else but you, aka tripnasty84. You ignored and evaded the fact that the Hep B vaccine has a seriously high aluminum adjuvant content and which contraindicates being injected into an infant, and much more any small child. You ignored and evaded the fact that a study shows us that male infants were shown to have a 300% increased risk of developing autism, and when they are given the Hep B vaccine at birth. You ignored and evaded a Pediatrics study from earlier years that showed a very low rate of protection in the teen years and after the series of Hep B vaccines, starting at birth.

    We can argue if Dr Paul’s data is correct in regard to a low level of Hep B vaccine protection at the age of 16 is correct or not, all day long, and as to the below said data. What you can not argue is the fact that the risk of the Hep B vaccine at birth is a foolish, unwarranted, and unjustified risk, and that the existing vaccine policy is only based on further serving the guaranteed vaccine profits of big pharma.

    – 16 year olds in the US that had completed their 3 shot series by age one

    – Just 24% of these teens had a protective (anti-Hep B surface antibody) levels of >10 IU/ml

    Aren’t they making enough money already? It is all about greed. It is clearly NOT about protecting human health.

    Vaccine Market Size Projected To Reach $77.5 Billion By 2024
    https://www.grandviewresearch.com/press-release/global-vaccine-market

    Vaccines Market worth $57.8 Billion by 2019
    http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vaccines-market-worth-578-billion-by-2019-289805011.html

  • Jonathan Graham

    JG never showed any evidence for his claims

    What you actually mean is that you don’t UNDERSTAND what I’ve shown you. Right?

    So simply say: “I Lowell Hubbs do not understand anything about the application of the Chi-squared test” and I’ll point out what’s wrong with Hooker’s analysis. If you want to keep pretending that you do know something then I can only conclude that you are standing out in the daylight denying the existence of the sun. I wouldn’t waste much time trying to convince someone like that. Would you?

    Again just a few simple and absolutely true words: “I Lowell Hubbs have no idea how to perform a chi-squared test”.

  • Jesus baby

    So, to summarize this thread, doctors who are anti-vaxxers haven’t published any vaccine studies. Dr. Offit on the other hand is one of the world’s leading experts. That will be all.

  • Jesus baby

    So now that we’ve shown one lie your quack told, and given that you want to change the subject to the aluminum adjuvant in hepatitis B vaccines, we can move on to lie #2. Remember that one?

    Your boy states, “Did you know that the hepatitis B vaccine contains 250 mcg of aluminum? That is 10-15X the maximal allowable dose for an infant.” He then posts a reference stating the recommended FDA limit for aluminum IN DAILY INTRAVENOUS FEEDING SOLUTIONS is 5 mcg/kg/day. Does he think the hepatitis B vaccine is given daily? If not, isn’t he misleading the senators, if not outright lying?

  • Jonathan Graham

    How does Lowell not know about the Keystone Cops?

  • It is with you, just the same old twisted bullshit, over and over and over. YOU in this case are the person who is claiming to KNOW something of significance as to the said re-analysis of 2004 DeStefano study, and yet you can come up with nothing. You actually ignore ever reply I make, and you simply continue with same false harassment, and antagonizing that you always do. That 2004 DeStefano study and issue is NOT about me personally. It is about if or not the study deleted vital data that did show an MMR vaccine risk connection, and that in regard to developing autism.

    Again, as for your said claim that the “Chi-squared test” should not have been used in regard to Brian Hookers re-analysis of that study, (if in fact it was used) then go ahead and list the the data that Hooker determined to be showing a risk for MMR caused autism, and then show us how that was wrong, and what the right data actually is. You were asked this before and you ignored it and you failed to produce it. You do nothing here but again and again go around in circles, and yet you produce nothing.

    Brian Hooker’s Findings Are Confirmed By CDC’s Results
    http://www.autisminvestigated.com/brian-hooker-confirmed-by-cdc/

    Statement of William W. Thompson, Ph.D., Regarding the 2004 Article Examining the Possibility of a Relationship Between MMR Vaccine and Autism

    Excerpted:

    My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998.

    I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.

    My concern has been the decision to omit relevant findings in a particular study for a particular sub­ group for a particular vaccine. There have always been recognized risks for vaccination and I believe it is the responsibility of the CDC to properly convey the risks associated with receipt of those vaccines.

    I have had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker over the last 10 months regarding studies the CDC has carried out regarding vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorders. I share his beliefthat CDC decision-making and analyses should be transparent. I was not, however, aware that he was recording any of our conversations, nor was I given any choice regarding whether my name would be made public or my voice would be put on the Internet.

    I will not be answering further questions at this time. I am providing information to Congressman William Posey, and of course will continue to cooperate with Congress. I have also offered to assist with reanalysis of the study data or development of further studies. For the time being, however, I am focused on my job and my family.

    https://morganverkamp.com/statement-of-william-w-thompson-ph-d-regarding-the-2004-article-examining-the-possibility-of-a-relationship-between-mmr-vaccine-and-autism/

    The Thompson Transcripts: Shocking Revelations by the CDC Whistleblower

    When trying to get this story out, as mainstream media looked the other way, our community faced a tidal wave of astroturfing on Facebook pages, Twitter and media sites. Bloggers and “shills” sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry quickly moved to hijack and reframe this incredible story, branding it with their favorite word: “debunked.”

    Read more:
    http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/the-thompson-transcripts-shocking-revelations-by-the-cdc-whistleblower/

    Brian Hooker legally recorded these phone conversations with CDC scientist and whistle blower, Dr. William Thompson on the following dates:

    May 8, 2014
    May 24, 2014
    June 12, 2014
    July 28, 2014

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlxdWfTLHH0

    These as well are recordings of the conversations between the CDC’s William Thompson and Brian Hooker.
    http://fearlessparent.org/why-is-thimerosal-still-in-vaccines-recording-1/

    MMR Vaccine causes Autism – CDC destroys evidence
    In 2015 CDC scientist Dr William Thompson revealed that the CDC ordered his team of researchers to destroy 2 years of documents
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8SSCEoT3MY

    CDC Responds: Admits Omitting Vaccine Data
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THGbJnpywyw

    Here you go, JG. This is what you have to work with. Good luck with that.

    Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young african american boys: a reanalysis of CDC data
    Brian S Hooker, author
    http://translationalneurodegeneration.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2047-9158-3-16

    Pediatrics. 2004 Feb;113(2):259-66.
    Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism and school-matched control subjects: a population-based study in metropolitan atlanta.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14754936

  • Jesus baby

    I dunno but he has a thing about cops.

  • Again, no such thing is true, and you are again lying.

    There is no just changing the subject to aluminum adjants and because that was all along part of the testimony and just as well the infant Hep B vaccine info. You simply refused to include it.

    And you already said that regarding aluminum. There is far more to the aluminum data that Dr Paul uses than that. There is more to issue than just that.There is of course and as well far more to the existing and available studies in regard to the harm of aluminum adjuvants, than that. If you had been paying attention to what I have posted on that in the past, you would also know that. Scientific studies do not matter at all to you, unless they support the pro-vax agenda.

    Let me ask you this. Does Paul Offit think that the same foods which contain aluminum are also injected in a vaccine? And that is asked because that is the same form of rationalization that Offit uses. As I have said, Offit has zero scientific studies to support any of his alleged vaccine safety claims in regard to aluminum adjuvants. Offit uses the same comparison and even in far more ridiculous forms. Does Offit think that being people eat food containing small amounts of aluminum, that it is the same thing as injecting vaccines, and that they are detoxified and eliminated by the very same pathways? They are not, and obviously he does.

    If a vaccine containing an aluminum adjuvant can cause the inflammation and the nonspecific high alert immune response that it does, and so as to mount an antibody response to the assumed deactivated viral or bacterial antigen in a vaccine; then that kind of thing should NOT be injected into a just born infant? What part of that do you not yet get? What part of this do you as well not get in regard to that an infant is not at any real risk of acquiring Hepatitis B? Therefore the practice of vaccinating a newborn involves far more risk than any perceived benefit. VAERS is as well full of cases of serious adverse reactions and even death after the Hep B vaccine.

  • Proponent

    Huh.. so.. after a day or so you finally looked it up, Lowell Hubbs?

    Well, that’s a step forward, I suppose. And from you having previously posted..

    Lowell Hubbs; “Your chi-squared test quackery is something you can just flush straight down the toilet. It is entirely worthless in this debate, and/or as to applying it to any debate of these matters.”

    And..

    Lowell Hubbs: “Obviously the term chi-squared has nothing to do with vaccines and/or the providing of evidence for vaccine safety.”

    … …

    Anyways.. got another question for you..

    What’s the difference between a case-control study and a cohort study?

  • Jonathan Graham

    YOU in this case are the person who is claiming to KNOW something of significance as to the said re-analysis of 2004 DeStefano study,

    No I’m claiming I’ve PRESENTED you with evidence you would have to be ignorant to ignore. The only question is – are you willfully so or not?

    and yet you can come up with nothing.

    Lowell I’ve presented you with a clear argument – if you understand it – are you saying you don’t understand the chi-squared test or not?

    That 2004 DeStefano study and issue is NOT about me personally.

    Well the person I’m discussing it with is you, so either you understand what I’m talking about – chi squared tests – or you do not.

    It is about if or not the study deleted vital data that did show an MMR vaccine risk connection, and that in regard to developing autism.

    No, firstly it’s about if there was anything of relevance to be deleted.

    Again, as for your said claim that the “Chi-squared test” should not have been used in regard to Brian Hookers re-analysis of that study, (if in fact it was used)

    What? You didn’t even READ hookers reanalysis? Why are you even typing anything? Do you know anyone who has? Could you ask them to post instead? Sheesh.

  • You mean that Paul Offit is a millionare lying scumbag that is falsely claiming to be a CDC spokeman, and all while having zero studies to support his pro-vaccine and false vaccine safety claims.

    And to summarize this thread what we have here is a cowardly person with no identity using the blasphemous name of Jesus baby, and that continues to post post after post containing nothing but false information, evasion of the information, and nothing but a pathetic dialogue that no person actually seeking vaccine truth will ever want to consider any of those posts as being credible.

    Just like I said, Offit is a no science existing behind him, scumbag.

    VaxXed Meets Paul Offit

    Joshua Coleman sees Paul Offit eating breakfast in New York on November 21, 2016 and approaches him for a polite conversation, and a request for an interview on the Vaxxed bus Paul wasn’t up for it and curses Mr Coleman. What a piece of garbage.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRAJdyPNWnA

  • Just look again at the rambling in denial insanity of that post you just made, JG. Just the same thing over and over, and it never ends.

    I will repeat this again, and as I posted before.

    Again, as for your said claim that the “Chi-squared test” should not have been used in regard to Brian Hookers re-analysis of that study, (if in fact it was used) then go ahead and list the the data that Hooker determined to be showing a risk for MMR caused autism, and then show us how that was wrong, and what the right data actually is. You were asked this before and you ignored it and you failed to produce it. You do nothing here but again and again go around in circles, and yet you produce nothing.

    You can produce nothing.

  • Proponent

    Lowell Hubbs: “Again, as for your said claim that the “Chi-squared test” should not have been used in regard to Brian Hookers re-analysis of that study, (if in fact it was used).. ”

    Directly from Hooker’s paper..

    “Methods

    The author embarked on the present study to evaluate whether a relationship exists between child age when the first MMR vaccine was administered among cases diagnosed with autism and controls born between 1986 through 1993 among school children in metropolitan Atlanta. The Pearson’s chi-squared method was used to assess relative risks of receiving an autism diagnosis within the total cohort as well as among different race and gender categories“.

    How could you miss this, if you.. in fact.. did read Hooker’s paper?

    You have some explaining to do, Lowell Hubbs..

  • Jonathan Graham

    . You were asked this before and you ignored it and you failed to produce it.

    I’ve produced – right in front of your face – sufficient evidence to ignore all of Hookers statistically conclusions in that study. Are you claiming you don’t see that?

  • Looked what up? I actually have seen all of this and also read it long ago.

    It is actually irrelevant unless you can apply it to some sort of an argument as to the study, or studies, and as well your argument specifically.

    These are the differences.

    A case-control study is a type of observational study in which two existing groups differing in outcome are identified and compared on the basis of some supposed causal attribute. Case-control studies are often used to identify factors that may contribute to a medical condition by comparing subjects who have that condition/disease (the “cases”) with patients who do not have the condition/disease but are otherwise similar (the “controls”).[1] They require fewer resources but provide less evidence for causal inference than a randomized controlled trial.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case-control_study

    A cohort study is a particular form of longitudinal study (panel study) that sample a cohort (a group of people who share a defining characteristic, typically who experienced a common event in a selected period, such as birth or graduation), performing a cross-section at intervals through time. A cohort study is a panel study, but a panel study is not always a cohort study as individuals in a panel study do not always share a common characteristic.[1]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohort_study

  • Proponent

    Getting there..

    Right, so.. fill in the blanks if you can, Lowell Hubbs..

    The original 2004 study by the CDC was:
    i) a case-control study
    ii) a cohort study

    Hooker’s reanalysis was:
    i) a case-control study
    ii) a cohort study

  • You have not and you are nothing but lying and entirely delusional. How beyond sick are you anyway. Any parent that is looking for vaccine facts and truth here should be entirely disgusted by your bullshit antics.

  • Jonathan Graham

    You have not

    So you don’t see it?

  • What does Johnny G need help defending his bullshit claims, so he has to call another shill like you in? Proponent, of what? More twisted claims that amount to nothing?

    I have never stated that Hooker did NOT use the chi-square method.

    That as well does not show and nor prove that his calculations were wrong, and nor that they were wrong specifically because that chi-square method was used.

    This is what it actually states in full.

    Statistical analyses
    The Pearson’s chi -squared test contained in the SAS® software was utilized for current statistical analyses, and a two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. This is in contrast to the original Destefano et al. [14] (CDC) study, where a case–control study design was used, where 3 control children were matched to each case child, and analyzed using conditional logistic regression dichotomized for the three age cut-offs at 18, 24 and 36 months. Pearson’s chi-squared is, in general, a more conservative analysis and therefore chosen for the present study. However, our results were also confirmed using a conditional logistic regression design similar to the Destefano et al. [14] (CDC) study. In the present study, frequencies of cases were determined for first MMR ages of less than versus greater than 18 months, 24 months and 36 months in each separate analysis. When accounting for cases in the cohort that excluded low birth weight (<2500 g) African American children, it was necessary to report results at 31 months rather than 36 months in order to avoid reporting data from age categories or “cells” that possessed less than 5 individuals.

    http://translationalneurodegeneration.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2047-9158-3-16

  • Like I said this is not about me, and this is about the study itself. I am not playing your stupid games attempting to make it again all about me. It is your responsibility and yours alone to show and to prove how that said study was wrong. Period. I am NOT putting up with your nonsense, it is not going there, and I am playing your sick game. You can just get started showing and proving what I stated that you need to do. How many chances now have you two had to do that, and each time it ends up with nothing. That is because you actually have nothing.

    Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young african american boys: a reanalysis of CDC data
    Brian S Hooker, author
    http://translationalneurodegeneration.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2047-9158-3-16

  • You and so called Proponent are no longer going to be playing your games. Get to showing directly how that study is wrong and why it is wrong and as to the numbers and the conclusion. You have danced around it all for long enough.

  • Jonathan Graham

    So you agree that I’ve mentioned the chi-squared test right?

  • Oh so there is now a major difference between the test and the method? You argue just to argue. How is your funder doing? Have you been getting regular payments? Have him call me.

  • Jesus baby

    Stay on topic, Lowell/tripnasty84. The topic is lie #2 your anti-vax pediatrician told in the video you are pushing. He’s giving them FDA aluminum recommendations for DAILY INTRAVENOUS FEEDING SOLUTIONS (5 mcg/kg/day) to argue that the 250 mcg in the hep B vaccine is a toxic dose. The recommended FDA limit for a biological product (like a vaccine) is 5X higher than that (1250 mcg). How is that not a lie?

  • You post the same bullshit over and over and repeatedly, and then demand and expect a different answer. I have already addressed that specifically.

    And how about if you stay on topic. The issues are the lack of necessity of a toxic and aluminum adjuvant containing Hep B vaccine, for just born infants The issue is as well the toxicity level of that aluminum adjuvant. The issue is as well the level of existing lack of protection provided after infant Hep B vaccination and the series, and that in regard to when they become teenagers and the risk of acquiring Hepatitis B may be increased, and for most many or most never be increased, and so on.

  • Jesus baby

    Readers note that rather than admit his boy lied again Hubbs/tripnasty84 lies that he already dealt with the subject and continues off topic.

  • For the 50th time, you have not proven any lie. Reader note, and as if in your delusional mind you actually have any readers, and much more any that are mislead enough to take you seriously.

    The real lie is obviously found in the CDC recommendation of just born infant vaccination with a Hep B vaccines, and claiming that vaccine is safe and effective and actually needed. More harm than good is obviously being done, and exactly, and has I have been pointing out.

    Jesus baby/ the real tripnasty84 can just keep on selling his soul to his funder and as well profiting big pharma. In the end what it boils down to is this; parents are getting educated to the vaccine truth. In that outcome they will make the wise and knowledgeable decision not to just follow doctors, hospital orders and directives, and to vaccinate a newborn with a toxic aluminum containing Hepatitis B vaccine. Parents are now waking up and taking those decisions, and rightfully into their own hands. Say no to the Hep B vaccine. Big pharma and their vaccine division are not going to go broke without those unnecessary profits.

    Hepatitis B Vaccine, by Dr Paul Thomas
    http://paulthomasmd.com/2013/04/10/hepatitis-b-vaccine/

    Hepatitis B Vaccine and Autism
    http://paulthomasmd.com/2016/01/06/hepatitis-b-vaccine-and-autism/

    Hepatitis B Vaccine & Autism- Paul Thomas, MD
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mq2MeHDatzM

    Hepatitis B Vaccine for Infants: Is it Worth it, and the Risk?
    http://www.vacfacts.info/hepatitis-b-vaccine-for-infants-is-it-worth-it-and-the-risk.html

  • Jonathan Graham

    What about it?

    So you agree that I’ve mentioned this. Hence if the function of the chi-squared test is intrinsically inappropriate or even produces lower quality data than what DeStefano used. I’d have clearly presented – to your face – from my very first mention of it. Reason to dismiss Hookers reanalysis. Right?

  • Ron Roy

    There’s Johnny again showing his swollen head again, Who gives a rats behind about a chi-squared test.Johnny if your so f_ _ _ _ _ _ g smart why aren’t you employed at something where you could make BIG money? The average person never heard of such a test.I looked it up and I fail to find where I could ever apply it in everyday life other than ( like yourself ) want to brag about knowing something, that is inconsequential, to make myself look more intelligent than I really am. A chi-sguared test doesn’t have to be used to prove or disprove anything.

    Chi-square is a statistical test commonly used to compare observed data with data we
    would expect to obtain according to a specific hypothesis. For example, if, according to
    Mendel’s laws, you expected 10 of 20 offspring from a cross to be male and the actual
    observed number was 8 males, then you might want to know about the “goodness to
    fit” between the observed and expected. Were the deviations (differences between
    observed and expected) the result of chance, or were they due to other factors. How much
    deviation can occur before you, the investigator, must conclude that something other than
    chance is at work, causing the observed to differ from the expected. The chi-square test
    is always testing what scientists call the null hypothesis, which states that there
    is no significant difference between the expected and observed result.

  • kfunk937

    Oh, oh! Ask him where Hooker got the raw data for his laughably incompetent, retracted “re-analysis”.

  • shay simmons

    Anti-vaxxers never read studies — they just take whatever another anti-vaxxer tells them at face value.

  • Jesus baby

    “For the 50th time, you have not proven any lie.”
    I just did. What possible argument do you have, Lowell/tripnasty84? Do you not understand what I’m saying was a lie? If you explain what you think I’m saying was a lie it might help.

  • Jonathan Graham

    There’s Johnny again showing his swollen head again,

    It’s interesting that all you have here are personal attacks. :-)

    if your so f_ _ _ _ _ _ g smart why aren’t you employed at something where you could make BIG money?

    I think I do ok. So do you – since you claim to know where I work.

    he average person never heard of such a test

    …which is why we don’t just hire anyone to do statistical analysis.

    I fail to find where I could ever apply it in everyday life other than

    Reanalyzing DeStefano et. al. perhaps?

    want to brag about knowing something, that is inconsequential,

    How is this inconsequential? Hooker used this technique to determine if his results were correct when he re-analyzed the CDC data and found an association between vaccines and autism. This is the study we are discussing Ron, get with the program.

    A chi-sguared test doesn’t have to be used to prove or disprove anything.

    Closest thing to correct that you’ve said for a while. Yes Hooker should have used a logistic regression but didn’t., So he ended up with the wrong answer: MMR correlate with autism.

  • Jonathan Graham

    True enough and another interesting trend is how much they will fight admitting they don’t know something. I’ve played this out with Ron Roy, Lowell Hubbs, Vaccine Papers, Autism Dadd. Same result.

  • kfunk937

    Parallels with the massive game of Telephone presently going on in the WH seem pertinent.

    How we get in this mess.

  • shay simmons

    To be fair, there are ordinarily several weeks of confusion with every new Administration. Previously, however, this has been embarrassing rather than actively malevolent.

  • AutismDadd

    yawn. more nonsense.

  • Jesus baby

    Gish gallop away
    Gish gallop away
    You know the nearer your destination
    The more you gish gallop away

  • Jesus baby/douchey#1, the same level of your in denial stupid exposed, different day. So by your reply, in effect you are admitting to that you can not respond to any of that information and even though you are a paid pro-vaccine shill that advocates for the use of vaccines, and as well in claiming that and of course that they are safe and effective. Yet you can not respond to direct information that show just how unnatural vaccines really are, and as well information that shows directly why vaccines do more harm than good. And actually this is all just the tip of the iceberg as to that existing information, and as well in regard to the existing scientific studies that as well have been done showing that said effect of more harm than good being done.

    Lets face it, YOU are here reply posting as an average estimate and available to do so 15 or more hours a day, 7 days a week, day and night and until 2 am or even later in the morning. That means that you obviously have no other job or employment. You see me take many days off where nothing is replied to until later in the evening. You know that. So let me ask you, do you have any other employment at all, yes or no; and what could that possibly be?

    There exists a group of people known as the douchey gang with one main leader, and they do nothing but what is known as black hat hacking. The ruin people lives by hacking their bank accounts and credit cards, and they drain everything a person has, and they steal the profits. They have been mainly after two people, but it obviously is not limited to that. Do you know those two people, and are you a member of that group? I suggest that you indeed are. It is as well known that there is a middle man extracting money from a funder and as well to further finance that said operation. That funder pays shills like you to post the trash that you do against me, and to personally target me. Do you know anything about that? I suggest that you do. What do you have to say about …that? I know you will deny it, but just the same I wanted to put that right in front of you.

    Definition of douchey
    US slang: characteristic of or having the qualities of a douchebag : obnoxiously annoying, offensive, or dislikable
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/douchey

  • It has been directly explained multiple times, and of course you must continue to ignore it. Apparently they pay you by the number of reply posts you make, and not by the hour. I bet its not the mailman that stops by with your payment.

  • So you are not going to deny that you get regular payments for your pro-vax shilling efforts here on vactruth. I’m still waiting for that call.

    Again, you can not make the claims that you do unless you apply it directly to the study. You can not simply say that the in general the chi-squared test.method produces lower quality data than what the DeStefano study used, and then just simply walk away from it. How is the method that DeStefano used applicable to start with and when a significant amount of said and damning data was covered up and eliminated from that study?

    [ I’d have clearly presented – to your face – from my very first mention of it. Reason to dismiss Hookers reanalysis. Right?]

    Wrong, and again …NO you have NOT.

    Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young african american boys: a reanalysis of CDC data
    Brian S Hooker, author
    http://translationalneurodegeneration.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2047-9158-3-16

    Pediatrics. 2004 Feb;113(2):259-66.
    Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism and school-matched control subjects: a population-based study in metropolitan atlanta.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14754936

    In my research I happened to run across some interesting analysis, and as to what the REAL problem is here, and with you. I thought it was so precisely fitting, that I just had to post it for you.

    Narcissistic personality disorder

    https://imgflip.com/i/1ist4s

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder

  • Jesus baby

    “It has been directly explained multiple times, and of course you must continue to ignore it.”
    Liar. You’ve just been link-spamming. You know it would be absurd to even try to defend that a$$hole.

  • Jesus baby

    “So by your reply, in effect you are admitting to that you can not respond to any of that information…”

    Not at all, Lowell/tripnasty84, I’m just discouraging your attempts at distraction.

    “There exists a group of people known as the douchey gang with one main leader, and they do nothing but what is known as black hat hacking. The ruin people lives by hacking their bank accounts and credit cards, and they drain everything a person has, and they steal the profits. They have been mainly after two people, but it obviously is not limited to that. Do you know those two people, and are you a member of that group? I suggest that you indeed are. It is as well known that there is a middle man extracting money from a funder and as well to further finance that said operation. That funder pays shills like you to post the trash that you do against me, and to personally target me. Do you know anything about that? I suggest that you do.”

    Wait, if the “douchery gang” is stealing all these people’s money why would they need further financing from a “funder”? Do they have like rocket cars and stuff?

  • Again, this is what you are repeatedly ignoring, and so I will RUB your nose in it again. You can distort the issue and focus on one little segment of it all you want. In the bigger picture Hep B vaccine given to a newborn is nothing but for profit greed and a sheeple level of misguided recklessness and insanity

    The real lie is obviously found in the CDC recommendation of just born infant vaccination with a Hep B vaccines, and claiming that vaccine is safe and effective and actually needed. More harm than good is obviously being done, and exactly, and has I have been pointing out.

    The issues are the lack of necessity of a toxic and aluminum adjuvant containing Hep B vaccine, for just born infants

    The issue is as well the toxicity level of that aluminum adjuvant.

    The issue is as well the level of existing lack of protection provided after infant Hep B vaccination and the series, and that in regard to when they become teenagers and the risk of acquiring Hepatitis B may be increased, and for most many or most never be increased, and so on.

    And don’t forget all the VAERS reports on this vaccine where adverse reactions were severe enough to require hospitalization and more. Many deaths were as well reported. Oh, VAERS means nothing right? That’s right ..screw you; lying for another day just to make more funding money, Jesus baby/douchie#1

    And don’t forget the study that showed a 300% increase in resulting autism in male infants that had been vaccinated at birth with the Hep B vaccine; really worth it isn’t it, and for a toxic vaccine that is not even needed. But then vaccines don’t cause autism, do they? Just another load of CDC cover-up and lies.

    Hepatitis B Vaccine, by Dr Paul Thomas
    http://paulthomasmd.com/2013/04/10/hepatitis-b-vaccine/

    Hepatitis B Vaccine and Autism
    http://paulthomasmd.com/2016/01/06/hepatitis-b-vaccine-and-autism/

    Hepatitis B Vaccine & Autism- Paul Thomas, MD
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mq2MeHDatzM

    Hepatitis B Vaccine for Infants: Is it Worth it, and the Risk?
    http://www.vacfacts.info/hepatitis-b-vaccine-for-infants-is-it-worth-it-and-the-risk.html

  • Just discouraging your attempts at distraction. “LOL”. How dumb to do think any readers that are left here actually are? And you are yet so beyond stupid that you think that is actually going to fly. Unreal.

    And you know exactly what I am talking about, yet you are denying it. Of course I knew and expected that. Don’t ask me, ask them. Obviously they are just like the drug companies and in that they are so greedy that nothing is ever enough. To make that statement, you would have to have knowledge of how much they are making on each. Are you then claiming to have that. I heard about 40 g on the shilling. That would be enough incentive for most people. They should buy you a batmobile to drive around in and as you are so bat $hit crazy.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Again, you can not make the claims that you do unless you apply it directly to the study.

    If it’s as obvious as you claiming there is no sun in broad daylight. Then the rebut would be considered self-evident.

    [ I’d have clearly presented – to your face – from my very first mention of it. Reason to dismiss Hookers reanalysis. Right?]

    Wrong, and again …NO you have NOT.

    Sure, as pointed out. It’s self-evident.

    So you are not going to deny that you get regular payments for your pro-vax shilling efforts here on vactruth.

    Things haven’t changed since your last baseless accusation. I have never received any compensation for posting here from anyone. Other than the entertainment value which talking to someone like you brings me.

  • Jesus baby

    “To make that statement, you would have to have knowledge of how much they are making on each.”

    Lowell/tripnasty, YOU JUST SAID they were stealing all the money multiple people had. So it’s just natural to ask why they’d need a “funder”.

  • Jesus baby

    “You can distort…”

    Lowell/tripnasty84, I’ve already shown your boy lied 2 times in less than a minute. Do you want me to keep going?

  • Jonathan Graham

    When are you going to as well respond to my question as to how many vaccines have you actually taken, and lets say in the last 10 years? Are you up to date in regard to the current CDC adult vaccine schedule? You have refused to answer that question. It is hypocritical of you to advocate for getting vaccines, and if you have not taken any yourself. So what is your answer?

    Well a) people who are pro-vaccine do not necessarily believe everyone needs to be up-to-date. Most of the frequent posters here seem to have stated that immunocompromized people get a bye. b) It’s also possible that people can be pro-vaccine and not believe that every vaccine is equally important. c) People can be pro-vaccine and simply lead busy lives and forget about these things. d) Being a hypocrite is irrelevant to the point being argued.

    Lets face it, YOU are here reply posting as an average estimate and available to do so 15 or more hours a day, 7 days a week, day and night and until 2 am or even later in the morning. That means that you obviously have no other job or employment. You see me take many days off where nothing is replied to until later in the evening. You know that. So let me ask you, do you have any other employment at all, yes or no; and what could that possibly be?

    It’s always interesting to watch someone take their data poor samples and extrapolate. If you actually did run the numbers you’d see that Jesus baby’s posting habits don’t exclude them from having a job.

    It is as well known that there is a middle man extracting money from a funder and as well to further finance that said operation. That funder pays shills like you to post the trash that you do against me, and to personally target me. Do you know anything about that? I suggest that you do. What do you have to say about …that?

    I’d probably watch that webseries.

  • AutismDadd

    Well said Lowell. These #@$%&**#@ are not here to discover the truth. They are here to harass and spread the mantra. Limit your dealings with them or block them. I just blocked J Graham. Had enough of that lying turd.

  • AutismDadd

    Well done. I admire your courage and fight Lowwell

  • AutismDadd

    WOO HOO better get that gasket looked at.

  • AutismDadd

    lame

  • AutismDadd

    Makes him sound like a Pro-vac

  • AutismDadd

    So it shouldn’t be given on ANY one day, which is the point.

  • AutismDadd

    Offit provides opinions on vaccines that he simply makes up. Apparently his claim to fame vaccine was quite problematic.

  • AutismDadd

    Explain what 90% efficacy means and how its derived.

  • AutismDadd

    So what does that mean, “exhibited a seroprotective response” ? Means there was a response to an injection. Why wouldn’t there be one? But what does the response mean? Of course its implied the response is positive and protective, but that’s what they want to be able to say. NEVER would they admit failure or lack of response. So its merely an observation, not proof of anything else. Its misleading as hoped.

  • AutismDadd

    Then tell us what a vaccine safety study is supposed to do, and why should we believe it?

  • AutismDadd

    Lowell is doing fine, but you are flailing away at windmills. Maybe these forums aren’t a good place for you to play?

  • Jesus baby

    Well Lowell/tripnasty84, you type a lot of words but you haven’t explained why even one vaccine safety study is corrupt.

  • Well Jesus baby/ the real tripnasty84/Dooshie#1. One sentence sums it up; “Are you really that beyond stupid”?

    Right here on this below two pages it explains it, and the page that you know you have ignored all along, (and because you can not answer a single question on it). Those pages shows directly how and why those vaccine safety studies are corrupt. The main studies used of course, and as well at the federal vaccine court, are only epidemiological studies by the way, and studies done on only one vaccine the MMR, and as well one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal.

    As for their known epidemiological studies.

    And, what did they study in those so called and claimed to larger epidemiological, (population based), vaccine safety studies? In fact they only studied one single vaccine, the MMR; and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. None of the larger epidemiological studies compared vaccinated to entirely un-vaccinated. None of the studies looked at the safety profile of the entire CDC vaccine schedule. None of those studies as well looked at the safety profile of giving from 5 to up to 9 vaccines or more to and infant or small child, in a single day and office visit.

    Every one of the larger MMR, and Thimerosal epidemiological studies were clearly COOKED, for the results, period. Found were the use of flawed study designs, use of unreliable data, predetermined outcomes unsupported by the data, and as well major conflicts of interest in the studies funding sources; none of them being independent and nor unbiased.

    VACCINES AND AUTISM – WHAT DO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES REALLY TELL US? (a complete analysis of the most commonly known, and used studies)

    We have 16 studies already that clearly state that vaccines do not cause autism.”
    — Amy Pisani, Executive Director, Every Child By Two

    “16 studies have shown no causal association between vaccines and autism, and these studies carry weight in the scientific industry.”
    — Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC Today Show Medical Editor

    “The science is largely complete. Ten epidemiological studies have shown MMR vaccine doesn’t cause autism; six have shown thimerosal doesn’t cause autism.”
    — Dr. Paul Offit, “Autism’s False Prophets”

    Read more:
    http://www.rescuepost.com/files/vaccines-and-autism-epidemiology-rebuttal.pdf

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    Nice to see as well you still using the continuance of the use of the character name /tripnasty84, and which is obviously the discus character name that YOU created and used one single time on a previous article here to make a post, and since that time you have of course falsely accused me of being that person, and which I am not. It really doesn’t get any lower than that.

  • Thank you. This may be the last article I post on. I need to shut it down soon and to dry up their funding money, because that money is also being siphon off and used to fund direct criminal activity.

  • Is your name, Jesus baby? And you feel that you need to respond for that individual and because they have no answer?

    [Well a) people who are pro-vaccine do not necessarily believe everyone needs to be up-to-date. Most of the frequent posters here seem to have stated that immunocompromized people get a bye. b) It’s also possible that people can be pro-vaccine and not believe that every vaccine is equally important. c) People can be pro-vaccine and simply lead busy lives and forget about these things. d) Being a hypocrite is irrelevant to the point being argued.]

    What a load of completebullshit. You are actually and literally saying here that people who are pro-vaccine and that reply comment on these articles here do not need to vaccinate themselves. I guess they just muct have conveniently forgotten to so and in their busy lives. They were apparently to busy to posting on the vactruth articles both night and day, and so they had no time to go get vaccinated. Are you saying as well then that they were also to busy to vaccinate their children? You know, any false excuse will do. There is nothing that you won’t make up false stories about, and there is nothing that you will not entirely twist around and to make justification of a pro-vax promoters level of hypocrisy. What an entirely twisted mind you have.

    [It’s always interesting to watch someone take their data poor samples and extrapolate. If you actually did run the numbers you’d see that Jesus baby’s posting habits don’t exclude them from having a job.]

    Again you make it up as you go, and you know you are lying. There are no numbers to run, arse hole. I have been watching this for a long time and I KNOW what I am seeing. Unless you personally know so called Jesus baby, you would have no idea if or not anything you are claiming to and supporting as to that person, is true at all. So you are directly admitting that you know them? Yes, no? Having spent as much time here as so called Jesus baby has spent, what time would ever leave for any kind of a job at all? What kind of a job do you suggest that is?

    [I’d probably watch that webseries.]

    The webseries on what? The paragraph you quoted directly applies to you as well. And why are you so concerned about it and in answering for J baby, and if that paragraph were not true? I see a pair of snakes slithering along together. You are paid to directly target me. All I need to do is let this be the last article I post on, and that funding will be greatly reduced, or end.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, you have simply declared “every one” of the studies was “clearly COOKED” and copy/pasted somebody else’s anti-vax opinion piece. Your task is for YOU, Lowell/tripnasty84 to pick one study and explain why it is corrupt.

  • Why do you keep lying about it when you know that isn’t true, and nor have you shown it to be true. And you really think that the Oregon State Senate was and would be that gullible, and that a well known Pediatrician would actually fabricate scientific study evidence? That would have been questioned right on the spot, and certainly because in that same room were doctors and people from the state medical board amount many others with a career based medical side vested interest in, and a general interest in seeing that said bill pass. You really are a special kind of …STUPID.

    And you can keep going and in continuing to make a fool out of yourself. all you want. Everyone that isn’t a shill can clearly see that you are lying in every post you make. That, and as well deliberately ignoring everything that is put in front of you. You better start saving your shill money as this shill funding thing is going to be shut down quite soon, All I have to do is end it on vactruth, and your funding dries up.

  • No, it is not actually natural at all, and when you already know exactly what I am talking about. It is called, lying.

  • Do you have any more lying crazy, for me? I do not find anything entertaining about you making a complete shillary buffoon of yourself. In fact is simply more than absolutely pathetic, and if not down right, nauseating.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell-tripnasty84, if I was wrong about your boy lying you would have been able to explain how he didn’t lie about the efficacy of the Hep B vaccine or the FDA limit for aluminum in a vaccine. But all you could do was hurl insults and try to link-spam to change the subject.

    And like I said about a month ago when you threatened to quit posting here, knock yourself out.

  • Jesus baby

    And another thing you didn’t think through very well in your conspiracy fantasy- black hat hackers do what they do simply to screw up other’s computer systems. It’s not about stealing money.

  • Jonathan Graham

    You are actually and literally saying here that people who are pro-vaccine and that reply comment on these articles here do not need to vaccinate themselves.

    …in order for the point that they are arguing to be correct. Yes, what you are doing when you claim their argument is in jeopardy because of their behavior is making an ad hominem attack.

    There are no numbers to run, arse hole. I

    Sure there are. There is an API which allows you to see ALL of the posts and posting times for all posts.

    I have been watching this for a long time and I KNOW what I am seeing

    Apparently not. JB on average has peak periods and lull periods. Just like all sorts of posters.

    Unless you personally know so called Jesus baby, you would have no idea if or not anything you are claiming to and supporting as to that person, is true at all. So you are directly admitting that you know them? Yes, no?

    I can only imaging how amusing you sound in real life when you go on like this. See again, I don’t need to know anyone. I have access to all the posting data on Disqus for any user with a public history.

    having spent as much time here as so called Jesus baby has spent, what time would ever leave for any kind of a job at all?

    Well a) all you can see is the posting times – you can not determine the amount of TIME they spent posting. b) If you work in front of a computer all day then you have a pretty large amount of flexibility in the potential posting patterns.

    The webseries on what?

    I just assumed you were writing fiction.

    The paragraph you quoted directly applies to you as well.

    LOL Lowell you know less than zero about hacking.

    You are paid to directly target me.

    More likely it’s your narcissism which makes you think these things are all about you.

    All I need to do is let this be the last article I post on, and that funding will be greatly reduced, or end.

    No please, anything but that! /irony

  • Those kind of hackers work in all areas of doing whatever they want to do, and/or whatever they are paid to do. It depends as well on their skill level. Where ever there is any kind of harm that can be done for profit. Wherever there is a personal vendetta to go after, and to profit at the same time is of course an extra bonus. Black hat hackers don’t steal money, and mess up peoples lives …”LOL”. Nice smoke screen pretending to be ignorant and/or just stupid. It didn’t work.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Again, the impact of the chi-squared on the quality of results is as obvious as the daylight from the sun.

  • Jesus baby

    You don’t know what black hat hacker means, Lowell/tripnasty84.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hat

    It’s amazing how self-inflated your ego is to believe anyone would pay people to do anything to you.

  • In fact I did explain all that and much more, regardless of your denial of it. Go ahead and tell me how and why you think injecting a just born infant with an aluminum adjuvant containing vaccine known as the Hep B vaccine, and for Hepatitis and which no infant is at risk for, is somehow a good idea? Tell me again how it is a good idea when a study has shown us that male infants have as well a 300% increased change of developing autism when injected as a newborn with the Hep B vaccine? There is nothing you will not ignore, and there is absolutely nothing you will not lie about in regard to maintaining your shill pushing pro-vaccine status.

    The only possible and reasonable use for that vaccine in regard to a newborn, is when the mother is known to be Hep B positive. However, studies have also shown a low level of effectiveness for that vaccine, and as for its injection in newborns with an existing Hepatitis B infected mother. So really, why is this vaccine used at all? The study below shows the Hep B vaccine to be ineffective in those said situations, and that antivirals and HBIG administration during pregnancy should receive much more focus and attention.

    FAIL: Infant Hep B Vaccines Perform Shamefully; Time To End Them?
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/fail-infant-hep-b-vaccines-perform-shamefully-time-end-them

    Hepatitis B vaccination with or without hepatitis B immunoglobulin at birth to babies born of HBsAg-positive mothers prevents overt HBV transmission but may not prevent occult HBV infection in babies: a randomized controlled trial.

    Hepatitis B vaccination with or without hepatitis B immunoglobulin at birth to babies born of HBsAg-positive mothers prevents overt HBV transmission but may not prevent occult HBV infection in babies: a randomized controlled trial

    Summary
    Vertical transmission of Hepatitis B virus HBV can result in a state of chronic HBV infection and its complications. HBV vaccination with or without hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) prevents transmission of overt infection to the babies. However, whether it also prevents occult HBV infection in babies is not known. Consecutive pregnant women of any gestation found to be HBsAg positive were followed till delivery, and their babies were included in the study. Immediately after delivery, babies were randomized to receive either HBIG or placebo in addition to recombinant HBV vaccine (at 0, 6, 10 and 14 weeks). The primary end-point of the study, assessed at 18 weeks of age, was remaining free of any HBV infection (either overt or occult) plus the development of adequate immune response to vaccine. The babies were further followed up for a median of 2 years of age to determine their eventual outcome. Risk factors for HBV transmission and for poor immune response in babies were studied. Of the 283 eligible babies, 259 were included in the trial and randomized to receive either HBIG (n = 128) or placebo (n = 131) in addition to recombinant HBV vaccine. Of the 222 of 259 (86%) babies who completed 18 weeks of follow-up, only 62/222 (28%) reached primary end-point. Of the remaining, 6/222 (3%) developed overt HBV infection, 142/222 (64%) developed occult HBV infection, and 12/222 (5%) had no HBV infection but had poor immune response. All 6 overt infections occurred in the placebo group (P = 0.030), while occult HBV infections were more common in the HBIG group (76/106 [72%] vs. 66/116 [57%]; P = 0.025). This may be due to the immune pressure of HBIG. There was no significant difference between the two groups in frequency of babies developing poor immune response or those achieving primary end-point. The final outcome of these babies at 24 months of age was as follows: overt HBV infection 4%, occult HBV infection 42%, no HBV infection but poor immune response 8% and no HBV infection with good immune response 28%. Women who were anti-HBe positive were a low-risk group, and their babies were most likely to remain free of HBV infection (occult or overt) and had good immune response to the vaccine. Maternal HBeAg-positive status and negativity for anti-HBe predicted not only overt but also any infection (both overt and occult) in babies. In addition, high maternal HBV DNA and treatment with vaccine alone were significant factors for overt HBV infection in babies. The current practice of administration of vaccine with HBIG at birth to babies born of HBsAg-positive mothers is not effective in preventing occult HBV infection in babies, which may be up to 40%. Because the most important risk factors for mother-to-baby transmission of HBV infection are the replicative status and high HBV DNA level in mothers; it will be worthwhile investigating the role of antivirals and HBIG administration during pregnancy to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HBV infection.

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvh.12102/abstract

    Hepatitis B Vaccine for Infants: Is it Worth it, and the Risk?
    http://www.vacfacts.info/hepatitis-b-vaccine-for-infants-is-it-worth-it-and-the-risk.html

    [And like I said about a month ago when you threatened to quit posting here, knock yourself out.]

    Do the words, knock yourself out, have any special meaning to you? Good luck with that.

  • Just look at the level of twisted and in denial insanity contained in that post you just made, wow. It just gets worse.

    [Sure there are. There is an API which allows you to see ALL of the posts and posting times for all posts]

    Again, I don’t need it because I have already seen what happens here day and night, and I have seen that for endless numbers of months now. Why didn’t you let so called Jesus baby reply for himself, and as to the admission that he has no other job but shilling right here, and as well working in the said organization that he is working in? What do you know, JG? You think you know something? What is that, fool?

    [JB on average has peak periods and lull periods. Just like all sorts of posters.]

    The only lull periods he so called Jesus baby has ever had is when I am not posting, or someone else is not posting here, and that he needs to go after and harass, antagonize, and attempt to belittle. Lie about it and for him, all you want. I assume it is a him, and not a her. Just like you, the coward has zero actual identity, of course.

    [Well a) all you can see is the posting times – you can not determine the amount of TIME they spent posting. b) If you work in front of a computer all day then you have a pretty large amount of flexibility in the potential posting patterns.]

    Again, you sure like to throw load after load of nonsense and in denial shill chivalry at it all. How do you know Jb works in front of a computer all day? What kind of employment would allow a person like him to do nothing but reply post on vactruth for 12 hours straight, and nonstop? That is exactly what has taken place repeatedly. Your false claims and excuses simply don’t cut it here, JG. So, do you two work in the same office, and as for your claimed to knowledge of this? You claimed to the same exact thing for yourself, and as to how you find the time to reply post day and night, 7 days a week. You also said that you do this while you are employed.

    [LOL Lowell you know less than zero about hacking.]

    Really? And how would you know what I know? But your knowledge of hacking is much more superior, and you claim to that; so whatever.

    [More likely it’s your narcissism which makes you think these things are all about you.]

    This is clearly all about you, and as a fact. There is absolutely no one that and as to what I posted for information on that, that the term, narcissism clearly applies to, more than you. I can say that as well in regard to any and all other reply posters that have ever been here on vactruth. Deny it all you want, and you have to.

    [No please, anything but that! /irony]

    You will talk a lot of in denial crap, until it happens.

  • Oh please, your attempt to cover it all up and make entirely lying denial out of it; is beyond pathetic. All you can ever provide for is just more attempted antagonizing, and false harassment. There is nothing left to say on it and/or to argue about. The outcome will be seen, in the end.

  • As to that, when are you going to actually address the reply posts I have made on that, and answer as well the questions I put forth?

    How actually in denial twisted, is your mind? The answer to that is of course evident in every continued reply you make.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, if you want to explain how he wasn’t lying about the Hep B vaccine efficacy you need to explain why he told them the efficacy was 24% in the Pediatrics study when it was really >90%. You haven’t.
    If you want to explain how he wasn’t lying about the FDA’s aluminum limit recommendation in a vaccine you’ll need to explain why he instead gave them limits for DAILY IV INFUSIONS OF FEEDING SOLUTIONS. You haven’t.
    Just saying you did it already is lying. Gish galloping about other things is irrelevant.
    And as I explained to you a month ago the phrase “knock yourself out” means “go ahead and do it”. So go ahead and quit posting here. You just make anti-vaxxers look even stupider anyway.

  • Jesus baby

    Lowell/tripnasty84, if you really believe all that nonsense WHY ARE YOU STILL POSTING?

  • Jesus baby/tripnasty/dooshie#1, We have already been over that, and over that, and over that again. There is no point to replying any further on that issue, as you ignore and reject everything that was stated to you on it. Anything further only amounts to more continued antagonizing, and only more false harassment directed by you.

    You have failed, and failed, and failed, an failed again and again, to reply to and to answer to the real questions I have repeatedly put in front of you, and in regard to the validity and actual advisability of giving a Hep B vaccine to a newborn. Until you can answer to that, you have nothing left to present with and nor to argue about, period. Get to actually replying to my above reply post. Put up, or shut up. That is your only choice, and as well only continuing to make yourself look even more deliberately in denial, and asinine with each and every continued reply you make. You have already done that, and the only way out for you is to actually answer the questions I put in front of you. That alone boils down to the actual reality that you have in front of you here.

  • Because I can. You are covering it up, and you are lying, and just as I said. If I had any fear at all, I would have quit all of this years ago, and in using my real identity, as well. The only reason I will and would ever discontinue anything here, is to cut off your funding money. There are people here being funded, and that funder has as well replied here, and literally he has admitted to it. There is no other reason you would continue as you have here, and if you were not part of that. You are assigned directly to go after me. Not just me but that is and has been the main target. You can lie about it all you want.

  • Jesus baby

    “We have already been over that…”

    There you go again. I have asked you repeatedly to address the 2 lies I pointed out and all you’ve done is gish gallop.

    “You have failed, and failed, and failed, an failed again and again, to reply to and to answer to the real questions I have repeatedly put in front of you


    Because you’re only do it to distract.

  • Jesus baby

    “Because I can.”

    Which makes no sense.

    “Look at cowardly you, and who uses no identity.”

    Says the hypocrite who made the sock puppet tripnasty84 to take his side and even upvoted it.

    “There are people here being funded, and that funder has as well replied here, and literally he has admitted to it.”

    Lowell/tripnasty84, when people say things like that to you they are being sarcastic. They are making fun of you.

    “You are assigned directly to go after me, JB as well.”
    Again, that’s your self-inflated ego talking. You think you’re important and want to feel like a persecuted martyr on some holy crusade. You’re just an ignorant rube with internet.

  • Pathetic …LIAR. Who raises people like you? Get to answering my questions, and as to what I put forth. All you do is intentionally ignore it. How endlessly asinine, ignorant, lying, and beyond stupid do you look, right now? And you think this and what you are doing is actually helping the pro-vaccine side. A person would think that no one could ever be that dumb; but obviously you are.

  • Says the sick and demented liar that actually made the tripnasty84, sock puppet, and falsely accused me of it.

    Obviously no one was being sarcastic there, and you know better, and you actually know what the truth is. The only one that actually got made fun of, was him.

    Every word of what I said is true. You are a sick and lying man, J baby. Be sure you are saving that shill money your funder sent you. You won’t have that income much longer, as the next article will not be commented on by me at all. That will continue until this entire thing is taken out, and down. We will see where it goes.

  • Jesus baby

    I’m showing the readers that the anti-vax pediatrician you admire lied to the Oregon senate and you have no rebuttal other than insults, link-spamming and distractions (which of course I ignore).

  • Jesus baby

    “…as the next article will not be commented on by me at all. That will continue until this entire thing is taken out, and down. We will see where it goes.”
    Yeah you said that a month ago, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jonathan Graham

    As to that

    Lowell, the “that” we are talking about is Hooker’s re-analysis and that – as plain as the sun is in the sky – his approach resulted in a lower-quality result. I’m not going to bother with anything that isn’t about this exact point and phrased in a way that is clear. Perhaps if you cut down on copypasting and just concentrated on making a clear argument. Things would go better.

    In any case you seem neither able to refute this point or even address it. So I think you lose this one.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Again, I don’t need it

    No, that’s not what you said. You said there were no numbers to run. I proved you wrong. Deal.

    The only lull periods he so called Jesus baby has ever had is when I am not posting

    Again you don’t really have the data for that and even if true it’s probably because you are responding to JB.

    How do you know Jb works in front of a computer all day?

    I don’t. Nor is that necessary to refute your position. All you asked about is what kind of job. So I provided an example of a job which allows for a lot of flexibility in posting times. Not to mention working in front of a computer all day is a far more likely hypothesis than your ideas about paid shills.

    to do nothing but reply post

    Sadly you are unable to support that claim. Even if someone is posting equally at all hours of the day you can’t conclude they aren’t doing anything but posting. All you can see are the posts. What they’re doing inbetween posts is your imagination.

    So, do you two work in the same office, and as for your claimed to knowledge of this?

    As I’ve said all I know about JB’s posting is from the API data. I’ve made no claim that requires more than that.

    reply post day and night, 7 days a week. You also said that you do this while you are employed.

    I don’t do that. Again if you actually had data instead of your imagination. You would see the parts of the day where I am clearly not posting..

    This is clearly all about you,

    Lowell you are the one claiming that someone is paying people to post to you. So you have imagined an elaborate mechanism which is focused on you. How is that not narcissistic?

  • Jonathan Graham

    Means there was a response to an injection.

    No it means that there was a response consisting of a particular group of antibodies beyond a level which is expected to be protective.

    Why wouldn’t there be one?

    Same reason taking Vitamin A doesn’t protect you from ebola. Just because something enters your bloodstream doesn’t mean it results in antibodies and just because you have antibodies doesn’t mean you see them at a level you are trying to target. Also there’s a question of generality. You are trying to hit this target across a population.

    NEVER would they admit failure or lack of response

    …and yet there are plenty of vaccines which haven’t made the cut. There would have been vaccines for herpes and noroviruses ages ago if having objectively measurable outcomes wasn’t important.

    So its merely an observation, not proof of anything else.

    Seroconversion is strongly correlated with disease immunity and is supported by a pretty large body of research.

  • Jonathan Graham

    have never stated that Hooker did NOT use the chi-square method.

    But you DID act as if you didn’t know. Which means you didn’t even read the abstract of Hooker’s re-analysis.

  • Jonathan Graham

    just blocked J Graham. Had enough of

    trying to avoid making your point and then getting owned when you finally do make one? I can see how that might have been tiring for you.

    As for me, I got a lot of work done while responding to you. Not to mention I got caught up on season 2 of Mr. Robot and I even taught myself to solve Rubik’s cube. Thanks for make it easy for me.

  • Jonathan Graham

    There are people here being funded, and that funder has as well replied here, and literally he has admitted to it.

    No Lowell, nobody has admitted to this. It’s just something you have twisted around in your head.

    You are assigned directly to go after me

    Narcissism.

  • And why are you so concerned and to reply to what was not directed to you, but what was directed to Jb. Why are you so concerned to make denial of it all One thing that stands out with you is that if JG is replying and then denying everything; you can damn sure bet it is true. It doesn’t matter what the subject matter is. In fact and in truth the character name David, directly admitted to it. He is either the funder, or directly connected to the funder. The person who as a fact has their head majorly twisted here is you. That has gone on-on a continual basis since you made your very first reply here; and how long ago was that? You nervous about what is taking place? Guess what? This is the last day I am posting on vactruth, and until this bullshit is taken down, and taken out. Your ugly and pasty faced red haired picture exemplifies literally the epitome of lying denial, and as well a devils issued level of twisted dishonesty, and literal insanity.

  • Look at what you actually do not know and can not convey it into terms. Again, you can not actually explain or present with the evidence in regard to the data and which shows Brian Hookers re-analysis calculations of that known 2004 study, to be wrong. You can not do that with or without the so called chi-squared method. You can ask you for the evidence a dozen times, and each time you evade it by claiming you posts have show it, when it fact nothing you have replied with has shown anything at all. Not for direct data, not for anything. You are a fraud, and you are obviously the real quack.

  • Look at the major level of your lying and twisted insanity, again. And really everything that you know you are, and as to everything that has been described regarding you; you must instantly attempt to and in your obvious hypocrisy; attempt to falsely bring the other person down to your own obvious and beyond scum bag level of existence. It is not working.

    What a beyond seriously sick man. In fact you are not a man at all. You are nothing but the equivalent of the devils own lying and falsely deceiving tongue. A two headed snake.

  • And like a mindless drone, you continue to entirely ignore everything I said; and because you have to. And you have the hypocritical level of audacity that you do, to say and to claim to that what I have put forth in the past is not sufficiently clear to you, and that it doesn’t make a clear argument, (even though it was perfectly clear), and so that you can reply to it.

    Nothing is ever good enough for you to reply to it. You do that and claim to that, and even though your own repeated reply posts look like some obviously defective, twisted, and insane version of Howdy Doody, actually wrote it all. And you actually think that the twisted reply you made above presents with something that is coherent and valid enough to make your case and point. How dumb would you have to be to actually fall for that, and the repeated and continued evasions filled garbage that you endlessly reply post?

  • No it was not a month ago, it was less time than that. Mark this date on your calendar 02-03-2017, at midnight. Your funding in regard to going after my posting on vactruth, it ends there, and exactly there. Bring it.

  • No, it is not that at all. You simply have no evidence for that claim and as I have specifically pointed out repeatedly. When are you going to address my list of negative issues in regard to the Hep B vaccine given to newborns? You know, the reasons that such a practice is doing far more harm than good. That is the central issue here, and which has nothing to do with the stupidity you keep trying to focus on.

    You know what? Your funder, character name David, (or someone directly connected to that), is a really arrogant ..arse. I remember clearly the reply posts he made to me. He thinks he so important and in the things he is connected to. He actually should be full of empathy and humility, to realize all the continued failures and short-comings of so called modern chemical pharma medicine. He refuses to face it. False and inexcusable levels of refuse to face truth and reality arrogance, have no place in any field of human health care.

    Actually I think it is less than half. Millions of adults have never been re-vaccinated since childhood. I have not had a vaccine in over 4 decades. And in their pharma CDC brainwashed haze of existence, and in questioning absolutely nothing they are told, this kind of common sense never even entered their minds. There is no existing vaccine derived herd immunity, (it would be impossible), only naturally derived herd immunity, is real.

    If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?
    http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/295562-if-only-half-of-america-is-properly-vaccinated-where-are-the

  • Jonathan Graham

    if JG is replying and then denying everything; you can damn sure bet it is true. It doesn’t matter what the subject matter is.

    So when I’ve said that some people are injured by vaccine you think it’s UNTRUE that some people are injured by vaccines. In other words you believe that NOBODY is injured by vaccines? So the actual truth is that you simply choose to believe the opposite of many things I say because of your massive prejudices.

    David, directly admitted to it.

    No he didn’t. The fact that you think he did just shows how strong your delusion is. Ever notice how you can’t produce this entirely unambiguous confession of David?

    You nervous about what is taking place?

    How could I be?

    his is the last day I am posting on vactruth, and until this bullshit is taken down, and taken out.

    Unlikely.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Like it or not Lowell you acted as if you didn’t know. Which means you didn’t read the study (or didn’t read it very closely). :-)

  • Jonathan Graham

    You said that there were no numbers to run. There are. You were wrong.

    You asked “What kind of job”. I answered: Lots and lots of jobs allow for someone to produce that posting pattern. So your conclusion is doubtful at best.

    You claimed that all they do in this period is post. I pointed out that you have zero ability to state that with confidence.

    You constantly talk about how people are sent/paid to reply to you. This is narcissism

  • Jonathan Graham

    Again, Lowell the impact of the chi-squared on the quality of results is as obvious as the daylight from the sun.

  • Jesus baby

    The big question is will you have the balls to try posting with another sock puppet account, Lowell/tripnasty84. I’ll see it in about 10 seconds if you do.

  • Jesus baby

    You never addressed either of the lies, Lowell/tripnasty84. It would have been impossible, but you didn’t even try.

  • There has been no need of any numbers to run, as I have been here and as well seen and read what has been posted. Do you see how deceptive and twisted you are. Anything at all in the attempt to deny the truth. As if I have not seen what I have.

    The rest of your post is about as worthless for having any common sense and merit, as a pile of the horse manure, and as to the same thing that your TROLL arse has left on every post you have ever made and since you first came to this vaccine truth articles site.

  • Nothing you have been trying to claim to here is even relevant in the bigger picture of the known harm done by the MMR vaccine.

    Again, this long list of studies has already long ago shown us what has really gone on with the MMR vaccine, and in regard to its connection to autism. A list of studies that of course you, Paul Offit, and the CDC entirely ignore. No, they would rather just ignore it all and beat up on Wakefield in regard to one single and initial 1998 Lancet study. It all looks worse for them than a monkey chasing its own tail.

    Callous Disregard-Research References.
    http://www.callous-disregard.com/research.htm

    Dr. Rowen: Measles Spread by those Vaccinated
    Measles Spread by the Vaccinated: Vaccines may be a Greater Danger than You Ever Knew!
    by Dr. Robert Rowen
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/dr-rowen-measles-spread-by-those-vaccinated/

    The Current Failure of Pertussis and Measles Vaccine
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-current-failure-of-pertussis-and-measles-vaccine.html

    These are well and yet the 9 questions that you refuse to answer in regard to the existing vaccine safety study science. Instead of answering those you falsely made up the bogus excuse that none of ti was clear enough for you, and that it did not meet with your expectations and requirements enough to satisfy you as to the questions. You even tried to claim that such information and questions need present with an assumption. In other words the straight up evidence of facts and study science, are conveniently off limits to you.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    http://www.vacfacts.info/my-response-to-antonio-baduy-caacutemara-and-the-blog-skeptical-raptor-as-to-their-response-to-9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    As for their known and so called large epidemiological studies that the CDC so relies on to show no vaccine autism connection.

    And, what did they study in those so called and claimed to larger epidemiological, (population based), vaccine safety studies? In fact they only studied one single vaccine, the MMR; and one single vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. None of the larger epidemiological studies compared vaccinated to entirely un-vaccinated. None of the studies looked at the safety profile of the entire CDC vaccine schedule. None of those studies as well looked at the safety profile of giving from 5 to up to 9 vaccines or more to and infant or small child, in a single day and office visit.

    Every one of the larger MMR, and Thimerosal epidemiolgical studies were clearly COOKED, for the results, period. Found were the use of flawed study designs, use of unrealiable data, predetermined outcomes unsupported by the data, and as well major conflicts of interest in the studies funding sources; none of them being independent and nor unbiased.

    VACCINES AND AUTISM – WHAT DO EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES REALLY TELL US?

    We have 16 studies already that clearly state that vaccines do not cause autism.”
    — Amy Pisani, Executive Director, Every Child By Two

    “16 studies have shown no causal association between vaccines and autism, and these
    studies carry weight in the scientific industry.”
    — Dr. Nancy Snyderman, NBC Today Show Medical Editor

    “The science is largely complete. Ten epidemiological studies have shown MMR vaccine
    doesn’t cause autism; six have shown thimerosal doesn’t cause autism.”
    — Dr. Paul Offit, “Autism’s False Prophets”

    Read more:
    http://www.rescuepost.com/files/vaccines-and-autism-epidemiology-rebuttal.pdf

    14 Studies
    http://www.fourteenstudies.org/

    Again, the pro-vaxers look as CRAZY as a large herd of monkeys running around in circles, and all chasing their own tails.

  • Trying to make all the shill money you can at the last moment? It may take a while for that funder to realize that this is real, but he will eventually, I assure you.

  • I don’t recall that you ever said that, but any pro-vaxxer that does then immediately as well goes into the false CDC claim the the risk of vaccine injury is only 1 in 1 million doses of vaccine. That claim is of course a major lie and a deception. So in fact you are essentially admitting to and actually, nothing at all.

    So in your mind if there are 73 million children in the US under the age of 18, then only 73 children were ever vaccine injured. The number of vaccine injured children is actually higher than 73, and in any given state in the US; much more the entire country. No bigger and more deceptive lie, has ever been told

    There were more than 73 million children under age 18 in the United States in 2008. Nearly one-third (21 million) were under age five.

    Children Under Age 18 in the United States Number Percentage
    Total population of children under age 18 73,941,848 100
    Under age 5 21,005,852 28.4
    5- to 13-years-old 36,004,639 48.69
    14- to 17-years-old 16,931,357 22.898

    https://naeyc.org/policy/advocacy/ChildrenandFamiliesFacts

    [No he didn’t. The fact that you think he did just shows how strong your delusion is. Ever notice how you can’t produce this entirely unambiguous confession of David?]

    If your asinine mind actually thinks I need to repost that, (and I could), you are far dumber than anyone could have imagined. All you ever again and again is to provide for more efforts to to only harass and antagonize. You are again and again, simply doing nothing but wasting my time.

  • Jonathan Graham

    There has been no need of any numbers to run, as I have been here and as well seen and read what has been posted. Do you see how deceptive and twisted you are.

    Well it’s pretty deceptive to claim that “there are no number to run’ then pretend you said “I didn’t need to run any numbers”. Especially since your experience is clearly incorrect…which you would know if you knew how to get the data.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Nothing you have been trying to claim to here is even relevant in the bigger picture of the known harm done by the MMR vaccine.

    Lowell, I’m talking about one and only one specific thing. That Hooker’s reanalysis is wrong – he used a technique which results in lower quality data. So your attempts to change the subject are deceptive.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Trying to make all the shill money you can at the last moment?

    Only someone with no understanding of economics would think there is any real money to be made in getting paid to post.

  • And I have already gone around and around with you on that study, and you have yet to produce nothing in days and days of posting back and forth on that issue. Thus the final step is to show you and explain to you what I just did. That is all anyone, and as well any parents are actually concerned about, and that is what does the entire picture as to the MMR vaccines, actually show us? I know that is as always far to much for your narrow mind to ever comprehend, so called Graham. That is your problem.

  • Jonathan Graham

    don’t recall that you ever said that

    Then you are catastrophically unobservant as well as ignorant. It doesn’t matter what is said after. If you aren’t lying and you consider anything I say to be not true then you ALSO have to believe that it’s “Not true that some people are harmed by vaccines”. Ergo you believe no people are harmed by vaccines.

    Which you don’t. Which means your statement about anything I say being false is a lie. QED.

    (and I could),

    No, you couldn’t.

    Like I said, you do nothing but waste my time.

    Which is, as I’ve pointed out either a lie or simply evidence that you behave irrationally.

  • Jonathan Graham

    And I have already gone around and around with you on that study,

    Nope, all you’ve done is avoid addressing the point. Which is that the impact of the chi-squared on the quality of results is as obvious as the daylight from the sun.

    You have no ability to respond. You are paralyzed.

  • Jesus baby/dooshbag#1. Again, I indeed did address it directly and several times. Again, you are lying and intentionally just wasting my time. False harassment and more merit-less antagonizing is the only thing you can ever attempt to accomplish here. How do you feel about that your funding money is going to dry up? Its about time. You wont get enough funding money out of just going after the typical people that reply here, and to amount to anything. Chances are good that you will be getting cut right off.

  • Is your mind really that shill dead? And who do you think is going to believe an entirely deceptive lie, like that? You have wasted enough of my with your endless bullshit.

  • You didn’t see anything in 10 seconds, and because it was never me. Don’t get your hopes up for reviving your funding money, and because it is not going to happen. You can continue to make it all up lie about it all you want, but I was not the person who created that said tripnasty84 account. In fact and as I said, it was more likely to have been you that created it, than anyone else. Here goes Jesus baby/tripnasty/dooshie#1 calling the funder every day, I think I see a sock puppet account, are you going to fund me again? Are you ever beyond sick, desperate, and pathetic, wow.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Notice how you can’t say exactly what’s wrong with the idea? All you can do is pretend something is a lie.

    See we already know the economics of various pay to perform online cheerleading (buying facebook likes, constructing fake facebook accounts) and tedious and repetitive online tasks (gold farming). They all pay exceptionally poorly. So much so that most of the people performing these tasks are in countries with a much lower cost of living. Even for skilled or semi-skilled help we have services like fiver which have a nominal five dollar rate for tasks.

    Not to mention that any such system would be difficult to judge ROI and difficult to evaluate work done. Which makes them higher risk investments.

    The economics simply don’t work,

  • And everyone that has followed my posts can see that is just another load of bullshit. Everyone can see as well that it is only you that has actually produced nothing. Your sickness here on this site, needs to end.

  • Jesus baby

    No, Lowell/tripnasty84, as usual you claim to have posted proof of stuff you never did. A truthful person would repost it to prove their point, but you never do because you’re just lying.
    And so in your conspiracy shill fantasy you even think you’re worth the most money per post:) Look’s like you have about an hour and 23 minutes left.

  • That sure was a large load of irrelevant trash. It wasn’t even worth my time to half way read through it, nor anyone else’s. Keep whooping it up; and as if you didn’t look beyond crazy enough already.

  • Jesus baby

    Well I’m just warning you, Lowell/tripnasty84. And you’re down to about an hour and 20 minutes bro.

  • Jonathan Graham

    And everyone that has followed my posts can see that is just another load of bullshit.

    Except…that they can’t say that Lowell. Not unless they have a pretty complete understanding of what a Chi-Squared test is….

    Now you have spent ENORMOUS amounts of energy trying to back away from either admitting that you understand the test OR admitting that you don’t.

    Of course I’ve just cornered you (again!) so now’s the time for you to ignore my post and just write a random screed about how I’m insane or lying. :-)

  • Jonathan Graham

    That sure was a large load of irrelevant trash.

    …and of course you can’t say exactly what’s wrong with my argument. Almost like you don’t know. I wonder how many more times I’ll corner you before you try to use your “I’m not posting here anymore” excuse.

  • No, I am not about to repost the 10 posts in a row I made in re-correcting your misinformation and your lies. Continued false harassment and more merit-less antagonizing, as I said, that is all you ever have. You just simply continue to prove me to be correct on that, and again and again. And no, I will shut this off at any time I want tonight, and no, its not going until 12.

  • And as if anyone gives a crap. How juvenile is your mind? People like you are obviously not even close to being normal.

  • It is obvious and as well it will be to any readers that are not shills, get it. What a complete …idiot.

  • Your seriously twisted level of existing insanity is something that should never be tolerated on this site, or any other. Were done. You have endlessly wasted far to much of my time.

  • Jesus baby

    “No, I am not about to repost…”

    Of course you’re not. That’s my point, Lowell/tripnasty84.

  • Jesus baby

    58 more minutes.

  • Jonathan Graham

    I bet none of those readers you imagine are out there can’t explain the problem either. Even people like Ron Roy who claim they understand you….get a sudden case of laryngitis when it comes to explaining you. :Again, almost like you don’t make any sense. :-)

  • Jonathan Graham

    Because I’ve pinned you. If you admit that you understand the Chi-squared test, you know that I’ll slap you down but if you admit you don’t understand it then you pretty much hand me the ability to dismiss the study.

    So what’s your only option?. Distract (post a bunch of other stuff and whine and scream that I respond to it), Dismiss (call something a lie or insane without being able to say how) and Delay (talk in circles).

    Well that was fun Lowell, hope you find a good counselor – you sure need one.

  • Proponent

    Lowell Hubbs: “Mark this date on your calendar 02-03-2017, at midnight. Your funding in regard to going after my posting on vactruth, it ends there, and exactly there.”

    “Your funding in regard to going after my posting on vactruth..”

    Huh.

    You mean.. Jesus Baby is specifically paid to follow and post responses to your posts/comments, then?

    But..

    Lowell Hubbs: “Unless you personally know so called Jesus baby, you would have no idea if or not anything you are claiming to and supporting as to that person, is true at all.”

    Ok, then.

  • Judith

    Babies are being introduced to vaccines at a very young age – before their immune systems are mature. An immature immune system can struggle to deal with vaccine pollution, toxins and contamination:

    “A study, published this week in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, the researchers led by Antonietta Gatti, of the National Council of Research of Italy and the Scientific Director of Nanodiagnostics, say their results “show the presence of micro- and nano-sized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccine samples” not declared in the products’ ingredients lists”

    Lead particles were found in the cervical cancer vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, for example, and in the seasonal flu vaccine Aggripal manufactured by Novartis as well as in the Meningetec vaccine meant to protect against meningitis C.”

    How trusting should we be of vaccines when history shows that this is not a rare occurrence.

    “The polio vaccine doled out between 1955 and 1963 was contaminated with simian virus 40 (SV40) from monkey kidney cells used to produce the vaccine. It’s been linked to the growing epidemic of cancer.

    In 2007, Merck & Company, Inc. recalled 1.2 million doses of Hib vaccines due to contamination with bacteria called cereus, a potentially lethal food-poisoning bug.

    In 2009, more than 40,000 doses of a meningitis C vaccine for babies were withdrawn from the British market when they were found to be contaminated with blood-poisoning bacteria, S aureus.

    In 2010, deep sequence analysis of eight different live attenuated virus vaccines revealed unexpected viral sequences in three of them: retrovirus avian leukosis was found in a measles vaccine, a virus similar to simian retrovirus was identified in Rotateq anti-diarrhea vaccine developed by CDC consultant Paul Offit, and the entire genome sequence of porcine cirovirus1 was found in Rotarix leading the FDA to suspend the rotavirus vaccine.

    In 2014, The US Food and Drug Administration ordered GlaxoSmithKline to review the manufacturing operation of its flu vaccine when it found microbiological contamination of products purporting to be sterile.

    In 2013, Merck & Company, Inc. recalled one batch of Gardasil when glass particles were discovered in several phials.

    Recently it was reported that Sanofi Pasteur refused to recall its ActHIB vaccine for babies, even though it knew it was contaminated with glass shards. The FDA didn’t object.”

    Since there is total indemnity – we cannot expect pharma to clean up it’s act.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/dirty-vaccines-new-study-reveals-prevalence-of-contaminants/5572881

  • Do you know my investigation crew? No? Then just shut the hell up. You will lose your funding as well.

  • Jesus baby
  • Jonathan Graham

    Do you know my investigation crew; and you do?

    Well I doubt you have anything resembling a “crew” the evidence is simply that the larger the group the larger number of people who would have to be just as deluded as you are to think that people like myself are getting paid to post here.

    Just shut the hell up. You will lose your funding as well

    Unless you are in an inertial reference frame traveling at near the speed of light. You’ve probably already broken this promise.

  • F..k you …be sure to save your funding money …honey.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Yeah, you’re angry because you got pwned. I get it.

    .be sure to save your funding money

    I’ll just take this opportunity to tell you how awkward your English is. Is it deliberate? “funding money” would be money that someone uses to fund someone else. Not money they receive from being funded.

    honey.

    Are you hitting on me Lowell?

  • You actually got directly owned on every rely post I made, and don’t try to tell your sick and delusional funder, any different

    Hitting on a sick F… like you? Not even in your dreams. I was just simply mocking, and harassing you directly. Be sure to tell your funder David, what has now happened here. You seriously sick, and disgusting puke of a man.

  • You wish. You red haired and pasty face PUKE of a so called, man. Talk all the continued sick, twisted, and in denial bullshit that you want. Society, does not need sick people like you. You are nothing but a waste of the earths space, and the planets oxygen.

  • Jonathan Graham

    You actually got directly owned

    Lowell, I pointed out exactly how I cornered you and why you can’t answer. You just responded with your typical frothing at the mouth. That’s not winning an argument, that’s you having a tantrum because you lost.

    Hitting on a sick F… like you? Not even in your dreams

    Not my dreams, but the number of people who call me “honey” is pretty much limited to people who have a romantic interest.

    I was just simply mocking, and harassing you …directly.

    Thanks for admitting you harass people. You know that’s against the TOS for Disqus right?

    Be sure to tell your funder, so called and as reply posted, David

    Who does not fund me nor has admitted to funding anyone. These ideas are fantasies Lowell. Which, are probably things you do to make yourself feel important. Notice that despite all sorts of threats about not posting anymore. You can’t stop. Because this is something you do to feel good about yourself.

  • Jonathan Graham

    You wish

    See the problem with you just replying to my posts with a tantrum is that it’s hard to determine exactly what part you are talking about. What do you claim that “I wish”?

    I don’t care how many people you have working with you. What I’m pointing out is how obvious it is that it’s likely to be few to nobody (or perhaps just an excessively broad defining of “working with”. Such as counting internet sites which you have deluded yourself into thinking have something to say about finding imaginary shills.)

    I don’t really care if you stay or leave but you have now rather clearly lied about leaving. So there’s that. :-)

  • sabelmouse

    i am not getting any comments on my feed and checking out people’s profiles they don’t seem to be commenting much. coincidence? is your disqus working?

  • Judith

    Hi Sabel – yes I think people are getting a little tired of the constant bombardment from the shills – however not going to stop commenting.

  • You SICK and regurgitating PUKE filled replying posting …a$$hole. You know all to well that you have no identity, and that even that your picture is FAKE. Your reply posting and existing lot here, continues to be and nothing more than, and amount to being nothing but fake shill and replying pro-vax cowards.

    I have beaten you to a PULP on every level of existing vaccine truth information here, and you know it… and that being, time after time, after time. And you just keep on distorting it all, and lying. You are a complete piece of lying pro-vax shill garbage, and you know it. Again, if you are so smart and educated as to the available science and analysis, WHY cant you answer these questions? Each time you attempt to and falsely complain that it want explained in a way that was sufficient for you and that met with your standards. I think that you known damn well that you can not actually answer those questions. Once and for all, prove me wrong? You are nothing but a lying COWARD, just admit it.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    My response to Antonio Baduy Cámara, and the blog Skeptical Raptor, as to their response to 9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxer’s
    You see, unlike the blog known as Skeptical Raptor, I am actually going to have the fortitude to post the article link that I am responding to.
    http://www.vacfacts.info/my-response-to-antonio-baduy-caacutemara-and-the-blog-skeptical-raptor-as-to-their-response-to-9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    The CDC Claimed To Epidemiological Safety Studies – Verses – The Independent Physiological Vaccine Safety Study Science
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-cdc-claimed-to-epidemiological-safety-studies-ndash-verses-ndash-the-independent-physiological-vaccine-safety-science.html

    Dirty Vaccines: Every Human Vaccine Tested Was Contaminated With Metals and Debris in New Study
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/dirty-vaccines-every-human-vaccine-tested-was-contaminated-metals-and-debris-new-

    Vaccine Contamination
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-contamination.html

    Actually I think it is less than half. Millions of adults have never been re-vaccinated since childhood. I have not had a vaccine in over 4 decades. And in their pharma CDC brainwashed haze of existence, and in questioning absolutely nothing they are told, this kind of common sense never even entered their minds. There is no existing vaccine derived herd immunity, (it would be impossible), only naturally derived herd immunity, is real.

    If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?
    http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/295562-if-only-half-of-america-is-properly-vaccinated-where-are-the

  • So then why have you repeatedly failed to reply to this?

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    My response to Antonio Baduy Cámara, and the blog Skeptical Raptor, as to their response to 9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxer’s
    You see, unlike the blog known as Skeptical Raptor, I am actually going to have the fortitude to post the article link that I am responding to.
    http://www.vacfacts.info/my-response-to-antonio-baduy-caacutemara-and-the-blog-skeptical-raptor-as-to-their-response-to-9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    The CDC Claimed To Epidemiological Safety Studies – Verses – The Independent Physiological Vaccine Safety Study Science
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-cdc-claimed-to-epidemiological-safety-studies-ndash-verses-ndash-the-independent-physiological-vaccine-safety-science.html

    Dirty Vaccines: Every Human Vaccine Tested Was Contaminated With Metals and Debris in New Study
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/dirty-vaccines-every-human-vaccine-tested-was-contaminated-metals-and-debris-new-

    Vaccine Contamination
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-contamination.html

    Actually I think it is less than half. Millions of adults have never been re-vaccinated since childhood. I have not had a vaccine in over 4 decades. And in their pharma CDC brainwashed haze of existence, and in questioning absolutely nothing they are told, this kind of common sense never even entered their minds. There is no existing vaccine derived herd immunity, (it would be impossible), only naturally derived herd immunity, is real.

    If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?
    http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/295562-if-only-half-of-america-is-properly-vaccinated-where-are-the

  • I actually own you, you puke and rot stinking pro-vax shill coward. Keep lying.

    Reply to it.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    My response to Antonio Baduy Cámara, and the blog Skeptical Raptor, as to their response to 9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxer’s
    You see, unlike the blog known as Skeptical Raptor, I am actually going to have the fortitude to post the article link that I am responding to.
    http://www.vacfacts.info/my-response-to-antonio-baduy-caacutemara-and-the-blog-skeptical-raptor-as-to-their-response-to-9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    The CDC Claimed To Epidemiological Safety Studies – Verses – The Independent Physiological Vaccine Safety Study Science
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-cdc-claimed-to-epidemiological-safety-studies-ndash-verses-ndash-the-independent-physiological-vaccine-safety-science.html

    Dirty Vaccines: Every Human Vaccine Tested Was Contaminated With Metals and Debris in New Study
    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/dirty-vaccines-every-human-vaccine-tested-was-contaminated-metals-and-debris-new-

    Vaccine Contamination
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-contamination.html

    Actually I think it is less than half. Millions of adults have never been re-vaccinated since childhood. I have not had a vaccine in over 4 decades. And in their pharma CDC brainwashed haze of existence, and in questioning absolutely nothing they are told, this kind of common sense never even entered their minds. There is no existing vaccine derived herd immunity, (it would be impossible), only naturally derived herd immunity, is real.

    If only half of America is properly vaccinated, where are the epidemics?
    http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/295562-if-only-half-of-america-is-properly-vaccinated-where-are-the

  • Jonathan Graham

    You SICK and regurgitating PUKE filled replying posting …a$$hole.

    Mad that you were caught lying about leaving are we?

    If you are so smart and educated as to the available science and analysis, WHY cant you answer these questions?

    Because I don’t understand what argument you are making and you refuse to clarify anything at all.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Just keep on posting Lowell, every one says “I Lowell Hubbs lied”. I think it’s about time for a rationalization. Don’t you? Perhaps you can make up some reason why you lied? Oooooh better yet try to blame ME for your lie. I mean…that’s probably what you are doing in your head. Right?

    Anyway the answers are always the same. a) I don’t respond to copy pasta and b) I don’t understand the cogent argument in your questions.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Lowell anytime you want to create an argument I can understand. The steps for which have clearly been laid out for you many times in a way that you clearly understand. I’m happy to discuss.

  • Anytime the evidence against vaccines gets to be to much for you, you again falsely claim that you can not understand it, and that it has not been properly and directly enough outlined for you. That actually means that you are a pathetic LIAR. Get it??? Everyone can see it clearly and directly, but you. You simply refuse to. That is not what they pay you for of course; and a pro-vax shill must deny the truth, and each and every time.

  • I didn’t lie, and this is the last article that will be reply posted on…you very sick and disgusting puke of a man.

    Translation: I Jonathan Graham, with actually a cowardly and FAKE identity ….refuse to understand the evidence given of, and as to the real vaccine truth. You are a lying skunk bag and paid shill coward, so just admit it.

    Answer the questions I have put in front of you.

  • I have not lied, you have. That issue is actually irrelevant, sick man.

    You deliberately FAIL to understand anything that shows you the real vaccine truth, and that is the truth. What a seriously sick man, so called, Jonathan Graham. And you know that is not your real name, you coward.

    Your shill money is and actually will be ended here, and it is just a matter of time. Trust me, it will be ended.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Dude, my non-understanding of your argument has persisted from the first time you made it. So you have no basis for your claim.

  • Jonathan Graham

    I didn’t lie

    Sure did. I was supposed to mark the date not the article. LOL

  • Jonathan Graham

    Anytime you are willing to explain, to a level of detail which is clear to me. I’m happy to discuss. This level of clarity has been explained to you and you agree you understand and has been demonstrated as achievable.

  • F..K you. You are nothing but an obviously LYING piece of paid off SHILL GARBAGE. The lowest form of non human life…that is existing on this earth. Vaccines cause vaccine injury, they in a major way harm human health, and they kill, period. Just face it. All of it is caused by vaccines.

    Autism’s costs to U.S. economy estimated to top $265 billion for 2015
    https://www.autismspeaks.org/science/science-news/autism%E2%80%99s-costs-us-economy-estimated-top-265-billion-2015

    £32billion bill for autism, Britain costliest condition: Total cost of treatment, care and support is more then heart disease, cancer and strokes combined
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2653518/32billion-bill-autism-Britain-costliest-condition-Total-cost-treatment-care-support-heart-disease-cancer-strokes-combined.html

    MEDICAL NUREMBERG FOR CDC NOW
    http://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/medical-nuremberg-for-cdc-now

    Dr. H (Suzanne Humpries) takes down Offit re aluminum!!!!!!

    Published on May 8, 2015
    Paul Offit lies directly, without shame, millions in vaccine patent
    CDC is criticized by HHS for severe conflicts of interest
    Pharma is indemnified ZERO liability
    54% of all US children have a chronic condition

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt6X2p-zV6o

    Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct (one very important article, to read)
    http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/

    GLOBAL VACCINE MARKET: RAPID
    GROWTH and CHANGING STATUS
     Tripled in value from USD 5B in 2000 to almost USD 24 B in 2013
    – Influenza vaccine market: estimated at $2.9 billion in 2011 to $3.8 billion by 2018
    – US : $1.6 billion in 2011 to $2.2 billion in 2018
     Global market projected to rise to USD 100 B by 2025
     More than 120 new products in the development pipeline
     60 are of importance for developing countries
     Vaccines: becoming an engine for the pharmaceutical industry
     Changing status of the vaccines within the pharmaceutical industry
     New business model for vaccines is emerging?

    Read more:
    http://who.int/influenza_vaccines_plan/resources/session_10_kaddar.pdf

    Vaccines Market worth $57.8 Billion by 2019
    http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/vaccines-market-worth-578-billion-by-2019-289805011.html

    There are (actually) 271 New Vaccines in Big Pharma’s (with now no liability risk since 1987, and for anyone at all from vaccine manufacturers, to the providers).

    President Ronald Reagan signed The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986, absolving drug companies from all medico-legal liability when children die, become chronically ill with vaccine-induced autoimmune disorders or are otherwise disabled from vaccine injuries. That law has led directly to an expected reckless, liability-free development of scores of new, over-priced, potential block-buster vaccines, now numbering over 250. The question that must be asked of Big Medicine’s practitioners: How will the CDC, the AMA, the AAFP and the American Academy of Pediatrics fit any more potentially neurotoxic vaccines into the current well-baby over-vaccination schedule? PhRMA (the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America), the pharmaceutical industry’s trade association and powerful lobbying group, says that: “today, more than 7,000 medicines are in development globally, all of which have the potential to help patients in the United States and around the world. According to another data source, there are 3,400 medicines in development today just in the United States, an increase of 40 percent since 2005.” PhRMA also says that today: “the 271 vaccines in development span a wide array of diseases, and employ exciting new scientific strategies and technologies. These potential vaccines – all in human clinical trials or under review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) – include 137 for infectious diseases, 99 for cancer, 15 for allergies and 10 for neurological disorders.” Whenever the FDA signals that it is ready to grant marketing approval for a new vaccine or drug, the first step for the pharmaceutical company’s marketing department is to promote an “educational” advertising campaign designed to instill fear in parents (and their pediatricians) about the horrible illnesses (albeit previously unknown, benign or rare) that even us doctors hadn’t yet recognized as being significant up until recently. Most of us physicians have gone along with the fear-mongering that makes our practices busier while it also makes billions of dollars in profits for some unworthy CEO or Wall Street investment banker, hedge fund manager or mutual fund investor – all at the expense of America’s precious and vulnerable children who are at high risk of being sickened along the way.

    Read more…
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/there-are-271-new-vaccines-in-big-pharmas-pipeline/

    United States Tracks Children to Push Gardasil Vaccine – Rest of the World Becoming Skeptical

    by Jefferey Jaxen
    Health Impact News

    Parents Receive Letters from State Strongly Urging HPV Shots for Their Tracked Children

    The United States continues to carelessly move forward with the HPV vaccine Gardisal. Meanwhile, due to its endless damage, the shot is the center of criminal lawsuits in Spain, India, France, Japan and many other countries. In the UK, the HPV vaccination push has 8,228 official reports of side-effects, almost more than all other vaccine reports combined. Dr. Dalbergue, a former pharmaceutical industry physician with Gardisal manufacturer Merck gave a 2104 interview stating that: “Gardisal is useless and costs a fortune” as well as predicting “Gardisal will become the greatest medical scandal of all times…” Ignoring data and worldwide protest, The Departments of Health within U.S. states are now sending letters to parents advising their children to submit to HPV vaccinations. With no prior announcement, parental consent given, or notice, the states of New York and Indiana have tracked HPV vaccine non-compliers and are now hassling them with physical letters.

    Read more…
    http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/united-states-tracks-children-to-push-gardasil-vaccine-rest-of-the-world-becoming-skeptical/

    Gardasil-The Flagship Example of the Failure of Vaccine Authorities to Regulate and Assure Vaccine Safety”-“HPV Vaccine Has Done This to My Child”-“I am NOT just another vaccine, coincidence”!
    http://www.vacfacts.info/gardasil-the-flagship-example-of-the-failure-of-vaccine-authorities-to-regulate-and-assure-vaccine-safety.html

    Gardasil-The Real Truth
    http://www.vacfacts.info/gardasil—the-real-truth.html

    Dr. Paul Offit’s Aluminum Deceptions and Academic Misconduct (one very important article, to read)
    http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/

    Paul Offit-The Real Truth
    http://www.vacfacts.info/paul-offit—the-real-truth.html

    Vaccine aluminum adjuvant causation of neuroglial activation and neuroinflammation in the brain of patients with autism- Page 2
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-aluminum-adjuvant-causation-of-neuroglial-activation-and-neuroinflammation-in-the-brain-of-patients-with-autism–page-2.html

    The Mechanisms of Vaccine Injury and Via Cytokine Storm
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-mechanisms-of-vaccine-injury-and-via-cytokine-storm.html

    Vaccination toxicity: The Zeta phase of MASS and “blood sludging”
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccination-toxicity-the-zeta-phase-of-mass-and-ldquoblood-sludgingrdquo.html

    Vaccine Caused Ischemia/Hypoxia
    http://www.vacfacts.info/vaccine-caused-ischemiahypoxia.html

    REDACTED VACCINE DEATH FORENSICS REPORT

    Baby M’s Parents,

    Petitioners
    Vs.
    Secretary of Health and Human Services,
    Respondent
    Preliminary Neurobehavioral/Forensics Report: Baby M, a minor.

    Dr Andrew Moulden BA, MA, MD, PhD April 30, 2009
    Vaccine Injury Coalition

    http://www.vacfacts.info/baby-ms-parents-vaccine-death-forensics-report.html

    Falsely Accused Shaken Baby Syndrome, (and vaccine caused SIDS)
    http://www.vacfacts.info/falsely-accused-shaken-baby-syndrome.html

    Informed Consent / Vaccine Risks Disclosure Form
    http://www.vacfacts.info/informed-consent–vaccine-risks-disclosure-form.html

  • You will see. You lose, and in the end. You very very SICK PUKE of a man. You could not do what you do, and with any real identity. Just admit that-that as well is fake.

    Get started.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • Really…and again…you have …nothing. Get started, and do that in as as much as you falsely to claim to not understand it.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    http://www.vacfacts.info/my-response-to-antonio-baduy-caacutemara-and-the-blog-skeptical-raptor-as-to-their-response-to-9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • You can’t understand this???? Really???? And of course, you are again… endlessly lying.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • You KNOW that you are NOTHING but a LYING …SCUMBAG …so called ..Johnny G …and so …go just ahead and admit to it.

  • sabelmouse

    it must be disqus then. i’ve had no comments on my feed for 3 days now, only replies to me that should be under notifications.
    but even when i go to people’s profiles there’s little there. even people who comment a lot.

  • Jonathan Graham

    More tantrums from Lowell the Liar. As I said anytime you are willing to explain, to a level of detail which is clear to me. I’m happy to discuss. I’ll point out that not only has “what would be clear to me” been explained to you and you agree you understand it and has been demonstrated as achievable but it’s also provably impossible for me to have much of relevance to say until you do this.

    So again, anytime you can start defining things – perhaps starting with the assumptions – those things which are not proved in your argument – you are making.

  • Jonathan Graham

    I simply don’t see the cogent argument there. Can you restate in a different way?

  • Jonathan Graham

    What do I lose? In your fantasy world I’m getting paid to post here right? You claimed that if you stopped posting my funding (that exists only in your imagination) would go away. However you keep posting and increasing the number of replies I make. Clearly you meant to stop posting but you can’t because, as I’ve said before this is something you do to feel better about yourself.

  • You aren’t getting away with that.

    It was a good study, even though it was a preliminary study. We need a follow up study replicating the findings, and in looking at much more. We clearly need more studies like that.

    New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Microand Nanocontamination
    http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

    Your posted article at Respectful Insolence, is written and edited by Orac, and of course Orac is known to be none other than David Gorski, also known as doctor and/or Professor David Gorski, a well-known online blogging character assassin, attempting to falsely masquerading as a science defender.

    A direct response to the article titled: I love it when an antivax “study” meant to show how “dirty” vaccines are backfires so spectacularly
    http://www.vacfacts.info/a-direct-response-to-the-article-titled-i-love-it-when-an-antivax-study-meant-to-show-how-dirty-vaccines-are-backfires-so-spectacularly.html

  • No, actually your replies became so increasing asinine and out of lying and falsely accusing control, and that after I stopped reply posting, that it needed a response. You did that deliberately to try and draw me back in. You know you are screwed if I end it, and that is going to happen.

    I told you this is the last article I am posting on and in responding to you. I will let the readers do that job. There is no point wasting the time I have in responding to you as many times as I have, and you simply wasted my time in doing that, for months. Of course and as I said there are other clear reasons that is ending.

    Go ahead and see if you can reply directly to this. I will leave it that, but the BS you come up with should be a good laugh for the readers, and any that know what that recent study is directly showing us. I can hear it already, oh it is not clear enough for you, and it does not meet your requirements. Oh, no I can reply as it doesn’t provide a hypothesis. You have more lying and false excuses than any shill that has ever been. Your arrogance alone simply does not cut it.

    New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Microand
    Nanocontamination

    Abstract
    Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new nvestigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.

    http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

    A direct response to the article titled: I love it when an antivax “study” meant to show how “dirty” vaccines are backfires so spectacularly
    http://www.vacfacts.info/a-direct-response-to-the-article-titled-i-love-it-when-an-antivax-study-meant-to-show-how-dirty-vaccines-are-backfires-so-spectacularly.html

  • Sure. You’re lying; and there I worded it, as much as I ever need to. You have no answers and no honesty reply. How about that? Just quit dancing around it. You have simply danced around it for months, and with all your avoidance and deflecting false excuses. Just admit that you have no ability to respond to it, and because what that page contains is exactly correct. You just don’t have any study science to prove your vaccine safety claims. Prove me wrong? You look like a complete fool, and you would have been better off to just get honest about it all.

    Cogent comes from a Latin word meaning to drive together, so cogent thinking is well-organized: it hangs together. Cogent:
    When you make a cogent argument, it means your argument is clear and persuasive.

    What exists on THAT PAGE is all of that and more. Face it.

    It has only been attempted once, and that was an obvious and clear failure on every level, period.

    ​My response to Antonio Baduy Cámara, and the blog Skeptical Raptor, as to their response to 9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxer’s
    http://www.vacfacts.info/my-response-to-antonio-baduy-caacutemara-and-the-blog-skeptical-raptor-as-to-their-response-to-9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • More false excuses as to why you can not discuss and respond to the issues of why there exists no adequate level of vaccine safety studies. You are so far into the dark ages of denial buried in the junk science epidemiological studies, you cant even see daylight. If calling you a scumbag indicates a tantrum, then you just keep patting yourself on the back with that and falsely calling yourself the winner. Posting like a child, but oh yes as long as the language is yet civil, and even though you are actually lying, harassing, and antagonizing and like hell; remember your words are all yet, civil. That makes you a complete scumbag, just one of the many reasons.

    You want to deny everything and ignore everything. You have refused to directly answer any questions I have ever put in front of you, but to evade it all and simply throw a false smoke screen at all ,and simply keep on lying. You were supposed to make the so called anti-vaxers look stupid and uneducated; but all you actually ever did here was show that to be only the case for yourself, and repeatedly.

    Do individuals and parents deserve an existing and adequate level of vaccine safety studies in regard to the injection of multiple vaccines? Yes, or no?

    Do individuals and parents deserve an adequate level of vaccine safety studies in regard to the issue of vaccine contamination, and its adverse effect on human health? Yes, or no?

    The nine questions expose as well directly details and right in front of you why those studies have never existed. Is that important? Not to you, because the only game you have going is of course denial, and more denial after that. How can you be all about the science, when you have no supporting science, Graham? You have nothing but inadequate, and obvious junk science.

    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • You know that nothing would ever be clear to you and clear enough for you unless it was pro-vax material. Quit lying. How many times do you repeatedly need prove that you are a twisted and lying scum bag?

  • Again, everyone can see that you are obviously lying. So you are actually admitting to being that dumb? That is what you ARE directly admitting. There is more than enough, basis.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • All that matters is that your funding gets ended, and it will.

  • No, I felt I need to respond to your obviously stepped up bullshit after I quit replying.

    Repeat after me. “I so called Jonathan Graham, refuse to understand anything at all that puts for the evidence as to the truth about vaccines, and as well the lack of adequate and existing vaccine safety studies”. “The infants and children of the world are not worth it to me, and poo poo on the parents as well”. ” I am paid to ignore and deny the vaccine truth, period”? “Nothing you can put forth will ever make me see and recognize the truth of what you are putting before me”. ” I love the sand hole I stick my head in every day, and no one will ever get me to stop doing it”. “My Shillary job as well depends on it”

  • Go ask Andrew Johnson and that tore site that takes funding contributions why you aren’t getting paid any more. It may take some time but it will happen. You sleaze man.

  • Jesus baby

    I knew you couldn’t stay away, Lowell/tripnasty84. In what way do you think that was a good study?

  • Jonathan Graham

    I have no idea who Andrew Jonson is, nor do I know what a “tore” site is. Do you mean “tor”? If so, what does that have to do with your imagined funding of people? The only evidence you have provided to suggest that I or anyone else is getting paid is our posting. However I (and I assume most other pro-vaccine folk) are still posting even though you think I’m not getting paid (or are about to not get paid)

    So how long do I have to keep posting for before evidence and logic overcomes your delusions that I’m getting paid Lowell?

    I confess I’m exceptionally intrigued to find out.

  • Jonathan Graham

    No, I felt I need to respond to your obviously stepped up bullshit after I quit replying.

    Then you haven’t quit replying. What you just did Lowell was a reply. So you lied about quitting.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Lowell, I don’t respond to an argument I don’t understand. Data is not an argument. Your nonsense that I refuse to understand is, as always refuted by my having provided clear, well understood and achievable criteria of what I would accept.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Again, everyone can see that you are obviously lying

    I wonder how many see that this phrase of yours is a kind of bullying.

    o you are actually admitting to being that dumb?

    I’m admitting that you’re not smart enough to rephrase in a way I can understand.

  • Jonathan Graham

    You know that nothing would ever be clear to you

    Refuted many times over by my providing a clear and achievable set of criteria that I would accept.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Do individuals and parents deserve an existing and adequate level of vaccine safety studies in regard to the injection of multiple vaccines? Yes, or no?

    Even this is pretty hard to interpret due to your horribly awkward English. Do you mean: Do people deserve an adequate level of evidence of vaccine safety?

    Sure, but the question is meaningless. Since it doesn’t answer the question: “What is an acceptable level of evidence of vaccine safety?”

  • kfunk937

    I confess I’m exceptionally intrigued to find out.

    Seeing as it’s winter, I’d like to extend a seasonal invitation to our “Watching Paint Dry” party, followed by our spring fiesta celebrating “Watching Grass Grow”. RSVPs requested. Plus 1s encouraged.

    Maybe you need to get out more.

  • Jonathan Graham

    Sure. You’re lying; and there I worded it, as much as I ever need to.

    Lowell, I wasn’t talking about your accusation of lying. I’m talking about your link. It simply doesn’t form a cogent argument to me. Perhaps you can restate that.

  • Jonathan Graham

    No, actually your replies became so increasing asinine and out of lying and falsely accusing control, and that after I stopped reply posting, that it needed a response.

    LOL Did I call that or did I call that. Not only do you have a rationalization but you managed to rationalize that I’m the cause of you breaking your word.

    “After I stopped” – Even you should be able to see that your “stop” didn’t last significantly longer than the ordinary breaks you take.

    As for your study, it’s more like half a study. While I suspect that the people involved have some kind of anti-vaccine bent. The best I think you can say about it is that it’s exploratory.

  • Get off your lazy duff and actually read the page. If you had done that instead of deliberately ignoring it, you would already have the answer. And you know I have no connection to any/tripnasty84, and yet in your childish manner of posting you insist on continuing again with that mindless and repeated level of attempted harassment.

    A direct response to the article titled: I love it when an antivax “study” meant to show how “dirty” vaccines are backfires so spectacularly
    http://www.vacfacts.info/a-direct-response-to-the-article-titled-i-love-it-when-an-antivax-study-meant-to-show-how-dirty-vaccines-are-backfires-so-spectacularly.html

  • Make your self serving bullshit up as you go, much? And again all of it of course in your nobody gives a crap about your twisted claims, favor? I told you you were a complete puke.

    And again as well in regard to any real science and in the evaluation of such studies, you have nothing. All you can produce is more biased, disregarding, and hateful ignorance of what exists in any such information.

    That study is far more than just exploratory. The CDC needs to fund similar follow up studies, and then admit to that there exist no studies that have ever been done to show what levels of such injected vaccine contaminants, are not hazardous and harmful to human health. They need to admit to the obvious risk. Until they can scientifically show and prove through studies that-that kind of vaccine contamination is not an injected vaccine risk; there actually should be a moratorium placed on the use of all vaccines.

  • And I said you are lying about your claim that what I have put forth is not in the form of a cogent argument.

    For example what on this page do you find to not represent a cognitive argument? And here we go again and again, and you know all to well that you are going to dance around it again and again, and the same lies as you have repeatedly put forth for months and months now. Come on Graham, dance, dance, and dance again around it, allemande left, circle right, circle left, corner, and do-si-do your shill partner.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

  • See, I told you would refuse to answer the question; and of course you refused to directly answer either question.

    Just how in your twisted and in denial mind is that said question I put to you, meaningless? As if you have no means and there exists no means to actually outline what is an acceptable level of evidence for vaccine safety. So by those means and on those terms you refuse to answer these two questions. I told you that from day one you have refused to answer any questions directly and that have been put to you by anyone at all here.

    Do individuals and parents deserve an existing and adequate level of vaccine safety studies in regard to the injection of multiple vaccines? Yes, or no?

    Do individuals and parents deserve an adequate level of vaccine safety studies in regard to the issue of vaccine contamination, and its adverse effect on human health? Yes, or no?

    You see this page right here and below, and that you have again been dancing around for endless months now? That page outlines directly what is necessary in regard to the still needed vaccine safety studies. That page outlines directly what is missing, and what is yet largely inadequate for existing vaccine safety studies. That page as well outlines with a well done analysis exactly and specifically why all of the known 14 to 16 epidemiological are clearly nothing but unreliable junk science. Epidemiological studies that were done on only one single vaccine, the (MMR) and one single and general vaccine ingredient, Thimerosal. Anyone with any common sense and honesty knows that is largely an inadequate level of vaccine safety studies, and the same studies have been used at the federal vaccine court to deny many of the now over 10,000 cases that were filed for vaccine injury, or resulting death compensation. This below is what you repeatedly refuse to face, and the reality of it.

    9 Questions For The Pro-Vaxers
    http://www.vacfacts.info/9-questions-for-the-pro-vaxers.html

    Although Thimerosal mercury has been phased out of most childhood vaccines with the exception of claimed to be trace amounts due to manufacturing, the CDC for years has continued to maintain that it is safe, and even for pregnant women. How reckless and refusing to face their actual liability …irresponsible is that? And who at the FDA is responsible to assure that when Thimerosal is removed from a vaccine after manufacturing, that all that is left is trace amounts? It is actually and mostly all left on big pharma’s honor to assure that, and we all know what that is worth; nothing at all.

    New CDC Research Debunks Agency’s Assertion That Mercury in Vaccines Is Safe

    If you have ever been concerned about this issue, this is one very important article to read. What exists here throws literally a damning spotlight on everything the CDC has falsely claimed to be true in regard to the safety of this substance, known as Thimerosal, mercury. Just like the issue of mercury in amalgam dental fillings, the ADA as well has claimed that substance continues to as well remain to be safe and effective; no such thing has ever been the case, and just the opposite is true. Nothing would ever be enough to get them to admit to their liability, and in regard to the harm to human health that has been done.

    http://www.ecowatch.com/cdc-mercury-vaccines-kennedy-2226257805.html?page=2

  • You have not refuted anything ever. First you make the goal as twisted and unattainable as you can make it; and then you just simply lie about it in claiming again and again that nothing has met with your criteria and standards enough to satisfy you. And all of that after having the false arrogance and the audacity in the first place to claim that everything must first satisfy you and your standards, and while you know that you will claim that nothing ever has met those standards and no matter what. Any thinking person can see that as being nothing but majorly asinine on your part. You can not debate these issues, and you know you can’t. It is as obvious and as simple as that. Just admit it.

    Go ahead and put forth your said outline in your next reply post; and for another good laugh. Make it complete and don’t leave anything out of that outline, and as to what it takes to satisfy you and as to your requirements.

  • You just reply post and post and post and post and post the same twisted garbage, and you never say anything worth anything at all. It is always the same false and twisted accusations, and there is nothing new here and that anyone would consider as even worth reading.

  • Jonathan, everyone knows how twisted, lying, in denial, and actually sick you are. You are not fooling anyone. What you just posted there is only and just another repeated example of what I am referring to, in regard to you.

  • Is it a lie that it will happen shortly, and that your funding will be ended? Why is the main funder hiding and living off the grid?

  • So apparently you know of the correct spelling, but yet you don’t know the person. A Tor browser is providing a contribution and donation site, and which apparently goes to a funder, or the main funder, so I am told. A caller unrelated to my side of it, called me and offered that information last night. I really could care less. One way to end it, but actually there is two. There is nothing in your twisted mind you wouldn’t lie about, and deny, and no matter what the subject matter is.

  • Jonathan Graham

    For example what on this page do you find to not represent a cognitive argument?

    Well you can’t even tell me what the assumptions – those things which are required to demonstrate your point and are not proved in the argument itself – are.

  • Jonathan Graham

    See, I told you would refuse to answer the question; and of course you refused to directly answer either question.

    I answered the only question I could intelligibly construct from the words that you posted.

    Just how in your twisted and in denial mind is that said question I put to you, meaningless?

    I have no idea what the question you posted means – unless it is effectively represented by my restatement. If it isn’t you should concentrate on actually helping us get to a question that can be mutually understood.

    As if you have no means and there exists no means to actually outline what is an acceptable level of evidence for vaccine safety.

    I’m saying that the question can be answered without referring to that. Which makes it not