Dangerous Banned Vaccine Repackaged and Given New Name

Parents unknowingly subjected their child to a proven dangerous vaccine.

Yet again the UK government has allowed a previously banned and dangerous vaccine onto the UK market, by repackaging it and giving it a new name in a bid to deceive parents.

The first time the UK government tried this tactic and succeeded was in 1988 when the JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccinations and Immunizations) sanctioned the MMR vaccine Pluserix for use in the UK. Pluserix had previously been banned in Canada, causing thousands of children to suffer irreversible side effects as a result. This vaccine went on to cause the same devastation in the UK. [1]

A DANGEROUS VACCINE

Dr. Lucjia Tomljenovic gave a full description of these devastating side effects, including encephalitis, bilateral deafness and meningitis, in her paper The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): Are They at Odds? Appalled at the committee’s behavior, she exposed exactly what was being said behind the closed doors of UK’s JCVI. She wrote:

Thus, instead of re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until safety concerns were fully evaluated, the JCVI choose to support the existing policy based on incomplete evidence that was available at that time.” [2]

One child who became profoundly deaf in one ear after she received the now banned vaccination, Katie Stephen, is still fighting for compensation to this day. Her mother, Wendy Stephen, is furious at her daughter’s treatment and told The Telegraph in a recent article:

 “She wasn’t born this way. This was done to her by the Department of Health. They distributed pamphlets arguing that this was the right thing to do for your child, and not just that, but the right thing to do for herd immunity in the UK against these three illnesses.” [3]

Parents unknowingly subjected their child to a proven dangerous vaccine.

Second Banned Vaccine Gets Revamp

Obviously not learning from the error of their ways, the UK government has once again potentially put thousands of lives at risk by re-introducing a banned, this time unlicensed vaccine onto the UK market.

In June 2012, the single mumps vaccine Medi-Mumps cultured on dog kidney cells was advertised for use at a number of private clinics as an alternative option to the MMR. It has since been discovered however, that Medi-Mumps is in fact the banned, unlicensed vaccine Pavivac. To cover this up, just like the MMR vaccine Pluserix, the vaccine was repackaged and given a new name. 

A SHOCKING DISCOVERY

Through intensive research, we have learned that on September 13, 2012, the UK’s MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency) wrote a press release titled Advertising Investigations. The MHRA wrote:

13 September 2012

The MHRA was made aware of information presented on the Children’s Immunisation Centre (CIC) website about Medi-Mumps and a related press release. The MHRA was concerned that the information provided an unbalanced view of the safety and efficacy of the vaccine because it did not mention the MHRA’s concerns and previous CSM advice or that the product was unlicensed. (emphasis added)

We understood that the Medi-Mumps vaccine is manufactured from the same stock and processed in the same way as Pavivac mumps vaccine. (emphasis added) The MHRA, acting on advice from an independent advisory committee, the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM), has for a number of years objected to the importation of the Pavivac product because there is insufficient information available to assure its safety, quality and efficacy. See statement from the committee on safety of medicines (82Kb) for more details.

CIC amended the websites to remove the information about Medi-Mumps.

Date case raised: 3 April 2012 

Date action agreed: 2 May 2012 

Date of publication: 13 September 2012” [4]

DON’T SAY WE DIDN’T WARN YOU

Amazingly in May of this year on this very site, I wrote an article titled New Vaccine Made From Dog Cells May Trigger Allergy to Dogs. [5] My article highlighted the fact that a new single mumps vaccine had been slipped into private clinics in the UK through the back door.

I highlighted that the Medi-Mumps vaccine had been advertised as being available from June 2012 in two private clinics, The Children’s Immunization Centre, who have now removed the vaccine in question from their listings [6] and The Early Onset Clinic who, at the time of this writing, are still advertising it as available today. [7]

I queried whether or not that the new vaccine could possibly be the banned vaccine Pavivac repackaged and re introduced as a new product:

“Interestingly Medi-Mumps is extremely similar to the banned vaccine Pavivac. The Pavivac vaccine was also manufactured in the Czech Republic and cultured on canine kidney cells but this vaccine was rejected by the CSM (Committee on the Safety of Medicines) in 2002 because of safety concerns.” [8]

My research was spot on and once again, vactruth.com can be proven to promote child health safety.

CONCLUSION

I would like to know just how these private clinics managed to get this so wrong. Did they not realize that they were and still are, in some cases, advertising and injecting very young children with an unlicensed, previously banned product? Do they also not realize that it has been illegal to advertise unlicensed products to the public since 2010? [9]

How can we, as healthcare consumers, ever trust our governments if they continue to sanction dangerous, banned and unlicensed products for use on our children? These are only two products that we now know about. How many other banned, unlicensed drugs, vaccines and healthcare products are being recommended for use that are repackaged and renamed?

References

  1. Jenny Hope Daily Mail Secret British MMR Vaccine Files Forced Open By Legal Action http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/news.php?id=3156#newspost

  2. Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D. The Vaccination Policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): Are They at Odds? http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
  3. The TelegraphRogue Strain of MMR Vaccine ‘Caused Deafness. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9521728/Rogue-strain-of-MMR-vaccine-caused-deafness.html
  4. MHRA Advertising Investigations http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Howweregulate/Medicines/Advertisingofmedicines/Advertisinginvestigations/CON184749

  5. New Vaccine Made From Dog Cells May Trigger Allergy to Dogs http://vactruth.com/2012/05/25/vaccine-dog-cells-allergy/

  6. Children’s Immunization Clinic http://www.childrensimmunisation.com/mumps/

  7. Early Onset Clinic http://earlyonset.com/mumps-vaccine-to-be-made-available-in-uk-from-june-2012.html

  8. CSM STATEMENT FROM THE COMMITTEE ON SAFETY OF MEDICINES ADVICE THAT UNLICENSED PAVIVAC SINGLE MUMPS VACCINE SHOULD NOT BE IMPORTED OR USED November 2002 http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/pl-p/documents/websiteresources/con2031109.pdf

  9. MHRA Information for wholesale dealers and manufacturers: Advertising of unlicensed medicines http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Howweregulate/Medicines/Medicinesregulatorynews/CON093892

Photo Credit

  • 2shoot

    Wish I could post these articles on FB

  • Spearce

    This is a very good article, Christina. Thanks so much for all your research and for telling the world what you find. The other comment on this article, besides mine, says the person wishes he or she could post these articles on FB. I wonder why that can’t be done. I think just copying and pasting the URL for each article should work, shouldn’t it?

  • guest

    Its pretty simple. If you don’t want to vaccinate don’t. But don’t put our young children at risk when they are not yet old enough to have vaccinations. If you are not vaccinated and you are ill, keep your kids away from other kids. 

  • Christina England

    You can post on facebook but warn your readers that the trolls are trying to control Vactruth from telling the truth to parents. Explain that when the WOT alert comes up if they scroll to bottom and click on ‘ignore this warning’ the link will work.

    Thank you both for your comments and support

    Christina

  • Davidjohnkenna

    How can we, as healthcare consumers, ever trust our governments… I don’t they are totally untrustworthy. Nut the sad fact is millions do trust them and rush out to be vaccinated.The pressure on many is the concept of herd immunity. Sounds good on a superficial
    reading but as you delve into it you realise it’s claptrap. Why Because even the Pharma
    recognise that vaccines do not provide 100% immunity. Some only 50% If at all. .Then people who have been vaccinated get the disease the vaccine was supposed to protect them against. Think flu, polio, and whooping cough. People die from vaccines. And protection is an assumption. How can it be proved? They will respond with, well I didn’t get the flu. Nor did lots of other who were not
    vaccinated. Finally why is it that doctors and nurses don’t get vaccinated? Aren’t they part of the herd?. only a 20% uptake in the UK by medical staff.for the H5 N1  In the US its mandatory for medical staff. In the EU there was a mixed uptake Poland didn’t bother..they recognised it was a scam. 

    Thanks Christina for an excellent article.
     

  • diannejacobsthompson

    Christina, the way you keep coming up with important and devastating information is truly amazing, particularly with such careful attention to detail and solid documentation. It’s no wonder this site is so viciously targeted by vaccine promoters and those poor misinformed souls who have been lied to and deceived all of their lives into believing disinformation and revisionist history. But it’s not difficult to understand their emotional, knee-jerk reactions–to hear the truth and accept it would mean not only admitting to being sold a bill of goods, but putting their innocent children in harm’s way and subjecting them to medical malpractice. That’s a hard thing for most of us to face, impossible for others, but for the sake of children everywhere, it’s a battle we all need to face and a war we need to win. I’m just thankful that you and others like you (not that there are many) have the courage to keep the front line moving forward, no matter what the obstacles, or how fierce the attack. And if anyone doubts the kind of battering that takes place, all they have to do is read the Facebook “warning” and comments about this site.

  • diannejacobsthompson

    Your post doesn’t make complete sense. If you believe that vaccinations actually provide immunity, why would there be any problem exposing vaccinated children to a sick child, supposing that you mean the sick child is ill with a disease or infection that others are vaccinated against like measles or whooping cough. The fact is, not that government or medical authorities admit this to the general public, but other sources do–most of these communicable diseases for which vaccines exist break out among those who have been vaccinated, meaning that either the vaccine failed to protect them from the disease, or that the vaccine itself caused it, like with polio in the US. All recent documented cases of polio have occurred among vaccinated individuals or their contacts. In truth, unvaccinated infants or children have much more to fear from recently vaccinated children who continue to shed vaccine viruses and their contaminants for weeks after a shot. But if an unvaccinated child contracts one of these diseases, for sure those of us who know better than to trust the false concept of “vaccine immunity” we know they would be a danger to everyone, particularly those whose immune systems have been compromised rather than strengthened by vaccines.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    THE CENTRAL ROLE OF IMMUNOEXCITOTOXICITY IN ALUMINUM AND MERCURY-CONTAINING

    ADJUVANT-TRIGGERED NEURODEVELOPMENTAL AND NEURODEGENERATIVE DISORDERS, by Dr. Russell Blaylock, board certified neurosurgeon, retired.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9DkcpEEBPI

    The vaccine harm science, that they at the CDC, refuse to acknowledge the existence of.
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-vaccine-damage—science.html 

    Ask, why are they not concerned enough to do any follow up studies? Answer: Because they already know what vaccines have done, and what they are doing. There is to much for them to lose, if the truth were known, on a large scale. They would lose everything, and the pharmaceutical liability would be bankrupting; even at the millions and billions in profits that they make. Think about it. The sacred cow of so called all of modern medicine, vaccines; would be destroyed and the entire foundation of what they promote and believe; left in need of being completely changed and rebuilt from the ground up. They simply will not allow it to be realized that the whole premise and foundation of modern medicine has been wrong since day one. That false premise was the only thing that would sell chemicalized so called medicine.

    The False Foundations of Modern Medicine
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-false-foundations-of-modern-medicine.html 

    The False Theory of Vaccine Derived – Herd Immunity
    http://www.vacfacts.info/the-false-theory-of-vaccine-derived—herd-immunity.html

  • Tony

    i find it odd you have an add from the NHS , regarding cancer , i seem to remember numerous articles linking the explosion in cancer in both humans and pets to vaccinations , so the add seems at best a sick joke  

  • Jim Bob

    Diane,

    Your post is riddled with inaccuracies. Vaccines do not provide 100%. Noone has ever claimed they do. However, there are small groups of people who cannot get vaccinated due to health complications like cancer or supressed immune systems. Also there is a small group of those who are vaccinated that will not develop full immunity to the preventable disease. Depending on the vaccine this is usually 5-10%. This is why health authorities want to keep vaccination rates above 90%.

    As for the myth about outbreaks among vaccinated groups, the math tells the story. The out break occurs within the 10% who did not get full immunity from the vaccine. Generally speaking that 10% is always larger then the unvaccinated population. But you would do well to compare the rates of infection between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated and your fact will be shown to be fraud.

    I’m not quite sure what you mean by polio shedding since there has only been one case of polio in the US in the past 5 years. I suppose you are digging up statistics that are well past their due date to support your theory when the attenuated vaccine was used. Even if you used the attenuated vaccine, the risk of contracting polio from the vaccine was approximately 1 in 2.5 million. Anyone who studies statistics will tell you that with numbers that large there must have been a underlying medical condition which exacerbated the detrimental effects of the vaccine. But all of this is moot, since the US vaccine schedule does not contain the attenuated polio vaccine.

    If I were you, I wouldn’t use this website as a source of information unless you want to end up very misinformed.

  • diannejacobsthompson

    Jim Bob, I’ve been doing research on vaccines since 1986 when my only child contracted a flesh-eating infection immediately after her first and only vaccination at the age of 5, which Vaers documents happens to a number of vaccinated individuals even now. And of course I look at statistics. Yours come from sources with a vested interest in creating misinformation. I look for more objective sources…like the following (CDC, JAMA, Science magazine, world-renowned virologist, Ph.D researcher in their rare instances of honesty)

    As for “immunity” all you can site is the stats for “antibody response”. Of course vaccines produce antibody response, like any infection would create. Do they match natural infection antibodies? Of course not, because their source is unnatural, and altered. The fact is, there are no statistics in existence that “prove” vaccines provide immunity to natural disease. To do that, there would have to be double-blind studies where children were vaccinated and then exposed to disease and that has never been done. As for your stats on who gets infection or disease in outbreaks–right, we should all trust our pharma-controlled government proclamations.

    THE WASHINGTON POST, Feb.2, 1986 “Vaccines
    can be a risk for infected persons–virus in vaccines, like natural
    virus infection…MAY  ACTIVATE LATENT VIRAL INFECTIONS.”–Dr.
    Robert Gallo, National Institute of Health

    Getting a vaccination does not guarantee immunity.
    (~CDC, January 28, 1994.)

    “Neutralizing antibodies are reported
    to reflect levels of protection, although this has not been validated
    in the field.” (~Journal of the American Medical
    Association, June 9, 1999, Vol. 281. No. 22)

    Vaccines made from animal substrate contain
    animal viruses that are impossible to filter out. By 1961, scientists
    discovered that animal viruses in vaccines, including smallpox, could
    act as a carcinogen when given to mice in combination with cancer-causing
    chemicals, even in amounts too small to induce tumors alone. They
    concluded that vaccine viruses function as a catalyst for tumor production.
    (~Science, December 15, 1961.)

    By the 1920s, several British medical researchers
    documented that smallpox was not only more common among the VACCINATED,
    but that the DEATH RATE from smallpox was actually higher among those
    who had been vaccinated. This indicates that the vaccine was ineffective
    and predisposed vaccinated persons to more lethal disease. (~Vaccination,
    Dr. Viera Scheibner, Australia, 1993, pp. 205-220.) 

     

  • Jim Bob

     Okay. I’ll guess I’ll sayit a third time. Vaccines are not 100% effective. As mentioned previously approximately 5-10% of those vaccinated will not achieve full immunity from the vaccine. Ergo, you do not want a child with a vaccine preventable illness near anyone including those who are vaccinated. That is why when vaccination rates approach or exceed 90% these illnesses disappear. When it starts to dip below this mark they re-appear.

    As for shedding, neither whopping cough nor polio actually sheds. If you want to know where the disease comes from hang out at the airport. All recent measles outbreaks started from someone returning from Europe. And unfortunately whooping cough was never eradicated so it keeps popping from time to time thanks to the anti-vax community. As for polio, I said it previously there has only been one case in the US in the past 5 years. So no shedding with polio. The only vaccine that has a risk of shedding is the chicken pox vaccine and it is extremely minimal if even possible at all.

  • George

    @diannejacobsthompson:disqus you state in your reply that you rely on 
     (CDC, JAMA, Science magazine, world-renowned virologist, Ph.D researcher in their rare instances of honesty) . Then you proceed to list cherry picked articles but I’ll give you credit for using reliable sources for the first three. Unfortunately for you point 2 is only a reiteration of what Jim Bob said so what exactly is your point? At point 4 you move on to a 50 year old article and follow that up with a link to a micropalentologist(not a 
    world-renowned virologist) with a poor understanding of math and then on to everyone’s favorite woo site – Mercola. C’mon, try to be serious, at least try to use credible sources. What’s next a link to a psychic?

  • George

    @diannejacobsthompson:disqus you state in your reply that you rely on 
     (CDC, JAMA, Science magazine, world-renowned virologist, Ph.D researcher in their rare instances of honesty) . Then you proceed to list cherry picked articles but I’ll give you credit for using reliable sources for the first three. Unfortunately for you point 2 is only a reiteration of what Jim Bob said so what exactly is your point? At point 4 you move on to a 50 year old article and follow that up with a link to a micropalentologist(not a 
    world-renowned virologist) with a poor understanding of math and then on to everyone’s favorite woo site – Mercola. C’mon, try to be serious, at least try to use credible sources. What’s next a link to a psychic?

  • OMG

    As usual, you always offer great feedback and links for further reading.  Thanks Lowell

  • OMG

    After reading Dianne’s comment below… Looks like she blew your misinformation right out of the water bob!   Sounds to me she KNOWS what she is talking about and is well informed.  

  • DebbyBruck

    Christina, another well documented article on the deception within the vaccine community. You have done the homework, now everyone needs to listen up and begin to think about how they will respond. Will they get active to tell friends, get involved with legislation in their area and support the truthful investigation of the science behind the vaccine programs. 

  • diannejacobsthompson

     I was thinking about that. What if someone put these articles on another website–fully linked to this one, of course?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    Jim Bob,

    It is your post that is riddled with inaccuracies and claims you can not and have not backed up with even as much as logical conclusions. I would ask you to back up the claims your make with referenced to data, and better yet some actual science. 

    Looking at one of your stated claims amount many.

    [But you would do well to compare the rates of infection between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated and your fact will be shown to be fraud.]

    Are you going to tell everyone reading this, that you have that data? Where are your entirely vaccinated verses unvaccinated studies; I bet you have a pile of them, right? You know, studies that show the outcome that you point to? Don’t be going telling anyone that you know of such a study and/ or of the data, which shows such a comparison, when in fact the CDC is and has been to scared to ever compare that data. We see endless such claims by people like you, but no actual data.

    And really even if that data existed; the truth is found as to the benefit risk ratio of vaaccines; not in baseless fear mongering of death and disability due to such an illness, but in numbers of actual acquiring of the illness and thus successful recovery and resulting long term if not life long immunity. To speak in the terms that you do; you would think all people, infants to adult; have no immune systems nor recovery ability whatsoever; other than through the toxic shots sold by Big Pharm. is the only means to survival thus only chemicalized pharma medicine? You know that the FDA has stated that ONLY a drug can cure or prevent disease, and monoplized since its conception, on eliminating any other competition and within the whole allopathic system, attempt to falsly brand any other natuopathic knowledge, as quackery.  Why is so called modern medicine then known today as a leading cause of death? Would you like to dispute some of that data and information?

    Death by Medicine
    http://www.vacfacts.info/death-by-medicine.html

    You are in DEEP denial, Mr Jim Bob.

    You attempt to proclaim that people are not listening to you, quote from you, (Okay. I’ll guess I’ll say it a third time.)

    I beleive it is you that is not listening, Jim Bob. Above there is this information from Dr Russell Blaylock, that you of course ignored. I would like you to actually listen to this video and tell em what you do not agree with; and explain why you beleive it to be incorrect? False discreditation and mud throwing will not work; I am asking you specifically about the information in that video. As well he has some published studies on his site that as well you may be interested in; but of course it does not fit with your safe and effective agenda; so you must continue to ignore it all. This is all about the balance of what what washes out in regard to the benefits verses the risks of vacines. In other words at what point would vaccine be doing more harm than good, in your mind? If you ignore it all, and do not acknowledge the harm done, and potential harm; how can you fairly evaluate that said situtation?  I do not want a bunch of excuses; I want you to address the actual information. 

    THE CENTRAL ROLE OF IMMUNOEXCITOTOXICITY IN ALUMINUM AND MERCURY-CONTAININGADJUVANT-TRIGGERED NEURODEVELOPMENTAL AND NEURODEGENERATIVE DISORDERS, by Dr. Russell Blaylock, board certified neurosurgeon, retired.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9DkcpEEBPI

    Published papers
    http://www.russellblaylockmd.com/

  • Erwin Alber

    Thanks Christina!  

    It appears that not everyone likes investigative journalism though. I wonder why. (sarcasm)      When I clicked on the link on FB to access this article I got this message:  

    Security Alert
    The link you are trying to visit has been classified as potentially abusive by a Facebook partner. To learn more about staying safe on the internet, visit Facebook’s Security Page. Please also read the Wikipedia articles on malware and phishing.Get the free Web of Trust add-on today!Stay safe when browsing the Internet via Facebook.
    Ignore this warning

  • A Concerned Parent

    Thank you for this timely information Christina.

  • Vinceny_vey

    What is the problem? Do not allow your child to be vaccinated under any circumstanes and it is all sorted. I would much rather have my child skip any form of vaccination than play russian roulette with its health. The government has not only been proved wrong on more than one occasion but it has tried time and time again to lie and deceive parents.

  • Christina England

     I know Erwin all my articles and a few others are classified as potentially abusive on facebook, cannot imagine who to, can you? The government maybe? More to come soon that will upset them further.

    Christina

  • Christina England

    Thank you for all your comments on this article it is interesting what people have to say on this. More on this one to come as the plot thickens.

    Christina

  • Christina England

     Tony

    We try to control what ads appear on VacTruth as much as possible. Some get slipped in that we are totally against and this can be very frustrating.

    Thank you for bringing our attention to this one.

    Christina

  • Bob

    I have been reported by the NHS for not allowing my newborn to be injected with this sort of toxic shite that is peddled by convicted criminals, ‘Big Pharma’. The bootlicking NHS reported me for being ‘anti-government’. We were treated like we had the plague after we refused to let our child be injected with these toxic concoctions. The doctors all get backhanders from Big Pharma in relation to the amount of the swill they peddle for their multinational, conglomerate pimps. Like Monsanto who are destroying the food chain on earth, they are getting incredibly powerful and have bought and paid for all our treasonous politicians. Soon, these useless ‘immunisations’ will be mandatory.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lowell-Hubbs/1285214003 Lowell Hubbs

    Jim Bob,

    When you are going to proclaim that someone is blinded by ignorance, perhaps you should at least base that accusation on something they have actually addressed and put forth. I never even mentioned that Mercola study, Jim Bob. As long as you are on that specific subject matter, the truth of the matter is that your said rambling claims are irrelevant. The B.pertussis pathogen, which is a bacteria, and targeted in the vaccine, has obviously mutated to a point that the vaccine is no longer effective; or nearly as effective as it was; that is of course providing that it ever was. The second aspect to it, is that B. parapertussis has become a more common infecting pathogen; and clearly has become so because of the existing vaccine. The same thing happens with antibiotics; what, it couldn’t happen due to a vaccine? For the most part, cases of suspected pertussis are most often not tested as to confirmation through PCR. Even if they are, the PCR test in this case has as well some evidence existing out there, that this somewhat more specific test, may as well not always be accurate either.

    So, all the vaccinating in world, will be of little use, if the vaccine targeted strain has mutated, and very possibly because of and due to the vaccine. That as well, if B parapertussis strain, (not targeted in the vaccine), has become an equally prevalent organism in this situation.

    So, what kind of an outcome results, when you have the CDC knowing all this, but as well ignoring all this, and yet continuing to falsely fear monger that it is the non vaccinating parents that caused the many outbreaks of pertussis that have been. They have even pushed for cocoon style vaccinating whole families at a time, and that failed as well, (shouldn’t that have been a clue?)  They keep on pushing the toxic boosters, while failing to address the real problem, because they flat out REFUSE to admit that any vaccine, has any problem, and nor will they admit that any vaccine has failed. 

    The highly dangerous, (Gardasil) as well, that they have, will, and as well will continue to white wash that and the issue as well, until hell freezes over. Nothing will nor would be enough. They have to much to lose in admitting anything at all.

    One other thing that you have done here Jim Bob, is swipe away any reference to Mercola, and entirely off the table for consideration. You can refuse to consider it, but that information is NOT off the table until you can prove that it is incorrect, and why it is incorrect. Other than in throwing your false discreditation, mud and poo at it; you obviously have you have not done that.

    Acellular pertussis vaccination enhances B. parapertussis
    colonization

    An acellular whooping cough vaccine actually enhances the
    colonization of Bordetella parapertussis in mice; pointing towards a rise in B. parapertussis incidence resulting from acellular vaccination, which may have contributed to the observed increase in whooping cough over the last decade.

    http://www.cidd.psu.edu/research/synopses/acellular-vaccine-enhancement-b.-parapertussi

    Mounting Evidence Shows Many Vaccines are Ineffective and Contribute to Rise of Outbreaks Caused by Mutated Viruses 

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/07/30/whooping-cough-vaccine.aspx

    But of course if you Jim Bob, do not want to realize nor address in honesty any conflicting information, or if and when you have no ability to do so, you just simply bear paw swipe it off the table for any consideration. A tactic all to commonly seen. 

    Potential Hazards of Modern Whooping Cough Tests; False positive results, unnecessary antibiotics, and inaccurate statistics, by Hilary Butler

    http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/06/20/potential-hazards-of-testing-for-whooping-cough-false-positive-results-unecessary-antibiotics-and-inaccurate-statistics-by-hilary-butler/

  • Myspamemailyhoo

    Maybe they don’t want people to be able to have dogs at home for companionship and protection since they are vaccinating babies with a vaccine that causes allergy to them. 

  • D23hyatt

    harder to surprize you and kick your door down to confiscate your guns with a damn dog barking ….

  • Veronica Robson

    MY DAUGHTER AGE 33 HAS BRAIN DAMAGE 26 HOURS AFTER MEASLES VACCINE GIVEN 1980 THE COMPANY WAS FLOCKHART DO YOU KNOW IF ANY OTHER CHILD WAS LEFT LIKE THIS IN THAT SHORT SPACE OF TIME BY THIS VACCINE.