Fact: Vaccinations are Killing Our Kids

Baby Stacy died after she received nine vaccines in one day.

Baby Stacy Sirjacobs died after she received 9 vaccines in one day.

Every day we are told that vaccinations are the best defense against the killer diseases threatening our children. The governments, media and pharmaceutical industries dish out billions of dollars advertising the benefits of vaccination in an effort to convince us.

By the age of 18 months children in the USA will have received a staggering 38 vaccinations (1) these are:

  • Up to 4 doses of the Hepatitis B Vaccine
  • 3 doses of the rotavirus vaccine
  • 4 doses of the DTaP
  • 4 doses of the Hib vaccine
  • 4 doses of the pneumococcal vaccine
  • 3 doses of the polio vaccine
  • up to 2 doses of the flu vaccine
  • 2 doses of the hepatitis A vaccine
  • 1 MMR shot
  • 1 chickenpox shot

With all these vaccinations being injected into their tiny bodies you would think that children would be safer now than ever but you would be in for a shock. Reports in the media suggest that far from being the safe and effective weapons against disease that we have been led to believe they are, vaccines are not only are proving to be inefficient at protecting children against killer diseases but they have in fact been shown to be responsible for killing our kids on mass.

Child deaths reported as a result of vaccinations this year


On August 9, 2012, the Financial Express (2) reported that three babies had died after receiving the Hepatitis B vaccination in Hospet (Kar) Mumbai.

The Financial Express stated that a NGO (Non Government Organization) vaccinated a total of 24 babies between the ages of 18 months and 2 years with the vaccine and 15 of them developed complications. Of these 15, three had died and several more were still undergoing treatment.

I would like to add that the report seemed to place a strong emphasis on the fact that these children were vaccinated by a Non Government Organization, which I feel Is yet another ploy to enable the authorities to pass the buck at a later stage.

Gardasil Vaccine

Sadly these were not the only deaths connected to vaccines to be hitting our headlines recently. On August 8, 2012, the NZ (New Zealand) Herald reported that a mother in New Zealand believed the Gardasil vaccine, the vaccination against cervical cancer, was responsible for the death of her teenage daughter.

Ms Renata told reporters that she had found her daughter Jasmine dead in bed six months after she had received her third dose of the vaccination.  She added that the year her daughter had received the vaccinations, she had never complained so much about her mental or physical state.

Sadly, this was not the only report I have found linking the Gardasil vaccination to the death of a child this year. In February, Linda Morin reported that she was suing Merck, the manufacturers of Gardasil, along with three doctors, pediatrician Guylaine Larose, neurologist Amelie Nadeau and her family doctor, Lynne Nadeau for the sum of $197,000. Ms. Morin stated that she had found her 14 year-old daughter Annabelle dead in the bathtub after she had received her second Gardasil vaccination.

According to LifeSiteNews (4) Linda Morin Annabelle’s mother had told reporters that she had been left in shock after discovering her daughter’s body. She said:

“I was shocked. I didn’t know what to do. This image will stay in my head for the rest of my life. It’s a nightmare. We often say that time heals things (but) time hasn’t healed anything yet.”

Not a very pleasant experience, I am sure you will agree, but sadly Annabelle was just one of a long line of children found dead after receiving their Gardasil vaccinations since the vaccination was recommended.

Moving on to deaths reported after the flu vaccine

On August 3, 2012, the Australian News (5) issued a report stating that a total of ten deaths had been linked to anti-flu vaccinations since 2008. (Although to be fair, the report did say that these deaths included unborn babies and elderly persons.)

The news report stated that there had been 2136 reports of adverse events following injection with CSL’s Fluvax and Fluvax Junior, the vaccine that replaced Panvax in 2010:

‘Fluvax is used for about half the nation’s estimated 6 million flu vaccinations each year. But the number of reported side-effects for Fluvax is five times higher than the other three most popular brands of flu vaccines together.’

This was not the only report indicating deaths after the flu vaccine this year. I reported that a previously healthy seven year-old had died in her mother’s arms in Vermont in January. (6)

Moving on to India

In July 2012 The Times of India (7) reported that two children had died after receiving the pentavalent vaccination (5 vaccines in 1). The Times of India reported that baby Tanujashree was just three months old when she was vaccinated with the 5 in 1 vaccination. She died within a few hours of being administered the vaccine. Reporters went on to say that Tanujasshree was the second child to have died after the vaccine, stating that in January the vaccine had also been responsible for the death of another three month-old baby who died in Kancheepuram within 24 hours of being given the vaccination.

These were not the only children to have died after the pentavalent vaccine this year.

In March 2012 the Refusers (8) reported that a total of four children had died after they had received the 5 in 1 vaccine in Kerala, India.

According to the report, experts argued that if the reaction occurred after the injection and there was no other cause for the reaction it must probably be due to the vaccine. This may be true but I bet another cause will be found very quickly. My guess is that the authorities will blame one of the following:

  • Poor storage facilities
  • Expired vaccinations
  • A previously undiagnosed illness or virus that the child already had
  • The person giving the vaccination was unqualified or inexperienced
  • The vaccination was given by a NGO

My Final Vaccine Horror Story

My final vaccine horror story of the year is the death of baby Stacy who died after she received a whopping nine vaccines in one day at the tender age of eight weeks old (9). Stacy was a premature baby and left behind her twin sister Lesly. Her father said:

‘We are summoning every citizen of every country to take to the streets in their own cities, towns and villages: things must now change!’

He is absolutely right — things must change. How many deaths of innocent children will it take for parents to begin to educate themselves about the dangers of vaccinations? I realize that not every child will die after a vaccination, but let’s face it — our children are fast becoming the unhealthiest children the world has ever seen. The way I see it, it is a far cry from the wonderful picture that our governments and pharmaceutical industries paint, isn’t it? Please, parents — educate yourselves fully about the dangers of vaccinations before you have your child vaccinated. Remember that an educated choice is a good choice.

 

References

  1. Neil Z Miller Overdosed Babies Are Multiple Vaccinations Safe http://www.whale.to/vaccine/Overdosed%20Babies.pdf
  2. Financial Express.NGO’s administers Hepatitis B vaccine, kills three children http://www.financialexpress.com/news/ngos-administers-hepatitis-b-vaccine-kills-three-children/986052/
  3. New Zealand Herald Mother blames cancer vaccine for teen’s death http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10825493
  4. Thaddeus Baklinski LifeSiteNews Parents sue after Quebec teen dies following Gardasil vaccination http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/parents-sue-after-quebec-teen-dies-following-gardasil-vaccination/
  1. The Australian News 10 Deaths linked to the anti flu vaccine http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/deaths-linked-to-anti-flu-vaccines/story-e6frg8y6-1226441791947
  2. Christina England VacTruth Healthy 7 Year Old Dies in Mother’s Arms After Flu Shot http://vactruth.com/2012/01/14/dies-in-mothers-arms/
  3. The Times of India Two infant deaths after vaccination in Tamil Nadu http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-13/chennai/32662981_1_pentavalent-vaccine-immunization-programme-aefi
  1. The Refusers Four children die in Kerala after administration of pentavalent vaccine – Pharmabiz http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/four-children-die-in-kerala-after-administration-of-pentavalent-vaccine-pharmabiz/
  1. Christina England Vactruth Baby Dies After 9 Vaccines in One Day http://vactruth.com/2012/01/19/baby-dies-after-first-shots/

 

 

  • Lou

    “Our children are fast becoming the unhealthiest children the world has ever seen.”

    It is not just  USA children; everywhere the “vaccination” slow kill weapon goes compromised immune systems, neurological disease and almost certain reduced life spans follow. The “vaccine” related deaths get the headlines, or should, but I wonder how many tens of thousands or perhaps hundreds of thousands of person years of reduced/degraded lifespans goes unseen for every death. 

    “Epidemiological studies around the world show vaccines to be the
    cause of 79% of insulin type I diabetes in children under 10. The increased
    risk ranged from 9% with the diphtheria vaccine to 50% with the Hepatitis B
    vaccine. CDC data confirms these findings. The incidence of many other
    chronic immunological diseases, including asthma, allergies, and immune
    mediated cancers, has risen rapidly and may also be linked to immunization.56

    “  
    Bart Classen, MD, PhD, developer of vaccine technologies, British
    Medical Journal 1999

    “In New Delhi, India, prior to
    2000, ASD/PDD (autism spectrum disorder/pervasive developmental
    disorder) symptoms were rare – typically only occurring in children who
    were vaccinated abroad. However, after the Indian pediatricians began
    recommending, in 2000, the addition of the triple-dose “vaccine” the incidence of a
    childhood ASD/PDD diagnosis increased to 2 % to 4 % of vaccinated New
    Delhi children.”    Doctor Paul King PhD

  • Taximom5

    I am in total agreement with your views, but I would suggest that you provide some documentation about baby Stacy.  Otherwise, it doesn’t even qualify as anecdote.  

    A first-name only baby, with an un-named father, in an un-named town, is supposedly given 9 vaccines (we are not told which) and dies on an unknown date, with no corroborating statement from the physician, the coroner, the or even the hospital.

    We would totally rip apart any attempt from the medical industry if they told us about a first-name-only child in an un-named town, who died on an unknown date of a “vaccine-preventable illness.”  We even challenge that kind of “data” when such information IS known, and we demand to know whether there was a pre-existing condition.

    This tale of baby Stacy may be true, for all I know, but the way it’s been presented, it becomes the same kind of crap we are presented with from the government and from the  medical/pharmacy industry, who tell us (incorrectly) that thousands and thousands of people die from supposedly vaccine-preventable flu.

    We must never present as evidence anything that can be shot full of holes–like the anecdote above.  Otherwise, we would have to accept the same kind of “evidence” from the opposition, who would be only too happy to oblige.  And they would be absolutely correct if they accuse us of fear-mongering.

    We must NEVER sink that low.

    If you’re going to present such stories, then follow Michael Belkin’s excellent example, and document everything.  Otherwise, I fear that you are doing our side more harm than good.

  • http://www.facebook.com/rbonan1 Robert Bonan

    My grandson Davin in December 2000 died 4 months after birth from his 3rd series of vaccine. I have a Flyer called ( Toxic Over Load Children Vaccinated To Extreme ) that I can email you If you want the flyer email me at Wakeupgethealthy@gmail.com and I will email you the flyer. I also did a blog post with the same title.In 1983 the required Injections from birth to 6 years old was 10 shots with 30 Antigens. Now in 2012 from 0-6 years old is 49 shots with over 120 antigens (Vaccines) loaded with harmful chemicals, Aluminum, Mercury, Formaldehyde, Poly Sorbate 80 proven to cause neurological disorders plus injecting RNA/DNA of animals. Will your child’s DNA ever be the same?  Google search ( Toxic Over Load Children Vaccinated To Extreme )
     
    * Fact – Never have they done studies of the cumulative effects of all vaccine ingredients and they keep adding more vaccines to the mix.
     
    Here is another critical point. Dr Russell Blaylock states that if the mother and father had all their shots then when the mother gets pregnant some of the vaccine genetic materials will be passed on to the fetus. So this newborn childs health will be under attack even before birth. Please educate before you vaccinate. We need to get the word out to many children are being assaulted, damaged, murdered and big pHarma is getting away with it. Let us STOP this madness.

  • Christina England

     Taximom5

    I apologize I gave the ref to this article as it is my own and on VacTruth. Stacy Sirjacobs in photo with twin sister Lesly died at eight weeks old in Belguim. She was vaccinated with Prevenar, a vaccine against meningitis and pneumonia, Infanrix Hexa, a
    six in one vaccination for diphtheria, tetanus, polio, pertussis,
    hepatitis B and Haemophilus type B, and finally the Rotarix, a
    preventive vaccine for gastroenteritis. Stacy died one week later. Her fathers name is Raphael Sirjacobs. Please read ref to article which is http://vactruth.com/2012/01/19/baby-dies-after-first-shots/ Christina England

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

     Hi Taximom5,

    I’m not sure if you have looked at the sources in the article — however, Christina worked with the parents in the original article being referenced.

    Thanks for reading.

  • Christina England

     I am in total agreement Lou thank you. Christina

  • Tessvowels

    How many have died from vaccines? Or are the vaccines blamed because they were given? I am not sure if they are bad or good… seems like they’ve been trying my whole life to stop the spread of polio… and now, they’re saying they are “this close”… Babies & the parents who allow these vaccines are victims of this dilemma… commercials with new mommy saying she “researched” vaccines and found reports of their safety… you can find any answer that pleases on the internet… but WHAT is the TRUTH? Are we all victims? Those of us with auto-immune diseases, are they the after-affects of being immunized as babies? WHO will answer the questions we have? WHO will tell the TRUTH? Don’t defend doctors to me, they are “practicing physicians”… and the guinea pig is me!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/AANMHH4B27QWNX5BHXV25YT6NQ J P

    By the age of 18 months children in the USA will have received a staggering 38 vaccinations (1) these are:

    Up to 4 doses of the Hepatitis B Vaccine3 doses of the rotavirus vaccine4 doses of the DTaP4 doses of the Hib vaccine4 doses of the pneumococcal vaccine3 doses of the polio vaccineup to 2 doses of the flu vaccine2 doses of the hepatitis A vaccine1 MMR shot1 chickenpox shot
    EXCELLENT article but I just thought I would mention you have a typo….the total shots listed is 28….not 38…..thought you might want to correct before you get accused of being a fear mongering liar….have a good one

  • Paul G King

    Actually, for the influenza vaccine, the number is up to three (3) 0.25-milliliter doses of the inactivated-influenza vaccine (1 at 6 months, 1 at 7 months and one at 3 months to 11 months after the 2nd dose depending upon when the child was born and reached 6 months of age during a given flu season, where more than 50% of the available doses MAY be Thimerosal-preserved doses.

    Thus, the maximum is “39″ doses by 18 months and, possibly more – such as another MMR if the parents are schedued to travel to a country where measles in endemic.

    For children under 1 year of age, a recent article by Goldman GS, Miller NZ.  Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990–2010.  Hum Exp Toxicol April 24, 2012 0960327112440111 (see:  http://het.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/03/08/0960327112440111.abstract)found that, for 2 to 8 vaccine-disease-components injected, there was a linearly increasing relationship between the number injected at the “same” time and the incidence of deaths and hospitalizations.

    “AbstractIn this study, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, 1990–2010, was investigated; cases that specified either hospitalization or death were identified among 38,801 reports of infants. Based on the types of vaccines reported, the actual number of vaccine doses administered, from 1 to 8, was summed for each case. Linear regression analysis of hospitalization rates as a function of (a) the number of reported vaccine doses and (b) patient age yielded a linear relationship with r2 = 0.91 and r2 = 0.95, respectively. The hospitalization rate increased linearly from 11.0% (107 of 969) for 2 doses to 23.5% (661 of 2817) for 8 doses and decreased linearly from 20.1% (154 of 765) for children aged <0.1 year to 10.7% (86 of 801) for children aged 0.9 year. The rate ratio (RR) of the mortality rate for 5–8 vaccine doses to 1–4 vaccine doses is 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4–1.7), indicating a statistically significant increase from 3.6% (95% CI, 3.2–3.9%) deaths associated with 1–4 vaccine doses to 5.5% (95% CI, 5.2–5.7%) associated with 5–8 vaccine doses. The male-to-female mortality RR was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.3–1.5). Our findings show a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses administered and the percentage of hospitalizations and deaths. Since vaccines are given to millions of infants annually, it is imperative that health authorities have scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants might receive. Finding ways to increase vaccine safety should be the highest priority."
    In this study, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, 1990–2010, was investigated; cases that specified either hospitalization or death were identified among 38,801 reports of infants. Based on the types of vaccines reported, the actual number of vaccine doses administered, from 1 to 8, was summed for each case. Linear regression analysis of hospitalization rates as a function of (a) the number of reported vaccine doses and (b) patient age yielded a linear relationship with r2 = 0.91 and r2 = 0.95, respectively. The hospitalization rate increased linearly from 11.0% (107 of 969) for 2 doses to 23.5% (661 of 2817) for 8 doses and decreased linearly from 20.1% (154 of 765) for children aged <0.1 year to 10.7% (86 of 801) for children aged 0.9 year. The rate ratio (RR) of the mortality rate for 5–8 vaccine doses to 1–4 vaccine doses is 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.4–1.7), indicating a statistically significant increase from 3.6% (95% CI, 3.2–3.9%) deaths associated with 1–4 vaccine doses to 5.5% (95% CI, 5.2–5.7%) associated with 5–8 vaccine doses. The male-to-female mortality RR was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.3–1.5). Our findings show a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses administered and the percentage of hospitalizations and deaths. Since vaccines are given to millions of infants annually, it is imperative that health authorities have scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants might receive. Finding ways to increase vaccine safety should be the highest priority."

    With the increasing use of "pentavalent" vaccines (DTaP-Hib-IPV or DTaP-HepB-IPV), the minimum number of vaccine-disease-components is increasingly "5".

  • Taximom5

    Hi, Jeffry,

    I did look at the sources. For that particular case, Christina sourced her own article.
    If Brian Deer did that, we’d be howling like banshees, and you know it. In fact, that’s almost exactly what he did do, and it’s one of the primary reasons autism parents have been criticizing him. How can we possibly not be embarrassed by someone supposedly on our side who could be accused of sinking to Brian Deer’s level?
    Don’t get me wrong; I do not doubt that it happened exactly the way Christina says it did, nor do I doubt that vaccines were, at the very LEAST, a major causal factor.
    I am in total agreement with you and with Christina about vaccines, about their effect on our children, their health, our health, etc., and about corporate greed being the primary causal factor.
    But if Big Pharma presents all their lies convincingly, and the best we can do is to present our facts in such a way as to LOOK like we are a) not factual and b) fear-mongering, guess who will be more convincing? Guess who will WIN?
    We might as well give up now; the way things are going, all you are doing is giving the pharma-shills ammunition to use against us.
    If the articles you publish give even me the impression that you are fear-mongering, that your facts are not well-documented, and that your articles come off as sensationalist fluff rather than fact, EVEN THOUGH I AGREE WITH YOU, then you have to take a step back and look at how you are doing things. Is it possible that you are doing something wrong? Obviously, my opinion is that you are.
    That corporate greed has resulted in highly sophisticated and extremely effective propaganda that has now existed for generations. If your counter-attacks are unsophisticated and ineffective, they are worthless.
    Those of us whose children were vaccine-injured don’t need a badly-sourced article to make us feel like we are not alone. Those whose children haven’t (yet) reacted to vaccines are not going to be swayed by sensationalist fluff, particularly if it’s not convincingly presented, no matter how truthful the account. We don’t need to look like nutcases, we need to look–and BE–utterly incontrovertible.
    We can’t fight fire with poorly equipped firemen who lack proper tools. Not only can they not beat the fire, but they could actually inadvertently fuel the fire.
    I’m sorry to be so harsh.

  • http://www.facebook.com/labant.csaba Labant Csaba

    In my country, Hungary is obligation the vaccination. I created a movement, i have my baby unvaccinated. But i lost against the healthness authority on the court, i have to continou my fight on the International Court in Strassbourg…

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Dear Taximom5,

    Thanks for sharing your opinion.

    Is it the intention of your comment is to be a critic and 1) having a personal axe to grind or 2) you don’t agree with the way the information is presented?

    I will assume you do not agree with the information is presented, which is fine. My question to you is this: If you are an expert on how information is to be presented in a successful manner, where are you doing it successfully?

  • mikies123

     Who will tell the truth?  That quote from Barbara Fishers Book, “Truth in all its kinds is most difficult to win and truth in medicine is the most difficult of all.”  Peter Mere Latham said that.  Do governments tell the truth; only if it serves their interests.  Do governments lie; if it serves their interests. 

    Is anything recommended by government based on real truth and wisdom…..not necessarily.  There is no way to get around our responsibility to verify, investigate to the greatest degree possible all that we put in our bodies, and the environment in  which we live. 

    Another guinea pig

  • http://www.truth4pets.org/ Jan Rasmusen

    Did you know that Merck has a national tour with two people dressed like a dog and cat and they’re pushing vaccination for pets, and by extension, for children? I am very sorry to say that vaccines are also killing our pets. We have a petition asking for informed consent before pet vaccination. We are fighters in the same war. Animals are routinely given multiple shots at once, throughout their entire lives. At least you and I aren’t still getting our measles shots! http://www.change.org/petitions/veterinarians-fully-inform-us-before-vaccinating-our-dogs-and-cats

  • Davidjohnkenna

    Three Polish doctors and six nurses are
    facing criminal prosecution after a number of homeless people died following
    medical trials for a vaccine to the H5N1 bird-flu virus.

    By Matthew Day in Warsaw Published: 4:37PM
    BST 02 Jul 2008

    21 people died after being given the vaccine The medical staff,
    from the northern town of Grudziadz, are being investigated over medical trials
    on as many as 350 homeless and poor people last year, which prosecutors say involved
    an untried vaccine to the highly-contagious virus.

    Authorities claim that the alleged victims received £1-2 to be
    tested with what they thought was a conventional flu vaccine but, according to
    investigators, was actually an anti bird-flu drug.

  • Davidjohnkenna

    Chief Medical Officer Liam Donalson estimate 69,000 would die
    from

    Swine flu. In the event only 450 people died and who knows whether

    their deaths were actually swine flu or underlying causes!

    However doctors are in line for huge bonuses if large numbers of
    their patients sign up for swine flu jabs.
    Managers at a major health trust are offering extra payments on top of the
    £5.25 that GPs already get per injection.
    If they vaccinate more than 90 per cent of those deemed at risk of the disease
    in their area, they will get 50 per cent more per jab – £7.88 per person.
    An uptake of just 40 per cent will earn doctors an extra 10 per cent.

    Follow
    the money. The vaccines are a side show.

  • Jana

    refernce #4 link doesn’t work 

  • Jana

    I wish you good luck! I read that in Huganry there were few parents arrested and went to jail because of not vaccinating their kids :((( 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Driver/100001568136916 Michael Driver

    Where are your SCIENCE, and MEDICINE credentials? You have NO business writing about things that you have NO understanding of! This anti vaccine stance is quackery, at best. Promoted by people like Jenny McCarthy, whose credentials are PLAYBOY BUNNY. And, Andrew Wakefield, who has been DISCREDITED. Also Ms. McCarthy claims to have “cured” her child of autism. Funny no one else has managed this feat. My grandson has ASD, NOT caused by vaccines, and we work with him, treat his behavior issues, and provide for his normal education.  ASD has risen not because of vaccines, but because of better diagnosis, and more recognition of the disorders. I am 55 years old, and know people in my age group that I have know a long time, some since childhood, that would now be diagnosed as ASD. There is a brilliant Surgeon I know, and worked with, that has classic Asperger’s Syndrome. He’s in his 50s. Vaccines didn’t cause his ASD.
    Look at the REAL facts, not some rubbish you find by some “expert” on the internet. There are outbreaks of PREVENTABLE (vaccines) diseases that are causing needless illness, misery, even death. These outbreaks have been traced to parents NOT vaccinating their children.
    I worked for 30 years as a Registered Nurse. Also, I grew up around the medical field. Your BIG PHARMA, and UNCARING, GREEDY DOCTORS stories are fabrications of imagination.

  • Viera Scheibner

    One or two deaths after vaccination is an absolutely insufficient reporting: there are tens of thousands of death caused by vaccination in developed countries.  Straight after DPT and polio vaccines were gradually madated by individual US states between 1974-78, cot death became the single biggest cause of infant deaths.  Immediately hundreds, if not thousands, of babies died, and only those in Tennessee were written about in medical journals.

    When the UK parents stopped vaccinating after the first media reports of brain damage caused by vaccination in mid-1975 (only 30% or even only 10% if babies were vaccinated), the overall infant mortality fell significantly; it started rising when parents started vaccinating again.  It is published in the Lancet, without considering vaccination, of course.

    “Australian Dr” recently published interesting figures in relation to child abuse: they wrote that in 2009 there were 209,000 cases of child abuse reported.  33,000 of these were followed up (=prosecuted). 

    What does it all mean? 

    Well, there are about 250,000 of live birth per year in Australia.  So, if of that yearly cohort 208,000 were reported as child abuse, that means over 80%.  The 33,000 ‘followed up’ were most likely deaths.  And what sort of child abuse it was likely to be? What else, the shaken baby syndrome, the vaccine deaths for which parents are blamed.

    Again, so what?

    What happens to over 80% of babies in the first year of life? Vaccination.

    If of those 33,000 only one half were deaths, that means a death rate of about 150 per 1000 live birth.  A far cry from the admitted 10/1000. 15 times as much as is admitted.

    If you think that that is impossible, then read deaths rates quoted for developing countries: usually 100 to 150 per thousand.

    Even though the above is only an estimate, think twice and search the Internet for data. These days one can download most medical papers free of charge.

    Parent should also exercise their legal right not to vaccinate.  Why to pass the buck onto others such the “health authorities”?  

  • AussieMum

     Lou,

    You are absolutely correct when you say….”our children are fast becoming the unhealthiest children the world has ever seen!”

    So!  Who is doing something about it? 

    Not our Australian government-

    file:///c:/Users/Home/Desktop/Vaccination%20exposed/CSL%20cosy%20with%20govt.htm

    Elizabeth Gillespie – Mum to vaccine injured son

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    I do not see any major issue relevance to what you are stating, Taximom. I also do not see the problem, or any problem with Christina referencing to her own article. However, one thing I will take issue with and have some question on, is that I was not able to find an original source for the baby Stacy information. Through google search, I was not able to find any other source for the story. The Neil Miller link which seems to be the source link was not any longer a working link. Yes, I would agree as to that part of it, that there needs to be a source link. Perhaps if possible, a news media link.

    Maybe you can outline exactly what you would do different, regarding how you should or would have properly referenced the information? 

    There is no way anyone can actually in any honesty shoot a hole in that said account of the babies death, and the obvious causation. They have no way to claim to that it is not so; and nor because they can say, here is the proof that it was not the vaccines. In honesty they can not do that because healthy children nor infants simply do not just get extremely ill and die, right after a load of vaccines; unless it likely was the vaccines. Had the child had some other underlying condition; that very likely as well would have been found postmortem. Most vaccine related deaths end up exactly that way; and the causation is always written off to something other than the vaccines. It never matters to them that it made absolutely no sense that the infant died of what they did, and in the way and time frame that they did.

    The medical/pharma shills will lie about it all, no matter what; and as well will stay in their denial and make denial, no matter what. That is just always going to be be part of this promotion of the truth agenda; and they simply have to much to lose-if the truth be known. They will conduct falsely discrediting personal attacks and throw mud and dirt ad hominem style all day long, and is not ever likely to stop. 

    Yes, the pro-vaccine promoters and their denialist propaganda machine is very deceptive and very strong. They know what they are up against with the vaccine truth activists. I would not even title it as anti-vaccine, because if the vaccines had actually worked as advertised, and if they actually were as safe as advertised, I doubt a person could argue against their benefits. Such, is not the case.

    The fact that this 8 week old and as was premature infant, was given 9 vaccines in one day; speaks VERY strongly as to the mindless and reckless insanity of the vaccine program in itself. To realize that there is seemingly no guidelines as to the limits of how many vaccines can be dumped into the body of a infant that young. 9 vaccines in one day are  obviously to many for even a 5 year old which would be several times the body weight. Take a look as well at the Hanna Poling case. 

    There are at times significant limits as to specifics regarding the outlining of the depth of the rest of this article; and sometimes that is all you have to work with. Obviously as well you would not expect these articles to be 4 times as long and would lose some of the readers interest, to follow all that.

  • OMG

    You don’t need credentials to research what other professionals are saying about vaccines!!  So what if Jenny McCarthy was a previous Play bunny. Whoopee!?, she is far from stupid and is doing a great job bringing global awareness to this epidemic of Autism.  Vaccines may not be responsible for every single case of autism but it is certainly one of the major triggers.  As for Andy Wakefied, his work has since been   proven by other professionals around the world!  I personally think you are saying a lot of misinformation here.  

  • notsofree

    When our kids were born, at the hospital, I put a “do not vaccinate” sign on their rolling crib.  It had a syringe with the circle and line through it.  I also cut and pasted all the side effects and ingredients to list below the  syringe.  Of course we were treated like we were some kind of aliens from another country.  Actually the the mexicans in the room next to us were treated better since they didn’t cause any waves. 

    If you plan to not vaccinate your kids you better have a cast iron constitution, and you damn sure better not care what others think of you, because you will be called out and you will lose some friends and limit your socializing on account of not vaccinating.  (Pediatricians tell their patients not to play with unvaccinated kids).

    We have been doing this vaccine/drug free thing for 16 years, we have been excommunicated from numerous social circles and kicked out of 3 pediatricians, we endure sideways looks from the school nurses, and ostracism from neighbors and relatives who worship at the altar of Medicism!!!

    Christina, your articles are encouraging and piquing a lot of people who are uncertain about this “mandatory” overvaccinating of our children.  Keep up the good work and keep educating us to inspire and empower those of us who are brave enough to live the vaccine free life.

  • Christina England

     Taximom5 and Lowell Hubbs
    Thank you for your comments. The reason that neither of you can find the original source to the Stacy article is because I was given this story as an exclusive which does happen in journalism. However, I can give you a television program where the father gives an exclusive interview on his case http://www.youtube.com /watch?v=CtBWkEuiVi0 This is where father demonstrates in Belguim on behalf of Stacy. I apologize that it is in French. As for Neil Z Miller I have just checked and the link is still live. Christina

  • Christina England

     Jana
    Ref 4 is fine but you have to sign in to news letter which is an excellent bulletin and worth having. I am sorry I should have explained.

    Christina

  • Christina England

     Thank you to all of those who have commented. I admit I am not a scientist or a doctor. I do not need to be as to become a journalist I only needed qualifications in journalism which I have.

    This was a news report on cases of children dying after vaccinations reported this year.

    If I wanted to give scientific data backing my claims up and doctors quoting on deaths after vaccinations I would quote the following professionals:

    Dr Viera Scheibner http://www.vierascheibner.org/index.php?view=article&catid=47%3Acot-deaths-sids&id=73%3Avaccinations-part-i-medical-research-on-sids-and-epidemics-&option=com_content&Itemid=58

    Dr Russel Blaylock http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/vaccine-mandate-problems-dr-russell-blaylock-md/

    Dr Harold Buttram http://www.whale.to/v/buttram68.html

    Dr Rebecca Carley http://www.drcarley.com/

    Dr Tim O;Shea http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQb6HTqC52M

    Dr Ali Al Bayati http://www.thebyteshow.com/Dr.Al_Bayati.html

    I could go on and on but as this was not the purpose of my article I will stop at this point.

    Christina England

  • Stephen

    Aussie Mum,
    I concur with your point of view but the health and well-being of our children extends far beyond anything our governments are doing. What about diet? Can you say, hand on heart, that your child is getting the optimum nutrition that it needs? How much sugar? How much refined food? Organic? GM free? I could go on but you get the point.

  • Stephen

    Aussie Mum,
    I concur with your point of view but the health and well-being of our children extends far beyond anything our governments are doing. What about diet? Can you say, hand on heart, that your child is getting the optimum nutrition that it needs? How much sugar? How much refined food? Organic? GM free? I could go on but you get the point.

  • Stephen

    Aussie Mum,
    I concur with your point of view but the health and well-being of our children extends far beyond anything our governments are doing. What about diet? Can you say, hand on heart, that your child is getting the optimum nutrition that it needs? How much sugar? How much refined food? Organic? GM free? I could go on but you get the point.

  • Stephen

    Errr Jeffry………you are not making sense. Why assume that a critic must automatically take a contrary position (you are mis-applying the rules of argument). Secondly, I would check your grammar before wading into people.

  • Stephen

    Errr Jeffry………you are not making sense. Why assume that a critic must automatically take a contrary position (you are mis-applying the rules of argument). Secondly, I would check your grammar before wading into people.

  • Stephen

    Errr Jeffry………you are not making sense. Why assume that a critic must automatically take a contrary position (you are mis-applying the rules of argument). Secondly, I would check your grammar before wading into people.

  • Jim Keith

    Thank you for the excellent article.
    Not just vaccines–read Mike Adams’ latest article:

    The Great Culling has begun: Will your genetic lineage survive?

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036756_depopulation_agenda_eugenics_survivor.html#ixzz23QRjKUxl

  • Taximom5

    Hi, Jeffry,

    You ask valid questions.

    Yes, the intention of my comment is to criticize an approach with which I strongly disagree, because I think that approach does more harm than good.
    Do I have a personal axe to grind? No. As I have stated, I am in complete agreement with you and Christina on the fundamental issues. If I did, have an axe to grind, it would be with the pharmaceutical industry who injured our children, and the people who have knowingly lied to cover it up, not with you and Christina.
    Yes, I disagree with the way the information has been presented. Presenting a vague, unsourced anecdote as proof of vaccine damage completely undermines the credibility of our position. One could just as easily present unsourced anecdotes of children dang from “vaccine-preventable illnesses.” in fact, Pharma-funded media does this all the time (and they actually give sources); if we refuse to accept their half-true anecdotes because they conveniently leave out details like malnourishment, or underlying health condition, or the fact that the child had just received a vaccine, we can’t turn around and ask anyone to accept our equivalent anecdote that provides even less information.
    Am I an expert in how information is to be presented successfully? No. I am not an expert. It is possible that I know more about it than you do, or perhaps I have the advantage of better perspective, but that does not make me an expert.
    Am I doing it successfully myself? No, not to any significant extent, but that is not my job. That is YOUR job.
    Your implication is that, if I’m not doing your job successfully, then I have no right to criticize what you are doing, which is ridiculous. That’s like saying, “if you’re not an M.D., you have no right to criticize anything a doctor does.”
    If you put information out there, then anyone who reads it has a right to criticize it. If what you do or say negatively affects the credibility of your position, don’t you think your colleagues should let you know?
    So now you have to decide: do you want to waste your time and energy shooting the messenger, or do you want to consider whether I might be right (or wrong), and make productive decisions based on that?

  • Mleawicks

    and thats why my baby is vacc free. will the shepple ever get it.

  • Mleawicks

    and thats why my baby is vacc free. will the shepple ever get it.

  • Taximom5

    Lowell, Christina referencing her own article on baby Stacy, with no independent source, destroys her credibility–and our credibility. I’m not saying she made it up–but that’s exactly what it will look like to anybody who hasn’t personally experienced vaccine damage,
    Anyone could make up a credible-sounding tale of a baby dying after 9 vaccines–or after coming down with pertussis, for that matter. Is there any difference between a newspaper announcing the death of a baby from pertussis–without mentioning that the baby had a congenital heart defect and a family of smokers–and Christina reporting on baby Stacy without a single verifiable source other than herself?
    I’m not doubting that baby Stacy existed, nor that vaccines caused her death. But if we accept as proof of vaccine damage a report that is so full of holes, then we open the doors. We cannot expect people NOT to accept the pharma propaganda reports of people dying from “vaccine-preventable diseases,” because those reports have far fewer obvious holes.
    If our side puts out information, we have to make sure that information is flawless. Believe me, Big Pharma pays people to point out flaws that don’t even exist. We shouldn’t be handing them opportunities.
    We have to start looking at our information through Pharma-Shill eyes. We have to see–before they do–where our presentation is weak, where the flaws are, where we lack credibility, even if it’s because of the strength of THEIR propaganda.
    We can’t just operate in a vacuum, saying, “we’re right, we know we’re right, and we’re just going to keep insisting we’re right until everyone believes us.” That’s a recipe for failure. But that’s basically what we are doing: “look, see baby Stacy? She died of vaccines! No, I can’t produce a single independent source who says so, but it’s true, I tell you, it’s true! You can’t prove it’s NOT true, so it must be true!”
    Of course nobody can prove it’s not true. We can’t prove that the babies who died of pertussis actually caught their pertussis from a family member’s pertussis vaccine, or that their immune systems were already weakened by vaccines, either. WE can’t prove anything in either case, because WE don’t have the data.
    Any attorney can tell you that it’s better to ask for a continuance than to present an inadequately prepared case.
    Personally, I’d rather see fewer articles from VacTruth, and have them be absolutely airtight, than to see many poorly-presented, sensationalist articles that become easy Pharma-shill ammunition.
    I understand the need for continuous flow of information, but it only takes one mistake to ruin the flow.

  • Taximom5

    Lowell, Christina referencing her own article on baby Stacy, with no independent source, destroys her credibility–and our credibility. I’m not saying she made it up–but that’s exactly what it will look like to anybody who hasn’t personally experienced vaccine damage,
    Anyone could make up a credible-sounding tale of a baby dying after 9 vaccines–or after coming down with pertussis, for that matter. Is there any difference between a newspaper announcing the death of a baby from pertussis–without mentioning that the baby had a congenital heart defect and a family of smokers–and Christina reporting on baby Stacy without a single verifiable source other than herself?
    I’m not doubting that baby Stacy existed, nor that vaccines caused her death. But if we accept as proof of vaccine damage a report that is so full of holes, then we open the doors. We cannot expect people NOT to accept the pharma propaganda reports of people dying from “vaccine-preventable diseases,” because those reports have far fewer obvious holes.
    If our side puts out information, we have to make sure that information is flawless. Believe me, Big Pharma pays people to point out flaws that don’t even exist. We shouldn’t be handing them opportunities.
    We have to start looking at our information through Pharma-Shill eyes. We have to see–before they do–where our presentation is weak, where the flaws are, where we lack credibility, even if it’s because of the strength of THEIR propaganda.
    We can’t just operate in a vacuum, saying, “we’re right, we know we’re right, and we’re just going to keep insisting we’re right until everyone believes us.” That’s a recipe for failure. But that’s basically what we are doing: “look, see baby Stacy? She died of vaccines! No, I can’t produce a single independent source who says so, but it’s true, I tell you, it’s true! You can’t prove it’s NOT true, so it must be true!”
    Of course nobody can prove it’s not true. We can’t prove that the babies who died of pertussis actually caught their pertussis from a family member’s pertussis vaccine, or that their immune systems were already weakened by vaccines, either. WE can’t prove anything in either case, because WE don’t have the data.
    Any attorney can tell you that it’s better to ask for a continuance than to present an inadequately prepared case.
    Personally, I’d rather see fewer articles from VacTruth, and have them be absolutely airtight, than to see many poorly-presented, sensationalist articles that become easy Pharma-shill ammunition.
    I understand the need for continuous flow of information, but it only takes one mistake to ruin the flow.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    No one is shooting the messenger. You are making a statement that you know what is effective and what is not. I assumed you had some type of information regarding the specifics.

    Thank you for the response.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    How specifically did I misapply the rules of argument? Thanks.

  • Christina England

     Taximom5

    My article was an exclusive and I have all the reports pertaining to the case of Stacy.

    Many journalists worldwide are given exclusives to report on and this is what makes the news. Jeff checked out this story and the paperwork before publishing it here on VacTruth.

    I have given you and anyone caring to check this story out a youtube clip of the father reporting on the death of his child. It is in French however the pictures are enough to prove this was a genuine case. Here is the link again http://www.youtube.com/watch?v

    Of course I cannot tell if Stacy had any underlying disorders however according to her medical history apart from being premature she did not.

    I can assure you that none of the articles appearing on Vactruth are of poor quality. All our articles are fully researched and checked by Jeff and Vactruths own editors.This is what makes our site so popular and well referenced by others.

    Christina

  • betsyanne

    I just watched a video concerning vax for humans and also for pets.  I learned NOT to give a rabies shot to our dogs years and years ago, but most people think I’m *uninformed*.  Well, those are the people who haven’t bothered to look past the end of their nose.

    The video is of a doctor who was a trauma surgeon (amongst other titles) for a while before she woke up to the real world.  She now practices homeopathy to reverse toxic damage in children, adults and pets.  I think she’s right in her assumption that chiropractors are the biggest link in helping people to become non-vaccinators, and they will be a great help in the future of our children concerning ending the vaccine nonsense.

    If you’re interested, here is the link:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9WoMps4Pmpo#!

    The quality is kinda crappy, but you’ll get the message.  She has a Boston-ish/Brooklyn-ish accent so it was hard for me to understand her, but again, you’ll get the message. 

    Also, search out Dr. Suzanne Humphries and read her information on how, after being a physician for 19 years, she also turned the corner into a more holistic format.  Interesting stuff she has to say concerning vaccines.

    Best book I’ve read in a long time – Vaccination is NOT Immunization by Dr. Tim O’Shea.  Very good reading.

    Hope some of this stuff is helpful to someone – anyone!

  • http://twitter.com/VaccineRisks Vaccine Risks

    Taximon, Christina
    is a serious journalist who has studied issues surrounding vaccine injuries for
    years and whose articles are well documented. The fact that little Stacy’s very
    sad story did not have more references is because, as Christina has pointed out
    it was one which was exclusive for Christina to report on, this often being the
    case for journalists.

    Criticism
    is welcome, but it would have been more respectful to enquire if there was a
    reference to the story, rather than your implications of sinking low, writing crap,
    etc.

    Vactruth
    publishes articles which are widely read. They are articles. They are not
    research studies,   nor are they intended to be presentations to
    attorneys.  Although they are researched
    and checked by Vactruth’s own editors before publication, they are naturally colored
    by the opinions of the individual writers.  

    Articles
    are most often documented, but there are not the same specifications regarding reference
    to sources for articles as there are for studies.

    In our
    articles we may well describe how our children contracted Guillain-Barré
    syndrome after administration of vaccines. There is no obligation to name the children
    nor to provide documentation for where they live. We may describe in detail but
    do not need to provide documentation for the childrens’  terrible suffering.

    The Vactruth team of writers receive a great deal of praise for the quality of
    their articles which are  spread widely,
    posted on serious sites and printed in reputable publications.

     

     

  • Davidjohnkenna

    Swine flu fears grow as NHS staff shun vaccine
    But hospital chief executives have told the
    Guardian that they expect as few as 10%-20% of their staff to get vaccinated
    and cannot fulfil the DH’s demands because the jabs, which are due to begin
    within days, are entirely voluntary.
    Hardly a ringing endorsement. So why should the
    public bother with this flu vaccine for children? we can see from the previous
    post why doctors are interested in others being vaccinated. Follow the money

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    Christina’s credibility was clearly not destroyed in any way, Taximom5. That is because the reference article was very detailed; and any further details typically are not available; because of the nature of how those cases work. And as a fact there often is a deliberate attempt cover-up vaccine death, and they just don’t want to investigate enough to ever know; if they can help it.

    You are just repeatedly presenting a pointless no win argument and that is because a better representation of the details is often not possible; and if you wait for a better detailed source of information and regarding those cases, it simply is not going to happen. 

    I would ask you, have you ever read the book, A Shot in the Dark, (about the DPT vaccine)? Should all of those cases of vaccine induced seizure disorder, and death; never have been written about as well in that book? Same situation. Because lets face it, it would never be detailed enough for you; nor for you to say, “ok lets print that”, because that is am air tight case for the conclusion it was the vaccine as cause.What you are claiming is in my view entirely baseless and without merit. This information can not be presented in any other way; and the only other way is to not present it at all. Which would you rather have? In the above expose on baby Stacy, you stated and referred to that case and report as being full of holes, or so full of holes. Really? The baby dies one week after none vaccines, covered in red dots, (an immune reaction), and then the officials claim the only cause of death found, was claim to be Meningitis? How did they prove that; by a blood test, culture; what? Did they prove it at all? Or was it vaccine induced encephalitis? Do you realize how many unbiased scientific studies show the exact mechanism of  over activation of the brains microgilia and with resulting chronic brain inflammation? This baby Stacy DID die of an adverse reaction to the 9 vaccines, period. Nothing else would even make sense. What are the odds the child died of meningitis, a week after those vaccines; and the vaccines had nothing to do with the death? At some point you need to use some common sense.

    Vactruth is not here to please the sheeple, nor to please the the denialist vaccine, pharma and medical shills. If your only real concern is that every article is presented in a way that those people can not lie about it or so that no person can find and point to some perceived hole in the information. The denialists will throw their falsely discrediting and personally attacking mud at it, no matter what. 

    You Taximom5 have entirely missed the point of the mission of truth that vactruth has. Your claims are entirely misguided.

    In fact regarding you, I have had a question from the start, and as I read more of your ongoing same old, same old, claimed to ranting presentation here; the question must be asked. ARE YOU actually a medical/pharma shill undercover, and in disguise? I ask, because that is clearly the only conclusion that I have made, and can make here. Nice trick!!!

    CDC refuses to study vaccine caused encephalopathy
    http://www.vacfacts.info/cdc-refuse-to-study-vaccine-in/

  • AussieMum

     Stephen,
    My son is on the Biomedical Treatment.

  • Taximom5

    Lowell, you understand neither my point nor my position.

    I am not denying the truth of Christina’s article, nor do I disagree with her conclusions. Yes, I have read “A Shot In The Dark.” My own children were vaccine-injured.
    My point is that not that the article shouldn’t have been written, but that it should have been done better, and that the quality of such an article is as important as the content.
    I didn’t say that VacTruth articles are here to please either sheeple or pharm shills; you are falling back on jargon-filled slogans rather than engaging in a real discussion.
    My point was that this article could have been and should have been BETTER, especially the section concerning Stacy. The hospital, vaccine batch numbers, all medications/treatments/tests given, and dates of birth, vaccination, hospitalization, and death should have been named. If the hospital refused to release medical records to the parents, that should have been stated. Doctors should have been named and quoted. If they refused to comment, that should have been stated (“Dr. XYZ refused to comment’, or “Dr. XYZ refused to answer this reporter’s questions”). Christina’s original exclusive should not have been the only source, because there are absolutely no sources given in THAT article for the information on Stacy (and the many grammar and punctuation errors in the original exclusive should have been corrected before publication –they are STILL there).
    As it stands, this story only rings true for those of us who have already observed vaccine damage first-hand. THAT’S NOT WHAT WE NEED. WE NEED TO CONVINCE THOSE WHO HAVE NEVER SEEN IT.
    I’m pointing out what I perceive to be major flaws in some articles here. I believe that these flaws seriously undermine our position. I’m not arguing with the facts, or the conclusions, or even the point of view. I’m only taking issue with the flaws. These flaws can be easily addressed, with better writing and more professional journalism!
    And the only conclusion you can make to such criticism is that I must be a medical/pharma shill if I dare to criticize??
    You are actually resorting to
    Pharma-shill rule #1: Demonize anyone who criticizes.
    Pharma-shill rule #2: Deny any possibility of flaw.

  • Jim Bob

    This website is the Fox News of vaccine information. Keep up the misinformation!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/4G2IGP4CHOCAAD2KQ2MPDAJ4QQ Larry

    The hospital, vaccine batch numbers, all medications/treatments/tests given, and dates of birth, vaccination, hospitalization, and death should have been named. If the hospital refused to release medical records to the parents, that should have been stated.
    ———
    And how do you suggest that all that information is to be collected? And WHO are you attempting to prove the case to? The people you want to prove it all all to, are who?
    You are going to attempt to provide in your mind the ultimate proof, to people that will deny it all, and every last bit of it NO MATTER WHAT anyway. The people you want to prove it all to, never have nor ever will think honestly and rationally. Nothing would or ever will be enough information, nor enough real science for them. As long as the CDC and FDA continue to deny it all, they simply will continue to deny it too.

    The whole game you have going here is simply unrealistic. And if you are actually a vaccine truth advocate, this is the first time I have ever seen anyone throwing dirt at their own people in the truth promotion trenches. Your sense of reality as to promotion of the information regarding the vaccine harm in these cases, simply does not seem to exist.  Start writting your own articles, and at least create an informational website. And this is coming from someone who has no vaccine fact information out there themselves? Get off your duff and do something of your own and if you think you can do it better! Show us how its done correctly then, Taximom5? Unbelievable.

  • Jim Bob

    Bang on OMG! Who needs credentials or an education to accurately assess and investigate something as complicated as virology, immunology and epidemiology. I have access to the internet. I don’t need to spend 10 years of my life studying the human body in a laboratory or classroom to educate myself as well as my doctor. Google is my university. After all, they don’t give webpages to just anyone!

    I was being sarcastic.

    PS. Wakefield’s study to this day has not been replicated. He even refuses to try to do it himself. As for the “other professionals” who support your position, lets look at the “other other professionals” who don’t which out number your side by a margin of at least 1000 to1.

  • PaPawiki

    Can parents demand tests be done in advance such as blood cultures? Some social service agencies may remove children if the term ‘vital’ medicine is withheld.
    Can parents demand vaccinations be administered one at a time to isolate any possible reaction to a specific administration?

  • OMG

    No need to be a *information snob*  You
    don’t necessarily have to study the above for ten years to figure out the mess
    society is in because of the fifthy vaccines and other *wonder* drugs modern medicine peddle.
    I tend to believe the honest professionals, (who have the necessary qualifications)
    that tell it like it is with common bloody sense, without all the tom foolery
    and who don’t have conflicts of interest in their back pocket.  I’m not
    claiming to be a expert on vaccines but I have read enough to make a informed
    decision. I don’t need a degree or credentials to make this decision for my
    child. I take it you work for big Pharma?  You pro vaccine people are terrified at the thought of ordinary mums and dads joining the dots and figuring it out aren’t you????? P.S There is plenty to back Dr Wakefield – The truth is on his side… 

  • Jim Bob

    Actually, I don’t work for big pharma. I work at an institute of higher learning. I have no problem with parents making informed decisions. But its the “informed” part that worries me. Informing yourself by way of the internet is a one-way ticket to stupidity. If you would ask me to make an informed decision comparing the opinion of my doctor and the VAST majority of the scientific community with those on the internet, I would always choose those who actually have an education and qualifications behind them. The rigours of academia most certainly outweight the rigours of internet browsing. Which means that those professionals with their degrees and qualifications are able to give a more informed opinion then yours or mine.

    PS. How in the world can you say you can’t trust those with conflicts of interest and then go on to exonerate Quackfield? Are you blinded by the misinformation on this site to see that he was financially benefiting from the conclusions he drew in his “study”?

  • Chiddu

    Factual error. Hospet is north Karnataka , not Mumbai, but the deaths were real and reported

  • Christina England

     Thank you so much Chiddu. I apologize for error I took this from a newspaper article and was not sure so I just wrote what they said. Christina England

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    Michael Driver,
     
    You need to wake up! How did you spend 30 years as an RN and NOT realize what was going on around you? Your failure and the failures of modern medicine to realize and acknowledge the failures modern medicine, is a large part of the problem in itself. Allopathic chemicalized medcial treatment has failed repeatedly on multiple levels at providing real health care where people actually are cured or at least getting better instead of getting worse. How many endless stories have I heard about people attempting to get a condition or a chronic condition treated and in attempting to get their life back, only found themselves to be getting sicker on the prescribed pharma drug trail? Then they go to the naturopathic/alternative health care side and realize why the toxic drug route was not working and learn of the real means to get their health back, and do exactly that.
     
    Mr. Driver? Are we all deficient in chemical drugs when we have a health condition in need of care and treatment? And are we all deficient in multiple vaccines and multiple vaccine chemicals and as well a bulwark of laboratory altered pathogens made from a near witches brew and stew of miscellaneous monkey and animal organs, and least to mention made from even the like of aborted fetuses. is this what we need to stay healthy and free of illness and disease? In all honesty, how has that been working? Ask yourself why are the children now actually sicker than they have ever been, with more chronic conditions, more allergies, more asthma, more ASD, more learning disbilities, more diabetes, more cancer, etc etc.How about the general public? Are they becoming more healthy, or is there a health care crisis that is nearly bankrupting the public and the nation? Wake up!      .
     
    I know that you want to proclaim Mr Driver, that anyone that questions the worth and validity of modern medicine, is entirely mislead and literally incapable of critical thinking and rational thought. If you could you would label us as well as raving nuts, and tin foil hat conspiracy theorists. When you examne the real evidence, it becaomes however all to evident, who the people are that are actually mislead.  Modern Medicine-A Leading Cause Of DeathWhat is and where is the proof, you might ask. The studies and the proof have been there all along.The basic groundwork in this understanding.• Heart disease: 616,067• Cancer: 562,875• Cancer: 562,875• Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 127,924• Accidents (unintentional injuries): 123,706• Alzheimer’s disease: 74,632• Diabetes: 71,382• Influenza and Pneumonia: 52,717• Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 46,448• Septicemia: 34,828 Complete table with source documentation can be found here.Sources used: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lcod.htmhttp://www.cdc.gov/NCHS/data/nvsr/nvsr58/nvsr58_19.pdf Then we can go to the year 2000 study originally published in the AMA Journal itself, showing the effects of doctors and so called modern medicine, to be then the 3rd leading cause of death in the US. The study and the numbers come right from the AMA Journal. Of course since 2000, they have made that abstract and the study a dead link on their site; imagine that. What did they have and decided they needed to hide??? To much truth? Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Killing 225,000 People Every Year, Jul 30, 2000http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2000/07/30/doctors-death-part-one.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/01/15/doctors-drugs-part-two.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/01/02/medical-mistakes-part-three.aspxhttp://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/10/26/prescription-drugs-number-one-cause-preventable-death-in-us.aspx Medical Errors – A Leading Cause of DeathAlternative analysis: http://www.vaclib.org/legal/drdeath.htmhttp://www.rense.com/general91/medic.htmThe JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000 article written by Dr Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, shows that medical errors may be the third leading cause of death in the United States.However, we can clearly see what was in that study when we go here below to an interview with Dr Barbara Starfield. MEDICALLY CAUSED DEATH IN AMERICAOn July 26, 2000, the US medical community received a titanic shock to the system, when one of its most respected and honored public-health experts, Dr. Barbara Starfield, revealed her findings on healthcare in America. The landmark Starfield study, “Is US health really the best in the world?”, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, came to the following conclusions: Every year in the US there are:ALL THESE ARE DEATHS PER YEAR:12,000 deaths from unnecessary surgeries;7,000 deaths from medication errors in hospitals;20,000 deaths from other errors in hospitals;80,000 deaths from infections acquired in hospitals;106,000 deaths from FDA-approved correctly prescribed medicines.The total of medically-caused deaths in the US every year is 225,000. Now look at your numbers, 225,000 fits right between,  Heart disease: 616,067 Cancer; 562,875 Chronic; and Lower respiratory diseases: 127,924; making that, (by the study figures), the third leading cause of death in the US! Now, this is 2012; do you think those numbers have become worse, or better? Nothing has changed, nor promoted any change, so obviously it could not ever actually get better. And the FDA is still the corrupt revolving door with the pharma industry, that silences any whistle blowers, and they all know that their jobs depend on not being in disagreement and rocking that boat. This makes the medical system in that year 2000, the third leading cause of death in the US, behind heart disease and cancer.Now, lets go to another study in the year 2004, showing so called modern medicine to be the first and leading cause of death in the US!  Take a look at the numbers. Modern Health Care System is the Leading Cause of Death, Part I, Jul 7, 2004 Excerpts: One of the most prominent articles on this site is Doctors are the Third Leading Cause of Death . Well that article was written in 2000 and now it appears that, based on a variety of references noted in the below article, some from prior to 2000 some after, the conventional medical system in fact the LEADING cause of death in this country. Not heart disease, not cancer–doctors. In all fairness, doctors themselves are not to blame for all of this. The entire modern health care system, however, is responsible for allowing, even promoting, so many unnecessary procedures, drugs and mishaps. This illustrates precisely why the system is so desperately in need of change, and why facilitating this change is, and will continue to be, such a substantial portion of my vision. By Gary Null PhD, Carolyn Dean MD ND, Martin Feldman MD, Debora Rasio MD, Dorothy Smith PhDA definitive review and close reading of medical peer-review journals, and government health statistics shows that American medicine frequently causes more harm than good. The number of people having in-hospital, adverse drug reactions (ADR) to prescribed medicine is 2.2 million. 1 Dr. Richard Besser, of the CDC, in 1995, said the number of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed annually for viral infections was 20 million. Dr. Besser, in 2003, now refers to tens of millions of unnecessary antibiotics. 2, 2aThe number of unnecessary medical and surgical procedures performed annually is 7.5 million. 3 The number of people exposed to unnecessary hospitalization annually is 8.9 million. 4 The total number of iatrogenic [induced inadvertently by a physician or surgeon or by medical treatment or diagnostic procedures] deaths shown in the following table is 783,936. It is evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the United States. The 2001 heart disease annual death rate is 699,697; the annual cancer death rate, 553,251. 5 Check out the graph on the site page referenced:Adverse Drug Reactions   106,000Medical error   98,000  Bedsores  115,000Infection  88,000Malnutrition   108,800Outpatients  199,000Unnecessary Procedures  37,136 Surgery-Related   32,000TOTAL 783,936 (cost) $282 billion Now, remember this number from above? Heart disease: 616,067 We could have an even higher death rate by using Dr. Lucien Leape’s 1997 medical and drug error rate of 3 million. 14 Multiplied by the fatality rate of 14 percent (that Leape used in 1994 16 we arrive at an annual death rate of 420,000 for drug errors and medical errors combined. If we put this number in place of Lazorou’s 106,000 drug errors and the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) 98,000 medical errors, we could add another 216,000 deaths making a total of 999,936 deaths annually. Read more:http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/07/07/healthcare-death-part-one.aspx  These articles below as well show that the real numbers are likely to be MUCH higher than being the third leading cause!The Questionable Contribution of Medical Measures to the Decline in Mortality. This study has never been refuted. Check out where it was done.http://links.jstor.org/pss/3349539http://www.ppge.ufrgs.br/giacomo/arquivos/eco02072/mckinlay-mckinlay-1977.pdfDeath by Medicine, Part Ihttp://www.healthe-livingnews.com/articles/death_by_medicine_part_1.htmlDeath by Medicine, Part 2http://www.healthe-livingnews.com/articles/death_by_medicine_part_2.htmlReferences.http://www.healthe-livingnews.com/articles/death_by_medicine_references.htmlDeath By Doctor, Dr. Peter Glidden(Actually listen to the statistics, do they matter; I think they do)!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JF7TcPsmvIModern Medicine-A Leading Cause of Deathhttp://www.vacfacts.info/modern-medicine-a-leading-caus/Death By Medicine, Trailerhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPNDL4M4qC4

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    To claim that it is misinformation, you have to prove it is misinformation. You do not get a free pass here, just based on that you believe the money, profit, power, monopoly, and control of all information in those circles of allopathic so called health care, allows for a system of unquestionable practices and protocols. As if that it all is simply beyond questioning, and not to be questioned as the best, and the best information there is. Wake up.  

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    The story of polio eradication, claiming they are close? If you actually believe that, I suggest these articles.

    Indian J Med Ethics. 2012 Apr-Jun;9(2):114-7.
    Polio programme: let us declare victory and move on.
    Vashisht N, Puliyel J.

    Source: Department of Paediatrics, St Stephens Hospital, Delhi 110054, India. 

    Abstract
    It was hoped that following polio eradication, immunisation could be stopped. However the synthesis of polio virus in 2002, made eradication impossible. It is argued that getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical. Furthermore, while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere was violated. The authors suggest that the huge bill of US$ 8 billion spent on the programme, is a small sum to pay if the world learns to be wary of such vertical programmes in the future.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591873

    VRM: Polio Scam
    http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=814

    The polio vaccine: a critical assessment of its arcane history, efficacy, and long-term health-related consequences
    http://www.thinktwice.com/Polio.pdf

    Scientific proof that the known cancer causing SV40 virus, a previous contaminant in the polio vaccine, is obviously either contagious; or the virus is still in the vaccines.
    http://www.vacfacts.info/scientific-proof-that-sv40-i/

  • Christina England

     Stephen thank you for you comment.

    I am a news writer and report on recent vaccination news. I am neither qualified or able to write scientifically nor do I want to. This site caters for all tastes and the writers here are all very different. I am not here to impress Big Pharma or the scientific community with complicated scientific arguments which the average parent cannot understand.

    The reason I referenced my own work is because I had already covered the research in full and did not wish to bore readers with repeating myself. The reason I reference whaleto is because he runs a brilliant site with nearly every scientific paper and article that has ever been published.

    Christina

  • Christina England

     Stephen thank you for you comment.

    I am a news writer and report on recent vaccination news. I am neither qualified or able to write scientifically nor do I want to. This site caters for all tastes and the writers here are all very different. I am not here to impress Big Pharma or the scientific community with complicated scientific arguments which the average parent cannot understand.

    The reason I referenced my own work is because I had already covered the research in full and did not wish to bore readers with repeating myself. The reason I reference whaleto is because he runs a brilliant site with nearly every scientific paper and article that has ever been published.

    Christina

  • Shiningknight11

    I feel so sorry for the Drs nurses clinicians etc… that must one day deal with the fact they were tricked into paying so much money towards the goal of helping people only to find they were tricked into killing! The humiliation they must feel when they realize how big pharma controls “higher education ” and uses that control to brain wash young drs and see that they study and learn only from the accepted material and discourage any freethinkers from studying alternate believes.

  • Donald Hall

    “I worked for 30 years as a Registered Nurse. Also, I grew up around the medical field. Your BIG PHARMA, and UNCARING, GREEDY DOCTORS stories are fabrications of imagination.”

    The National Institute of Health defines the final stage of clinical trial as the post-licensure administration of the product to the general public. That is, the mass use of vaccines is what finally determines the actual degree of risk, as the real world reported adverse reactions accumulate. Yet, YOU, a nurse, and the industry presupposes them safe, meaning, in vaccine lingo, the benefits outweigh the risks, despite the fact that they do not yet know the reality of those risks. That is a terribly circular, dangerous and deceptive protocol.

    Even if you swallow the tripe of herd immunity as a valid means of societal protection, it, too, is meaningless if the true risks of vaccination are not known.Thanks for showing us how little nurses know…….

  • Mistysdream44

     YES YOU HAVE TO RIGHT TO SAY IF, WHAT AND WHEN YOUR CHILD GETS THE VACCINATIONS.YOU CAN EVEN SAY NO !!!!!!!!!! COMPLETELY. YOUR CHILD CAN NOT GO TO A PUBLIC SCHOOL BUT YOU HAVE EVER RIGHT TO SAY YES ,NO ONE AT A TIME AND YES TO THIS AND NO TO THAT……

  • Samanthamead

    six month’s ago my daughter (16 months at the time) died in her sleep after getting 4 shot’s in her leg’s.when my dad found her she had blood coming out of her noise.Two of the shot’s she had got is a DTaP and a Hep A. she passed in her sleep 12 hours after getting her shot’s. My daughter was a healthy baby girl that has never even been sick.When her test came back all they said was we don’t know what happend to her and they can’t prove it was the shot’s.They also said that it wasn’t SIDS because in california the age stop’s at 12 months. She was my life and No one is helping me and i can’t do anything because I don’t have a cause of death. If anyone can help me an anyway please let me know.

  • Mexican

    Wow, it’s a sad day indeed when being anti vaccination makes you less important than mexicans ….       Racism is so ugly 

  • Mindanoiha

    Am so very sorry about your sorrow Samanthamead. Heartfelt blessings.

  • Spazzfly

     Our pediatrician charged us $200 to alter the vaccine schedule. And she still tries to catch us off guard and administer more. We haven’t done any of the Hep shots, and spread the shots out more, instead of so many one month with a month off of shots. Also, there is a way to legally enroll your child into a public school without their vaccines. Can’t recall at the moment, but I’m pretty sure it is a letter stating conscientious belief exemptions.

  • Oswaldtheluckyrabbit93

    Do you realize how horrific these diseases are that children are supposed to be vaccinated against? I cannot believe there are parents who are willing to put their children at risk for polio, measles, whopping cough, etc. These are debilitating and deadly diseases with high mortality rates! Look at the number of people who used to suffer and die because of these diseases because there was no vaccination – that doesn’t happen anymore because they are easily preventable. 

  • billb

    You are the same people who burned witches.

  • theotherone
  • http://www.facebook.com/geltzjj Josh Geltz

    You people who support Tim O’Shea really need to brush up on history. Vaccination is important! While I agree that SOME immunizations do not recapitulate the bodies natural immune response against a pathogen (as is the case for subunit vaccines…that is, vaccines that use only a single or several proteins to elicit an antibody response in an effort to afford protection against the entire pathogen), live-attenuate viruses that do not retain their virulence actually provide a robust level of LIFE-LONG IMMUNITY. For example, vaccinations have protected against, smallpox, chickenpox, measles, mumps, rubella, polio, etc…, which have reduced incidence, severity, and deaths.
    Now on to the autism claim. NO SCIENTIFIC or MEDICAL EVIDENCE has EVER been presented that vaccination causes autism. However, medical and scientific evidence has been presented, IN ABUNDANCE, that failure to vaccinate can lead to severe infections resulting in neurological disorders, morbidity, and mortality (ie… 30% death rate for smallpox, 70% neurological complications for polio (assuming you survive), etc… But you’re right. Vaccines are harmful…that’s why we’re healthier and living longer than our predecessors.
    Death by vaccinations can happen although this happens in less than 0.000001% (that’s right, 1 in 1-million chance) and is associated with underlying problems in that individual’s capacity to fight disease (immunocompromised due to underyling genetic issues).
    You’re DNA won’t be the same after vaccination = FALSE!!!! Unless you’re being vaccinated with a LENTIVIRUS (HIV) or Adenovirus…NEITHER OF WHICH HAVE VIRAL VACCINES AVAILABLE. All the viral vaccines used today are INCAPABLE of integration into the host genetic material…Learn a little bit about homologous recombination, genetics, and immunology before you start making nonsense claims.

    Lastly, Dr. Tim O’shea is a chiropractor not an MD, or more importantly not a PhD (scientist that actually studies aspects of immunoloyg, virology, genetics, molecular biology, biochemistry, etc…) Dr. Tim O’Shea is dead WRONG!!! Look at the facts and make an informed decision based upon historical evidence that goes back to 1000AD, and more recently, the eradication of smallpox (1980).

    But you’re right, Vaccines are bad, whatever you do, don’t get vaccinated. The earth is overpopulated as it is and the more people that refuse vaccinates simply gives the intelligent individuals more breathing space once you idiots die.

  • John Wells

    So I”m reading all of these comments and I’m laughing!!! Wasn’t this study rebuked? HA! Vaccines ultimately assist children in having a healthy life without the problems of the common cold or the whooping cough.

    I understand that this is a very old post, but I just wanted to say something on this subject.

  • Wolf5

    I have been a biology professor for 20+ years. This type of “information” bothers me. Dr. O’Shea and his colleagues have continued the unfortunate negatives of chiropractic care by espousing their soapbox of ideas. The most basic thing to remember here, is just because you can provide examples of things and that you can provide lots of data does not mean you have a correlation established. From a research prospective, clinical studies do not establish cause and effect. This is basic science that I and my colleagues struggle with as we work with students every day. These “drs.” have no concept of this apparently or choose to ignore it so that they be just as bad as they claim big pharm to be! You too are choosing a path that is adamant for profit! I hope you can accept that you do this with passion but not science. It is one thing to show an increase in peanut allergies at the same time you show peanut oil in vaccines. It is a HUGE ASSUMPTION to make a connection between the two. Why for example, might it be simply that peanut allergies went undetected and so that is why we see more of it now? There could be any number of other reasons. Exposure to peanuts early on has absolutely no biological reason to CAUSE allergies later! That is absurd. If the child has peanut allergies they might have a response to the vaccines, even if they are trying to screen out proteins, but the point is, they would have had a reaction to nut or peanut proteins at some point anyway. Here is how all should view the ridiculousness of your logic and your lack of knowledge of the human immune system and biochemistry……and by the way it is a valid point to understand that chiropractors specifically are able to become a “dr.” by avoiding any hard sciences like genetics or biochemistry. If your logic held true, then that would mean that any protein that is new to a child automatically is treated as an antigen AND more importantly, caused so much of a reaction that it guarantees an allergy will develop. How ridiculous is that. That is like saying anything new we expose to our child will cuase them to develop an allergy to it.

  • Steve

    I have to say that the world is a very different place from the times when disease spread through the masses. We have a better medical system for one – vaccinations aside, and we have much better nutritional knowledge and access. I am a strong believer that nutrition keeps the immune system functioning well and provides protection. Sure these diseases will effect the population however I would think they will effect those with with genetic weaknesses or those suffering from malnutrition and this is why third world countries still see wide spread of disease.
    I think some are valid but I strongly believe most are for money. It’s a great money maker; scare the public, make them feel like bad parents and they crack…..so why not come up with a vaccine for all kinds of diseases?
    I think a better solution would be clean and healthy food for all and especially for the countries where disease is most present but then where is the economic benifit in that?
    There are quacks on both sides of this debate that’s for sure.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    I hope you can use the same logic and investigate vaccines. Using the logic you provided … just because a lot of examples are provided by pharmaceutical companies that vaccines are “safe and effective”, doesn’t establish cause and effect, either.

    And to allergies – what about latex allergies? How many rubber particles are in multiple dose vials? I’m pretty sure they’re not counted… and so how does one account for such a drastic increase in latex allergies?

    Ever heard of serum sickness?

    Lastly, do you know what is ridiculous? Pretending vaccines saved us from a myriad of diseases. There are plenty of examples of diseases that no vaccine was available, but they followed the same trend – scarlet fever, for example.

    “Arrogant science” wants us to believe that some virus cultured on monkey kidneys and testicles mixed in with who knows what somehow magically saved us. What goes completely ignored are other factors such as improved food preparation and storage, hygiene, and better sanitation facilities.

  • sick and tired

    There are tombstones that will prove you wrong! I want to know if it was your one in a million child would you feel the same way,because my grandson was one in a million! In more ways than one!!!! He was 9 months old and healthy till he had 5 shots at once then in less than 24 hours I got the call NO human wants to get. My daughter had to call me and tell me her son was gone! There was another baby two days ago. Went to ped got his shots and mom found a cold body when she went to check on him. One in a million odds are not so good when it is your loved one. So stand on your perch and sing this bull all you want ,but our family KNOWS what can happen and how it is covered up!!!!!!! Add to that you are a pompus ass I cannot believe you wrote that last paragraph! JERK!

  • Rick

    Can we please stop debating vaccinations, I am so sick of people picking on the Pharmaceutical giants. These guys are looking out for us, god help us all if they didn’t exist.

    There is absolutely no financial incentive for Pharmaceutical giants to increase the amount of vaccinations from 5 when I was a child to over 40 today. There is no financial incentive for them to ‘diagnose and treat’ new diseases each and every year with untested remedies. They don’t make money by fast tracking testing, lobbying governments and increasing the amount of vaccinations annually for diseases that aren’t even a risk. And don’t think for a moment that they use Fear to sell drugs, that is just crazy. Fear doesn’t have any impact on the consumer’s decision whatsoever.

    In fact, Pharmaceutical giants promote healthy diets, exercise and natural remedies because they care about us, not profit. They believe natural, plant based remedies are the area to invest research dollars in. They want to see all of us off medication, living long healthy lives. Their shareholders have their fingers crossed in the hopes they will cure and eradicate all diseases so these companies will no longer be necessary, that is their business plan.

    Everything is fine. We are so lucky be able to get an H1N1 shot, a Flu shot or that new super cancer cure, the Gardasil shot. Seriously, just do it. It’s awesome, everyone else is doing it, you won’t stand out. Fitting in makes us feel great, you know that silly.

    If you think otherwise, then you are obviously a ‘Tin Foil Hat wearing Conspiracy Theorist Truther Tea Party Occupying Paranoid Twit’ living in their mother’s basement (fact, look it up).

    A don’t you bother doing any research yourself, you aren’t qualified to do so. Any information you find on line is from conspiracy websites and quacks.

    DO NOT READ THESE LINKS, THEY DO NOT EXIST!

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/gerganakoleva/2012/06/27/merck-whistleblower-suit-a-boon-to-anti-vaccination-advocates-though-it-stresses-importance-of-vaccines/

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/business/03health.html?_r=0

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/30/us-merck-fosamax-idUSBRE97T0XF20130830

    http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/parents-sue-after-quebec-teen-dies-following-gardasil-vaccination/

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/08/28/polio-eradication-campaign.aspx

    http://action.sumofus.org/a/eli-lilly/3/6/?sub=homepage

    http://candidaabrahamson.wordpress.com/2012/08/08/three-biggest-pharmaceutical-lawsuits-of-2012-psychiatric-drugs-focus-of-all-three/

    http://www.thefitchlawfirm.com/blog/settlement-reached-in-ohio-h1n1-wrongful-death-lawsuit.cfm

    http://www.christianpress.com/index.php/legal-news/483-ssri-birth-defect-lawsuits-continue-to-pile-up-against-pharmaceutical-giants

    http://www.rense.com/general28/jers.htm

    http://www.naturalnews.com/032558_flu_shots_wear_off.html

  • Beverly Buckman

    ANYTHING THAT IS FORCED UPON YOU IS WRONG. VACCINES ARE USELESS AND THE US HAS THE HIGHEST CANCER RATE OF ANY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD….WAKE UP SHEEP.

  • RealityCheck131

    What a joke. Must be a bunch of uneducated morons in here. Being “anti-vaccine” just means you are contributing to kids dying. Vaccines don’t kill kids, you morons. DISEASES KILL KIDS. And you are helping those diseases come back. Way to go, idiots. Go educate yourself. Try science instead of bullshit scams like this site.

  • RealityCheck131

    You “learned” to help diseases make a comeback and kill kids? Congrats, moron.

  • RealityCheck131

    Yes, some shady doctors in Poland being prosecuted for malpractice means vaccines are bad. WRONG. Please educate yourself.

  • RealityCheck131

    The truth is on Dr Wakefield’s side? What a JOKE. Please stop spreading your idiocy. His license was revoked. Most of the authors of the study retracted it. Please educate yourself, moron.

  • betsyanne

    I really think you need to do some homework. And while you’re doing that, you definitely need a reality check 131.
    SHILL ALERT. TROLL ALERT. And why are you calling me a moron? Just because I don’t believe everything you believe? That doesn’t make me a moron it makes me aware of thinking outside the box. You should try that.

  • betsyanne

    You seem to think everyone here is a moron except yourself. I think you’re a shill and a troll. I’d personally rather be a moron that what you do for kicks. Try studying up on the dangers of vaccinations and maybe you won’t be so haughty.

  • j

    Just taking the numbers from one of the assertions in this article (that there were 2136 adverse reactions to one flu vaccine out of 3 million doses), that’s 2136 divided by 3000000 or 0.000712 (about 7/100ths of 1 percent) chance of an adverse reaction. The author then blithely equates this to a death rate. The rest of the article is just anecdotal, not science.

  • j

    Vaccines are clearly not useless. And the cancer rate has nothing to do with it. Nobody claims vaccines are useful for cancers.