3 Filthy Truths About Vaccines and Cancer

Vaccines have not been tested for causing cancer.

Parents, if biological material was used to create a vaccine and it caused cancer when injected into hamsters, would you want that vaccine injected into your child?

Of course not!

But, that is exactly what happened to over 98 million Americans – and likely many more! Let me explain.

In the 1950s the poliovirus was cultured on monkey kidney cells to produce polio and adenovirus vaccines. A cancer-causing virus called SV40 was discovered, however, that fact was covered up and silenced.

That is important because, to my knowledge, that congressional information hasn’t been made available to the general public until now. I’m making available some snippets of the cover-up and its relevance to you, especially if you received a polio vaccine during the 1950s and ‘60s. Before that information is revealed, you must know…

 

Filthy Truth #1 – Vaccines are NOT Tested for Cancer-Causing Capabilities

Parents want peace of mind. They want to know their children are safe, and they want to trust their doctors. But, more parents are doing the opposite. Why?

I suspect that many parents are getting savvy to the potential inherent problems in vaccines. They’re educating themselves more on vaccine adverse reactions. Most parents know a child or have a friend with a child on the autistic spectrum. Here’s a relevant example.

We’ve all gone grocery shopping.

You know if you look at the product label, you get a general idea of what is contained in the product. That is how you find most of the nasty ingredients in processed foods. Vaccines are not quite the same, plus there’s a deceptive catch.

By law, doctors only have to give parents the vaccine information sheets. Parents, you want to request, read, and keep the vaccine product inserts! You can find them located here: http://vactruth.com/vaccine-inserts/

Do a search for the term “carcinogenesis,” literally ‘cancer creation’, on the product insert for any vaccine. You’ll see the following common phrase regarding most vaccines, “This vaccine has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potentials or impairment of fertility.” (Emphasis mine)

Personally, this should be the legal loophole at law for parents exempting their children from vaccinations. If a product manufacturer cannot guarantee that a product won’t make a person infertile, cause cancer or malformations, then parents have every right to protect themselves and their children from such life-long risks.

Can you imagine the horrified look on parents’ faces when they discover vaccines haven’t been tested for cancer causing capabilities? Maybe parents would ask more demanding questions and require better explanations from their pediatricians.

 

Filthy Truth #2 – Cancer Virus Contaminates Vaccine

Vaccines were never as safe as moms and dads were—or are—led to believe!

Here’s why.

In order to make the vaccine in the 1950s, the poliovirus was cultured on monkey kidney cells. Researchers discovered the cells were contaminated with a virus called SV40.

Contamination of vaccines became so well known in scientific circles, ‘radical vaccine enthusiast’ and vaccine patent holder Dr. Paul Offit reluctantly admits,

The polio vaccine used in the late 1950s and early 1960s was contaminated with a monkey virus called simian virus 40 (SV40) present in monkey kidney cells used to grow the vaccine. Recently, investigators found SV40 DNA in biopsy specimens obtained from patients with cancers such as mesothelioma (lung), osteosarcoma (bone) and non-Hodgkins lymphoma (lymph nodes)… Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis that SV40 virus contained in polio vaccines administered before 1963 cause cancers. In addition, available evidence suggests that SV40 virus is likely be transmitted to people by a mechanism other than vaccines.” http://www.chop.edu/service/vaccine-education-center/hot-topics/sv40.html

Dr. Offit also forgot to mention SV40 infections also are found in the brain of autistic children. Hmmmm. Read about it here: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/13550281003685839

There is very good reason for people like Dr. Paul Offit to downplay the contamination of vaccines.

Bernice Eddy, who at the time was a scientist at the Division of Biologics Standards (DBS), discovered a major problem. Page 500 of the Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session. April 20, 21; and May 3, 4, 1972, states,

“The next and only serious vaccine crisis that has occurred since the polio episode was the realization in mid-1961 that a monkey virus later shown to cause tumors in hamsters was contaminating both polio and adenovirus vaccines. The virus, known as SV40, was entering the vaccines and, just as in the polio case was surviving the formalin [form of formaldehyde] treatment.

There were several states by which the full extent of the SV40 problem became known. First was the discovery in 1959-1960 by a DBS [Division of Biologics Standards] scientist, once again Bernice Eddy, that an unknown agent in the monkey kidney cells used to produce polio and adenovirus vaccines would cause tumors when the cells were injected into hamsters.” (Emphasis mine)

How does the above information play with your—or anyone’s—sense of integrity? What about trusting federal health agencies, their research, and data? What will be revealed next is shocking.

 

Filthy Truth #3 – Contamination is Hidden from Parents

In my opinion what happened next is borderline criminal: The information was suppressed.

Rather than admitting to the problem and taking measures to correct it, those in high places of science and trust allowed contaminated vaccines to be injected into millions of unwitting and helpless women and children.

Page 502 of the same congressional document states,

“In 1954 Eddy, as a polio control officer, found live virus in supposedly killed polio vaccine; in 1955 she was relieved of her duties as polio control officer…After her discoveries concerning the SV40 virus, her staff and animal space were reduced and she was demoted from head of a section to head of a unit.”

Page 505,

“…even when the contaminating virus was found to be oncogenic [cancer causing] in hamsters, the DBS [Division of Biologics Standards] and its expert advisory committee decided to leave existing stocks on the market rather than risk eroding public confidence by a recall.” (Emphasis mine)

And…

“There has been a tendency on the part of certain higher government circles to play down any open discussion of problems associated with vaccines…”

Government officials knew parents definitely would reconsider injecting biological agents, especially vaccines, into their children so they perpetrated a BIG lie that became buried in the annals of vaccine history, which they probably thought they could hide forever. Unfortunately, the SV40 cover-up may not be the only ‘sleeping dog’ story in vaccinology. There just may be some interesting factual stories regarding how some influenza strains either came into being or became so potent.

 

Summary

I think parents want one thing: Assurance of scientific information to have peace of mind. They want to know their children are safe—and they want to trust their doctors, especially pediatricians. But, more parents are doing the opposite. Why? I suspect many parents not only are getting savvy to the potential problems with vaccines, but also know of serious health problems from children of neighbors and friends who suffer adverse vaccine reactions, which scares them.

Parents definitely ought to look at vaccines with a skeptical eye. They must read and keep the vaccine product inserts. If you’re not comfortable getting your child vaccinated, exempt your child. You have every legal right to do that.

Given the unethical happenings surrounding some of the above information, I suspect that it just may be the tip of the iceberg when it comes to all vaccines and carcinogenicity.

 

*Note: The information in this article is posted as a Public Service by Vactruth.com and taken from U.S. Printing Office Washington, DC 20402–0001  

Source:

Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session. Page 499-505. April 20,21; and May 3,4, 1972.

 

Photo Credit: GE Healthcare

  • http://www.nevermindthem.com/ Denise E.

    Very good info…it is out there, it just gets suppressed…..read Fear of the Invisible, 
    http://fearoftheinvisible.com/   AWESOME documentation of everything you’ve stated here!

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Thanks Denise. Once anyone starts to look into the history of vaccines a different story certainly unfolds. I appreciate you reading and sharing.

  • Di

    Thank you for all you do and are doing to get this information to people.  May God bless you and keep you always.
    God Bless,
    Di

  • Anonymous

    Excellent article!
    Never have there been more vaccines administered and never has cancer been so widespread as it is now. Is there a link? It certainly seems to be the case.

    Clinical trials and vaccine monitoring are unlikely to reveal cases of cancer. They are run for far too short lengths of time and it is certainly not in vaccine promoters’ interests to find a vaccine-cancer connection. Statistics presented are frequently manipulated by expert, highly paid statisticians.

    Vaccine promoters are well aware that if and when thousands of cancer cases occur a while after vaccinations it is practically impossible to prove any vaccine-cancer connection.
     
    For unbiased research workers evidence of a link is almost impossible to prove, especially when there are billions of dollars invested by vaccine promoters in hiding the truth.

    Research journals have a marked tendency to publish studies which favour the pharmaceutical industry due to financial support from the industry.

    Vaccines given concomitantly are a godsend to promoters. Manufacturers (who anyway have no liability), health authorities and other promoters can either blame each others’ vaccine or respond that a specific one of the vaccines must be proved to be the cause, fully knowing that this is not possible.

    Gardasil is (incorrectly) promoted as a vaccine which prevents cancer. It is ironic, cynical and scandalous that neither Merck, the manufacturer nor other promoters appear to be aware that the vaccine may actually increase the risk of cancer.

    One way that Gardasil may increase cancer risk is that strains which are replaced by the vaccine (“replacement”, a normal phenomenon in virology) may be more carcinogenic than the original strains.
     
    In other words it cannot possibly be guaranteed that Gardasil does not increase the risk of cancer before at least the following three issues have been seriously addressed:

    – Presence of recombinant DNA (rDNA)
    – Lack of carcinogenicity testing of the vaccine
    – Replacement

    Regarding these factors, it is utterly inexcusable whether the vaccine promoters are aware, unaware or if they simply do not care.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Di,

    You are welcome. I’m certain if parents had access to most of the information that has been suppressed by ‘health authorities’, pediatricians would likely have very few clients to vaccinate. With that being said, I’m glad parents are starting to ask their pediatricians tough questions.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Vaccines are the perfect niche. As you mentioned vaccine manufacturers have a guaranteed captured market and virtually no liability for the harm their product causes. Americans were sold through propaganda that the answer to the mysterious cause of acute flaccid paralysis (polio) was a vaccine. Thankfully, we know can see that widespread spraying of petrochemicals coupled with pesticides were the likely culprit.

    But there is a bigger question to be answered. Why would health authorities knowingly allow innocent woman and children to be vaccinated with a cancer-causing virus?

  • Arrow40t

    This info is like 50 years old… No more SV40 today, And there’s no real data linking it directly to human cancer. Not vaccinating is irresponsible parenting and should be a felony, as you are putting others children in harms way by lowering the overall immunity of the population….

  • Lowell

    There is plenty of evidence, and scientific evidence linking SV 40 to cancer. How sure are you that there is no SV 40 today? If you have not followed the unbiased evidence science indicating the presence of SV 40 causing cancer; then how would you have evidence, much more evidence and scientific proof that SV 40 is not in the polio vaccines today, if not as well SV40 circulating in the population today? You have to look at all the evidence; and not just cherry pick the science and evidence that works for you.

    The polio vaccine: a critical assessment of its arcane history, efficacy, and long-term health-related consequencesNeil Z. Millerhttp://www.thinktwice.com/Polio.pdfSV 40http://www.vaccinetruth.org/sv40.htmExcerpt: Moreover, Fisher says, standard epidemiological techniques may be useless in determining whether SV40 exposure is linked to higher cancer rates. If the research of Janet Butel and others is correct and SV40 is now spreading among human beings, it may be impossible to assemble an experimental group that has never been exposed to SV40.http://www.gulfwarvets.com/virus.htmSimian Virus 40 (SV40):A Cancer Causing Monkey Virusfrom FDA-Approved VaccinesExcerpted: The Institute of Medicine ReportIn July 2002, the National Academy of Science Institute of Medicine (IOM) Immunization Safety Committee convened a study into SV40 and cancer which culminated in a report published in October 2002. According to the IOM report “SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer”:The committee concludes that the biological evidence is strong that SV40 is a transforming [i.e., cancer-causing] virus, . . . that the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions, [and] that the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure from the polio vaccine is related to SV40 infection in humans.[83]http://www.sv40foundation.org/CPV-link.htmlThe Cancerous SV40Listen to what it states Bernice eddy found and the result, they cover-ed it up.http://youtu.be/49ckRAlxVwkBernice EddyFrom: Fields:  Dr. Bernice Eddy and her friend and collaborator, Dr. Sarah Stewart, were the first to describe the polyoma virus. They showed that this virus causes tumors in many different animals and that it can be transferred from one individual to another. The virus was later named the SE Polyoma Virus in their honor.Bernice Eddy was born in 1903 in West Virginia, U.S.A. She received her Ph.D. degree from the University of Cincinnati in 1927. In 1931 she joined the Public Health Service and in 1937 she started working at the National Institutes of Health. She developed the method of tissue culture for tumor viruses, which is growing virus-infected animal cells in a container. This method made it possible to work with such cells outside of the animals they came from. The tissue culture method allows studies of one type of tissue without interference from other cells.http://www.distinguishedwomen.com/bio.php?womanid=759My site:www.vacfacts.info

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    I will try that again, and you can delete the previous post, as something pushed the info all together, disabling the links.

    There is plenty of evidence, and scientific evidence linking SV 40 to cancer. How sure are you that there is no SV 40 today? If you have not followed the unbiased evidence science indicating the presence of SV 40 causing cancer; then how would you have evidence, much more evidence and scientific proof that SV 40 is not in the polio vaccines today, if not as well SV40 circulating in the population today? You have to look at all the evidence; and not just cherry pick the science and evidence that works for you.

    The polio vaccine: a critical assessment of its arcane history, efficacy, and long-term health-related consequences

    Neil Z. Miller

    http://www.thinktwice.com/Polio.pdf

    SV 40
    http://www.vaccinetruth.org/sv40.htm

    Excerpt: Moreover, Fisher says, standard epidemiological techniques may be useless in determining whether SV40 exposure is linked to higher cancer rates. If the research of Janet Butel and others is correct and SV40 is now spreading among human beings, it may be impossible to assemble an experimental group that has never been exposed to SV40.

    http://www.gulfwarvets.com/virus.htm

    Simian Virus 40 (SV40):
    A Cancer Causing Monkey Virus
    from FDA-Approved Vaccines

    Excerpted: The Institute of Medicine Report

    In July 2002, the National Academy of Science Institute of Medicine (IOM) Immunization Safety Committee convened a study into SV40 and cancer which culminated in a report published in October 2002. According to the IOM report “SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer”:

    The committee concludes that the biological evidence is strong that SV40 is a transforming [i.e., cancer-causing] virus, . . . that the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions, [and] that the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure from the polio vaccine is related to SV40 infection in humans.[83]

    http://www.sv40foundation.org/CPV-link.html

    The Cancerous SV40

    Listen to what it states Bernice eddy found and the result, they cover-ed it up.

    http://youtu.be/49ckRAlxVwk

    Bernice Eddy

    Dr. Bernice Eddy and her friend and collaborator, Dr. Sarah Stewart, were the first to describe the polyoma virus. They showed that this virus causes tumors in many different animals and that it can be transferred from one individual to another. The virus was later named the SE Polyoma Virus in their honor.

    Bernice Eddy was born in 1903 in West Virginia, U.S.A. She received her Ph.D. degree from the University of Cincinnati in 1927. In 1931 she joined the Public Health Service and in 1937 she started working at the National Institutes of Health. She developed the method of tissue culture for tumor viruses, which is growing virus-infected animal cells in a container. This method made it possible to work with such cells outside of the animals they came from. The tissue culture method allows studies of one type of tissue without interference from other cells.

    http://www.distinguishedwomen.com/bio.php?womanid=759

  • Catherine J Frompovich

    How about trying on for size this “old” information about the polio vaccine’s ‘inventor’? 
    http://www.naturalnews.com/031564_Jonas_Salk_medical_experiments.html 

    The questions everyone, especially parents, needs to be asking are: 
    1) How can we TRUST their science when in the past they’ve…?
    And, 2) is that kind of ‘science’ still ongoing? 

    There’s an awful lot of information about vaccines that has been withheld PURPOSELY, I think, from consumers who then willingly ‘buy into’ pseudo-science disseminated by the controlled media.  They, along with their children, are accepting the hype and are being vaccinated.  However, if they knew what really was going on, they would oppose vaccines, which is now starting to happening. I say, “Get smart; avoid the ‘poison dart’.”  You and your children will be healthier if you do.  Check out the statistics and just don’t throw words around like “lowering the overall immunity of the population,” as you really don’t know what you are saying, I think.  You are just parroting pseudo-scientific spin, in my opinion.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    I just can’t resist this. Please first check your facts as to the scientific and evidence based facts regarding herd immunity. The term herd immunity by the way was coined from what was known (to my knowledge of it) from the veterinary understanding of herd immunity and it involved natural immunity, and not so called vaccine derived immunity. You can challenge anyone from the medical community to reference source the science behind vaccine derived herd immunity, and I have seen what they come up with, and it is not impressive; if they come up with anything at all.

    We have had periodically many herd immunity failures in the use of several of the vaccines. Outbreaks where the largest percentage of those with the illness were fully vaccinated. The CDC does not want you to realize this and repeatedly has put a false spin on it each and every time; blaming the non vaccinated and the parents for a break in herd immunity even though the required vaccine uptake to acquire so called herd had been met. If all else fails the CDC then proclaims with little to no antibody levels testing and scientific evidence, that more vaccine boosters are needed.

    And where did we get the notion that the benefits of natural immunity was such a bad and dangerous thing? Fear mongering to sell vaccines, that’s where; and without any physiological understanding of what it involves to develop and keep a strong immune system; which by the way isn’t achieved jacked full of immune depleting chemical and biological toxins. Most of our doctors will never even as much as recommend a sufficient dosage of vitamin D, and/or C; and much of our population is deficient in vitamin D which has a direct effect on lowering immune system function. So quite obviously it is well past time to educate ourselves.

    It really is not a very good selling point on the efficacy of vaccines to claim that the vaccines only work if near everyone is vaccinated. Nor to claim that your un-vaccinated child can infect my vaccinated child. If that’s all the better they can do, I will walk away from vaccines in the middle of a deadly outbreak. I will take 5000 IU of vitamin D per day, (not 400), and vitamin C to tolerance. Avoid sugar which lowers the immune response, and start juicing some green vegetables. Is there more sanity in believing a toxic vaccine will save you? Look at the ingredients list? The vaccine promoters always claim that vaccine safety and the evidence of efficacy is science based. If you believe that, you apparently have not actually spent much time reading their assumed science;  nor any existing analysis. And really, have you seen the page the CDC has representing the scientific evidence on the safety of multiple vaccines? It is a joke!  Clearly as well the best outcomes in 1918 were in those camps being treated by chiropractic adjustments and/or homeopathy. What does that historical fact tell you? But no, you may have never been told nor heard of this information; or perhaps you will think it is all a conspiracy theory? Why would anyone come to believe or assume that said information was not factual; because its unimaginable to so many people that the medical systems in place, would have covered all that up by simply never allowing it into their medical references. And they have never looked for it in comparison to the lack of information and the misinformation they have been fed.It is not the seed, it is the soil! The germs and pathogens verses the host. Just like Becamp knew around 100 years ago and Pasteur denied. The understanding of the real history that has been covered up and removed from sources the public is normally exposed to, is the key to understanding why and how it became like it is. This is why it only gets worse; more pharmaceutical drugs, and more vaccines. What are the results of all that in regard to the existing health of the children and the general public? What we see, is that all just some odd coincidence? If Pasteur had been right, the health of this nation should be fantastic. It has steadily become just the opposite; and it is undeniable. Those who do not learn from the past are destined to repeat the same failed mistakes in the future! 

  • http://www.nevermindthem.com/ Denise E.

    Preach it, Brother!!

  • http://www.nevermindthem.com/ Denise E.

    Can you say, “Population control”?

  • Deserthaven

    Much to say in reply but a few have addressed it thoroughly below. However, just to reiterate one point only……if vaccines were safe and effective how on earth could an unvaccinated person possibly be a health threat to your vaccinated child? Seriously, just use some common sense and logic here.

  • http://vactruth.com Jeffry John Aufderheide

    Lowell, I appreciate your contribution. I suspect the person commenting above is just trolling and has never looked into SV40.

  • Lyudmilaomalley

    Dearest Jeffry Jonn, thank you very much for your invaluable information about the dangeres of vaccines, we are very greateful for your great work and tramendeous afforts to confirm the parents who are misslead in vaccination promotions. Mother of 6, one of them was damadge by vaccination and later 4 as well. I like your film about vaccine trials, can you send to me some films on DVD if you can

  • redshoes

    Jeffry you have so hit the nail straight on the head with this info.  Great article.  Here’s hoping this will go far and wide.

  • saddened

    But WHY would they put harmful things into the vaccines? So they can make money off people when/if they get sick?

  • Richard Einstein

    Absolutely, they make money off sick people. Plus the Jew World Order intend to cull the population of the planet by 95%. They plan to use many ways to kill off the goyim. Chemtrails, GMO poisons in food and the poisons put into drinking water along with the deadly fluoride there are many other toxins.

  • Bruce McBurney

    I have been trying to expose an answer to the problem 100 Miles per gallon fuel systems. Yes 5 times the fuel mileage is possible but suppressed by oil companies for over 80 years and we have the patents and the science to prove it, see the evidence we have now see at website (no spaces) him acre search dot com other sites with similar info are .Byron wine dot com Rex research dot com
    We need to end suppression before it causes the end of us all.

  • Bruce McBurney

    We do not need vaccines we need colloidal silver and gold. Made proper with High voltage AC electricity. the Russian’s Pravda Stated it will kill all flu virus even the ones they put together and many other medical problem but not used because the drug companies would lose to much profits. for free plans to do it correctly see on you tube Himacmovieman

    Also aspirin is the real cause of all the many people died in 1918 according to some research, aspirin lowers the fever, the fever that would normally kill the FLU virus.

  • Wyatt Hill

    I agree with you 100 percent !!!

  • Wyatt Hill

    That’s the Obamacare / agenda 21 plan-
    Cancer for all and death to 95 percent-
    Use silver solution and no vaccines or Pharma drugs
    amygdalin in bitter apricot seeds, broad beans etc..
    will stop cancer caused by vaccines and chemtrails.