36

Your Child May Get This Deadly Allergy After Being Vaccinated

Vaccines containing latex may be triggering allergic reactions to common products, like baby pacifiers.

Millions of children worldwide are being injected with latex allergens over and over again in connection with vaccination schedules, often starting with the Hepatitis B vaccine when babies are only a few hours old. Is it any wonder that latex allergy affects millions and that the numbers are increasing?

The presence of latex allergens in vaccines is due to leaching from syringe tip caps, plungers  and  multi-dose vial stoppers.

Many suffer from latex allergy

According to WebMD,

In the US  1 – 5% of the population suffer from latex allergy. It is increased in groups who are regularly exposed to latex. Symptoms of latex allergy have been described in 54% of staff in a pediatric emergency department.

Latex allergy probably is more common in children and in younger working adults because of the increased medical and/or occupational exposure over the past two decades.(1)

Exactly. The reason why latex allergy is more common in children is most likely  due to  “medical exposure,” for example vaccinations!

Many who suffer from latex allergy are also allergic to several types of fruit

The prevalence of latex allergy is increased in persons with allergies to avocado, banana, chestnut, kiwi, papaya, peach, or nectarine. Cross-reacting antigens have been found between these tropical fruits and latex.(1)

Symptoms of latex allergy

Symptoms range from skin rashes and swelling, hives, nasal congestion, swelling of the lips and tongue, sneezing, wheezing, breathlessness to anaphylaxis, the life-threatening allergic reaction that can constrict airways in the lungs and cause death.

Little is known about the safety of vaccinating people who are allergic to latex

There is little scientific information regarding the safety of vaccination of latex allergic persons.
In a press release in June 2001 Professor Robert Hamilton, professor of medicine, John Hopkins University, stated:

If a drug is sold and stored in vials with a natural rubber stopper, no matter what precautions you take, latex allergens can contaminate that drug.
The FDA has asked for evidence that such allergens are present in pharmaceutical vials and that they can induce reactions in individuals already allergic to latex. Now we can provide it to them.

Until the FDA requires all vials to be labeled as “containing natural rubber” for easy identification and that the stoppers be latex free, some sensitized individuals will be at risk for a potentially serious or fatal allergic reaction.(2)

Latex allergens can be present in all vaccines which have latex in the syringe plungers, tip caps and multi-dose vial stoppers.

Which vaccines contain latex allergens? 

Information for all vaccines can normally be found in vaccine package inserts.

A list of vaccines which have latex in the packaging is also issued by CDC (Centers for Disease Control). (3)  In reality this is a list of vaccines which contain latex allergens.  It is regularly updated because both vaccines and types of syringe tip caps, plungers and vial stoppers are often changed.

Some vaccines which at present (June 2012) contain latex allergens include anthrax (Bio Thrax), Comvax, DTaP ( Infanrix, and Tripedia),  DT (Generic), Hib (Hiberix, PedvaxHIB and ActHIB), Hepatitis A (Havrix and Vaqta), Hepatitis B, (Engerix-B and Recombivax HB), HPV vaccine Cervarix, influenza vaccines (Fluarix, Fluvirin, Fluzone and Agriflu),Kinrix,  meningococcal vaccine Menomune, Pediarix, polio vaccine IPOL, Rotarix (applicator), Td vaccines (Decavac, Tenivac and Generic), Tdap vaccines ( Adacel and Boostrix), TriHIBit, Twinrix and Yellow fever vaccine YF-Vax.

– so by following the recommended schedule children in US may get 20 – 30 vaccines which contain latex allergens before they are six years old!

CDC recommends vaccines which contain latex allergens for those who have latex allergy

Here is CDC’s recommendation:
“ For latex allergies other than anaphylactic allergies (e.g., a history of contact allergy to latex gloves), vaccines supplied in vials or syringes that contain dry natural rubber or rubber latex may be administered.” (3)

(In other words, as long as latex allergic patients haven’t had a previous severe anaphylactic shock, just go ahead and inject with latex allergen containing vaccines!)

CDC’s advice to vaccinate those who are latex allergic is contradictory to that which is given by unbiased experts who maintain that sources of latex should be avoided.  It is also contradictory to common sense.

The Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust Department of Dermatology gives this information to patients with latex allergy:

You must take every possible precaution to avoid contact with natural rubber latex.

Your present degree of allergy may be insufficient to cause a serious reaction. It is wise to avoid all rubber since the degree of allergy and thus your reaction can change with each contact.(4)

Examples where precautions should be taken include latex containing gloves, balloons, contraceptives, adhesive plasters and glues,  shoes, textiles, swimming hats, hot water bottles, baby soothers, door/window insulation, urinary catheters, “drip” giving sets, intravenous tubing ports, syringe plungers and multi-dose injection vials.

It is a paradox that contact should be avoided with hot water bottles and balloons, yet CDC advises that latex allergen containing vaccines may be injected – over and over again!

Latex free packaging

Some vaccines are in syringes with latex free tip caps and plungers or in multi-dose vials with latex free stoppers. These are more expensive than those which contain latex. There is little information available concerning leaching of substances in latex free packaging.


Vaccines may also contain solid rubber latex particles

There is an additional problem to latex allergens in vaccines: Multi-dose vial stoppers are punctured with a needle in connection with dose withdrawals. The greater the number of punctures, the more possibility there is of rubber latex particles being released from the stoppers.

In connection with my work at a hospital I counted and identified particles in injections both before and after puncturing multi-dose vial stoppers. There were, as expected, more rubber particles after puncturing and the numbers were higher after several punctures.

As it is a well known fact that particles in injections may result in serious complications for patients I took the matter up with “the authorities”.

I contacted Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and asked if there is a requirement for manufacturers of injections including vaccines to produce documentation concerning particulate matter after puncture of rubber stoppers.

It was surprising and disconcerting to see FDA’s answer which stated:

“TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT FOR THE MANUFACTURER TO COUNT AND IDENTIFY PARTICLES AFTER VACCINE STOPPERS ARE PUNCTURED.”

This implies lack of specified quality requirements regarding vaccine stoppers.

The full version of the communication may be read here. (5)

Message to health authorities and other vaccine promoters

We don’t get bouncing babies by injecting them with vaccines which contain rubber latex allergens!

 

References

  1. http://www.webmd.com/allergies/guide/latex-allergy-treatments?page=2
  2. http://www.latexallergyresources.org/articles/vial-stoppers-johns-hopkins-press-release-june-8th-2001    
  3. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/latex-table.pdf
  4. http://www.oxfordradcliffe.nhs.uk/forpatients/090427patientinfoleaflets/110510latexallergy.pdf
  5. http://www.scribd.com/doc/59243842/Particles-in-Injections-Rev#fullscreen

 

Photo Credit

Sandy Lunoe
 

  • Carol Bird

    why can’t we stop this madness its been going on to long ive study vaccines for the last twenty years now nothing seems to be getting any better its nightmare why don’t people get it whats happening now lets try and do something . carol england

  • Mleawicks

    sadly they are so brainwashed. People look at me like I don’t have a brain when they find out we don’t get vaccs. not even or I should say especial in our child! poison pure poison

  • Sleigh676788

    i have been given so much crap for not vacc. but it does not make sense to vacc. when you know what is actually in a vaccine. its hard to debate with people because they are scared into getting them

  • Sleigh676788

    i have been given so much crap for not vacc. but it does not make sense to vacc. when you know what is actually in a vaccine. its hard to debate with people because they are scared into getting them

  • Sheer madness..An asault on children every where

  • Argus

    I don’t see the point of this article – all the information and recommendations listed from health afencies is already well known.

    Oh yes – we have to blame vaccines for something. So without any evidence, you try to imply that administration of vaccines CAUSES latex allergy. After all, there are no other more significant sources of latex exposure that might cause sensitization, right?

    And illustrate this with a picture of a baby sucking on a latex pacifier.

  • Argus

    I don’t see the point of this article – all the information and recommendations listed from health afencies is already well known.

    Oh yes – we have to blame vaccines for something. So without any evidence, you try to imply that administration of vaccines CAUSES latex allergy. After all, there are no other more significant sources of latex exposure that might cause sensitization, right?

    And illustrate this with a picture of a baby sucking on a latex pacifier.

  • Argus

    I don’t see the point of this article – all the information and recommendations listed from health afencies is already well known.

    Oh yes – we have to blame vaccines for something. So without any evidence, you try to imply that administration of vaccines CAUSES latex allergy. After all, there are no other more significant sources of latex exposure that might cause sensitization, right?

    And illustrate this with a picture of a baby sucking on a latex pacifier.

  • Josemargmendes

    Do you use to inject some kind of rubber particles or traces of latex into your bloodstream ?  If yes, your right: there are more significant sources of latex exposure that might cause sensitization…in your case, of course !

  • Ladistudress

    i dont want my baby being vaccinated but my husband and his family are taking my baby i dont want her to they wont listen they always say we will ask the doc on what i should do i tryed and asked the doc she insidted that kids are getting sickand that i need to get my baby jabbed :( 

  • AussieMum

     Without anyone having a blueprint of your DNA, no-one can definitely determine what causes the allergies.  However, if a substance has been directly injected into your body and bypasses your defence system and you react. Then you can make the hypothesis; vaccines laced with latex, cause allergic reactions.

    Without a hypothesis, how are we ever going to determine how or why certain people react.

    I declare my conflict of interest:  Vaccine Injured son

    What do you declare your conflict of interest is Argus?

  • Already well known, Argus? Where?

    Are you telling me that injecting latex contaminated vaccines, and even those with countable particles, can not and could not cause the increase in latex allergies that has been known? And you have the physiological science to back that claim? Where?

    Is there anything at all related to vaccine harm, Argus; that you won’t deny?

    You see that is the problem; those in vaccinology are assumed to be experts in all that is going on. They simply and quite obviously do not actually understand the immune system they are dealing with. If they did, they would know that what they do is causing more harm than good. I would like to have every person who is connected to vaccine development sit in an environmental allergy clinic for a week and review every work up and patients record there. Maybe then they would get an idea of the large scope of lack of real understanding of the human body, that they actually have.

    A facility like this.http://www.lacrosseallergy.com/AboutOurClinic/OurResearch/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ja/2012/253879/ 

    If the information is clearly understood as to peanut oil in vaccines causing the major increases in life threatening allergic reactions to peanuts; then why is it so far of a streach, to understand the vaccine induced latex allergies? The CDC fails to understand, by choice, even as much as how these endless and toxic multiple vaccines become an an actual immune suppressing agent; how would they even begin to see and admit to this, and the rest of it? The CDC can not comprehend that injecting substances is entirely of a differant nature than ingesting them as for and regarding the dietary route. They maintain without one single iota of proof, that it is one and the same thing physiologically; and that all is detoxed and handled by the human body exactly the same way. How irresponsible and negligent is that?

    Squalene oil in regard to Gulf War Syndrome, putting L histidine in Gardasil a never before used vaccine ingredient. They assume they do not need to study it for safety because and/ or if it already exists naturally in the human body, or is consumed small amounts dietarily. That, is their science? Oh, they know enough to measure that peanut or squalene oil obviously increases the adjuvant effect; but what about the adverse effects; they clearly could care less? 

    Vaccines and the Peanut Allergy Epidemic http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies/vaccines-and-the-peanut-allergy-epidemic/
    Polysorbate 80 and Histidine, a marriage of disasterhttp://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak/080830

    But according to you, Argus; if no existing and accepted CDC science is acknowleged; it just simply did not happen and there is thus there is no proof it happened; is that not correct? Even then and when anyone would show you existing, non biased and alternatively sourced science showing the mechanisms of effect; it is still not proof, right, Argus? Nothing is enough, right Argus? Denial of all.

    I have my full identity shown here; and obviously I am not a pharma nor a medical shill; where is your identity? I challenge you to put that up and identify that here and right now? List all your conflicts of interest. I as well gain absolutely nothing by what I put forth. I stand on the side of the parents, and their infants and children who have everything to lose. What do you have to lose?

      

  • Already well known, Argus? Where? No point to the article? Under what denialist and denial of all rock do you live under?

    Are you telling me that injecting latex contaminated vaccines, and even those with countable particles, can not and could not cause the increase in latex allergies that have been well known? And you have the physiological science to back that claim? Where?

    Is there anything at all related to vaccine harm, Argus; that you won’t deny?

    You see that is the problem; those in vaccinology are assumed to be experts in all that is going on. They simply and quite obviously do not actually understand the immune system they are dealing with. If they did, they would know that what they do is causing more harm than good. I would like to have every person who is connected to vaccine development sit in an environmental allergy clinic for a week and review every work up and patients record there. Maybe then they would get an idea of the large scope of lack of real understanding of the human body, that they actually have.

    A facility like this.
    http://www.lacrosseallergy.com/AboutOurClinic/OurResearch/
    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ja/2012/253879/ 

    If the information is clearly understood as to peanut oil in vaccines causing the major increases in life threatening allergic reactions to peanuts; then why is it so far of a streach, to understand the vaccine induced latex allergies? The CDC fails to understand, by choice, even as much as how these endless and toxic multiple vaccines become an an actual immune suppressing agent; how would they even begin to see and admit to this, and the rest of it? The CDC can not comprehend that injecting substances is entirely of a differant nature than ingesting them, as for and regarding the dietary or external exposure route. They maintain without one single iota of proof, that it is one and the same thing physiologically; and that all is detoxed and handled by the human body exactly the same way. How irresponsible and negligent is that?

    Squalene oil in regard to Gulf War Syndrome, putting L histidine in Gardasil a never before used vaccine ingredient. They assume they do not need to study it for safety because and/ or if it already exists naturally in the human body, or is consumed small amounts dietarily. That, is their science? Oh, they know and knew enough to measure it that peanut or squalene oil, obviously increase the adjuvant effect; but what about the adverse effects; that they quite clearly could care less about? 

    Vaccines and the Peanut Allergy Epidemic http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies/vaccines-and-the-peanut-allergy-epidemic/

    Fatal food allergies caused by vaccines
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HtxHyMqON4

    The Peanut Allergy Epidemic is a MAN-MADE EPIDEMIC caused by vaccinations!
    http://www.opposingviews.com/i/the-peanut-allergy-epidemic-is-a-man-made-epidemic-caused-by-vaccinations/

    http://www.peanutallergy.com/blogs/general-peanut-allergy-blogs/vaccinations-cause-peanut-allergy

    Polysorbate 80 and Histidine, a marriage of disaster
    http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak/080830

    But according to you, Argus; if no existing and accepted at the CDC science is acknowleged; it just simply did not happen and there is thus no proof that it ever it happened; is that not correct? Even then and when anyone would show you existing, non biased and alternatively sourced science showing the mechanisms of effect; it is still not proof, right, Argus? Nothing is enough, right Argus? Denial of all.

    I have my full identity shown here; and obviously I am not a pharma nor a medical shill; where is your identity? I challenge you to put that up and identify that here and right now? List all your conflicts of interest. I as well gain absolutely nothing by what I put forth. I stand on the side of the parents, and their infants and children who have everything to lose. What do you have to lose?

    I would ask you this, Argus? Why is it that the unvaccinated children never have these problems, and rarely if ever need a doctor for anything? What; you don’t believe that is true? Vaccines saved millions from death and disability right? Really; and is that actually a fact? Based on what, assumed circumstancial evidence; yet that is never enough to prove vaccine neurological harm, and causation of ASD ? An no amount of vaccine harm is nor would be enough to vacate that we are the vaccines savior claim, and thought; correct? No number of vaccines would ever be to many, right? They can not do any wrong; is that not what the CDC believes and promotes; and no evidence nor amount of unbiased alternative science, and the real historical record showing that they did; would ever be enough; right?

    Vaccine FAQs
    Aluminum Information from The Vaccine Book
    http://www.askdrsears.com/topics/vaccines/vaccine-faqs

    Modern (so called) Medicine and Vaccination Truth
    http://www.vacfacts.info

  • Already well known, Argus? Where? No point to the article? Under what denialist and denial of all rock do you live under?

    Are you telling me that injecting latex contaminated vaccines, and even those with countable particles, can not and could not cause the increase in latex allergies that have been well known? And you have the physiological science to back that claim? Where?

    Is there anything at all related to vaccine harm, Argus; that you won’t deny?

    You see that is the problem; those in vaccinology are assumed to be experts in all that is going on. They simply and quite obviously do not actually understand the immune system they are dealing with. If they did, they would know that what they do is causing more harm than good. I would like to have every person who is connected to vaccine development sit in an environmental allergy clinic for a week and review every work up and patients record there. Maybe then they would get an idea of the large scope of lack of real understanding of the human body, that they actually have.

    A facility like this.
    http://www.lacrosseallergy.com/AboutOurClinic/OurResearch/
    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ja/2012/253879/ 

    If the information is clearly understood as to peanut oil in vaccines causing the major increases in life threatening allergic reactions to peanuts; then why is it so far of a streach, to understand the vaccine induced latex allergies? The CDC fails to understand, by choice, even as much as how these endless and toxic multiple vaccines become an an actual immune suppressing agent; how would they even begin to see and admit to this, and the rest of it? The CDC can not comprehend that injecting substances is entirely of a differant nature than ingesting them, as for and regarding the dietary or external exposure route. They maintain without one single iota of proof, that it is one and the same thing physiologically; and that all is detoxed and handled by the human body exactly the same way. How irresponsible and negligent is that?

    Squalene oil in regard to Gulf War Syndrome, putting L histidine in Gardasil a never before used vaccine ingredient. They assume they do not need to study it for safety because and/ or if it already exists naturally in the human body, or is consumed small amounts dietarily. That, is their science? Oh, they know and knew enough to measure it that peanut or squalene oil, obviously increase the adjuvant effect; but what about the adverse effects; that they quite clearly could care less about? 

    Vaccines and the Peanut Allergy Epidemic http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies/vaccines-and-the-peanut-allergy-epidemic/

    Fatal food allergies caused by vaccines
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HtxHyMqON4

    The Peanut Allergy Epidemic is a MAN-MADE EPIDEMIC caused by vaccinations!
    http://www.opposingviews.com/i/the-peanut-allergy-epidemic-is-a-man-made-epidemic-caused-by-vaccinations/

    http://www.peanutallergy.com/blogs/general-peanut-allergy-blogs/vaccinations-cause-peanut-allergy

    Polysorbate 80 and Histidine, a marriage of disaster
    http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak/080830

    But according to you, Argus; if no existing and accepted at the CDC science is acknowleged; it just simply did not happen and there is thus no proof that it ever it happened; is that not correct? Even then and when anyone would show you existing, non biased and alternatively sourced science showing the mechanisms of effect; it is still not proof, right, Argus? Nothing is enough, right Argus? Denial of all.

    I have my full identity shown here; and obviously I am not a pharma nor a medical shill; where is your identity? I challenge you to put that up and identify that here and right now? List all your conflicts of interest. I as well gain absolutely nothing by what I put forth. I stand on the side of the parents, and their infants and children who have everything to lose. What do you have to lose?

    I would ask you this, Argus? Why is it that the unvaccinated children never have these problems, and rarely if ever need a doctor for anything? What; you don’t believe that is true? Vaccines saved millions from death and disability right? Really; and is that actually a fact? Based on what, assumed circumstancial evidence; yet that is never enough to prove vaccine neurological harm, and causation of ASD ? An no amount of vaccine harm is nor would be enough to vacate that we are the vaccines savior claim, and thought; correct? No number of vaccines would ever be to many, right? They can not do any wrong; is that not what the CDC believes and promotes; and no evidence nor amount of unbiased alternative science, and the real historical record showing that they did; would ever be enough; right?

    Vaccine FAQs
    Aluminum Information from The Vaccine Book
    http://www.askdrsears.com/topics/vaccines/vaccine-faqs

    Modern (so called) Medicine and Vaccination Truth
    http://www.vacfacts.info

  • Already well known, Argus? Where? No point to the article? Under what denialist and denial of all rock do you live under?

    Are you telling me that injecting latex contaminated vaccines, and even those with countable particles, can not and could not cause the increase in latex allergies that have been well known? And you have the physiological science to back that claim? Where?

    Is there anything at all related to vaccine harm, Argus; that you won’t deny?

    You see that is the problem; those in vaccinology are assumed to be experts in all that is going on. They simply and quite obviously do not actually understand the immune system they are dealing with. If they did, they would know that what they do is causing more harm than good. I would like to have every person who is connected to vaccine development sit in an environmental allergy clinic for a week and review every work up and patients record there. Maybe then they would get an idea of the large scope of lack of real understanding of the human body, that they actually have.

    A facility like this.
    http://www.lacrosseallergy.com/AboutOurClinic/OurResearch/
    http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ja/2012/253879/ 

    If the information is clearly understood as to peanut oil in vaccines causing the major increases in life threatening allergic reactions to peanuts; then why is it so far of a streach, to understand the vaccine induced latex allergies? The CDC fails to understand, by choice, even as much as how these endless and toxic multiple vaccines become an an actual immune suppressing agent; how would they even begin to see and admit to this, and the rest of it? The CDC can not comprehend that injecting substances is entirely of a differant nature than ingesting them, as for and regarding the dietary or external exposure route. They maintain without one single iota of proof, that it is one and the same thing physiologically; and that all is detoxed and handled by the human body exactly the same way. How irresponsible and negligent is that?

    Squalene oil in regard to Gulf War Syndrome, putting L histidine in Gardasil a never before used vaccine ingredient. They assume they do not need to study it for safety because and/ or if it already exists naturally in the human body, or is consumed small amounts dietarily. That, is their science? Oh, they know and knew enough to measure it that peanut or squalene oil, obviously increase the adjuvant effect; but what about the adverse effects; that they quite clearly could care less about? 

    Vaccines and the Peanut Allergy Epidemic http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies/vaccines-and-the-peanut-allergy-epidemic/

    Fatal food allergies caused by vaccines
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HtxHyMqON4

    The Peanut Allergy Epidemic is a MAN-MADE EPIDEMIC caused by vaccinations!
    http://www.opposingviews.com/i/the-peanut-allergy-epidemic-is-a-man-made-epidemic-caused-by-vaccinations/

    http://www.peanutallergy.com/blogs/general-peanut-allergy-blogs/vaccinations-cause-peanut-allergy

    Polysorbate 80 and Histidine, a marriage of disaster
    http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak/080830

    But according to you, Argus; if no existing and accepted at the CDC science is acknowleged; it just simply did not happen and there is thus no proof that it ever it happened; is that not correct? Even then and when anyone would show you existing, non biased and alternatively sourced science showing the mechanisms of effect; it is still not proof, right, Argus? Nothing is enough, right Argus? Denial of all.

    I have my full identity shown here; and obviously I am not a pharma nor a medical shill; where is your identity? I challenge you to put that up and identify that here and right now? List all your conflicts of interest. I as well gain absolutely nothing by what I put forth. I stand on the side of the parents, and their infants and children who have everything to lose. What do you have to lose?

    I would ask you this, Argus? Why is it that the unvaccinated children never have these problems, and rarely if ever need a doctor for anything? What; you don’t believe that is true? Vaccines saved millions from death and disability right? Really; and is that actually a fact? Based on what, assumed circumstancial evidence; yet that is never enough to prove vaccine neurological harm, and causation of ASD ? An no amount of vaccine harm is nor would be enough to vacate that we are the vaccines savior claim, and thought; correct? No number of vaccines would ever be to many, right? They can not do any wrong; is that not what the CDC believes and promotes; and no evidence nor amount of unbiased alternative science, and the real historical record showing that they did; would ever be enough; right?

    Vaccine FAQs
    Aluminum Information from The Vaccine Book
    http://www.askdrsears.com/topics/vaccines/vaccine-faqs

    Modern (so called) Medicine and Vaccination Truth
    http://www.vacfacts.info

  • siamesekat

    Prior to the days of vaccine mania, e.g., before the mid-1980s, was there any measurable incidence at all of latex allergies??? I recall first having been asked if I had any known allergy to latex around 1997 (during a doctor’s visit), and I just stared at the nurse as if she were from outer space. I replied, “WHO ever heard of such a thing, and why would anyone have an allergy to latex?” The nurse replied that it was a “new” and common allergy, but I still did not get it then.

  • siamesekat

    Prior to the days of vaccine mania, e.g., before the mid-1980s, was there any measurable incidence at all of latex allergies??? I recall first having been asked if I had any known allergy to latex around 1997 (during a doctor’s visit), and I just stared at the nurse as if she were from outer space. I replied, “WHO ever heard of such a thing, and why would anyone have an allergy to latex?” The nurse replied that it was a “new” and common allergy, but I still did not get it then.

  • Mdochniak

    A proteomic investigation of B lymphocytes in an autistic family: a pilot study of exposure to natural rubber latex (NRL) may lead to autism.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20957522

  • That’s very interesting thank you Mdochniak.

  • Thank you Lowell H for all this interesting information.

  • Laura

    Ask your husband are you with me or your family. Fear is what keeps them thinking shots is the only way to keep safe. God gave us an immune system. Man made Vac, thinks they are better. I will pray for you. I have 7 kids,  My last two no shots. Have been fine and they are in public school. They try to say they can’t go to school, not true. I sign a paper saying I don’t do shots.When  I have had doctors tell me they can’t go to school without shots,  I know they just
    lied to me. Nurses like to say it.

  • Cherry Misra

    To Angus,   Please give a thought to evolution-  There is a reason that over hundreds of millions of years human beings developed skin!  One of the main purposes of skin is to keep foreign substances OUT of the human body.  Though people may have opinions as to vaccines being safe or unsafe,  the fact is that if you are going to pass through the outer protection of the human body to put foreign substances inside,  you need to make very very sure that those substances will not harm the individual.  Food which goes through the intestine,  also faces many barriers to foreign, harmful substances entering the body.    I feel that you may be too young to recall the Thalidomide disaster in which a medication given to pregnant women caused horrendous deformities  and autism in their children.   I was a child then and I saw the photos of the harmed children .    If medical science could make a mistake at that time, they can certainly make mistakes now.    We already know that both mercury and aluminium have never been proven safe in vaccines – but they are used in vaccines.   Does that give us any confidence that other harmful substances  are not present in vaccines?    
        I would say that the public health and pharma cartel are now in a pickle-  They have a multibillion dollar vaccine  industry which could collapse  if parents learn that there are harmful substances in vaccines – and there certainly are some-  so they dare not do testing which shows the truth.  Looks like someone has already figured out that the pharma companies are TOO BIG TO FAIL ,   and is already protecting them.

  • Cherry Misra

    To Angus,   Please give a thought to evolution-  There is a reason that over hundreds of millions of years human beings developed skin!  One of the main purposes of skin is to keep foreign substances OUT of the human body.  Though people may have opinions as to vaccines being safe or unsafe,  the fact is that if you are going to pass through the outer protection of the human body to put foreign substances inside,  you need to make very very sure that those substances will not harm the individual.  Food which goes through the intestine,  also faces many barriers to foreign, harmful substances entering the body.    I feel that you may be too young to recall the Thalidomide disaster in which a medication given to pregnant women caused horrendous deformities  and autism in their children.   I was a child then and I saw the photos of the harmed children .    If medical science could make a mistake at that time, they can certainly make mistakes now.    We already know that both mercury and aluminium have never been proven safe in vaccines – but they are used in vaccines.   Does that give us any confidence that other harmful substances  are not present in vaccines?    
        I would say that the public health and pharma cartel are now in a pickle-  They have a multibillion dollar vaccine  industry which could collapse  if parents learn that there are harmful substances in vaccines – and there certainly are some-  so they dare not do testing which shows the truth.  Looks like someone has already figured out that the pharma companies are TOO BIG TO FAIL ,   and is already protecting them.

  • Cherry Misra

    To those of you  who struggle and worry about vaccinating, let me tell you how that ended for one mom and her child:
       During the early days of my interest in autism:  There was a big campfire on my lawn.  It was a cold winter night in New Delhi and I knew only one person of the group of runners .  Looking across the fire, I could see a handsome, boyish looking blonde young man.   Although few of the runners were going into my home,  this boy and his business colleague did so and I happened to go in too.  I absolutely do not know how it happened but suddenly this attractive young man  was telling me that he was German and that he had Aspergers ( a mild form of autism).  Then he added,  ” It doesnt show so much now, but it was more obvious when I was younger”  Then he told me that as a baby his mother had noticed him change after vaccines and she refused to give him any more, despite taking a lot of flack from relatives and friends.
    I nearly cried and I kept telling him, “Tell your mother thankyou,  Tell her thankyou from me”

  • Nicetrynocigar

    You mean he might be using condoms to prevent pregnancy or std’s? Of course that’s not what you meant but keep thinking you are clever, no here will tell you any different.

  • Nicetrynocigar

    You mean he might be using condoms to prevent pregnancy or std’s? Of course that’s not what you meant but keep thinking you are clever, no here will tell you any different.

  • Nicetrynocigar

    You mean he might be using condoms to prevent pregnancy or std’s? Of course that’s not what you meant but keep thinking you are clever, no here will tell you any different.

  • siamesekat

    Cherry Misra: From your interest in autism, have you uncovered any other credible etiologic factors to explain the exponential rise in incidence in this disease in children worldwide since 1987 other than vaccines?  I see no merit in any of the epigenetic theories; after all, if there is something genetic (which there certainly is not, unless triggered by vaccines), why weren’t the forefathers of the parents of today’s autistic children spawning autistic sons in epidemic proportions prior to 1987?  Human genes do not change that much in 25 years.  A poison is the only causal link in autism.  And, yes, most humans are genetically coded to become diseased by definition from a “poison.”  Why did no one believe in epigenetics to explain all the unusual disease which suddenly broke out among residents in Hinkley, CA in the 1980s?

  • siamesekat

    Cherry Misra: From your interest in autism, have you uncovered any other credible etiologic factors to explain the exponential rise in incidence in this disease in children worldwide since 1987 other than vaccines?  I see no merit in any of the epigenetic theories; after all, if there is something genetic (which there certainly is not, unless triggered by vaccines), why weren’t the forefathers of the parents of today’s autistic children spawning autistic sons in epidemic proportions prior to 1987?  Human genes do not change that much in 25 years.  A poison is the only causal link in autism.  And, yes, most humans are genetically coded to become diseased by definition from a “poison.”  Why did no one believe in epigenetics to explain all the unusual disease which suddenly broke out among residents in Hinkley, CA in the 1980s?

  • Many thanks to Sanevax for spreading the article to warn about the dangers http://sanevax.org/do-vaccines-promote-latex-allergies/

  • VaccineRisks

    Many thanks to Sanevax for spreading the article to warn about the dangers http://sanevax.org/do-vaccines-promote-latex-allergies/

  • Lexi

    Another principal researcher of the early 1900s was Dr Charles Richet, the one who coined the term anaphylaxis. [4] His field was the reactions that some people seemed to have to certain foods. Richet found that with food allergies the reaction came on as the result of intact proteins in the food having bypassed the digestive system and making their way intact into the blood, via leaky gut. Foreign protein in the blood, of course, is a universal trigger for allergic reaction, not just in man but in all animals.
    But Richet noted that in the severe cases, food anaphylaxis did not happen just by eating a food. That would simply be food poisoning.
    Food anaphylaxis is altogether different. This sudden violent reaction requires an initial sensitivity involving injection of some sort, followed by a later ingestion of the sensitized food. Get the shot, then later eat the food.
    The initial exposure created the hypersensitivity. The second exposure would be the violent, perhaps fatal, physical event.
    Tim O’Sheawww.thedoctorwithin.comreprinted in Spizz magazine, July 2011

  • Mine did. Thankfully, it’s fairly mild. Still have o be careful though… for the future.

  • Madradmid

    After many years working in nursing & midwifery, I am now so sensitive to latex that bra & pants causing issues. However, I have lost count of the number of times I have had Hepb vaccs…..is my sensitivity due to years of using powdered latex OR the hepb vaccs? (I am a non-responder & they have tried for years to get me to a useful level of antibodies!)

  • Mindanoiha

    Madradmid I am sorry to hear about your latex allergy. It may have been caused by one or several vaccines which contain latex allergens. Subsequent contact with latex products increases the risk of latex allergy.

    When those who administer vaccines ask us if we are sensitive to latex they are concerned about us possibly having a reaction to the vaccine.

    However, this is a most unsatisfactory situation because if we say that we are not latex sensitive they may then give inject us with a vaccine containing latex allergens – and  latex allergy risk will then be increased.

  • courageandhope

    I do know that a Home Depot clerk in the paint department told me they no longer sold paint with latex in it because there were no many latex allergies. The formula had to be changed. I hadn’t realized it was such a problem. For a tiny baby, it’s a hard way to find out you’re allergic, to get a shot and have a bad reaction.